Content-Type: text/html

# Modus tollens

HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences
You can edit this page right now! It's a free, community project

Modus tollens is a common, simple argument form:

  If P, then Q.
  Not Q.
  Therefore, not P.

Consider an example:

  If there is fire here, then there is oxygen here.
  There is no oxygen here.
  Therefore, there is no fire here.

This argument form is valid: indeed, if there is no oxygen here, then we can conclude validly that there is no fire here.

Another example:

  If Lizzy was the murderer, then she owns an axe.
  Lizzy does not own an axe.
  Therefore, Lizzy was not the murderer.

Just suppose that the premises are both true. If Lizzy was the murderer, then she really must have owned an axe; and it is a fact that Lizzy does not own an axe. What follows? That she was not the murderer.

Suppose one wants to say: the first premise is false. If Lizzy was the murderer, then she would not necessarily have to have owned an axe; maybe she borrowed someone's. That might be a legitimate criticism of the argument, but notice that it does not mean the argument is invalid. An argument can be valid even though it has a false premise; remember to distinguish validity and soundness.

See also: modus ponens.

HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences
You can edit this page right now! It's a free, community project
Edit text of this page | View other revisions
Last edited May 1, 2001 1:18 pm (diff)
Search: