Wikiversity
enwikiversity
https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Main_Page
MediaWiki 1.47.0-wmf.4
first-letter
Media
Special
Talk
User
User talk
Wikiversity
Wikiversity talk
File
File talk
MediaWiki
MediaWiki talk
Template
Template talk
Help
Help talk
Category
Category talk
School
School talk
Portal
Portal talk
Topic
Topic talk
Collection
Collection talk
Draft
Draft talk
TimedText
TimedText talk
Module
Module talk
Event
Event talk
Wikiversity:Notices for custodians
4
1786
2812316
2812265
2026-05-31T14:59:55Z
Codename Noreste
2969951
/* Redundant user rights */ reply ([[mw:c:Special:MyLanguage/User:JWBTH/CD|CD]])
2812316
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{/Header}}
== Call for custodians and bureaucrats ==
<div class="cd-moveMark">''Moved from [[Wikiversity:Request custodian action#Call for custodians and bureaucrats]]. [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Codename Noreste|contribs]]) 18:46, 12 May 2026 (UTC)''</div>
Can I encourage currently active [[Wikiversity:Curators|curators]] to consider putting themselves forward for [[Wikiversity:Custodianship|custodianship]] and/or [[Wikiversity:Bureaucrat|bureaucratship]]. We have a productive, capable group of [[Wikiversity:Staff|staff]] at the moment who should probably have more rights to better support the project and we are light on for active custodians and bureaucrats. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 11:34, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
: I'm willing to do so. [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Codename Noreste|contribs]]) 11:48, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
::Awesome. Could you self-nominate at [[Wikiversity:Candidates for Custodianship]]? -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 10:59, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
::: I filed my nomination, but according to the custodianship policy, I am running for probationary custodianship, and after a period of four weeks, I will run again for permanent custodianship to determine if I have performed well and professionally. [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Codename Noreste|contribs]]) 19:00, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
:I'm also willing to run for bureaucratship as I imagine my activity levels should remain sufficient. I could put in a nomination within the next week or so. —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 12:55, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
::Wonderful. [[Wikiversity:Candidates for Bureaucratship]]. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 00:09, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
:Would also like to help! [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 23:25, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
::Merci beaucoup :) When you're ready, you can self-nominate for probationary custodianship at [[Wikiversity:Candidates for Custodianship]]. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 00:08, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
: Would an uninvolved bureaucrat close the following discussions? Roughly a week has passed. [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Codename Noreste|contribs]]) 16:53, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
:: Ping @[[User:Guy vandegrift|Guy vandegrift]] @[[User:Dave Braunschweig|Dave Braunschweig]] @[[User:Mu301|Mu301]]: Two probationary custodian nominations are ready for closing if you're available. Also note that there are two bureaucrat nominations that should stay open for another week or so. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 10:57, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
:::{{done}} --[[User:Mu301|mikeu]] <sup>[[User talk:Mu301|talk]]</sup> 16:51, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
:::: Thanks, Mike, appreciate it.
:::: It's now been a couple of weeks for the two bureaucrat nominations, so I think they could be closed. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 02:10, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::{{done}} --[[User:Mu301|mikeu]] <sup>[[User talk:Mu301|talk]]</sup> 19:24, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
== Call for custodian mentors==
If you have more than 3 months experience as a custodian, please consider listing yourself as potential mentor for probationary custodians: [[Wikiversity:List of custodian mentors]]
-- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 22:27, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
== 2FA requirement for bureaucrats ==
Per [[Special:ListGroupRights#bureaucrat]] and per [[phab:T423120|T423120]], you'll notice that two-factor authentication is required to use bureaucrat permissions (and will soon be enforced). Our existing bureaucrats should take a moment to verify and utilize two-factor authentication. Thank you. [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Codename Noreste|contribs]]) 22:31, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
: Thanks for the reminder. Bureaucrats should have received emails. I switched it on recently. Relatively painless and hasn't disrupted workflow, so seems to be well implemented. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 02:13, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
::Yes, I turned this on. I would highly recommend that anyone with rights (custodians, curators, etc.) enable this. --[[User:Mu301|mikeu]] <sup>[[User talk:Mu301|talk]]</sup> 19:42, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
== Redundant user rights ==
I recently changed the user rights for community approved custodians and bureaucrats per consensus. I just realized that I removed curator for Atcovi when adding 'crat thinking that curator was redundant. I then realized that I haven't been consistent about removing old bits. I don't have a strong opinion on this. Just asking. Should curator rights be removed when adding custodian or 'crat? I've never been a curator and don't currently have that bit set. Some accounts still have curator with other rights and others (like mine) don't. --[[User:Mu301|mikeu]] <sup>[[User talk:Mu301|talk]]</sup> 00:00, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
:If someone steps down as bureaucrat but wants to remain a custodian/curator, then having those rights as well ensures that they won't be accidentally removed. This exact scenario just happened on another wiki where I am a bureaucrat. It can't hurt to have the redundant ones, if you ask me. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 00:02, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
::[[Special:ListUsers/bureaucrat|Currently]], all the 'crats have custodian; Koavf additionally has curator, which none of the other 'crat accounts have. PieWriter, MathXplore, and Koavf are the only custodians to also have curator. [https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Special:ListUsers?username=&group=sysop&wpsubmit=&wpFormIdentifier=mw-listusers-form&limit=50] I propose that we should either a) add curator to all 'crats and custodians or b) remove the redundant bit from all accounts. I don't have a preference, I'm just advocating for consistency and clarity. --[[User:Mu301|mikeu]] <sup>[[User talk:Mu301|talk]]</sup> 00:49, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
::: I lean more on removing the curator bit from all custodians and bureaucrats, as custodians themselves have most, if not all curator user rights, followed by some additional user rights. I planned to remove the curator bit from custodians and to leave a note here about my action(s) for review, until I saw this message. [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Codename Noreste|contribs]]) 00:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
:::: I'm inclined to follow the [[w:Principle of least privilege]] and remove redundant bits. A custodian or 'crat doesn't need curator. Granting these bits later should be no big deal. --[[User:Mu301|mikeu]] <sup>[[User talk:Mu301|talk]]</sup> 01:13, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
: Agree with principles of simplicity and consistency. Plus that agreed practice should be documented. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 03:18, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
{{ping|Atcovi|PieWriter|MathXplore|Koavf}} Pinging contributors who may have an interest in discussion. --[[User:Mu301|mikeu]] <sup>[[User talk:Mu301|talk]]</sup> 01:59, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
:I'm okay with whatever. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 02:19, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
: Removing the curator is OK. [[User:MathXplore|MathXplore]] ([[User talk:MathXplore|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/MathXplore|contribs]]) 02:33, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
:Seems fine to me [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 02:37, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
: {{done}} for all three above. Atcovi already removed his own curator rights as it was redundant to custodian rights. [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Codename Noreste|contribs]]) 14:59, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
k9w972eiwr8auv0e65eboitwe7vg41f
Wikiversity:Requests for Deletion
4
1791
2812318
2812272
2026-05-31T15:16:36Z
Codename Noreste
2969951
/* United States UFO files */ Deleted. (using [[wikt:MediaWiki:Gadget-AjaxEdit.js|AjaxEdit]])
2812318
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{/header}}
== [[IMHA Research Archives]] ==
I propose to '''move to userspace''', including the subpages. I struggle to understand how Wikiversity readers are supposed to benefit from the material here and in the subpages. In the log, there is e.g. '10 February 2019 Marshallsumter discuss contribs deleted page IMHA Research Archives (content was: "{<nowiki/>{Delete|Author request}} Thanks! -")', so the page was deleted before, but not the subpages.
We could also delete all the material if we have strong enough suspicion too much of it is copyright violation. In any case, moving to user space improves the matter a little by moving the content away from Google search. --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] ([[User talk:Dan Polansky|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dan Polansky|contribs]]) 13:38, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
:Looking at some sub-pages, they can be deleted e.g., because they only consist of broken links or are largely empty. I deleted a couple but haven't been through all to check. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 00:27, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
As an example, let me give the wikitext content of [[IMHA Research Archives/3. Scientific litterature search, storage and use]]:
<pre>
==[[/Medicina Maritima - the Spanish scientific maritime health journal/]]==
==[[/PubMed/]]==
==[[/Google and Google Scholar/]]==
==[[/Zotero/]]==
==[https://www.dropbox.com/sh/d91z7bcyelfvk42/AAAkIvjtBnnFMbiU9ZLOdVL9a/Andrioti_database%20sources0310.pptx?dl=0 Maritime health web portal ressources ]==
</pre>
The wikilinks are red; the external link to dropbox says "You don't have access". This was made in 2016. --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] ([[User talk:Dan Polansky|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dan Polansky|contribs]]) 09:04, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
:I suggest delete -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 03:27, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
:: I think we should avoid deletion as much as possible, instead moving to user space (bar copyvio, ethics violation, etc.). This is a good general principle. It greatly improves auditability and makes it so much easier for anyone to request undeletion since they know what content they are requesting for undeletion. --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] ([[User talk:Dan Polansky|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dan Polansky|contribs]]) 09:52, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
:::Do not recreate Wikiversity from the educational and research project to the personal blog. That will lead to the cancelation of it by WMF. [[User:Juandev|Juandev]] ([[User talk:Juandev|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Juandev|contribs]]) 21:44, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
:::: The English Wikiversity has a long tradition of moving problematic content to user space, as per evidence collected at [[User:Dan_Polansky/About Wikiversity#Moving pages to userspace]]. If Wikimedia Foundation finds this problematic, they can start a discussion in Colloquium and state their concerns. They do not need to make explicit threats at first; they can start a discussion and explain why it is problematic. They can even do it from an anonymous IP and provide a well-articulated reasoning. And anyone else can start a discussion in Colloquium to change this tradition. I do not see why we should not want to change that tradition based on well-articulated, compelling reasoning. I see no reason why Juandev should be making threats instead of them, on a per RFD basis. --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] ([[User talk:Dan Polansky|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dan Polansky|contribs]]) 05:58, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
:::: If Juandev is ''sincere'' about deleting very-low-value items ''from user space'', he should perhaps demonstrate that by asking his pages like [[:cs:Uživatel:Juandev/Problémy/Kov/Repase dvířek elektroskříně]] to be deleted; otherwise, I register a ''glaring inconsistence''. --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] ([[User talk:Dan Polansky|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dan Polansky|contribs]]) 07:43, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
::What was the original delate page about @[[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]]? I guess that would be crucial for the decission. [[User:Juandev|Juandev]] ([[User talk:Juandev|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Juandev|contribs]]) 21:48, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Juandev|Juandev]] the couple of pages I checked and deleted were much like @[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] posted above i.e., headings with empty sections and/or broken links but no substantive content. But I think each sub-page needs checking. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 21:59, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
::::So I'm saying that the main page usually determines what the other pages are for. But if I don't know the page because it's been deleted, or why was deleted (deletion based on the founder's request is probably not the rule), it's hard to judge. [[User:Juandev|Juandev]] ([[User talk:Juandev|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Juandev|contribs]]) 22:16, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
:::::I've pasted the original content of the root page: [[IMHA Research Archives#Original page]] (i.e., prior to the content being removed and deletion requested) to help understand the context for the sub-pages. In 2018, Saltrabook blanked the page, indicating that the content had been moved elsewhere, and requested page deletion. Marshallsumter then deleted the main page but not the sub-pages. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 01:58, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
::::::I see, so if those subpages are usefull I would keept them, if not I would delete them. I dont see a point of providing free hosting to sombody, by moving many pages to their user space. The question is if we want to host (i.e. to have in the main ns) lists of links elsewhere. I have no opinion on that. [[User:Juandev|Juandev]] ([[User talk:Juandev|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Juandev|contribs]]) 10:11, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
: Let me clarify that while many of the subpages are like the example above, [[IMHA Research Archives/Scientific litterature search, storage and use/Zotero]] is different:
:: "A continuous critical and evidence based learning is a core issue in clinical practice, research, teaching, publication and prevention activities. The Zotero Program is just one of many scientific literature management programs, that should be used for these purposes. Of course one can live without such a database but it helps a lot and can save a lot of time that could be used for more interesting issues. Not only that, but it helps to create better publications and knowledge. Without this program it can be very time consuming to publish a scientific article with the requested style for the references. Further in daily practice when you want to collect and cite a few references for a specific evidence in a clinical colloquium and discussion, this program is excellent. Therefore we strongly recommend that all maritime health persons learn how to use this excellent tool in their daily maritime health practice of all different types. There are good online courses for self-instruction on how to use Zotero. For example this one: Zotero fast online course But in order to increase IMHAR´s collective scientific strength in the use of EBM we would like to give training sessions in every possible opportunity, IMHA Symposia, seminars and other types of meetings. The database is useful for personal purposes but especially also for collaborative aims. At the IMHAR meeting in Paris Oct 7th 2016 we will give an introduction to the program by showing how it can be used in the daily practice and discuss strength and weaknesses compared to other similar databases."
: Even longer is e.g. [[IMHA Research Archives/Scientific litterature search, storage and use/Medicina Maritima - the Spanish scientific maritime health journal]].
: However, that does not mean these should be salvaged. --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] ([[User talk:Dan Polansky|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dan Polansky|contribs]]) 07:53, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
:{{ping|Saltrabook}} I'm wondering if you can respond here to help us decide about whether to delete the IMHA Research Archives sub-pages or perhaps move them to your user space? -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 11:58, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
: [[Special:Diff/2811248]] provides confirmation from Saltrabook to go ahead and delete these archives -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 12:56, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
== Undeletion request ==
It was deleted by an admin without discussion and with untrue rationale. If people take offense with the question that doesn't mean it's not a valid question and the page was good. Please undelete the Wikidebate page [https://web.archive.org/web/20250810030352/https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Is_it_likely_that_Earth_has_been_visited_by_aliens_millions_of_years_ago%3F Is it likely that Earth has been visited by aliens millions of years ago?]
There are lots of sources on the subject, the wikidebate is sourced very well compared to other wikidebates and wikiversity pages, and the page is educational, useful and of good quality. [[User:Prototyperspective|Prototyperspective]] ([[User talk:Prototyperspective|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Prototyperspective|contribs]]) 23:57, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
:Page: [[Is it likely that Earth has been visited by aliens millions of years ago?]]
:Ping: [[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 00:21, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
:There is no need for a discussion for straight garbage-level, pseudoscientific content.
:For '''Is it likely that Earth has been visited by aliens millions of years ago?''', the flaws for this page wouldn't even take someone more than a few minutes to assess:
:* Essentially, the "pro" arguments unproven claims being derived from irrelevant, established facts (basically: "it is likely aliens have came because Earth has existed for so long [sources proving Earth's longevity]"). These are not serious, scientifically-backed arguments - these are non sequiturs. It's as if I said Wikipedia has existed longer than my existence on Earth ([https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/74351725/eyJoIjogImZiODhmYzNkODU1N2UxMWExYzUyODJiYzgzZTRmZDM4OTBjODY5YWMzMjA3NDNmOWEyZTA0ZTU3ZGYwZjAyYTkiLCAidSI6ICJodHRwczovL3B1cmUuaHZhLm5sL3dz-libre.pdf?1636354596=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DCritical_Point_of_View_A_Wikipedia_Reade.pdf&Expires=1775872055&Signature=GqbUZboYRvUYWi~aW40LT5eZSHrLuDL3o0-DxAH8vSvcJcGAuyByZWLF2oHTY6GlB72TqvZxpE-v9d4gvsA6myriYqO~QQQZgWxjT2JXjUWC-yiPcTF4l~lroJSi4dY0v9eKiBcU03l-aeUdrX8~UPfi0TfW0IhsmzH-VBR6X6FrzRpIqc6uM6n9YXfr5FRB3aCqqokU690af3n0Hguaub1Zgmh9qjYYqzBS0VOOHjKTTEQnDuadX3jl5CQeXYTaeCC3H0hMeVwHlratbrnuFEKC1aN0-5znCUoSzMEg21ECzGPTrSDM1W05dcK-u0ZTCeUGKAuC-2yRFL3sY46MIw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA#page=157 reputable source proving ''this'' fact]), therefore it's likely that my birth took place solely for the sake of me experiencing Wikipedia (0 backing). It makes no sense and no person with at least a high school-level of intelligence would take this seriously.
:* What is worse is that the user is being misleading with their "[the page is] sourced very well" claim. The sources ''themselves'' don't even back up the claims. It's just used as proof for an established concept, where the user then uses this established concept to jump to an unsupported, laughable conclusion that is pulled out of thin air. It's utterly ridiculous to even consider such a page for mainspace since it clearly violates our [[Wikiversity:Verifiability]] policy. This is, once again, pseudoscientific content that has caused our website to reduce in quality over the last few years.
:* Going source by source, we can see that:
:#[https://web.archive.org/web/20250918011642/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/thebigd/compress-earths-history-into-24-hrs-humans-came-at-1158-pm-yet-killed-70-of-wildlife/ ‘Compress Earth’s history into 24 hrs. Humans came at 11:58 pm, yet killed 70% of wildlife’] is literally just a blog post which doesn't even mention aliens or extraterrestrial life. It just talks about Earth's history in accordance with the 24-hour metric of time, and the author tries to use this article as a 'piece in the puzzle' of aliens "possibly" visiting Earth... which, once again, is unsupported and is not backed up anywhere in the article.
:#[https://web.archive.org/web/20250808053249/https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2023/11/jurassic-worlds-might-be-easier-spot-modern-earth The Cornell article does not even remotely support the idea that "aliens visited Earth"]. It mentions a ''chance'' of "life there [a habitable exoplanet] might not be limited to microbes, but could include creatures as large and varied as the megalosauruses or microraptors that once roamed Earth.", but again, no justification to take this article as proof that "aliens may have visited us!". There's no mention of aliens visiting Earth anywhere in the article. Once again this is only proving the background premise, but not the unsupported, nonsensical "alien likelihood" argument that the author of this garbage page is trying to push so desperately.
:#The Parker Solar Probe WP article does not even mention aliens either. It follows the same issues as the previous argument.
:And the other page this user complained about [https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User_talk:Atcovi#Deletion_of_educational_page_because_of_personal_opinion on my talk page] holds almost similar, maybe even more fatal mistakes, than this one. It has nothing to do with "taking offense", this is just low-quality, garbage content. —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 00:56, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
::Why do you think pro claims are required to be proven? It's possible to object to them and these are arguments, not contextualized to be statements of proven facts. And it's not a strange or unreasonable argument to make that since Earth has existed for long, it's more likely that aliens have come here in the past than in recent times or the near future. Instead of insulting others' intelligence, maybe engage with the actual reasoning rather than censoring it away. And there are lots of sources, such as [https://interestingengineering.com/science/alien-civilizations-may-have-visited-earth-millions-of-years-ago-study-says Alien Civilizations May Have Visited Earth Millions of Years Ago, Study Says] etc etc. The sources are used for the arguments themselves individually. [[User:Prototyperspective|Prototyperspective]] ([[User talk:Prototyperspective|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Prototyperspective|contribs]]) 12:30, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
:::Because, once again, this is not a site that caters to rampant debating for the sake of "we need to employ rationality and logic to solve the world's problems", we have policies that we need to fulfill. The claims made in the pro argument clearly do not meet [[Wikiversity:Verifiability]], since you cannot verify these arguments with the sources because they are not relevant.
:::''"And it's not a strange or unreasonable argument to make that since Earth has existed for long, it's more likely that aliens have come here in the past than in recent times or the near future."'' The point being is that these arguments are not supported by the sources. Even the article you mention poses the idea as a hypothetical model. This is just you twisting the article to fit your unsupported narrative. I'll bring direct quotes for you to show why the linked article does not help you:
:::* ''One problem the researchers do make sure to point out is that '''they are working with only one data point: our own behaviors and capabilities for space exploration'''. “We tried to come up with a model that would involve the fewest assumptions about sociology that we could,” Carroll-Nellenback told Business Insider. '''We have no real way of knowing the motivations of an alien civilization'''.'' --> proves that this is just speculation and no evidence-based arguments have been provided for the idea that aliens likely visited Earth.
:::And I'm not sure if you read my entire response, but I ''did'' engage with your "actual reasoning" and exposed its weaknesses and lack of adherence to Wikiversity policies. If we allowed content that was just filled with non sequiturs we would have content that fails Wikiversity's educational objectives and reduces the overall quality of this website, hence why such a harsh stance needs to be taken. —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 13:50, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
::::Thanks for proving that the Wikimedia ecosystem is unfit to deliberate on controversial topics. The question is entirely valid and the content is far better sourced than nearly all Wikidebates and has no genuine flaws. The only possible issue with it as far as I can see is that now that Wikidebates has been paused people can't add objections if they do have sth specific to say about the topic that's not already included on that page which already had plenty of Cons and objections.
::::The page was more educational than most of Wikiversity and it was well-sourced – wikidebates was for arguments so people were invited to make arguments based on sourced things or outlined logic and the page met [[WV:V]] and most pages on Wikiversity aren't sourced as good. Doesn't look like people can see beyond their biases and personal views here but that's more evident in the marginalization and deletion of wikidebates and the low activity in that project than these selective deletions. A constructive thing to do would be to add reasoned Cons and objections not yet on the page and people had plenty of time to do that. There are and will be other sites for free constructive rational adversarial deliberation (not a big loss in that sense). [[User:Prototyperspective|Prototyperspective]] ([[User talk:Prototyperspective|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Prototyperspective|contribs]]) 16:31, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::Thank you for failing to address any of my arguments and going on an unrelated, nonsensical tangent that has nothing to do with the discussion. Once you start producing work that aligns with Wikiversity's content policies instead of typing up laughable, pseudoscientific garbage, then maybe your work can be accepted and not removed. —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 16:59, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
::::::I suggest you stop ridiculing things and learn respectfully forming genuine points about the subject at hand. {{tq|the idea as a hypothetical model}} but please learn first about what arguments are and why they're not the same as a statement of objective proven fact. [[User:Prototyperspective|Prototyperspective]] ([[User talk:Prototyperspective|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Prototyperspective|contribs]]) 17:18, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
==Pages by Harold Foppele==
[[User:Harold Foppele]] is locally blocked indefinitely and globally banned for sockpuppetry. There were also WMF and local community concerns expressed about copyright violation and AI (over)use. As a result, I think the Wikiversity pages created by this account warrant review with regard what should be deleted, what should be retained etc.:
* [[Completing the square]]
* [[Number of independent spatial modes in a spherical volume]]
* [[Quantum]]
** [[Quantum/Andrew N. Jordan]]
* [[Quantum A Matter Of Size]]
* [[Quantum A Spooky Action at a Distance]]
* [[Quantum: A Walk Through the Universe]]
* [[Quantum Computing Algorithms in the NISQ Era]]
* [[Quantum Formulas Collection]]
* [[Quantum harmonic oscillator]]
* [[Quantum Matter Elements and Particles]]
* [[Quantum mechanics]]
** [[Quantum mechanics/Timeline]]
* [[Quantum mechanics learning module]]
* [[Quantum mechanics measurements]]
* [[Quantum Noisy Qubits]]
* [[Quantum optics beam splitter experiments]]
* [[Quantum: The Secret of Cohesion: How Waves Hold Matter Together]]
* [[Quantum Ultra fast lasers]]
* [[Speed of sound experiments]]
* [[User:Harold Foppele]]
-- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 08:12, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
:'''Delete all''' Not worth keeping. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 08:27, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
== [[Classical guitar pedagogy]] ==
According to the talk page, the author of this page intended to create this page for Wikipedia. At this moment in time (nearly 20 years later), the page is still riddled with red links and doesn't seem to fit Wikiversity's learning modules. Therefore, I propose that this page should be deleted. —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 13:03, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
:'''Weak delete''' This at least has <em>something</em> that someone could use, but agreed that it's not particularly useful and not likely to be developed. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 00:25, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
: '''Move''' to [[w:User:Grégory Leclair/Classical guitar pedagogy]] -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 13:18, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
== [[Film writing]] ==
Undeveloped since 2007. —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 13:05, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
:<del>'''Delete''' Nothing here. Great idea in principle, tho. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 00:25, 20 May 2026 (UTC)</del><ins>'''Keep''': It's now at least developed enough to be something. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 05:42, 31 May 2026 (UTC)</ins>
: '''Keep''' as part of [[:Category:Film]] resources. I've tidied the page, so it looks less abandoned. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 02:57, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
:@[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] @[[User:Koavf|Koavf]] The page seems to have been tidied up. Do you want to reevaluate your votes? [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 02:40, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
==[[United States UFO files]]==
{{archive top|Deleted, but the author of the resource did not respond here. [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Codename Noreste|contribs]]) 15:16, 31 May 2026 (UTC)}}
Seems to be WP-like; material copied from [[w:United States UFO files]] -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 01:46, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
:'''Delete''', but why would a PROD template not suffice? My logic was that it is a newly created page (made just today), and isn't a big project/difficult page to deal with. Do we not deal with newly created pages that appear to not satisfy Wikiversity's objectives/mission with a PROD template? Wouldn't we best reserve RFDs for long-standing pages (like the two pages above this section being listed for deletion) or ''after'' the PROD template isn't enough to determine the fate of such pages (per [[Wikiversity:Deletion policy#Proposed deletion (prod)|here]]: "Anyone still considering that the resource should be deleted [after the placement of the PROD template] may discuss deletion.")? A PROD template may also be useful in this case to alert the author that the page is not compatible with Wikiversity's learning objectives and communicates a concise opportunity to refine the page with the 90-day limit. Maybe even in this case, a speedy would've been enough (possibly fitting [[Wikiversity:Deletion policy#Criteria for speedy deletion|#12]]: "No research objectives or discussion in history. Welcome users and resources when likely to be expanded shortly.").
:Interested to hear your thoughts as I want to make sure this is clear, as I've been cleaning up a lot of 'dead' pages around Wikiversity and find myself confused on whether to use PROD or RFD. Thanks, —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 02:08, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
: Yes, could be speedy deleted. Otherwise, I don't know about the merits about leaving it around for 90 days, hence me bringing it to here. There is some comment in [[Wikiversity:Deletion policy]] about the specific deletion templates not being so important. More important I think is to flag for discussion. However, we could also improve the proposed policy to make the process clearer. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 02:20, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
: Ping {{u|User:Realcosmixyt}} for comment -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 12:54, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
{{archive bottom}}
== [[Emergency Operation Centre GIS]] ==
{{archive top|Consensus to delete. [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Codename Noreste|contribs]]) 21:39, 30 May 2026 (UTC)}}
Undeveloped for over a decade (only thing present is just an outline). —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 14:44, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
:*'''Delete'''
:―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 15:59, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
:* '''Delete'''. Insufficiently developed. Was moved from [[b:Emergency Operation Centre GIS]].
: -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 13:13, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
{{archive bottom}}
==[[Mippedia]] ==
{{archive top|Consensus to delete, and the author of the template did not respond to Jtneill's comment. [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Codename Noreste|contribs]]) 21:37, 30 May 2026 (UTC)}}
I propose the deletion of the page "[[Mippedia]]", due to the subject not being backed by reputable sources. Pages with the same subject has been deleted multiple times on the Indonesian Wikipedia. The original writer of the page did it solely to promote his wiki site. [[User:ANNAFscience|ANNAFscience]] ([[User talk:ANNAFscience|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/ANNAFscience|contribs]]) 10:39, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
: {{ping|Sevent Me}} any comment? -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 13:10, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
:'''Delete''' I don't know what the point of this is. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 16:26, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
: '''Delete'''. Advertising. Points to a non-English, copyright restricted website. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 12:58, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
{{archive bottom}}
==[[Wikiphilosophers]]==
Moving from {{tl|prod}} by {{at|Atcovi}}: "similar "philosophy"-related content has been removed in the past [issue of pseudoscience] + very little moderation (mirroring the issues of [[Wikidebates]]) + lacks educational value." The project has also been nominated for deletion on its talk page: [[Talk:Wikiphilosophers]]. There are many subpages:
{{Special:PrefixIndex/Wikiphilosophers/}}
-- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 13:45, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
:'''Delete'''. Unfortunately, this project wasn't as successful as I had hoped. Kind regards, [[User:Perquirius|Perquirius]] ([[User talk:Perquirius|overleg]] • [[Special:Contributions/Perquirius|bijdragen]]) 14:29, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
::Don't forget to delete [[Template:Wikiphilosophers]], [[Template:Wikiphilosophers/doc]] and [[Template:Wikiphilosophers topics]] also. [[User:Perquirius|Perquirius]] ([[User talk:Perquirius|overleg]] • [[Special:Contributions/Perquirius|bijdragen]]) 14:30, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
== [[Template:UserSkype]] ==
Service was discontinued over a year ago. I suggest deleting the Userbox and [[:Category:Users familiar with Skype]], as it can only confuse or mislead. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 21:17, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
:'''Delete''' per reasoning. —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 22:40, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
: '''Delete''' -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 06:48, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
74a26ucsegdtow7s9vprfqh2ainhfq1
2812322
2812318
2026-05-31T15:20:21Z
Codename Noreste
2969951
/* Film writing */ Kept. (using [[wikt:MediaWiki:Gadget-AjaxEdit.js|AjaxEdit]])
2812322
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{/header}}
== [[IMHA Research Archives]] ==
I propose to '''move to userspace''', including the subpages. I struggle to understand how Wikiversity readers are supposed to benefit from the material here and in the subpages. In the log, there is e.g. '10 February 2019 Marshallsumter discuss contribs deleted page IMHA Research Archives (content was: "{<nowiki/>{Delete|Author request}} Thanks! -")', so the page was deleted before, but not the subpages.
We could also delete all the material if we have strong enough suspicion too much of it is copyright violation. In any case, moving to user space improves the matter a little by moving the content away from Google search. --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] ([[User talk:Dan Polansky|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dan Polansky|contribs]]) 13:38, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
:Looking at some sub-pages, they can be deleted e.g., because they only consist of broken links or are largely empty. I deleted a couple but haven't been through all to check. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 00:27, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
As an example, let me give the wikitext content of [[IMHA Research Archives/3. Scientific litterature search, storage and use]]:
<pre>
==[[/Medicina Maritima - the Spanish scientific maritime health journal/]]==
==[[/PubMed/]]==
==[[/Google and Google Scholar/]]==
==[[/Zotero/]]==
==[https://www.dropbox.com/sh/d91z7bcyelfvk42/AAAkIvjtBnnFMbiU9ZLOdVL9a/Andrioti_database%20sources0310.pptx?dl=0 Maritime health web portal ressources ]==
</pre>
The wikilinks are red; the external link to dropbox says "You don't have access". This was made in 2016. --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] ([[User talk:Dan Polansky|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dan Polansky|contribs]]) 09:04, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
:I suggest delete -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 03:27, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
:: I think we should avoid deletion as much as possible, instead moving to user space (bar copyvio, ethics violation, etc.). This is a good general principle. It greatly improves auditability and makes it so much easier for anyone to request undeletion since they know what content they are requesting for undeletion. --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] ([[User talk:Dan Polansky|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dan Polansky|contribs]]) 09:52, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
:::Do not recreate Wikiversity from the educational and research project to the personal blog. That will lead to the cancelation of it by WMF. [[User:Juandev|Juandev]] ([[User talk:Juandev|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Juandev|contribs]]) 21:44, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
:::: The English Wikiversity has a long tradition of moving problematic content to user space, as per evidence collected at [[User:Dan_Polansky/About Wikiversity#Moving pages to userspace]]. If Wikimedia Foundation finds this problematic, they can start a discussion in Colloquium and state their concerns. They do not need to make explicit threats at first; they can start a discussion and explain why it is problematic. They can even do it from an anonymous IP and provide a well-articulated reasoning. And anyone else can start a discussion in Colloquium to change this tradition. I do not see why we should not want to change that tradition based on well-articulated, compelling reasoning. I see no reason why Juandev should be making threats instead of them, on a per RFD basis. --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] ([[User talk:Dan Polansky|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dan Polansky|contribs]]) 05:58, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
:::: If Juandev is ''sincere'' about deleting very-low-value items ''from user space'', he should perhaps demonstrate that by asking his pages like [[:cs:Uživatel:Juandev/Problémy/Kov/Repase dvířek elektroskříně]] to be deleted; otherwise, I register a ''glaring inconsistence''. --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] ([[User talk:Dan Polansky|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dan Polansky|contribs]]) 07:43, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
::What was the original delate page about @[[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]]? I guess that would be crucial for the decission. [[User:Juandev|Juandev]] ([[User talk:Juandev|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Juandev|contribs]]) 21:48, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Juandev|Juandev]] the couple of pages I checked and deleted were much like @[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] posted above i.e., headings with empty sections and/or broken links but no substantive content. But I think each sub-page needs checking. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 21:59, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
::::So I'm saying that the main page usually determines what the other pages are for. But if I don't know the page because it's been deleted, or why was deleted (deletion based on the founder's request is probably not the rule), it's hard to judge. [[User:Juandev|Juandev]] ([[User talk:Juandev|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Juandev|contribs]]) 22:16, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
:::::I've pasted the original content of the root page: [[IMHA Research Archives#Original page]] (i.e., prior to the content being removed and deletion requested) to help understand the context for the sub-pages. In 2018, Saltrabook blanked the page, indicating that the content had been moved elsewhere, and requested page deletion. Marshallsumter then deleted the main page but not the sub-pages. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 01:58, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
::::::I see, so if those subpages are usefull I would keept them, if not I would delete them. I dont see a point of providing free hosting to sombody, by moving many pages to their user space. The question is if we want to host (i.e. to have in the main ns) lists of links elsewhere. I have no opinion on that. [[User:Juandev|Juandev]] ([[User talk:Juandev|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Juandev|contribs]]) 10:11, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
: Let me clarify that while many of the subpages are like the example above, [[IMHA Research Archives/Scientific litterature search, storage and use/Zotero]] is different:
:: "A continuous critical and evidence based learning is a core issue in clinical practice, research, teaching, publication and prevention activities. The Zotero Program is just one of many scientific literature management programs, that should be used for these purposes. Of course one can live without such a database but it helps a lot and can save a lot of time that could be used for more interesting issues. Not only that, but it helps to create better publications and knowledge. Without this program it can be very time consuming to publish a scientific article with the requested style for the references. Further in daily practice when you want to collect and cite a few references for a specific evidence in a clinical colloquium and discussion, this program is excellent. Therefore we strongly recommend that all maritime health persons learn how to use this excellent tool in their daily maritime health practice of all different types. There are good online courses for self-instruction on how to use Zotero. For example this one: Zotero fast online course But in order to increase IMHAR´s collective scientific strength in the use of EBM we would like to give training sessions in every possible opportunity, IMHA Symposia, seminars and other types of meetings. The database is useful for personal purposes but especially also for collaborative aims. At the IMHAR meeting in Paris Oct 7th 2016 we will give an introduction to the program by showing how it can be used in the daily practice and discuss strength and weaknesses compared to other similar databases."
: Even longer is e.g. [[IMHA Research Archives/Scientific litterature search, storage and use/Medicina Maritima - the Spanish scientific maritime health journal]].
: However, that does not mean these should be salvaged. --[[User:Dan Polansky|Dan Polansky]] ([[User talk:Dan Polansky|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dan Polansky|contribs]]) 07:53, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
:{{ping|Saltrabook}} I'm wondering if you can respond here to help us decide about whether to delete the IMHA Research Archives sub-pages or perhaps move them to your user space? -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 11:58, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
: [[Special:Diff/2811248]] provides confirmation from Saltrabook to go ahead and delete these archives -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 12:56, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
== Undeletion request ==
It was deleted by an admin without discussion and with untrue rationale. If people take offense with the question that doesn't mean it's not a valid question and the page was good. Please undelete the Wikidebate page [https://web.archive.org/web/20250810030352/https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Is_it_likely_that_Earth_has_been_visited_by_aliens_millions_of_years_ago%3F Is it likely that Earth has been visited by aliens millions of years ago?]
There are lots of sources on the subject, the wikidebate is sourced very well compared to other wikidebates and wikiversity pages, and the page is educational, useful and of good quality. [[User:Prototyperspective|Prototyperspective]] ([[User talk:Prototyperspective|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Prototyperspective|contribs]]) 23:57, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
:Page: [[Is it likely that Earth has been visited by aliens millions of years ago?]]
:Ping: [[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 00:21, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
:There is no need for a discussion for straight garbage-level, pseudoscientific content.
:For '''Is it likely that Earth has been visited by aliens millions of years ago?''', the flaws for this page wouldn't even take someone more than a few minutes to assess:
:* Essentially, the "pro" arguments unproven claims being derived from irrelevant, established facts (basically: "it is likely aliens have came because Earth has existed for so long [sources proving Earth's longevity]"). These are not serious, scientifically-backed arguments - these are non sequiturs. It's as if I said Wikipedia has existed longer than my existence on Earth ([https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/74351725/eyJoIjogImZiODhmYzNkODU1N2UxMWExYzUyODJiYzgzZTRmZDM4OTBjODY5YWMzMjA3NDNmOWEyZTA0ZTU3ZGYwZjAyYTkiLCAidSI6ICJodHRwczovL3B1cmUuaHZhLm5sL3dz-libre.pdf?1636354596=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DCritical_Point_of_View_A_Wikipedia_Reade.pdf&Expires=1775872055&Signature=GqbUZboYRvUYWi~aW40LT5eZSHrLuDL3o0-DxAH8vSvcJcGAuyByZWLF2oHTY6GlB72TqvZxpE-v9d4gvsA6myriYqO~QQQZgWxjT2JXjUWC-yiPcTF4l~lroJSi4dY0v9eKiBcU03l-aeUdrX8~UPfi0TfW0IhsmzH-VBR6X6FrzRpIqc6uM6n9YXfr5FRB3aCqqokU690af3n0Hguaub1Zgmh9qjYYqzBS0VOOHjKTTEQnDuadX3jl5CQeXYTaeCC3H0hMeVwHlratbrnuFEKC1aN0-5znCUoSzMEg21ECzGPTrSDM1W05dcK-u0ZTCeUGKAuC-2yRFL3sY46MIw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA#page=157 reputable source proving ''this'' fact]), therefore it's likely that my birth took place solely for the sake of me experiencing Wikipedia (0 backing). It makes no sense and no person with at least a high school-level of intelligence would take this seriously.
:* What is worse is that the user is being misleading with their "[the page is] sourced very well" claim. The sources ''themselves'' don't even back up the claims. It's just used as proof for an established concept, where the user then uses this established concept to jump to an unsupported, laughable conclusion that is pulled out of thin air. It's utterly ridiculous to even consider such a page for mainspace since it clearly violates our [[Wikiversity:Verifiability]] policy. This is, once again, pseudoscientific content that has caused our website to reduce in quality over the last few years.
:* Going source by source, we can see that:
:#[https://web.archive.org/web/20250918011642/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/thebigd/compress-earths-history-into-24-hrs-humans-came-at-1158-pm-yet-killed-70-of-wildlife/ ‘Compress Earth’s history into 24 hrs. Humans came at 11:58 pm, yet killed 70% of wildlife’] is literally just a blog post which doesn't even mention aliens or extraterrestrial life. It just talks about Earth's history in accordance with the 24-hour metric of time, and the author tries to use this article as a 'piece in the puzzle' of aliens "possibly" visiting Earth... which, once again, is unsupported and is not backed up anywhere in the article.
:#[https://web.archive.org/web/20250808053249/https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2023/11/jurassic-worlds-might-be-easier-spot-modern-earth The Cornell article does not even remotely support the idea that "aliens visited Earth"]. It mentions a ''chance'' of "life there [a habitable exoplanet] might not be limited to microbes, but could include creatures as large and varied as the megalosauruses or microraptors that once roamed Earth.", but again, no justification to take this article as proof that "aliens may have visited us!". There's no mention of aliens visiting Earth anywhere in the article. Once again this is only proving the background premise, but not the unsupported, nonsensical "alien likelihood" argument that the author of this garbage page is trying to push so desperately.
:#The Parker Solar Probe WP article does not even mention aliens either. It follows the same issues as the previous argument.
:And the other page this user complained about [https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User_talk:Atcovi#Deletion_of_educational_page_because_of_personal_opinion on my talk page] holds almost similar, maybe even more fatal mistakes, than this one. It has nothing to do with "taking offense", this is just low-quality, garbage content. —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 00:56, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
::Why do you think pro claims are required to be proven? It's possible to object to them and these are arguments, not contextualized to be statements of proven facts. And it's not a strange or unreasonable argument to make that since Earth has existed for long, it's more likely that aliens have come here in the past than in recent times or the near future. Instead of insulting others' intelligence, maybe engage with the actual reasoning rather than censoring it away. And there are lots of sources, such as [https://interestingengineering.com/science/alien-civilizations-may-have-visited-earth-millions-of-years-ago-study-says Alien Civilizations May Have Visited Earth Millions of Years Ago, Study Says] etc etc. The sources are used for the arguments themselves individually. [[User:Prototyperspective|Prototyperspective]] ([[User talk:Prototyperspective|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Prototyperspective|contribs]]) 12:30, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
:::Because, once again, this is not a site that caters to rampant debating for the sake of "we need to employ rationality and logic to solve the world's problems", we have policies that we need to fulfill. The claims made in the pro argument clearly do not meet [[Wikiversity:Verifiability]], since you cannot verify these arguments with the sources because they are not relevant.
:::''"And it's not a strange or unreasonable argument to make that since Earth has existed for long, it's more likely that aliens have come here in the past than in recent times or the near future."'' The point being is that these arguments are not supported by the sources. Even the article you mention poses the idea as a hypothetical model. This is just you twisting the article to fit your unsupported narrative. I'll bring direct quotes for you to show why the linked article does not help you:
:::* ''One problem the researchers do make sure to point out is that '''they are working with only one data point: our own behaviors and capabilities for space exploration'''. “We tried to come up with a model that would involve the fewest assumptions about sociology that we could,” Carroll-Nellenback told Business Insider. '''We have no real way of knowing the motivations of an alien civilization'''.'' --> proves that this is just speculation and no evidence-based arguments have been provided for the idea that aliens likely visited Earth.
:::And I'm not sure if you read my entire response, but I ''did'' engage with your "actual reasoning" and exposed its weaknesses and lack of adherence to Wikiversity policies. If we allowed content that was just filled with non sequiturs we would have content that fails Wikiversity's educational objectives and reduces the overall quality of this website, hence why such a harsh stance needs to be taken. —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 13:50, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
::::Thanks for proving that the Wikimedia ecosystem is unfit to deliberate on controversial topics. The question is entirely valid and the content is far better sourced than nearly all Wikidebates and has no genuine flaws. The only possible issue with it as far as I can see is that now that Wikidebates has been paused people can't add objections if they do have sth specific to say about the topic that's not already included on that page which already had plenty of Cons and objections.
::::The page was more educational than most of Wikiversity and it was well-sourced – wikidebates was for arguments so people were invited to make arguments based on sourced things or outlined logic and the page met [[WV:V]] and most pages on Wikiversity aren't sourced as good. Doesn't look like people can see beyond their biases and personal views here but that's more evident in the marginalization and deletion of wikidebates and the low activity in that project than these selective deletions. A constructive thing to do would be to add reasoned Cons and objections not yet on the page and people had plenty of time to do that. There are and will be other sites for free constructive rational adversarial deliberation (not a big loss in that sense). [[User:Prototyperspective|Prototyperspective]] ([[User talk:Prototyperspective|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Prototyperspective|contribs]]) 16:31, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::Thank you for failing to address any of my arguments and going on an unrelated, nonsensical tangent that has nothing to do with the discussion. Once you start producing work that aligns with Wikiversity's content policies instead of typing up laughable, pseudoscientific garbage, then maybe your work can be accepted and not removed. —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 16:59, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
::::::I suggest you stop ridiculing things and learn respectfully forming genuine points about the subject at hand. {{tq|the idea as a hypothetical model}} but please learn first about what arguments are and why they're not the same as a statement of objective proven fact. [[User:Prototyperspective|Prototyperspective]] ([[User talk:Prototyperspective|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Prototyperspective|contribs]]) 17:18, 22 April 2026 (UTC)
==Pages by Harold Foppele==
[[User:Harold Foppele]] is locally blocked indefinitely and globally banned for sockpuppetry. There were also WMF and local community concerns expressed about copyright violation and AI (over)use. As a result, I think the Wikiversity pages created by this account warrant review with regard what should be deleted, what should be retained etc.:
* [[Completing the square]]
* [[Number of independent spatial modes in a spherical volume]]
* [[Quantum]]
** [[Quantum/Andrew N. Jordan]]
* [[Quantum A Matter Of Size]]
* [[Quantum A Spooky Action at a Distance]]
* [[Quantum: A Walk Through the Universe]]
* [[Quantum Computing Algorithms in the NISQ Era]]
* [[Quantum Formulas Collection]]
* [[Quantum harmonic oscillator]]
* [[Quantum Matter Elements and Particles]]
* [[Quantum mechanics]]
** [[Quantum mechanics/Timeline]]
* [[Quantum mechanics learning module]]
* [[Quantum mechanics measurements]]
* [[Quantum Noisy Qubits]]
* [[Quantum optics beam splitter experiments]]
* [[Quantum: The Secret of Cohesion: How Waves Hold Matter Together]]
* [[Quantum Ultra fast lasers]]
* [[Speed of sound experiments]]
* [[User:Harold Foppele]]
-- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 08:12, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
:'''Delete all''' Not worth keeping. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 08:27, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
== [[Classical guitar pedagogy]] ==
According to the talk page, the author of this page intended to create this page for Wikipedia. At this moment in time (nearly 20 years later), the page is still riddled with red links and doesn't seem to fit Wikiversity's learning modules. Therefore, I propose that this page should be deleted. —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 13:03, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
:'''Weak delete''' This at least has <em>something</em> that someone could use, but agreed that it's not particularly useful and not likely to be developed. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 00:25, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
: '''Move''' to [[w:User:Grégory Leclair/Classical guitar pedagogy]] -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 13:18, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
== [[Film writing]] ==
{{archive top|Consensus to keep after vote changes. [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Codename Noreste|contribs]]) 15:20, 31 May 2026 (UTC)}}
Undeveloped since 2007. —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 13:05, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
:<del>'''Delete''' Nothing here. Great idea in principle, tho. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 00:25, 20 May 2026 (UTC)</del><ins>'''Keep''': It's now at least developed enough to be something. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 05:42, 31 May 2026 (UTC)</ins>
: '''Keep''' as part of [[:Category:Film]] resources. I've tidied the page, so it looks less abandoned. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 02:57, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
:@[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] @[[User:Koavf|Koavf]] The page seems to have been tidied up. Do you want to reevaluate your votes? [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 02:40, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
{{archive bottom}}
==[[United States UFO files]]==
{{archive top|Deleted, but the author of the resource did not respond here. [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Codename Noreste|contribs]]) 15:16, 31 May 2026 (UTC)}}
Seems to be WP-like; material copied from [[w:United States UFO files]] -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 01:46, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
:'''Delete''', but why would a PROD template not suffice? My logic was that it is a newly created page (made just today), and isn't a big project/difficult page to deal with. Do we not deal with newly created pages that appear to not satisfy Wikiversity's objectives/mission with a PROD template? Wouldn't we best reserve RFDs for long-standing pages (like the two pages above this section being listed for deletion) or ''after'' the PROD template isn't enough to determine the fate of such pages (per [[Wikiversity:Deletion policy#Proposed deletion (prod)|here]]: "Anyone still considering that the resource should be deleted [after the placement of the PROD template] may discuss deletion.")? A PROD template may also be useful in this case to alert the author that the page is not compatible with Wikiversity's learning objectives and communicates a concise opportunity to refine the page with the 90-day limit. Maybe even in this case, a speedy would've been enough (possibly fitting [[Wikiversity:Deletion policy#Criteria for speedy deletion|#12]]: "No research objectives or discussion in history. Welcome users and resources when likely to be expanded shortly.").
:Interested to hear your thoughts as I want to make sure this is clear, as I've been cleaning up a lot of 'dead' pages around Wikiversity and find myself confused on whether to use PROD or RFD. Thanks, —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 02:08, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
: Yes, could be speedy deleted. Otherwise, I don't know about the merits about leaving it around for 90 days, hence me bringing it to here. There is some comment in [[Wikiversity:Deletion policy]] about the specific deletion templates not being so important. More important I think is to flag for discussion. However, we could also improve the proposed policy to make the process clearer. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 02:20, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
: Ping {{u|User:Realcosmixyt}} for comment -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 12:54, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
{{archive bottom}}
== [[Emergency Operation Centre GIS]] ==
{{archive top|Consensus to delete. [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Codename Noreste|contribs]]) 21:39, 30 May 2026 (UTC)}}
Undeveloped for over a decade (only thing present is just an outline). —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 14:44, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
:*'''Delete'''
:―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 15:59, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
:* '''Delete'''. Insufficiently developed. Was moved from [[b:Emergency Operation Centre GIS]].
: -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 13:13, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
{{archive bottom}}
==[[Mippedia]] ==
{{archive top|Consensus to delete, and the author of the template did not respond to Jtneill's comment. [[User:Codename Noreste|Codename Noreste]] ([[User talk:Codename Noreste|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Codename Noreste|contribs]]) 21:37, 30 May 2026 (UTC)}}
I propose the deletion of the page "[[Mippedia]]", due to the subject not being backed by reputable sources. Pages with the same subject has been deleted multiple times on the Indonesian Wikipedia. The original writer of the page did it solely to promote his wiki site. [[User:ANNAFscience|ANNAFscience]] ([[User talk:ANNAFscience|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/ANNAFscience|contribs]]) 10:39, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
: {{ping|Sevent Me}} any comment? -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 13:10, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
:'''Delete''' I don't know what the point of this is. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 16:26, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
: '''Delete'''. Advertising. Points to a non-English, copyright restricted website. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 12:58, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
{{archive bottom}}
==[[Wikiphilosophers]]==
Moving from {{tl|prod}} by {{at|Atcovi}}: "similar "philosophy"-related content has been removed in the past [issue of pseudoscience] + very little moderation (mirroring the issues of [[Wikidebates]]) + lacks educational value." The project has also been nominated for deletion on its talk page: [[Talk:Wikiphilosophers]]. There are many subpages:
{{Special:PrefixIndex/Wikiphilosophers/}}
-- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 13:45, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
:'''Delete'''. Unfortunately, this project wasn't as successful as I had hoped. Kind regards, [[User:Perquirius|Perquirius]] ([[User talk:Perquirius|overleg]] • [[Special:Contributions/Perquirius|bijdragen]]) 14:29, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
::Don't forget to delete [[Template:Wikiphilosophers]], [[Template:Wikiphilosophers/doc]] and [[Template:Wikiphilosophers topics]] also. [[User:Perquirius|Perquirius]] ([[User talk:Perquirius|overleg]] • [[Special:Contributions/Perquirius|bijdragen]]) 14:30, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
== [[Template:UserSkype]] ==
Service was discontinued over a year ago. I suggest deleting the Userbox and [[:Category:Users familiar with Skype]], as it can only confuse or mislead. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''<span style="color:black">v</span>f</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 21:17, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
:'''Delete''' per reasoning. —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 22:40, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
: '''Delete''' -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 06:48, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
a3jkx0l09yyrvwgxhoql76a162yfma7
Film writing
0
31520
2812320
2811416
2026-05-31T15:19:39Z
Codename Noreste
2969951
Consensus to keep.
2812320
wikitext
text/x-wiki
Any writing fulfilling the technical needs for making a film can be called film writing.
This is not the same as normal writing.
The film writing process can be oganised into the following steps:
* Brainstorming
* Concept
* Screenplay
* Dialogues
==Brainstorming==
[[w:Brainstorm|Brainstorm]] ideas for screen plays. This can be good practice and learning, and a potential starting point for learning to develop a screenplay.
==Concept==
This is a basic story line for a film. This contains character mapping (i.e. detailed description of each character and story line with various scenes expected in the film).
==Screenplay==
This is a series of scenes described as they must be shot in a film. This contains the details expected in every scene as per the scenes narrated in the story line with details of characters present in it.
==Dialogues==
This is the last stage of film writing where the dialogue writer writes the dialogues for each character.
==Next step==
Proceed to [[filmmaking]].
[[Category:Film]]
[[Category:Writing]]
2sw1bzgcz29ly49j1xk1kmi10cqsnqz
2812321
2812320
2026-05-31T15:19:56Z
Atcovi
276019
/* Next step */ template
2812321
wikitext
text/x-wiki
Any writing fulfilling the technical needs for making a film can be called film writing.
This is not the same as normal writing.
The film writing process can be oganised into the following steps:
* Brainstorming
* Concept
* Screenplay
* Dialogues
==Brainstorming==
[[w:Brainstorm|Brainstorm]] ideas for screen plays. This can be good practice and learning, and a potential starting point for learning to develop a screenplay.
==Concept==
This is a basic story line for a film. This contains character mapping (i.e. detailed description of each character and story line with various scenes expected in the film).
==Screenplay==
This is a series of scenes described as they must be shot in a film. This contains the details expected in every scene as per the scenes narrated in the story line with details of characters present in it.
==Dialogues==
This is the last stage of film writing where the dialogue writer writes the dialogues for each character.
==Next step==
{{Proceed|Proceed to [[filmmaking]]}}
[[Category:Film]]
[[Category:Writing]]
1cdwffc2i19djwokwtq186pqh5663gu
User:Jtneill/Wikiversity
2
56061
2812408
2811763
2026-06-01T05:52:44Z
Jtneill
10242
/* Custodianship */ + Diffs
2812408
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{TOCright}}
[[:Category:Wikiversitans|Wikiversitan]] since March, 2008
''A loose, personal (i.e., somewhat idiosynchratic) organisation of Wikiversity-related how-tos and links.''
==To sort==
{|style="background:transparent;"
|valign=top|
* [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~magnus/commonshelper.php commonshelper]
* [[User:Jtneill/Wikification|Wikification]]
* [[w:Help:Interwiki_linking#Project_titles_and_shortcuts|Interwiki linking]]
* [[Wikiversity:Activity bars]]
* [[Wikiversity:Percent complete]]
|valign=top|
* [[Wikiversity:Import|import]]
* [[Wikiversity:Maintenance]]
* [[Wikiversity:Namespaces]]
* [[Wikiversity:Naming conventions]]
|valign=top|
* [[Wikiversity:Participants]]
* [[Wikiversity:Peer review]]
* [[Wikiversity:Review board]]
* [[Wikiversity:Searching]]
* [[How to be a Wikimedia sysop]]
|}
==Anchor==
* [[Template:Anchor]], e.g., [[#test]] will go to <code><nowiki>{{anchor|test}}</nowiki></code> or <code><nowiki>{{anchor|anchor=test}}</nowiki></code> (should go to end of page)
==Archiving==
* Example of autoarchiving: [[User talk:Terra]]
==Blogging==
* [[Wikiversity Blog howto]]
==Boxes==
[[User:Jtneill/Sandbox/Tables and boxes]]
The simplest of boxes
{| class="messagebox"
|-
| ABC
XYZ
|}
<blockquote style="padding-left:1.0em; padding-right:1.0em; background-color:#eaf8f4;">
Its good that it works in practice, because it certainly doesn’t work in theory[https://blogs.ch.cam.ac.uk/pmr/2007/10/14/the-thing-about-wikipedia-is-that-it-only-works-in-practice-in-theory-it-can-never-work/]
</blockquote>
==Categories==
It is possible to change the order in which a page’s categories are displayed. By default, categories are displayed in the order they appear in the wikitext. Wikis with a consensus to do so can [[m:Special:MyLanguage/Requesting wiki configuration changes|request]] a configuration change to display them in alphabetical order. [https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T373480]
Using titleparts
<nowiki>[[Category:{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}|1}}]]</nowiki>
==[[/Centering/]]==
{{User:Jtneill/Wikiversity/Centering}}
==Chat==
* [[irc:wikiversity-en|#wikiversity-en]]
==Citations and referencing==
* [[w:Help:Citation tools|Citation tools]]
* [[:Category:Citation templates]]
* [[mw:Help:Cite]]
* [[Template:Citation]]
* [[WV:REF]]
* Example: Outward Bound Process Model<ref>Walsh, V., & Golins, G. L. (1976). ''[http://wilderdom.com/theory/OutwardBoundProcessModel.html The exploration of the Outward Bound process]''. Denver, CO: Colorado Outward Bound School.</ref>
;References
{{reflist|1}}
==Collapse boxes==
{{collapse top|Mary had a little lamb}}
Mary had a little lamb,
Little lamb, little lamb,
Mary had a little lamb,
Its fleece was white as snow
And everywhere that Mary went,
Mary went, Mary went,
Everywhere that Mary went
The lamb was sure to go
It followed her to school one day
School one day, school one day
It followed her to school one day
Which was against the rules.
It made the children laugh and play,
Laugh and play, laugh and play,
It made the children laugh and play
To see a lamb at school
And so the teacher turned it out,
Turned it out, turned it out,
And so the teacher turned it out,
But still it lingered near
And waited patiently about,
Patiently about, patiently about,
And waited patiently about
Till Mary did appear
"Why does the lamb love Mary so?"
Love Mary so? Love Mary so?
"Why does the lamb love Mary so?"
The eager children cry
"Why, Mary loves the lamb, you know."
Loves the lamb, you know, loves the lamb, you know
"Why, Mary loves the lamb, you know."
The teacher did reply
{{collapse bottom}}
==Colour==
* [[Wikiversity web page colors|Color tables]] | [[Wikiversity:Color names|Color names]]
* e.g., Font: {{font|color=green|Green}}, Background: <span style="background:hotpink; color:white;">Pink</span>
==Columns==
===Column breaks===
{|
|-
| Works on all browsers (col-begin/break/end):
{{col-begin}}
{{col-break}}
* Col1
{{col-break}}
* Col2
{{col-break}}
* Col3
{{col-end}}
Works on all browsers (col/break/colend):
{{col}}
{{break}}
* Col1
{{break}}
* Col2
{{break}}
* Col3
{{col/end}}
|}
===Moz-column===
Easier to use, but doesn't work on all browsers:
<div style="column-count:3;-moz-column-count:3;-webkit-column-count:3">
* Ant
* Bee
* Buzzard
* Cat
* Dog
* Egret
* Elephant
* Tiger
* Whale
* Worm
</div>
==Conversions==
===HTML===
* [[w:Wikipedia:Tools/Editing_tools#From_HTML]]
* [http://www.ebruni.it/en/software/os/i_love_wiki/index.mpl i love wiki]
* {{tick}} [http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/html2wiki/index.html HTML::WikiConverter]
* {{tick}} [http://openfacts2.berlios.de/html2wiki/index.php HTML::WikiConverter]] Add URL
==CSS==
* [[MediaWiki:Common.css]]
==Custodianship==
* [[Wikiversity:Custodianship]]
** [[Wikiversity:Candidates for Custodianship]]
** [[Wikiversity:Notices for custodians]]
** [[Wikiversity:Request custodian action]]
** [[:Category:Wikiversity custodians]]
==Diffs==
Some ways of showing diffs:
* [[Wikipedia:User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh/FormattedEditRequest}Proposed edits side by side]] (using script)
{| class="diff"
! Before
! After
|-
| class="diff-deletedline" |
<div>
The course page should list all enrolled students.<br>
Student names should be updated weekly.
</div>
| class="diff-addedline" |
<div>
The course page should identify participating student editors.<br>
Student editor names may be added as appropriate.
</div>
|}
<syntaxhighlight lang="diff">
-The course page should list all enrolled students.
+The course page should identify participating student editors.
</syntaxhighlight>
==Edit page==
Create an internal link to the edit source page using:
[[Special:EditPage/{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Edit source]]
<nowiki>
{{edit page}}
</nowiki>
gives:
{{edit page}}
<nowiki>
{{edit page box}}
</nowiki>
gives:
{{edit page box}}
==Extensions==
* [[Special:Version#Extensions]]
* [[/CategoryTree|CategoryTree]]
* [http://www.sandboxserver.org/wiki/index.php?title=Testing_Mediawiki_extensions Sandbox server - testing extensions]
* [[User:Jtneill/WYSIWIG|WYSIWIG]]
==Font==
<p>{{font|face="courier"|size=medium|courier size 3}}</p>
<p>{{font|face="verdana"|size=large|verdana size 4}}</p>
<p>{{font|face="arial"|size=x-large|arial size 5}}</p>
<p>{{font|face="times new roman"|size=xx-large|times new roman size 6}}</p>
<p><b>{{font|face="verdana"|size=xx-large|verdana bold size 6}}</b></p>
<p>{{font|face="lucida calligraphy"|size=xx-large|lucida calligraphy size 7}}</p>
==Formatting==
===Justification===
<div style="text-align: justify"> This text is right justified (but it doesn't look like unless the paragraph is long enough to go over one line on the page, so this is intentionally a particularly and unnecessarily long sentence in order to demonstrate right justification using <nowiki><div style="text-align: justify">...</div></nowiki>).</div>
==Line height==
{{center top}}<p style="line-height: 36px;">
<big><big><big><big>This uses a<br>line height of 36px</big></big></big></big></p>
<pre><p style="line-height: 36px;">...</p></pre>
{{center bottom}}
===Mouse-over===
* [[Help:Mouse-over]]
* [[Template:H:title]]
==Getting started==
* [[Wikiversity:Guided tour|Guided tour]]
* [[Wikiversity:Introduction|Introduction]] (Wikiversity)
* [[/Introduction|Introduction]] (Jtneill)
* [[/Welcome|Welcome]] (Jtneill)
* [[Introduction to Wiki]] - [[Wiki 101]]
* [[How to use wiki technology as a free learner]]
* [[:Image:Short.ogg|Wikiversity - short intro]] (10 sec. video)
* [[:Image:Editing_tutorial-large.ogg|Wikiversity editing tutorial]] (2 min video)
* [[Wikiversity:Community Portal]]
* [[Wikiversity:Content development]]
* [[Help:Edit summary]]
* [[Making links]]
==Good design==
* [[User:Jtneill/Good design]]
==Icons==
* [[Help:Icons]]
* [[User:McCormack/icons]]
==Images==
===[[Template:Gallery|Gallery]]===
{{Gallery
|title=Gallery of images
|footer=Uses this [[Template:Gallery|template]]
|width=150
|lines=2
||Comment
|File:Wikiversity-logo-Snorky.svg|[[Help:Contents/Links|Links]] can be put in captions.
|File:Wikiversity-logo-Snorky.svg|Full [[MediaWiki]]<br />[[syntax]] may be used…
|File:Wikiversity-logo-Snorky.svg|
}}
<!-- Fixed image in bottom right which is linked -->
<div id="template-navbar" style="position: fixed; left:1; right:0; bottom:0; padding:0; font-size:122%;">[[Image:Happy.png|right|50px|link=en:Happiness|Happiness]]</div>
===ImageMap===
* [[mw:Extension:ImageMap|Extension ImageMap]] e.g.,
{{center top}}
<imagemap>File:Treasurchest.svg|center|80px
default [[Special:Random/|Random Wikiversity mainspace page]]
desc none</imagemap>Click the treasure box to go to a random [[Wikiversity]] page{{center bottom}}
;Explanation
The ImageMap extension allows, among other things, an image to link directly to a page e.g., as an internal link:
<imagemap>
File:Treasurchest.svg|center|150px|alt=Alt text
default [[Motivation and emotion/Book/2015|Motivation and emotion Book - 2015]]
</imagemap>
The syntax is:
<pre style="overflow:auto">
<imagemap>
File:Treasurchest.svg|center|150px|alt=Alt text
default [[Motivation and emotion/Book/2015|Motivation and emotion Book - 2015]]
</imagemap>
</pre>
or as an external link:
<imagemap>
File:Treasurchest.svg|center|150px|alt=Alt text
default [https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/motivation Motivation (Psychology Today)]
</imagemap>
The syntax is:
<pre style="overflow:auto">
<imagemap>
File:Treasurchest.svg|center|150px|alt=Alt text
default [https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/motivation Motivation (Psychology Today)]
</imagemap>
</pre>
==Integrations==
I'm interested to explore possible connections between WV and:
* [http://archive.org Archive.org]
* [[w:Citizendium|Citizendium]]
* [[w:Google Groups]]
* [[Moodle]]
* [[Open University]]
* [http://openlearn.open.ac.uk/course/view.php?name=Cohere Cohere]
* [[WikiMedia Sister Projects]], particularly:
** [[Wikibooks]]
** [[Wikipedia]]
** [[Simple Wikipedia]]
==Licensing==
* My teaching materials are licensed under [[Wikiversity:License tags#Free licenses|creative commons attribution 2.5]] and hosted either on http://wilderdom.com or http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au. I am thinking I should be dual licensing, but am still coming to grips with trying to understand the licensing similarities, differences, and issues.
