Disputatio Usoris:Davus618
E Vicipaedia
Ave, Dave. I have taken the liberty of replying to your Disputatio:Vasingtonia, C.C. query. D Ambulans 02:43, 16 Februarii 2006 (UTC)
- Tibi gratias ago. Davus618 02:47, 16 Februarii 2006 (UTC)
[recensere] Vasingtonia
Please do not change the date formats in this article. It is customary procedure to adhere to our policies on the use of dates and numbers.--Ioshus Rocchio 18:15, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
[recensere] Vasingtonia bis
Actually, I had brought up that point in the discussion page. After Ioshus agreed with me, I changed it to be in line with this. Certainly no slight was meant to your work. But I am curious, given that the article is about America, why use Roman dates? Sinister Petrus 18:19, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
- I chose Roman dates merely because the article was in Latin. Based on Auxilium pro editione, I don't see any reason why dates should be in any of the formats it lists. Davus618 18:31, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
- Just curious, thanks for the answer. Sinister Petrus 18:32, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
- Actually it does mention the use of roman dates. I think it says "both unwieldly and unsightly". The auxilium pro editione is a bit outdated and may need a rewrite, but it definitely does address this. The main thing is though, this is a latin wikipedia, not a roman one, just as the english wikipedia is not a british, australian, or american wikipedia. IFWEWROTELIKETHEROMANSALLTHETIMEARTICLESWOULDLOOKLIKETHISIDONTTHINKYOUREALLYWANTTHATDOYOU? ANd yes, by our policies I meant our general practice, and official/unofficial guidelines...the mos noster, if you will.--Ioshus Rocchio 19:38, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
- I have answered on that page ... and we should welcome you officially, so ... ;-)
- Actually it does mention the use of roman dates. I think it says "both unwieldly and unsightly". The auxilium pro editione is a bit outdated and may need a rewrite, but it definitely does address this. The main thing is though, this is a latin wikipedia, not a roman one, just as the english wikipedia is not a british, australian, or american wikipedia. IFWEWROTELIKETHEROMANSALLTHETIMEARTICLESWOULDLOOKLIKETHISIDONTTHINKYOUREALLYWANTTHATDOYOU? ANd yes, by our policies I meant our general practice, and official/unofficial guidelines...the mos noster, if you will.--Ioshus Rocchio 19:38, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
- Just curious, thanks for the answer. Sinister Petrus 18:32, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
[recensere] Salve
Welcome here! --Roland (disp.) 20:00, 30 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
Salve!
Gratus aut grata apud Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob collata tua gratias agimus speramusque fore ut delecteris et manere velis. Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, sed quid ni his incipias?
- Ops nexusque usoribus novis (
en,
de)
- Auxilium pro editione (latine) (
en)
- Translator's Guide
- Taberna
- Porta communis
- Lexica Neolatina
- Fontes nominum locorum
- Vicipaedia:Regulae propositae
Si plura de modis et moribus Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, ut Vicipaediam aliam adeas, exempli causa:
In ipsis paginis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento scriptis tuis subsignare, litteris imprimendis ~~~~, quae sua sponte et nomen tuum et diem dabunt. Etsi in paginis ipsis lingua Latina tantum uti liceat, in paginis disputationis qualibet lingua scribas. Si quid interrogare volueris, vel apud Tabernam vel in pagina mea disputationis rogato. Ave, spero te "Vicipaedianum" aut "Vicipaedianam" fieri velle!