Disputatio:Aemona

E Vicipaedia

[recensere] Fonte

La fonte per tutte le città europeane cui voci ho scritto oggi si trova qua: http://www.osservatoriolibri.com/luoghi.html

Vi prego, per cortesia: non farmi ad aggiungere quella "footnote" su OGNI pagina che ho fatto! Pazienza ... GiovaneScuola2006 00:48, 24 Octobris 2006 (UTC)

Nostra culpa, ma si, faremmo ti aggiungerla... Perche credi lo essere una mala idea? Solamente da informazione, a chiunque la legge. Puoi copy/paste <ref>http://www.osservatoriolibri.com/luoghi.html</ref>.--Ioshus (disp) 03:03, 24 Octobris 2006 (UTC)

[recensere] Fons

I observe that the catholic church for the diocesis of Lubjana uses the name Archidioecesis Labacensis. Aemona?--Massimo Macconi 07:49, 3 Februarii 2007 (UTC)

True; so does the university (Universitas Labacensis); and I think that words derived from Aemona weren't used much in the past centuries when there was a need to refer to Ljubljana in Latin documents. Note that there is no continuity between the ancient Aemona (ruined in the 5th century) and the present-day Ljubljana (established in the 13th century), although they are located on the same site. 89.142.136.55 21:31, 30 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
Labacum seems to be much more regular as this site would comfirm. Graesse also chips in with about 10 alternative names (including Labacum and Aemona) as does Hofmann (prefers Labacum, with Emona as an alternative). --Harrissimo 21:42, 30 Augusti 2007 (UTC)