Abstract Wikipedia abstractwiki https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Main_page MediaWiki 1.47.0-wmf.2 first-letter Media Special Talk User User talk Abstract Wikipedia Abstract Wikipedia talk File File talk MediaWiki MediaWiki talk Template Template talk Help Help talk Category Category talk TimedText TimedText talk Module Module talk Translations Translations talk 4 6 7941 7936 2026-05-15T14:36:21Z MediaWiki message delivery 61 /* Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #248 is out: A higher meaning */ new section 7941 wikitext text/x-wiki {{/Header}} {{/Archives}} <!-- Add your discussion below this line --> == Put this on ice == How are non-English speakers (who this project is specifically for) meant to develop this wiki's practices and policies if a) all project pages are only available in English, and discussion is largely done in English, and b) there's no attempt to get non-en.wiki communities onboard. At present this looks like it's just going to produce Anglocentric/Eurocentric content, which belies the whole point of having a wiki in one's native language. Yes it's early days and everyone is experimenting and bug-fixing, but the project has already been released to community control, with a predominantly English-speaking/European community. This needs to be put on ice until it can be launched properly with multilingual support and invitations to all wikis, particularly smaller ones. [[User:Kowal2701|Kowal2701]] ([[User talk:Kowal2701|talk]]) 11:44, 28 March 2026 (UTC) :Just because it's not perfect doesn't mean it needs to be shut down. These are all gradual processes. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 15:58, 28 March 2026 (UTC) ::There’s being "not perfect" where things can be improved at a later date, and then there's having antithetical foundations. Also see [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(WMF)#c-Warudo-20260327114000-Warudo-20260327113600] re functions. [[User:Kowal2701|Kowal2701]] ([[User talk:Kowal2701|talk]]) 16:15, 28 March 2026 (UTC) :::You haven't named a single thing that can't be improved at a later date. We're hoping to be able to translate project pages. Non-enwiki communities can be gotten on board later. Function generation already works multilingually in many cases, and those where it does not can be improved. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 16:57, 28 March 2026 (UTC) ::::When the practices and policies will have already been developed, and informal positions of authority already filled. [[User:Kowal2701|Kowal2701]] ([[User talk:Kowal2701|talk]]) 17:04, 28 March 2026 (UTC) :::::@[[User:Kowal2701|Kowal2701]] Thank you for your concerns. We are already aiming at less-served communities through specific calls to action to create more language functions and abstract content in their language. Just give the time to actually see these changes happen. Cheers, [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 18:55, 28 March 2026 (UTC) ::::::Hi Sannita, I'm just wondering how are AW project pages planned to be translated in the future? Is there going to be use of some kind of automated tool such as DeepL or Google Translate, or will it be a custom-designed system? [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 20:39, 28 March 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] We will enable the Translate extension soon, so everyone will be able to translate project pages into their own languages. Sorry for keeping you waiting on this. [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:41, 29 March 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:Kowal2701|Kowal2701]]: thank you for your concern and suggestion. When this Beta started, we have immediately [[:f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-03-19|mentioned that there might be the possibility of restarting the project]]. So that might indeed happen. :But so far, this early start of the not fully polished project allows us to learn so incredibly much. In the last few days we have learned so much more than we would have been able without the launch in months! And it helps us to focus on where to put our limited resources, so that we can make the overall project better quicker than would have been possible otherwise. From that perspective, this has been quite a success. :I am trying to understand your suggestion: what do you think would need to be in place before a possible relaunch? Which requirements would need to be met? --[[User:DVrandecic (WMF)|DVrandecic (WMF)]] ([[User talk:DVrandecic (WMF)|talk]]) 13:53, 29 March 2026 (UTC) ::Thank you, I wasn't aware of that. Some uninformed thoughts below. ::Re communication: ideally people would communicate using functions, and there'd be some kind of visual editor where people type in their native language and it gets translated into functions, but I realise that's a pipe dream. Something that allows people who don't have a mutual language to communicate is imo necessary, maybe there could be a tool that machine translates comments. Machine translation ''sucks'', but so long as people get the gist of what is being said, that'd be better than nothing. I dread to think what disputes would be like though. ::Re invitations, idk what has already been done, but I would've thought now would the time to get some people from smaller wikis editing and experimenting, just an invitation on a wiki's main noticeboard would probably do the trick (is there a [[meta:MassMessage]] service for updates re Abstract wiki that could be recommended?). Then a central or watchlist notice for the actual launch, hopefully by which time there'd already be a small group of editors able to assist the influx of newbies. An intuitive tutorial is also necessary, as well as an intuitive version of [[f:Wikifunctions:Catalogue]]. [[User:Kowal2701|Kowal2701]] ([[User talk:Kowal2701|talk]]) 18:14, 29 March 2026 (UTC) :::What do you think about boilerplate templates. So writing a sentence and then marking the parts of the sentence what can be derived from Wikidataitems or the lexeme linked to it. This seems to me like an realistic approach for making it easier to contribute. I am happy you wrote about the predominantly English-speaking/European community involved in this project. It seems like it is different to contribute so far and I had the expectation people from small language versions come on their own and contribute also if they dont speak English. So far it seems to be not the case and I hope it will be easier to contribute. I think for the beginning the goal of Abstract Wikipedia should be generating sentences based on data. So supporting small language versions should be not the goal of the first phase as it seems to take some time and improvements of the structures to make it easier to contribute. Sharing the work and offering people help with creating an function for an specific sentence can be a important way of getting more content in Abstract Wikipedia. Maybe it is unrealistic to find a huge number of people who are interested in writing functions who generate text. [[User:Hogü-456|Hogü-456]] ([[User talk:Hogü-456|talk]]) 20:58, 29 March 2026 (UTC) :::[[Abstract Wikipedia:Useful functions for article composition]] is already available, as is [[Help:How to create an article]], but they are not perfect. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 22:05, 29 March 2026 (UTC) :Wikidata has a project chat in many languages. We can do that in the future. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 14:28, 16 April 2026 (UTC) ::Anyone can write on this page in any language. Personally, I’d prefer to see the original and get it translated into English rather than trying to make sense of a poor machine translation without even knowing which language the original was in. For the same reason, I would generally reply in English. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 23:18, 16 April 2026 (UTC) == Why don't we just structure this with wikitemplates? == I feel like the project could be done a lot better by using templates kind of like how wikipedia does them. Just the entire thing is templates that can be rendered in many languages. So like [[Q106289265]] would have the content <nowiki>{{Z26039|Q7257}}</nowiki> and could even have some aliasing done across languages so it could be <nowiki>{{subject is|Q7257}}</nowiki>. Code would be editable with a regular visual editor or code editor. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 04:34, 29 March 2026 (UTC) :This is available in pages when Parsoid rendering is enabled. We don't use this becuase it doesn't make sense for constructing and editing massive articles. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 21:37, 29 March 2026 (UTC) ::How do you do parsoid rendering? And why wouldn't it make sense? With aliases and everything could work great. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 23:12, 29 March 2026 (UTC) :::I believe it is enabled by default. If you do have it on: {{#function:Z10000|you'll s|ee this}} [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 14:54, 30 March 2026 (UTC) :you may be interested in reading this old [[m:Abstract_Wikipedia/Google.org_Fellows_evaluation|Google report]]. [[User:BrokenSegue|BrokenSegue]] ([[User talk:BrokenSegue|talk]]) 14:32, 9 May 2026 (UTC) == Automatically querying wikidata == Is it possible in the future for this project to have things that automatically query wikidata? Like an infobox that gives people's spouses, or a function that queries a specific property on wikidata [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 20:10, 29 March 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that is the long term goal. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 21:37, 29 March 2026 (UTC) ::What’s “long term” about it? We already have functions that query specific properties on Wikidata, [[f:Z32431]] being a simple example. A list of spouses seems like a fairly simple function too, although there might be performance issues if there are a lot of spouses. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 22:01, 31 March 2026 (UTC) :I had exactly this question. One of the example here is [[Q1033]] where I read "Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa.". The problem is that this concept is hard-coded. What if its population will decrease and it will become the second-most populous country? [[User:Wiso|Wiso]] ([[User talk:Wiso|talk]]) 08:21, 20 April 2026 (UTC) == Logo == {{Tracked|T424781}} In vector2009 and monobook, the logo shows as the standard enwiki logo. Which is confusing as this is technically a whole other sisterproject. I suggest [[:File:Wikipedia-logo-blank.svg|this]] be used as a temporary logo for these skins. [[User:Kinopiko|Kinopiko]] ([[User talk:Kinopiko|talk]]) 06:00, 31 March 2026 (UTC) :There's also the scalable favicon, [[commons:File:Abstract-Wikipedia-favicon.svg|Abstract-Wikipedia-favicon.svg]] [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 01:54, 3 April 2026 (UTC) :This still appears to be as of yet unfixed. I understand this wiki is still very early in its lifespan so I'm not particularly miffed about it, it looking identical due to the logo is rather confusing at first but with separation with tab groups in my browser it becomes manageable. I am personally excited to see what logo(s) will be devised for this project; seeing the same thing happen for the other sister projects has been very fun to watch in the past. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 21:49, 20 April 2026 (UTC) == I made a desktop app that helps with editing == [[file:Abstract Wikipedia Editor v4.1.0.png|thumb|alt=screenshot|now there's a screenshot available]] I made a desktop app that helps with creating and editing Abstract Wikipedia pages. It pulls data from wikidata to form templates that it makes into wikitext, and it can round-trip articles into and from the wikitext. Here it is [[User:Immanuelle/Abstract Wikipedia Editor]]. I hope that it helps with editing. — [[user:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[user talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 00:51, 6 April 2026 (UTC) : I've created [[Abstract Wikipedia:Tools]] for tracking these things. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 14:44, 7 April 2026 (UTC) : @[[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] But the main namespace is not for wikitext. Are you publishing this content there anyway? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small>^{[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]}_{[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]}</small> 15:05, 7 April 2026 (UTC) :: It's not actual wikitext. It's a custom template syntax that's kind of like wikitext, which gets converted into abstract content when you press "Push to Abstract Wikipedia." [[User:JJPMaster|JJP]]_{[[User talk:JJPMaster|Mas]]_{[[Special:Contributions/JJPMaster|ter]]}} ([[Q1270787|she]]/[[Q3437264|they]]) 16:57, 7 April 2026 (UTC) ::: @[[User:Ainali|Ainali]]@[[User:JJPMaster|JJPMaster]] if you have syntax suggestions I am interested. I was in a rush with implementing this, and I want to in the future implement aliases for wikifunctions and possibly items, so that you can type things out yourself. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 19:53, 7 April 2026 (UTC) ::: Ah, I see. IT was just the announcement that was ambiguous then. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small>^{[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]}_{[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]}</small> 20:03, 7 April 2026 (UTC) : FYI anything made by a clanker AI robot is not "made by you." Thank you for your attention to this matter. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 15:18, 7 April 2026 (UTC) :: Who, then? [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 20:16, 7 April 2026 (UTC) ::: The clanker AI robot. [[User:Babelball|Babelball]] ([[User talk:Babelball|talk]]) 16:42, 8 April 2026 (UTC) :::: I edited the Wikidata page for the tool to mention Claude. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:35, 8 April 2026 (UTC) ::::: FYI that LLM-generated code is not eligible for copyright, and therefore the MIT license by extension. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 17:59, 9 April 2026 (UTC) :::::: I think the statements that Wikidata could make are limited by what references can be found. [https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/licensing-a-repository This help page] makes it sound as if there are limited options for expressing a repo's licensing situation, so I am not surprised that MIT should be the blanket release, even if strictly speaking some of the code contained within is ineligible for copyright, or infringes on an existing copyright (which would need to be demonstrated). But I suppose [https://cpomagazine.com/cyber-security/taking-stock-of-the-anthropic-source-code-leak-ai-agent-compromise-signals-security-issues-claude-copies-ahead-of-massive-ipo turnabout] is fair play? — [[user:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[user talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 19:53, 9 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::: @[[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] I like the idea of the wikidata content being restricted based on sources provided. I will try to implement something like this in the next release. Any ideas of which particular statements are useful and should be imported more readily? [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 20:28, 9 April 2026 (UTC) :::::::: I meant in [[d:Q138963952|the Wikidata item]] ''for'' AWE, but in general I think our articles should incorporate references early on, since even abstract content needs justification. [[d:help:sources#Language-independent general principles|This help page]] may be handy; '[[d:property:P3680|statement supported by]]' could be useful for linking to biographical articles in the manner "According to [source], [claim]" (obviously adjusted to the relevant language structures in each language for saying such things). — [[user:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[user talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 20:42, 9 April 2026 (UTC) :::::::::@[[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] oh that makes sense. But as for the wikidata sources, actually providing the sources is something that is trivially easy as far as accessing wikidata is concerned, but I am not sure how to give sources for claims in wikilambdas. Do you know how? [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 20:44, 9 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::::::I don't. Currently the distinction between content and format is unclear to me. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:48, 9 April 2026 (UTC) :::::::::::@[[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] what do you mean by content vs format? [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 21:52, 9 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::::::::In the most 'abstract' sense, an article would have as irreducible parts semantic content only (from Wikidata), with syntax handled by the group of functions responsible for getting things looking right in a given target language. In practice, the overall structuring of the article largely defines or limits the syntactic structures of language produced. This is sensible for an encyclopedia which has a fairly conventional or constrained sort of prose. Of course, a web encyclopedia needs more than prose. Hence the functions for making links and formatting text (right now directly to HTML, bypassing wikitext). Although this is a MediaWiki installation, no article has had media content added to it yet, since the formatting functions that would enable that aren't in place. So I would say that content and formatting are entangled, currently. A reference could be considered either: the text that provides the sourcing of a statement, or the formatting that enables this semantic content to read as a reference, perhaps inline or as a footnote, end note, or marginal note. [[f:WF:type proposals#Representing abstract content]] has a couple RfCs about this. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 01:45, 10 April 2026 (UTC) :::::::::::::Yeah I am very confused about what the intention of Abstract Wikipedia is and how much it lines up with the reality. I had thought that the articles would be mostly directly generated from wikidata. :::::::::::::Only particular direction I see clearly is that I think we need articles on all of these pages [[d:Wikidata:List of articles that Abstract Wikipedia should have]] since they will likely bring a lot of traffic to the site and since they have a lot of information, people will have a lot of reason to come to this site and come up with new ways of expressing things on the pages. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 04:06, 10 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::::::::::I am however really liking section headers like the one here [[Q12539]] and I am going to include them in the next release [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 04:13, 10 April 2026 (UTC) :::::::::::::::Yes I think that adding sections to articles might be really the first part of the journey towards actually having somewhat readable articles. Although a lot of this is dependent on the article text actually rendering at all [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 04:21, 10 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::::::::::::Yeah I think I am getting the hang of things. Adding sections and paragraph breaks to the new versions. Denoted by ::::::::::::::::<nowiki>{{p}}</nowiki> ::::::::::::::::for a paragraph break ::::::::::::::::and ::::::::::::::::==QID== ::::::::::::::::for a subheading ::::::::::::::::All content is now generated within paragraphs, and the <nowiki>{{p}}</nowiki> splits the paragraphs up. Feeglgeef mentioned that the paragraphs are a significant accessibility feature, and the paragraphs are also easier to insert with the methods of the app. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 04:36, 10 April 2026 (UTC) :::::::::::::::::I am also implementing "it" to avoid repeating the name of the article constantly, and I am implementing citation preservation on certain things.Meanwhile also trying to fix the accessibility issue that was criticized. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 05:25, 10 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::::::::::::::New release is out [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 07:42, 10 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::::::::::::::I would suggest not to use [[d:Q6091500]] at the moment. In some languages, there might be multiple words for different uses of "it". If you are editing with only the English logic, it won't help build a multilingual wiki. [[User:Sun8908|Sun8908]] ([[User talk:Sun8908|talk]]) 17:42, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :::::::::::::::::::@[[User:Sun8908|Sun8908]] fair. I had thought it would be dropped in pro-drop languages but I do not think that was a reasonable assumption. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 19:47, 11 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::::::::::::::::I asked at the Monday meeting. Not sure if anything is being done about it though. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 20:15, 15 April 2026 (UTC) :Nice work. I for one don't care how you made the tool, the important part to me is how it works and if it helps me/us edit AW. [[User:So9q|So9q]] ([[User talk:So9q|talk]]) 20:23, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :[[File:AWE split paragraphs.png|thumb|Article on wheat]] {{ping|Immanuelle}} your tool is back at it again! I've asked you to test it before you use it to create a bunch of articles twice now. You, evidently, haven't listened! I understand you're probably acting in good faith, but you ''have'' to test your tool before you unleash it on the wiki. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 01:38, 18 April 2026 (UTC) ::No, I did listen. I am not sure what your objection is, but this looks like intended behaviour. I was asked to make every single sentence into its own paragraph to make it easier to debug maintaining accessibility. Previous the tool grouped many sentences into a single paragraph. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 02:49, 18 April 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]]: You were asked to make each actual paragraph into a call of the "paragraph" function. You were not asked to make every individual sentence a paragraph. That is probably even less accessible than what we started with. [[User:JJPMaster|JJP]]_{[[User talk:JJPMaster|Mas]]_{[[Special:Contributions/JJPMaster|ter]]}} ([[Q1270787|she]]/[[Q3437264|they]]) 03:06, 18 April 2026 (UTC) ::::The content itself needs refining. As it is, most articles have no value-added over the Wikidata triples plus labels; basically just slight readability improvements. We require complex structures sooner rather than later. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 03:08, 18 April 2026 (UTC) ::::I thought that the rule was that we put every single sentence into a paragraph of its own because text readers need a paragraph to read the text. We cannot debug things if there are multiple sentences within a paragraph, because these sentences go up to the top and make it so that the paragraph itself fails to render. ::::So this was specifically an accessibility concern for people who are visually impaired, with an accepted reduction in readability for people with regular vision so that it can also be debugged. ::::Like this: ::::"What we might try is wrapping each sentence as a paragraph, with occasional pairing of closely related sentences. That keeps failure isolated while preserving at least some natural flow. ::::We could consider also implementing a “sentence” or “content unit” function that simply calls “paragraph”, so we can later tell where the intended paragraphs are." [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 04:11, 18 April 2026 (UTC) :::::We need to import the quote template [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 04:12, 18 April 2026 (UTC) :Does anybody want any other changes to be made to this tool? Things are still relatively up in the air about what an optimum article even is, and as a result it kind of makes us limited in what we can do with it. I'm changing the way that the paragraphs work to fit what I now perceive as the consensus. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 18:11, 18 April 2026 (UTC) : I tried to run it on macOS 14.5, but it errored out when I clicked "Pull from Wikidata." It appears that this was because you hardcoded your Python path. <code>Error: Error invoking remote method 'generate-wikitext': Error: spawn C:/Users/Immanuelle/AppData/Local/Programs/Python/Python313/python.exe ENOENT</code> — [[user:JJPMaster|JJP]]_{[[user talk:JJPMaster|Mas]]_{[[special:contribs/JJPMaster|ter]]}} ([[Q1270787|she]]/[[Q3437264|they]]) 11:56, 6 April 2026 (UTC) :: For the record, the solution is to go into <code>src/main.ts</code> and change the Python path to something other than <code>C:/Users/Immanuelle/...</code> — [[user:JJPMaster|JJP]]_{[[user talk:JJPMaster|Mas]]_{[[special:contribs/JJPMaster|ter]]}} ([[Q1270787|she]]/[[Q3437264|they]]) 12:05, 6 April 2026 (UTC) : TYSM!! I did have to debug the code a little first to get it working, but this will be so helpful for me. — [[user:ChaoticVermillion|<span style="color: orangered">Chaotic</span><span style="color: crimson">Vermillion</span>]] ([[user talk:ChaoticVermillion|converse]], [[special:contribs/ChaoticVermillion|contribs]]) 11:59, 6 April 2026 (UTC) :: I am so sorry and I fixed it so the new release should avoid that problem in the future. — [[user:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[user talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 17:55, 6 April 2026 (UTC) ::: @[[User:ChaoticVermillion|ChaoticVermillion]] btw there is an update that has a lot more functions and I am not sure if you are using it. The new one allows you to undo edits or restore revisions. Something that I cannot figure out how to do in regular Abstract Wikipedia. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 17:55, 8 April 2026 (UTC) == Wikiprojects == Are there wiki projects here? Can I just make some in this namespace? [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 15:12, 10 April 2026 (UTC) :I don't see why not. It's a wiki, after all :). Please just don't flood the talkspace with templates that don't exist. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 16:51, 10 April 2026 (UTC) ::I've created a first Wikiproject ([[Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject Core articles]]) and an explainer page ([[Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject]]). [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 17:11, 10 April 2026 (UTC) :::I made this one too [[Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality Prose]] [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 18:39, 10 April 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Feeglgeef}} Are WikiProjects for specific languages OK? Responsibility seems to be stretched between maintaining Wikidata labels and lexemes alongside creating and maintaining functions on Wikifunctions, so I'm unsure if Abstract Wikipedia would be considered a good place to coordinate these things. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 21:56, 20 April 2026 (UTC) :::There's no community consensus for or against, so, since this is a wiki, I don't see any reason why anyone would stop you :). [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 23:46, 20 April 2026 (UTC) == Numerous errors have been introduced, possibly due to the "AWE" tool == As [[User:Fram|Fram]] has [[w:Wikipedia:Village_pump_(WMF)#c-Fram-20260410163000-Fram-20260408131600|pointed out]] over on the English Wikipedia in his usual style, [[User:Immanuelle]] has been breaking pages such as [[Q711]] with edits such as [[Special:Diff/4383]]. I was able to [[Special:Diff/4415|fix this]] by changing "it" to Wikidata item reference in "defining role sentence". @[[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]]: Judging by your edit history, you have introduced this error to a lot of pages. Before continuing with your work to make the rest of the articles from your list, [[d:Wikidata:List of articles that Abstract Wikipedia should have]], I kindly ask you to fix the pages you've already made. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 17:16, 10 April 2026 (UTC) :This is, of course, what happens when you use a slop-machine to write code. See existing discussion on [[User talk:Immanuelle/Abstract Wikipedia Editor#Creates inaccessible content]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 17:19, 10 April 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] I thought you wanted everything nested in the paragraph things. That's why I did that, following your request that you linked to. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 17:45, 10 April 2026 (UTC) :::I know. In the future, can you test whatever the slop-machine gives you ''on-wiki'' to ensure you don't mass-vandalize it again? Thank you! [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 17:52, 10 April 2026 (UTC) ::::@[[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] the problem I faced is that I do not know how to actually understand error messages on this wiki. When every page fails to render, it is very difficult to know if I introduced an error, or the program introduced an error. