Abstract Wikipedia abstractwiki https://abstract.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_Wikipedia:Main_page MediaWiki 1.47.0-wmf.21 first-letter Media Special Talk User User talk Abstract Wikipedia Abstract Wikipedia talk File File talk MediaWiki MediaWiki talk Template Template talk Help Help talk Category Category talk TimedText TimedText talk Module Module talk Translations Translations talk 4 450 22258 22242 2026-09-26T06:04:48Z Bunnypranav 929 Mark section resolved ([[User:Bunnypranav/sectionResolved.js|sectionResolved]]) 22258 wikitext text/x-wiki __NEWSECTIONLINK__ This page is the venue to request for the deletion of pages that cannot be speedy deleted (see also [[Template:Delete]]). [[Category:Abstract Wikipedia administration]] == Scholarly articles == * [[Q67404404]] {{Q|67404404}} * [[Q50082993]] {{Q|50082993}} * [[Q68271926]] {{Q|68271926}} * [[Q114133712]] {{Q|114133712}} There is very little abstract encyclopedic content that can come out of a page about a specific, non-notable scholarly article. [[User:JJPMaster|JJP]]_{[[User talk:JJPMaster|Mas]]_{[[Special:Contributions/JJPMaster|ter]]}} ([[Q1270787|she]]/[[Q3437264|they]]) 19:07, 18 May 2026 (UTC) :We currently don't have a community-ratified definition of notability. I've tried to kick off this discussion [[Project:Notability|here]]. For now, I ask that stewards/global sysops '''wait''' until we come to a consensus on a policy. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 19:10, 18 May 2026 (UTC) ::{{ping|JJPMaster}} very interesting request. I'm not entirely sure... I would tend to agree for these papers but not all of them ({{Q|Q30249683}} exists on 16 Wikipedias for instance), so where to put the threshold between notable and non-notable? on which criteria? Anyway, I agree to ''wait'' until the community reach a consensus on what is notable on AW. Also, I'm pinging {{ping|Immanuelle}} who created these articles. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 14:13, 30 May 2026 (UTC) :::{{ping|Feeglgeef}} the notability discussion does seems to be moving, meanwhile it's seems more and more obvious that these page are not good (see the deletion request below too). Should we still wait? I don't think so anymore. Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 08:36, 19 July 2026 (UTC) :::: Sure, sounds good. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 23:44, 19 July 2026 (UTC) *{{vd}} low quality, no response or improvement. The case for significance of these topics is not made in the articles. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:26, 15 July 2026 (UTC) {{done}} [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 05:27, 20 July 2026 (UTC) == [[Q6489603]] == See [[Talk:Q6489603]]. This does not work as a category, it is more an article about a category. --[[User:Ameisenigel|Ameisenigel]] ([[User talk:Ameisenigel|talk]]) 08:34, 31 May 2026 (UTC) : Under my [[Abstract Wikipedia:Notability|proposed notability guideline]], this would not be notable, so I {{s}} deletion [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 17:30, 31 May 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:Ameisenigel|Ameisenigel]] @[[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] Although the page has been deleted, I believe that the vague wording related to categories (and templates) should be clarified. Please review and improve the deletion policy to help current and future contributors better understand how categories are handled. Refer [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy#Categories]] [[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 15:07, 18 June 2026 (UTC) :{{Done|Deleted}} <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 14:07, 17 June 2026 (UTC) == Creations by XeNivalys == [[user:XeNivalys]] has posted several pages as part of their cross-wiki spam crusade. Please delete them all and if possible issue a block. --[[User:Bedivere|Bedivere]] ([[User talk:Bedivere|talk]]) 04:53, 9 June 2026 (UTC) :{{Done|Deleted}}. 🪶-[[User:Tanbiruzzaman|<span style="font-family:monospace;color:#006400;letter-spacing:1px;">TΛNBIRUZZΛMΛN</span>]] ([[User talk:Tanbiruzzaman|💬]]) 08:33, 9 June 2026 (UTC) == auto-created broken articles == I suggest we do a bit of a cleanup of pages that were created by a software tool, using immature functions that have been deprecated for months, that would be very annoying to clean up by hand. So I propose deletion of the following (feel free to add to this list anything that matches this description). No prejudice to re-creation if anyone wants to make them good. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:20, 15 July 2026 (UTC) * [[Q11378973]] * [[Q11433427]] * [[Q11395853]] * [[Q11465292]] * [[Q11467693]] * [[Q7768]] [[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 07:20, 15 July 2026 (UTC) : I thout the same, or even more: I would like to discuss if it is best to delete outdated articles. There is a lot of discussion and critique about a lot of those articles. I think in particular to articles created by @Immanuelle, that are not edited afterwards by somebody else. Those articles were a) created in mass and b) most of them with outdated functions. PS: I value the attempt of use:Immanuelle and hope to see him/her to continue on this project, now or later. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:44, 15 July 2026 (UTC) ::Ping [[User:Immanuelle]]. Do you mind if we heavily clean up some of your contributions? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 08:25, 15 July 2026 (UTC) {{done}} the original set. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:11, 26 July 2026 (UTC) : Articles created by [[User:Immanuelle]] and not edited after creation. I would like to propose to delete these (if not already mentioned above): :*[[Q29682]] Sumiyoshi Shrine :*[[Q135040386]] Takeihakatsuno Shrine :*[[Q63471]] Omura Shrine :*[[Q65320]] Iwa Shrine :*[[Q94057]] Olive Shrine :*[[Q94317]] Kikuchi Shrine :*[[Q94760]] Kotohira-gū :*[[Q116140]] Tado Taisha :*[[Q133753]] Shiogama Shrine :*[[Q135732]] Ōagata Shrine :*[[Q137707]] Katō Shrine :*[[Q167136]] Kengun Shrine :*[[Q172253]] Amatsu Shrine :*[[Q195684]] Yahiko Shrine :*[[Q199699]] Tsurumine Hachiman Shrine :*[[Q211522]] Sannō Shrine :*[[Q246469]] Wakasa Shrine :*[[Q246479]] Ikoma Shrine :*[[Q246667]] Hakuto Shrine :*[[Q251160]] Ōgamiyama Shrine :*[[Q251682]] Yūtoku Inari Shrine :*[[Q276779]] Kifune Shrine :*[[Q276830]] Seimei Shrine :*[[Q276831]] Mitami Shrine :*[[Q283483]] Kanō Tenmangū :*[[Q288248]] Tokorozawa Shinmei Shrine :*[[Q703904]] Oyamazumi Shrine :*<s>[[Q704219]] Terukuni Shrine</s> Updated recently :*[[Q704430]] Udo Jingū :*[[Q704622]] Kirishima Jingū :*[[Q704636]] Naminoue Shrine :*[[Q704686]] Miyazaki Jingū :*[[Q704702]] Shirayama Hime Shrine :*[[Q704855]] Hōkoku Shrine :*[[Q704865]] Hida Ichinomiya Minashi Shrine :*[[Q704876]] Kasama Inari Shrine :*[[Q704890]] Tosa Shrine :*[[Q704898]] Hōfu Tenmangū :*[[Q705136]] Tsushima Shrine :*[[Q705297]] Nishinomiya Shrine :*[[Q705303]] Shirahige Shrine :*[[Q705310]] Hakone Shrine :*[[Q705542]] Ōmiwa Shrine :*[[Q706499]] Kashima Jingū :*[[Q11360548]] Kamitakano Shrine :*[[Q11360577]] Shimonaka Hachiman :*[[Q11360668]] Shimohara-hachiman Shrine :*[[Q11360748]] Shimomasuda Shrine :*[[Q11360904]] Shimogoryō Shrine :*[[Q11361253]] Shimoshinmei Tenso Shrine :*[[Q11361494]] Shimodate Haguro Shrine :*[[Q11361528]] Shimoshiotsu Shrine :*[[Q11361819]] Fuba-hachimangu :*<s>[[Q23548]] National Aeronautics and Space Administration</s> Updated recently :*[[Q11691]] stock exchange :*<s>[[Q42274]] Google Earth</s> Updated recently :*[[Q80228]] bottle :*[[Q173799]] entertainment :*<s>[[Q18123741]] infectious disease</s> Updated recently :*[[Q16550]] Breithorn :*<s>[[Q569243]] Universiti Brunei Darussalam</s> Updated recently :*<s>[[Q602]] Rhône</s> Updated recently :*<s>[[Q15928]] Velenje</s> Updated recently :*<s>[[Q45677]] Château de Choisy</s> Updated recently :*[[Q503530]] Sioma Ngwezi National Park :*<s>[[Q499550]] Smith Islands National Park</s> Updated recently :*<s>[[Q503518]] Lower Zambezi National Park</s> Updated recently :*<s>[[Q150]] French</s> Updated recently :*[[Q404]] HTTP 404 :*<s>[[Q42397345]] 307 Temporary Redirect</s> Updated recently :*[[Q38897603]] Observations on urethral infection in the male. :*[[Q379519]] Mid-Autumn Festival :*<s>[[Q45470]] Sasuke Inari Shrine</s> Updated recently :*<s>[[Q372380]] Katori Jingū</s> Updated recently :*[[Q385407]] Ōmi Jingū :*[[Q482065]] Atsuta Jingū :*[[Q521319]] Takekoma Inari Shrine :*[[Q631373]] Kashii-gū :*[[Q5151]] month :*[[Q444]] Lech Wałęsa :*[[Q555]] Rachel Maddow :*[[Q999]] astatine :*[[Q461391]] Gavin Newsom :*[[Q868]] Aristotle :*[[Q9181]] Abraham :*[[Q91]] Abraham Lincoln :*[[Q3783]] Amazon :*[[Q10987]] honey :*[[Q11663]] weather :*[[Q884]] South Korea :*[[Q7235]] Sophocles :*[[Q11002]] sugar :*[[Q376]] clock :*[[Q11391]] ultraviolet radiation :*[[Q9358]] Friedrich Nietzsche :*[[Q7317]] Giuseppe Verdi :*<s>[[Q13217298]] Giza Necropolis</s> Updated recently :*[[Q2487]] Thirty Years' War :*[[Q8269]] The Tale of Genji :*[[Q9438]] Thomas Aquinas :*[[Q8743]] Thomas Edison :*[[Q12514]] Three Gorges Dam :*<s>[[Q80]] Tim Berners-Lee</s> Updated recently :*[[Q8736]] Treaty of Versailles :*[[Q8467]] Umar ibn Al-Khattāb :*[[Q8740]] Vietnam War :*[[Q7355]] Yellow River :*[[Q11205]] arithmetic :*[[Q6206]] capitalism :*[[Q573]] day :*<s>[[Q8047]] enzyme</s> Updated recently :*[[Q8597]] Akbar :*[[Q8409]] Alexander the Great :*[[Q7850]] Chinese :*[[Q8275]] Iliad :*[[Q37660]] South China Sea :*<s>[[Q313]] Venus</s> Updated recently :*[[Q362]] World War II :*[[Q12078]] cancer :*[[Q199804]] chronic obstructive pulmonary disease :*[[Q8142]] currency :*[[Q7430]] deoxyribonucleic acid :*[[Q12493]] dome :*[[Q2095]] food :*[[Q937]] Albert Einstein :*[[Q12104]] Avena sativa :*[[Q612]] Dubai :*[[Q905]] Franz Kafka :*<s>[[Q5588]] Frida Kahlo</s> Deleted and recreated by an other user :*[[Q125851781]] Fâtih Sultan Mehemmed Han :*[[Q7742]] Louis XIV of France :*[[Q5816]] Mao Zedong :*[[Q1218]] Jerusalem :*[[Q12554]] Middle Ages :*[[Q517]] Napoleon :*[[Q5599]] Peter Paul Rubens :*[[Q5577]] Salvador Dalí :*[[Q12099]] Secale cereale :*[[Q9316]] Sikhism :*[[Q933]] South Pole :*<s>[[Q254]] Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart</s> Deleted and recreated by an other user :*[[Q9683]] Tang dynasty :*[[Q9121]] atom :*[[Q5322]] capacitor :*[[Q7164]] World Bank :*[[Q3559]] comet :*[[Q6186]] communism :*[[Q258]] South Africa :*[[Q317]] dictatorship :*[[Q11651]] electric current :*[[Q8162]] linguistics :*[[Q11468]] nanotechnology :*[[Q8461]] racism :*[[Q9165]] soul :*[[Q287]] wood :*[[Q6388]] swimming :*<s>[[Q12214]] smallpox</s> Updated recently :*[[Q9794]] reggae :*[[Q7380]] primate :*[[Q11372]] physical chemistry :*<s>[[Q9404]] nervous system</s> Updated recently :*[[Q382441]] marine mammal :*[[Q3]] life :*[[Q11028]] information :*[[Q7075]] library :*[[Q1072]] heart :*[[Q11364]] hormone :*[[Q8458]] human rights :*[[Q8492]] juice :*[[Q82571]] linear algebra :*[[Q12800]] machine gun :*[[Q12167]] malnutrition :*[[Q10990]] meat :*[[Q7269]] monarchy :*[[Q11426]] metal :*[[Q6235]] nationalism :*[[Q12739]] nuclear power :*<s>[[Q11472]] paper</s> Updated recently :*<s>[[Q12195]] poliomyelitis</s> Updated recently :*[[Q10998]] potato :*[[Q7372]] shark :*[[Q5916]] spaceflight :*[[Q42527]] spice :*[[Q7553]] translation :*[[Q808]] virus :*[[Q8072]] volcano :*[[Q12876]] tank :*[[Q8188]] syllable :*[[Q10737]] suicide :*[[Q1511]] Richard Wagner :*[[Q7315]] Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky :*[[Q11518]] Pythagorean theorem :*[[Q11451199]] List of Shikinaisha in Aki Province :*[[Q11379]] energy :*[[Q9103]] female breast :*[[Q11435]] liquid :*[[Q86]] headache :*[[Q11573]] metre :*[[Q8495]] milk :*[[Q11009]] nut :*[[Q5994]] piano :*[[Q11474]] plastic :*[[Q11423]] mass :*[[Q11190]] medicine :*[[Q9492]] probability :*[[Q9465]] ethics :*[[Q619]] Nicolaus Copernicus :*[[Q1399]] Niccolò Machiavelli :*[[Q9049]] Noam Chomsky :*<s>[[Q332]] Neptune</s> Updated recently :*[[Q7176]] Naguib Mahfouz :*[[Q5592]] Michelangelo :*[[Q5513]] Lake Baikal :*[[Q5679]] Lord Byron :*[[Q7071]] Li Bai :*[[Q7259]] Ada Lovelace :*[[Q7172]] League of Arab States :*[[Q5879]] Johann Wolfgang von Goethe :*[[Q169470]] physicist :*[[Q719665]] Inari :*[[Q276944]] Ōkuninushi :*[[Q386563]] Ōyamatsumi :*[[Q1474187]] Watatsumi :*[[Q352]] Adolf Hitler :*[[Q7251]] Alan Turing :*[[Q5484]] Caspian Sea :*[[Q9592]] Catholic Church :*<s>[[Q160]] Cetacea</s> Updated recently :*[[Q3044]] Charlemagne :*[[Q7207]] Elizabeth I of England :*[[Q181765]] Holy Roman Emperor :*[[Q12138]] Gregorian calendar :*[[Q9089]] Hinduism :*[[Q7226]] Joan of Arc :*[[Q9317]] John Maynard Keynes :*[[Q5603]] Andy Warhol :*[[Q1357]] Araneae :*[[Q1828555]] Arabic script :*[[Q5685]] Anton Chekhov :*[[Q748]] Buddhism :*[[Q500]] Citrus × limon :*[[Q3503]] Congo :*[[Q8413]] Constantine the Great :*<s>[[Q1043]] Carl Linnaeus</s> Updated recently :*[[Q303]] Elvis Presley :*[[Q9130]] Erwin Schrödinger :*[[Q8007]] Franklin Delano Roosevelt :*[[Q5432]] Francisco Goya :*[[Q5089]] Ganges :*[[Q8778]] Galen :*[[Q9235]] Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel :*[[Q720]] Genghis Khan :*<s>[[Q188]] German</s> Updated recently :*[[Q7895]] reproductive system :*[[Q15969]] Jean Améry :*[[Q20925]] 1986 Belgian Grand Prix :*[[Q96221]] Heinrich Ehrhardt :*[[Q77534]] Doris Pack :*[[Q454]] peace :*[[Q5251735]] defuzzification :*[[Q11408]] magnetic field :*[[Q9368]] liver :*[[Q9620]] nerve :*[[Q11756]] prehistory :*[[Q851]] Saudi Arabia :*[[Q9215]] Sigmund Freud :*[[Q332062]] Sorghum bicolor :*[[Q9202]] Statue of Liberty :*[[Q1049]] Sudan :*[[Q35355]] Sumer :*[[Q8251]] The Art of War :*[[Q1071]] geography :*[[Q5325]] inductor :*[[Q205]] infinity :*[[Q12140]] medication :*[[Q627]] nitrogen :*[[Q12802]] nuclear weapon :*[[Q569]] beryllium :*<s>[[Q618]] boron</s> Deleted and recreated by an other user :*[[Q650]] fluorine :*[[Q654]] neon :*<s>[[Q658]] sodium</s> Deleted and recreated by an other user :*[[Q663]] aluminium :*[[Q670]] silicon :*[[Q682]] sulfur :*<s>[[Q706]] calcium</s> Deleted and recreated by an other user :*[[Q722]] vanadium :*[[Q725]] chromium :*[[Q731]] manganese :*[[Q677]] iron :*[[Q740]] cobalt :*[[Q744]] nickel :*[[Q758]] zinc :*[[Q1304]] livermorium :*[[Q1103]] iodine :*[[Q1108]] caesium :*[[Q888]] krypton :*[[Q938]] strontium :*[[Q941]] yttrium :*[[Q1046]] niobium :*[[Q1053]] molybdenum :*[[Q1054]] technetium :*[[Q1086]] ruthenium :*[[Q1087]] rhodium :*[[Q1090]] silver :*[[Q1094]] indium :*[[Q1099]] antimony :*[[Q7159]] African Union :*[[Q9546]] Al-Ghazali :*[[Q5580]] Albrecht Dürer :*[[Q7374]] Alfred Hitchcock :*[[Q727]] Amsterdam :*<s>[[Q1340]] Antonio Vivaldi</s> Deleted and recreated by an other user :*[[Q7298]] Antonín Dvořák :*[[Q10872]] Archaea :*[[Q8589]] Ashoka :*[[Q8018]] Augustine of Hippo :*[[Q7768]] Association of Southeast Asian Nations :*[[Q1486]] Buenos Aires :*[[Q9045]] Chanakya Kautilya :*[[Q2042]] Charles de Gaulle :*[[Q882]] Charlie Chaplin :*[[Q7322]] Christopher Columbus :*[[Q81513]] Citrus :*[[Q8209]] Cyrillic script :*[[Q1067]] Dante Alighieri :*[[Q7939]] El Niño :*[[Q613]] Emirate of Dubai :*[[Q8272]] Epic of Gilgamesh :*[[Q115]] Ethiopia :*[[Q8747]] Euclid :*[[Q5683]] Geoffrey Chaucer :*[[Q8229]] Latin script :*<s>[[Q4918]] Mediterranean Sea</s> Updated recently :*[[Q25326]] Mollusca :*[[Q9458]] Muhammad :*[[Q5185]] Nematoda :*[[Q11379325]] Izawa Shrine :*[[Q11379739]] Imari Shrine :*[[Q575650]] Rust :*<s>[[Q34010]] Haskell</s> Updated recently :*<s>[[Q978185]] TypeScript</s> Updated recently :*[[Q479833]] batch file :*[[Q42979]] BASIC :*[[Q131140]] COBOL :*[[Q648619]] F# :*[[Q334879]] Erlang :*<s>[[Q83303]] Fortran</s> Updated recently :*[[Q2613697]] Julia :*[[Q207316]] Lua :*[[Q212587]] OCaml :*[[Q840410]] PowerShell :*[[Q235086]] Smalltalk :*[[Q17147733]] Swift :*[[Q582706]] Israeli settlement :*[[Q1107129]] sōja :*[[Q127866012]] A Simple Example for Linear Partial Differential Equations and Its Solution Using the Method of Separation of Variables :*[[Q30249683]] Attention Is All You Need :*[[Q210907]] Haida Gwaii :*[[Q9876]] Vught :*[[Q13489381]] effective altruism :*[[Q82945199]] Alfréd von Adda :*[[Q114133712]] Evaluating the biological validity of European river typology systems with least disturbed benthic macroinvertebrate communities :*[[Q68271926]] Spectroscopic evidence of infall and outflow around intermediate high-mass YSOs in the Mon OB1 dark cloud :*[[Q63308014]] (222315) 2000 ST367 :*[[Q50082993]] Comparison of the applicability of Demirjian and Willems methods for dental age estimation in children from the Thrace region, Turkey. :*[[Q31266481]] Cerro Guayaquil :*[[Q4180914]] Test d'évaluation du français :*[[Q12171]] menstruation :*[[Q8065]] natural disaster :*[[Q12184]] pandemic :*[[Q8183]] phoneme :*[[Q67404404]] Response of the rabbit vas deferens in vivo to vasoactive drugs :*[[Q8070]] tsunami :*[[Q7283]] terrorism :*[[Q139491990]] JEPA :*[[Q118876059]] Claude :*[[Q116758847]] Anthropic :*[[Q112508731]] Blake Lemoine : [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:18, 18 July 2026 (UTC) ::Some are okay. I clicked on two, and IMO both should be kept: [[Q188]] German, [[Q3503]] Congo (River). So I think we need to go through them not just mass delete. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 11:13, 18 July 2026 (UTC) :::Those 2 are only one sentence, are using a conversion from string or monolingual text to HTML and are therefor not good to be used as example. I think it is better to delete them. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:15, 18 July 2026 (UTC) :::I'd be happy to hear other opinions on this kind of short stub with older functions. For now I'll concentrate on deleting those that don't even meet that level of viability. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 03:07, 27 July 2026 (UTC) ::::Unless if they are update and improve very soon, I also think it's better to delete them quickly (obviously with no prejudice to recreation): they don't bring anything and they give a very unfaithful representation of what AW is (especially now with the RFC or the Wikimania, where many people were telling me things along the line of "oh so it's a tool to make one or two - bad - sentences"...). Cheers, [[User:VIGNERON|VIGNERON]] ([[User talk:VIGNERON|talk]]) 09:06, 27 July 2026 (UTC) :::::I marked the articles that have been update recently, so they slould not be deleted as part of this request. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 09:40, 27 July 2026 (UTC) ::::::There are also some lists articles that have been edited twice: ::::::* [[Q11622280]] ::::::* [[Q11611527]] ::::::* [[Q11381490]] ::::::* [[Q11453224]] ::::::* [[Q11387367]] ::::::* [[Q11611572]] ::::::[[User:Autom|Autom]] ([[User talk:Autom|talk]]) 18:25, 27 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::Do you mean "to be deleted as well"? [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:00, 27 July 2026 (UTC) :::::::{{done}} these --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 03:43, 12 August 2026 (UTC) == Articles created by User:BigKrow == Articles created by @[[User:BigKrow|BigKrow]] do not have any substance: [[Q668755]] Bob Burnquist, [[Q37492190]] Musty and [[Q267298]] battery. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:15, 30 July 2026 (UTC) :{{done}} --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:24, 12 August 2026 (UTC) == Test article == [[Q27318]], literally named test, but using QID for tests/exams. No useful content. [[User:Feedmepaperr|Feedmepaperr]] ([[User talk:Feedmepaperr|talk]]) 02:23, 31 July 2026 (UTC) :{{done}} --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:26, 12 August 2026 (UTC) == Auto created articles using [[f:Z26955]] (DO NOT USE) SPO sentence (singulars in present) == I request that the following auto created aricles of @[[User:Immanuelle|User:Immanuelle]] using [[f:Z26955]] (DO NOT USE) SPO sentence (singulars in present) to be deleted: *[[Q9585]] Shia Islam *[[Q8474]] Suleiman the Magnificent *[[Q48744]] Samukawa Shrine *[[Q48378]] pulley *[[Q1057]] metabolism *[[Q40164]] lever *[[Q7347]] Great Lakes *[[Q656656]] tap *[[Q9134]] mythology *[[Q7925]] rain *[[Q780]] chicken *[[Q85810444]] transformer *[[Q5686]] Charles Dickens *[[Q4617]] Corbin Bleu *<s>[[Q1048]] Julius Caesar</s> Updated recently *[[Q11032]] newspaper *[[Q8502]] mountain *[[Q5300]] central processing unit *[[Q753]] copper *[[Q7200]] Alexander Pushkin *[[Q674]] phosphorus *[[Q622664]] University of California, San Diego *[[Q11368886]] Kuge Inari Shrine *[[Q7725]] evening *[[Q666]] number of the beast *[[Q9420]] thought *[[Q9381]] Adam Smith *[[Q5670]] Abu Nuwas *[[Q890]] Gangnam Style *[[Q1096]] tin *[[Q705154]] Niutsuhime Shrine *[[Q11591100]] saijin *[[Q79]] Egypt *[[Q1299]] The Beatles *[[Q11264]] Cuban Revolution *[[Q34932]] Brisbane *[[Q44578]] Titanic *[[Q876]] selenium *[[Q42646]] Windsor Castle *[[Q1091]] cadmium *[[Q11381872]] Sumiyoshi Shrine *[[Q991]] Fyodor Dostoyevsky *[[Q11420]] judo *[[Q35571]] Fuzhou dialect *[[Q11382]] conservation of energy *[[Q8441]] man *[[Q349]] sport *[[Q8087]] geometry *[[Q11367549]] Nakano Tenman Shrine *[[Q8066]] amino acid *[[Q43229]] organization *[[Q134556]] single *[[Q1394]] Vladimir Lenin *[[Q1038]] zirconium *[[Q11416]] gambling *[[Q837]] Nepal *[[Q339]] Pluto *[[Q573954]] University of Limerick *[[Q35378]] Bac Mòr *[[Q243]] Eiffel Tower *[[Q38076]] McDonald's *[[Q5511]] Lake Tanganyika *[[Q12128]] dentistry *[[Q5891]] philosophy *[[Q160236]] Metropolitan Museum of Art *[[Q1631]] Édith Piaf *[[Q9268]] Judaism *[[Q11557476]] Ichinomiya Asama Shrine *[[Q703633]] Hikawa Shrine *[[Q1653]] Danube *[[Q12870]] explosive chemicals *[[Q11033]] mass media *[[Q15433043]] Moungi Bawendi *[[Q3551]] Rabat *[[Q1867]] Taipei *[[Q6722]] Carl Friedrich Gauss *[[Q9312]] Immanuel Kant *[[Q5597]] Raphael *[[Q12506]] Hagia Sophia *[[Q36600]] The Hague *[[Q5809]] Che Guevara *[[Q77]] Uruguay *[[Q8514]] desert *[[Q6527]] Jean-Jacques Rousseau *[[Q11772]] Ancient Greece *[[Q7946]] mineral [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:53, 1 August 2026 (UTC) == Template:Support == [[Q5056]] is an article made using a QID used exclusively for templates. I cannot connect it to Wikidata because that would involve delinking [[Template:Support]], which is what this QID is meant for. I don't know if it's possible to also just make it impossible to make articles for things like this but that'd be helpful. [[User:Feedmepaperr|Feedmepaperr]] ([[User talk:Feedmepaperr|talk]]) 13:07, 2 August 2026 (UTC) :{{done}} --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:11, 9 August 2026 (UTC) == 1981–82 Western Football League == * [[Q4580255]] Created by a cross-wiki spammer. No meaningful content. [[User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|<span class="skin-invert" style="color:black;font-family:Monotype Corsiva,sans-serif;font-size:110%;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal">NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh</span>]] 17:59, 3 August 2026 (UTC) :{{vote delete}} Not needed. [[User:Jianhui67|Jianhui67]] ([[User talk:Jianhui67|talk]]) 03:44, 4 August 2026 (UTC) :{{done}} --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC) == Wiki == * [[Q171]] (Wiki) poor attempt of an article. No meaningfull content. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 21:30, 6 August 2026 (UTC) *:{{done}} --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 06:07, 9 August 2026 (UTC) == mammal == * [[Q7377]] "Mammal is a Vertebrata." @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] if the only function gives grammatically unsound output, please can you just add it as a (failing) test on the function itself, rather than making a whole article to show the failure. I've had to delete a whole lot of earlier experiments (see above), and I'm concerned that if you don't invest in each article you make, we're going to have to go through a lot of yours too. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 03:51, 12 August 2026 (UTC) == commune of France == * [[Q484170]]: "It is a commune, electoral unit, territorial collectivity of France, LAU 2, fourth-level administrative division and fifth-level administrative division." @[[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] this sentence doesn't really make a lot of sense. I think auto-functions like [[:f:Z39177]] should only be used when their output is acceptable (in at least one language!), otherwise we should invest editing effort to customise what we want to say. (Or wait until there is a better function available.) --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:05, 12 August 2026 (UTC) :Yes, that was a first try (preview does not work on my side). I was on the way of correcting that when the Internet died yesterday. It's up again so I will improve them now. I'm using them as test items as you do with [[Q408]] (by the way I'm also improving the French functions and lexemes using this article as a basis). I would suggest to use the talk page in these cases and not RfD, I think it might more fit the international wiki ''étiquette.'' Or maybe we could have a template or a function mimicking <nowiki>{{in use}}</nowiki>? Cheers. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 11:15, 12 August 2026 (UTC) ::{{withdrawn}} Okay, I'm glad you were not planning to leave it that way. Sorry that you felt bringing it here was impolite. To note in-use, my best suggestion at the moment would be [[:f:Z32220]]. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:58, 12 August 2026 (UTC) :::Thanks! Do you think it would be worth creating an actual function or a function derived from [[f:Z32220]] that would indicate more clearly the article is currently worked on? And where would be the best place to discuss that? (if you think that's needed, cause I can also just go with it). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:12, 12 August 2026 (UTC) ::::Go for it if you want to use it. I think you'll be the first person using it. It might catch on? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:15, 12 August 2026 (UTC) == Blank, test, meaningless, and nonsensical pages == We should really do something about the pages that only use something like [[f:Z26039]] (subject is instance of). These pages provide no substance, are without references, and add to the perception that AW is a half-baked mess. Moreover, many pages by Jsamwrites should be deleted because they are clear tests of his new functions. There should be an actual deletion reason added to [[Abstract Wikipedia:Deletion policy]] which includes any pages created to test a specific function with no clear intent to improve it post-creation. We need ''less'' pages that are ''higher'' quality. That 2,031 number we see on the main page is full of useless pages like these. All of these were pulled from [[Special:ShortPages]]. '''Completely blank pages:''' * [[Q212815]] * [[Q18395344]] * [[Q37492190]] * [[Q135041278]] * [[Q138503695]] ''(despite being redlinks the above pages actually do exist, but are blank)'' * [[Q20053443]] * [[Q138005203]] * [[Q15718485]] * [[Q3957]] * [[Q79037]] * [[Q97169030]] * [[Q140303820]] * [[Q140627851]] * [[Q6250]] * [[Q139424852]] * [[Q597307]] * [[Q13194720]] (singular link to enwiki) * [[Q115632178]] (singular link to enwiki) * [[Q115632204]] (singular link to enwiki) * [[Q137974879]] (singular link to enwiki) * [[Q7701156]] * [[Q2402748]] (just an image) * [[Q124354356]] (just an image) * [[Q65445677]] * [[Q307474]] (just an image) * [[Q48306]] (just an image) '''Monolingual text:''' * [[Q2372824]] (monolingual Russian) * [[Q124710391]] (monolingual English) * [[Q139891201]] (monolingual English) * [[Q140237703]] (monolingual English) '''Pages with no substantial content other than an infobox/table:'''<br /> <small>I'm not including articles that have an infobox that actually includes information about the subject. These are just navigation boxes.</small> * [[Q17422]] * [[Q17900]] * [[Q968159]] * [[Q397469]] * [[Q200034]] * [[Q6517455]] * [[Q1092377]] * [[Q64214281]] * [[Q64605672]] * [[Q85751139]] * [[Q64605651]] * [[Q113071731]] '''Test/nonsensical/useless pages:''' * [[Q102]] (article subject is a word. very good content here) * [[Q8216]] (an alphabet is an alphabet. amazing) * [[Q5148741]] (a person is a human. good to know) * [[Q1357]] (article subject is a taxon, without indication which) * [[Q16035842]] (hearing loss is a hearing disorder. stating the obvious) * [[Q18123741]] (infectious disease is a type of disease. repeating itself) * [[Q3246016]] (for sure just a test page) * [[Q85781149]] (same as above) * [[Q3124]] (same as above) * [[Q3045]] (same as above) * [[Q186030]] (the article content is "Contemporary art is a .") * [[Q982364]] (completely meaningless) [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 05:17, 12 August 2026 (UTC) :Ping @[[User:Jsamwrites|Jsamwrites]] since he was mentioned. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 05:21, 12 August 2026 (UTC) ::Yes, my apologies. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 05:56, 12 August 2026 (UTC) ::@[[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] Personally, I disagree with deleting these pages, especially considering that the project is still in its early stages. While adding a relevant image may seem simple to those of us with a technical background, it is a significant barrier for many other contributors. The same applies to pages that currently consist of a basic "is a" classification sentence. Shouldn't these be viewed as opportunities for improvement? Even a simple sentence stating that something is "a human" or "a taxon" holds foundational value for certain contributors. :: ::"We need fewer pages of higher quality" is a noble ambition, but it falls short when we have so few functions across such a vast number of domains. :: ::To help address this, I have carefully created 31 functions covering domains like Geography, People, Software, and Programming Languages (a complete list is available [[f:User:Jsamwrites#Sentences|here]]). :: ::Regarding the personal part of your message: as you can see from the link, every new function is designed to improve existing articles. You can verify this by looking at [[f:Special:FunctionUsage|function usage]] alongside the creation dates of these pages. Developing a new function takes time—especially given our commitment to multilinguality and the current lack of an API for creation and modification. :: ::Even after all these years, Wikipedia still relies heavily on the concept of "stub articles." We shouldn't prevent contributors from creating basic pages or categories, especially when we don't yet have stub templates to flag them for expansion. :: ::At this early stage, our focus should be on encouraging contributors across different domains—by expanding into new areas, rather than deleting their work. What may seem simple to some of us is often a meaningful contribution to the original creator. ::Thanks @[[User:99of9|99of9]] for pinging me for such an important topic of discussion. ::[[User:Jsamwrites|John Samuel]] ([[User:Jsamwrites|talk]]) 06:04, 12 August 2026 (UTC) :::Hi John, I'm very sorry if I came off frustrated, especially in the test pages section. I've had a long day and I'm tired, rushing my writing without fleshing out thoughts. :::I originally made this list of pages for deletion for the blank pages after taking a look at [[Special:ShortPages]] (all the bullets before the monolingual text section), but as you can, see it has since expanded. Regarding the short articles, I'm mainly concerned with the ones that were created in the opening weeks of AW, the editor has left, and the article has remained incorrect and broken. The only articles in this post that I truly want to delete are those - the rest are up for discussion. :::My thought process about why I want a lot of pages to be deleted is due to the closure discussions over at meta and enwiki. While much of the argument there is seemingly done in bad faith, and I've been increasingly frustrated due to that, they do rightfully point out that many of the two thousand articles are subpar, containing obvious grammatical or factual errors. I agree that many of these pages hold potential for expansion - from my experience, contributors would rather add to an existing article than create an entire one. It's just that as things stand, the quality of these pages bring down the reputation and quality of AW. An admin at a local wiki may be hesitant to include AW pages if they see this content. :::This is ultimately the reason why any other wiki has deletion policies - many of these articles would quality for the English Wikipedia's [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Speedy_deletion#A1._No_context A1 speedy deletion criteria]. The other option, of course, is to improve these pages, but that seems unlikely to me given the amount of pages, the amount of editors, and the effort required to do this. But hey, you could say the same thing about Wikipedia when it came out. :::Another issue comes with the lack of categorization or maintenance templates. I've raised issue with the WMF over at the phabricator, but they seem as willing to implement these as they would be to implement wikitext as a whole. Given this issue, it is hard for editors to even ''find'' these pages to begin with, without browsing the new pages, recent changes, or all pages special pages. :::<br /> :::I'm heading to bed after this, and will not be able to respond until the afternoon tomorrow. What my ultimate thoughts are is that we should remove a lot of the most ''obvious'', ''damaging'' articles. Many can and should stay, especially those that have room for growth as you mentioned. I think this should be done on a case-by-case basis, but I'm not sure how best to describe it. [[User:EatingCarBatteries|EatingCarBatteries]] ([[User talk:EatingCarBatteries|talk]]) 06:50, 12 August 2026 (UTC) :::Surely you don't disagree with deleting *some* of these? Even the blank ones?? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:01, 12 August 2026 (UTC) ::::We're dealing with many good-faith people trying out. I think the focus should be on "how we don't discourage these people from editing Abstract Wikipedia". The other focus is "how we convince people clinking on random article that Abstract Wikipedia is not a complete nonsense". I would be many possibilities for that, three examples : ::::* Deleting blank and monolingual articles but sending a nice message to the users "thank you for trying out, we're removing for now cause we want to focus on a fewer number of articles, here are the good practices if you want to try again". ::::* Just sending a nice message with the good practices, offer help (on-wiki, on another channel?) and reconsider the problem in a few weeks ::::* Block the creation of new articles from now on to encourage people to improve the existing ones (but we also should offer help for that and a better space to experiment with) ::::The important thing here is: how do we care of lost new users (it is a complicated project to understand, took me a few days and I was familiar with Wikifunctions since 2023, with Wikidata since 2012, and with Wikipedia and code since 2010...). [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:25, 12 August 2026 (UTC) :::::Yes, there are lots of new users around at the moment, and it's great to think about how to encourage them. I'll add another idea: rewrite [[Help:How to create an article]] using html functions. Feel free to send nice messages, but please don't require the deleting admin to do that, there are already too many per day for me to keep up with. I oppose blocking the creation of new articles. I think people like to work on what they are connected with. In the last few days I've seen some great fresh starts. E.g. [[Q5753]]. I don't want to discourage new articles, I want to see bad articles either improved or removed. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 13:37, 12 August 2026 (UTC) == Q110268499? == This living person’s notability is not self-evident. Online sources seem to link back to the person’s own content. As a primary source, I don’t find [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Henning-Schmidgen/publication/399101654_Muntadher_Saleh_and_Leonardo_da_Vinci_The_Neo-Renaissance_of_the_Tigris_and_the_Engineering_of_Arabic_Typography/links/694fe61627359023a010d165/Muntadher-Saleh-and-Leonardo-da-Vinci-The-Neo-Renaissance-of-the-Tigris-and-the-Engineering-of-Arabic-Typography?origin=publication_detail&_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uRG93bmxvYWQiLCJwcmV2aW91c1BhZ2UiOiJwdWJsaWNhdGlvbiJ9fQ this article convincing]. I am happy to assume good faith, but I worry about Abstract Wikipedia’s credibility too. [[Abstract Wikipedia talk:Notability#Suggesting even sharper criteria|Comments on our draft policy]] suggest that we might want to see an existing Wikipedia page, and we might want to consider that a higher priority for a living person. Procedurally, when there is no such page, I think we should certainly review notability more carefully, but this is difficult without established criteria. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 13:44, 26 August 2026 (UTC) : Indeed there is no wikipedia article for this person, and that would a reason for deletion. : The Wikidata entry is quite extensive, but sources seem to link back to the person’s own content. : I think the creator of [[Q110268499]] is pushing images of this person on several wikis and is reverted on en.wikipedia and ar.wikipedia. His edits on fr.wikipedia, es.wikipedia and others are not (yet) reverted. It might be in good faith, but the user has a lot of issues, including AI articles. : Article on no.wikipedia wad speedily deleted on basis for AI generated, and speedily deleted several times on en.wikiquote for Not sufficiently notable. : So a lot of reasons for deletion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 22:13, 26 August 2026 (UTC) ::Thank you for the additional information. For the record, I don’t consider the absence of any Wikipedia page conclusive in itself, but I support deletion if no evidence of notability comes forward. There is little enough content [[Q110268499|there]] anyway, so I don’t see a problem with speedy deletion for low value and no links. [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 22:47, 26 August 2026 (UTC) :'''Delete'''. Likely self-promotion. [[User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh|<span class="skin-invert" style="color:black;font-family:Monotype Corsiva,sans-serif;font-size:110%;font-weight:normal;line-height:normal">NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh</span>]] 22:38, 26 August 2026 (UTC) :{{done}} --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 03:41, 1 September 2026 (UTC) == Q313940 == * [[Q313940]] Vandalism '''解浪''' <small>[hɛ.ɾaŋ] ([[User:解浪|U]]/[[User Talk:解浪|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/解浪|C]]/[[Special:GlobalAccount/解浪|CA]])</small> 16:31, 31 August 2026 (UTC) :It looks like the vandalism has been reverted and the article is okay now? --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 03:41, 1 September 2026 (UTC) ::On FAQ/ko not all was reverted yet. I think I corrected the [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abstract_Wikipedia:Frequently_Asked_Questions/ko&diff=prev&oldid=16551 last one] [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:41, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :: Yes It's okay now, but it needs protection. ― '''解浪''' <small>[hɛ.ɾaŋ] ([[User:解浪|U]]/[[User Talk:解浪|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/解浪|C]]/[[Special:GlobalAccount/解浪|CA]])</small> 07:42, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :::Yes please protect it as it is a target of LTA vandalism. [[User:Jianhui67|Jianhui67]] ([[User talk:Jianhui67|talk]]) 03:15, 2 September 2026 (UTC) ::::{{done}} I've semi-protected it for now. Thanks everyone. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 03:19, 2 September 2026 (UTC) == [[Q929731]] == No valid abstract article. --[[User:Ameisenigel|Ameisenigel]] ([[User talk:Ameisenigel|talk]]) 18:08, 1 September 2026 (UTC) Other articles created by {{ping|User:BigKrow}} *[[Q5454630]] fish fry: Fixed English text *[[Q7369]] dolphin: Fixed English text *[[Q482964]] Depeche Mode: Only infobox *[[Q83099]] Jana Gana Mana: Only infobox *[[Q590342]] World of Tanks: Only infobox *[[Q38684]] Bay of Bengal: Only one sentence (Bay of Bengal is part of the Indian Ocean.) *[[Q959362]] gin: Only one sentence (The instance of of gin is liquor) *[[Q1499]] Uttarakhand: Only one sentence (Uttarakhand is a state of India.) *[[Q25280]] Harrisburg: Only one sentenc (The population of Harrisburg was 50,099 in 2020.) *[[Q3957]] town: Only one sentece (Town is part of the country.) [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:03, 4 September 2026 (UTC) == [[Q117462830]] == Blank. [[User:ReXLer|ReXLer]] ([[User talk:ReXLer|talk]]) 19:09, 1 September 2026 (UTC) :{{Done|Deleted}} by 99of9 <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 05:37, 14 September 2026 (UTC) == [[Q939743]] == [[Q939743]] (Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe) is a result of test edits by a new user. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:09, 5 September 2026 (UTC) :I improved the article since those tests. Decent stub now? [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 22:04, 9 September 2026 (UTC) :: OK, article can stay. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:20, 10 September 2026 (UTC) :{{withdrawn}} by OP. <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 12:02, 12 September 2026 (UTC) == [[Q830149]] == This Wikidata ID is for Paris, Texas, but a number of authors appear to have gotten confused and written an article about Paris, France (Q90). Since the existing article for Q90 is much better-developed, it's probably best to delete this, providing a blank slate for anyone who wants to write an article about the correct Paris. [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 20:59, 11 September 2026 (UTC) :{{Done|Deleted}} <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 12:01, 12 September 2026 (UTC) == [[Q141305964]] == I don't think we're ready for this kind of pointed BLP. There is one citation on WD, but not for all the claims, and I'm not sure it meets our expected notability standard. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:47, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :FYI @[[User:Webmaster2024|Webmaster2024]] --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 04:49, 23 September 2026 (UTC) ::Speedy deletion for me. He's known on the niche Internet, afaik. The risk of harm is important. We should also do something on Commons + WD probably. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 11:50, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :::btw, I blanked the page for now given the risk. This is called [[:w:fr:WP:Blanchiment_de_courtoisie]] on frwiki, I don't known the standard use in other ones. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 11:52, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :sorry, I'm new to abstract wiki. I forgot that this page is about BLP [[User:Webmaster2024|Webmaster2024]] ([[User talk:Webmaster2024|talk]]) 20:33, 23 September 2026 (UTC) ::no worries @[[User:Webmaster2024|Webmaster2024]] if that was with a good intention! My advice would be to try out this project with a city you know, or a taxon, etc. Feel free to shout any question! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 23:00, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :{{done}} --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 22:18, 24 September 2026 (UTC) == [[Q37530492]] == {{ping|Diamondarmorstev}} This article is for family name Jupiter not the planet Jupiter, so for the wrong Q-id. The correct one is [[Q319]]. :{{Done|Deleted}} <span style="font-family:monospace;font-weight:bold">[[User:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">~/Bunny</span><span style="color:#2c5282">pranav</span>]]:&lt;[[User talk:Bunnypranav|<span style="color:#63b3ed">ping</span>]]&gt;</span> 06:04, 26 September 2026 (UTC) eoahnhds5mdl2d65yb9hl0mpzeq1hsw 5 2323 22253 9717 2026-09-25T15:33:20Z ValWinter 4969 /* Working towards a general ideal abstract article */ new section 22253 wikitext text/x-wiki == self-description == There should be articles for Q-numbers linked to project space pages on this wiki, so that guidance documents have an abstract content equivalent. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:23, 18 April 2026 (UTC) : I support the idea morally, but I don't think AW is currently capable of handling meta-content yet. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 23:37, 18 April 2026 (UTC) :: Which is why I think it can be a goal to work toward, and a progressive test of capability. See list at [[user:Arlo Barnes#core|my userpage]]. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:26, 19 April 2026 (UTC) ::: I'm not certain that's how we want to use [[d:Q14204246]] instances. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 21:23, 19 April 2026 (UTC) :::: To what use should they be put then, if any? — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:25, 19 April 2026 (UTC) ::::: To describe the topics encyclopedically? [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 11:49, 11 May 2026 (UTC) :::::: But if we are going by Wikidata sitelinks, the topics are various project and help namespace pages on separate wikis, including this one — as a sort of [[Q1549285]]. Or maybe the line between stating what said pages are used for, and what their basic use ''is'' doesn't distinguish as much as I might initially think. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 12:02, 11 May 2026 (UTC) == Adding Item labels == I think it is helpful to see directly at the page the item labels of the proposed core articles and a link to the item. At my user page I tried it with {{Q|868}} and it did not show a label. In Wikifunctions I got the english Label. What do you think about adding the Template Q to the items to show a label. [[User:Hogü-456|Hogü-456]] ([[User talk:Hogü-456|talk]]) 19:51, 19 April 2026 (UTC) :Seems like the Q template import at Abstract Wikipedia needs something else to actually retrieve the labels, then. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 April 2026 (UTC) ::It is possible to add a language explicit in the template as an argument. This requires translating the Wikiproject page to enable people to view item labels in different languages. As Abstract Wikipedia has the goal of making content available in more languages I think this is an important point to be not too much english centered. [[User:Hogü-456|Hogü-456]] ([[User talk:Hogü-456|talk]]) 19:35, 24 April 2026 (UTC) :::{{q|505335}} ([[Q505335]]) for example has a 'mul' label, it should display that by default. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 19:59, 24 April 2026 (UTC) : Being bold here: I added the template Q for the labels. It also links to wikidata and shows the (same) wikidate Q-id with a link). The links to wikidata and the Q-id are not needed, so maybe an alternitve template to only show the text of tha labes could fix that. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 16:59, 3 May 2026 (UTC) ::There is [[Template:Label]] for showing only the label of an item. So for example <code><nowiki>{{label|Q97|link=wikidata}}</nowiki></code>. So far the link is not leading to Wikidata as expected. So the templates needs improvement or same changes in Abstract Wikipedia. I link it is useful if the link leads to the Wikidata item. As it can help learning about what an item is about and to see what content is available in Wikidata so far. [[User:Hogü-456|Hogü-456]] ([[User talk:Hogü-456|talk]]) 19:17, 4 May 2026 (UTC) :::<code><nowiki>{{label|Q97|link=-}}</nowiki></code> shows the label text only. So fro example :::# [[Q97]] {{label|Q97|link=-}} :::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:16, 5 May 2026 (UTC) :::: Or <code><nowiki>[[Q97]] {{label|Q97|link=-}} ([https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q97 Wikidata link]</nowiki></code>) gives ::::# [[Q97]] {{label|Q97|link=-}} ([https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q97 Wikidata link]) :::: [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:27, 5 May 2026 (UTC) == Missing Templates in Abstract Wikipedia == I currently do not know if there are created templates on this platform to aid in article creation because I currently find creating or editing abstract Wikipedia more tedious instead of it making life simpler for both humans and machines since we were using Wikifunctions and Wikidata as our backbone. I contacted @[[User:Hogü-456|Hogü-456]] to see if he had answers but he said I could post it here for a wider discussion. Thinking out loud, I think if we could create standard templates for articles on various subjects, category and topics of interest, that will get us much closer to the overall dream of abstract Wikipedia and automatically pull in people with non-technical background. For example, the way the article for [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q408 Australia] could be used as yardstick for creating articles for a country and once a template is created for country level article creation, we could even have bots create these articles under the approval of human. There are some other beautiful articles already we could use it's structure to create a master template for any of the following: * Plants * Animals * Disease * Biographies * Countries * Wikimedia affiliates * ETC... Again, Wikidata powered infobox dubbed Databox makes articles beautiful and would make our articles great. [[User:Dnshitobu|Dnshitobu]] ([[User talk:Dnshitobu|talk]]) 08:25, 11 May 2026 (UTC) :Of course. I think [[Q49613|year intros]] are also somewhat inspiring, they don't create ''great'' content, but it's somewhat useful. Each "template article" (which we might require to obtain featured status) might have some of its own functions created for it that will need to be made multilingual. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 12:05, 11 May 2026 (UTC) :: Question: Would it be possible to add infoboxes to Abstract Wikipedia articles? Infoboxes generated fully from Wikidata will provide a wealth of data, like template:Wikidata Infobox on Commons. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:46, 11 May 2026 (UTC) :::I don't see why not. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 15:51, 11 May 2026 (UTC) == Working towards a general ideal abstract article == Instead of different people working on their own articles, what if as a group we worked on a few articles together? Just to create a list of good quality articles people can reference as they start to contribute. I have not seen an article that is more than a few sentences long. The reason I do not create long articles is because I am still learning how to use this software and I assume that is the reason for many others as well. If we all 'chipped in' to a few chosen articles per month (or something similar) we would become more familiar with this platform AND get much closer to having good quality articles. [[User:ValWinter|ValWinter]] ([[User talk:ValWinter|talk]]) 15:33, 25 September 2026 (UTC) qvpy2tu6k0u4uk4qbw7tlnvbng7ak9w 22257 22253 2026-09-25T20:42:52Z ValWinter 4969 /* Working towards a general ideal abstract article */ Reply 22257 wikitext text/x-wiki == self-description == There should be articles for Q-numbers linked to project space pages on this wiki, so that guidance documents have an abstract content equivalent. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:23, 18 April 2026 (UTC) : I support the idea morally, but I don't think AW is currently capable of handling meta-content yet. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 23:37, 18 April 2026 (UTC) :: Which is why I think it can be a goal to work toward, and a progressive test of capability. See list at [[user:Arlo Barnes#core|my userpage]]. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 07:26, 19 April 2026 (UTC) ::: I'm not certain that's how we want to use [[d:Q14204246]] instances. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 21:23, 19 April 2026 (UTC) :::: To what use should they be put then, if any? — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:25, 19 April 2026 (UTC) ::::: To describe the topics encyclopedically? [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 11:49, 11 May 2026 (UTC) :::::: But if we are going by Wikidata sitelinks, the topics are various project and help namespace pages on separate wikis, including this one — as a sort of [[Q1549285]]. Or maybe the line between stating what said pages are used for, and what their basic use ''is'' doesn't distinguish as much as I might initially think. — [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 12:02, 11 May 2026 (UTC) == Adding Item labels == I think it is helpful to see directly at the page the item labels of the proposed core articles and a link to the item. At my user page I tried it with {{Q|868}} and it did not show a label. In Wikifunctions I got the english Label. What do you think about adding the Template Q to the items to show a label. [[User:Hogü-456|Hogü-456]] ([[User talk:Hogü-456|talk]]) 19:51, 19 April 2026 (UTC) :Seems like the Q template import at Abstract Wikipedia needs something else to actually retrieve the labels, then. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 21:50, 19 April 2026 (UTC) ::It is possible to add a language explicit in the template as an argument. This requires translating the Wikiproject page to enable people to view item labels in different languages. As Abstract Wikipedia has the goal of making content available in more languages I think this is an important point to be not too much english centered. [[User:Hogü-456|Hogü-456]] ([[User talk:Hogü-456|talk]]) 19:35, 24 April 2026 (UTC) :::{{q|505335}} ([[Q505335]]) for example has a 'mul' label, it should display that by default. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 19:59, 24 April 2026 (UTC) : Being bold here: I added the template Q for the labels. It also links to wikidata and shows the (same) wikidate Q-id with a link). The links to wikidata and the Q-id are not needed, so maybe an alternitve template to only show the text of tha labes could fix that. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 16:59, 3 May 2026 (UTC) ::There is [[Template:Label]] for showing only the label of an item. So for example <code><nowiki>{{label|Q97|link=wikidata}}</nowiki></code>. So far the link is not leading to Wikidata as expected. So the templates needs improvement or same changes in Abstract Wikipedia. I link it is useful if the link leads to the Wikidata item. As it can help learning about what an item is about and to see what content is available in Wikidata so far. [[User:Hogü-456|Hogü-456]] ([[User talk:Hogü-456|talk]]) 19:17, 4 May 2026 (UTC) :::<code><nowiki>{{label|Q97|link=-}}</nowiki></code> shows the label text only. So fro example :::# [[Q97]] {{label|Q97|link=-}} :::[[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:16, 5 May 2026 (UTC) :::: Or <code><nowiki>[[Q97]] {{label|Q97|link=-}} ([https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q97 Wikidata link]</nowiki></code>) gives ::::# [[Q97]] {{label|Q97|link=-}} ([https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q97 Wikidata link]) :::: [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 11:27, 5 May 2026 (UTC) == Missing Templates in Abstract Wikipedia == I currently do not know if there are created templates on this platform to aid in article creation because I currently find creating or editing abstract Wikipedia more tedious instead of it making life simpler for both humans and machines since we were using Wikifunctions and Wikidata as our backbone. I contacted @[[User:Hogü-456|Hogü-456]] to see if he had answers but he said I could post it here for a wider discussion. Thinking out loud, I think if we could create standard templates for articles on various subjects, category and topics of interest, that will get us much closer to the overall dream of abstract Wikipedia and automatically pull in people with non-technical background. For example, the way the article for [https://abstract.wikipedia.org/view/en/Q408 Australia] could be used as yardstick for creating articles for a country and once a template is created for country level article creation, we could even have bots create these articles under the approval of human. There are some other beautiful articles already we could use it's structure to create a master template for any of the following: * Plants * Animals * Disease * Biographies * Countries * Wikimedia affiliates * ETC... Again, Wikidata powered infobox dubbed Databox makes articles beautiful and would make our articles great. [[User:Dnshitobu|Dnshitobu]] ([[User talk:Dnshitobu|talk]]) 08:25, 11 May 2026 (UTC) :Of course. I think [[Q49613|year intros]] are also somewhat inspiring, they don't create ''great'' content, but it's somewhat useful. Each "template article" (which we might require to obtain featured status) might have some of its own functions created for it that will need to be made multilingual. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 12:05, 11 May 2026 (UTC) :: Question: Would it be possible to add infoboxes to Abstract Wikipedia articles? Infoboxes generated fully from Wikidata will provide a wealth of data, like template:Wikidata Infobox on Commons. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 15:46, 11 May 2026 (UTC) :::I don't see why not. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 15:51, 11 May 2026 (UTC) == Working towards a general ideal abstract article == Instead of different people working on their own articles, what if as a group we worked on a few articles together? Just to create a list of good quality articles people can reference as they start to contribute. I have not seen an article that is more than a few sentences long. The reason I do not create long articles is because I am still learning how to use this software and I assume that is the reason for many others as well. If we all 'chipped in' to a few chosen articles per month (or something similar) we would become more familiar with this platform AND get much closer to having good quality articles. [[User:ValWinter|ValWinter]] ([[User talk:ValWinter|talk]]) 15:33, 25 September 2026 (UTC) :I found this under the [[Special:SpecialPages|Special pages]] section titled [[Special:MostRevisions|Pages with the most revisions]]. The number of revisions shows a clue to how long an article is, with the current largest being [[Q408|Australia]]. Maybe we could look through these and pick which ones to start bringing up to a good quality. [[User:ValWinter|ValWinter]] ([[User talk:ValWinter|talk]]) 20:42, 25 September 2026 (UTC) 79kpwokzchtqqfen4m5hbp326ok6rhw 5 3028 22249 22224 2026-09-25T13:33:46Z Ornithorynque liminaire 6476 /* Even even sharper criteria */ Reply 22249 wikitext text/x-wiki == Suggesting even sharper criteria == While the current proposal is a bit sharper than the Wikidata notability criteria, I would like to propose to have it even sharper. I think that a Wikidata item should need at least one Wikipedia language sitelink to have Abstract notability. I think of two arguments for this. a) If no one bothered to write about it in ''any'' human language, is it really notable? b) Or perhaps they did, but it was deleted as not notable in all languages tried so far. Are we then opening some doors for people to still be able to "write" about very niche topics? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small>^{[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]}_{[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]}</small> 19:10, 18 May 2026 (UTC) :I'm inclined to agree. Writing an abstract article is much, much harder than writing a concrete article. If a topic truly is notable, the author can probably throw together an article in a Wikipedia of any of the languages they speak. If it does miss anything that is actually legitimate to include, well, we're not a bureaucracy, so we can just keep it. Perhaps a note that deletion should be avoided for articles that are obviously notable, but just don't have a concrete Wikipedia article. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 19:17, 18 May 2026 (UTC) :I don't know if this is a great standard, since it would mean that our notability standard would depend on two factors on which I would rather not rely: (a) the languages the article author knows, and (b) the notability standards of other projects. English Wikipedia has quite high notability standards, so I can understand why someone would be less willing to make an article there. And if they only know English, they wouldn't be able to make one anywhere else. [[User:JJPMaster|JJP]]_{[[User talk:JJPMaster|Mas]]_{[[Special:Contributions/JJPMaster|ter]]}} ([[Q1270787|she]]/[[Q3437264|they]]) 19:44, 18 May 2026 (UTC) ::This is true, we shouldn't discriminate against prospective contributors because they know fewer languages, nor should we allow people who know languages with small Wikipedias to write about whatever they want. Perhaps we could require that it be "possible to write a reasonable encyclopedic entry about the topic"? This, however, is incredibly vague, leaving a lot of wiggle room to sysops/RfD voters. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 19:54, 18 May 2026 (UTC) ::It sounds like you are arguing for a right to be able to escape the notability criteria of Wikipedias by writing here. I'll flip that around to a question. If they only know English, and can't write about the topic on English Wikipedia, why ''should'' they be allowed to write about that specific topic here? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small>^{[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]}_{[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]}</small> 20:01, 18 May 2026 (UTC) :::The question to ask is why ''shouldn't'' they. It's a wiki, so you're able to add content by default. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 20:03, 18 May 2026 (UTC) ::::Well, if they are allowed to write about anything technically possible, the same argument could go for what they write about it: "anything should be allowed, it's a wiki". I think that is a very weak argument in our movement, that's more of an argument for self-hosted wikis. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small>^{[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]}_{[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]}</small> 06:23, 19 May 2026 (UTC) :::::I don't mean people should be able to write whatever they want, I mean, philosophically, the burden of proof should be on those who want to restrict. Blog-like content takes up space and bandwith, detracting from our mission of allowing everyone to share in the sum of human knowledge. I mean content should be blacklisted, not whitelisted. Your argument about "if they only know English, and can't write about the topic on English Wikipedia, why should they be allowed to write about that specific topic here?" requires more explanation to show why there should be an active prohibition. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 15:17, 19 May 2026 (UTC) ::::::I was mainly thinking that since this specific topic won't be imported to English Wikipedia, and that particular user only could verify the (effectively useless) output in English, it just seem like a waste of everyone's time and resources. ::::::I'm not sure we need hard rules for checking the output, but I would really hope that when creating an article, there is a presumption that one should check that it looks okay in at least one language and not create them blindly and move on. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small>^{[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]}_{[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]}</small> 14:52, 20 May 2026 (UTC) :I think I agree with Ainali here. --[[User:Ameisenigel|Ameisenigel]] ([[User talk:Ameisenigel|talk]]) 18:40, 21 May 2026 (UTC) :I like the way the policy is right now. Abstract Wikipedia aims to be language-independent, so I don't think it should restrict itself to articles that have already been created in a specific language. Yes, it may abstract information present in existing articles some or even most of the time, but so long as <small>"[the item] refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references"</small> I don't see why entirely new articles shouldn't be allowed. I think it's important to consider those without a Wikipedia in their language (albeit a minority) and more so those who come to Abstract Wikipedia to contribute information in a completely abstract way from the get-go. Some articles on the language Wikipedias are translated, while others are entirely new. Why should Abstract Wikipedia be any different? I'm not saying there should be articles for everything, but so long as a real article can be constructed, where's the harm? Ultimately it comes down to if the project should literally abstract and aggregate Wikipedia ''as we know it'', or if it should become its own universal collaborative encyclopedia. [[User:Some helpful person|Some helpful person]] ([[User talk:Some helpful person|talk]]) 22:15, 22 May 2026 (UTC) ::I think you are touching on an important aspect. And the question I wonder about is: Are articles created here primarily meant to be consumed in client Wikipedias, or do we want ''this project'' to be where readers go?. If the second, I agree that it doesn't make sense to be restricted by existing articles in other languages (although then I think we need to establish proper notability criteria like the Wikipedias rather than Wikidata). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small>^{[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]}_{[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]}</small> 09:35, 23 May 2026 (UTC) I would like the notability criteria still a bit sharper: # To be notable the Wikidata item should need at least one Wikipedia language sitelink to have Abstract notability (as proposed above). # If oldest Wikipedia link is newer than 30 days (or so) the Abstract Wikipedia article may be speedily deleted. This is to prevent promotional articles. 30 days is longer as usual. AW would be a perfect place to spread promotion in all languages. This does NOT imply that the article SHOULD be deleted. It is perfectly acceptable to add a range of articles on a Wikipedia, Wikidata and Abstract Wikipedia in one flow, if the community think that is OK. # All facts mentioned in the Abstract Wikipedia article should be present in the linked Wikipedia(s), Wikidata or other Wikimedia projects articles, or closely related articles. This is to prevent fan cruft, only to be maintained in AW. # The provided output should be checked by the author. It should be OK in at least one of the languages the article author knows. I am in doubt what to do when new additions will break the output in for example English, or any language the author knows. PS: Babel templates on the user page would preferably be mandatory. :These proposal is not because I am an Deletionist. In fact I consider myself an Inclusionist. I really think this is needed to prevent promotional articles, unverified facts, articles that do not produce a proper sentence etc. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 22:09, 26 May 2026 (UTC) ::I have to respectfully disagree. I definitely share your concern about spam/promotional articles, but I think you're adding too much work for editors. This is a volunteer project, and the number of people willing to contribute is already low, plus this proposal would just outsource the problem to other wikis. I haven't been convinced we can't adequately prevent spam just like other wikis do, by identifying the spam, nominating it for deletion, and having a sysop delete it. I think this proposal is sort of like [[w:Transportation Security Administration|TSA]] in the US, it wastes tens of millennia of human time per year and still only has a 20% success rate. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 22:42, 26 May 2026 (UTC) :::My concern is that one edit can have a large affect. Like one promotional article will be shown o on ALL Wikipedia's (showing AW content), Like adding a complex sentence that only works for English, but will break the whole paragraph in all other languages, A bot operator adding thousands of articles that are poorly formatted, etc. etc. But all is open for discussion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 27 May 2026 (UTC) :Do you anticipate humans mainly checking these criteria, or should a bot check on sitelinks for example? [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 22:17, 26 May 2026 (UTC) ::My thought are that humans would check these. If bots can do it it would be very helpful of course. On the English WP any addition should be referenced, and the reference should contains the facts presented. This feels similar to me. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 22:34, 26 May 2026 (UTC) :I agree with Feeglgeef, this seems like something that would take a lot of manpower to enforce. Also, I think this reflects a "literally abstract Wikipedia" approach to the project. I'm curious if AW is solely meant to translate existing articles (the introduction suggests it's a replacement for machine translation) or if it should become its own language-independent Wikipedia (encouraging new information)? [[User:Some helpful person|Some helpful person]] ([[User talk:Some helpful person|talk]]) 01:51, 27 May 2026 (UTC) ::I think both are true: it requires existing sources, and summaries/relevances of the sources, in order to start; but inevitably it will be independent simply due to being a separate wiki, even if it is to be regarded as being mainly 'for' imports to natural language wikis. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 03:11, 27 May 2026 (UTC) *Test case: One class of article I've been pondering is chemical compounds. I think they'd meet the current criteria, but not always the sharper criteria proposed above. A basic article for a molecule may be easier to write on AW than it is on any language, because many facts could be either drawn from Wikidata or templated as a calculation based on that data. This is the kind of article that even English Wiki might want to transclude. I'd be interested in hearing whether you think they are in or out. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:38, 27 May 2026 (UTC) *:Interesting point. I think this could even be avoided if we get to create "template" articles here, but to be honest, I haven't heard about those in such a long time I am not sure if they are still in the road map. (As I remember them, we just create one template to reuse for all chemical compounds, soccer players, human settlements, etc. so that we don't need to "write" them separately, and also can improve them all at once.) <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small>^{[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]}_{[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]}</small> 14:04, 27 May 2026 (UTC) *::The only criteria that would be blocking here is to have at least one Wikipedia language sitelink. I see the chemical compounds to be an addition to the English Wikipedia I think it is very unlikely that English Wikipedia, or any large Wikipedia will consider to allow AW entries in their Wikipedia. And maybe a request for exceptions can be honored in case by case basis. In my opinion it is very useful to have this rule to prevent promotional articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:53, 27 May 2026 (UTC) *:::I don't really see how natural language wikis could prevent copying and pasting from rendered output of an abstract article; as long as the attribution is intact, it would be analogous to copying from a public domain ''Britannica'' article. But probably most would turn off the option to import automatically. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 15:06, 27 May 2026 (UTC) == Even even sharper criteria == Hi, I see two main risks for the project: * Making very accessible knowledge and ontologies shaped by occidentals while not having access to alternatives (lack of global neutrality) * Facilitated cross-wiki vandalism (hate against people, advertisements, etc.) Given we are still in the first steps of the project, I would suggest for now: * AW articles should already exist in at least 5 Wikipedias, with sufficient diversity (for instance, with articles from languages of at least 2 different continents, or national+local language for a small town in Europe, etc.) * AW article from at least 10 Wikipedias for living people. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:49, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :Five Wikipedias seems too restrictive: [[Q3087908]], one of the "pilot articles", just barely squeaks by. It's got articles in German, English, French, Dutch, and Chinese (plus articles in the Swedish and Cebuano botipedias). [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:51, 23 September 2026 (UTC) ::Well : it squeaks by. The risk with taxons is lower (still note that's an article about a species that's endemic from America with no linguistic version in any native american language - how much knowledge do we miss here?) but still exist. With this criterion we still have hundreds of thousands of articles to start with. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 07:14, 24 September 2026 (UTC) :::{{OK}} Your proposal makes sense for now, as we are in the beta phase. Later on we might to decide to lower the limits to 2 and 5 or so. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:43, 24 September 2026 (UTC) :These may be useful guidelines but I would hesitate to make them a rule. Articles with little content and few sources can be nominated for deletion without questioning the subject’s notability. Especially in the case of a person, we should be more concerned that the article’s assertions provide good-quality sources, and these may also help to establish notability. But contributors should be aware that their hard work in constructing a “good enough” article will go to waste if the subject is not notable. I think it would be good practice, therefore, for low-quality articles to be nominated for deletion with a stated view on whether notability is doubtful (for example, because few Wikipedia editions have an article on the subject). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:27, 24 September 2026 (UTC) ::Good point. Better as a guideline that an rule for now, and actual cases will give us some matter to discuss more adapted limits in some cases for the future! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:33, 25 September 2026 (UTC) h43rvuqni9rnonh1plumgr1x4yndu9k 22259 22249 2026-09-26T10:02:10Z HenkvD 1447 /* Even even sharper criteria */ Reply 22259 wikitext text/x-wiki == Suggesting even sharper criteria == While the current proposal is a bit sharper than the Wikidata notability criteria, I would like to propose to have it even sharper. I think that a Wikidata item should need at least one Wikipedia language sitelink to have Abstract notability. I think of two arguments for this. a) If no one bothered to write about it in ''any'' human language, is it really notable? b) Or perhaps they did, but it was deleted as not notable in all languages tried so far. Are we then opening some doors for people to still be able to "write" about very niche topics? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small>^{[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]}_{[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]}</small> 19:10, 18 May 2026 (UTC) :I'm inclined to agree. Writing an abstract article is much, much harder than writing a concrete article. If a topic truly is notable, the author can probably throw together an article in a Wikipedia of any of the languages they speak. If it does miss anything that is actually legitimate to include, well, we're not a bureaucracy, so we can just keep it. Perhaps a note that deletion should be avoided for articles that are obviously notable, but just don't have a concrete Wikipedia article. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 19:17, 18 May 2026 (UTC) :I don't know if this is a great standard, since it would mean that our notability standard would depend on two factors on which I would rather not rely: (a) the languages the article author knows, and (b) the notability standards of other projects. English Wikipedia has quite high notability standards, so I can understand why someone would be less willing to make an article there. And if they only know English, they wouldn't be able to make one anywhere else. [[User:JJPMaster|JJP]]_{[[User talk:JJPMaster|Mas]]_{[[Special:Contributions/JJPMaster|ter]]}} ([[Q1270787|she]]/[[Q3437264|they]]) 19:44, 18 May 2026 (UTC) ::This is true, we shouldn't discriminate against prospective contributors because they know fewer languages, nor should we allow people who know languages with small Wikipedias to write about whatever they want. Perhaps we could require that it be "possible to write a reasonable encyclopedic entry about the topic"? This, however, is incredibly vague, leaving a lot of wiggle room to sysops/RfD voters. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 19:54, 18 May 2026 (UTC) ::It sounds like you are arguing for a right to be able to escape the notability criteria of Wikipedias by writing here. I'll flip that around to a question. If they only know English, and can't write about the topic on English Wikipedia, why ''should'' they be allowed to write about that specific topic here? <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small>^{[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]}_{[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]}</small> 20:01, 18 May 2026 (UTC) :::The question to ask is why ''shouldn't'' they. It's a wiki, so you're able to add content by default. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 20:03, 18 May 2026 (UTC) ::::Well, if they are allowed to write about anything technically possible, the same argument could go for what they write about it: "anything should be allowed, it's a wiki". I think that is a very weak argument in our movement, that's more of an argument for self-hosted wikis. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small>^{[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]}_{[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]}</small> 06:23, 19 May 2026 (UTC) :::::I don't mean people should be able to write whatever they want, I mean, philosophically, the burden of proof should be on those who want to restrict. Blog-like content takes up space and bandwith, detracting from our mission of allowing everyone to share in the sum of human knowledge. I mean content should be blacklisted, not whitelisted. Your argument about "if they only know English, and can't write about the topic on English Wikipedia, why should they be allowed to write about that specific topic here?" requires more explanation to show why there should be an active prohibition. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 15:17, 19 May 2026 (UTC) ::::::I was mainly thinking that since this specific topic won't be imported to English Wikipedia, and that particular user only could verify the (effectively useless) output in English, it just seem like a waste of everyone's time and resources. ::::::I'm not sure we need hard rules for checking the output, but I would really hope that when creating an article, there is a presumption that one should check that it looks okay in at least one language and not create them blindly and move on. <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small>^{[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]}_{[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]}</small> 14:52, 20 May 2026 (UTC) :I think I agree with Ainali here. --[[User:Ameisenigel|Ameisenigel]] ([[User talk:Ameisenigel|talk]]) 18:40, 21 May 2026 (UTC) :I like the way the policy is right now. Abstract Wikipedia aims to be language-independent, so I don't think it should restrict itself to articles that have already been created in a specific language. Yes, it may abstract information present in existing articles some or even most of the time, but so long as <small>"[the item] refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references"</small> I don't see why entirely new articles shouldn't be allowed. I think it's important to consider those without a Wikipedia in their language (albeit a minority) and more so those who come to Abstract Wikipedia to contribute information in a completely abstract way from the get-go. Some articles on the language Wikipedias are translated, while others are entirely new. Why should Abstract Wikipedia be any different? I'm not saying there should be articles for everything, but so long as a real article can be constructed, where's the harm? Ultimately it comes down to if the project should literally abstract and aggregate Wikipedia ''as we know it'', or if it should become its own universal collaborative encyclopedia. [[User:Some helpful person|Some helpful person]] ([[User talk:Some helpful person|talk]]) 22:15, 22 May 2026 (UTC) ::I think you are touching on an important aspect. And the question I wonder about is: Are articles created here primarily meant to be consumed in client Wikipedias, or do we want ''this project'' to be where readers go?. If the second, I agree that it doesn't make sense to be restricted by existing articles in other languages (although then I think we need to establish proper notability criteria like the Wikipedias rather than Wikidata). <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small>^{[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]}_{[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]}</small> 09:35, 23 May 2026 (UTC) I would like the notability criteria still a bit sharper: # To be notable the Wikidata item should need at least one Wikipedia language sitelink to have Abstract notability (as proposed above). # If oldest Wikipedia link is newer than 30 days (or so) the Abstract Wikipedia article may be speedily deleted. This is to prevent promotional articles. 30 days is longer as usual. AW would be a perfect place to spread promotion in all languages. This does NOT imply that the article SHOULD be deleted. It is perfectly acceptable to add a range of articles on a Wikipedia, Wikidata and Abstract Wikipedia in one flow, if the community think that is OK. # All facts mentioned in the Abstract Wikipedia article should be present in the linked Wikipedia(s), Wikidata or other Wikimedia projects articles, or closely related articles. This is to prevent fan cruft, only to be maintained in AW. # The provided output should be checked by the author. It should be OK in at least one of the languages the article author knows. I am in doubt what to do when new additions will break the output in for example English, or any language the author knows. PS: Babel templates on the user page would preferably be mandatory. :These proposal is not because I am an Deletionist. In fact I consider myself an Inclusionist. I really think this is needed to prevent promotional articles, unverified facts, articles that do not produce a proper sentence etc. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 22:09, 26 May 2026 (UTC) ::I have to respectfully disagree. I definitely share your concern about spam/promotional articles, but I think you're adding too much work for editors. This is a volunteer project, and the number of people willing to contribute is already low, plus this proposal would just outsource the problem to other wikis. I haven't been convinced we can't adequately prevent spam just like other wikis do, by identifying the spam, nominating it for deletion, and having a sysop delete it. I think this proposal is sort of like [[w:Transportation Security Administration|TSA]] in the US, it wastes tens of millennia of human time per year and still only has a 20% success rate. [[User:Feeglgeef|Feeglgeef]] ([[User talk:Feeglgeef|talk]]) 22:42, 26 May 2026 (UTC) :::My concern is that one edit can have a large affect. Like one promotional article will be shown o on ALL Wikipedia's (showing AW content), Like adding a complex sentence that only works for English, but will break the whole paragraph in all other languages, A bot operator adding thousands of articles that are poorly formatted, etc. etc. But all is open for discussion. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 08:44, 27 May 2026 (UTC) :Do you anticipate humans mainly checking these criteria, or should a bot check on sitelinks for example? [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 22:17, 26 May 2026 (UTC) ::My thought are that humans would check these. If bots can do it it would be very helpful of course. On the English WP any addition should be referenced, and the reference should contains the facts presented. This feels similar to me. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 22:34, 26 May 2026 (UTC) :I agree with Feeglgeef, this seems like something that would take a lot of manpower to enforce. Also, I think this reflects a "literally abstract Wikipedia" approach to the project. I'm curious if AW is solely meant to translate existing articles (the introduction suggests it's a replacement for machine translation) or if it should become its own language-independent Wikipedia (encouraging new information)? [[User:Some helpful person|Some helpful person]] ([[User talk:Some helpful person|talk]]) 01:51, 27 May 2026 (UTC) ::I think both are true: it requires existing sources, and summaries/relevances of the sources, in order to start; but inevitably it will be independent simply due to being a separate wiki, even if it is to be regarded as being mainly 'for' imports to natural language wikis. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 03:11, 27 May 2026 (UTC) *Test case: One class of article I've been pondering is chemical compounds. I think they'd meet the current criteria, but not always the sharper criteria proposed above. A basic article for a molecule may be easier to write on AW than it is on any language, because many facts could be either drawn from Wikidata or templated as a calculation based on that data. This is the kind of article that even English Wiki might want to transclude. I'd be interested in hearing whether you think they are in or out. --[[User:99of9|99of9]] ([[User talk:99of9|talk]]) 12:38, 27 May 2026 (UTC) *:Interesting point. I think this could even be avoided if we get to create "template" articles here, but to be honest, I haven't heard about those in such a long time I am not sure if they are still in the road map. (As I remember them, we just create one template to reuse for all chemical compounds, soccer players, human settlements, etc. so that we don't need to "write" them separately, and also can improve them all at once.) <span style="color:#EAA">♥</span>[[User:Ainali|Ainali]] <small>^{[[User talk:Ainali|discussion]]}_{[[Special:Contributions/Ainali|contributions]]}</small> 14:04, 27 May 2026 (UTC) *::The only criteria that would be blocking here is to have at least one Wikipedia language sitelink. I see the chemical compounds to be an addition to the English Wikipedia I think it is very unlikely that English Wikipedia, or any large Wikipedia will consider to allow AW entries in their Wikipedia. And maybe a request for exceptions can be honored in case by case basis. In my opinion it is very useful to have this rule to prevent promotional articles. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 14:53, 27 May 2026 (UTC) *:::I don't really see how natural language wikis could prevent copying and pasting from rendered output of an abstract article; as long as the attribution is intact, it would be analogous to copying from a public domain ''Britannica'' article. But probably most would turn off the option to import automatically. [[User:Arlo Barnes|Arlo Barnes]] ([[User talk:Arlo Barnes|talk]]) 15:06, 27 May 2026 (UTC) == Even even sharper criteria == Hi, I see two main risks for the project: * Making very accessible knowledge and ontologies shaped by occidentals while not having access to alternatives (lack of global neutrality) * Facilitated cross-wiki vandalism (hate against people, advertisements, etc.) Given we are still in the first steps of the project, I would suggest for now: * AW articles should already exist in at least 5 Wikipedias, with sufficient diversity (for instance, with articles from languages of at least 2 different continents, or national+local language for a small town in Europe, etc.) * AW article from at least 10 Wikipedias for living people. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 19:49, 23 September 2026 (UTC) :Five Wikipedias seems too restrictive: [[Q3087908]], one of the "pilot articles", just barely squeaks by. It's got articles in German, English, French, Dutch, and Chinese (plus articles in the Swedish and Cebuano botipedias). [[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 23:51, 23 September 2026 (UTC) ::Well : it squeaks by. The risk with taxons is lower (still note that's an article about a species that's endemic from America with no linguistic version in any native american language - how much knowledge do we miss here?) but still exist. With this criterion we still have hundreds of thousands of articles to start with. [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 07:14, 24 September 2026 (UTC) :::{{OK}} Your proposal makes sense for now, as we are in the beta phase. Later on we might to decide to lower the limits to 2 and 5 or so. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 07:43, 24 September 2026 (UTC) :These may be useful guidelines but I would hesitate to make them a rule. Articles with little content and few sources can be nominated for deletion without questioning the subject’s notability. Especially in the case of a person, we should be more concerned that the article’s assertions provide good-quality sources, and these may also help to establish notability. But contributors should be aware that their hard work in constructing a “good enough” article will go to waste if the subject is not notable. I think it would be good practice, therefore, for low-quality articles to be nominated for deletion with a stated view on whether notability is doubtful (for example, because few Wikipedia editions have an article on the subject). [[User:GrounderUK|GrounderUK]] ([[User talk:GrounderUK|talk]]) 09:27, 24 September 2026 (UTC) ::Good point. Better as a guideline that an rule for now, and actual cases will give us some matter to discuss more adapted limits in some cases for the future! [[User:Ornithorynque liminaire|Ornithorynque liminaire]] ([[User talk:Ornithorynque liminaire|talk]]) 13:33, 25 September 2026 (UTC) :::See [https://query.wikidata.org/#%23%20Abstract%20wikipedia%20articles%20with%20small%20number%20of%20sitelinks%20%28including%20itself%2C%20commons%2C%20etc.%20%29%0ASELECT%20%3Fitem%20%3FitemLabel%20%3Fsitelinks%0AWHERE%20%7B%0A%20%20%20%20%3Fsitelink%20schema%3Aabout%20%3Fitem.%0A%20%20%20%20%3Fsitelink%20schema%3AinLanguage%20%22abstract%22.%20%0A%20%20%20%20%3Fitem%20wikibase%3Asitelinks%20%3Fsitelinks.%0A%20%20%20%20FILTER%20%28%20CONTAINS%28%20STR%28%3Fsitelink%29%2C%20%22wiki%2FQ%22%20%29%20%29%20%23%20only%20Abtract%20articles%0A%20%20SERVICE%20wikibase%3Alabel%20%7B%20bd%3AserviceParam%20wikibase%3Alanguage%20%22%5BAUTO_LANGUAGE%5D%2Cmul%2Cen%22.%20%7D%0A%7D%0AORDER%20BY%20%3Fsitelinks%0ALIMIT%20100 here a query] of 100 abstract wikipedia articles sorted by number of sitelinks (including itself, commons etc). Among others this includes a lot of shrines. [[User:HenkvD|HenkvD]] ([[User talk:HenkvD|talk]]) 10:02, 26 September 2026 (UTC) g6b01n0tbm44tiqdbozrco7ci9snyqo 0 6394 22248 22247 2026-09-25T13:07:25Z 99of9 614 choose populated place infobox 22248 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q181209", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36678", "Z36678K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q181209" }, "Z36678K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 76pz9uimwqekkj4atkja9k9pwei9irf 0 6395 22250 2026-09-25T14:04:11Z ValWinter 4969 Created new abstract article for 'equal pay for equal work' 22250 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q11414572", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M60912710" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11414572" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37068", "Z37068K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q11414572" }, "Z37068K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q151885" }, "Z37068K3": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q2915476" }, "Z37068K4": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } j3bi8qrphxiof3lh4axc6bueyw0az1b 2 6396 22251 2026-09-25T14:19:15Z ValWinter 4969 creation 22251 wikitext text/x-wiki == ValWinter == [[File:Heston, Two Ways to Go, 1896.gif|alt=Two children holding hands on different paths. One path has a sign stating, "The Freethought Road". The other path has two signs that state, "The Orthodox Route" and "This is the Vale of Tears".|thumb|Watson Heston, Two Ways to Go]] I think this project is a good idea for making information more accessible. 435670hliwvgzkyh2h773341aym1kt8 0 6397 22252 2026-09-25T15:24:49Z ValWinter 4969 Creation 22252 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q8458", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z32962", "Z32962K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K1" }, "Z32962K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q367293" }, "Z32962K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z35672", "Z35672K1": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36206", "Z36206K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8458" }, "Z36206K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P2579" }, "Z36206K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z38053", "Z38053K1": { "Z1K1": "Z310", "Z310K1": "M65758" }, "Z38053K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q8458" }, "Z38053K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } bidu0jt4bjml868j05y5jd0nj6fkrxf 0 6398 22254 2026-09-25T16:00:38Z ReXLer 7812 mmmm 22254 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q12897", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z43277", "Z43277K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12897" }, "Z43277K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } }, { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z37104", "Z37104K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q12897" }, "Z37104K2": { "Z1K1": "Z6092", "Z6092K1": "P106" }, "Z37104K3": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } mwhrreunkd0rk1hofah8hsjwu798c6p 0 6399 22255 2026-09-25T19:37:52Z BigKrow 2917 New 22255 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q63404515", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36678", "Z36678K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q63404515" }, "Z36678K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } ofqfi176yh8r2vjzcu3f2ahtzcy3g7b 0 6400 22256 2026-09-25T19:39:34Z BigKrow 2917 Created page with "{ "qid": "Q657", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36678", "Z36678K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q657" }, "Z36678K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z82..." 22256 abstractwiki text/plain { "qid": "Q657", "sections": { "Q8776414": { "index": 0, "fragments": [ "Z89", { "Z1K1": "Z7", "Z7K1": "Z36678", "Z36678K1": { "Z1K1": "Z6091", "Z6091K1": "Q657" }, "Z36678K2": { "Z1K1": "Z18", "Z18K1": "Z825K2" } } ] } } } 2ejuhygzwc12x0qwsisskc65z5l6p4e