* I plan to gradually transfer most of my teaching materials to the various [[w:WikiMedia Foundation|WikiMedia Foundation]] wiki projects, particularly wikiversity. [[m:Polls|Let's just hope Jimbo doesn't put adds on these sites]], otherwise I will be transferring the materials somewhere else (again).
* [http://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:IRC_meeting:New_licence_for_Wikiversity_Beta New_licence_for_Wikiversity_Beta]
* {{tl|db-copyvio}}
* {{tl|hangon}}
* [[:Category:Astronomy Images]]
==Links==
* Plain links: e.g., <span class="plainlinks">[http://archive.org http://archive.org]</span>: <br><nowiki><span class="plainlinks"> ... </span></nowiki>
* [[mw:Manual:Opening external links in a new window]]
==Long page warning==
* [[MediaWiki:Longpagewarning]]
==[[Main page]]==
* [[:Category:Main page templates]]
* [[Main Page/Layout 0.5]]
* <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Wikiversity:Main_Page&oldid=209253 Main page]</span> (old)
==Map==
<mapframe latitude="-28.420391" longitude="136.757813" zoom="2" width="200" height="109" align="right">{
"type": "FeatureCollection",
"features": [
{
"type": "Feature",
"properties": {},
"geometry": {
"type": "Point",
"coordinates": [
149.12419,
-35.308275
]
}
}
]
}</mapframe>
==Namespaces==
* [[Special:NamespaceInfo]]
==Navigation==
{{nav|User:Jtneill}}
* [[Template:nav]]
==Notes==
Small e.g.,
{{attention}} <small>For calendar due dates, see unit outline.</small>
Notice templates
{{Notice|{{tl|Notice}}}}
{{Note|{{tl|Note}}}}
==Notifications==
* [[Help:Notifications]]
==Pages==
* [[Special:AllPages]]
* Number of pages in category: <nowiki>{{PAGESINCATEGORY:User:Jtneill}}</nowiki>
* {{hitcounter}} - <nowiki>{{hitcounter}}</nowiki>
==[[Project:Participants|Participants]]==
*[[Wikiversity:Support staff]]
===Users===
*{{Participant|CQ}} - see Person of the Hour script
*{{Participant|Donek}}
*{{Participant|Dan Polansky}}
==Pedagogy==
* [[Learning by doing]]
* [[Wikiversity:Project incubator]]
==Policy==
* [[w:Wikipedia:Contributing_FAQ#Is_there_a_minimum_age_requirement_to_contribute_or_register.3F|Is there a minimum age requirement?]]
{{Official policies}}
{{Proposed policies}}
==Project boxes==
* [[Help:Resource attribution]]
==Purge==
To purge the cache for a given page, append this to the URL:
?action=purge
[[mw:Manual:Purge]]
==Quotes==
* [[Template:Quote]]
*
==[[Quizzes]]==
* [[Help:Quiz-Simple]]
* [http://www.qedoc.org/en/index.php?title=User:Jtneill My Qedoc user page]
** [http://eduforge.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=1138 Qedoc now exports quizzes to Wikiversity]
==Referencing==
* [[meta:WMDE Technical Wishes/Sub-referencing]]
==Sandbox==
* http://www.sandboxserver.org/
* [[Wikiversity:Sandbox Server]]
* [[Topic:Sandbox Server 0.5]]
* [http://scratchpad.wikia.com/wiki/Scratchpad_Wiki_Labs Scratchpad]
* [[../Sandbox]]
==Searching==
* [[Help:Google]]
* [[Wikiversity:Colloquium/archives/April 2008#Google search|Google search]] - <nowiki>[[google:wikiversity]]</nowiki> [[google:wikiversity]]
* Use a + instead of a space
==Search multiple categories==
;Dual category search including one category with subcategories
Search for chapters which [[Template:Clarification templates|need clarification]]:
<inputbox>
type=search
width=33
default=incategory:"Resources needing clarification"
namespaces=Main**
prefix=Motivation and emotion/Book
searchbuttonlabel=Search book chapters
bgcolor=transparent
break=no
</inputbox>
==Sitenotice==
* [[MediaWiki:Sitenotice]]
* [[MediaWiki:Sitenotice id]]
==Size==
===Big/small===
* Use <code><nowiki><big>...</big> - could be also <big><big>...</big></big> etc. and also <small>...</small></nowiki></code>
===CSS===
<div style="font-size: 200%">200% text</div><code><nowiki><div style="font-size: 200%">200% text</div></nowiki></code>
<div style="font-size: 150%">150% text</div><code><nowiki><div style="font-size: 150%">150% text</div></nowiki></code>
==Special==
* [[Special:SpecialPages]]
* Abuse
** [[Special:AbuseFilter]]
** [[Special:AbuseLog]]
* [[Special:AccountSecurity]]
* [[Special:Allpages]]
* [https://auth.wikimedia.org/enwikiversity/wiki/Special:CreateAccount Create account]
* [[meta:Special:GlobalWatchlist]]
* [[Special:ListGroupRights]]
* [[Special:PermanentLink]]
* [[Random]] - [[Special:Random]] - [[Wikiversity:Random]]
* [[Special:ShortPages]]
* [[Special:Version#Installed extensions]]
==Strategy==
* [[Wikiversity:Publicity]]
* [[Wikiversity:Vision]]
* [[Wikiversity:Vision 2009]]
==Statistics==
* [[Wikiversity:Statistics]]
* [[Google Search and Wikiversity]]
* [http://wikistics.falsikon.de/latest/wikiversity/en/ Monthly page hits for wikiversity.en]
* [http://gtools.org/tool/wikipedia-edit-counter/?str=jtneill&project=en.wikiversity Jtneill edit count]
* https://xtools.wmcloud.org/pageinfo/en.wikiversity.org/
* [[Special:Impact]] - [[w:Special:Impact]]
==Sub-pages==
* [[Special:Prefixindex/User:Jtneill]]
* Transclude:
** <code><nowiki>{{Special:Prefixindex/User:Jtneill}}</nowiki></code>
** <code><nowiki>{{Special:Prefixindex/{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}}}</nowiki></code>
==Stubs==
* [[:Category:Stub templates]]
==Structure==
* [[Wikiversity:Browse/Concept]]
==Symbols==
🟨🟡⭐💛🟥⭕️❌🟦🔵🟩🟢✅
* [[User:VeronicaJeanAnderson]]
==System messages==
* [[Special:AllMessages]]
* [[#Sitenotice|Site notice]]
==Style==
* [[MoS]]
* [[MediaWiki:Common.css]]
==Tables==
* [[Help:Table]]
* [[User:Jtneill/Sandbox/Tables and boxes]]
==Tagging/notification==
* <nowiki>@[[User:UserName|UserName]]</nowiki>
* <nowiki>{{ping|UserName}}</nowiki>
==Templates==
===Page development===
* {{tl|welcome and expand}} - {{tl|we}}
* {{tl|main welcome}}
* {{tl|search}}
* {{tl|draft}}
* {{tl|underconstruction}}
* {{tl|Learning project boilerplate}}
* {{tl|info}}
* {{tl|note}}
* {{tl|notice}}
* {{tl|Nutshell}}
* <nowiki>{{notice|{{findsources}}}}</nowiki>
===Page navigation===
* [[Template:EasyNavBar]]
* [[Template:Recovery psychology]] (example)
* [[Workshop for Australian education policy]] (example)
===Sister projects===
* [[Template:Sisterprojectsearch]]
* [[Template:Wikibooks]]
* [[Template:Wikipedia]]
* [[Template:Wikiversity]]
===User talk===
* {{tl|Welcomeip}}
* {{tl|Welcome}}
* {{tl|Talk header}}
* [[:Category:User warning templates]]
===Administrative===
* [[Template:Category redirect]]
* [[Template:Warning]]
==Theory==
* [[Learning by engagement]]
* [[User:JWSchmidt/Wiki Scholar]]
==Thoughts==
* [[Red link]]s are doorways to the infinite library ([[w:The Library of Babel|Library of Babel]])
==Tooltips==
{{Tooltip|Tooltips allow additional text to be displayed when cursor hovers over|Pretty cool, eh?}}
==User==
* [[w:Special:GlobalRenameRequest]]
* [[Special:UserGroupRights]]
* [[Special:UserRights]]
* [[m:Steward requests/Permissions]]
* [[meta:Help:Two-factor authentication]]
==Usability==
* [[Wikiversity:Usability]]
* http://usability.wikimedia.org - [http://usability.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jtneill Jtneill]
==Video==
* .ogg files can be uploaded and embedded
* See [[/Video]] for examples
==wikEd==
* [[w:User_talk:Cacycle/wikEd]]
==Wiki2Reveal==
* [[Wiki2Reveal]] (slides on the fly from MediaWiki page)
==x Test anchor==
<!-- Test anchor - don't delete! -->
{{anchor|test}}
==See also==
* [[User:Jade Knight/Tools]]
7nmxgp65gvoiolqewal9bmz0htgcu0s
2812409
2812408
2026-06-01T05:59:13Z
Jtneill
10242
/* Diffs */
2812409
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{TOCright}}
[[:Category:Wikiversitans|Wikiversitan]] since March, 2008
''A loose, personal (i.e., somewhat idiosynchratic) organisation of Wikiversity-related how-tos and links.''
==To sort==
{|style="background:transparent;"
|valign=top|
* [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~magnus/commonshelper.php commonshelper]
* [[User:Jtneill/Wikification|Wikification]]
* [[w:Help:Interwiki_linking#Project_titles_and_shortcuts|Interwiki linking]]
* [[Wikiversity:Activity bars]]
* [[Wikiversity:Percent complete]]
|valign=top|
* [[Wikiversity:Import|import]]
* [[Wikiversity:Maintenance]]
* [[Wikiversity:Namespaces]]
* [[Wikiversity:Naming conventions]]
|valign=top|
* [[Wikiversity:Participants]]
* [[Wikiversity:Peer review]]
* [[Wikiversity:Review board]]
* [[Wikiversity:Searching]]
* [[How to be a Wikimedia sysop]]
|}
==Anchor==
* [[Template:Anchor]], e.g., [[#test]] will go to <code><nowiki>{{anchor|test}}</nowiki></code> or <code><nowiki>{{anchor|anchor=test}}</nowiki></code> (should go to end of page)
==Archiving==
* Example of autoarchiving: [[User talk:Terra]]
==Blogging==
* [[Wikiversity Blog howto]]
==Boxes==
[[User:Jtneill/Sandbox/Tables and boxes]]
The simplest of boxes
{| class="messagebox"
|-
| ABC
XYZ
|}
<blockquote style="padding-left:1.0em; padding-right:1.0em; background-color:#eaf8f4;">
Its good that it works in practice, because it certainly doesn’t work in theory[https://blogs.ch.cam.ac.uk/pmr/2007/10/14/the-thing-about-wikipedia-is-that-it-only-works-in-practice-in-theory-it-can-never-work/]
</blockquote>
==Categories==
It is possible to change the order in which a page’s categories are displayed. By default, categories are displayed in the order they appear in the wikitext. Wikis with a consensus to do so can [[m:Special:MyLanguage/Requesting wiki configuration changes|request]] a configuration change to display them in alphabetical order. [https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T373480]
Using titleparts
<nowiki>[[Category:{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}|1}}]]</nowiki>
==[[/Centering/]]==
{{User:Jtneill/Wikiversity/Centering}}
==Chat==
* [[irc:wikiversity-en|#wikiversity-en]]
==Citations and referencing==
* [[w:Help:Citation tools|Citation tools]]
* [[:Category:Citation templates]]
* [[mw:Help:Cite]]
* [[Template:Citation]]
* [[WV:REF]]
* Example: Outward Bound Process Model<ref>Walsh, V., & Golins, G. L. (1976). ''[http://wilderdom.com/theory/OutwardBoundProcessModel.html The exploration of the Outward Bound process]''. Denver, CO: Colorado Outward Bound School.</ref>
;References
{{reflist|1}}
==Collapse boxes==
{{collapse top|Mary had a little lamb}}
Mary had a little lamb,
Little lamb, little lamb,
Mary had a little lamb,
Its fleece was white as snow
And everywhere that Mary went,
Mary went, Mary went,
Everywhere that Mary went
The lamb was sure to go
It followed her to school one day
School one day, school one day
It followed her to school one day
Which was against the rules.
It made the children laugh and play,
Laugh and play, laugh and play,
It made the children laugh and play
To see a lamb at school
And so the teacher turned it out,
Turned it out, turned it out,
And so the teacher turned it out,
But still it lingered near
And waited patiently about,
Patiently about, patiently about,
And waited patiently about
Till Mary did appear
"Why does the lamb love Mary so?"
Love Mary so? Love Mary so?
"Why does the lamb love Mary so?"
The eager children cry
"Why, Mary loves the lamb, you know."
Loves the lamb, you know, loves the lamb, you know
"Why, Mary loves the lamb, you know."
The teacher did reply
{{collapse bottom}}
==Colour==
* [[Wikiversity web page colors|Color tables]] | [[Wikiversity:Color names|Color names]]
* e.g., Font: {{font|color=green|Green}}, Background: <span style="background:hotpink; color:white;">Pink</span>
==Columns==
===Column breaks===
{|
|-
| Works on all browsers (col-begin/break/end):
{{col-begin}}
{{col-break}}
* Col1
{{col-break}}
* Col2
{{col-break}}
* Col3
{{col-end}}
Works on all browsers (col/break/colend):
{{col}}
{{break}}
* Col1
{{break}}
* Col2
{{break}}
* Col3
{{col/end}}
|}
===Moz-column===
Easier to use, but doesn't work on all browsers:
<div style="column-count:3;-moz-column-count:3;-webkit-column-count:3">
* Ant
* Bee
* Buzzard
* Cat
* Dog
* Egret
* Elephant
* Tiger
* Whale
* Worm
</div>
==Conversions==
===HTML===
* [[w:Wikipedia:Tools/Editing_tools#From_HTML]]
* [http://www.ebruni.it/en/software/os/i_love_wiki/index.mpl i love wiki]
* {{tick}} [http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/html2wiki/index.html HTML::WikiConverter]
* {{tick}} [http://openfacts2.berlios.de/html2wiki/index.php HTML::WikiConverter]] Add URL
==CSS==
* [[MediaWiki:Common.css]]
==Custodianship==
* [[Wikiversity:Custodianship]]
** [[Wikiversity:Candidates for Custodianship]]
** [[Wikiversity:Notices for custodians]]
** [[Wikiversity:Request custodian action]]
** [[:Category:Wikiversity custodians]]
==Diffs==
Some ways of showing diffs:
* [[Wikipedia:User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh/FormattedEditRequest|Proposed edits side by side]] (using script)
{| class="diff"
! Before
! After
|-
| class="diff-deletedline" |
<div>
The course page should list all enrolled students.<br>
Student names should be updated weekly.
</div>
| class="diff-addedline" |
<div>
The course page should identify participating student editors.<br>
Student editor names may be added as appropriate.
</div>
|}
<syntaxhighlight lang="diff">
-The course page should list all enrolled students.
+The course page should identify participating student editors.
</syntaxhighlight>
==Edit page==
Create an internal link to the edit source page using:
[[Special:EditPage/{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Edit source]]
<nowiki>
{{edit page}}
</nowiki>
gives:
{{edit page}}
<nowiki>
{{edit page box}}
</nowiki>
gives:
{{edit page box}}
==Extensions==
* [[Special:Version#Extensions]]
* [[/CategoryTree|CategoryTree]]
* [http://www.sandboxserver.org/wiki/index.php?title=Testing_Mediawiki_extensions Sandbox server - testing extensions]
* [[User:Jtneill/WYSIWIG|WYSIWIG]]
==Font==
<p>{{font|face="courier"|size=medium|courier size 3}}</p>
<p>{{font|face="verdana"|size=large|verdana size 4}}</p>
<p>{{font|face="arial"|size=x-large|arial size 5}}</p>
<p>{{font|face="times new roman"|size=xx-large|times new roman size 6}}</p>
<p><b>{{font|face="verdana"|size=xx-large|verdana bold size 6}}</b></p>
<p>{{font|face="lucida calligraphy"|size=xx-large|lucida calligraphy size 7}}</p>
==Formatting==
===Justification===
<div style="text-align: justify"> This text is right justified (but it doesn't look like unless the paragraph is long enough to go over one line on the page, so this is intentionally a particularly and unnecessarily long sentence in order to demonstrate right justification using <nowiki><div style="text-align: justify">...</div></nowiki>).</div>
==Line height==
{{center top}}<p style="line-height: 36px;">
<big><big><big><big>This uses a<br>line height of 36px</big></big></big></big></p>
<pre><p style="line-height: 36px;">...</p></pre>
{{center bottom}}
===Mouse-over===
* [[Help:Mouse-over]]
* [[Template:H:title]]
==Getting started==
* [[Wikiversity:Guided tour|Guided tour]]
* [[Wikiversity:Introduction|Introduction]] (Wikiversity)
* [[/Introduction|Introduction]] (Jtneill)
* [[/Welcome|Welcome]] (Jtneill)
* [[Introduction to Wiki]] - [[Wiki 101]]
* [[How to use wiki technology as a free learner]]
* [[:Image:Short.ogg|Wikiversity - short intro]] (10 sec. video)
* [[:Image:Editing_tutorial-large.ogg|Wikiversity editing tutorial]] (2 min video)
* [[Wikiversity:Community Portal]]
* [[Wikiversity:Content development]]
* [[Help:Edit summary]]
* [[Making links]]
==Good design==
* [[User:Jtneill/Good design]]
==Icons==
* [[Help:Icons]]
* [[User:McCormack/icons]]
==Images==
===[[Template:Gallery|Gallery]]===
{{Gallery
|title=Gallery of images
|footer=Uses this [[Template:Gallery|template]]
|width=150
|lines=2
||Comment
|File:Wikiversity-logo-Snorky.svg|[[Help:Contents/Links|Links]] can be put in captions.
|File:Wikiversity-logo-Snorky.svg|Full [[MediaWiki]]<br />[[syntax]] may be used…
|File:Wikiversity-logo-Snorky.svg|
}}
<!-- Fixed image in bottom right which is linked -->
<div id="template-navbar" style="position: fixed; left:1; right:0; bottom:0; padding:0; font-size:122%;">[[Image:Happy.png|right|50px|link=en:Happiness|Happiness]]</div>
===ImageMap===
* [[mw:Extension:ImageMap|Extension ImageMap]] e.g.,
{{center top}}
<imagemap>File:Treasurchest.svg|center|80px
default [[Special:Random/|Random Wikiversity mainspace page]]
desc none</imagemap>Click the treasure box to go to a random [[Wikiversity]] page{{center bottom}}
;Explanation
The ImageMap extension allows, among other things, an image to link directly to a page e.g., as an internal link:
<imagemap>
File:Treasurchest.svg|center|150px|alt=Alt text
default [[Motivation and emotion/Book/2015|Motivation and emotion Book - 2015]]
</imagemap>
The syntax is:
<pre style="overflow:auto">
<imagemap>
File:Treasurchest.svg|center|150px|alt=Alt text
default [[Motivation and emotion/Book/2015|Motivation and emotion Book - 2015]]
</imagemap>
</pre>
or as an external link:
<imagemap>
File:Treasurchest.svg|center|150px|alt=Alt text
default [https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/motivation Motivation (Psychology Today)]
</imagemap>
The syntax is:
<pre style="overflow:auto">
<imagemap>
File:Treasurchest.svg|center|150px|alt=Alt text
default [https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/motivation Motivation (Psychology Today)]
</imagemap>
</pre>
==Integrations==
I'm interested to explore possible connections between WV and:
* [http://archive.org Archive.org]
* [[w:Citizendium|Citizendium]]
* [[w:Google Groups]]
* [[Moodle]]
* [[Open University]]
* [http://openlearn.open.ac.uk/course/view.php?name=Cohere Cohere]
* [[WikiMedia Sister Projects]], particularly:
** [[Wikibooks]]
** [[Wikipedia]]
** [[Simple Wikipedia]]
==Licensing==
* My teaching materials are licensed under [[Wikiversity:License tags#Free licenses|creative commons attribution 2.5]] and hosted either on http://wilderdom.com or http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au. I am thinking I should be dual licensing, but am still coming to grips with trying to understand the licensing similarities, differences, and issues.
* I plan to gradually transfer most of my teaching materials to the various [[w:WikiMedia Foundation|WikiMedia Foundation]] wiki projects, particularly wikiversity. [[m:Polls|Let's just hope Jimbo doesn't put adds on these sites]], otherwise I will be transferring the materials somewhere else (again).
* [http://beta.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:IRC_meeting:New_licence_for_Wikiversity_Beta New_licence_for_Wikiversity_Beta]
* {{tl|db-copyvio}}
* {{tl|hangon}}
* [[:Category:Astronomy Images]]
==Links==
* Plain links: e.g., <span class="plainlinks">[http://archive.org http://archive.org]</span>: <br><nowiki><span class="plainlinks"> ... </span></nowiki>
* [[mw:Manual:Opening external links in a new window]]
==Long page warning==
* [[MediaWiki:Longpagewarning]]
==[[Main page]]==
* [[:Category:Main page templates]]
* [[Main Page/Layout 0.5]]
* <span class="plainlinks">[http://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Wikiversity:Main_Page&oldid=209253 Main page]</span> (old)
==Map==
<mapframe latitude="-28.420391" longitude="136.757813" zoom="2" width="200" height="109" align="right">{
"type": "FeatureCollection",
"features": [
{
"type": "Feature",
"properties": {},
"geometry": {
"type": "Point",
"coordinates": [
149.12419,
-35.308275
]
}
}
]
}</mapframe>
==Namespaces==
* [[Special:NamespaceInfo]]
==Navigation==
{{nav|User:Jtneill}}
* [[Template:nav]]
==Notes==
Small e.g.,
{{attention}} <small>For calendar due dates, see unit outline.</small>
Notice templates
{{Notice|{{tl|Notice}}}}
{{Note|{{tl|Note}}}}
==Notifications==
* [[Help:Notifications]]
==Pages==
* [[Special:AllPages]]
* Number of pages in category: <nowiki>{{PAGESINCATEGORY:User:Jtneill}}</nowiki>
* {{hitcounter}} - <nowiki>{{hitcounter}}</nowiki>
==[[Project:Participants|Participants]]==
*[[Wikiversity:Support staff]]
===Users===
*{{Participant|CQ}} - see Person of the Hour script
*{{Participant|Donek}}
*{{Participant|Dan Polansky}}
==Pedagogy==
* [[Learning by doing]]
* [[Wikiversity:Project incubator]]
==Policy==
* [[w:Wikipedia:Contributing_FAQ#Is_there_a_minimum_age_requirement_to_contribute_or_register.3F|Is there a minimum age requirement?]]
{{Official policies}}
{{Proposed policies}}
==Project boxes==
* [[Help:Resource attribution]]
==Purge==
To purge the cache for a given page, append this to the URL:
?action=purge
[[mw:Manual:Purge]]
==Quotes==
* [[Template:Quote]]
*
==[[Quizzes]]==
* [[Help:Quiz-Simple]]
* [http://www.qedoc.org/en/index.php?title=User:Jtneill My Qedoc user page]
** [http://eduforge.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=1138 Qedoc now exports quizzes to Wikiversity]
==Referencing==
* [[meta:WMDE Technical Wishes/Sub-referencing]]
==Sandbox==
* http://www.sandboxserver.org/
* [[Wikiversity:Sandbox Server]]
* [[Topic:Sandbox Server 0.5]]
* [http://scratchpad.wikia.com/wiki/Scratchpad_Wiki_Labs Scratchpad]
* [[../Sandbox]]
==Searching==
* [[Help:Google]]
* [[Wikiversity:Colloquium/archives/April 2008#Google search|Google search]] - <nowiki>[[google:wikiversity]]</nowiki> [[google:wikiversity]]
* Use a + instead of a space
==Search multiple categories==
;Dual category search including one category with subcategories
Search for chapters which [[Template:Clarification templates|need clarification]]:
<inputbox>
type=search
width=33
default=incategory:"Resources needing clarification"
namespaces=Main**
prefix=Motivation and emotion/Book
searchbuttonlabel=Search book chapters
bgcolor=transparent
break=no
</inputbox>
==Sitenotice==
* [[MediaWiki:Sitenotice]]
* [[MediaWiki:Sitenotice id]]
==Size==
===Big/small===
* Use <code><nowiki><big>...</big> - could be also <big><big>...</big></big> etc. and also <small>...</small></nowiki></code>
===CSS===
<div style="font-size: 200%">200% text</div><code><nowiki><div style="font-size: 200%">200% text</div></nowiki></code>
<div style="font-size: 150%">150% text</div><code><nowiki><div style="font-size: 150%">150% text</div></nowiki></code>
==Special==
* [[Special:SpecialPages]]
* Abuse
** [[Special:AbuseFilter]]
** [[Special:AbuseLog]]
* [[Special:AccountSecurity]]
* [[Special:Allpages]]
* [https://auth.wikimedia.org/enwikiversity/wiki/Special:CreateAccount Create account]
* [[meta:Special:GlobalWatchlist]]
* [[Special:ListGroupRights]]
* [[Special:PermanentLink]]
* [[Random]] - [[Special:Random]] - [[Wikiversity:Random]]
* [[Special:ShortPages]]
* [[Special:Version#Installed extensions]]
==Strategy==
* [[Wikiversity:Publicity]]
* [[Wikiversity:Vision]]
* [[Wikiversity:Vision 2009]]
==Statistics==
* [[Wikiversity:Statistics]]
* [[Google Search and Wikiversity]]
* [http://wikistics.falsikon.de/latest/wikiversity/en/ Monthly page hits for wikiversity.en]
* [http://gtools.org/tool/wikipedia-edit-counter/?str=jtneill&project=en.wikiversity Jtneill edit count]
* https://xtools.wmcloud.org/pageinfo/en.wikiversity.org/
* [[Special:Impact]] - [[w:Special:Impact]]
==Sub-pages==
* [[Special:Prefixindex/User:Jtneill]]
* Transclude:
** <code><nowiki>{{Special:Prefixindex/User:Jtneill}}</nowiki></code>
** <code><nowiki>{{Special:Prefixindex/{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}}}</nowiki></code>
==Stubs==
* [[:Category:Stub templates]]
==Structure==
* [[Wikiversity:Browse/Concept]]
==Symbols==
🟨🟡⭐💛🟥⭕️❌🟦🔵🟩🟢✅
* [[User:VeronicaJeanAnderson]]
==System messages==
* [[Special:AllMessages]]
* [[#Sitenotice|Site notice]]
==Style==
* [[MoS]]
* [[MediaWiki:Common.css]]
==Tables==
* [[Help:Table]]
* [[User:Jtneill/Sandbox/Tables and boxes]]
==Tagging/notification==
* <nowiki>@[[User:UserName|UserName]]</nowiki>
* <nowiki>{{ping|UserName}}</nowiki>
==Templates==
===Page development===
* {{tl|welcome and expand}} - {{tl|we}}
* {{tl|main welcome}}
* {{tl|search}}
* {{tl|draft}}
* {{tl|underconstruction}}
* {{tl|Learning project boilerplate}}
* {{tl|info}}
* {{tl|note}}
* {{tl|notice}}
* {{tl|Nutshell}}
* <nowiki>{{notice|{{findsources}}}}</nowiki>
===Page navigation===
* [[Template:EasyNavBar]]
* [[Template:Recovery psychology]] (example)
* [[Workshop for Australian education policy]] (example)
===Sister projects===
* [[Template:Sisterprojectsearch]]
* [[Template:Wikibooks]]
* [[Template:Wikipedia]]
* [[Template:Wikiversity]]
===User talk===
* {{tl|Welcomeip}}
* {{tl|Welcome}}
* {{tl|Talk header}}
* [[:Category:User warning templates]]
===Administrative===
* [[Template:Category redirect]]
* [[Template:Warning]]
==Theory==
* [[Learning by engagement]]
* [[User:JWSchmidt/Wiki Scholar]]
==Thoughts==
* [[Red link]]s are doorways to the infinite library ([[w:The Library of Babel|Library of Babel]])
==Tooltips==
{{Tooltip|Tooltips allow additional text to be displayed when cursor hovers over|Pretty cool, eh?}}
==User==
* [[w:Special:GlobalRenameRequest]]
* [[Special:UserGroupRights]]
* [[Special:UserRights]]
* [[m:Steward requests/Permissions]]
* [[meta:Help:Two-factor authentication]]
==Usability==
* [[Wikiversity:Usability]]
* http://usability.wikimedia.org - [http://usability.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Jtneill Jtneill]
==Video==
* .ogg files can be uploaded and embedded
* See [[/Video]] for examples
==wikEd==
* [[w:User_talk:Cacycle/wikEd]]
==Wiki2Reveal==
* [[Wiki2Reveal]] (slides on the fly from MediaWiki page)
==x Test anchor==
<!-- Test anchor - don't delete! -->
{{anchor|test}}
==See also==
* [[User:Jade Knight/Tools]]
trx82ojjwpzjmr3394g8rg4mfdgt8xm
Music/Software/Lilypond
0
90768
2812326
2687934
2026-05-31T16:36:30Z
Mu301
3705
rm broken markup
2812326
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{box|background=yellow|align=center|border size=10px|radius=20px|text align=center|
<big>''To sample audio files for each of the 128 instruments available on LilyPond visit this link:''</big><br> <br>
<big><u>[[Music/Software/Lilypond/MIDI]]</u></big> <br> }}
[[file:LilyPond-logo-with-music.png|150px|center]]
__TOC__
==Two versions of LylyPond==
===Lilypond.org (GNU)]===
:This "[[w:GNU|GNU]]" version is the stronger of the two, with documentation so well written that users of the weaker and more restricted WMF version can glean useful information:
:* https://lilypond.org/manuals.html
:*[https://lilypond.org/text-input.html Brief introduction to LilyPond]
:*[https://lilypond.org/learning.html Manuals (available in three convenient formats)]
:The editor [[w:Frescobaldi_(software)|Frescobaldi]] is essential for this version. For a Windows machine, downloading instructions are available at:
:*[https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/learning/graphical-setup-under-windows lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/learning/graphical-setup-under-windows]
===Wikimedia Foundation (WMF)===
:A restricted version of [[w:LilyPond|LilyPond]] has been installed for use by the [https://wikimediafoundation.org/our-work/wikimedia-projects/ Wikimedia Foundation]. Two good resources for this version can be found at:
:*[[Wikipedia:Help:Score]]
:*[[Wikisource:Help:Sheet music]]
[[File:LilyPond wikimedia Playback speed.png|thumb|LilyPond wikimedia Playback speed]]
:The simple approach to sound used by the WMF version is described at Wikipedia's [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Score#MIDI_instruments Help:Score#MIDI_instruments]. As shown in the figure to the right, editors have the option of including a tab that not only plays the sound, but also allows readers to modify the playback speed, as well as download a MIDI sound file. The methods described by [[Wikipedia:Help:Score]] create what looks like an image from [[w:Wikimedia commons|Wikimedia Commons]]. But it is actually [[w:HTML|hypertext markup]].
:The Lilypond.org (GNU) version is also suitable for WMF editors, provided adjustments are made to the [[w:muscore3_(software)|muscore3 editor.]] These adjustments include changing the ouput format from wave to an muscore xml image.<ref>I had trouble doing this on my Windows machine. See
[https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/learning/graphical-setup-under-windows lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/learning/graphical-setup-under-windows] and </ref>
==Musical instruments available through the MIDI sound option==
<big>''To hear a [[w:MIDI|MIDI sound file]] for each of the 128 "instruments" available on LilyPond vist:''</big>
*<big>[[Music/Software/Lilypond/MIDI]]</big>
This link allows you to play short [[w:Riff|riff]]s that samples the sound of these instruments at various tempos and pitches. [[w:special:permalink/1114897134#Part_I:_The_Adoration_of_the_Earth|Stravinsky's riff]] was deliberately made unmusical, with the last fermata extra long so that the listener can hear both rapid, as well as sustained notes. For example, if the [[w:Help:Score#MIDI_instruments|MIDI instrument]] selection is #"bassoon", the corresponding WMF LilyPond script, score, and audio are:
<small><nowiki><score sound="1"> \relative c''{\set Staff.midiInstrument = #"bassoon"\clef treble\cadenzaOn c2\grace { b16[c] } [b g e (b'] a1~a2) } </score></nowiki></small>
<score sound="1"> \relative c''{\set Staff.midiInstrument = #"bassoon"\clef treble\cadenzaOn c2\grace { b16[c] } [b g e (b'] a1~a2) } </score>
The purpose of the <code>\cadenzaOn</code> command was to remove all bar lines from the printed score. It has no effect on the tempo. Since three tempos are given for each "instrument", this code had to be written in 384 times, each with small changes in the parameters. The python code that performed this feat is documented at:
*[[Python/LilyPond]]
===Modifying the tempo===
The tempo of the passages can be changed by replacing the text <code>\set Staff.midiInstrument</code> by <code>\set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 4 = 40</code> to obtain:<ref>[[w:special:permalink/1118265754#Hiding_tempo]]</ref><ref>We also replaced the last note by a4 since the slower pace does not need such a long note at the end.</ref>
<score sound="1"> \relative c''{\set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 4 = 40 \set Staff.midiInstrument = #"bassoon"\clef treble\cadenzaOn c2\grace { b16[c] } [b g e (b'] a4) } </score>
===Glockenspiel's strange harmonics===
I noticed that the glockenspiel plays strange harmonics and subharmonics. In this passage all values of C are half-notes.
<score sound="1"> \relative c{\set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 4 = 80 \set Staff.midiInstrument = #"glockenspiel"\clef treble\cadenzaOn
c2 d4 e f g a b c2 d4 e f g a b c2 d4 e f g a b c2 d4 e f g a b c2} </score>
-----
{{Subpages}}
[[Category:Music software]]
cuvoplgxo76sdjliguly6pjzhounun9
2812327
2812326
2026-05-31T16:41:10Z
Mu301
3705
/* Musical instruments available through the MIDI sound option */
2812327
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{box|background=yellow|align=center|border size=10px|radius=20px|text align=center|
<big>''To sample audio files for each of the 128 instruments available on LilyPond visit this link:''</big><br> <br>
<big><u>[[Music/Software/Lilypond/MIDI]]</u></big> <br> }}
[[file:LilyPond-logo-with-music.png|150px|center]]
__TOC__
==Two versions of LylyPond==
===Lilypond.org (GNU)]===
:This "[[w:GNU|GNU]]" version is the stronger of the two, with documentation so well written that users of the weaker and more restricted WMF version can glean useful information:
:* https://lilypond.org/manuals.html
:*[https://lilypond.org/text-input.html Brief introduction to LilyPond]
:*[https://lilypond.org/learning.html Manuals (available in three convenient formats)]
:The editor [[w:Frescobaldi_(software)|Frescobaldi]] is essential for this version. For a Windows machine, downloading instructions are available at:
:*[https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/learning/graphical-setup-under-windows lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/learning/graphical-setup-under-windows]
===Wikimedia Foundation (WMF)===
:A restricted version of [[w:LilyPond|LilyPond]] has been installed for use by the [https://wikimediafoundation.org/our-work/wikimedia-projects/ Wikimedia Foundation]. Two good resources for this version can be found at:
:*[[Wikipedia:Help:Score]]
:*[[Wikisource:Help:Sheet music]]
[[File:LilyPond wikimedia Playback speed.png|thumb|LilyPond wikimedia Playback speed]]
:The simple approach to sound used by the WMF version is described at Wikipedia's [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Score#MIDI_instruments Help:Score#MIDI_instruments]. As shown in the figure to the right, editors have the option of including a tab that not only plays the sound, but also allows readers to modify the playback speed, as well as download a MIDI sound file. The methods described by [[Wikipedia:Help:Score]] create what looks like an image from [[w:Wikimedia commons|Wikimedia Commons]]. But it is actually [[w:HTML|hypertext markup]].
:The Lilypond.org (GNU) version is also suitable for WMF editors, provided adjustments are made to the [[w:muscore3_(software)|muscore3 editor.]] These adjustments include changing the ouput format from wave to an muscore xml image.<ref>I had trouble doing this on my Windows machine. See
[https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/learning/graphical-setup-under-windows lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/learning/graphical-setup-under-windows] and </ref>
==Musical instruments available through the MIDI sound option==
<big>''To hear a [[w:MIDI|MIDI sound file]] for each of the 128 "instruments" available on LilyPond vist:''</big>
*<big>[[Music/Software/Lilypond/MIDI]]</big>
This link allows you to play short [[w:Riff|riff]]s that samples the sound of these instruments at various tempos and pitches. [[w:special:permalink/1114897134#Part_I:_The_Adoration_of_the_Earth|Stravinsky's riff]] was deliberately made unmusical, with the last fermata extra long so that the listener can hear both rapid, as well as sustained notes. For example, if the [[w:Help:Score#MIDI_instruments|MIDI instrument]] selection is #"bassoon", the corresponding WMF LilyPond script, score, and audio are:
<pre><score sound="1"> \relative c''{\set Staff.midiInstrument = #"bassoon"\clef treble\cadenzaOn c2\grace { b16[c] } [b g e (b'] a1~a2) } </score></pre>
<score sound="1"> \relative c''{\set Staff.midiInstrument = #"bassoon"\clef treble\cadenzaOn c2\grace { b16[c] } [b g e (b'] a1~a2) } </score>
The purpose of the <code>\cadenzaOn</code> command was to remove all bar lines from the printed score. It has no effect on the tempo. Since three tempos are given for each "instrument", this code had to be written in 384 times, each with small changes in the parameters. The python code that performed this feat is documented at:
*[[Python/LilyPond]]
===Modifying the tempo===
The tempo of the passages can be changed by replacing the text <code>\set Staff.midiInstrument</code> by <code>\set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 4 = 40</code> to obtain:<ref>[[w:special:permalink/1118265754#Hiding_tempo]]</ref><ref>We also replaced the last note by a4 since the slower pace does not need such a long note at the end.</ref>
<score sound="1"> \relative c''{\set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 4 = 40 \set Staff.midiInstrument = #"bassoon"\clef treble\cadenzaOn c2\grace { b16[c] } [b g e (b'] a4) } </score>
===Glockenspiel's strange harmonics===
I noticed that the glockenspiel plays strange harmonics and subharmonics. In this passage all values of C are half-notes.
<score sound="1"> \relative c{\set Score.tempoHideNote = ##t \tempo 4 = 80 \set Staff.midiInstrument = #"glockenspiel"\clef treble\cadenzaOn
c2 d4 e f g a b c2 d4 e f g a b c2 d4 e f g a b c2 d4 e f g a b c2} </score>
-----
{{Subpages}}
[[Category:Music software]]
kxvmwhut41tx2y0j57vuegmpqlzwzq8
VHDL programming in plain view
0
121359
2812418
2811748
2026-06-01T11:16:37Z
Young1lim
21186
/* Data */
2812418
wikitext
text/x-wiki
<!---------------------------------------------------------------------->
== Flip Flop and Latch ==
* FFLatch.Overview.1.A ([[Media:FFLatch.Overview.1.A.20111103.pdf|pdf]])
* Counter.74LS193.1.A ([[Media:Counter.74LS193.1.A.20111108.pdf|pdf]])
* Clock.Overview.1.A ([[Media:Clock.Overview.1.A.20111108.pdf|pdf]])
* Function.Overview.1.A ([[Media:Function.Overview.1.A.20111201.pdf|pdf]])
<br>
== Versions of VHDL ==
* VHDL Versions ([[Media:VHDL.1.A.Versions.20120619.pdf|pdf]])
* VHDL Libraries ([[Media:VHDL.1.A.Libraries.20140219.pdf|pdf]])
<br>
== Basic Features of VHDL ==
==== Data ====
* Data Objects ([[Media:Data.Object.1A.20260601.pdf|A]], [[Media:Data.Object.1B.20260526.pdf|B]])
* Data Types ([[Media:Data.Type.2A.20260526.pdf|A]], [[Media:Data.Type.2B.20260526.pdf|B]])
* Packages ([[Media:Data.Package.3A.20251206.pdf|pdf]])
* Signal Types ([[Media:Signal.Type.1A.20250614.pdf|pdf]])
* Attributes ([[Media:Data.4.A.Attribute.20251021.pdf|pdf]])
<br>
==== Signals & Variables ====
* Signals & Variables ([[Media:Signal.1A.SigVar.20250614.pdf|pdf]])
* Sequential Signal Assignments ([[Media:Signal.4A.Sequential.20250612.pdf|pdf]])
* Concurrent & Sequential Signal Assignments ([[Media:Signal.1.A.ConSeq.20120611.pdf|pdf]])
* Inertial & Transport Delay Models ([[Media:Signal.2.A.InertTrans.20120704.pdf|pdf]])
* Simulation & Synthesis ([[Media:Signal.3.A.SimSyn.20120504.pdf|pdf]])
<br>
==== Structure ====
* Component ([[Media:Struct.1.A.Component.20120804.pdf|pdf]])
* Configuration ([[Media:Struct.1.A.Configuration.20121003.pdf|pdf]])
* Generic ([[Media:Struct.1.A.Generic.20120802.pdf|pdf]])
</br>
==== Entity and Architecture ====
<br>
==== Block Statement ====
<br>
==== Process Statement ====
<br>
==== Operators ====
<br>
==== Assignment Statement ====
<br>
==== Concurrent Statement ====
<br>
==== Sequential Control Statement ====
<br>
==== Function ====
* Function.1.A Usage ([[Media:Function.1.A.Usage.20120611.pdf|pdf]])
* Function.2.A Conversion Function ([[Media:Function.2.A.Conversion.pdf|pdf]])
* Function.3.A Resolution Function ([[Media:Function.3.A.Resolution.pdf|pdf]])
<br>
==== Procedure ====
<br>
==== Package ====
</br>
go to [ [[Electrical_%26_Computer_Engineering_Studies]] ]
[[Category:VHDL]]
[[Category:FPGA]]
9751zoj5amve8t3hmuw8p8scflqqx3b
Understanding Arithmetic Circuits
0
139384
2812387
2812144
2026-06-01T01:26:17Z
Young1lim
21186
/* Adder */
2812387
wikitext
text/x-wiki
== Adder ==
* Binary Adder Architecture Exploration ( [[Media:Adder.20131113.pdf|pdf]] )
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Adder type !! Overview !! Analysis !! VHDL Level Design !! CMOS Level Design
|-
| '''1. Ripple Carry Adder'''
|| [[Media:VLSI.Arith.1A.RCA.20250522.pdf|A]]||
|| [[Media:Adder.rca.20140313.pdf|pdf]]
|| [[Media:VLSI.Arith.1D.RCA.CMOS.20211108.pdf|pdf]]
|-
| '''2. Carry Lookahead Adder'''
|| [[Media:VLSI.Arith.1.A.CLA.20260109.pdf|org]], [[Media:VLSI.Arith.2A.CLA.20260530.pdf|A]], [[Media:VLSI.Arith.2B.CLA.20260601.pdf|B]] ||
|| [[Media:Adder.cla.20140313.pdf|pdf]]||
|-
| '''3. Carry Save Adder'''
|| [[Media:VLSI.Arith.1.A.CSave.20151209.pdf|A]]||
|| ||
|-
|| '''4. Carry Select Adder'''
|| [[Media:VLSI.Arith.1.A.CSelA.20191002.pdf|A]]||
|| ||
|-
|| '''5. Carry Skip Adder'''
|| [[Media:VLSI.Arith.5A.CSkip.20250405.pdf|A]]||
||
|| [[Media:VLSI.Arith.5D.CSkip.CMOS.20211108.pdf|pdf]]
|-
|| '''6. Carry Chain Adder'''
|| [[Media:VLSI.Arith.6A.CCA.20211109.pdf|A]]||
|| [[Media:VLSI.Arith.6C.CCA.VHDL.20211109.pdf|pdf]], [[Media:Adder.cca.20140313.pdf|pdf]]
|| [[Media:VLSI.Arith.6D.CCA.CMOS.20211109.pdf|pdf]]
|-
|| '''7. Kogge-Stone Adder'''
|| [[Media:VLSI.Arith.1.A.KSA.20140315.pdf|A]]||
|| [[Media:Adder.ksa.20140409.pdf|pdf]]||
|-
|| '''8. Prefix Adder'''
|| [[Media:VLSI.Arith.1.A.PFA.20140314.pdf|A]]||
|| ||
|-
|| '''9.1 Variable Block Adder'''
|| [[Media:VLSI.Arith.1A.VBA.20221110.pdf|A]], [[Media:VLSI.Arith.1B.VBA.20230911.pdf|B]], [[Media:VLSI.Arith.1C.VBA.20240622.pdf|C]], [[Media:VLSI.Arith.1C.VBA.20250218.pdf|D]]||
|| ||
|-
|| '''9.2 Multi-Level Variable Block Adder'''
|| [[Media:VLSI.Arith.1.A.VBA-Multi.20221031.pdf|A]]||
|| ||
|}
</br>
=== Adder Architectures Suitable for FPGA ===
* FPGA Carry-Chain Adder ([[Media:VLSI.Arith.1.A.FPGA-CCA.20210421.pdf|pdf]])
* FPGA Carry Select Adder ([[Media:VLSI.Arith.1.B.FPGA-CarrySelect.20210522.pdf|pdf]])
* FPGA Variable Block Adder ([[Media:VLSI.Arith.1.C.FPGA-VariableBlock.20220125.pdf|pdf]])
* FPGA Carry Lookahead Adder ([[Media:VLSI.Arith.1.D.FPGA-CLookahead.20210304.pdf|pdf]])
* Carry-Skip Adder
</br>
== Barrel Shifter ==
* Barrel Shifter Architecture Exploration ([[Media:Bshift.20131105.pdf|bshfit.vhdl]], [[Media:Bshift.makefile.20131109.pdf|bshfit.makefile]])
</br>
'''Mux Based Barrel Shifter'''
* Analysis ([[Media:Arith.BShfiter.20151207.pdf|pdf]])
* Implementation
</br>
== Multiplier ==
=== Array Multipliers ===
* Analysis ([[Media:VLSI.Arith.1.A.Mult.20151209.pdf|pdf]])
</br>
=== Tree Mulltipliers ===
* Lattice Multiplication ([[Media:VLSI.Arith.LatticeMult.20170204.pdf|pdf]])
* Wallace Tree ([[Media:VLSI.Arith.WallaceTree.20170204.pdf|pdf]])
* Dadda Tree ([[Media:VLSI.Arith.DaddaTree.20170701.pdf|pdf]])
</br>
=== Booth Multipliers ===
* [[Media:RNS4.BoothEncode.20161005.pdf|Booth Encoding Note]]
* Booth Multiplier Note ([[Media:BoothMult.20160929.pdf|H1.pdf]])
</br>
== Divider ==
* Binary Divider ([[Media:VLSI.Arith.1.A.Divider.20131217.pdf|pdf]])</br>
</br>
</br>
go to [ [[Electrical_%26_Computer_Engineering_Studies]] ]
[[Category:Digital Circuit Design]]
[[Category:FPGA]]
aqqcibwvcuavrfzoybp5ig99pn2oi5v
Suicide
0
142861
2812351
2785747
2026-05-31T22:10:04Z
Atcovi
276019
removing poor quality page
2812351
wikitext
text/x-wiki
[[File:Edouard_Manet_-_Le_Suicidé.jpg|thumb|[[wikipedia:Edouard_Manet|Edouard Manet]] - ''Le Suicidé'']]
'''Suicidology''' is the scientific study of suicide and the components of suicide, including suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, suicide epidemiology, and suicide prevention. It also encompasses the study of non-suicidal self-injury and other forms of self-destructive behavior (including [[Eating Disorders|eating disorders]], which have been reported to be significantly associated with suicide attempts).<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Pisetsky|first=Emily M.|last2=Thornton|first2=Laura M.|last3=Lichtenstein|first3=Paul|last4=Pedersen|first4=Nancy L.|last5=Bulik|first5=Cynthia M.|date=2013-11|title=Suicide attempts in women with eating disorders|url=https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8023043/|journal=Journal of Abnormal Psychology|volume=122|issue=4|pages=1042–1056|doi=10.1037/a0034902|issn=1939-1846|pmc=8023043|pmid=24364606}}</ref> According to the [[wikipedia:World_Health_Organization|WHO]], more than 720,000 people die by suicide every year.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide|title=Suicide|website=www.who.int|language=en|access-date=2025-11-20}}</ref> The United States has assumed $93.5 billion in total costs of suicidal behavior.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book|title=The neuroscience of suicidal behavior|last=Heeringen|first=Kees van|date=2018|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-107-14894-9|series=Cambridge fundamentals of neuroscience in psychology|location=Cambridge ; New York, NY}}</ref>
__NOTOC__
==Discussion questions==
* What are the reasons that individuals engage in suicide? How can these reasons be reduced or mitigated so as to lower rates of suicide?
* Why does a person in a particular situation want to take his or her own life, while another person in the same situation would react in a different way and perhaps seek help?<ref name=":0" />
* How can rates of suicide be lowered?
* Does psychiatric coercion worsen problems of suicide?
* How do most people who possess certain variables that are highly associated with suicide, such as hopelessness, burdensomeness, and emotional pain, ''not'' commit suicide? What differentiates them from those who possess these variables and end up attempting/committing suicide?<ref>{{Cite book|title=Why People Die by Suicide|last=Joiner|first=Thomas|date=2009|publisher=Harvard University Press|isbn=978-0-674-02549-3|location=Cambridge}}</ref>
{{Col}}
== Learning resources ==
;Subpages
* [[/Suicidogenesis/]]
* [[/Stress-diathesis model/]]
* [[/Stress-response systems/]]
;Others
* [[Draft Homicide Bill]]
* [[Motivation and emotion/Book/2013/Suicidality and motivation|What motives underlie suicidality?]]
== Suggested readings ==
* ''Suicide Prohibition: The Shame of Medicine'' by psychiatrist Thomas Szasz.
* ''Fatal Freedom: The Ethics and Politics of Suicide'' by Thomas Szasz.
* ''The Neuroscience of Suicidal Behavior (Cambridge Fundamentals of Neuroscience in Psychology)'' by Kees van Heeringen.
===Wikipedia===
* [[Wikipedia: Suicide|Suicide]]
* [[Wikipedia: Suicide prevention|Suicide prevention]]
{{ColBreak}}
==See also==
* [[Szaszian studies]]
* [[Psychiatry]]
* [[Psychology]]
* [[Euthanasia]]
* [[Anti-psychiatry]]
==Exernal links==
* [https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/ Suicide Prevention Lifeline]
* [https://suicidology.org/what-is-suicidology/ What Is Suicidology?]
{{Col/end}}
== References ==
{{Reflist}}
[[Category:Suicide| ]]
[[Category:Suicidology]]
je6spbnnfyy9t4ylk9m488jhn7sdnla
Music/Software
0
166652
2812323
2462630
2026-05-31T15:34:22Z
Mu301
3705
+ LilyPond
2812323
wikitext
text/x-wiki
*[[/Lilypond/]]
*[[/PWGL/]], a freeware software application that facilitates computer-assisted composition of music.
[[Category:Software]]
c5w3hviqvmy1s7jfuyzwkbs9n1h5znu
2812324
2812323
2026-05-31T15:37:37Z
Mu301
3705
+w description
2812324
wikitext
text/x-wiki
*[[/Lilypond/]] - LilyPond is a free software program and file format for [[w:music engraving]].
*[[/PWGL/]] - a freeware software application that facilitates computer-assisted composition of music.
[[Category:Software]]
7g5y6px7ym6fkgy4ob7lrgri3cwhead
2812325
2812324
2026-05-31T16:12:21Z
Mu301
3705
dynamic subpage listing
2812325
wikitext
text/x-wiki
List of subpages:
{{Special:Prefixindex/Music/Software|hideredirects=1|stripprefix=1}}
[[Category:Software]]
tp9ldfugul9m1mrwbghp7bjtev4dvvw
User:Jtneill/sandbox
2
199556
2812390
2804530
2026-06-01T02:03:28Z
Jtneill
10242
2812390
wikitext
text/x-wiki
<syntaxhighlight lang="diff">
-The course page should list all enrolled students.
+The course page should identify participating student editors.
</syntaxhighlight>
{| width="100%" align="center" style="clear:both; margin:0; border:0; padding:0; background-color:transparent; font-family:Arial,Tahoma,'Palatino Linotype',sans-serif; font-size:0.875em;"
![[File:Blue2F8CC2 circle 100%.svg|36px]]<br />[[User talk:RadiX|<span style="color:#BFEFFF;">talk</span>]]
![[File:Blue circle logo.svg|36px]]<br />[[Special:EmailUser/RadiX|<span style="color:#BFEFFF;">email</span>]]
![[File:Urantia three-concentric-blue-circles-on-white symbol.svg|36px]]<br />[[User:RadiX|<span style="color:#BFEFFF;">home</span>]]
![[File:Blue circle logo.svg|36px]]<br />[[Special:Contributions/RadiX|<span style="color:#BFEFFF;">edits</span>]]
![[File:Blue2F8CC2 circle 100%.svg|36px]]<br />[[:m:User:RadiX/Info|<span style="color:#BFEFFF;">info</span>]]
|}
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
!colspan="2"| mw-collapsible
|-
| Lorem ipsum || dolor sit amet
|}
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed"
!colspan="2"| collapsible
|-
| Lorem ipsum || dolor sit amet
|}
Create an internal link to the edit source page using:
[[Special:EditPage/{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Edit source]]
* Something with poor grammar.{{g}}{{gr}}{{grammar}}
* Something lack citation.{{f}}{{fact}}{{cn}}
* Something to be written better.{{rewrite}}{{explain}}
* Incorrectly spelt{{sp}}{{spelling}}
{{tip|Suggestions for this section:
* Present in alphabetical order
* Use [[w:Letter case#Sentence casing|sentence casing]]
* Include the source in parentheses
}}
A very simple box can be created by using a space at the start of the line
{{Collapse top|This is the title text}}
{{lorem ipsum}}
{{Collapse bottom}}
{{Notice|This page is complete for 2022.}}
{{Motivation and emotion/Lectures/Complete}}
{{Motivation and emotion/Lectures|Lecture 01: Introduction|first}}
{{Motivation and emotion/Lectures/Complete}}
<!-- {{Motivation and emotion/Lectures/In development}} -->
<!-- {{Motivation and emotion/Lectures/Complete}} -->
{{Motivation and emotion/Lectures/Navigation}}
<inputbox>
type=search
width=24
prefix=Motivation and emotion
searchbuttonlabel=Search
bgcolor=transparent
</inputbox>
<inputbox>
type=search
width=25
namespaces=Main**
prefix=Motivation and emotion
searchbuttonlabel=Search
bgcolor=transparent
</inputbox>
<inputbox>
type=search
width=25
namespaces=Main**
prefix=Motivation and emotion
searchbuttonlabel=Search
bgcolor=transparent
</inputbox>
{|style="border-style: solid; border-width: 10px 10px 10px 10px"
|-
| style="padding: 0 0 50px 0" | Hello
|-
| Goodbye
|}
==Junk==
<span style="background:#00FF00">On Campus</span>, outside 1C33 ({{attention}}during lockdown, this will be in the Virtual Room)
{{collapse box|Contributions: Wikiversity|
# 13:27, 21/08/21: Grammatical error revised with addition of "?" [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2021%2FImposter_syndrome&type=revision&diff=2308014&oldid=2307379]
# 13:27, 21/08/21: Added headings "see also", "refrences", and "external links" [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2021%2FImposter_syndrome&type=revision&diff=2308014&oldid=2307379]
# 15:59, 27/08/21: Grammatical error revised "nasa" to "NASA" [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2021%2FImposter_syndrome&type=revision&diff=2310667&oldid=2309962]
# 9:00, 12/09/21: Inserted chapter template to book 'Sublimation' [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion/Book/2021/Sublimation&action=history]
# 11:01, 12/09/21: Inserted chapter template to book 'Limbic system and emotion' [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2021%2FLimbic_system_and_emotion&type=revision&diff=2317354&oldid=2301485]
# 9:33, 12/09/21: Multiple small structural edits and grammatical changes. Also commented "colloquial" in response to informal language and "repetition" to a sentence used twice [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2020%2FHypomania_and_motivation&type=revision&diff=2317363&oldid=2244447]
# 12/09/21, 9:36: Comment added "reference?" to questionably factual claim[https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2020%2FMusic_and_study&type=revision&diff=2317364&oldid=2238513]
# 9:37, 12/09/21: Comment added "Check your reference order, they are incorrect" [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2020%2FMusic_and_study&type=revision&diff=2317364&oldid=2238513]
# 9:53, 12/09/21: Grammar and spelling edits made such as "Of" to "of" [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2020%2FCOVID-19_pandemic_impacts_on_motivation_and_emotion&type=revision&diff=2317367&oldid=2305679]
# 9:51, 12/09/21: General overview with some comments made pertaining to spelling, grammar, and again, questionably factual claims [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2020%2FAntidepressants_and_motivation&type=revision&diff=2317366&oldid=2312772]
# 10:12, 12/09/21: Minor revisions made to grammar and spelling such as "The University" replacing "university" [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2018%2FSelf-regulated_learning&type=revision&diff=2317372&oldid=2317371]
# 19:45, 15/09/21: Minor edits to spelling and grammar [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.phptitle=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2021%2FGratitude&type=revision&diff=2317999&oldid=2317779]
}}
<blockquote>sdakfjasl;kdfjdsf (see Table 1).</blockquote>
Table 1.
This is an APA Style Table
{| class="wikitable"
|+
!
!Col 1
!
|-
|
|
|xxx
|-
|
|
|
|-
|
|
|
|}
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359178917300940?casa_token=B1ixm5Cy4i8AAAAA:t41F6gfsugqIPjsBZSNvCyz3iuZNSPgxaKrAojkbNE2xKJIfDDN1k5vM7f4TRCMtdathPWQ6_HnD
==Dual category search including one category with subcategories==
Search all chapters:
<inputbox>
type=search
width=20
default=incategory:"Resources needing clarification"
namespaces=Main**
prefix=Motivation and emotion/Book
searchbuttonlabel=Search book chapters
bgcolor=transparent
break=no
</inputbox>
==2==
==3==
==4==
{{RoundBoxRight}}
<div style="text-align: center; font-size: larger; font-weight: bold;">[[/How to make a multimedia recording/]] (45 mins)<br>[[File:Parodyfilm.png|center|65px]]</div>
{{LeftRightBoxClose}}
{{quote|<big>Quote text</big><br>- [[q:author| Author details]]}}
{{RoundBoxTop|theme=15}}
Text goes here
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop|theme=7}}
Text goes here
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop|theme=3}}'''Focus questions:'''
* What is x?
* What is the relationships between conscientiousness and motivation?
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{Robelbox|theme={{{theme|10}}}|title=Money and extrinsic motivation}}<div style="{{Robelbox/pad}}">
Financial gain is a unique motive as it is an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivation#Extrinsic_motivation extrinsic motivation]. Whilst revenge and self-defence motivations (see below) typically stem from internal needs, killing for money is a behaviour that is motivated purely by external rewards. This motivation arises from outside the individual with money acting as an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incentive incentive]. Killing for money can be seen as an externally regulated behaviour that is performed to obtain reward (Reeve, 2018). Unsurprisingly, people who are motivated through external regulation show poor functioning and poor outcomes, both of which can be related to homicidal behaviour (Ryan & Deci, 2017).
</div>
{{Robelbox/close}}
n3rp3fgmeglll6pq8dpbr0rxz8th99q
2812391
2812390
2026-06-01T02:04:50Z
Jtneill
10242
2812391
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{| class="diff"
! Before
! After
|-
| class="diff-deletedline" |
<div>
The course page should list all enrolled students.<br>
Student names should be updated weekly.
</div>
| class="diff-addedline" |
<div>
The course page should identify participating student editors.<br>
Student editor names may be added as appropriate.
</div>
|}
<syntaxhighlight lang="diff">
-The course page should list all enrolled students.
+The course page should identify participating student editors.