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 18:18, 10 April 2026 (UTC) :::::@[[User:Warudo|Warudo]] I guess my question for you would be how did you figure out that this was an error on the page? [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 18:19, 10 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::That's a fair question. The way things are now you can't be sure if the error is because of technical issues with the site or a bad page. In this case it was rather easy though. The "dependency" parameter of [[f:Z28016]] expects a reference to a Wikidata item but you passed the string "it" to it. That is an obvious mistake so it was easy to tell that it's not a random error. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 19:23, 10 April 2026 (UTC) :::::::That makes sense. I will try to be a lot more careful with error detection in the future. Hopefully the technical issues with the site are fixed and I can see the content issues more soon [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 20:08, 10 April 2026 (UTC) ::::I suggest that “vandalize” is an inappropriate choice of word in this case. Whatever your feelings about the quality of the code or the care with which it is being deployed, I think you could manage to assume good faith on the part of a fellow contributor. Thank you. ::::At a technical level, there is an issue with simply bracketing multiple calls together to yield a paragraph, since a failure in any one call will lead to the loss of the whole paragraph. In [[:f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-03-26]], the advice given was: ::::::“By the way, here’s one tip: currently, caching for Abstract Wikipedia happens on the level of the “fragment”. This means that by putting several sentences into a single paragraph, the paragraph as a whole is being run, may cause time-outs, and will be cached. Instead, if, for now, you put one sentence into each fragment, caching and evaluation can be more spread out and should allow for more content.” ::::[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 19:00, 10 April 2026 (UTC) :::::@[[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] would you suggest removing the paragraph by default behavior in the editor over this? [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 19:50, 10 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::What we might try is wrapping each sentence as a paragraph, with occasional pairing of closely related sentences. That keeps failure isolated while preserving at least some natural flow. ::::::We could consider also implementing a “sentence” or “content unit” function that simply calls “paragraph”, so we can later tell where the intended paragraphs are. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 21:23, 10 April 2026 (UTC) :::::::This is not accessible for users with screen-readers, and thus not a viable work-around. Each paragraph must be in a paragraph tag. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 22:31, 10 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::::It’s sub-optimal, I agree, but every unit of meaning would be wrapped in p tags, which is more accessible than a series of bare fragments or failed function calls. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:07, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :::::::::If you do need to make inaccessible articles, please at least give them a category on the talk page. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 21:21, 11 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::::::We’d need to agree an accessibility standard first, but I’m not planning on creating any articles until there are suitable functions available. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 22:36, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :::::::::::I agree. Accessibility standards need to be established and not just assumed. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 23:28, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :::::::::::I definitely do agree that we need accessibility standards, but this isn't really a nice-to-have that you debate about but rather the floor. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 00:27, 12 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::::::::I took this thread as consensus that we need to have every sentence as its own paragraph. Is that incorrect? Do people want me to change it back to one paragraph per paragraph break? I removed that one because it covered up errors. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 04:21, 18 April 2026 (UTC) :::::When someone "vandalizes" it is not necessarily intentional, see [[wikt:vandalise]]. I do understand that Immanuelle has good faith, but at the same time, the "deployment" caused tens of articles to be broken, and furthermore I don't suspect something this bad would have slipped through had a human carefully reviewed the code. When a contributor deploys a semi-automated tool and uses it to make edits at the rate {{ping|Immanuelle}} was at this rate, you are morally obligated to test it. This wasn't the first time the slop-machine that they used caused them to mess up tens of articles, and if Immanuelle doesn't exercise extreme care in the future, I don't suspect it will be the last. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 22:25, 10 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::It was a silent error that was only discovered by chance. What kind of testing would you have done to avoid this? [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 22:37, 10 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::@[[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]]": On Wikipedia, "[[:en:WP:VAND|Vandalism]]" is a technical term that means "editing (or other behavior) '''''deliberately''' intended to [[:en:Wikipedia:DE|obstruct or defeat]] the [[:en:Wikipedia:Five_pillars|project's purpose]]''". Accidental disruptive editing is not considered vandalism. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 22:52, 10 April 2026 (UTC) :::::::@[[User:Warudo|Warudo]] on the topic of this glitch. I think I have removed it from all pages that had it. Please tell me if there are more that you see. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 23:29, 10 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::::Thanks for cleaning up :) [[User:So9q|So9q]] ([[User talk:So9q|talk]]) 20:29, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :::::::This isn't the English Wikipedia, or even a wikipedia at all, despite the domain. Unless a defined technical term related to Wikifunctions I'd consider words to have their natural language meaning. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 01:28, 11 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::::@[[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]]: Last time I checked, this was the Abstract ''Wikipedia''. But in any case, this is the definition provided in [[f:Wikifunctions:Vandalism|Wikifunctions]] as well as [[meta:meta:Vandalism|meta]]. Vandalism has to be deliberate. [[User:Warudo|Warudo]] ([[User talk:Warudo|talk]]) 08:50, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :::::::::It's not ''the'' Abstract Wikipedia like ''the'' English Wikipedia, but just Abstract Wikipedia. It isn't a Wikipedia in and of itself (as in, it's not supposed to be viewed by end readers), but rather a tool for Wikipedias. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 15:33, 11 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::::::It still has an independent editing community. Just because it draws from Wikidata and Wikifunctions doesn't mean content decisions aren't made here; it necessarily has to have some autonomy just like any language edition. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 19:18, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :::::::::“Deliberately” is also the first word of section 3.3 of our Code of Conduct, linked at the foot of every page. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 17:11, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :::::+1 Please assume good faith and keep it civil. [[User:So9q|So9q]] ([[User talk:So9q|talk]]) 20:27, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:Warudo|Warudo]] will hold off on page creation [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 17:43, 10 April 2026 (UTC) :Just a note @[[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]], the project is a Beta version, so, in my opinion, it's not a good idea to flood it with a large number of [{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target=Immanuelle&namespace=0&newOnly=1&limit=250&end=2026-04-10}} article stubs]. Additionally, the natural language functions are still limited.--[[User:Mdktb|Mdktb]] ([[User talk:Mdktb|talk]]) 18:58, 10 April 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Mdktb|Mdktb]] okay that is a good point. I think I was confused since I thought that we were more on the trying to get new users stage. I will stick to fixing up my errors and only making pages on things that I have a lot of stuff to say on. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 19:20, 10 April 2026 (UTC) :::@[[User:Mdktb|Mdktb]] and here is a wikiproject I made and tagged some pages with that is specifically related to developing more natural language [[Abstract Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality Prose]] [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 19:27, 10 April 2026 (UTC) ::Would you be willing to raise this in the project chat? I'm thinking we are in an experimentation state that will keep improving incrementally just like the first edition of Wikipedia did since January 15, 2001. Just like back then I don't think it's a good idea to arbitrarily limit good faith editing. We probably will have to revisit these articles later as more and better functions become available but that in itself is not a valid argument for refraining from edits. [[User:So9q|So9q]] ([[User talk:So9q|talk]]) 20:36, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :::Already here ;) [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 21:05, 11 April 2026 (UTC) ::I agree with your stub-flooding comment, I don't think it's particularly useful to have a bunch of articles that say nothing. The concern right now should be testing. I expect that the way in which we write abstract articles will change drastically eventually, so writing hundreds of articles is not only a waste of time but a debt. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 21:07, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :::We can always use [[Special:AncientPages]] to find them later on. :::My expectation is that things will change, but we’ll be able to change the articles. They aren’t set in stone. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 03:21, 18 April 2026 (UTC) :The error in question was that "it" ended up getting into the jsons as a string instead of the id for "it". This occurred due to an error with the program with function aliasing, functions and items can have aliases that are used to be human readable, and replaced with their codes during insertion. But apparently when you try to insert a nonexistent alias then it just inserts the text and there is no server side validation at all of edits. :My guess is that basically they do not have an api since they have no server side validation and were relying on solely client side, and did not anticipate someone building such a tool that accidentally bypassed client side validation through a cache injection which was motivated by UX purposes :I plan on attending the Monday volunteer meeting and asking about this issue. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 22:45, 10 April 2026 (UTC) ::> But apparently when you try to insert a nonexistent alias then it just inserts the text and there is no server side validation at all of edits. ::This sounds like a bug. Would you be willing to create a ticket in phab with details? [[User:So9q|So9q]] ([[User talk:So9q|talk]]) 20:38, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :::The team has already declined (or indicated that they had no plans) to do validation in this form, so I don't think a new ticket would be ideal. Either way, this shouldn't affect anyone besides those using a headless browser (or anyone using good, human-reviewed code and a headless browser), so I don't think it would be a priority anyway. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 21:19, 11 April 2026 (UTC) ::::Not sure what you are talking about. At the meeting they did not seem to be opposed to doing server side validation. They just said that they had a bit of concerns about infrastructure that was stopping it as an immediate thing. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 20:14, 15 April 2026 (UTC) :::::The volunteer's corner? I unfortunately missed that, but it was more than a year ago that I believe they decided not to pursue it, so you're probably right. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 13:46, 16 April 2026 (UTC) :So I have resolved this issue, as I have resolved most of the issues that people brought up. The whole paragraph debate is something I am returning to the older version of. Does anybody want other changes to the way that it makes articles? [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 18:09, 18 April 2026 (UTC) == REST API for editing? == Hi, does anyone know if there is a ticket in phab for a public API endpoint that allows editing of AW content? It would be very useful to improve tooling and content. [[User:So9q|So9q]] ([[User talk:So9q|talk]]) 20:41, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :I don't believe so. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 21:03, 11 April 2026 (UTC) :I do not know why there isn't a REST API, but I had to [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat#I made a desktop app that helps with editing|specifically work around it with my editing tool]]. It will be very nice in the future to have a REST API. :I think that right now there isn't actually any server-side verification of whether an article is well-structured, and that might be the reason why there isn't a REST API yet. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 23:46, 11 April 2026 (UTC) ::What rest api are you talking about? Checkout [[Special:RestSandbox]]. [[User:Tanbiruzzaman|Tanbiruzzaman]] ([[User talk:Tanbiruzzaman|talk]]) 16:50, 12 April 2026 (UTC) :I would like to proudly announce that it can be done. See [[Special:Diff/6102]]. Here was my request: :<syntaxhighlight lang="json">{ "source": "{\"qid\":\"Q100000\",\"sections\":{\"Q8776414\":{\"index\":0,\"fragments\":[\"Z89\"]}}}", "title": "Q100000", "comment": "Hello from MediaWiki REST API", "content_model": "abstractwiki", "token": "[token]" } </syntaxhighlight> [[User:JJPMaster|JJP]]_{[[User talk:JJPMaster|Mas]]_{[[Special:Contributions/JJPMaster|ter]]}} ([[Q1270787|she]]/[[Q3437264|they]]) 04:43, 20 April 2026 (UTC) == Spaces between sentences == In abstract articles with two sentences or more, I usually see two spaces between the sentences. Why two? I usually write one space, and that's probably what most people do in English. I know that some people write two; I don't like it myself, but this practice does exist. But here, it raises a few more nuanced questions: # Where is it actually defined that there are supposed to be ''any'' spaces between the sentences? I might be wrong, but it probably comes from the extension code and not from the functions. # Can this be customized per language? I don't know all the rules for all the languages, but I strongly suspect that some languages use spaces between sentences differently, and no default is good for all the languages. I'd especially check if it's good for Thai, Burmese, Japanese, and Chinese. # When I examine the HTML code of the rendered sentences, each of them is a <code><nowiki><div></nowiki></code>. It's a bit odd—I'd expect <code><nowiki><span></nowiki></code> there. [[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] ([[User talk:Amire80|talk]]) 21:07, 14 April 2026 (UTC) :Can you give an example article, please? [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 14:01, 15 April 2026 (UTC) ::[[Q833]], [[Q11361384]], and probably every other abstract article whose rendered English text has more than sentence. [[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] ([[User talk:Amire80|talk]]) 14:34, 15 April 2026 (UTC) :::No, not every single one (see [[Q333]]), but most of them. This has happened because Denny promoted separating sentences into individual fragments and Immanuel used an AI slop-machine to create an editing tool. Essentially, they're being treated as separate elements (like how one paragraph is different from a section heading), so the UI adds a space. This, of course, should not be done, because it breaks screen-readers and looks weird, but apparently everyone is just OK with it. Like a thousand articles have been created by the afforementioned slop-generated tool (because the person who oversaw the bot that created it seems to care more about quantity than quality), whereas I've only created three myself (because I care more about quality and shaping the direction of the wiki in preparation for when abstract content becomes actually viable). [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 15:02, 15 April 2026 (UTC) ::::If I understand correctly, [[Q333]] has one fragment, which is one function call, which in turn creates two sentences and joins them using a hardcoded space. If each sentence was created using a separate fragment, they would probably appear with two spaces in practice. Neither option is very good. ::::The mass creation of abstract articles using that tool is probably not really related to this. [[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] ([[User talk:Amire80|talk]]) 15:52, 15 April 2026 (UTC) :::::No, one of them is objectively wrong and one of them is correct. You're not ''supposed'' to split two sentences into two fragments. That's the point. The mass creation of articles using that tool ''is'' related, because it's responsible for the proliferation of articles that follow the wrong one. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 17:36, 15 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::Why not split sentences into fragments? I can easily imagine some functions that produce several sentences, but it's not universal. ::::::And why is it ''correct'' to join sentences using a hardcoded space? Joining sentences shouldn't be done using a hardcoded space, but with a generic "join sentences" function, which will be one space for many languages, but probably not for all of them. [[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] ([[User talk:Amire80|talk]]) 17:55, 15 April 2026 (UTC) :::::::Yes, not having to hardcode is the eventual goal. Splitting sentences into fragments is bad because it adds extra spacing (this is a feature, and a good one!), because it's bad for screen-readers, and because it would be impossible to distinguish between paragraphs, the article would just be a collection of sentences. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:03, 15 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::::I still don't understand why splitting into fragments is bad. What is good about extra spacing? It looks like a bad feature, not a good one. It sounds like a rendering and presentation issue, not a logical issue. Fragments can be inline, and the inline ones should be <code><nowiki><span></nowiki></code>s, not <code><nowiki><div></nowiki></code>s. And there should also be an option for <code><nowiki><div></nowiki></code> fragments. And maybe some others. Forcing every fragment to be a <code><nowiki><div></nowiki></code> sounds like a bad feature. [[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] ([[User talk:Amire80|talk]]) 18:46, 15 April 2026 (UTC) :::::::::Again, the spacing is good because the correct reason to split is to create two separate paragraphs. Even if the spacing ''was'' removed, it would still not work for screen-readers, and blocking out blind people when the mission is to spread knowledge to neglected languages is incredibly ironic. I'm not sure how else I'm supposed to communicate this to you. It's like asking "why is magma so hot! I want to drink magma instead of water, but it's too hot and not refreshing!" [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 19:07, 15 April 2026 (UTC) ::::::::::Maybe I understand what a "fragment" is supposed to be differently. Where is defined what is it supposed to be? [[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] ([[User talk:Amire80|talk]]) 20:22, 15 April 2026 (UTC) == Archiving discussions on this page? == We're soon coming up to having a month old messages here, and considering the current length of it and size of the community, perhaps 30 days is a good limit for archiving them. Does anyone know how to get an archive bot running here? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small>^{[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]}_{[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]}</small> 06:44, 16 April 2026 (UTC) :+1 [[User:So9q|So9q]] ([[User talk:So9q|talk]]) 09:55, 16 April 2026 (UTC) :+1 [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 13:41, 16 April 2026 (UTC) :+1. I think SpBot does archiving on Wikifunctions. Maybe it could be brought here as well? [[User:ChaoticVermillion|<span style="color: orangered">Chaotic</span><span style="color: crimson">Vermillion</span>]] ([[User talk:ChaoticVermillion|converse]], [[Special:Contributions/ChaoticVermillion|contribs]]) 14:18, 16 April 2026 (UTC) :+1 [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 14:24, 16 April 2026 (UTC) == Importing the q template == I really want the <nowiki>{{q}}</nowiki> template here imported from wikidata. It is very helpful with qids. Linking to here instead of wikidata. Might be able to be expanded for lexemes and wikifunctions too. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 14:26, 16 April 2026 (UTC) :I've copied it and its dependencies from Wikifunctions: see {{Q|1}} It may need some tweaking to work well here, because we also use QIDs. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:51, 17 April 2026 (UTC) ::Great! I think we need [[Template:Quote]] too [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 04:13, 18 April 2026 (UTC) == Caching issues (hopefully) fixed == Hey all, I know the caching issues have been a real pain for you. I've just now deployed what (I hope) is a fix that works for calls on Wikifunctions.org, fragments here, and embedded Wikifunctions calls. See for example [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q1344227 view/en/Q1344227] which should load fragments near-immediately for you (not need a retry or time out). You'll also see e.g. that https://test.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikifunctions now has "stable" results, not just endless "please wait" comments. That said, please tell me where I'm wrong and you're having issues! Much better to hear now than assume it's fixed and start all over again tomorrow. I appreciate your feedback and patience over this; it has been very generous of you all. Our next work in this area is to make the cache much more scalable and resilient over time, so it's faster and more reliable for you, and cheaper for us to support. Thank you again. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 14:47, 16 April 2026 (UTC) :Thank you (and the rest of the team) for your efforts for this new wiki! We really appreciate it. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 14:58, 16 April 2026 (UTC) :Wow this is great! Now we can do a lot more verification on whether created pages are working well! Gotta look over a bunch of pages. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 15:20, 16 April 2026 (UTC) ::Yes I tried to fix up a bunch of pages. Many of them actually render properly now. But I did need to change quite a few [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 17:36, 16 April 2026 (UTC) :::Yes, please give your attention to the quality of pages you've already created rather than expanding the quantity. For example, on [[Q153]] I notice that you used Z28016 a lot, but that "defining" should only be used when it is the only instance of that class in that location (which works fine for a capital city), but not e.g. for hydrogen being "the" part of ethanol. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:43, 17 April 2026 (UTC) == Importing templates from wikipedias == I think it would be a good idea to set something up so that templates from wikipedia can be represented as wikifunctions. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 14:59, 16 April 2026 (UTC) :Already {{done}} on WF, see [[f:WF:MediaWiki parser functions]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 15:08, 16 April 2026 (UTC) == Idea for the project chat == I've been thinking of some ideas that we could implement related to the project chat. I'm not saying I endorse anything, just throwing out an idea. There's been a ''lot'' of activity on here, I'm not sure if this is going to be a permanent thing or if it's just because the wiki just started. If it maintains its activity, we might want to divide it up like the English Wikipedia does, perhaps into "Proposals", "Technical and Wikifunctions", and "Miscellaneous." [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 15:19, 16 April 2026 (UTC) :Simple english wikipedia has almost all discussion happen on its Project chat. I think we should only add nerw things once we really need more chats. Having everything here makes it easier for people to keep up with the news of abstract wikipedia. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 16:31, 16 April 2026 (UTC) ::The place to keep up with news for "abstract [sic] wikipedia [sic]" is the newsletter. I think that separating might actually make it easier to follow the specific discussion that you want, as you can choose which of the three to subscribe to. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 17:58, 16 April 2026 (UTC) ::We should at least have a talk page archiving bot, like [[:en:User:lowercase sigmabot III]]. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 20:18, 16 April 2026 (UTC) == What to do with Z26955 == There are a lot of articles with [[:f:Z26955|Z26955]] in them, since it has this obvious warning on it, what should we do with existing articles that have it? Just remove it on sight? [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 15:33, 16 April 2026 (UTC) :We should only improve articles by fixing the problems, not by removing them. If you can replace a function by a better one, that’s great. Otherwise, please leave it for now so that we can see what needs fixing. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 23:04, 16 April 2026 (UTC) == Representing "part of" == How do I represent that something is part of another thing? I used to use the spo sentence without understanding that it did not work. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 16:30, 16 April 2026 (UTC) :I think [[f:Z32982]] can be used, with the role as [[d:Q1310239]]. [[User:ChaoticVermillion|<span style="color: orangered">Chaotic</span><span style="color: crimson">Vermillion</span>]] ([[User talk:ChaoticVermillion|converse]], [[Special:Contributions/ChaoticVermillion|contribs]]) 18:55, 16 April 2026 (UTC) :See Q307, perhaps :https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q307 :Middle finger of Galileo's right hand is the part of of Galileo Galilei. [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-25174-74|&#126;2026-25174-74]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-25174-74|talk]]) 03:07, 25 April 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #244 is out: Milestones; Some major issues hopefully resolved == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-16|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we celebrate 4000 functions on Wikifunctions and 1000 abstract articles on Abstract Wikipedia, we announce that we should have fixed some major issues with the websites, we inform you on our latest outreach activities, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:22, 17 April 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30325620 --> == AceWiki: Abstract Wikipedia before Abstract Wikipedia? == For those of you not in the know, ACE is [[w:Attempto Controlled English|Attempto Controlled English]]. This is a special subset of English that, unlike regular English, is entirely grammatically unambiguous and is machine-readable. For example, the sentence "Every person has a cat" is ACE, as a computer could easily parse that into a logical structure of the form "for any person P, P has a cat." Well, I found a semantic wiki software called AceWiki, whose articles are written entirely in Attempto Controlled English (see [https://acewiki.petapico.org/acewikigeo/ AceWikiGEO]). The sentence structures seen in AceWiki articles (while I can't link directly to any article, the article on the United States of America, which can be found in the Index in the sidebar, is a good example) are quite similar to those in our existing abstract articles. Using a tool called [https://github.com/Attempto/ACE-in-GF ACE-in-GF], ACE text could be translated into any language. I've been thinking about the idea of a tool that allows an editor to write Attempto Controlled English text, and have that text turned into an abstract article. As an example: '''ACE''' -- "Every antelope is a mammal." &rarr; '''Abstract content''' -- [[f:Z26627|Classifying a class of nouns (Z26627)]]: [[d:Q25894|antelope (Q25894)]], [[d:Q7377|mammal (Q7377)]] This tool would not be optimized for mass article creation, since it would not include an option to generate articles directly from Wikidata, but I think it could be interesting to see how being able to write abstract articles in natural language might lower the barrier to contributing to this project. Thoughts? [[User:JJPMaster|JJP]]_{[[User talk:JJPMaster|Mas]]_{[[Special:Contributions/JJPMaster|ter]]}} ([[Q1270787|she]]/[[Q3437264|they]]) 01:59, 20 April 2026 (UTC) :I'm not sure how we'd actually do the conversion step. If you'd be willing to attempt to make a prototype I'd love to look at it, but I'm skeptical. