Wikiversity betawikiversity https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Main_Page MediaWiki 1.47.0-wmf.23 first-letter Media Special Talk User User talk Wikiversity Wikiversity talk File File talk MediaWiki MediaWiki talk Template Template talk Help Help talk Category Category talk TimedText TimedText talk Module Module talk Translations Translations talk Event Event talk Wikiversity talk:Multilingualism 5 1867 386358 4477 2026-10-06T14:50:49Z Iauth 53833 /* Some notes */ new section 386358 wikitext text/x-wiki The explanations on this page create ''confusio'' in my head rather than helping clarity. The current ways of doing things are mentioned but not really explained. Should we follow them for now? A future way is proposed with several pictures which are neither very clear nor explain well how the future shall be working. : Also an obvious problem - parallelity of access - is not addressed. : This is specifically peculiar, since in order to author a contribution to a discussion, several pages need to be altered consistently. : My suggestion: Have one master page which collects all the ''real contributions'' and require it be accessed for alteration in the following manner: :# alter by quickly creating another headline at the end, put your sign <nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki> beneath it, and store it. :# In case of an edit conflict, abort your edit, and restart the process. :# If not an edit conflict, section-edit your previously created contribution. :# When saving your edit while it is not finished yet, leave a clear mark like "ongoing edit" so as to inform potential translators, and readers. :# When done, store it and (except maybe for cosmetic changes, additional references, etc.) do not alter it any more. :# If you want to add something, start a new section (It's ok to add a backward and a forward link between them) The picture series with their comments give a faint idea of what might be intended. Yet as described, it is not workable yet, lacking clarity. * It would be nice to explain these pictures better. Use terms of what exactly to do. * I suggest to write names down, of the yellow-brownish and the green pages. Avoid terms like "discussion page", just name it, e.g. <code>{{NS:Talk}}:example/fra</code> for the french talk page if that is meant to be so (i.e. <code><nowiki>{{NS:Talk}}:example/fra</nowiki></code>). * I suggeest to name or number the sample enties (colored blocks) in the images for reference. If that means replacing images by tables containing real text, ok, then be it so. * It would be helpful to replace the red, blue, and green bars by actual sample text. "lorem ipsum" may suffice, but references should be there, not only section headings (or numbers) as asked for above. Thus it would be visible how to refer to contributions, how to refer to short summaries, and how to refer to translations of either, and where these actually are stored. * How does a translator handle missing translations before the one he is adding? Create a series of empty headings, or not? * What exactly does one do to start a new discussion? On which page? How to find a name for the page? * I suggest to put clear headlines and directives at the beginning of each multilingual page, e.g. "This is a page of short summaries in Greek" "To add to the discussion, goto page XXXX" etc. Finally: When shall that new scheme be used? Will a voting be held? Someplace it seems to be used, maybe, but perhaps not clearly followed? --[[User:Purodha|Purodha]] 16:59, 16 September 2006 (UTC) ==Dutch version== I want to start a Dutch version of multilingualism.--[[User:Daanschr|Daanschr]] 19:30, 15 November 2006 (UTC) ==Problems with the proposition at present== Insisting on being short can be bad for a discussion where the details are more important then the concepts. I see a few major problems in summarizing all contributions of participants of a discussion of the same language. 1) It ends the individual perspective, which means less freedom, more bureaucracy and politics and less consideration for objectivity and subjectivity. 2) Languages will be politically put against eachother. Political blocks of languages will be formed. 3) A speaker of a language with lots of participants will have less influence on a debate, then a speaker of a language with a small amount of participants, but enough translators. I don't agree that consensus will be reached. My experience in life, on Usenet, on Wikipedia is that people nearly always keep their own views. These views will confront eachother in unendless powerstruggles. A method to prevent politization could be decentralization and deregulation. My proposition is that translators will translate individual input into other languages instead of translating summaries. To make sure that all languages can partake to a discussion, it will be required that an organization will be formed that organizes discussions and which will allocate resources (people) to tasks (with deadlines). What must be ensured to my opinion is the freedom of those who join a discussion.