</syntaxhighlight>
{| width="100%" align="center" style="clear:both; margin:0; border:0; padding:0; background-color:transparent; font-family:Arial,Tahoma,'Palatino Linotype',sans-serif; font-size:0.875em;"
![[File:Blue2F8CC2 circle 100%.svg|36px]]<br />[[User talk:RadiX|<span style="color:#BFEFFF;">talk</span>]]
![[File:Blue circle logo.svg|36px]]<br />[[Special:EmailUser/RadiX|<span style="color:#BFEFFF;">email</span>]]
![[File:Urantia three-concentric-blue-circles-on-white symbol.svg|36px]]<br />[[User:RadiX|<span style="color:#BFEFFF;">home</span>]]
![[File:Blue circle logo.svg|36px]]<br />[[Special:Contributions/RadiX|<span style="color:#BFEFFF;">edits</span>]]
![[File:Blue2F8CC2 circle 100%.svg|36px]]<br />[[:m:User:RadiX/Info|<span style="color:#BFEFFF;">info</span>]]
|}
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
!colspan="2"| mw-collapsible
|-
| Lorem ipsum || dolor sit amet
|}
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed"
!colspan="2"| collapsible
|-
| Lorem ipsum || dolor sit amet
|}
Create an internal link to the edit source page using:
[[Special:EditPage/{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Edit source]]
* Something with poor grammar.{{g}}{{gr}}{{grammar}}
* Something lack citation.{{f}}{{fact}}{{cn}}
* Something to be written better.{{rewrite}}{{explain}}
* Incorrectly spelt{{sp}}{{spelling}}
{{tip|Suggestions for this section:
* Present in alphabetical order
* Use [[w:Letter case#Sentence casing|sentence casing]]
* Include the source in parentheses
}}
A very simple box can be created by using a space at the start of the line
{{Collapse top|This is the title text}}
{{lorem ipsum}}
{{Collapse bottom}}
{{Notice|This page is complete for 2022.}}
{{Motivation and emotion/Lectures/Complete}}
{{Motivation and emotion/Lectures|Lecture 01: Introduction|first}}
{{Motivation and emotion/Lectures/Complete}}
<!-- {{Motivation and emotion/Lectures/In development}} -->
<!-- {{Motivation and emotion/Lectures/Complete}} -->
{{Motivation and emotion/Lectures/Navigation}}
<inputbox>
type=search
width=24
prefix=Motivation and emotion
searchbuttonlabel=Search
bgcolor=transparent
</inputbox>
<inputbox>
type=search
width=25
namespaces=Main**
prefix=Motivation and emotion
searchbuttonlabel=Search
bgcolor=transparent
</inputbox>
<inputbox>
type=search
width=25
namespaces=Main**
prefix=Motivation and emotion
searchbuttonlabel=Search
bgcolor=transparent
</inputbox>
{|style="border-style: solid; border-width: 10px 10px 10px 10px"
|-
| style="padding: 0 0 50px 0" | Hello
|-
| Goodbye
|}
==Junk==
<span style="background:#00FF00">On Campus</span>, outside 1C33 ({{attention}}during lockdown, this will be in the Virtual Room)
{{collapse box|Contributions: Wikiversity|
# 13:27, 21/08/21: Grammatical error revised with addition of "?" [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2021%2FImposter_syndrome&type=revision&diff=2308014&oldid=2307379]
# 13:27, 21/08/21: Added headings "see also", "refrences", and "external links" [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2021%2FImposter_syndrome&type=revision&diff=2308014&oldid=2307379]
# 15:59, 27/08/21: Grammatical error revised "nasa" to "NASA" [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2021%2FImposter_syndrome&type=revision&diff=2310667&oldid=2309962]
# 9:00, 12/09/21: Inserted chapter template to book 'Sublimation' [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion/Book/2021/Sublimation&action=history]
# 11:01, 12/09/21: Inserted chapter template to book 'Limbic system and emotion' [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2021%2FLimbic_system_and_emotion&type=revision&diff=2317354&oldid=2301485]
# 9:33, 12/09/21: Multiple small structural edits and grammatical changes. Also commented "colloquial" in response to informal language and "repetition" to a sentence used twice [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2020%2FHypomania_and_motivation&type=revision&diff=2317363&oldid=2244447]
# 12/09/21, 9:36: Comment added "reference?" to questionably factual claim[https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2020%2FMusic_and_study&type=revision&diff=2317364&oldid=2238513]
# 9:37, 12/09/21: Comment added "Check your reference order, they are incorrect" [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2020%2FMusic_and_study&type=revision&diff=2317364&oldid=2238513]
# 9:53, 12/09/21: Grammar and spelling edits made such as "Of" to "of" [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2020%2FCOVID-19_pandemic_impacts_on_motivation_and_emotion&type=revision&diff=2317367&oldid=2305679]
# 9:51, 12/09/21: General overview with some comments made pertaining to spelling, grammar, and again, questionably factual claims [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2020%2FAntidepressants_and_motivation&type=revision&diff=2317366&oldid=2312772]
# 10:12, 12/09/21: Minor revisions made to grammar and spelling such as "The University" replacing "university" [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2018%2FSelf-regulated_learning&type=revision&diff=2317372&oldid=2317371]
# 19:45, 15/09/21: Minor edits to spelling and grammar [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.phptitle=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2021%2FGratitude&type=revision&diff=2317999&oldid=2317779]
}}
<blockquote>sdakfjasl;kdfjdsf (see Table 1).</blockquote>
Table 1.
This is an APA Style Table
{| class="wikitable"
|+
!
!Col 1
!
|-
|
|
|xxx
|-
|
|
|
|-
|
|
|
|}
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359178917300940?casa_token=B1ixm5Cy4i8AAAAA:t41F6gfsugqIPjsBZSNvCyz3iuZNSPgxaKrAojkbNE2xKJIfDDN1k5vM7f4TRCMtdathPWQ6_HnD
==Dual category search including one category with subcategories==
Search all chapters:
<inputbox>
type=search
width=20
default=incategory:"Resources needing clarification"
namespaces=Main**
prefix=Motivation and emotion/Book
searchbuttonlabel=Search book chapters
bgcolor=transparent
break=no
</inputbox>
==2==
==3==
==4==
{{RoundBoxRight}}
<div style="text-align: center; font-size: larger; font-weight: bold;">[[/How to make a multimedia recording/]] (45 mins)<br>[[File:Parodyfilm.png|center|65px]]</div>
{{LeftRightBoxClose}}
{{quote|<big>Quote text</big><br>- [[q:author| Author details]]}}
{{RoundBoxTop|theme=15}}
Text goes here
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop|theme=7}}
Text goes here
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop|theme=3}}'''Focus questions:'''
* What is x?
* What is the relationships between conscientiousness and motivation?
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{Robelbox|theme={{{theme|10}}}|title=Money and extrinsic motivation}}<div style="{{Robelbox/pad}}">
Financial gain is a unique motive as it is an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivation#Extrinsic_motivation extrinsic motivation]. Whilst revenge and self-defence motivations (see below) typically stem from internal needs, killing for money is a behaviour that is motivated purely by external rewards. This motivation arises from outside the individual with money acting as an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incentive incentive]. Killing for money can be seen as an externally regulated behaviour that is performed to obtain reward (Reeve, 2018). Unsurprisingly, people who are motivated through external regulation show poor functioning and poor outcomes, both of which can be related to homicidal behaviour (Ryan & Deci, 2017).
</div>
{{Robelbox/close}}
qyeyn5ho1g1hbxi2xrl2f397pydx3pw
2812407
2812391
2026-06-01T05:52:13Z
Jtneill
10242
Move some
2812407
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{| width="100%" align="center" style="clear:both; margin:0; border:0; padding:0; background-color:transparent; font-family:Arial,Tahoma,'Palatino Linotype',sans-serif; font-size:0.875em;"
![[File:Blue2F8CC2 circle 100%.svg|36px]]<br />[[User talk:RadiX|<span style="color:#BFEFFF;">talk</span>]]
![[File:Blue circle logo.svg|36px]]<br />[[Special:EmailUser/RadiX|<span style="color:#BFEFFF;">email</span>]]
![[File:Urantia three-concentric-blue-circles-on-white symbol.svg|36px]]<br />[[User:RadiX|<span style="color:#BFEFFF;">home</span>]]
![[File:Blue circle logo.svg|36px]]<br />[[Special:Contributions/RadiX|<span style="color:#BFEFFF;">edits</span>]]
![[File:Blue2F8CC2 circle 100%.svg|36px]]<br />[[:m:User:RadiX/Info|<span style="color:#BFEFFF;">info</span>]]
|}
{| class="wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
!colspan="2"| mw-collapsible
|-
| Lorem ipsum || dolor sit amet
|}
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed"
!colspan="2"| collapsible
|-
| Lorem ipsum || dolor sit amet
|}
Create an internal link to the edit source page using:
[[Special:EditPage/{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Edit source]]
* Something with poor grammar.{{g}}{{gr}}{{grammar}}
* Something lack citation.{{f}}{{fact}}{{cn}}
* Something to be written better.{{rewrite}}{{explain}}
* Incorrectly spelt{{sp}}{{spelling}}
{{tip|Suggestions for this section:
* Present in alphabetical order
* Use [[w:Letter case#Sentence casing|sentence casing]]
* Include the source in parentheses
}}
A very simple box can be created by using a space at the start of the line
{{Collapse top|This is the title text}}
{{lorem ipsum}}
{{Collapse bottom}}
{{Notice|This page is complete for 2022.}}
{{Motivation and emotion/Lectures/Complete}}
{{Motivation and emotion/Lectures|Lecture 01: Introduction|first}}
{{Motivation and emotion/Lectures/Complete}}
<!-- {{Motivation and emotion/Lectures/In development}} -->
<!-- {{Motivation and emotion/Lectures/Complete}} -->
{{Motivation and emotion/Lectures/Navigation}}
<inputbox>
type=search
width=24
prefix=Motivation and emotion
searchbuttonlabel=Search
bgcolor=transparent
</inputbox>
<inputbox>
type=search
width=25
namespaces=Main**
prefix=Motivation and emotion
searchbuttonlabel=Search
bgcolor=transparent
</inputbox>
<inputbox>
type=search
width=25
namespaces=Main**
prefix=Motivation and emotion
searchbuttonlabel=Search
bgcolor=transparent
</inputbox>
{|style="border-style: solid; border-width: 10px 10px 10px 10px"
|-
| style="padding: 0 0 50px 0" | Hello
|-
| Goodbye
|}
==Junk==
<span style="background:#00FF00">On Campus</span>, outside 1C33 ({{attention}}during lockdown, this will be in the Virtual Room)
{{collapse box|Contributions: Wikiversity|
# 13:27, 21/08/21: Grammatical error revised with addition of "?" [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2021%2FImposter_syndrome&type=revision&diff=2308014&oldid=2307379]
# 13:27, 21/08/21: Added headings "see also", "refrences", and "external links" [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2021%2FImposter_syndrome&type=revision&diff=2308014&oldid=2307379]
# 15:59, 27/08/21: Grammatical error revised "nasa" to "NASA" [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2021%2FImposter_syndrome&type=revision&diff=2310667&oldid=2309962]
# 9:00, 12/09/21: Inserted chapter template to book 'Sublimation' [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion/Book/2021/Sublimation&action=history]
# 11:01, 12/09/21: Inserted chapter template to book 'Limbic system and emotion' [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2021%2FLimbic_system_and_emotion&type=revision&diff=2317354&oldid=2301485]
# 9:33, 12/09/21: Multiple small structural edits and grammatical changes. Also commented "colloquial" in response to informal language and "repetition" to a sentence used twice [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2020%2FHypomania_and_motivation&type=revision&diff=2317363&oldid=2244447]
# 12/09/21, 9:36: Comment added "reference?" to questionably factual claim[https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2020%2FMusic_and_study&type=revision&diff=2317364&oldid=2238513]
# 9:37, 12/09/21: Comment added "Check your reference order, they are incorrect" [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2020%2FMusic_and_study&type=revision&diff=2317364&oldid=2238513]
# 9:53, 12/09/21: Grammar and spelling edits made such as "Of" to "of" [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2020%2FCOVID-19_pandemic_impacts_on_motivation_and_emotion&type=revision&diff=2317367&oldid=2305679]
# 9:51, 12/09/21: General overview with some comments made pertaining to spelling, grammar, and again, questionably factual claims [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2020%2FAntidepressants_and_motivation&type=revision&diff=2317366&oldid=2312772]
# 10:12, 12/09/21: Minor revisions made to grammar and spelling such as "The University" replacing "university" [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2018%2FSelf-regulated_learning&type=revision&diff=2317372&oldid=2317371]
# 19:45, 15/09/21: Minor edits to spelling and grammar [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.phptitle=Motivation_and_emotion%2FBook%2F2021%2FGratitude&type=revision&diff=2317999&oldid=2317779]
}}
<blockquote>sdakfjasl;kdfjdsf (see Table 1).</blockquote>
Table 1.
This is an APA Style Table
{| class="wikitable"
|+
!
!Col 1
!
|-
|
|
|xxx
|-
|
|
|
|-
|
|
|
|}
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1359178917300940?casa_token=B1ixm5Cy4i8AAAAA:t41F6gfsugqIPjsBZSNvCyz3iuZNSPgxaKrAojkbNE2xKJIfDDN1k5vM7f4TRCMtdathPWQ6_HnD
==Dual category search including one category with subcategories==
Search all chapters:
<inputbox>
type=search
width=20
default=incategory:"Resources needing clarification"
namespaces=Main**
prefix=Motivation and emotion/Book
searchbuttonlabel=Search book chapters
bgcolor=transparent
break=no
</inputbox>
==2==
==3==
==4==
{{RoundBoxRight}}
<div style="text-align: center; font-size: larger; font-weight: bold;">[[/How to make a multimedia recording/]] (45 mins)<br>[[File:Parodyfilm.png|center|65px]]</div>
{{LeftRightBoxClose}}
{{quote|<big>Quote text</big><br>- [[q:author| Author details]]}}
{{RoundBoxTop|theme=15}}
Text goes here
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop|theme=7}}
Text goes here
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop|theme=3}}'''Focus questions:'''
* What is x?
* What is the relationships between conscientiousness and motivation?
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{Robelbox|theme={{{theme|10}}}|title=Money and extrinsic motivation}}<div style="{{Robelbox/pad}}">
Financial gain is a unique motive as it is an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivation#Extrinsic_motivation extrinsic motivation]. Whilst revenge and self-defence motivations (see below) typically stem from internal needs, killing for money is a behaviour that is motivated purely by external rewards. This motivation arises from outside the individual with money acting as an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incentive incentive]. Killing for money can be seen as an externally regulated behaviour that is performed to obtain reward (Reeve, 2018). Unsurprisingly, people who are motivated through external regulation show poor functioning and poor outcomes, both of which can be related to homicidal behaviour (Ryan & Deci, 2017).
</div>
{{Robelbox/close}}
dwfp4y0www6mnhqaeek91ez4u3awat0
Haskell programming in plain view
0
203942
2812410
2811610
2026-06-01T09:44:58Z
Young1lim
21186
/* Lambda Calculus */
2812410
wikitext
text/x-wiki
==Introduction==
* Overview I ([[Media:HSKL.Overview.1.A.20160806.pdf |pdf]])
* Overview II ([[Media:HSKL.Overview.2.A.20160926.pdf |pdf]])
* Overview III ([[Media:HSKL.Overview.3.A.20161011.pdf |pdf]])
* Overview IV ([[Media:HSKL.Overview.4.A.20161104.pdf |pdf]])
* Overview V ([[Media:HSKL.Overview.5.A.20161108.pdf |pdf]])
</br>
==Applications==
* Sudoku Background ([[Media:Sudoku.Background.0.A.20161108.pdf |pdf]])
* Bird's Implementation
:- Specification ([[Media:Sudoku.1Bird.1.A.Spec.20170425.pdf |pdf]])
:- Rules ([[Media:Sudoku.1Bird.2.A.Rule.20170201.pdf |pdf]])
:- Pruning ([[Media:Sudoku.1Bird.3.A.Pruning.20170211.pdf |pdf]])
:- Expanding ([[Media:Sudoku.1Bird.4.A.Expand.20170506.pdf |pdf]])
</br>
==Using GHCi==
* Getting started ([[Media:GHCi.Start.1.A.20170605.pdf |pdf]])
</br>
==Using Libraries==
* Library ([[Media:Library.1.A.20170605.pdf |pdf]])
</br>
</br>
==Types==
* Constructors ([[Media:Background.1.A.Constructor.20180904.pdf |pdf]])
* TypeClasses ([[Media:Background.1.B.TypeClass.20180904.pdf |pdf]])
* Types ([[Media:MP3.1A.Mut.Type.20200721.pdf |pdf]])
* Primitive Types ([[Media:MP3.1B.Mut.PrimType.20200611.pdf |pdf]])
* Polymorphic Types ([[Media:MP3.1C.Mut.Polymorphic.20201212.pdf |pdf]])
==Functions==
* Functions ([[Media:Background.1.C.Function.20180712.pdf |pdf]])
* Operators ([[Media:Background.1.E.Operator.20180707.pdf |pdf]])
* Continuation Passing Style ([[Media:MP3.1D.Mut.Continuation.20220110.pdf |pdf]])
==Expressions==
* Expressions I ([[Media:Background.1.D.Expression.20180707.pdf |pdf]])
* Expressions II ([[Media:MP3.1E.Mut.Expression.20220628.pdf |pdf]])
* Non-terminating Expressions ([[Media:MP3.1F.Mut.Non-terminating.20220616.pdf |pdf]])
</br>
</br>
==Lambda Calculus==
* Lambda Calculus - informal description ([[Media:LCal.1A.informal.20220831.pdf |pdf]])
* Lambda Calculus - Formal definition ([[Media:LCal.2A.formal.20221015.pdf |pdf]])
* Expression Reduction ([[Media:LCal.3A.reduction.20220920.pdf |pdf]])
* Normal Forms ([[Media:LCal.4A.Normal.20220903.pdf |pdf]])
* Encoding Datatypes
:- Church Numerals ([[Media:LCal.5A.Numeral.20230627.pdf |pdf]])
:- Church Booleans ([[Media:LCal.6A.Boolean.20230815.pdf |pdf]])
:- Functions ([[Media:LCal.7A.Function.20231230.pdf |pdf]])
:- Combinators ([[Media:LCal.8A.Combinator.20241202.pdf |pdf]])
:- Recursions ([[Media:LCal.9A.Recursion.20260601.pdf |A]], [[Media:LCal.9B.Recursion.20260330.pdf |B]])
</br>
</br>
==Function Oriented Typeclasses==
=== Functors ===
* Functor Overview ([[Media:Functor.1.A.Overview.20180802.pdf |pdf]])
* Function Functor ([[Media:Functor.2.A.Function.20180804.pdf |pdf]])
* Functor Lifting ([[Media:Functor.2.B.Lifting.20180721.pdf |pdf]])
=== Applicatives ===
* Applicatives Overview ([[Media:Applicative.3.A.Overview.20180606.pdf |pdf]])
* Applicatives Methods ([[Media:Applicative.3.B.Method.20180519.pdf |pdf]])
* Function Applicative ([[Media:Applicative.3.A.Function.20180804.pdf |pdf]])
* Applicatives Sequencing ([[Media:Applicative.3.C.Sequencing.20180606.pdf |pdf]])
=== Monads I : Background ===
* Side Effects ([[Media:Monad.P1.1A.SideEffect.20190316.pdf |pdf]])
* Monad Overview ([[Media:Monad.P1.2A.Overview.20190308.pdf |pdf]])
* Monadic Operations ([[Media:Monad.P1.3A.Operations.20190308.pdf |pdf]])
* Maybe Monad ([[Media:Monad.P1.4A.Maybe.201900606.pdf |pdf]])
* IO Actions ([[Media:Monad.P1.5A.IOAction.20190606.pdf |pdf]])
* Several Monad Types ([[Media:Monad.P1.6A.Types.20191016.pdf |pdf]])
=== Monads II : State Transformer Monads ===
* State Transformer
: - State Transformer Basics ([[Media:MP2.1A.STrans.Basic.20191002.pdf |pdf]])
: - State Transformer Generic Monad ([[Media:MP2.1B.STrans.Generic.20191002.pdf |pdf]])
: - State Transformer Monads ([[Media:MP2.1C.STrans.Monad.20191022.pdf |pdf]])
* State Monad
: - State Monad Basics ([[Media:MP2.2A.State.Basic.20190706.pdf |pdf]])
: - State Monad Methods ([[Media:MP2.2B.State.Method.20190706.pdf |pdf]])
: - State Monad Examples ([[Media:MP2.2C.State.Example.20190706.pdf |pdf]])
=== Monads III : Mutable State Monads ===
* Mutability Background
: - Inhabitedness ([[Media:MP3.1F.Mut.Inhabited.20220319.pdf |pdf]])
: - Existential Types ([[Media:MP3.1E.Mut.Existential.20220128.pdf |pdf]])
: - forall Keyword ([[Media:MP3.1E.Mut.forall.20210316.pdf |pdf]])
: - Mutability and Strictness ([[Media:MP3.1C.Mut.Strictness.20200613.pdf |pdf]])
: - Strict and Lazy Packages ([[Media:MP3.1D.Mut.Package.20200620.pdf |pdf]])
* Mutable Objects
: - Mutable Variables ([[Media:MP3.1B.Mut.Variable.20200224.pdf |pdf]])
: - Mutable Data Structures ([[Media:MP3.1D.Mut.DataStruct.20191226.pdf |pdf]])
* IO Monad
: - IO Monad Basics ([[Media:MP3.2A.IO.Basic.20191019.pdf |pdf]])
: - IO Monad Methods ([[Media:MP3.2B.IO.Method.20191022.pdf |pdf]])
: - IORef Mutable Variable ([[Media:MP3.2C.IO.IORef.20191019.pdf |pdf]])
* ST Monad
: - ST Monad Basics ([[Media:MP3.3A.ST.Basic.20191031.pdf |pdf]])
: - ST Monad Methods ([[Media:MP3.3B.ST.Method.20191023.pdf |pdf]])
: - STRef Mutable Variable ([[Media:MP3.3C.ST.STRef.20191023.pdf |pdf]])
=== Monads IV : Reader and Writer Monads ===
* Function Monad ([[Media:Monad.10.A.Function.20180806.pdf |pdf]])
* Monad Transformer ([[Media:Monad.3.I.Transformer.20180727.pdf |pdf]])
* MonadState Class
:: - State & StateT Monads ([[Media:Monad.9.A.MonadState.Monad.20180920.pdf |pdf]])
:: - MonadReader Class ([[Media:Monad.9.B.MonadState.Class.20180920.pdf |pdf]])
* MonadReader Class
:: - Reader & ReaderT Monads ([[Media:Monad.11.A.Reader.20180821.pdf |pdf]])
:: - MonadReader Class ([[Media:Monad.12.A.MonadReader.20180821.pdf |pdf]])
* Control Monad ([[Media:Monad.9.A.Control.20180908.pdf |pdf]])
=== Monoid ===
* Monoids ([[Media:Monoid.4.A.20180508.pdf |pdf]])
=== Arrow ===
* Arrows ([[Media:Arrow.1.A.20190504.pdf |pdf]])
</br>
==Polymorphism==
* Polymorphism Overview ([[Media:Poly.1.A.20180220.pdf |pdf]])
</br>
==Concurrent Haskell ==
</br>
go to [ [[Electrical_%26_Computer_Engineering_Studies]] ]
==External links==
* [http://learnyouahaskell.com/introduction Learn you Haskell]
* [http://book.realworldhaskell.org/read/ Real World Haskell]
* [http://www.scs.stanford.edu/14sp-cs240h/slides/ Standford Class Material]
[[Category:Haskell|programming in plain view]]
q7xyh3eg7r64g4lav7t01bycag3w9h1
User:Jason M. C., Han/Impressionist Visualizations (for musical imaginations) and some Sound files
2
220853
2812375
2585815
2026-06-01T00:46:25Z
CommonsDelinker
9184
Removing [[:c:File:Days_of_Emancipation,_Player_JMC,_Han.ogg|Days_of_Emancipation,_Player_JMC,_Han.ogg]], it has been deleted from Commons by [[:c:User:Didym|Didym]] because: per [[:c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Celebrating the New Life (piano Teacher
2812375
wikitext
text/x-wiki
When cities are too busy and minds are too bored, if you travelled here, please calm down your minds and enjoy a down-slowed Chinese Afternoon Tea.
There are some 'symbolized landscapes' from my trips both in reality and in musical imaginations, which can awake some soften parts of our hearts to appreciate digital beauties and relax full hearts of tiredness (somehow...).
Yes, if willing, you can also add or create some impressions near your home and share, with possibilities 'near this cup of tea', because in my mind, worlds (western and eastern) have been merged with each other too much; and some deep desires of beauties-appreciation already seeded in our hearts, in this quiet and lazy afternoon. It's our common impressions of life and knowledge.
Now, close your eyes and imagine you are in a red modern China dreams-studio, like:
[[File:Landmarks before International Childern's Day - Street View of Dalian 4th.jpg|thumb|Dream Studio]].
And suddenly, a group of Swallow-fish(Memories), passing by, which are taking you back to the old time, like:
[[File:Landmarks before International Childern's Day - Street View of Dalian 5th.jpg|thumb|A group of Platax teira (swallow fish) flowering]]...
Throughout West to East in a window, you may see Samson Agonistes of your own hero-heart was squared in a special old-view, like a natural Chinese-painting…
[[File:China Painting Way to see Baroque Samson Agonistes Square (Czech).jpg|thumb|
Samson Agonistes Square seen through Chinese-painting Window-framing]]
Yes, you have lost yourself too much and too long, and you need to pray(Meditation) through a currents-dividing tool (pet) for 'getting-into your True Heart-Sea':
[[File:White Jade Trident for currents-dividing.jpg|thumb|White Jade Trident for currents-dividing]]
=== '''Music Sound Files:''' ===
* Sound imagery: Farmers' joyful expression on the farming fields under the red-sunshine and stars-sky...
* Sound imagery: Little River's Song from Mother Nature
[[File:Autumn Red-Mountains Series- 1st Small River's Song (Nature's Music).webm|thumb|Little River's Song from Mother Nature: In my mind, Nature is a most great musician. Do you think so? Please listen to her Small River]]
* Sound imagery: Colourful Clouds Running after Moon
[[File:Colourful Clouds Running after Moon.ogg|thumb|'''Words for this music in Chinese impressionism'''
Nowadays, Impressionism Root, from France and Western European Region, has also been growing in some modernist composers' melodic creations and modifications, for the renaissance of Chinese traditional music and folk fashion. It's because of this approach's naturalism and conveniences from commons' eyes, in memorizing, re-picking up, analysing, and re-expressing imageries of landscapes, as deep impressions carrying senses of aesthetics. Here, the application of Pentatonic scale integrating with impressionism enriched composers' expressive techniques, which meets the requirements of inspirations from Chinese traditional Shan Shui painting, further, with imagery spirituality overweighing material shapes.
This piece has companied my 10s more years, with the title 'Colourful Clouds Running After Moon'. The Piano transcript of this melody was modified by Chinese composer 王建中 (Jian Zhong, Wang) who collected fork impressions from South East of China (Southern Min). It's like a Chinese fairy story talking about Moon goddess's miss and waiting in one crystal castle of Moon Palace highway upon colourful clouds. You can hear that she has transformed her spiritual power to be several floating streams (phrases collected from Pentatonic scale) running directly from her sleeves (actions of arms, wrists and fingers), and magically fictionalized to be clouds' colours and textures of liquid. Then, all parts have been threaded in harmony and coherence. Meanwhile, a vocal singing of main theme is also organized as the wandering of Pentatonic scale, which is flying in the sky and being deeply stored in mind. It's accompaniment is clearly produced as in Fairy dancing style of traditional china.
Yes, in some experts' eyes, this edition would also have been classed as a draft , caused by the reason that it was recorded in my classroom for educational purpose and there are really some falls and lacks waiting my bettering in the future. However, to me, currently, it was a good edition in my wellbeing situation of Music Education Research which I would like to share with more people (teaching and life-long learning), and I commented it in my smartphone as 'can be heard in ears and probably great'.
'''2nd draft''':
''With life scenes, Jason mother' suggestions (for Chinese-English translation), Peer-observations from Life; and totally, it was for Music Education in a 'Life classroom'']]
* Sound imagery: Swordsmen in Fairy world
[[File:Swordmen in Fairy world.ogg|thumb|The application of this sound file is for realizing one Wikiversity Educational Portal of Chinese impressionist Visualization (enlightened from one course-plan discussion in British Council).Meanwhile, it has other functions, as for your entertainment time, enjoyment of a cup of afternoon-tea accompanying with photographs-watching and good-hearing of some impressions in Chinese fine music. Therefore, I made a piece of piano improvisation (Performance), according to another dream in my young teenager time and Pop music transcript.'Swordsmen in Fairy World (Legend)' - you may ask me: oh, Jason, what are you saying about? Is it about Modern or traditional Swordsmen fighting for swordsmanship from traditional western worlds, such as from Roman ... in a fairy-legend Middle Earth of Trinity, as what stated in The Lord of Rings?(Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swordsmanship; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle-earth; and, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lord_of_the_Rings) Not really, but quite similar in the history between two roots.In Great China Area, young teenagers, when coming to their ages, have also gotten one cultural complex to get away from families, wander around, run after their Kong Fu dreams and see some amazing landscapes in their periods, which are lasting for thousands years. Also, being very similar with various magical creatures and species living in Middle Earth, upon a map of Nine regions in Classic of Mountains and Seas, there also have been some magical creatures there, such as nine-headed phoenix family and Nine-tailed Fox family, and diverse races controlling natural powers from different approaches, as in naturalism methodologies, but mainly belonging to Taoism philosophy. (Wikipedia introductions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classic_of_Mountains_and_Seas;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warring_States_period) They became Swordsmen representing different approaches of Kong Fu - some to train their internal spirituality, some to train physics etc., in different 'schools', and from deserts to river-areas. They were fighting with each other for achieving a place in Jiang Hu Academy-community (Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wuxia#Jianghu); so that, they can construct different-fashions of love, friendship, family, and realize their own dreaming beliefs, faiths, freedom, democracy, humanity, reasonability, and... some even for ruling the whole worlds -"master of the wulin alliance"). Currently, in the fields of Computer & online roles-play games, Pop music, TV Drama series, films and fine arts of visualization, stories built upon this theme is still famous, as what stories from Middle-Earth. The Legend of Sword and Fairy was mainly built upon this theme. (Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Legend_of_Sword_and_Fairy).In my music list, this one collected from 4th of this series has always take a place in remembrance of my pasted young teenagers time. It is also one reason of my Education Research, English-expressing and academic Kong Fu self-reasoning till today - to see how large my Jiang Hu Universe (Middle-Earth) is. Indeed, finally, as in this melody, it can be transformed to be cosmological impressions of life meanings and universal being.Oh, sorry to say so many divergent braches, just... please take it easy as to taste a cup of afternoon tea for relaxing a busy working day, with this self-making Chinese breath. Wishing you can enjoy!]]
* Sound imagery: A little river Crossing Life River
[[File:A little river.ogg|thumb|This one was only a very little river running away from home, with its 'touched & wet eyes' saying 'emotional notes from voices' appealing a 'long-lost miss' to somewhere in far distance... ]]
* Feel hungry? Go to eat some snacks and Dumpling Moons on '''Snacks Table''':
[[File:Food Series (Home-made) of Mooncake (Mid-autumn) Festival - 2nd Open a Snacks Table.jpg|thumb|When you opened the box of Mooncakes, it's equal that you open a snacks table of Mooncake Festival]]
[[File:Food Series (Home-made) of Mooncake (Mid-autumn) Festival - 5th Little Yellow Moons born from water.jpg|thumb|It's self-made Dumpling Moons born in the next day after Mooncake (Mid-autumn) Festival]]
* Sound Visualization: An unknown poem of Gusu Pingtan-singing Treasure heard in a relaxing afternoon
[[File:Pingtan Treasure.ogg|thumb|It was a short piece of Pingtan-singing (Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzhou_Pingtan) recorded from two artists' work in a public place of old city - Suzhou (Wikipedia Introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzhou), or called Gusu District's (Wikipedia Introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gusu_District). Why I thought it was possibly and valuably allowed to be submitted to Wikimedia Commons was because of three reasons. Firstly, it was in a Pingtan public place allowing all common travellers like me - a little Jason, to record by their own smart-phone. In this reasoning chain, they publically allowed me to record; and somehow, just focusing on this music product itself, I can be called a first maker having picked up two artists' common & improvising work without letting it disappear in an immediate way. In other words, I recorded it in the first person, who had seen it as a natural phenomenon(landscape) rather than in social network - its happening and disappearing from silence and to silence. Secondly, it was for commons who were in their trips, which met our media's faith. Thirdly, it was a real beauty of fork singing with Gusu dialects. You can feel its sweet and gentle voices softly relaxing your spirit, which made me drunk in in a whole afternoon. Male voices were bright but melodious; while, female voices were treble but mild... Pingtan was an important heritage from commons and for commons. When enjoying it, we can try to taste a cup of slow tea and understand its old fashion. Therefore, you knew, it had also recorded one of my most enjoyable time there. Those above were reasons I thought it was valuable and possible to be shared. I didn't sure after transformation, its figures were still carried. Maybe, only voices were left there. Though I didn't know the names of those two artists, I would like to send my respects to them and their old fashion. Thanks for making the world beautiful!]]
* Sound Story: Mother's old stories near Christmas Day
[[File:Mother's Old story - China Impression.ogg|thumb|It was recorded as the melody 'Listen to Mother's Old Story' collected from the manuscripts collection of level Grade 5th in <The Works-Collection for National Grading Tests'>, for piano education. Just see it as an artist impression, we can feel mother's tender talk to kids about old stories in the past... may it be a night-reading of storybooks or from her memories beside bed...I am very happy to introduce it, for the reason that you can hear modern piano melodic structure: prelude-introduction-development - conclusion (coda). You can also hear polyphony and counterpoint have been applied in its composition. Meanwhile, Eastern Pentatonic scale has almost communicated with Baroque Inspirations in the first theme, supplemental theme and accompaniment. Therefore, I collected this funny piece in my Wikiversity's visualization & Impressionism of China.I thought it's near Christmas Day,..., baby Jesus also had his holly mother St. Marry. Sometimes in his childhood, he might have also listened to Holly Mother's old stories in the night besides the bed... Then, imaginations began and Christmas Father brought gifts...]]
=== '''Visualizations:''' ===
(Guide: Please press the button below and go to the second page (I am sorry, depending on my level technology, this problem is waiting to be solved by learn more. )
'''A head''' of Jason:[[File:Nine Sea-Dragons Chair plus a head of Jason.jpg|thumb|A head of Jason after swimming a hot ourdoor spring ]]
'''And'''
'''Two''' naught '''Pets''': [[File:Respondent Dragon-2nd.jpg|thumb|Respondent Dragon-2nd]] and [[File:Literature Yau for Ocean 3.jpg|thumb|Literature Yau for Ocean 3]]
'''Jason's fairy story about Monkey King's Dreamland - Mount Huaguo (A Flowers and Fruit Mountain):''' Once upon a time, ...
[[File:Monkey King's Homeland - Mount Huaguo.jpg|thumb|Monkey King's Homeland - Mount Huaguo]]
* A collection of '''2018 New Year's Eve Celebration in Dalian'''
[[File:2018 NYEC in Dalian (Self-participation; Deep Sea Legend following Fireworks).jpg|thumb|2018 NYEC in Dalian (Self-participation; Deep Sea Legend following Fireworks)]]
[[File:2018 NYEC in Dalian (Self-participation; Firework-4th).jpg|thumb|2018 NYEC in Dalian (Self-participation; Firework-4th)]]
[[File:360 degree whole view of '2018 New Year's Eve Celebration in Dalian'.jpg|thumb|360 degree whole view of '2018 New Year's Eve Celebration in Dalian']]
* Impression of '''2018 Beer Festival in Dalian'''
[[File:2018 Dalian Beer Festival Night Landmark 1st.jpg|thumb|Several weeks ago, an international Beer Festival was held in my hometown Dalian - from 26th, July of 2018 to 6th, August of 2018 ]]
* Flowers in '''2018 golden autumn'''
[[File:Autumn 12th.jpg|thumb|Autumn in my hometown Dalian and beside my feet ]]
[[File:Autumn 5th.jpg|thumb| a 'wall' of Boston ivy ]]
* Impression of '''2019 Kids' Dance during exanimation for celebrating Lucky Pig's Year'''
[[File:Kid's Dance Chinese Folk Piano Player Jason M. C.,Han.ogg|thumb|Kid's Dance Chinese Folk Piano Player Jason M. C.,Han]]
'''A cooking story - Scallop's Flowering Dream''' (SFD in my cooking names-list):1. Boiling small scallops to 3/4 protein-cooked level;2. Boiling glass noodles to the cooked & soft level (Wikipedia introduction:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellophane_noodles );3. Mixing glass noodles with scallops' meat in scalleops' shells like in the picture; 4. Researching your own sauce with hot, or salty or sweet tastes (with beansauce, beanoil, or flavorsauce) with very hot oil in a hot pot;5. Covering those food materials in shells with your own sauce spooned from the boiling hotpot in your hand one by one (you can also pour those together, but the colour would not be beatiful...) 6. Making-up this dish with some associated materials such as Peppermint‘s leaves (Wikipedia introduction:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peppermint)and Goji fruits (Wikipedia introduction:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lycium_barbarum)(Notice: Pople in the seafood allergy situation - Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_allergy shouldn't eat it; and people in gout situation would control the amount of their intaking)
[[File:Autumn food 1st.jpg|thumb| Cooking story - Scallop's Flowering Dream ]]
* '''Ferry dreams''' in common impressionism
[[File:Ferry impression in Spring Night 1.jpg|thumb|This series of Impressionist photographs were made in a warm spring night during my family trip for tombs-clearance and ancestors-remembrance. Though it was a sad period and some senses of sadness had also been lasting till now, about the departures of my family members, relatives, and my nice teachers ..., in that spring night, when setting off some pressures, resting my sorrow minds into a ferry chair and leaning my head to the side of father's shoulder, this impressionist imagery appeared beautifully there, silence but nice - like a crystal castle fantastically standing up, in the deep night... Oh, it was so lonely, but still tried to light the whole darkness... like a lost star (one pop song) to warm & light that whole spring night... by it's own crystal lights, and a crystal heart... Then, I picked up this impression. From my eyes, it's not made by my own ability, but natural accompaniments - the soft breeze, those lights, waves, diffuse reflections from water surface, and spreading in dreaming colours... then, coming in front of me the unconscious fragments ... oh! beautiful, like a impressionist painting, or a piece of Debussy's melody under a huge background of universe... I don't know... but, I can only appreciate its beauties from a common passenger's eyes...May it be I can never have chances to really touch those landscapes in my channel;May it be when they are touched, then, a spring dream will be broken and woke up into pieces - never get back;but, thanksgiving, thanks to a peaceful night blessed there, with crystal castle standing in front of my eyes and my dream...]][[File:Ferry impression in Spring Night 2.jpg|thumb|This series of Impressionist photographs were made in a warm spring night during my family trip for tombs-clearance and ancestors-remembrance. Though it was a sad period and some senses of sadness had also been lasting till now, about the departures of my family members, relatives, and my nice teachers ..., in that spring night, when setting off some pressures, resting my sorrow minds into a ferry chair and leaning my head to the side of father's shoulder, this impressionist imagery appeared beautifully there, silence but nice - like a crystal castle fantastically standing up, in the deep night... Oh, it was so lonely, but still tried to light the whole darkness... like a lost star (one pop song) to warm & light that whole spring night... by it's own crystal lights, and a crystal heart... Then, I picked up this impression. From my eyes, it's not made by my own ability, but natural accompaniments - the soft breeze, those lights, waves, diffuse reflections from water surface, and spreading in dreaming colours... then, coming in front of me the unconscious fragments ... oh! beautiful, like a impressionist painting, or a piece of Debussy's melody under a huge background of universe... I don't know... but, I can only appreciate its beauties from a common passenger's eyes...May it be I can never have chances to really touch those landscapes in my channel;May it be when they are touched, then, a spring dream will be broken and woke up into pieces - never get back;but, thanksgiving, thanks to a peaceful night blessed there, with crystal castle standing in front of my eyes and my dream...]]
* '''Southern Yangzi River and West Lake'''
[[File:Watering Hang zhou and Dragon Carp for Happyness.pdf|thumb|Watering Hang zhou and Dragon Carp for Happiness]]
In the summer night, we and our Family members - parents, grandparents, and others... enjoy walking in a pathway and shaking a cattail leaf fan, with 'Moonlight upon Lotus Pool (Summer)'.
[[File:Impressions of West Lake for further usages in Education -2.jpg|thumb|I forgot where it was, but subtropical (Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subtropics) plants accompanying with water had left beautiful impressions in Jason's mind. You knew, other places in the same latitudes around our earth, you cannot feel so wet and warm climates.]][[File:Impressions of West Lake for further usages in Education -3.jpg|thumb|I forgot where it was, but subtropical (Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subtropics) plants accompanying with water had left beautiful impressions in Jason's mind. You knew, other places in the same latitudes around our earth, you cannot feel so wet and warm climates.]]
[[File:Impressions of West Lake for further usages in Education -4.jpg|thumb|His life might be ignored by others. But, just that moment, under sunshine, it was vividly blooming beside one tree nearby West Lake. Compared with West Lake, maybe no one would like be attracted by his vitality. However, his was still smiling under a fuzzed green background, to celebrate his universal being, as a significant impression, in Jason's mind.]]
[[File:Impressions of West Lake for further usages in Education -6.jpg|thumb|Flowers were blooming and twinkling under a huge deep green background, as stars...]]
[[File:Hefang Street, Hangzhou - 9.jpg|thumb|Micro-landscape in one corner of street with the impression of Chinese landscape painting]]
[[File:Impressions of West Lake for further usages in Education -10.jpg|thumb|Micro-landscape in one corner of street with the impression of Chinese landscape painting 10 is symbolized for 'perfect' in culture.]]
* '''Gusu Journey''':
[[File:Gusu Impressions - Home in water.jpg|thumb|1st: did you know Venice? Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VeniceVery similar, It was East Venice, but living in the world of White-black ink painting. Every day, you would need to take a boating out, like a walk...]]
[[File:Gusu Impressions - Common breath together by trees, buildings and their lake projections.jpg|thumb|3rd: it was in autumn, but the full scene' vitality hasn't lost too much. Even, you can hear their breath and heart-beating echoing from lake's mirror. Then, we will know they were still living and dancing, to face a coming winter. I believed that every natural painting had its protecting angel, depending on whom, they could live longer...]]
[[File:Gusu Impressions - Tiger Hill impression 1st - Washing your hair in Sword Pond.jpg|thumb|22rd: it's said under this pond, there was a mysterious sword treasure of Wu king Helu waiting us to explore. Indeed, what I was attracted wasn't that, but the first beauty of China Xi Shi has washed her hair when standing over the top bridge. But how? Or, how long did she have a hair which could get to the surface of water continuously? No matter how, she was real the first beauty in my memory who could make fish felt ashamed and went down to the bottom of water, long as thousands years ago. Indeed, in my memory, she was very similar with Helen of Troy (Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helen_of_Troy), whose beauties could easily make wars between two countries and destroy one.]]
[[File:Gusu Impressions - Water Lilies (Autum Impressionism - a respect to Sir Monet).jpg|thumb|5th: could you get a sense of sir Monet's Water lilies series? Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_Lilies_(Monet_series)Just, it was in autumn that flowers had been out... a pity. But, you can still feel their strong lives and beautiful higher gestures. If they could be in analogy with gentlemen, I thought standing still until the last minute of lives was their contributions of Life's meaning.]]
* China Impressionism - In the season of '''Fishing Harvest''', it's a real & big smile on people's face
'''Common people's knowledge:''' It's an old story saying that: when autumn comes, public sea in North will be opened to fishing men and their wide shoulders; then, black fishes (and other species) will be listed in bear's harvest - flying back to your dinner table, only if you are praying to the peace of a Crystal Sea-heart... I have fulfilled my praying, and in one night...I found numberless boats twinkling short lights as stars distributing from the sea outside my window to the boundaries of sky, which made the darkness as a pearls-curtain, beautifully decorated there. Eh, getting it, I told myself: it's a season of Sea-openness for hard-working fishing men... (The left-second picture in the middle can show us that night what I saw; meanwhile, in the right top picture, in which Jason was pictured with something in the darkness, indeed, it was a fishing boat under the construction... )The other day, following a visit to Dragon-king's Head-pool, I can see numberless boats in port and eat my fish. Indeed, it was merely an impression of that scenery that when thinking of some indications in life, I knew a fishing harvest was coming. My true life was shown as the right side of this photography visualization. On average, in each two or three days, I would swim in the blue sea as I introduced in the past and wandering in the street with family members. I thought - swimming and wandering -they had some similarities - no purpose and for self-relaxing and some beautiful landscapes to nourish eyes... You saw, one day, I brought one of my favorite certificates in online courses to the seaside - It was about music and politics which wasn't from my nature. but I had to insist on until its heart-inside-completion. I gave myself a 'LIKE' Dear friends, you knew it was hard to maintain a peaceful situation in seaside's areas, as in my hometown and yours... Lord was the provider of everything, only if you and I, as commons, paid our labours working in 'Ask, Seek and Knock' out your own life of happiness. Please don't break worlds' main peace of development, as many sins we did in last century... They wouldn't be forgiven in the final judgement...By slowing down a boring mood and opening your heart as what's like in Sea's embrace... we could fly to our natural height of heavenly sky.
[[File:Joyfulness in the season of Fishing Harvest.jpg|thumb|This image file was made in the day before last day while travelling in Dragon King's Pool, shopping some seafoods and local vegetables in Countryside Farmer's Fair and watching a fishing harvest situation in fishing pool. Meanwhile, we were very joyful that I bought some Japanese Spanish mackerels ( Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_Spanish_mackerel; or to say, Chinese seerfish...Oh, sorry, I cannot tell the differences among those sub-branches of this fish. I think: only coming into mouth, and the quality of meat could tell me the differences.)I and my mother together think it's a really annual happy situation we were in. Then, I transformed myself to be a cultural phenomena & self-model. By being together with a fishing boat (from childhood, I felt very happy to picture myself with some boats, bigger ships and even huge cruises...), I can get a sense of Autumn in September was like in a season of Fishing Harvest. You see, my smile was really joyful and peaceful!I would like share this image as 'Joyfulness from Fishing Harvest' to face my monthly photo challenge of WIKIMEDIA COMMONS [[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 05:18, 13 September 2018 (UTC)]]
* '''Northwest China'''
[[File:Dreaming a spring flowering in desert.jpg|thumb|Indeed, the impression of this dream wasn't from this year, but reserved from last year. It was also not about a spring, but Jason in a hot and boring summer. However, it's a spring morning today when I re-embraced this piece of memory, accompanying with a single song of alone journey somewhere around the world, from Paris' café to Venice's movie, etc. My heart began wandering around. I found what green brushes are growing out is a Arabic Spring. Oh, Jason, are you stupidly joking? Have you ever seen a real spring grown from a desert? No, sorry, but I have some references from others... What imageries described in sir Debussy' Première Arabesque (Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Debussy ),and especially in my birth place Ning Xia, there is a landscape named Sha Po Tou (The head of deserts, made by my uncle, 2016) summarizing my boyhood memories about deserts and people's rough personalities for fighting against bad climate and growing green life upon golden wildness. (Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ningxia; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shapotou_District) Following it, my mind-travelling can obtain this impression - so warm but clear,to embrace a Arabic Style Spring, blooming from the bottom of heart-desert.]]
* 'You knew, a quiet heart when you are '''praying for peace''' ' - Tibet Prayer
[[File:Going to prayer - a common Lama's life.jpg|thumb|Going to prayer - a common Lama's life]]
* Bringing back a Chinese National Colour from commons' tradition and prayer - Peony [[File:Peony material 4th in Peony Educational Series.jpg|thumb|Peony material-nature]]
[[File:Peony Paeonia suffruticosa JMC.Han.jpg|thumb| Impressionist presentation of Peony (Paeonia suffruticosa)]]
* Collecting a colour from Rosa Chinensis Lovers
[[File:Fire-Heads Dance.jpg|thumb|Fire-Heads Dance]]
k3fyvwhxhoi4wptd1kwpaysryf4ipib
Plant Divisions (Phyla)
0
235272
2812317
2749603
2026-05-31T15:14:53Z
~2026-32413-31
3086786
/*fixed # of discover plant species- previously was 250,000- there are more species of just angiosperms than that */
2812317
wikitext
text/x-wiki
[[Image:Diversity of plants (Streptophyta) version 2.png|thumb|300px|right|A sample of plant diversity.]]
In botany, the equivalent of a Phylum is called a division. The Kingdom Plantae is divided into 13 Divisions. A Division (pl. Phyla) is the largest formal major grouping within plant taxonomy below kingdoms.
This list is presented in alphabetical order, and not in any systematic/evolutionary arrangement.
Science is by no means static. There are arguments of all sizes and shapes about the taxonomy of the Plant Divisions. Other sources may combine or split these listed Divisions. However, at this time, the list presented here should stand in good stead for an introduction to the topic of plant diversity.
There are approximately 380,000 plant species that have been described by science.
This list tries to give the following information on each Division:
*Division Name
*A link to a subpage discussing that Phylum in more detail (if it yet exists)
*Name Meaning (in English)
*An English Common Name, where one is in regular use
*Distinguishing characteristics of plants within the Division
*An approximate number of species described within that Division. Since botany does not stand still, this number can change.
You can also see [[Introduction to Taxonomy]] for more on that topic.
==Anthocerotophyta==
[[Image:Hornwort (3144429129).jpg|thumb|100px|right|Hornworts.]]
[[/Anthocerotophyta/]]
Name Meaning: Anthoceros-like plant
English Common Name: Hornworts
Major distinguishing characteristics: Horn-shaped sporophytes, no vascular system
Approximate number of species described: 100-300 or more
[[File:Hornwort_(3144429129).jpg|right|thumb|100x100px|Hornworts.]]
==Bryophyta==
[[Image:Mose09.jpg|thumb|100px|right|Moss, a bryophyte.]]
[[/Bryophyta/]]
Name Meaning: Bryum-like plant, moss plant
English Common Name: Moss
Major distinguishing characteristics: Persistent branched sporophytes, no vascular system
Approximate number of species described: 12,000
It usually grows on lakes
==Charophyta==
[[Image:Chara overview.jpg|thumb|100px|right|''Chara'', a Charophyte.]]
[[/Charophyta/]]
Name Meaning: Chara-like plant
English Common Name: Charophytes
Major distinguishing characteristics:
Approximate number of species described: 1,000
==Chlorophyta==
[[image:Bulletin de l'Acadmie impriale des sciences de St.-Ptersbourg (20431048865).jpg|thumb|100px|right|A Chlorophyte.]]
[[/Chlorophyta/]]
Name Meaning: Yellow-green plant
English Common Name: Chlorophytes
Major distinguishing characteristics: mainly autotrophs with exceptions and have the same chlorophyll a and b pigments as "higher" plant divisions
Approximate number of species described: 8,000
==Cycadophyta==
[[Image:Unidentified cycad in greenhouse.jpg|thumb|100px|right|Unidentified cycad in greenhouse.]]
[[/Cycadophyta/]]
Name Meaning: Cycas-like plant, palm-like plant
English Common Name: Cycads
Major distinguishing characteristics: Seeds, crown of compound leaves
Approximate number of species described: 100 - 200
==Ginkgophyta==
[[Image:Gingko biloba2.jpg|thumb|100px|right|''Gingko biloba''.]]
[[/Ginkgophyta/]]
Name Meaning: Ginkgo-like plant
English Common Name: Ginkgo, maidenhair tree
Major distinguishing characteristics: Seeds not protected by fruit
Approximate number of species described: 1 living, about 50 extinct
==Glaucophyta==
[[Image:Glaucophyte.jpg|thumb|100px|right|A glaucophyte.]]
[[/Glaucophyta/]]
Name Meaning: Blue-green plant
English Common Name: Glaucophytes
Major distinguishing characteristics:
Approximate number of species described: 13
==Gnetophyta==
[[Image:Gnetum scandens (6780786863).jpg|thumb|100px|right|''Gnetum scandens''.]]
Gnetophyta
Name Meaning: Gnetum-like plant
English Common Name: Gnetophytes
Major distinguishing characteristics: Seeds and woody vascular system with vessels.
Approximate number of species described: 70
==Lycopodiophyta (Lycophyta)==
[[Image:Clubmoss - Flickr - pellaea (1).jpg|thumb|100px|right|Clubmoss.]]
[[/Lycopodiophyta (Lycophyta)/]]
Name Meaning: Lycopodium-like plants, wolf plant
English Common Name: Clubmosses, spikemosses
Major distinguishing characteristics: Microphyll leaves, vascular system
Approximate number of species described: 1290 living
==Magnoliophyta (Anthophyta)==
[[Image:Sweetbay Magnolia Magnolia virginiana Flower Closeup 2242px.jpg|thumb|100px|right|''Magnolia virginiana''.]]
[[/Magnoliophyta/]]
Name Meaning: Magnolia-like plant
English Common Name: Flowering plants, angiosperms
Major distinguishing characteristics: Flowers and fruit, vascular system with vessels
Approximate number of species described: 300,000
==Marchantiophyta (Hepatophyta)==
[[Image:Liverwort Ferndale Park.jpg|thumb|100px|right|Liverwort.]]
[[wikipedia:Marchantiophyta|Marchantiophyta (Hepatophyta)]]
Name Meaning: Marchantia-like plant, liver plant
English Common Name: Liverworts
Major distinguishing characteristics: Ephemeral unbranched sporophytes, no vascular system
Approximate number of species described: 9,000
==Pinophyta (Coniferophyta)==
[[Image:Taxus wallichiana kz1.jpg|thumb|100px|right|''Taxus wallichiana'', the Himalayan Yew, a conifer.]]
[[/Pinophyta (Coniferophyta)/]]
Name Meaning: Pinus-like plant, cone-bearing plant
English Common Name: Conifers
Major distinguishing characteristics: Cones containing seeds and wood composed of tracheids
Approximate number of species described: 629 living
==Polypodiophyta (Monilophyta)==
[[Image:Tree Fern.jpg|thumb|100px|right|Tree fern fronds and fiddleneck (growing young frond).]]
[[wikipedia:Fern|Polypodiophyta]] (Monophyte)
Once called [[Pteridophyta]] (outdated! The sub-divisions Lycopodiophyte and Euphyllophyte have been differentiated)
Name Meaning: Many foot plant, Polypodium-like plant
English Common Name: ferns, horsetails
Major distinguishing characteristics: Prothallus gametophytes and vascular system
Approximate number of species described: 9000
==Other Resources==
*[http://tolweb.org/Green_plants/2382 Tree of Life, Green Plants]
*[http://eol.org/pages/281/overview Encyclopedia of life, Plantae]
*[[Animal Phyla]] a companion piece to this one
==References==
* [[Wikipedia:Phylum]]
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Botany]]
ipd4ftln8scg7k20cpls4hao4j9jsew
User:Jason M. C., Han/Piano-kids' Corner from classroom and virtually online
2
240847
2812372
2807113
2026-06-01T00:46:15Z
CommonsDelinker
9184
Removing [[:c:File:Celebrating_the_New_Life_(piano_Teacher_Jixun_(Jason)_Han).wav|Celebrating_the_New_Life_(piano_Teacher_Jixun_(Jason)_Han).wav]], it has been deleted from Commons by [[:c:User:Didym|Didym]] because: per [[:c:Commons:Deletion requests/Fil
2812372
wikitext
text/x-wiki
'''No Orders, Beautiful flowers were blooming from Childhood! Let us pick up your most beautiful moments...'''
[[File:Salzburg Cathedral (Inside) - Mozart Baptized place 1. - Mozart-Complexes World under Water (Modernist View).jpg|thumb|Piano Kids, on that day, modern colours, lights and technologies made Mozart's birthplace (Washing) -Salzburg Cathedral like a world (palace) under the biggest water - Blue Sea]]
[[File:Beautiful landscapes surrounding Mozart's birthplace - Heavenly Spring flowing from Alps Moutain.jpg|thumb|Heavenly Ice-spring from Alps Mountain]]
[[File:Mozart from Green Nature 1.jpg|thumb|Mozart comes from Green Mountain and Nature]]
[[File:Models for Chaoshan Family Tourism - Taifo Hall.jpg|thumb|Uncle Han -the piano teacher and his wife Yang, Gao (Cynthia) were volunteeringly pictured outside the door of Taifo Hall in Chaoshan. They are promoting it for Family Tourism there. It's a beautiful time in all family members' memories, as a piano song told in life story...]]
[[File:Beautiful Sunset View of Oceanic City from top building during COVID-19 period.jpeg|thumb|Beautiful Sunset View of Oceanic City during COVID-19 period]]
[[File:Small items in Commons Life of 2019 Spring 2.jpg|thumb|Flaming Katy and piano-peers as Micro-landscape in classroom ]]
[[File:An Oil Painting watched since born.jpeg|thumb|Oil Painting: Forest Cabin in front of Fuji(or Helan) Mountain 'hanging on the wall']]
Oh, dear piano pupils, we have seen so many beautiful landscapes, across the times and spaces. Now, firstly, getting into East- your nature and self-meditation, let us try to take the Pentatonic Scales Exercises for relaxing you 'busy heart' and focusing your attention back to piano...
*[[Portal:Pentatonic Impressionism (China Wu Sheng) in the view of Neo-classical Piano Techniques-training]]
'''Afterwards, we can take further great life-tasks in piano...'''
[[File:Piano Lecture of Dalian Library (Music) delivered by Jason (Jixun) on October 13th, 2024.jpg|thumb|2024 Piano Lecture of Dalian Library (Music) Delivered by Jason (Jixun), Han and His Piano Pupils Team Associated by Family members and Library workers]]
''' Lecture Speech Conclusion(Essay)'''
[[File:The Chinese characterastics speech of Piano pupils' art technique training and musicality athletics cultivation (Report Conclusion of Jixun, Han - Jason's team lecture on the date of October 13th, 2024 at Dalian Library).pdf|thumb|The Chinese characterastics speech of Piano pupils' art technique training and musicality athletics cultivation (Report Conclusion of Jixun, Han - Jason's team lecture on the date of October 13th, 2024 at Dalian Library)]]
'''Waiting Translation'''
===='''2026-New Beginning - Celebrating Our New Time'''====
[[File:Attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association No. 1 Pic.jpg|thumb|Attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association and performing on the stage]]
[[File:Attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association No. 2 Pic.jpg|thumb|Attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association and getting the certificate of Trustee, to make a very happy Horse Year's gift for myself.]]
[[File:Attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association No. 3 Pic.jpg|thumb|Attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association and getting to its Horse Year's Title]]
[[File:Attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association No. 4 Pic.jpg|thumb|Attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association and picturing myself before its officially opening]]
[[File:Attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association No. 5 Pic.jpg|thumb|Cool boy Jason Han's Big face before attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association]]
[[File:The Trustee certificate of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association No. 6 Pic.jpg|thumb|Translation: The letter of Appointment - Honestly recuiting Jixun (Jason M. C.), Han as the trustee of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association]]
The melody I played at this conference is "Celebrating Our New Life". Before its happening, I has taught a lovely girl in my piano classroom for a while. Let us listen to its classroom situation just several days before this conference and as a preparation.
'''Teacher's Demonstration: '''
''' Student's Expression of Zichen Tao (That Snow girl who growing up to be a big young girl in her middle school,busy, but still learning of piano after passing her 10th Grade Examination of China Cultural and Tourism Ministry )'''
[[File:Piano Student Zichen Tao's playing of Celebrating the New Life.wav|thumb|Piano Student Zichen Tao's playing of "Celebrating Our New Life"]]
[[File:Sending the trophy of Austria IZAN Music Festival to my piano student Zichen Tao in Dalian.jpg|thumb|By sending the trophy of 2026 Austria IZAN Music Festival to my piano student Zichen Tao in Dalian, I hold a small ceremony.On the day when she won the contest, what melody she did play was "Celebrating Our New Life" on stage, as shown above. ]]
===='''New Time and Fresh Air from 2024'''====
*[[Portal:Fresh Air of Piano after COVID-19 and beginning up a Recovering New Time of Openness from 2024]]
===='''Firstly, passing by a Skyline of Citylife Night-Skyline'''====
[[File:Flowing City (Lin Hai), Player and Teacher JMC,Han (Jason).ogg|thumb| Flowing City from 'Forest Sea', JMC,Han
[[File:Dalian Urban Night Skyline from Xiao Ping Island Mountain-top No.2.jpg|thumb|Dalian Urban Night Skyline from Xiao Ping Island Mountain-top No.2]] ]]
===='''New Era is coming...:(New Teaching List)'''====
[[File:Skiing Statue made during my rollers-skating.jpg|thumb|Skiing Statue shows Spirit (like piano)]]
[[File:The new situation of bubbles-fish statue.jpg|thumb|Ice & Snow Bubbles-fish are welcoming]]
[[File:Mmexport1614470203508.jpg|thumb|Picture of piano lessons still under Covid-19 situation]]
Etude in the Advanced level - Sir Chopin's famous Black-keys (Flatten G Major) Etude:
[[File:Chopin Black-keys Flat G Etude (Exercise), player JMC, Han.ogg|thumb| Black-keys: An Etude your teacher has no chance in childhood, but still hurries up to be better]]
[[File:Chopin Impromptus Op.29, JMC, Han.ogg|thumb|Chopin Impromptus Op.29, JMC, Han - Deep Fast Waltz-thinking in Quiet Gentleman's Self-Expression (Improvising)]]
[[File:Sogdian whirl with large pipa.jpg|thumb| (Public Domain Work: See original page: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sogdian_whirl_with_large_pipa.jpg#mw-jump-to-license): Could you find some musicality similarly with Chopin's Black-keys' Pentatonic?]]
True Fairland - a piano melody of The Nutcracker (Dance of Sugar Plum Fairy): the advanture from childhood realizes your piano dream-"Fingering Ballet"
[[File:The Nutcracker (Dance of Sugar Plum Fairy), Piano performer JMC, Han.ogg|thumb|The piano performance of <Dance of the Sugar Plum Fairy> in 'The Nutcracker' (Ballet Re-edited Piano Melody)]]
Czerny 299 etudes were designed for the smart&strong fingering&modelling of hands and a pair of Vienna school's ears for the harmony...such as No.23...
[[File:Czerny 299 No. 23 JMC,Han.ogg|thumb|Czerny 299 No. 23, player JMC,Han]]
A peacefully praying Sinfonia of Sir Bach is freshly added in the "New exam book's list' during this COVID-19 period, to which you can have a relaxing hear and try (Don't worry, listening, it's enough time, you knew, 'Andatino'-Peacefully walking, and to sing by hands, in a small Baroque place :
[[File:Sinfonia No.11 - 3Ps Invention, Bach, JMC,Han.ogg|thumb|Sinfonia No.11 Andatino- 3Ps Invention, Bach, Teacher JMC,Han (COVID-19 Protection Time)]]
Encouragement in Italy Smart Fashion, but needs the very carefully fingering-techniques training (Long time, advanced), feet-edges' staccato, sentence-Pizzicato, flowing streams...Italian artist techniques always attract our eyeballs... Let us attempt to... make out your own Italy style! Cheer up!
[[File:Domenico Scarlatti G Major Sonata, JMC,Han.ogg|thumb| Domenico Scarlatti G Major Sonata (In COVID-19 Pandemic Period), JMC,Han.ogg]]
'''A good teaching video result played by Yixuan, Wang:'''
http://m.kugou.com/mv/?hash=f00b36624f27b091b79e3f30e158aa03&sruserid=640650901
Baroque staccato techniques were always in a reasonable, confident, relaxing(wrists), fluent and vivid - 'Enough manners' of the Era, which needs us apply very careful fingering trainings. In a view of the whole structure, according to ears' musical suitable habits(psychological), I gave 1st section a twice repetitions, and then a throughout 2nd section to the Code. Hopefully, French Suite would make us brave, confident and relaxed. (but it also need years' accumulation of hand working to let those out and better) Have a try? Good luck!
[[File:BWV.816 Gigue-French Suites No.5 Bach, Player JMC, Han.ogg|thumb|BWV.816 Gigue-French Suites No.5 Bach, Player JMC, Han]]
(By turning to Wikimedia Commons, you will find two versions under its 'historical tree', currently. They are showing different stages we can reach. The first version was kept because it's relatively slower and more stable that in the basic stage we can make notes heard staccato and clear. After feeling suitable in this stage, we need to improve its tempo and get Gigue Dances' happy, vivid,,dialoguing with moods, jumping and wrists' breathing naturally. It needs time to train your hands frequently, untill relaxing but accurately. Main Difficulties: Stiffen wrists, Cramp and Tiredness... Now, it's the time of yourself...)
Hi! We, piano kids: Imaging a scene, let us hands-dances with the good manners and a earnest mind in a beautiful Baroque palace. It's easy and natural...
[[File:Primary Bach No. 16 March, Player JMC, Han.ogg|thumb|'Primary Bach No. 16 March' -A peaceful Bach-melody for all 'Piano Kids'...]]