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:12, 21 April 2026 (UTC) == Help with the news section on main page == Hi all, I would like to have some help in importing [[:f:Template:Main page/News]] here and inserting it in the main page's module. Can someone help me to do it? [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 10:26, 20 April 2026 (UTC) :I believe [[Template:Main page/News]] is already set up and visible on the main page, unless you mean importing the history of the WF template over. [[User: Tenshi Hinanawi|Tenshi!]] ([[User talk: Tenshi Hinanawi|Talk page]]) 11:12, 20 April 2026 (UTC) ::Ah, that's great, thanks! [[User:Sannita (WMF)|Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:53, 20 April 2026 (UTC) == Layout guidelines? == One thing I'm noticing is that there are a ''lot'' of ways to do the same thing. I'd like to know which is preferred in the simple case of making single-sentence articles that just say what they are. Take [[Q503]] for example. If you look at the edit history of the article, you'll see it went through a few changes: * Initially, it was a [[f:Z14396|''string of monolingual text'']] call wrapped inside of a [[f:Z27868|''string to HTML fragment'']] call. The innermost function got the monolingual text returned from [[f:Z26095|''subject is kind of'']], converted it to a string, and then to a HTML fragment. * Afterwards the two topmost functions were removed until only the ''subject is kind of'' function call remained, and this was wrapped in a call to [[f:Z29749|''monolingual text as HTML with visible language tag'']]. * Finally the ''subject is kind of'' call was placed into a typed list provided as an argument to the [[f:Z32234|''join text-like objects into HTML fragment'']] call, which in turn was made into a proper paragraph rather than a standalone <code>&lt;div&gt;</code> as it was previously. None of these seem like a particularly bad way to approach things, and I have seem all of them in the wild; the first thing I tried I did so as it was the way the first article I stumbled upon chose to render its text. Since [[Abstract Wikipedia:Useful functions for article composition]] only goes over linguistic functions, and doesn't seem to provide any guidance on ''composition'' functions (i.e. building the HTML contents itself, as you have to do in the plain visual editor online), I thought I'd ask here if there is a preferred way to do things, and if it could perhaps be made clearer on the website if so. It is rather bothersome wanting to build e.g. a wikitable, and needing to peruse the available functions on Wikifunctions instead of having an easily-accessible way to see what is generally recommended for the particular circumstance. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 21:36, 20 April 2026 (UTC) :I'm partial to paragraph(join text-like objects into HTML fragment(your sentences)), as not using a paragraph tag is bad for those who use screen readers, and I designed join text-like objects to reduce function calls and therefore speed up the article processing step. The long-term problem with this method is that Japanese and Chinese both do not have spaces between sentences, so I plan to soon create a function that takes a list of text-like objects and then converts it into a paragraph under the correct style of each language. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 23:51, 20 April 2026 (UTC) ::That sounds good, I have grown more fond of that method as well. What you described would be great to have, I have been adding [[f:Z13128]] references inbetween each sentence to counteract the lack of spacing but something that would do this automatically for English while also obeying the sentence rules of other languages it renders in would be very ideal. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 16:33, 21 April 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|Feeglgeef}} I noticed [[f:Z33068]]. I decided to hack up an implementation of it that aligns with what you said, I don't know if this is what your original intention for the function was and I apologize if I misconstrued it. At the moment, it just runs the ''join text-like objects'' function I mentioned earlier wrapped in a call to ''paragraph'', but adds spaces if the language is not Japanese or Chinese. I'm not sure if, in this scope, a lack of spaces is the only difference between how certain languages arrange their sentences. This also only accounts for the ZObjects for Chinese and Japanese specifically, I think some sort of switch statement or separate configuration object would be better suited for this—not to mention that there are separate natural language objects for the different scripts of Japanese, so those would have to be blanketed under Japanese when considering the language passed in (which I don't want to chain a bunch of ORs to do at the moment). For now, though, it seems to work fine. I added two different test cases and they both pass, and I have also utilized the function on [[Q241691]]. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 03:31, 23 April 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, thank you for implementing that, it looks good to me. I've created a persistent object for storing the languages that don't use spaces, [[f:Z33984]]. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 13:47, 23 April 2026 (UTC) == Wikidata problems == Sorry for posting two questions here in a row. I'll try to make this brief. On the bottom of [[Q247237]] is what ''should'' be a list of albums, but on my end it appears as just "''PLUS''" repeated fourteen times. This seems to occur any time I use [[f:Z13464]] on a list of Wikidata item references... is anyone else seeing this? I'm not sure what I could be doing wrong. Related to this, I wonder if I can avoid needing to explicitly state each of these items? I moved the list to a separately-defined object on Wikifunctions to avoid having to constantly transfer it between websites since I don't think the clipboard works cross-site. Ordinarily, if I were trying to get all Autechre studio albums, I would use Wikidata's SPARQL query feature to do this, by finding every entity whose [[wikidata:P31|P31]] is [[wikidata:Q482994|Q482994]] and whose [[wikidata:P50|P50]] is [[wikidata:Q247237|Q247237]]. This doesn't seem to be doable with Wikifunctions, though, or at least I'm not seeing it... so I don't know how I would do this automatically. We are making articles out of functions here, so I think it would be worthwhile if I tried to future-proof the list using this paradigm. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 16:30, 21 April 2026 (UTC) :On your first question, I've [[f:Z33903|tried to replicate this on WF]] and I cannot, which makes it difficult to solve. :We cannot currently reverse most WD statements, so your use case is not ''currently'' possible, but we are able to access the statements that are ''on'' an item. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:10, 21 April 2026 (UTC) ::I'm experiencing the issue again on [[f:Z33997]], it seems. Check the test results of the three-item test, "''programmer''" should not appear twice. I ran into a similar problem earlier in working on the implementation. For the two-item case, using a call to ''[[f:Z13397|get the nth element of a list]]'' on both items (index 1 and 2 respectively) returned the first item twice. I had to use a call to ''[[f:Z811|first element]]'' to fix it. ::Could this be a caching issue, perhaps? That seems likely, because I don't know why else this would be happening. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 16:16, 23 April 2026 (UTC) :::I am considering raising this issue on Phabricator if it hasn't been brought up already, this doesn't seem intentional. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 14:48, 24 April 2026 (UTC) == What are we called? == If editors of Wikipedia are Wikipedians, editors of Wiktionary are Wiktionarians, editors of Wikivoyage are Wikivoyagers, and editors of Wikiversity are Wikiversitarians, what are we? Abstract Wikipedians? Abstracters? Abstractions? AWians? [[User:JJPMaster|JJP]]_{[[User talk:JJPMaster|Mas]]_{[[Special:Contributions/JJPMaster|ter]]}} ([[Q1270787|she]]/[[Q3437264|they]]) 11:54, 24 April 2026 (UTC) :I don't like Abstractions and AWians. Abstracters sounds cool, it could be our "informal" term, while Abstract Wikipedians is our "formal" one. We could also apply it based on context (in the mainspace you're an abstracter, in the projectspace you're an abstract wikipedian), I'm not sure, though. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 13:12, 24 April 2026 (UTC) :I think an -or ending for 'abstractor' sounds cooler, personally. Abstract Wikipedians is boring but is the most straightforward option. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 14:50, 24 April 2026 (UTC) ::I did mean to spell it as "Abstractors." Sorry about the typo. [[User:JJPMaster|JJP]]_{[[User talk:JJPMaster|Mas]]_{[[Special:Contributions/JJPMaster|ter]]}} ([[Q1270787|she]]/[[Q3437264|they]]) 18:55, 24 April 2026 (UTC) == Indexed by Google - deliberate? == https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aabstract.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F Exposing Qid to Google looks like a mistake. Not likely to attract the public. Might adversely affect Wikipedia's Page rank or whatever? [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-25174-74|&#126;2026-25174-74]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-25174-74|talk]]) 04:20, 25 April 2026 (UTC) :Indexing may already have stopped, after the 7th April - no recent pages found. [[Special:Contributions/&#126;2026-25174-74|&#126;2026-25174-74]] ([[User talk:&#126;2026-25174-74|talk]]) 04:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC) == I can't edit generated text on pages for some reason? == why is this? Thank you. [[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] ([[User talk:BigKrow|talk]]) 07:58, 25 April 2026 (UTC) :You're not supposed to be able to edit generated text. You can edit the code that makes it, though. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 16:58, 25 April 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #245 is out: The Foundation's search for the perfect language == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-25|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we present an academic paper about Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss our latest Type created, and we take a look at the newest created functions. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 09:54, 25 April 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30325620 --> == Why the editing API doesn't work == {{tracked|T423542}} Immanuelle wrongly stated that there is no REST API for editing. [[#REST API for editing?|There is]]. However, it does not work when called from software outside Abstract Wikipedia. That is because there is no way to grant a bot password or OAuth customer the permission to edit abstract articles (<code>wikilambda-abstract-edit</code>) and create them (<code>wikilambda-abstract-create</code>), since no grant on [[Special:ListGrants]] includes either. Should this be fixed? [[User:JJPMaster|JJP]]_{[[User talk:JJPMaster|Mas]]_{[[Special:Contributions/JJPMaster|ter]]}} ([[Q1270787|she]]/[[Q3437264|they]]) 01:57, 26 April 2026 (UTC) :Yes I think the rights should be added. I think the number of automated edits should be low at the moment as Abstract Wikipedia is still in an early phase and so far there is not much support for small languages and so many functions will maybe change to cover more languages. As automatic editing using a Bot Account requires an formal request it is no problem if the option exists. [[User:Hogü-456|Hogü-456]] ([[User talk:Hogü-456|talk]]) 18:17, 26 April 2026 (UTC) :Sounds good to me. Could we add a bot section to [[Abstract Wikipedia:Requests for permissions]]? [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 23:35, 5 May 2026 (UTC) ::[[Abstract_Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions#Bot]] ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 23:56, 5 May 2026 (UTC) == Q884 == The page [[Q884]] has inaccurate statements about the head of government and the head of state of South Korea. Part of what it returns in English is "Lee Ju-ho is the head of government of South Korea.Park Geun-hye is the head of state of South Korea." However, neither Lee Ju-ho nor Park Geun-hye currently have their respective roles mentioned here. How should these statements be turned into ones using the past tense? [[User:Intolerable situation|Intolerable situation]] ([[User talk:Intolerable situation|talk]]) 14:44, 30 April 2026 (UTC) :not currently possible :((((( [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 14:46, 30 April 2026 (UTC) :Feeglgeef is correct, past tense sentence generation is something we are sorely lacking at the moment. If you look at [[f:WF:Type proposals#Representing abstract content|Wikifunctions' type proposals]] you can see some initiatives that could hopefully mitigate this. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 13:49, 1 May 2026 (UTC) == Abstract Wikipedia should use a different mw-wiki-logo than Wikipedia for Vector 2010 skin == {{Tracked|T424781}} Hello friends. I've been asked to start a community conversation about this. I'd like to propose that Abstract Wikipedia create its own logo, so that folks visiting this wiki don't get it mixed up with Wikipedia. Even though this project is under the Wikipedia domain, I think it's pretty unique and it'd make sense to make sure it doesn't get mixed up with enwiki or other Wikipedias by newbies googling for Wikipedia articles. Thoughts? Thanks. [[User:Novem Linguae|Novem Linguae]] ([[User talk:Novem Linguae|talk]]) 12:02, 1 May 2026 (UTC) :Isn't there already one? Are we talking about a logo in a different context? [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 12:25, 1 May 2026 (UTC) ::Looks like this is just for the Vector 2010 skin. [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Main_page?useskin=vector Example.] I'll edit this section and the ticket to clarify that. [[User:Novem Linguae|Novem Linguae]] ([[User talk:Novem Linguae|talk]]) 12:28, 1 May 2026 (UTC) :::Ah, thank you, I'd {{s}} this then. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 12:31, 1 May 2026 (UTC) :This has been raised before above in [[#Logo]], the same problem appears on Monobook. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 13:45, 1 May 2026 (UTC) ::Would you support using [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/static/images/mobile/copyright/abstractwiki-wordmark.svg the Vector 2022 logo] on Vector 2010 and Monobook? That'd be a simple technical solution. [[User:Novem Linguae|Novem Linguae]] ([[User talk:Novem Linguae|talk]]) 14:02, 1 May 2026 (UTC) :::Yes, I see no issue with using that for the moment. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 14:04, 1 May 2026 (UTC) == What would it take for AW to catch up to (English) Reasonator? Porting over functions? == The Wikidata tool [https://reasonator.toolforge.org Reasonator] already automatically creates several sentences in English describing human Wikidata items using [https://codeberg.org/magnusmanske/reasonator/commit/b506362c3c2e90b32de32708ec668eee49603cb0 auto_long_desc.js] under [https://codeberg.org/magnusmanske/reasonator/src/commit/a6ee9095c3accfb67845caf438ce83c98c19e38e/LICENSE a GPL 2.0 free software license] without using any large language model or other AI. Abstract Wikipedia, on the other hand, requires [[Help:How to create an article/en|a several step process just to create a lead sentence]]. Does Resonator have functions in [https://codeberg.org/magnusmanske/reasonator/src/commit/a6ee9095c3accfb67845caf438ce83c98c19e38e/public_html/auto_long_desc.js#L406 the English section of auto_long_desc.js] that Wikifunctions doesn't have at the moment? Is that what's preventing Abstract Wikipedia from auto-generating substantial text (at least in English) based off of Wikidata like Resonator does? Below is [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?q=Q1339&lang=en an example of what Resonator can generate from Wikidata] without needing human edits the way Abstract Wikipedia does. (Though I omitted some children for the sake of brevity.) <blockquote> '''Johann Sebastian Bach''' was a [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=696651 Saxe-Eisenach]-[https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=12548 Holy Roman Empire]-[https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=183 German] [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=36834 composer], [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=765778 organist], [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=5371902 harpsichordist], [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=1259917 violinist], [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=899758 violist], [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=158852 conductor], [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=1076502 choir director], [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=691031 concertmaster], [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=14915627 musicologist], [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=16145150 music educator], [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=214970 virtuoso], and [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=2251335 school teacher]. He was born on [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?date=1685-03-21 March 21, 1685] in [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=7070 Eisenach] to [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=309470 Johann Ambrosius Bach] and [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=66671 Maria Elisabeth Lämmerhirt]. He studied at [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=1930161 St. Michael's School] until [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?date=1702-04 April 1702]. His field of work included [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=8361 Baroque music] and [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=9730 classical music]. He was [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=215793 chapelmaster] from [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?date=1717-12 December 1717] until [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?date=1723-04 April 1723] and [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=641457 Thomaskantor] from [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?date=1723 1723] until [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?date=1750 1750]. He worked for [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=117540 Collegium Musicum], for [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=1230608 Saint Blaise], for [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=61689 Leopold, Prince of Anhalt-Köthen], for [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=61972 Johann Ernst III, Duke of Saxe-Weimar] from [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?date=1703-01 January 1703] until [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?date=1703-08 August 1703], for [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=699668 Thomasschule zu Leipzig], and for [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=798194 Bachkirche Arnstadt] from [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?date=1703-08 August 1703] until [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?date=1707 1707]. He married [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=57487 Maria Barbara Bach] on [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?date=1707-10-17 October 17, 1707] (married until on [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?date=1720-07-07 July 7, 1720] ) and [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=57212 Anna Magdalena Bach] on [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?date=1721-12-03 December 3, 1721] (married until on [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?date=1750-07-28 July 28, 1750] ). His children include [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=15079141 Catharina Dorothea Bach], [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=107277 Wilhelm Friedemann Bach], […] He died of [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=12202 stroke] on [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?date=1750-07-28 July 28, 1750] in [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=2079 Leipzig]. He was buried at [https://reasonator.toolforge.org/?&q=170402 St. Thomas Church]. </blockquote> [[User:Lovelano|Lovelano]] ([[User talk:Lovelano|talk]]) 18:41, 1 May 2026 (UTC) == Project scope == Might be a stupid question but what articles are/will be allowed on Abstract Wikipedia? How far is it meant to expand? The language Wikipedias have some differing policies, so might not be as simple as copying those. Personally I find the idea of creating an article for any and every Wikidata item really cool and a good ''baseline'' for what can have an article, but wouldn't ~120 million abstract articles become unwieldy? If the only requirement is that the article topic has a Wikidata item, then there are many interesting possibilities; one could write about individual dates, Wikidata test items, even Wikimedia disambiguation pages. Have not found where this is explained, if anywhere. This may be up to common sense, but trouble is, couldn't one create an encyclopedically meaningful article on just about anything? Pretty important policy not to have if it's undecided, though is not a problem at the moment. Just wondering. [[User:Some helpful person|Some helpful person]] ([[User talk:Some helpful person|talk]]) 23:36, 1 May 2026 (UTC) :This isn't a stupid question and I don't think this is entirely settled. Have you seen [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]]? [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 23:57, 1 May 2026 (UTC) ::Ah, I forgot about that page. So it is meant to abstract information from existing Wikipedia articles? Makes sense, though it still raises the question of creating new articles. [[User:Some helpful person|Some helpful person]] ([[User talk:Some helpful person|talk]]) 00:41, 2 May 2026 (UTC) :::At this juncture, I don't think anyone has in mind drafting anything new here as such: this is just responding to existing Wikidata items and the possibility of new Wikipedia articles drafted from them, using Wikifunctions. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 00:51, 2 May 2026 (UTC) :I don't think we ever get any article an existing wiki does not have. Even if abstract content creation gets as fast as reasonably possible, it will never beat out typing text, so we will never catch up with, say, enwiki or eswiki. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 01:10, 2 May 2026 (UTC) ::It's also a question of policy. There are topics about which things could be said, but which wouldn't meet the baseline notability or other criteria of the big monolingual wikis. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 20:22, 2 May 2026 (UTC) :::This is true, if we keep [[d:]]'s notability policy (which seems like the most natural one) then there are many subjects that we theoretically can talk about that don't meet the [[w:WP:GNG|GNG]] and similar guidelines. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 22:25, 2 May 2026 (UTC) == How many articles in how many languages are actually fully available without errors == This is a response to the call in [[:f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-02]]. The most important thing to count is already listed there: '''How many articles in how many languages are actually fully available without errors?''' It should be not just a count, but a list: I want to see which articles are readable in which languages; which articles are readable in some languages, but not others (which ones?); which articles are not readable in any language; etc. An even more relevant, but much harder to measure thing is how many of those articles are actually more useful than not having an article at all. There is no article about Boston in many languages, but [[Q100]], which currently says "Boston is the capital of Massachusetts.Boston is the largest city of Massachusetts." is not significantly more useful than nothing at all even if it's fully rendered in another language in which there is no concrete article about it. [[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] ([[User talk:Amire80|talk]]) 12:12, 2 May 2026 (UTC) :Perhaps this should have been on the talk page of that status update instead of the project chat? [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:25, 2 May 2026 (UTC) ::The status update is about two projects and so I can understand if there are comments here. What do you think about creating a status update overview page with links to the status updates in Abstract Wikipedia to offer the possibility to discuss the status updates and especially things related to Abstract Wikipedia there. [[User:Hogü-456|Hogü-456]] ([[User talk:Hogü-456|talk]]) 18:57, 4 May 2026 (UTC) :::I don't think that's necessary. You can just include your abstractwiki (as in, the live wiki, not the project) related comments on the page on [[f:]], or, if for some reason that's not possible, as a reply to the newsletter announcement here. The point is, the project chat is crowded enough with topics as it is, ideally it should be more focussed on general matters of discussion than close-ended enquiries about topics that have their own talk page. I find Amire80's use of a new == heading here to be improper. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 19:32, 4 May 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #246 is out: Request for input: what should we count for Abstract Wikipedia == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-02|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we ask you what would be the relevant metrics for Abstract Wikipedia, we discuss our latest news on Composition Language v2, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 12:21, 2 May 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30325620 --> == Spaces between sentences, another attempt == [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat#Extra spaces between sentences|A month ago]], @[[User:内存溢出的猫|内存溢出的猫]]<ref group="spaces3>According to Google Translate, it's pronounced "Nèicún yìchū de māo". Please correct me if it's wrong. When I write, I want to know how are things that I write pronounced aloud, and very unfortunately, I never learned to read Chinese characters, and even if I did, most English speakers probably didn't. Come to think of it, is there a function that ''reliably'' transliterates Chinese characters?</ref> That discussion doesn't seem to have yielded any fixes or meaningful discussions, at least not that I can see. [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat#Spaces between sentences|Two weeks ago]], I tried to bring up a similar topic, but that discussion somehow got derailed and also didn't yield anything useful. Now, the problem looks differently, but it's still a problem. When I look at [[Q10251]], for example, what I see is four sentences that ''appear'' with ''no'' spaces between them. Not one, not two—none at all. It looks like this: :Plasma is a fundamental state of matter.Plasma is a classical state of matter.A plasma is a gas.A plasma is a matter. Note that I emphasized ''appear'': When I see them rendered on the screen, they have no spaces between them. In the HTML, however, they are represented as four <code><nowiki><div></nowiki></code>s, and their inline positioning is handled by CSS. This means, for example, that if I copy and paste them, I don't get a long string with no spaces after full stops, but four sentences with a single line break after each full stop: <poem> Plasma is a fundamental state of matter. Plasma is a classical state of matter. A plasma is a gas. A plasma is a matter. </poem> This is not how it is supposed to be done. <code><nowiki><div></nowiki></code>s are supposed to be used for block elements and not hacked into appearing as if they are inline (also known as phrasing). Spaces between sentences are supposed to be real characters rather than HTML and CSS tricks, they may be different in different languages, and in some languages they may be nothing at all. I hope that the definition of the problem is clear. <references group="spaces3"></references> [[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] ([[User talk:Amire80|talk]]) 12:49, 2 May 2026 (UTC) :Hi, have a look at it [[Special:PermanentLink/7132|now]]. Does this match your expectations? I think it's not rendering right now for whatever reason, but there are other examples of it being done this way that you can see: [[Q241691]]. The article renders properly in both English (spaces between sentences) and Japanese (no spaces at all). : :'''English:''' :<blockquote>Programmed Data Processor is a computer model series by Digital Equipment Corporation. PDP-8 is a Programmed Data Processor.</blockquote> :'''Japanese:''' :<blockquote>PDPシリーズはディジタル・イクイップメント・コーポレーションによるコンピュータ・モデル・シリーズである。PDP-8はPDPシリーズである。</blockquote> : :I have some, err, strong opinions about [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]]'s 「Abstract Wikipedia Editor」 tool, which is the predominant cause for all of these very janky and poorly-laid-out articles that you see. This is not how an article ought to be written on Abstract Wikipedia, and I and other editors are aware of this. If you see these problems, please do fix them! The wiki will be all the better for it. : :In the absence of consensus on such things as these (and awaiting any official policy pages) I have written [[f:User:Theki/best practices]] on my Wikifunctions userpage. You are welcome to read it if you wish. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:20, 2 May 2026 (UTC) ::The output of [[Q241691]] looks OK to me in this regard. How was it done? ::[[Q10251]] gives me an error. [[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] ([[User talk:Amire80|talk]]) 18:10, 2 May 2026 (UTC) :::WikiLambda is doing WikiLambda things. This WASI time limit error happens intermittently on Abstract Wikipedia articles and it usually goes away after a short while. The only thing is that it doesn't really seem like purging these articles does anything to force the orchestrator to retry its evaluation so the article might not render that paragraph until someone comes in and pokes at it by editing it somehow. ::: :::The working article uses the [[f:Z33068|''paragraph from sentences'']] function to lay out its individual sentence content. This function automatically handles converting any and all text-like objects (strings, HTML fragments, and monolingual text) to a consistent form, so sentence fragments can all be supplied verbatim to its list input. When the function is putting the sentences together it defaults to using a single space to separate them, but first checks if the requested language is in the [[f:Z33984|''languages without spaces between sentences'']] list. If it is, it doesn't add spaces at all, and just concatenates the sentences normally. I hope this explanation makes sense. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 18:19, 2 May 2026 (UTC) ::::It makes some sense, but earlier, you suggested: "If you see these problems, please do fix them", and I'm not entirely sure how to do it. How would I fix it in [[Q100]], for example? [[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] ([[User talk:Amire80|talk]]) 19:41, 2 May 2026 (UTC) :::::In this case you would do the following: :::::# At the bottom, click the plus and then 「Add empty fragment」. :::::# Set the function to [[f:Z33068]], as mentioned earlier. :::::# Now go through each sentence fragment, find the innermost sentence-generation function, click on the three dots, and copy it. Do not copy the calls to [[f:Z29749]] or similar, these are not necessary. :::::# Go to the ''paragraph with sentences'' function call and add an element to the list. :::::# Click on the three dots next to the new element, and paste in the earlier sentence fragment. :::::# You can now delete the original fragment and repeat the process in the same list for the one after it. :::::&mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:46, 2 May 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Theki|Theki]] I intend on fixing it, I recently made an attempt but the suggested fixes made problems worse. Do you have any practical suggestions of how to structure the templates? I will try to implement them when I have more time. ::Also your name is very confusing, are you in the process of getting it changed wiki-wide? [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 22:36, 2 May 2026 (UTC) :::Um, are you referring to my signature not matching my wiki username? I have considered for a long time changing it from ''theki'', but I don't feel like putting in the effort when it seems to be perfectly ignorable for most people. The user 「''Rae''」 can't be usurped because they made, like, two or three articles on the Persian Wikipedia two decades ago or something, I don't know. If that weren't the case I would be User:Rae right now but after that failed to go through I just decided to stop bothering. Maybe at some point I'll come up with a username I'm happy with keeping for the foreseeable future but I have other concerns at the moment. :::Could you explain how your attempted fixes 「made problems worse」? Presently I side with Feeglgeef's sentiments and prefer to wait for abstract content to actually be feasible to make on a reasonably descriptive scale (see: the type proposals) before I go around making articles willy-nilly, which is what AWE has been doing—making a bunch of pretty low-quality articles on a massive scale when it probably ''really'' would have been better to, err, hold off on that. :::And I honestly know very little about the actual workings of your editor, I don't really use it nor am I familiar with its template syntax or whatever it may use, so I'm going to look over how it actually works and then get back to you on that. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 23:28, 2 May 2026 (UTC) ::::Using this [[f:Z33068]] made things worse [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 00:44, 3 May 2026 (UTC) :::::That did not go through correctly but I do not think we have a proper thing for it. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 00:45, 3 May 2026 (UTC) ::::::What? Could you elaborate? &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 01:00, 3 May 2026 (UTC) ::::::{{ping|Immanuelle}} I checked. Your issue is that your editor is not providing the article language to Z33068K2; that is, the ''paragraph from sentences'' function has a second argument, and your editor was omitting it. If you properly specify it, it will work. Please, next time, actually tell me what went wrong instead of going quiet and forcing me to look after it myself. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:06, 4 May 2026 (UTC) == Most used fragments == [[:f:Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-02|The latest status update]] lists the most used fragments: "[[:f:Z32123]] with 1452, followed by [[:f:Z27868]] with 736 and [[:f:Z29749]] with 650)". How was this calculated? [[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] ([[User talk:Amire80|talk]]) 13:44, 2 May 2026 (UTC) :Again, this should definitely have been on the talk page for that status update. This isn't the everything page, it should be used for discussion relating to the wiki. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:26, 2 May 2026 (UTC) ::It's not a question just about the status update, even if it was prompted by it. It's a question about Abstract Wikipedia that can be relevant beyond the status update. ::Stop policing how people use discussion pages without a particularly good reason. If you don't have an answer to the actual question, don't write anything. [[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] ([[User talk:Amire80|talk]]) 19:38, 2 May 2026 (UTC) :::I have to agree with Feeglgeef that this would be better raised on the status update's talk page itself. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 19:42, 2 May 2026 (UTC) :::I'm "policing" which discussion pages are being used for the same reason different discussion spaces exist in the first place. And your distinction between "just about" and "prompted by" is irrelevant. If I want to ask someone how they did something, I would ask them first, not go to a general discussion board. This is still the project ''chat'', not a Q&A zone. {{ping|DVrandecic (WMF)|p=,}} can you please answer the question? [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 22:22, 2 May 2026 (UTC) :I have a local script that I have run on a local copy. Nothing more complicated than that. Could also be very wrong -- the script hasn't been peer-reviewed or anything. --[[User:DVrandecic (WMF)|DVrandecic (WMF)]] ([[User talk:DVrandecic (WMF)|talk]]) 08:54, 4 May 2026 (UTC) ::Thanks, @[[User:DVrandecic (WMF)|DVrandecic (WMF)]]. Can you share the code, please? I'll be happy to review it. [[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] ([[User talk:Amire80|talk]]) 15:30, 4 May 2026 (UTC) ==Wiktionary integration== I was trying out a few functions recently, such as [https://www.wikifunctions.org/view/en/Z27243 the new superlative function], and I noticed that ''every adjective'' has to be a Wikidata item. For example, I couldn't type in the inputs "Bugatti Veyron", "fast", "Earth" because "fast" as an adjective is not a Wikidata item. This doesn't really make sense, given that Wiktionary already has the word for "fast" and its superlative form in many different languages. Would it be possible to integrate Wiktionary into the function, so the user can type an adjective or verb from Wiktionary instead of having to deal with Wikidata (which consists almost entirely of nouns)? [[User:Somepinkdude|Somepinkdude]] ([[User talk:Somepinkdude|talk]]) 16:49, 6 May 2026 (UTC) :No, sadly. I would try "speed" as the adjective, though, you have to use abstract qualities instead of concrete English terms. [[File:Wikifunctions Superlative speed example.png|thumb|Here's an example of the word being used.]] [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 18:02, 6 May 2026 (UTC) :Wikidata has standard items as well as lexeme data, so if anything, we should try to integrate those. E.g. [[:d:Lexeme:L1029]]. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 19:48, 6 May 2026 (UTC) ::I tried this, and it gave "Bugatti Veyron is the speedest car on Earth", which is laughably bad. The problem is that Wikidata does not "know" what the superlative form is, while Wiktionary does. Speed is a fairly common descriptor, but what about less common adjectives which aren't on Wikidata? Will there need to be a bot to copy all of this information from Wiktionary? [[User:Somepinkdude|Somepinkdude]] ([[User talk:Somepinkdude|talk]]) 22:14, 6 May 2026 (UTC) :::I'm not suggesting that the functionality works <em>now</em>, but that we need to integrate the funcationality. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 22:17, 6 May 2026 (UTC) :::Well, no, the superlative form is chosen by [[f:Z12203]]. I think there's a bug with the English implementation that calls that function wrong. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 22:19, 6 May 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:Somepinkdude|Somepinkdude]] I did find the item {{Q|Q19807466}} which was linked to a concept database's entry for "fast"; I have at least linked it to the English lexeme "fast" and will try to add more links at a better hour. [[User:Mahir256|Mahir256]] ([[User talk:Mahir256|talk]]) 04:18, 7 May 2026 (UTC) == Showcase == I was wondering if there's a curated list of decent articles to learn by example here on Abstract Wikipedia? [[User:Fgnievinski|Fgnievinski]] ([[User talk:Fgnievinski|talk]]) 02:02, 8 May 2026 (UTC) :Unfortunately not, and, honestly, I wouldn't recommend article creation at the moment, it's likely to need significant refactoring as the way we represent abstract content changes, but, I can point you to [[Q668]] as a reasonably good example at the moment. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 02:39, 8 May 2026 (UTC) ::Thank you. "308 languages" blew my mind – well done! [[User:Fgnievinski|Fgnievinski]] ([[User talk:Fgnievinski|talk]]) 02:54, 8 May 2026 (UTC) :::308 is the number of ''concrete'' Wikipedias in which a manually-written article about India is available. :::The abstract article renders for me in English as "India is a country in Asia. India is a republic. New Delhi is the capital of India. India is the most populous country in world." Switching to another language to get rendered as an abstract article is done by typing the language's name in the box above the rendered text. I tried French, German, and Dutch, and got errors in all of them. [[User:Amire80|Amir E. Aharoni]] ([[User talk:Amire80|talk]]) 03:12, 8 May 2026 (UTC) ::::So it goes. The paragraph has quite a lot of distinct sentence generation functions, all of which of course have to be implemented in the target language. This will be rounded out once we're able to more effectively generalize linguistic content. I view these functions as sort of patchy temporary solutions to the sentence generation problem while we figure out something more robust, which I hope is soon to come. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 04:15, 8 May 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #247 is out: References from Wikidata now available == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-08|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we announce that is now possible to pass references in Wikidata statements, we introduce the [https://abstract-data.toolforge.org/ Abstract Data dashboard], we report you on the presentation about Abstract Wikipedia at WikiCon Australia, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Also, we remind you that if you have questions or ideas to discuss, the next '''Volunteers' Corner''' will be held on '''[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1778520600 May 11, at 17:30 UTC]''' ([https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw link to the meeting]). Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 11:16, 8 May 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30325620 --> == about the usage of Z33068 == The use of [[f:Z33068]] (en: paragraph from sentences) <s>always</s> most of the time results in the error "Reached time limit in orchestrator." So should it be used at all for now, temporarily? Or maybe there are already some tickets about this that I am not aware of? -- [[User:Asked42|Asked42]] ([[User talk:Asked42|talk]]) 18:23, 10 May 2026 (UTC) :It previously worked, so I'm hoping whatever the issue is will be fixed soon. The current state of the wiki makes [[m:Immediatism|immediatism]] an illogical philosophy to have at the moment, in my opinion. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 20:16, 10 May 2026 (UTC) ::This issue seems to no longer exist, you might need to clear the cache by making a dummy edit on affected articles. I implemented the function in Python (instead of composition), which has increased the speed by about 2000 ms. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 04:31, 11 May 2026 (UTC) :::Seems like working. Thank you. -- [[User:Asked42|Asked42]] ([[User talk:Asked42|talk]]) 19:06, 11 May 2026 (UTC) == Manual of Style == I've created a [[Abstract Wikipedia:Manual of Style|draft for a Manual of Style]]. Please feel free to comment on or make bold edits to the page. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 03:29, 11 May 2026 (UTC) :Thank you! That’s great and I’ll look at it more soon. I’m still taking a bit of a wikibreak. [[User:Immanuelle|Immanuelle]] ([[User talk:Immanuelle|talk]]) 22:32, 14 May 2026 (UTC) :Is there anything I've written [[f:User:Theki/best_practices#Abstract_Wikipedia|here]] that you think would make for a good technical section of the page? &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 00:04, 15 May 2026 (UTC) ::I've added some of them. Thank you for your list of best practices by the way, I generally agree with them (I can't endorse connecting WD items currently in hope of a better technical solution, but otherwise I do). [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 00:58, 15 May 2026 (UTC) == Proposals on the architecture of Abstract Content rendering == Starting from a discussion born on the Wikifunctions Telegram chat, I've explained two different proposals on how the NLG on Abstract Wikipedia should be organized in the page [[User:Dv103/Abstract articles architectures]]. Please come to contribute to the discussion, or to propose alternatives. [[User:Dv103|Dv103]] ([[User talk:Dv103|talk]]) 14:32, 11 May 2026 (UTC) == [[MediaWiki:Wikimedia-copyright-footer]] == The copyright message has a few issues, mainly that it does not address abstract content (which is not "text"), nor object labels (which are under CC0). Proposed text: "<nowiki> Text and abstract content are available under the [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License]; the labels of objects from [[f:|Wikifunctions]] are available under the [https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ Creative Commons CC0 License]; additional terms may apply. See [https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Policy:Terms_of_Use Terms of Use] for details. </nowiki>" Which, when rendered, looks like: Text and abstract content are available under the [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License]; the labels of objects from [[f:|Wikifunctions]] are available under the [https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ Creative Commons CC0 License]; additional terms may apply. See [https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Policy:Terms_of_Use Terms of Use] for details. The message is somewhat inspired by the current one and WF's. Thoughts? Thank you! [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 13:30, 12 May 2026 (UTC) :@[[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]]: As you probably imagine, this text is very tightly controlled by the Wikimedia Foundation's Legal department. I think the first port of call should be a discussion about why you might want to change things, rather than a rush to specific re-wordings, before approaching them for sign-off. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 14:28, 12 May 2026 (UTC) ::Well I briefly summarized my justification, my proposed text was just an idea for a starting point. Basically, the abstract content is not really "text", so the footer doesn't actually tell the reader what they're allowed to do with it, and I argue that the current wording implies that the labels are licensed under CC-BY-SA 4, when they aren't. I think a change is critical as otherwise we're not showing the reader a license, or, arguably, in the case of labels, showing users a license that ''does not apply'', which is a pretty bad thing. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 14:51, 12 May 2026 (UTC) == [[MediaWiki:Abstractwiki-suggested-functions.json]] == I'd think we should add [[f:Z33068]] here. The function allows you to form a paragraph out of sentences and handles languages having different standards of whether to add a space between them, and adding it here would make finding it easier. I'm not sure what policy we want to have for the suggested functions, this idea might help formulate it. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 16:06, 12 May 2026 (UTC) :[[User:Jdforrester (WMF)]] tells me the page has been changed to [[Special:CommunityConfiguration/AbstractWikiSuggestedWikifunctions]] on the telegram. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 16:25, 12 May 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]]: Yup, see the weekly update on [[f:Wikifunctions:Status_updates/2026-05-02|2026-05-02]]. [[User:Jdforrester (WMF)|Jdforrester (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jdforrester (WMF)|talk]]) 16:35, 12 May 2026 (UTC) :I also believe Z33068 should be added to the list. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 17:25, 12 May 2026 (UTC) == Abstract Wikipedia statistics site source code == https://abstract-data.toolforge.org/ is a very useful tool, but it doesn't seem to have anything pointing to the location of its source code. Is it closed-source or unfree? While I'm at it I feel I should suggest having language pages' paths formatted differently from how they are currently—at the moment it's <code>/languages/Toki%20Pona</code> when something like <code>/languages/tok</code> would be more suitable. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; : See [[:gitlab:toolforge-repos/abstract-data]]. Also pinging {{ping|DSantamaria-WMF|p=}} (thanks for the tool, by the way). [[User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|<span class="skin-invert" style="color:black;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:110%;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal">NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh</span>]] 00:25, 13 May 2026 (UTC) ::Thank you. I think a link to that repository should be put in a footer somewhere on the website as I wouldn't have found that if not for you. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 02:30, 13 May 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Theki}} For the record, I found that repo by searching for "abstract-data" on [[:toolhub:|Toolhub]]. [[User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|<span class="skin-invert" style="color:black;font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:110%;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal">NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh</span>]] 03:34, 13 May 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks for the feedback and the report, fixed both things, we have now the link to the repo in the side bar footer, and also the language codes are used in the URLs. Thanks! [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 11:46, 13 May 2026 (UTC) ::::Are you particularly attached to keeping country flag emojis next to the language names? Some consider it an [https://flagsarenotlanguages.com/blog anti-pattern]. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 16:17, 14 May 2026 (UTC) :::::I think the use of flags is not really harmful since this is not a ''language selector'', it is just a list of languages. Of course not every language has an associated flag, for example Latin, which does look a bit awkward, but it can't be helped. Maybe give languages without a flag a unique icon from Wikimedia Commons? e.g. <div style="display:inline-flex;align-items:center;border:1px solid #0002;border-radius:4px;gap:4px;padding:4px;">[[File:Toki pona.svg|16px]] Toki Pona</div> instead of <div style="display:inline-flex;align-items:center;border:1px solid #0002;border-radius:4px;gap:4px;padding:4px;"><span>🌐</span>Toki Pona</div>. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 16:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC) ::::::I thought I saw 🏛️ being used for Latin earlier. But of course, as far as the Unicode Consortium is concerned, [[Q65300415|🇬🇧]] doesn't mean '[[Q1680|English]]', no more than [[Q100587670|🏳️‍🌈]] means '[[Q1359130|Polari]]'; technically, it doesn't even mean '[[Q145|United Kingdom]]', just the letters 🇺 and 🇰 next to each other (which linguistically would indicate [[Q8798|Ukrainian]] in ISO 639, but these are 'regional indicator symbols'). [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 17:21, 14 May 2026 (UTC) :::::::As seems (from this comment and also [[f:User_talk:DSantamaria-WMF#c-%E9%AD%94%E7%90%B4-20260513063700-Country_flags_in_abstract-data|others' comments]]) that flags are a little bit controversial, I just removed them, IMHO it was just an aesthetic concept, I like the look and feel that flags bring to the language labels, but happy to remove them if make some people feel uncomfortable with the concept. [[User:DSantamaria-WMF|DSantamaria-WMF]] ([[User talk:DSantamaria-WMF|talk]]) 05:54, 15 May 2026 (UTC) == Make it more user Friendly == Make it more user-friendly by adding drag-and-drop compenots and one click additions, and make it similar to a visual macro buidler. [[User:ChippyTechGH|ChippyTechGH]] ([[User talk:ChippyTechGH|talk]]) 01:00, 15 May 2026 (UTC) :Could you file something like this on [[phab:|phabricator]]? [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 01:01, 15 May 2026 (UTC) == Person infoboxes == Hi all, I've just created [[f:Z35167|infobox for person (Z35167)]]. All it can really do presently is display the name of the person in the chosen language and in the person's native language, but it's a good start. I started writing it as a composition but chose to switch to writing it in JavaScript instead, which ended up being less headache-inducing (managing a large list of strings to concatenate together is not fun, plus compositions bring lots of additional overhead). Unfortunately, this means that the actual ''useful'' parts of the infobox—the information about the person themself—is not really doable. I'd need to dereference the Wikidata property references to get their label in the requested language, but since they're references and I'm working with code, not compositions, I can't just call [[f:Z6822|fetch Wikidata property (Z6822)]] and be done with it. If there's a WikiLambda API to do this inside of the JS itself that would be great and would solve everything, but at the moment that alone is what's holding it back, or so it seems. I can get the actual ''values'' of statements just fine, though. If I am missing some amazing WikiLambda API function that will solve this problem for me by letting me dereference the PID, then please let me know because that would be great. If you want to look at an example of the infobox right meow, you can view [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/tok/Q317521 Q317521 in Toki Pona] and see how it states Musk's name in both Toki Pona ''and'' his native English name. COOL! My hope is that this can be made less barebones in the near future. Infoboxes are a great way to get quick information on a subject and can fill in the informational gaps in the presently sparse articles we have at the moment, all while staying in the user's requested language. Feedback is appreciated! &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 02:58, 15 May 2026 (UTC) :Thank you for this! I wonder if perhaps it would be better to create one "infobox" function and then have compositions call that, making wd retrival possible? [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 03:38, 15 May 2026 (UTC) ::Working on that at the moment, I think I've got it working but I'm hitting a ratelimit in the orchestrator so I don't know for sure. The main issue with it now is that the actual [[f:Z35175|infobox template (Z35175)]] wrapper was programmed in JS so as to not be a pain in the ass, so this means that it can only take in strings, HTML fragments, etc. so the retrieval of Wikidata stuff still needs to be done by the caller and is rather verbose (see [[f:Z35168|the main implementation]]). The niceties will come soon later once I know that it all works at a lower level, though. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 05:04, 15 May 2026 (UTC) ::So the problem now seems to be that when [[f:Z29825|label of Wikidata property in language (Z29825)]] isn't being faulty, it's being incredibly slow. Considering retrieving Wikidata items from their references seems to take, like, four to five seconds, and we'll have tens of statements in these infoboxes, I don't see how the property names could be retrieved in a way that doesn't cause the orchestrator to time out or hit a ratelimit. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 06:01, 15 May 2026 (UTC) :::I think I figured something out? I'm just going to try calling [[f:Z35036|fetch Wikidata property or parts (Z35036)]], it seems to be much faster for whatever reason. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 06:05, 15 May 2026 (UTC) :::It works now, a little rough around the edges, also very slow, but I think I'm mostly happy with it. Of course it would be great if all you needed to provide to the template function to get a label-statement row was the property reference itself, but I'm too sleep-deprived to figure that out at the moment. I made five bespoke functions specifically for this infobox, more than I would like, but it's probably not ''that'' bad. I'm just hoping I didn't duplicate any functionality in trying to make the composition less verbose and repetitive. &mdash; [[User:Theki|rae^5e]] &lt;[[User talk:Theki|talk]]&gt; 07:15, 15 May 2026 (UTC) == Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia Newsletter #248 is out: A higher meaning == There is [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15|a new update]] for Abstract Wikipedia and Wikifunctions. Please, come and read it! In this issue, we discuss functions creating language fragments, we present our latest news in Types, and we take a look at the latest software developments. Want to catch up with the previous updates? Check [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates|our archive]]! Enjoy the reading! -- [[User:Sannita (WMF)|User:Sannita (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Sannita (WMF)|talk]]) 14:36, 15 May 2026 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Sannita (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Global_message_delivery/Targets/Wikifunctions_%26_Abstract_Wikipedia&oldid=30536976 --> t8nbd6oyt4zr5ipwigyem2znsxiknih 4 7 7968 7461 2026-05-16T01:21:27Z Minorax 556 7968 wikitext text/x-wiki <languages /> <translate> == What is Abstract Wikipedia? == <!--T:1--> <!--T:2--> Abstract Wikipedia is a new Wikimedia project that allows communities to collaboratively create language-independent articles in their native language, which others can then access in their own languages. This transformation is done by using functions from Wikifunctions that access structured content from Wikidata. == What is an abstract article? == <!--T:3--> <!--T:4--> An abstract article represents information about a topic in a structured, language-independent form. Contributors combine structured data from Wikidata with language functions from Wikifunctions to produce natural-language sentences that describe the topic. == How is Abstract Wikipedia different from Wikipedia? == <!--T:5--> <!--T:6--> Wikipedia articles are written directly in a specific language. <!--T:7--> Abstract Wikipedia instead stores information in a structured form that can generate text in many languages with the help of Wikifunctions. == How does Abstract Wikipedia relate to Wikidata and Wikifunctions? == <!--T:8--> <!