User talk:Tdxiang
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents
[edit] Re: Anthony cfc RFA
No prob. I don't think there's any rule that only a 'crat can close and archive a RfA. A single admin should certainly be able to do this too, if he/she can tell the outcome in a clear-cut case with no dispute, which is usually the case. The main thing a 'crat can do special that admins can't, is make someone an admin with the click of a button, which should normally only be done following a successful RfA anyway. But it saves time from having to petition at Meta! Blockinblox - talk 12:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Esperanza archive
Please consider unprotecting Wikipedia talk:Esperanza/Archive 1; protection should not be used to prevent talk page archives from being editable. J Di 08:15, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Bot status
Bot status granted for Synthebot! Thanks, Archer7 - talk 12:02, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] RfD
I'm a little confused. It looked to me like the decision regarding Order of the Garter, Franks, List of Byzantine Emperors, and Privy Council of the United Kingdom was to delete all but List of Byzantine Emperors. Creol had simplified it and it looked much better. I think most of the editors were saying to delete unless the articles were simplified. Since that article was simplified, I'm not sure why you deleted it. I don't care much either way, I was just confused because I expected that article to be kept. Thanks.· Tygartl1·talk· 14:04, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] List of Byz emperors restored
I restored your deletion of the article List of Byzantine Emperors. The RfD on the entire group did pass, but that specific article did not get a majority of the votes for deletion (Blockinblox and I voted simplify, 2 voted delete, and Eptalon voted delete with change to simplify if someone wants to.) As I had already simplified the article after it's nomination (and after the 2 delete votes who may not have noticed the articles status changed) that would have had its count at 2 simp, 2 delete, and Eptalon's as the 3rd simp (someone did want to simplify it). With a 3-2 vote for simplify, it did not pass for deletion. -- Creol(talk) 06:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Singapore?
Oh, are you the one interviewed in Digital Life? (That message is to warn people from leaving attack messages) Chenzw (talk ▪ changes) 03:16, 14 April 2007 (UTC)