Sir Debussy's Arabesque Suites (The second suite) is also in the list.
The musicality in my world is:
It's the legend of Butterfly in birds' chorus... it took us to a Life-mountain behind our living garden facing a quiet sea...
Watching, in some time of one section, you can also hear Monet's 'Quiet Morning' upon the sea...
Alongside Butterfly's dance-suite, imagination is beginning. Oh, listening... (Main meaning referenced from my main page)
What about it in your world and imagination?
'''Sound teaching demonstration:'''
[[File:Claude Debussy - 2nd Arabic Suite (Arabesque) - Spring Butterfly, Performer JMC, Han.wav|thumb|2nd Arabic Suite- Spring Butterfly (Impressionism Singing -Main Natural Lines&Breathes from Sir Debussy)]]
'''Good video teaching result from a 12 years' old little girl piano-pupil Mo Zhou:'''
http://m.kugou.com/mv/?hash=b50e133a360fa8d30cdcd9fca4163e73&sruserid=640650901
(Photographer: Ms. Yang, Gao)
Listening! boys and girls, Dvorak's Humor-jumping and Homesick-expressing:
A true Czech-homeland heart,
but
Dancing... somewhere in American Countryside
[[File:Flatten G Humoresque Dvorak, Player JMC,Han.ogg|thumb|Flatten G Humoresque, A. Dvorak, Player JMC,Han]]
[[File:One Town-view from Cesky Krumlov Castle.jpeg|thumb| Krumlov Castle-town's view]]
====Xinran, Yu - a lovely Chinese little piano girl's 'Ink-Mountain & Green Rivers' view of <The Cowherd's Flute> ====
'''Comment:'''
"Before taking the national examination and the exhibition competition, we together listened and learned to the net-editions of young master Lang Lang and Yujia Wang...(regarding with this famous little melody of Chinese tradition)
I think in this melody, she tried out her best for the techniques-training and the musicality in her age... from a little performer's view. Therefore,I gave the comment-Excellent.
Close your eyes, thinking of a little lovely girl happily playing among ink-mountains and the green rivers, with a water buffalo, some birds followed, and her smart flute... let us relax in the Chinese Ink-Landscape and listen to this little melody...(referenced partly from the writing in Wikimedia Commons page)
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 02:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
==== Zichen Tao - A little Chinese snowgirl's hardworking of D Major Sonatina====
'''Comment:'''
D Major Sonatina is still piano Children's favorites to perform and show... taken to the national grade examination, daily performed with each other, and also to city's piano Competition &Exhibition. That's an educational case lasting for many years in Dalian.
This edition is played by a lovely and white Chinese girl - Zichen, Tao. She and her mother took the very responsibility to check the wrong notes, improve the learning progress, and make the performing manners and designs for the stage-show...
Therefore, in my view as her piano teacher, this edition is already great in her age...(though hand-running details need to improve for her age). Hopefully, her family can enjoy this piano experience, companying with this melody in her childhood. (Partly referenced from her Wikimedia Commons' page)
[[File:D major Sonatina , Piano student Zichen Tao.ogg|thumb| D major Sonatina (Kuhlau's) played by piano pupil Zichen Tao]]
==== Meng's Performance and Comments after learning in the reality from Jason M. C.,Han in Children's Corner: ====
[[File:Children's corner of Meng.ogg|thumb| Meng Meng (nick name)'s edition of Doctorial in Children's Corner: Currently, the Fourth Version was her most beautiful one self-made in classroom before Piano Grade Test Exanimation. Regarding with all editions' comments and reasons, please reference to the original file in Wikimedia Commons]]
[[File:MM Good classroom F major 1838 Grande valse brillante.ogg|thumb|MM Good classroom F major 1838 Grande valse brillante]]
'''[[Portal: Part of Comments - 'for students' Examination Performance, Piano tutor's teaching self-reflexivity and possible some requirements of Pedalling Sound-effects with Artist Fashion of Post-impressionism' | Part of Comments - 'for students' Examination Performance, Piano tutor's teaching self-reflexivity and possible some requirements of Pedalling Sound-effects with Artist Fashion of Post-impressionism']]'''
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 04:15, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
==== Kim Hui's 'Doctoral Training','Under the sunshine' in Children's Corner: ====
'''Comments for Kim Hui's first draft:'''
1. She did the second theme (associated) well 'much deeper like vocally singing out a better life in New Era under the sunshine, on a piece of small area in a rainforest'...
2. Her Korean dance (Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_dance) has been done well, in which I can hear traditional drum-points in bass-part and crossing hand to tremble part.
3. I can hear Time-travelling and space-shaking to the past through a 'Dark-cave', from..., minutes 1.30-1.40... But, I think: if 'dramatically' and 'significantly' in dynamics (loudness), it would be better to show...
4. I can hear Forest's Evensong in Coda part - 'dim.' to the silence of night and a 'rit.' slowing down to the sleeping dream, and even several night-birds' dreaming voices...But, please make a much gentler taste (not so hurry up and not so strong) of those pictures. Meanwhile, I hope you can get a better & coherent control of the rhythm among different sections.
5. I knew, regarding with 'peak-parts', she had made many attempts 'drumming beats rights and keeping those connections clear'. However, still, in minutes 1.04 and 1.59, I felt it's a little bit 'rough', and needed to be handled in of the solidification... Oh, maybe, I am so severe... sorry, I should give you the encouragement.
Main comment: 'Under the sunshine' is suitable to Kim Hui's fashion and can be kept in her performance list. Her first draft and its preparation has given me an enjoyable teaching experience and many beautiful memories of life. It's fluent and vivid, expressive and dedicated. Thanks, Kim Hui! More colours and lights would be added from technique details, from her independent fingering and some traditional piano manners, meanwhile, the rhythm should be balanced well in the future. There are many developing zones of 'this painting' she can better and draw out for her future.[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 21:22, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
===== Kim Hui's second 'Show-Time' in classroom - Poem of Music (Piano Etude) =====
'''Teacher's Demonstration:'''
[[File:Poem of music.ogg|thumb|Poem of music JMC, Han]]
'''Student's Second Performance - Poem of Music: '''
[[File:Poem of Music (Piano Etude) - Student Kim Hui.ogg|thumb|Poem of Music (Piano Etude) - Student Kim Hui]]
'''Comments for Kim Hui's first draft:'''
1. She has mainly got the technique-points, but a little bit of rough in some details, such as the minutes 0.30-0.31 - 'Tail-closing part' of a sentence - in the progression of 'Diminished Seventh Chord-Arpeggio'... However, as her first draft and the random collection from a normal classroom, I thought it's well-done. we can wish its further 'Developing Zone', in the view of piano education.
2. In 'Coda Part' of Poem of Music (Piano Etude), she was able to show a great controllability of the 'Legato' between two hands, as the pieces of falling leaves slowly flying-upon the surface of water. Sometimes, it was evenly better than mine. I hoped she could manage it in a better way.
3. She showed some thoughts of musicality... However, 'Techniques-points' still wasted much of her energy. I think the total Dynamics in physics will be improved soon.
(waiting more)
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 14:53, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
===== Kim Hui can reach the advanced level of piano performance in this 'Little Children's Corner' =====
Though It's still Covid-19 Health-protection Time, after Home-self-Training Time, some classroom face-mask covering & health-good-protection lessons and an examination of China Culture&Tourism Ministry, She can play this 'Doctoral Etude' which is dreamed many piano pupils, with impressionism style. As her teacher, I didn't think It's a simple Etude which was expressed in many scenes, but with the big universe imagination and impression. Therefore, we have trained it as Meng's approach and further developed it.
Indeed, I think she performed far greater than this edition, right in that online national examination. She got it, Congratulation! Let us listen to her ...
[[File:Debussy-Children's Corner-Doctorial Etude, Piano pupil Jinghui Jin (Kim).ogg|thumb|Debussy-Children's Corner-Doctorial Etude, Piano pupil Jinghui Jin (Kim)]]
==== 'Colourful Clouds Running After Moon' impressed into the Heart of Xinyi, Hua (Hua family's Heart-sweet girl from 'Painting Imagery')====
'''Comments for the first draft of Xinyi, Hua:'''
1. I like her treatment of the prelude part in 'Colourful Clouds Running After Moon'. It's light and soft like silky clouds up-bridging alongside moonlight towards a round moon above the dark-blue sea. However, please try to link each silky pentatonic-arpeggio weave as a smooth whole from the bottom to the top, and from the left hand to the right hand. If so, her progress will be enlarged;
2. I can hear the situation 'Colourful Clouds Running After Moon' appeared in many linking parts before and later. She was attempting to give an acceleration imitating this procedure from a slower speed to a fast one, and between two hands' echo-following from a loose density to a tight one... However, if obviously, it will be better;
3. Like 0.58 to 1.03 minutes, I can hear that in some parts, she would like to make a returning sound-boomerang (Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boomerang) up-rising 'to the moon' and down-landing upon the sea-surface. If a small time of middle reaction was canceled out by her proficiency, we will appreciate the musical beauty in a much more advanced situation;
4. In 1.22 to 1.30 minutes, I know she would like to make a silky veil, with the colourful clouds as material, upon moon's beautiful face by her right hand. It's a little bit of pity that the controlling ability of relative loudness made she carried this willing but harder to realize. Meanwhile, this veil needed to be smooth. Oh, sorry, I am so critical... indeed, she did not bad;
5. There is a hard hurt in 1.36 minute - it's still a repetition of bass-chord though she has already attempted her best to grasp the bass large chord through left hand's opening degrees (Little girl, I knew you had tried your best. Though the momentum was great, I still need to point it out.);
6. 2.12 - 2.40 minutes is the part - 'Bright Moon up-rising above the harvest sea'. This is a grand scene which needs great forces from students' forearms and a fast reactions for some flexible connections to arpeggio-parts... Congratulations, little girl, she have got it, though it's a little bit slower. She have given out a great momentum;
7. In the Moon-tail part, she has expressed her great musicality to make moon disappear in the dawn of sea;
8. Many ornamentations she has done well, though still some need to be gently breezing in the impressionism of Chinese landscape painting.
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 12:22, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
===== 'Pure White Dove' in Young Teenager Xinyi's Eyes =====
[[File:Dove in the eyes of Young Teenager girl Xinyi, Hua.ogg|thumb|'Pure White Dove' ('La Paloma' - 'No More' in English) in the eyes of Young Teenager girl Xinyi, Hua]]
'''Congratulation to your beautifully singing of the 'Melodic lines' behind the right hand's octaves-grasping!'''
'''Comments:'''
1. Four biggest designs appeared: around B50 (Minutes 1.36), B55 (Minutes 1.48), B58 (Minutes 1.54) and B62 (Minutes 2.01) - four Peak-currents, we'd like to throw (rit.) the 'missing notes' into the air and rotate them a little bit more slowly - like to send, wait and feel Dove's messages across the ocean in a self-holding & self-releasing intoxication. She tried her best to make them out, but not quite clearly and still need much time to grow up...
2. I liked her coda part (from B65 Minutes 2.08 to the end): She was so sure about two hands' March-doubling, as a confirmation of future and belief; or to say, she transformed her 'missing' in the melody to be a true hope of tomorrow, or someday... Evenly, I thought it's better than mine...
3. For more than half years, we have worked hard to help her link all octave-grasping pearls out of melodic lines in singing breaths. She almost got it successfully, through small breaks...
4. Some 'Spanish Dotted notes' and 'Triples-wandering', with the rhythm of Spanish Dance Habanera-Andante (Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradanza) can be fulfilled, but some not really... I am happy she recognized them and paid more attentions to... It's waiting time that she could perform much better.
5. Yes, I had to say: still some small faults there... The good usage of pedalling almost hide some, but... also a little bit rough... Oh, I didn't want to be a so severe teacher. Rather than, much more good wishes of her growth should be given. Okay, hopefully, she enjoyed it.
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 12:57, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
'''Teacher's Demonstration for standards above and Further Progress (Advanced Level):''' [[File:Dove With Spanish Sense in Piano JMC.Han.ogg|thumb|Dove With Spanish Sense in Piano JMC.Han (It was once used by the photography gallery of music friend User:PigeonIP - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:PigeonIP/Tauben/2019_April_1-10 and the main page La Paloma in wikipedia )]]
'''More information and reading - articles (list) about 'Dove', please watch:''' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Paloma
==== Malagueña Dream from a little Chinese girl - Yinuo's heart (A promise ... to piano) in a small beach-side classroom ====
[[File:Student edition - Malagueña Suite (modified for piano) played by Yinuo, Liu.ogg|thumb|Student edition - Malagueña Suite (modified for piano) played by Yinuo, Liu]]
'''Comments for the first draft of Yinuo, Liu:'''
1. We can hear the impression of Flamenco rhythmic pattern (Compás) (Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flamenco) diffusing from some simple rhythm-components of a parts in a total ABA structure of Malagueña Suite. This is what I - the tutor and the little girl -learner would like to express through three more different accompaniment bass-forms, including pizzicatos, small slurring breathes and some opposite weights..., which imitated some of Classical Guitar's handling ways. Thanks to the little girl Yinuo, you have realized most of our designs! Congratulations!
2. I really like her beautiful Cante jondo - associated 'vocal' lines by right hand which was balanced & flying above the flamenco accompaniment of the left hand when the second thematic melody began. It's a deep, profound and emotions-rich singing, almost from a beautiful Spanish girl's natural expression for the missing, the reasoning of life & Universe when facing a 'deep and far' sea. Though if the dynamics would be dramatically and the singing would be much deeper, the emotional atmosphere would be better: I thought to only a girl of her 11 years' old age, she has already attempted her best to understand those across cultures;
3. I like the middle B's fantastical view of holiday beach under the sunshine, which was almost formed by white waves from blue sea. It's relaxable, dreamful and graceful, like a girl poet's walk alongside a small sand bay... (Yinuo, you knew, if you can make the 'rit. - A Tempo' much more nature like the real tides of sea and the speed tiny faster, the progress zone will be enlarged);
4. I know in two middle long 'vocal' ornaments, she would like to show us ' the blackbirds or the nightingales of its gardens...' However, if making it much more smoothly, expressively, and flexibly, even a little bit down-slowed, her Spanish 'tasteful' fashion will be more beautiful;
5. Repeated A part is better to be different in small details which can show the ability of hands and the variation of music.
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 13:35, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
==== Für Elise in piano boy Zhe's eyes ====
'''Teacher's demonstration in classroom for better:'''[[File:For Elise (Für Elise) Beethoven JMC Han.ogg|thumb|For Elise (Für Elise) Beethoven JMC Han]]
'''Student's performance in classroom:'''
[[File:Für Elise -Student Performance Zhe,Zhang.ogg|thumb|Für Elise in piano boy Zhe's eyes]]
==== D major Sonatina (Kuhlau) - Piano-pupil girl Mengshuang's 'Strong Willpower and Persistence' ====
'''Teacher's demonstration in classroom for better:'''
[[File:D major sonatina 2nd movement Kuhlau (played by Jason).ogg|thumb|D major sonatina 2nd movement Kuhlau - Teacher JMC. Han]]
'''Student's performance in classroom:'''
[[File:D major Sonatina (Kuhlau) - the version from piano-student Meng Shuang, Wang.ogg|thumb|D major Sonatina (Kuhlau) - the version from piano-student Meng Shuang, Wang. This classroom version has been selected by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Rsteen/Artists_from_Denmark/2019_August_1-10]]
'''Comments and Statements:'''
1. Totally to say, the main melody fast-run by the right hand has kept its fluency, transparency and clearance. It's very hard in piano training for herself, owe to that her hands-shape was a little bit of 'frozen'. Thanks for your hard-working in the training. Congratulation!
2. Her musicality in this melody has also been motivated out - unrestrained and natural in the expression.
3. Left hand's accompaniment was in good triplet-treatment, but please light and dedicate a little bit... It's to say: the controllability still needs to improve.
4. Some heads of sentences and smaller phrases need to be match together between two hands in a better way - some parts, because of small ornamentations and dotted notes, weren't quite well...
5. I am very happy that you (in your 12th year of life) were willing to play out the middle 'rit. - A Tempo' in a comparison ('rit.' was slowing down the waiting, then, 'A Tempo' for the Peak expression in return). However, it was still a little bit rough (before its right time). You can try to modify it in a better view.
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 03:08, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
==== How to play Mozart's Classics? ====
===== Work from Mozart's earlier time - Turkish March =====
'''Teacher's Demonstration in classroom:'''
'''Video:'''
[[File:Turkey March Video-Mozart-Jason Han.webm|thumb|Turkish March (Video) for Mozart's; JMC, Han]]
'''Sound:'''
[[File:Turkey March for Mozart and Memory JMC, Han.ogg|thumb|Turkish March (Sound) for Mozart's and Memory (many times used in peer Tokfo/Vienna Gallery - such as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tokfo/Vienna/2019_January_26-28 ); JMC, Han]]
==== Sure, Ma's boy-view of Mozart's 'Turkish March' ====
[[File:Sure, Ma's Version of 'Turkish March' in piano classroom for piano education.ogg|thumb|'Turkish March' - an old mysterious Turkey story in piano student (Jason's piano pupil) boy Sure, Ma's classroom edition. Thanks, this good teaching & Learning result was selected by Tokfo/Vienna Gallery: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tokfo/Vienna/2019_April_25-27 ]]
'''Further Comments for his first draft:'''
1. It's very difficult for a young boy to manage Turkish March's speed in a smooth way... He tried his best to keep it stable and unified, and almost did achieve it. (Turkish March is easily to make people play faster and faster until crazily broken. He tried to solve it by giving a slower beginning ) But, it's a little bit of too serious,afraid to touch wrong. Indeed, I heard his another time, in which he totally open himself and relax from nature... We could give him more hopes.
2. His melodic flow of scale-phrases (legato) are quite fluent and natural, which shows his scale-playing and fingering were quite great. But, a small break occurred around 1.14 to 1.17 minutes could be caused by the stiff right wrist (too tried) and no-good fingering design. He should frequently move second and third fingers in a much smarter way. To a young boy in his age, it should already be 'okay'.
3. When the theme occurred in the second time, it's better to give a dynamics-difference in contrast. My mother-Ms Song said: it's like an old story (sound) heard from a far distance to near somewhere - mysteriously. However, he gave a very tight connection, as if it was linked with the previous section.
4. He tried his best to take the Worldwide difficult challenge - 'Broken-chordal Arpeggiated-octaves' (Around 2.00 to 2.14 minutes). I gave him a 'LIKE' that he had taken this challenge which even many pianists or teachers made some 'faults' as their heart pities - You can hear the edition of Romuald Greiss' in Wikipedia and several my previous times... However, this boy achieved it after many trainings time after time... Though later half one, compared with the beginning, might be in lower distinguishing degree, he didn't make any 'breaks', which comforted my teaching way so much. Thanks, boy Sure!
5. The final problem would occur in 'Alberti Bass' (left hand) of Coda part. Coming to it, you will feel easy to give up, which required more endeavors to control your hands in narrow and elaborate dealing way. He did it good, but lost in the counting of number (B111), and further, the connection with the final 'Square-opening Dance' (a small break). other things, such as the strength, are fine in his age.
6. In addition, I am planning to add a 'Turkish Stop' by a final pedaling. I didn't know whether he could, someday.
Overall, I gave him an Excellent Comment. Hopefully, he will play better after better in his growth. [[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 14:13, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
'''Further Comments for his second draft:'''
1. As his teacher, I am very happy to hear several great designs we have made in classrooms can be achieved in the second draft, according to the background knowledge of 'Turkey March' I taught, such as the final 'Turkey Stop' (not really in modern piano, but a little bit similar) and the Bass-points-layer (simulating the military drum) beneath the long fast running scale-phrases of right hand (middle section)... Cool boy, thanks that you can remember your teacher's words! Congratulation!
2. Yes, right after the chance of Music library Report-performance in local we have made and getting back, you improved the edition's speed and fluency. You can evenly save 15 seconds, contrasted with before, which showed that your fingering & running ability of hands had been greatly improved. However, the disadvantage is that it's easier to make some small motives uneven and rough (touching wrong notes) without purpose, which needs more your careful attention and exactness about details.
3. I knew you tried your best to face the peak challenge Mozart made to all people - making broken-progression of octaves message (middle part) and hearing out its hidden melodic lines. Great! However, it's still a little bit beyond your ability that its distinction with chords-effect weren't so clear. No matter, Sure boy, more exercises, it will be better.
In all, progressing soon which shows the potential, thanks to your performances1 There is still the developing zone waiting for you.
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 15:08, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
==== Clever Girl Jia Xin's Clever view of Sir Bach's 3-parts Invention ====
'''Teacher's Demonstration for Future Development:'''
[[File:3 Parts Invention 8th- from Sir Bach.ogg|thumb|3 Parts Invention 8th- from Sir Bach's BWV 794 – Sinfonia No. 8 in F major ]]
''' Jia Xin's Performance:'''
[[File:3-parts Invention No. 8 (F major) in piano-girl Jia Xin's view.ogg|thumb|3-parts Invention No. 8 (F major) in piano-girl Jia Xin's view]]
'''Comments of her first draft:'''
1. Totally, 3 parts are ranged in Bach's harmony, to a girl in her age - 12 years old. It's not easier to make so clear layers out. I was satisfied with this point, after heard every time;
2. I can hear piano techniques for polyphonic & counterpoint music like Bach's, such as cannon, intimation between two hands, up-climbing shoulder by shoulder, dialogues, long-notes down-pressed for different parts' SHE (sentence-head-enhancement), long-notes kept for parts' division and maintaining, fingering grouping in one hand for 2 parts, parts' continuously melting into one for the summarization, and..., Baroque ornamentation... mentioned for long. For those trainings, and further, the internalization into her own mind-analysis, we had searched information & knowledge through Wikipedia, two more manuscripts, books and other webs online, further, spent classroom time to reason, analyse, train and fix note by note for long time... In this case, I gave her hard-working a 'Like' again;
3. There would also be some problems regarding with recording pressure and her memory...: some big ones - left hand's relatively weak ability in managing two parts, small mistakes (like B18's f note played as sharp f - around 1.13 minute, B21's final g isn't raised there - around 1.23-1.24 minutes, and others...), small ornaments in a little bit of rough view and a much more graceful manner in Coda part. (sorry, to such a 12 years old girl, my suggestions could be so severe. But when listening, they are directly in my ears...)
4. She did really pay her attention to Dynamics, but please better - lighter, smarter and more obviously...
5. The speed of later part is better than the slower earlier part.
Overall, I also gave her an excellent comment for her performance (Live) in classroom. For further development, she can listen to my edition and the one in 'Inventions and Sinfonias (Bach)' - Wikipedia article (I thought it's great, but I didn't like too many speed-variations in Bach's works. It's better more reasonable: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inventions_and_Sinfonias_(Bach) )
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 07:33, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
==== Yixuan's piano-view and traveling landscapes ====
'''First view (only 9 years old) of Sir Bach's 2-parts Inventions'''
[[File:Bach 2-parts Invention, played by Yixuan Wang (Only 9 years old).ogg|thumb|Bach 2-parts Invention, played by Yixuan Wang (Only 9 years old)]]
'''Comments from teacher:'''
1. Musical parts and space-dimensions were much clearer than before, which reflected the little girl Yixuan's hard-working continuously after her piano examination...
2. I can hear the heads of musical sentences which were highlighted by each hand when required. I can also hear cannon-following, doubling and countermelody which were clearly shown into her performance. It's quite necessary for students in this age - 9 years old. In certain degree, she is already a good and careful student in piano.
3. Still, the controllability and the stability of hands, especially the turn of her 3rd, 4th and 5th fingers, need to be improved, which caused some small faults, such as 0.49-0.50 minutes (Bar 22) - a recovered B in right 3rd finger, 0.54-0.55 minutes (Bar 25) - 3rd, 4th & 5th fingers of left hand, and a small disharmonic note - flatten B in the right hand - 0.32 (Bar 14)...
4. It's great that I can hear Baroque staccatos were in their graceful manners - like imperfect pearls required by its era. She almost did it...
5. Totally saying: it must be a very hard-job for a student in 9 years old to play Bach's 2-parts Invention. She bravely took up this life-task and successfully completed - this point should be affirmed. Congratulation! You can do more further...
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 02:28, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
'''MARIAGE D'AMOUR (Dreaming Wedding Ceremony) and its Educational Story:'''
It's only no more than 2 weeks she did get the main techniques, after taking a Covid-19 Protection piano lesson and further test(Face-mask covering and breathe-prevention…).Then, she went back home and made a hard self-working exercise. Afterwards, around 10 days, this edition can come out. Why was she so keen on making it? She told me... One of her family's friends would like a piece of background music for his wedding ceremony, and they knew she was a good piano pupil.They invited her to take this task. She online self found out her long dreaming piece, and felt very happy for them. She thought only hard-working at home can realize this dream in this 'Hard Recovery Time'. She has beautifully taken this life-task for a very short time, and finally I could find a beautiful smile on her face... Though there were still some small faults in teacher's view, such as the biggest 1.02-1.03...
('''Problems:'''
Mentioned one is because of the distance of the Tenth-grasping is out of her hand-shape and ability in this age - rolling but touching a wrong note; In addition, the breathing of each sentence's tail somehow is with a longer responded break... Further, the Pedaling for the coherence from natural breathing need to improve; The final departing dropping notes were too noisy... which needs to be quiet,rit. and peaceful...),
her hands' ability (especially the big chords-grasping, whole-viewing, locating, and sight-reading) was improved by her own endeavors (Maybe... subjects-divided examination-taking online through self-video-recording,in this special time, motivated her self-management...). This point made me feel happy... Hopefully, the friend of her family enjoyed their wedding ceremony with this own and LIVE background music, luckily as in a fantastic, peaceful and forever-lasting life-dream of happiness.
In future, Hoping: Yixuan, you can play this fantastic wedding song of piano (fluently and heart-touchingly) for more families and share their friendship, love and happiness...
Little girl pupil, thank you!^_^
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 01:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
[[File:CCzerny 299 Etude No. 27, Piano student Yixuan Wang, Tutor Jason Han.oggzerny 299 Etude No. 27, Piano student Yixuan Wang, Tutor Jason Han.ogg|thumb|
Czerny 299 Etude No. 27, Piano student Yixuan Wang, Tutor Jason Han.ogg]]
I have taught two children this Etude-a girl and also a boy (with outcomes). They played all well in very different musicalities. One is like a fast gym meeting 299's standards. The other-hers is with a good sound effect -light and peaceful after her grade examination. Both I all like.
Regarding with how to train this sound effect with pedal, Please see my etudes'platform:
https://en.m.wikiversity.org/wiki/Portal:Piano_Etudes_as_Poems
'''G major Sonata L.349 - Yixuan Wang's New Attempt of Italian Baroque Style of A. Scarlatti'''
A. Scarlatti's Sonatas are quite hard for young students and young teenagers to train and perform.However, Yixuan is fine, I thought.
It needs a very fast & light fingering of Scale & Arpeggios and different STACCATOing keyboard-touching way, meanwhile, the exaggerating fluency of simple patterns... I thought she somehow had touched at her own little age. Just, more from nature, more details-care and the flexibility of hands&body could make things better.
At her age, it's already fine.Thanks to the recent striving in this still hard time of COVID-19 Recovery. [[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 02:31, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
[[File:G major Sonata L.349, Piano Pupil Yixuan, Wang.ogg|thumb|A, Scarlatti L.349 Sonata, Piano-pupil Yixuan, Wang]]
It's very hard to train Scarlatti's Italian Style of technique skills... However, Yixuan, Wang has never given up...
during this COVID-19 Time...-Protecting herself with masks, meanwhile, playing times after times... Finally, we can get some senses of fast, airily,lightly and breezily... Yes, there may also be some problems, like- it's very easy to be stressful and breathless on the stage...But to her age, do you think it's already good...
Therefore, I recorded it in a video and published it on a musical platform -Kugou, and a educational platform - Youku, as to remember her growth:
http://m.kugou.com/mv/?hash=f00b36624f27b091b79e3f30e158aa03&sruserid=640650901
====Piano Pupil Mo Zhou's Smart Growth and Hard-working learning of Techniques ====
The video of Mo Zhou's most beautiful performance of Debussy's work- 2re Arabesque (I call it 'Butterfly's Dream') :
Kugou musical platform -
http://m.kugou.com/mv/?hash=547cb2c1e2f57a9e8ec66e8ecf36c269&sruserid=640650901
Youku educational part -
http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XNTgxNzA2Njk2MA==.html?x&sharefrom=android&sharekey=9631de9a76de1af3d601221019590cd26
(Published on the musical platform of Kugou and the educational part of Youku; the classroom volunteering photographer is Ms. Yang Gao)
'''Piano Pupil Mo, Zhou's Violin simulation of Cremer's Etude's Art'''
Catching the hands' positions (somehow borrowed from voilin's) is almost the hardest point to train.One focuses on left hand's Notes-Slipping; the other regards with the interval Position-switching (2 notes) check of right hand frequently.
Though this little girl has a pair of smart&slim hands, she attempted her best. You can hear the most part's effect LIVE in classroom...
In this point, I gave a 'LIKE'.
[[File:Cramer Etude, Performed by Piano Pupil Mo, Zou.ogg|thumb|Cramer Etude, Performed by Piano Pupil Mo, Zhou]]
'''A, Scarlatti L.349 Sonata - A Italian Style Taste of Baroque Music'''
''Comments:''
Mo,Zhou's hands are very smart, regarding with which some very tiny actions she can take, though they aren't quite big. Yes, she has been always willing to enlarge her hands.
This point, but somehow, associate her to take this Italian Baroque Style (Rocca) quite easy.
Yes, I thought she was fine regarding with much more details.(though it's LIVE that very few unexpected faults could be caused by the stress of the recording).
I thought: to her performance, my teaching is working well. She did many requirements... Let us listen to her.[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 03:25, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
[[File:G major Sonata L.349, Piano pupil Mo, Zhou.ogg|thumb|File:G major Sonata L.349, Piano pupil Mo, Zhou.ogg]]
==== Brilliant Snow-ball boy (Yu) of Zhang family is praying for his father working in New Zealand ====
[[File:Pupil Yu,Zhang's edition - e minor sonata of Sir Haydn.ogg|thumb|E minor sonata of Sir Haydn was played by Piano student Yu, Zhang in classroom]]
'''(Waiting better)'''
Could you understand how hard Sir Haydn's & Mozart's mature sonata-structuralism and Classical Countermelody (from String Quartet: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Amadeus_Mozart) were for the training of such a young boy or some students around this aget? Oh, looking back, I, myself, also did feel hard... However, this boy and another older piano sister did really insist on doing so. Today, they can give their own editions - very different with own personalities and natures.
Another point I would like to say: It's only one week's time that this boy was fighting for 'a good hearing' of his father. Afterwards, a modified recording edition soon got out, which showed his proficiency and quality...Good boy!
To be honest, reviewing the past year, in order to train Sir Haydn's melody, we researched many ways together, including mathematics... Sometimes, evenly felt hopeless... Playing from childhood, Haydn's style is quite simple to me - models, switching, sonata structure..., but to students, they didn't quite like the sense of thinking being structured... And at the very beginning, I even didn't understand why they felt difficult... Recognizing something, We began to make many games, and evenly counting out some scores for the achievement of his 'fried chicken legs'...
Here, from rhythm to notation, and from melodic interaction to parts-division, I felt it's much clearer, more fluent and stable, than before... His ability of coordination has also been improved, though still some problems. I dared and felt confidential to say: it's a great edition of himself. Hopefully, he can progress further.
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 16:08, 4 April 2019 (UTC) Now, he made it much more fluent and accurate, and also played out his own fashion, though some details still need to be modified. Honestly to say, I thought somehow he got his progress in this period which we can hear...[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 03:28, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
'''Comments'''
It's the second time of piano boy Yu Zhang's teaching result show. In this time, he chose the melody <Under the Sunshine> - a Chinese fork teaching melody as one subject of national examination and also a performance of one piano competition in Dalian.
In my view as his teacher, he gave a very different view of this melody, compared with girls'. He paid more attentions to the whole view of melody's energy, strength, fluency and the joyfulness in Under the Sunshine, but didn't too much care about the details of some parts. However, on the stage, it showed a very great expression as from boy's situation... Good luck and happy experiment. After some practices, in the classroom we together recorded it and submit it up... (Referenced Partly from his page in Wikimedia Commons)
==== How to play Chinese Folk tune - 'Kids' Dance' with Chinese kids' fashion? Listen to little girl Kunlu's performance ====
'''Teacher's Demonstration in classroom:'''
[[File:Kid's Dance Chinese Folk Piano Player Jason M. C.,Han.ogg|thumb|Kid's Dance - 'Kid's Dance', from a folk piano-tune in China National Grading Book, was personally performed here, as a gift for all piano-kids' 'Happy 2019 Lucky Pig Year']]
'''Student Kunlu's Performance in classroom:'''
[[File:Kid's Dance (Chinese) - Student Kunlu, Han.ogg|thumb|Student Kunlu, Han's (Han family's girl born as bright as dewdrop in Kun - Saturn of Wuxing) good performance of Kid's Dance (Chinese)]]
'''Teacher's Comments:'''
Totally to say: Though She can play better editions (many better ones, last winter), in this sound file, she showed the coherence, fluency, flexibility and stability ( as Chinese fork-tune required). Hearing such a smart Chinese girl playing such a fugue-cannoning song, you will feel: it's a right song designing for a right girl... I think that's one meaning of piano-performance. Though spending much time, We did also research special 'Chinese supplemental positions & Dialogues' in polyphony together, which gave us many beautiful memories... Further more, in this age, her staccatos, slurs and Tenuto have been performed quite well, which helped her to keep a unified speed to the end.
Taking back a step, there must still be some small faults in classroom (without purposes) that I have to point out: such as B18's #C blowing to D a little bit, the attention didn't get back in B41 head A which made a small break, and a small mistake of 'Recovered C' rather than #C... In order to dream of its accuracy and pentatonic harmony, it's a hard-working that we have already come over many problems and mistakes... Therefore, I think she fulfilled herself and achieved many things from 'Kid's Dance'. Hopefully, she enjoys the procedure of music-carving. [[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 15:07, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
===== Kunlu's Crystal Heart on International Children's Day - Kleine Kinder Kleine Sorgen (Little Child) =====
'''Teacher's Comments:'''
1. The degrees of proficiency, fluency (and internal speed) have been improved, right on International Children's Day.
2. I preferred her treble part very much - so cool, pure, clean and refreshing, which reflected her crystal heart in childhood.
3. The grasping of big chords - stronger, that's great - but needs to be more accurately and deep (The word 'deep' wasn't always 'loud' and 'heavy'). Please try to understand this point. Yes, it needs to show the hardness of growth (to young teenager), but also the achievement 'to be stronger and more confident of yourself...' [[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 03:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
[[File:Internationl Children's Day Gifts - 2. Kleine Kinder Kleine Sorgen (Little Child, Piano-modification of Germany Song).ogg|thumb| Kleine Kinder Kleine Sorgen (Little Child, Piano-modification of Germany Song), played by Kunlu, Han]]
==== Teacher's Shares of his own home-works from childhood (Open) - Jason, Han====
====='''M. Moszkowsky Etude (Op.72 No.5) - "C major's Fluency, Clarification, Sunshine and Love'''=====
New Beginning with...: M. Moszkowsky Etude (Op.72 No.5) played by Jixun Han (Jason) for piano teaching. It's long time that my piano classroom on the cloud in wikiversity hasn't update its situation. After so many things, now I can partly return to English writing world. The first Etude I would like to upload is still MM Edute which gave me so fluent and clean mind in my childhood. Oh, 38 years old, and after a wedding ceremony with my real lover, my fingers would not be so great as around 15s'... However, I would like to update its situation and new editions untill great someday. Now, let's began with this new melody. It's taught to my good Chinese boy pupil named Guoguo (fruit zeyu, Cui) when I grasped up and recorded. Yes, this little boy will also play well. Let's listen to my version, firstly. Thanks Jason M. C., Han (talk) 13:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
More information, please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_compositions_by_Moritz_Moszkowski
Homework Requirements (challenges):
1. B23-B24(B stands for Musical Bar): By right hand, heads of every 4-notes group make a down-going semi-notes scale, which needs a very careful&exact arpegio-fingering with a whole—palm holded and also thumb-measuring ability. Meanwhile, the left hand is making a whole-tenth measure, but arranged upon every two chords' link. The semi-notes scale is also its fixed channel accordingly. This point is very different to follow and be made accurately and perfectly, which needs long-time training.
2. B49-50 It's almost a two-hands doubling for playing arpeggio-phrase.But not really! You can watch the second phrase- fingering! Your left hand need a smallish shape. Meanwhile, the little finger's head of last phrase need to jump out a minor third distance down. It's very hard to control and also not a doubling.
(Hard for playing, but good for sounding, if out. Therefore, dears, have a try like mine...)
Yours little uncle Han [[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 14:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
[[File:M. Moszkowsky Etude (Op.72 No.5) played by Jixun Han (Jason) for piano teaching.wav|thumb|M. Moszkowsky Etude (Op.72 No.5) played by Jixun Han (Jason) for piano teaching]]
===== '''Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata''' =====
Indeed, Beethoven left a historical challenge (difficulty) but the continuously creative inspiration to understand the techniques & musicality of all his movements, equally to all people. We can attempt different approaches and own personal life-experiences to understand them, and discuss out some possible results.
[[File:Moonlight Sonata - 3rd Movement of Sharp c minor Sonata Beethoven.ogg|thumb|Moonlight Sonata - 3rd Movement of Sharp c minor Sonata after a library presentation of Beethoven (Further, thanks to the April-collections of Tokfo Gallery (Vienna: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tokfo/Vienna/2019_April_28-30) and Sir James Gallery (Bonn:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Sir_James/Bonn/2019_April_29) - great encouragements!)]]
'''3rd Movement- 'Moonlights Storming' - Techniques Analysis from Notation-reading ('Presto agitato' of Breitkopf & Hartel Company and Berlin Arts Collage also compared with Old New York Edition - as the remembrance of one monitor):'''
'''Musicality:''' In a grandly general view, it's like...in a crazily running (very fast) race, viewed from the window, moonlights have been dismembered upon deep Lake Lucerne (many fragmental sections composed together).
[[File:Vienna Beethoven Monument (with angels and children surrounding).jpg|thumb| Beethoven's Monument in Vienna]]
[[File:Beside Beethoven's Musicality.jpg|thumb| A third-person's Watching of Beethoven's Musicality]]
For its musicality cultivation, I could give a similar sense of its situation, like in Picasso's works- such as Picasso's Guernica (Ceridwen's Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license) For achieving it, a little bit of dark-moods anger and sadness faced from the unfairness and out of control could be inputted, after all technique points were trained in the dexterity. Therefore, from emotion to say, I thought the video right after getting back from UK and the lost one in Newcastle central station were better than this time. [[File:3rd movement of Sonata 'Moonlight' Rocking Video JMC, Han (Jason).webm|thumb|3rd movement of moonlight sonata; Rocking Video JMC, Han (Jason)]] However, I satisfied with it, right like in life and after the presentation. From this point, we can see: Beethoven, as a piano master, has super-reached too much before the time - even abstractionism and postmodernism (deconstructionism).
'''2nd Movement - 'a little Fantasy Moonflower blooming between two rocky layers' - Techniques Analysis from Notation-reading (Allegretto of Breitkopf & Hartel Company and Berlin Arts Collage):'''
1. Parts-distinguishing way can be applied to pick up the main melodic points from its background and legato them into lines.
'''( Notice: Here, from the historical observation, a thing needs to be clarified: Baroque-regression (back-reasoning) was usually made by classical composers (in Vienna school: Mozart, Haydn and Beethoven etc.), especially in their later years of life for calming down the dramatical emotions, and keeping Life's Reasonability. Meanwhile, from Haydn, they discussed and created classical counterpoints from symphony and string quartet together, to modify creative inspirations. Beethoven also inherited it. Therefore, when we play some in piano, we need to analyse and apply some special techniques, commonly used in classical polyphony, to pick up the main from the background, sentence by sentence, as an era-responding.)[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 03:38, 15 May 2019 (UTC)'''
2. Octaves-bridging and chords-connections for big hands, into their hidden melodies, are the most difficulties, which need your frequent exercises, sentence by sentence. (Painful but worthful! Finally, flexible and skillful... )
3. Long keeping-notes, in certain parts, are important for the continuity of the tune and the texture, without broken.
4. It's better in light and tender keyboard-touching way to make melodic lines clear and 'the little flower' smile lightly.
5. 'Rondo' (ABA) formation can be applied to understand its repetitions, responding and structure.
[[File:Moonlight Sonata (Sharp c minor Sonata) 2nd Movement Beethoven JMC,Han.ogg|thumb|Moonlight Sonata - a little fantasy flower between two rocky layers]][[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 14:51, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
===== Blue Danube is always flowing from heart and life, with the vitality as spring: =====
Children and young teenagers, let us swim in this life-long river, to see some beautiful landscapes!
[[File:Blue Denube in my heart.jpg|thumb|Blue Denube in my heart]]
[[File:Blue Danube (Exercise and variations-collections in piano) JMC, Han.ogg|thumb|Blue Danube (Exercise and variations-collections in piano) JMC, Han]]
===== Pachelbel's Canon is always the canon (polyphonic technique) since Baroque Era, but in '''Modern Piano's Pop Variations''' =====
[[File:Pachelbel's Canon in Pop Variations (Geoge Winston Notation) Player Jason, Han.ogg|thumb| Pachelbel's Canon in Pop Variations (George Winston Notation) Player Jason, Han]]
'''Story of teaching & learning (from Wikimedia Commons):'''
Regarding with this piano melody, there is a long story in my heart... Oh, did you hear Mag-pie's singing (I like 'pie' in the tail of this word) in the first draft? Yes, it was attracted and landing on the tree outside my balcony... You can clearly hear it at the beginning and in the tail in my first draft... Almost, it would like to share my memory...
Long long ago, my old brother on my mother's side used to be one hero of my life and fashion... On each holiday, he was always able to find great music pieces, MTVs, transcripts , and scientific fictions, from foreign countries, such as American and Japan (Summer)... and brought & shared with me... Then, I attempted my best to exercise them into the reality, which included this song - Canon Variations from pianist George Winston... Those memories have never faded out, but in my deep sea. To now, evenly did I think Canon was from US and a POP song... After seeking the exact information in Wikipedia, I found it's Pachelbel's Canon in D and Baroque Era and German, rather than C and Modern and Pop in American... and with a 'Gigue for Violins and Basso Continuo', it's not only for piano in many parts than our 3 parts in original piano edition. However either, I still like it very much and would like call it American POP in my music world...
Then after, a male colleague in my working college said to me: Jason, on my wedding ceremony, I would like to play it for a girl... Could you give me a simple one? Then, searching online, I found a simple (middle level) notation and an original (advanced level) notation, I downloaded both, and chose the simple one for him Three months, he was able to play it from 0 level (he wasn't able to read the notation)... I thought piano would have give him a good memory of wedding...
Following, I found a girl felt bored about her piano examination... Then, by choosing the simple transcript and inserting into her lessons... it made my tutoring classrooms really beautiful, relaxable, magical and peaceful...
Now, I have time to play the original edition out... One long dream of my heart is going to be fullfilled... Though my hands in several points didn't make my perfectionism satisfied contrasted with before, especially the tenth-cross design between the left hand and the right hand, I knew it's my life, and fate?... I prefered to update its situations for bettering continuously... if having time...
Compared with the firstly draft, I thought the second was much down-calmed and peaceful...Somehow, I preferred the first draft, but a little bit of 'fast'... I cannot make the decision...then, kept two. However either, I still felt very happy the little natural friend - mag-pie can join... For this reason, I kept it. Hopefully, you will enjoy...
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 04:50, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
===== KV.265 12 Variations on Ah vous dirai-je, Maman - 'Twinkle Twinkle Little Star' =====
Analysis (Waiting)
[[File:KV.265 12 Variations on Ah vous dirai-je, Maman Mozart JMC, Han.ogg|thumb|KV.265 12 Variations on Ah vous dirai-je, Maman Mozart JMC, Han]]
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 08:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
=====''' 'The beautiful views of Scotti-highlands' from Thompson's Book (Advanced Level) - Teaching and demonstration '''=====
[[File:The beautiful views of Scotti-highlands (Teaching demonstration - video; Jason, Han).webm|thumb| After the performance in local Crossing-year 2019-2020 Library Concert and many further exercises, a good edition in classroom got out - Piano kids, always, you knew: No pains, No gains]]
For its musicality and academic thoughts, please visit Wikiverty's Portal of Piano education(The Section: The beautiful views of Scotti-highlands' in a Far-land Home (Academic thoughts, musicality, literature-writing and case-realization)):
*[[Portal:Green Sleeves (Impressionist Visualization)]]
*[[Portal: Sir J.S.BACH and His contributions to Piano Kids' Reasonable Life]]
[[File:C minor Prelude Bach (BWV847), Performer JMC, Han.wav|thumb|C minor Prelude Bach (BWV847)]]
==== 'Swan's Dream Upon the lake' - Little Girl 'Wenxin's' (Brilliant & Sweet literatures in arts ) Performance====
'''Teacher's Demonstration:'''
[[File:The Dying Swan - black angel JMC Han.ogg|thumb| Musicality from watching 'The Dying Swan - the black angel', performed by JMC Han]]
'''Wenxin's Performance:'''
1. Techniques-recovery: The Arpeggio-training of left hand in the accompaniment was the biggest challenge to not only a piano-child at her age - no more than 12 (In Chinese culture, Kid's first year was in mother's womb. Thereby, I asked her - how old are you, and she gave the number '13'...), to me and evenly some expertise pianists. (Camille Saint-Saëns's 'The Swan' on wikipedia or other social editions). The arpeggio-accompaniment is travelling in rich variations of tunes, which caused left hand much harder to expand, shrink and positions-change. Therefore, it spent us more than half a year to train and recover her hand's dexterity from a small failure of her piano life in the Grade Test, just like 'Princess Swan's' experience. Now, totally to say, she got an excellent situation in which children at her age can perform. Thanks to your hard-working!
2. Musicality-cultivation: Usually, she showed a very great musicality in the first page - to the minute (Approximately 1.05) - tender, expending, lyrical and expressive... However, it's really a hardness to keep it throughout the second section - a shading & wandering heart-road in the growth. The attention has to be paid too much on the exactness of left hand's arpeggio-travelling. With a pity, still, some notes were beaten wrongly. But oppositely again, we can see: Princess Swan, in her period of Darkness growth - facing Satan, turning into a dark angel and only appearing in night... She really faced a hardness and the difficulty of life, right as beating wrong notes, getting out some noises and travelling a little bit slowly and roughly in a channel. In this view, perhaps that the difficulties can be transformed- in the musical needs and with a small fashion. Congratulation, more exercises, haha!
3. Together, we gave two great designs: one is the 'Big Brightness' began from the minute (Approximately 2.03) when the main theme happens again; and the other is 'Swan's Departure like Sound of Fall-Leaves rotating upon Lake's Surface' (from minute 2.49 to the end)... She almost achieved some - the mood calmed down very much and stably progressed to further with a confidence. However, a little bit of disfluency made the impression fade, somehow. Meanwhile, a 'rit. to a tempo' turned inversely - what a pity.
Totally to say, musicality, at her age, was preciously showing in this time's performance. The hard-working of recovery and exercises, during many classes, touched my heart very much. (I knew that...) More trainings of Arpeggio-running (dominate sevenths) and its fluency can help her achieve more in the future. Wenxin, thanks to you for letting us appreciate this world-famous melody in piano.
[[File:Growth of Swan in eyes of the little girl - Wenxi, Zhang.ogg|thumb|Growth of Swan in the eyes of the little girl - Wenxi, Zhang]]
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 16:06, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
==== Listen to Mother's Old Story! - A beautiful and quiet little girl's Good Wish ====
'''Teacher's Demonstration:'''
[[File:Mother's Old story - China Impression.ogg|thumb| Listen to Mother's Old story - China Impression (JMC, Han - teacher's domenstration)]]
'''Student's Performance:'''
[[File:Listen to Mother's Old Story - Piano Pupil Yiwen, Cui.ogg|thumb| Listen to Mother's Old Story- Piano Pupil Yiwen, Cui]]
'''Teacher's Comments:'''
Yiwen, Cui (Direct translation of her Chinese name - A beautiful girl who is good at the translation of art and literature, from Cui family), at the age of 10, is a quite and beautiful girl. She got a good life effect from this Chinese piano-kid's song - 'Listen to Mother's Old Story': making her family and parents happy, getting some confidences through this piano song from the examination, showing her fashion in my library concert held for piano kids... After those more above, frequent exercises, and getting her permission, I can submit this classroom-recording edition. Though in the tail I found a note lost... and some parts of her left hand might run much more fluently... , I think her emotional background of this music reached to a good level, and those polyphonic parts can be clearly heard two layers, their cannoning, and so on... Congratulation!
'''(Words from the description in Wikimedia Commons page)'''
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 01:04, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
==== Moonlight upon Lotus Pool (Summer) - Letters-Accompaniment Improvising Chinese Pop-song with both Classical Tradition and Pentatonic Scale ====
'''Teacher's Comment:'''
1. I am very excited that you (only 10-years-old) understood Letter-To-Accompaniment Improvising sheet and its approach in a very fast way.
2. It's great you can use both Pentatonic Arpeggios and Tenth-Rolling-Bass-dropping in your accompaniment (You can make Tenth-rolling Bass in a more fluent view, I thought)
3. We can feel the musical scene from your musicality - In a beautiful summer night, Walking along a lotus pool, you and your family members were enjoying the moonlight and a breeze of cool wind...
4. In future, hopefully, you can improve your 'new learns' to a higher level.
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 01:04, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
''' Xuan, Lee's Second Attempt - Pearl of the Orient'''
==== 'Mother in the candlelight' - A little girl (Siqi)'s heart-words for her mother's birthday - in the growth and in the dreams... ====
'''Heart-story:'''
Regarding with this piano-song, there is a little story about this little commons' girl: Usually, her parents were very busy in the family's restaurant... I and my mother saw she had independently managed herself well and grew up alone for many years... In this year - 2019, time was near her mother's birthday. In the KTV (a place like karaoke bar, but for small single groups of people in rooms, with TV in the middle for singing ), she heard this song - 'Mother in the candlelight' and found her parents enjoyed singing it very much. Then, she decided to play it as a gift to her mother, right on mother's birthday. It's my biggest honour to be together sight-reading the notation, making the re-designs and re-editions of this song into piano - like, Prelude, Introduction-theme 1st, theme 2nd, Development and Peak, a small Repetition and Coda... She learnt in a very fast and hard-working way that merely around one month she played it in this level. And finally, she got her heart-sweet - playing it for her mother, as a birthday gift.(Wikimedia Commons' original page, 2019)
'''Comments from teacher:'''
1. The musical emotions were very rich and expressive, especially the 'Peak-Calling for mother' (2.53 minutes - 3.53 minutes). I almost can hear 'Mum...' (or Mumu...) for many times in a kid's tear-drops and in the candlelight... by your right hand's touchable singing...
2. I liked our 'Flanger tr. Ornaments' very much (I thought it's from Mozartian). I am very happy you can put it in for soon time...
3. I am very happy in the Coda-tail, you can get my suggestion - ending by a Major Seventh Progression-Arpeggio. This point should give the thanks to my mentor - Ray. I quite enjoy its special colour...
4. Your strong and mixed left hand accompaniment must have been trained for many times. I knew it's a hard-working job, but tender and flexible a little bit... better?
5. The singing of right hand and its 'breathing' were quite natural and fine, sentence by sentence..., but the total speed is too slower than normal, which reflect the running ability of the left hand needed to improve. I knew: to your 9-years-old hands, it's a very hard requirement... However, waiting the up-grown, I have the confidence you can hands-sing it in a much more fluent way...
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 14:10, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
'''Night's Piano-Song - The depth of China Pop-Piano (and Siqi's Heart-Try)'''
''Comments:''
She made the depth of two peak notes but in light touching way. I thought also that she did this Pop-piano's musicality in a poet's Night-thinking...
She is suitable for the performance of this-type-'songs' and improvising (still at little age and need to prepare in time).
Let us listen to her and feel her expression.
==== The Cowherd's Flute played by a little girl piano pupil - Guo Guo (Nickname: Happy fruits) ====
This edition has already been her best attempt, regarding with its landscape-painting style, lovely Cowherd's Flute we can refer to Wikipedia introduction (Seeking key words 'The Cowboy's Flute' in). It's recorded as a beautiful memory of her piano-learning and her Childhood. Let us listen to her:
[[File:The Cowboy's Flute - Yuxuan, Lu (Guo Guo).ogg|thumb|The Cowherd's Flute - Yuxuan, Lu (Guo Guo)]]
==== Clementi Sonata Op35 No. 5 (Movement 1st), played by Piano pupil Yixuan, Qiao ====
Clementi's Sonata-Op35 No. 5 was a so long and difficult piece for students around their ninth year. Therefore, we have divided it into many small sections and taught. She learnt in progress. Meanwhile, this little and beautiful girl (She was beautifully good at dancing, somehow rather than piano.) has already attempted her best in exercising and recording. I thought it recorded her good piano-learning experiences and those memories of childhood. Regarding with further information about this work, please refer to the educational portal: https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Portal:Sonatinas_from_Kids%27_corner_near_heaven#Muzio_Clementi . Let us listen to her:
[[File:Clementi Sonatina Op35. No 5 Movement 1st Piano pupil YIxuan, Qiao.ogg|thumb|Clementi Sonatina Op35. No 5 Movement 1st Piano pupil YIxuan, Qiao]]
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 02:42, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
====Little and Little, Twinkling Stars - Little Piano-Kids' Playground====
Say 'Hello' to our 'Little Goldman'
[[File:Vienna Trip - The Little Goldman- Strauss Family.jpg|thumb|Hand-making my own picture of Strauss Family's Little Goldman]]
* [[Portal:Little and Little, Twinkling Stars - Little Piano-Kids' Playground| Little and Little, Twinkling Stars - Little Piano-Kids' Playground]]
0c2s2m3rgu51dbe7bpxonylmas3wzvs
2812373
2812372
2026-06-01T00:46:19Z
CommonsDelinker
9184
Removing [[:c:File:Piano_Student_Zichen_Tao's_playing_of_Celebrating_the_New_Life.wav|Piano_Student_Zichen_Tao's_playing_of_Celebrating_the_New_Life.wav]], it has been deleted from Commons by [[:c:User:Didym|Didym]] because: per [[:c:Commons:Deletion requ
2812373
wikitext
text/x-wiki
'''No Orders, Beautiful flowers were blooming from Childhood! Let us pick up your most beautiful moments...'''
[[File:Salzburg Cathedral (Inside) - Mozart Baptized place 1. - Mozart-Complexes World under Water (Modernist View).jpg|thumb|Piano Kids, on that day, modern colours, lights and technologies made Mozart's birthplace (Washing) -Salzburg Cathedral like a world (palace) under the biggest water - Blue Sea]]
[[File:Beautiful landscapes surrounding Mozart's birthplace - Heavenly Spring flowing from Alps Moutain.jpg|thumb|Heavenly Ice-spring from Alps Mountain]]
[[File:Mozart from Green Nature 1.jpg|thumb|Mozart comes from Green Mountain and Nature]]
[[File:Models for Chaoshan Family Tourism - Taifo Hall.jpg|thumb|Uncle Han -the piano teacher and his wife Yang, Gao (Cynthia) were volunteeringly pictured outside the door of Taifo Hall in Chaoshan. They are promoting it for Family Tourism there. It's a beautiful time in all family members' memories, as a piano song told in life story...]]
[[File:Beautiful Sunset View of Oceanic City from top building during COVID-19 period.jpeg|thumb|Beautiful Sunset View of Oceanic City during COVID-19 period]]
[[File:Small items in Commons Life of 2019 Spring 2.jpg|thumb|Flaming Katy and piano-peers as Micro-landscape in classroom ]]
[[File:An Oil Painting watched since born.jpeg|thumb|Oil Painting: Forest Cabin in front of Fuji(or Helan) Mountain 'hanging on the wall']]
Oh, dear piano pupils, we have seen so many beautiful landscapes, across the times and spaces. Now, firstly, getting into East- your nature and self-meditation, let us try to take the Pentatonic Scales Exercises for relaxing you 'busy heart' and focusing your attention back to piano...
*[[Portal:Pentatonic Impressionism (China Wu Sheng) in the view of Neo-classical Piano Techniques-training]]
'''Afterwards, we can take further great life-tasks in piano...'''
[[File:Piano Lecture of Dalian Library (Music) delivered by Jason (Jixun) on October 13th, 2024.jpg|thumb|2024 Piano Lecture of Dalian Library (Music) Delivered by Jason (Jixun), Han and His Piano Pupils Team Associated by Family members and Library workers]]
''' Lecture Speech Conclusion(Essay)'''
[[File:The Chinese characterastics speech of Piano pupils' art technique training and musicality athletics cultivation (Report Conclusion of Jixun, Han - Jason's team lecture on the date of October 13th, 2024 at Dalian Library).pdf|thumb|The Chinese characterastics speech of Piano pupils' art technique training and musicality athletics cultivation (Report Conclusion of Jixun, Han - Jason's team lecture on the date of October 13th, 2024 at Dalian Library)]]
'''Waiting Translation'''
===='''2026-New Beginning - Celebrating Our New Time'''====
[[File:Attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association No. 1 Pic.jpg|thumb|Attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association and performing on the stage]]
[[File:Attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association No. 2 Pic.jpg|thumb|Attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association and getting the certificate of Trustee, to make a very happy Horse Year's gift for myself.]]
[[File:Attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association No. 3 Pic.jpg|thumb|Attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association and getting to its Horse Year's Title]]
[[File:Attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association No. 4 Pic.jpg|thumb|Attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association and picturing myself before its officially opening]]
[[File:Attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association No. 5 Pic.jpg|thumb|Cool boy Jason Han's Big face before attending the Annual Conference of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association]]
[[File:The Trustee certificate of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association No. 6 Pic.jpg|thumb|Translation: The letter of Appointment - Honestly recuiting Jixun (Jason M. C.), Han as the trustee of Dalian Gan Jingzi Musicians Association]]
The melody I played at this conference is "Celebrating Our New Life". Before its happening, I has taught a lovely girl in my piano classroom for a while. Let us listen to its classroom situation just several days before this conference and as a preparation.
'''Teacher's Demonstration: '''
''' Student's Expression of Zichen Tao (That Snow girl who growing up to be a big young girl in her middle school,busy, but still learning of piano after passing her 10th Grade Examination of China Cultural and Tourism Ministry )'''
[[File:Sending the trophy of Austria IZAN Music Festival to my piano student Zichen Tao in Dalian.jpg|thumb|By sending the trophy of 2026 Austria IZAN Music Festival to my piano student Zichen Tao in Dalian, I hold a small ceremony.On the day when she won the contest, what melody she did play was "Celebrating Our New Life" on stage, as shown above. ]]
===='''New Time and Fresh Air from 2024'''====
*[[Portal:Fresh Air of Piano after COVID-19 and beginning up a Recovering New Time of Openness from 2024]]
===='''Firstly, passing by a Skyline of Citylife Night-Skyline'''====
[[File:Flowing City (Lin Hai), Player and Teacher JMC,Han (Jason).ogg|thumb| Flowing City from 'Forest Sea', JMC,Han
[[File:Dalian Urban Night Skyline from Xiao Ping Island Mountain-top No.2.jpg|thumb|Dalian Urban Night Skyline from Xiao Ping Island Mountain-top No.2]] ]]
===='''New Era is coming...:(New Teaching List)'''====
[[File:Skiing Statue made during my rollers-skating.jpg|thumb|Skiing Statue shows Spirit (like piano)]]
[[File:The new situation of bubbles-fish statue.jpg|thumb|Ice & Snow Bubbles-fish are welcoming]]
[[File:Mmexport1614470203508.jpg|thumb|Picture of piano lessons still under Covid-19 situation]]
Etude in the Advanced level - Sir Chopin's famous Black-keys (Flatten G Major) Etude:
[[File:Chopin Black-keys Flat G Etude (Exercise), player JMC, Han.ogg|thumb| Black-keys: An Etude your teacher has no chance in childhood, but still hurries up to be better]]
[[File:Chopin Impromptus Op.29, JMC, Han.ogg|thumb|Chopin Impromptus Op.29, JMC, Han - Deep Fast Waltz-thinking in Quiet Gentleman's Self-Expression (Improvising)]]
[[File:Sogdian whirl with large pipa.jpg|thumb| (Public Domain Work: See original page: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sogdian_whirl_with_large_pipa.jpg#mw-jump-to-license): Could you find some musicality similarly with Chopin's Black-keys' Pentatonic?]]
True Fairland - a piano melody of The Nutcracker (Dance of Sugar Plum Fairy): the advanture from childhood realizes your piano dream-"Fingering Ballet"
[[File:The Nutcracker (Dance of Sugar Plum Fairy), Piano performer JMC, Han.ogg|thumb|The piano performance of <Dance of the Sugar Plum Fairy> in 'The Nutcracker' (Ballet Re-edited Piano Melody)]]
Czerny 299 etudes were designed for the smart&strong fingering&modelling of hands and a pair of Vienna school's ears for the harmony...such as No.23...
[[File:Czerny 299 No. 23 JMC,Han.ogg|thumb|Czerny 299 No. 23, player JMC,Han]]
A peacefully praying Sinfonia of Sir Bach is freshly added in the "New exam book's list' during this COVID-19 period, to which you can have a relaxing hear and try (Don't worry, listening, it's enough time, you knew, 'Andatino'-Peacefully walking, and to sing by hands, in a small Baroque place :
[[File:Sinfonia No.11 - 3Ps Invention, Bach, JMC,Han.ogg|thumb|Sinfonia No.11 Andatino- 3Ps Invention, Bach, Teacher JMC,Han (COVID-19 Protection Time)]]
Encouragement in Italy Smart Fashion, but needs the very carefully fingering-techniques training (Long time, advanced), feet-edges' staccato, sentence-Pizzicato, flowing streams...Italian artist techniques always attract our eyeballs... Let us attempt to... make out your own Italy style! Cheer up!
[[File:Domenico Scarlatti G Major Sonata, JMC,Han.ogg|thumb| Domenico Scarlatti G Major Sonata (In COVID-19 Pandemic Period), JMC,Han.ogg]]
'''A good teaching video result played by Yixuan, Wang:'''
http://m.kugou.com/mv/?hash=f00b36624f27b091b79e3f30e158aa03&sruserid=640650901
Baroque staccato techniques were always in a reasonable, confident, relaxing(wrists), fluent and vivid - 'Enough manners' of the Era, which needs us apply very careful fingering trainings. In a view of the whole structure, according to ears' musical suitable habits(psychological), I gave 1st section a twice repetitions, and then a throughout 2nd section to the Code. Hopefully, French Suite would make us brave, confident and relaxed. (but it also need years' accumulation of hand working to let those out and better) Have a try? Good luck!