--T:9--> Abstract Wikipedia builds on these Wikimedia projects: </translate> * <translate><!--T:10--> '''Wikidata''' provides structured information about topics, and natural language (lexicographic) data.</translate> * <translate><!--T:11--> '''Wikifunctions''' provides (among other things) functions that generate natural-language text in many languages.</translate> * <translate><!--T:12--> '''Abstract Wikipedia''' combines these elements to create articles that can be generated in many languages.</translate> <translate> == Is Abstract Wikipedia using AI? == <!--T:13--> <!--T:14--> No. Abstract Wikipedia does not automatically generate articles using AI. <!--T:15--> Abstract articles are created and maintained by contributors, and functions written by the community generate the text from structured data. == Does Abstract Wikipedia automatically appear on other Wikipedias? == <!--T:16--> <!--T:17--> No. Abstract Wikipedia does not automatically add content to other Wikipedias. Each Wikipedia community remains fully in control of its content, and existing local articles are never replaced. <!--T:18--> In the future, each Wikipedia community will be able to decide whether they want to use content generated from Abstract Wikipedia. == Who can contribute to Abstract Wikipedia? == <!--T:19--> <!--T:20--> Like other Wikimedia projects, Abstract Wikipedia is edited and maintained by volunteers from the community. <!--T:21--> People can contribute in different ways, including creating or improving abstract articles, writing language functions in Wikifunctions, adding data to Wikidata, improving documentation, and helping shape how the project evolves. == Can I use Abstract Wikipedia today? == <!--T:22--> <!--T:23--> Yes. You can explore our early Beta version of Abstract Wikipedia (this site). You can generate abstract articles and view the generated text in different languages. <!--T:24--> Abstract Wikipedia is still in an '''early stage''' so many parts of the experience will continue to evolve based on community feedback. We will be improving the capabilities and usability of the site considerably in the future. You might encounter bugs, usability issues, time-outs, or other problems in the current version. Please let us know [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|here]] if that happens or if you have ideas for improvements! <!--T:25--> In the future, Wikipedia communities will also be able to integrate content created on Abstract Wikipedia into their own wikis, if they like. </translate> [[Category:Abstract Wikipedia administration{{#translation:}}|Frequently Asked Questions]] 12gyccivh0ind4cm9og530vj4kxpj5c 12 41 7956 7606 2026-05-16T01:20:49Z Minorax 556 7956 wikitext text/x-wiki <languages/> <translate> <!--T:1--> In Abstract Wikipedia you can only create articles about topics that already have a Wikidata item. If the topic does not already exist on Wikidata that you can tell by [[<tvar name="1">d:special:search</tvar>|search]], follow [[<tvar name="2">d:Special:MyLanguage/help:items#Creating a new item</tvar>|this help page]] to make a new item for it. == Steps == <!--T:2--> <!--T:3--> In order to create an article, you can go to [[<tvar name="1">Special:CreateAbstract</tvar>|Create a New Abstract Article]]. </translate> [[File:aw-tutorial-step-1.png|center|frameless|800px|<translate><!--T:4--> Select a topic</translate>]] <translate><!--T:5--> Type to select a topic, and click on create.</translate> [[File:aw-tutorial-step-2.png|center|frameless|800px|<translate><!--T:6--> Empty abstract article</translate>]] <translate><!--T:7--> You will get to a new screen. On the right hand side you see the preview in the selected language, on the left hand side the abstract content.</translate> [[File:aw-tutorial-step-3.png|center|frameless|800px|<translate><!--T:8--> Click on the plus sign to add a fragment.</translate>]] <translate><!--T:9--> Click on the plus button in the left panel to add a new fragment. For now, we are adding an empty fragment.</translate> [[File:aw-tutorial-step-4.png|center|frameless|800px|<translate><!--T:10--> An empty fragment</translate>]] <translate><!--T:11--> This will look like this, showing a function call without a function selected yet. We click on the caron next to the red "Select Function" text.</translate> [[File:aw-tutorial-step-5.png|center|frameless|800px|<translate><!--T:12--> Function selector open</translate>]] <translate><!--T:13--> That will open the function selector.</translate> [[File:aw-tutorial-step-6.png|center|frameless|800px|<translate><!--T:14--> Selecting a function</translate>]] <translate><!--T:15--> We select a function. It has to be a function that exists on Wikifunctions, and at this point, it has to return an HTML fragment. In this example we choose the function "string to HTML fragment", as this allows us to enter a string, or choose a function that creates a string.</translate> [[File:aw-tutorial-step-7.png|center|frameless|800px|<translate><!--T:16--> Selected the "string to HTML fragment" function</translate>]] <translate><!--T:17--> We have now selected a function. We get fields for the arguments. Instead of typing a string, we want to add another function.</translate> [[File:aw-tutorial-step-8.png|center|frameless|800px|<translate><!--T:18--> Change the mode of the argument</translate>]] <translate><!--T:19--> In order to do so, we change the mode of the argument named string by clicking on the three dots next to string. This allows us to change from the current mode, literal, to a function call.</translate> [[File:aw-tutorial-step-9.png|center|frameless|800px|<translate><!--T:20--> Select the inner function</translate>]] <translate><!--T:21--> Here we can now select a function that returns a string.</translate> [[File:aw-tutorial-step-10.png|center|frameless|800px|<translate><!--T:22--> Choose a function returning a string</translate>]] <translate><!--T:23--> We select the function "Article-less instantiating fragment" -- a function that creates sentences such as "Paris is a city." Note that selecting the function “Article-less instantiating HTML fragment” would have allowed us to skip using the function “string to HTML fragment”.</translate> [[File:aw-tutorial-step-10.png|center|frameless|800px|<translate><!--T:24--> Arguments for article-less instantiating fragment function</translate>]] <translate><!--T:25--> Now we see the arguments for this function. We also get automatically fitting arguments filled in. This leads to the sentence "Paris is a Paris.", because the arguments "entity" and "class" both get prefilled with the item we are writing about.</translate> [[File:aw-tutorial-step-11.png|center|frameless|800px|<translate><!--T:26--> Changing the mode on the "class" argument</translate>]] <translate><!--T:27--> We need to change the mode on the "class" argument from the automatically filled value (an Argument reference) to a literal.</translate> [[File:aw-tutorial-step-12.png|center|frameless|800px|<translate><!--T:28--> Changed the mode of "class" to literal.</translate>]] <translate><!--T:29--> This gives us now a field to select a Wikidata item for the value of the "class" argument.</translate> [[File:aw-tutorial-step-13.png|center|frameless|800px|<translate><!--T:30--> Selecting city for the class argument</translate>]] <translate><!--T:31--> We select the "city" item for the class argument.</translate> [[File:aw-tutorial-step-14.png|center|frameless|800px|<translate><!--T:32--> The first sentence is created.</translate>]] <translate> <!--T:33--> Once this is selected, the first sentence of the article should be ready. We can now click on publish and have a first version of the article available. Now you can click edit to add more. == This is far too complicated! == <!--T:34--> <!--T:35--> Yes, agreed. <!--T:36--> There are two ways to make this easier:</translate> * <translate><!--T:37--> improve the UX</translate> * <translate><!--T:38--> improve the catalogue of functions</translate> <translate> <!--T:39--> Whereas the development team at the Wikimedia Foundation will be focused on the first approach (and will always appreciate UX ideas), the community can work on a more comprehensive and easy to use catalogue of functions in Wikifunctions. Here we see that naming the functions and arguments is important, and that we probably want to avoid too many functions which turn one type in another in the above flow. <!--T:40--> But yes, most importantly, Abstract Wikipedia is currently in an early public Beta, and it is currently difficult to create and edit articles. We all will need to work together to improve that. If you have ideas for new functions, please suggest them at [[<tvar name="1">Abstract Wikipedia:Suggested functions</tvar>|Suggested functions]]. == See also == <!--T:41--> </translate> * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Useful functions for article composition]] [[Category:Help{{#translation:}}]] dky9fu68nxpf97exwsfjavvabeyt3vd 10 457 7944 7664 2026-05-15T15:25:29Z Sannita (WMF) 48 update 7944 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;<translate><!--T:1--> Volunteer's Corners</translate> * <translate><!--T:2--> The next Volunteers' Corner will be at <tvar name="date-and-time"><bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1778520600 17:30 UTC on 2026-05-11]</bdi></tvar> on <tvar name="platform"><bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi></tvar> at <tvar name="link"><bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi></tvar>.</translate> * <translate><!--T:3--> The [[<tvar name="1">:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-05.webm</tvar>|most recent Volunteer's Corner]] is available on Commons.</translate> ; <translate><!--T:4--> Recent status updates about Wikifunctions</translate> <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <translate>[[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15</tvar>|2026-05-15]]: A higher meaning</translate> * <translate><!--T:16--> [[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-08</tvar>|2026-05-08]]: References from Wikidata are now available</translate> * <translate><!--T:15--> [[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-02</tvar>|2026-05-02]]: Request for input: what should we count for Abstract Wikipedia?</translate> * <translate><!--T:14--> [[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-25</tvar>|2026-04-25]]: The Foundation's search for the perfect language</translate> * <translate><!--T:13--> [[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-16</tvar>|2026-04-16]]: Milestones; Some major issues hopefully resolved</translate> </div> <span class="plainlinks">[https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status_updates <span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small"><translate><!--T:10--> More news</translate></span>]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> 6cc9ewmqu1151co3ey4g7l7dp9bwae5 7945 7944 2026-05-15T15:25:40Z Sannita (WMF) 48 Marked this version for translation 7945 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;<translate><!--T:1--> Volunteer's Corners</translate> * <translate><!--T:2--> The next Volunteers' Corner will be at <tvar name="date-and-time"><bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1778520600 17:30 UTC on 2026-05-11]</bdi></tvar> on <tvar name="platform"><bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi></tvar> at <tvar name="link"><bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi></tvar>.</translate> * <translate><!--T:3--> The [[<tvar name="1">:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-05.webm</tvar>|most recent Volunteer's Corner]] is available on Commons.</translate> ; <translate><!--T:4--> Recent status updates about Wikifunctions</translate> <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <translate><!--T:17--> [[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15</tvar>|2026-05-15]]: A higher meaning</translate> * <translate><!--T:16--> [[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-08</tvar>|2026-05-08]]: References from Wikidata are now available</translate> * <translate><!--T:15--> [[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-02</tvar>|2026-05-02]]: Request for input: what should we count for Abstract Wikipedia?</translate> * <translate><!--T:14--> [[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-25</tvar>|2026-04-25]]: The Foundation's search for the perfect language</translate> * <translate><!--T:13--> [[<tvar name="1">:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-16</tvar>|2026-04-16]]: Milestones; Some major issues hopefully resolved</translate> </div> <span class="plainlinks">[https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status_updates <span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small"><translate><!--T:10--> More news</translate></span>]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> d5h9k0fhy64runum3e09llcya4lxab3 1198 549 7961 2165 2026-05-16T01:21:14Z FuzzyBot 563 Importing a new version from external source 7961 wikitext text/x-wiki '''Wikidata''' provides structured information about topics, and natural language (lexicographic) data. 9eakxt8ffp4iv690l05vixn1k3yrzju 1198 550 7962 2166 2026-05-16T01:21:14Z FuzzyBot 563 Importing a new version from external source 7962 wikitext text/x-wiki '''Wikifunctions''' provides (among other things) functions that generate natural-language text in many languages. 3wj3ienvmo7uoe6otum4ptbdexd5q5f 1198 564 7963 2178 2026-05-16T01:21:14Z FuzzyBot 563 Importing a new version from external source 7963 wikitext text/x-wiki Yes. You can explore our early Beta version of Abstract Wikipedia (this site). You can generate abstract articles and view the generated text in different languages. oifn8k4n86eqghadqzo5k3y2b50t7v4 2 895 7973 7203 2026-05-16T01:58:46Z JJPMaster 1823 /* Other */ rearranging ([[:en:User:DreamRimmer/DR Editor|DR]]) 7973 wikitext text/x-wiki {{#babel:en-N|es-4|ase-0}} Hi! I'm coming over from [[f:User:JJPMaster|Wikifunctions]] to help Abstract Wikipedia get all the [[m:Wiki99/LGBT+|Wiki99/LGBT+]] articles. I was also (probably) the first person to ever edit Abstract Wikipedia using the [[Special:RestSandbox|MediaWiki REST API]]. See [[Special:Diff/6102]]. == Current projects == * [[/Atoa/]] (ACE to abstract): A tool which will allow the user to generate Abstract Content from [[w:en:Attempto Controlled English|Attempto Controlled English]] natural language input. == My articles == ===LGBTQ+=== * [[Q189125|transgender]] (will need to improve in the future) * [[Q6636|homosexuality]] * [[Q9800899|lesbian]] * [[Q43200|bisexuality]] * [[Q17884|LGBTQ]] * [[Q18556697|HIV infection]] * [[Q33487|homophobia]] ===Other=== * [[Q44641|Wendy Carlos]] * [[Q467|woman]] (currently non-functional) * [[Q138864867|Abstract Wikipedia Sandbox]] * [[Q100000|Cadier en Keer]] * [[Q190|God]] iqh8ez8ry8oagtp3t4vwqdrnx6m0828 2 1117 7954 7742 2026-05-15T15:33:09Z HenkvD 1447 7954 wikitext text/x-wiki {| border="1" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: #99B3FF solid 1px; background: #F1F8F1; border-collapse: collapse;" | | colspan="10" | <div class="plainlinks"><center>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<b>Gebruiker:HenkvD op [[commons:Template talk:Sisterlinks|zusterprojecten]]:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</b><small>[http://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gebruiker:HenkvD/Categorie%C3%ABn&action=edit (bewerk)]</div></small></center> |- | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Wikipedia-logo.png|18px]]<br>Wikipedia<br>[[:de:Benutzer:HenkvD|de:]] [[:en:User:HenkvD|en:]] [[:fr:Utilisateur:HenkvD|fr:]] '''[[:nl:User:HenkvD|nl:]]''' | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Wiktionary-logo-en.png|17px]]<br>Wiktionary<br>[[:wikt:en:User:HenkvD|en:]]<br />[http://www.omegawiki.org/index.php/User:HenkvD ΩWiki] | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Wikinews-logo.png|35px]]<br>Wikinews<br>[[wikinews:User:HenkvD|en:]] [[:n:nl:User:HenkvD|nl:]]<br><div id="cat" class="plainlinks">[http://incubator.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:HenkvD nl: in incubator]</div> | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Wikiquote-logo.png|16px]]<br>Wikiquote<br>[[:q:en:User:HenkvD|en:]] |- | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Wikibooks-logo.png|18px]]<br>Wikibooks<br>[[:b:en:User:HenkvD|en:]] | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Wikisource-logo.png|18px]]<br>Wikisource<br>[[:s:en:User:HenkvD|en:]] '''[[:s:nl:Gebruiker:HenkvD|nl:]]''' <div id="cat" class="plainlinks">[http://wikisource.org/wiki/User:HenkvD old]</div> | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Wikiversity-logo-en.svg|18px]]<br>Wikiversity<br>[[:de:v:User:HenkvD|de:]] [[:en:v:User:HenkvD|en:]] | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Wikimedia-logo.png|18px]]<br>[[:meta:User:HenkvD|Meta]]<br><div id="cat" class="plainlinks">[http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:HenkvD Strategy]<br><div id="cat" class="plainlinks">'''[http://nl.wikimedia.org/wiki/Gebruiker:HenkvD nl:]''' </div> |- | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Wikivoyage-Logo-v3-icon.svg|16px]]<br>Wikivoyage<br>[[:en:voy:User:HenkvD|en:]] | valign="top" align="center" | [[File:Wikidata-logo.svg|19px|Wikidata]]<br><div class="plainlinks">[http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:HenkvD Wikidata]</div> | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Commons-logo.svg|14px]]<br>[[:Commons:User:HenkvD|Commons]] | valign="top" align="center" | [[File:Wikifunctions-logo.svg|14px]] [[File:Abstract-Wikipedia-wordmark.svg|42px]]<br>[[f:User:HenkvD|Wikifunctions]] <br>'''AbstractWiki''' |} My name is Henk, from [[Q55|the Netherlands]] ([[:nl:Gebruiker:HenkvD]]). I am interested in Abstract Wikipedia functionality and have general knowledge if the Dutch language (as native speaker). As most other the Dutch persons I have good knowledge of English and some of German and a bit of French and Romance languages.<br> I have an IT background, and try to understand the programming in Wikifunctions, but can't actually program them, except minor adjustments.<br> I will try to analyse Wikifunction, Wikidata, lexemes and add Wikifunction tests if needed. {{#babel:nl|en-3|de-1}} Examples * [[Q90]] - Paris is a city. Paris is the capital of France. * [[Q1033]] - Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa. * [[Q11750]] - list of sovereign states Some help pages are multilingual like [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]] First steps to get Abstract Wikipedia started: * Basic functions on Wikifunctions ** Use defaults if no lexeme and/or gender * link Wikidata Q-items to Lexemes * Gender of lexemes on Wikidata {{AbstractTestLemma}} {| class="wikitable" ! Function !! English !! Z1157 Nederlands !! Z60 Local language |- | <nowiki>{{#function:</nowiki>[[f:Z26039|Z26039]]<nowiki>|Q64|Q515|Z1002}}</nowiki> | {{#function:Z26039|Q64|Q515|Z1002}} || {{#function:Z26039|Q64|Q515|nl}} || {{#function:Z26039|Q64|Q515|Z60}} |} lt16cn1a0oy7b4myoahtvso84rlalsv 7955 7954 2026-05-15T15:34:15Z HenkvD 1447 Undid revision [[Special:Diff/7954|7954]] by [[Special:Contributions/HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 7955 wikitext text/x-wiki {| border="1" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: #99B3FF solid 1px; background: #F1F8F1; border-collapse: collapse;" | | colspan="10" | <div class="plainlinks"><center>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<b>Gebruiker:HenkvD op [[commons:Template talk:Sisterlinks|zusterprojecten]]:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</b><small>[http://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gebruiker:HenkvD/Categorie%C3%ABn&action=edit (bewerk)]</div></small></center> |- | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Wikipedia-logo.png|18px]]<br>Wikipedia<br>[[:de:Benutzer:HenkvD|de:]] [[:en:User:HenkvD|en:]] [[:fr:Utilisateur:HenkvD|fr:]] '''[[:nl:User:HenkvD|nl:]]''' | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Wiktionary-logo-en.png|17px]]<br>Wiktionary<br>[[:wikt:en:User:HenkvD|en:]]<br />[http://www.omegawiki.org/index.php/User:HenkvD ΩWiki] | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Wikinews-logo.png|35px]]<br>Wikinews<br>[[wikinews:User:HenkvD|en:]] [[:n:nl:User:HenkvD|nl:]]<br><div id="cat" class="plainlinks">[http://incubator.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:HenkvD nl: in incubator]</div> | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Wikiquote-logo.png|16px]]<br>Wikiquote<br>[[:q:en:User:HenkvD|en:]] |- | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Wikibooks-logo.png|18px]]<br>Wikibooks<br>[[:b:en:User:HenkvD|en:]] | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Wikisource-logo.png|18px]]<br>Wikisource<br>[[:s:en:User:HenkvD|en:]] '''[[:s:nl:Gebruiker:HenkvD|nl:]]''' <div id="cat" class="plainlinks">[http://wikisource.org/wiki/User:HenkvD old]</div> | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Wikiversity-logo-en.svg|18px]]<br>Wikiversity<br>[[:de:v:User:HenkvD|de:]] [[:en:v:User:HenkvD|en:]] | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Wikimedia-logo.png|18px]]<br>[[:meta:User:HenkvD|Meta]]<br><div id="cat" class="plainlinks">[http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:HenkvD Strategy]<br><div id="cat" class="plainlinks">'''[http://nl.wikimedia.org/wiki/Gebruiker:HenkvD nl:]''' </div> |- | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Wikivoyage-Logo-v3-icon.svg|16px]]<br>Wikivoyage<br>[[:en:voy:User:HenkvD|en:]] | valign="top" align="center" | [[File:Wikidata-logo.svg|19px|Wikidata]]<br><div class="plainlinks">[http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:HenkvD Wikidata]</div> | valign="top" align="center" | [[Image:Commons-logo.svg|14px]]<br>[[:Commons:User:HenkvD|Commons]] | valign="top" align="center" | [[File:Wikifunctions-logo.svg|14px]] [[File:Abstract-Wikipedia-wordmark.svg|42px]]<br>[[f:User:HenkvD|Wikifunctions]] <br>'''AbstractWiki''' |} My name is Henk, from [[Q55|the Netherlands]] ([[:nl:Gebruiker:HenkvD]]). I am interested in Abstract Wikipedia functionality and have general knowledge if the Dutch language (as native speaker). As most other the Dutch persons I have good knowledge of English and some of German and a bit of French and Romance languages.<br> I have an IT background, and try to understand the programming in Wikifunctions, but can't actually program them, except minor adjustments.<br> I will try to analyse Wikifunction, Wikidata, lexemes and add Wikifunction tests if needed. {{#babel:nl|en-3|de-1}} Examples * [[Q90]] - Paris is a city. Paris is the capital of France. * [[Q1033]] - Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa. * [[Q11750]] - list of sovereign states Some help pages are multilingual like [[Abstract Wikipedia:About]] First steps to get Abstract Wikipedia started: * Basic functions on Wikifunctions ** Use defaults if no lexeme and/or gender * link Wikidata Q-items to Lexemes * Gender of lexemes on Wikidata {{AbstractTestLemma}} {| class="wikitable" ! Function !! English !! Z1157 Nederlands !! Z60 Local language |- | <nowiki>{{#function:</nowiki>[[f:Z26039|Z26039]]<nowiki>|Q64|Q515|Z1002}}</nowiki> | {{#function:Z26039|Q64|Q515|Z1002}} || {{#function:Z26039|Q64|Q515|Z1157}} || {{#function:Z26039|Q64|Q515|Z60}} |} 2xdyn4003pn1kpmmef522w4fvi7vjqz 0 1266 7938 4293 2026-05-15T13:53:58Z Theki 2698 7938 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11471", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26039", "Z26039K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26039K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q181175" }, "Z26039K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26039", "Z26039K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26039K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q58415929" }, "Z26039K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26039", "Z26039K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26039K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2487752" }, "Z26039K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26095", "Z26095K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26095K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q133250" }, "Z26095K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26095", "Z26095K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26095K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3054889" }, "Z26095K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, "Hi" ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } p9n0vknqolpbot4t6jpy7azq6ceyp4a 7939 7938 2026-05-15T13:54:17Z Theki 2698 7939 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11471", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26039", "Z26039K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26039K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q181175" }, "Z26039K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26039", "Z26039K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26039K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q58415929" }, "Z26039K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26039", "Z26039K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26039K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2487752" }, "Z26039K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26095", "Z26095K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26095K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q133250" }, "Z26095K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z26095", "Z26095K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z26095K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q3054889" }, "Z26095K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } ia8ldn7w73amykykn5mg5oz06kwipol 10 1883 7950 7669 2026-05-15T15:25:41Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7950 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;Volunteer's Corners * The next Volunteers' Corner will be at <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1778520600 17:30 UTC on 2026-05-11]</bdi> on <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi> at <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi>. * The [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-05.webm|most recent Volunteer's Corner]] is available on Commons. ; Recent status updates about Wikifunctions <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15|2026-05-15]]: A higher meaning * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-08|2026-05-08]]: References from Wikidata are now available * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-02|2026-05-02]]: Request for input: what should we count for Abstract Wikipedia? * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-25|2026-04-25]]: The Foundation's search for the perfect language * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-16|2026-04-16]]: Milestones; Some major issues hopefully resolved </div> <span class="plainlinks">[https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status_updates <span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small">More news</span>]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> kziwr89h81hzu1x69gea3wdhvdc0713 12 1984 7959 7848 2026-05-16T01:21:02Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7959 wikitext text/x-wiki <languages/> In Abstract Wikipedia you can only create articles about topics that already have a Wikidata item. If the topic does not already exist on Wikidata that you can tell by [[d:special:search|search]], follow [[d:Special:MyLanguage/help:items#Creating a new item|this help page]] to make a new item for it. == Steps == In order to create an article, you can go to [[Special:CreateAbstract|Create a New Abstract Article]]. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-1.png|center|frameless|800px|Select a topic]] Type to select a topic, and click on create. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-2.png|center|frameless|800px|Empty abstract article]] You will get to a new screen. On the right hand side you see the preview in the selected language, on the left hand side the abstract content. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-3.png|center|frameless|800px|Click on the plus sign to add a fragment.]] Click on the plus button in the left panel to add a new fragment. For now, we are adding an empty fragment. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-4.png|center|frameless|800px|An empty fragment]] This will look like this, showing a function call without a function selected yet. We click on the caron next to the red "Select Function" text. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-5.png|center|frameless|800px|Function selector open]] That will open the function selector. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-6.png|center|frameless|800px|Selecting a function]] We select a function. It has to be a function that exists on Wikifunctions, and at this point, it has to return an HTML fragment. In this example we choose the function "string to HTML fragment", as this allows us to enter a string, or choose a function that creates a string. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-7.png|center|frameless|800px|Selected the "string to HTML fragment" function]] We have now selected a function. We get fields for the arguments. Instead of typing a string, we want to add another function. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-8.png|center|frameless|800px|Change the mode of the argument]] In order to do so, we change the mode of the argument named string by clicking on the three dots next to string. This allows us to change from the current mode, literal, to a function call. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-9.png|center|frameless|800px|Select the inner function]] Here we can now select a function that returns a string. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-10.png|center|frameless|800px|Choose a function returning a string]] We select the function "Article-less instantiating fragment" -- a function that creates sentences such as "Paris is a city." Note that selecting the function “Article-less instantiating HTML fragment” would have allowed us to skip using the function “string to HTML fragment”. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-10.png|center|frameless|800px|Arguments for article-less instantiating fragment function]] Now we see the arguments for this function. We also get automatically fitting arguments filled in. This leads to the sentence "Paris is a Paris.", because the arguments "entity" and "class" both get prefilled with the item we are writing about. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-11.png|center|frameless|800px|Changing the mode on the "class" argument]] We need to change the mode on the "class" argument from the automatically filled value (an Argument reference) to a literal. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-12.png|center|frameless|800px|Changed the mode of "class" to literal.]] This gives us now a field to select a Wikidata item for the value of the "class" argument. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-13.png|center|frameless|800px|Selecting city for the class argument]] We select the "city" item for the class argument. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-14.png|center|frameless|800px|The first sentence is created.]] Once this is selected, the first sentence of the article should be ready. We can now click on publish and have a first version of the article available. Now you can click edit to add more. == This is far too complicated! == Yes, agreed. There are two ways to make this easier: * improve the UX * improve the catalogue of functions Whereas the development team at the Wikimedia Foundation will be focused on the first approach (and will always appreciate UX ideas), the community can work on a more comprehensive and easy to use catalogue of functions in Wikifunctions. Here we see that naming the functions and arguments is important, and that we probably want to avoid too many functions which turn one type in another in the above flow. But yes, most importantly, Abstract Wikipedia is currently in an early public Beta, and it is currently difficult to create and edit articles. We all will need to work together to improve that. If you have ideas for new functions, please suggest them at [[Abstract Wikipedia:Suggested functions|Suggested functions]]. == See also == * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Useful functions for article composition]] [[Category:Help{{#translation:}}]] kz4hruv8i46kzou5234guqk9x9zxd63 4 1985 7964 7317 2026-05-16T01:21:15Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7964 wikitext text/x-wiki <languages /> == What is Abstract Wikipedia? == Abstract Wikipedia is a new Wikimedia project that allows communities to collaboratively create language-independent articles in their native language, which others can then access in their own languages. This transformation is done by using functions from Wikifunctions that access structured content from Wikidata. == What is an abstract article? == An abstract article represents information about a topic in a structured, language-independent form. Contributors combine structured data from Wikidata with language functions from Wikifunctions to produce natural-language sentences that describe the topic. == How is Abstract Wikipedia different from Wikipedia? == Wikipedia articles are written directly in a specific language. Abstract Wikipedia instead stores information in a structured form that can generate text in many languages with the help of Wikifunctions. == How does Abstract Wikipedia relate to Wikidata and Wikifunctions? == Abstract Wikipedia builds on these Wikimedia projects: * '''Wikidata''' provides structured information about topics, and natural language (lexicographic) data. * '''Wikifunctions''' provides (among other things) functions that generate natural-language text in many languages. * '''Abstract Wikipedia''' combines these elements to create articles that can be generated in many languages. == Is Abstract Wikipedia using AI? == No. Abstract Wikipedia does not automatically generate articles using AI. Abstract articles are created and maintained by contributors, and functions written by the community generate the text from structured data. == Does Abstract Wikipedia automatically appear on other Wikipedias? == No. Abstract Wikipedia does not automatically add content to other Wikipedias. Each Wikipedia community remains fully in control of its content, and existing local articles are never replaced. In the future, each Wikipedia community will be able to decide whether they want to use content generated from Abstract Wikipedia. == Who can contribute to Abstract Wikipedia? == Like other Wikimedia projects, Abstract Wikipedia is edited and maintained by volunteers from the community. People can contribute in different ways, including creating or improving abstract articles, writing language functions in Wikifunctions, adding data to Wikidata, improving documentation, and helping shape how the project evolves. == Can I use Abstract Wikipedia today? == Yes. You can explore our early Beta version of Abstract Wikipedia (this site). You can generate abstract articles and view the generated text in different languages. Abstract Wikipedia is still in an '''early stage''' so many parts of the experience will continue to evolve based on community feedback. We will be improving the capabilities and usability of the site considerably in the future. You might encounter bugs, usability issues, time-outs, or other problems in the current version. Please let us know [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|here]] if that happens or if you have ideas for improvements! In the future, Wikipedia communities will also be able to integrate content created on Abstract Wikipedia into their own wikis, if they like. [[Category:Abstract Wikipedia administration{{#translation:}}|Frequently Asked Questions]] dcdkhsq9opre4560h6yd3o6krl8ucbb 7969 7964 2026-05-16T01:21:44Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7969 wikitext text/x-wiki <languages /> == What is Abstract Wikipedia? == Abstract Wikipedia is a new Wikimedia project that allows communities to collaboratively create language-independent articles in their native language, which others can then access in their own languages. This transformation is done by using functions from Wikifunctions that access structured content from Wikidata. == What is an abstract article? == An abstract article represents information about a topic in a structured, language-independent form. Contributors combine structured data from Wikidata with language functions from Wikifunctions to produce natural-language sentences that describe the topic. == How is Abstract Wikipedia different from Wikipedia? == Wikipedia articles are written directly in a specific language. Abstract Wikipedia instead stores information in a structured form that can generate text in many languages with the help of Wikifunctions. == How does Abstract Wikipedia relate to Wikidata and Wikifunctions? == Abstract Wikipedia builds on these Wikimedia projects: * '''Wikidata''' provides structured information about topics, and natural language (lexicographic) data. * '''Wikifunctions''' provides (among other things) functions that generate natural-language text in many languages. * '''Abstract Wikipedia''' combines these elements to create articles that can be generated in many languages. == Is Abstract Wikipedia using AI? == No. Abstract Wikipedia does not automatically generate articles using AI. Abstract articles are created and maintained by contributors, and functions written by the community generate the text from structured data. == Does Abstract Wikipedia automatically appear on other Wikipedias? == No. Abstract Wikipedia does not automatically add content to other Wikipedias. Each Wikipedia community remains fully in control of its content, and existing local articles are never replaced. In the future, each Wikipedia community will be able to decide whether they want to use content generated from Abstract Wikipedia. == Who can contribute to Abstract Wikipedia? == Like other Wikimedia projects, Abstract Wikipedia is edited and maintained by volunteers from the community. People can contribute in different ways, including creating or improving abstract articles, writing language functions in Wikifunctions, adding data to Wikidata, improving documentation, and helping shape how the project evolves. == Can I use Abstract Wikipedia today? == Yes. You can explore our early Beta version of Abstract Wikipedia (this site). You can generate abstract articles and view the generated text in different languages. Abstract Wikipedia is still in an '''early stage''' so many parts of the experience will continue to evolve based on community feedback. We will be improving the capabilities and usability of the site considerably in the future. You might encounter bugs, usability issues, time-outs, or other problems in the current version. Please let us know [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|here]] if that happens or if you have ideas for improvements! In the future, Wikipedia communities will also be able to integrate content created on Abstract Wikipedia into their own wikis, if they like. [[Category:Abstract Wikipedia administration{{#translation:}}|Frequently Asked Questions]] lttaamlwfm11a5pob2gfa1u39m8906y 10 1989 7948 7665 2026-05-15T15:25:41Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7948 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;স্বেচ্ছাসেবক সভা * পরবর্তী স্বেচ্ছাসেবক সভা <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1778520600 17:30 UTC on 2026-05-11]</bdi>-এ <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi>-এ <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi>-এ হবে। * [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-05.webm|সর্বশেষ স্বেচ্ছাসেবক সভা]] কমন্সে পাওয়া যাবে। ; উইকিফাংশন্স সম্পর্কে সাম্প্রতিক হালনাগাদ <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15|2026-05-15]]: A higher meaning</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-08|2026-05-08]]: References from Wikidata are now available</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-02|2026-05-02]]: Request for input: what should we count for Abstract Wikipedia?</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-25|2026-04-25]]: The Foundation's search for the perfect language</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-16|2026-04-16]]: Milestones; Some major issues hopefully resolved</span> </div> <span class="plainlinks">[https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status_updates <span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small">আরও সংবাদ</span>]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> kowpce99s5m3qtrgs80fggx1oetmpwk 10 2061 7949 7666 2026-05-15T15:25:41Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7949 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;Freiwilligentreffen * Das nächste Freiwilligentreffen findet um <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1778520600 17:30 UTC on 2026-05-11]</bdi> auf <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi> unter <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi> statt. * Das [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-05.webm|letzte Freiwilligentreffen]] ist auf Commons verfügbar. ; Aktuelle Neuigkeiten zum Status von Wikifunctions <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15|2026-05-15]]: A higher meaning</span> * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-08|2026-05-08]]: Einzelnachweise aus Wikidata jetzt verfügbar * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-02|2026-05-02]]: Bitte um Anregungen: Was sollten wir für die Abstrakte Wikipedia zählen? * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-25|2026-04-25]]: Die Suche der Foundation nach der perfekten Sprache * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-16|2026-04-16]]: Meilensteine; Einige größere Probleme hoffentlich behoben </div> <span class="plainlinks">[https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status_updates <span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small">Weitere Neuigkeiten</span>]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> tu059tjgeqyrcllw2l9iztxnu8cjleu 10 2080 7947 7667 2026-05-15T15:25:41Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7947 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;ركن المتطوعين * سيكون ركن المتطوعين التالي في <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1778520600 17:30 UTC on 2026-05-11]</bdi> على <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi> في <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi>. * [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-05.webm|أحدث ركن المتطوعين]] متاح على كومنز. ; تحديثات الحالة الأخيرة حول ويكي الدوال <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15|2026-05-15]]: A higher meaning</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-08|2026-05-08]]: References from Wikidata are now available</span> * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-02|2026-05-02]]: طلب للمساهمة: ما الذي يجب أن نعتبره في ويكيبيديا المجردة؟ * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-25|2026-04-25]]: بحث المؤسسة عن اللغة المثالية * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-16|2026-04-16]]: إنجازات هامة؛ تم حل بعض المشكلات الرئيسية على أمل </div> <span class="plainlinks">[https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status_updates <span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small">المزيد من الأخبار</span>]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> cxpx3gtmbz76xcky6y1g1pgzg690zwn 12 2083 7957 7849 2026-05-16T01:21:02Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7957 wikitext text/x-wiki <languages/> في ويكيبيديا المجردة، لا يمكنك إنشاء مقالات إلا حول المواضيع التي لها بالفعل عنصر في ويكي بيانات. إذا لم يكن الموضوع موجودًا بالفعل في ويكي بيانات، يمكنك التأكد من ذلك عن طريق [[d:special:search|البحث]]، ثم طالع [[d:Special:MyLanguage/help:items#Creating a new item|هذه الصفحة المساعدة]] لإنشاء عنصر جديد له. <span id="Steps"></span> == الخطوات == لإنشاء مقالة، يمكنك الانتقال إلى [[Special:CreateAbstract|إنشاء مقالة مجردة جديدة]]. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-1.png|center|frameless|800px|اختيار موضوعًا]] اكتب لاختيار موضوع، ثم انقر على «أنشئ». [[File:aw-tutorial-step-2.png|center|frameless|800px|مقالة مجردة فارغة]] ستنتقل إلى شاشة جديدة. على الجانب الأيمن سترى المعاينة باللغة المختارة، وعلى الجانب الأيسر سترى المحتوى الموجز. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-3.png|center|frameless|800px|انقر على الرمز (+) لإضافة جزءًا.]] انقر على زر علامة الجمع (+) في اللوحة اليسرى لإضافة جزء جديد. حاليًا، سنضيف جزءًا فارغًا. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-4.png|center|frameless|800px|جزءاً فارغاً]] سيظهر هذا على النحو التالي، حيث يعرض استدعاء دالة دون تحديد دالة بعد. انقر على المربع المجاور لنص "تحديد دالة" الأحمر. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-5.png|center|frameless|800px|محدد الدوال مفتوح]] سيؤدي ذلك إلى فتح مُحدد الدوال. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-6.png|center|frameless|800px|اختيار دالة]] نختار دالة. يجب أن تكون هذه الدالة موجودة على ويكي الدالة، ويجب أن تُعيد جزءًا من كود HTML. في هذا المثال، نختار دالة "string to HTML fragment"، لأنها تسمح لنا بإدخال سلسلة نصية، أو اختيار دالة تُنشئ سلسلة نصية. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-7.png|center|frameless|800px|تم الاختيار الدالة «string to HTML fragment»]] <span class="mw-translate-fuzzy">لقد اخترنا الآن دالة. نحصل على حقول للوسائط. بدلاً من كتابة سلسلة نصية، نريد إضافة دالة أخرى،</span> [[File:aw-tutorial-step-8.png|center|frameless|800px|غيّر وضع الوسيطة]] للقيام بذلك، نغير نمط الوسيط المسمى "string" بالنقر على النقاط الثلاث بجوار "string". يتيح لنا هذا التغيير من النمط الحالي، وهو "literal"، إلى استدعاء دالة. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-9.png|center|frameless|800px|اختيار الدالة الداخلية]] هنا يمكننا الآن اختيار دالة التي ترجع سلسلة نصية. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-10.png|center|frameless|800px|اختر دالة تُرجع سلسلة نصية]] نختار الدالة "Article-less instantiating fragment" - وهي دالة تُنشئ جملًا مثل "باريس مدينة". لاحظ أن اختيار الدالة "Article-less instantiating HTML fragment" كان سيسمح لنا بتجاوز استخدام الدالة "string to HTML fragment". [[File:aw-tutorial-step-10.png|center|frameless|800px|حجج لصالح دالة إنشاء الأجزاء بدون استخدام أدوات التعريف]] والآن نرى وسائط هذه الدالة. كما نحصل على وسائط مُلائمة مُعبأة تلقائيًا. وهذا يؤدي إلى الجملة "باريس هي باريس."، لأن الوسيطين "entity" و"class" يتم ملؤهما مسبقًا بالعنصر الذي نكتب عنه. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-11.png|center|frameless|800px|تغيير الوضع في وسيطة "الفئة"]] نحتاج إلى تغيير الوضع في وسيط "class" من القيمة المعبأة تلقائيًا (مرجع وسيط) إلى قيمة حرفية. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-12.png|center|frameless|800px|تم تغيير نمط "الفئة" إلى حرفي.]] وهذا يمنحنا الآن حقلاً لاختيار عنصر من عناصر ويكي بيانات لقيمة وسيطة "الفئة". [[File:aw-tutorial-step-13.png|center|frameless|800px|اختيار المدينة للوسيط الفئة]] نختار عنصر "المدينة" لوسيط الفئة. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-14.png|center|frameless|800px|يتم إنشاء الجملة الجديدة.]] بمجرد تحديد هذا الخيار، ستكون الجملة الأولى من المقال جاهزة. الآن، يمكنك النقر على "نشر" وستحصل على النسخة الأولى من المقال. يمكنك الآن النقر على "تعديل" لإضافة المزيد. <span id="This_is_far_too_complicated!"></span> == هذا معقد للغاية! == نعم، أتفق. هناك طريقتان ليجعل هذا أسهل: * تحسين تجربة المستخدم * تحسين قائمة الدوال بينما سيركز فريق التطوير في مؤسسة ويكيميديا ​​على النهج الأول (وسيُقدّر دائمًا أفكار تجربة المستخدم)، يمكن للمجتمع العمل على فهرس أكثر شمولًا وسهولة في الاستخدام للدوال في ويكي الدالة. نلاحظ هنا أهمية تسمية الوظائف والوسائط، وأننا على الأرجح نرغب في تجنب وجود عدد كبير جدًا من الدوال التي تُحوّل نوعًا إلى آخر في التسلسل المذكور أعلاه. لكن الأهم من ذلك، أن ويكيبيديا المجردة لا تزال في مرحلة تجريبية عامة مبكرة، ويصعب حاليًا إنشاء المقالات وتعديلها. لذا، علينا جميعًا العمل معًا لتحسين ذلك. إذا كانت لديكم أفكار لدوال جديدة، يُرجى اقتراحها على [[Abstract Wikipedia:Suggested functions|الدوال المقترحة]]. <span id="See_also"></span> == انظر أيضا == * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Useful functions for article composition]] [[Category:Help{{#translation:}}]] nxcj39u19upl873ktqoodad1f0c9fw1 4 2202 7965 7319 2026-05-16T01:21:15Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7965 wikitext text/x-wiki <languages /> <span id="What_is_Abstract_Wikipedia?"></span> == ما هي ويكيبيديا المجردة؟ == ويكيبيديا المجردة مشروع جديد من مشاريع ويكيميديا، يُمكّن المجتمعات من إنشاء مقالات مستقلة عن اللغة بلغتهم الأم بشكل تعاوني، ليتمكن الآخرون من الوصول إليها بلغاتهم. ويتم هذا التحويل باستخدام دوال من ويكي الدوال التي تصل إلى المحتوى المنظم من ويكي بيانات. <span id="What_is_an_abstract_article?"></span> == ما هي مقالة مجردة؟ == تُقدّم المقالة المجردة معلومات حول موضوع ما بصيغة منظمة ومستقلة عن اللغة. ويقوم المساهمون بدمج البيانات المنظمة من ويكي بيانات مع دوال اللغة من ويكي الدوال لإنتاج جمل بلغة طبيعية تصف الموضوع. <span id="How_is_Abstract_Wikipedia_different_from_Wikipedia?"></span> == كيف تختلف ويكيبيديا المجردة عن ويكيبيديا؟ == تُكتب مقالات ويكيبيديا مباشرة بلغة معينة. بدلاً من ذلك، تقوم ويكيبيديا المجردة بتخزين المعلومات في شكل منظم يمكنه إنشاء نص بلغات عديدة بمساعدة ويكي الدوال. <span id="How_does_Abstract_Wikipedia_relate_to_Wikidata_and_Wikifunctions?"></span> == كيف ترتبط ويكيبيديا المجردة بويكي بيانات وويكي الدوال؟ == تبني ويكيبيديا المجردة على هذه مشاريع ويكيميديا: * <span class="mw-translate-fuzzy">يوفر '''ويكي بيانات''' بيانات معجمية ومعلومات منظمة حول المواضيع</span> * <span class="mw-translate-fuzzy">يوفر '''ويكي الدوال''' دوال تقوم بإنشاء نصوص بلغة طبيعية في العديد من اللغات.</span> * تجمع '''ويكيبيديا المجردة''' هذه العناصر لإنشاء مقالات يمكن إنشاؤها بلغات عديدة. <span id="Is_Abstract_Wikipedia_using_AI?"></span> == هل تستخدم ويكيبيديا المجردة الذكاء الاصطناعي؟ == لا. لا تقوم ويكيبيديا المجردة بإنشاء المقالات تلقائياً باستخدام الذكاء الاصطناعي. تُنشئ مقالات المجردة ويتم صيانتها من قبل المساهمين، وتقوم الدوال المكتوبة من قبل المجتمع بإنشاء النص من بيانات منظمة. <span id="Does_Abstract_Wikipedia_automatically_appear_on_other_Wikipedias?"></span> === هل تظهر ويكيبيديا المجردة على مواقع ويكيبيديا أخرى تلقائيًا؟ == لا. لا تقوم ويكيبيديا المجردة بإضافة محتوى تلقائياً إلى ويكيبيديا أخرى. كل مجتمع ويكيبيديا يحتفظ بالسيطرة الكاملة على محتواه، ولا يتم استبدال المقالات المحلية الموجودة مطلقاً. في المستقبل، سيتمكن كل مجتمع من مجتمعات ويكيبيديا من تحديد ما إذا كان يرغب في استخدام المحتوى المُنشأ من ويكيبيديا المجردة. <span id="Who_can_contribute_to_Abstract_Wikipedia?"></span> == من يستطيع المساهمة في ويكيبيديا المجردة؟ == مثل مشاريع ويكيميديا ​​الأخرى، يتم تحرير ويكيبيديا المجردة وصيانتها بواسطة متطوعين من المجتمع. يمكن للأشخاص المساهمة بطرق مختلفة، بما في ذلك إنشاء أو تحسين المقالات المجردة، وكتابة دوال اللغة في ويكي الدوال، وإضافة البيانات إلى ويكي بيانات، وتحسين الوثائق، والمساعدة في تشكيل كيفية تطور المشروع. <span id="Can_I_use_Abstract_Wikipedia_today?"></span> == هل يمكنني استخدام ويكيبيديا المجردة اليوم؟ == <div class="mw-translate-fuzzy"> نعم. يمكنك استكشاف النسخة التجريبية المبكرة من ويكيبيديا المجردة. يمكنك إنشاء مقالات مجردة وعرض النص المُنشأ بلغات مختلفة. </div> لا تزال ويكيبيديا المجردة في '''مراحلها الأولى'''، لذا ستستمر العديد من جوانب تجربة المستخدم في التطور بناءً على ملاحظات المستخدمين. سنعمل على تحسين إمكانيات الموقع وسهولة استخدامه بشكل ملحوظ في المستقبل. قد تواجهون بعض المشاكل التقنية، مثل الأخطاء البرمجية، أو صعوبات في الاستخدام، أو انقطاع الاتصال، أو غيرها من المشاكل في الإصدار الحالي. يُرجى إبلاغنا [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|هنا]] في حال حدوث ذلك، أو إذا كانت لديكم أي اقتراحات للتحسين! في المستقبل، ستتمكن مجتمعات ويكيبيديا أيضًا من دمج المحتوى الذي تم إنشاؤه على ويكيبيديا المجردة في مواقع الويكي الخاصة بها، إذا رغبت في ذلك. [[Category:Abstract Wikipedia administration{{#translation:}}|Frequently Asked Questions]] jpthybirqxnocel8hvtr3vfnwtplbd4 7970 7965 2026-05-16T01:21:44Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7970 wikitext text/x-wiki <languages /> <span id="What_is_Abstract_Wikipedia?"></span> == ما هي ويكيبيديا المجردة؟ == ويكيبيديا المجردة مشروع جديد من مشاريع ويكيميديا، يُمكّن المجتمعات من إنشاء مقالات مستقلة عن اللغة بلغتهم الأم بشكل تعاوني، ليتمكن الآخرون من الوصول إليها بلغاتهم. ويتم هذا التحويل باستخدام دوال من ويكي الدوال التي تصل إلى المحتوى المنظم من ويكي بيانات. <span id="What_is_an_abstract_article?"></span> == ما هي مقالة مجردة؟ == تُقدّم المقالة المجردة معلومات حول موضوع ما بصيغة منظمة ومستقلة عن اللغة. ويقوم المساهمون بدمج البيانات المنظمة من ويكي بيانات مع دوال اللغة من ويكي الدوال لإنتاج جمل بلغة طبيعية تصف الموضوع. <span id="How_is_Abstract_Wikipedia_different_from_Wikipedia?"></span> == كيف تختلف ويكيبيديا المجردة عن ويكيبيديا؟ == تُكتب مقالات ويكيبيديا مباشرة بلغة معينة. بدلاً من ذلك، تقوم ويكيبيديا المجردة بتخزين المعلومات في شكل منظم يمكنه إنشاء نص بلغات عديدة بمساعدة ويكي الدوال. <span id="How_does_Abstract_Wikipedia_relate_to_Wikidata_and_Wikifunctions?"></span> == كيف ترتبط ويكيبيديا المجردة بويكي بيانات وويكي الدوال؟ == تبني ويكيبيديا المجردة على هذه مشاريع ويكيميديا: * <span class="mw-translate-fuzzy">يوفر '''ويكي بيانات''' بيانات معجمية ومعلومات منظمة حول المواضيع</span> * <span class="mw-translate-fuzzy">يوفر '''ويكي الدوال''' دوال تقوم بإنشاء نصوص بلغة طبيعية في العديد من اللغات.</span> * تجمع '''ويكيبيديا المجردة''' هذه العناصر لإنشاء مقالات يمكن إنشاؤها بلغات عديدة. <span id="Is_Abstract_Wikipedia_using_AI?"></span> == هل تستخدم ويكيبيديا المجردة الذكاء الاصطناعي؟ == لا. لا تقوم ويكيبيديا المجردة بإنشاء المقالات تلقائياً باستخدام الذكاء الاصطناعي. تُنشئ مقالات المجردة ويتم صيانتها من قبل المساهمين، وتقوم الدوال المكتوبة من قبل المجتمع بإنشاء النص من بيانات منظمة. <span id="Does_Abstract_Wikipedia_automatically_appear_on_other_Wikipedias?"></span> === هل تظهر ويكيبيديا المجردة على مواقع ويكيبيديا أخرى تلقائيًا؟ == لا. لا تقوم ويكيبيديا المجردة بإضافة محتوى تلقائياً إلى ويكيبيديا أخرى. كل مجتمع ويكيبيديا يحتفظ بالسيطرة الكاملة على محتواه، ولا يتم استبدال المقالات المحلية الموجودة مطلقاً. في المستقبل، سيتمكن كل مجتمع من مجتمعات ويكيبيديا من تحديد ما إذا كان يرغب في استخدام المحتوى المُنشأ من ويكيبيديا المجردة. <span id="Who_can_contribute_to_Abstract_Wikipedia?"></span> == من يستطيع المساهمة في ويكيبيديا المجردة؟ == مثل مشاريع ويكيميديا ​​الأخرى، يتم تحرير ويكيبيديا المجردة وصيانتها بواسطة متطوعين من المجتمع. يمكن للأشخاص المساهمة بطرق مختلفة، بما في ذلك إنشاء أو تحسين المقالات المجردة، وكتابة دوال اللغة في ويكي الدوال، وإضافة البيانات إلى ويكي بيانات، وتحسين الوثائق، والمساعدة في تشكيل كيفية تطور المشروع. <span id="Can_I_use_Abstract_Wikipedia_today?"></span> == هل يمكنني استخدام ويكيبيديا المجردة اليوم؟ == <div class="mw-translate-fuzzy"> نعم. يمكنك استكشاف النسخة التجريبية المبكرة من ويكيبيديا المجردة. يمكنك إنشاء مقالات مجردة وعرض النص المُنشأ بلغات مختلفة. </div> لا تزال ويكيبيديا المجردة في '''مراحلها الأولى'''، لذا ستستمر العديد من جوانب تجربة المستخدم في التطور بناءً على ملاحظات المستخدمين. سنعمل على تحسين إمكانيات الموقع وسهولة استخدامه بشكل ملحوظ في المستقبل. قد تواجهون بعض المشاكل التقنية، مثل الأخطاء البرمجية، أو صعوبات في الاستخدام، أو انقطاع الاتصال، أو غيرها من المشاكل في الإصدار الحالي. يُرجى إبلاغنا [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|هنا]] في حال حدوث ذلك، أو إذا كانت لديكم أي اقتراحات للتحسين! في المستقبل، ستتمكن مجتمعات ويكيبيديا أيضًا من دمج المحتوى الذي تم إنشاؤه على ويكيبيديا المجردة في مواقع الويكي الخاصة بها، إذا رغبت في ذلك. [[Category:Abstract Wikipedia administration{{#translation:}}|Frequently Asked Questions]] lhsgzbfophw394pl3nti7gbud0lt9d8 0 2236 7937 5879 2026-05-15T13:35:02Z Theki 2698 7937 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q85", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z28016", "Z28016K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z28016K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q5119" }, "Z28016K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q79" }, "Z28016K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 4twvbxrq7lmutvbe2ce8a5ehqdndt25 10 2278 7953 7671 2026-05-15T15:25:42Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7953 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;-{A|zh-hans:志愿者;zh-hant:志工;}-角落 * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">The next Volunteers' Corner will be at <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1778520600 17:30 UTC on 2026-05-11]</bdi> on <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi> at <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi>.</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">The [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-05.webm|most recent Volunteer's Corner]] is available on Commons.</span> ; <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">Recent status updates about Wikifunctions</span> <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15|2026-05-15]]: A higher meaning</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-08|2026-05-08]]: References from Wikidata are now available</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-02|2026-05-02]]: Request for input: what should we count for Abstract Wikipedia?</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-25|2026-04-25]]: The Foundation's search for the perfect language</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-16|2026-04-16]]: Milestones; Some major issues hopefully resolved</span> </div> <span class="plainlinks">[https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status_updates <span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small">更多新闻</span>]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> rwiquotrcpm76ijt09d03o2go1uy22z 4 2348 7966 7318 2026-05-16T01:21:15Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7966 wikitext text/x-wiki <languages /> <span id="What_is_Abstract_Wikipedia?"></span> == Was ist die Abstrakte Wikipedia? == Die Abstrakte Wikipedia ist ein neues Wikimedia-Projekt, das es Gemeinschaften ermöglicht, gemeinsam sprachunabhängige Artikel in ihrer Muttersprache zu erstellen, auf die andere dann in ihren eigenen Sprachen zugreifen können. Diese Transformation erfolgt mithilfe von Funktionen aus Wikifunctions, die auf strukturierte Inhalte aus Wikidata zugreifen. <span id="What_is_an_abstract_article?"></span> == Was ist ein abstrakter Artikel? == Ein abstrakter Artikel stellt Informationen zu einem Thema in strukturierter, sprachunabhängiger Form dar. Die Mitwirkenden kombinieren strukturierte Daten aus Wikidata mit Sprachfunktionen aus Wikifunctions, um natürlichsprachliche Sätze zu erzeugen, die das Thema beschreiben. <span id="How_is_Abstract_Wikipedia_different_from_Wikipedia?"></span> == Worin unterscheidet sich die Abstrakte Wikipedia von der Wikipedia? == Wikipedia-Artikel werden direkt in einer bestimmten Sprache verfasst. Die Abstrakte Wikipedia speichert Informationen hingegen in einer strukturierten Form, die mithilfe von Wikifunctions Texte in vielen Sprachen generieren kann. <span id="How_does_Abstract_Wikipedia_relate_to_Wikidata_and_Wikifunctions?"></span> == In welcher Beziehung steht Abstrakte Wikipedia zu Wikidata und Wikifunctions? == Die Abstrakte Wikipedia baut auf folgenden Wikimedia-Projekten auf: * <span class="mw-translate-fuzzy">'''Wikidata''' liefert lexikografische Daten und strukturierte Informationen zu Themen</span> * <span class="mw-translate-fuzzy">'''Wikifunctions''' bietet Funktionen, die natürlichsprachlichen Text in vielen Sprachen generieren.