Abstract Wikipedia abstractwiki https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Main_page MediaWiki 1.48.0-wmf.4 first-letter Media Special Talk User User talk Abstract Wikipedia Abstract Wikipedia talk File File talk MediaWiki MediaWiki talk Template Template talk Help Help talk Category Category talk TimedText TimedText talk Module Module talk Translations Translations talk Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat 4 6 25941 25868 2026-11-11T13:26:58Z Renamed user dc97874b65459e90298c6af2c4e7f043 9439 25941 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call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uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) gc5jfzom4oxao4rj7496cdjjf2etn6e 25966 25941 2026-11-11T14:32:14Z YoshiRulz 640 /* Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF */ Reply 25966 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call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uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) f5zuwg8r3mf69whur9eg4xzqh3ewrpj 25967 25966 2026-11-11T14:41:52Z YoshiRulz 640 /* Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages */ Reply 25967 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call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uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) 0h0jio6w5vq7002jg9qbphufmrhnxfv 25985 25967 2026-11-11T14:51:31Z YoshiRulz 640 /* the biggest change in superlatives */ Reply 25985 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call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uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :CC {{ping|Mahir256|p=}} who I recall was working on Items for qualities/"adjectives". [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:51, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) 8dxmsfy5gd7l2j7ygntpcds3loobd1u 26016 25985 2026-11-11T16:58:32Z Mfchris84 4937 /* Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF */ 26016 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call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uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :CC {{ping|Mahir256|p=}} who I recall was working on Items for qualities/"adjectives". [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:51, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :: {{ping|YoshiRulz}} thanks for you hint. Unfortunately i don't see this buttons to re-run a function with the newest data, where should i look for this? Sorry! Newbe here :-) Thanks! --[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 16:58, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) nlfd023svmj1quq3ijl17nt1c8h0l63 26017 26016 2026-11-11T17:04:14Z YoshiRulz 640 /* Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF */ Reply 26017 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call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uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :CC {{ping|Mahir256|p=}} who I recall was working on Items for qualities/"adjectives". [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:51, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :: {{ping|YoshiRulz}} thanks for you hint. Unfortunately i don't see this buttons to re-run a function with the newest data, where should i look for this? Sorry! Newbe here :-) Thanks! --[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 16:58, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::I'm referring to when you're on Wikifunctions and you make a call, like [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D the one you linked]. Per [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance_metadata_and_result_freshening|docs]] you only need to be in the <code>autoconfirmed</code> group. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) diizmk6ghezxakou2c9ksbk237h92t4 26018 26017 2026-11-11T17:05:58Z Mfchris84 4937 /* Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF */ Reply 26018 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call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uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :CC {{ping|Mahir256|p=}} who I recall was working on Items for qualities/"adjectives". [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:51, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :: {{ping|YoshiRulz}} thanks for you hint. Unfortunately i don't see this buttons to re-run a function with the newest data, where should i look for this? Sorry! Newbe here :-) Thanks! --[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 16:58, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::I'm referring to when you're on Wikifunctions and you make a call, like [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D the one you linked]. Per [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance_metadata_and_result_freshening|docs]] you only need to be in the <code>autoconfirmed</code> group. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::I read on [[Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance metadata and result freshening]] that in the Provenance section (i think in AW, isn'it) there should be a button for refresh with newest data. But i only see the information whe the data was rendered last time. I see that i am already an autoconfirmed user, so i have no further ideas... [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 17:05, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) 546xjg93zceup6hpcfq6osrzmynp938 26019 26018 2026-11-11T17:06:16Z Mfchris84 4937 /* Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF */ 26019 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call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uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :CC {{ping|Mahir256|p=}} who I recall was working on Items for qualities/"adjectives". [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:51, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :: {{ping|YoshiRulz}} thanks for you hint. Unfortunately i don't see this buttons to re-run a function with the newest data, where should i look for this? Sorry! Newbe here :-) Thanks! --[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 16:58, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::I'm referring to when you're on Wikifunctions and you make a call, like [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D the one you linked]. Per [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance_metadata_and_result_freshening|docs]] you only need to be in the <code>autoconfirmed</code> group. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::I read on [[mediawiki:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance metadata and result freshening]] that in the Provenance section (i think in AW, isn'it) there should be a button for refresh with newest data. But i only see the information whe the data was rendered last time. I see that i am already an autoconfirmed user, so i have no further ideas... [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 17:05, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) dw6j2ifqr5pvz41t93bvjehpue1rfi0 26020 26019 2026-11-11T17:06:47Z Mfchris84 4937 /* Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF */ 26020 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call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uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :CC {{ping|Mahir256|p=}} who I recall was working on Items for qualities/"adjectives". [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:51, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :: {{ping|YoshiRulz}} thanks for you hint. Unfortunately i don't see this buttons to re-run a function with the newest data, where should i look for this? Sorry! Newbe here :-) Thanks! --[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 16:58, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::I'm referring to when you're on Wikifunctions and you make a call, like [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D the one you linked]. Per [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance_metadata_and_result_freshening|docs]] you only need to be in the <code>autoconfirmed</code> group. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::I read on [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance metadata and result freshening]] that in the Provenance section (i think in AW, isn'it) there should be a button for refresh with newest data. But i only see the information whe the data was rendered last time. I see that i am already an autoconfirmed user, so i have no further ideas... [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 17:05, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) b3d7rgnh3q9cr1vccyk5ooktqjzxmt4 26021 26020 2026-11-11T18:27:01Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 /* Logo contest */ Reply 26021 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call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uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :CC {{ping|Mahir256|p=}} who I recall was working on Items for qualities/"adjectives". [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:51, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :: {{ping|YoshiRulz}} thanks for you hint. Unfortunately i don't see this buttons to re-run a function with the newest data, where should i look for this? Sorry! Newbe here :-) Thanks! --[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 16:58, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::I'm referring to when you're on Wikifunctions and you make a call, like [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D the one you linked]. Per [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance_metadata_and_result_freshening|docs]] you only need to be in the <code>autoconfirmed</code> group. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::I read on [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance metadata and result freshening]] that in the Provenance section (i think in AW, isn'it) there should be a button for refresh with newest data. But i only see the information whe the data was rendered last time. I see that i am already an autoconfirmed user, so i have no further ideas... [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 17:05, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :I really do not think that's a priority to spend time on this right now. Let's do this in 8 months, when we will have demonsntrated to the world (and by world, I mean mostly angry English Wikipedia contributors) than this project somehow works and therefore we won't have been killed by the WMF. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:27, 11 November 2026 (UTC) 03flhhh0r9wmn02if81v66a9nqy0ocu 26022 26021 2026-11-11T18:28:41Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 /* Automatically remove links to the same page */ Reply 26022 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z801%22%2C%22Z801K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z19308%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z28548%22%2C%22Z28548K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z27665%22%2C%22Z27665K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z23116%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z27665%22%2C%22Z27665K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z19282%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z6825%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z19198%22%2C%22Z19198K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z19308%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z28548%22%2C%22Z28548K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z27665%22%2C%22Z27665K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z19300%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z6825%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z30460%22%2C%22Z30460K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q18545%22%7D%2C%22Z30460K2%22%3A%22Z1002%22%7D%7D%7D%7D%2C%22Z28548K2%22%3A%5B%22Z6092%22%2C%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6092%22%2C%22Z6092K1%22%3A%22P5402%22%7D%5D%7D%7D%2C%22Z19198K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z30460%22%2C%22Z30460K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q18545%22%7D%2C%22Z30460K2%22%3A%22Z1002%22%7D%7D%7D%7D%7D%7D%7D%2C%22Z28548K2%22%3A%5B%22Z6092%22%2C%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6092%22%2C%22Z6092K1%22%3A%22P5137%22%7D%5D%7D%7D%7D&uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :CC {{ping|Mahir256|p=}} who I recall was working on Items for qualities/"adjectives". [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:51, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yeah, I'm quite familiar with this, but do you have special formatting/rules for AW/WF stuff @[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]]? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:28, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :: {{ping|YoshiRulz}} thanks for you hint. Unfortunately i don't see this buttons to re-run a function with the newest data, where should i look for this? Sorry! Newbe here :-) Thanks! --[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 16:58, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::I'm referring to when you're on Wikifunctions and you make a call, like [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D the one you linked]. Per [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance_metadata_and_result_freshening|docs]] you only need to be in the <code>autoconfirmed</code> group. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::I read on [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance metadata and result freshening]] that in the Provenance section (i think in AW, isn'it) there should be a button for refresh with newest data. But i only see the information whe the data was rendered last time. I see that i am already an autoconfirmed user, so i have no further ideas... [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 17:05, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :I really do not think that's a priority to spend time on this right now. Let's do this in 8 months, when we will have demonsntrated to the world (and by world, I mean mostly angry English Wikipedia contributors) than this project somehow works and therefore we won't have been killed by the WMF. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:27, 11 November 2026 (UTC) mlxshw30v4so4e24gao02rch26mj46t 26023 26022 2026-11-11T18:29:43Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 /* Automatically remove links to the same page */ Reply 26023 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call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uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :CC {{ping|Mahir256|p=}} who I recall was working on Items for qualities/"adjectives". [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:51, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yeah, I'm quite familiar with this, but do you have special formatting/rules for AW/WF stuff @[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]]? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:28, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::(and the underlying question was: has it been already proposed? or maybe you would have liked to document it yourself?) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:29, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :: {{ping|YoshiRulz}} thanks for you hint. Unfortunately i don't see this buttons to re-run a function with the newest data, where should i look for this? Sorry! Newbe here :-) Thanks! --[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 16:58, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::I'm referring to when you're on Wikifunctions and you make a call, like [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D the one you linked]. Per [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance_metadata_and_result_freshening|docs]] you only need to be in the <code>autoconfirmed</code> group. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::I read on [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance metadata and result freshening]] that in the Provenance section (i think in AW, isn'it) there should be a button for refresh with newest data. But i only see the information whe the data was rendered last time. I see that i am already an autoconfirmed user, so i have no further ideas... [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 17:05, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :I really do not think that's a priority to spend time on this right now. Let's do this in 8 months, when we will have demonsntrated to the world (and by world, I mean mostly angry English Wikipedia contributors) than this project somehow works and therefore we won't have been killed by the WMF. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:27, 11 November 2026 (UTC) gwcg0rb2jdoiumf93i5mz9emw9karjz 26032 26023 2026-11-11T20:36:11Z 99of9 614 /* Automatically remove links to the same page */ Reply 26032 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call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uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :CC {{ping|Mahir256|p=}} who I recall was working on Items for qualities/"adjectives". [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:51, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yeah, I'm quite familiar with this, but do you have special formatting/rules for AW/WF stuff @[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]]? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:28, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::(and the underlying question was: has it been already proposed? or maybe you would have liked to document it yourself?) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:29, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::::i don't think I've seen it proposed before. In terms of formatting make sure to tag anything AW/WF related with "Abstract Wikipedia Team". --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 20:36, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :: {{ping|YoshiRulz}} thanks for you hint. Unfortunately i don't see this buttons to re-run a function with the newest data, where should i look for this? Sorry! Newbe here :-) Thanks! --[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 16:58, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::I'm referring to when you're on Wikifunctions and you make a call, like [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D the one you linked]. Per [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance_metadata_and_result_freshening|docs]] you only need to be in the <code>autoconfirmed</code> group. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::I read on [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance metadata and result freshening]] that in the Provenance section (i think in AW, isn'it) there should be a button for refresh with newest data. But i only see the information whe the data was rendered last time. I see that i am already an autoconfirmed user, so i have no further ideas... [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 17:05, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :I really do not think that's a priority to spend time on this right now. Let's do this in 8 months, when we will have demonsntrated to the world (and by world, I mean mostly angry English Wikipedia contributors) than this project somehow works and therefore we won't have been killed by the WMF. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:27, 11 November 2026 (UTC) 0xreohyqil1h0321jr6mhqqqrbkv16x 26033 26032 2026-11-11T20:49:06Z 99of9 614 /* Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF */ Reply 26033 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z801%22%2C%22Z801K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z19308%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z28548%22%2C%22Z28548K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z27665%22%2C%22Z27665K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z23116%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z27665%22%2C%22Z27665K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z19282%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z6825%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z19198%22%2C%22Z19198K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z19308%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z28548%22%2C%22Z28548K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z27665%22%2C%22Z27665K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z19300%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z6825%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z30460%22%2C%22Z30460K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q18545%22%7D%2C%22Z30460K2%22%3A%22Z1002%22%7D%7D%7D%7D%2C%22Z28548K2%22%3A%5B%22Z6092%22%2C%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6092%22%2C%22Z6092K1%22%3A%22P5402%22%7D%5D%7D%7D%2C%22Z19198K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z30460%22%2C%22Z30460K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q18545%22%7D%2C%22Z30460K2%22%3A%22Z1002%22%7D%7D%7D%7D%7D%7D%7D%2C%22Z28548K2%22%3A%5B%22Z6092%22%2C%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6092%22%2C%22Z6092K1%22%3A%22P5137%22%7D%5D%7D%7D%7D&uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :CC {{ping|Mahir256|p=}} who I recall was working on Items for qualities/"adjectives". [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:51, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yeah, I'm quite familiar with this, but do you have special formatting/rules for AW/WF stuff @[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]]? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:28, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::(and the underlying question was: has it been already proposed? or maybe you would have liked to document it yourself?) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:29, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::::i don't think I've seen it proposed before. In terms of formatting make sure to tag anything AW/WF related with "Abstract Wikipedia Team". --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 20:36, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :: {{ping|YoshiRulz}} thanks for you hint. Unfortunately i don't see this buttons to re-run a function with the newest data, where should i look for this? Sorry! Newbe here :-) Thanks! --[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 16:58, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::I'm referring to when you're on Wikifunctions and you make a call, like [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D the one you linked]. Per [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance_metadata_and_result_freshening|docs]] you only need to be in the <code>autoconfirmed</code> group. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::I read on [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance metadata and result freshening]] that in the Provenance section (i think in AW, isn'it) there should be a button for refresh with newest data. But i only see the information whe the data was rendered last time. I see that i am already an autoconfirmed user, so i have no further ideas... [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 17:05, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::It is only available on WF at the moment, not AW. But the developers are actively planning it here soon. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 20:49, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :I really do not think that's a priority to spend time on this right now. Let's do this in 8 months, when we will have demonsntrated to the world (and by world, I mean mostly angry English Wikipedia contributors) than this project somehow works and therefore we won't have been killed by the WMF. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:27, 11 November 2026 (UTC) fdcioc0h0wg5o1ke6qlk7h6f3sa0ax6 26038 26033 2026-11-11T23:13:36Z Mfchris84 4937 /* Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF */ Reply 26038 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call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uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :CC {{ping|Mahir256|p=}} who I recall was working on Items for qualities/"adjectives". [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:51, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yeah, I'm quite familiar with this, but do you have special formatting/rules for AW/WF stuff @[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]]? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:28, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::(and the underlying question was: has it been already proposed? or maybe you would have liked to document it yourself?) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:29, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::::i don't think I've seen it proposed before. In terms of formatting make sure to tag anything AW/WF related with "Abstract Wikipedia Team". --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 20:36, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :: {{ping|YoshiRulz}} thanks for you hint. Unfortunately i don't see this buttons to re-run a function with the newest data, where should i look for this? Sorry! Newbe here :-) Thanks! --[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 16:58, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::I'm referring to when you're on Wikifunctions and you make a call, like [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D the one you linked]. Per [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance_metadata_and_result_freshening|docs]] you only need to be in the <code>autoconfirmed</code> group. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::I read on [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance metadata and result freshening]] that in the Provenance section (i think in AW, isn'it) there should be a button for refresh with newest data. But i only see the information whe the data was rendered last time. I see that i am already an autoconfirmed user, so i have no further ideas... [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 17:05, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::It is only available on WF at the moment, not AW. But the developers are actively planning it here soon. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 20:49, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::::Thanks for the information! ::::::Just another newbie-n00b follow up-question. The second senctence in the Article [[Q655617]] is in German still wrong. It shows "Die Gartenlaube ist das älteste Massenmedien..." but it should come up with the nominativ singular "älteste Massenmedium". The Lexemes are already still up for days, the cache said it was rebuild 6 hours ago (i set up a test [[f:Z53353]] , and unfortunately i can not dive into the function because maybe there is the pluralis form defined? Does someone can clarify here? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 23:13, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :I really do not think that's a priority to spend time on this right now. Let's do this in 8 months, when we will have demonsntrated to the world (and by world, I mean mostly angry English Wikipedia contributors) than this project somehow works and therefore we won't have been killed by the WMF. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:27, 11 November 2026 (UTC) 1dfqnu7tuty0fkaqbyq41rgtftef5v8 26049 26038 2026-11-12T01:11:55Z YoshiRulz 640 /* Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF */ Reply 26049 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call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uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :CC {{ping|Mahir256|p=}} who I recall was working on Items for qualities/"adjectives". [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:51, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yeah, I'm quite familiar with this, but do you have special formatting/rules for AW/WF stuff @[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]]? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:28, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::(and the underlying question was: has it been already proposed? or maybe you would have liked to document it yourself?) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:29, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::::i don't think I've seen it proposed before. In terms of formatting make sure to tag anything AW/WF related with "Abstract Wikipedia Team". --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 20:36, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :: {{ping|YoshiRulz}} thanks for you hint. Unfortunately i don't see this buttons to re-run a function with the newest data, where should i look for this? Sorry! Newbe here :-) Thanks! --[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 16:58, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::I'm referring to when you're on Wikifunctions and you make a call, like [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D the one you linked]. Per [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance_metadata_and_result_freshening|docs]] you only need to be in the <code>autoconfirmed</code> group. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::I read on [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance metadata and result freshening]] that in the Provenance section (i think in AW, isn'it) there should be a button for refresh with newest data. But i only see the information whe the data was rendered last time. I see that i am already an autoconfirmed user, so i have no further ideas... [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 17:05, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::It is only available on WF at the moment, not AW. But the developers are actively planning it here soon. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 20:49, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::::Thanks for the information! ::::::Just another newbie-n00b follow up-question. The second senctence in the Article [[Q655617]] is in German still wrong. It shows "Die Gartenlaube ist das älteste Massenmedien..." but it should come up with the nominativ singular "älteste Massenmedium". The Lexemes are already still up for days, the cache said it was rebuild 6 hours ago (i set up a test [[f:Z53353]] , and unfortunately i can not dive into the function because maybe there is the pluralis form defined? Does someone can clarify here? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 23:13, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::::Moved your test, please double-check it.<br>I think [[f:Z32970|the implementation]] simply isn't doing gender agreement at all. Hopefully there are already helper functions for that, otherwise you'll have to figure out how to read that info from the lexemes and set up label fallbacks. Or maybe [[f:Z43120]] is usable now. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 01:11, 12 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :I really do not think that's a priority to spend time on this right now. Let's do this in 8 months, when we will have demonsntrated to the world (and by world, I mean mostly angry English Wikipedia contributors) than this project somehow works and therefore we won't have been killed by the WMF. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:27, 11 November 2026 (UTC) blmmkzp5q4dyhskagv6xbhb06z7pydu 26056 26049 2026-11-12T03:52:23Z MisprintMint 9977 /* Content Assessment */ new section 26056 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call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uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :CC {{ping|Mahir256|p=}} who I recall was working on Items for qualities/"adjectives". [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:51, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yeah, I'm quite familiar with this, but do you have special formatting/rules for AW/WF stuff @[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]]? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:28, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::(and the underlying question was: has it been already proposed? or maybe you would have liked to document it yourself?) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:29, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::::i don't think I've seen it proposed before. In terms of formatting make sure to tag anything AW/WF related with "Abstract Wikipedia Team". --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 20:36, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :: {{ping|YoshiRulz}} thanks for you hint. Unfortunately i don't see this buttons to re-run a function with the newest data, where should i look for this? Sorry! Newbe here :-) Thanks! --[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 16:58, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::I'm referring to when you're on Wikifunctions and you make a call, like [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D the one you linked]. Per [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance_metadata_and_result_freshening|docs]] you only need to be in the <code>autoconfirmed</code> group. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::I read on [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance metadata and result freshening]] that in the Provenance section (i think in AW, isn'it) there should be a button for refresh with newest data. But i only see the information whe the data was rendered last time. I see that i am already an autoconfirmed user, so i have no further ideas... [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 17:05, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::It is only available on WF at the moment, not AW. But the developers are actively planning it here soon. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 20:49, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::::Thanks for the information! ::::::Just another newbie-n00b follow up-question. The second senctence in the Article [[Q655617]] is in German still wrong. It shows "Die Gartenlaube ist das älteste Massenmedien..." but it should come up with the nominativ singular "älteste Massenmedium". The Lexemes are already still up for days, the cache said it was rebuild 6 hours ago (i set up a test [[f:Z53353]] , and unfortunately i can not dive into the function because maybe there is the pluralis form defined? Does someone can clarify here? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 23:13, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::::Moved your test, please double-check it.<br>I think [[f:Z32970|the implementation]] simply isn't doing gender agreement at all. Hopefully there are already helper functions for that, otherwise you'll have to figure out how to read that info from the lexemes and set up label fallbacks. Or maybe [[f:Z43120]] is usable now. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 01:11, 12 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :I really do not think that's a priority to spend time on this right now. Let's do this in 8 months, when we will have demonsntrated to the world (and by world, I mean mostly angry English Wikipedia contributors) than this project somehow works and therefore we won't have been killed by the WMF. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:27, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Content Assessment == Would it be good to add project assessment such as the ones in the English Wikipedia or the Spanish Wikipedia, using western numerals to start? I know there are other numeral systems in different languages or areas, though most cases they use the western numeral system. i don't know exactly how it would work, though. if anyone can follow up with this it would be appreciated. [[User:MisprintMint|MisprintMint]] ([[User talk:MisprintMint|talk]]) 03:52, 12 November 2026 (UTC) r7wgsxri223ci621zwu6ice1mg3fata 26057 26056 2026-11-12T04:34:47Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 /* Content Assessment */ Reply 26057 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call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uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :CC {{ping|Mahir256|p=}} who I recall was working on Items for qualities/"adjectives". [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:51, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yeah, I'm quite familiar with this, but do you have special formatting/rules for AW/WF stuff @[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]]? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:28, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::(and the underlying question was: has it been already proposed? or maybe you would have liked to document it yourself?) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:29, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::::i don't think I've seen it proposed before. In terms of formatting make sure to tag anything AW/WF related with "Abstract Wikipedia Team". --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 20:36, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :: {{ping|YoshiRulz}} thanks for you hint. Unfortunately i don't see this buttons to re-run a function with the newest data, where should i look for this? Sorry! Newbe here :-) Thanks! --[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 16:58, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::I'm referring to when you're on Wikifunctions and you make a call, like [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D the one you linked]. Per [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance_metadata_and_result_freshening|docs]] you only need to be in the <code>autoconfirmed</code> group. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::I read on [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance metadata and result freshening]] that in the Provenance section (i think in AW, isn'it) there should be a button for refresh with newest data. But i only see the information whe the data was rendered last time. I see that i am already an autoconfirmed user, so i have no further ideas... [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 17:05, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::It is only available on WF at the moment, not AW. But the developers are actively planning it here soon. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 20:49, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::::Thanks for the information! ::::::Just another newbie-n00b follow up-question. The second senctence in the Article [[Q655617]] is in German still wrong. It shows "Die Gartenlaube ist das älteste Massenmedien..." but it should come up with the nominativ singular "älteste Massenmedium". The Lexemes are already still up for days, the cache said it was rebuild 6 hours ago (i set up a test [[f:Z53353]] , and unfortunately i can not dive into the function because maybe there is the pluralis form defined? Does someone can clarify here? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 23:13, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::::Moved your test, please double-check it.<br>I think [[f:Z32970|the implementation]] simply isn't doing gender agreement at all. Hopefully there are already helper functions for that, otherwise you'll have to figure out how to read that info from the lexemes and set up label fallbacks. Or maybe [[f:Z43120]] is usable now. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 01:11, 12 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :I really do not think that's a priority to spend time on this right now. Let's do this in 8 months, when we will have demonsntrated to the world (and by world, I mean mostly angry English Wikipedia contributors) than this project somehow works and therefore we won't have been killed by the WMF. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:27, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Content Assessment == Would it be good to add project assessment such as the ones in the English Wikipedia or the Spanish Wikipedia, using western numerals to start? I know there are other numeral systems in different languages or areas, though most cases they use the western numeral system. i don't know exactly how it would work, though. if anyone can follow up with this it would be appreciated. [[User:MisprintMint|MisprintMint]] ([[User talk:MisprintMint|talk]]) 03:52, 12 November 2026 (UTC) :Well, I would love to redesign such a system to better incorporate diversity (cultural, but also gendered one notably) before starting to use it. Having a discussion here is a good starting point :) :I encourage you to start experimenting here before @[[User:MisprintMint|MisprintMint]], however, it's good to be familiar with the strange way things are being done here! Do not hesitate if you need any help. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:34, 12 November 2026 (UTC) g7ga2o6av2tovwxp65zr7br9xm4l3rp 26067 26057 2026-11-12T08:54:47Z Sdkb 1058 /* Using preferred statements */ new section 26067 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z801%22%2C%22Z801K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z19308%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z28548%22%2C%22Z28548K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z27665%22%2C%22Z27665K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z23116%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z27665%22%2C%22Z27665K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z19282%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z6825%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z19198%22%2C%22Z19198K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z19308%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z28548%22%2C%22Z28548K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z27665%22%2C%22Z27665K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z19300%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z873%22%2C%22Z873K1%22%3A%22Z6825%22%2C%22Z873K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z30460%22%2C%22Z30460K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q18545%22%7D%2C%22Z30460K2%22%3A%22Z1002%22%7D%7D%7D%7D%2C%22Z28548K2%22%3A%5B%22Z6092%22%2C%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6092%22%2C%22Z6092K1%22%3A%22P5402%22%7D%5D%7D%7D%2C%22Z19198K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z30460%22%2C%22Z30460K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q18545%22%7D%2C%22Z30460K2%22%3A%22Z1002%22%7D%7D%7D%7D%7D%7D%7D%2C%22Z28548K2%22%3A%5B%22Z6092%22%2C%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6092%22%2C%22Z6092K1%22%3A%22P5137%22%7D%5D%7D%7D%7D&uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :CC {{ping|Mahir256|p=}} who I recall was working on Items for qualities/"adjectives". [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:51, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yeah, I'm quite familiar with this, but do you have special formatting/rules for AW/WF stuff @[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]]? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:28, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::(and the underlying question was: has it been already proposed? or maybe you would have liked to document it yourself?) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:29, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::::i don't think I've seen it proposed before. In terms of formatting make sure to tag anything AW/WF related with "Abstract Wikipedia Team". --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 20:36, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :: {{ping|YoshiRulz}} thanks for you hint. Unfortunately i don't see this buttons to re-run a function with the newest data, where should i look for this? Sorry! Newbe here :-) Thanks! --[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 16:58, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::I'm referring to when you're on Wikifunctions and you make a call, like [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D the one you linked]. Per [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance_metadata_and_result_freshening|docs]] you only need to be in the <code>autoconfirmed</code> group. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::I read on [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance metadata and result freshening]] that in the Provenance section (i think in AW, isn'it) there should be a button for refresh with newest data. But i only see the information whe the data was rendered last time. I see that i am already an autoconfirmed user, so i have no further ideas... [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 17:05, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::It is only available on WF at the moment, not AW. But the developers are actively planning it here soon. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 20:49, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::::Thanks for the information! ::::::Just another newbie-n00b follow up-question. The second senctence in the Article [[Q655617]] is in German still wrong. It shows "Die Gartenlaube ist das älteste Massenmedien..." but it should come up with the nominativ singular "älteste Massenmedium". The Lexemes are already still up for days, the cache said it was rebuild 6 hours ago (i set up a test [[f:Z53353]] , and unfortunately i can not dive into the function because maybe there is the pluralis form defined? Does someone can clarify here? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 23:13, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::::Moved your test, please double-check it.<br>I think [[f:Z32970|the implementation]] simply isn't doing gender agreement at all. Hopefully there are already helper functions for that, otherwise you'll have to figure out how to read that info from the lexemes and set up label fallbacks. Or maybe [[f:Z43120]] is usable now. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 01:11, 12 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :I really do not think that's a priority to spend time on this right now. Let's do this in 8 months, when we will have demonsntrated to the world (and by world, I mean mostly angry English Wikipedia contributors) than this project somehow works and therefore we won't have been killed by the WMF. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:27, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Content Assessment == Would it be good to add project assessment such as the ones in the English Wikipedia or the Spanish Wikipedia, using western numerals to start? I know there are other numeral systems in different languages or areas, though most cases they use the western numeral system. i don't know exactly how it would work, though. if anyone can follow up with this it would be appreciated. [[User:MisprintMint|MisprintMint]] ([[User talk:MisprintMint|talk]]) 03:52, 12 November 2026 (UTC) :Well, I would love to redesign such a system to better incorporate diversity (cultural, but also gendered one notably) before starting to use it. Having a discussion here is a good starting point :) :I encourage you to start experimenting here before @[[User:MisprintMint|MisprintMint]], however, it's good to be familiar with the strange way things are being done here! Do not hesitate if you need any help. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:34, 12 November 2026 (UTC) == Using preferred statements == At [[Special:Permalink/26063]] in the Campus section, the last sentence currently reads "Its areas are 140 acre, 12 acre, 76 acre, and 108 acre." This is because it's using [[wikidata:Q125341047#P2046]], which lists the size of the campus at various historical points in time. However, the present size is given preferred rank, so it is what I would expect to be used here. How do we make that happen? (Separately, I attempted to write a sentence on the school's official colors using [[wikifunctions:Z36218]], but in that case it listed only one of the two official colors despite them both being given equal rank on Wikidata.) <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)">[[User:Sdkb|<span style="color:#FFF;text-decoration:inherit;font:1em Lucida Sans">Sdkb</span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Sdkb|'''talk''']]</sup> 08:54, 12 November 2026 (UTC) jumkyv07c0d7a100gfrbasxj1h4jkei 26069 26067 2026-11-12T10:16:58Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 /* Using preferred statements */ Reply 26069 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call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uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :CC {{ping|Mahir256|p=}} who I recall was working on Items for qualities/"adjectives". [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:51, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yeah, I'm quite familiar with this, but do you have special formatting/rules for AW/WF stuff @[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]]? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:28, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::(and the underlying question was: has it been already proposed? or maybe you would have liked to document it yourself?) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:29, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::::i don't think I've seen it proposed before. In terms of formatting make sure to tag anything AW/WF related with "Abstract Wikipedia Team". --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 20:36, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :: {{ping|YoshiRulz}} thanks for you hint. Unfortunately i don't see this buttons to re-run a function with the newest data, where should i look for this? Sorry! Newbe here :-) Thanks! --[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 16:58, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::I'm referring to when you're on Wikifunctions and you make a call, like [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D the one you linked]. Per [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance_metadata_and_result_freshening|docs]] you only need to be in the <code>autoconfirmed</code> group. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::I read on [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance metadata and result freshening]] that in the Provenance section (i think in AW, isn'it) there should be a button for refresh with newest data. But i only see the information whe the data was rendered last time. I see that i am already an autoconfirmed user, so i have no further ideas... [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 17:05, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::It is only available on WF at the moment, not AW. But the developers are actively planning it here soon. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 20:49, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::::Thanks for the information! ::::::Just another newbie-n00b follow up-question. The second senctence in the Article [[Q655617]] is in German still wrong. It shows "Die Gartenlaube ist das älteste Massenmedien..." but it should come up with the nominativ singular "älteste Massenmedium". The Lexemes are already still up for days, the cache said it was rebuild 6 hours ago (i set up a test [[f:Z53353]] , and unfortunately i can not dive into the function because maybe there is the pluralis form defined? Does someone can clarify here? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 23:13, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::::Moved your test, please double-check it.<br>I think [[f:Z32970|the implementation]] simply isn't doing gender agreement at all. Hopefully there are already helper functions for that, otherwise you'll have to figure out how to read that info from the lexemes and set up label fallbacks. Or maybe [[f:Z43120]] is usable now. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 01:11, 12 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :I really do not think that's a priority to spend time on this right now. Let's do this in 8 months, when we will have demonsntrated to the world (and by world, I mean mostly angry English Wikipedia contributors) than this project somehow works and therefore we won't have been killed by the WMF. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:27, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Content Assessment == Would it be good to add project assessment such as the ones in the English Wikipedia or the Spanish Wikipedia, using western numerals to start? I know there are other numeral systems in different languages or areas, though most cases they use the western numeral system. i don't know exactly how it would work, though. if anyone can follow up with this it would be appreciated. [[User:MisprintMint|MisprintMint]] ([[User talk:MisprintMint|talk]]) 03:52, 12 November 2026 (UTC) :Well, I would love to redesign such a system to better incorporate diversity (cultural, but also gendered one notably) before starting to use it. Having a discussion here is a good starting point :) :I encourage you to start experimenting here before @[[User:MisprintMint|MisprintMint]], however, it's good to be familiar with the strange way things are being done here! Do not hesitate if you need any help. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:34, 12 November 2026 (UTC) == Using preferred statements == At [[Special:Permalink/26063]] in the Campus section, the last sentence currently reads "Its areas are 140 acre, 12 acre, 76 acre, and 108 acre." This is because it's using [[wikidata:Q125341047#P2046]], which lists the size of the campus at various historical points in time. However, the present size is given preferred rank, so it is what I would expect to be used here. How do we make that happen? (Separately, I attempted to write a sentence on the school's official colors using [[wikifunctions:Z36218]], but in that case it listed only one of the two official colors despite them both being given equal rank on Wikidata.) <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)">[[User:Sdkb|<span style="color:#FFF;text-decoration:inherit;font:1em Lucida Sans">Sdkb</span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Sdkb|'''talk''']]</sup> 08:54, 12 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Sdkb|Sdkb]], thank you for reporting that! I saw that problem as well, it was on my to-do list to expose it here. :Do we all agree that by default, all functions should give all the best values? (all the values with preffered rank, or all the normal values). :That would mean edit Z36218 to make it use all the values like Z42543 does, but also edit Z42543 to ensure it only takes the best values. :I can do it but it's not a small change, so I'd prefer to have community's opinion. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 10:16, 12 November 2026 (UTC) 2y2t74ubat28cottobcxn9n2xr8ccfn 26070 26069 2026-11-12T10:50:13Z Jsamwrites 874 /* Using preferred statements */ Reply 26070 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#ifexist:Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}|{{/Header/{{USERLANGUAGE}}}}|{{/Header}}}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #252 is out: Improved loading and display of Test results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-12|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you an improvement in loading and display of Test results, we talk about our next events, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that Denny will lead a discussion on the [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15#News in Types: way forward for natural language generation types|new NLG types]] in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1781625600 June 16, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30606821 --> == Add Z32962 to the list of suggested functions? == I think Z32962 would be a useful addition to the list of suggested functions. Can an admin please add it if others agree? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC) : Please comment on [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Native labels == English Wikipedia usually displays native labels whenever applicable. Should we modify Z28016 to do the same or make a new function? [[User:Redmin|Redmin]] ([[User talk:Redmin|talk]]) 04:39, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == readiness indicator == It occurred to me that an abstract page that works well enough for one language output might be broken for another, so it would be good to have some sort of indicator in the UI of which languages might be ready for transwiki and which still need preliminaries. I'm not sure if it would be better to do this as part of the testing and error-handling, or manually (like patrolling versions, but language-specific). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:12, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :: The function [[f:Z35921|NLG default text]] will be able to indicate on the target Wikipedia that the text in this language is not ready yet. Maybe sentences with this indicator, or even lemma's with this indicator could be excluded from the target Wikipedia. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:52, 15 June 2026 (UTC) :::I see that in the [[#Marking NLG Default text]] section, but I am thinking more at the whole-article level; dropping a problematic fragment from the final render could change the overall meaning. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC) == Add an LLM generator, where you can generate the schema == Hi. Please add an LLM generator, where you can ask AI to generate a schema for Abstract wikipedia. [[User:ChippyTimeCom|ChippyTimeCom]] ([[User talk:ChippyTimeCom|talk]]) 01:18, 17 June 2026 (UTC) :Do you mean an AI model to translate natural language input to abstract output? This was tinkered with before, I believe, last year—see [[f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2025-05-09]] if you would like to read about it. This idea remained a mockup and not much more from what I can tell, but they may revisit the idea someday. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:40, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :: The main thing stoping one from pulling up a chatbot is that it has no knowledge of what wikifunctions are available, meaning it will probably just hallucinate them. I know Gemini has an ability to upload files, but all of Wikifunctions would be too large. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:58, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :::We have no obligation to use an LLM, that's just the main thing associated with the buzzword that is AI now. We can really come up with any AI model—''in a general sense''—that will fit our needs. You can do a ''lot'' with simple neural networks. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:33, 18 June 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #253 is out: The or not the, this is (the?) question == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-19|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present you a delicate question regarding grammatical framework, we talk about our next events and about the results of our latest online meetings, we discuss news about Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:34, 19 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30701693 --> == This needs to be fixed == On tennis [[Q847]], it says "Tennis is the country of origin of England." [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-36465-63|&#126;2026-36465-63]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-36465-63|talk]]) 07:31, 23 June 2026 (UTC) :Thanks, I've switched it around. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC) == HTML, monolingual text or String for fragments == I think there is an important issue on the Output type of parts for text segments. Currently some sentences produce String output (like [[f:Z26039]] ) or monolingual text output ( like [[:f:Z26570]] ) pr HTML output ( like [[f:Z36200]] ). Apart from not being consistent I think there is even a bigger issue: these types don't allow text to be set in bold (in the introduction sentence for instance), or wikilinks to other AW articles. Am I correct that is only allowed in HTML text? If so I think we should change ALL languages functions to output type HTML as soon as possible. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:51, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :Currently, I am exploring this function for converting all of these to HTML fragment [[f:Z36303]]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 16:46, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::OK, thanks. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:17, 24 June 2026 (UTC) :I agree that new sentence functions should be HTML. For now the old ones should be wrapped by a converter (which is best done on WF). Then all calls from AW can be to HTML producing functions. When we need bold we could either try to inject it, or write equivalent functions that will eventually replace the usage of the string ones. The string ones may still be valuable for processing some of the new NLG types, so we shouldn't actually flip the original functions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:30, 24 June 2026 (UTC) ::I think wrapping the functions to HTML is delaying the solution. We either need to flip all (NLG) functions or all functions should be copied to HTML versions (and the all functions shoule not be used therafter) ::{| class=wikitable ! Option !! Pro !! Con |- | A. Wrap all fuctions to HTML || Easy to perform || This is delaying the solution |- | B. Flip all functions to HTML || Keeps tracebility || Huge impact/disturbance, especialy when cached |- | C. Copy all functions to HTML || No disturbance || Looses tracability |} :: The most practical soulution would be option C. I woluld perfer that as soon as possbile. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::I like your suggestions. Based on my personal experience with different result types from Wikifunctions, I would suggest that AW support all three and convert the results to HTML using built-in functions. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 05:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::The reason why function need to change is because the current string functions don't allow HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. AW supporting all 3 type pf output could easily be avoiding by option A. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::C is fine by me. The easiest first-implementation of a copied function C is a wrapper of the monolingual/string, so A is sort of the first step of C. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::OK, good suggestion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :No. I really don't see why we should. These are functions that generate text fragments in a single language—the monolingual text type is the most appropriate return type for them. It is just text. They can be coerced to HTML extremely easily and doing that step ahead of time, hardcoded, for the sole purpose of making abstract articles ''marginally'' easier to write, is just not worth the effort and foregoes what makes the functions' return types suitable in the first place. If there is some argument that can be made for hard pivoting to HTML fragments then I am all ears, but I really don't see a reason for it. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::I like to contradict. These functions create complete sentences, nd those should be able to use HLTM features like bold text, wikilinks etc. My current interest is to add HTML texts like <nowiki><span lang="mul ">NLG Default text</span></nowiki>. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 06:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::These additional features (bold/links etc) would benefit from additional parameters to control them. I still don't know how to do this best. I tried once at [[:f:Z32496]] and [[:f:Z32410]], but it may not be right, and may not be a complete solution anyway. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:26, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::A newer idea I had is to add all the links in the language-configured function, then call link-removing functions like [[:f:Z36853]] or [[:f:Z36831]] when composing them into AW. This could extend to swapping links for bold. Instead of an initial link, the QIDs could be wrapped with HTML spans with a QID ID, which could then be selectively converted into links or bolded etc. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::Simple wrapping is just to benefit the AW editor. IMO it's worth it because it's pretty easy to make a new function, so is very low cost, and for the new editors on AW, they don't have to understand composing or our WF Types. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC) :::OK, let's start with option A, as a first step for option C. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:16, 25 June 2026 (UTC) ::::I have made wrappers (option A) for some general functions like [[f:Z36983]], [[f:Z36983]]. [[f:Z36987]], [[f:Z36993]] and [[f:Z37011]]. [[f:Z32965]] already existed, but as well as the monolingual [[f:Z26095]] both have an error: Error in evaluation. Can somebody fix this? On the AW articles I have updated a few lemmas by replacing the old functions to HTML functions, but find this quite cumbersome. A few hundred lemmas should be updated, but I have no time and/or no desire to do so. In the coming weeks (or so) I will start on Option C for these functions. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 17:51, 27 June 2026 (UTC) :::::Thanks. I'll try to help replace some of the usage. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:12, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::::I think I've sorted out [[:f:Z32965]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:45, 29 June 2026 (UTC) :::So a bunch of bespoke functions on Wikifunctions that offer some marginal improvement over their more generalized counterparts, and we expect to do all of our language generation functions ''this way'' now or something, god forbid we expend ''one'' extra function call to just wrap the output if an injection function is really that scary to you. Wrapping the functions to HTML is not 「delaying the solution」 more than it's just the least disruptive way to approach this completely frivolous problem. Are we to write all of our NLG functions to output HTML now? That is what makes sense for us now, in the future? What? We have a type for this, it's called Monolingual text. We have Python and JavaScript at our disposal, and they are wicked biznasty at string manipulation (i.e. they are very good at it), so injecting formatting into a larger sentence instead of porting the whole thing over to use HTML exclusively is really not that big of an ask. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Then please try to have [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z37011?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z37011%22%2C%22Z37011K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q90%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q5119%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K3%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q142%22%7D%2C%22Z37011K4%22%3A%22Z1216%22%7D this] error in HTML. Currently it is ❌≪Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .≫❌ Please have it changed to <span style="color:magenta;">Parys (is the) haadstêd (of) Frankryk .</span> [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC) :::::Thinking about this. One way we could do this particular markup would be for default monolingual functions to return a result with special language code (perhaps mul, zxx, ...). This would require wider discussion. Then the HTML function could detect that and wrap accordingly. But it doesn't solve the general problem of injections IMO. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::This is now working (using [mul]) at [[:f:Z37462]]. This should work for all monolingual base functions, but not for those starting with strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:49, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::I updated [[f:Z36911]] and [[f:Z36909]]. I am not sure if this works as a lot is cached. The string version will probably not work yet, so I left that one using ❌≪ ≫❌. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:09, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::::After my post I actually made that function and test even more complicated to include a call to action (CTA): a link to the function that is not configured in the requested language. I am starting to like where this is going, and think I can even get it done with strings by recognising your ❌≪ pattern, stripping it, and replacing it with a span (and a CTA link) when it turns to HTML. Unfortunately the linking requires passing in a ZID, so might need a new general conversion function with an extra parameter. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:40, 9 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Here's what I did with a string function: [[:f:Z37497]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:31, 9 July 2026 (UTC) ::::For me, injections are not so easy. A simple one is trying to inject a link to Sydney into en:"Sydney Harbour Bridge is the closest to the ocean in Sydney." (In all languages, so sometimes the subject-object order will be reversed.) But even still, I'd really like to have good injection functions, so if you're up for making them, I'll definitely use them. If they work reliably on all NLG monolingual strings, then we can use them in the wrappers (even if you think the wrappers are frivolous), and the configurations can remain deeper on the monolingual strings. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:56, 8 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I've added this test at [[:f:Z37479]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #254: Working on Functions, together == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-06-26|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we report on new collaborative patterns emerging in our community, we discuss news in Types, we share some events that relate to Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:58, 27 June 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30724999 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #255: Integration on test wiki and annual plan == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-01|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss integration of Abstract Wikipedia in Test Wiki and our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1783359000 July 6, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Response to English Wikipedia criticism == Hi all, you might be aware of [[:w:en:Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF)#Abstract Wikipedia goes somewhat live and already hosts unattributed enwiki copies...|this discussion on English Wikipedia]], that raised several criticisms about the project. As a team, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|drafted an initial response]], that we want to run through you. If you want to suggest changes or edits, please [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Response to English Wikipedia criticism|use the talk page]]. Please, keep a polite and constructive tone. The editing period will be '''open until July 17'''. The final result of this editing will be published on Meta, and will be linked to the English Wikipedia community. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:18, 6 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #256: Moving toward our first Abstract Wikipedia integration milestone == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss further our objectives for the new Wikimedia Foundation Fiscal Year, we show the latest community tool, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Infoboxes == I changed layout of the infoboxes, to be more in line with Wikipedia's infoboxes. See for example [[f:Z36678|Z36678]] "infobox for city" used in [[Q90]] "Paris". I would like [[f:Z37625|Z37625]] "infobox row" to check if a claim exists in Wikidata, but I have difficulties with he parameters for [[f:Z27299|Z27299]] "Wikidata item has claim?". With with literal input it works but with argument references it gives an error. Who can fix this?<br> Furthermore I think it would be nice it we could add a pen-icon next to the values to be able to edit the claim on Wikidata, and pen-icon at the property to edit the label. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:04, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :I was able to fix my error. Infobox rows will now only be shown when a claim exists. That will prevent errors a particular claim is missing for a particular city. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 13:56, 13 July 2026 (UTC) ::Looks awesome. Though I was trying it with other cities (such as Chicago and Moscow) in English, and it was throwing orchestrator rate limit errors. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:41, 14 July 2026 (UTC) :I am struggling to find a function that indicates a Wikidata property type, like Property:P569 (date of birth) is a date type (Point in time?). Can anybody help? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:25, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::I missed this until now. Are you still looking? [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks, Not needed anymore. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:56, 3 October 2026 (UTC) == Lexemes of property names == {{ping|HenkvD|feeglgeef|GrounderUK}} Hello. Please could anybody tell me their opinion on this question? It may be necessary to find a lexeme corresponding to the name of a property. For instance, [[f:Z28445|Z28445]] "most recent year-specific sentence about item" has a property reference as argument and needs the name of the property to be rendered in the output; the particular property could be {{Q|P1082}}. In the English implementation, the name of the property "population" is found from the WikiData property attributes, but for other languages other syntactical information such as gender may be needed, so I suppose that a link to the lexeme is required. How should the rendering function find a link to the lexeme? Is there a way to find the item corresponding to the property? Or should the syntactical information be found some other way? [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:14, 12 July 2026 (UTC) :Ah. Now I've found {{Q|P1629}}, so i suppose that that provides a solution. Sorry to disturb you. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 15:44, 12 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback needed on constructing a new abstract article == Hi all, I wanted to ask a couple of questions to the community regarding how easy or difficult is to construct a new abstract article. Consider I'm a newbie that wants to create a new abstract article about my home city. What would you suggest I do first? Is there a sufficiently good example I can copy and adapt? Can I add already almost everything that I would like to add (say, number of inhabitants, region where my city is, mayor of the city, stuff like that) or is there something I ''cannot'' add still? What is there and what is missing at the moment? Thanks in advance for your answers! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :Sannita, in general it is very difficult (even for me) to construct a new abstract article from scratch. Copying from an existing article is easier, as also mentioned in [[Help:How to create an article]]. That example is also a city, so we better make that article a good example. The information you mention could be in the infobox, which is also available to use and extend (if performance permits). Creating a article by copy/paste should be done for each sentence or paragraph. Add additional sentences is still very difficult. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:08, 13 July 2026 (UTC) :The biggest challenge for me would be finding the right functions to do the job. It's kinda to the point where the help article, mentioned by HenkvD, is just saying to copy other articles. The issue is with trying to add more "unique" sentence structures that may not be in every article. For example, take this: :<code>New York is known for being the financial hub for the United States</code> :More abstractly: <code>X is known for being Y for the Z</code> :If a function that does something like that doesn't exist, that pushes the user into a weird space where they may have to use a different function that may sound more robotic or be grammatically incorrect. :It's not hard to create a stub abstract article, but anything beyond that takes a lot of time and effort to find the right functions for the job. Additionally, dealing with different data types (ex: Wikidata item reference vs Wikidata item) may turn off people who aren't familiar with computer science principles. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 02:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC) ::The problem with copying other articles is that you need to somehow know that the article you're copying from is correct. If I wanted, for example, to make an article about some root vegetable like [[Q188614]] and copied [[Q81]] I'd be doing a very bad job because the second paragraph is written in a way that is completely untranslatable in its structure (by that I mean it is not fixable by changing [[f:Z18845]] to a function that work for all languages, the fragment itself integrates features of English grammar, such as SVO word order, and therefore needs a rewrite). ::What you probably need is a collection of Featured Articles that are written in accordance with best practices and are safe to copy from. This would make it so novice users don't start picking up anti-patterns and propagating them all over abstract Wikipedia, making them harder to fix. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 15:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC) :::Absolutely correct. I've deleted that paragraph with an explanation that that kind of work is better done on Wikifunctions to construct an English renderer. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:20, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :I'm throwing together some thoughts at [[User:99of9/ArticleWriting]]. It's still very much a draft, but I hope the ideas help. Asking questions about it may help me focus on what you want. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:53, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :To be honest I don't think we are ready to start adding new articles at full speed. Only a few functions can be used properly, and not many functions can be used in enough other languages. Furthermore the performance is so bad that most of the functions will time-out. Personally i consider the AW articles as sandboxes to experiment on, not yet articles that are well constructed. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 12:33, 17 July 2026 (UTC) {{tracked|T430898}} ::Single fragments usually don't time out when you first put them in. So you can usually edit productively in your first session. But then 24 hours later, the whole thing gets re-cached in a single go, none of them complete, and the errors all get cached. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:42, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ==Discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]== [[File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg|20px|link=|alt=]]&nbsp;You are invited to join the discussion at [[Meta:Requests_for_comment/The_future_of_Abstract_Wikipedia|Meta Requests for comment: The future of Abstract Wikipedia]]. <!-- Template:Please see --> [[User:Qcne|Qcne]] ([[User talk:Qcne|talk]]) 11:34, 14 July 2026 (UTC) == Feedback on function I created == I would ask this in the Telegram channel, but this is a longwinded question that I would like to get more detailed feedback on. First and foremost, it is seriously important that we get the ability to call functions with python/JS implementations. It would make creating these types of functions ten times faster, with the additional benefit of being easier to read. I'm relatively close to completion on a function that will create a brief introductory paragraph for species articles: '''[[wikifunctions:Z37793|Intro for species in English composition]]'''. It contains the following: * Intro (e.g. "'''''Homo sapiens''''', also known as the '''Human''', is a species of primate in the family [[Q635162|Hominidae]].") **The word "primate" in this case is a string supplied by the user and is optional - it could be anything they want (ex: humanoid, animal, bipedal creature, etc) * Year of description (e.g. "The species was described in 1758 by Carl Linnaeus.") * IUCN conservation status (e.g. "''C. lupus'' has been assessed as Least Concern by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN).") So all together: <blockquote> '''''Dionaea muscipula''''', also known as the '''Venus flytrap''', is a species of carnivorous plant in the family [[Q156185|Droseraceae]]. The species was described in 1768 by John Ellis. ''D. muscipula'' has been assessed as Vulnerable by the [[Q48268|International Union for Conservation of Nature]] (IUCN). </blockquote> It also works when there is a lot of taxon authors:<blockquote> The species was described in 2026 by Anh Van Pham, Chung Van Hoang, Nguyen Quang Truong, Thuy Thu Thi Nguyen, Ky Danh Nguyen, Toan Canh Thai and Thomas Ziegler.</blockquote> The composition itself is basically stringing together a lot of html fragments - if you want to find a specific bit, you just scroll down to around the section of the paragraph you want. Each HTML fragment is roughly a sentence. I originally intended to add a sentence about distribution, but I didn't know how nicely that would play when [[wikidata:Property:P9714|P9714]] has a million values attached to it. Eventually I plan to integrate this translation into a system like the [[wikifunctions:Z20898|one that exists for year articles]]. I have a couple questions: * Is there any other additions to this function that I should make? Ideally, this should be data I can fetch from Wikidata. * What are the best practices to make the function easier to translate? I've tried to rely on other functions which can work with different languages (and making my own, including [[wikifunctions:Z37833|Z37833]]) * I'm still relatively new to Wikifunctions. If someone could take a look and see if there is any glaring errors or functions that exist and do what I am already doing, that'd be awesome. I am aware of a couple bugs: * The error handling is not great, and the sentence about description date has a hardcoded true value in the if function. I'm looking for a better way to deal with the errors - the main idea for this is to stop the function from generating sentences if the necessary values don't exist in Wikidata. * A function I made ([[wikifunctions:Z37808|Z37808]]) that fetches the describing authority crashes if the person does not have a label in the given language. Feel free to edit/fix anything if you want to. Thanks a ton! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 08:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC) :Nice one. I'll take a look. My general comment is that the extra supplied string (e.g. for the family) should not be a string, it should be a different QID. This is because in Abstract Wikipedia we can't pass in single-language strings. The function needs to somehow get from the QIDs all the way to the HTML by itself. Once you've got the structure ready, the next thing you can do is include your examples as Tests. The easiest way to make an HTML test for a function which already has a configuration is to make one with an empty validation comparison, run it, then copy the stuff it failed with into the validation. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::Oh, one more structural change. Even though this is for "English", it's usually best to accept an extra parameter for the "language variant", because there are a bunch of variants of English (which, for example, may have different common names). You may not use it for now, but it's a pain to change the arguments after the function has a lot of use. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:24, 17 July 2026 (UTC) ::And if you need the "of primate" hypernym to be optional, you could include a boolean parameter to say whether or not to print whatever QID is supplied. Or another idea, (this may be controversial) you could decide that if both QIDs were the same, that was when to drop the "of human". This second method would work particularly well in AW IMHO, because it would autofill both to be the same as the page QID, so it would work from the start without even clicking a boolean (and editors could then pick another QID if they wanted a hypernym). --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 10:31, 17 July 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #257: Beyond syntactic tables == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss syntactic tables and news in Types, we show some community blogposts and tools, we remind you of the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia events at Wikimania 2026, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30755600 --> == Wikifunctions Reached rate limit == When I open [[Q408]], the article is full of "Wikifunctions returned a failed response: Reached rate limit in evaluator" except for some titles and images. This happens on many other pages. [[User:Steven Sun|Steven Sun]] ([[User talk:Steven Sun|talk]]) 12:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC) :This issue is tracked in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T430898 . The error codes sometimes get recategorised, but it ultimately seems to be some kind of rate issue. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:46, 21 July 2026 (UTC) == The problem of categories == As it stands, categories require you to physically type the link into the source editor (e.g. <code><nowiki>[[Category:Living people]]</nowiki></code>), which would require a page to be made, thereby nullifying the abstract page. I predict many wikis would like to be able to categorize Abstract articles, as in my opinion, any page that has substantial content (even if it doesn't exist yet) is worth categorizing. They may not populated in normal categorizes, but it could be something like this: * [[:Category:Abstract articles about living people]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about STEM]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about health]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about geographic places]] * [[:Category:Abstract articles about extant species]] * and more, at the choice of the language's community <small>(similar to that of draft categories)</small><br /> Additionally, regarding only Abstract Wikipedia, it would be nice to be able to add (and see) local categories to abstract pages. We have over 2000 pages already, and the only way to find any of them is to go to [[Special:AllPages]], [[Special:LongPages]], or to click the random page button. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 00:09, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :Good suggestion. Can you put in a Phabricator feature request to figure out how to categorise? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC) ::Sure! [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == Suggested functions changed == I've swapped the suggested functions per the discussion on the talk page at [[MediaWiki talk:AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions.json]]. Please let me know if this causes any trouble editing. In particular @[[User:Denny]], [[User:DVrandecic (WMF)]], [[User:Sannita (WMF)]], [[User:Jdforrester_(WMF)]] if will hinder your presentation, I'm happy to revert for a while if you are relying on the old list. If you're not relying on it, I'm confident that the new list is better for newcomers. Too many of them have been misled by the previous list. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:99of9|99of9]]: Thanks! That looks great. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 07:12, 25 July 2026 (UTC) == "replace Abstract Wikipedia link to QID with bold" doesn't work if the label of QiD is the same of the dependency == HI, I'm creating some stubs about the capitals of the world. In case like [[Q1842|Luxembourg]] or [[Q55115|Monaco-Ville]] the funcion above doesn't work, probably because it reads twice the words Luxembourg and Monaco [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 14:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC) :I've fixed by replacing the literal value with the QID [[User:Mastrocom|Mastrocom]] ([[User talk:Mastrocom|talk]]) 16:31, 26 July 2026 (UTC) == Expanding FAQ to correct common misconceptions == re: The ongoing closure RfC on Meta, I thought it might help to make a {{Q|4345841}} for AW. I didn't feel it was my place to do so, so I gathered [[Project_talk:Frequently_Asked_Questions#Correcting_common_misconceptions,_possibly_needs_a_separate_page_AW:NOT|a list of misconceptions on the FAQ's talk page]] which can be used as a starting point. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 02:52, 28 July 2026 (UTC) :The points all have an answer now, ready for copyediting. And there's still the question of where to put them. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:05, 11 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #258: Abstract Wikipedia at Wikimania == <div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-07-29|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the presentations and workshops at Wikimania, including a features feedback request based on what we heard there, and highlight new features shipped this week including diffs for Wikifunctions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! [[m:user:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] 19:05, 30 July 2026 (UTC) </div> <!-- Message sent by User:Quiddity (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == Suggestions wanted for early pilot articles to make available cross-wiki == Hey all, We're building up to the first pilot release of cross-wiki abstract articles, where one community's sysops will be able to pick some (or none) of certain abstract articles onto their wiki for their readers to see. To demonstrate the system at all, we picked five general topics: Paris and London, Wikipedia, and our commonly-used "example" topics of Douglas Adams and Jupiter. (You can see the available list at [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].) However, these are probably not the best or only topics to get started with. We're going to be only making a small selection available to start with, but we'd love your ideas of what articles are the best early demonstrators of the work you're all doing. (I appreciate that this may be influenced by which pilot wiki or wikis are using them, so happy for you to have further ideas later, of course!) What 3–5 articles do you collectively think we should add to this list? [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 21:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC) : I think the proposed articles are already available on the target pilot communities/pilot Wikipedia's. I therefore propose other type or articles :* an Italian politician, only available in Italian language :* small towns in the smaller target Wikipedia's :* a species only available in one language : Furthermore I don't think the larger wikipedia's (en/de/fr/es) are open for this kind of experiments, but I could be wrong. :[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 05:34, 6 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yeah, I heavily doubt enwiki will be open to Abstract Wikipedia integration given the fiasco that has been happening. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 21:54, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :I really like the diverse range of these five selected articles ([https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PreviewAbstract?uselang=en Special:PreviewAbstract].). I feel that we can further expand the list. We currently have [[f:User:Jsamwrites/Infoboxes|infoboxes]] covering topics such as astronomy, chemistry, media, GLAM, history, computer science, and Wikimedia movements (including Wikimania). We also have infoboxes for languages alongside inflection tables, which should particularly interest Wiktionary communities. For example, article on [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q11923 French grammar]. :Additionally, some of the recent articles on AW are multilingual, while others are bilingual (English and French, showcasing how we can handle tenses and pronoun usage). A more detailed selection of articles is a great way to demonstrate that Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia can effectively support both simple and complex articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 18:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC) :: Just for your information, the French grammar article is incorrect, because both sub-level articles about pronouns are incorrect and therefore the table found on all three is wrong. "on" is a singular, third person pronoun, and always conjugated as such. Its use as a plural, first person one is purely informal/colloquial and should absolutely never be seen anywhere on Wikipedia. It is a very basic mistake that no French speaker of even rudimentary proficiency would have missed, so I wonder how this table was generated. If that is the kind of example you plan to showcase as proof of concept, or integrate into Wiktionary, I would seriously reconsider, especially since French is one of the biggest languages in the movement, not one of the much smaller ones supposedly targeted by abstractwiki. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:09, 7 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thank you for pointing this out. This content actually comes directly from a Wikifunctions function, so I’ll fix that. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:56, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::{{ping|Choucas}} thanks for letting us know but I disagree and [[:en:Personal pronouns in French]] disagrees too. The fact it's informal and colloquial means it shouldn't be used in sentences but on a table showing all the possibilities, it should absolutely be present. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:48, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::: If you clicked on the interwiki link on my userpace, you have probably seen that like you, I am a native speaker, so there is no need to explain to me how personal pronouns work in French. If the table looked the same as on the enwiki page, with the additional columns and footnotes, then yes, there would be no harm in showing the subtleties around the use of "on". However, currently the table is three rows and two columns, with no explanation whatsoever, and within the rest of the page it clearly implied it is conjugated as a plural first person pronoun. Either there is a full table, or there is a simplified one and "on" is put in singular third person, but having it only in first person plural was just wrong. That is really the only thing I was pointing at, albeit in way less many words. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 09:44, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Yes, that (I hope) was the fix I applied on Wikifunctions. The inclusion of “on” as a third-person singular pronoun was reversed this morning. Hopefully we’ll see an expanded table in due course! [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:16, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] We will need a detailed table to avoid confusion. I temporarily removed it from the table. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:18, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Choucas|Choucas]] For the time being, I removed "on" since it requires a detailed explanation (I will add when we are able to add more complex sentences.). However, English Wikipedia article needs to be corrected as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_pronouns_in_French#Subject_pronouns [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:17, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :I think we need a process (like this but more structured) where the AW community decides which articles are ready to be "released", before they can be taken up by other wikis. Otherwise (as Choucas highlighted above), we risk losing credibility by making available drafts or serious errors. I'm not saying they need to be perfect before release, but I think it should be a community decision at this end as well as the other end (the language-wiki embedding them). Since this batch is the first, I think we should even vote on whether we support each of the 5 the team chose as ready. What do others think? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:14, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::I agree that we might need a process now in the early days, but we should when creating such policy document the ambition that we eventually would like to make it solely in the hands of the reusing community. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 09:52, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I fully agree that we need a clear process, including a decision by the AW community on the quality of the pilot articles before they are released to the target wikis. It should also be explicit which target wikis and communities are in scope. :::On [[Help:Abstract articles]], I read that English, German, French, and Spanish Wikipedias are in scope as target communities. Does this mean that, for example, the English Wikipedia community has expressed interest in participating as a pilot? :::Regarding Dagbani, Igbo, and Hausa, these languages currently have either no configured language functions or only one. Before selecting pilot articles, the process should begin with configuring and testing the necessary language functions in those languages. Only after that foundation is in place would it make sense to start identifying and evaluating potential pilot articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:21, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::It’s not very clear. I think it just means that during the pilot period, any pilot community’s language would be added to the limited set of languages for which previews would be available. From the final paragraph in [[Help:Abstract articles#Language coverage]], it appears that the Abstract Wikipedia community would ultimately control which languages are supported (expecting most or all). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:27, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::I think Abstract Wikipedia contributors need some way to indicate that an article is a draft or otherwise inadequate, based on the quality of the information it currently provides. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:41, 8 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Perhaps, but I hope we won't try for a system that requires us to that manually article by article. I imagine that we will create, for example, one good set of functions to create an abstract article about tennis players or lakes and then bot create tens of thousands in one go. And obviously we should have some high standards for when to run the bot, but it will then be unrealistic to check them one by one by hand. A tool that says which ones renders flawlessly and in which languages would be great (and even better if it can also give reports for what is missing for those who can't, like missing data on Wikidata or lexemes or lables in that language). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 21:34, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :::::I’m not in favour of bot-created articles. But the quality-assurance challenges exist even with changes to a single Wikifunctions function or Wikidata lexeme (for example). That’s why we will need article diffs that show how the rendered content has changed over time, not just the article structure. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::Early on in the development, there was talk about "template articles" to be used for all articles of a certain topic (like soccer players or lakes). That is not in the development plan any longer. And if we neither have that nor going to create articles in bulk, I don't think I have any interest in this project any longer. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 10:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::I’m just expressing my personal reservations about bot-articles. Templates and information-rich functions (like infoboxes or introductory content) are a different matter. Ultimately, I think the development plan needs to align with the needs of the content creators and content consumers, rather than the other way around (recognizing that resources are always limited, of course). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 10:42, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I'm sorry, I didn't mean templates in the traditional Wikipedia sense. Rather that we have an entire abstract article as a template. Like the "canonical lake article". Which would mean that an improvement of the template improved all abstract articles about lakes (that hadn't been subst:ed and individually developed because it was a lake someone cared extra about). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 11:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::We don't have templates, but instead we do already have some intro sentences, like [[f:Z37922|Z37922]] (intro for species) and [[f:Z38757|Z38757]] (person lead sentence with occupations). Personally I think that once enough functions are available in enough languages we could create thousands of bot articles for cities, species, soccer players, lakes etc.Into senetences combined with infoboxes that would provide enough basic information in my opinion. Details information can then be added on article by article basis. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:46, 9 August 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Yes, that’s what I thought. I don’t think it’s technically difficult, but the subject-specific content would generally have to come from Wikidata or Commons, wouldn’t it? I’d be more inclined to say: here are the editorial “facts” (which may or may not be present on Wikidata), and here is one standard representation of those facts (which may or may not be an article, as such). But I appreciate this is off-topic. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes. I don’t think the team have already decided that those articles are ready, but that is clearly a community decision. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 18:45, 8 August 2026 (UTC) :There is 2 different things here. The topics and the content. :For the topics, the list is good, albeit too general. Adding a place (maybe a small town or a building like a small chapel), a species (some kind of fish) a more mundane person (some John Doe unlike the famous Douglas Adams) would be better to demonstrate the diversity of possibilities (the "template" works for every/most human, not just for "famous" ones). I think it needs to be topics that have no article yet on most Wikipedia (unlike London that already exists on most Wikipedia). :For the content, it's an other separate matter entirely. There is improvements but we are still a bit far from the minimum expected. We should keep working on that :Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping on this; it'd be great to have some specific examples to add to the load testing. "an Italian politician" is fine, but ''which'' one? ''etc.'' [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 18:53, 18 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Jdforrester (WMF)}} sure, why not: ::* [[d:Q177978]] (a not-so-famous French painter with a lot of data in Wikidata and only existing on 17 Wikipedias) ::* [[d:Q3639574]] (a library/archive in Italy, 3 articles right now) ::* [[d:Q141099118]] (a recently discovered specie, only 2 articles) ::{{ping|HenkvD|99of9|Ainali|GrounderUK|EatingCarBatteries|Jsamwrites}} what do you think of my proposals? do you have other ideas? ::Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 12:45, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]]: None of those topics have articles yet, which make them very poor tests of the infrastructure. :-) But if you're going to get them created as good example articles, awesome. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 12:52, 19 August 2026 (UTC) ::::* OK for [[d:Q177978]] a not-so-famous French painter ::::* Maybe: [[d:Q3639574]] a library/archive in Italy ::::* Not OK [[d:Q141099118]] no common names, not much details. I will try to look for an other species. ::::* We also need a settlement. ::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:13, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::::* Proposed species [[d:Q3087908]] Butterfly with only 7 articles, and many statements in Wikidata. :::::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:44, 19 August 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] I have started working on [[d:Q177978]]. Wikidata has lots of information about the artist. It could be an interesting article. :::Reference: https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:47, 20 August 2026 (UTC) ::::I started {{Q|Q842706}} to see what could be written about a small French commune. Well, not a lot of complex things but it will soon be better than the old automated stubs that most of the Wikipedias have (most of them are empty and outdated...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:08, 24 August 2026 (UTC) :OK, we're going with these three you suggested and created: :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q177978 Q177978] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q842706 Q842706] :* [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q3087908 Q3087908] :We'll deploy this tomorrow, and they'll start getting generated from next week. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 19:18, 15 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #259: Congratulations Jules*. An apple is a fruit == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-05|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate Wikimedian of the Year and we discuss his favourite article in relation to Abstract Wikipedia, we introduce a new Type of function on Wikifunctions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! We also remind you that in the next weeks these newsletter reminders will be paused, and that they will resume in mid-August. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:19, 10 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> : While I understand the point this little apple story is trying to make, I am afraid this whole thing falls flat for a very simple reason: we are not in 2002 anymore. Wikipedia is not a wild new idealistic thing, that only years of work by passionate volunteers will prove can succeed. Even worse, this is actually showing that this new start of the road in 2026 is even rougher and less promising than how it was in 2002: indeed, at that time, absolutely anyone could come in any newly set up Wikipedia in their own language and type the equivalent of "an apple is a fruit" and be done in a matter of fifteen seconds. That is why all these apples grew: because it was as simple as adding more words in your own language, and correcting the words of others, and that was (and still is) the magic of it. Instead, Abstract is starting from scratch again, with an impossibly high technical complexity to add even the most basic sentence or correct the simplest typo, making the growth of any article an exponentially more complex endeavor. I am not blind to the charm of the idea behind Abstract, but it is hard to look at what it involves in practice and see how it makes sense in 2026. [[User:Choucas|Choucas]] ([[User talk:Choucas|talk]]) 15:33, 10 August 2026 (UTC) ::I see you've come here from the RfC.<br>The method of producing articles by translating individual sentences [[Special:Permalink/14399|is possible on AW]], but is of course antithetical to the "improve every language at once" nature of the project.<br>It's always going to be more work to add to an abstract article than just writing text, and that's acceptable because that work has a greater impact too. It will be the choice of each editor whether they want to contribute here or to a local wikitext article. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 03:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Choucas|YoshiRulz}} you make a good point, looked at in isolation: writing one sentence is easier than writing one Wikifunction. But on Abstract Wikipédia you don't write sentence (nor translate), you set up pattern (a Wikifunction) that can be used on many articles (potentially all of them, we can imagine a point not so far away where all abstract Wikipedia pages would simply call one big general function "make an article", you can have a look at [[Q18498]]). The difference is like making an addition 1+1+1+1+... (Wikipedia method) and making a multiplication 5000*1 (Wikifunctions method). So at the start, it may seems to be more work but very quickly it's better and faster with much less work. And yes, Wikifunctions are not for everyone (just like Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, Wikidata are not for everyone) and won't replace Wikipedia (it goes without saying, but since it reuse the "Wikipedia" name, it should probably be said). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 07:03, 13 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #260: Shoutout to User:99of9 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-13|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we congratulate our own User:99of9 for his extensive work with the Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia communities, we discuss what happened at Wikimania, we introduce a document for interested communities to join Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:55, 13 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30870212 --> == IDE plugin? == I think we can make this a [ VSCode / Emacs / Notepad++ / ''vi'' / '''''ed''''' ] plugin so it doesn't take forever to achieve stuff by clicking at the webpage. I'm bad at programming (read: C minus at college) and I expect this to involve Wikimedia API programming and stuff... [[User:IrisChronomia|IrisChronomia]] ([[User talk:IrisChronomia|talk]]) 11:05, 20 August 2026 (UTC) :The relevant concept seems to be [[Q30251139]]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:18, 22 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #261: Mayors and the North == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-20|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we have an essay from Denny about accidental gaps in languages, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:40, 21 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30928401 --> == How should Abstract Wikipedia work? == What do we think, as a community? [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:About#How does Abstract Wikipedia work?]] [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:42, 25 August 2026 (UTC) :I have particular reservations about simply acquiring data from Wikidata. On the one hand, it keeps the abstract article up to date but, on the other hand, it means our language-neutral content is not necessarily actively curated. :I don’t see a simple solution to this, but I believe we should, as a minimum, distinguish between content that is explicitly curated on the Abstract Wikipedia article page and that which is obtained from Wikidata when the function call is evaluated. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:50, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == improve diffs == Right now, when we try to check changes that happened to an article, the site only shows the functions and item/lexeme codes, not in a natural language form, making moderating and tracking changes quite challenging. Is there a way to allow both the code and the natural language changes to be available while checking diffs? [[User:Omar M. Ghaly|Omar M. Ghaly]] ([[User talk:Omar M. Ghaly|talk]]) 08:34, 27 August 2026 (UTC) :I'm finding it difficult also. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:56, 27 August 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #262: Wikifunctions Object Reference == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-08-28|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a new Type implemented after a community request, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:31, 28 August 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Who is this for? == I've had a bash at creating a few articles here, and whilst I get the general premise I can't help but think who is the target audience here? Not just for reading the articles, but for creating them as well. At the moment, and I know it's early-days, creating an article is not exactly easy. You have to be fairly technically minded and understand functions, their inputs and outputs, and you have to know which functions suit your needs. None of which is currently intuitive or particularly available. On the other hand is the consumption audience. Who is this aimed at to read abstract articles? Humans? AI? It almost feels like a solution searching for a problem. Don't get me wrong, this is an impressive bit of software, but I just don't understand where it sits in WM's portfolio. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] ([[User talk:Osarius|talk]]) 20:23, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :Did you read [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]</sub></small> 08:34, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :Also, in '''my opinion''', the goal is to realize the [[foundationsite:what-we-do/open-the-knowledge/|vision]] of '''a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge''' across '''all languages'''. I could have specified 'all '''human''' languages,' but the potential of Wikifunctions goes beyond that to include [[:en:Constructed_language|'''constructed''' languages]] as well. While 'all' may sound ambitious, that is the core vision—who knows, we might even be able to generate short articles in Sumerian one day.  :To answer your second question: since Abstract Wikipedia is being built by humans, it will serve as a space where people discuss and reach consensus on expressing even simple facts across languages (such as "An apple is a fruit"), likely sourced from Wikidata. Ultimately, it will be used by humans, potentially via conversational agents—though it is too early to predict exact use cases given current advances in AI. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 08:54, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Osarius|Osarius]] Basically Abstract Wikipedia create articles that can be shown on (many) other Wikipedia's if that community allows it. Only Articles that are not already present on the target Wikipedia. '''So the audience will be on the target Wikipedia's.''' This is not yet activated but we are starting pilots, see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities]]. But first functions should be written for those languages, Wikidata labels should be updated, Wikidata Lexemes should be updated or created. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Requests for protection page? == There probably should be a requests for protection page. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 15:35, 2 September 2026 (UTC) :Considering the size of the wiki, for now, I would say [[Abstract Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard]] is suffiencient. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:27, 3 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #263: 5,000 Functions, passing Z40000 == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-03|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we mark the 5,000th function on Wikifunction, we explore a new Type for functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1788802200 September 7, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:00, 4 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #264: Your code can now call back to the Wikidata fetch functions == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-10|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the possibility of calling Wikidata fetch functions, we present a new Type, we celebrate more than 200 new functions this week, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:13, 11 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == More visibility for page for interested communities == Hi all, we prepared [[Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities|a landing page]] for potential Wikipedia communities that want to try out Abstract Wikipedia, and wanted to showcase it a bit more. In your opinion, is it a good idea to put that page into the sidebar together with the community portal and the project chat? Or do you suggest other venues as better or as additional places? Let me know here! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 08:36, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :I’d suggest the Main Page under “Get Started”. Perhaps that’s too much visibility, but it encourages contributors to work within existing language communities, where they exist, even if their community is not ready to consider integrating Abstract Wikipedia into their Wikipedia edition. I’d also consider the Community portal to be appropriate. :I wouldn’t link directly from the sidebar, but we could consider an “in your language” link to a translatable landing page, from which contributors could find language-specific project pages. This would also cover the case where the language they are interested in is not their current interface language. The language-specific pages could link to relevant on-wiki discussions, particularly where communities are already actively involved or have concluded that they have other priorities or specific preconditions. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:14, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::At the moment I have added a link to the [[Abstract Wikipedia:Community portal]] page. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:57, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == The next Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting is tomorrow! == Hi all! A quick message to inform you that Denny will lead a quick first introduction to syntactic phrase functions in the next '''Natural Language Generation Special Interest Group meeting''', that will be held tomorrow, '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1789488000 September 15, at 16:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xzn-kqer-mah link to the meeting]). See you at the meeting! In case you can't join, the meeting will be recorded and made available on Commons. -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:27, 14 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Creating abstract articles are difficult to me == Hi, sorry, new on AW and don't know if this is the right place to put it, but yeah. I wanted to create an abstract article on my language Tumbuka, but the tutorial at [[Help:How to create an article]] seemed really confusing. Tried the tutorial and immediately disbanded because I got lost quickly. Any easier ways to do this? Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 13:30, 14 September 2026 (UTC) : To start with, for which topic did you want to create an article? Articles are organized by topic (from [[Wikidata:]]) and not by language since the goal is to have abstract content that can produce text in different languages. Here's the article [[Q11573]] as an example. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:56, 14 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes sorry, I wanted to create the article on the topic of the Tumbuka language. It's my language so I wanted to make an abstract article on it. Thank you. [[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]] ([[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|talk]]) 23:29, 14 September 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see; sorry for misreading. Well, a good first edit I think would be putting {{Z|38329}} on [[Q34138]]...which I now see you already did. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 September 2026 (UTC) ::::All good. I understand it now. Have a great day. '''''[[User:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi]]'''''[[User talk:Viyowoyero-vya-Malaŵi|'''<span style='color: #00008b;background-color: #FFFFFF;'><sub>★</sub><sup>★</sup><sub>★</sub></span>''']] 11:49, 20 September 2026 (UTC) == Automatic "about" hatnotes == Some ideas I had: * [[d:P:P1889|<code>P1889</code> 'different from']] should be relatively easy to make use of. <q>This article is about the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31}}</nowiki>. For the <nowiki>{{#statements:P31|from={{#statements:P1889}}}}</nowiki>, see <nowiki>{{#statements:P1889}}</nowiki>.</q> ** Should this also pull from [[d:P:P1382|<code>P1382</code> 'partially co-incident with']]? If two concepts are similar enough to warrant linking with P1382, would you expect each to be mentioned in the ''body'' of the other's article? * I'm curious if and how [[d:P:P460|<code>P460</code> 'said to be the same as']] (and [[d:P:P2959|<code>P2959</code> 'permanent duplicated item']]) would work in a wiki with no redirects&mdash;there probably shouldn't be separate abstract articles for {{Q|313}} and the {{Q|12601444}}, for example, and it would be an editorial decision as to which QID is used. Should the other QID(s) be populated with just a hatnote as a "soft redirect"? * The other thing language wikis do with redirects+hatnotes is disambiguation. AW uses QIDs as titles so that half of the problem doesn't exist, but since readers will be using natural language to search for articles, they may end up on the article for an Item which happens to share a label with the one they were after. For example, [[w:en:ball]] says <q>For the event, see Ball (dance event).</q>, but {{Q|18545}} doesn't (and probably shouldn't) have a <code>[[d:P:P1889|P1889]]={{Q|478515}}</code>. But they ''are'' linked via Lexemes: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Z801?call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uselang=de this call] is a proof-of-concept for retrieving the data needed for such a disambiguation hatnote. It's specific to one language, but I don't see why a hatnote Function shouldn't be localised to the point of returning outputs with different meanings in each language. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 08:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC) :Hatnotes shouldn't be automatic. [[d:Q90]] has a list of 35 other locations named "Paris" that it's different from (plus a "Paris Township" and a Wikipedia disambiguation page). Editorial judgment is needed to decide which ones are important and which ones aren't. :One thing WikiFunctions ''can'' do is selectively display disambiguation hatnotes based on language. For example, someone speaking English might reasonably confuse a [[d:Q18545]] "ball" with a [[d:Q478515]] "ball", requiring a hatnote to disambiguate, but a Spanish-speaker is unlikely to confuse a "pelota" with a "fiesta de baile", so no hatnote should be displayed. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 08:30, 17 September 2026 (UTC) ::Great ideas. The question might be more, in my opinion: which tools do we need to make good use of the existing 4 properties @YoshiRulz cited? which other tools do we need to identify the other cases of potential confusion, which are language-dependant (and culture/context dependant). ::I would argue we would need a viz tool (based on Wikidata and Wiktionaries probably) to better understand thoses cases. At some point, we will also need to ask experts from a certain domain and a diversity of background - workshops at global academic conferences could be a good place for that. ::In the mean time, we could start working on the functions proposed by @[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]]. Happy to help at some point. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, and side note: @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] already created [[:f:Z40059]], which uses P1889, and it is already used on 34 AW articles, notably in == See also == sections (quite clever). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:24, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #265: More engaging error messages == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-18|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we explain how we reworked error messaging, we talk about our recent and upcoming meetings, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:59, 18 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Boundaries of knowledge == Hi there, I created [[:f:Z42779]] <definition is different depending on>; for now it is used just once, on [[Q186030]] (contemporary art). This function makes explicit how a concept may very depending on the language, the authors, etc. I see it as a very important in our work to align different cultures and languages around encyclopedic concepts. The main risk of our great project (and, to be fair, for most Wikimedia projects) is to impose occidental or even anglo-saxon concepts to the rest of the works. So I saw epistemic functions as a path forward - and this is the first of them. Happy to discuss here what should be the next steps! (btw, I created a French implementation and a [mul] one, for once, the English implementation is not even created, feel free to add it) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:14, 23 September 2026 (UTC) == will Abstract Wikipedia support element ID tags that generate on-the-fly data containers? == For example, if i type in a search query such as "climate data for Europe", will i ever be able to see in front of me a page consisting of climate tables using a template like [[:w:Template:Weather_box|the Wikipedia weatherbox]], without the need to fetch the surrounding text of the pages for those cities? I think this may be called container-based design. Is it not possible currently on Wikipedia because by default MediaWiki sees all pages as unbroken chains of text, so there is no ability to fetch a part of a page by its container ID. and it could be used for many other things besides climate. the general case Im thinking of is to fetch one single element with a specific tag from a long list of pages and assemble all those tagged items on the same screen. I think this would be a highly valuable research tool. Best regards, [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 21:42, 26 September 2026 (UTC) :Tabular data on Commons can't be imported at the moment. If that feature is added, then we could automate tables like the one you linked, and you could use that Function outside of {{SITENAME}}. Can you elaborate on your research use-case? There may be [[d:WD:T|an existing tool]] which is more suitable. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 09:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC) ::hmm, Im not sure what you mean by that. i'm thinking of something applicable to many purposes. for example another use case of a container-based UI would be for a dictionary, where each of the labels on each sense would become a sort ID, so we could view the senses ordered by date, ordered by field, and so on, and then since each of these sense would have a tag we could also run a query to get all of the entries with that tag displayed on one page. and ideally, also with intersections, so i could see on one page all of the chemistry terms that were originally coined in German. that's simply impossible right now because MediaWiki has never used a container-based design ... every page is just one huge chunk of text and all of the formatting that looks like it divides a page into sections is just more text. and therefore there's no way to fetch just a piece of a page. ::my tech knowledge is fairly basic so i may have trouble expressing what i mean in clear terms, but i'm very clear on the concept. i'm hoping this project will remove what i see as the main problem with MediaWiki's antiquated design. [[User:Soap|Soap]] ([[User talk:Soap|talk]]) 17:54, 11 October 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's in the future plans for the project. What is planned is splitting up the (abstract) articles into multiple sections which can be edited independently: [[phab:T411699]] [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:58, 11 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #266: Memoization arriving == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about storing a function call's result in a cache for easier recalling, we analyse how quickly one particular fact propagates through different Wikipedia language editions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 28 September 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30951652 --> == Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities == Dear community, We are approaching the time where the deployment of the Abstract Wikipedia project will happen in three pilot communities (Malayalam, Dagbani, and Igbo). As part of this work, we have been looking at content gaps across wikis and we found that an interesting one is around cities and how often they get updated. Denny spoke about the level of updatedness of Paris in [[f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-09-25|his last Weekly update]]. For example, we [[Abstract Wikipedia:Potential city articles for Abstract Wikipedia pilot communities|identified a number of gaps across the three pilot communities]], i.e. abstract articles existing on Abstract Wikipedia but not on the pilot wikis. In light of this, we would like you to consider articles about cities as a potential focus area, as the pilot communities can probably decide that these will be the first articles to integrate on their Wikipedias. Do you think it is possible to create some sort of a “local sprint” on this focus area? We are open to feedback. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:57, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :Any effort should focus on quality, not quantity: I looked at a random sampling of AW's current city articles, and about half of them are at or below the "an apple is a fruit" level of completeness. There also needs to be a focus on ease of translation: those cities were variously described as being a "city", a "capital city", a "borough", a "municipality of Brazil", a "municipality with town privileges in the Czech Republic", and a "direct-administered municipality" -- quite the collection of words and phrases you'd need to translate to get them to work in a new language. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 21:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :These 7 are on the level 3 (top 1000) list, and have no article on dagwp nor igwp: [[Q174]], [[Q727]], [[Q956]], [[Q1156]], [[Q3130]], [[Q3766]], [[Q8684]].<br>Are there article layout conventions written up somewhere? I looked in projectspace and helpspace and didn't see any. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 12:36, 2 October 2026 (UTC) ::No layout conventions, it's a free-for-all at the moment. When I do it I roughly model on the en-wiki structure of that city. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:29, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] Even though some of the city articles are in basic form, I think Paris is a good example (to demonstrate what's available and what's not in a given language). I updated Wikidata labels in Latin and Malayalam today (for infobox and see also section). So the infoboxes in English, French, Latin, and Malayalam should work. Check [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z36678 my test cases on WF]. Best, [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:51, 4 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] @[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] @[[User:99of9|99of9]] @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] Thank you for your interventions, very much appreciated. I wanted to ask also another thing: what do you think of a potential wiki page of articles "ready for sharing" with pilot communities, based on your judgement? Would it be possible to set one up? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:50, 8 October 2026 (UTC) :::::Hi. :::::On my side, I would tend to avoid that Western/Global North contributors declare articles "ready" to be delivered for communities to the Global South (such as the ones with the languages identified for the pilots). We lack an integration of non-occidental ontologies into Wikidata and, obviously, AW. We can expect articles with quality labels in the future, with validation from communities members from different cultural backgrounds. For now, well, it's on ongoing project. I would rather prefer for the pilot communities to express their needs about the different topics we already chose to work on, and give us feedback on what's missing/what's reflecting maybe a biased view of the world. :::::Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:40, 15 October 2026 (UTC) == My article review? == I have been working on creating [[Q115518310]] over the past few days. I feel that it has reached a good stopping point for now. Since I made it through trial and error, there might be some parts that do not quite follow convention. If there is anywhere that can be improved, I look forward to your feedback. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 07:54, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :I think it is the best article we have so far! Congratulations. [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 01:17, 2 October 2026 (UTC) :Wow, nice, that looks awesome! :How much time and effort did making that take, though? Over a few weeks, I see 30-something revisions just on this Wiki, plus hundreds of edits that you made to Wikifunctions to get this to work well... (Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!) :I'm half-seriously wondering if we should just translate the functions this uses to as many languages as we can, publish this article to each language's Wikipedia, and then give up on the rest of the Abstract Wikipedia sinkhole. :(Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of AW, and it's something I've optimistically thought about for a while. I just think that, at least in its current form, it's awfully impractical, since properly transcribing even a very simple two-sentence stub takes quite a bit of time, effort, and obscure knowledge, and doing anything even slightly complex is quite difficult if not basically impossible...) :[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 02:10, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::Actually, I think the function in this article is on the quite simple side. I am currently at [[Q17]], and taking on the challenge of creating another article in a Wikipedia-style tone. In the case of smartphones, specifications are explicit, so I just needed to list Wikidata values, but many Wikipedia articles do not simply list data. [[User:鈴音雨|鈴音雨]] ([[User talk:鈴音雨|talk]]) 02:33, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::"Though the functions you made should be useful for other articles too!" This is the main point. At this stage, whenever we try to push the boundaries of a boundary-pushing article, we have to do a lot of work. But The idea of that work is to make functions that eventually get used in thousands or millions of other articles. To track how easy this is so far (I'm not saying it's simple yet) try copying this structure to another smartphone with good documentation on Wikidata. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :::Good idea, thanks! With some help from 鈴音雨's article and functions, I started [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q727665?oldid=24367 an article for the HTC Dream]. Maybe it wasn't the best choice, because the Wikidata item was lacking a lot of information, but [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q727665&diff=2559051605&oldid=2499753284 I've made some improvements there] too! :::FWIW, here are some things I had difficulty with: :::* Many of the standard templates are relatively inflexible, resulting in awkward phrasing. (But the ones you've made are better!) :::* I wasn't sure how to mention "T-Mobile G1" as the main alternative name. :::* There are no references shown for the dates, even though I added some in Wikidata. It looks like the rest are to Wikidata statements, rather than their sources? :::* Much of the information in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream seems too complicated to add here. :::[[User:Sollyucko|Sollyucko]] ([[User talk:Sollyucko|talk]]) 04:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) ::::I tried too, but I chose an even easier article to copy to: [[Q122204657]]. It worked fairly well, but like you I had to add a lot of info on Wikidata first. The sticking points you mention mostly need additional work on Wikifunctions. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 02:21, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata Sitelink changes in Recent Changes and Watchlist == ''(Apologies for cross-posting in English, translating it will help spread the message)'' Editors on group 1 wikis, including Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikisource, will no longer see notifications on [[Special:RecentChanges|Recent Changes]] and [[Special:Watchlist|Watchlist]] when a link to ''another'' language version of a page is added, removed, or changed in its Wikidata item. This change will begin on '''October 5 at 07:00 UTC''' as a two-week trial to reduce high-volume, low-value notifications and make higher-value changes easier to identify. Editors who rely on these notifications should be aware of the change and can share feedback or concerns on the [[m:Wikidata For Wikimedia Projects/Clearer Wikidata Edit Summaries/Hide Language Link edits|project]] or [[m:Talk:Wikidata_For_Wikimedia_Projects/Clearer_Wikidata_Edit_Summaries/Hide_Language_Link_edits|talk page]].<br/>Please reach out if you have any questions, thank you! -- [[User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|Danny Benjafield (WMDE)]] ([[User_talk:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)|talk]]) sent via [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 12:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Danny Benjafield (WMDE)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Danny_Benjafield_(WMDE)/MassMessage_test_list&oldid=31106967 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #267: Refreshing results == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we talk about two new capabilities addressing the issues of caching and freshness of function call results, we introduce our groundwork to support the first pilot communities for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:31, 2 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31099195 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #268: Quarterly planning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss the work we have planned for this quarter (October-December 2026), we introduce news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1791826200 October 12, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:42, 10 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31143368 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #269: Changes in evaluator representations == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce our latest changes in evaluator representations, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:46, 17 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Adding An Infobox == '''I was working on creating and article for Kentucky (Q1603), and got this:''' ''An implementation of a function ([object Object]) makes use of a hardcoded list which does not contain the option "Q35657". <nowiki><a href="http://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/[object Object]">Add the option Q35657 to the implementation.</nowiki>'' '''How do I fix this or add another function in it's place?''' [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 17:12, 19 October 2026 (UTC) :I'm guessing you used the "auto-infobox" function. That function picks which infobox to generate based on the best "instance of" statement on Wikidata. There currently isn't a rule for generating infoboxes for instances of Q35657 ("U.S. state"), so the function doesn't know what to do and returns an error. :Your best bet is to head over to [[:f:Wikifunctions:Project chat|Wikifunctions:Project chat]] and ask for someone to create an infobox implementation. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:14, 19 October 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks! I've also tried it with "infobox for populated place," and that seems to work. [[User:Skyeteam|Skyeteam]] ([[User talk:Skyeteam|talk]]) 11:00, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :Courtesy link: [[Q1603]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 13:53, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Expression of Interest: AI-Powered Kikuyu Language Preservation and Wikimedia Knowledge Accessibility == Hello Wikipedia team, I would like to express my interest in exploring opportunities to support the development of Kikuyu-language content and digital language resources within the Wikimedia ecosystem. I am considering two complementary project ideas that could contribute to improving access to knowledge in Kikuyu and supporting the long-term digital preservation of the language: <nowiki>'''</nowiki>1. AI-Powered English–Kikuyu Translation and Digital Language Preservation for Wikipedia<nowiki>'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and human-in-the-loop validation to support the translation and development of high-quality Kikuyu-language Wikipedia content. It would also aim to develop reusable language resources, including parallel text corpora, terminology databases, translation memories, and community-led validation workflows. <nowiki>'''2. English–Kikuyu Document Translation Platform'''</nowiki> This initiative would explore the development of a web-based platform that enables users to translate documents between English and Kikuyu, including processing multiple documents while preserving their structure and formatting. In addition to supporting educational, research, and community needs, the platform could help expand the availability of digital content in Kikuyu. I believe these ideas could contribute to the broader goal of making knowledge more accessible across languages. I am particularly interested in understanding how the first initiative could align with Abstract Wikipedia, Wikifunctions, and existing Wikimedia language-community efforts. I would appreciate guidance on the appropriate next steps, the requirements for participating in the Wikipedia pilot, and how best to engage the Kikuyu Wikipedia community in evaluating these ideas. I would also welcome advice on whether these initiatives could complement the existing work on language-independent knowledge representation and the generation of content in underrepresented languages. Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to learning how I could contribute to this work. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-56974-68|~2026-56974-68]] ([[User talk:~2026-56974-68|talk]]) 07:18, 26 October 2026 (UTC) Yours truly, Kabuye Mathias Conrad ckm1738@gmail.com == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #270: Wikiabstrak app == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we introduce the latest app created by a Wikimedia volunteer about Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest functions created by the community. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 26 October 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31162541 --> == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #271: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we address some key questions about errors and fallbacks on Abstract Wikipedia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 15:41, 2 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Feedback wanted: a "Clone article" feature == Hi everyone! Based on an idea from the community (thanks a lot, @[[User:99of9|99of9]]!), we are exploring the idea of a "Clone article" button for Abstract Wikipedia ([[phab:T442013|T442013]]). The button would let you start a new article as a copy of an existing one. Starting from a well-formed article could be easier than starting from a blank page. As part of the process, users would be prompted to review the function calls and adjust them before publishing. This could speed up the process for contributors, but we also see some potential concerns. New editors might copy weak articles, leaving experienced editors to clean up and editors who are new to function calls might also find it hard to adjust a copied article. To address some of these potential shortcomings, one idea is that cloning could be limited to "model articles" that the community approves. ;Questions # Would a clone feature be useful to you? # Would you prefer limiting cloning to community-approved model articles as a safeguard, or allowing any article to be cloned? # Are there any other thoughts or concerns? Nothing is decided yet. We will collect feedback until Friday 13, then post a summary here. Thank you! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 13:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :I believe cloning articles has the power to be a very useful tool for editors (probably those more experienced than me :]) and limiting cloning to community-approved articles to be good. My only question is how and where the approval process would take place, but I'd assume that it will be decided later via consensus? <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 16:30, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is a good idea. This would have been very useful for my work on [[Q82595]] and [[Q9448]], and could be very useful for work on related articles. I'm inclined to support allowing any article to be cloned, but limiting the feature to a <code>cloner</code> user group. This would allow users trusted by the community on the content-creation side to create articles in this way without needing additional input/an approval process. For example, [[Q5492]], [[Q1066]], [[Q1062]], and [[Q1383]] could all be created as clones of [[Q1169]] once that article is brought up to standard (as I doubt it would pass a community approval process to be a model article right now). <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 17:23, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :This is indeed a very good proposal. On Wikidata, I often use the “Duplicate item” feature, which makes it much easier and faster to create items that share most of their information but differ in a few details. Similarly, on Abstract Wikipedia, I have created articles about cities and paintings that use the same functions and differ only in their Wikidata item identifiers. If an article works well for one item, there is no reason why the same set of functions shouldn't work for other items of the same type, apart from potential issues with missing labels. Personally, I would be in favour of introducing a generic “Clone article” feature that could be used for all articles. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 21:44, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :That's a good idea. Hopefully, it can be realized in conjunction with the sandbox mechanism. The replication destination is a sandbox, and it is not public until it is published. The cache does not work in sandbox articles and is rendered with the latest functions and data. [[User:Higa4|Higa4]] ([[User talk:Higa4|talk]]) 22:53, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{OK}} I think it is a good idea. Maybe it could also be implemented on the edit function as "Copy article to clipboard" like "Copy (line) to clipboard". [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 4 November 2026 (UTC) Hi, sorry I won't go with the flow. With the current state of things, I would be very much appreciate such a button. However, we must have a long-term vision, and I don't think that AW may work without : * template/pattern (as in sewing) articles. We won't create the 36,000 communes of France by copy-and-pasting, and we must maintain some level of consistency, getting inspiration from the great work of Project:Communes of France on frwiki. * making easy for new contributors to edit articles. We need a huge work on functions/lexemes/interface itself. New contributors should be able to contribute in wikitext/plain text/structured forms, and this information should be used either to create a new article on a particular Wikipedia, or to improve the Abstract Wikipedia page (or, in some cases, the template itself). Every new functionality like this copy button will increase the short-term metrics such as the number of articles, but increase the maintenance load mid-term, and decrease our chances to reach the long-term goals. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:03, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == the biggest change in superlatives == Hi there, I investigated how we currently use [[f:Z37065]] (en: superlative definition with location, fr: superlatif +, jp: 場所付き最上級の定義). The most common use is the one we see in {{Q|Q408}} : <nowiki>{{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|<lang>}}</nowiki> ("Greater [[Q3130|Sydney]] is the most populous [[Q200250|metropolis]] in Australia", {{#function:Z37065|Q130283188|Q138758272|Q200250|Q408|Z1004}}, "Grand [[Q3130|Sydney]] est la [[Q200250|métropole]] la plus peuplée de Australie." (incorrect but understandable), "シドニー大都市圏はオーストラリアにおいて最も人口の多い[[Q200250|メトロポリス]]である。" (not able to judge if it's correct, but looks OK?)). I've made a list of all the superlatives we are currently using with that function in [[f:Z50724]]. Here is my summary: * Classic superlatives look quite straightforward to use : {{Q|Q12935276}}, {{Q|Q16042592}}, {{Q|Q138758272}}, {{Q|Q124288708}}, {{Q|Q140358213}}, {{Q|Q46944820}}; * {{Q|Q12943371}} and {{Q|Q23670522}} do not look perfect opposites to me, happy to discuss that; * Other are nouns and not adjectives, which is a (small) concern to me : {{Q|Q101079585}}, {{Q|Q208826}}, {{Q|Q4}}. I would suggest to create (or find) adjectival WD items to keep it clean, especially for {{Q|Q4}} (dealiest ?); * {{Q|Q19269277}} is not a superlative to me but a historic quality, I would be keen to use an other function for this. * {{Q|Q5491373}} is the only extreme geographic point I found, I would suggest to use a dedicate function for extreme geographical points (with NW/W/SW/etc. or altitude/depth/ as a parameter); * {{Q|Q104709533}} is only used for {{Q|Q21501482}} ; the risk for neutrality is high so I would be keen to not use it with Z37065 for now ; * I also have trouble with {{Q|Q18670221}}. Globally, I would be keen to have a restricted list for two reasons: * The WD items are recent, so their Qids are high, and superlatives labels are extremely common, so those items are super hard to find; * It would be easier to maintain. Obviously we would need an easy process to add more adjectives is those are needed. Do you see other adjectives we could already add? I was thinking about "isolated". Finally, I think the path to improve those in an encyclopedic setting would be to work on criteria (always very important for superlatives) and sources (more important for this than for many other facts, given their symbolic importance). Sorry, that's a long message, but an important subject in my opinion. I didn't tag people having used this function for bow, but feel free to do it! Have a wonderful day all. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 15:57, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :{{ping|Ornithorynque liminaire}} I'd be okay with a list of approved adjectives as long as it's easy to add items. One thing I'll note is that the existence of nouns but not adjectives in Wikidata is an ongoing challenge here; for example, I used {{q|Q18670221}} as a superlative in lieu of "successful", and in the same articles I used {{q|Q208826}} ("[[Q9448|Premier League]] is the highest association football league in English Football League System") in lieu of {{q|Q15290}} ("Premier League is the best association football league in England") after [[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] removed Q15290, correctly citing NPOV concerns. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 16:46, 4 November 2026 (UTC) :Nouns as superlatives are a big concern for me: adjectives are a feature of most languages (though some use attributive verbs instead), but attributive nouns are considerably less common. If we don't keep things clean, Z37065 and related functions are going to need massive tables of which values need special handling. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 00:24, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :I support a cleanup/standardisation. I'm not sure the best way. I'm a bit hesitant to "split" WD items into an adjectival version alongside a noun or whatever, because the parts of speech are meant to be in the lexeme space rather than the concept space. But if they're causing linguistic trouble, let's do it. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:59, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::I suggest we make a list of the ones that are easy to use and any others we want to support at [[:f:Talk:Z37065]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 09:11, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :CC {{ping|Mahir256|p=}} who I recall was working on Items for qualities/"adjectives". [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:51, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Project update == Hi everyone, We wanted to provide an update on the work we’re doing [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2026-2027/Product_&_Technology_OKRs#DE2:_Abstract_Wikipedia|this year]] to test Abstract Wikipedia's viability as a scalable, human-centered way to create multilingual encyclopedic content. We expect to have a better sense of the project’s limitations and potential in the first half of 2027, so that an informed decision can be made about what’s next for the project. From now until the end of December, we are focused on helping our three [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:For_interested_communities#Participating_pilot_communities pilot communities] publish their first Abstract Wikipedia articles. To do this, we are hosting workshops in their local communities to demonstrate how to create the lexemes and functions needed for the articles they are interested in adding. We are also testing ways to make it easier to edit and create articles, both with technology and by connecting language communities with the Wikifunctions and Abstract Wikipedia communities. You can see more details about this work [[f:Wikifunctions:Status#What_are_we_working_on_this_Quarter?_(October-December_2026)|on our status page]]. Our approach is to learn from the pilot experiences and make improvements that will enable more communities to integrate articles on their own. We will continue to post weekly updates in our [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates|newsletter]], and you can reach out to us on our project chat pages: * https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Wikifunctions:Project_chat * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Project_chat]] You can also see the related response that the Board has posted to [[m:Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#c-Victoria-20261104150600-Update|the RFC on Meta]]. If you are interested in adding articles from Abstract Wikipedia to your language wiki, please see [[Abstract Wikipedia:For interested communities|this page]] for more information! [[User:ATsay-WMF|ATsay-WMF]] ([[User talk:ATsay-WMF|talk]]) 16:06, 4 November 2026 (UTC) ==Having an issue with Z37683== Hello, newcomer here. I think this is an incredible idea for a website. I'm trying to work on [[Q23333]], but Z37683 is not cooperating. Strangely, I saw [[Q7747]] use this before and it was displaying fine, but now I am seeing the same error I am seeing on Whitlam, which is quite strange. [[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]] ([[User talk:Paccyd33|talk]]) 03:19, 5 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Paccyd33|Paccyd33]], welcome and well done on your article, it's great! :This error is not your fault , I've seen it appear earlier today. Q7747 is probably displaying ok thanks to cache. :I suspect a small change in one Python implementation of a basic function, but I will investigate. You might ignore it for now, but do not hesitate if you run in other trouble :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 03:39, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::Mmmh, I'm testing a lot of things but I don't really see where it could come from in functions themselves. Any help appreciated! The central error so far is "function call : « inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in indentation (<string>, line 42) »" (of course, line 42!). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:06, 5 November 2026 (UTC) ::: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Z20424&diff=prev&oldid=344491 I found the source] of this error.--[[User:Artsiom91|Artsiom91]] ([[User talk:Artsiom91|talk]]) 07:47, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yes. I also reported this in the Telegram channel. It has now been fixed, and will gradually repopulate the cache. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:14, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #272: A new Type for NLG Functions? == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss a potential new Type for NLG Functions, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 November 9, at 11:00 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Note the earlier time in the day, in order to make it easier for some folks to attend this one. Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:29, 6 November 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=31238554 --> == Logo idea == What if the logo was the uncompleted part of the Wikipedia logo, due to the project's purpose being to close knowledge gaps more effectively [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 19:15, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Thanks for sharing @[[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]. That's not modest but I kinda like the idea. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:37, 6 November 2026 (UTC) :Acutally, I have another idea to show the wikidata entry numbers for each character [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 15:44, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::Also interesting (but a bit painful to take a view at, rigth?). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:03, 10 November 2026 (UTC) == Automatically remove links to the same page == Hi, On other wikis, MediaWiki automatically removes links to the very same page and replaces them with bold. It think it would be great if the WikiLambda extension could do something similar : * automatically remove links to the same page; * put the first occurrence in bold. It would make AW articles easier to read, without the need to use Z36831 and Z37726 (replace specific Abstract Wikipedia link with bold / remove all Abstract Wikipedia links to these QIDs) every minute. Would you agree? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:58, 7 November 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is quite a good idea. <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 17:02, 7 November 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]], what would the best way to document this need? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:47, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::If you are familiar with it, the best place to put such a feature request is in Phabricator. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 23:10, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :::Agree with @[[User:99of9|99of9]], best to report it in Phabricator. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:59, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::Yeah, I'm quite familiar with this, but do you have special formatting/rules for AW/WF stuff @[[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]]? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:28, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::(and the underlying question was: has it been already proposed? or maybe you would have liked to document it yourself?) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:29, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::::i don't think I've seen it proposed before. In terms of formatting make sure to tag anything AW/WF related with "Abstract Wikipedia Team". --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 20:36, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Special:Nearby - Dealing with Coordinates on Pages == As in the other Wikis AW also has the [[Special:Nearby#/coord/48.59446,15.656996|Special:Nearby]]-Page. I am not sure how it exactly works, but i think there must be some structured storing of a coordinate pair in the wikitext of the page. On my first AW article [[Q174400]] i have added the coordinate sentence, but i think that's not enough to work with the Nearby-Function. But maybe there exists already a function for appropriate coordinate rendering? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 10:27, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :I don't this that has been configured! We run on a special extension of MediaWiki, quite new, and I don't see it as a priority, so I would understand thus coice. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:58, 9 November 2026 (UTC) ::It's [[mw:Extension:NearbyPages]] + [[mw:Extension:GeoData]], but you're meant to tag pages with <syntaxhighlight lang="wikitext" inline>{{#coordinates:}}</syntaxhighlight> which we obviously can't. If it instead read from the parser ''output'' HTML then we could mimic that. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:41, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Function Call in AW shows different result than in WF == Just another Newcomer-Question, my apologizes! I have created [[Q655617]]. The instance-sentence in German shows in up in AW "Die Gartenlaube ist ein Illustrierte". (which is wrong, it should bei "eine Illustrierte" fem.) I have testes the function in WF and first shows the same wrong result. If i assume correctly, it has to do with the fact, that no de Lexeme existed for the entity [[d:20820199]], so i created one: [[d:Lexeme:L1814393]]; after this creation in WF the functions renders correctly in the female form: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D WF-Result] but in AW it still shows the wrong one. I have tried `action=purge` no effect. Any explainations? Thanks! [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 22:33, 8 November 2026 (UTC) :Hallo @[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]], I think the cache is more powerful in AW, which is not necessarily a good think. We do not have many info on it as it is a very recent system, I hope we will have at some point (but honestly the top priority is to make it work, for now too many functions fail...). Let's way a few days. :In the same time, we also a lot of work to do in German to respect the gender of words (and persons...). If you're interested in working on that I will be delighted to help. I will also document the recent work I did in French in respect to that. :Have a great day! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:48, 9 November 2026 (UTC) :Looks like the cache was refreshed. For next time, the manual clear button is <q>{{int:wikilambda-function-evaluator-result-details}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-caching}}</q> &gt; <q>{{int:wikilambda-functioncall-metadata-cache-freshen-button}}</q>. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 14:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :: {{ping|YoshiRulz}} thanks for you hint. Unfortunately i don't see this buttons to re-run a function with the newest data, where should i look for this? Sorry! Newbe here :-) Thanks! --[[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 16:58, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::I'm referring to when you're on Wikifunctions and you make a call, like [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/de/Z32962?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z32962%22%2C%22Z32962K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q655617%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q20820199%22%7D%2C%22Z32962K3%22%3A%22Z1430%22%7D the one you linked]. Per [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance_metadata_and_result_freshening|docs]] you only need to be in the <code>autoconfirmed</code> group. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 17:04, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::I read on [[mw:Help:Wikifunctions/Provenance metadata and result freshening]] that in the Provenance section (i think in AW, isn'it) there should be a button for refresh with newest data. But i only see the information whe the data was rendered last time. I see that i am already an autoconfirmed user, so i have no further ideas... [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 17:05, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::It is only available on WF at the moment, not AW. But the developers are actively planning it here soon. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 20:49, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::::::Thanks for the information! ::::::Just another newbie-n00b follow up-question. The second senctence in the Article [[Q655617]] is in German still wrong. It shows "Die Gartenlaube ist das älteste Massenmedien..." but it should come up with the nominativ singular "älteste Massenmedium". The Lexemes are already still up for days, the cache said it was rebuild 6 hours ago (i set up a test [[f:Z53353]] , and unfortunately i can not dive into the function because maybe there is the pluralis form defined? Does someone can clarify here? [[User:Mfchris84|Mfchris84]] ([[User talk:Mfchris84|talk]]) 23:13, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::::::Moved your test, please double-check it.<br>I think [[f:Z32970|the implementation]] simply isn't doing gender agreement at all. Hopefully there are already helper functions for that, otherwise you'll have to figure out how to read that info from the lexemes and set up label fallbacks. Or maybe [[f:Z43120]] is usable now. [[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 01:11, 12 November 2026 (UTC) == Logo contest == I think the best way to decide a logo is just to hold another contest, like all the other projects. [[User:ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]] ([[User talk:ZNomadYT|talk]]) 13:26, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :I really do not think that's a priority to spend time on this right now. Let's do this in 8 months, when we will have demonsntrated to the world (and by world, I mean mostly angry English Wikipedia contributors) than this project somehow works and therefore we won't have been killed by the WMF. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:27, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == Content Assessment == Would it be good to add project assessment such as the ones in the English Wikipedia or the Spanish Wikipedia, using western numerals to start? I know there are other numeral systems in different languages or areas, though most cases they use the western numeral system. i don't know exactly how it would work, though. if anyone can follow up with this it would be appreciated. [[User:MisprintMint|MisprintMint]] ([[User talk:MisprintMint|talk]]) 03:52, 12 November 2026 (UTC) :Well, I would love to redesign such a system to better incorporate diversity (cultural, but also gendered one notably) before starting to use it. Having a discussion here is a good starting point :) :I encourage you to start experimenting here before @[[User:MisprintMint|MisprintMint]], however, it's good to be familiar with the strange way things are being done here! Do not hesitate if you need any help. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 04:34, 12 November 2026 (UTC) == Using preferred statements == At [[Special:Permalink/26063]] in the Campus section, the last sentence currently reads "Its areas are 140 acre, 12 acre, 76 acre, and 108 acre." This is because it's using [[wikidata:Q125341047#P2046]], which lists the size of the campus at various historical points in time. However, the present size is given preferred rank, so it is what I would expect to be used here. How do we make that happen? (Separately, I attempted to write a sentence on the school's official colors using [[wikifunctions:Z36218]], but in that case it listed only one of the two official colors despite them both being given equal rank on Wikidata.) <span style="border:3px outset;border-radius:8pt 0;padding:1px 5px;background:linear-gradient(6rad,#86c,#2b9)">[[User:Sdkb|<span style="color:#FFF;text-decoration:inherit;font:1em Lucida Sans">Sdkb</span>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Sdkb|'''talk''']]</sup> 08:54, 12 November 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:Sdkb|Sdkb]], thank you for reporting that! I saw that problem as well, it was on my to-do list to expose it here. :Do we all agree that by default, all functions should give all the best values? (all the values with preffered rank, or all the normal values). :That would mean edit Z36218 to make it use all the values like Z42543 does, but also edit Z42543 to ensure it only takes the best values. :I can do it but it's not a small change, so I'd prefer to have community's opinion. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 10:16, 12 November 2026 (UTC) :Here's my answer to your first question: I noticed that you're using the [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z41294 legacy function]. Could you try [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z47242?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z47242%22%2C%22Z47242K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q125341047%22%7D%2C%22Z47242K2%22%3A%22Z1002%22%2C%22Z47242K3%22%3A%5B%22Z39328%22%2C%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z39328%22%2C%22Z39328K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q3427356%22%7D%2C%22Z39328K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q468801%22%7D%7D%5D%7D this newer function] instead? :It works for the campus example and produces the sentence: "Its area is 140 acres." :I hope this helps! [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 10:50, 12 November 2026 (UTC) 1mjkhtjumzqbavclhwa0pg3wfclspec Q96807071 0 446 25986 24437 2026-11-11T15:15:42Z YoshiRulz 640 Add lede 25986 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q96807071", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38350", "Z38350K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q96807071" }, "Z38350K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q30081" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5292" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2283" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1513879" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M144228100" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q96807071" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37726", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q96807071" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q14827288" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q96807071" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q96807071" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P571" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q96807071" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P856" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } mt4jeekx98fmnh1jcxqbouamk33cbbt Abstract Wikipedia:Requests for deletion 4 450 26024 25800 2026-11-11T18:37:20Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 /* Q134463226 */ Reply 26024 wikitext text/x-wiki __NEWSECTIONLINK__ This page is the venue to request the deletion of pages that cannot be speedy deleted. See also: [[Abstract Wikipedia:Deletion policy]]; [[Template:Delete]]. [[Category:Abstract Wikipedia administration]] == Scholarly articles == * [[Q67404404]] {{Q|67404404}} * [[Q50082993]] {{Q|50082993}} * [[Q68271926]] {{Q|68271926}} * [[Q114133712]] {{Q|114133712}} There is very little abstract encyclopedic content that can come out of a page about a specific, non-notable scholarly article. [[User:JJPMaster|JJP]]<sub>[[User talk:JJPMaster|Mas]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/JJPMaster|ter]]</sub></sub> ([[Q1270787|she]]/[[Q3437264|they]]) 19:07, 18 May 2026 (UTC) :We currently don't have a community-ratified definition of notability. I've tried to kick off this discussion [[Project:Notability|here]]. For now, I ask that stewards/global sysops '''wait''' until we come to a consensus on a policy. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 19:10, 18 May 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|JJPMaster}} very interesting request. I'm not entirely sure... I would tend to agree for these papers but not all of them ({{Q|Q30249683}} exists on 16 Wikipedias for instance), so where to put the threshold between notable and non-notable? on which criteria? Anyway, I agree to ''wait'' until the community reach a consensus on what is notable on AW. Also, I'm pinging {{ping|Immanuelle}} who created these articles. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 14:13, 30 May 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Feeglgeef}} the notability discussion does seems to be moving, meanwhile it's seems more and more obvious that these page are not good (see the deletion request below too). Should we still wait? I don't think so anymore. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 08:36, 19 July 2026 (UTC) :::: Sure, sounds good. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 23:44, 19 July 2026 (UTC) *{{vd}} low quality, no response or improvement. The case for significance of these topics is not made in the articles. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:26, 15 July 2026 (UTC) {{done}} [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 05:27, 20 July 2026 (UTC) == [[Q6489603]] == See [[Talk:Q6489603]]. This does not work as a category, it is more an article about a category. --[[User:Ameisenigel|Ameisenigel]] ([[User talk:Ameisenigel|talk]]) 08:34, 31 May 2026 (UTC) : Under my [[Abstract Wikipedia:Notability|proposed notability guideline]], this would not be notable, so I {{s}} deletion [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 17:30, 31 May 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Ameisenigel|Ameisenigel]] @[[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] Although the page has been deleted, I believe that the vague wording related to categories (and templates) should be clarified. Please review and improve the deletion policy to help current and future contributors better understand how categories are handled. Refer [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy#Categories]] [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 15:07, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :{{Done|Deleted}} <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 14:07, 17 June 2026 (UTC) == Creations by XeNivalys == [[user:XeNivalys]] has posted several pages as part of their cross-wiki spam crusade. Please delete them all and if possible issue a block. --[[User:Bedivere|Bedivere]] ([[User talk:Bedivere|talk]]) 04:53, 9 June 2026 (UTC) :{{Done|Deleted}}. 🪶-[[User:Tanbiruzzaman|<span style="font-family:monospace;color:#006400;letter-spacing:1px;">TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN</span>]] ([[User talk:Tanbiruzzaman|💬]]) 08:33, 9 June 2026 (UTC) == auto-created broken articles == I suggest we do a bit of a cleanup of pages that were created by a software tool, using immature functions that have been deprecated for months, that would be very annoying to clean up by hand. So I propose deletion of the following (feel free to add to this list anything that matches this description). No prejudice to re-creation if anyone wants to make them good. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:20, 15 July 2026 (UTC) * [[Q11378973]] * [[Q11433427]] * [[Q11395853]] * [[Q11465292]] * [[Q11467693]] * [[Q7768]] [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:20, 15 July 2026 (UTC) : I thout the same, or even more: I would like to discuss if it is best to delete outdated articles. There is a lot of discussion and critique about a lot of those articles. I think in particular to articles created by @Immanuelle, that are not edited afterwards by somebody else. Those articles were a) created in mass and b) most of them with outdated functions. PS: I value the attempt of use:Immanuelle and hope to see him/her to continue on this project, now or later. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:44, 15 July 2026 (UTC) ::Ping [[User:Immanuelle]]. Do you mind if we heavily clean up some of your contributions? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:25, 15 July 2026 (UTC) {{done}} the original set. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:11, 26 July 2026 (UTC) : Articles created by [[User:Immanuelle]] and not edited after creation. I would like to propose to delete these (if not already mentioned above): :*[[Q29682]] Sumiyoshi Shrine :*[[Q135040386]] Takeihakatsuno Shrine :*[[Q63471]] Omura Shrine :*[[Q65320]] Iwa Shrine :*[[Q94057]] Olive Shrine :*[[Q94317]] Kikuchi Shrine :*[[Q94760]] Kotohira-gū :*[[Q116140]] Tado Taisha :*[[Q133753]] Shiogama Shrine :*[[Q135732]] Ōagata Shrine :*[[Q137707]] Katō Shrine :*[[Q167136]] Kengun Shrine :*[[Q172253]] Amatsu Shrine :*[[Q195684]] Yahiko Shrine :*[[Q199699]] Tsurumine Hachiman Shrine :*[[Q211522]] Sannō Shrine :*[[Q246469]] Wakasa Shrine :*[[Q246479]] Ikoma Shrine :*[[Q246667]] Hakuto Shrine :*[[Q251160]] Ōgamiyama Shrine :*[[Q251682]] Yūtoku Inari Shrine :*[[Q276779]] Kifune Shrine :*[[Q276830]] Seimei Shrine :*[[Q276831]] Mitami Shrine :*[[Q283483]] Kanō Tenmangū :*[[Q288248]] Tokorozawa Shinmei Shrine :*[[Q703904]] Oyamazumi Shrine :*<s>[[Q704219]] Terukuni Shrine</s> Updated recently :*[[Q704430]] Udo Jingū :*[[Q704622]] Kirishima Jingū :*[[Q704636]] Naminoue Shrine :*[[Q704686]] Miyazaki Jingū :*[[Q704702]] Shirayama Hime Shrine :*[[Q704855]] Hōkoku Shrine :*[[Q704865]] Hida Ichinomiya Minashi Shrine :*[[Q704876]] Kasama Inari Shrine :*[[Q704890]] Tosa Shrine :*[[Q704898]] Hōfu Tenmangū :*[[Q705136]] Tsushima Shrine :*[[Q705297]] Nishinomiya Shrine :*[[Q705303]] Shirahige Shrine :*[[Q705310]] Hakone Shrine :*[[Q705542]] Ōmiwa Shrine :*[[Q706499]] Kashima Jingū :*[[Q11360548]] Kamitakano Shrine :*[[Q11360577]] Shimonaka Hachiman :*[[Q11360668]] Shimohara-hachiman Shrine :*[[Q11360748]] Shimomasuda Shrine :*[[Q11360904]] Shimogoryō Shrine :*[[Q11361253]] Shimoshinmei Tenso Shrine :*[[Q11361494]] Shimodate Haguro Shrine :*[[Q11361528]] Shimoshiotsu Shrine :*[[Q11361819]] Fuba-hachimangu :*<s>[[Q23548]] National Aeronautics and Space Administration</s> Updated recently :*[[Q11691]] stock exchange :*<s>[[Q42274]] Google Earth</s> Updated recently :*[[Q80228]] bottle :*[[Q173799]] entertainment :*<s>[[Q18123741]] infectious disease</s> Updated recently :*[[Q16550]] Breithorn :*<s>[[Q569243]] Universiti Brunei Darussalam</s> Updated recently :*<s>[[Q602]] Rhône</s> Updated recently :*<s>[[Q15928]] Velenje</s> Updated recently :*<s>[[Q45677]] Château de Choisy</s> Updated recently :*[[Q503530]] Sioma Ngwezi National Park :*<s>[[Q499550]] Smith Islands National Park</s> Updated recently :*<s>[[Q503518]] Lower Zambezi National Park</s> Updated recently :*<s>[[Q150]] French</s> Updated recently :*[[Q404]] HTTP 404 :*<s>[[Q42397345]] 307 Temporary Redirect</s> Updated recently :*[[Q38897603]] Observations on urethral infection in the male. :*[[Q379519]] Mid-Autumn Festival :*<s>[[Q45470]] Sasuke Inari Shrine</s> Updated recently :*<s>[[Q372380]] Katori Jingū</s> Updated recently :*[[Q385407]] Ōmi Jingū :*[[Q482065]] Atsuta Jingū :*[[Q521319]] Takekoma Inari Shrine :*[[Q631373]] Kashii-gū :*[[Q5151]] month :*[[Q444]] Lech Wałęsa :*[[Q555]] Rachel Maddow :*[[Q999]] astatine :*[[Q461391]] Gavin Newsom :*[[Q868]] Aristotle :*[[Q9181]] Abraham :*[[Q91]] Abraham Lincoln :*[[Q3783]] Amazon :*[[Q10987]] honey :*[[Q11663]] weather :*[[Q884]] South Korea :*[[Q7235]] Sophocles :*[[Q11002]] sugar :*[[Q376]] clock :*[[Q11391]] ultraviolet radiation :*[[Q9358]] Friedrich Nietzsche :*[[Q7317]] Giuseppe Verdi :*<s>[[Q13217298]] Giza Necropolis</s> Updated recently :*[[Q2487]] Thirty Years' War :*[[Q8269]] The Tale of Genji :*[[Q9438]] Thomas Aquinas :*[[Q8743]] Thomas Edison :*[[Q12514]] Three Gorges Dam :*<s>[[Q80]] Tim Berners-Lee</s> Updated recently :*[[Q8736]] Treaty of Versailles :*[[Q8467]] Umar ibn Al-Khattāb :*[[Q8740]] Vietnam War :*[[Q7355]] Yellow River :*[[Q11205]] arithmetic :*[[Q6206]] capitalism :*[[Q573]] day :*<s>[[Q8047]] enzyme</s> Updated recently :*[[Q8597]] Akbar :*[[Q8409]] Alexander the Great :*[[Q7850]] Chinese :*[[Q8275]] Iliad :*[[Q37660]] South China Sea :*<s>[[Q313]] Venus</s> Updated recently :*[[Q362]] World War II :*[[Q12078]] cancer :*[[Q199804]] chronic obstructive pulmonary disease :*[[Q8142]] currency :*[[Q7430]] deoxyribonucleic acid :*[[Q12493]] dome :*[[Q2095]] food :*[[Q937]] Albert Einstein :*[[Q12104]] Avena sativa :*[[Q612]] Dubai :*[[Q905]] Franz Kafka :*<s>[[Q5588]] Frida Kahlo</s> Deleted and recreated by an other user :*[[Q125851781]] Fâtih Sultan Mehemmed Han :*[[Q7742]] Louis XIV of France :*[[Q5816]] Mao Zedong :*[[Q1218]] Jerusalem :*[[Q12554]] Middle Ages :*[[Q517]] Napoleon :*[[Q5599]] Peter Paul Rubens :*[[Q5577]] Salvador Dalí :*[[Q12099]] Secale cereale :*[[Q9316]] Sikhism :*[[Q933]] South Pole :*<s>[[Q254]] Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart</s> Deleted and recreated by an other user :*[[Q9683]] Tang dynasty :*[[Q9121]] atom :*[[Q5322]] capacitor :*[[Q7164]] World Bank :*[[Q3559]] comet :*[[Q6186]] communism :*[[Q258]] South Africa :*[[Q317]] dictatorship :*[[Q11651]] electric current :*[[Q8162]] linguistics :*[[Q11468]] nanotechnology :*[[Q8461]] racism :*[[Q9165]] soul :*[[Q287]] wood :*[[Q6388]] swimming :*<s>[[Q12214]] smallpox</s> Updated recently :*[[Q9794]] reggae :*[[Q7380]] primate :*[[Q11372]] physical chemistry :*<s>[[Q9404]] nervous system</s> Updated recently :*[[Q382441]] marine mammal :*[[Q3]] life :*[[Q11028]] information :*[[Q7075]] library :*[[Q1072]] heart :*[[Q11364]] hormone :*[[Q8458]] human rights :*[[Q8492]] juice :*[[Q82571]] linear algebra :*[[Q12800]] machine gun :*[[Q12167]] malnutrition :*[[Q10990]] meat :*[[Q7269]] monarchy :*[[Q11426]] metal :*[[Q6235]] nationalism :*[[Q12739]] nuclear power :*<s>[[Q11472]] paper</s> Updated recently :*<s>[[Q12195]] poliomyelitis</s> Updated recently :*[[Q10998]] potato :*[[Q7372]] shark :*[[Q5916]] spaceflight :*[[Q42527]] spice :*[[Q7553]] translation :*[[Q808]] virus :*[[Q8072]] volcano :*[[Q12876]] tank :*[[Q8188]] syllable :*[[Q10737]] suicide :*[[Q1511]] Richard Wagner :*[[Q7315]] Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky :*[[Q11518]] Pythagorean theorem :*[[Q11451199]] List of Shikinaisha in Aki Province :*[[Q11379]] energy :*[[Q9103]] female breast :*[[Q11435]] liquid :*[[Q86]] headache :*[[Q11573]] metre :*[[Q8495]] milk :*[[Q11009]] nut :*[[Q5994]] piano :*[[Q11474]] plastic :*[[Q11423]] mass :*[[Q11190]] medicine :*[[Q9492]] probability :*[[Q9465]] ethics :*[[Q619]] Nicolaus Copernicus :*[[Q1399]] Niccolò Machiavelli :*[[Q9049]] Noam Chomsky :*<s>[[Q332]] Neptune</s> Updated recently :*[[Q7176]] Naguib Mahfouz :*[[Q5592]] Michelangelo :*[[Q5513]] Lake Baikal :*[[Q5679]] Lord Byron :*[[Q7071]] Li Bai :*[[Q7259]] Ada Lovelace :*[[Q7172]] League of Arab States :*[[Q5879]] Johann Wolfgang von Goethe :*[[Q169470]] physicist :*[[Q719665]] Inari :*[[Q276944]] Ōkuninushi :*[[Q386563]] Ōyamatsumi :*[[Q1474187]] Watatsumi :*[[Q352]] Adolf Hitler :*[[Q7251]] Alan Turing :*[[Q5484]] Caspian Sea :*[[Q9592]] Catholic Church :*<s>[[Q160]] Cetacea</s> Updated recently :*[[Q3044]] Charlemagne :*[[Q7207]] Elizabeth I of England :*[[Q181765]] Holy Roman Emperor :*[[Q12138]] Gregorian calendar :*[[Q9089]] Hinduism :*[[Q7226]] Joan of Arc :*[[Q9317]] John Maynard Keynes :*[[Q5603]] Andy Warhol :*[[Q1357]] Araneae :*[[Q1828555]] Arabic script :*[[Q5685]] Anton Chekhov :*[[Q748]] Buddhism :*[[Q500]] Citrus × limon :*[[Q3503]] Congo :*[[Q8413]] Constantine the Great :*<s>[[Q1043]] Carl Linnaeus</s> Updated recently :*[[Q303]] Elvis Presley :*[[Q9130]] Erwin Schrödinger :*[[Q8007]] Franklin Delano Roosevelt :*[[Q5432]] Francisco Goya :*[[Q5089]] Ganges :*[[Q8778]] Galen :*[[Q9235]] Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel :*[[Q720]] Genghis Khan :*<s>[[Q188]] German</s> Updated recently :*[[Q7895]] reproductive system :*[[Q15969]] Jean Améry :*[[Q20925]] 1986 Belgian Grand Prix :*[[Q96221]] Heinrich Ehrhardt :*[[Q77534]] Doris Pack :*[[Q454]] peace :*[[Q5251735]] defuzzification :*[[Q11408]] magnetic field :*[[Q9368]] liver :*[[Q9620]] nerve :*[[Q11756]] prehistory :*[[Q851]] Saudi Arabia :*[[Q9215]] Sigmund Freud :*[[Q332062]] Sorghum bicolor :*[[Q9202]] Statue of Liberty :*[[Q1049]] Sudan :*[[Q35355]] Sumer :*[[Q8251]] The Art of War :*[[Q1071]] geography :*[[Q5325]] inductor :*[[Q205]] infinity :*[[Q12140]] medication :*[[Q627]] nitrogen :*[[Q12802]] nuclear weapon :*[[Q569]] beryllium :*<s>[[Q618]] boron</s> Deleted and recreated by an other user :*[[Q650]] fluorine :*[[Q654]] neon :*<s>[[Q658]] sodium</s> Deleted and recreated by an other user :*[[Q663]] aluminium :*[[Q670]] silicon :*[[Q682]] sulfur :*<s>[[Q706]] calcium</s> Deleted and recreated by an other user :*[[Q722]] vanadium :*[[Q725]] chromium :*[[Q731]] manganese :*[[Q677]] iron :*[[Q740]] cobalt :*[[Q744]] nickel :*[[Q758]] zinc :*[[Q1304]] livermorium :*[[Q1103]] iodine :*[[Q1108]] caesium :*[[Q888]] krypton :*[[Q938]] strontium :*[[Q941]] yttrium :*[[Q1046]] niobium :*[[Q1053]] molybdenum :*[[Q1054]] technetium :*[[Q1086]] ruthenium :*[[Q1087]] rhodium :*[[Q1090]] silver :*[[Q1094]] indium :*[[Q1099]] antimony :*[[Q7159]] African Union :*[[Q9546]] Al-Ghazali :*[[Q5580]] Albrecht Dürer :*[[Q7374]] Alfred Hitchcock :*[[Q727]] Amsterdam :*<s>[[Q1340]] Antonio Vivaldi</s> Deleted and recreated by an other user :*[[Q7298]] Antonín Dvořák :*[[Q10872]] Archaea :*[[Q8589]] Ashoka :*[[Q8018]] Augustine of Hippo :*[[Q7768]] Association of Southeast Asian Nations :*[[Q1486]] Buenos Aires :*[[Q9045]] Chanakya Kautilya :*[[Q2042]] Charles de Gaulle :*[[Q882]] Charlie Chaplin :*[[Q7322]] Christopher Columbus :*[[Q81513]] Citrus :*[[Q8209]] Cyrillic script :*[[Q1067]] Dante Alighieri :*[[Q7939]] El Niño :*[[Q613]] Emirate of Dubai :*[[Q8272]] Epic of Gilgamesh :*[[Q115]] Ethiopia :*[[Q8747]] Euclid :*[[Q5683]] Geoffrey Chaucer :*[[Q8229]] Latin script :*<s>[[Q4918]] Mediterranean Sea</s> Updated recently :*[[Q25326]] Mollusca :*[[Q9458]] Muhammad :*[[Q5185]] Nematoda :*[[Q11379325]] Izawa Shrine :*[[Q11379739]] Imari Shrine :*[[Q575650]] Rust :*<s>[[Q34010]] Haskell</s> Updated recently :*<s>[[Q978185]] TypeScript</s> Updated recently :*[[Q479833]] batch file :*[[Q42979]] BASIC :*[[Q131140]] COBOL :*[[Q648619]] F# :*[[Q334879]] Erlang :*<s>[[Q83303]] Fortran</s> Updated recently :*[[Q2613697]] Julia :*[[Q207316]] Lua :*[[Q212587]] OCaml :*[[Q840410]] PowerShell :*[[Q235086]] Smalltalk :*[[Q17147733]] Swift :*[[Q582706]] Israeli settlement :*[[Q1107129]] sōja :*[[Q127866012]] A Simple Example for Linear Partial Differential Equations and Its Solution Using the Method of Separation of Variables :*[[Q30249683]] Attention Is All You Need :*[[Q210907]] Haida Gwaii :*[[Q9876]] Vught :*[[Q13489381]] effective altruism :*[[Q82945199]] Alfréd von Adda :*[[Q114133712]] Evaluating the biological validity of European river typology systems with least disturbed benthic macroinvertebrate communities :*[[Q68271926]] Spectroscopic evidence of infall and outflow around intermediate high-mass YSOs in the Mon OB1 dark cloud :*[[Q63308014]] (222315) 2000 ST367 :*[[Q50082993]] Comparison of the applicability of Demirjian and Willems methods for dental age estimation in children from the Thrace region, Turkey. :*[[Q31266481]] Cerro Guayaquil :*[[Q4180914]] Test d'évaluation du français :*[[Q12171]] menstruation :*[[Q8065]] natural disaster :*[[Q12184]] pandemic :*[[Q8183]] phoneme :*[[Q67404404]] Response of the rabbit vas deferens in vivo to vasoactive drugs :*[[Q8070]] tsunami :*[[Q7283]] terrorism :*[[Q139491990]] JEPA :*[[Q118876059]] Claude :*[[Q116758847]] Anthropic :*[[Q112508731]] Blake Lemoine : [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:18, 18 July 2026 (UTC) ::Some are okay. I clicked on two, and IMO both should be kept: [[Q188]] German, [[Q3503]] Congo (River). So I think we need to go through them not just mass delete. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:13, 18 July 2026 (UTC) :::Those 2 are only one sentence, are using a conversion from string or monolingual text to HTML and are therefor not good to be used as example. I think it is better to delete them. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:15, 18 July 2026 (UTC) :::I'd be happy to hear other opinions on this kind of short stub with older functions. For now I'll concentrate on deleting those that don't even meet that level of viability. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 03:07, 27 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Unless if they are update and improve very soon, I also think it's better to delete them quickly (obviously with no prejudice to recreation): they don't bring anything and they give a very unfaithful representation of what AW is (especially now with the RFC or the Wikimania, where many people were telling me things along the line of "oh so it's a tool to make one or two - bad - sentences"...). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 09:06, 27 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I marked the articles that have been update recently, so they slould not be deleted as part of this request. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:40, 27 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::There are also some lists articles that have been edited twice: ::::::* [[Q11622280]] ::::::* [[Q11611527]] ::::::* [[Q11381490]] ::::::* [[Q11453224]] ::::::* [[Q11387367]] ::::::* [[Q11611572]] ::::::[[User:Autom|Autom]] ([[User talk:Autom|talk]]) 18:25, 27 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::Do you mean "to be deleted as well"? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:00, 27 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::{{done}} these --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 03:43, 12 August 2026 (UTC) == Articles created by User:BigKrow == Articles created by @[[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] do not have any substance: [[Q668755]] Bob Burnquist, [[Q37492190]] Musty and [[Q267298]] battery. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:15, 30 July 2026 (UTC) :{{done}} --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:24, 12 August 2026 (UTC) == Test article == [[Q27318]], literally named test, but using QID for tests/exams. No useful content. [[User:Feedmepaperr|Feedmepaperr]] ([[User talk:Feedmepaperr|talk]]) 02:23, 31 July 2026 (UTC) :{{done}} --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:26, 12 August 2026 (UTC) == Auto created articles using [[f:Z26955]] (DO NOT USE) SPO sentence (singulars in present) == I request that the following auto created aricles of @[[User:Immanuelle|User:Immanuelle]] using [[f:Z26955]] (DO NOT USE) SPO sentence (singulars in present) to be deleted: *[[Q9585]] Shia Islam *[[Q8474]] Suleiman the Magnificent *[[Q48744]] Samukawa Shrine *[[Q48378]] pulley *[[Q1057]] metabolism *[[Q40164]] lever *[[Q7347]] Great Lakes *[[Q656656]] tap *[[Q9134]] mythology *[[Q7925]] rain *[[Q780]] chicken *[[Q85810444]] transformer *[[Q5686]] Charles Dickens *[[Q4617]] Corbin Bleu *<s>[[Q1048]] Julius Caesar</s> Updated recently *[[Q11032]] newspaper *[[Q8502]] mountain *[[Q5300]] central processing unit *[[Q753]] copper *[[Q7200]] Alexander Pushkin *[[Q674]] phosphorus *[[Q622664]] University of California, San Diego *[[Q11368886]] Kuge Inari Shrine *[[Q7725]] evening *[[Q666]] number of the beast *[[Q9420]] thought *[[Q9381]] Adam Smith *[[Q5670]] Abu Nuwas *[[Q890]] Gangnam Style *[[Q1096]] tin *[[Q705154]] Niutsuhime Shrine *[[Q11591100]] saijin *[[Q79]] Egypt *[[Q1299]] The Beatles *[[Q11264]] Cuban Revolution *[[Q34932]] Brisbane *[[Q44578]] Titanic *[[Q876]] selenium *[[Q42646]] Windsor Castle *[[Q1091]] cadmium *[[Q11381872]] Sumiyoshi Shrine *[[Q991]] Fyodor Dostoyevsky *[[Q11420]] judo *[[Q35571]] Fuzhou dialect *[[Q11382]] conservation of energy *[[Q8441]] man *[[Q349]] sport *[[Q8087]] geometry *[[Q11367549]] Nakano Tenman Shrine *[[Q8066]] amino acid *[[Q43229]] organization *[[Q134556]] single *[[Q1394]] Vladimir Lenin *[[Q1038]] zirconium *[[Q11416]] gambling *[[Q837]] Nepal *[[Q339]] Pluto *[[Q573954]] University of Limerick *[[Q35378]] Bac Mòr *[[Q243]] Eiffel Tower *[[Q38076]] McDonald's *[[Q5511]] Lake Tanganyika *[[Q12128]] dentistry *[[Q5891]] philosophy *[[Q160236]] Metropolitan Museum of Art *[[Q1631]] Édith Piaf *[[Q9268]] Judaism *[[Q11557476]] Ichinomiya Asama Shrine *[[Q703633]] Hikawa Shrine *[[Q1653]] Danube *[[Q12870]] explosive chemicals *[[Q11033]] mass media *[[Q15433043]] Moungi Bawendi *[[Q3551]] Rabat *[[Q1867]] Taipei *[[Q6722]] Carl Friedrich Gauss *[[Q9312]] Immanuel Kant *[[Q5597]] Raphael *[[Q12506]] Hagia Sophia *[[Q36600]] The Hague *[[Q5809]] Che Guevara *[[Q77]] Uruguay *[[Q8514]] desert *[[Q6527]] Jean-Jacques Rousseau *[[Q11772]] Ancient Greece *[[Q7946]] mineral [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:53, 1 August 2026 (UTC) == Template:Support == [[Q5056]] is an article made using a QID used exclusively for templates. I cannot connect it to Wikidata because that would involve delinking [[Template:Support]], which is what this QID is meant for. I don't know if it's possible to also just make it impossible to make articles for things like this but that'd be helpful. [[User:Feedmepaperr|Feedmepaperr]] ([[User talk:Feedmepaperr|talk]]) 13:07, 2 August 2026 (UTC) :{{done}} --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:11, 9 August 2026 (UTC) == 1981–82 Western Football League == * [[Q4580255]] Created by a cross-wiki spammer. No meaningful content. [[User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|<span class="skin-invert" style="color:black;font-family:Monotype Corsiva,sans-serif;font-size:110%;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal">NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh</span>]] 17:59, 3 August 2026 (UTC) :{{vote delete}} Not needed. [[User:Jianhui67|Jianhui67]] ([[User talk:Jianhui67|talk]]) 03:44, 4 August 2026 (UTC) :{{done}} --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC) == Wiki == * [[Q171]] (Wiki) poor attempt of an article. No meaningfull content. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:30, 6 August 2026 (UTC) *:{{done}} --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:07, 9 August 2026 (UTC) == mammal == * [[Q7377]] "Mammal is a Vertebrata." @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] if the only function gives grammatically unsound output, please can you just add it as a (failing) test on the function itself, rather than making a whole article to show the failure. I've had to delete a whole lot of earlier experiments (see above), and I'm concerned that if you don't invest in each article you make, we're going to have to go through a lot of yours too. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 03:51, 12 August 2026 (UTC) == commune of France == * [[Q484170]]: "It is a commune, electoral unit, territorial collectivity of France, LAU 2, fourth-level administrative division and fifth-level administrative division." @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] this sentence doesn't really make a lot of sense. I think auto-functions like [[:f:Z39177]] should only be used when their output is acceptable (in at least one language!), otherwise we should invest editing effort to customise what we want to say. (Or wait until there is a better function available.) --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:05, 12 August 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that was a first try (preview does not work on my side). I was on the way of correcting that when the Internet died yesterday. It's up again so I will improve them now. I'm using them as test items as you do with [[Q408]] (by the way I'm also improving the French functions and lexemes using this article as a basis). I would suggest to use the talk page in these cases and not RfD, I think it might more fit the international wiki ''étiquette.'' Or maybe we could have a template or a function mimicking <nowiki>{{in use}}</nowiki>? Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 11:15, 12 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{withdrawn}} Okay, I'm glad you were not planning to leave it that way. Sorry that you felt bringing it here was impolite. To note in-use, my best suggestion at the moment would be [[:f:Z32220]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:58, 12 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks! Do you think it would be worth creating an actual function or a function derived from [[f:Z32220]] that would indicate more clearly the article is currently worked on? And where would be the best place to discuss that? (if you think that's needed, cause I can also just go with it). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:12, 12 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Go for it if you want to use it. I think you'll be the first person using it. It might catch on? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:15, 12 August 2026 (UTC) == Blank, test, meaningless, and nonsensical pages == We should really do something about the pages that only use something like [[f:Z26039]] (subject is instance of). These pages provide no substance, are without references, and add to the perception that AW is a half-baked mess. Moreover, many pages by Jsamwrites should be deleted because they are clear tests of his new functions. There should be an actual deletion reason added to [[Abstract Wikipedia:Deletion policy]] which includes any pages created to test a specific function with no clear intent to improve it post-creation. We need ''less'' pages that are ''higher'' quality. That 2,031 number we see on the main page is full of useless pages like these. All of these were pulled from [[Special:ShortPages]]. '''Completely blank pages:''' * [[Q212815]] * [[Q18395344]] * [[Q37492190]] * [[Q135041278]] * [[Q138503695]] ''(despite being redlinks the above pages actually do exist, but are blank)'' * [[Q20053443]] * [[Q138005203]] * [[Q15718485]] * [[Q3957]] * [[Q79037]] * [[Q97169030]] * [[Q140303820]] * [[Q140627851]] * [[Q6250]] * [[Q139424852]] * [[Q597307]] * [[Q13194720]] (singular link to enwiki) * [[Q115632178]] (singular link to enwiki) * [[Q115632204]] (singular link to enwiki) * [[Q137974879]] (singular link to enwiki) * [[Q7701156]] * [[Q2402748]] (just an image) * [[Q124354356]] (just an image) * [[Q65445677]] * [[Q307474]] (just an image) * [[Q48306]] (just an image) '''Monolingual text:''' * [[Q2372824]] (monolingual Russian) * [[Q124710391]] (monolingual English) * [[Q139891201]] (monolingual English) * [[Q140237703]] (monolingual English) '''Pages with no substantial content other than an infobox/table:'''<br /> <small>I'm not including articles that have an infobox that actually includes information about the subject. These are just navigation boxes.</small> * [[Q17422]] * [[Q17900]] * [[Q968159]] * [[Q397469]] * [[Q200034]] * [[Q6517455]] * [[Q1092377]] * [[Q64214281]] * [[Q64605672]] * [[Q85751139]] * [[Q64605651]] * [[Q113071731]] '''Test/nonsensical/useless pages:''' * [[Q102]] (article subject is a word. very good content here) * [[Q8216]] (an alphabet is an alphabet. amazing) * [[Q5148741]] (a person is a human. good to know) * [[Q1357]] (article subject is a taxon, without indication which) * [[Q16035842]] (hearing loss is a hearing disorder. stating the obvious) * [[Q18123741]] (infectious disease is a type of disease. repeating itself) * [[Q3246016]] (for sure just a test page) * [[Q85781149]] (same as above) * [[Q3124]] (same as above) * [[Q3045]] (same as above) * [[Q186030]] (the article content is "Contemporary art is a .") * [[Q982364]] (completely meaningless) [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 05:17, 12 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] since he was mentioned. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 05:21, 12 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes, my apologies. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 05:56, 12 August 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] Personally, I disagree with deleting these pages, especially considering that the project is still in its early stages. While adding a relevant image may seem simple to those of us with a technical background, it is a significant barrier for many other contributors. The same applies to pages that currently consist of a basic "is a" classification sentence. Shouldn't these be viewed as opportunities for improvement? Even a simple sentence stating that something is "a human" or "a taxon" holds foundational value for certain contributors. :: ::"We need fewer pages of higher quality" is a noble ambition, but it falls short when we have so few functions across such a vast number of domains. :: ::To help address this, I have carefully created 31 functions covering domains like Geography, People, Software, and Programming Languages (a complete list is available [[f:User:Jsamwrites#Sentences|here]]). :: ::Regarding the personal part of your message: as you can see from the link, every new function is designed to improve existing articles. You can verify this by looking at [[f:Special:FunctionUsage|function usage]] alongside the creation dates of these pages. Developing a new function takes time—especially given our commitment to multilinguality and the current lack of an API for creation and modification. :: ::Even after all these years, Wikipedia still relies heavily on the concept of "stub articles." We shouldn't prevent contributors from creating basic pages or categories, especially when we don't yet have stub templates to flag them for expansion. :: ::At this early stage, our focus should be on encouraging contributors across different domains—by expanding into new areas, rather than deleting their work. What may seem simple to some of us is often a meaningful contribution to the original creator. ::Thanks @[[User:99of9|99of9]] for pinging me for such an important topic of discussion. ::[[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:04, 12 August 2026 (UTC) :::Hi John, I'm very sorry if I came off frustrated, especially in the test pages section. I've had a long day and I'm tired, rushing my writing without fleshing out thoughts. :::I originally made this list of pages for deletion for the blank pages after taking a look at [[Special:ShortPages]] (all the bullets before the monolingual text section), but as you can, see it has since expanded. Regarding the short articles, I'm mainly concerned with the ones that were created in the opening weeks of AW, the editor has left, and the article has remained incorrect and broken. The only articles in this post that I truly want to delete are those - the rest are up for discussion. :::My thought process about why I want a lot of pages to be deleted is due to the closure discussions over at meta and enwiki. While much of the argument there is seemingly done in bad faith, and I've been increasingly frustrated due to that, they do rightfully point out that many of the two thousand articles are subpar, containing obvious grammatical or factual errors. I agree that many of these pages hold potential for expansion - from my experience, contributors would rather add to an existing article than create an entire one. It's just that as things stand, the quality of these pages bring down the reputation and quality of AW. An admin at a local wiki may be hesitant to include AW pages if they see this content. :::This is ultimately the reason why any other wiki has deletion policies - many of these articles would quality for the English Wikipedia's [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Speedy_deletion#A1._No_context A1 speedy deletion criteria]. The other option, of course, is to improve these pages, but that seems unlikely to me given the amount of pages, the amount of editors, and the effort required to do this. But hey, you could say the same thing about Wikipedia when it came out. :::Another issue comes with the lack of categorization or maintenance templates. I've raised issue with the WMF over at the phabricator, but they seem as willing to implement these as they would be to implement wikitext as a whole. Given this issue, it is hard for editors to even ''find'' these pages to begin with, without browsing the new pages, recent changes, or all pages special pages. :::<br /> :::I'm heading to bed after this, and will not be able to respond until the afternoon tomorrow. What my ultimate thoughts are is that we should remove a lot of the most ''obvious'', ''damaging'' articles. Many can and should stay, especially those that have room for growth as you mentioned. I think this should be done on a case-by-case basis, but I'm not sure how best to describe it. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:50, 12 August 2026 (UTC) :::Surely you don't disagree with deleting *some* of these? Even the blank ones?? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:01, 12 August 2026 (UTC) ::::We're dealing with many good-faith people trying out. I think the focus should be on "how we don't discourage these people from editing Abstract Wikipedia". The other focus is "how we convince people clinking on random article that Abstract Wikipedia is not a complete nonsense". I would be many possibilities for that, three examples : ::::* Deleting blank and monolingual articles but sending a nice message to the users "thank you for trying out, we're removing for now cause we want to focus on a fewer number of articles, here are the good practices if you want to try again". ::::* Just sending a nice message with the good practices, offer help (on-wiki, on another channel?) and reconsider the problem in a few weeks ::::* Block the creation of new articles from now on to encourage people to improve the existing ones (but we also should offer help for that and a better space to experiment with) ::::The important thing here is: how do we care of lost new users (it is a complicated project to understand, took me a few days and I was familiar with Wikifunctions since 2023, with Wikidata since 2012, and with Wikipedia and code since 2010...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:25, 12 August 2026 (UTC) :::::Yes, there are lots of new users around at the moment, and it's great to think about how to encourage them. I'll add another idea: rewrite [[Help:How to create an article]] using html functions. Feel free to send nice messages, but please don't require the deleting admin to do that, there are already too many per day for me to keep up with. I oppose blocking the creation of new articles. I think people like to work on what they are connected with. In the last few days I've seen some great fresh starts. E.g. [[Q5753]]. I don't want to discourage new articles, I want to see bad articles either improved or removed. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:37, 12 August 2026 (UTC) == Q110268499? == This living person’s notability is not self-evident. Online sources seem to link back to the person’s own content. As a primary source, I don’t find [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Henning-Schmidgen/publication/399101654_Muntadher_Saleh_and_Leonardo_da_Vinci_The_Neo-Renaissance_of_the_Tigris_and_the_Engineering_of_Arabic_Typography/links/694fe61627359023a010d165/Muntadher-Saleh-and-Leonardo-da-Vinci-The-Neo-Renaissance-of-the-Tigris-and-the-Engineering-of-Arabic-Typography?origin=publication_detail&_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uRG93bmxvYWQiLCJwcmV2aW91c1BhZ2UiOiJwdWJsaWNhdGlvbiJ9fQ this article convincing]. I am happy to assume good faith, but I worry about Abstract Wikipedia’s credibility too. [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Notability#Suggesting even sharper criteria|Comments on our draft policy]] suggest that we might want to see an existing Wikipedia page, and we might want to consider that a higher priority for a living person. Procedurally, when there is no such page, I think we should certainly review notability more carefully, but this is difficult without established criteria. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:44, 26 August 2026 (UTC) : Indeed there is no wikipedia article for this person, and that would a reason for deletion. : The Wikidata entry is quite extensive, but sources seem to link back to the person’s own content. : I think the creator of [[Q110268499]] is pushing images of this person on several wikis and is reverted on en.wikipedia and ar.wikipedia. His edits on fr.wikipedia, es.wikipedia and others are not (yet) reverted. It might be in good faith, but the user has a lot of issues, including AI articles. : Article on no.wikipedia wad speedily deleted on basis for AI generated, and speedily deleted several times on en.wikiquote for Not sufficiently notable. : So a lot of reasons for deletion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 22:13, 26 August 2026 (UTC) ::Thank you for the additional information. For the record, I don’t consider the absence of any Wikipedia page conclusive in itself, but I support deletion if no evidence of notability comes forward. There is little enough content [[Q110268499|there]] anyway, so I don’t see a problem with speedy deletion for low value and no links. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 22:47, 26 August 2026 (UTC) :'''Delete'''. Likely self-promotion. [[User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|<span class="skin-invert" style="color:black;font-family:Monotype Corsiva,sans-serif;font-size:110%;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal">NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh</span>]] 22:38, 26 August 2026 (UTC) :{{done}} --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 03:41, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Q313940 == * [[Q313940]] Vandalism '''解浪''' <small>[hɛ.ɾaŋ] ([[User:解浪|U]]/[[User Talk:解浪|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/解浪|C]]/[[Special:GlobalAccount/解浪|CA]])</small> 16:31, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :It looks like the vandalism has been reverted and the article is okay now? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 03:41, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::On FAQ/ko not all was reverted yet. I think I corrected the [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abstract_Wikipedia:Frequently_Asked_Questions/ko&diff=prev&oldid=16551 last one] [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:41, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes It's okay now, but it needs protection. ― '''解浪''' <small>[hɛ.ɾaŋ] ([[User:解浪|U]]/[[User Talk:解浪|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/解浪|C]]/[[Special:GlobalAccount/解浪|CA]])</small> 07:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :::Yes please protect it as it is a target of LTA vandalism. [[User:Jianhui67|Jianhui67]] ([[User talk:Jianhui67|talk]]) 03:15, 2 September 2026 (UTC) ::::{{done}} I've semi-protected it for now. Thanks everyone. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 03:19, 2 September 2026 (UTC) == [[Q929731]] == No valid abstract article. --[[User:Ameisenigel|Ameisenigel]] ([[User talk:Ameisenigel|talk]]) 18:08, 1 September 2026 (UTC) Other articles created by {{ping|User:BigKrow}} *[[Q5454630]] fish fry: Fixed English text *[[Q7369]] dolphin: Fixed English text *[[Q482964]] Depeche Mode: Only infobox *[[Q83099]] Jana Gana Mana: Only infobox *[[Q590342]] World of Tanks: Only infobox *[[Q38684]] Bay of Bengal: Only one sentence (Bay of Bengal is part of the Indian Ocean.) *[[Q959362]] gin: Only one sentence (The instance of of gin is liquor) *[[Q1499]] Uttarakhand: Only one sentence (Uttarakhand is a state of India.) *[[Q25280]] Harrisburg: Only one sentenc (The population of Harrisburg was 50,099 in 2020.) *[[Q3957]] town: Only one sentece (Town is part of the country.) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:03, 4 September 2026 (UTC) :{{done}} except for Harrisburg (two sentences now). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 01:45, 8 November 2026 (UTC) == [[Q117462830]] == Blank. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 19:09, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :{{Done|Deleted}} by 99of9 <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:37, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == [[Q939743]] == [[Q939743]] (Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe) is a result of test edits by a new user. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:09, 5 September 2026 (UTC) :I improved the article since those tests. Decent stub now? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:04, 9 September 2026 (UTC) :: OK, article can stay. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:20, 10 September 2026 (UTC) :{{withdrawn}} by OP. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 12:02, 12 September 2026 (UTC) == [[Q830149]] == This Wikidata ID is for Paris, Texas, but a number of authors appear to have gotten confused and written an article about Paris, France (Q90). Since the existing article for Q90 is much better-developed, it's probably best to delete this, providing a blank slate for anyone who wants to write an article about the correct Paris. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 20:59, 11 September 2026 (UTC) :{{Done|Deleted}} <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 12:01, 12 September 2026 (UTC) == [[Q141305964]] == I don't think we're ready for this kind of pointed BLP. There is one citation on WD, but not for all the claims, and I'm not sure it meets our expected notability standard. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:47, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :FYI @[[User:Webmaster2024|Webmaster2024]] --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:49, 23 September 2026 (UTC) ::Speedy deletion for me. He's known on the niche Internet, afaik. The risk of harm is important. We should also do something on Commons + WD probably. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 11:50, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::btw, I blanked the page for now given the risk. This is called [[:w:fr:WP:Blanchiment_de_courtoisie]] on frwiki, I don't known the standard use in other ones. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 11:52, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :sorry, I'm new to abstract wiki. I forgot that this page is about BLP [[User:Webmaster2024|Webmaster2024]] ([[User talk:Webmaster2024|talk]]) 20:33, 23 September 2026 (UTC) ::no worries @[[User:Webmaster2024|Webmaster2024]] if that was with a good intention! My advice would be to try out this project with a city you know, or a taxon, etc. Feel free to shout any question! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 23:00, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :{{done}} --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 22:18, 24 September 2026 (UTC) == [[Q37530492]] == {{ping|Diamondarmorstev}} This article is for family name Jupiter not the planet Jupiter, so for the wrong Q-id. The correct one is [[Q319]]. :{{Done|Deleted}} <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 06:04, 26 September 2026 (UTC) == [[Q41692]] == has only fixed English text and looks broken [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 21:45, 30 September 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 00:12, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :{{Done|Deleted}} <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 13:41, 12 October 2026 (UTC) == [[Q2393807]] == [[Q2393807]] (taquito) has only fixed English text. Reference is empty. @[[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:00, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :{{done|This has been fixed!}} [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 20:20, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == Shrines == @[[User:Immanuelle]]. Request to delete the following abstract articles about shines with less than 5 links. See the discussion at [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Notability#Even even sharper criteria]]. *[[Q135040386]] Takeihakatsuno Shrine 0 links *[[Q199699]] Tsurumine Hachiman Shrine 1 link *[[Q11258505]] Ayameike Shrine 1 link *[[Q11366822]] Nakameguro Hachiman Shrine 1 link *[[Q11367983]] Marunouchi Warei Shrine 1 link *[[Q11368256]] Maruyama Shrine (Oita) 1 link *[[Q11368529]] Inari Shrine (Misato) 1 link *[[Q11368944]] Kusanagi Shrine 1 link *[[Q11360548]] Kamitakano Shrine 1 link *[[Q11361253]] Shimoshinmei Tenso Shrine 1 link *[[Q11361528]] Shimoshiotsu Shrine 1 link *[[Q94057]] Olive Shrine 2 links *[[Q11261436]] Ogami Shrine 2 links *[[Q11366632]] Nakaōji Shrine 2 links *[[Q11368920]] Kukuhi Shrine 2 links *[[Q11360668]] Shimohara-hachiman Shrine 2 links *[[Q11360748]] Shimomasuda Shrine 2 links *[[Q11361494]] Shimodate Haguro Shrine 2 links *[[Q11380928]] Izuta Shrine 2 links *[[Q167136]] Kengun Shrine 3 links *[[Q11305182]] Samuhara Shrine 3 links *[[Q11368930]] Hisaizu Shrine 3 links *[[Q11360904]] Shimogoryō Shrine 3 links *[[Q276831]] Mitami Shrine 4 links *[[Q245834]] Nawa Shrine 4 links *[[Q246463]] Kamochi Shrine 4 links *[[Q246479]] Ikoma Shrine 4 links *[[Q246667]] Hakuto Shrine 4 links *[[Q246469]] Wakasa Shrine 4 links [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:15, 1 October 2026 (UTC) :The criteria hasn't been formally accepted, so I don't think it applies for deletion right now? [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 16:08, 1 October 2026 (UTC) ::Please reconsider as it now officially a guideline. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:38, 22 October 2026 (UTC) == [[Q174811]] == {{Ping|User:Taratarussia}} [[Q174811]] (Up) is an article with fully fixed English text. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:59, 10 October 2026 (UTC) :{{Done|Deleted}} <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 12:05, 21 October 2026 (UTC) == [[Q115223111]] == Looks like advertisement. No interwikis. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:35, 20 October 2026 (UTC) :{{done|deleted.}} [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 20:19, 23 October 2026 (UTC) == [[Q134463226]] == {{Q|Q134463226}} has only one interwiki, so not meeting our threshold described in [[AW:Notability]]. @[[User:Kehanetr|Kehanetr]] [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:04, 1 November 2026 (UTC) :Please don’t misunderstand; this wasn’t an advertisement I was simply trying to contribute while learning. Thank you for pointing out the guidelines. If it needs to be deleted, please feel free to do so. My apologies, and have a good day. [[User:Kehanetr|Kehanetr]] ([[User talk:Kehanetr|talk]]) 18:23, 1 November 2026 (UTC) ::No worries at all @[[User:Kehanetr|Kehanetr]] ! Not everyone knows the guidelines, and they are quite recent. I will let the discussion open just in case someone has a different opinion. ::If you want to experiment with a biography, I would suggest to write about a prominent figure, that minimises the risks. Happy to help! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:30, 1 November 2026 (UTC) :::I would certainly love to contribute; once I have a firm grasp of the structure of this new encyclopedia, I will do my best to prepare entries on important topics that should be included. :::Ultimately, I completely understand if the article needs to be deleted at this stage due to current guidelines. However, if the subject gains wider recognition and meets the required criteria in the future, I hope the page can be recreated. :::Thank you for your support and for guiding me through the rules. I'll leave the floor entirely to other community members who might want to share their perspectives on this matter. [[User:Kehanetr|Kehanetr]] ([[User talk:Kehanetr|talk]]) 18:51, 1 November 2026 (UTC) ::::{{Checked}}. Do not hesitate if you want to keep experimenting of if you have questions :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 18:37, 11 November 2026 (UTC) == [[Q141596121]] == No interwiki links, just a Wikidata item. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: DarkGreen">md</span>]][[User talk:Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Indigo">m.b</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Mdm.Bla|<span style="color: Maroon">la</span>]]</span> 22:49, 3 November 2026 (UTC) :{{Done|Deleted}} <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 11:09, 4 November 2026 (UTC) == [[Q1717393]] == {{Q|Q1717393}} has only one interwiki. According to our [[AW:Notability|guidelines]], that's too low for a person in the current state of the project. I feel the notability is high in Germany but low everywhere else, so AW might not be the best place. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 05:09, 5 November 2026 (UTC) == [[Q13553585]] == The content of this article is the chemical element, but the Wikidata entry Q13553585 is about the family name "Gold" instead. Further, since Q13553585 doesn't have an article (as opposed to a disambiguation page) on Wikipedia in any language, it fails the AW notability requirements. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 07:17, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :{{Done|Deleted}} <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 07:30, 11 November 2026 (UTC) 3nbccwy8o1ukq76jtfvh81jrx81ymol Template:Main page/News 10 457 25968 25067 2026-11-11T14:45:32Z Sannita (WMF) 48 update 25968 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;<translate><!--T:1--> Volunteer's Corners</translate> * <translate><!--T:2--> The next Volunteers' Corner will be at <tvar name="date-and-time"><bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 11:00 UTC on 2026-11-09]</bdi></tvar> on <tvar name="platform"><bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi></tvar> at <tvar name="link"><bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi></tvar>.</translate> * <translate><!--T:3--> The [[<tvar name="1">:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-11.webm</tvar>|most recent Volunteer's Corner]] is available on Commons.</translate> ; <translate><!--T:4--> Recent status updates about Wikifunctions</translate> <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <translate>[[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04</tvar>|2026-11-04]]: A new Type for NLG Functions?</translate> * <translate><!--T:41--> [[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30</tvar>|2026-10-30]]: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia</translate> * <translate><!--T:40--> [[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25</tvar>|2026-10-25]]: Wikiabstrak app</translate> * <translate><!--T:39--> [[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17</tvar>|2026-10-17]]: Changes in evaluator representations</translate> * <translate><!--T:37--> [[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09</tvar>|2026-10-09]]: Quarterly planning</translate> </div> <span class="plainlinks">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small"><translate><!--T:10--> More news</translate></span>]]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> 26gb1t6cygt6y8930qeikkfud4s06ms 25969 25968 2026-11-11T14:45:42Z Sannita (WMF) 48 Marked this version for translation 25969 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;<translate><!--T:1--> Volunteer's Corners</translate> * <translate><!--T:2--> The next Volunteers' Corner will be at <tvar name="date-and-time"><bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 11:00 UTC on 2026-11-09]</bdi></tvar> on <tvar name="platform"><bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi></tvar> at <tvar name="link"><bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi></tvar>.</translate> * <translate><!--T:3--> The [[<tvar name="1">:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-11.webm</tvar>|most recent Volunteer's Corner]] is available on Commons.</translate> ; <translate><!--T:4--> Recent status updates about Wikifunctions</translate> <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <translate><!--T:42--> [[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04</tvar>|2026-11-04]]: A new Type for NLG Functions?</translate> * <translate><!--T:41--> [[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30</tvar>|2026-10-30]]: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia</translate> * <translate><!--T:40--> [[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25</tvar>|2026-10-25]]: Wikiabstrak app</translate> * <translate><!--T:39--> [[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17</tvar>|2026-10-17]]: Changes in evaluator representations</translate> * <translate><!--T:37--> [[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09</tvar>|2026-10-09]]: Quarterly planning</translate> </div> <span class="plainlinks">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small"><translate><!