--[[User:Daanschr|Daanschr]] 13:06, 19 November 2006 (UTC) == Interlingual Beta Club == I've proposed the [[Wikipedia:v:Wikiversity:Interlingual Beta Club|Interlingual Beta Club]] on the English Wikiversity hoping to address some of the problems stated above. I'm hoping that this organization can be replicated on the other Wikiversities and help foster a spirit of collaboration. This could be the organization that [[User:Daanschr|Daanschr]] proposed above. [[User:CQ|CQ]] 20:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC) == Some notes == Hello World "I hope we are saving it". There is (wikitalk) I mean alot that I want to share it with you and it's waiting for the right moment, for now I want to notice you at a point ( the source page could be in any language because not all the references comes in English language), I think we should say the source page could be in any language and the user can translate it by his choice to any language. Or you guys figure out the right sentences for it. I need a private link as an whatsapp to discuss some features such as my username. Thanks & Regards Wiki [[User:Iauth|Iauth]] ([[User talk:Iauth|talk]]) 14:50, 6 October 2026 (UTC) q40axffvj3r7shnn8wefjawb7kmppxx 386359 386358 2026-10-06T14:55:19Z Iauth 53833 /* Some notes */ 386359 wikitext text/x-wiki The explanations on this page create ''confusio'' in my head rather than helping clarity. The current ways of doing things are mentioned but not really explained. Should we follow them for now? A future way is proposed with several pictures which are neither very clear nor explain well how the future shall be working. : Also an obvious problem - parallelity of access - is not addressed. : This is specifically peculiar, since in order to author a contribution to a discussion, several pages need to be altered consistently. : My suggestion: Have one master page which collects all the ''real contributions'' and require it be accessed for alteration in the following manner: :# alter by quickly creating another headline at the end, put your sign <nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki> beneath it, and store it. :# In case of an edit conflict, abort your edit, and restart the process. :# If not an edit conflict, section-edit your previously created contribution. :# When saving your edit while it is not finished yet, leave a clear mark like "ongoing edit" so as to inform potential translators, and readers. :# When done, store it and (except maybe for cosmetic changes, additional references, etc.) do not alter it any more. :# If you want to add something, start a new section (It's ok to add a backward and a forward link between them) The picture series with their comments give a faint idea of what might be intended. Yet as described, it is not workable yet, lacking clarity. * It would be nice to explain these pictures better. Use terms of what exactly to do. * I suggest to write names down, of the yellow-brownish and the green pages. Avoid terms like "discussion page", just name it, e.g. <code>{{NS:Talk}}:example/fra</code> for the french talk page if that is meant to be so (i.e. <code><nowiki>{{NS:Talk}}:example/fra</nowiki></code>). * I suggeest to name or number the sample enties (colored blocks) in the images for reference. If that means replacing images by tables containing real text, ok, then be it so. * It would be helpful to replace the red, blue, and green bars by actual sample text. "lorem ipsum" may suffice, but references should be there, not only section headings (or numbers) as asked for above. Thus it would be visible how to refer to contributions, how to refer to short summaries, and how to refer to translations of either, and where these actually are stored. * How does a translator handle missing translations before the one he is adding? Create a series of empty headings, or not? * What exactly does one do to start a new discussion? On which page? How to find a name for the page? * I suggest to put clear headlines and directives at the beginning of each multilingual page, e.g. "This is a page of short summaries in Greek" "To add to the discussion, goto page XXXX" etc. Finally: When shall that new scheme be used? Will a voting be held? Someplace it seems to be used, maybe, but perhaps not clearly followed? --[[User:Purodha|Purodha]] 16:59, 16 September 2006 (UTC) ==Dutch version== I want to start a Dutch version of multilingualism.--[[User:Daanschr|Daanschr]] 19:30, 15 November 2006 (UTC) ==Problems with the proposition at present== Insisting on being short can be bad for a discussion where the details are more important then the concepts. I see a few major problems in summarizing all contributions of participants of a discussion of the same language. 1) It ends the individual perspective, which means less freedom, more bureaucracy and politics and less consideration for objectivity and subjectivity. 2) Languages will be politically put against eachother. Political blocks of languages will be formed. 3) A speaker of a language with lots of participants will have less influence on a debate, then a speaker of a language with a small amount of participants, but enough translators. I don't agree that consensus will be reached. My experience in life, on Usenet, on Wikipedia is that people nearly always keep their own views. These views will confront eachother in unendless powerstruggles. A method to prevent politization could be decentralization and deregulation. My proposition is that translators will translate individual input into other languages instead of translating summaries. To make sure that all languages can partake to a discussion, it will be required that an organization will be formed that organizes discussions and which will allocate resources (people) to tasks (with deadlines). What must be ensured to my opinion is the freedom of those who join a discussion.