</span> * Die '''Abstrakte Wikipedia''' kombiniert diese Elemente, um Artikel zu erstellen, die in vielen Sprachen generiert werden können. <span id="Is_Abstract_Wikipedia_using_AI?"></span> == Nutzt die Abstrakte Wikipedia KI? == Nein. Die Abstrakte Wikipedia generiert Artikel nicht automatisch mithilfe von KI. Die abstrakten Artikel werden von Mitwirkenden erstellt und gepflegt, und Funktionen, die von der Community geschrieben wurden, generieren den Text aus strukturierten Daten. <span id="Does_Abstract_Wikipedia_automatically_appear_on_other_Wikipedias?"></span> == Erscheint die Abstrakte Wikipedia automatisch auf anderen Wikipedias? == Nein. Die Abstrakte Wikipedia fügt Inhalte nicht automatisch anderen Wikipedias hinzu. Jede Wikipedia-Gemeinschaft behält die volle Kontrolle über ihre Inhalte, und bestehende lokale Artikel werden niemals ersetzt. Zukünftig wird jede Wikipedia-Community selbst entscheiden können, ob sie Inhalte nutzen möchte, die von der Abstrakten Wikipedia generiert werden. <span id="Who_can_contribute_to_Abstract_Wikipedia?"></span> == Wer kann zur Abstrakten Wikipedia beitragen? == Wie andere Wikimedia-Projekte wird auch die Abstrakte Wikipedia von Freiwilligen aus der Gemeinschaft bearbeitet und gepflegt. Es gibt verschiedene Möglichkeiten, sich einzubringen, beispielsweise durch das Erstellen oder Verbessern von abstrakten Artikeln, das Schreiben von Sprachfunktionen in Wikifunctions, das Hinzufügen von Daten zu Wikidata, das Verbessern der Dokumentation und das Mitgestalten der Weiterentwicklung des Projekts. <span id="Can_I_use_Abstract_Wikipedia_today?"></span> == Kann ich heute die Abstrakte Wikipedia nutzen? == <div class="mw-translate-fuzzy"> Ja. Du kannst unsere frühe Beta-Version der Abstrakten Wikipedia erkunden. Du kannst abstrakte Artikel erstellen und den generierten Text in verschiedenen Sprachen anzeigen lassen. </div> Die Abstrakte Wikipedia befindet sich noch in der Entwicklungsphase, daher werden sich viele Aspekte basierend auf dem Feedback der Community weiterentwickeln. Wir werden die Funktionen und die Benutzerfreundlichkeit der Website in Zukunft deutlich verbessern. In der aktuellen Version können Fehler, Bedienungsprobleme, Zeitüberschreitungen oder andere Schwierigkeiten auftreten. Bitte informiere uns [[Abstract Wikipedia:Projekt-Chat|hier]], falls dies der Fall ist oder falls Du Verbesserungsvorschläge hast! In der Zukunft werden Wikipedia-Gemeinschaften auch die Möglichkeit haben, auf der Abstrakten Wikipedia erstellte Inhalte in ihre eigenen Wikis zu integrieren, wenn sie das wünschen. [[Category:Abstract Wikipedia administration{{#translation:}}|Frequently Asked Questions]] e003x8hive3hteksco9y84mwipw7spk 7971 7966 2026-05-16T01:21:44Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7971 wikitext text/x-wiki <languages /> <span id="What_is_Abstract_Wikipedia?"></span> == Was ist die Abstrakte Wikipedia? == Die Abstrakte Wikipedia ist ein neues Wikimedia-Projekt, das es Gemeinschaften ermöglicht, gemeinsam sprachunabhängige Artikel in ihrer Muttersprache zu erstellen, auf die andere dann in ihren eigenen Sprachen zugreifen können. Diese Transformation erfolgt mithilfe von Funktionen aus Wikifunctions, die auf strukturierte Inhalte aus Wikidata zugreifen. <span id="What_is_an_abstract_article?"></span> == Was ist ein abstrakter Artikel? == Ein abstrakter Artikel stellt Informationen zu einem Thema in strukturierter, sprachunabhängiger Form dar. Die Mitwirkenden kombinieren strukturierte Daten aus Wikidata mit Sprachfunktionen aus Wikifunctions, um natürlichsprachliche Sätze zu erzeugen, die das Thema beschreiben. <span id="How_is_Abstract_Wikipedia_different_from_Wikipedia?"></span> == Worin unterscheidet sich die Abstrakte Wikipedia von der Wikipedia? == Wikipedia-Artikel werden direkt in einer bestimmten Sprache verfasst. Die Abstrakte Wikipedia speichert Informationen hingegen in einer strukturierten Form, die mithilfe von Wikifunctions Texte in vielen Sprachen generieren kann. <span id="How_does_Abstract_Wikipedia_relate_to_Wikidata_and_Wikifunctions?"></span> == In welcher Beziehung steht Abstrakte Wikipedia zu Wikidata und Wikifunctions? == Die Abstrakte Wikipedia baut auf folgenden Wikimedia-Projekten auf: * <span class="mw-translate-fuzzy">'''Wikidata''' liefert lexikografische Daten und strukturierte Informationen zu Themen</span> * <span class="mw-translate-fuzzy">'''Wikifunctions''' bietet Funktionen, die natürlichsprachlichen Text in vielen Sprachen generieren.</span> * Die '''Abstrakte Wikipedia''' kombiniert diese Elemente, um Artikel zu erstellen, die in vielen Sprachen generiert werden können. <span id="Is_Abstract_Wikipedia_using_AI?"></span> == Nutzt die Abstrakte Wikipedia KI? == Nein. Die Abstrakte Wikipedia generiert Artikel nicht automatisch mithilfe von KI. Die abstrakten Artikel werden von Mitwirkenden erstellt und gepflegt, und Funktionen, die von der Community geschrieben wurden, generieren den Text aus strukturierten Daten. <span id="Does_Abstract_Wikipedia_automatically_appear_on_other_Wikipedias?"></span> == Erscheint die Abstrakte Wikipedia automatisch auf anderen Wikipedias? == Nein. Die Abstrakte Wikipedia fügt Inhalte nicht automatisch anderen Wikipedias hinzu. Jede Wikipedia-Gemeinschaft behält die volle Kontrolle über ihre Inhalte, und bestehende lokale Artikel werden niemals ersetzt. Zukünftig wird jede Wikipedia-Community selbst entscheiden können, ob sie Inhalte nutzen möchte, die von der Abstrakten Wikipedia generiert werden. <span id="Who_can_contribute_to_Abstract_Wikipedia?"></span> == Wer kann zur Abstrakten Wikipedia beitragen? == Wie andere Wikimedia-Projekte wird auch die Abstrakte Wikipedia von Freiwilligen aus der Gemeinschaft bearbeitet und gepflegt. Es gibt verschiedene Möglichkeiten, sich einzubringen, beispielsweise durch das Erstellen oder Verbessern von abstrakten Artikeln, das Schreiben von Sprachfunktionen in Wikifunctions, das Hinzufügen von Daten zu Wikidata, das Verbessern der Dokumentation und das Mitgestalten der Weiterentwicklung des Projekts. <span id="Can_I_use_Abstract_Wikipedia_today?"></span> == Kann ich heute die Abstrakte Wikipedia nutzen? == <div class="mw-translate-fuzzy"> Ja. Du kannst unsere frühe Beta-Version der Abstrakten Wikipedia erkunden. Du kannst abstrakte Artikel erstellen und den generierten Text in verschiedenen Sprachen anzeigen lassen. </div> Die Abstrakte Wikipedia befindet sich noch in der Entwicklungsphase, daher werden sich viele Aspekte basierend auf dem Feedback der Community weiterentwickeln. Wir werden die Funktionen und die Benutzerfreundlichkeit der Website in Zukunft deutlich verbessern. In der aktuellen Version können Fehler, Bedienungsprobleme, Zeitüberschreitungen oder andere Schwierigkeiten auftreten. Bitte informiere uns [[Abstract Wikipedia:Projekt-Chat|hier]], falls dies der Fall ist oder falls Du Verbesserungsvorschläge hast! In der Zukunft werden Wikipedia-Gemeinschaften auch die Möglichkeit haben, auf der Abstrakten Wikipedia erstellte Inhalte in ihre eigenen Wikis zu integrieren, wenn sie das wünschen. [[Category:Abstract Wikipedia administration{{#translation:}}|Frequently Asked Questions]] ngpe5fzdmihcwnw1qwieflp3g7vd379 10 2418 7951 7670 2026-05-15T15:25:41Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7951 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;Volontärshörnan * <span class="mw-translate-fuzzy">Nästa volontärshörna kommer hållas [$1 17:30 UTC den 2026-04-13] på Google Meet, på $2.</span> * Den [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-05.webm|förra volontärshörnan]] finns att se på Commons. ; Senaste nytt om Wikifunctions <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15|2026-05-15]]: A higher meaning</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-08|2026-05-08]]: References from Wikidata are now available</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-02|2026-05-02]]: Request for input: what should we count for Abstract Wikipedia?</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-25|2026-04-25]]: The Foundation's search for the perfect language</span> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-16|2026-04-16]]: Milestones; Some major issues hopefully resolved</span> </div> <span class="plainlinks">[https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status_updates <span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small">Fler nyheter</span>]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> 677njezaw6bu2yhkc4jthfslpdne28z 12 2505 7958 7853 2026-05-16T01:21:02Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7958 wikitext text/x-wiki <languages/> In der Abstrakten Wikipedia kannst du nur Artikel zu Themen erstellen, die bereits ein Wikidata-Datenobjekt haben. Falls das Thema noch nicht in Wikidata existiert, was du über die [[d:special:search|Suche]] feststellen kannst, befolge [[d:Special:MyLanguage/help:items#Creating a new item|diese Hilfeseite]], um ein neues Datenobjekt dafür zu erstellen. <span id="Steps"></span> == Schritte == Um einen Artikel zu erstellen, kannst du auf [[Special:CreateAbstract|Einen neuen Abstrakten Artikel erstellen]] gehen. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-1.png|center|frameless|800px|Wähle ein Thema aus]] Gib ein Thema ein und klicke auf „Erstellen“. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-2.png|center|frameless|800px|Leerer abstrakter Artikel]] Du gelangst zu einem neuen Bildschirm. Auf der rechten Seite siehst Du die Vorschau in der ausgewählten Sprache, auf der linken Seite den zusammenfassenden Inhalt. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-3.png|center|frameless|800px|Klicke auf das Pluszeichen, um ein Fragment hinzuzufügen.]] Klicke im linken Bereich auf die Plus-Schaltfläche, um ein neues Fragment hinzuzufügen. Zunächst fügen wir ein leeres Fragment hinzu. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-4.png|center|frameless|800px|Ein leeres Fragment]] Das sieht dann so aus und zeigt einen Funktionsaufruf, ohne dass eine Funktion ausgewählt ist. Wir klicken auf das Symbol neben dem roten Text „Funktion auswählen“. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-5.png|center|frameless|800px|Funktionsauswahl geöffnet]] Dadurch wird die Funktionsauswahl geöffnet. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-6.png|center|frameless|800px|Eine Funktion auswählen]] Wir wählen eine Funktion aus. Diese muss auf Wikifunctions vorhanden sein und derzeit ein HTML-Fragment zurückgeben. In diesem Beispiel wählen wir die Funktion "Zeichenkette zu HTML", da wir damit entweder eine Zeichenkette eingeben oder eine Funktion auswählen können, die eine Zeichenkette erzeugt. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-7.png|center|frameless|800px|Ausgewählte Funktion "Zeichenkette zu HTML"]] Wir haben nun eine Funktion ausgewählt. Wir erhalten Felder für die Argumente. Anstatt eine Zeichenkette einzugeben, möchten wir eine weitere Funktion hinzufügen. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-8.png|center|frameless|800px|Ändern des Modus des Arguments]] Dazu ändern wir den Modus des Arguments mit dem Namen Zeichenkette, indem wir auf die drei Punkte neben Zeichenkette klicken. Dadurch können wir vom aktuellen Modus Literal zu einem Funktionsaufruf wechseln. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-9.png|center|frameless|800px|Die innere Funktion auswählen]] Hier können wir nun eine Funktion auswählen, die eine Zeichenkette zurückgibt. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-10.png|center|frameless|800px|Eine Funktion auswählen, die eine Zeichenkette zurückgibt]] Wir wählen die Funktion "Instanziierungssatz ohne Artikel" -- eine Funktion, die Sätze wie "Paris ist eine Stadt." erzeugt. Die Auswahl der Funktion “Article-less instantiating HTML fragment” hätte es uns ermöglicht, die Funktion “Zeichenkette zu HTML” zu überspringen. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-10.png|center|frameless|800px|Argumente für die Funktion zur artikellosen Instanziierung von Fragmenten]] Nun sehen wir die Argumente dieser Funktion. Außerdem werden automatisch passende Argumente eingefügt. Dies führt zu dem Satz "Paris ist ein Paris.", da die Argumente "Entität" und "Klasse" jeweils mit dem Datenobjekt, über das wir schreiben, vorausgefüllt werden. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-11.png|center|frameless|800px|Ändern des Modus des Arguments "Klasse"]] Wir müssen den Modus des Arguments "Klasse" von einem automatisch ausgefüllten Wert (einer Argumentreferenz) auf ein Literal ändern. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-12.png|center|frameless|800px|Modus von "Klasse" wurde in Literal geändert.]] Damit haben wir nun ein Feld, um ein Wikidata-Datenobjekt für den Wert des Arguments "Klasse" auszuwählen. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-13.png|center|frameless|800px|Auswahl der Stadt als Klassenargument]] Wir wählen das Datenobjekt „Stadt“ als Klassenargument aus. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-14.png|center|frameless|800px|Der erste Satz ist erstellt.]] Sobald dies ausgewählt ist, sollte der erste Satz des Artikels fertig sein. Jetzt kannst Du auf „Veröffentlichen“ klicken und eine erste Version des Artikels ist verfügbar. Anschließend kannst Du auf „Bearbeiten“ klicken, um weitere Informationen hinzuzufügen. <span id="This_is_far_too_complicated!"></span> == Das ist viel zu kompliziert! == Ja, einverstanden. Es gibt zwei Möglichkeiten, dies zu vereinfachen: * die Benutzerfreundlichkeit verbessern * den Funktionskatalog verbessern Während sich das Entwicklungsteam der Wikimedia Foundation auf den ersten Ansatz konzentriert (und UX-Ideen stets begrüßt), kann die Community an einem umfassenderen und benutzerfreundlicheren Funktionskatalog in Wikifunctions arbeiten. Hierbei zeigt sich, dass die Benennung von Funktionen und Argumenten wichtig ist und dass wir im obigen Ablauf möglichst viele Funktionen vermeiden sollten, die einen Datentyp in einen anderen umwandeln. Aber ja, am wichtigsten ist, dass sich die Abstrakte Wikipedia derzeit in einer frühen öffentlichen Beta-Phase befindet und das Erstellen und Bearbeiten von Artikeln momentan schwierig ist. Wir müssen alle zusammenarbeiten, um dies zu verbessern. Wenn Du Ideen für neue Funktionen hast, schlage diese bitte unter [[Abstract Wikipedia:Suggested functions|Vorgeschlagene Funktionen]] vor. <span id="See_also"></span> == Siehe auch == * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Useful functions for article composition]] [[Category:Help{{#translation:}}]] ol3d6ieevt2b5kjwfaqso3l27c4iqpr 0 2759 7940 7869 2026-05-15T14:04:07Z Theki 2698 7940 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q117812747", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35167", "Z35167K1": { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z6821", "Z6821K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" } }, "Z35167K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33068", "Z33068K1": [ "Z1", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z33975", "Z33975K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z33975K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q628099" }, "Z33975K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q34" }, "Z33975K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ], "Z33068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 17ncgv3y5z7h03mx44qplmpa3vtlfkl 10 2805 7952 7668 2026-05-15T15:25:41Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7952 wikitext text/x-wiki <noinclude><languages /></noinclude> <div style="margin: auto; vertical-align:top"> <div class="mainpage_boxcontents_small"> ;<span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">Volunteer's Corners</span> * A következő Önkéntes Sarok <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://zonestamp.toolforge.org/1778520600 17:30 UTC on 2026-05-11]</bdi>-kor lesz <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">Google Meet</bdi> oldalon a <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">[https://meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw meet.google.com/xuy-njxh-rkw]</bdi> linken. * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">The [[:c:File:Abstract Wikipedia Volunteer Corner 2026-05.webm|most recent Volunteer's Corner]] is available on Commons.</span> ; <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">Recent status updates about Wikifunctions</span> <!--Keep this to the most recent 5 entries--> * <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">[[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-15|2026-05-15]]: A higher meaning</span> * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-08|2026-05-08]]: Elérhetők a Wikidatáról származó hivatkozások * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-05-02|2026-05-02]]: Véleménykérés: Mi számítson az Absztrakt Wikipédia számára? * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-25|2026-04-25]]: Az Alapítvány kutatása a megfelelő nyelv végett * [[:f:Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status updates/2026-04-16|2026-04-16]]: Mérföldkövek; Néhány fontos gond remélhetőleg javítva </div> <span class="plainlinks">[https://www.wikifunctions.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Wikifunctions:Status_updates <span class="mw-ui-button mw-ui-constructive mw-ui-small"><span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">More news</span></span>]</span> </div><noinclude>[[Category:templates]]</noinclude> 6sgqjhxlw82p3fvmbdnl030cxpux59a 12 2809 7960 7851 2026-05-16T01:21:03Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7960 wikitext text/x-wiki <languages/> Az Absztrakt Wikipédián csak Wikidata-elemmel rendelkező témákról készíthető szócikk. Ha nem szerepel a téma a Wikidatán (ez [[d:special:search|kereséssel]] állapítható meg), kövesd [[d:Special:MyLanguage/help:items#Creating a new item|e segítséglapot]] az új elem létrehozásához. <span id="Steps"></span> == Lépések == A szócikk létrehozásához mehetsz a [[Special:CreateAbstract|Új absztrakt szócikk létrehozása]] linkre. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-1.png|center|frameless|800px|Témaválasztás]] Írd be a kiválasztott témát, és kattints a létrehozásra. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-2.png|center|frameless|800px|Üres absztrakt szócikk]] Új képernyő jelenik meg. Jobboldalt a kiválasztott nyelvi előnézet van, baloldalt az absztrakt tartalom. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-3.png|center|frameless|800px|Kattints a pluszjelre a részlet hozzáadásához.]] Kattints a balra található pluszjelre az új részlet hozzáadására. Most üres részletet adunk hozzá. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-4.png|center|frameless|800px|Üres részlet]] Ez így néz ki, függvényhívásként kiválasztott függvény nélkül. A piros „Függvény kiválasztása” szöveg melletti nyílra kattintunk. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-5.png|center|frameless|800px|Nyitott függvényválasztó]] Ez megnyitja a függvényválasztót. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-6.png|center|frameless|800px|Függvényválasztás]] Kiválasztunk egy függvényt Ennek a Wikifunkciókon létező függvénynek kell lennie, és itt HTML-részletet kell kiadnia. E példában a „karakterláncból HTML-részlet” függvényt választjuk, mert lehetővé teszi karakterlánc vagy karakterláncot adó függvény választását. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-7.png|center|frameless|800px|„Karakterláncból HTML-részlet” függvény kiválasztva]] <span class="mw-translate-fuzzy">Kiválasztottunk egy függvényt. A paraméterekhez mezőket kaptunk. A karakterlánc beírása helyett másik függvényt választunk ki.</span> [[File:aw-tutorial-step-8.png|center|frameless|800px|Paramétermód változtatása]] Ehhez a karakterlánc-paraméter módját megváltoztatjuk a mellette lévő 3 pontra kattintva. Ez lehetővé teszi a jelenlegi literálmódról a függvényhívásra váltást. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-9.png|center|frameless|800px|Belső függvény kiválasztása]] Most kiválaszthatunk egy karakterláncot adó függvényt. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-10.png|center|frameless|800px|Karakterláncot adó függvény kiválasztása]] A „Névelő nélküli leíró részlet” függvényt választjuk – ez „Párizs város.” formátumú mondatokat alkot. Megjegyzendő, hogy a „Névelő nélküli leíró részlet” függvény lehetővé teszi a „Karakterláncból HTML-részlet” függvény kihagyását. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-10.png|center|frameless|800px|Névelő nélküli leíró részlet függvény paraméterei]] Most láthatók a függvény paraméterei. Az automatikusan megadott paraméterek kitöltése is megtörtént. Ez a „Párizs Párizs.” mondatot eredményezi, mert az entitás és osztály paramétereket is a leírni kívánt elem tölti ki előre. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-11.png|center|frameless|800px|Osztályparaméter módjának megváltoztatása]] Az osztályparaméter módját az automatikusan kitöltött értékről (argumentumhivatkozás) literálra kell cserélni. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-12.png|center|frameless|800px|„Osztály” módjának váltása literálra.]] Ez mezőt ad nekünk Wikidata-elem kiválasztására az osztályargumentum értékéhez. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-13.png|center|frameless|800px|Város kiválasztása osztályargumentumként]] Kiválasztjuk a „város” elemet osztályargumentumként. [[File:aw-tutorial-step-14.png|center|frameless|800px|Az első mondat létrejött.]] Ennek kiválasztásakor az első mondatnak késznek kell lennie. Megnyomhatjuk a „Közzététel” gombot, elérhetővé téve a cikk első változatát. Továbbiak hozzáadásához kattinthatsz a „Szerkesztés” gombra. <span id="This_is_far_too_complicated!"></span> == Ez túl bonyolult! == Igen, ez tény. Kétféleképp lehet ezt könnyíteni: * UX-javítással * a függvénykatalógus javításával Bár a Wikimédia Alapítvány fejlesztői csapata az első megközelítésre összpontosít (és mindig támogatja az UX-ötleteket), a közösség a Wikifunkciókon a teljesebb és könnyebben használható függvénykatalógusért tehet. Itt látható a függvények és paraméterek megnevezésének fontossága, és hogy valószínűleg szeretnénk elkerülni a túl sok egyik típust másikká alakító függvény használatát. De igen, ami a legfontosabb, az Absztrakt Wikipédia jelenleg korai nyilvános béta állapotban van, és jelenleg nehéz a cikkek létrehozása és szerkesztése. Mindannyiunknak együtt kell működni ennek javításában. Ha vannak új függvényötleteid, tedd fel őket javaslatra a [[Abstract Wikipedia:Suggested functions|Kért függvények]] listáján. <span id="See_also"></span> == Lásd még == * [[Abstract Wikipedia:Useful functions for article composition]] [[Category:Help{{#translation:}}]] rj4icuwum2hdjs3iw965btgcgbxe4fp 4 2888 7942 7698 2026-05-15T14:46:43Z Theki 2698 /* Stream semantic units */ typos 7942 wikitext text/x-wiki This page proposes to discuss the possible different architectures in which the generation of an Abstract Wikipedia article can be organized. The main issues are how to handle context, and how to keep execution times reasonable. Pleas feel free to improve this page, to comment below the architecture sections, and to add your own alternative proposals. == Current architecture == [[File:Simple fragments.svg|frame]] This architecture is the currently used one: an Abstract Wikipedia article is the collection of multiple fragments, that are inserted in the article as single function calls. The different types of sentence are encoded as call to different functions, with the content encoded by the function parameters. Each fragment is independent from the other. Currently fragment generating functions output monolingual texts, that then need to be converted into HTML code; it is possible to also define fragment generating functions that directly output HTML code, in order to include formattings/wikilinks/etc. === Pros === * Being the current architecture, it is already supported. * For each "fragment" a different function is called, allowing fast-executing functions and to parallelise the generation of an Abstract article. ** Note that, with the current implementation, this advantage disappears when multiple fragments are grouped in paragraphs or other text-organizing functions. * Somewhat intuitive both for Abstract Wikipedia editors and for Functioneers. === Cons === * Each type of sentence requires the definition of its own function. Considering that even simple sentences can have multiple combinations, the number of needed functions would undergo to combinatoric explosion. ** Also note that each function needs to be singularly implemented in each language, with little possibility of code reuse. It would be almost impossible for smaller languages to keep up with the implementation of an ever growing number of fragments. * Each fragment would be generated without any knowledge of the global context. Considering that natural languages heavily rely on context, the generation of grammatical and somewhat natural-looking text would become impossible with articles with more than 2-3 sentences. * Currently, the fragment generating functions are very vaguely defined: they are basically defined through the English translation of the fragment, introducing a heavy bias towards English and Indo-European languages, as can be proved for example by the fact that [[f:Z26039]] and [[f:Z26095]] are different functions, while [[f:Z26570]] does not define in which sense the entity is in the location (is it in the geographical area? physically inside the building? near the location?). ** Note that this con can be resolved by a better redefinition of the fragments. This would still cause the definition of hyper-specific fragment functions, with the consequent lost of intuitivity and the already mentioned combinatorial explosion. === Comments === == Modest improvement to current architecture using spans == [[File:NLG object architecture under modest improvement.svg|right|x200px]] tl;dr: Do all linguistic processing on plaintext (Z11/Monolingual text), but keep track of which span(s) in the string corresponds to each Item from the outer callsite. Then that outer Function can format and linkify the final string by iterating those ranges as ordered by their start index. {| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" ! (Existing types, for completeness) |- | <syntaxhighlight lang="rust"> type WFString = Z6; type MonolingualText = Z11; // = Pair<Langcode, WFString> type Langcode = Z60; type HTMLFragment = Z89; type List<E> = Z881<E>; type Pair<F, S> = Z882<F, S>; type Map<K, V> = Z883<K, V>; // = List<Pair<K, V>> w/ key uniqueness invariant type WDItem = Z6001; type WDItemRef = Z6091; type Natural = Z13518; </syntaxhighlight> |} <syntaxhighlight lang="rust"> type Span = Pair<Natural, Natural>; type Multimap<K, V> = Map<K, List<V>>; // = List<Pair<K, V>> w/o key uniqueness invariant type NLGOutput = Pair<MonolingualText, Multimap<WDItemRef, Span>>; type RichTextTransform = fn(HTMLFragment) -> HTMLFragment; type SuperlativeInLocationDefiningSentence<R> = fn( subject: WDItemRef, class: WDItemRef, location: WDItemRef, characteristic: WDItemRef, displayLang: Langcode, ) -> R; pub static superlativeInLocationDefiningSentence: SuperlativeInLocationDefiningSentence<HTMLFragment> = |subj, class, loc, charc, lang| applyFormatting( toSentenceCaseAndAddPunctuation( (match lang { Langcode("en", _) => enSuperlativeInLocationDefiningSentence, _ => todo!(), })(subj, class, loc, charc, lang), lang ), Multimap([ createArticleSubjectEmphasisTransformation(subj), createLinkifyTransformation(class, awArticleLinkFor(class)), createLinkifyTransformation(loc, awArticleLinkFor(loc)), ]) ); pub static toSentenceCaseAndAddPunctuation: (NLGOutput, Langcode) -> NLGOutput = todo!(); pub static createArticleSubjectEmphasisTransformation: (WDItemRef) -> RichTextTransform = |item| Pair(item, |innerHTML| HTMLFragment(format!("<strong>{innerHTML}</strong>"))); pub static awArticleLinkFor: (WDItemRef) -> WFString = |item| format!("https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/{item.qid}"); pub static createLinkifyTransformation: (WDItemRef, WFString) -> RichTextTransform = |item, linkTarget| Pair(item, |innerHTML| HTMLFragment(format!("<a href=\"{linkTarget}\">{innerHTML}</a>"))); pub static applyFormatting: (NLGOutput, Multimap<WDItemRef, RichTextTransform>) -> HTMLFragment = todo!(); // handwaving, but it would split the Monolingual text in the 1st arg's first item based on the spans from the 1st arg's second item, convert them to HTML fragments, then apply each of the transformations from the 2nd arg </syntaxhighlight> {| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" ! (The implementation <code>enSuperlativeInLocationDefiningSentence</code>, as an example) |- | <syntaxhighlight lang="rust"> pub static enSuperlativeInLocationDefiningSentence: SuperlativeInLocationDefiningSentence<NLGOutput> = |subj, class, loc, charc, lang| { let words = [ labelFor(subj, lang), enCopulaFor(subj), MonolingualText(lang, "the"), enSuperlativeFor(charc), labelFor(class, lang), enPrepositionForLoc(loc), labelFor(loc, lang), ]; NLGOutput( MonolingualText(lang, words.join(" ")), [ // Rust is 0-indexed, but there's probably a bunch of errors here anyway, so don't copy it Span(subj, 0..words[0].length), Span(class, (4 + &words[0..=3].iter().map(|&text| text.length).sum()) ..(4 + &words[0..=4].iter().map(|&text| text.length).sum())), Span(loc, (6 + &words[0..=5].iter().map(|&text| text.length).sum()) ..(6 + &words[0..=6].iter().map(|&text| text.length).sum())), Span(charc, (3 + &words[0..=2].iter().map(|&text| text.length).sum()) ..(3 + &words[0..=3].iter().map(|&text| text.length).sum())), ] ) }; </syntaxhighlight> |} === Pros === * The existing corpus of NLG Functions can be either kept as-is (e.g. inflection helpers) or migrated piecemeal (sentence-generating Functions). * This texts+spans structure puts to rest the question of which Type to use for the outputs of sentence-generating Functions: Z11, not Z89 (and definitely not Z6). === Cons === * Inherits the m&ndash;n problem of the status quo: each sentence-generating Function still needs an Implementation in every language. There's no new affordance for constructing grammatically correct sentences from smaller fragments. * Inherits other problems of the status quo, covered in [[#Current architecture]] above. === Comments === (With apologies to non-Rust programmers for its use here as a statically-typed lingua franca, and with apologies to Rust programmers for weird or broken syntax. I know <code>pub fn &lt;identifier&gt;</code> exists.) <br>This outlines what I foresee as the most evolved form of the current architecture, and is an expansion of [[f:WF:Type_proposals/Syntactic_table#c-YoshiRulz-20260403175300-Comments|my offhand comment here]]. <br>I'm only offering this as a "baseline", I can't advocate its adoption (except as a stop-gap, since as mentioned above it does solve the return type problem). Personally, I want to see an architecture which can attain prose, or something close to it, in most of the world's languages. <br>[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 21:26, 11 May 2026 (UTC) == Semantic unit architecture == This architecture is the architecture explained in the Wikifunctions type proposal for [[f:Wikifunctions:Type proposals/Semantic unit|Semantic units]] by user [[User:Mahir256|Mahir256]] (see [[f:Wikifunctions:Type_proposals/Semantic_unit/Douglas_Adams|the example]] to better understand how the encoding of abstract content and of context would work). The architecture explained here is mostly taken from the article [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.3233/SW-243564#x1-14001-4], with some minor tweaking to accomodate to the actual needs of Abstract Wikipedia. [[File:Semantic unit.svg|frame]] The entire Abstract article would be generated in a single function call. The input would be the entire abstract content enclosed in a "context", that would encode all the meta-information that is necessary for the generation of the article (like the references to all the real-life objects that do not have a QID that uniquely identifies them). The (really simplified) rendering process would be as follows: # The abstract article is converted by rendering functions to a syntactic tree, i.e. a tree encoding the lexemes that are present in the sentence and the mutual relation between them. The rendering function acts on a single semantic unit (i.e., a node of the abstract article tree), and recursively calls the rendering functions acting on the child semantic units. # The syntactic tree is rendered into the final HTML article. This renderer comprises various steps, that generally require a complete traversal of the entire syntactic tree or of the internal partial representation. === Pros === * It is an architecture that allows the creation of a cohesive text, thanks to the support of a shared context. It also allows more freedom for the language-specific renderers to organize the text in a way that makes more sense to the specific language. * Since the abstract content is encoded as a tree, it prevents the combinatoric explosion of constructor types and of needed implementations. === Cons === * The generation of an entire article with a single function call is now not possible, due to the prohibitively high execution times. This architecture does not allow to parallelise the generation of an article, or just to progressively generate the article in a progressive fashion. * The learning curve would initially be very steep both for Abstract Wikipedia editors and for Functioneers; after the initial difficulties, this encoding would not include any particular difficulty, and it would probably be easier to use in order to encode complex abstract content that hyper-specific fragments. === Comments === == Stream semantic units == [[File:Stream semantic unit.svg|thumb]] This architecture is based on the semantic unit architecture, but with the difference that the abstract content, instead of being completely provided in a single function call, is split into paragraphs. Each renderer internally would work very similarly to the renders described in the previous section. The article is generated by the concatenation of the outputs of the various renderers. Starting from the second renderer, each renderer would have two sources of inputs: * the input defined in the function call (i.e., in Abstract Wikipedia), consisting in the Semantic unit representing a part of the article (indicatively, a paragraph), * the input coming from the previous renderer, consisting in 2 inputs: ** the abstract content that the previous renderer decided not to render, ** the context (initially created on Abstract Wikipedia and passed to the first renderer as an input), updated by all the renderers that have executed previously. The renderer would then execute, providing three outputs: * the HTML containing the rendered abstract content that the renderer decided to render, * the abstract content (Semantic unit) that for some reasons it may decide not to render and to pass to the next renderer, * the context, updated by the renderer itself. The first output would go directly to compose the Abstract Wikipedia article, while the other 2 outputs will be used as inputs by the next renderer. At the end of the chain, a "Final renderer" would render the eventual abstract content that has not been rendered yet. While it is already technically possible to implement this chain on Wikifunctions, it would be a single function call, and, like the previous proposal, it would suffer from the issue that it would need to generate the entire article in one go. The real advantage of this proposal would come if, instead of being implemented by a regular function, it was implemented through a magical function that would execute the renderers sequentially, giving each one the complete function execution timeout, collecting the partial outputs (and showing the partial generated output directly in the page) and passing the internal outputs to the next renderer, alongside the new external input. === Pros === * It would have all the advantages of the Semantic unit architectures, and still give at least partial outputs in a reasonable time (limiting timeouts). * Even if it doesn't allow the constructors to know all the abstract content that eventually will need to be rendered, it still gives them a quantity of foreknowledge that should be enough for practical purposes, while maintaining all the necessary memory of the previous content. After all, this is more or less the same type of knowledge humans have while generating linguistic content. === Cons === * It is not currently implementable, since it requires a magic function that has a special behavior. * It requires rendering partial abstract content in discrete sequential chunks, without the possibility to refine them once more abstract content is rendered. However, as mentioned before, realistically this should not be a problem, since the quantity of foreknowledge that renderers have available (i.e., the content of the entire paragraph) should be enough for all practical purposes. === Comments === pu9b1rfmsir9dpnn97cpt7ajvjclmg1 7943 7942 2026-05-15T14:47:02Z Theki 2698 typo 7943 wikitext text/x-wiki This page proposes to discuss the possible different architectures in which the generation of an Abstract Wikipedia article can be organized. The main issues are how to handle context, and how to keep execution times reasonable. Pleas feel free to improve this page, to comment below the architecture sections, and to add your own alternative proposals. == Current architecture == [[File:Simple fragments.svg|frame]] This architecture is the currently used one: an Abstract Wikipedia article is the collection of multiple fragments, that are inserted in the article as single function calls. The different types of sentence are encoded as call to different functions, with the content encoded by the function parameters. Each fragment is independent from the other. Currently fragment generating functions output monolingual texts, that then need to be converted into HTML code; it is possible to also define fragment generating functions that directly output HTML code, in order to include formattings/wikilinks/etc. === Pros === * Being the current architecture, it is already supported. * For each "fragment" a different function is called, allowing fast-executing functions and to parallelise the generation of an Abstract article. ** Note that, with the current implementation, this advantage disappears when multiple fragments are grouped in paragraphs or other text-organizing functions. * Somewhat intuitive both for Abstract Wikipedia editors and for Functioneers. === Cons === * Each type of sentence requires the definition of its own function. Considering that even simple sentences can have multiple combinations, the number of needed functions would undergo to combinatoric explosion. ** Also note that each function needs to be singularly implemented in each language, with little possibility of code reuse. It would be almost impossible for smaller languages to keep up with the implementation of an ever growing number of fragments. * Each fragment would be generated without any knowledge of the global context. Considering that natural languages heavily rely on context, the generation of grammatical and somewhat natural-looking text would become impossible with articles with more than 2-3 sentences. * Currently, the fragment generating functions are very vaguely defined: they are basically defined through the English translation of the fragment, introducing a heavy bias towards English and Indo-European languages, as can be proved for example by the fact that [[f:Z26039]] and [[f:Z26095]] are different functions, while [[f:Z26570]] does not define in which sense the entity is in the location (is it in the geographical area? physically inside the building? near the location?). ** Note that this con can be resolved by a better redefinition of the fragments. This would still cause the definition of hyper-specific fragment functions, with the consequent lost of intuitivity and the already mentioned combinatorial explosion. === Comments === == Modest improvement to current architecture using spans == [[File:NLG object architecture under modest improvement.svg|right|x200px]] tl;dr: Do all linguistic processing on plaintext (Z11/Monolingual text), but keep track of which span(s) in the string corresponds to each Item from the outer callsite. Then that outer Function can format and linkify the final string by iterating those ranges as ordered by their start index. {| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" ! (Existing types, for completeness) |- | <syntaxhighlight lang="rust"> type WFString = Z6; type MonolingualText = Z11; // = Pair<Langcode, WFString> type Langcode = Z60; type HTMLFragment = Z89; type List<E> = Z881<E>; type Pair<F, S> = Z882<F, S>; type Map<K, V> = Z883<K, V>; // = List<Pair<K, V>> w/ key uniqueness invariant type WDItem = Z6001; type WDItemRef = Z6091; type Natural = Z13518; </syntaxhighlight> |} <syntaxhighlight lang="rust"> type Span = Pair<Natural, Natural>; type Multimap<K, V> = Map<K, List<V>>; // = List<Pair<K, V>> w/o key uniqueness invariant type NLGOutput = Pair<MonolingualText, Multimap<WDItemRef, Span>>; type RichTextTransform = fn(HTMLFragment) -> HTMLFragment; type SuperlativeInLocationDefiningSentence<R> = fn( subject: WDItemRef, class: WDItemRef, location: WDItemRef, characteristic: WDItemRef, displayLang: Langcode, ) -> R; pub static superlativeInLocationDefiningSentence: SuperlativeInLocationDefiningSentence<HTMLFragment> = |subj, class, loc, charc, lang| applyFormatting( toSentenceCaseAndAddPunctuation( (match lang { Langcode("en", _) => enSuperlativeInLocationDefiningSentence, _ => todo!(), })(subj, class, loc, charc, lang), lang ), Multimap([ createArticleSubjectEmphasisTransformation(subj), createLinkifyTransformation(class, awArticleLinkFor(class)), createLinkifyTransformation(loc, awArticleLinkFor(loc)), ]) ); pub static toSentenceCaseAndAddPunctuation: (NLGOutput, Langcode) -> NLGOutput = todo!(); pub static createArticleSubjectEmphasisTransformation: (WDItemRef) -> RichTextTransform = |item| Pair(item, |innerHTML| HTMLFragment(format!("<strong>{innerHTML}</strong>"))); pub static awArticleLinkFor: (WDItemRef) -> WFString = |item| format!("https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/{item.qid}"); pub static createLinkifyTransformation: (WDItemRef, WFString) -> RichTextTransform = |item, linkTarget| Pair(item, |innerHTML| HTMLFragment(format!("<a href=\"{linkTarget}\">{innerHTML}</a>"))); pub static applyFormatting: (NLGOutput, Multimap<WDItemRef, RichTextTransform>) -> HTMLFragment = todo!(); // handwaving, but it would split the Monolingual text in the 1st arg's first item based on the spans from the 1st arg's second item, convert them to HTML fragments, then apply each of the transformations from the 2nd arg </syntaxhighlight> {| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" ! (The implementation <code>enSuperlativeInLocationDefiningSentence</code>, as an example) |- | <syntaxhighlight lang="rust"> pub static enSuperlativeInLocationDefiningSentence: SuperlativeInLocationDefiningSentence<NLGOutput> = |subj, class, loc, charc, lang| { let words = [ labelFor(subj, lang), enCopulaFor(subj), MonolingualText(lang, "the"), enSuperlativeFor(charc), labelFor(class, lang), enPrepositionForLoc(loc), labelFor(loc, lang), ]; NLGOutput( MonolingualText(lang, words.join(" ")), [ // Rust is 0-indexed, but there's probably a bunch of errors here anyway, so don't copy it Span(subj, 0..words[0].length), Span(class, (4 + &words[0..=3].iter().map(|&text| text.length).sum()) ..(4 + &words[0..=4].iter().map(|&text| text.length).sum())), Span(loc, (6 + &words[0..=5].iter().map(|&text| text.length).sum()) ..(6 + &words[0..=6].iter().map(|&text| text.length).sum())), Span(charc, (3 + &words[0..=2].iter().map(|&text| text.length).sum()) ..(3 + &words[0..=3].iter().map(|&text| text.length).sum())), ] ) }; </syntaxhighlight> |} === Pros === * The existing corpus of NLG Functions can be either kept as-is (e.g. inflection helpers) or migrated piecemeal (sentence-generating Functions). * This texts+spans structure puts to rest the question of which Type to use for the outputs of sentence-generating Functions: Z11, not Z89 (and definitely not Z6). === Cons === * Inherits the m&ndash;n problem of the status quo: each sentence-generating Function still needs an Implementation in every language. There's no new affordance for constructing grammatically correct sentences from smaller fragments. * Inherits other problems of the status quo, covered in [[#Current architecture]] above. === Comments === (With apologies to non-Rust programmers for its use here as a statically-typed lingua franca, and with apologies to Rust programmers for weird or broken syntax. I know <code>pub fn &lt;identifier&gt;</code> exists.) <br>This outlines what I foresee as the most evolved form of the current architecture, and is an expansion of [[f:WF:Type_proposals/Syntactic_table#c-YoshiRulz-20260403175300-Comments|my offhand comment here]]. <br>I'm only offering this as a "baseline", I can't advocate its adoption (except as a stop-gap, since as mentioned above it does solve the return type problem). Personally, I want to see an architecture which can attain prose, or something close to it, in most of the world's languages. <br>[[User:YoshiRulz|YoshiRulz]] ([[User talk:YoshiRulz|talk]]) 21:26, 11 May 2026 (UTC) == Semantic unit architecture == This architecture is the architecture explained in the Wikifunctions type proposal for [[f:Wikifunctions:Type proposals/Semantic unit|Semantic units]] by user [[User:Mahir256|Mahir256]] (see [[f:Wikifunctions:Type_proposals/Semantic_unit/Douglas_Adams|the example]] to better understand how the encoding of abstract content and of context would work). The architecture explained here is mostly taken from the article [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.3233/SW-243564#x1-14001-4], with some minor tweaking to accommodate to the actual needs of Abstract Wikipedia. [[File:Semantic unit.svg|frame]] The entire Abstract article would be generated in a single function call. The input would be the entire abstract content enclosed in a "context", that would encode all the meta-information that is necessary for the generation of the article (like the references to all the real-life objects that do not have a QID that uniquely identifies them). The (really simplified) rendering process would be as follows: # The abstract article is converted by rendering functions to a syntactic tree, i.e. a tree encoding the lexemes that are present in the sentence and the mutual relation between them. The rendering function acts on a single semantic unit (i.e., a node of the abstract article tree), and recursively calls the rendering functions acting on the child semantic units. # The syntactic tree is rendered into the final HTML article. This renderer comprises various steps, that generally require a complete traversal of the entire syntactic tree or of the internal partial representation. === Pros === * It is an architecture that allows the creation of a cohesive text, thanks to the support of a shared context. It also allows more freedom for the language-specific renderers to organize the text in a way that makes more sense to the specific language. * Since the abstract content is encoded as a tree, it prevents the combinatoric explosion of constructor types and of needed implementations. === Cons === * The generation of an entire article with a single function call is now not possible, due to the prohibitively high execution times. This architecture does not allow to parallelise the generation of an article, or just to progressively generate the article in a progressive fashion. * The learning curve would initially be very steep both for Abstract Wikipedia editors and for Functioneers; after the initial difficulties, this encoding would not include any particular difficulty, and it would probably be easier to use in order to encode complex abstract content that hyper-specific fragments. === Comments === == Stream semantic units == [[File:Stream semantic unit.svg|thumb]] This architecture is based on the semantic unit architecture, but with the difference that the abstract content, instead of being completely provided in a single function call, is split into paragraphs. Each renderer internally would work very similarly to the renders described in the previous section. The article is generated by the concatenation of the outputs of the various renderers. Starting from the second renderer, each renderer would have two sources of inputs: * the input defined in the function call (i.e., in Abstract Wikipedia), consisting in the Semantic unit representing a part of the article (indicatively, a paragraph), * the input coming from the previous renderer, consisting in 2 inputs: ** the abstract content that the previous renderer decided not to render, ** the context (initially created on Abstract Wikipedia and passed to the first renderer as an input), updated by all the renderers that have executed previously. The renderer would then execute, providing three outputs: * the HTML containing the rendered abstract content that the renderer decided to render, * the abstract content (Semantic unit) that for some reasons it may decide not to render and to pass to the next renderer, * the context, updated by the renderer itself. The first output would go directly to compose the Abstract Wikipedia article, while the other 2 outputs will be used as inputs by the next renderer. At the end of the chain, a "Final renderer" would render the eventual abstract content that has not been rendered yet. While it is already technically possible to implement this chain on Wikifunctions, it would be a single function call, and, like the previous proposal, it would suffer from the issue that it would need to generate the entire article in one go. The real advantage of this proposal would come if, instead of being implemented by a regular function, it was implemented through a magical function that would execute the renderers sequentially, giving each one the complete function execution timeout, collecting the partial outputs (and showing the partial generated output directly in the page) and passing the internal outputs to the next renderer, alongside the new external input. === Pros === * It would have all the advantages of the Semantic unit architectures, and still give at least partial outputs in a reasonable time (limiting timeouts). * Even if it doesn't allow the constructors to know all the abstract content that eventually will need to be rendered, it still gives them a quantity of foreknowledge that should be enough for practical purposes, while maintaining all the necessary memory of the previous content. After all, this is more or less the same type of knowledge humans have while generating linguistic content. === Cons === * It is not currently implementable, since it requires a magic function that has a special behavior. * It requires rendering partial abstract content in discrete sequential chunks, without the possibility to refine them once more abstract content is rendered. However, as mentioned before, realistically this should not be a problem, since the quantity of foreknowledge that renderers have available (i.e., the content of the entire paragraph) should be enough for all practical purposes. === Comments === g9mqjaldvj6i7ikcfm641evbva13hre 4 2949 7967 7797 2026-05-16T01:21:16Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7967 wikitext text/x-wiki <languages /> <span id="What_is_Abstract_Wikipedia?"></span> == Mi az Absztrakt Wikipédia? == Az Absztrakt Wikipédia új Wikimédia-projekt, mely lehetővé teszi a közösségek együttműködését nyelvfüggetlen cikkek anyanyelvükön való létrehozásában, melyeket mások saját nyelveiken érhetnek el. Ezt a Wikifunkciókon elérhető függvények teszik lehetővé, melyek a Wikidatán lévő strukturált adatokat érik el. <span id="What_is_an_abstract_article?"></span> == Mi az absztrakt szócikk? == Az absztrakt szócikk egy témáról szóló információt strukturált, nyelvfüggetlen formában ír le. A közreműködők a Wikidatáról származó strukturált adatokat a Wikifunkciók nyelvi függvényeivel egyesítve hoznak létre a témáról szóló természetes nyelvi mondatokat. <span id="How_is_Abstract_Wikipedia_different_from_Wikipedia?"></span> == Miben különbözik az Absztrakt Wikipédia a Wikipédiától? == A Wikipédia szócikkek közvetlenül egy adott nyelven keletkeznek. Az Absztrakt Wikipédia ehelyett az információt strukturált formában tárolja, mely sok nyelven tud szöveget létrehozni a Wikifunkciók segítségével. <span id="How_does_Abstract_Wikipedia_relate_to_Wikidata_and_Wikifunctions?"></span> == Hogy kapcsolódik az Absztrakt Wikipédia a Wikidatához és a Wikifunkciókhoz? == Az Absztrakt Wikipédia e Wikimédia-projektekre épül: * <span class="mw-translate-fuzzy">A '''Wikidata''' lexikográfiai adatokat és strukturált információkat ad témákról</span> * <span class="mw-translate-fuzzy">A '''Wikifunkciók''' függvényeket biztosít, melyek természetes nyelvi szövegeket hoznak létre sok nyelven.</span> * Az '''Absztrakt Wikipédia''' ez elemeket egyesíti sok nyelven létrehozható szócikkek létrehozására. <span id="Is_Abstract_Wikipedia_using_AI?"></span> == Használ az Absztrakt Wikipédia AI-t? == Nem. Az Absztrakt Wikipédia nem generál automatikusan szócikkeket AI alkalmazásával. Az absztrakt szócikkeket a közreműködők írják és tartják fenn, és a közösség által írt függvények hozzák létre a szöveget a strukturált adatokból. <span id="Does_Abstract_Wikipedia_automatically_appear_on_other_Wikipedias?"></span> == Automatikusan megjelenik az Absztrakt Wikipédia más Wikipédiákon? == Nem. Az Absztrakt Wikipédia nem ad hozzá más Wikipédiákhoz tartalmat. Minden Wikipédia-közösség teljesen maga irányítja a tartalmát, és a meglévő helyi szócikkeket nem cseréljük le. A jövőben minden Wikipédia-közösség el fogja tudni dönteni, hogy szeretnének-e az Absztrakt Wikipédiáról származó szöveget felhasználni. <span id="Who_can_contribute_to_Abstract_Wikipedia?"></span> == Ki járulhat hozzá az Absztrakt Wikipédiához? == Mint minden Wikimédia-projektet, az Absztrakt Wikipédiát is a közösség önkéntesei szerkesztik és tartják fenn. A szerkesztők különbözőképpen járulhatnak hozzá, például létrehozhatnak vagy javíthatnak absztrakt cikkeket, nyelvi függvényeket írhatnak a Wikifunkciókban, javíthatják a dokumentációt, és segíthetnek meghatározni a projekt fejlődését. <span id="Can_I_use_Abstract_Wikipedia_today?"></span> == Használhatom már az Absztrakt Wikipédiát? == <div class="mw-translate-fuzzy"> Igen. Felfedezheted az Absztrakt Wikipédia korai béta verzióját. Létrehozhatsz absztrakt cikkeket, és megtekintheted a létrejött szöveget különböző nyelveken. </div> Az Absztrakt Wikipédia jelenleg '''korai szakaszban''' van, így az élmény sok része tovább fog fejlődni a közösségi visszajelzések alapján. Képességei és használhatósága jelentősen javulni fognak a jövőben. A jelenlegi verzióban előfordulhatnak hibák, használhatósági gondok, időtúllépések vagy más problémák. [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|Itt]] írd le a problémát, ha bekövetkezik, vagy ha vannak ötleteid a javításra! A jövőben a Wikipédia közösségei képesek lesznek az Absztrakt Wikipédián alapuló tartalom integrálására saját wikijeikbe, ha szeretnék. [[Category:Abstract Wikipedia administration{{#translation:}}|Frequently Asked Questions]] 03p41hyizc4fiq4fkup7f19rtfw9bct 7972 7967 2026-05-16T01:21:44Z FuzzyBot 563 Updating to match new version of source page 7972 wikitext text/x-wiki <languages /> <span id="What_is_Abstract_Wikipedia?"></span> == Mi az Absztrakt Wikipédia? == Az Absztrakt Wikipédia új Wikimédia-projekt, mely lehetővé teszi a közösségek együttműködését nyelvfüggetlen cikkek anyanyelvükön való létrehozásában, melyeket mások saját nyelveiken érhetnek el. Ezt a Wikifunkciókon elérhető függvények teszik lehetővé, melyek a Wikidatán lévő strukturált adatokat érik el. <span id="What_is_an_abstract_article?"></span> == Mi az absztrakt szócikk? == Az absztrakt szócikk egy témáról szóló információt strukturált, nyelvfüggetlen formában ír le. A közreműködők a Wikidatáról származó strukturált adatokat a Wikifunkciók nyelvi függvényeivel egyesítve hoznak létre a témáról szóló természetes nyelvi mondatokat. <span id="How_is_Abstract_Wikipedia_different_from_Wikipedia?"></span> == Miben különbözik az Absztrakt Wikipédia a Wikipédiától? == A Wikipédia szócikkek közvetlenül egy adott nyelven keletkeznek. Az Absztrakt Wikipédia ehelyett az információt strukturált formában tárolja, mely sok nyelven tud szöveget létrehozni a Wikifunkciók segítségével. <span id="How_does_Abstract_Wikipedia_relate_to_Wikidata_and_Wikifunctions?"></span> == Hogy kapcsolódik az Absztrakt Wikipédia a Wikidatához és a Wikifunkciókhoz? == Az Absztrakt Wikipédia e Wikimédia-projektekre épül: * <span class="mw-translate-fuzzy">A '''Wikidata''' lexikográfiai adatokat és strukturált információkat ad témákról</span> * <span class="mw-translate-fuzzy">A '''Wikifunkciók''' függvényeket biztosít, melyek természetes nyelvi szövegeket hoznak létre sok nyelven.</span> * Az '''Absztrakt Wikipédia''' ez elemeket egyesíti sok nyelven létrehozható szócikkek létrehozására. <span id="Is_Abstract_Wikipedia_using_AI?"></span> == Használ az Absztrakt Wikipédia AI-t? == Nem. Az Absztrakt Wikipédia nem generál automatikusan szócikkeket AI alkalmazásával. Az absztrakt szócikkeket a közreműködők írják és tartják fenn, és a közösség által írt függvények hozzák létre a szöveget a strukturált adatokból. <span id="Does_Abstract_Wikipedia_automatically_appear_on_other_Wikipedias?"></span> == Automatikusan megjelenik az Absztrakt Wikipédia más Wikipédiákon? == Nem. Az Absztrakt Wikipédia nem ad hozzá más Wikipédiákhoz tartalmat. Minden Wikipédia-közösség teljesen maga irányítja a tartalmát, és a meglévő helyi szócikkeket nem cseréljük le. A jövőben minden Wikipédia-közösség el fogja tudni dönteni, hogy szeretnének-e az Absztrakt Wikipédiáról származó szöveget felhasználni. <span id="Who_can_contribute_to_Abstract_Wikipedia?"></span> == Ki járulhat hozzá az Absztrakt Wikipédiához? == Mint minden Wikimédia-projektet, az Absztrakt Wikipédiát is a közösség önkéntesei szerkesztik és tartják fenn. A szerkesztők különbözőképpen járulhatnak hozzá, például létrehozhatnak vagy javíthatnak absztrakt cikkeket, nyelvi függvényeket írhatnak a Wikifunkciókban, javíthatják a dokumentációt, és segíthetnek meghatározni a projekt fejlődését. <span id="Can_I_use_Abstract_Wikipedia_today?"></span> == Használhatom már az Absztrakt Wikipédiát? == <div class="mw-translate-fuzzy"> Igen. Felfedezheted az Absztrakt Wikipédia korai béta verzióját. Létrehozhatsz absztrakt cikkeket, és megtekintheted a létrejött szöveget különböző nyelveken. </div> Az Absztrakt Wikipédia jelenleg '''korai szakaszban''' van, így az élmény sok része tovább fog fejlődni a közösségi visszajelzések alapján. Képességei és használhatósága jelentősen javulni fognak a jövőben. A jelenlegi verzióban előfordulhatnak hibák, használhatósági gondok, időtúllépések vagy más problémák. [[Abstract Wikipedia:Project chat|Itt]] írd le a problémát, ha bekövetkezik, vagy ha vannak ötleteid a javításra! A jövőben a Wikipédia közösségei képesek lesznek az Absztrakt Wikipédián alapuló tartalom integrálására saját wikijeikbe, ha szeretnék. [[Category:Abstract Wikipedia administration{{#translation:}}|Frequently Asked Questions]] 4w0snkk4s8etf7phua3b8ifb279xhhe 1198 3007 7946 2026-05-15T15:25:40Z FuzzyBot 563 Importing a new version from external source 7946 wikitext text/x-wiki [[$1|2026-05-15]]: A higher meaning 9f04a7dzshr6tnc4a5fpwljt6saff6h