Wikipedia:Peer review

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is a place to get comments and peer review from other Wikipedians on Wikipedia pages. Use this page to post links to articles that you would like comments and peer review on. If you see an excellent article here, add {{vgood}} to the page.

For comments on policies, other users, technology, and other miscellaneous concerns that are not directly related to reviewing article content, use Simple Talk.

Contents

[edit] Requests

Previous requests: 1
Propositions and discussions on very good articles are here

Please put newer requests at the top of the list

[edit] Help:Contributions

I got an idea from EN but I pretty much wrote it all from scratch. I feel it needs some work and perhaps some images to make it more "readable", but I'd like you to give me some advice and some improvements for the page. Jordanhatch 21:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chopstick

Chopstick needs a peer review. A "in the past" section has been added. Read the talk page. Coffsneeze 02:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Napalm

Article was copied over from enWP;I went through a first round of simplifications. Many more will probably be necessary till it is at a level our users will understand. I invite the community to help. --Eptalon 18:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Many undefined words or red links. Coffsneeze 20:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

I know. my idea of getting it simpler was to first go over the language; I have made a few sentences shorter, and replaced words here and there. This will not be a very good article in the near future. As to the redlinks; I will tackle them once I managed to get the language under control. Some redlinks may disappear i future versions, hence starting at the redlinks is a bad idea. --Eptalon 20:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dolley Payne Todd Madison

I request for a peer review of Dolley Payne Todd Madison. It only has one red link. It also needs sources.Coffsneeze 19:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Many terms need linking (too many to list). Several section need rewording. Her period as first lady is somewhat ambiguous and could mean that J.Madison was President during her term as First Lady rather than her being First Lady during his term as President (He was President while she was First Lady). The final sentence definately needs cleaned up. There is too much being said about trivial matters such as her father and son. They do not need 3-4 sentences to say they were poor and a problem child. (if they need to be mentioned by more than just a name anyway). Image needs to be thumbnailed (and likely the size removed - usage of the default size is usually best) -- Creol(talk) 07:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vitamin D/Category:Vitamins

I request for a peer review.Coffsneeze 02:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Good idea, I created some of the missing vitamin articles. It would be good for the community to review them (basically all of Category:Vitamins. We might also need someone with a better backgorund in chemistry or biology than me to create the missing articles of the Vitamin B complex.--Eptalon 08:53, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Iwasawa theory

This is a nice theory, involving quite a bit of math. Copied the article from en, and started to get a number of annex articles. All of those will need review, and very likely simplification. So anyone good with group theory, ring theory, should step forward and try to simplify these. Very likely needs a strong mathematical background -- Eptalon 21:55, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] All articles in Category:Provinces of Cuba

I have basically copied all the Cuban province articles (from EnWP). I have also made them so simple as to be understandable. The problem is that many of them are in a poor state, and should be improved. --Eptalon 15:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC)