Suradnik:Rosier
Izvor: Wikipedija
en-5 | This user is able to contribute with a professional level of English. |
We'll meet again, don't know where, don't know when
But I know we'll meet again some sunny day
Digital Maoism: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism The problem is in the way the Wikipedia has come to be regarded and used; how it's been elevated to such importance so quickly. And that is part of the larger pattern of the appeal of a new online collectivism that is nothing less than a resurgence of the idea that the collective is all-wise, that it is desirable to have influence concentrated in a bottleneck that can channel the collective with the most verity and force. This is different from representative democracy, or meritocracy. This idea has had dreadful consequences when thrust upon us from the extreme Right or the extreme Left in various historical periods. The fact that it's now being re-introduced today by prominent technologists and futurists, people who in many cases I know and like, doesn't make it any less dangerous.[1]

"to the ordinary user, the turmoil and uncertainty that may lurk beneath the surface of a Wikipedia article are invisible. He or she arrives at a Wikipedia article via Google, perhaps, and sees that it is part of what claims to be an "encyclopedia". This is a word that carries a powerful connotation of reliability. The typical user doesn't know how conventional encyclopedias achieve reliability, only that they do."[2]
- Wikipedia Promotes Free Speech, Encourages "Global Conversation"
- The Wikipedia FAQK
- Wikipedia Celebrates 750 Years Of American Independence
- It's on Wikipedia, So It Must Be True
- Talking point: Wikipedia may be fallible, but we'd be crazy to stop consulting it
- Growing Wikipedia Refines Its 'Anyone Can Edit' Policy
- Why Wikipedia isn't like Linux
- A false Wikipedia 'biography'
- Wikipedia: A Techno-Cult of Ignorance
- A Criticism of Wikipedia Now Exceeding a Scream
- Wikipedia: The Agony of Delete
- Esquire wikis article on Wikipedia
- Can you trust Wikipedia?
- Wikipedia: magic, monkeys and typewriters
- Why Wikipedia Must Jettison Its Anti-Elitism
- What Wikipedia doesn't want you to know
- USUAL SUSPECTS ? Help, I've Been Wiki'ed!
- Unreliable (adj): log on and see
- Wikipedia hoaxster found, but a solution for Wikipedia is still lacking
- There's no Wikipedia entry for 'moral responsibility'
- Online encyclopedias put to the test
- The Faith-Based Encyclopedia Blinks
- Can you trust Wikipedia?
- Wikipedia science 31% more cronky than Britannica's
- Why Wikipedia sucks. Big time.
- I Have The Power
- Ooops: Wikipedia blocks posts from Qatar
- Webforum operated by banned Wikipedia members
- SVUG #18: How do I get into Wikipedia?
- Wikipedia: garbage in, garbage out
- A Stand Against Wikipedia
- Anti-Wikipedia 2: The Rise of the Latrines
- Fighting for your right not to be intimidated by Wikipedia
- Criticism of Wikipedia on Wikipedia
- The Messiness of WikiDemocracy
- Dokdo: One of Wikipedia's 'Lamest Edit Wars'
- Technical solutions: Wisdom of the crowds
- Wikipedia editing hobby goes nationwide
- Politicians notice Wikipedia
- Bias, sabotage haunt Wikipedia's free world
- Wikipedia study 'fatally flawed'
- The death of Wikipedia
- Now, let's bury the myth
- what bears do on the lawn
- Campaign manager resigns amid Wikipedia flap
- Wide World of WIKIPEDIA
- Why I Quit Wikipedia
- The Six Sins of the Wikipedia
- Avoid Wikipedia, warns Wikipedia chief
- The real bias in Wikipedia: a response to David Shariatmadari
- Can History be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past
- Wales and Sanger on Wikipedia
- A thirst for knowledge
- Wikipedia Empire Based on Open Source Worst Practices?
- Wikipedia geeks battle scourge of `vandals' and `sock puppets'
- German Wikipedia plans to stop vandals
- The Hive: Can thousands of Wikipedians be wrong?
- Questions of credibility make for a sticky Wiki
- Irwin's Wikipedia page defaced
- Will Wikipedia Mean the End Of Traditional Encyclopedias?
- Toward a New Compendium of Knowledge (longer version)
- Guerrilla Wikipedians rate rival's chances
- Critic of user-contributed Wikipedia identifies entries with evidence of plagiarism
- More Accurate Wikipedia Warnings
- Archive gives access to Web's past
- Look Me Up Under 'Missing Link'
- The Dark Side of Wikipedia
- Wikipedia semen shortage filled by User Generated Content
- ↑ Lanier, Jaron. "DIGITAL MAOISM: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism", Edge Foundation, May 30, 2006. Retrieved on travanj 30, 2007.
- ↑ McHenry, Robert. "The Faith-Based Encyclopedia Blinks", TCS Daily, 2005-12-14. Retrieved on prosinac 30, 2005.
-
![]() Rosieru, za doprinos Wikipediji. |
Dodijelila: Ygraine |
![]() Opća nagrada |
Dodijelio: Kingstone93 |
![]() Opća nagrada |
Dodijelio: Zeljko |