--T:10--> More news</translate></span>]]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> q7dvkol9faiy6utcrhn86gmhzohm6gh Q7227384 0 477 26048 6646 2026-11-12T00:57:03Z Sdkb 1058 Add infobox, image, better info 26048 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q7227384", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M31029407" }, "Z36038K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z24766", "Z24766K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z24766K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37424", "Z37424K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37424K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37726", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1377182" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506398" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15140392" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z39194", "Z39194K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q486868" }, "Z39194K2": { "Z1K1": "Z40", "Z40K1": "Z41" }, "Z39194K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1994301" }, "Z39194K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47647", "Z47647K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z47647K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" }, "Z47647K3": [ "Z39328" ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q209465" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5283295" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8434" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2472587" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10682341" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11047409" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33457", "Z33457K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56291680" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2367225" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } ] } } } j7rhh3ne7pbiekhxbbixcfqv5wbkjyh 26050 26048 2026-11-12T01:26:59Z Sdkb 1058 Added notable people 26050 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q7227384", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M31029407" }, "Z36038K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z24766", "Z24766K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z24766K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37424", "Z37424K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37424K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37726", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1377182" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506398" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15140392" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z39194", "Z39194K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q486868" }, "Z39194K2": { "Z1K1": "Z40", "Z40K1": "Z41" }, "Z39194K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1994301" }, "Z39194K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47647", "Z47647K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z47647K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" }, "Z47647K3": [ "Z39328" ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q209465" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z41294", "Z41294K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q125341047" }, "Z41294K2": { "Z1K1": "Z40", "Z40K1": "Z42" }, "Z41294K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q192613" }, "Z41294K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5283295" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32123", "Z32123K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32234", "Z32234K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28922269" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4376769" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8434" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32839", "Z32839K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11298016" }, "Z32839K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q508719" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32179", "Z32179K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q145132" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10800557" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q208681" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q66763708" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q740966" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3391743" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q862237" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1930187" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56068" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2919046" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q115784320" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1827902" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4416090" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5428874" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32179", "Z32179K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q456730" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5137571" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q313246" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q6625963" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10682341" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11047409" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33457", "Z33457K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56291680" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2367225" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } ] } } } g3uhj3g0ivb1cxhogc2uw4thg6uv2n3 26051 26050 2026-11-12T01:55:47Z Sdkb 1058 Add organizations 26051 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q7227384", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M31029407" }, "Z36038K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z24766", "Z24766K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z24766K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37424", "Z37424K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37424K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37726", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1377182" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506398" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15140392" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47647", "Z47647K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z47647K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" }, "Z47647K3": [ "Z39328" ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z39194", "Z39194K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q486868" }, "Z39194K2": { "Z1K1": "Z40", "Z40K1": "Z41" }, "Z39194K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1994301" }, "Z39194K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q209465" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z41294", "Z41294K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q125341047" }, "Z41294K2": { "Z1K1": "Z40", "Z40K1": "Z42" }, "Z41294K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q192613" }, "Z41294K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5283295" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32123", "Z32123K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32234", "Z32234K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28922269" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4376769" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8434" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P5460" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32839", "Z32839K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11298016" }, "Z32839K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q508719" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32179", "Z32179K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q145132" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10800557" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q208681" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q66763708" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q740966" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3391743" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q862237" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1930187" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56068" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2919046" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q115784320" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1827902" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4416090" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5428874" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32179", "Z32179K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q456730" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5137571" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q313246" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q6625963" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10682341" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q98774402" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q877998" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7767104" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q738377" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11047409" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33457", "Z33457K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56291680" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2367225" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } ] } } } 0v13brwtya2egldmtt73fhudlh3kg07 26060 26051 2026-11-12T04:44:28Z Sdkb 1058 Add images, etc. 26060 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q7227384", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M31029407" }, "Z36038K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z24766", "Z24766K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z24766K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37424", "Z37424K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37424K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37726", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1377182" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506398" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36831", "Z36831K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15140392" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z36831K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15140392" } ] } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M30871356" }, "Z36038K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z24766", "Z24766K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q125341047" }, "Z24766K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47221", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328" ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47647", "Z47647K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z47647K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" }, "Z47647K3": [ "Z39328" ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z39194", "Z39194K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q486868" }, "Z39194K2": { "Z1K1": "Z40", "Z40K1": "Z41" }, "Z39194K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1994301" }, "Z39194K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q209465" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z48021", "Z48021K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z48018", "Z48018K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M131759131" }, "Z48018K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z48018K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q106635642" }, "Z48018K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z48018", "Z48018K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M131723687" }, "Z48018K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q483453" }, "Z48018K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q483453" }, "Z48018K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z41294", "Z41294K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q125341047" }, "Z41294K2": { "Z1K1": "Z40", "Z40K1": "Z42" }, "Z41294K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q192613" }, "Z41294K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5283295" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32123", "Z32123K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32234", "Z32234K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28922269" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4376769" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8434" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P5460" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32839", "Z32839K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11298016" }, "Z32839K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q508719" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32179", "Z32179K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q145132" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10800557" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q208681" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q66763708" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q740966" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3391743" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q862237" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1930187" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56068" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2919046" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q115784320" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1827902" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4416090" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5428874" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32179", "Z32179K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q456730" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5137571" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q313246" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q6625963" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10682341" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M92879888" }, "Z36038K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z24766", "Z24766K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7767104" }, "Z24766K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q98774402" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q877998" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7767104" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q738377" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11047409" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33457", "Z33457K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56291680" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2367225" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } ] } } } 08ato5ed4bycbnu1xb2u07w0ma4ktnz 26061 26060 2026-11-12T05:11:54Z Sdkb 1058 Linking improvements 26061 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q7227384", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M31029407" }, "Z36038K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z24766", "Z24766K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z24766K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37424", "Z37424K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37424K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37726", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1377182" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506398" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36831", "Z36831K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15140392" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z36831K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15140392" } ] } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M30871356" }, "Z36038K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z24766", "Z24766K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q125341047" }, "Z24766K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47221", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328" ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47647", "Z47647K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z47647K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" }, "Z47647K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z39194", "Z39194K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q486868" }, "Z39194K2": { "Z1K1": "Z40", "Z40K1": "Z41" }, "Z39194K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1994301" }, "Z39194K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q209465" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z48021", "Z48021K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z48018", "Z48018K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M131759131" }, "Z48018K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z48018K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q106635642" }, "Z48018K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z48018", "Z48018K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M131723687" }, "Z48018K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q483453" }, "Z48018K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q483453" }, "Z48018K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z41294", "Z41294K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q125341047" }, "Z41294K2": { "Z1K1": "Z40", "Z40K1": "Z42" }, "Z41294K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q192613" }, "Z41294K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5283295" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36831", "Z36831K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28922269" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4376769" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z36831K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" } ] } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8434" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P5460" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32839", "Z32839K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11298016" }, "Z32839K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q508719" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32179", "Z32179K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q145132" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10800557" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q208681" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q66763708" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q740966" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3391743" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q862237" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1930187" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56068" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2919046" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q115784320" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1827902" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4416090" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5428874" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32179", "Z32179K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q456730" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5137571" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q313246" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q6625963" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10682341" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M92879888" }, "Z36038K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z24766", "Z24766K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7767104" }, "Z24766K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36831", "Z36831K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q98774402" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q877998" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z36831K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7767104" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q738377" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11047409" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36831", "Z36831K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56291680" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2367225" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z36831K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" } ] } ] } } } 6cxuwypcto8ht0lkhp5zwtl1xxsf0ju 26062 26061 2026-11-12T06:24:08Z Sdkb 1058 Additional info 26062 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q7227384", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M31029407" }, "Z36038K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z24766", "Z24766K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z24766K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37424", "Z37424K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37424K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37726", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1377182" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506398" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36831", "Z36831K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15140392" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z36831K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15140392" } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2196" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M30871356" }, "Z36038K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z24766", "Z24766K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q125341047" }, "Z24766K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47221", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328" ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47647", "Z47647K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z47647K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" }, "Z47647K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z39194", "Z39194K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q486868" }, "Z39194K2": { "Z1K1": "Z40", "Z40K1": "Z41" }, "Z39194K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1994301" }, "Z39194K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47221", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328" ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q209465" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z48021", "Z48021K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z48018", "Z48018K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M131759131" }, "Z48018K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z48018K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q106635642" }, "Z48018K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z48018", "Z48018K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M131723687" }, "Z48018K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q483453" }, "Z48018K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q483453" }, "Z48018K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q125341047" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P149" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z41294", "Z41294K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q125341047" }, "Z41294K2": { "Z1K1": "Z40", "Z40K1": "Z41" }, "Z41294K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q192613" }, "Z41294K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5283295" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36831", "Z36831K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28922269" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4376769" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z36831K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" } ] } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P6589" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2403" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8434" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P5460" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P10588" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P5514" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37071", "Z37071K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37071K2": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "5" }, "Z37071K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q919978" }, "Z37071K4": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q6540832" }, "Z37071K5": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28368736" }, "Z37071K6": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P5822" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32839", "Z32839K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11298016" }, "Z32839K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q508719" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32179", "Z32179K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q145132" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10800557" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q208681" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q66763708" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q740966" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3391743" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q862237" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1930187" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56068" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2919046" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q115784320" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1827902" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4416090" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5428874" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32179", "Z32179K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q456730" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5137571" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q313246" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q6625963" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10682341" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M92879888" }, "Z36038K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z24766", "Z24766K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7767104" }, "Z24766K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36831", "Z36831K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q98774402" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q877998" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z36831K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7767104" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q738377" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2813" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11047409" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36831", "Z36831K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56291680" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2367225" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z36831K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36831", "Z36831K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28449243" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q386208" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56291680" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z36831K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56291680" } ] } ] } } } 7m5d0ey3uloyli1v8qezmuq5mjpba14 26063 26062 2026-11-12T06:51:39Z Sdkb 1058 Sentence flow improvement, more images 26063 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q7227384", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M31029407" }, "Z36038K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z24766", "Z24766K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z24766K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37424", "Z37424K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37424K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37726", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1377182" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506398" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36831", "Z36831K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15140392" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z36831K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15140392" } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2196" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M30871356" }, "Z36038K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z24766", "Z24766K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q125341047" }, "Z24766K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47221", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328" ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47647", "Z47647K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z47647K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" }, "Z47647K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z39194", "Z39194K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q486868" }, "Z39194K2": { "Z1K1": "Z40", "Z40K1": "Z41" }, "Z39194K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1994301" }, "Z39194K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47221", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328" ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q209465" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z48021", "Z48021K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z48018", "Z48018K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M131759131" }, "Z48018K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z48018K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q106635642" }, "Z48018K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z48018", "Z48018K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M131723687" }, "Z48018K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q483453" }, "Z48018K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q483453" }, "Z48018K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q125341047" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P149" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z41294", "Z41294K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q125341047" }, "Z41294K2": { "Z1K1": "Z40", "Z40K1": "Z41" }, "Z41294K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q192613" }, "Z41294K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5283295" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36831", "Z36831K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28922269" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4376769" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z36831K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" } ] } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z42543", "Z42543K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z42543K2": { "Z1K1": "Z40", "Z40K1": "Z41" }, "Z42543K3": [ "Z6092", { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P6589" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2403" } ], "Z42543K4": [ "Z6092" ], "Z42543K5": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q192613" }, "Z42543K6": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8434" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M45011434" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q29957908" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P5460" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P10588" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P5514" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37071", "Z37071K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37071K2": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "5" }, "Z37071K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q919978" }, "Z37071K4": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q6540832" }, "Z37071K5": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28368736" }, "Z37071K6": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P5822" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32839", "Z32839K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11298016" }, "Z32839K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q508719" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32179", "Z32179K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q145132" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10800557" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q208681" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q66763708" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q740966" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3391743" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q862237" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1930187" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56068" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2919046" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q115784320" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1827902" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4416090" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5428874" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32179", "Z32179K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q456730" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5137571" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47841", "Z47841K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q313246" }, "Z47841K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q6625963" } ], "Z47841K3": [ "Z6091" ], "Z47841K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10682341" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M92879888" }, "Z36038K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z24766", "Z24766K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7767104" }, "Z24766K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36831", "Z36831K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q98774402" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q877998" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z36831K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7767104" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q738377" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2813" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11047409" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M31013245" }, "Z36038K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z24766", "Z24766K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q21140826" }, "Z24766K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36831", "Z36831K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56291680" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2367225" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z36831K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36831", "Z36831K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28449243" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q386208" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56291680" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z36831K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56291680" } ] } ] } } } az29e0zfrs91gpecoby51fauxq2fw1g Q148 0 577 26046 23139 2026-11-11T23:53:58Z Lemmepassmyexamsbigyahu 9883 Added the flag of the People's Republic of China 26046 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q148", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M436175" }, "Z36038K2": "Flag of the People's Republic of China" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38956", "Z38956K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38956K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3624078" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q27231" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q956" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5119" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18111" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2285706" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15031" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q48352" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q727694" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q23492" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q39099" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8142" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } b43xfe1yy33o6adq0462bog4bmdrfo5 26058 26046 2026-11-12T04:36:26Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 bold 26058 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q148", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M436175" }, "Z36038K2": "Flag of the People's Republic of China" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38956", "Z38956K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38956K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37726", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q148" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3624078" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q27231" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q148" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q956" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5119" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18111" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2285706" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15031" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q48352" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q727694" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q23492" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q39099" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8142" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 5e4389dgc3hc0468uos77fgbe2renhc 26059 26058 2026-11-12T04:38:35Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 simplification 26059 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q148", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M436175" }, "Z36038K2": "Flag of the People's Republic of China" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38956", "Z38956K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38956K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37726", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q148" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3624078" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q27231" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q148" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q956" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5119" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18111" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2285706" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15031" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q48352" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q727694" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q23492" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q39099" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8142" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } cmsvaaspk7kc926gb5rkg9d3t1pamca Q94057 0 766 25939 2654 2026-11-11T12:43:24Z HenkvD 1447 + infobox 25939 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q94057", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } } ] } } } f3wxos2yod1lym4b7uebvdd8aqik9gm Q167136 0 781 25915 2681 2026-11-11T12:11:38Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25915 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q167136", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M102375566" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } } ] } } } bm49fk1f8iqi7391z2mvfsc6egzafkb Q199699 0 788 25934 2689 2026-11-11T12:35:37Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25934 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q199699", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M42659263" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } } ] } } } qru4zy6p2lm9kwstat89aagwjprul0f Q11258505 0 792 25933 2698 2026-11-11T12:34:27Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25933 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11258505", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M12733119" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11059454" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } kt1yw547ddfjav4i0kjs5nkr2llsh5u Q11261436 0 794 25923 24963 2026-11-11T12:21:12Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25923 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11261436", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M15807480" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q644201" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } oj79i1l8711ruslcfcoamx2nddu0fwq Q11305182 0 795 25914 2706 2026-11-11T12:08:39Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25914 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11305182", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M10962414" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2842779" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } p27d6ru32sfu3kbf6m9r4x4pdgrthc2 Q11366632 0 813 25922 2740 2026-11-11T12:20:11Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25922 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11366632", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M198362506" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q813858" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 0syvfkt5hakpdd176h6pwmqku7wnh2x Q11366822 0 814 25921 6998 2026-11-11T12:19:15Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox - duplicate info 25921 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11366822", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M5773271" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q233903" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26039", "Z26039K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26039K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11390939" }, "Z26039K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q317997" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1762010" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q261637" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1762010" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } ] } } } 0kaytjh9z7rxx4lwpooute33lbyg9hn Q11367983 0 815 25932 2744 2026-11-11T12:33:37Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25932 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11367983", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M7383878" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11467754" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } d0l797mtum59c1o9cxex8yz8l855wzv Q11368256 0 816 25931 2746 2026-11-11T12:32:41Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25931 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11368256", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M103275623" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q261637" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 029lqfdp9h6daaduueajnr1c4ss9lhb Q11368529 0 817 25930 2748 2026-11-11T12:31:36Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25930 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11368529", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M6622803" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3080728" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } sevg8kh2eaprasqf30mwjosiuwsizz7 Q11368920 0 819 25920 11947 2026-11-11T12:17:33Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25920 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11368920", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M9419879" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32123", "Z32123K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32234", "Z32234K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, " ", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10749920" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } ] } } } fun5l32qctdqc0ov1zn8uppkopbrkbo Q11368930 0 820 25913 12664 2026-11-11T12:07:50Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25913 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11368930", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M55896950" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32123", "Z32123K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32234", "Z32234K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, " ", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q276944" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } ] } } } herdhwaj8rc6v59ntveao5oosonhzvx Q11368944 0 821 25929 24093 2026-11-11T12:29:59Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25929 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11368944", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M116721277" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q461258" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } e31hwa15oqu8elk9460ft1lbd4q8cjy Q11369003 0 822 25919 2759 2026-11-11T12:16:40Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25919 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11369003", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M56358717" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q272993" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } kixdikybmvvgcyyercgb0i7esct9tr9 Q245834 0 828 25910 2771 2026-11-11T12:04:27Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25910 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q245834", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M12480451" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11415325" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 540iq4j2mm2gouidagbtob7tyf8wt3t Q246463 0 832 25909 12674 2026-11-11T12:03:19Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25909 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q246463", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M3180400" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32123", "Z32123K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32234", "Z32234K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, " ", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10939047" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } ] } } } mwi439fb1joaehi30yg8t2sxcvpq7g0 Q246469 0 844 25912 2805 2026-11-11T12:06:55Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25912 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q246469", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M4821883" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q478504" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 2x42kjoyczuf24umafdyu0yxl30zkj0 Q276831 0 874 25911 14359 2026-11-11T12:05:20Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25911 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q276831", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M4566231" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2564508" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } c7425fr246mgbmntgp97zeu24a6dnn1 Q11360548 0 935 25938 3070 2026-11-11T12:40:16Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox - duplicate info 25938 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11360548", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M106345737" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q868971" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q455602" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 7nqenemuwei1uzhofndzpzds468irrd Q11360577 0 936 25937 3071 2026-11-11T12:39:04Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox - duplicate info 25937 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11360577", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M45901434" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q780521" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q261637" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 8vbbmzchvk322pxtk5i2tfmebuy0ir9 Q11360668 0 937 25928 3072 2026-11-11T12:28:10Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox - duplicate info 25928 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11360668", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M25073351" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q819639" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q261637" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } swhvll15lxc8hq5gucdo7568769serp Q11360748 0 938 25927 3073 2026-11-11T12:27:04Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox - duplicate info 25927 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11360748", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M25551112" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q642018" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q455602" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } ssib19eqgq0zbl9eeb5qye2l86mml9x Q11360904 0 939 25916 3074 2026-11-11T12:13:46Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox - duplicate info 25916 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11360904", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1075455" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1062686" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 2yuwwkt4heu94otb9zm4o677n45syqo 25917 25916 2026-11-11T12:14:13Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25917 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11360904", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M4252478" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1075455" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1062686" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 25pd5g1c9xtetzoba182dlap2yejf0z Q11361253 0 940 25926 3075 2026-11-11T12:25:45Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox - duplicate info 25926 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11361253", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M8011733" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q233495" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q455602" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 1glzqwvpgvtfxggx4hafnh4gw0yo1n4 Q11361384 0 941 25936 5386 2026-11-11T12:38:01Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox - duplicate info 25936 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11361384", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M30365577" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32123", "Z32123K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32234", "Z32234K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q374477" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32123", "Z32123K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32234", "Z32234K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q261637" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } ] } } } 0mlioco1ajnpi3yq85c2i2qlbpyegqs Q11361494 0 942 25925 3077 2026-11-11T12:23:44Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox - duplicate info 25925 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11361494", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M163274797" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q694322" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q276944" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } d4fcs463mninqyzungzug5mlgkao2kz Q11361528 0 943 25935 3078 2026-11-11T12:36:42Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox - duplicate info 25935 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11361528", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M52877950" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q843882" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11174872" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } q72uieffsqovft3i3ildv9088hw9r3q Q11361819 0 944 25924 3079 2026-11-11T12:22:28Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox - duplicate info 25924 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11361819", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M10869407" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27868", "Z27868K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14396", "Z14396K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q166946" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q261637" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11591100" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } firyizycmz0x2gbazfjb05e4b43pulm Q2736 0 1426 26029 25116 2026-11-11T19:47:42Z Mdm.Bla 9338 All the laws have text now! 26029 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q2736", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q216048" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506630" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P92" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506630" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P571" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506630" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P50" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q503218" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36049", "Z36049K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M48779878" }, "Z36049K2": { "Z1K1": "Z12", "Z12K1": [ "Z11" ] }, "Z36049K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1419" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2043" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2049" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845769" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q55135234" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1502749" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q55135234" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845769" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1321837" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q113496102" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845769" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12507" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2077" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2067" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2386" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2547" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q937857" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1402831" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1114" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14280", "Z14280K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "10" }, "Z14280K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q201330" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1114" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14280", "Z14280K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "1" }, "Z14280K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1872" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1873" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1381731" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2623418" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q170494" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223269" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q170494" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q640704" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q133105" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q43663" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q133105" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q512804" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3710" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1652" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P106" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10566551" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P355" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223291" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q204917" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P121" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1048067" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P121" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q847803" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P121" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223291" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223291" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P10645" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q14660" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P137" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223291" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1967895" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12166442" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P9140" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z25701", "Z25701K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6060", "Z6060K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "1" }, "Z6060K2": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "30" }, "Z6060K3": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" } } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1321220" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2047" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z25701", "Z25701K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6060", "Z6060K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" }, "Z6060K2": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "15" }, "Z6060K3": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" } } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q186982" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2047" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z25701", "Z25701K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6060", "Z6060K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" }, "Z6060K2": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "30" }, "Z6060K3": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" } } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15709466" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q570364" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1378798" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1382481" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36049", "Z36049K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M84109405" }, "Z36049K2": { "Z1K1": "Z12", "Z12K1": [ "Z11", { "Z1K1": "Z11", "Z11K1": "Z1002", "Z11K2": "" } ] }, "Z36049K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q772180" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q16868672" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q772180" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1542" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2376629" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18530" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q772180" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q571251" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18531" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18531" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379461" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3537603" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q691101" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7302543" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2927094" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q13163738" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379266" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379266" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379266" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379461" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379266" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q279532" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q279532" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845769" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29743", "Z29743K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q279532" }, "Z29743K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18530" }, "Z29743K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1499569" }, "Z29743K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q329285" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q329285" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7508383" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q333282" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q333282" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1502749" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29743", "Z29743K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q333282" }, "Z29743K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1985622" }, "Z29743K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q115955619" }, "Z29743K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q242415" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q242415" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q63583284" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29743", "Z29743K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q242415" }, "Z29743K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7079063" }, "Z29743K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q115955619" }, "Z29743K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } } ] } } } khkv6ov7qtv2x3nyt974xqoaaeaqux2 26030 26029 2026-11-11T20:21:42Z Mdm.Bla 9338 lead 26030 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q2736", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q216048" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36266", "Z36266K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36266K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56512863" }, "Z36266K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q349" }, "Z36266K4": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2" }, "Z36266K5": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P797" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506630" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P92" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506630" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P571" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506630" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P50" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q503218" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36049", "Z36049K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M48779878" }, "Z36049K2": { "Z1K1": "Z12", "Z12K1": [ "Z11" ] }, "Z36049K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1419" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2043" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2049" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845769" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q55135234" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1502749" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q55135234" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845769" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1321837" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q113496102" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845769" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12507" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2077" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2067" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2386" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2547" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q937857" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1402831" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1114" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14280", "Z14280K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "10" }, "Z14280K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q201330" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1114" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14280", "Z14280K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "1" }, "Z14280K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1872" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1873" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1381731" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2623418" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q170494" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223269" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q170494" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q640704" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q133105" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q43663" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q133105" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q512804" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3710" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1652" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P106" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10566551" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P355" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223291" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q204917" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P121" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1048067" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P121" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q847803" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P121" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223291" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223291" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P10645" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q14660" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P137" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223291" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1967895" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12166442" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P9140" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z25701", "Z25701K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6060", "Z6060K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "1" }, "Z6060K2": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "30" }, "Z6060K3": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" } } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1321220" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2047" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z25701", "Z25701K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6060", "Z6060K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" }, "Z6060K2": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "15" }, "Z6060K3": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" } } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q186982" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2047" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z25701", "Z25701K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6060", "Z6060K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" }, "Z6060K2": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "30" }, "Z6060K3": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" } } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15709466" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q570364" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1378798" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1382481" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36049", "Z36049K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M84109405" }, "Z36049K2": { "Z1K1": "Z12", "Z12K1": [ "Z11", { "Z1K1": "Z11", "Z11K1": "Z1002", "Z11K2": "" } ] }, "Z36049K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q772180" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q16868672" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q772180" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1542" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2376629" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18530" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q772180" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q571251" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18531" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18531" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379461" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3537603" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q691101" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7302543" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2927094" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q13163738" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379266" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379266" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379266" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379461" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379266" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q279532" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q279532" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845769" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29743", "Z29743K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q279532" }, "Z29743K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18530" }, "Z29743K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1499569" }, "Z29743K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q329285" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q329285" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7508383" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q333282" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q333282" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1502749" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29743", "Z29743K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q333282" }, "Z29743K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1985622" }, "Z29743K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q115955619" }, "Z29743K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q242415" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q242415" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q63583284" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29743", "Z29743K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q242415" }, "Z29743K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7079063" }, "Z29743K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q115955619" }, "Z29743K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } } ] } } } c785pz4ujdqkh9n06bo6mvwp3uxfr9f 26031 26030 2026-11-11T20:26:53Z Mdm.Bla 9338 origin 26031 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q2736", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q216048" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36266", "Z36266K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36266K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56512863" }, "Z36266K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q349" }, "Z36266K4": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2" }, "Z36266K5": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P797" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P495" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506630" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P92" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506630" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P571" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506630" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P50" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q503218" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36049", "Z36049K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M48779878" }, "Z36049K2": { "Z1K1": "Z12", "Z12K1": [ "Z11" ] }, "Z36049K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1419" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2043" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2049" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845769" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q55135234" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1502749" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q55135234" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845769" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1321837" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q113496102" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845769" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12507" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2077" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2067" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2386" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2547" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q937857" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1402831" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1114" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14280", "Z14280K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "10" }, "Z14280K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q201330" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1114" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14280", "Z14280K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "1" }, "Z14280K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1872" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1873" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1381731" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2623418" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q170494" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223269" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q170494" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q640704" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q133105" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q43663" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q133105" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q512804" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3710" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1652" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P106" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10566551" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P355" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223291" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q204917" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P121" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1048067" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P121" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q847803" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P121" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223291" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223291" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P10645" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q14660" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P137" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223291" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1967895" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12166442" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P9140" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z25701", "Z25701K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6060", "Z6060K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "1" }, "Z6060K2": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "30" }, "Z6060K3": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" } } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1321220" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2047" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z25701", "Z25701K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6060", "Z6060K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" }, "Z6060K2": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "15" }, "Z6060K3": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" } } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q186982" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2047" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z25701", "Z25701K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6060", "Z6060K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" }, "Z6060K2": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "30" }, "Z6060K3": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" } } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15709466" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q570364" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1378798" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1382481" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36049", "Z36049K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M84109405" }, "Z36049K2": { "Z1K1": "Z12", "Z12K1": [ "Z11", { "Z1K1": "Z11", "Z11K1": "Z1002", "Z11K2": "" } ] }, "Z36049K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q772180" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q16868672" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q772180" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1542" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2376629" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18530" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q772180" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q571251" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18531" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18531" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379461" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3537603" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q691101" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7302543" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2927094" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q13163738" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379266" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379266" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379266" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379461" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379266" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q279532" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q279532" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845769" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29743", "Z29743K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q279532" }, "Z29743K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18530" }, "Z29743K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1499569" }, "Z29743K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q329285" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q329285" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7508383" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q333282" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q333282" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1502749" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29743", "Z29743K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q333282" }, "Z29743K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1985622" }, "Z29743K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q115955619" }, "Z29743K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q242415" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q242415" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q63583284" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29743", "Z29743K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q242415" }, "Z29743K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7079063" }, "Z29743K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q115955619" }, "Z29743K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } } ] } } } 0ofb4fcytitt7gznkx5vw1l28perwhk 26065 26031 2026-11-12T07:57:07Z 99of9 614 more images 26065 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q2736", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M4284090" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q216048" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36266", "Z36266K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36266K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q56512863" }, "Z36266K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q349" }, "Z36266K4": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2" }, "Z36266K5": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P797" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P495" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506630" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P92" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506630" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P571" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q506630" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P50" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q503218" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36049", "Z36049K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M48779878" }, "Z36049K2": { "Z1K1": "Z12", "Z12K1": [ "Z11" ] }, "Z36049K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1419" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2043" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2049" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845769" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q55135234" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8524" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1502749" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q55135234" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845769" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1321837" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q113496102" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845769" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M117327494" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12507" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2077" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2067" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2386" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2547" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q937857" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1402831" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1114" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14280", "Z14280K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "10" }, "Z14280K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q201330" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1114" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z14280", "Z14280K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "1" }, "Z14280K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1872" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1873" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1381731" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2623418" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q170494" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223269" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q170494" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q640704" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q133105" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q43663" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q133105" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q512804" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q768186" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3710" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M3325537" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2736" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1652" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P106" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10566551" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P355" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223291" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q204917" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P121" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1048067" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P121" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q847803" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P121" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223291" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223291" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P10645" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q859528" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q14660" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P137" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q223291" }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1967895" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12166442" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P9140" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z25701", "Z25701K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6060", "Z6060K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "1" }, "Z6060K2": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "30" }, "Z6060K3": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" } } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1321220" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2047" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z25701", "Z25701K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6060", "Z6060K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" }, "Z6060K2": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "15" }, "Z6060K3": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" } } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38181", "Z38181K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q186982" }, "Z38181K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2047" }, "Z38181K3": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z25701", "Z25701K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6060", "Z6060K1": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" }, "Z6060K2": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "30" }, "Z6060K3": { "Z1K1": "Z13518", "Z13518K1": "0" } } }, "Z38181K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15709466" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q570364" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1378798" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1382481" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36049", "Z36049K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M84109405" }, "Z36049K2": { "Z1K1": "Z12", "Z12K1": [ "Z11", { "Z1K1": "Z11", "Z11K1": "Z1002", "Z11K2": "" } ] }, "Z36049K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q772180" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q16868672" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12252328" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q772180" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1542" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2376629" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18530" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q772180" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q571251" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18531" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18531" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379461" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3537603" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q691101" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7302543" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2927094" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q13163738" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q265777" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379266" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379266" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379266" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379461" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1379266" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q279532" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q279532" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1380410" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845769" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29743", "Z29743K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q279532" }, "Z29743K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18530" }, "Z29743K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1499569" }, "Z29743K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q329285" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q329285" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7508383" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q333282" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q333282" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1502749" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29743", "Z29743K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q333282" }, "Z29743K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1985622" }, "Z29743K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q115955619" }, "Z29743K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z34250", "Z34250K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q242415" }, "Z34250K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32149", "Z32149K1": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q242415" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q61054219" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q63583284" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29749", "Z29749K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z29743", "Z29743K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q242415" }, "Z29743K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7079063" }, "Z29743K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q115955619" }, "Z29743K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z29749K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z32149K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z27854", "Z27854K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } } } ] } } } guw0plvxjj0svp0u3xs528jgtbyk6tb Q623 0 1591 26054 21921 2026-11-12T03:05:24Z 99of9 614 atomic number more important than symbol 26054 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q623", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M39385953" }, "Z36038K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36270", "Z36270K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36270K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38355", "Z38355K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38355K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11344" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1086" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P246" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P8000" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2313842" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19753345" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36831", "Z36831K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4330518" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11351" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z36831K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4330518" } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P138" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32839", "Z32839K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q937228" }, "Z32839K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2067" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37661", "Z37661K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1108" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z37661K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q78974" }, "Z37661K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P10685" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32839", "Z32839K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q25276" }, "Z32839K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36083", "Z36083K1": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q471790" } ], "Z36083K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37661", "Z37661K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1014081" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1194370" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z37661K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1014081" }, "Z37661K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1014081" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2114" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37661", "Z37661K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1058364" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q878130" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z37661K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1058364" }, "Z37661K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37661", "Z37661K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1770822" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q878130" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z37661K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1770822" }, "Z37661K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37661", "Z37661K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q840660" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q192900" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Z37661K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q840660" }, "Z37661K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q840660" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2114" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32839", "Z32839K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q21198401" }, "Z32839K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M165945768" }, "Z36038K2": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36270", "Z36270K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q186693" }, "Z36270K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36083", "Z36083K1": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q622460" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5309" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5283" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q178026" } ], "Z36083K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5309" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5309" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P690" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5309" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2054" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5309" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1088" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33690", "Z33690K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5283" }, "Z33690K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5283" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P589" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5283" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P690" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5283" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2054" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5283" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1109" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5283" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P1088" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5283" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P5480" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5283" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P5673" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 3plqfsg5v2bkvlybtybcy9rt7ch0be9 Q11380928 0 1683 25918 5378 2026-11-11T12:15:13Z HenkvD 1447 + image and infobox 25918 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11380928", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M160956680" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51058", "Z51058K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z51058K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32123", "Z32123K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32234", "Z32234K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26570", "Z26570K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26570K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q845945" }, "Z26570K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q861621" }, "Z26570K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32123", "Z32123K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32234", "Z32234K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1525571" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1762010" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32123", "Z32123K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32234", "Z32234K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q134917316" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10444029" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } ] } } } aihuao4kba8cvv2p4x5ur4zjpm1gfmt Template:Main page/News/en 10 1883 25974 25072 2026-11-11T14:45:44Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 25974 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;Volunteer's Corners * The next Volunteers' Corner will be at <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 11:00 UTC on 2026-11-09]</bdi> on <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi> at <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi>. * The [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-11.webm|most recent Volunteer's Corner]] is available on Commons. ; Recent status updates about Wikifunctions <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|2026-11-04]]: A new Type for NLG Functions? * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|2026-10-30]]: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|2026-10-25]]: Wikiabstrak app * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|2026-10-17]]: Changes in evaluator representations * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|2026-10-09]]: Quarterly planning </div> <span class="plainlinks">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small">More news</span>]]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> ehhmmdhm8gb57k85dm88z1bx8msrtvo Template:Main page/News/bn 10 1989 25972 25070 2026-11-11T14:45:43Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 25972 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;স্বেচ্ছাসেবক সভা * পরবর্তী স্বেচ্ছাসেবক সভা <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 11:00 UTC on 2026-11-09]</bdi>-এ <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi>-এ <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi>-এ হবে। * [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-11.webm|সর্বশেষ স্বেচ্ছাসেবক সভা]] কমন্সে পাওয়া যাবে। ; উইকিফাংশন্স সম্পর্কে সাম্প্রতিক হালনাগাদ <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|2026-11-04]]: A new Type for NLG Functions?</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|2026-10-30]]: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|2026-10-25]]: Wikiabstrak app</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|2026-10-17]]: Changes in evaluator representations</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|2026-10-09]]: Quarterly planning</span> </div> <span class="plainlinks">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small">আরও সংবাদ</span>]]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> 3wkfim1jrlr4s6lllw3wunnu61hu990 Template:Main page/News/de 10 2061 25973 25071 2026-11-11T14:45:43Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 25973 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;Freiwilligentreffen * Das nächste Freiwilligentreffen findet um <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 11:00 UTC on 2026-11-09]</bdi> auf <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi> unter <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi> statt. * Das [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-11.webm|letzte Freiwilligentreffen]] ist auf Commons verfügbar. ; Aktuelle Neuigkeiten zum Status von Wikifunctions <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|2026-11-04]]: A new Type for NLG Functions?</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|2026-10-30]]: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia</span> * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|2026-10-25]]: Wikiabstrak-App * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|2026-10-17]]: Änderungen an Darstellungen im Auswerter * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|2026-10-09]]: Vierteljährliche Planung </div> <span class="plainlinks">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small">Weitere Neuigkeiten</span>]]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> c6u33f4wpzv5tosvanrwdheavt0wx04 Template:Main page/News/ar 10 2080 25971 25602 2026-11-11T14:45:43Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 25971 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;ركن المتطوعين * سيكون ركن المتطوعين التالي في <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 11:00 UTC on 2026-11-09]</bdi> على <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi> في <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi>. * [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-11.webm|أحدث ركن المتطوعين]] متاح على كومنز. ; تحديثات الحالة الأخيرة حول ويكي الدوال <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|2026-11-04]]: A new Type for NLG Functions?</span> * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|2026-10-30]]: الأخطاء وآليات الاحتياط في ويكيبيديا المجردة * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|2026-10-25]]: تطبيق Wikiabstrak * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|2026-10-17]]: تغييرات في تمثيلات المُقيِّمين * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|2026-10-09]]: التخطيط الربع سنوي </div> <span class="plainlinks">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small">المزيد من الأخبار</span>]]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> 0b8jsnac8p0oixyrc01a6fcu4dyt6ae Q12171 0 2254 26047 25782 2026-11-12T00:06:36Z 99of9 614 description of flow 26047 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q12171", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12171" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2996394" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z44369", "Z44369K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12142910" }, "Z44369K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q140399652" }, "Z44369K3": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q140399652" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q140399652" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q140399648" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q140399648" } ], "Z44369K4": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7873" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q40397" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q9612" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5880" } ], "Z44369K5": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17561779" } ], "Z44369K6": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q192613" }, "Z44369K7": { "Z1K1": "Z40", "Z40K1": "Z42" }, "Z44369K8": [ "Z6091" ], "Z44369K9": { "Z1K1": "Z40", "Z40K1": "Z41" }, "Z44369K10": { "Z1K1": "Z40", "Z40K1": "Z41" }, "Z44369K11": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 6j2rd7wa8cmsqx168t4z46dcimk06jh Template:Main page/News/zh 10 2278 25984 25082 2026-11-11T14:45:45Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 25984 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;-{A|zh-hans:志愿者;zh-hant:志工;}-角落 * 下一期志愿者角将于<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 11:00 UTC on 2026-11-09]</bdi>在 <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi> 的<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi>举行。 * [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-11.webm|最近的志愿者角]]已发布在维基共享资源上。 ; 维基函数最新动态 <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|2026-11-04]]: A new Type for NLG Functions?</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|2026-10-30]]: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|2026-10-25]]: Wikiabstrak app</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|2026-10-17]]: Changes in evaluator representations</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|2026-10-09]]: Quarterly planning</span> </div> <span class="plainlinks">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small">更多新闻</span>]]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> l0hx1fimz6pwm2t7bc6mspg9gpwb46i Q15876324 0 2306 25940 24669 2026-11-11T13:11:39Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25940 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q15876324", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M21996808" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15876324" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15876324" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15876324" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15876324" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15876324" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15876324" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15876324" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15876324" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15876324" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15876324" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15876324" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15876324" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } ogpwyg6ewk6lms2i7h9uwvg6045kdu5 Q3640080 0 2307 25942 24079 2026-11-11T13:28:27Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25942 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q3640080", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M67682589" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3640080" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3640080" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3640080" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3640080" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3640080" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3640080" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3640080" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3640080" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3640080" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3640080" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3640080" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3640080" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3640080" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } n40qkkemyl26xzcoun3tvjd27mu2u5v Q15130000 0 2308 25943 25311 2026-11-11T13:29:11Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25943 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q15130000", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M21886285" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15130000" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15130000" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15130000" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15130000" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15130000" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15130000" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48824K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15130000" }, "Z48824K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48824K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z48824" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15130000" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15130000" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15130000" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q15130000" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } raroju6e0ipl3x9yvc68pvhl3ygvt1j Q12859910 0 2309 25944 24082 2026-11-11T13:30:06Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25944 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q12859910", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M185180" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12859910" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12859910" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12859910" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12859910" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12859910" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12859910" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12859910" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12859910" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12859910" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12859910" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12859910" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1631107" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z40069K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K1", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z40069K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z40069" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } lejhw3p1f61jb8f72aj42sets74qj0v Q311243 0 2312 25945 24069 2026-11-11T13:31:03Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25945 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q311243", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M161512471" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q311243" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q311243" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q311243" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q311243" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q311243" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q311243" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q311243" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q311243" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q311243" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q311243" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q311243" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q311243" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q311243" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q311243" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } thi27ffgd8hef0dtga2q1b874y2b6x7 Q1214313 0 2313 25946 24074 2026-11-11T13:33:38Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25946 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q1214313", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M100310963" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1214313" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1214313" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1214313" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1214313" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1214313" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1214313" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1214313" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1214313" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1214313" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1214313" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1631107" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z40069K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K1", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z40069K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z40069" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } j46w8gxbujzc6zlwqxfdwov9o42ehar Q17422064 0 2314 25947 24088 2026-11-11T13:37:53Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25947 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q17422064", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M2695093" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17422064" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17422064" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17422064" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17422064" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17422064" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17422064" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17422064" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17422064" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17422064" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17422064" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } jj3lmiwvrjav49z25q22bj688u746kw Template:Main page/News/sv 10 2418 25982 25080 2026-11-11T14:45:45Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 25982 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;Volontärshörnan * Nästa volontärshörna kommer hållas på <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi> <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 11:00 UTC on 2026-11-09]</bdi>, på <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi>. * Den [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-11.webm|förra volontärshörnan]] finns att se på Commons. ; Senaste nytt om Wikifunctions <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|2026-11-04]]: A new Type for NLG Functions?</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|2026-10-30]]: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|2026-10-25]]: Wikiabstrak app</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|2026-10-17]]: Changes in evaluator representations</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|2026-10-09]]: Quarterly planning</span> </div> <span class="plainlinks">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small">Fler nyheter</span>]]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> iu87d0apmzkcmyqw5t8nd90bo6bv168 Q3937618 0 2628 25948 24080 2026-11-11T13:44:37Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25948 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q3937618", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M13398897" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937618" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937618" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937618" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937618" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937618" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937618" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937618" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937618" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937618" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937618" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937618" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937618" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937618" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937618" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1631107" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z40069K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K1", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z40069K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z40069" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } h85icfnembnnt9xeue8c3cilewk71vr Q19006513 0 2629 25949 24098 2026-11-11T13:45:23Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25949 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q19006513", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M8390523" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19006513" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19006513" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19006513" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19006513" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19006513" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19006513" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19006513" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19006513" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19006513" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19006513" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19006513" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19006513" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } fikbxkwthrrgo63wrah2m0a7x546k8u Q3937621 0 2630 25950 24081 2026-11-11T13:46:38Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25950 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q3937621", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M22553475" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937621" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937621" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937621" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937621" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937621" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937621" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937621" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937621" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937621" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937621" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937621" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937621" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937621" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3937621" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1631107" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z40069K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K1", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z40069K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z40069" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } p5f49ba4ytp3u036vdcwjjrixl3lj2i Q19273481 0 2631 25951 24099 2026-11-11T13:47:38Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25951 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q19273481", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M180805286" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19273481" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19273481" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19273481" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19273481" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19273481" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19273481" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19273481" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19273481" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19273481" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19273481" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19273481" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19273481" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19273481" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19273481" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } lf55yelv3jtb60teqm7x49er11bepxf Q3275359 0 2633 25952 24078 2026-11-11T13:49:23Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25952 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q3275359", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M8256776" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3275359" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3275359" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3275359" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3275359" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3275359" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3275359" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3275359" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3275359" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3275359" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } hgf7z6d9miugdc7ra9tvxldccn9dtuz Q19904842 0 2634 25953 24101 2026-11-11T13:49:59Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25953 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q19904842", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M38344581" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19904842" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19904842" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19904842" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19904842" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19904842" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19904842" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19904842" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19904842" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19904842" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19904842" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19904842" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1631107" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z40069K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K1", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z40069K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z40069" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 05b4ky7ntmyz68qqi2ybl0v40fh8d3q Q18599466 0 2636 25954 23830 2026-11-11T13:51:44Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25954 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q18599466", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18599466" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18599466" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18599466" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18599466" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18599466" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48824K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18599466" }, "Z48824K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48824K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z48824" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18599466" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18599466" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18599466" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18599466" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18599466" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } ddwh2liujss7ceiddwch1htj18acryx Q18610108 0 2637 25955 14140 2026-11-11T13:52:32Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25955 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q18610108", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610108" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610108" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610108" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610108" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610108" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48824K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610108" }, "Z48824K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48824K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z48824" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610108" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610108" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610108" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610108" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 13rxaxmvz9xytm3spqaiuvlumbshhrn Q18610125 0 2638 25956 23831 2026-11-11T13:56:41Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25956 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q18610125", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610125" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610125" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610125" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610125" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610125" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610125" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610125" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610125" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18610125" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } ibnwlrjyk9bc1i8l9grz82udx7u57k3 Q910199 0 2640 25957 23816 2026-11-11T13:57:40Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25957 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q910199", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q910199" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q910199" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q910199" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q910199" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q910199" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48824K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q910199" }, "Z48824K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48824K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z48824" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q910199" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q910199" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q910199" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q910199" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q910199" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q910199" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1631107" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z40069K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K1", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z40069K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z40069" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 53r3xf178pcd4fyp03o7nxg4g7v1m4j Q1113293 0 2641 25958 23817 2026-11-11T13:58:21Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25958 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q1113293", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1113293" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1113293" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1113293" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1113293" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1113293" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1113293" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1113293" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1113293" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1113293" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } h14ys4kc3k133ofsz1shzxloq3rt8z5 Q11913985 0 2642 25959 22125 2026-11-11T13:59:10Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25959 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11913985", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11913985" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11913985" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11913985" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11913985" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11913985" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11913985" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11913985" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11913985" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11913985" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11913985" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11913985" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 7hamoc1wid9vtree395p7immy8juvbn Q80317 0 2643 25960 23813 2026-11-11T14:06:35Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25960 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q80317", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q80317" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q80317" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q80317" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q80317" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q80317" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q80317" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q80317" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q80317" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q80317" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q80317" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 6cfbfe14lm2e0zne12gxbzzmjnc08du Q14127232 0 2650 25961 24083 2026-11-11T14:10:54Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25961 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q14127232", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M21880384" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q14127232" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q14127232" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q14127232" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q14127232" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q14127232" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q14127232" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q14127232" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q14127232" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q14127232" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q14127232" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q14127232" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z52016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q14127232" }, "Z52016K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z52016K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z52016" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1631107" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z40069K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K1", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z40069K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z40069" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } b0mpn87080mxlohvszxqnon97ltcafs Q17491047 0 2651 25962 24089 2026-11-11T14:12:21Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25962 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q17491047", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M141497672" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491047" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491047" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491047" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491047" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491047" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491047" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491047" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48547K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491047" }, "Z48547K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48547K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z48547" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491047" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491047" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } r5xfzug08m8ufh94je2kx86atqa02c5 Q17491252 0 2652 25963 24090 2026-11-11T14:13:44Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25963 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q17491252", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M141499201" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491252" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491252" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491252" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491252" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491252" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491252" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491252" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491252" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491252" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491252" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491252" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } g9mqc9z66t9ypmxohmdgcqzldyibiiw Q40432 0 2653 25964 24067 2026-11-11T14:14:24Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25964 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q40432", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M184210" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q40432" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q40432" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q40432" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q40432" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q40432" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q40432" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q40432" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q40432" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q40432" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q40432" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47308K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q40432" }, "Z47308K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47308K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47308" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q40432" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1631107" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z40069K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K1", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z40069K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z40069" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } pb7m3w9ooy468c5uxpbkcbmkw4pu5bl Q17495322 0 2656 25989 24096 2026-11-11T16:05:58Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25989 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q17495322", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M128448141" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495322" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495322" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495322" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495322" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495322" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495322" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495322" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495322" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495322" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495322" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495322" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495322" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495322" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } rnqs7s260ziv0fo2dmoxy90ymogexmm Q17494606 0 2657 26034 16791 2026-11-11T21:26:33Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 26034 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q17494606", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494606" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494606" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494606" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494606" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494606" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494606" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494606" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494606" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494606" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494606" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } hmlvk5po0j54drh9w1lcaps7an33aqi Q17494605 0 2659 25990 14127 2026-11-11T16:31:29Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25990 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q17494605", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494605" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494605" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494605" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494605" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494605" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494605" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494605" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494605" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494605" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494605" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17494605" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } mcpu6e55hv3ei9f8813cdlcq4agb2n3 Q16038495 0 2661 25991 23822 2026-11-11T16:31:59Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25991 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q16038495", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M21252955" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q16038495" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q16038495" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q16038495" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q16038495" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q16038495" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q16038495" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q16038495" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q16038495" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q16038495" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q16038495" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q16038495" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } l8amuo01mrf7388mim3uerb8ocsdfy5 Q17491755 0 2662 25992 24091 2026-11-11T16:32:35Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25992 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q17491755", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M4796177" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491755" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491755" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491755" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491755" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491755" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491755" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491755" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491755" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491755" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491755" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17491755" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } rd1q8oshsjxdh34mb30x01hf9039na0 Q17493555 0 2663 25993 24094 2026-11-11T16:33:08Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25993 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q17493555", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M38016269" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17493555" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17493555" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17493555" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17493555" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17493555" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17493555" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17493555" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17493555" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17493555" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17493555" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17493555" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 7kp8qtlyhwrmiv3zegf5963qotavzaz Q18938367 0 2665 25994 24097 2026-11-11T16:33:33Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25994 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q18938367", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M22950618" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18938367" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18938367" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18938367" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18938367" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18938367" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18938367" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18938367" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18938367" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18938367" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18938367" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q18938367" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 5az5ffrybfb3osqyrtph4f3codxpquj Q19861759 0 2666 25995 24100 2026-11-11T16:34:04Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25995 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q19861759", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M36888886" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19861759" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19861759" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19861759" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19861759" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19861759" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19861759" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19861759" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19861759" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q19861759" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 8eytznsgshx1ed12jq1otq6v1odquse Q21712125 0 2667 25996 23835 2026-11-11T16:34:31Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25996 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q21712125", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q21712125" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q21712125" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q21712125" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q21712125" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q21712125" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q21712125" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q21712125" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q21712125" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 6zqc24b6dikufwkdgtk1srn6yu47wre Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies 4 2699 26040 23251 2026-11-11T23:27:02Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 Redirected page to [[Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT+]] 26040 wikitext text/x-wiki #REDIRECT[[Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT+]] mewn5shjfocqri7m2i8dbxkyushdsu4 Template:Main page/News/hu 10 2805 25977 25075 2026-11-11T14:45:44Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 25977 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;<span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">Volunteer's Corners</span> * A következő Önkéntes Sarok <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 11:00 UTC on 2026-11-09]</bdi>-kor lesz <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi> oldalon a <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi> linken. * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">The [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-11.webm|most recent Volunteer's Corner]] is available on Commons.</span> ; <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">Recent status updates about Wikifunctions</span> <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|2026-11-04]]: A new Type for NLG Functions?</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|2026-10-30]]: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|2026-10-25]]: Wikiabstrak app</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|2026-10-17]]: Changes in evaluator representations</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|2026-10-09]]: Quarterly planning</span> </div> <span class="plainlinks">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small"><span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">More news</span></span>]]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> rr9ac8xvzpi2avkb8pi0mcsysbo5rl8 Template:Main page/News/tok 10 3056 25983 25081 2026-11-11T14:45:45Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 25983 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;kulupu pi jan pali * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">The next Volunteers' Corner will be at <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 11:00 UTC on 2026-11-09]</bdi> on <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi> at <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi>.</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">The [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-11.webm|most recent Volunteer's Corner]] is available on Commons.</span> ; sona sin pi lipu Wikiwilo <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|2026-11-04]]: A new Type for NLG Functions?</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|2026-10-30]]: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|2026-10-25]]: Wikiabstrak app</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|2026-10-17]]: Changes in evaluator representations</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|2026-10-09]]: Quarterly planning</span> </div> <span class="plainlinks">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small"><span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">More news</span></span>]]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> f6u0u85t2atb8lsovz2ydj7judegatw Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ 4 3532 26039 23257 2026-11-11T23:26:30Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 fusion per discussion 26039 wikitext text/x-wiki {{shortcut|Abstract:LGBTQ}} '''WikiProject LGBTQ+''' is a [[Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProject]] dedicated to improving Abstract Wikipedia's coverage of [[w:LGBTQ|LGBTQ]] topics, starting with the articles at [[m:Wiki99/LGBT+|Wiki99/LGBT+]]. "The Q stands for Queer!"[cn] == Members == * [[User:JJPMaster|JJP]]<sub>[[User talk:JJPMaster|Mas]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/JJPMaster|ter]]</sub></sub> ([[Q1270787|she]]/[[Q3437264|they]]) * [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; * [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) * [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) * [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) * [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) === Initial articles === * [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q13581178 list of LGBT film festivals] ** [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q134699165 France] * [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q17884 LGBTQ] === Useful functions === ==== For pronouns ==== * [[:f:Z44615|Z44615: pronouns of a person]] * [[:f:Z44619|Z44619: exact pronouns of a person in a specific language]] === See also === * [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_LGBT Wikidata:WikiProject LGBT] * [[Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies]] [[Category:WikiProjects|LGBT+]] ksuply5l1qwk0gbkjp9bzkjywvq6qmk 26041 26039 2026-11-11T23:27:52Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 Ornithorynque liminaire moved page [[Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT+]] to [[Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+]] 26039 wikitext text/x-wiki {{shortcut|Abstract:LGBTQ}} '''WikiProject LGBTQ+''' is a [[Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProject]] dedicated to improving Abstract Wikipedia's coverage of [[w:LGBTQ|LGBTQ]] topics, starting with the articles at [[m:Wiki99/LGBT+|Wiki99/LGBT+]]. "The Q stands for Queer!"[cn] == Members == * [[User:JJPMaster|JJP]]<sub>[[User talk:JJPMaster|Mas]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/JJPMaster|ter]]</sub></sub> ([[Q1270787|she]]/[[Q3437264|they]]) * [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; * [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) * [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) * [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) * [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) === Initial articles === * [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q13581178 list of LGBT film festivals] ** [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q134699165 France] * [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q17884 LGBTQ] === Useful functions === ==== For pronouns ==== * [[:f:Z44615|Z44615: pronouns of a person]] * [[:f:Z44619|Z44619: exact pronouns of a person in a specific language]] === See also === * [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_LGBT Wikidata:WikiProject LGBT] * [[Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies]] [[Category:WikiProjects|LGBT+]] ksuply5l1qwk0gbkjp9bzkjywvq6qmk 26071 26041 2026-11-12T11:39:25Z Jsamwrites 874 Add section on biographies (from Wikidata) 26071 wikitext text/x-wiki {{shortcut|Abstract:LGBTQ}} '''WikiProject LGBTQ+''' is a [[Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProject]] dedicated to improving Abstract Wikipedia's coverage of [[w:LGBTQ|LGBTQ]] topics, starting with the articles at [[m:Wiki99/LGBT+|Wiki99/LGBT+]]. "The Q stands for Queer!"[cn] == Members == * [[User:JJPMaster|JJP]]<sub>[[User talk:JJPMaster|Mas]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/JJPMaster|ter]]</sub></sub> ([[Q1270787|she]]/[[Q3437264|they]]) * [[User:Theki|rae<sup>5e</sup>]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; * [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) * [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) * [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) * [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) === Initial articles === * [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q13581178 list of LGBT film festivals] ** [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q134699165 France] * [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q17884 LGBTQ] === Useful functions === ==== For pronouns ==== * [[:f:Z44615|Z44615: pronouns of a person]] * [[:f:Z44619|Z44619: exact pronouns of a person in a specific language]] === Wikidata === * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Wikidata/Biographies|Wikidata-driven biographies]] === See also === * [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_LGBT Wikidata:WikiProject LGBT] * [[Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies]] [[Category:WikiProjects|LGBT+]] kmngn74nkja53rc8w0tjf6iv9k71b2n Abstract Wikipedia:About/tr 4 3620 25988 15493 2026-11-11T15:45:39Z ~2026-59730-51 9956 add sentences and polish the translation 25988 wikitext text/x-wiki <languages /> [[Category:Abstract Wikipedia{{#translation:}}]] <span id="What_is_Abstract_Wikipedia?"></span> ==Soyut Vikipedi nedir?== Soyut Vikipedi, Vikipedi'nin bir kardeş projesidir. Vikipedi'nin vizyonu, herkesin her bilgiye ulaşabildiği bir dünyadır. Soyut Vikipedi, Vikipedi'ye katkı sağlayan gönüllülerin dünyadaki bilgi eksikliğini gidermelerine olanak sağlar. Vikipedi'de 300 dilin üzerinde, toplamda 20 milyonu aşkın konuda makale bulunmaktadır. Ancak bu dillerin hiçbiri tek başına bu 20 milyon konu hakkındaki bilgiye erişim sağlamıyor: Örneğin, İngilizce'de yedi milyondan fazla, Hırvatça'da 230.000, Svahili'de ise 100.000 makale var. Bu dilleri konuşmuyorsanız, o dilde yazılan bilgilere kolayca ulaşamazsınız. Yapay zekadaki son gelişmeler sayesinde makine çevirisi ne kadar ilerlemiş olsa da birçok dil çifti için güvenebileceğiniz çeviriler üretebilecek noktaya henüz ulaşmadı. Soyut Vikipedi bunları yapay zekâya dayanmadan yapıyor. Her adım insan kontrolü altında kalıyor ve gönüllüler tarafından erişilip düzenlenebiliyor. Halüsinasyonlar, açıklanamayan ve çözümlenemeyen hatalar bulunmuyor. Eğer bir şey yanlış ise, problem takip edilebilir ve çözümlenebilir. Bununla birlikte, metinlerin nasıl oluşturulduğu hakkında tam şeffaflık bulunur. Kaynaklama ve kaynaklar korunabilir ve sorgulanabilir. Her seferinde şans eseri Kenya'nın başkentini seçen olasılıksal bir model değil. İnsanlar tarafından derlenen ve sahiplenilen bir bilgi. <span id="How_does_Abstract_Wikipedia_work?"></span> ==Soyut Vikipedi nasıl çalışır?== Soyut Vikipedi'deki makaleler, insan dillerinden bağımsız bir simgelemle saklanır. Soyut Vikipedi'nin arayüzü, gönüllü katkıda bulunanların, dilden bağımsız olan bu simgelemi oluşturmasına ve sürdürmesine olanak tanır. İkinci adımda, bu gösterim insan dilinde metne dönüştürülür. Bunun gerçekleşmesi için gereken adımlar da Wikifunctions'ta gönüllülerden oluşan bir topluluk tarafından oluşturulur ve sürdürülür. Bu adımlar, gönüllü topluluklar tarafından Wikidata'ya eklenen ve sürdürülen nüfus sayıları, doğum tarihleri ​​veya düzensiz gramer biçimleri gibi verileri kullanabilir. Adım adım yönerge için [[Special:MyLanguage/Help:How to create an article|Yardım:Madde oluşturmak]] sayfasına bakınız. Bir örneğe bakalım: [[Q1033|Nijerya Afrika'daki en çok nüfuslu ülkedir.]] Soyut Vikipedi'de bu, şöyle saklanabilir: {{block indent|1=[[f:Z27243|Z27243]]([[d:Q1033|Q1033]], [[d:Q138758272|Q138758272]], [[d:Q6256|Q6256]], [[d:Q15|Q15]], Z27243K5)}} Veya, bu tanımlayıcıları İngilizce etiketlerle ifade etmek istersek: {{block indent|1=superlative(Nigeria, populous, country, Africa, language)}} Bu, Vikişlev'den fonksiyon çağırır. Dile bağlı olarak, başka bir fonksiyon daha çağrılır. İngilizce için, şu fonksiyonu çağırmış oluruz: {{block indent|1=[[f:Z27243|Z27243]]([[d:Q1033|Q1033]], [[d:Q138758272|Q138758272]], [[d:Q6256|Q6256]], [[d:Q15|Q15]], [[f:Z1002|Z1002]])}} Bu da şu İngilizce metni getirir {{block indent|1=''"Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa."''}} Almanca seçseydik, başka bir fonksiyon çağrılırdı: {{block indent|1=[[f:Z27243|Z27243]]([[d:Q1033|Q1033]], [[d:Q138758272|Q138758272]], [[d:Q6256|Q6256]], [[d:Q15|Q15]], [[f:Z1430|Z1430]])}} Bu da şu Almanca metni gösterirdi: {{block indent|1=''"Nigeria ist das bevölkerungsreichste Land Afrikas."''}} Daha fazla dillerden örnekler burada görülebilir. Soyut Vikipedi, Wikimedia Hareketi'nden birçok topluluğu bir araya getiriyor ve birlikte çalışmalarına olanak tanıyor. Vikiveri'den birçok konu hakkında temel sözcük verileri ve yapılandırılmış veriler, Vikişlev'den gerekli hesaplamaları yakalayan fonksiyonlar ve Wikimedia Commons'tan resimler ve haritalar Soyut Vikipedi'de bir araya getirilerek Vikipedi'nin 300'den fazla dil sürümü için kullanılabilir hâle getiriliyor. Soyut Vikipedi'nin amacı, daha fazla bilgiyi daha fazla insana daha fazla dilde ulaştırmak ve gönüllü editörlerin, hangi dili konuşurlarsa konuşsunlar, daha etkili olmalarını ve diller arası iş birliği yapmalarını sağlamaktır. Bilgideki iyileştirmeler otomatik olarak Vikipedilere yansıyacak, hatalar daha hızlı tespit edilip daha etkili bir şekilde düzeltilecek ve diller arası iş birlikleri mümkün hale gelecektir. Bilgiyi birbirinden uzak tutan dil engellerini ortadan kaldırıyoruz. [[Category:Abstract Wikipedia basic information]] 74726jr9cd40n19u9mepiz95ojdxjgw Translations:Abstract Wikipedia:About/5/tr 1198 3625 25987 9776 2026-11-11T15:45:39Z ~2026-59730-51 9956 add sentences and polish the translation 25987 wikitext text/x-wiki Soyut Vikipedi bunları yapay zekâya dayanmadan yapıyor. Her adım insan kontrolü altında kalıyor ve gönüllüler tarafından erişilip düzenlenebiliyor. Halüsinasyonlar, açıklanamayan ve çözümlenemeyen hatalar bulunmuyor. Eğer bir şey yanlış ise, problem takip edilebilir ve çözümlenebilir. Bununla birlikte, metinlerin nasıl oluşturulduğu hakkında tam şeffaflık bulunur. Kaynaklama ve kaynaklar korunabilir ve sorgulanabilir. Her seferinde şans eseri Kenya'nın başkentini seçen olasılıksal bir model değil. İnsanlar tarafından derlenen ve sahiplenilen bir bilgi. osn5dlhylj4kyafbha64nr0rse2h9b7 Q7401482 0 4177 25997 11171 2026-11-11T16:35:06Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25997 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q7401482", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M57571379" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7401482" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7401482" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7401482" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7401482" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7401482" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7401482" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7401482" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7401482" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7401482" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7401482" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7401482" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } k1pnmwaraquutm4wdopf1dn09ky8x70 Template:Main page/News/ko 10 4309 25979 25078 2026-11-11T14:45:44Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 25979 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;지원자 코너 * 다음 지원자 코너는 <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 11:00 UTC on 2026-11-09]</bdi>에 <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi>(<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi>)에서 진행됩니다. * [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-11.webm|가장 최근의 지원자 코너 내용]]은 공용에서 확인하실 수 있습니다. ; 위키함수의 현황 업데이트 <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|2026-11-04]]: A new Type for NLG Functions?</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|2026-10-30]]: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|2026-10-25]]: Wikiabstrak app</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|2026-10-17]]: Changes in evaluator representations</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|2026-10-09]]: Quarterly planning</span> </div> <span class="plainlinks">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small">더 많은 소식</span>]]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> 6wxd6hj4r9pezrdbs3074chs7w03if3 Q17490649 0 4466 25998 12038 2026-11-11T16:35:54Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25998 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q17490649", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17490649" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17490649" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17490649" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17490649" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17490649" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17490649" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17490649" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17490649" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17490649" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17490649" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17490649" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 0p21d77kea29ou2jkkx6aey5cxgnsi7 Q17495553 0 4467 25999 12037 2026-11-11T16:36:28Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 25999 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q17495553", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M130135368" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495553" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495553" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495553" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495553" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495553" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495553" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495553" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495553" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495553" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495553" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495553" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495553" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495553" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 7m5sl525615n3qkbql1nzsmfk8p0uon Q17277950 0 4699 26000 24087 2026-11-11T16:37:40Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 26000 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q17277950", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M132870" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17277950" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17277950" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17277950" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17277950" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17277950" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17277950" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17277950" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17277950" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17277950" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17277950" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 4ol3thiqryt8pq1ub1gg6pqvz5fr5pk Q64262379 0 4700 26001 24103 2026-11-11T16:38:14Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 26001 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q64262379", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M124502669" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q64262379" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q64262379" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q64262379" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q64262379" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q64262379" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q64262379" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q64262379" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q64262379" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q64262379" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q64262379" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q64262379" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q64262379" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q64262379" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 2os7mkls214mn4u56g9u4dif3dmhkhi Q17495243 0 4701 26002 24095 2026-11-11T16:38:46Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 26002 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q17495243", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M172331148" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495243" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495243" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495243" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495243" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495243" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495243" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47296K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495243" }, "Z47296K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47296K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47296" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495243" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495243" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495243" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495243" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47663K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495243" }, "Z47663K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47663K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47663" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495243" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17495243" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } ks9dlcjejft2q0z6wkd9cbidsmgil4q Q269342 0 4716 26003 24068 2026-11-11T16:39:15Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 26003 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q269342", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M32430178" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q269342" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q269342" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q269342" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q269342" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q269342" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q269342" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q269342" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q269342" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48852K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q269342" }, "Z48852K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48852K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48852" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } qn2ncv9nhkjqz9f0xvz5mua0fqmjo21 Q563727 0 4717 26005 24071 2026-11-11T16:48:33Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 26005 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q563727", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M99511246" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q563727" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q563727" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q563727" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q563727" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q563727" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q563727" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q563727" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q563727" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q563727" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q563727" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q563727" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q563727" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1631107" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z40069K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K1", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z40069K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z40069" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 0gs3awt11m1sb5ngwgh9kngaer9bb43 Q28497182 0 4718 26004 12698 2026-11-11T16:48:06Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 26004 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q28497182", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M54052018" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28497182" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28497182" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28497182" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28497182" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28497182" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28497182" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28497182" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28497182" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28497182" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 7ufzboarl7nnsqro03qojkk3z44plxi Q215486 0 4719 26015 12699 2026-11-11T16:57:34Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 26015 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q215486", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M2738140" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q215486" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q215486" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q215486" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q215486" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q215486" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q215486" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q215486" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q215486" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q215486" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } snkvsq14wcxjzydqs7bgyxcxf3hu0fo Q993743 0 4721 26014 24708 2026-11-11T16:57:06Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 26014 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q993743", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M15497207" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q993743" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q993743" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q993743" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q993743" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q993743" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q993743" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q993743" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q993743" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47693K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q993743" }, "Z47693K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47693K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47693" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q993743" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q993743" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 7zbaotpcwhz4eqny45xbxar39qu90bq User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire 3 5216 26025 24939 2026-11-11T19:00:08Z Kehanetr 7660 /* Thank you & quick questions about platform rules */ new section 26025 wikitext text/x-wiki == Welcome == {{Welcome}} Thanks for your contributions so far. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 22:30, 12 August 2026 (UTC) == Description == are we allowed to have descriptions? @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:20, 28 September 2026 (UTC) :What do you mean by descriptions @[[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]]? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:49, 28 September 2026 (UTC) ::ah, if you mean a monolingual description like you added in [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q657?uselang=fr&curid=6400&diff=22463&oldid=22256 Chad], no, it's not the point of the project. We should only use functions that can produce a relatively similar text in every language. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:51, 28 September 2026 (UTC) :::I replaced the monolingual by some functions so you can see how it's done. Please try to continue this way! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 20:00, 28 September 2026 (UTC) == N'Djamena == better? @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 22:57, 28 September 2026 (UTC) :yes, thank you :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:17, 29 September 2026 (UTC) == Could you please help my friend? == i think @[[User:Lofi Gurl|Lofi Gurl]] would benefit to the project please guide them thanks @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 16:49, 27 October 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]], I do not understand your request, can you please reframe it? Thanks! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:39, 29 October 2026 (UTC) == Explanation for thanking me. == Hi, sorry to bother you, but could you clarify why you thanked me for creating my own user page? I '''do not''' mean that question in a negative or "you shouldn't have done that that is MY user page" way. I'm just a little confused as the creation of my user page doesn't actually improve any Abstract Wikipedia article. Thanks and bye! <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 18:17, 28 October 2026 (UTC) :Actually, never mind. I just realised you edited some of the articles I've created. Thanks! <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 19:00, 28 October 2026 (UTC) ::Hi @[[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]]! We are not a lot here, so we're very happy to see new people coming around here and creating their userpages! This might be the start of great contributions, so we want to celebrate that. I read all recent edits and try to help newcomers, so do not hesitate if you have any questions :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:39, 29 October 2026 (UTC) :::OK, @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]]. Do you know where I can find help on how to create/edit articles here? I know ''some'' of the basics, but I don’t know more advanced functions and stuff that might be useful :| <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 09:04, 29 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] Our best articles are {{Q|Q17}} and {{Q|Q408}} I'd say! The easiest way is to use the functions you will find on these articles I'd guess. If you feel something is strange (highly possible) of some other thing is missing, I'm here to help (slowly, I'm travelling) or the Project Chat can host great conversations. Good contributions! ::::(I will try to improve our help pages when I'm back home!) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:02, 29 October 2026 (UTC) == Thank you & quick questions about platform rules == Hello @Ornithorynque liminaire Thank you very much for your kind guidance and for closing the recent deletion discussion so thoughtfully. Your encouraging words truly motivate me as I learn the ropes of this new platform. Since you kindly offered to help with questions, I wanted to ask two quick things regarding the general guidelines here: '''1.Recreating deleted entries:''' On some language editions like Turkish Wikipedia, recreating a previously deleted article is strictly restricted as "recreated content." If a deleted entry here (or any similar topic) eventually meets the required interwiki and notability thresholds in the future, can it be safely recreated without being automatically deleted again? '''2.Stub articles and templates:''' Are there plans to introduce "stub" classifications or stub templates here in the future for short, developing entries? Thank you again for your time, patience, and support! Best regards, [[User:Kehanetr|Kehanetr]] ([[User talk:Kehanetr|talk]]) 19:00, 11 November 2026 (UTC) 98ole07n7c87t6czjnn2j7tbzssfllv 26026 26025 2026-11-11T19:01:49Z Kehanetr 7660 /* Thank you & quick questions about platform rules */ 26026 wikitext text/x-wiki == Welcome == {{Welcome}} Thanks for your contributions so far. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 22:30, 12 August 2026 (UTC) == Description == are we allowed to have descriptions? @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:20, 28 September 2026 (UTC) :What do you mean by descriptions @[[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]]? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:49, 28 September 2026 (UTC) ::ah, if you mean a monolingual description like you added in [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q657?uselang=fr&curid=6400&diff=22463&oldid=22256 Chad], no, it's not the point of the project. We should only use functions that can produce a relatively similar text in every language. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:51, 28 September 2026 (UTC) :::I replaced the monolingual by some functions so you can see how it's done. Please try to continue this way! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 20:00, 28 September 2026 (UTC) == N'Djamena == better? @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 22:57, 28 September 2026 (UTC) :yes, thank you :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:17, 29 September 2026 (UTC) == Could you please help my friend? == i think @[[User:Lofi Gurl|Lofi Gurl]] would benefit to the project please guide them thanks @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 16:49, 27 October 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]], I do not understand your request, can you please reframe it? Thanks! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:39, 29 October 2026 (UTC) == Explanation for thanking me. == Hi, sorry to bother you, but could you clarify why you thanked me for creating my own user page? I '''do not''' mean that question in a negative or "you shouldn't have done that that is MY user page" way. I'm just a little confused as the creation of my user page doesn't actually improve any Abstract Wikipedia article. Thanks and bye! <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 18:17, 28 October 2026 (UTC) :Actually, never mind. I just realised you edited some of the articles I've created. Thanks! <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 19:00, 28 October 2026 (UTC) ::Hi @[[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]]! We are not a lot here, so we're very happy to see new people coming around here and creating their userpages! This might be the start of great contributions, so we want to celebrate that. I read all recent edits and try to help newcomers, so do not hesitate if you have any questions :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:39, 29 October 2026 (UTC) :::OK, @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]]. Do you know where I can find help on how to create/edit articles here? I know ''some'' of the basics, but I don’t know more advanced functions and stuff that might be useful :| <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 09:04, 29 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] Our best articles are {{Q|Q17}} and {{Q|Q408}} I'd say! The easiest way is to use the functions you will find on these articles I'd guess. If you feel something is strange (highly possible) of some other thing is missing, I'm here to help (slowly, I'm travelling) or the Project Chat can host great conversations. Good contributions! ::::(I will try to improve our help pages when I'm back home!) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:02, 29 October 2026 (UTC) == Thank you & quick questions about platform rules == Hello @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] Thank you very much for your kind guidance and for closing the recent deletion discussion so thoughtfully. Your encouraging words truly motivate me as I learn the ropes of this new platform. Since you kindly offered to help with questions, I wanted to ask two quick things regarding the general guidelines here: '''1.Recreating deleted entries:''' On some language editions like Turkish Wikipedia, recreating a previously deleted article is strictly restricted as "recreated content." If a deleted entry here (or any similar topic) eventually meets the required interwiki and notability thresholds in the future, can it be safely recreated without being automatically deleted again? '''2.Stub articles and templates:''' Are there plans to introduce "stub" classifications or stub templates here in the future for short, developing entries? Thank you again for your time, patience, and support! Best regards, [[User:Kehanetr|Kehanetr]] ([[User talk:Kehanetr|talk]]) 19:00, 11 November 2026 (UTC) 74151r69bsfcbzfuorehtbni0eivssl 26027 26026 2026-11-11T19:21:45Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 /* Thank you & quick questions about platform rules */ Reply 26027 wikitext text/x-wiki == Welcome == {{Welcome}} Thanks for your contributions so far. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 22:30, 12 August 2026 (UTC) == Description == are we allowed to have descriptions? @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:20, 28 September 2026 (UTC) :What do you mean by descriptions @[[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]]? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:49, 28 September 2026 (UTC) ::ah, if you mean a monolingual description like you added in [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q657?uselang=fr&curid=6400&diff=22463&oldid=22256 Chad], no, it's not the point of the project. We should only use functions that can produce a relatively similar text in every language. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:51, 28 September 2026 (UTC) :::I replaced the monolingual by some functions so you can see how it's done. Please try to continue this way! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 20:00, 28 September 2026 (UTC) == N'Djamena == better? @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 22:57, 28 September 2026 (UTC) :yes, thank you :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:17, 29 September 2026 (UTC) == Could you please help my friend? == i think @[[User:Lofi Gurl|Lofi Gurl]] would benefit to the project please guide them thanks @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 16:49, 27 October 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]], I do not understand your request, can you please reframe it? Thanks! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:39, 29 October 2026 (UTC) == Explanation for thanking me. == Hi, sorry to bother you, but could you clarify why you thanked me for creating my own user page? I '''do not''' mean that question in a negative or "you shouldn't have done that that is MY user page" way. I'm just a little confused as the creation of my user page doesn't actually improve any Abstract Wikipedia article. Thanks and bye! <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 18:17, 28 October 2026 (UTC) :Actually, never mind. I just realised you edited some of the articles I've created. Thanks! <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 19:00, 28 October 2026 (UTC) ::Hi @[[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]]! We are not a lot here, so we're very happy to see new people coming around here and creating their userpages! This might be the start of great contributions, so we want to celebrate that. I read all recent edits and try to help newcomers, so do not hesitate if you have any questions :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:39, 29 October 2026 (UTC) :::OK, @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]]. Do you know where I can find help on how to create/edit articles here? I know ''some'' of the basics, but I don’t know more advanced functions and stuff that might be useful :| <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 09:04, 29 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] Our best articles are {{Q|Q17}} and {{Q|Q408}} I'd say! The easiest way is to use the functions you will find on these articles I'd guess. If you feel something is strange (highly possible) of some other thing is missing, I'm here to help (slowly, I'm travelling) or the Project Chat can host great conversations. Good contributions! ::::(I will try to improve our help pages when I'm back home!) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:02, 29 October 2026 (UTC) == Thank you & quick questions about platform rules == Hello @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] Thank you very much for your kind guidance and for closing the recent deletion discussion so thoughtfully. Your encouraging words truly motivate me as I learn the ropes of this new platform. Since you kindly offered to help with questions, I wanted to ask two quick things regarding the general guidelines here: '''1.Recreating deleted entries:''' On some language editions like Turkish Wikipedia, recreating a previously deleted article is strictly restricted as "recreated content." If a deleted entry here (or any similar topic) eventually meets the required interwiki and notability thresholds in the future, can it be safely recreated without being automatically deleted again? '''2.Stub articles and templates:''' Are there plans to introduce "stub" classifications or stub templates here in the future for short, developing entries? Thank you again for your time, patience, and support! Best regards, [[User:Kehanetr|Kehanetr]] ([[User talk:Kehanetr|talk]]) 19:00, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :Thank you for your questions! I try to help people thoughtfully indeed, keeping in mind the interests of the project but also the fact than everyone needs respect and, sometimes, help. :# Nothing is deleted automatically here! I'm reading all the recent changes for now, ensuring the decisions we've taken collectively are respected. If we change the thresholds in the future (which I hope so, it means we'll be quite complete and have good processes to ensure diversity across cultures), of course previously deleted articles might be recreated. Even before if we reach a community consensus for a particular article :) :# Not for now :) We don't have a lot of templates generally, and I'm not a big fan personnally of this approach (knwowledge is infinite, everything is a stub). :In general, my advice is: try various things and keep experimenting! If you see something strange on a page, tag the contributor on the talk page. If you see something that might need a community decision, bring it the Project chat. And that's it! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:21, 11 November 2026 (UTC) hbfiyjrpdjq61b2t3suwr7tik0nomjg 26028 26027 2026-11-11T19:32:12Z Kehanetr 7660 /* Thank you & quick questions about platform rules */ Reply 26028 wikitext text/x-wiki == Welcome == {{Welcome}} Thanks for your contributions so far. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 22:30, 12 August 2026 (UTC) == Description == are we allowed to have descriptions? @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:20, 28 September 2026 (UTC) :What do you mean by descriptions @[[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]]? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:49, 28 September 2026 (UTC) ::ah, if you mean a monolingual description like you added in [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q657?uselang=fr&curid=6400&diff=22463&oldid=22256 Chad], no, it's not the point of the project. We should only use functions that can produce a relatively similar text in every language. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:51, 28 September 2026 (UTC) :::I replaced the monolingual by some functions so you can see how it's done. Please try to continue this way! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 20:00, 28 September 2026 (UTC) == N'Djamena == better? @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 22:57, 28 September 2026 (UTC) :yes, thank you :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:17, 29 September 2026 (UTC) == Could you please help my friend? == i think @[[User:Lofi Gurl|Lofi Gurl]] would benefit to the project please guide them thanks @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 16:49, 27 October 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]], I do not understand your request, can you please reframe it? Thanks! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:39, 29 October 2026 (UTC) == Explanation for thanking me. == Hi, sorry to bother you, but could you clarify why you thanked me for creating my own user page? I '''do not''' mean that question in a negative or "you shouldn't have done that that is MY user page" way. I'm just a little confused as the creation of my user page doesn't actually improve any Abstract Wikipedia article. Thanks and bye! <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 18:17, 28 October 2026 (UTC) :Actually, never mind. I just realised you edited some of the articles I've created. Thanks! <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 19:00, 28 October 2026 (UTC) ::Hi @[[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]]! We are not a lot here, so we're very happy to see new people coming around here and creating their userpages! This might be the start of great contributions, so we want to celebrate that. I read all recent edits and try to help newcomers, so do not hesitate if you have any questions :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:39, 29 October 2026 (UTC) :::OK, @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]]. Do you know where I can find help on how to create/edit articles here? I know ''some'' of the basics, but I don’t know more advanced functions and stuff that might be useful :| <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 09:04, 29 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] Our best articles are {{Q|Q17}} and {{Q|Q408}} I'd say! The easiest way is to use the functions you will find on these articles I'd guess. If you feel something is strange (highly possible) of some other thing is missing, I'm here to help (slowly, I'm travelling) or the Project Chat can host great conversations. Good contributions! ::::(I will try to improve our help pages when I'm back home!) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:02, 29 October 2026 (UTC) == Thank you & quick questions about platform rules == Hello @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] Thank you very much for your kind guidance and for closing the recent deletion discussion so thoughtfully. Your encouraging words truly motivate me as I learn the ropes of this new platform. Since you kindly offered to help with questions, I wanted to ask two quick things regarding the general guidelines here: '''1.Recreating deleted entries:''' On some language editions like Turkish Wikipedia, recreating a previously deleted article is strictly restricted as "recreated content." If a deleted entry here (or any similar topic) eventually meets the required interwiki and notability thresholds in the future, can it be safely recreated without being automatically deleted again? '''2.Stub articles and templates:''' Are there plans to introduce "stub" classifications or stub templates here in the future for short, developing entries? Thank you again for your time, patience, and support! Best regards, [[User:Kehanetr|Kehanetr]] ([[User talk:Kehanetr|talk]]) 19:00, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :Thank you for your questions! I try to help people thoughtfully indeed, keeping in mind the interests of the project but also the fact than everyone needs respect and, sometimes, help. :# Nothing is deleted automatically here! I'm reading all the recent changes for now, ensuring the decisions we've taken collectively are respected. If we change the thresholds in the future (which I hope so, it means we'll be quite complete and have good processes to ensure diversity across cultures), of course previously deleted articles might be recreated. Even before if we reach a community consensus for a particular article :) :# Not for now :) We don't have a lot of templates generally, and I'm not a big fan personnally of this approach (knwowledge is infinite, everything is a stub). :In general, my advice is: try various things and keep experimenting! If you see something strange on a page, tag the contributor on the talk page. If you see something that might need a community decision, bring it the Project chat. And that's it! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:21, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::Thank you so much for this wonderful and encouraging response! Coming from standard Wikipedia editions with strict bureaucracy, I realized I was overcomplicating things in my head. Your explanation completely cleared up my confusion and made me feel much more comfortable here. ::I will definitely follow your advice and keep experimenting. Thanks again for your kindness and warm welcome! :) [[User:Kehanetr|Kehanetr]] ([[User talk:Kehanetr|talk]]) 19:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) 9ef7qrv02dnae71uaxttq030bczsley 26036 26028 2026-11-11T23:08:00Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 /* Thank you & quick questions about platform rules */ Reply 26036 wikitext text/x-wiki == Welcome == {{Welcome}} Thanks for your contributions so far. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 22:30, 12 August 2026 (UTC) == Description == are we allowed to have descriptions? @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:20, 28 September 2026 (UTC) :What do you mean by descriptions @[[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]]? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:49, 28 September 2026 (UTC) ::ah, if you mean a monolingual description like you added in [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q657?uselang=fr&curid=6400&diff=22463&oldid=22256 Chad], no, it's not the point of the project. We should only use functions that can produce a relatively similar text in every language. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:51, 28 September 2026 (UTC) :::I replaced the monolingual by some functions so you can see how it's done. Please try to continue this way! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 20:00, 28 September 2026 (UTC) == N'Djamena == better? @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 22:57, 28 September 2026 (UTC) :yes, thank you :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:17, 29 September 2026 (UTC) == Could you please help my friend? == i think @[[User:Lofi Gurl|Lofi Gurl]] would benefit to the project please guide them thanks @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 16:49, 27 October 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]], I do not understand your request, can you please reframe it? Thanks! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:39, 29 October 2026 (UTC) == Explanation for thanking me. == Hi, sorry to bother you, but could you clarify why you thanked me for creating my own user page? I '''do not''' mean that question in a negative or "you shouldn't have done that that is MY user page" way. I'm just a little confused as the creation of my user page doesn't actually improve any Abstract Wikipedia article. Thanks and bye! <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 18:17, 28 October 2026 (UTC) :Actually, never mind. I just realised you edited some of the articles I've created. Thanks! <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 19:00, 28 October 2026 (UTC) ::Hi @[[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]]! We are not a lot here, so we're very happy to see new people coming around here and creating their userpages! This might be the start of great contributions, so we want to celebrate that. I read all recent edits and try to help newcomers, so do not hesitate if you have any questions :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:39, 29 October 2026 (UTC) :::OK, @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]]. Do you know where I can find help on how to create/edit articles here? I know ''some'' of the basics, but I don’t know more advanced functions and stuff that might be useful :| <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 09:04, 29 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] Our best articles are {{Q|Q17}} and {{Q|Q408}} I'd say! The easiest way is to use the functions you will find on these articles I'd guess. If you feel something is strange (highly possible) of some other thing is missing, I'm here to help (slowly, I'm travelling) or the Project Chat can host great conversations. Good contributions! ::::(I will try to improve our help pages when I'm back home!) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:02, 29 October 2026 (UTC) == Thank you & quick questions about platform rules == Hello @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] Thank you very much for your kind guidance and for closing the recent deletion discussion so thoughtfully. Your encouraging words truly motivate me as I learn the ropes of this new platform. Since you kindly offered to help with questions, I wanted to ask two quick things regarding the general guidelines here: '''1.Recreating deleted entries:''' On some language editions like Turkish Wikipedia, recreating a previously deleted article is strictly restricted as "recreated content." If a deleted entry here (or any similar topic) eventually meets the required interwiki and notability thresholds in the future, can it be safely recreated without being automatically deleted again? '''2.Stub articles and templates:''' Are there plans to introduce "stub" classifications or stub templates here in the future for short, developing entries? Thank you again for your time, patience, and support! Best regards, [[User:Kehanetr|Kehanetr]] ([[User talk:Kehanetr|talk]]) 19:00, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :Thank you for your questions! I try to help people thoughtfully indeed, keeping in mind the interests of the project but also the fact than everyone needs respect and, sometimes, help. :# Nothing is deleted automatically here! I'm reading all the recent changes for now, ensuring the decisions we've taken collectively are respected. If we change the thresholds in the future (which I hope so, it means we'll be quite complete and have good processes to ensure diversity across cultures), of course previously deleted articles might be recreated. Even before if we reach a community consensus for a particular article :) :# Not for now :) We don't have a lot of templates generally, and I'm not a big fan personnally of this approach (knwowledge is infinite, everything is a stub). :In general, my advice is: try various things and keep experimenting! If you see something strange on a page, tag the contributor on the talk page. If you see something that might need a community decision, bring it the Project chat. And that's it! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:21, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::Thank you so much for this wonderful and encouraging response! Coming from standard Wikipedia editions with strict bureaucracy, I realized I was overcomplicating things in my head. Your explanation completely cleared up my confusion and made me feel much more comfortable here. ::I will definitely follow your advice and keep experimenting. Thanks again for your kindness and warm welcome! :) [[User:Kehanetr|Kehanetr]] ([[User talk:Kehanetr|talk]]) 19:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::Great! Really do not hesitate in playing and making errors that'a how humans learn! I will do my best to keep this project as human and as less bureaucratic as we ''wikimedianly'' can :D [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 23:08, 11 November 2026 (UTC) 7hzw1r6h7wf17h86cvpbt02ncntrple 26037 26036 2026-11-11T23:08:27Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 /* Thank you & quick questions about platform rules */ 26037 wikitext text/x-wiki == Welcome == {{Welcome}} Thanks for your contributions so far. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 22:30, 12 August 2026 (UTC) == Description == are we allowed to have descriptions? @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 18:20, 28 September 2026 (UTC) :What do you mean by descriptions @[[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]]? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:49, 28 September 2026 (UTC) ::ah, if you mean a monolingual description like you added in [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q657?uselang=fr&curid=6400&diff=22463&oldid=22256 Chad], no, it's not the point of the project. We should only use functions that can produce a relatively similar text in every language. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:51, 28 September 2026 (UTC) :::I replaced the monolingual by some functions so you can see how it's done. Please try to continue this way! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 20:00, 28 September 2026 (UTC) == N'Djamena == better? @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 22:57, 28 September 2026 (UTC) :yes, thank you :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 17:17, 29 September 2026 (UTC) == Could you please help my friend? == i think @[[User:Lofi Gurl|Lofi Gurl]] would benefit to the project please guide them thanks @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 16:49, 27 October 2026 (UTC) :Hi @[[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]], I do not understand your request, can you please reframe it? Thanks! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:39, 29 October 2026 (UTC) == Explanation for thanking me. == Hi, sorry to bother you, but could you clarify why you thanked me for creating my own user page? I '''do not''' mean that question in a negative or "you shouldn't have done that that is MY user page" way. I'm just a little confused as the creation of my user page doesn't actually improve any Abstract Wikipedia article. Thanks and bye! <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 18:17, 28 October 2026 (UTC) :Actually, never mind. I just realised you edited some of the articles I've created. Thanks! <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 19:00, 28 October 2026 (UTC) ::Hi @[[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]]! We are not a lot here, so we're very happy to see new people coming around here and creating their userpages! This might be the start of great contributions, so we want to celebrate that. I read all recent edits and try to help newcomers, so do not hesitate if you have any questions :) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:39, 29 October 2026 (UTC) :::OK, @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]]. Do you know where I can find help on how to create/edit articles here? I know ''some'' of the basics, but I don’t know more advanced functions and stuff that might be useful :| <span style="color:#E2C196;background-color:#101418">DeuteranopizzA</span> ([[User:Deuteranopizza|user page]]|[[User talk:Deuteranopizza|talk]]) 09:04, 29 October 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Deuteranopizza|Deuteranopizza]] Our best articles are {{Q|Q17}} and {{Q|Q408}} I'd say! The easiest way is to use the functions you will find on these articles I'd guess. If you feel something is strange (highly possible) of some other thing is missing, I'm here to help (slowly, I'm travelling) or the Project Chat can host great conversations. Good contributions! ::::(I will try to improve our help pages when I'm back home!) [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 14:02, 29 October 2026 (UTC) == Thank you & quick questions about platform rules == Hello @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] Thank you very much for your kind guidance and for closing the recent deletion discussion so thoughtfully. Your encouraging words truly motivate me as I learn the ropes of this new platform. Since you kindly offered to help with questions, I wanted to ask two quick things regarding the general guidelines here: '''1.Recreating deleted entries:''' On some language editions like Turkish Wikipedia, recreating a previously deleted article is strictly restricted as "recreated content." If a deleted entry here (or any similar topic) eventually meets the required interwiki and notability thresholds in the future, can it be safely recreated without being automatically deleted again? '''2.Stub articles and templates:''' Are there plans to introduce "stub" classifications or stub templates here in the future for short, developing entries? Thank you again for your time, patience, and support! Best regards, [[User:Kehanetr|Kehanetr]] ([[User talk:Kehanetr|talk]]) 19:00, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :Thank you for your questions! I try to help people thoughtfully indeed, keeping in mind the interests of the project but also the fact than everyone needs respect and, sometimes, help. :# Nothing is deleted automatically here! I'm reading all the recent changes for now, ensuring the decisions we've taken collectively are respected. If we change the thresholds in the future (which I hope so, it means we'll be quite complete and have good processes to ensure diversity across cultures), of course previously deleted articles might be recreated. Even before if we reach a community consensus for a particular article :) :# Not for now :) We don't have a lot of templates generally, and I'm not a big fan personnally of this approach (knwowledge is infinite, everything is a stub). :In general, my advice is: try various things and keep experimenting! If you see something strange on a page, tag the contributor on the talk page. If you see something that might need a community decision, bring it the Project chat. And that's it! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:21, 11 November 2026 (UTC) ::Thank you so much for this wonderful and encouraging response! Coming from standard Wikipedia editions with strict bureaucracy, I realized I was overcomplicating things in my head. Your explanation completely cleared up my confusion and made me feel much more comfortable here. ::I will definitely follow your advice and keep experimenting. Thanks again for your kindness and warm welcome! :) [[User:Kehanetr|Kehanetr]] ([[User talk:Kehanetr|talk]]) 19:32, 11 November 2026 (UTC) :::Great! Really do not hesitate in playing and making errors, that's how humans learn! I will do my best to keep this project as human and as less bureaucratic as we ''wikimedianly'' can :D [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 23:08, 11 November 2026 (UTC) f5xvn7kcgv0e8q1sc2b2lxuah8psmhe Template:Main page/News/ja 10 5504 25978 25076 2026-11-11T14:45:44Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 25978 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;<span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">Volunteer's Corners</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">The next Volunteers' Corner will be at <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 11:00 UTC on 2026-11-09]</bdi> on <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi> at <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi>.</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">The [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-11.webm|most recent Volunteer's Corner]] is available on Commons.</span> ; <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">Recent status updates about Wikifunctions</span> <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|2026-11-04]]: A new Type for NLG Functions?</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|2026-10-30]]: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|2026-10-25]]: Wikiabstrak app</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|2026-10-17]]: Changes in evaluator representations</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|2026-10-09]]: Quarterly planning</span> </div> <span class="plainlinks">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small">その他のニュース</span>]]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> 300ohu5dixt0ov088hw6mvsdw9pdje2 Template:Main page/News/fa 10 5544 25975 25073 2026-11-11T14:45:44Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 25975 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;<span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">Volunteer's Corners</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">The next Volunteers' Corner will be at <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 11:00 UTC on 2026-11-09]</bdi> on <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi> at <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi>.</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">The [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-11.webm|most recent Volunteer's Corner]] is available on Commons.</span> ; به روزرسانی های وضعیت اخیر درباره ویکی توابع <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|2026-11-04]]: A new Type for NLG Functions?</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|2026-10-30]]: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|2026-10-25]]: Wikiabstrak app</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|2026-10-17]]: Changes in evaluator representations</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|2026-10-09]]: Quarterly planning</span> </div> <span class="plainlinks">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small">اخبار بیشتر</span>]]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> h3i5vuxfobxajma2bnfbuq2yzlp4lv3 Template:Main page/News/fr 10 6114 25976 25074 2026-11-11T14:45:44Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 25976 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;Le coin des bénévoles * Le prochain Coin des bénévoles se tiendra le <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 11:00 UTC on 2026-11-09]</bdi> sous <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi> sur <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi>. * La [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-11.webm|dernière version du Coin des bénévoles]] est disponible sur Commons. ; Dernières mises à jour de l'état de Wikifunctions <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|2026-11-04]]: A new Type for NLG Functions?</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|2026-10-30]]: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia</span> * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|2026-10-25]]: application Wikiabstrak * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|2026-10-17]]: modifications dans la représentation des évaluateurs * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|2026-10-09]]: planning trimestriel </div> <span class="plainlinks">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small">Plus...</span>]]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> rregohjlipxyycbess5ydauwpkhv6an Template:Main page/News/pl 10 6140 25981 25079 2026-11-11T14:45:45Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 25981 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;Kąciki wolontariackie * Kolejne spotkanie w ramach cyklu „Kącik wolontariacki” odbędzie się o <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 11:00 UTC on 2026-11-09]</bdi> na platformie Google Meet pod adresem <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi>. * [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-11.webm|Ostatnia edycja „Kącika wolontariackiego”]] jest dostępna w Commons. ; Ostatnie aktualności dotyczące Wikifunkcji <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|2026-11-04]]: A new Type for NLG Functions?</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|2026-10-30]]: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|2026-10-25]]: Wikiabstrak app</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|2026-10-17]]: Changes in evaluator representations</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|2026-10-09]]: Quarterly planning</span> </div> <span class="plainlinks">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small">Więcej aktualności</span>]]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> ovcamzh594gxreiji8zqlri60ai5ggb Q181209 0 6394 26053 22248 2026-11-12T02:10:14Z Lemmepassmyexamsbigyahu 9883 Added more information 26053 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q181209", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36678", "Z36678K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q181209" }, "Z36678K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36983", "Z36983K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q181209" }, "Z36983K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28575" }, "Z36983K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q218" }, "Z36983K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } g0ons4bdeit1tgaqbd7cfi5cajxer47 Template:Main page/News/ml 10 6764 25980 25077 2026-11-11T14:45:45Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 25980 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;വോളണ്ടിയേഴ്‌സ് കോർണറുകൾ * അടുത്ത വോളണ്ടിയേഴ്‌സ് കോർണർ <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi> എന്ന ലിങ്കിൽ <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi> -ൽ <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1794222000 11:00 UTC on 2026-11-09]</bdi> -ന് നടക്കും. * [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-11.webm|ഏറ്റവും പുതിയ വോളണ്ടിയേഴ്‌സ് കോർണർ]] കോമൺസിൽ ലഭ്യമാണ്. ; വിക്കിഫങ്ഷൻസിനെക്കുറിച്ചുള്ള സമീപകാല സ്റ്റാറ്റസ് വിവരങ്ങൾ <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-11-04|2026-11-04]]: A new Type for NLG Functions?</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-30|2026-10-30]]: Errors and fallbacks in Abstract Wikipedia</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-25|2026-10-25]]: Wikiabstrak app</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-17|2026-10-17]]: Changes in evaluator representations</span> * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-10-09|2026-10-09]]: ത്രൈമാസ ആസൂത്രണം </div> <span class="plainlinks">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|<span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small">കൂടുതൽ വാർത്തകൾ</span>]]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> 83yj5y1kfywbi4i31agqvar5rg6gc9c Q567861 0 6928 26013 24608 2026-11-11T16:56:18Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 26013 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q567861", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M16143987" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q567861" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q567861" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q567861" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q567861" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q567861" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q567861" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q567861" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q567861" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q567861" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47308K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q567861" }, "Z47308K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47308K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47308" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49520K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q567861" }, "Z49520K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49520K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49520" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1631107" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z40069K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K1", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z40069K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z40069" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } m9f5qscpt8rykumvowzg8ilmy6nbg62 Q141807203 0 6929 26012 24610 2026-11-11T16:55:42Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 26012 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q141807203", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M202120602" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q141807203" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q141807203" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q141807203" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q141807203" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47645K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q141807203" }, "Z47645K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47645K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47645" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q141807203" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q141807203" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q141807203" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q141807203" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 0m1uqvg4i582tfzjaakkfkdfhtqrzaf Q1167912 0 6950 26011 24650 2026-11-11T16:52:23Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 26011 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q1167912", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M334843" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1167912" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1167912" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1167912" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1167912" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1167912" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1167912" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48824K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1167912" }, "Z48824K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48824K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z48824" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1167912" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1167912" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1167912" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1167912" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1167912" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } o3azoj6xvxua9phgczjh4x6dyvjquk0 Q4429116 0 6952 26010 24655 2026-11-11T16:51:43Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 26010 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q4429116", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M21856725" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4429116" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4429116" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4429116" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4429116" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4429116" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4429116" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48824K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4429116" }, "Z48824K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48824K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z48824" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4429116" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4429116" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4429116" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4429116" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4429116" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 0y9efxxw04yjd7qd0fn6ac5coh2cz9t Q681876 0 6953 26009 24656 2026-11-11T16:51:12Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 26009 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q681876", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M155850" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q681876" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q681876" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q681876" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q681876" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q681876" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q681876" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48824K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q681876" }, "Z48824K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48824K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z48824" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q681876" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q681876" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q681876" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q681876" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q681876" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 0v1v6wf0k4hs0heb8qlejvml7zccgom Q432253 0 6954 26008 24657 2026-11-11T16:50:44Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 26008 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q432253", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M2294013" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q432253" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q432253" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q432253" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q432253" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q432253" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q432253" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q432253" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q432253" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q432253" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q432253" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q432253" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1631107" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z40069K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K1", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z40069K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z40069" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } 1gqat42spenkc30vpvi6z9mmluhnuwj Q2395218 0 6955 26006 24658 2026-11-11T16:49:37Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 26006 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q2395218", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M22174454" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2395218" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2395218" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2395218" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2395218" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2395218" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2395218" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2395218" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2395218" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2395218" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2395218" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2395218" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } n9rortc46oxxa1y8s1kbkn05ko2enny Q45585 0 7011 26007 24855 2026-11-11T16:50:05Z Jsamwrites 874 Generate painting article draft from Wikidata 26007 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q45585", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M25498286" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q45585" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z38053" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z36990K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q45585" }, "Z36990K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z36990" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z37726K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z50772K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q45585" }, "Z50772K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z50772K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z50772" }, "Z37726K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q45585" }, "Z7K1": "Z37726" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47286K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q45585" }, "Z47286K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47286K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47286" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47221K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q45585" }, "Z47221K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47221K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47221" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48824K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q45585" }, "Z48824K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48824K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z48824" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1200750" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z49484K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q45585" }, "Z49484K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z49484K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z49484" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47659K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q45585" }, "Z47659K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47659K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47659" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47695K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q45585" }, "Z47695K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47695K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ], "Z7K1": "Z47695" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2668072" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z47719K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q45585" }, "Z47719K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z47719K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z47719" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q309" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z32145" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z48808K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q45585" }, "Z48808K2": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z48808K3": [ "Z39328" ], "Z7K1": "Z48808" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z35672K1": { "Z18K1": "Z825K2", "Z1K1": "Z18" }, "Z7K1": "Z35672" } ], "index": 0 } } } lsoraa4x37e801xoef8ekkvgl3efxf1 Abstract Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBTQ+ 5 7034 26043 24907 2026-11-11T23:27:52Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 Ornithorynque liminaire moved page [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT+]] to [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBTQ+]] 24907 wikitext text/x-wiki == 🌈 Mois de l’histoire LGBTQ+ 2026 : appel à contributions ! == (English version below) Bonjour, 🌈 '''Le Mois de l’histoire LGBTQ+ revient du 1er au 30 novembre 2026 pour sa cinquième édition !''' Pendant tout le mois de novembre, nous vous invitons à contribuer aux projets Wikimedia pour '''documenter, préserver et rendre plus visibles les histoires, les personnalités, les lieux, les cultures et les luttes LGBTQ+'''. 📚 '''Chaque contribution compte !''' * '''Wikipédia''' : créez ou améliorez des articles sur l’histoire et les thématiques LGBTQ+. * '''Wikidata''' : enrichissez les données, ajoutez des références et reliez les connaissances entre les projets Wikimedia. * '''Wikimedia Commons''' : partagez des photographies, des documents historiques et des archives sous licence libre. * '''Wikisource et les autres projets Wikimedia''' : contribuez à préserver et diffuser les textes et les mémoires LGBTQ+. ✨ '''Cette année, les avancées de [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/ Wikipédia abstraite] et de [https://www.wikifunctions.org/ Wikifunctions] ouvrent de nouvelles perspectives pour le partage multilingue des connaissances.''' Elles soulignent l’importance de contenus fiables, structurés et interconnectés entre Wikipédia, Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons et les autres projets Wikimedia, pour rendre ces histoires accessibles dans toujours plus de langues. Que vous soyez débutant·e ou expérimenté·e, '''rejoignez-nous pour faire vivre et transmettre les mémoires LGBTQ+ !''' 🏳️‍🌈 ➡️ '''[[m:Wiki Loves Pride/Mois de l'histoire LGBTQ+/2026|Participez au Mois de l’histoire LGBTQ+ 2026 !]]''' Merci pour vos contributions et n’hésitez pas à partager cet appel autour de vous ! === 🌈 LGBTQ+ History Month 2026: Call for Contributions! === Hello everyone, 🌈 '''LGBTQ+ History Month returns from November 1 to 30, 2026, for its fifth edition!''' Throughout November, we invite you to contribute to Wikimedia projects to '''document, preserve, and increase the visibility of LGBTQ+ histories, people, places, cultures, and movements'''. 📚 '''Every contribution matters!''' * '''Wikipedia''': create or improve articles about LGBTQ+ history and related topics. * '''Wikidata''': enrich structured data, add references, and connect knowledge across Wikimedia projects. * '''Wikimedia Commons''': share freely licensed photographs, historical documents, and archives. * '''Wikisource and other Wikimedia projects''': help preserve and share LGBTQ+ texts and memories. ✨ '''This year, advances in [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/ Abstract Wikipedia] and [https://www.wikifunctions.org/ Wikifunctions] open new possibilities for sharing knowledge across languages.''' They highlight the importance of reliable, structured, and interconnected content across Wikipedia, Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, and other Wikimedia projects, helping make these histories accessible in more languages. Whether you are a newcomer or an experienced contributor, '''join us in preserving and sharing LGBTQ+ histories!''' 🏳️‍🌈 ➡️ '''[[m:Wiki Loves Pride/Mois de l'histoire LGBTQ+/2026|Join LGBTQ+ History Month 2026!]]''' Thank you for your contributions, and please help spread the word! [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 14:02, 28 October 2026 (UTC) 4rpj0xwbroubsnigosj48dz5qd2bb8x User:Renamed user dc97874b65459e90298c6af2c4e7f043 2 7133 26052 25351 2026-11-12T02:07:26Z Mfield 1520 Mfield moved page [[User:ZNomadYT]] to [[User:Renamed user dc97874b65459e90298c6af2c4e7f043]] without leaving a redirect: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "[[Special:CentralAuth/ZNomadYT|ZNomadYT]]" to "[[Special:CentralAuth/Renamed user dc97874b65459e90298c6af2c4e7f043|Renamed user dc97874b65459e90298c6af2c4e7f043]]" 25351 wikitext text/x-wiki #REDIRECT [[wikipedia:User:ZNomadYT]] j3f6kisr1fqo76ss5q0aelzmlk4t33z Talk:Q4918 1 7215 26068 25654 2026-11-12T09:08:19Z Jsamwrites 874 /* sea/her */ Reply 26068 wikitext text/x-wiki == sea/her == @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]]: [[:f:Z49520]] does not work in French cause the sea has no pronoun... [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire (she/they)]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 00:21, 10 November 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] Thanks for your feedback. This issue has been corrected. It may not be visible here yet due to caching, but you can check it here: [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/fr/Z49520?call=%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z7%22%2C%22Z49520K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q4918%22%7D%2C%22Z49520K2%22%3A%22Z1004%22%2C%22Z49520K3%22%3A%5B%22Z39328%22%2C%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z39328%22%2C%22Z39328K1%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q3427356%22%7D%2C%22Z39328K2%22%3A%7B%22Z1K1%22%3A%22Z6091%22%2C%22Z6091K1%22%3A%22Q468801%22%7D%7D%5D%2C%22Z7K1%22%3A%22Z49520%22%7D link]. [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 09:08, 12 November 2026 (UTC) ri5lym625mtuatcjf4nnhuvubidh79j Q36159 0 7238 26035 25769 2026-11-11T22:46:42Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 dedicated function 26035 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q36159", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M131408908" }, "Z36038K2": "James with the Los Angeles Lakers in 2022" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51128", "Z51128K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q36159" }, "Z51128K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38757", "Z38757K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q36159" }, "Z38757K2": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q30" } ], "Z38757K3": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3665646" } ], "Z38757K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } fcch7tsvvn7o54myjyznxegmv0by5hb Q306656 0 7256 25965 2026-11-11T14:27:49Z Renamed user dc97874b65459e90298c6af2c4e7f043 9439 Created page with "{ "qid": "Q306656", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q306656" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z609..." 25965 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q306656", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q306656" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q35127" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36218", "Z36218K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q306656" }, "Z36218K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P856" }, "Z36218K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 1vyt67tr4zi2pf1dpyqo2d34t6ht7zc Translations:Template:Main page/News/42/en 1198 7257 25970 2026-11-11T14:45:42Z FuzzyBot 563 Importing a new version from external source 25970 wikitext text/x-wiki [[$1|2026-11-04]]: A new Type for NLG Functions? 5bvbz5l796syus6j2yoffkf42yvt55m Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT+ 4 7258 26042 2026-11-11T23:27:52Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 Ornithorynque liminaire moved page [[Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT+]] to [[Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+]] 26042 wikitext text/x-wiki #REDIRECT [[Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+]] tfgv9f9y5q4uoevxx0ajfhtgvx74zt8 Abstract Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT+ 5 7259 26044 2026-11-11T23:27:52Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 Ornithorynque liminaire moved page [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT+]] to [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBTQ+]] 26044 wikitext text/x-wiki #REDIRECT [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBTQ+]] plvxr0efku6pmfae42hjnfp8e34g5kt Q80524 0 7260 26045 2026-11-11T23:45:47Z Lemmepassmyexamsbigyahu 9883 created an article for Indian rupee 26045 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q80524", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q80524" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8142" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q668" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36993", "Z36993K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1480044" }, "Z36993K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11639620" }, "Z36993K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36993K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2270398" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q308229" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q41207" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37840", "Z37840K1": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q39074541" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28174118" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28174085" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28173333" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q65056584" } ], "Z37840K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q47433" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37840", "Z37840K1": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q6022874" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q6022889" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17056011" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q6022673" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q37880457" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q27794717" } ], "Z37840K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M70230474" }, "Z36038K2": "" } ] } } } tqx9e43dz1sqoij5qkfg50gcpriqt9r 26055 26045 2026-11-12T03:23:40Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 order 26055 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q80524", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q80524" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8142" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q668" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36993", "Z36993K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q1480044" }, "Z36993K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11639620" }, "Z36993K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z36993K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37011", "Z37011K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2270398" }, "Z37011K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q308229" }, "Z37011K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z37011K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q41207" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37840", "Z37840K1": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q39074541" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28174118" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28174085" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q28173333" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q65056584" } ], "Z37840K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32145", "Z32145K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q47433" }, "Z32145K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36038", "Z36038K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M70230474" }, "Z36038K2": "" }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37840", "Z37840K1": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q6022874" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q6022889" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q17056011" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q6022673" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q37880457" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q27794717" } ], "Z37840K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 4n9n6xpwowr8qgwpz90jxsyax94noxo Q3246557 0 7261 26064 2026-11-12T07:26:57Z Sdkb 1058 Created page with "{ "qid": "Q3246557", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M103914545" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6..." 26064 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q3246557", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M103914545" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37424", "Z37424K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z37424K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q4671277" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q194166" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z47294", "Z47294K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z47294K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" }, "Z47294K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z51864", "Z51864K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3246557" }, "Z51864K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" }, "Z51864K3": [ "Z39328", { "Z1K1": "Z39328", "Z39328K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3427356" }, "Z39328K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q468801" } } ] }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32839", "Z32839K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8191099" }, "Z32839K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37840", "Z37840K1": [ "Z6091", { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7227384" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q50015" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q10664609" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5126318" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12236173" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q7199570" }, { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q6382470" } ], "Z37840K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 6j5iri0034f8t6tws24pujfu1xppobi User talk:Sdkb 3 7262 26066 2026-11-12T08:49:05Z HenkvD 1447 /* Welcome */ new section 26066 wikitext text/x-wiki == Welcome == {{Welcome}} Welcome back and thanks for your contributions so far. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:49, 12 November 2026 (UTC) r0h6if2rbtdqkm0rmjlnoxiyd7g1ufz