Disputatio:Linguae mundi
E Vicipaedia
Honestly this page is so full of errors and problems that when I first came to the Wikipedia, this was the page I wanted to fix. Unfortunately, the more I looked at it, the bigger the job seemed to be (especially when I considered things like all the linked pages I would be responsible for renaming). Now that I know more about how wiki works, I really should get off my clunes and do this someday soon. --Iustinus 15:09 nov 11, 2004 (UTC)
Et ego... nescio nomina latina linguarum, sed scio classificationem. Ubi sunt linguae Nilo-Saharienses? Aut Americani, nisi Iroquoiae? Aut Papuanorum? Go for it! - 172.202.106.195 01:45 nov 15, 2004 (UTC)
- There are now so many Romance languages listed that I wondered if it was a good idea to have a bit more hierarchy, allowing the important ones to shine out among the unimportant ones. So I have done this, and I have also tried to make a rough geographical arrangement from West to East. If others think the hierarchy is a bad idea, we can easily abandon it. Andrew Dalby 13:43, 14 Ianuarii 2007 (UTC)
[recensere] Purgatio
Si nomina alternativa sunt, inutile est multiplicare nexus; igitur reverti
- lingua Accadica sive lingua Archadica
ad
[recensere] "Lingua Romanica Africana sive Vandalitica"
Quomodo scimus hanc linguam exstitisse? Pagina Anglica en:African Romance in dubium est, fontibus carentibus. Andrew Dalby 13:12, 11 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
- Respondeo ego (!) esse bibliographiam aliasque res de hanc linguam (si re vera fuit lingua) in Vicipaedia Italiana it:Lingua romanza d'Africa. Sed rationem nominis "Vandalitica" non scio. Andrew Dalby 13:50, 11 Februarii 2007 (UTC)
[recensere] Magnitudo paginae
Sunt aut 5000 aut 6800 aut 13500 linguae (aut plures)!