[[File:BWV.816 Gigue-French Suites No.5 Bach, Player JMC, Han.ogg|thumb|BWV.816 Gigue-French Suites No.5 Bach, Player JMC, Han]]
(By turning to Wikimedia Commons, you will find two versions under its 'historical tree', currently. They are showing different stages we can reach. The first version was kept because it's relatively slower and more stable that in the basic stage we can make notes heard staccato and clear. After feeling suitable in this stage, we need to improve its tempo and get Gigue Dances' happy, vivid,,dialoguing with moods, jumping and wrists' breathing naturally. It needs time to train your hands frequently, untill relaxing but accurately. Main Difficulties: Stiffen wrists, Cramp and Tiredness... Now, it's the time of yourself...)
Hi! We, piano kids: Imaging a scene, let us hands-dances with the good manners and a earnest mind in a beautiful Baroque palace. It's easy and natural...
[[File:Primary Bach No. 16 March, Player JMC, Han.ogg|thumb|'Primary Bach No. 16 March' -A peaceful Bach-melody for all 'Piano Kids'...]]
Sir Debussy's Arabesque Suites (The second suite) is also in the list.
The musicality in my world is:
It's the legend of Butterfly in birds' chorus... it took us to a Life-mountain behind our living garden facing a quiet sea...
Watching, in some time of one section, you can also hear Monet's 'Quiet Morning' upon the sea...
Alongside Butterfly's dance-suite, imagination is beginning. Oh, listening... (Main meaning referenced from my main page)
What about it in your world and imagination?
'''Sound teaching demonstration:'''
[[File:Claude Debussy - 2nd Arabic Suite (Arabesque) - Spring Butterfly, Performer JMC, Han.wav|thumb|2nd Arabic Suite- Spring Butterfly (Impressionism Singing -Main Natural Lines&Breathes from Sir Debussy)]]
'''Good video teaching result from a 12 years' old little girl piano-pupil Mo Zhou:'''
http://m.kugou.com/mv/?hash=b50e133a360fa8d30cdcd9fca4163e73&sruserid=640650901
(Photographer: Ms. Yang, Gao)
Listening! boys and girls, Dvorak's Humor-jumping and Homesick-expressing:
A true Czech-homeland heart,
but
Dancing... somewhere in American Countryside
[[File:Flatten G Humoresque Dvorak, Player JMC,Han.ogg|thumb|Flatten G Humoresque, A. Dvorak, Player JMC,Han]]
[[File:One Town-view from Cesky Krumlov Castle.jpeg|thumb| Krumlov Castle-town's view]]
====Xinran, Yu - a lovely Chinese little piano girl's 'Ink-Mountain & Green Rivers' view of <The Cowherd's Flute> ====
'''Comment:'''
"Before taking the national examination and the exhibition competition, we together listened and learned to the net-editions of young master Lang Lang and Yujia Wang...(regarding with this famous little melody of Chinese tradition)
I think in this melody, she tried out her best for the techniques-training and the musicality in her age... from a little performer's view. Therefore,I gave the comment-Excellent.
Close your eyes, thinking of a little lovely girl happily playing among ink-mountains and the green rivers, with a water buffalo, some birds followed, and her smart flute... let us relax in the Chinese Ink-Landscape and listen to this little melody...(referenced partly from the writing in Wikimedia Commons page)
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 02:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
==== Zichen Tao - A little Chinese snowgirl's hardworking of D Major Sonatina====
'''Comment:'''
D Major Sonatina is still piano Children's favorites to perform and show... taken to the national grade examination, daily performed with each other, and also to city's piano Competition &Exhibition. That's an educational case lasting for many years in Dalian.
This edition is played by a lovely and white Chinese girl - Zichen, Tao. She and her mother took the very responsibility to check the wrong notes, improve the learning progress, and make the performing manners and designs for the stage-show...
Therefore, in my view as her piano teacher, this edition is already great in her age...(though hand-running details need to improve for her age). Hopefully, her family can enjoy this piano experience, companying with this melody in her childhood. (Partly referenced from her Wikimedia Commons' page)
[[File:D major Sonatina , Piano student Zichen Tao.ogg|thumb| D major Sonatina (Kuhlau's) played by piano pupil Zichen Tao]]
==== Meng's Performance and Comments after learning in the reality from Jason M. C.,Han in Children's Corner: ====
[[File:Children's corner of Meng.ogg|thumb| Meng Meng (nick name)'s edition of Doctorial in Children's Corner: Currently, the Fourth Version was her most beautiful one self-made in classroom before Piano Grade Test Exanimation. Regarding with all editions' comments and reasons, please reference to the original file in Wikimedia Commons]]
[[File:MM Good classroom F major 1838 Grande valse brillante.ogg|thumb|MM Good classroom F major 1838 Grande valse brillante]]
'''[[Portal: Part of Comments - 'for students' Examination Performance, Piano tutor's teaching self-reflexivity and possible some requirements of Pedalling Sound-effects with Artist Fashion of Post-impressionism' | Part of Comments - 'for students' Examination Performance, Piano tutor's teaching self-reflexivity and possible some requirements of Pedalling Sound-effects with Artist Fashion of Post-impressionism']]'''
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 04:15, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
==== Kim Hui's 'Doctoral Training','Under the sunshine' in Children's Corner: ====
'''Comments for Kim Hui's first draft:'''
1. She did the second theme (associated) well 'much deeper like vocally singing out a better life in New Era under the sunshine, on a piece of small area in a rainforest'...
2. Her Korean dance (Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_dance) has been done well, in which I can hear traditional drum-points in bass-part and crossing hand to tremble part.
3. I can hear Time-travelling and space-shaking to the past through a 'Dark-cave', from..., minutes 1.30-1.40... But, I think: if 'dramatically' and 'significantly' in dynamics (loudness), it would be better to show...
4. I can hear Forest's Evensong in Coda part - 'dim.' to the silence of night and a 'rit.' slowing down to the sleeping dream, and even several night-birds' dreaming voices...But, please make a much gentler taste (not so hurry up and not so strong) of those pictures. Meanwhile, I hope you can get a better & coherent control of the rhythm among different sections.
5. I knew, regarding with 'peak-parts', she had made many attempts 'drumming beats rights and keeping those connections clear'. However, still, in minutes 1.04 and 1.59, I felt it's a little bit 'rough', and needed to be handled in of the solidification... Oh, maybe, I am so severe... sorry, I should give you the encouragement.
Main comment: 'Under the sunshine' is suitable to Kim Hui's fashion and can be kept in her performance list. Her first draft and its preparation has given me an enjoyable teaching experience and many beautiful memories of life. It's fluent and vivid, expressive and dedicated. Thanks, Kim Hui! More colours and lights would be added from technique details, from her independent fingering and some traditional piano manners, meanwhile, the rhythm should be balanced well in the future. There are many developing zones of 'this painting' she can better and draw out for her future.[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 21:22, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
===== Kim Hui's second 'Show-Time' in classroom - Poem of Music (Piano Etude) =====
'''Teacher's Demonstration:'''
[[File:Poem of music.ogg|thumb|Poem of music JMC, Han]]
'''Student's Second Performance - Poem of Music: '''
[[File:Poem of Music (Piano Etude) - Student Kim Hui.ogg|thumb|Poem of Music (Piano Etude) - Student Kim Hui]]
'''Comments for Kim Hui's first draft:'''
1. She has mainly got the technique-points, but a little bit of rough in some details, such as the minutes 0.30-0.31 - 'Tail-closing part' of a sentence - in the progression of 'Diminished Seventh Chord-Arpeggio'... However, as her first draft and the random collection from a normal classroom, I thought it's well-done. we can wish its further 'Developing Zone', in the view of piano education.
2. In 'Coda Part' of Poem of Music (Piano Etude), she was able to show a great controllability of the 'Legato' between two hands, as the pieces of falling leaves slowly flying-upon the surface of water. Sometimes, it was evenly better than mine. I hoped she could manage it in a better way.
3. She showed some thoughts of musicality... However, 'Techniques-points' still wasted much of her energy. I think the total Dynamics in physics will be improved soon.
(waiting more)
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 14:53, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
===== Kim Hui can reach the advanced level of piano performance in this 'Little Children's Corner' =====
Though It's still Covid-19 Health-protection Time, after Home-self-Training Time, some classroom face-mask covering & health-good-protection lessons and an examination of China Culture&Tourism Ministry, She can play this 'Doctoral Etude' which is dreamed many piano pupils, with impressionism style. As her teacher, I didn't think It's a simple Etude which was expressed in many scenes, but with the big universe imagination and impression. Therefore, we have trained it as Meng's approach and further developed it.
Indeed, I think she performed far greater than this edition, right in that online national examination. She got it, Congratulation! Let us listen to her ...
[[File:Debussy-Children's Corner-Doctorial Etude, Piano pupil Jinghui Jin (Kim).ogg|thumb|Debussy-Children's Corner-Doctorial Etude, Piano pupil Jinghui Jin (Kim)]]
==== 'Colourful Clouds Running After Moon' impressed into the Heart of Xinyi, Hua (Hua family's Heart-sweet girl from 'Painting Imagery')====
'''Comments for the first draft of Xinyi, Hua:'''
1. I like her treatment of the prelude part in 'Colourful Clouds Running After Moon'. It's light and soft like silky clouds up-bridging alongside moonlight towards a round moon above the dark-blue sea. However, please try to link each silky pentatonic-arpeggio weave as a smooth whole from the bottom to the top, and from the left hand to the right hand. If so, her progress will be enlarged;
2. I can hear the situation 'Colourful Clouds Running After Moon' appeared in many linking parts before and later. She was attempting to give an acceleration imitating this procedure from a slower speed to a fast one, and between two hands' echo-following from a loose density to a tight one... However, if obviously, it will be better;
3. Like 0.58 to 1.03 minutes, I can hear that in some parts, she would like to make a returning sound-boomerang (Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boomerang) up-rising 'to the moon' and down-landing upon the sea-surface. If a small time of middle reaction was canceled out by her proficiency, we will appreciate the musical beauty in a much more advanced situation;
4. In 1.22 to 1.30 minutes, I know she would like to make a silky veil, with the colourful clouds as material, upon moon's beautiful face by her right hand. It's a little bit of pity that the controlling ability of relative loudness made she carried this willing but harder to realize. Meanwhile, this veil needed to be smooth. Oh, sorry, I am so critical... indeed, she did not bad;
5. There is a hard hurt in 1.36 minute - it's still a repetition of bass-chord though she has already attempted her best to grasp the bass large chord through left hand's opening degrees (Little girl, I knew you had tried your best. Though the momentum was great, I still need to point it out.);
6. 2.12 - 2.40 minutes is the part - 'Bright Moon up-rising above the harvest sea'. This is a grand scene which needs great forces from students' forearms and a fast reactions for some flexible connections to arpeggio-parts... Congratulations, little girl, she have got it, though it's a little bit slower. She have given out a great momentum;
7. In the Moon-tail part, she has expressed her great musicality to make moon disappear in the dawn of sea;
8. Many ornamentations she has done well, though still some need to be gently breezing in the impressionism of Chinese landscape painting.
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 12:22, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
===== 'Pure White Dove' in Young Teenager Xinyi's Eyes =====
[[File:Dove in the eyes of Young Teenager girl Xinyi, Hua.ogg|thumb|'Pure White Dove' ('La Paloma' - 'No More' in English) in the eyes of Young Teenager girl Xinyi, Hua]]
'''Congratulation to your beautifully singing of the 'Melodic lines' behind the right hand's octaves-grasping!'''
'''Comments:'''
1. Four biggest designs appeared: around B50 (Minutes 1.36), B55 (Minutes 1.48), B58 (Minutes 1.54) and B62 (Minutes 2.01) - four Peak-currents, we'd like to throw (rit.) the 'missing notes' into the air and rotate them a little bit more slowly - like to send, wait and feel Dove's messages across the ocean in a self-holding & self-releasing intoxication. She tried her best to make them out, but not quite clearly and still need much time to grow up...
2. I liked her coda part (from B65 Minutes 2.08 to the end): She was so sure about two hands' March-doubling, as a confirmation of future and belief; or to say, she transformed her 'missing' in the melody to be a true hope of tomorrow, or someday... Evenly, I thought it's better than mine...
3. For more than half years, we have worked hard to help her link all octave-grasping pearls out of melodic lines in singing breaths. She almost got it successfully, through small breaks...
4. Some 'Spanish Dotted notes' and 'Triples-wandering', with the rhythm of Spanish Dance Habanera-Andante (Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradanza) can be fulfilled, but some not really... I am happy she recognized them and paid more attentions to... It's waiting time that she could perform much better.
5. Yes, I had to say: still some small faults there... The good usage of pedalling almost hide some, but... also a little bit rough... Oh, I didn't want to be a so severe teacher. Rather than, much more good wishes of her growth should be given. Okay, hopefully, she enjoyed it.
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 12:57, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
'''Teacher's Demonstration for standards above and Further Progress (Advanced Level):''' [[File:Dove With Spanish Sense in Piano JMC.Han.ogg|thumb|Dove With Spanish Sense in Piano JMC.Han (It was once used by the photography gallery of music friend User:PigeonIP - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:PigeonIP/Tauben/2019_April_1-10 and the main page La Paloma in wikipedia )]]
'''More information and reading - articles (list) about 'Dove', please watch:''' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Paloma
==== Malagueña Dream from a little Chinese girl - Yinuo's heart (A promise ... to piano) in a small beach-side classroom ====
[[File:Student edition - Malagueña Suite (modified for piano) played by Yinuo, Liu.ogg|thumb|Student edition - Malagueña Suite (modified for piano) played by Yinuo, Liu]]
'''Comments for the first draft of Yinuo, Liu:'''
1. We can hear the impression of Flamenco rhythmic pattern (Compás) (Wikipedia introduction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flamenco) diffusing from some simple rhythm-components of a parts in a total ABA structure of Malagueña Suite. This is what I - the tutor and the little girl -learner would like to express through three more different accompaniment bass-forms, including pizzicatos, small slurring breathes and some opposite weights..., which imitated some of Classical Guitar's handling ways. Thanks to the little girl Yinuo, you have realized most of our designs! Congratulations!
2. I really like her beautiful Cante jondo - associated 'vocal' lines by right hand which was balanced & flying above the flamenco accompaniment of the left hand when the second thematic melody began. It's a deep, profound and emotions-rich singing, almost from a beautiful Spanish girl's natural expression for the missing, the reasoning of life & Universe when facing a 'deep and far' sea. Though if the dynamics would be dramatically and the singing would be much deeper, the emotional atmosphere would be better: I thought to only a girl of her 11 years' old age, she has already attempted her best to understand those across cultures;
3. I like the middle B's fantastical view of holiday beach under the sunshine, which was almost formed by white waves from blue sea. It's relaxable, dreamful and graceful, like a girl poet's walk alongside a small sand bay... (Yinuo, you knew, if you can make the 'rit. - A Tempo' much more nature like the real tides of sea and the speed tiny faster, the progress zone will be enlarged);
4. I know in two middle long 'vocal' ornaments, she would like to show us ' the blackbirds or the nightingales of its gardens...' However, if making it much more smoothly, expressively, and flexibly, even a little bit down-slowed, her Spanish 'tasteful' fashion will be more beautiful;
5. Repeated A part is better to be different in small details which can show the ability of hands and the variation of music.
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 13:35, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
==== Für Elise in piano boy Zhe's eyes ====
'''Teacher's demonstration in classroom for better:'''[[File:For Elise (Für Elise) Beethoven JMC Han.ogg|thumb|For Elise (Für Elise) Beethoven JMC Han]]
'''Student's performance in classroom:'''
[[File:Für Elise -Student Performance Zhe,Zhang.ogg|thumb|Für Elise in piano boy Zhe's eyes]]
==== D major Sonatina (Kuhlau) - Piano-pupil girl Mengshuang's 'Strong Willpower and Persistence' ====
'''Teacher's demonstration in classroom for better:'''
[[File:D major sonatina 2nd movement Kuhlau (played by Jason).ogg|thumb|D major sonatina 2nd movement Kuhlau - Teacher JMC. Han]]
'''Student's performance in classroom:'''
[[File:D major Sonatina (Kuhlau) - the version from piano-student Meng Shuang, Wang.ogg|thumb|D major Sonatina (Kuhlau) - the version from piano-student Meng Shuang, Wang. This classroom version has been selected by https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Rsteen/Artists_from_Denmark/2019_August_1-10]]
'''Comments and Statements:'''
1. Totally to say, the main melody fast-run by the right hand has kept its fluency, transparency and clearance. It's very hard in piano training for herself, owe to that her hands-shape was a little bit of 'frozen'. Thanks for your hard-working in the training. Congratulation!
2. Her musicality in this melody has also been motivated out - unrestrained and natural in the expression.
3. Left hand's accompaniment was in good triplet-treatment, but please light and dedicate a little bit... It's to say: the controllability still needs to improve.
4. Some heads of sentences and smaller phrases need to be match together between two hands in a better way - some parts, because of small ornamentations and dotted notes, weren't quite well...
5. I am very happy that you (in your 12th year of life) were willing to play out the middle 'rit. - A Tempo' in a comparison ('rit.' was slowing down the waiting, then, 'A Tempo' for the Peak expression in return). However, it was still a little bit rough (before its right time). You can try to modify it in a better view.
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 03:08, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
==== How to play Mozart's Classics? ====
===== Work from Mozart's earlier time - Turkish March =====
'''Teacher's Demonstration in classroom:'''
'''Video:'''
[[File:Turkey March Video-Mozart-Jason Han.webm|thumb|Turkish March (Video) for Mozart's; JMC, Han]]
'''Sound:'''
[[File:Turkey March for Mozart and Memory JMC, Han.ogg|thumb|Turkish March (Sound) for Mozart's and Memory (many times used in peer Tokfo/Vienna Gallery - such as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tokfo/Vienna/2019_January_26-28 ); JMC, Han]]
==== Sure, Ma's boy-view of Mozart's 'Turkish March' ====
[[File:Sure, Ma's Version of 'Turkish March' in piano classroom for piano education.ogg|thumb|'Turkish March' - an old mysterious Turkey story in piano student (Jason's piano pupil) boy Sure, Ma's classroom edition. Thanks, this good teaching & Learning result was selected by Tokfo/Vienna Gallery: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tokfo/Vienna/2019_April_25-27 ]]
'''Further Comments for his first draft:'''
1. It's very difficult for a young boy to manage Turkish March's speed in a smooth way... He tried his best to keep it stable and unified, and almost did achieve it. (Turkish March is easily to make people play faster and faster until crazily broken. He tried to solve it by giving a slower beginning ) But, it's a little bit of too serious,afraid to touch wrong. Indeed, I heard his another time, in which he totally open himself and relax from nature... We could give him more hopes.
2. His melodic flow of scale-phrases (legato) are quite fluent and natural, which shows his scale-playing and fingering were quite great. But, a small break occurred around 1.14 to 1.17 minutes could be caused by the stiff right wrist (too tried) and no-good fingering design. He should frequently move second and third fingers in a much smarter way. To a young boy in his age, it should already be 'okay'.
3. When the theme occurred in the second time, it's better to give a dynamics-difference in contrast. My mother-Ms Song said: it's like an old story (sound) heard from a far distance to near somewhere - mysteriously. However, he gave a very tight connection, as if it was linked with the previous section.
4. He tried his best to take the Worldwide difficult challenge - 'Broken-chordal Arpeggiated-octaves' (Around 2.00 to 2.14 minutes). I gave him a 'LIKE' that he had taken this challenge which even many pianists or teachers made some 'faults' as their heart pities - You can hear the edition of Romuald Greiss' in Wikipedia and several my previous times... However, this boy achieved it after many trainings time after time... Though later half one, compared with the beginning, might be in lower distinguishing degree, he didn't make any 'breaks', which comforted my teaching way so much. Thanks, boy Sure!
5. The final problem would occur in 'Alberti Bass' (left hand) of Coda part. Coming to it, you will feel easy to give up, which required more endeavors to control your hands in narrow and elaborate dealing way. He did it good, but lost in the counting of number (B111), and further, the connection with the final 'Square-opening Dance' (a small break). other things, such as the strength, are fine in his age.
6. In addition, I am planning to add a 'Turkish Stop' by a final pedaling. I didn't know whether he could, someday.
Overall, I gave him an Excellent Comment. Hopefully, he will play better after better in his growth. [[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 14:13, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
'''Further Comments for his second draft:'''
1. As his teacher, I am very happy to hear several great designs we have made in classrooms can be achieved in the second draft, according to the background knowledge of 'Turkey March' I taught, such as the final 'Turkey Stop' (not really in modern piano, but a little bit similar) and the Bass-points-layer (simulating the military drum) beneath the long fast running scale-phrases of right hand (middle section)... Cool boy, thanks that you can remember your teacher's words! Congratulation!
2. Yes, right after the chance of Music library Report-performance in local we have made and getting back, you improved the edition's speed and fluency. You can evenly save 15 seconds, contrasted with before, which showed that your fingering & running ability of hands had been greatly improved. However, the disadvantage is that it's easier to make some small motives uneven and rough (touching wrong notes) without purpose, which needs more your careful attention and exactness about details.
3. I knew you tried your best to face the peak challenge Mozart made to all people - making broken-progression of octaves message (middle part) and hearing out its hidden melodic lines. Great! However, it's still a little bit beyond your ability that its distinction with chords-effect weren't so clear. No matter, Sure boy, more exercises, it will be better.
In all, progressing soon which shows the potential, thanks to your performances1 There is still the developing zone waiting for you.
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 15:08, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
==== Clever Girl Jia Xin's Clever view of Sir Bach's 3-parts Invention ====
'''Teacher's Demonstration for Future Development:'''
[[File:3 Parts Invention 8th- from Sir Bach.ogg|thumb|3 Parts Invention 8th- from Sir Bach's BWV 794 – Sinfonia No. 8 in F major ]]
''' Jia Xin's Performance:'''
[[File:3-parts Invention No. 8 (F major) in piano-girl Jia Xin's view.ogg|thumb|3-parts Invention No. 8 (F major) in piano-girl Jia Xin's view]]
'''Comments of her first draft:'''
1. Totally, 3 parts are ranged in Bach's harmony, to a girl in her age - 12 years old. It's not easier to make so clear layers out. I was satisfied with this point, after heard every time;
2. I can hear piano techniques for polyphonic & counterpoint music like Bach's, such as cannon, intimation between two hands, up-climbing shoulder by shoulder, dialogues, long-notes down-pressed for different parts' SHE (sentence-head-enhancement), long-notes kept for parts' division and maintaining, fingering grouping in one hand for 2 parts, parts' continuously melting into one for the summarization, and..., Baroque ornamentation... mentioned for long. For those trainings, and further, the internalization into her own mind-analysis, we had searched information & knowledge through Wikipedia, two more manuscripts, books and other webs online, further, spent classroom time to reason, analyse, train and fix note by note for long time... In this case, I gave her hard-working a 'Like' again;
3. There would also be some problems regarding with recording pressure and her memory...: some big ones - left hand's relatively weak ability in managing two parts, small mistakes (like B18's f note played as sharp f - around 1.13 minute, B21's final g isn't raised there - around 1.23-1.24 minutes, and others...), small ornaments in a little bit of rough view and a much more graceful manner in Coda part. (sorry, to such a 12 years old girl, my suggestions could be so severe. But when listening, they are directly in my ears...)
4. She did really pay her attention to Dynamics, but please better - lighter, smarter and more obviously...
5. The speed of later part is better than the slower earlier part.
Overall, I also gave her an excellent comment for her performance (Live) in classroom. For further development, she can listen to my edition and the one in 'Inventions and Sinfonias (Bach)' - Wikipedia article (I thought it's great, but I didn't like too many speed-variations in Bach's works. It's better more reasonable: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inventions_and_Sinfonias_(Bach) )
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 07:33, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
==== Yixuan's piano-view and traveling landscapes ====
'''First view (only 9 years old) of Sir Bach's 2-parts Inventions'''
[[File:Bach 2-parts Invention, played by Yixuan Wang (Only 9 years old).ogg|thumb|Bach 2-parts Invention, played by Yixuan Wang (Only 9 years old)]]
'''Comments from teacher:'''
1. Musical parts and space-dimensions were much clearer than before, which reflected the little girl Yixuan's hard-working continuously after her piano examination...
2. I can hear the heads of musical sentences which were highlighted by each hand when required. I can also hear cannon-following, doubling and countermelody which were clearly shown into her performance. It's quite necessary for students in this age - 9 years old. In certain degree, she is already a good and careful student in piano.
3. Still, the controllability and the stability of hands, especially the turn of her 3rd, 4th and 5th fingers, need to be improved, which caused some small faults, such as 0.49-0.50 minutes (Bar 22) - a recovered B in right 3rd finger, 0.54-0.55 minutes (Bar 25) - 3rd, 4th & 5th fingers of left hand, and a small disharmonic note - flatten B in the right hand - 0.32 (Bar 14)...
4. It's great that I can hear Baroque staccatos were in their graceful manners - like imperfect pearls required by its era. She almost did it...
5. Totally saying: it must be a very hard-job for a student in 9 years old to play Bach's 2-parts Invention. She bravely took up this life-task and successfully completed - this point should be affirmed. Congratulation! You can do more further...
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 02:28, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
'''MARIAGE D'AMOUR (Dreaming Wedding Ceremony) and its Educational Story:'''
It's only no more than 2 weeks she did get the main techniques, after taking a Covid-19 Protection piano lesson and further test(Face-mask covering and breathe-prevention…).Then, she went back home and made a hard self-working exercise. Afterwards, around 10 days, this edition can come out. Why was she so keen on making it? She told me... One of her family's friends would like a piece of background music for his wedding ceremony, and they knew she was a good piano pupil.They invited her to take this task. She online self found out her long dreaming piece, and felt very happy for them. She thought only hard-working at home can realize this dream in this 'Hard Recovery Time'. She has beautifully taken this life-task for a very short time, and finally I could find a beautiful smile on her face... Though there were still some small faults in teacher's view, such as the biggest 1.02-1.03...
('''Problems:'''
Mentioned one is because of the distance of the Tenth-grasping is out of her hand-shape and ability in this age - rolling but touching a wrong note; In addition, the breathing of each sentence's tail somehow is with a longer responded break... Further, the Pedaling for the coherence from natural breathing need to improve; The final departing dropping notes were too noisy... which needs to be quiet,rit. and peaceful...),
her hands' ability (especially the big chords-grasping, whole-viewing, locating, and sight-reading) was improved by her own endeavors (Maybe... subjects-divided examination-taking online through self-video-recording,in this special time, motivated her self-management...). This point made me feel happy... Hopefully, the friend of her family enjoyed their wedding ceremony with this own and LIVE background music, luckily as in a fantastic, peaceful and forever-lasting life-dream of happiness.
In future, Hoping: Yixuan, you can play this fantastic wedding song of piano (fluently and heart-touchingly) for more families and share their friendship, love and happiness...
Little girl pupil, thank you!^_^
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 01:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
[[File:CCzerny 299 Etude No. 27, Piano student Yixuan Wang, Tutor Jason Han.oggzerny 299 Etude No. 27, Piano student Yixuan Wang, Tutor Jason Han.ogg|thumb|
Czerny 299 Etude No. 27, Piano student Yixuan Wang, Tutor Jason Han.ogg]]
I have taught two children this Etude-a girl and also a boy (with outcomes). They played all well in very different musicalities. One is like a fast gym meeting 299's standards. The other-hers is with a good sound effect -light and peaceful after her grade examination. Both I all like.
Regarding with how to train this sound effect with pedal, Please see my etudes'platform:
https://en.m.wikiversity.org/wiki/Portal:Piano_Etudes_as_Poems
'''G major Sonata L.349 - Yixuan Wang's New Attempt of Italian Baroque Style of A. Scarlatti'''
A. Scarlatti's Sonatas are quite hard for young students and young teenagers to train and perform.However, Yixuan is fine, I thought.
It needs a very fast & light fingering of Scale & Arpeggios and different STACCATOing keyboard-touching way, meanwhile, the exaggerating fluency of simple patterns... I thought she somehow had touched at her own little age. Just, more from nature, more details-care and the flexibility of hands&body could make things better.
At her age, it's already fine.Thanks to the recent striving in this still hard time of COVID-19 Recovery. [[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 02:31, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
[[File:G major Sonata L.349, Piano Pupil Yixuan, Wang.ogg|thumb|A, Scarlatti L.349 Sonata, Piano-pupil Yixuan, Wang]]
It's very hard to train Scarlatti's Italian Style of technique skills... However, Yixuan, Wang has never given up...
during this COVID-19 Time...-Protecting herself with masks, meanwhile, playing times after times... Finally, we can get some senses of fast, airily,lightly and breezily... Yes, there may also be some problems, like- it's very easy to be stressful and breathless on the stage...But to her age, do you think it's already good...
Therefore, I recorded it in a video and published it on a musical platform -Kugou, and a educational platform - Youku, as to remember her growth:
http://m.kugou.com/mv/?hash=f00b36624f27b091b79e3f30e158aa03&sruserid=640650901
====Piano Pupil Mo Zhou's Smart Growth and Hard-working learning of Techniques ====
The video of Mo Zhou's most beautiful performance of Debussy's work- 2re Arabesque (I call it 'Butterfly's Dream') :
Kugou musical platform -
http://m.kugou.com/mv/?hash=547cb2c1e2f57a9e8ec66e8ecf36c269&sruserid=640650901
Youku educational part -
http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XNTgxNzA2Njk2MA==.html?x&sharefrom=android&sharekey=9631de9a76de1af3d601221019590cd26
(Published on the musical platform of Kugou and the educational part of Youku; the classroom volunteering photographer is Ms. Yang Gao)
'''Piano Pupil Mo, Zhou's Violin simulation of Cremer's Etude's Art'''
Catching the hands' positions (somehow borrowed from voilin's) is almost the hardest point to train.One focuses on left hand's Notes-Slipping; the other regards with the interval Position-switching (2 notes) check of right hand frequently.
Though this little girl has a pair of smart&slim hands, she attempted her best. You can hear the most part's effect LIVE in classroom...
In this point, I gave a 'LIKE'.
[[File:Cramer Etude, Performed by Piano Pupil Mo, Zou.ogg|thumb|Cramer Etude, Performed by Piano Pupil Mo, Zhou]]
'''A, Scarlatti L.349 Sonata - A Italian Style Taste of Baroque Music'''
''Comments:''
Mo,Zhou's hands are very smart, regarding with which some very tiny actions she can take, though they aren't quite big. Yes, she has been always willing to enlarge her hands.
This point, but somehow, associate her to take this Italian Baroque Style (Rocca) quite easy.
Yes, I thought she was fine regarding with much more details.(though it's LIVE that very few unexpected faults could be caused by the stress of the recording).
I thought: to her performance, my teaching is working well. She did many requirements... Let us listen to her.[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 03:25, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
[[File:G major Sonata L.349, Piano pupil Mo, Zhou.ogg|thumb|File:G major Sonata L.349, Piano pupil Mo, Zhou.ogg]]
==== Brilliant Snow-ball boy (Yu) of Zhang family is praying for his father working in New Zealand ====
[[File:Pupil Yu,Zhang's edition - e minor sonata of Sir Haydn.ogg|thumb|E minor sonata of Sir Haydn was played by Piano student Yu, Zhang in classroom]]
'''(Waiting better)'''
Could you understand how hard Sir Haydn's & Mozart's mature sonata-structuralism and Classical Countermelody (from String Quartet: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Amadeus_Mozart) were for the training of such a young boy or some students around this aget? Oh, looking back, I, myself, also did feel hard... However, this boy and another older piano sister did really insist on doing so. Today, they can give their own editions - very different with own personalities and natures.
Another point I would like to say: It's only one week's time that this boy was fighting for 'a good hearing' of his father. Afterwards, a modified recording edition soon got out, which showed his proficiency and quality...Good boy!
To be honest, reviewing the past year, in order to train Sir Haydn's melody, we researched many ways together, including mathematics... Sometimes, evenly felt hopeless... Playing from childhood, Haydn's style is quite simple to me - models, switching, sonata structure..., but to students, they didn't quite like the sense of thinking being structured... And at the very beginning, I even didn't understand why they felt difficult... Recognizing something, We began to make many games, and evenly counting out some scores for the achievement of his 'fried chicken legs'...
Here, from rhythm to notation, and from melodic interaction to parts-division, I felt it's much clearer, more fluent and stable, than before... His ability of coordination has also been improved, though still some problems. I dared and felt confidential to say: it's a great edition of himself. Hopefully, he can progress further.
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 16:08, 4 April 2019 (UTC) Now, he made it much more fluent and accurate, and also played out his own fashion, though some details still need to be modified. Honestly to say, I thought somehow he got his progress in this period which we can hear...[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 03:28, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
'''Comments'''
It's the second time of piano boy Yu Zhang's teaching result show. In this time, he chose the melody <Under the Sunshine> - a Chinese fork teaching melody as one subject of national examination and also a performance of one piano competition in Dalian.
In my view as his teacher, he gave a very different view of this melody, compared with girls'. He paid more attentions to the whole view of melody's energy, strength, fluency and the joyfulness in Under the Sunshine, but didn't too much care about the details of some parts. However, on the stage, it showed a very great expression as from boy's situation... Good luck and happy experiment. After some practices, in the classroom we together recorded it and submit it up... (Referenced Partly from his page in Wikimedia Commons)
==== How to play Chinese Folk tune - 'Kids' Dance' with Chinese kids' fashion? Listen to little girl Kunlu's performance ====
'''Teacher's Demonstration in classroom:'''
[[File:Kid's Dance Chinese Folk Piano Player Jason M. C.,Han.ogg|thumb|Kid's Dance - 'Kid's Dance', from a folk piano-tune in China National Grading Book, was personally performed here, as a gift for all piano-kids' 'Happy 2019 Lucky Pig Year']]
'''Student Kunlu's Performance in classroom:'''
[[File:Kid's Dance (Chinese) - Student Kunlu, Han.ogg|thumb|Student Kunlu, Han's (Han family's girl born as bright as dewdrop in Kun - Saturn of Wuxing) good performance of Kid's Dance (Chinese)]]
'''Teacher's Comments:'''
Totally to say: Though She can play better editions (many better ones, last winter), in this sound file, she showed the coherence, fluency, flexibility and stability ( as Chinese fork-tune required). Hearing such a smart Chinese girl playing such a fugue-cannoning song, you will feel: it's a right song designing for a right girl... I think that's one meaning of piano-performance. Though spending much time, We did also research special 'Chinese supplemental positions & Dialogues' in polyphony together, which gave us many beautiful memories... Further more, in this age, her staccatos, slurs and Tenuto have been performed quite well, which helped her to keep a unified speed to the end.
Taking back a step, there must still be some small faults in classroom (without purposes) that I have to point out: such as B18's #C blowing to D a little bit, the attention didn't get back in B41 head A which made a small break, and a small mistake of 'Recovered C' rather than #C... In order to dream of its accuracy and pentatonic harmony, it's a hard-working that we have already come over many problems and mistakes... Therefore, I think she fulfilled herself and achieved many things from 'Kid's Dance'. Hopefully, she enjoys the procedure of music-carving. [[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 15:07, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
===== Kunlu's Crystal Heart on International Children's Day - Kleine Kinder Kleine Sorgen (Little Child) =====
'''Teacher's Comments:'''
1. The degrees of proficiency, fluency (and internal speed) have been improved, right on International Children's Day.
2. I preferred her treble part very much - so cool, pure, clean and refreshing, which reflected her crystal heart in childhood.
3. The grasping of big chords - stronger, that's great - but needs to be more accurately and deep (The word 'deep' wasn't always 'loud' and 'heavy'). Please try to understand this point. Yes, it needs to show the hardness of growth (to young teenager), but also the achievement 'to be stronger and more confident of yourself...' [[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 03:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
[[File:Internationl Children's Day Gifts - 2. Kleine Kinder Kleine Sorgen (Little Child, Piano-modification of Germany Song).ogg|thumb| Kleine Kinder Kleine Sorgen (Little Child, Piano-modification of Germany Song), played by Kunlu, Han]]
==== Teacher's Shares of his own home-works from childhood (Open) - Jason, Han====
====='''M. Moszkowsky Etude (Op.72 No.5) - "C major's Fluency, Clarification, Sunshine and Love'''=====
New Beginning with...: M. Moszkowsky Etude (Op.72 No.5) played by Jixun Han (Jason) for piano teaching. It's long time that my piano classroom on the cloud in wikiversity hasn't update its situation. After so many things, now I can partly return to English writing world. The first Etude I would like to upload is still MM Edute which gave me so fluent and clean mind in my childhood. Oh, 38 years old, and after a wedding ceremony with my real lover, my fingers would not be so great as around 15s'... However, I would like to update its situation and new editions untill great someday. Now, let's began with this new melody. It's taught to my good Chinese boy pupil named Guoguo (fruit zeyu, Cui) when I grasped up and recorded. Yes, this little boy will also play well. Let's listen to my version, firstly. Thanks Jason M. C., Han (talk) 13:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
More information, please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_compositions_by_Moritz_Moszkowski
Homework Requirements (challenges):
1. B23-B24(B stands for Musical Bar): By right hand, heads of every 4-notes group make a down-going semi-notes scale, which needs a very careful&exact arpegio-fingering with a whole—palm holded and also thumb-measuring ability. Meanwhile, the left hand is making a whole-tenth measure, but arranged upon every two chords' link. The semi-notes scale is also its fixed channel accordingly. This point is very different to follow and be made accurately and perfectly, which needs long-time training.
2. B49-50 It's almost a two-hands doubling for playing arpeggio-phrase.But not really! You can watch the second phrase- fingering! Your left hand need a smallish shape. Meanwhile, the little finger's head of last phrase need to jump out a minor third distance down. It's very hard to control and also not a doubling.
(Hard for playing, but good for sounding, if out. Therefore, dears, have a try like mine...)
Yours little uncle Han [[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 14:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
[[File:M. Moszkowsky Etude (Op.72 No.5) played by Jixun Han (Jason) for piano teaching.wav|thumb|M. Moszkowsky Etude (Op.72 No.5) played by Jixun Han (Jason) for piano teaching]]
===== '''Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata''' =====
Indeed, Beethoven left a historical challenge (difficulty) but the continuously creative inspiration to understand the techniques & musicality of all his movements, equally to all people. We can attempt different approaches and own personal life-experiences to understand them, and discuss out some possible results.
[[File:Moonlight Sonata - 3rd Movement of Sharp c minor Sonata Beethoven.ogg|thumb|Moonlight Sonata - 3rd Movement of Sharp c minor Sonata after a library presentation of Beethoven (Further, thanks to the April-collections of Tokfo Gallery (Vienna: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Tokfo/Vienna/2019_April_28-30) and Sir James Gallery (Bonn:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Sir_James/Bonn/2019_April_29) - great encouragements!)]]
'''3rd Movement- 'Moonlights Storming' - Techniques Analysis from Notation-reading ('Presto agitato' of Breitkopf & Hartel Company and Berlin Arts Collage also compared with Old New York Edition - as the remembrance of one monitor):'''
'''Musicality:''' In a grandly general view, it's like...in a crazily running (very fast) race, viewed from the window, moonlights have been dismembered upon deep Lake Lucerne (many fragmental sections composed together).
[[File:Vienna Beethoven Monument (with angels and children surrounding).jpg|thumb| Beethoven's Monument in Vienna]]
[[File:Beside Beethoven's Musicality.jpg|thumb| A third-person's Watching of Beethoven's Musicality]]
For its musicality cultivation, I could give a similar sense of its situation, like in Picasso's works- such as Picasso's Guernica (Ceridwen's Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license) For achieving it, a little bit of dark-moods anger and sadness faced from the unfairness and out of control could be inputted, after all technique points were trained in the dexterity. Therefore, from emotion to say, I thought the video right after getting back from UK and the lost one in Newcastle central station were better than this time. [[File:3rd movement of Sonata 'Moonlight' Rocking Video JMC, Han (Jason).webm|thumb|3rd movement of moonlight sonata; Rocking Video JMC, Han (Jason)]] However, I satisfied with it, right like in life and after the presentation. From this point, we can see: Beethoven, as a piano master, has super-reached too much before the time - even abstractionism and postmodernism (deconstructionism).
'''2nd Movement - 'a little Fantasy Moonflower blooming between two rocky layers' - Techniques Analysis from Notation-reading (Allegretto of Breitkopf & Hartel Company and Berlin Arts Collage):'''
1. Parts-distinguishing way can be applied to pick up the main melodic points from its background and legato them into lines.
'''( Notice: Here, from the historical observation, a thing needs to be clarified: Baroque-regression (back-reasoning) was usually made by classical composers (in Vienna school: Mozart, Haydn and Beethoven etc.), especially in their later years of life for calming down the dramatical emotions, and keeping Life's Reasonability. Meanwhile, from Haydn, they discussed and created classical counterpoints from symphony and string quartet together, to modify creative inspirations. Beethoven also inherited it. Therefore, when we play some in piano, we need to analyse and apply some special techniques, commonly used in classical polyphony, to pick up the main from the background, sentence by sentence, as an era-responding.)[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 03:38, 15 May 2019 (UTC)'''
2. Octaves-bridging and chords-connections for big hands, into their hidden melodies, are the most difficulties, which need your frequent exercises, sentence by sentence. (Painful but worthful! Finally, flexible and skillful... )
3. Long keeping-notes, in certain parts, are important for the continuity of the tune and the texture, without broken.
4. It's better in light and tender keyboard-touching way to make melodic lines clear and 'the little flower' smile lightly.
5. 'Rondo' (ABA) formation can be applied to understand its repetitions, responding and structure.
[[File:Moonlight Sonata (Sharp c minor Sonata) 2nd Movement Beethoven JMC,Han.ogg|thumb|Moonlight Sonata - a little fantasy flower between two rocky layers]][[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 14:51, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
===== Blue Danube is always flowing from heart and life, with the vitality as spring: =====
Children and young teenagers, let us swim in this life-long river, to see some beautiful landscapes!
[[File:Blue Denube in my heart.jpg|thumb|Blue Denube in my heart]]
[[File:Blue Danube (Exercise and variations-collections in piano) JMC, Han.ogg|thumb|Blue Danube (Exercise and variations-collections in piano) JMC, Han]]
===== Pachelbel's Canon is always the canon (polyphonic technique) since Baroque Era, but in '''Modern Piano's Pop Variations''' =====
[[File:Pachelbel's Canon in Pop Variations (Geoge Winston Notation) Player Jason, Han.ogg|thumb| Pachelbel's Canon in Pop Variations (George Winston Notation) Player Jason, Han]]
'''Story of teaching & learning (from Wikimedia Commons):'''
Regarding with this piano melody, there is a long story in my heart... Oh, did you hear Mag-pie's singing (I like 'pie' in the tail of this word) in the first draft? Yes, it was attracted and landing on the tree outside my balcony... You can clearly hear it at the beginning and in the tail in my first draft... Almost, it would like to share my memory...
Long long ago, my old brother on my mother's side used to be one hero of my life and fashion... On each holiday, he was always able to find great music pieces, MTVs, transcripts , and scientific fictions, from foreign countries, such as American and Japan (Summer)... and brought & shared with me... Then, I attempted my best to exercise them into the reality, which included this song - Canon Variations from pianist George Winston... Those memories have never faded out, but in my deep sea. To now, evenly did I think Canon was from US and a POP song... After seeking the exact information in Wikipedia, I found it's Pachelbel's Canon in D and Baroque Era and German, rather than C and Modern and Pop in American... and with a 'Gigue for Violins and Basso Continuo', it's not only for piano in many parts than our 3 parts in original piano edition. However either, I still like it very much and would like call it American POP in my music world...
Then after, a male colleague in my working college said to me: Jason, on my wedding ceremony, I would like to play it for a girl... Could you give me a simple one? Then, searching online, I found a simple (middle level) notation and an original (advanced level) notation, I downloaded both, and chose the simple one for him Three months, he was able to play it from 0 level (he wasn't able to read the notation)... I thought piano would have give him a good memory of wedding...
Following, I found a girl felt bored about her piano examination... Then, by choosing the simple transcript and inserting into her lessons... it made my tutoring classrooms really beautiful, relaxable, magical and peaceful...
Now, I have time to play the original edition out... One long dream of my heart is going to be fullfilled... Though my hands in several points didn't make my perfectionism satisfied contrasted with before, especially the tenth-cross design between the left hand and the right hand, I knew it's my life, and fate?... I prefered to update its situations for bettering continuously... if having time...
Compared with the firstly draft, I thought the second was much down-calmed and peaceful...Somehow, I preferred the first draft, but a little bit of 'fast'... I cannot make the decision...then, kept two. However either, I still felt very happy the little natural friend - mag-pie can join... For this reason, I kept it. Hopefully, you will enjoy...
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 04:50, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
===== KV.265 12 Variations on Ah vous dirai-je, Maman - 'Twinkle Twinkle Little Star' =====
Analysis (Waiting)
[[File:KV.265 12 Variations on Ah vous dirai-je, Maman Mozart JMC, Han.ogg|thumb|KV.265 12 Variations on Ah vous dirai-je, Maman Mozart JMC, Han]]
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 08:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
=====''' 'The beautiful views of Scotti-highlands' from Thompson's Book (Advanced Level) - Teaching and demonstration '''=====
[[File:The beautiful views of Scotti-highlands (Teaching demonstration - video; Jason, Han).webm|thumb| After the performance in local Crossing-year 2019-2020 Library Concert and many further exercises, a good edition in classroom got out - Piano kids, always, you knew: No pains, No gains]]
For its musicality and academic thoughts, please visit Wikiverty's Portal of Piano education(The Section: The beautiful views of Scotti-highlands' in a Far-land Home (Academic thoughts, musicality, literature-writing and case-realization)):
*[[Portal:Green Sleeves (Impressionist Visualization)]]
*[[Portal: Sir J.S.BACH and His contributions to Piano Kids' Reasonable Life]]
[[File:C minor Prelude Bach (BWV847), Performer JMC, Han.wav|thumb|C minor Prelude Bach (BWV847)]]
==== 'Swan's Dream Upon the lake' - Little Girl 'Wenxin's' (Brilliant & Sweet literatures in arts ) Performance====
'''Teacher's Demonstration:'''
[[File:The Dying Swan - black angel JMC Han.ogg|thumb| Musicality from watching 'The Dying Swan - the black angel', performed by JMC Han]]
'''Wenxin's Performance:'''
1. Techniques-recovery: The Arpeggio-training of left hand in the accompaniment was the biggest challenge to not only a piano-child at her age - no more than 12 (In Chinese culture, Kid's first year was in mother's womb. Thereby, I asked her - how old are you, and she gave the number '13'...), to me and evenly some expertise pianists. (Camille Saint-Saëns's 'The Swan' on wikipedia or other social editions). The arpeggio-accompaniment is travelling in rich variations of tunes, which caused left hand much harder to expand, shrink and positions-change. Therefore, it spent us more than half a year to train and recover her hand's dexterity from a small failure of her piano life in the Grade Test, just like 'Princess Swan's' experience. Now, totally to say, she got an excellent situation in which children at her age can perform. Thanks to your hard-working!
2. Musicality-cultivation: Usually, she showed a very great musicality in the first page - to the minute (Approximately 1.05) - tender, expending, lyrical and expressive... However, it's really a hardness to keep it throughout the second section - a shading & wandering heart-road in the growth. The attention has to be paid too much on the exactness of left hand's arpeggio-travelling. With a pity, still, some notes were beaten wrongly. But oppositely again, we can see: Princess Swan, in her period of Darkness growth - facing Satan, turning into a dark angel and only appearing in night... She really faced a hardness and the difficulty of life, right as beating wrong notes, getting out some noises and travelling a little bit slowly and roughly in a channel. In this view, perhaps that the difficulties can be transformed- in the musical needs and with a small fashion. Congratulation, more exercises, haha!
3. Together, we gave two great designs: one is the 'Big Brightness' began from the minute (Approximately 2.03) when the main theme happens again; and the other is 'Swan's Departure like Sound of Fall-Leaves rotating upon Lake's Surface' (from minute 2.49 to the end)... She almost achieved some - the mood calmed down very much and stably progressed to further with a confidence. However, a little bit of disfluency made the impression fade, somehow. Meanwhile, a 'rit. to a tempo' turned inversely - what a pity.
Totally to say, musicality, at her age, was preciously showing in this time's performance. The hard-working of recovery and exercises, during many classes, touched my heart very much. (I knew that...) More trainings of Arpeggio-running (dominate sevenths) and its fluency can help her achieve more in the future. Wenxin, thanks to you for letting us appreciate this world-famous melody in piano.
[[File:Growth of Swan in eyes of the little girl - Wenxi, Zhang.ogg|thumb|Growth of Swan in the eyes of the little girl - Wenxi, Zhang]]
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 16:06, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
==== Listen to Mother's Old Story! - A beautiful and quiet little girl's Good Wish ====
'''Teacher's Demonstration:'''
[[File:Mother's Old story - China Impression.ogg|thumb| Listen to Mother's Old story - China Impression (JMC, Han - teacher's domenstration)]]
'''Student's Performance:'''
[[File:Listen to Mother's Old Story - Piano Pupil Yiwen, Cui.ogg|thumb| Listen to Mother's Old Story- Piano Pupil Yiwen, Cui]]
'''Teacher's Comments:'''
Yiwen, Cui (Direct translation of her Chinese name - A beautiful girl who is good at the translation of art and literature, from Cui family), at the age of 10, is a quite and beautiful girl. She got a good life effect from this Chinese piano-kid's song - 'Listen to Mother's Old Story': making her family and parents happy, getting some confidences through this piano song from the examination, showing her fashion in my library concert held for piano kids... After those more above, frequent exercises, and getting her permission, I can submit this classroom-recording edition. Though in the tail I found a note lost... and some parts of her left hand might run much more fluently... , I think her emotional background of this music reached to a good level, and those polyphonic parts can be clearly heard two layers, their cannoning, and so on... Congratulation!
'''(Words from the description in Wikimedia Commons page)'''
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 01:04, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
==== Moonlight upon Lotus Pool (Summer) - Letters-Accompaniment Improvising Chinese Pop-song with both Classical Tradition and Pentatonic Scale ====
'''Teacher's Comment:'''
1. I am very excited that you (only 10-years-old) understood Letter-To-Accompaniment Improvising sheet and its approach in a very fast way.
2. It's great you can use both Pentatonic Arpeggios and Tenth-Rolling-Bass-dropping in your accompaniment (You can make Tenth-rolling Bass in a more fluent view, I thought)
3. We can feel the musical scene from your musicality - In a beautiful summer night, Walking along a lotus pool, you and your family members were enjoying the moonlight and a breeze of cool wind...
4. In future, hopefully, you can improve your 'new learns' to a higher level.
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 01:04, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
''' Xuan, Lee's Second Attempt - Pearl of the Orient'''
==== 'Mother in the candlelight' - A little girl (Siqi)'s heart-words for her mother's birthday - in the growth and in the dreams... ====
'''Heart-story:'''
Regarding with this piano-song, there is a little story about this little commons' girl: Usually, her parents were very busy in the family's restaurant... I and my mother saw she had independently managed herself well and grew up alone for many years... In this year - 2019, time was near her mother's birthday. In the KTV (a place like karaoke bar, but for small single groups of people in rooms, with TV in the middle for singing ), she heard this song - 'Mother in the candlelight' and found her parents enjoyed singing it very much. Then, she decided to play it as a gift to her mother, right on mother's birthday. It's my biggest honour to be together sight-reading the notation, making the re-designs and re-editions of this song into piano - like, Prelude, Introduction-theme 1st, theme 2nd, Development and Peak, a small Repetition and Coda... She learnt in a very fast and hard-working way that merely around one month she played it in this level. And finally, she got her heart-sweet - playing it for her mother, as a birthday gift.(Wikimedia Commons' original page, 2019)
'''Comments from teacher:'''
1. The musical emotions were very rich and expressive, especially the 'Peak-Calling for mother' (2.53 minutes - 3.53 minutes). I almost can hear 'Mum...' (or Mumu...) for many times in a kid's tear-drops and in the candlelight... by your right hand's touchable singing...
2. I liked our 'Flanger tr. Ornaments' very much (I thought it's from Mozartian). I am very happy you can put it in for soon time...
3. I am very happy in the Coda-tail, you can get my suggestion - ending by a Major Seventh Progression-Arpeggio. This point should give the thanks to my mentor - Ray. I quite enjoy its special colour...
4. Your strong and mixed left hand accompaniment must have been trained for many times. I knew it's a hard-working job, but tender and flexible a little bit... better?
5. The singing of right hand and its 'breathing' were quite natural and fine, sentence by sentence..., but the total speed is too slower than normal, which reflect the running ability of the left hand needed to improve. I knew: to your 9-years-old hands, it's a very hard requirement... However, waiting the up-grown, I have the confidence you can hands-sing it in a much more fluent way...
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 14:10, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
'''Night's Piano-Song - The depth of China Pop-Piano (and Siqi's Heart-Try)'''
''Comments:''
She made the depth of two peak notes but in light touching way. I thought also that she did this Pop-piano's musicality in a poet's Night-thinking...
She is suitable for the performance of this-type-'songs' and improvising (still at little age and need to prepare in time).
Let us listen to her and feel her expression.
==== The Cowherd's Flute played by a little girl piano pupil - Guo Guo (Nickname: Happy fruits) ====
This edition has already been her best attempt, regarding with its landscape-painting style, lovely Cowherd's Flute we can refer to Wikipedia introduction (Seeking key words 'The Cowboy's Flute' in). It's recorded as a beautiful memory of her piano-learning and her Childhood. Let us listen to her:
[[File:The Cowboy's Flute - Yuxuan, Lu (Guo Guo).ogg|thumb|The Cowherd's Flute - Yuxuan, Lu (Guo Guo)]]
==== Clementi Sonata Op35 No. 5 (Movement 1st), played by Piano pupil Yixuan, Qiao ====
Clementi's Sonata-Op35 No. 5 was a so long and difficult piece for students around their ninth year. Therefore, we have divided it into many small sections and taught. She learnt in progress. Meanwhile, this little and beautiful girl (She was beautifully good at dancing, somehow rather than piano.) has already attempted her best in exercising and recording. I thought it recorded her good piano-learning experiences and those memories of childhood. Regarding with further information about this work, please refer to the educational portal: https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Portal:Sonatinas_from_Kids%27_corner_near_heaven#Muzio_Clementi . Let us listen to her:
[[File:Clementi Sonatina Op35. No 5 Movement 1st Piano pupil YIxuan, Qiao.ogg|thumb|Clementi Sonatina Op35. No 5 Movement 1st Piano pupil YIxuan, Qiao]]
[[User:Jason M. C., Han|Jason M. C., Han]] ([[User talk:Jason M. C., Han|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jason M. C., Han|contribs]]) 02:42, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
====Little and Little, Twinkling Stars - Little Piano-Kids' Playground====
Say 'Hello' to our 'Little Goldman'
[[File:Vienna Trip - The Little Goldman- Strauss Family.jpg|thumb|Hand-making my own picture of Strauss Family's Little Goldman]]
* [[Portal:Little and Little, Twinkling Stars - Little Piano-Kids' Playground| Little and Little, Twinkling Stars - Little Piano-Kids' Playground]]
42y3cj7ctljkz90mypa3qiq3r3zfxl8
Artificial neural network/Training
0
292771
2812315
2480483
2026-05-31T14:19:14Z
18SWADKKS
3086752
/* See also */ Removed typo
2812315
wikitext
text/x-wiki
[[File:Artificial neuron.svg|thumb|Training the weights of an artificial neuron]]
== Introduction ==
[[w:en:Neural network|Neural networks]] learn (or are trained) by processing examples, each of which contains a known "input" and "result," forming probability-weighted associations between the two, which are stored within the data structure of the net itself. The training of a neural network from a given example is usually conducted by determining the difference between the processed output of the network (often a prediction) and a target output. This difference is the error. The network then adjusts its weighted associations according to a learning rule and using this error value. Successive adjustments will cause the neural network to produce output that is increasingly similar to the target output. After a sufficient number of these adjustments, the training can be terminated based on certain criteria. This is known as [[w:en:supervised learning|supervised learning]].
Such systems "learn" to perform tasks by considering examples, generally without being programmed with task-specific rules. For example, in [[w:en:image recognition|image recognition]], they might learn to identify images that contain cats by analyzing example images that have been manually [[w:en:Labeled data|labeled]] as "cat" or "no cat" and using the results to identify cats in other images. They do this without any prior knowledge of cats, for example, that they have fur, tails, whiskers, and cat-like faces. Instead, they automatically generate identifying characteristics from the examples that they process.
== Learning Tasks ==
* '''(Learning and Training)''' Define properties that you associate with learning of children, training in sports, ... What are similarities and difference to the concept of training of neural networks.
* '''(Error Function and Gradient Descent)''' Let <math>(w_1, \ldots , w_n) \in \mathbb{R}^n </math> a vector of parameters, which define the state of a neural network. A single value defines e.g. the weight between connections between neurons in the ANN. The error is dependent on these values, so the error function maps <math>(w_1, \ldots , w_n) \in \mathbb{R}^n </math> to a non-negative error <math>E_{\mathbb{D}}(w_1, \ldots , w_n) \geq 0 </math>. The error is dependent on the training data <math>\mathbb{D}</math>. Explain how the [[Gradient descent|Gradient Descend Method]] can be used to reduce the error <math>E_{\mathbb{D}}(w_1, \ldots , w_n) \in \mathbb{R}_0^{+} </math> (see [[w:en:Backpropagation|Backpropagation Networks]]<ref>Leonard, J., & Kramer, M. A. (1990). Improvement of the backpropagation algorithm for training neural networks. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 14(3), 337-341.</ref>).
== See also ==
* [[Artificial intelligence]]
== References ==
<references/>
[[Category:Artificial intelligence]]
[[Category:Artificial neural networks|training]]
0jj7aou655yty1a6c80r41g4u1i05so
Portal:Fresh Air of Piano after COVID-19 and beginning up a Recovering New Time of Openness from 2024
102
316903
2812374
2724816
2026-06-01T00:46:22Z
CommonsDelinker
9184
Removing [[:c:File:Celebrating_Our_New_Life_(Piano_Music)_played_by_piano_student_Mingyang,_Zhang.wav|Celebrating_Our_New_Life_(Piano_Music)_played_by_piano_student_Mingyang,_Zhang.wav]], it has been deleted from Commons by [[:c:User:Didym|Didym]] because
2812374
wikitext
text/x-wiki
'''Storys and Comments'''
"Celebrating Our New Life" is a piece of famous Chinese piano music. After the grading examination of China's the Ministry of Culture and Tourism and getting 10th level certificate, Mingyang, Zhang played out a very fluent edition. Yes...,he made some simplified changes in the part of his left hand from the improvisation and accompaniment, by the reason that he enjoy Chinese Pop music and learnt some by ears in his free time.It was almost not quite set according to the notation. However, I thought it's fine and also his little genius by nature. It would not be disturbed. Therefore, congratulations and waiting for his further & bigger development in the future.
[[File:G major of Domenico Scarlatti (VIVO K125) played by Chinese piano little girl student Yiyao, Duan.wav|thumb|G major of Domenico Scarlatti (VIVO K125) played by Chinese piano little girl student Yiyao, Duan]]
'''Storys and Comments'''
Yiyao, Duan is a little Chinese girl student of primary school. In free time, she have been learning piano as her daily habits for many years.In this summer vacation, she has passed the 10th piano grade examination of China Culture and Tourism Ministry's Art Development Center successfully. After the examination, I asked her what piano school and style she would like to choose. She preferred Domenico Scarlatti, because of its vivid and trippingly style, somehow like the happy heart after the examination in summer. She has a great musicality of piano playing, but still a little bit of rough in this piece of piano music, I thought. Therefore, after many weeks' practices, I recorded this piece of performance in the real LIVE classroom for her. Let's listen to her performance, and waiting for her growth further more. Thanks
'''Storys and Comments'''
As piano pupils from childhood, we all knew: 'Summer', composed by Jeo Hishashi, is very famous in piano classroom. More information regarding with this piece of piano music Boy fruit played, please refer to Kikujiro (Wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kikujiro ). Zeyu,Cui (Fruit) is my piano student - a little boy named Zeyu Cui is a little expert in its performance. He played it in many situations- in classroom, in life and somewhere traveling with piano. In his heart-music,you can hear: a piano boy's growing day after day and year after year, a tender expression of his love to mother and father, and a desire of happily playing with his companies in school, etc. Let's listen to him! Further information and story,I will add up soon both here and Wikiversity.
[[File:G Major Sonata of Domenico Scarlatti (Allegro K146) played and learned by piano student Zichen,Tao.wav|thumb|G Major Sonata of Domenico Scarlatti (Allegro K146) played and learned by piano student Zichen,Tao]]
'''Storys and Comments'''
This sound file is made by me to record the performance of my piano student Zichen, Tao. She is a little Chinese girl student of primary school, having learnt piano through part-time for many years. After I delivered a lecture talking about several piano composers and their styles in works, she decided to choose Domenico Scarlatti to learn and play. Now, I found: though some details were a little bit not delicate, the total framework and technique were almost fine in the classroom. Then, she will grow in this piece of bright、happy、trippingly and vivid piano music. Let's listen to her expression. Thanks!
'''Storys and comments'''
I thought the emotional expressions as the dialogues between butterfly lovers one hand by the other、the detailed technique-treatments such as the arpegio-accompanyment、the eighth-chords exactness, and the top-part arms-force...were trained very fluent, comfortable and excellent. Therefore, as a piano teacher, I felt very pleased to introduce it to the public listening. Further technique&art-comments and studying storys I will up-send soon
[[File:Little Trumpet (Piano Music) played by piano student Chen, Cao.wav|thumb|Little Trumpet (Piano Music) played by piano student Chen, Cao. ]]
'''Storys and Comments'''
The naught and clever boy played it as in his own personality. After many exercises, you can hear it looks like a smart fingering game from the nature of childhood, such as the situation in the break time between classes on the playground. That's fine, thereby, I would like to introduce it that musical (piano) education's true purpose was located in - studying happily from nature. Let's listen to him!
'''Storys and Comments'''
Anzhi is a Chinese boy of his eighth age. His father, aged similarly with me, has the same memory of playing the computer game Plants vs. Zombies(More information, please refer to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plants_vs._Zombies). Then, as his piano teacher, we found he is a little expert in playing piano music from computer games. He has the passion to learn, exercise and record this piece of piano music. After many trainings and getting his permission, I felt very happy to introduce it to our public listening!
1x58pga0z1fhn4jssdo89hf0amv69jf
Reformation Workshop
0
320155
2812339
2808646
2026-05-31T19:35:29Z
Lbeaumont
278565
AI use is very minimal (cited and based on specific directions), not substantial.
2812339
wikitext
text/x-wiki
—Building our future
[[File:Reformation_Workshop.png|thumb|We can [[Clear Thinking/Curriculum|think critically]], and act [[Finding Courage|courageously]] to create a [[Envisioning Our Future|better future]].]]
== Welcome! ==
In a world facing profound challenges and rapid change, the need for thoughtful, purposeful reform has never been greater. This workshop is an invitation—to prepare yourself, to [[Clear Thinking/Curriculum|think critically]], and to act [[Finding Courage|courageously]] in pursuit of a better future.<ref>[[w:ChatGPT|ChatGPT]] generated this introductory text after being prompted with the recommendations that follow. </ref>
[[Improving Social Systems#What do you want?|Reformation is difficult]]. It requires reflection, resilience, and responsibility. But it is also essential. Whether we are improving our personal habits or transforming entire systems, meaningful change begins with awareness and is sustained by intentional effort.
