Hjælp-diskussion:Diskussionssider
Fra Wikipedia, den frie encyklopædi
Nå, jeg kan se der er blevet ryddet lidt op i mine stavefejl :-) Tak for hjælpen! Jeg har forresten undladt at oversætte to ting fra den engelske, som følger, da jeg ikke syntes de gav mening:
- Summarize discussion (or refactor): After a discussion on a page has died down for several weeks or the discussion has become heated and long, you (if you can be smart and respectful at the same time) might replace the discussion with a summary of major points, as though you were (!) writing an encyclopedia article about the discussion. If the discussion entailed opposing arguments, present the arguments from an unbiased point of view. Where possible, distinguish the common ground from the points of contention. See Refactoring talk pages below.
[redigér] Refactoring talk pages
According to Wikipedia:editing policy, the notion of refactoring, in the context of a wiki, means basically cleaning up and reorganizing a page such that all the useful information on the page is preserved and made more accessible. It's relatively rare that one needs to entirely refactor a Wikipedia article—usually, edits and additions are what is necessary.
The purpose of talk pages is to assist in creating better articles. Therefore, the purpose of refactoring talk page discussions is to help create good encyclopedia articles, at least in the long run. A short-run purpose is to channel a discussion in a useful direction, that is, to help aim it at the future time when it can be used in an encyclopedia article.
There are a number of talk or other discussion oriented pages which could use a bit of traditional Wiki refactoring. There's useful content there, sometimes, that can be transferred to the article itself. Sometimes large chunks of old talk pages can be completely wiped out with no harm done—feel free to do so, unless you think there's some value in preserving the discussion. In refactoring a talk page, one solid recommendation is to use the traditional wiki refactoring technique of adding a summary with whatever consensus we've arrived at the top, grouping separate discussion items together, and placing them towards the bottom.
See Wikipedia:Refactoring for details on why and how to refactor talk pages.
Hvis der er nogen der syntes de er vigtige, så læg bare en besked her, så jeg kan få taget hul på dem. -- Brother Dysk 13. apr 2005 kl. 10:32 (CEST)
- Jeg synes, der kan være en vis fidus i indholdet her. Som jeg forstår det, handler det om, at man, når en bestemt diskussion må siges at være afsluttet, så kan man lave et resume af diskussionen og slette den oprindelige diskussion. For tiden er der fx en enorm lang diskussion på artiklen om Gurre slot. Den vil næppe være særlig brugbar om et halvt år (det kniber nok såmænd allerede nu for de involverede med helt at finde rundt i den), men hvis nogen kort skitserede synspunkterne, og hvem der havde fremført dem, så ville en ny bruger kunne se, at 1)emnet er blevet diskuteret, 2)hvem argumenterede for hvad og 3)hvad blev konklusionen (hvis en sådan findes). Men det er selvfølgelig bare min mening.--Heelgrasper 13. apr 2005 kl. 10:39 (CEST)