Disputatio Categoriae:Legati Populi
E Vicipaedia
bad name:
- why "Legatum"?
- if this category is confined to the United States of America, its title should reflect that (there are other countries in the world as well that have a representative democracy). If this category is not confined to the U. S., its description is too narrow.
--UV 10:28, 2 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
-
- I know the name is bad. Representativus would seem better; however, in standard latin, it is an adjective. Also, I don't know why it is listed as Legatum Populi. It should be listed as Legatum Populi Civitatum Foederatarum Americae. I look into it. Andy85719 20:45, 2 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
- You mean legatus, -i m., not legatum, -i n. The two words have different meanings. --UV 21:26, 2 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
- Crap. That's right. Legatum is legacy. More work for me. Andy85719 21:49, 2 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for correcting the legatum/legatus thing. Still, does this category cover
- representatives from all the world's countries? Then the description needs to be modified (it refers to the United States exclusively). Or does it cover
- representatives from the U. S. only? Then this should be reflected in the category title as well. --UV 00:01, 3 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
- You mean legatus, -i m., not legatum, -i n. The two words have different meanings. --UV 21:26, 2 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
- I know the name is bad. Representativus would seem better; however, in standard latin, it is an adjective. Also, I don't know why it is listed as Legatum Populi. It should be listed as Legatum Populi Civitatum Foederatarum Americae. I look into it. Andy85719 20:45, 2 Augusti 2007 (UTC)
[recensere] Comitia=?
Quae sunt haec comitia? Sunt ea totus Congressus, qui Washingtoniae convocatus est? IacobusAmor 02:30, 3 Augusti 2007 (UTC)