The following recommendations are organized around key areas where reform is both urgently needed and deeply possible—from the ways we care for ourselves and others, to how we engage with information, belief, governance, money, and global challenges.
This is not just about fixing what’s broken. It’s about envisioning and building something better. A future that works—for more people, with more [[wisdom]], and with greater integrity.
We can progress from good intentions to effective action. Let’s begin.
[https://www.academia.edu/165232648/Reformation_Workshop_Slides Slides based on this course] are available.
== Prepare Yourself for Reformation ==
[[Improving Social Systems#What do you want?|Reformation is difficult]]. Take the following steps to prepare yourself for the journey.
* [[Living Wisely/Take Care|Take care]] of yourself and others. [[Living Wisely|Live wisely]]. Begin by adopting these [[Wise Living Toolkit#Wise Practices|wise practices]].
* [[Envisioning Our Future|Envision a brighter future]].
** Progress [[Envisioning Our Future/Toward Compassion|toward compassion]].
* Carefully consider the question "[[Exploring Existential Concerns/What Ought We Do?|What we ought do]]?"
* [[A Journey to GameB#Pre GameB (PreB)|Get yourself ready]].
* Recognize that [[Improving Social Systems|improving social systems]] is difficult and essential.
** This requires engaging others and [[Improving Social Systems#Building Support|building support]] for carrying out the improvement, among other essential work.
** Prepare to [[Improving Social Systems|improve social systems]].
** [[Sustaining Agency|Sustain your agency]] throughout the transformations.
== Reform Information Systems ==
We form our beliefs based on what we think we know. It is essential that we align our knowledge base with reality.
* [[Intellectual honesty|Expect intellectual honesty]].
* [[Fostering Curiosity#Learning at the Speed of Thought|Improve learning systems]].
** Recognize that the future of education is learning.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://lelandbeaumont.substack.com/p/the-future-of-education-is-learning|title=The future of education is learning|last=Beaumont|first=Leland|date=2022-10-19|website=Seeking Real Good|access-date=2025-03-29}}</ref>
* [[Navigating Information Landscapes|Navigate the information landscape]] skillfully.
* [[Evaluating Information|Evaluate information wisely]].
** [[Seeking True Beliefs|Seek true beliefs]]
** [[Finding Common Ground/Every Ism Creates a Schism|Escape ideologies]] and [[Doing Philosophy|think for yourself]].
** [[Evaluating Journalism Standards|Evaluate journalism standards]].
** [[Navigating Social Proof|Navigate social proof skillfully]].
** Use your [[Influence and Persuasion|influence and persuasion]] wisely and skillfully.
* [[Understanding Misbelief|Avoid misbeliefs]].
* [[The Idea Incubator/Reforming Social Media Platforms|Reform social media platforms]].
* [[Finding Common Ground|Find common ground]].
== Reform Belief Systems ==
Because our [[Forming beliefs|beliefs]] shape our actions, and our actions are [[Global Perspective#Interdependence|interdependent]], he have an obligation—to ourselves and others—to [[Seeking True Beliefs|seek true beliefs]].
* [[Seeking True Beliefs|Seek true beliefs]].
** [[Seeking True Beliefs/Hold Well-Chosen Beliefs Firmly but Not Rigidly|Hold well-chosen beliefs firmly but not rigidly]].
* Align your [[Exploring Worldviews/Aligning worldviews|worldview with reality]].
* Adopt well chosen [[Moral Reasoning|moral reasoning]].
* Practice a [[Real Good Religion]].
== Reform Governance Systems ==
Because [[Global Perspective#Interdependence|we live together]], we must govern together.
* [[Coming Together|Come together]].
* Recognize [[Evolving Governments/Good Government|good government]].
** Advocate for good government.
** [[Assessing Human Rights/Beyond Olympic Gold|Advance human rights worldwide]].
* [[Evolving Governments|Evolve Governments]].
* [[Untangling Multipolar Traps|Untangle Multipolar Traps]]
== Reform Monetary Systems ==
Because money is the [[Wisdom Research/Pinnacles|lynchpin]] of many of our institutions and actions, we must [[Evolving Money|reform our financial systems]] to serve human flourishing—not the other way around.
* Learn to [[Limits To Growth/Coping with Abundance|cope with abundance]] and share the productivity dividend.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://lelandbeaumont.substack.com/p/who-owns-the-productivity-dividend|title=Who owns the Productivity dividend?|last=Beaumont|first=Leland|date=2023-05-02|website=Seeking Real Good|access-date=2025-03-29}}</ref>
* Respect [[Limits To Growth|limits to growth]].
* Eliminate [[Living Wisely/Economic Faults|economic faults]].
* Ensure sufficiency<ref>{{cite book|title=On Inequality|last=Frankfurt |first=Harry G.|date=September 29, 2015|publisher=Princeton University Press|isbn=978-0691167145|pages=120|authorlink=w:Harry_Frankfurt}}</ref> for the most vulnerable.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://lelandbeaumont.substack.com/p/find-work-or-starve-8fa99a4551be|title=Find Work or Starve|last=Beaumont|first=Leland|date=2021-01-13|website=Seeking Real Good|access-date=2025-04-10}}</ref>
* Fulfill our [[w:What_We_Owe_the_Future|obligations to future generations]].
* Understand [[Macroeconomics/Quick Reference|macroeconomics]].
* [[Evolving Money|Evolve money]].
== Address Grand Challenges ==
The world faces many [[grand challenges]].
Improvements are required locally in the short term and [[Global Perspective|globally]] in the long term.
* [[Doing Good|Do good]] in the short term while [[Improving Social Systems|undertaking structural reformations]] for long term systemic impact.
* Work locally while continuing to [[Global Perspective|think globally]].
** Value [[Global Perspective#Interdependence|interdependence]].
* [[Assessing Human Rights/Beyond Olympic Gold|Advance human rights worldwide]].
* Address the [[grand challenges]].
== Practice Intentional Evolution ==
Help us [[Intentional Evolution|evolve toward]] the [[Level 5 Research Center|next big thing]]. [[Living Wisely/Seeking Real Good|Seek real good]]!
== We can do this ==
Although this is likely to be a difficult very long-term project, it is definitely achievable because it requires improving only our [[Exploring Social Constructs|social constructs]]. Let’s keep going.
== References ==
[[Category:Living Wisely]]
[[Category:Futurology]]
[[Category:Peace studies]]
{{CourseCat}}
1fqmvnmbvwqkdklx942kzpl1w0cdrpn
User:Dc.samizdat/Golden chords of the 120-cell
2
326765
2812328
2812268
2026-05-31T17:22:08Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* The 8-point regular polytopes */
2812328
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent polyhedral sections of the 120-cell beginning with a vertex. In curved 3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>, every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it occurs in either a left or right chiral form. We shall refer to such a helical geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the central planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once on the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation each vertex turns 540° and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The skew octagon geodesic orbits of the 16 vertices lie on two disjoint {8/3} octagram circular helix isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>4\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each.
We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
Its Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>4\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in a hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagonal rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel skew dodecagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>8\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular triacontagon {30}. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
9oumnr24b9g3igop8m7b616h7lr8094
2812329
2812328
2026-05-31T17:40:40Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* The 8-point regular polytopes */
2812329
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent polyhedral sections of the 120-cell beginning with a vertex. In curved 3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>, every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it occurs in either a left or right chiral form. We shall refer to such a helical geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the central planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once on the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation each vertex turns 540° and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The skew octagon geodesic orbits of the 16 vertices lie on two disjoint {8/3} octagram circular helix isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>4\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each.
We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
Its Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>4\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in a hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagonal rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel skew dodecagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>8\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular triacontagon {30}. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
p8qljik56cyz5bxtxbjv5askyt4w6tg
2812332
2812329
2026-05-31T18:07:01Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* Hypercubes */
2812332
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent polyhedral sections of the 120-cell beginning with a vertex. In curved 3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>, every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it occurs in either a left or right chiral form. We shall refer to such a helical geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the central planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once on the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation each vertex turns 540° and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each.
We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
Its Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>4\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in a hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagonal rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel skew dodecagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>8\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular triacontagon {30}. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
kjag1m8c8cr9alrwbi48ex7g0oey3co
2812333
2812332
2026-05-31T18:11:52Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* The 24-cell */
2812333
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent polyhedral sections of the 120-cell beginning with a vertex. In curved 3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>, every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it occurs in either a left or right chiral form. We shall refer to such a helical geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the central planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once on the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation each vertex turns 540° and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each.
We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>4\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in a hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagonal rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel skew dodecagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>8\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular triacontagon {30}. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
1qx14k9vfkhyahqoelevl9ejx5izyx1
2812334
2812333
2026-05-31T18:20:18Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* The 24-cell */
2812334
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent polyhedral sections of the 120-cell beginning with a vertex. In curved 3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>, every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it occurs in either a left or right chiral form. We shall refer to such a helical geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the central planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once on the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation each vertex turns 540° and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each.
We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in a hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagonal rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel skew dodecagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular triacontagon {30}. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
5f7xbcjwvtwdrpoier08k80rqjenqcy
2812336
2812334
2026-05-31T18:39:59Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* Conclusions */
2812336
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent polyhedral sections of the 120-cell beginning with a vertex. In curved 3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>, every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it occurs in either a left or right chiral form. We shall refer to such a helical geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the central planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once on the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation each vertex turns 540° and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each.
We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in a hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagonal rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel skew dodecagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular triacontagon {30}. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
62l7bo7i2rv39ydebgjytunszh10tnn
2812338
2812336
2026-05-31T19:22:06Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* Thirty distinguished distances */
2812338
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it occurs in either a left or right chiral form. We shall refer to such a helical geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the central planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once on the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation each vertex turns 540° and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each.
We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in a hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagonal rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel skew dodecagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular triacontagon {30}. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
7faep7ps2zxh2de0472ykdbdnmp3ped
2812341
2812338
2026-05-31T20:28:13Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* Hypercubes */
2812341
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it occurs in either a left or right chiral form. We shall refer to such a helical geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the central planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once on the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] helical geodesic orbits of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in a hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagonal rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel skew dodecagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular triacontagon {30}. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
1wquv9e8e1c4nksmjf6y6hriof6jl7l
2812343
2812341
2026-05-31T20:38:31Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* The 8-point regular polytopes */
2812343
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it moves in either a left or right handed helical spiral. We shall refer to such a chiral geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the central planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once on the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] helical geodesic orbits of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in a hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagonal rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel skew dodecagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular triacontagon {30}. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
qn7f6auyu5r60tkhe0hpxyxs3mx1k7k
2812344
2812343
2026-05-31T20:41:08Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* The 8-point regular polytopes */
2812344
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it moves in either a left or right handed circular spiral. We shall refer to such a chiral geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the central planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once on the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] helical geodesic orbits of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in a hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagonal rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel skew dodecagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular triacontagon {30}. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
ifr2t6g66p17gl6l4g06ec1qh4rvo2d
2812352
2812344
2026-05-31T23:20:56Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* The 8-point regular polytopes */
2812352
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it moves in either a left or right handed circular spiral. We shall refer to such a chiral geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the invariant planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once on the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] helical geodesic orbits of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in a hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagonal rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel skew dodecagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular triacontagon {30}. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
gmhuqbn1rjalfirvdqeq2eone5efxaa
2812354
2812352
2026-05-31T23:35:03Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* Hypercubes */
2812354
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it moves in either a left or right handed circular spiral. We shall refer to such a chiral geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the invariant planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once along the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords, each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] helical geodesic orbits of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel skew octagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in a hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagonal rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel skew dodecagon geodesic orbits of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular triacontagon {30}. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
0jz278vplaaurepxf1zbjd0gdwy6u56
2812359
2812354
2026-06-01T00:01:09Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* The 24-cell */
2812359
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it moves in either a left or right handed circular spiral. We shall refer to such a chiral geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the invariant planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once along the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords, each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in a hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagonal rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular triacontagon {30}. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
ccztfof9y685xs7fy6lyqm88yfk79br
2812361
2812359
2026-06-01T00:14:03Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* The 24-cell */
2812361
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it moves in either a left or right handed circular spiral. We shall refer to such a chiral geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the invariant planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once along the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords, each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in a hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagonal rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords of a hexagon in one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular triacontagon {30}. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
1sh978w0y99dil9ef5ysaw7abhml1bx
2812362
2812361
2026-06-01T00:18:55Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* The 600-cell */
2812362
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it moves in either a left or right handed circular spiral. We shall refer to such a chiral geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the invariant planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once along the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords, each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in a hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagonal rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords of a hexagon in one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular [[w:Triacontagon|triacontagon {30}]]. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
feugkpys1hqnq5ws5jh6zv8f2aqgte4
2812366
2812362
2026-06-01T00:33:04Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* The 600-cell */
2812366
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it moves in either a left or right handed circular spiral. We shall refer to such a chiral geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the invariant planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once along the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords, each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in a hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagonal rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords of a hexagon in one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular [[w:Triacontagon|triacontagon {30}]]. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
We can rotate the 600-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on 15 disjoint 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of any other 16-cells. Fifteen Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular rope of 15 twisted strands.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane, with the same effect on 5 disjoint 24-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant hexagon central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of any other 16-cells. Fifteen Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular rope of 15 twisted strands.
A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagonal rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any hexagonal invariant central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords of a hexagon in one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
m2vsahqnesxo9gaxk2kjlzubkzwe2fd
2812389
2812366
2026-06-01T01:31:06Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* The 24-cell */
2812389
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it moves in either a left or right handed circular spiral. We shall refer to such a chiral geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the invariant planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once along the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords, each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> chords within one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagon rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any invariant hexagon central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords of a great hexagon in one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular [[w:Triacontagon|triacontagon {30}]]. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
We can rotate the 600-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on 15 disjoint 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of any other 16-cells. Fifteen Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular helix of 15 twisted strands.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 24-cell, by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane, with the same effect on 5 disjoint 24-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions of its 24-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of any other 24-cells. Five Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular helix of 5 twisted strands.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically by 36° in an invariant decagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete decagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° and is completed in 15 isoclinic displacements of 36°. The Clifford polygon of the decagon rotation is a skew {15/2} pentadecagram of 60° <math>r_5</math> chords. The rotational curve over each 60° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 12° turns. Five Clifford parallel pentadecagon {15} geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>..\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords form a circular helix of 5 twisted strands.
In the 600-cell an isoclinic rotation by 36° in any invariant decagon central plane takes every great decagon to a Clifford parallel great decagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 36° while rotating 36° internally. It also takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon, and every great square to a Clifford parallel great square. All 120 vertices move at once on eight Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 60° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 36° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-fifteenth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>..\pi</math> over fifteen <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane three times, over the five chords of a great pentagon in one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 15 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 600-cell returns to its original orientation.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
dcsgiydhiba60rrpxf998os0y9ulpar
2812394
2812389
2026-06-01T02:25:22Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* The 600-cell */
2812394
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it moves in either a left or right handed circular spiral. We shall refer to such a chiral geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the invariant planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once along the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords, each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> edges of a great square in one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagon rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any invariant hexagon central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of a great hexagon in a moving invariant rotation plane. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular [[w:Triacontagon|triacontagon {30}]]. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
We can rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing 16-cell edges, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on 15 disjoint 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of any other 16-cells. Fifteen Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular helix of fifteen twisted strands.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing 24-cell edges, by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane, with the same effect on 5 disjoint 24-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions of its 24-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of any other 24-cells. Ten Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular helix of ten twisted strands.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing its own edges, by 36° in an invariant decagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. The Clifford polygon of the decagon rotation is a skew {15/4} pentadecagram of 60° <math>r_5</math> chords. The rotational curve over each <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 12° turns. Eight Clifford parallel pentadecagon geodesic isoclines over <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords form a circular helix of eight twisted strands.
In the 600-cell an isoclinic rotation by 36° in any invariant decagon central plane takes every great decagon to a Clifford parallel great decagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 36° while rotating 36° internally. It also takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon, and every great square to a Clifford parallel great square. All 120 vertices move at once on eight Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 60° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 36° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-fifteenth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>5\pi</math> over 15 <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane 3 times, over the 5 edges of a great pentagon in a moving invariant rotation plane. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 15 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 600-cell returns to its original orientation.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
rflr5egfvl07hftiihc0envhemkfstf
2812396
2812394
2026-06-01T02:38:26Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* Finally the 120-cell */
2812396
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it moves in either a left or right handed circular spiral. We shall refer to such a chiral geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the invariant planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once along the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords, each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> edges of a great square in one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagon rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any invariant hexagon central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of a great hexagon in a moving invariant rotation plane. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular [[w:Triacontagon|triacontagon {30}]]. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
We can rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing 16-cell edges, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on 15 disjoint 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of any other 16-cells. Fifteen Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular helix of fifteen twisted strands.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing 24-cell edges, by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane, with the same effect on 5 disjoint 24-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions of its 24-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of any other 24-cells. Ten Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular helix of ten twisted strands.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing its own edges, by 36° in an invariant decagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. The Clifford polygon of the decagon rotation is a skew {15/4} pentadecagram of <math>r_5</math> chords. The rotational curve over each <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 12° turns. Eight Clifford parallel pentadecagon geodesic isoclines over <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords (24-cell and tesseract edges) form a circular helix of eight twisted strands.
In the 600-cell an isoclinic rotation by 36° in any invariant decagon central plane takes every great decagon to a Clifford parallel great decagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 36° while rotating 36° internally. It also takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon, and every great square to a Clifford parallel great square. All 120 vertices move at once on eight Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 60° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 36° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-fifteenth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>5\pi</math> over 15 <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane 3 times, over the 5 edges of a great pentagon in a moving invariant rotation plane. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 15 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 600-cell returns to its original orientation.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
ljxc3e2sn2acgxxo6oi523l728i20ef
2812397
2812396
2026-06-01T02:42:33Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* Finally the 120-cell */
2812397
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it moves in either a left or right handed circular spiral. We shall refer to such a chiral geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the invariant planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once along the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords, each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> edges of a great square in one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagon rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any invariant hexagon central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of a great hexagon in a moving invariant rotation plane. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular [[w:Triacontagon|triacontagon {30}]]. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
We can rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing 16-cell edges, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on 15 disjoint 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of any other 16-cells. Fifteen Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular helix of fifteen twisted strands.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing 24-cell edges, by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane, with the same effect on 5 disjoint 24-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions of its 24-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of any other 24-cells. Ten Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular helix of ten twisted strands.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing its own edges, by 36° in an invariant decagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. The Clifford polygon of the decagon rotation is a skew {15/4} pentadecagram of <math>r_5</math> chords. Successive <math>r_5</math> chords are edges of different 24-cells. The rotational curve over each <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 12° turns. Eight Clifford parallel pentadecagon geodesic isoclines over <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords form a circular helix of eight twisted strands.
In the 600-cell an isoclinic rotation by 36° in any invariant decagon central plane takes every great decagon to a Clifford parallel great decagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 36° while rotating 36° internally. It also takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon, and every great square to a Clifford parallel great square. All 120 vertices move at once on eight Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 60° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 36° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-fifteenth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>5\pi</math> over 15 <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane 3 times, over the 5 edges of a great pentagon in a moving invariant rotation plane. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 15 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 600-cell returns to its original orientation.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
qjc9s0avbgjnvck26bf1uqhzu6ysmy3
2812398
2812397
2026-06-01T02:45:50Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* Finally the 120-cell */
2812398
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it moves in either a left or right handed circular spiral. We shall refer to such a chiral geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the invariant planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once along the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords, each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> edges of a great square in one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagon rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any invariant hexagon central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of a great hexagon in a moving invariant rotation plane. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular [[w:Triacontagon|triacontagon {30}]]. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
We can rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing 16-cell edges, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on 15 disjoint 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of any other 16-cells. Fifteen Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular helix of fifteen twisted strands.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing 24-cell edges, by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane, with the same effect on 5 disjoint 24-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions of its 24-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of any other 24-cells. Ten Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular helix of ten twisted strands.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing its own edges, by 36° in an invariant decagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. The Clifford polygon of the decagon rotation is a skew {15/4} pentadecagram of <math>r_5</math> chords. Successive <math>r_5</math> chords are edges of different 24-cells. The rotational curve over each <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 12° turns. Eight Clifford parallel pentadecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>5\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords form a circular helix of eight twisted strands.
In the 600-cell an isoclinic rotation by 36° in any invariant decagon central plane takes every great decagon to a Clifford parallel great decagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 36° while rotating 36° internally. It also takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon, and every great square to a Clifford parallel great square. All 120 vertices move at once on eight Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 60° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 36° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-fifteenth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over 15 <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane 3 times, over the 5 edges of a great pentagon in a moving invariant rotation plane. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 15 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 600-cell returns to its original orientation.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
kvxlucx09xzsp9lr07hmekbk5fbntsn
2812399
2812398
2026-06-01T03:01:59Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* The 8-point regular polytopes */
2812399
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it moves in either a left or right handed circular spiral. We shall refer to such a chiral geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the invariant planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once along the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords, each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> edges of a great square in one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix which visits each vertex once.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix that visits each vertex once.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagon rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix that visits each vertex once.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any invariant hexagon central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of a great hexagon in a moving invariant rotation plane. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular [[w:Triacontagon|triacontagon {30}]]. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
We can rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing 16-cell edges, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on 15 disjoint 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of any other 16-cells. Fifteen Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular helix of fifteen twisted strands that visits each vertex once.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing 24-cell edges, by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane, with the same effect on 5 disjoint 24-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions of its 24-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of any other 24-cells. Ten Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular helix of ten twisted strands that visits each vertex once.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing its own edges, by 36° in an invariant decagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. The Clifford polygon of the decagon rotation is a skew {15/4} pentadecagram of <math>r_5</math> chords. Successive <math>r_5</math> chords are edges of different 24-cells. The rotational curve over each <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 12° turns. Eight Clifford parallel pentadecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>5\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords form a circular helix of eight twisted strands that visits each vertex once.
In the 600-cell an isoclinic rotation by 36° in any invariant decagon central plane takes every great decagon to a Clifford parallel great decagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 36° while rotating 36° internally. It also takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon, and every great square to a Clifford parallel great square. All 120 vertices move at once on eight Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 60° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 36° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-fifteenth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over 15 <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane 3 times, over the 5 edges of a great pentagon in a moving invariant rotation plane. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 15 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 600-cell returns to its original orientation.
...
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
n52d9j62t2ov1v17d6id87sq1x7zl9m
2812400
2812399
2026-06-01T03:03:58Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* Finally the 120-cell */
2812400
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it moves in either a left or right handed circular spiral. We shall refer to such a chiral geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the invariant planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once along the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords, each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> edges of a great square in one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix which visits each vertex once.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix that visits each vertex once.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagon rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix that visits each vertex once.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any invariant hexagon central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of a great hexagon in a moving invariant rotation plane. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular [[w:Triacontagon|triacontagon {30}]]. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
We can rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing 16-cell edges, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on 15 disjoint 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of any other 16-cells. Fifteen Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular helix of fifteen twisted strands that visits each vertex once.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing 24-cell edges, by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane, with the same effect on 5 disjoint 24-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions of its 24-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of any other 24-cells. Ten Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular helix of ten twisted strands that visits each vertex once.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing its own edges, by 36° in an invariant decagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. The Clifford polygon of the decagon rotation is a skew {15/4} pentadecagram of <math>r_5</math> chords. Successive <math>r_5</math> chords are edges of different 24-cells. The rotational curve over each <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 12° turns. Eight Clifford parallel pentadecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>5\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords form a circular helix of eight twisted strands that visits each vertex once.
In the 600-cell an isoclinic rotation by 36° in any invariant decagon central plane takes every great decagon to a Clifford parallel great decagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 36° while rotating 36° internally. It also takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon, and every great square to a Clifford parallel great square. All 120 vertices move at once on eight Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 60° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 36° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-fifteenth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over 15 <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane 3 times, over the 5 edges of a great pentagon in a moving invariant rotation plane. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 15 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 600-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
ak5d5f41os6uls6no8oticgjdekz85y
2812402
2812400
2026-06-01T03:15:50Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* The 600-cell */
2812402
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it moves in either a left or right handed circular spiral. We shall refer to such a chiral geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the invariant planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once along the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords, each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> edges of a great square in one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix which visits each vertex once.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix that visits each vertex once.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagon rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix that visits each vertex once.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any invariant hexagon central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of a great hexagon in a moving invariant rotation plane. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular [[w:Triacontagon|triacontagon {30}]]. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2) \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
We can rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing 16-cell edges, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on 15 disjoint 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit other 16-cell vertex positions. Fifteen Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular helix of fifteen twisted strands that visits each vertex once.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing 24-cell edges, by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane, with the same effect on 5 disjoint 24-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions of its 24-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit other 24-cell vertex positions. Ten Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular helix of ten twisted strands that visits each vertex once.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing its own edges, by 36° in an invariant decagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. The Clifford polygon of the decagon rotation is a skew {15/4} pentadecagram of <math>r_5</math> chords. Successive <math>r_5</math> chords are edges of different 24-cells. The rotational curve over each <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 12° turns. Eight Clifford parallel pentadecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>5\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords form a circular helix of eight twisted strands that visits each vertex once.
In the 600-cell an isoclinic rotation by 36° in any invariant decagon central plane takes every great decagon to a Clifford parallel great decagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 36° while rotating 36° internally. It also takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon, and every great square to a Clifford parallel great square. All 120 vertices move at once on eight Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 60° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 36° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-fifteenth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over 15 <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane 3 times, over the 5 edges of a great pentagon in a moving invariant rotation plane. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 15 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 600-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
bturzai61pp8mbvxl6emap1htye8qx4
2812403
2812402
2026-06-01T03:23:26Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* The 600-cell */
2812403
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it moves in either a left or right handed circular spiral. We shall refer to such a chiral geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the invariant planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once along the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords, each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> edges of a great square in one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix which visits each vertex once.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix that visits each vertex once.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagon rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix that visits each vertex once.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any invariant hexagon central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of a great hexagon in a moving invariant rotation plane. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular [[w:Triacontagon|triacontagon {30}]]. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
We can rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing 16-cell edges, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on 15 disjoint 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit other 16-cell vertex positions. Fifteen Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular helix of fifteen twisted strands that visits each vertex once.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing 24-cell edges, by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane, with the same effect on 5 disjoint 24-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions of its 24-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit other 24-cell vertex positions. Ten Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular helix of ten twisted strands that visits each vertex once.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing its own edges, by 36° in an invariant decagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. The Clifford polygon of the decagon rotation is a skew {15/4} pentadecagram of <math>r_5</math> chords. Successive <math>r_5</math> chords are edges of different 24-cells. The rotational curve over each <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 12° turns. Eight Clifford parallel pentadecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>5\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords form a circular helix of eight twisted strands that visits each vertex once.
In the 600-cell an isoclinic rotation by 36° in any invariant decagon central plane takes every great decagon to a Clifford parallel great decagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 36° while rotating 36° internally. It also takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon, and every great square to a Clifford parallel great square. All 120 vertices move at once on eight Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 60° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 36° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-fifteenth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over 15 <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane 3 times, over the 5 edges of a great pentagon in a moving invariant rotation plane. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 15 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 600-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
sl4z19ofs96k9doh1419rdp8cyu619l
2812406
2812403
2026-06-01T03:42:26Z
Dc.samizdat
2856930
/* The 600-cell */
2812406
wikitext
text/x-wiki
= Golden chords of the 120-cell =
{{align|center|David Brooks Christie}}
{{align|center|dc@samizdat.org}}
{{align|center|Draft in progress}}
{{align|center|January 2026 - May 2026}}
<blockquote>Steinbach discovered the formula for the ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. Fontaine and Hurley extended this result, discovering a formula for the reciprocal of a regular polygon chord derived geometrically from the chord's star polygon. We observe that these findings in plane geometry apply more generally, to polytopes of any dimensionality. Fontaine and Hurley's geometric procedure for finding the reciprocals of the chords of a regular polygon from their star polygons also finds the rotational geodesics of any polytope of any dimensionality.</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
Steinbach discovered the Diagonal Product Formula and the Golden Fields family of ratios of diagonal to side in the regular polygons. He showed how this family extends beyond the pentagon {5} with its well-known golden bisection proportional to 𝜙, finding that the heptagon {7} has an analogous trisection, the nonagon {9} has an analogous quadrasection, and the hendecagon {11} has an analogous pentasection, an extended family of golden proportions with quasiperiodic properties.
Kappraff and Adamson extended these findings in plane geometry to a theory of Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, showing that the Golden Fields not only do not end with the hendecagon, they form an infinite number of periodic trajectories when operated on by the Mandelbrot operator. They found a relation between the edges of star polygons and dynamical systems in the state of chaos, revealing a connection between chaos theory, number, and rotations in Coxeter Euclidean geometry.
Fontaine and Hurley examined Steinbach's finding that the length of each chord of a regular polygon is both the product of two chords and the sum of a set of smaller chords, so that in rotations to add is to multiply. They illustrated Steinbach's sets of additive chords lying parallel to each other in the plane (pointing in the same direction), and by applying Steinbach's formula more generally they found another summation relation of signed parallel chords (pointing in opposite directions) which relates each chord length to its reciprocal, and relates the summation to a distinct star polygon rotation.
We examine these remarkable findings (which stem from study of the chords of humble regular polygons) in higher-dimensional spaces, specifically in the chords, polygons and rotations of the [[120-cell]], the largest four-dimensional regular convex polytope.
== Visualizing the 120-cell ==
{| class="wikitable floatright" width="400"
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:120-cell.gif|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point 120-cell <small><math>\{5,3,3\}</math></small> performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]].{{Sfn|Hise|2011|loc=File:120-cell.gif|ps=; "Created by Jason Hise with Maya and Macromedia Fireworks. A 3D projection of a 120-cell performing a [[W:SO(4)#Geometry of 4D rotations|simple rotation]]."}} In this simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges are shown; its 29 interior chords are not rendered. Therefore even though it is translucent, only its outer surface is visible. The complex interior parts of the 120-cell, all its inscribed 5-cells, 16-cells, 8-cells, 24-cells, 600-cells and its much larger inventory of polyhedra, are completely invisible in this view, as none of their edges are rendered at all.
|style="vertical-align:top"|[[File:Ortho solid 016-uniform polychoron p33-t0.png|200px]]<br>Orthographic projection of the 600-point [[W:Great grand stellated 120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] <small><math>\{\tfrac{5}{2},3,3\}</math></small>.{{Sfn|Ruen: Great grand stellated 120-cell|2007}} The 120-cell is its convex hull. The projection to the left renders only the 120-cell's shortest chord, its 1200 edges. The projection above also renders only one of the 120-cell's 30 chords, the edges of its 120 inscribed regular 5-cells. The 120-cell itself (the convex hull) is invisible in this view, as its edges are not rendered.
|}
[[120-cell#Geometry|The 120-cell is the maximally complex regular 4-polytope]], containing inscribed instances of every regular 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-polytope, except the regular polygons of more than {15} sides.
The 120-cell is the convex hull of a regular [[120-cell#Relationships among interior polytopes|compound of each of the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes]]. They are the [[5-cell|5-point (5-cell) 4-simplex]], the [[16-cell|8-point (16-cell) 4-orthoplex]], the [[W:Tesseract|16-point (8-cell) tesseract]], the [[24-cell|24-point (24-cell)]], the [[600-cell|120-point (600-cell)]], and the [[120-cell|600-point (120-cell)]]. The 120-cell is the convex hull of a compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells, of 75 disjoint 16-cells, of 25 disjoint 24-cells, and of 5 disjoint 600-cells.
The 120-cell contains an even larger inventory of irregular polytopes, created by the intersection of multiple instances of these component regular 4-polytopes. Many are quite unexpected, because they do not occur as components of any regular polytope smaller than the 120-cell. As just one example among the [[120-cell#Concentric hulls|sections of the 120-cell]], there is an irregular 24-point polyhedron with 16 triangle faces and 4 nonagon {9} faces.{{Sfn|Moxness|}}
Most renderings of the 120-cell, like the rotating projection here, only illustrate its outer surface, which is a honeycomb of face-bonded dodecahedral cells. Only the objects in its 3-dimensional surface are rendered, namely the 120 dodecahedra, their pentagon faces, and their edges. Although the 120-cell has chords of 30 distinct lengths, in this kind of simplified rendering only the 120-cell's own edges (its shortest chord) are shown. Its 29 interior chords, the edges of objects in the interior of the 120-cell, are not rendered, so interior objects are not visible at all.
Visualizing the complete interior of the 600-vertex 120-cell in a single image is impractical because of its complexity. Only four 120-cell edges are incident at each vertex, but [[120-cell#Chords|600 chords (of all 30 lengths)]] are incident at ''each'' vertex.
== Compounds in the 120-cell ==
The 8-point (16-cell), not the 5-point (5-cell), is the smallest building block; it compounds to every larger regular 4-polytope. The 5-point (5-cell) does compound to the 600-point (120-cell), but it does not fit into any smaller regular 4-polytope.
The 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 2 in the 16-point (8-cell), and by 3 in the 24-point (24-cell). The 16-point (8-cell) compounds in the 24-point (24-cell) by 3 non-disjoint instances of itself, with each of the 24 vertices shared by two 16-point (8-cells). The 24-point (24-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell), and the 120-point (600-cell) compounds by 5 disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell).
The 24-point (24-cell) also compounds by 5<sup>2</sup> non-disjoint instances of itself in the 120-point (600-cell); it compounds in 5 disjoint instances of itself, 10 (not 5) different ways. Whichever set of 5 disjoint 24-point (24-cells) are assembled, the resulting 120-point (600-cell) contains 25 distinct 24-point (24-cells), not just 5 (or 10). This implies that 15 disjoint 8-point (16-cells) will construct a 120-point (600-cell), which will contain 75 distinct 8-point (16-cells).
The 600-point (120-cell) is 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), just 2 different ways (not 5 or 10 ways), so it is 10 distinct 120-point (600-cells). This implies that the 8-point (16-cell) compounds by 3 times 5<sup>2</sup> (75) disjoint instances of itself in the 600-point (120-cell), which contains 3<sup>2</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (225) distinct instances of the 24-point (24-cell), and 3<sup>3</sup> times 5<sup>2</sup> (675) distinct instances of the 8-point (16-cell).
These facts were discovered painstakingly by various researchers, and no one has found a general rule governing subsumption relations among regular polytopes. The reasons for some of their numeric incidence relations are far from obvious. [[W:Pieter Hendrik Schoute|Schoute]] was the first to see that the 120-point (600-cell) is a compound of 5 24-point (24-cells) ''10 different ways'', and after he saw it a hundred years lapsed until Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne proved his result, and showed why.{{Sfn|Denney, Hooker, Johnson, Robinson, Butler & Claiborne|2020|loc=''The geometry of H4 polytopes''}}
So much for the compounds of 16-cells. The 120-cell is also the convex hull of the compound of 120 disjoint regular 5-cells. That stellated compound (without its convex hull of 120-cell edges) is the [[w:Great_grand_stellated_120-cell|great grand stellated 120-cell]] illustrated above, the final regular [[W:Stellation|stellation]] of the 120-cell, and the only [[W:Schläfli-Hess polychoron|regular star 4-polytope]] to have the 120-cell for its convex hull. The edges of the great grand stellated 120-cell are <math>\phi^6</math> as long as those of its 120-cell [[W:List of polyhedral stellations#Stellation process|stellation core]] deep inside.
The compound of 120 disjoint 5-point (5-cells) can be seen to be equivalent to the compound of 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells), as follows. Beginning with a single 120-point (600-cell), expand each vertex into a regular 5-cell, by adding 4 new equidistant vertices, such that the 5 vertices form a regular 5-cell inscribed in the 3-sphere. The 120 5-cells are disjoint, and the 600 vertices form 5 disjoint 120-point (600-cells): a 120-cell.
== Thirty distinguished distances ==
The 30 numbers listed in the table are all-important in Euclidean geometry. A case can be made on symmetry grounds that their squares are the 30 most important numbers between 0 and 4. The 30 rows of the table are the 30 distinct [[120-cell#Geodesic rectangles|chord lengths of the unit-radius 120-cell]], the largest regular convex 4-polytope. Since the 120-cell subsumes all smaller regular polytopes, its 30 chords are the complete chord set of all the regular polytopes that can be constructed in the first four dimensions of Euclidean space, except for regular polygons of more than 15 sides.
{| class="wikitable" style="white-space:nowrap;text-align:center"
!rowspan=2|<math>c_t</math>
!rowspan=2|arc
!rowspan=2|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{n}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|<math>\left\{p\right\}</math>
!rowspan=2|<small><math>m\left\{\frac{k}{d}\right\}</math></small>
!rowspan=2|Steinbach roots
!colspan=7|Chord lengths of the unit 120-cell
|-
!colspan=5|unit-radius length <math>c_t</math>
!colspan=2|unit-edge length <math>c_t/c_1</math><br>in 120-cell of radius <math>c_8=\sqrt{2}\phi^2</math>
|-
|<small><math>c_{1,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>15.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{30\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{4,1}-c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.270091</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^4}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.072949}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>25.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{15\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(c_{18,1}-c_{4,1}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{3-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.437016</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.190983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{3,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>36{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{10\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>3 \left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right) c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(\sqrt{5}-1\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>0.618034</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.381966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.28825</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>41.4{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.707107</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.61803</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{5,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>44.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>2 \left\{\frac{15}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{2,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.756934</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}}{\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2 \phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.572949}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>2.80252</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{6,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>49.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{17}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{5-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.831254</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5}}{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.690983}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.07768</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{7,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>56.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>0.93913</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{0.881966}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>3.47709</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>60{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{6\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>1.</math></small>
|<small><math>1</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.70246</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{9,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>66.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{2 \phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}-\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.09132</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{\phi }}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\chi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^3}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.04057</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{10,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>69.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2 \sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.14412</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi }{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>4.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{11,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>72{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{6}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{5\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.17557</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3-\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.38197}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \sqrt{3-\phi } \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.3525</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>75.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{24}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.22474</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.53457</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{13,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>81.1{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.30038</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{9-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(9-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>4.8146</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{14,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>84.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{40}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi } c_{8,1}}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.345</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi }}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\sqrt{5} \phi }{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt[4]{5} \sqrt{\phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>4.9798</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{15,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>90.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{4\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{4,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.41421</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.23607</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{16,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>95.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{29}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.4802</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.19098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(11-\sqrt{5}\right)} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>5.48037</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{17,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>98.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{31}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.51954</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{7+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(7+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\psi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.62605</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{18,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>104.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{8}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{4}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.58114</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{5} \sqrt{\phi ^4}</math></small>
|<small><math>5.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{19,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>108.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{9}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{10}{3}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>c_{3,1}+c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.61803</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{1+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>5.9907</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{20,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>110.2{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.64042</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13-\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13-\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.69098}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\phi ^2}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.07359</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{21,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>113.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{60}{19}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.67601</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\chi }{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.20537</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{22,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>120{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{10}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{3\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.73205</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{6} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.41285</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{23,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>124.0{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{120}{41}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi }+\frac{5}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{5}{2}+\frac{2}{1+\sqrt{5}}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.7658</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4-\frac{\psi }{2 \phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.11803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\chi \phi ^5}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.53779</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{24,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>130.9{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{20}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.81907</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{11+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(11+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.30902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{\sqrt{5}}{\phi }}</math></small>
|<small><math>6.73503</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{25,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>135.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{11}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{7+3 \sqrt{5}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.85123</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\phi ^2}{\sqrt{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{\phi ^4}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.42705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^4</math></small>
|<small><math>6.8541</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{26,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>138.6{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{12}{5}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.87083</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{7}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.5}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{7} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>6.92667</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{27,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>144{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{12}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{5}{2}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{2} \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.90211</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\phi +2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{2+\phi }</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.61803}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{2 \phi +4}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.0425</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{28,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>154.8{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{13}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}} c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>1.95167</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{\sqrt{13+\sqrt{5}}}{2}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{1}{4} \left(13+\sqrt{5}\right)}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.80902}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi ^2 \sqrt{8-\frac{1}{\phi ^2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>7.22598</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{29,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>164.5{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{14}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math></math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{15}{7}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\phi c_{12,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \left(1+\sqrt{5}\right)</math></small>
|<small><math>1.98168</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}} \phi </math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{\frac{3 \phi ^2}{2}}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3.92705}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{3} \phi ^3</math></small>
|<small><math>7.33708</math></small>
|-
|<small><math>c_{30,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>180{}^{\circ}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{\frac{30}{15}\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>\left\{2\right\}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 c_{8,1}</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.</math></small>
|<small><math>2</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4}</math></small>
|<small><math>\sqrt{4.}</math></small>
|<small><math>2 \sqrt{2} \phi ^2</math></small>
|<small><math>7.40492</math></small>
|-
|rowspan=4 colspan=6|
|rowspan=4 colspan=4|
<small><math>\phi</math></small> is the golden ratio:<br>
<small><math>\phi ^2-\phi -1=0</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }+1=\phi</math></small>, and: <small><math>\phi+1=\phi^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>\frac{1}{\phi }::1::\phi ::\phi ^2</math></small><br>
<small><math>1/\phi</math></small> and <small><math>\phi</math></small> are the golden sections of <small><math>\sqrt{5}</math></small>:<br>
<small><math>\phi +\frac{1}{\phi }=\sqrt{5}</math></small>
|colspan=2|<small><math>\phi = (\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>1.618034</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\chi = (3\sqrt{5} + 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>3.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = (3\sqrt{5} - 1)/2</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|-
|colspan=2|<small><math>\psi = 11/\chi = 22/(3\sqrt{5} + 1)</math></small>
|<small><math>2.854102</math></small>
|}
...
The list of 30 chords can be rearranged into a table of 16 rows and 2 columns with a pair of 180° complements in each row. This table first appears in [[w:Regular_Polytopes_(book)|''Regular Polytopes'']] (1947),{{Sfn|Coxeter|1973}} where Coxeter identified each row with a distinct pair of congruent [[w:120-cell#Concentric_hulls|polyhedral sections of the 120-cell]] beginning with a vertex. In curved [[w:3-sphere|3-dimensional space <math>\mathbb{S}^3</math>]], every vertex is the center of a set of concentric polyhedra of increasing radii that nest like Russian dolls. The smallest polyhedral section of radius <math>c_1</math> is a dodecahedron cell, and the largest, central section of radius <math>c_{15}</math> is a non-uniform 60-point [[w:Rhombicosidodecahedron|rhombicosidodecahedron.]] At radial distances greater than <math>c_{15}</math> the successive complement-radius polyhedra decrease in size, to the antipodal dodecahedron cell at distance <math>c_{29}</math>.
...
== The 8-point regular polytopes ==
In 2-space we have the regular 8-point octagon, in 3-space the regular 8-point cube, and in 4-space the regular 8-point [[16-cell]].
A planar octagon with rigid edges of unit length has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_3=1+\sqrt{2} \approx 2.414,r_4=\sqrt{4 + \sqrt{8}} \approx 2.613</math>
The chord ratio <math>r_3=1+\sqrt{2}</math> is a geometrical proportion, the [[W:Silver ratio|silver ratio]]. Fontaine and Hurley's procedure for obtaining the reciprocal of a chord tells us that:
:<math>r_3-r_1-r_1=1/r_3 \approx 0.414</math>
Note that <math>r_3-2=1/r_3=\sqrt{2}-1</math>.
If we embed this planar octagon in 3-space, we can make it skew, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from three others instead of two others, at the vertices of a unit-edge cube with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1, r_2=\sqrt{2}, r_3=\sqrt{3}, r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
If we embed this cube in 4-space, we can skew it some more, repositioning its vertices so that each is one unit-edge length distant from six others instead of three others, at the vertices of a unit-edge 4-polytope with chords of length:
:<math>r_1=1,r_2=1,r_3=1,r_4=\sqrt{2}</math>
All of its chords except its long diameters are the same unit length as its edge. In fact they are its 24 edges, and it is a 16-cell of radius <math>1/\sqrt{2}</math>.
[[File:octagon16cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of a regular 16-cell to the [[16-cell#Projections|B<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only its edges are shown; its long diameter chords are not drawn. All 24 edges are the same length and none lie parallel to the projection plane. The two disjoint squares lie in completely orthogonal central planes.]]
The [[16-cell]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small>. It has 8 vertices, 24 edges, 32 equilateral triangle faces, and 16 regular tetrahedron cells. It is the [[16-cell#Octahedral dipyramid|four-dimensional analogue of the octahedron]], and each of its four orthogonal central hyperplanes is an octahedron.
The only planar regular polygons found in the 16-cell are face triangles and central plane squares, but the 16-cell also contains a skew regular octagon, its [[W:Petrie polygon|Petrie polygon]].{{Efn|name=Petrie polygon of a honeycomb}} The chords of this regular octagon, which lies skew in 4-space, are those given above for the 16-cell, as opposed to those for the cube or the regular octagon in the plane. The 16-cell is a construct of 3 Petrie octagons which share the same 8 vertices but have disjoint sets of 8 edges each.
The regular octad has higher symmetry in 4-space than it does in 2-space. The 16-cell is the 4-[[w:Cross-polytope|orthoplex]], the simplest regular 4-polytope after the [[5-cell|4-simplex]]. All the larger regular convex 4-polytopes are compounds of the 16-cell. The regular octagon exhibits this high symmetry only when embedded in 4-space at the vertices of the 16-cell.
The 16-cell constitutes an [[W:Orthonormal basis|orthonormal basis]] for the choice of a 4-dimensional Cartesian reference frame, because its vertices define four orthogonal axes. The eight vertices of a unit-radius 16-cell are (±1, 0, 0, 0), (0, ±1, 0, 0), (0, 0, ±1, 0), (0, 0, 0, ±1). All vertices are connected by <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges except opposite pairs.
The vertex coordinates of the 16-cell form 6 central squares lying in 6 pairwise [[W:Orthogonal|orthogonal]] coordinate planes. Great squares in opposite planes that do not share an axis (e.g. in the ''xy'' and ''wz'' planes) are completely disjoint (they do not intersect at any vertices). These planes are [[W:Completely orthogonal|completely orthogonal]].{{Efn|name=Six orthogonal planes of the Cartesian basis}}
Since the unit-radius coordinate system is convenient, let us derive the unit-radius 16-cell by skewing a unit-radius planar octagon, which has chords of length:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{2-\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.765,r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.848,r_4=2</math>
We will need a planar octagon with rigid <math>r_2</math> chords, rather than one with rigid <math>r_1</math> edges. The octagon's <math>r_2</math> chords form two disjoint great squares, visible in the orthogonal projection, which we can reposition in 3-space to form a cube by making them parallel, and in 4-space to form a 16-cell by making them completely orthogonal.
Since the edges of the 16-cell are all the same length <math>r_1=\sqrt{2},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{2}</math>, those chords are distinct only in the context of a rotation. Each chord is a 4-vector with a length and a direction. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 45° turns.
[[File:16-cell-orig.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 8-point 16-cell <small><math>\{3,3,4\}</math></small> performing a double rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}}]]
[[W:Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space|Rotations in 4-dimensional Euclidean space]] can be seen as the composition of two 2-dimensional rotations in completely orthogonal planes. The general rotation in 4-space is a [[W:SO(4)#Double rotations|double rotation]] in pairs of completely orthogonal planes. Two completely orthogonal planes are called invariant planes of the rotation when all points in the plane rotate on circles that remain in the plane, even as the whole plane tilts sideways (like a coin flipping) into another plane. The two completely orthogonal rotations of each plane (like a wheel, and like a coin flipping) are simultaneous but independent, in that they are not geometrically constrained to turn at the same rate. However, the most circular kind of rotation (as opposed to an elliptical double rotation of a rigid spherical object) occurs when the invariant planes do rotate through the same angle in the same time interval. Such equi-angled double rotations are called [[w:SO(4)#Isoclinic_rotations|isoclinic]], also [[w:William_Kingdon_Clifford|Clifford]] displacements.
The <math>r_1</math> chords of the 16-cell form a Petrie polygon which zig-zags back and forth, in the left and right rotational directions, between two completely orthogonal great squares formed by <math>r_2</math> chords.
The <math>r_2</math> chords of two completely orthogonal great squares lie parallel and perpendicular to each other. A ''simple'' rotation of the 16-cell in ''one'' of those two square central planes rotates that square like a wheel, while the other square does not move.{{Efn|name=simple rotations}} The four vertices of the rotating square orbit on a great circle in the plane.
The <math>r_3</math> chords of the 16-cell form a circular helix, visible as a blue {8/3} octagram in the orthogonal projection. A ''double'' rotation of the 16-cell, in both of two completely orthogonal invariant <math>r_2</math> square planes at once by equal angles, moves the eight vertices along the circular helix over the <math>r_3</math> chords. The vertex motion is a [[w:Geodesic|geodesic]] circle orbit on the 3-sphere of a special kind: it does not lie in a central plane, its [[w:Winding_number|winding number]] is not 1 (it is 3 in this case), its circumference is not <math>2\pi</math>, and it moves in either a left or right handed circular spiral. We shall refer to such a chiral geodesic orbit as an ''isocline'', and to the skew polygram of its rotational chords as a ''Clifford polygon''.
The 16-cell is the simplest possible frame in which to [[16-cell#Rotations|observe 4-dimensional rotations]] because its characteristic rotations feature a single pair of invariant rotation planes. In the 16-cell an isoclinic rotation by 90° in any pair of invariant completely orthogonal square central planes takes every great square to its completely orthogonal great square in a twisting displacement, as the invariant planes tilt sideways 90° into each other's plane while rotating 90° internally. All the vertices move at once along the same circular helix geodesic isocline, displaced 90° in 8 orthogonal directions, and the rigid 16-cell assumes a new orientation in 4-space. When the 90° isoclinic rotation is continued in the same rotational direction through an additional 90°, each vertex is again displaced 90°, but from the new orientation in a direction orthogonal to its first 90° displacement. The rotational curve over each 90° <math>r_3</math> chord makes three 45° turns. In 360° of isoclinic rotation over four <math>r_3</math> chords, each vertex makes six 90° turns and reaches its antipodal position.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 90° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-eighth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over eight <math>r_3</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the four <math>r_2</math> edges of a great square in one of the two moving invariant rotation planes. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 16-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Hypercubes ==
The long diameter of the unit-edge [[W:Hypercube|hypercube]] of dimension <math>n</math> is <math>\sqrt{n}</math>, so the unit-edge [[w:Tesseract|4-hypercube, the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract,]] has chords:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
Uniquely in its 4-dimensional case, the hypercube's edge length equals its radius, like the hexagon. We call such polytopes ''radially equilateral'', because they can be constructed from equilateral triangles which meet at their center, each contributing two radii and an edge. The [[w:Cuboctahedron|cuboctahedron]] and the 24-cell are also radially equilateral.
[[File:8-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 16-point (8-cell) tesseract <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation about a plane in 4-space.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The stationary plane bisects the figure from front-left to back-right and top to bottom.]]
The [[W:Tesseract|tesseract]] is the [[W:Regular convex 4-polytope|regular convex 4-polytope]] with [[W:Schläfli symbol|Schläfli symbol]] <small><math>\{4,3,3\}</math></small>. It has 16 vertices, 32 edges, 24 square faces, and 8 cube cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cube.
The 16-point tesseract is the convex hull of a compound of two 8-point 16-cells, in exact dimensional analogy to the way the 8-point cube is the convex hull of a [[W:Stellated octahedron|compound of two 4-point regular tetrahedra]]. The [[W:Demihypercube|demihypercubes]] occupy alternate vertices of the hypercubes. The diagonals of the square faces of the unit-edge, unit-radius tesseract are the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> edges of two unit-radius 16-cells, also the edges of the square central planes.
We can rotate the tesseract isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on both alternate-position 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cell. The two skew {8/3} octagram Clifford polygons lie on two disjoint isoclines of the same chirality. Two [[w:Clifford_parallel|Clifford parallel]] octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular double helix which visits each vertex once.
The tesseract is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 16-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew octagon, but the tesseract is a construct of 4 Petrie octagons with disjoint sets of 8 tesseract edges each. We can construct the tesseract by skewing two planar octagons. Because the tesseract is radially equilateral (unlike the 16-cell), we use two octagons of unit-edge length to build the unit-radius tesseract. To start we embed the planar octagons in 4-space at the same point and make them completely orthogonal. Then we skew each planar octagon into a cube, so we have a compound of two completely orthogonal cubes. Provided we skewed them both in the same direction, the 16 vertices will be the vertices of a tesseract with half its 32 edges missing.
Because the tesseract contains two 16-cells in alternate positions it has two sets of 6 orthogonal square central planes. Two angles are required to specify the relationship between two planes in 4-space. Pairs of square central planes within each 16-cell are 90° apart in one angle, and either 0° or 90° apart in the other angle. They are 90° apart in both angles if and only if they are completely orthogonal planes, 90° apart by isoclinic rotation, with no vertices in common. Otherwise they are 0° apart in one of the angles, 90° apart by simple rotation, and they intersect in one axis and lie in a common 3-dimensional hyperplane.{{Efn|A double rotation in which one of the two angles of rotation is 0°, so that one of the completely orthogonal invariant planes does not rotate, is called a simple rotation. Ordinary rotations observed in a 3-dimensional space are simple rotations.|name=simple rotations}}
A pair of square central planes from alternate-position 16-cells are 60° apart by isoclinic rotation, with their corresponding vertices 120° apart. The planes are not orthogonal or parallel, so they intersect in a line somewhere, but they have no vertices in common, they have no 3-dimensional hyperplane in common, and they cannot reach each other by simple rotation. Such pairs of objects are called [[W:Clifford parallel|Clifford parallel]] because all their corresponding pairs of vertices are the same distance apart, although they are not parallel in the usual sense, because they have a common center. Not only the alternate-position 16-cells' corresponding square central planes, but also the 16-cells themselves, are Clifford parallel objects. More generally, multiple disjoint instances of a 4-polytope which compound to make a larger 4-polytope are Clifford parallel objects.
== The 24-cell ==
[[File:24-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the radially equilateral 24-cell, showing its 3 great circle polygons and its 4 chord lengths.]]
In 2-space we have the radially equilateral 6-point hexagon. In 3-space we have the radially equilateral 12-point cuboctahedron, with 4 hexagonal central planes. In 4-space we have the radially equilateral 24-point 24-cell, with 12 cuboctahedron central hyperplanes and 16 hexagonal central planes.
The [[24-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small>. It has 24 vertices, 96 edges, 96 equilateral triangle faces, and 24 octahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the cuboctahedron.
The 24-cell has the same chord set as the 4-hypercube tesseract:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{2},r_3=\sqrt{3},r_4=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[File:dodecagon24cell.png|thumb|Orthogonal projection of half a 24-cell to the [[24-cell#Geodesics|F<sub>4</sub> Coxeter plane]]. Only one Petrie dodecagon {12} of the 24-cell is shown. In a unit-radius 24-cell, all black lines are 24-cell edges of unit length, also tesseract edges. The two disjoint hexagons lie in Clifford parallel central planes. Blue chords are <math>\sqrt{2}</math> 16-cell edges, also isocline chords in square rotations. Green chords are <math>\sqrt{3}</math> distances between corresponding vertices of two 16-cells, also isocline chords in hexagonal rotations.]]
The 24-cell is [[W:Dual polytope|self-dual]], like the regular polygons and regular simplexes. It is the maximal regular construct of triangles and squares (with no pentagons). It is the convex hull of a compound of three disjoint 8-point 16-cells, rotated 60° isoclinically with respect to each other. Each of the three pairs of 16-cells is a tesseract. Each 24-cell edge is also a tesseract edge. The corresponding vertices of two 16-cells or two tesseracts are 120° apart by a <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chord. Each tesseract has 8 cube cells, and each cube has four <math>\sqrt{3}</math> long diameters. The <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords joining the corresponding vertices of two tesseracts belong to the third tesseract as cell long diameters.
The 24-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular dodecagon {12}, which has chords:
:<math>r_1=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}-1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 0.518,r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\tfrac{\sqrt{3}+1}{\sqrt{2}} \approx 1.932,r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
The <math>r_1</math> and <math>r_5</math> chords of the planar dodecagon do not occur in the 24-cell, which is a construct of eight skew dodecagons with disjoint sets of twelve <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges each. In the skew dodecagons the chord lengths are:
:<math>r_1=\sqrt{1},r_2=\sqrt{1},r_3=\sqrt{2},r_4=\sqrt{3},r_5=\sqrt{3},r_6=\sqrt{4}</math>
[[Image:24-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 24-point 24-cell <small><math>\{3,4,3\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2007}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 24 octahedra is visible.]]
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 30° turns.
We can rotate the 24-cell isoclinically the way we rotated the 16-cell, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on all three 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation in invariant square central planes each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit the vertex positions of the other 16-cells. Three Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular triple helix that visits each vertex once.
We can also rotate the 24-cell isoclinically by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. A complete hexagonal isoclinic revolution requires 720° like a complete square isoclinic revolution, but it is completed in 12 isoclinic displacements of 60° each rather than 8 isoclinic displacements of 90° each. The Clifford polygon of the hexagon rotation is a skew {12/5} dodecagram of green <math>r_5</math> chords, visible in the orthogonal projection. The rotational curve over each 120° <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 30° turns. Two Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular double helix that visits each vertex once.
In the 24-cell an isoclinic rotation by 60° in any invariant hexagon central plane takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 60° while rotating 60° internally. It also takes every great square to a Clifford parallel great square in a different 16-cell. All 24 vertices move at once on two Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 120° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 60° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-twelfth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over twelve <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane twice, over the six <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of a great hexagon in a moving invariant rotation plane. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 24-cell returns to its original orientation.
== The 600-cell ==
[[Image:600-cell.gif|thumb|Orthographic projection of the 120-point 600-cell <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small> performing a simple rotation.{{Sfn|Hise|2011}} The 3-dimensional surface made of 600 tetrahedra is visible. Invisible in this rendering are 25 inscribed instances of the 24-cell (above), which occur in the 600-cell as interior boundary envelopes.]]
The [[600-cell]] is the regular convex 4-polytope with Schläfli symbol <small><math>\{3,3,5\}</math></small>. It has 120 vertices, 720 edges, 1200 equilateral triangle faces, and 600 tetrahedron cells. It is the four-dimensional analogue of the icosahedron.
The 600-cell rounds out the 24-cell by adding 96 more vertices between the 24-cell's existing 24 vertices, in effect adding twenty-four more 24-cells inscribed in the 600-cell. The new surface thus formed is a honeycomb of smaller, more numerous cells: tetrahedra of edge length <math>\phi^{-1} \approx 0.618</math> instead of octahedra of edge length <math>\sqrt{1}</math>. It encloses the <math>\sqrt{1}</math> edges of the 24-cells, which become invisible interior chords in the 600-cell, like the <math>\sqrt{2}</math> and <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords.
Since the tetrahedra are made of shorter triangle edges than the octahedra (by a factor of <math>\phi^{-1}</math>, the inverse golden ratio), the 600-cell is not radially equilateral like the 24-cell and the tesseract. Like them it is radially triangular in a special way, but one in which [[w:Golden_triangle_(mathematics)|golden triangles]] rather than equilateral triangles meet at the center.
In 2-space we have the ''radially golden'' [[W:Decagon#The golden ratio in decagon|regular decagon]]. In 3-space we have the radially golden 30-point [[W:icosidodecahedron|icosidodecahedron]], with 6 decagon central planes. In 4-space we have the radially golden 120-point 600-cell, with 60 icosidodecahedron central hyperplanes and 72 decagon central planes.
[[File:600-cell vertex geometry.png|thumb|Planar geometry of the 600-cell, showing its 5 regular great circle polygons and its 8 chord lengths with angles of arc. The golden ratio governs the fractional roots of every other chord, and the radial golden triangles which meet at the center.|400x400px]]
The 600-cell's Petrie polygon is the regular [[w:Triacontagon|triacontagon {30}]]. The unit-radius planar {30}-gon has these distinct chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.209</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.416</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 0.813</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.338</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \cos (\tfrac{7\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.486</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \cos (\tfrac{4\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.827</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \cos (\tfrac{2\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.956</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \cos (\tfrac{\pi}{15}/2) \approx 1.989</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Only the chord lengths <math>r_3</math>, <math>r_5</math>, <math>r_6</math>, <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, <math>r_9</math>, <math>r_{10}</math>, <math>r_{12}</math>, <math>r_{15}</math> occur in the 600-cell, which is a construct of 24 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_3</math>, six of which intersect in each icosahedral vertex figure. The skew {30}-gons have these chords:
:<math>r_1=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_2=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_3=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_4=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{5}/2)=1/\phi \approx 0.618</math>
:<math>r_5=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{1}</math>
:<math>r_6=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{3-\phi} \approx 1.176</math>
:<math>r_7=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_8=2 \sin (\tfrac{\pi}{2}/2)=\sqrt{2}</math>
:<math>r_9=2 \sin (\tfrac{3\pi}{5}/2)=\phi \approx 1.618</math>
:<math>r_{10}=2 \sin (\tfrac{2\pi}{3}/2)=\sqrt{3}</math>
:<math>r_{11}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{12}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{13}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{14}=2 \sin (\tfrac{4\pi}{5}/2)=\sqrt{2+\phi} \approx 1.902</math>
:<math>r_{15}=2 \sin (\pi/2)=\sqrt{4}</math>
Where chords are the same length, they are distinct only in the context of a rotation. The rotational curve over each <math>r_i</math> chord makes <math>i</math> 12° turns.
We can rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing 16-cell edges, by 90° in two completely orthogonal invariant square central planes, with the same effect on 15 disjoint 16-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from all 8 vertex positions of its 16-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit other 16-cell vertex positions. Fifteen Clifford parallel octagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>6\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{2}</math> chords form a circular helix of fifteen twisted strands that visits each vertex once.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing 24-cell edges, by 60° in an invariant hexagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane, with the same effect on 5 disjoint 24-cells. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 12 vertex positions of its 24-cell just once and returns to its original position, but it does not visit other 24-cell vertex positions. Ten Clifford parallel dodecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>10\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{3}</math> chords form a circular helix of ten twisted strands that visits each vertex once.
We can also rotate the 600-cell isoclinically in invariant planes containing its own edges, by 36° in an invariant decagon central plane and its completely orthogonal invariant central plane. The Clifford polygon of the decagon rotation is a skew {15/4} pentadecagram of <math>r_5</math> chords. Successive <math>r_5</math> chords are edges of different 24-cells. The rotational curve over each <math>r_5</math> chord makes five 12° turns. Eight Clifford parallel pentadecagon geodesic isoclines of circumference <math>5\pi</math> over <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords form a circular helix of eight twisted strands that visits each vertex once.
In the 600-cell an isoclinic rotation by 36° in any invariant decagon central plane takes every great decagon to a Clifford parallel great decagon in a twisting displacement, as all the central planes tilt sideways 36° while rotating 36° internally. It also takes every great hexagon to a Clifford parallel great hexagon, and every great square to a Clifford parallel great square. All 120 vertices move at once on eight Clifford parallel geodesic isoclines, displaced 60° in different directions.
The trajectory of each vertex over each 36° isoclinic rotational displacement is a one-fifteenth segment of its geodesic orbit. Its entire orbit traces an isocline circle in 4-space over 15 <math>\sqrt{1}</math> chords, and also traces an ordinary great circle in the plane 3 times, over the 5 edges of a great pentagon in a moving invariant rotation plane. In the course of a 720° isoclinic rotation each vertex departs from 15 vertex positions just once and returns to its original position, and the 600-cell returns to its original orientation.
== Finally the 120-cell ==
...
The 120-cell is the [[W:Dual polytope|dual polytope]] of the 600-cell. They have the same Petrie polygon, the regular skew triacontagon {30}, but the 120-cell is a construct of 40 Petrie {30}-gons of edge length <math>r_1</math>, two of which intersect in each tetrahedral vertex figure.
== Conclusions ==
Fontaine and Hurley's discovery is more than a geometric formula for the reciprocal of a regular ''n''-polygon diagonal. It also yields the discrete sequence of isocline chords of the distinct isoclinic rotation characteristic of a ''d''-dimensional polytope. The characteristic rotational chord sequence of the ''d''-polytope can be represented geometrically in two dimensions on a distinct star polygon, but it lies on a geodesic circle through ''d''-dimensional space. Fontaine and Hurley discovered the geodesic topology of polytopes generally. Their procedure will reveal the geodesics of arbitrary non-uniform polytopes, since it can be applied to a polytope of any dimensionality and irregularity, by first fitting the polytope to the smallest regular polygon whose chords include its chords.
The discovery of a chordal construction for discrete isoclinic rotations generally closes the circuit on Kappraff and Adamson's discovery of a rotational connection between dynamical systems, Steinbach's golden fields, and Coxeter's Euclidean geometry of ''n'' dimensions. Application of the Fontaine and Hurley procedure in higher-dimensional spaces demonstrates why the connection exists: because polytope sequences generally, from Steinbach's golden polygon chord sequences, to chord sequences in isoclinic rotation helixes, to subsumption relations in the sequence of regular 4-polytopes, arise as expressions of the reflections and rotations of distinct Coxeter symmetry groups, when those various groups interact.
== Appendix: Sequence of regular 4-polytopes ==
{{Regular convex 4-polytopes|wiki=W:|columns=7}}
== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
== Citations ==
{{Reflist}}
== References ==
{{Refbegin}}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=1997 | title=Golden fields: A case for the Heptagon | journal=Mathematics Magazine | volume=70 | issue=Feb 1997 | pages=22–31 | doi=10.1080/0025570X.1997.11996494 | jstor=2691048 | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|1997}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last=Steinbach | first=Peter | year=2000 | title=Sections Beyond Golden| journal=Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music and Science | issue=2000 | pages=35-44 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2000/bridges2000-35.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Steinbach|2000}}}}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Jablan | first2=Slavik | last3=Adamson | first3=Gary | last4=Sazdanovich | first4=Radmila | year=2004 | title=Golden Fields, Generalized Fibonacci Sequences, and Chaotic Matrices | journal=Forma | volume=19 | pages=367-387 | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2005/bridges2005-369.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff, Jablan, Adamson & Sazdanovich|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Kappraff | first1=Jay | last2=Adamson | first2=Gary | year=2004 | title=Polygons and Chaos | journal=Dynamical Systems and Geometric Theories | url=https://archive.bridgesmathart.org/2001/bridges2001-67.pdf | ref={{SfnRef|Kappraff & Adamson|2004}} }}
* {{Cite journal | last1=Fontaine | first1=Anne | last2=Hurley | first2=Susan | year=2006 | title=Proof by Picture: Products and Reciprocals of Diagonal Length Ratios in the Regular Polygon | journal=Forum Geometricorum | volume=6 | pages=97-101 | url=https://scispace.com/pdf/proof-by-picture-products-and-reciprocals-of-diagonal-length-1aian8mgp9.pdf }}
{{Refend}}
558hvywlnupl9i65q5orrnf8b4m3k84
User talk:PieWriter
3
327012
2812392
2810954
2026-06-01T02:17:28Z
Jtneill
10242
/* Displaying diffs on talk page */ new topic ([[mw:c:Special:MyLanguage/User:JWBTH/CD|CD]])
2812392
wikitext
text/x-wiki
==To do==
* [[Meme Theory and Semiotics]]
* Fix pages with errors from [[:Category:Hatnote templates with errors]]
* Fix CS1 errors at [[:Category:CS1 errors]]
== Biography ==
@[[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] I got confused when I saw the comments at Rfd, since the originator was not Wikiversity. Just to explain, I discussed this with Administrators as of how to incorporate this and how to use it. Since visual content appeals more to students than dull text, it looks like an idea to add questions like "Who invented what and what are the results" (just simply formulated). The biography should be expanded to meet the requirements. Feel free to contribute if you wish. Cheers [[User:Harold Foppele|Harold Foppele]] ([[User talk:Harold Foppele|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Harold Foppele|contribs]]) 11:48, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
:@[[User:Harold Foppele|Harold Foppele]] Can you show me who you discussed it with diffs? [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 12:00, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
::Since it is an email discussion, that would be inappropriate. But feel free to share your thoughts. [[User:Harold Foppele|Harold Foppele]] ([[User talk:Harold Foppele|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Harold Foppele|contribs]]) 12:47, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
== Pppery ==
Are you and Pppery the same user ? [[User:Harold Foppele|Harold Foppele]] ([[User talk:Harold Foppele|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Harold Foppele|contribs]]) 17:15, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
:@[[User:Pppery|Pppery]] Why don’t u answer that? [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 23:44, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
:: We are not. [[User:Pppery|Pppery]] ([[User talk:Pppery|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Pppery|contribs]]) 23:44, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
== Wikiversity scope, etc ==
It is very clear that Wikiversity is not Wikipedia.
You have probably worked out that Wikiversity is not a place where I am normally active. I am an active [[w:en:AFC]] reviewer, and follow drafts to Commons where I patrol for files which are not licenced correctly to load to Commons. That hobby work has led me here.
I appear unable to have an effect on the Wikiversity contributor who is treating this place as enWiki, and whose understanding of copyright law seems impossible to educate. I am grateful for your assistance in this endeavour.
I am not sure of the processes here. They appear to be more relaxed than enWiki, and are most assuredly less relaxed than Commons. The areas where I feel able to judge, professor (etc) profiles and copyright, I feel those here who administer the system, albeit with subtly different titles, might jump in with firm guidance. The other content, the educational content, I am wholly unable to judge.
I'm not sure what I am asking you to do, but I hoe that someone such as you, who has the administrative toolkit, might offer that firm education and guidance which seems to be required by our enthusiastic contributor. [[User:Timtrent|Timtrent]] ([[User talk:Timtrent|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Timtrent|contribs]]) 07:47, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
:@[[User:Timtrent|Timtrent]] Thank you for your message and for taking the time to look into this.
:Just to clarify, I’m not a curator/custodian on Wikiversity, so I don’t have access to any special tools beyond those of a regular contributor. That said, I’m totally agree with what you raised
:You’re right that Wikiversity operates somewhat differently from Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, however copyright policies are quite similar ([[WV:Copyrights]]).
:I have tried interacting with the user, but he just brushes me off, claiming that I am not a curator and thus implying my actions have no value.
:One suggestion is that we could file a report at [[WV:Request custodian action]] about a possible warning/block of the user, so the user understands the seriousness of their action. [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 07:54, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
::For some weird reason I thought you had the admin tools.
::The user is extremely pleasant, but just does not hear what is said. What I think is needed is for someone to brandish the mop and bucket and to inform them firmly where their path is mistaken. I see that as a precise, assertive, and friendly interaction prior to action. I can see a list of those here who have those rights, but I have no concept of whom to choose to ask (I don't quite feel as if formal action via a drama board is needed yet).
::I have double checked my file copyright thinking with [[w:en:User talk: Diannaa#Copyright advice at Wikiversity, please|an enWiki copyright expert]] who has confirmed all I have said regarding copyright.
::Would you mind choosing a suitable curator/custodian, please, and asking them for friendly and educational intervention? They will also be able to advise on scope, though Wikiversity is very clear on what it is not. If blocks have to happen I see that as a later phase. [[User:Timtrent|Timtrent]] ([[User talk:Timtrent|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Timtrent|contribs]]) 08:42, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
:::Pinging two reliable ones, @[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] and @[[User:MathXplore|MathXplore]]. [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 08:59, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
::::With good fortune and not a little diplomacy I think it is possible to educate this user into being a good citizen here. I hope sanctions are not needed. I think they have an abundance of good faith, and are simply having trouble converting their approach and thinking from the world of academe to the world of WMF. [[User:Timtrent|Timtrent]] ([[User talk:Timtrent|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Timtrent|contribs]]) 10:28, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
==Welcome==
{{Robelbox|theme=9|title='''[[Wikiversity:Welcome|Welcome]] to [[Wikiversity:What is Wikiversity|Wikiversity]], PieWriter!'''|width=100%}}
<div style="{{Robelbox/pad}}">
You can [[Wikiversity:Contact|contact us]] with [[Wikiversity:Questions|questions]] at the [[Wikiversity:Colloquium|colloquium]] or get in touch with [[User talk:Jtneill|me personally]] if you would like some [[Help:Contents|help]].
Remember to [[Wikiversity:Signature#How to add your signature|sign]] your comments when [[Wikiversity:Who are Wikiversity participants?|participating]] in [[Wikiversity:Talk page|discussions]]. Using the signature icon [[File:OOjs UI icon signature-ltr.svg]] makes it simple.
We invite you to [[Wikiversity:Be bold|be bold]] and [[Wikiversity|assume good faith]]. Please abide by our [[Wikiversity:Civility|civility]], [[Wikiversity:Privacy policy|privacy]], and [[Foundation:Terms of Use|terms of use]] policies.
To find your way around, check out:
<!-- The Left column -->
<div style="width:50.0%; float:left">
* [[Wikiversity:Introduction|Introduction to Wikiversity]]
* [[Help:Guides|Take a guided tour]] and learn [[Help:Editing|how to edit]]
* [[Wikiversity:Browse|Browse]] or visit an educational level portal:<br>[[Portal:Pre-school Education|pre-school]] | [[Portal:Primary Education|primary]] | [[Portal:Secondary Education|secondary]] | [[Portal:Tertiary Education|tertiary]] | [[Portal:Non-formal Education|non-formal]]
* [[Wikiversity:Introduction explore|Explore]] links in left-hand navigation menu
</div>
<!-- The Right column -->
<div style="width:50.0%; float:left">
* Read an [[Wikiversity:Wikiversity teachers|introduction for teachers]]
* Learn [[Help:How to write an educational resource|how to write an educational resource]]
* Find out about [[Wikiversity:Research|research]] activities
* Give [[Wikiversity:Feedback|feedback]] about your observations
* Discuss issues or ask questions at the [[Wikiversity:Colloquium|colloquium]]
</div>
<br clear="both"/>
To get started, experiment in the [[wikiversity:sandbox|sandbox]] or on [[special:mypage|your userpage]].
See you around Wikiversity! ---- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 12:33, 24 March 2026 (UTC)</div>
<!-- Template:Welcome -->
{{Robelbox/close}}
:<nowiki>:)</nowiki>[[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 12:35, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
== [[Wikiversity:Candidates for Curatorship/PieWriter]] ==
I've closed [[Wikiversity:Candidates for Curatorship/PieWriter]] as successful, and you've been given the curator rights. Congratulations! Please don't hesitate to ask any questions if you have any.
BTW, please make sure to add your name to [[Wikiversity:Support staff]]. —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 12:07, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
:Thanks and will do! [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 12:18, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
Congratulations. I've added you as custodian. --[[User:Mu301|mikeu]] <sup>[[User talk:Mu301|talk]]</sup> 16:57, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
:Thank you! [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 23:54, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
: Congrats. Reminder to update [[Wikiversity:Support staff]]. Note: {{u|Atcovi}} to mentor. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 00:11, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
::Will do! [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 00:12, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
== Test pages ==
Note that [[Fairy Rings/Database]] was not a test page, rather project page. [[User:Juandev|Juandev]] ([[User talk:Juandev|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Juandev|contribs]]) 14:10, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
:@[[User:Juandev|Juandev]] Oh, I didn’t notice that. I thought it was also a test page. Is it possible to undelete the page? [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 04:00, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
::Yes it is, try it @[[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]]. [[User:Juandev|Juandev]] ([[User talk:Juandev|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Juandev|contribs]]) 07:24, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Juandev|Juandev]] I tried but only custodians can undelete [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 10:55, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
::::I see, I am sorry, I dont have all rights for all flags in my mind. But now I see, it was not created in English, so lets leave it like that. Thank you for your time and dedication. [[User:Juandev|Juandev]] ([[User talk:Juandev|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Juandev|contribs]]) 18:43, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::Thanks! [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 23:25, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
== Displaying diffs on talk page ==
At some point I recall seeing you use a neat way of showing visual diffs in a discussion, with old on left and new on right. Do you remember how? -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 02:17, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
143z87c0rk6q8sbgb1dnd34cpuvxn5k
2812393
2812392
2026-06-01T02:22:31Z
PieWriter
3039865
/* Displaying diffs on talk page */ Reply
2812393
wikitext
text/x-wiki
==To do==
* [[Meme Theory and Semiotics]]
* Fix pages with errors from [[:Category:Hatnote templates with errors]]
* Fix CS1 errors at [[:Category:CS1 errors]]
== Biography ==
@[[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] I got confused when I saw the comments at Rfd, since the originator was not Wikiversity. Just to explain, I discussed this with Administrators as of how to incorporate this and how to use it. Since visual content appeals more to students than dull text, it looks like an idea to add questions like "Who invented what and what are the results" (just simply formulated). The biography should be expanded to meet the requirements. Feel free to contribute if you wish. Cheers [[User:Harold Foppele|Harold Foppele]] ([[User talk:Harold Foppele|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Harold Foppele|contribs]]) 11:48, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
:@[[User:Harold Foppele|Harold Foppele]] Can you show me who you discussed it with diffs? [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 12:00, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
::Since it is an email discussion, that would be inappropriate. But feel free to share your thoughts. [[User:Harold Foppele|Harold Foppele]] ([[User talk:Harold Foppele|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Harold Foppele|contribs]]) 12:47, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
== Pppery ==
Are you and Pppery the same user ? [[User:Harold Foppele|Harold Foppele]] ([[User talk:Harold Foppele|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Harold Foppele|contribs]]) 17:15, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
:@[[User:Pppery|Pppery]] Why don’t u answer that? [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 23:44, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
:: We are not. [[User:Pppery|Pppery]] ([[User talk:Pppery|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Pppery|contribs]]) 23:44, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
== Wikiversity scope, etc ==
It is very clear that Wikiversity is not Wikipedia.
You have probably worked out that Wikiversity is not a place where I am normally active. I am an active [[w:en:AFC]] reviewer, and follow drafts to Commons where I patrol for files which are not licenced correctly to load to Commons. That hobby work has led me here.
I appear unable to have an effect on the Wikiversity contributor who is treating this place as enWiki, and whose understanding of copyright law seems impossible to educate. I am grateful for your assistance in this endeavour.
I am not sure of the processes here. They appear to be more relaxed than enWiki, and are most assuredly less relaxed than Commons. The areas where I feel able to judge, professor (etc) profiles and copyright, I feel those here who administer the system, albeit with subtly different titles, might jump in with firm guidance. The other content, the educational content, I am wholly unable to judge.
I'm not sure what I am asking you to do, but I hoe that someone such as you, who has the administrative toolkit, might offer that firm education and guidance which seems to be required by our enthusiastic contributor. [[User:Timtrent|Timtrent]] ([[User talk:Timtrent|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Timtrent|contribs]]) 07:47, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
:@[[User:Timtrent|Timtrent]] Thank you for your message and for taking the time to look into this.
:Just to clarify, I’m not a curator/custodian on Wikiversity, so I don’t have access to any special tools beyond those of a regular contributor. That said, I’m totally agree with what you raised
:You’re right that Wikiversity operates somewhat differently from Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons, however copyright policies are quite similar ([[WV:Copyrights]]).
:I have tried interacting with the user, but he just brushes me off, claiming that I am not a curator and thus implying my actions have no value.
:One suggestion is that we could file a report at [[WV:Request custodian action]] about a possible warning/block of the user, so the user understands the seriousness of their action. [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 07:54, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
::For some weird reason I thought you had the admin tools.
::The user is extremely pleasant, but just does not hear what is said. What I think is needed is for someone to brandish the mop and bucket and to inform them firmly where their path is mistaken. I see that as a precise, assertive, and friendly interaction prior to action. I can see a list of those here who have those rights, but I have no concept of whom to choose to ask (I don't quite feel as if formal action via a drama board is needed yet).
::I have double checked my file copyright thinking with [[w:en:User talk: Diannaa#Copyright advice at Wikiversity, please|an enWiki copyright expert]] who has confirmed all I have said regarding copyright.
::Would you mind choosing a suitable curator/custodian, please, and asking them for friendly and educational intervention? They will also be able to advise on scope, though Wikiversity is very clear on what it is not. If blocks have to happen I see that as a later phase. [[User:Timtrent|Timtrent]] ([[User talk:Timtrent|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Timtrent|contribs]]) 08:42, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
:::Pinging two reliable ones, @[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] and @[[User:MathXplore|MathXplore]]. [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 08:59, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
::::With good fortune and not a little diplomacy I think it is possible to educate this user into being a good citizen here. I hope sanctions are not needed. I think they have an abundance of good faith, and are simply having trouble converting their approach and thinking from the world of academe to the world of WMF. [[User:Timtrent|Timtrent]] ([[User talk:Timtrent|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Timtrent|contribs]]) 10:28, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
==Welcome==
{{Robelbox|theme=9|title='''[[Wikiversity:Welcome|Welcome]] to [[Wikiversity:What is Wikiversity|Wikiversity]], PieWriter!'''|width=100%}}
<div style="{{Robelbox/pad}}">
You can [[Wikiversity:Contact|contact us]] with [[Wikiversity:Questions|questions]] at the [[Wikiversity:Colloquium|colloquium]] or get in touch with [[User talk:Jtneill|me personally]] if you would like some [[Help:Contents|help]].
Remember to [[Wikiversity:Signature#How to add your signature|sign]] your comments when [[Wikiversity:Who are Wikiversity participants?|participating]] in [[Wikiversity:Talk page|discussions]]. Using the signature icon [[File:OOjs UI icon signature-ltr.svg]] makes it simple.
We invite you to [[Wikiversity:Be bold|be bold]] and [[Wikiversity|assume good faith]]. Please abide by our [[Wikiversity:Civility|civility]], [[Wikiversity:Privacy policy|privacy]], and [[Foundation:Terms of Use|terms of use]] policies.
To find your way around, check out:
<!-- The Left column -->
<div style="width:50.0%; float:left">
* [[Wikiversity:Introduction|Introduction to Wikiversity]]
* [[Help:Guides|Take a guided tour]] and learn [[Help:Editing|how to edit]]
* [[Wikiversity:Browse|Browse]] or visit an educational level portal:<br>[[Portal:Pre-school Education|pre-school]] | [[Portal:Primary Education|primary]] | [[Portal:Secondary Education|secondary]] | [[Portal:Tertiary Education|tertiary]] | [[Portal:Non-formal Education|non-formal]]
* [[Wikiversity:Introduction explore|Explore]] links in left-hand navigation menu
</div>
<!-- The Right column -->
<div style="width:50.0%; float:left">
* Read an [[Wikiversity:Wikiversity teachers|introduction for teachers]]
* Learn [[Help:How to write an educational resource|how to write an educational resource]]
* Find out about [[Wikiversity:Research|research]] activities
* Give [[Wikiversity:Feedback|feedback]] about your observations
* Discuss issues or ask questions at the [[Wikiversity:Colloquium|colloquium]]
</div>
<br clear="both"/>
To get started, experiment in the [[wikiversity:sandbox|sandbox]] or on [[special:mypage|your userpage]].
See you around Wikiversity! ---- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 12:33, 24 March 2026 (UTC)</div>
<!-- Template:Welcome -->
{{Robelbox/close}}
:<nowiki>:)</nowiki>[[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 12:35, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
== [[Wikiversity:Candidates for Curatorship/PieWriter]] ==
I've closed [[Wikiversity:Candidates for Curatorship/PieWriter]] as successful, and you've been given the curator rights. Congratulations! Please don't hesitate to ask any questions if you have any.
BTW, please make sure to add your name to [[Wikiversity:Support staff]]. —[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 12:07, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
:Thanks and will do! [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 12:18, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
Congratulations. I've added you as custodian. --[[User:Mu301|mikeu]] <sup>[[User talk:Mu301|talk]]</sup> 16:57, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
:Thank you! [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 23:54, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
: Congrats. Reminder to update [[Wikiversity:Support staff]]. Note: {{u|Atcovi}} to mentor. -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 00:11, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
::Will do! [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 00:12, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
== Test pages ==
Note that [[Fairy Rings/Database]] was not a test page, rather project page. [[User:Juandev|Juandev]] ([[User talk:Juandev|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Juandev|contribs]]) 14:10, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
:@[[User:Juandev|Juandev]] Oh, I didn’t notice that. I thought it was also a test page. Is it possible to undelete the page? [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 04:00, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
::Yes it is, try it @[[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]]. [[User:Juandev|Juandev]] ([[User talk:Juandev|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Juandev|contribs]]) 07:24, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Juandev|Juandev]] I tried but only custodians can undelete [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 10:55, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
::::I see, I am sorry, I dont have all rights for all flags in my mind. But now I see, it was not created in English, so lets leave it like that. Thank you for your time and dedication. [[User:Juandev|Juandev]] ([[User talk:Juandev|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Juandev|contribs]]) 18:43, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::Thanks! [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 23:25, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
== Displaying diffs on talk page ==
At some point I recall seeing you use a neat way of showing visual diffs in a discussion, with old on left and new on right. Do you remember how? -- [[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] - <small>[[User talk:Jtneill|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Jtneill|c]]</small> 02:17, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
:@[[User:Jtneill|Jtneill]] Yeah, I did it with the help of a user script, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh/FormattedEditRequest [[User:PieWriter|PieWriter]] ([[User talk:PieWriter|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/PieWriter|contribs]]) 02:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
t6lei8au1iu6sdkbfzxsjta3wokvggb
Patriarch Ages Curious Numerical Facts Response
0
328204
2812330
2806922
2026-05-31T17:58:25Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* Demetrius the Chronographer */
2812330
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors
As shown in the following tables (While most values are obtained directly from the primary source texts listed in the header, the '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (53, 653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ==
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
==== The 502 Calculation ====
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 = 1200 + 9 = 1209</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) = 1201 + 40 = 1241</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \end{aligned}</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
cpvumr3hbq06nh0i32m8ui3nxxuz1pc
2812331
2812330
2026-05-31T18:05:40Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* Additional Textual Evidence */
2812331
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (53, 653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ==
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
==== The 502 Calculation ====
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 = 1200 + 9 = 1209</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) = 1201 + 40 = 1241</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \end{aligned}</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
tg9za9xwiy3h0ywby5edcjkcijnyltv
2812335
2812331
2026-05-31T18:36:17Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* The Birth of Shem (A Digression) */
2812335
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (53, 653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 = 1200 + 9 = 1209</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) = 1201 + 40 = 1241</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \end{aligned}</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
kgurgxc7jqvg6pumoa404sn8cr5cdb0
2812353
2812335
2026-05-31T23:25:23Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* Lectio Difficilior Potior */
2812353
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 = 1200 + 9 = 1209</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) = 1201 + 40 = 1241</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \end{aligned}</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
i4bn8ekuycrupzlr3egil3h8ifihvyh
2812355
2812353
2026-05-31T23:41:24Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection */
2812355
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 = 1200 + 9 = 1209</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) = 1201 + 40 = 1241</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \end{aligned}</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== The Masoretic text Variation ==
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Masoretic Text'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
t8dlamw6968w2vodgmrd74jqcadvkeo
2812360
2812355
2026-06-01T00:05:03Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* The Masoretic text Variation */
2812360
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 = 1200 + 9 = 1209</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) = 1201 + 40 = 1241</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \end{aligned}</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== The Masoretic text Variation ==
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Masoretic Text'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \end{aligned}</math>
* '''Masoretic Text (Adam to Exodus):'''
:<math display="block">(2800 - 46) - (349) - (652) + 215 = 2666 \text{ years}</math>
</div>
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
qo11k1smdwffhlwgdrpybmbns5ssl57
2812363
2812360
2026-06-01T00:23:48Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* The Masoretic text Variation */
2812363
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 = 1200 + 9 = 1209</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) = 1201 + 40 = 1241</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \end{aligned}</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== The Masoretic text Variation ==
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Masoretic Text'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \end{aligned}</math>
* '''Masoretic Text (Adam to Exodus):'''
:<math display="block">(2800 - 46) - (349) - (652) + 215 = 2666 \text{ years}</math>
</div>
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
sktepu7g9cvnjbruj5izroi9gp142q3
2812364
2812363
2026-06-01T00:25:11Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* The Masoretic text Variation */
2812364
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 = 1200 + 9 = 1209</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) = 1201 + 40 = 1241</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \end{aligned}</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== The Masoretic text Variation ==
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Masoretic Text'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \end{aligned}</math>
* '''Masoretic Text (Adam to Exodus):'''
:<math display="block">(2800 - 46) + (349) - (652) + 215 = 2666 \text{ years}</math>
</div>
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
g3w8es0rk5pszfqputbo6b06tsrf0nv
2812365
2812364
2026-06-01T00:27:18Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* The Masoretic text Variation */
2812365
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 = 1200 + 9 = 1209</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) = 1201 + 40 = 1241</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \end{aligned}</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== The Masoretic text Variation ==
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Masoretic Text'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \text{ years} \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \text{ years} \end{aligned}</math>
* '''Masoretic Text (Adam to Exodus):'''
:<math display="block">(2800 - 46) + (349) - (652) + 215 = 2666 \text{ years}</math>
</div>
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
ddbf6xqs1onl2kjjn8nfzqsfczz7bij
2812367
2812365
2026-06-01T00:36:14Z
Atcovi
276019
58% of just the first 15k characters were labelled as most likely to be AI-generated
2812367
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
{{AI-generated}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 = 1200 + 9 = 1209</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) = 1201 + 40 = 1241</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \end{aligned}</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== The Masoretic text Variation ==
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Masoretic Text'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \text{ years} \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \text{ years} \end{aligned}</math>
* '''Masoretic Text (Adam to Exodus):'''
:<math display="block">(2800 - 46) + (349) - (652) + 215 = 2666 \text{ years}</math>
</div>
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
g28h4hbf78paegq2yr008i7hfwmt43r
2812368
2812367
2026-06-01T00:39:46Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 */
2812368
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
{{AI-generated}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 &= 1200 + 9 \\
&= 1209
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) = 1201 + 40 = 1241</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \end{aligned}</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== The Masoretic text Variation ==
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Masoretic Text'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \text{ years} \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \text{ years} \end{aligned}</math>
* '''Masoretic Text (Adam to Exodus):'''
:<math display="block">(2800 - 46) + (349) - (652) + 215 = 2666 \text{ years}</math>
</div>
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
r12mkvyh3uv7gpoo8efzb09ryz4i370
2812369
2812368
2026-06-01T00:41:57Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 */
2812369
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
{{AI-generated}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 &= 1200 + 9 \\
&= 1209
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) &= 1201 + 40 \\
&= 1241</math>
\end{aligned}
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49
&= 2450</math>
\end{aligned}
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \end{aligned}</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== The Masoretic text Variation ==
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Masoretic Text'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \text{ years} \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \text{ years} \end{aligned}</math>
* '''Masoretic Text (Adam to Exodus):'''
:<math display="block">(2800 - 46) + (349) - (652) + 215 = 2666 \text{ years}</math>
</div>
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
1v7002se26ctoc6mlbq6a9rqhtc7zcn
2812370
2812369
2026-06-01T00:43:04Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 */
2812370
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
{{AI-generated}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 &= 1200 + 9 \\
&= 1209
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) &= 1201 + 40 \\
&= 1241
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49
&= 2450
\end{aligned}
</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \end{aligned}</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== The Masoretic text Variation ==
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Masoretic Text'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \text{ years} \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \text{ years} \end{aligned}</math>
* '''Masoretic Text (Adam to Exodus):'''
:<math display="block">(2800 - 46) + (349) - (652) + 215 = 2666 \text{ years}</math>
</div>
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
iuv1vyrp0y5kuig83a30pm3ccrak0tq
2812371
2812370
2026-06-01T00:44:36Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 */
2812371
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
{{AI-generated}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 &= 1200 + 9 \\
&= 1209
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) &= 1201 + 40 \\
&= 1241
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49 \\
&= 2450
\end{aligned}
</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \end{aligned}</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== The Masoretic text Variation ==
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Masoretic Text'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \text{ years} \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \text{ years} \end{aligned}</math>
* '''Masoretic Text (Adam to Exodus):'''
:<math display="block">(2800 - 46) + (349) - (652) + 215 = 2666 \text{ years}</math>
</div>
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
o5pflzhz66ndymgoc5wqv8fnxd6j687
2812376
2812371
2026-06-01T00:46:32Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
2812376
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 &= 1200 + 9 \\
&= 1209
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) &= 1201 + 40 \\
&= 1241
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49 \\
&= 2450
\end{aligned}
</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \end{aligned}</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== The Masoretic text Variation ==
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Masoretic Text'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \text{ years} \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \text{ years} \end{aligned}</math>
* '''Masoretic Text (Adam to Exodus):'''
:<math display="block">(2800 - 46) + (349) - (652) + 215 = 2666 \text{ years}</math>
</div>
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
74ch4bm7mql4k5df98wco24imy14uec
2812377
2812376
2026-06-01T00:51:51Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension */
2812377
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 &= 1200 + 9 \\
&= 1209
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) &= 1201 + 40 \\
&= 1241
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49 \\
&= 2450
\end{aligned}
</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49 \\
&= 2450 \text{ years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 &= 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7
&= 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40
&= 2800
\end{aligned}
</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== The Masoretic text Variation ==
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Masoretic Text'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \text{ years} \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \text{ years} \end{aligned}</math>
* '''Masoretic Text (Adam to Exodus):'''
:<math display="block">(2800 - 46) + (349) - (652) + 215 = 2666 \text{ years}</math>
</div>
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
7m3txqtzo595fda7m797213pxu82h3v
2812378
2812377
2026-06-01T00:52:37Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension */
2812378
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 &= 1200 + 9 \\
&= 1209
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) &= 1201 + 40 \\
&= 1241
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49 \\
&= 2450
\end{aligned}
</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49 \\
&= 2450 \text{ years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\text{(Base 49): } 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 &= 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7
&= 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } 70 \times 40
&= 2800
\end{aligned}
</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== The Masoretic text Variation ==
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Masoretic Text'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \text{ years} \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \text{ years} \end{aligned}</math>
* '''Masoretic Text (Adam to Exodus):'''
:<math display="block">(2800 - 46) + (349) - (652) + 215 = 2666 \text{ years}</math>
</div>
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
067kp5bu5oh21al8gh6q58vck7qifdc
2812379
2812378
2026-06-01T00:53:09Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension */
2812379
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 &= 1200 + 9 \\
&= 1209
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) &= 1201 + 40 \\
&= 1241
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49 \\
&= 2450
\end{aligned}
</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49 \\
&= 2450 \text{ years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 &= 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7
&= 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40
&= 2800
\end{aligned}
</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== The Masoretic text Variation ==
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Masoretic Text'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \text{ years} \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \text{ years} \end{aligned}</math>
* '''Masoretic Text (Adam to Exodus):'''
:<math display="block">(2800 - 46) + (349) - (652) + 215 = 2666 \text{ years}</math>
</div>
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
7m3txqtzo595fda7m797213pxu82h3v
2812380
2812379
2026-06-01T00:54:24Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension */
2812380
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 &= 1200 + 9 \\
&= 1209
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) &= 1201 + 40 \\
&= 1241
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49 \\
&= 2450
\end{aligned}
</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49 \\
&= 2450 \text{ years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 \\
&= 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7
&= 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 \\
&= 2800
\end{aligned}
</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== The Masoretic text Variation ==
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Masoretic Text'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \text{ years} \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \text{ years} \end{aligned}</math>
* '''Masoretic Text (Adam to Exodus):'''
:<math display="block">(2800 - 46) + (349) - (652) + 215 = 2666 \text{ years}</math>
</div>
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
tsunzs69g41sa521tyex02eaywsfinm
2812381
2812380
2026-06-01T00:54:56Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension */
2812381
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 &= 1200 + 9 \\
&= 1209
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) &= 1201 + 40 \\
&= 1241
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49 \\
&= 2450
\end{aligned}
</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49 \\
&= 2450 \text{ years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 \\
&= 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 \\
&= 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 \\
&= 2800
\end{aligned}
</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== The Masoretic text Variation ==
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Masoretic Text'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \text{ years} \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \text{ years} \end{aligned}</math>
* '''Masoretic Text (Adam to Exodus):'''
:<math display="block">(2800 - 46) + (349) - (652) + 215 = 2666 \text{ years}</math>
</div>
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
029r730z6ibntvphmxzvhnw0p4rbw34
2812382
2812381
2026-06-01T00:59:45Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension */
2812382
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 &= 1200 + 9 \\
&= 1209
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) &= 1201 + 40 \\
&= 1241
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49 \\
&= 2450
\end{aligned}
</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49 \\
&= 2450 \text{ years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 \\
&= 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 \\
&= 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 \\
&= 2800
\end{aligned}
</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== The Masoretic text Variation ==
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Masoretic Text'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">7^4 + 7^2 = 2401 + 49 = 2450 \text{ years}</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">\begin{aligned} \text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 = 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 = 2800 \text{ years} \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 = 2800 \text{ years} \end{aligned}</math>
* '''Masoretic Text (Adam to Exodus):'''
:<math display="block">(2800 - 46) + (349) - (652) + 215 = 2666 \text{ years}</math>
</div>
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
9ao17rfrcb0nb2u4g9v8pgk9mcsfnhh
2812383
2812382
2026-06-01T01:01:59Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* The Masoretic text Variation */
2812383
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{Original research}}
This page extends the mathematical insights presented in the 2017 article, [https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ ''Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs''] by Paul D. While the original article offers compelling arguments, this analysis provides additional evidence and demonstrates that the underlying numerical data is even more robust and systematic than initially identified.
== Summary of Main Arguments ==
The ages of the patriarchs in Genesis are not historical records, but are a symbolic mathematical structure. Key points include:
* '''Artificial Mathematical Design:''' Patriarchal lifespans and event years are based on symbolic or "perfect" numbers (such as 7, 49, and 60) rather than biological or historical reality.
* '''The Universal Flood as a Later Insertion:''' Evidence suggests the universal scope of Noah's Flood was a later addition to a patriarchal foundation story. This insertion disrupted the original timelines, forcing recalibrations in the Masoretic Text (MT), Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and Septuagint (LXX) to avoid chronological contradictions.
* '''Chronological Overlaps:''' In the original numerical framework (prior to recalibration for a universal flood), four patriarchs survived beyond the date of the Flood.
* '''Alignment with Sacred Cycles:''' The chronologies are designed to align significant events—such as the Exodus and the dedication of Solomon’s Temple—with specific "years of the world" (''Anno Mundi''), synchronizing human history with a divine calendar.
= ''Arichat Yamim'' (Long Life) =
Most of the patriarchs' lifespans in the Hebrew Bible exceed typical human demographics, and many appear to be based on rounded multiples of 101 years. For example, the combined lifespans of Seth, Enosh, and Kenan total '''2,727 years''' (27 × 101). Likewise, the sum for Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch is '''2,222 years''' (22 × 101), and for Methuselah and Noah, it is '''1,919 years''' (19 × 101).
This phenomenon is difficult to explain, as no known ancient number system features "101" as a significant unit. However, a possible explanation emerges if we assume the original chronographer arrived at these figures through a two-stage process: an initial prototype relying on Mesopotamian sexagesimal numbers, followed by a refined prototype rounded to the nearest Jubilee cycle.
In his 1989 London Bible College thesis, ''The Genealogies of Genesis: A Study of Their Structure and Function'', Richard I. Johnson argues that the cumulative lifespans of the patriarchs from Adam to Moses derive from a "perfect" Mesopotamian value: seven ''šar'' (7 × 3,600) or 420 ''šūši'' (420 × 60), divided by two. Using the sexagesimal (base-60) system, the calculation is structured as follows:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7\,\text{šar}}{2} &= \frac{420\,\text{šūši}}{2} \\ &= 210\,\,\text{šūši} \\
&= \left(210 \times 60 \,\text{years} \right) \\
&= 12,600 \, \text{years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
This 12,600-year total was partitioned into three allotments, each based on a 100-Jubilee cycle (4,900 years) but rounded to the nearest Mesopotamian ''šūši'' (multiples of 60).
==== Prototype 1: Initial "Mesopotamian" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #f0f4f7; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #009688;">
The initial "PT1" framework partitioned the 12,600-year total into three allotments based on 100-Jubilee cycles (rounded to the nearest ''šūši''):
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Six patriarchs allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''. This approximates 100 Jubilees (82 × 60 ≈ 100 × 49).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' These 17 patriarchs were also allotted a combined sum of '''82 ''šūši'' (4,920 years)'''.
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Methuselah, Lamech, and Noah were allotted the remaining '''46 ''šūši'' (2,760 years)''' (12,600 − 4,920 − 4,920).
</div>
----
==== Prototype 2: Refined "Jubilee" Allocation ====
----
<div style="background-color: #fdf7ff; padding: 15px; border-left: 5px solid #9c27b0;">
Because the rounded Mesopotamian sums in Prototype 1 were not exact Jubilee multiples, the framework was refined by shifting 29 years from the "Remainder" to each of the two primary groups. This resulted in the "PT2" figures as follows:
* '''Group 1 (Seth to Enoch):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 2 (Adam, plus Shem to Moses):''' Increased to '''4,949 years''' (101 × 49-year Jubilees).
* '''Group 3 (The Remainder):''' Decreased by 58 years to '''2,702 years''' (12,600 − 4,949 − 4,949).
</div>
----
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="width:100%; color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in a patriarch surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Prototype Chronologies (Age at death)
|-
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e0f2f1; border-bottom:2px solid #009688;" | PROTOTYPE 1<br/>(PT1)
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PROTOTYPE 2<br/>(PT2)
|-
| rowspan="6" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 1}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|45 šūši}}<br/><small>(2700)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2727</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|37 šūši}}<br/><small>(2220)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 15 <small>(900)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2222</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 6 <small>(360)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 365
|-
| rowspan="3" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 3}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|46 šūši}}<br/><small>(2760)</small></div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|32 šūši}}<br/><small>(1920)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2702</div>
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1919</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 14 <small>(840)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 783
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783
|-
| rowspan="18" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|Group 2}}</div>
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|82 šūši}}<br/><small>(4920)</small></div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|40 šūši}}<br/><small>(2400)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 16 <small>(960)</small>
| rowspan="18" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">4949</div>
| rowspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">2401</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 10 <small>(600)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 438
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 7 <small>(420)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 433
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|25 šūši}}<br/><small>(1500)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 8 <small>(480)</small>
| rowspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1525</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 464
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 4 <small>(240)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 239
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 230
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 148
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">{{nowrap|17 šūši}}<br/><small>(1020)</small></div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| rowspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | <div style="display:inline-block; transform:rotate(270deg);">1023</div>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 3 <small>(180)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 147
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Levi
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 137
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kohath
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 133
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Amram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 131
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 2 <small>(120)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | 120
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="2" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="6" | 210 šūši<br/><small>(12,600 years)</small>
|}
==Mesopotamian Derived Lifespans==
[[File:Diagram of the Supplementary Hypothesis.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|Diagram of the [[w:supplementary_hypothesis|supplementary hypothesis]], a popular model of the [[w:composition_of_the_Torah|composition of the Torah]]. The Priestly source is shown as '''P'''.]]
Many scholars believe the biblical chronology was developed by an individual or school of scribes known as the [[w:Priestly_source|Priestly source]] (see diagram). Deprived of a physical Temple, the Judean elite focused on transforming oral traditions into a permanent, 'portable' written Law. To do so, scribes likely adopted the prestigious sexagesimal (base-60) mathematical system of their captors, codifying a history that would command respect within a Mesopotamian intellectual context. The presence of these mathematical structures provides strong evidence that these lifespans were integrated into the biblical narrative during or shortly after the Babylonian captivity (c. 586–538 BCE).
The following comparison illustrates how the '''Prototype 1''' chronology utilized timespans found in the [[w:Sumerian_King_List|Sumerian King List (SKL)]]. The longest lifespans in this chronology—960 and 900 years—are figures well-represented as Sumerian kingship durations.
* '''16 ''šūši'' (960 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Kullassina-bel|Kullassina-bel]], [[w:Kalibum|Kalibum]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Adam, Jared, Methuselah, Noah
* '''15 ''šūši'' (900 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Zuqaqip|Zuqaqip]], [[w:Melem-Kish|Melem-Kish]], [[w:Ilku|Ilku]], [[w:Enmebaragesi|Enmebaragesi]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel
* '''10 ''šūši'' (600 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:Atab|Atab]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Shem
* '''7 ''šūši'' (420 years)'''
** SKL: [[w:En-tarah-ana|En-tarah-ana]], [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]]
** '''Prototype 1''': Arpachshad, Shelah
The precise alignment of these four distinct groupings suggests that the Prototype 1 Chronology was not merely inspired by Mesopotamian traditions, but was mathematically calibrated to synchronize with them. Notably, in his work ''[[w:Antiquities_of_the_Jews|Antiquities of the Jews]]'', [[w:Josephus|Flavius Josephus]] characterizes several pre-flood (antediluvian) patriarchs as having explicit leadership or ruling roles, further mirroring the regal nature of the Sumerian list.
==The Grouping of Adam==
The placement of Adam in Group 2 for lifespan allotments is surprising given his role as the first human male in the Genesis narrative. Interestingly, Mesopotamian mythology faces a similar ambiguity regarding the figure Adapa. In [[w:Apkallu#Uanna_(Oannes)_or_Adapa?|some inscriptions (click here)]], the word "Adapa" is linked to the first sage and associated with the first pre-flood king, Ayalu (often identified as [[w:Alulim|Alulim]]). In [[w:Adapa#Other_myths|other myths (click here)]], Adapa is associated with the post-flood king, [[w:Enmerkar|Enmerkar]].
In the [[w:Apkallu#Uruk_List_of_Kings_and_Sages|"Uruk List of Kings and Sages"]] (165 BC), discovered in 1959/60 in the Seleucid-era temple of Anu in Bīt Rēš, the text documents a clear succession of divine and human wisdom. It consists of a list of seven antediluvian kings and their associated semi-divine sages (apkallū), followed by a note on the 'Deluge' (see [[w:Gilgamesh_flood_myth|Gilgamesh flood myth]]). After this break, the list continues with eight more king-sage pairs representing the post-flood era, where the "sages" eventually transition into human scholars.
A tentative translation reads:
*During the reign of [[w:Alulim|'''Ayalu''', the king, '''Adapa''' was sage]].
*During the reign of [[w:Alalngar|'''Alalgar''', the king, '''Uanduga''' was sage]].
*During the reign of '''Ameluana''', the king, '''Enmeduga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Amegalana''', the king, '''Enmegalama''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeusumgalana''', the king, '''Enmebuluga''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Dumuzi''', the shepherd, the king, '''Anenlilda''' was sage.
*During the reign of '''Enmeduranki''', the king, '''Utuabzu''' was sage.
*After the flood, during the reign of '''Enmerkar''', the king, '''Nungalpirigal''' was sage . . .
*During the reign of '''Gilgamesh''', the king, '''Sin-leqi-unnini''' was scholar.
. . .
This list illustrates the traditional sequence of sages that parallels the biblical patriarchs, leading to several specific similarities in their roles and narratives.
==== Mesopotamian Similarities ====
*[[w:Adapa#As_Adam|Adam as Adapa]]: Possible parallels include the similarity in names (potentially sharing the same linguistic root) and thematic overlaps. Both accounts feature a trial involving the consumption of purportedly deadly food, and both figures are summoned before a deity to answer for their transgressions.
*[[w:En-men-dur-ana#Myth|Enoch as Enmeduranki]]: Enoch appears in the biblical chronology as the seventh pre-flood patriarch, while Enmeduranki is listed as the seventh pre-flood king in the Sumerian King List. The Hebrew [[w:Book of Enoch|Book of Enoch]] describes Enoch’s divine revelations and heavenly travels. Similarly, the Akkadian text ''Pirišti Šamê u Erṣeti'' (Secrets of Heaven and Earth) recounts Enmeduranki being taken to heaven by the gods Shamash and Adad to be taught the secrets of the cosmos.
*[[w:Utnapishtim|Noah as Utnapishtim]]: Similar to Noah, Utnapishtim is warned by a deity (Enki) of an impending flood and tasked with abandoning his possessions to build a massive vessel, the Preserver of Life. Both narratives emphasize the preservation of the protagonist's family, various animals, and seeds to repopulate the world. Utnapishtim is the son of [[w:Ubara-Tutu|Ubara-Tutu]], who in broader Mesopotamian tradition was understood to be the son of En-men-dur-ana, who traveled to heaven. Similarly, Noah is a descendant (the great-grandson) of Enoch, who was also taken to heaven.
==== Conclusion ====
The dual association of Adapa—as both the first antediluvian sage and a figure linked to the post-flood king Enmerkar—provides a compelling mythological parallel to the numerical "surprise" of Adam’s grouping. Just as Adapa bridges the divide between the primordial era and the post-flood world, Adam’s placement in Group 2 suggests a similar thematic ambiguity. This pattern is further reinforced by the figure of Enoch, whose role as the seventh patriarch mirrors Enmeduranki, the seventh king; both serve as pivotal links between humanity and the divine realm. Together, these overlaps imply that the biblical lifespan allotments were influenced by ancient conventions that viewed the progression of kingship and wisdom as a fluid, structured tradition rather than a strictly linear history.
==The Universal Flood==
In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, four pre-flood patriarchs—[[w:Jared (biblical figure)|Jared]], [[w:Methuselah|Methuselah]], [[w:Lamech (Genesis)|Lamech]], and [[w:Noah|Noah]]—are attributed with exceptionally long lifespans, and late enough in the chronology that their lives overlap with the Deluge. This creates a significant anomaly where these figures survive the [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Universal Flood]], despite not being named among those saved on the Ark in the biblical narrative.
It is possible that the survival of these patriarchs was initially not a theological problem. For example, in the eleventh tablet of the ''[[w:Epic of Gilgamesh|Epic of Gilgamesh]]'', the hero [[w:Utnapishtim|Utnapishtim]] is instructed to preserve civilization by loading his vessel not only with kin, but with "all the craftsmen."
Given the evident Mesopotamian influences on early biblical narratives, it is possible that the original author of the biblical chronology may have operated within a similar conceptual framework—one in which Noah preserved certain forefathers alongside his immediate family, thereby bypassing the necessity of their death prior to the deluge. Alternatively, the author may have envisioned the flood as a localized event rather than a universal cataclysm, which would not have required the total destruction of human life outside the Ark.
Whatever the intentions of the original author, later chronographers were clearly concerned with the universality of the Flood. Consequently, chronological "corrections" were implemented to ensure the deaths of these patriarchs prior to the deluge. The lifespans of the problematic patriarchs are detailed in the table below. Each entry includes the total lifespan with the corresponding birth and death years (Anno Mundi, or years after creation) provided in parentheses.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Bible Chronologies: Lifespan (Birth year) (Death year)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| 847 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 962 <br/><small>(460)<br/>(1422)</small>
| colspan="2" | 962 <br/><small>(960)<br/>(1922)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1556)</small>
| 720 <br/> <small>(587)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 969 <br/> <small>(687)<br/>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 969 <br/><small>(1287)<br/>(2256)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 783 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1437)</small>
| 653 <br/> <small>(654)<br/>(1307)</small>
| 777 <br/> <small>(874)<br/>(1651)</small>
| 753 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2207)</small>
| 723 <br/> <small>(1454)<br/>(2177)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(707)<br/>(1657)</small>
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1056)<br/>(2006)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 950 <br/> <small>(1642)<br/>(2592)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | The Flood
| colspan="2" | <small>(1307)</small>
| <small>(1656)</small>
| colspan="2" |<small>(2242)</small>
|}
=== Samaritan Adjustments ===
As shown in the table above, the '''Samaritan Pentateuch''' (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech while leaving their birth years unchanged (460 AM, 587 AM, and 654 AM respectively). This adjustment ensures that all three patriarchs die precisely in the year of the Flood (1307 AM), leaving Noah as the sole survivor.
While this mathematically resolves the overlap, the solution is less than ideal from a theological perspective; it suggests that these presumably righteous forefathers were swept away in the same judgment as the wicked generation, perishing in the same year as the Deluge.
=== Masoretic Adjustments ===
The '''Masoretic Text''' (MT) maintains the original lifespan and birth year for Jared, but implements specific shifts for his successors. It moves Methuselah's birth and death years forward by exactly '''one hundred years'''; he is born in year 687 AM (rather than 587 AM) and dies in year 1656 AM (rather than 1556 AM).
Lamech's birth year is moved forward by '''two hundred and twenty years''', and his lifespan is reduced by six years, resulting in a birth in year 874 AM (as opposed to 654 AM) and a death in year 1651 AM (as opposed to 1437 AM). Finally, Noah's birth year and the year of the flood are moved forward by '''three hundred and forty-nine years''', while his original lifespan remains unchanged.
These adjustments shift the timeline of the Flood forward sufficiently so that Methuselah's death occurs in the year of the Flood and Lamech's death occurs five years prior, effectively resolving the overlap. However, this solution is less than ideal because it creates significant irregularities in the ages of the fathers at the birth of their successors (see table below). In particular, Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech are respectively '''162''', '''187''', and '''182''' years old at the births of their successors—ages that are notably higher than the preceding patriarchs Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, and Enoch, who are respectively '''130''', '''105''', '''90''', '''70''', '''65''', and '''65''' in the Masoretic Text.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" | 67
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="2" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" | 53
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
|}
=== Septuagint Adjustments ===
In his article ''[https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/2017/08/24/some-curious-numerical-facts-about-the-ages-of-the-patriarchs/ Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]'', the author Paul D makes the following statement regarding the Septuagint (LXX):
<blockquote>“The LXX’s editor methodically added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begat his son. Adam begat Seth at age 230 instead of 130, and so on. This had the result of postponing the date of the Flood by 900 years without affecting the patriarchs’ lifespans, which he possibly felt were too important to alter. Remarkably, however, the editor failed to account for Methuselah’s exceptional longevity, so old Methuselah still ends up dying 14 years after the Flood in the LXX. (Whoops!)”</blockquote>
The Septuagint solution avoids the Samaritan issue where multiple righteous forefathers were swept away in the same year as the wicked. It also avoids the Masoretic issue of having disparate fathering ages.
However, the Septuagint solution of adding hundreds of years to the chronology subverts mathematical motifs upon which the chronology was originally built. Abraham fathering Isaac at the age of 100 is presented as a miraculous event within the post-flood Abraham narrative; yet, having a long line of ancestors who begat sons when well over a hundred and fifty significantly dilutes the miraculous nature of Isaac's birth.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
====The "Whoops Theory": A Digression====
Paul D.’s "Whoops Theory" suggests the LXX editor added 100 years to the age at which each patriarch begot his son, intending to "fix" the timeline, but somehow failed in the case of Methuselah. Fortunately, in addition to the biblical text traditions themselves, the writings of early chronographers provide insight into how these histories were developed. The LXX was the favored source for most Christian scholars during the early church period. Consider the following statement by Eusebius in his ''Chronicon'':
<blockquote>"Methusaleh fathered Lamech when he was 167 years of age. He lived an additional 802 years. Thus he would have survived the flood by 22 years."</blockquote>
This statement illustrates that Eusebius, as early as 325 AD, was aware of these chronological tensions. If he recognized the discrepancy, it is highly probable that earlier chronographers would also have been conscious of the overlap, suggesting it was not part of the earliest traditions but was a later development.
==== Demetrius the Chronographer ====
Writing in the late 3rd century BC (c. 221 BC), '''Demetrius the Chronographer''' stands as the earliest known witness to biblical chronological calculations. Despite the fragmentary nature of his work, his data remains pivotal; Demetrius explicitly calculated 2,264 years between the creation of Adam and the Flood, a total that inherently supports a longer chronology where Methuselah’s fathering age is '''187''' years rather than '''167'''.
In the original article's comments, a debate surfaced regarding this longer chronology and the '''187''' year fathering age for Methuselah. Paul D. defends his "Whoops Theory" by systematically challenging the validity of early witnesses, particularly those that support the longer timeline:
* '''Josephus:''' Characterized as being dependent on the Masoretic tradition rather than an independent witness.
* '''Pseudo-Philo:''' Dismissed entirely due to severe textual corruption (described as "a real mess").
* '''Julius Africanus:''' Questioned because his records survive only through a later intermediary, Syncellus.
* '''Demetrius:''' Rejected as a witness because his chronology contains an additional two years whose precise placement remains unknown.
* '''Codex Alexandrinus:''' Identified as the lone legitimate witness to the 187-year fathering age.
The dismissal of Julius Africanus due to his survival through an intermediary, or the disqualification of Demetrius based on a two-year uncertainty, is arguably overstated. As shown in the comparative tables below, there is remarkably little variation in the "LONG CHRONOLOGY" begettal ages. They are identical for Adam through Enoch, with some variation in the last few patriarchs prior to the flood.
The below reconstructed Demetrius chronology employs a plausible explanation for the 2-year discrepancy: the ambiguity surrounding the precise timing of the Flood in relation to the births of Shem and Arphaxad. As explored later in this resource, chronographers frequently differ on whether Arphaxad was born two years after the Flood (Gen 11:10) or in the same year—a nuance that can account for such variances without necessitating the rejection of the witness. Given that Demetrius operates within the longest known chronological framework, the suggestion that he utilized longer begettal ages for earlier patriarchs while failing to apply the correction for Methuselah—the very figure requiring it most in such an expanded timeline—is statistically and logically improbable.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
{{RoundBoxTop}}
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
=== Flood Adjustment Summary ===
In summary, there was no ideal methodology for accommodating a universal flood within the various textual traditions.
* In the '''Prototype 2''' chronology, multiple ancestors survive the flood alongside Noah. This dilutes Noah's status as the sole surviving patriarch, which in turn weakens the legitimacy of the [[w:Covenant_(biblical)#Noahic|Noahic covenant]]—a covenant predicated on the premise that God had destroyed all humanity in a universal reset, making Noah a fresh start in God's relationship with humanity.
* The '''Samaritan''' solution was less than ideal because Noah's presumably righteous ancestors perish in the same year as the wicked, which appears to undermine the discernment of God's judgments.
* The '''Masoretic''' and '''Septuagint''' solutions, by adding hundreds of years to begettal ages, normalize what is intended to be the miraculous birth of Isaac when Abraham was an hundred years old.
== Additional Textual Evidence ==
Because no single surviving manuscript preserves the original PT2 in its entirety, it must be reconstructed using internal textual evidence. As described previously, a primary anchor for this reconstruction is the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Seth-to-Enoch group (Group 1), which is preserved across nearly all textual traditions. Also, where traditions diverge from this sum, they do so in patterns that preserve underlying symmetries and reveal the editorial intent of later redactors, as shown in the following tables.
(The '''Armenian Eusebius''' chronology does not explicitly record lifespans for Levi, Kohath, and Amram. These specific values are assumed to be shared across other known ''Long Chronology'' traditions.)
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Individual Patriarch ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Individual Patriarch Lifespans)
|-
! rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | Patriarch
! colspan="1" rowspan = "2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (Armenian)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 800}} <br/>= 930
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|230 + 700}} <br/>= 930
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|105 + 807}} <br/>= 912
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|205 + 707}} <br/>= 912
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|90 + 815}} <br/>= 905
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|190 + 715}} <br/>= 905
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 840}} <br/>= 910
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|170 + 740}} <br/>= 910
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 830}} <br/>= 895
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 730}} <br/>= 895
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|62 + 900}} <br/>= 962
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
| {{nowrap|62 + 785}} <br/>= 847
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|162 + 800}} <br/>= 962
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|65 + 300}} <br/>= 365
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|165 + 200}} <br/>= 365
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|67 + 902}} <br/>= 969
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|187 + 782}} <br/>= 969
| {{nowrap|67 + 653}} <br/>= 720
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|167 + 802}} <br/>= 969
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|53 + 730}} <br/>= 783
| {{nowrap|182 + 595}} <br/>= 777
| {{nowrap|53 + 600}} <br/>= 653
| {{nowrap|188 + 565}} <br/>= 753
| {{nowrap|188 + 535}} <br/>= 723
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|502 + 448}} <br/>= 950
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|500 + 450}} <br/>= 950
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | {{nowrap|100 + 500}} <br/>= 600
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arpachshad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|35 + 403}} <br/>= 438
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|135 + 303}} <br/>= 438
| {{nowrap|135 + 400}} <br/>= 535
| {{nowrap|135 + 403}} <br/>= 538
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan (II)
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | —
| 460
| —
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 403}} <br/>= 433
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 303}} <br/>= 433
| {{nowrap|130 + 330}} <br/>= 460
| {{nowrap|130 + 406}} <br/>= 536
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|34 + 430}} <br/>= 464
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|134 + 270}} <br/>= 404
| {{nowrap|134 + 433}} <br/>= 567
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 209}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 109}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 209}} <br/>= 339
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|32 + 207}} <br/>= 239
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|132 + 107}} <br/>= 239
| {{nowrap|132 + 207}} <br/>= 339
| {{nowrap|135 + 207}} <br/>= 342
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|30 + 200}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|130 + 100}} <br/>= 230
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|130 + 200}} <br/>= 330
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|? + ?}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|29 + 119}} <br/>= 148
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|79 + 69}} <br/>= 148
| {{nowrap|179 + 125}} <br/>= 304
| {{nowrap|79 + 119}} <br/>= 198
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
| {{nowrap|70 + 75}} <br/>= 145
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|70 + 135}} <br/>= 205
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abraham
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|100 + 75}} <br/>= 175
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Isaac
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|60 + 120}} <br/>= 180
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jacob..Moses
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8; font-weight:bold; color:#555;" | {{nowrap|345 + 323}} <br/>= 668
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|560 + 114}} <br/>= 674
| colspan="1" | {{nowrap|345 + 328}} <br/>= 673
| colspan="2" | {{nowrap|345 + 324}} <br/>= 669
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! style="text-align:left; color:black;" | LIFESPAN<br/>DURATION<br/>SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| colspan="1" | 11,991
| colspan="1" | 13,551
| colspan="1" | 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
=== Samaritan Adjustment Details ===
As noted previously, the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) systematically reduces the total lifespans of Jared, Methuselah, and Lamech so that all three die precisely in the year of the Flood, leaving Noah as the sole survivor. The required reduction in Jared's lifespan was '''115 years'''. Interestingly, the Samaritan tradition also reduces the lifespans of later patriarchs by a combined total of 115 years, seemingly to maintain a numerical balance between the "Group 1" and "Group 2" patriarchs.
Specifically, this balance was achieved through the following adjustments:
* '''Eber''' and '''Terah''' each had their lifespans reduced by 60 years (one ''šūši'' each).
* '''Amram's''' lifespan was increased by five years.
This net adjustment of 115 years (60 + 60 - 5) suggests a deliberate schematic balancing.
=== Masoretic Adjustment Details ===
In the 2017 article, "[https://wordpress.com Some Curious Numerical Facts about the Ages of the Patriarchs]," Paul D. describes a specific shift in Lamech's death age in the Masoretic tradition:
<blockquote>"The original age of Lamech was 753, and a late editor of the MT changed it to the schematic 777 (inspired by Gen 4:24, it seems, even though that is supposed to be a different Lamech: If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech seventy-sevenfold). (Hendel 2012: 8; Northcote 251)"</blockquote>
While Paul D. accepts 753 as the original age, this conclusion creates significant tension within his own numerical analysis. A central pillar of his article is the discovery that the sum of all patriarchal ages from Adam to Moses totals exactly '''12,600 years'''—a result that relies specifically on Lamech living 777 years. To dismiss 777 as a late "tweak" in favor of 753 potentially overlooks the intentional mathematical architecture that defines the Masoretic tradition. As Paul D. acknowledges:
<blockquote>"Alas, it appears that the lifespan of Lamech was changed from 753 to 777. Additionally, the age of Eber was apparently changed from 404 (as it is in the LXX) to 464... Presumably, these tweaks were made after the MT diverged from other versions of the text, in order to obtain the magic number 12,600 described above."</blockquote>
==== ''Lectio Difficilior Potior'' ====
The principle of ''[[Wikipedia:Lectio difficilior potior|Lectio Difficilior Potior]]'' (the "harder reading is stronger") suggests that scribes tend to simplify or "smooth" texts by introducing patterns. Therefore, when reconstructing an earlier tradition, the critic should often favor the reading with the least amount of artificial internal structure. This concept is particularly useful in evaluating major events in Noah's life.
In the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) tradition, Noah is born in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:28,31%7Cversion=SPE Lamech’s 53rd year and Lamech dies when he is 653]. In the Septuagint tradition Lamech dies [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:31%7Cversion=AB when he is 753, exactly one hundred years later than the Samaritan tradition]. If we combine that with the 500-year figure for Noah's age at the birth of his sons, a suspiciously neat pattern emerges:
* '''Year 500 (of Noah):''' Shem is born.
* '''Year 600 (of Noah):''' The Flood occurs.
* '''Year 700 (of Noah):''' Lamech dies.
This creates a perfectly intervalic 200-year span (500–700) between the birth of the heir and the death of the father. Such a "compressed chronology" (500–600–700) is a hallmark of editorial smoothing. Applying ''Lectio Difficilior'', one might conclude that these specific figures (653, and 753) are secondary schematic developments rather than original data. In the reconstructed prototype chronology (PT2), it is proposed that Lamech's original lifespan was '''783 years'''—a value not preserved in any surviving tradition. Under this theory, Lamech's lifespan was reduced by six years in the Masoretic tradition to reach the '''777''' figure described previously, while Amram's was increased by six years in a deliberate "balancing" of total chronological years.
=== Armenian Eusebius Adjustments ===
Perhaps the most surprising adjustments of all are those found in the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology. Eusebius's original work is dated to 325 AD, and the Armenian recension is presumed to have diverged from the Greek text approximately a hundred years later. It is not anticipated that the Armenian recension would retain Persian-era mathematical motifs; however, when the lifespan durations for all of the patriarchs are added up, the resulting figure is 13,200 years, which is exactly 600 years (or 10 ''šūši'') more than the Masoretic Text. Also, the specific adjustments to lifespans between the Prototype 2 (PT2) chronology and the Armenian recension of Eusebius's Long Chronology appear to be formulated using the Persian 60-based system.
Specifically, the following adjustments appear to have occurred for Group 2 patriarchs:
* '''Arpachshad''', '''Peleg''', and '''Serug''' each had their lifespans increased by 100 years.