--[[User:Daanschr|Daanschr]] 13:06, 19 November 2006 (UTC) == Interlingual Beta Club == I've proposed the [[Wikipedia:v:Wikiversity:Interlingual Beta Club|Interlingual Beta Club]] on the English Wikiversity hoping to address some of the problems stated above. I'm hoping that this organization can be replicated on the other Wikiversities and help foster a spirit of collaboration. This could be the organization that [[User:Daanschr|Daanschr]] proposed above. [[User:CQ|CQ]] 20:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC) == Some notes == Hello World "I hope we are saving it". There is (wikitalk) I mean alot that I want to share it with you and it's waiting for the right moment, for now I want to notice you at a point ( the source page could be in any language because not all the references comes in English language), I think we should say the source page could be in any language and the user can translate it by his choice to any language. Or you guys figure out the right sentences for it. I need a private link as an whatsapp to discuss some features such as my username. Thanks & Regards Wiki [[User:wiki|wiki]] ([[User talk:wiki|talk]]) 14:50, 6 October 2026 (UTC) lo83ggcp8h9cqho1eyykhf5hc5ln03x User:Profev 2 50033 386360 386265 2026-10-07T09:07:15Z Profev 36331 + 386360 wikitext text/x-wiki Ànims i bon dia. {|cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3" style="border: 1px solid #77d; background:#f8f8ff" width="75%" class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" data-expandtext="Més" data-collapsetext="Ocultar" |- |Prestacions a l'edició d'articles |- |style="border: 1px solid #bbf;background:#fff"| - Estic disposat a organitzar, estructurar o debatre totes les pàgines. - Si es dona el cas de que no s'adapta un curs o pàgina al teu criteri, ningú t'impedeix fer-ne una de pròpia amb propi estil. - Puc respondre dubtes, ajudar o recomanar qualsevol detall que es vulgui incloure. - Em presto per a coordinar temes de matemàtiques principalment, ajudes principals: |} {| |- |width=400px|Escriure fórmules amb latex <math>\Rightarrow</math> LaTeX :*[https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaTeX#Expresiones_matem%C3%A1ticas Drecera a l'article LaTeX.] :*[https://osl.ugr.es/CTAN/info/lshort/english/lshort.pdf Pdf de LaTeX dur.] Article [https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gr%C3%A1ficos_vectoriales_escalables SVG.] ||Per construir taules <math>\Rightarrow</math> ayuda:tablas :*[https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayuda:Tablas Drecera més completa a taules.] Espais durs o espais inseparables per si es troba al salt de línia: <code>&amp;nbsp;</code> per exemple <code>55&amp;nbsp;m.</code> = 55&nbsp;m. |} Estructura actual del sistema de matemàtiques per la ESO i batxillerat o alternativament [https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Category:Escola_secund%C3%A0ria dins la secundària com assignatura]: {| |width="50%" valign="top"| [https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Category:Matem%C3%A0tiques_d%27ESO Matemàtiques d'ESO] :[https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Category:Matem%C3%A0tiques_de_primer_d%27ESO 1r ESO] ::[[Repartiments_I_ESO|Repartiments]] :[https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Category:Matem%C3%A0tiques_de_segon_d%27ESO 2n ESO] :[https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Category:Matem%C3%A0tiques_de_tercer_d%27ESO 3r ESO] ::[[Exemples de funcions a trossos|Funcions a trossos]] ::[[Saber computacional III|Saber computacional]] :[https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Category:Matem%C3%A0tiques_de_quart_d%27ESO 4t ESO] ::[[Àlgebra i geometria IV|Àlgebra i geometria]] |width="50%" valign="top"| [https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Category:Matem%C3%A0tiques_de_batxillerat Matemàtiques de batxillerat] :Temes inicials ::[[El cos dels nombres reals Bat|Nombres reals]] ::[[Exercicis Límits 01|Límits I]] :Segon curs (amb temes dependents) ::Límits II. ::[[Derivades Ll1|Derivades:]] [[Taula derivades-batx|Taules]] i [[Exercicis derivades 01|Exercicis]] |} :[https://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Category:PAU_de_matem%C3%A0tiques Selectivitat PAU] Moltes pàgines són esbossos, per tant, s'han de modificar i millorar molt. {|style="border: 1px solid #ccc;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="3" bgcolor="#fff" |[[File:Spain traffic signal p18.svg|left|25px]] Per crear pàgines, només has de buscar-les amb el nom exacte i si no el troba, automàticament et deixa un link vermell per crear-la, i perquè estigui classificada has d'afegir la categoria al final del escrit així: <code>[[</code>Category:Matemàtiques d'ESO<code>]]</code> :Recomano buscar la categoria abans de crear-la, ja que pot ser que hi hagi una pàgina semblant ja classificada. :Mentre més precís és la seva classificació millor, sinó, queden treballs difícils de trobar a les arrels de les classificacions anomenades Sategory. :Per debatre tota pàgina té un raconet anomenat discussió, seguiu el fil del tema, les wiki no es un for a l'atzar. |} tnajmmksxouoikiy9d175nh60gimcf8