* '''Shelah''', '''Eber''', and '''Reu''' each had their lifespans increased by 103 years.
* '''Nahor''' had his lifespan increased by 50 years.
* '''Amram''' had his lifespan increased by 1 year.
=== Lifespan Adjustments by Group ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center;"
|+ Comparison of Chronological Traditions (Patriarch Group Lifespan Duration Sum)
|-
! rowspan="2" | Patriarch Groups
! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#f3e5f5; border-bottom:2px solid #9c27b0;" | PT2
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="2" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic<br/>(MT)
! style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan<br/>(SP)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint<br/>(LXX)
! style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius<br/>(325 AD)
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 1: Seth to Enoch<br/><small>(6 Patriarchs)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 3: Methuselah, Lamech, Noah<br/><small>(The Remainder)</small>
| style="font-weight:bold; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2702
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2696<br/><small>(2702 - 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2323<br/><small>(2702 - 379)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2672<br/><small>(2702 - 30)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 2642<br/><small>(2702 - 60)</small>
|-
| style="font-weight:bold; text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Group 2: Adam & Shem to Moses<br/><small>(The "Second Half")</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9; font-weight:bold;" | 4949
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4955<br/><small>(4949 + 6)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 4834<br/><small>(4949 - 115)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5930<br/><small>(4949 + 981)</small>
| style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 5609<br/><small>(4949 + 660)</small>
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:14px;"
! LIFESPAN DURATION SUM
| colspan="2" | 12,600
| 11,991
| 13,551
| 13,200
|}
<small>* '''Dash (—)''' indicates where primary sources do not provide complete death data.</small>
* '''The Masoretic Text (MT):''' This tradition shifted 6 years from the "Remainder" to Group 2. This move broke the original symmetry but preserved the '''4,949-year sum''' for the Group 1 block.
* '''The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP):''' This tradition reduced both Group 1 and Group 2 by exactly 115 years each. While this maintained the underlying symmetry between the two primary blocks, the 101-Jubilee connection was lost.
* '''The Septuagint (LXX):''' This tradition adds 981 years to Group 2 while subtracting 30 years from the Remainder. This breaks the symmetry of the primary blocks and subverts any obvious connection to sexagesimal (base-60) influence.
* '''The Armenian Eusebius Chronology:''' This tradition reduced the Remainder by 60 years while increasing Group 2 by 660 years. This resulted in a net increase of exactly 600 years, or '''10 ''šūši''''' (base-60 units).
The use of rounded Mesopotamian figures in the '''Armenian Eusebius Chronology''' suggests it likely emerged prior to the Hellenistic conquest of Persia. Conversely, the '''Septuagint's''' divergence indicates a later development—likely in [[w:Alexandria|Alexandria]]—where Hellenized Jews were more focused on correlating Hebrew history with Greek and Egyptian chronologies than on maintaining Persian-era mathematical motifs.
The sum total of the above adjustments amounts to 660 years, or 11 ''šūši''. When combined with the 60-year reduction in Lamech's life (from 783 years to 723 years), the combined final adjustment is 10 ''šūši''.
= It All Started With Grain =
[[File:Centres_of_origin_and_spread_of_agriculture_labelled.svg|thumb|500px|Centres of origin of agriculture in the Neolithic revolution]]
The chronology found in the ''Book of Jubilees'' has deep roots in the Neolithic Revolution, stretching back roughly 14,400 years to the [https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/ancient-bread-jordan/ Black Desert of Jordan]. There, Natufian hunter-gatherers first produced flatbread by grinding wild cereals and tubers into flour, mixing them with water, and baking the dough on hot stones. This original flour contained a mix of wild wheat, wild barley, and tubers like club-rush (''Bolboschoenus glaucus''). Over millennia, these wild plants transformed into domesticated crops.
The first grains to be domesticated in the Fertile Crescent, appearing around 10,000–12,000 years ago, were emmer wheat (''Triticum dicoccum''), einkorn wheat (''Triticum monococcum''), and hulled barley (''Hordeum vulgare''). Early farmers discovered that barley was essential for its early harvest, while wheat was superior for making bread. The relative qualities of these two grains became a focus of early biblical religion, as recorded in [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Lev.23:10-21 Leviticus 23:10-21], where the people were commanded to bring the "firstfruits of your harvest" (referring to barley) before the Lord:
<blockquote>"then ye shall bring a sheaf of the firstfruits of your harvest unto the priest: And he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord"</blockquote>
To early farmers, for whom hunger was a constant reality and winter survival uncertain, that first barley harvest was a profound sign of divine deliverance from the hardships of the season. The commandment in Leviticus 23 continues:
<blockquote>"And ye shall count unto you from the morrow after the sabbath, from the day that ye brought the sheaf of the wave offering; seven sabbaths shall be complete: Even unto the morrow after the seventh sabbath shall ye number fifty days; and ye shall offer a new meat offering unto the Lord. Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals; they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."</blockquote>
[[File:Ghandum_ki_katai_-punjab.jpg|thumb|500px|[https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.]]
These seven sabbaths amount to forty-nine days. The number 49 is significant because wheat typically reaches harvest roughly 49 days after barley. This grain carried a different symbolism: while barley represented survival and deliverance from winter, wheat represented the "better things" and the abundance provided to the faithful. [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Deu.16:9-10 Deuteronomy 16:9-10] similarly commands the people to count seven weeks from the time the sickle is first put to the standing grain, celebrating the feast on the fiftieth day.
This 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests was so integral to ancient worship that it informed the timeline of the Exodus. Among the plagues of Egypt, [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Exo.9:31-32 Exodus 9:31-32] describes the destruction of crops:
<blockquote>"And the flax and the barley was smitten: for the barley was in the ear, and the flax was bolled. But the wheat and the rye <small>(likely emmer wheat or spelt)</small> were not smitten: for they were not grown up."</blockquote>
This text establishes that the Exodus—God's deliverance from slavery—began during the barley harvest. Just as the barley harvest signaled the end of winter’s hardship, it symbolized Israel's release from bondage.
The Israelites left Egypt on the 15th of Nisan (the first month) and arrived at the Wilderness of Sinai on the 1st of Sivan (the third month), 45 days later. In Jewish tradition, the giving of the Ten Commandments is identified with the 6th or 7th of Sivan—exactly 50 days after the Exodus. Thus, the Exodus (deliverance) corresponds to the barley harvest and is celebrated as the [[wikipedia:Passover|Passover]] holiday, while the Law (the life of God’s subjects) corresponds to the wheat harvest and is celebrated as [[wikipedia:Shavuot|Shavuot]]. This pattern carries into Christianity: Jesus was crucified during Passover (barley harvest), celebrated as [[wikipedia:Easter|Easter]], and fifty days later, the Holy Spirit was sent at [[wikipedia:Pentecost|Pentecost]] (wheat harvest).
=== The Mathematical Structure of Jubilees ===
The chronology of the ''Book of Jubilees'' is built upon this base-7 agricultural cycle, expanded into a fractal system of "weeks":
* '''Week of Years:''' 7<sup>1</sup> = 7 years
* '''Jubilee of Years:''' 7<sup>2</sup> = 49 years
* '''Week of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>3</sup> = 343 years
* '''Jubilee of Jubilees:''' 7<sup>4</sup> = 2,401 years
The author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology envisions the entirety of early Hebraic history, from the creation of Adam to the entry into Canaan, as occurring within a Jubilee of Jubilees, concluding with a fiftieth Jubilee of years. In this framework, the 2,450-year span (2,401 + 49 = 2,450) serves as a grand-scale reflection of the agricultural transition from the barley of deliverance to the wheat of the Promised Land.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology]]
The above diagram illustrates the reconstructed Jubilee of Jubilees fractal chronology. The first twenty rows in the left column respectively list 20 individual patriarchs, with parentheses indicating their age at the birth of their successor. Shem, the 11th patriarch and son of Noah, is born in reconstructed year 1209, which is roughly halfway through the 2,401-year structure. Abram is listed in the 21st position with a 77 in parentheses, indicating that Abram entered Canaan when he was 77 years old. The final three rows represent the Canaan, Egypt, and 40-year Sinai eras. Chronological time flows from the upper left to the lower right, utilizing 7x7 grids to represent 49-year Jubilees within a larger, nested "Jubilee of Jubilees" (49x49). Note that the two black squares at the start of the Sinai era mark the two-year interval between the Exodus and the completion of the Tabernacle.
* The '''first Jubilee''' (top-left 7x7 grid) covers the era from Adam's creation through his 49th year.
* The '''second Jubilee''' (the adjacent 7x7 grid to the right) spans Adam's 50th through 98th years.
* The '''third Jubilee''' marks the birth of Seth in the year 130, indicated by a color transition within the grid.
* The '''twenty-fifth Jubilee''' occupies the center of the 49x49 structure; it depicts Shem's birth and the chronological transition from pre-flood to post-flood patriarchs.
{{RoundBoxTop}}
==== The Birth of Shem (A Digression) ====
Were Noah's sons born when Noah was 500 or 502?
While [https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.5:32 Genesis 5:32] states that "Noah was 500 years old, and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth," this likely indicates the year Noah ''began'' having children rather than the year all three were born. Shem’s specific age can be deduced by comparing other verses:
# Noah was 600 years old when the floodwaters came ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.7:6 Genesis 7:6]).
# Shem was 100 years old when he fathered Arpachshad, two years after the flood ([https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=Gen.11:10 Genesis 11:10])
'''The Calculation:''' If Shem was 100 years old two years after the flood, he was 98 when the flood began. Subtracting 98 from Noah’s 600th year (600 - 98) results in '''502'''. This indicates that either Japheth or Ham was the eldest son, born when Noah was 500, followed by Shem two years later. Shem is likely listed first in the biblical text due to his status as the ancestor of the Semitic peoples.
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
== The Mathematical relationship between 40 and 49 ==
As noted previously, the ''Jubilees'' author envisions early Hebraic history within a "Jubilee of Jubilees" fractal chronology (2,401 years). Shem is born in year 1209, which is a nine-year offset from the exact mathematical center of 1200. To understand this shift, one must look at a mathematical relationship that exists between the foundational numbers 40 and 49. Specifically, 40 can be expressed as a difference of squares derived from 7; using the distributive property, the relationship is demonstrated as follows:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
(7-3)(7+3) &= 7^2 - 3^2 \\
&= 49 - 9 \\
&= 40
\end{aligned}
</math>
The following diagram graphically represents the above mathematical relationship. A Jubilee may be divided into two unequal portions of 9 and 40.
[[File:Jubilee_to_Generation_Division.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram illustrating the division of a Jubilee into unequal portions of 9 and 40.]]
Shem's placement within the structure can be understood mathematically as the first half of the fractal plus nine pre-flood years, followed by the second half of the fractal plus forty post-flood years, totaling the entire fractal plus one Jubilee (49 years):
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Book_of_Jubilees_Early_Patriarchs_split.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of early Hebraic history as envisioned by the author of the ''Jubilees'' chronology with a split fractal framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan)'''
** Pre-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 - 1}{2} + 3^2 &= 1200 + 9 \\
&= 1209
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Post-Flood Patriarch years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\frac{7^4 + 1}{2} + (7^2 - 3^2) &= 1201 + 40 \\
&= 1241
\end{aligned}
</math>
** Total Years:
*:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49 \\
&= 2450
\end{aligned}
</math>
</div>
== The Samaritan Pentateuch Connection ==
Of all biblical chronologies, the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' share the closest affinity during the pre-flood era, suggesting that the Jubilee system may be a key to unlocking the SP’s internal logic. The diagram below illustrates the structural organization of the patriarchs within the Samaritan tradition.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Jubilees mathematical framework]]
=== Determining Chronological Priority ===
A comparison of the begettal ages in the above Samaritan diagram with the Jubilees diagram reveals a deep alignment between these systems. From Adam to Shem, the chronologies are nearly identical, with minor discrepancies likely resulting from scribal transmission. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, Shem, Ham, and Japheth are born in year 1207 (with Shem's reconstructed birth year as 1209), maintaining a birth position within the 25th Jubilee—the approximate center of the 49x49 "Jubilee of Jubilees."
This raises a vital question of chronological priority: which system came first? Shem’s placement at the center of the 49x49 grid suggests that the schematic framework of the Book of Jubilees may have influenced the Samaritan Pentateuch's chronology, even if the latter's narratives are older. It is highly probable that Shem's "pivot" position was an intentional design feature inherited or shared by the Samaritan tradition, rather than a coincidental alignment.
=== The 350-Year Symmetrical Extension ===
Post-flood begettal ages differ significantly between these two chronologies. In the Samaritan Pentateuch, the ages of six patriarchs at the birth of their successors are significantly higher than those in the ''Book of Jubilees'', extending the timeline by exactly 350 years (assuming the inclusion of a six-year conquest under Joshua, represented by the black-outlined squares in the SP diagram). This extension appears to be a deliberate, symmetrical addition: a "week of Jubilees" (343 years) plus a "week of years" (7 years).
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49 \\
&= 2450 \text{ years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 \\
&= 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 \\
&= 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 \\
&= 2800
\end{aligned}
</math>
</div>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Early Samaritan Chronology ===
To understand the motivation for the 350-year variation between the ''Book of Jubilees'' and the SP, a specific mathematical framework must be considered. The following diagram illustrates the Samaritan tradition using a '''40-year grid''' (4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks each):
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) contains 25 blocks, representing exactly '''1,000 years'''.
* '''The second cluster''' represents a second millennium.
* '''The final set''' contains 20 blocks (4x5), representing '''800 years'''.
Notably, when the SP chronology is mapped to this 70-unit format, the conquest of Canaan aligns precisely with the end of the 70th block. This suggests a deliberate structural design—totaling 2,800 years—rather than a literal historical record.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Samaritan Pentateuch'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
== The Masoretic text Variation ==
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Diagram of Hebraic history as presented in ''the Masoretic Text'' chronology, organized into a Generational (4x10 year blocks) mathematical framework]]
<div style="line-height: 1.5;">
* '''Book of Jubilees (Adam to Canaan):'''
:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
7^4 + 7^2 &= 2401 + 49 \\
&= 2450 \text{ years}
\end{aligned}
</math>
* '''Samaritan Pentateuch (Adam to Conquest):'''
:<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
\text{(Base 49): } & 7^4 + 7^3 + 7^2 + 7^1 \\
&= 2401 + 343 + 49 + 7 \\
&= 2800 \\ \text{(Base 40): } & 70 \times 40 \\
&= 2800
\end{aligned}
</math>
* '''Masoretic Text (Adam to Exodus):'''
:<math display="block">
(2800 - 46) + (349) - (652) + 215 = 2666 \text{ years}</math>
</div>
== Living in the Rough ==
[[File:Samaritan Passover sacrifice IMG 1988.JPG|thumb|350px|A Samaritan Passover Sacrifice 1988]]
As explained previously, 49 (a Jubilee) is closely associated with agriculture and the 49-day interval between the barley and wheat harvests. The symbolic origins of the number '''40''' (often representing a "generation") are less clear, but the number is consistently associated with "living in the rough"—periods of trial, transition, or exile away from the comforts of civilization.
Examples of this pattern include:
* '''Noah''' lived within the ark for 40 days while the rain fell;
* '''Israel''' wandered in the wilderness for 40 years;
* '''Moses''' stayed on Mount Sinai for 40 days and nights without food or water.
Several other prophets followed this pattern, most notably '''Jesus''' in the New Testament, who fasted in the wilderness for 40 days before beginning his ministry. In each case, the number 40 marks a period of testing that precedes a new spiritual or national era.
Another recurring theme in the [[w:Pentateuch|Pentateuch]] is the tension between settled farmers and mobile pastoralists. This friction is first exhibited between Cain and Abel: Cain, a farmer, offered grain as a sacrifice to God, while Abel, a pastoralist, offered meat. When Cain’s offering was rejected, he slew Abel in a fit of envy. The narrative portrays Cain as clever and deceptive, whereas Abel is presented as honest and earnest—a precursor to the broader biblical preference for the wilderness over the "civilized" city.
In a later narrative, Isaac’s twin sons, Jacob and Esau, further exemplify this dichotomy. Jacob—whose name means "supplanter"—is characterized as clever and potentially deceptive, while Esau is depicted as a rough, hairy, and uncivilized man, who simply says what he feels, lacking the calculated restraint of his brother. Esau is described as a "skillful hunter" and a "man of the field," while Jacob is "dwelling in tents" and cooking "lentil stew."
The text draws a clear parallel between these two sets of brothers:
* In the '''Cain and Abel''' narrative, the plant-based sacrifice of Cain is rejected in favor of the meat-based one.
* In the '''Jacob and Esau''' story, Jacob’s mother intervenes to ensure he offers meat (disguised as game) to secure his father's blessing. Through this "clever" intervention, Jacob successfully secures the favor that Cain could not.
Jacob’s life trajectory progresses from the pastoralist childhood he inherited from Isaac toward the most urbanized lifestyle of the era. His son, Joseph, ultimately becomes the vizier of Egypt, tasked with overseeing the nation's grain supply—the ultimate symbol of settled, agricultural civilization.
This path is juxtaposed against the life of Moses: while Moses begins life in the Egyptian court, he is forced into the wilderness after killing a taskmaster. Ultimately, Moses leads all of Israel back into the wilderness, contrasting with Jacob, who led them into Egypt. While Jacob’s family found a home within civilization, Moses was forbidden to enter the Promised Land, eventually dying in the "rough" of the wilderness.
Given the contrast between the lives of Jacob and Moses—and the established associations of 49 with grain and 40 with the wilderness—it is likely no coincidence that their lifespans follow these exact mathematical patterns. Jacob is recorded as living 147 years, precisely three Jubilees (3 x 49). In contrast, Moses lived exactly 120 years, representing three "generations" (3 x 40).
The relationship between these two "three-fold" lifespans can be expressed by the same nine-year offset identified in the Shem chronology:
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
3(49 - 9) &= 3(40) \\
147 - 27 &= 120
\end{aligned}
</math>
[[File:Three_Jubilees_vs_Three_Generations.png|thumb|center|500px|Jacob lived for 147 years, or three Jubilees of 49 years each as illustrated by the above 7 x 7 squares. Jacob's life is juxtaposed against the life of Moses, who lived 120 years, or three generations of 40 years each as illustrated by the above 4 x 10 rectangles.]]
Samaritan tradition maintains a unique cultural link to the "pastoralist" ideal: unlike mainstream Judaism, Samaritans still practice animal sacrifice on Mount Gerizim to this day. This enduring ritual focus on meat offerings, rather than the "grain-based" agricultural system symbolized by the 49-year Jubilee, further aligns the Samaritan identity with the symbolic number 40. Building on this connection to "wilderness living," the Samaritan chronology appears to structure the era prior to the conquest of Canaan using the number 40 as its primary mathematical unit.
=== A narrative foil for Joshua ===
As noted in the previous section, the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' structures the era prior to Joshua using 40 years as a fundamental unit; in this system, Joshua completes his six-year conquest of Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after the creation of Adam. It was also observed that the Bible positions Moses as a "foil" for Jacob: Moses lived exactly three "generations" (3x40) and died in the wilderness, whereas Jacob lived three Jubilees (3x49) and died in civilization.
This symmetry suggests an intriguing possibility: if Joshua conquered Canaan exactly 70 units of 40 years (2,800 years) after creation, is there a corresponding "foil" to Joshua—a significant event occurring exactly 70 Jubilees (3,430 years) after the creation of Adam?
<math display="block">
\begin{aligned}
49 - 9 &= 40 \\
70(49 - 9) &= 70(40) \\
3,430 - 630 &= 2,800
\end{aligned}
</math>
Unfortunately, unlike mainstream Judaism, the Samaritans do not grant post-conquest writings the same scriptural status as the Five Books of Moses. While the Samaritans maintain various historical records, these were likely not preserved with the same mathematical rigor as the ''Samaritan Pentateuch'' itself. Consequently, it remains difficult to determine with certainty if a specific "foil" to Joshua existed in the original architect's mind.
The Samaritans do maintain a continuous, running calendar. However, this system uses a "Conquest Era" epoch—calculated by adding 1,638 years to the Gregorian date—which creates a 1639 BC (there is no year 0 AD) conquest that is historically irreconcilable. For instance, at that time, the [[w:Hyksos|Hyksos]] were only beginning to establish control over Lower Egypt. Furthermore, the [[w:Amarna letters|Amarna Letters]] (c. 1360–1330 BC) describe a Canaan still governed by local city-states under Egyptian influence. If the Samaritan chronology were a literal historical record, the Israelite conquest would have occurred centuries before these letters; yet, neither archaeological nor epistolary evidence supports such a massive geopolitical shift in the mid-17th century BC.
There is, however, one more possibility to consider: what if the "irreconcilable" nature of this running calendar is actually the key? What if the Samaritan chronographers specifically altered their tradition to ensure that the Conquest occurred exactly 2,800 years after Creation, and the subsequent "foil" event occurred exactly 3,430 years after Creation?
As it turns out, this is precisely what occurred. The evidence for this intentional mathematical recalibration was recorded by none other than a Samaritan High Priest, providing a rare "smoking gun" for the artificial design of the chronology.
=== A Mystery Solved ===
In 1864, the Rev. John Mills published ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', documenting his time spent with the Samaritans in 1855 and 1860. During this period, he consulted regularly with the High Priest Amram. In Chapter XIII, Mills records a specific chronology provided by the priest.
The significant milestones in this timeline include:
* '''Year 1''': "This year the world and Adam were created."
* '''Year 2801''': "The first year of Israel's rule in the land of Canaan."
* '''Year 3423''': "The commencement of the kingdom of Solomon."
According to 1 Kings 6:37–38, Solomon began the Temple in his fourth year and completed it in his eleventh, having labored for seven years. This reveals that the '''3,430-year milestone'''—representing exactly 70 Jubilees (70 × 49) after Creation—corresponds precisely to the midpoint of the Temple’s construction. This chronological "anchor" was not merely a foil for Joshua; it served as a mathematical foil for the Divine Presence itself.
In Creation Year 2800—marking exactly 70 "generations" of 40 years—God entered Canaan in a tent, embodying the "living rough" wilderness tradition symbolized by the number 40. Later, in Creation Year 3430—marking 70 "Jubilees" of 49 years—God moved into the permanent Temple built by Solomon, the ultimate archetype of settled, agricultural civilization. Under this schema, the 630 years spanning Joshua's conquest to Solomon's temple are not intended as literal history; rather, they represent the 70 units of 9 years required to transition mathematically from the 70<sup>th</sup> generation to the 70<sup>th</sup> Jubilee:
:<math>70 \times 40 + (70 \times 9) = 70 \times 49</math>
=== Mathematical Structure of the Later Samaritan Chronology ===
The following diagram illustrates 2,400 years of reconstructed chronology, based on historical data provided by the Samaritan High Priest Amram. This system utilizes a '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 10 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,400''' after Creation.
The 70th generation and 70th Jubilee are both marked with callouts in this diagram. There is a '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''', which is composed of:
* The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness;
* The 6 years of the initial conquest;
* The 630 years between the conquest and the completion of Solomon’s Temple.
Following the '''676-year "Tabernacle" era''' is a '''400-year "First Temple" era''' and a '''70-year "Exile" era''' as detailed in the historical breakdown below.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Samaritan_Pentateuch_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Samaritan chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Book of Daniel states: "In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah, Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it" (Daniel 1:1). While scholarly consensus varies regarding the historicity of this first deportation, if historical, it occurred in approximately '''606 BC'''—ten years prior to the second deportation of '''597 BC''', and twenty years prior to the final deportation and destruction of Solomon’s Temple in '''586 BC'''.
The '''539 BC''' fall of Babylon to the Persian armies opened the way for captive Judeans to return to their homeland. By '''536 BC''', a significant wave of exiles had returned to Jerusalem—marking fifty years since the Temple's destruction and seventy years since the first recorded deportation in 606 BC. A Second Temple (to replace Solomon's) was completed by '''516 BC''', seventy years after the destruction of the original structure.
High Priest Amram places the fall of Babylon in year '''3877 after Creation'''. If synchronized with the 539 BC calculation of modern historians, then year '''3880''' (three years after the defeat of Babylon) corresponds with '''536 BC''' and the initial return of the Judeans.
Using this synchronization, other significant milestones are mapped as follows:
* '''The Exile Period (Years 3810–3830):''' The deportations occurred during this 20-year window, represented in the diagram by '''yellow squares outlined in red'''.
* '''The Desolation (Years 3830–3880):''' The fifty years between the destruction of the Temple and the initial return of the exiles are represented by '''solid red squares'''.
* '''Temple Completion (Years 3880–3900):''' The twenty years between the return of the exiles and the completion of the Second Temple are marked with '''light blue squares outlined in red'''.
High Priest Amram places the founding of Alexandria in the year '''4100 after Creation'''. This implies a 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning years 3900 to 4100). While this duration is not strictly historical—modern historians date the founding of Alexandria to 331 BC, only 185 years after the completion of the Second Temple in 516 BC—it remains remarkably close to the scholarly timeline.
The remainder of the diagram represents a 300-year "Second Temple Hellenistic Era," which concludes in '''Creation Year 4400''' (30 BC).
=== Competing Temples ===
There is one further significant aspect of the Samaritan tradition to consider. In High Priest Amram's reconstructed chronology, the year '''4000 after Creation'''—representing exactly 100 generations of 40 years—falls precisely in the middle of the 200-year "Second Temple Persian Era" (spanning creation years 3900 to 4100, or approximately 516 BC to 331 BC). This alignment suggests that the 4000-year milestone may have been significant within the Samaritan historical framework.
According to the Book of Ezra, the Samaritans were excluded from participating in the reconstruction of the Jerusalem Temple:
<blockquote>"But Zerubbabel, and Jeshua, and the rest of the chief of the fathers of Israel, said unto them, Ye have nothing to do with us to build an house unto our God; but we ourselves together will build unto the Lord God of Israel" (Ezra 4:3).</blockquote>
After rejection in Jerusalem, the Samaritans established a rival sanctuary on '''[[w:Mount Gerizim|Mount Gerizim]]'''. [[w:Mount Gerizim Temple|Archaeological evidence]] suggests the original temple and its sacred precinct were built around the mid-5th century BC (c. 450 BC). For nearly 250 years, this modest 96-by-98-meter site served as the community's religious center. However, the site was transformed in the early 2nd century BC during the reign of '''Antiochus III'''. This massive expansion replaced the older structures with white ashlar stone, a grand entrance staircase, and a fortified priestly city capable of housing a substantial population.
[[File:Archaeological_site_Mount_Gerizim_IMG_2176.JPG|thumb|center|500px|Mount Gerizim Archaeological site, Mount Gerizim.]]
This era of prosperity provides a plausible window for dating the final '''[[w:Samaritan Pentateuch|Samaritan Pentateuch]]''' chronological tradition. If the chronology was intentionally structured to mark a milestone with the year 4000—perhaps the Temple's construction or other significant event—then the final form likely developed during this period. However, this Samaritan golden age had ended by 111 BC when the Hasmonean ruler '''[[w:John Hyrcanus|John Hyrcanus I]]''' destroyed both the temple and the adjacent city. The destruction was so complete that the site remained largely desolate for centuries; consequently, the Samaritan chronological tradition likely reached its definitive form sometime after 450 BC but prior to 111 BC.
= The Rise of Zadok =
The following diagram illustrates 2,200 years of reconstructed Masoretic chronology. This diagram utilizes the same system as the previous Samaritan diagram, '''40-year grid''' (modeled on 4x10 year blocks) organized into 5x5 clusters (25 blocks per cluster), where each cluster represents exactly 1,000 years:
* '''The first cluster''' (outlined in dark grey) spans years '''2,000 to 3,000''' after Creation.
* '''The second cluster''' spans years '''3,000 to 4,000''' after Creation.
* '''The final set''' contains 5 individual blocks representing the period from '''4,000 to 4,200''' after Creation.
The Masoretic chronology has many notable distinctions from the Samaritan chronology described in the previous section. Most notable is the absence of important events tied to siginificant dates. There was nothing of significance that happened on the 70th generation or 70th Jubilee in the Masoretic chronology. The 40 years of wandering in the wilderness and Conquest of Canaan are shown in the diagram, but the only significant date associated with these events in the exodus falling on year 2666 after creation. The Samaritan chronology was a collage of spiritual history. The Masoretic chronology is a barren wilderness. To understand why the Masoretic chronology is so devoid of featured dates, it is important to understand the two important dates that are featured, the exodus at 2666 years after creation, and the 4000 year event.
[[File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Late_Era_40.png|thumb|center|500px|Schematic of later Hebraic history based on Masoretic chronology, demonstrating a generational mathematical framework.]]
The Maccabean Revolt (167–160 BCE) was a successful Jewish rebellion against the Seleucid Empire that regained religious freedom and eventually established an independent Jewish kingdom in Judea. Triggered by the oppressive policies of King Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the uprising is the historical basis for the holiday of Hanukkah, which commemorates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem after its liberation. In particular, Hanukkah celebrates the rededication of the Second Temple in Jerusalem, which took place in 164 BC, cooresponding to creation year 4000.
= Hellenized Jews =
Hellenized Jews were
ancient Jewish individuals, primarily in the Diaspora (like Alexandria) and some in Judea, who adopted Greek language, education, and cultural customs after Alexander the Great's conquests, particularly between the 3rd century BCE and 1st century CE. While integrating Hellenistic culture—such as literature, philosophy, and naming conventions—most maintained core religious monotheism, avoiding polytheism while producing unique literature like the Septuagint.
= End TBD =
'''Table Legend:'''
* <span style="color:#b71c1c;">'''Red Cells'''</span> indicate figures that could result in patriarchs surviving beyond the date of the Flood.
* <span style="color:#333333;">'''Blank Cells'''</span> indicate where primary sources do not provide specific lifespan or death data.
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Pre-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! rowspan="2" colspan="1" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Adam
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 230
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Seth
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 105
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 205
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enosh
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 90
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 190
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Kenan
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 170
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Mahalalel
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 66
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Jared
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 62
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 162
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Enoch
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 65
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 165
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Methuselah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 65
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 67
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 187
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 167 / 187
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Lamech
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 55
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#ffcdd2; color:#b71c1c; font-weight:bold; border:2px solid #ef5350;" | 53
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 188
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 182 / 188
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Noah
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 602
| rowspan="2" colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 600
| rowspan="2" colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shem
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:13px; text-align:center; table-layout:fixed;"
|+ Comparison of Post-Flood Chronological Traditions (Age at birth of son)
|-
! colspan="1" rowspan="2" | Patriarch
! colspan="3" style="background-color:#e3f2fd; border-bottom:2px solid #2196f3;" | SHORT CHRONOLOGY
! colspan="6" style="background-color:#fff3e0; border-bottom:2px solid #ff9800;" | LONG CHRONOLOGY
|-
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Jubilees <br/> (Jub)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Masoretic <br/> (MT)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#e3f2fd;" | Samaritan <br/> (SP)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Demetrius <br/> (204 BC)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Africanus <br/> (221 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Theophilus <br/> (192 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Septuagint <br/> (LXX)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Eusebius <br/> (325 AD)
! colspan="1" style="background-color:#fff3e0;" | Josephus <br/> (94 AD)
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | Pre-Flood
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 1656
| colspan="1" | 1309
| colspan="1" | 2264
| colspan="1" | 2262
| colspan="1" | 2242
| colspan="3" | Varied
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Arphaxad
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 66
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 35
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Cainan II
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 130
| colspan="2" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | -
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Shelah
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 71
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Eber
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 64
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 34
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 134
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Peleg
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 61
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="7" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Reu
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 59
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 32
| colspan="5" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 135
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Serug
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 57
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 30
| colspan="6" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 130
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 132
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Nahor
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 62
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 29
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79 / 179
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 79
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 120
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Terah
| colspan="9" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 70
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Abram
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 78
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 75
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Canaan
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 218
| colspan="8" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Egypt
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 238
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 430
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 215
|-
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; background-color:#f9f9f9;" | Sinai +/-
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | 40
| colspan="1" style="background-color:#f9f9f9;" | -
| colspan="3" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 46
| colspan="4" style="background-color:#e8e8e8;" | 40
|- style="background-color:#333; color:white; font-weight:bold; font-size:15px;"
! colspan="1" style="text-align:left; color:black;" | GRAND TOTAL
| colspan="1" | 2450
| colspan="1" | 2666
| colspan="1" | 2800
| colspan="1" | 3885
| colspan="1" | 3754
| colspan="1" | 3938
| colspan="3" | Varied
|}
== The Septuagint Chronology ==
=== The Correlations ===
An interesting piece of corroborating evidence exists in the previously mentioned 1864 publication by Rev. John Mills, ''Three Months' Residence at Nablus'', where High Priest Amram records his own chronological dates based on the Samaritan Pentateuch. Priest Amram lists the Flood date as 1307 years after creation, but then lists the birth of Arphaxad as 1309 years—exactly two years after the Flood—which presumably places Shem's birth in year 502 of Noah's life (though Shem's actual birth date in the text is obscured by a typo).
The internal tension in Priest Amram's calculations likely reflects the same two-year variance seen between Demetrius and Africanus. Priest Amram lists the birth years of Shelah, Eber, and Peleg as 1444, 1574, and 1708, respectively. Africanus lists those same birth years as 2397, 2527, and 2661. In each case, the Priest Amram figure differs from the Africanus value by exactly 953 years. While the chronology of Africanus may reach us through an intermediary, as Paul D. notes, the values provided by both Demetrius and Africanus are precisely what one would anticipate to resolve the "Universal Flood" problem.
[[Category:Religion]]
k3ktzakns1jpjjz2frkcyuk9jfljvwb
User talk:CanonicalMormon
3
328261
2812395
2795992
2026-06-01T02:28:56Z
Atcovi
276019
/* Patriarch Ages Curious Numerical Facts Response */ new section
2812395
wikitext
text/x-wiki
==Welcome==
{{Robelbox|theme=9|title='''[[Wikiversity:Welcome|Welcome]] to [[Wikiversity:What is Wikiversity|Wikiversity]], CanonicalMormon!'''|width=100%}}
<div style="{{Robelbox/pad}}">
You can [[Wikiversity:Contact|contact us]] with [[Wikiversity:Questions|questions]] at the [[Wikiversity:Colloquium|colloquium]] or get in touch with [[User talk:Juandev|me personally]] if you would like some [[Help:Contents|help]].
Remember to [[Wikiversity:Signature#How to add your signature|sign]] your comments when [[Wikiversity:Who are Wikiversity participants?|participating]] in [[Wikiversity:Talk page|discussions]]. Using the signature icon [[File:OOjs UI icon signature-ltr.svg]] makes it simple.
We invite you to [[Wikiversity:Be bold|be bold]] and [[Wikiversity|assume good faith]]. Please abide by our [[Wikiversity:Civility|civility]], [[Wikiversity:Privacy policy|privacy]], and [[Foundation:Terms of Use|terms of use]] policies.
To find your way around, check out:
<!-- The Left column -->
<div style="width:50.0%; float:left">
* [[Wikiversity:Introduction|Introduction to Wikiversity]]
* [[Help:Guides|Take a guided tour]] and learn [[Help:Editing|how to edit]]
* [[Wikiversity:Browse|Browse]] or visit an educational level portal:<br>[[Portal:Pre-school Education|pre-school]] | [[Portal:Primary Education|primary]] | [[Portal:Secondary Education|secondary]] | [[Portal:Tertiary Education|tertiary]] | [[Portal:Non-formal Education|non-formal]]
* [[Wikiversity:Introduction explore|Explore]] links in left-hand navigation menu
</div>
<!-- The Right column -->
<div style="width:50.0%; float:left">
* Read an [[Wikiversity:Wikiversity teachers|introduction for teachers]]
* Learn [[Help:How to write an educational resource|how to write an educational resource]]
* Find out about [[Wikiversity:Research|research]] activities
* Give [[Wikiversity:Feedback|feedback]] about your observations
* Discuss issues or ask questions at the [[Wikiversity:Colloquium|colloquium]]
</div>
<br clear="both"/>
To get started, experiment in the [[wikiversity:sandbox|sandbox]] or on [[special:mypage|your userpage]].
See you around Wikiversity! --[[User:Juandev|Juandev]] ([[User talk:Juandev|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Juandev|contribs]]) 14:25, 11 March 2026 (UTC)</div>
<!-- Template:Welcome -->
{{Robelbox/close}}
== [[Patriarch Ages Curious Numerical Facts Response]] ==
Hello CanonicalMormon. Thank you for your contributions to Wikiversity. I've put your article through zeroGPT.com and the first 15k characters were reported to be 58% likely to have been generated by an AI. I'm inquiring if you used AI to assist you in the creation of this article. Please note that it is obligatory to make this notable for your audience, and failing to adhere to [[Wikiversity:Artificial intelligence]] could lead to your page being deleted - so I'm coming here first to have a dialogue.
Thanks!
—[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 02:28, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
3dndh7f7hjwiezzbcsluyjktqcnjxr9
2812401
2812395
2026-06-01T03:11:39Z
Unitfreak
695864
/* Patriarch Ages Curious Numerical Facts Response */ Reply
2812401
wikitext
text/x-wiki
==Welcome==
{{Robelbox|theme=9|title='''[[Wikiversity:Welcome|Welcome]] to [[Wikiversity:What is Wikiversity|Wikiversity]], CanonicalMormon!'''|width=100%}}
<div style="{{Robelbox/pad}}">
You can [[Wikiversity:Contact|contact us]] with [[Wikiversity:Questions|questions]] at the [[Wikiversity:Colloquium|colloquium]] or get in touch with [[User talk:Juandev|me personally]] if you would like some [[Help:Contents|help]].
Remember to [[Wikiversity:Signature#How to add your signature|sign]] your comments when [[Wikiversity:Who are Wikiversity participants?|participating]] in [[Wikiversity:Talk page|discussions]]. Using the signature icon [[File:OOjs UI icon signature-ltr.svg]] makes it simple.
We invite you to [[Wikiversity:Be bold|be bold]] and [[Wikiversity|assume good faith]]. Please abide by our [[Wikiversity:Civility|civility]], [[Wikiversity:Privacy policy|privacy]], and [[Foundation:Terms of Use|terms of use]] policies.
To find your way around, check out:
<!-- The Left column -->
<div style="width:50.0%; float:left">
* [[Wikiversity:Introduction|Introduction to Wikiversity]]
* [[Help:Guides|Take a guided tour]] and learn [[Help:Editing|how to edit]]
* [[Wikiversity:Browse|Browse]] or visit an educational level portal:<br>[[Portal:Pre-school Education|pre-school]] | [[Portal:Primary Education|primary]] | [[Portal:Secondary Education|secondary]] | [[Portal:Tertiary Education|tertiary]] | [[Portal:Non-formal Education|non-formal]]
* [[Wikiversity:Introduction explore|Explore]] links in left-hand navigation menu
</div>
<!-- The Right column -->
<div style="width:50.0%; float:left">
* Read an [[Wikiversity:Wikiversity teachers|introduction for teachers]]
* Learn [[Help:How to write an educational resource|how to write an educational resource]]
* Find out about [[Wikiversity:Research|research]] activities
* Give [[Wikiversity:Feedback|feedback]] about your observations
* Discuss issues or ask questions at the [[Wikiversity:Colloquium|colloquium]]
</div>
<br clear="both"/>
To get started, experiment in the [[wikiversity:sandbox|sandbox]] or on [[special:mypage|your userpage]].
See you around Wikiversity! --[[User:Juandev|Juandev]] ([[User talk:Juandev|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Juandev|contribs]]) 14:25, 11 March 2026 (UTC)</div>
<!-- Template:Welcome -->
{{Robelbox/close}}
== [[Patriarch Ages Curious Numerical Facts Response]] ==
Hello CanonicalMormon. Thank you for your contributions to Wikiversity. I've put your article through zeroGPT.com and the first 15k characters were reported to be 58% likely to have been generated by an AI. I'm inquiring if you used AI to assist you in the creation of this article. Please note that it is obligatory to make this notable for your audience, and failing to adhere to [[Wikiversity:Artificial intelligence]] could lead to your page being deleted - so I'm coming here first to have a dialogue.
Thanks!
—[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 02:28, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
:The original content is all mine, but I have been submitting it to AI for spelling and grammar checks and light editing.
:Is that problematic, and if so, are there better alternatives for getting help with these issues? [[User:Unitfreak|Unitfreak]] ([[User talk:Unitfreak|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Unitfreak|contribs]]) 03:11, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
dg5638q5vctk6cipb6imqulyov3axx2
2812404
2812401
2026-06-01T03:24:46Z
Unitfreak
695864
2812404
wikitext
text/x-wiki
==Welcome==
{{Robelbox|theme=9|title='''[[Wikiversity:Welcome|Welcome]] to [[Wikiversity:What is Wikiversity|Wikiversity]], CanonicalMormon!'''|width=100%}}
<div style="{{Robelbox/pad}}">
You can [[Wikiversity:Contact|contact us]] with [[Wikiversity:Questions|questions]] at the [[Wikiversity:Colloquium|colloquium]] or get in touch with [[User talk:Juandev|me personally]] if you would like some [[Help:Contents|help]].
Remember to [[Wikiversity:Signature#How to add your signature|sign]] your comments when [[Wikiversity:Who are Wikiversity participants?|participating]] in [[Wikiversity:Talk page|discussions]]. Using the signature icon [[File:OOjs UI icon signature-ltr.svg]] makes it simple.
We invite you to [[Wikiversity:Be bold|be bold]] and [[Wikiversity|assume good faith]]. Please abide by our [[Wikiversity:Civility|civility]], [[Wikiversity:Privacy policy|privacy]], and [[Foundation:Terms of Use|terms of use]] policies.
To find your way around, check out:
<!-- The Left column -->
<div style="width:50.0%; float:left">
* [[Wikiversity:Introduction|Introduction to Wikiversity]]
* [[Help:Guides|Take a guided tour]] and learn [[Help:Editing|how to edit]]
* [[Wikiversity:Browse|Browse]] or visit an educational level portal:<br>[[Portal:Pre-school Education|pre-school]] | [[Portal:Primary Education|primary]] | [[Portal:Secondary Education|secondary]] | [[Portal:Tertiary Education|tertiary]] | [[Portal:Non-formal Education|non-formal]]
* [[Wikiversity:Introduction explore|Explore]] links in left-hand navigation menu
</div>
<!-- The Right column -->
<div style="width:50.0%; float:left">
* Read an [[Wikiversity:Wikiversity teachers|introduction for teachers]]
* Learn [[Help:How to write an educational resource|how to write an educational resource]]
* Find out about [[Wikiversity:Research|research]] activities
* Give [[Wikiversity:Feedback|feedback]] about your observations
* Discuss issues or ask questions at the [[Wikiversity:Colloquium|colloquium]]
</div>
<br clear="both"/>
To get started, experiment in the [[wikiversity:sandbox|sandbox]] or on [[special:mypage|your userpage]].
See you around Wikiversity! --[[User:Juandev|Juandev]] ([[User talk:Juandev|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Juandev|contribs]]) 14:25, 11 March 2026 (UTC)</div>
<!-- Template:Welcome -->
{{Robelbox/close}}
== [[Patriarch Ages Curious Numerical Facts Response]] ==
Hello CanonicalMormon. Thank you for your contributions to Wikiversity. I've put your article through zeroGPT.com and the first 15k characters were reported to be 58% likely to have been generated by an AI. I'm inquiring if you used AI to assist you in the creation of this article. Please note that it is obligatory to make this notable for your audience, and failing to adhere to [[Wikiversity:Artificial intelligence]] could lead to your page being deleted - so I'm coming here first to have a dialogue.
Thanks!
—[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 02:28, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
3dndh7f7hjwiezzbcsluyjktqcnjxr9
2812405
2812404
2026-06-01T03:31:06Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
/* Patriarch Ages Curious Numerical Facts Response */ Reply
2812405
wikitext
text/x-wiki
==Welcome==
{{Robelbox|theme=9|title='''[[Wikiversity:Welcome|Welcome]] to [[Wikiversity:What is Wikiversity|Wikiversity]], CanonicalMormon!'''|width=100%}}
<div style="{{Robelbox/pad}}">
You can [[Wikiversity:Contact|contact us]] with [[Wikiversity:Questions|questions]] at the [[Wikiversity:Colloquium|colloquium]] or get in touch with [[User talk:Juandev|me personally]] if you would like some [[Help:Contents|help]].
Remember to [[Wikiversity:Signature#How to add your signature|sign]] your comments when [[Wikiversity:Who are Wikiversity participants?|participating]] in [[Wikiversity:Talk page|discussions]]. Using the signature icon [[File:OOjs UI icon signature-ltr.svg]] makes it simple.
We invite you to [[Wikiversity:Be bold|be bold]] and [[Wikiversity|assume good faith]]. Please abide by our [[Wikiversity:Civility|civility]], [[Wikiversity:Privacy policy|privacy]], and [[Foundation:Terms of Use|terms of use]] policies.
To find your way around, check out:
<!-- The Left column -->
<div style="width:50.0%; float:left">
* [[Wikiversity:Introduction|Introduction to Wikiversity]]
* [[Help:Guides|Take a guided tour]] and learn [[Help:Editing|how to edit]]
* [[Wikiversity:Browse|Browse]] or visit an educational level portal:<br>[[Portal:Pre-school Education|pre-school]] | [[Portal:Primary Education|primary]] | [[Portal:Secondary Education|secondary]] | [[Portal:Tertiary Education|tertiary]] | [[Portal:Non-formal Education|non-formal]]
* [[Wikiversity:Introduction explore|Explore]] links in left-hand navigation menu
</div>
<!-- The Right column -->
<div style="width:50.0%; float:left">
* Read an [[Wikiversity:Wikiversity teachers|introduction for teachers]]
* Learn [[Help:How to write an educational resource|how to write an educational resource]]
* Find out about [[Wikiversity:Research|research]] activities
* Give [[Wikiversity:Feedback|feedback]] about your observations
* Discuss issues or ask questions at the [[Wikiversity:Colloquium|colloquium]]
</div>
<br clear="both"/>
To get started, experiment in the [[wikiversity:sandbox|sandbox]] or on [[special:mypage|your userpage]].
See you around Wikiversity! --[[User:Juandev|Juandev]] ([[User talk:Juandev|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/Juandev|contribs]]) 14:25, 11 March 2026 (UTC)</div>
<!-- Template:Welcome -->
{{Robelbox/close}}
== [[Patriarch Ages Curious Numerical Facts Response]] ==
Hello CanonicalMormon. Thank you for your contributions to Wikiversity. I've put your article through zeroGPT.com and the first 15k characters were reported to be 58% likely to have been generated by an AI. I'm inquiring if you used AI to assist you in the creation of this article. Please note that it is obligatory to make this notable for your audience, and failing to adhere to [[Wikiversity:Artificial intelligence]] could lead to your page being deleted - so I'm coming here first to have a dialogue.
Thanks!
—[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]] [[User talk:Atcovi|(Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Atcovi|Contribs)]] 02:28, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
:The original ideas and content are all mine, but I have submitted my text to AI for spelling and grammar checks, and some editing.
:Is this problematic, and if so, is there a way to get help with spelling, grammar, and editing that is not an issue? [[User:CanonicalMormon|CanonicalMormon]] ([[User talk:CanonicalMormon|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/CanonicalMormon|contribs]]) 03:31, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
0lql1i5ygzhkercnbm1fs502tic6f9v
Intuitive Calculus
0
329025
2812350
2811772
2026-05-31T22:04:31Z
Atcovi
276019
/* 5/23/2026 [Logarithms] */ italicizie notes
2812350
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{mathematics}}'''<u>Book</u>''': ''Infinite Powers'' by Steven Strogatz (ISBN#: 1328879984){{tertiary}}
{{Notes}}
{{juststarted}}
{{contrib-creator|[[User:Atcovi|Atcovi]]}}
== Notes ==
[[File:Parts of Parabola.svg|thumb|A diagram of a parabola.]]
=== 4/11/2026 (Archimedes and the method of exhaustion) ===
* Archimedes and figuring out the ''quadratic'' (or computation of the area) of a parabolic segment. This is just basically spamming smaller triangles into a [[parabola]] to equal one big triangle (<math display="inline">=1</math>) in order to figure out the area.
Total area of a parabolic segment from Archimedes findings: <math display="inline">1</math> + <math display="inline">1/4</math> + <math display="inline">1/16</math> + <math display="inline">1/64</math> ← geometric series.
^each term is <math display="inline">1/4</math> of the term preceding it as the daughter triangles always contribute a total of 1 quarter as much area as their parents do.
Archimedes proved that <math display="inline">a = 4/3</math> through a '''double reductio ad absurdum'''<ref>{{Cite book|title=Infinite powers: how calculus reveals the secrets of the universe|last=Strogatz|first=Steven|date=2020|publisher=Mariner Books ; Houghton Mifflin Harcourt|isbn=978-1-328-87998-1|edition=First Mariner books edition|location=Boston New York|page=36}}</ref> using the '''method of exhaustion''', an analytical way of finding a result<ref>{{Cite book|title=Infinite powers: how calculus reveals the secrets of the universe|last=Strogatz|first=Steven|date=2020|publisher=Mariner Books ; Houghton Mifflin Harcourt|isbn=978-1-328-87998-1|edition=First Mariner books edition|location=Boston New York|page=102}}</ref>.
=== 5/2/2026 (Johannes Kepler) ===
==== [[w:Johannes_Kepler|Johannes Kepler]] ====
# '''[[w:Elliptic orbit|Elliptical orbits]]'''
#*'''Ellipse''': Plane curve where the sum of distances from any point on the curve to two fixed points (foci) is constant. For example, a circle is a type of ellipse. A circle is a set of points where distance from a given point (aka its center) is constant. Kepler stated that all planets follow an elliptical orbit.
# '''[https://www.socratica.com/pages/keplers-second-law-of-motion Equal Areas in Equal Times]'''
#*'''Formula''': Time (P<sub>1</sub> → P<sub>2</sub>) = Time (P<sub>3</sub> → P<sub>4</sub>) [their sectors have equal areas]
# '''Third Law and the Sacred Frenzy'''<ref>{{Cite book|title=Infinite powers: how calculus reveals the secrets of the universe|last=Strogatz|first=Steven|date=2020|publisher=Mariner Books ; Houghton Mifflin Harcourt|isbn=978-1-328-87998-1|edition=First Mariner books edition|location=Boston New York|page=84}}</ref>
#*<math display="inline">T</math><sup>2</sup> = <math display="inline">a</math><sup>3</sup>
#**<math display="inline">T</math> = how long it takes for a planet to go around the sun just once.
#**<math display="inline">A</math> = avg. of the planet's nearest and farthest distance from the sun.
=== 5/14/2026 (Calculus definitions, introduction to adequality) ===
* '''[[w:Differential_calculus|Differential calculus]]:''' cuts complicated problems into infinitely many simpler pieces. Ex, derivatives.
* '''[[w:Integral_calculus|Integral calculus]]''': puts the pieces back together again to solve the original problem. Ex, integrals.
[[File:Tangent function animation.gif|thumb|The derivative at different points of a differentiable function. In this case, the derivative is equal to <math>\sin \left(x^2\right) + 2x^2 \cos\left(x^2\right)</math>.<ref>{{Cite journal|date=2026-04-13|title=Derivative|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Derivative&oldid=1348562692|journal=Wikipedia|language=en}}</ref>]]
[[File:Cartesian-coordinate-system.svg|thumb|This is known as a ''Cartesian coordinate system''.|left]]
* '''[[w:Analytical_geometry|Analytical geometry]]''': Also known as Cartesian geometry, is geometry using a coordinate system (pictured towards the left). Analytical geometry is used in physics, engineering, and aviation. "Analysis" in analytic geometry is meant to be understood as a way of ''figuring out'' the results rather than proving the results<ref>{{Cite book|title=Infinite powers: how calculus reveals the secrets of the universe|last=Strogatz|first=Steven|date=2020|publisher=Mariner Books ; Houghton Mifflin Harcourt|isbn=978-1-328-87998-1|edition=First Mariner books edition|location=Boston New York|page=101}}</ref>.
==== Adequality ====
''See pages 103 to 107, which provide a breakdown of [[w:Pierre_de_Fermat|Pierre de Fermat]] and his concept of adequality.''
Pierre de Fermat's concept of adequality (meaning ''approximate equality''<ref>{{Cite journal|date=2024-09-18|title=Number Theory: An Approach Through History from Hammurapi to Legendre|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Number_Theory:_An_Approach_Through_History_from_Hammurapi_to_Legendre&oldid=1246411217|journal=Wikipedia|language=en}}</ref>) was a way of finding the maxima, minima, tangents, and other problems in calculus. For example, two nearly equal values, [let's say] ''a'' and ''b'' at the maximum of a parabola, are used to find the maxima of a parabola through a small 'nudge' in the variable<ref>{{Cite book|title=Infinite powers: how calculus reveals the secrets of the universe|last=Strogatz|first=Steven|date=2020|publisher=Mariner Books ; Houghton Mifflin Harcourt|isbn=978-1-328-87998-1|edition=First Mariner books edition|location=Boston New York|page=106}}</ref>.
Fermat's ideas eventually led to the concept of derivatives (illustrated towards the right) in modern calculus.
=== 5/16/2026 (continuation of Fermat's adequality) ===
[[File:Week 9 Fermat and Adequality Proto-Calculus Notes - Part 1.jpg|thumb|438x438px|'''Figure 1.''' Written statements [in all caps] are as follows (from the top-down): 1. WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM VALUE? 2. TWO NEARBY X-VALUES, X<sub>1</sub> AND X<sub>2</sub>, PRODUCE ALMOST THE SAME OUTPUT; l = left side, r = right side in the hill diagram]]
==== What does b - (x<sub>1</sub> + x<sub>2</sub>) = 0 represent? ====
b = x<sub>1</sub> + x<sub>2</sub>
Reference the hill diagram in '''Figure 1''' (you may have to open the file and zoom in). X<sub>1</sub> and X<sub>2</sub> represent two nearby points on both sides of the "hill" which both produce almost the same output.
For both of the values, adding both X<sub>1</sub> and X<sub>2</sub> would equal <math display="inline">b</math> (the total length). B = x<sub>1</sub> + x<sub>2</sub> would come out to B = 2x, with '''x = b/2''' (where the maximum is). This is the value of <math display="inline">x</math> that would ideally give the highest value for <math display="inline">c</math> (see below).
==== Purpose of bx - x<sup>2</sup> = c? ====
What is the purpose of the equation (see https://youtube.com/AOKoo_nQSts?si=1RfOYMAHm-Ll5sVT&t [minute 4:17] for context/writing of this equation): <math display="inline">bx</math> - <math display="inline">x</math><sup>2</sup> = <math display="inline">c</math>?
If we take a line (total = <math display="inline">b</math>), and make a cut at some point in the line (and designate the cut 'mark' as <math display="inline">x</math>), how could we figure out <math display="inline">c</math> (output produced by the equation, <math display="inline">bx</math> - <math display="inline">x</math><sup>2</sup> = <math display="inline">c</math>)?
<math display="inline">x</math> represents a portion of the line, while <math display="inline">b - x</math> represents the remaining portion of the line. The product of both <math display="inline">x</math> and <math display="inline">b - x</math> is <math display="inline">bx</math> - <math display="inline">x</math><sup>2</sup>. The goal is to find the value of <math display="inline">x</math> that would produce the highest <math display="inline">c</math> value.
=== 5/20/2026 [Fermet's Theorem] ===
* Pages 107 to 113 detail Fermat's concept of adequality and other mathematical findings led to the decompression of fingerprint files for the FBI in the 1990s. Read [https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/400027 this] for more about the FBI's decision to digitalize fingerprint files and the process behind it.
* ''[expand upon Fermat's optimization? Use the PDF?]''
* '''Fermet's Theorem =''' If a real-valued function, <math>f(x)</math>, is differentiable<ref>function has a well-defined, smooth slope at every single point</ref> in an interval <math>(a, b)</math> and <math>f(x)</math> has a maximum OR minimum at <math>c</math> ∈ <math>(a, b)</math>, then <math display="inline">f'(c)</math> = <math display="inline">0</math><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://old.maa.org/press/periodicals/convergence/fermat-s-method-for-finding-maxima-and-minima-a-mini-primary-source-project-for-calculus-1-students|title=Fermat’s Method for Finding Maxima and Minima: A Mini-Primary Source Project for Calculus 1 Students {{!}} Mathematical Association of America|website=old.maa.org|access-date=2026-05-21}}</ref>.
** Explanation of ∈: essentially "belongs to/inside/a member of." For example, <math>c</math> ∈ <math>(a, b)</math> → "the number c<math></math> is inside the interval between <math>a</math> and <math>b</math>".
=== 5/23/2026 [Logarithms] ===
''[insert logarithms introduction/lesson]''
log(''a'' x ''b'') = log ''a'' + log ''b''
Multiply two numbers together, take the log = answer is the SUM of their individual logs. Logarithms are like an "undo" tool. They "undo" the mathematical operations done by exponential functions, and the relationship between logarithms and exponential functions is reciprocal.
* ''e'' = 2.71828... similar to π in circles<ref>{{Cite book|title=Infinite powers: how calculus reveals the secrets of the universe|last=Strogatz|first=Steven|date=2020|publisher=Mariner Books ; Houghton Mifflin Harcourt|isbn=978-1-328-87998-1|edition=First Mariner books edition|location=Boston New York|page=136}}</ref>. See [https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_(mathematical_constant) e (mathematical constant)] (simple-wiki) & [[w:Natural logarithm]] (wikipedia). The rate of change of ''e''<sup>x</sup> is ''e''<sup>x</sup>. The rate of exponential growth is proportional to the function's current level<ref>{{Cite book|title=Infinite powers: how calculus reveals the secrets of the universe|last=Strogatz|first=Steven|date=2020|publisher=Mariner Books ; Houghton Mifflin Harcourt|isbn=978-1-328-87998-1|edition=First Mariner books edition|location=Boston New York|page=137}}</ref>. An example to illustrate this is the following: as a microphone picks up a noise that increases in volume (perhaps the source of the sound is moving closer to the microphone), the loudspeaker amplifies the noise at a constant, exponential rate ''in proportional'' (NOT equal) to the noise it is picking up through the microphone.
=== 5/27/2026 [Derivatives] ===
[[File:2020-03-25 00 08 15 A Five Cheese Pizza Hot Pocket after being heated in the Franklin Farm section of Oak Hill, Fairfax County, Virginia.jpg|thumb|When looking at how many ''more'' calories I will consume per infinitesimally small bite of the hot pocket, we are assessing the derivative of the hot pocket's calories.
Yes, this may not be practical, but hopefully bringing food into the 'equation' will help you understand the concept of derivatives better.]]
* What is the definition of a '''derivative'''? Essentially the rate of change: ''dy/dx''. An example of a derivative is [[PlanetPhysics/Acceleration|acceleration]]. Another example of a derivative is the following question: how many calories will I consume per bite of a hot pocket (each bite being infinitesimally small)?
The question posed by the book is as follows: ''how do we define the slope when the slope keeps changing?''<ref>{{Cite book|title=Infinite powers: how calculus reveals the secrets of the universe|last=Strogatz|first=Steven|date=2020|publisher=Mariner Books ; Houghton Mifflin Harcourt|isbn=978-1-328-87998-1|edition=First Mariner books edition|location=Boston New York|page=143}}</ref>
Shifting our mindset from [[Speak Math Now!|algebra]]: In calculus, the rate of change is ''not'' constant, as the IV changes (and is therefore regarded as a '''function'''). We go from Δy/Δx [set rate of change] → ''dy/dx'' [infinitesimally tiny, varied changes].
So instead of thinking of the hourly rate for a cashier as a set number (let's say $16/hr), we should think of the $16/hr as a ''constant'' function. This is going to pay off in calculus as we deal with rates of changes that are not always 'set in stone', or constant. For example, measuring a horse's total speed in a [[w:Horse_racing|horse race]] is not going to be a constant, set number - it will be a function with a constantly changing rate. For this specific example:
* '''x''' = time
* '''y''' = speed
* '''dy/dx''' = rate of change of horse's speed with respect to time (think of it as: "rate of change of [y] in respect to [x]").
== Wikipedia/Study Links ==
[[w:Archimedes|'''Archimedes''']]
* [[w:Approximations_of_pi|approximations of pi]]
* quadrature (computation of area) of a parabolic segment
* [[w:Archimedes_Palimpsest|''Archimedes Palimpsest'']]
* [https://math.nyu.edu/Archimedes/Lever/LeverLaw.html Archimedes' Law of the Lever]
'''[[w:Pierre_de_Fermat|Pierre de Fermat]]'''
* [https://old.maa.org/sites/default/files/images/upload_library/46/Barnett_TRIUMPHS_MiniPSPs/MiniPSP_FermatsMethod_2023_02_20.pdf ''Fermat’s Method for Finding Maxima and Minima'']- Kenneth M Monks (2023)
'''Other'''
* [[w:Glossary_of_mathematical_symbols|Glossary of mathematical symbols]]
== See Also ==
* [[User:Addemf/sandbox/Who Invented Calculus?]]
== References/Sources ==
{{reflist}}
[[Category:Atcovi's Work]]
[[Category:Calculus]]
63ecfyihn39sm20u6w39c8mh75xkb0w
User:Fortuna imperatrix mundi/IaR2
2
329439
2812412
2807453
2026-06-01T11:08:45Z
Fortuna imperatrix mundi
1058581
Rfs
2812412
wikitext
text/x-wiki
==References==
* [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230307261_2 Orgel, S. (2011). Prologue: I am Richard II. In: Petrina, A., Tosi, L. (eds) Representations of Elizabeth I in Early Modern Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307261_2]
* [https://broadlytextual.com/2017/12/15/i-am-richard-ii-know-ye-not-that-drama-and-political-anxiety-in-shakespeares-london/ Hixon, E., Syracuse Univ]
* Bate, Jonathan (2008). Soul of the Age. London: Penguin. pp. 256–286. ISBN 978-0-670-91482-1.
* [https://theconversation.com/richard-ii-by-william-shakespeare-why-the-divine-right-of-kings-still-matters-186648 McFarlane, K., Univ South Australia]
* [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/31090/summary Lemon, Rebecca. "The Faulty Verdict in "The Crown v. John Hayward"." SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, vol. 41 no. 1, 2001, p. 109-132. Project MUSE, https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sel.2001.0009]
* [https://brill.com/display/book/9789401211666/B9789401211666-s009.xml?language=en&srsltid=AfmBOoqTUaTQr0msNWRdtEZZ9qQ3rNcVkSoBvDPXuGv7nRvHrC8t5OzH Kizelbach, U. (2014), In The Pragmatics of Early Modern Politics: Power and Kingship in Shakespeare’s History Plays. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401211666_009]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/z-kOAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Lopez, R2]
* [https://www.manchesterhive.com/display/9781526130532/9781526130532.00008.xml?print rgel, S. (2017). "I am Richard II". In Spectacular Performances. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press. Retrieved Apr 22, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526130532.00008]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271041996_Was_Elizabeth_I_Richard_II_The_Authenticity_of_Lambarde%27s_%27Conversation%27 Scott-Warren, Jason. (2012). Was Elizabeth I Richard II?: The Authenticity of Lambarde's 'Conversation'. The Review of English Studies. 64. 208-230. 10.1093/res/hgs062]
* Stanley Wells, “Introduction” in Richard II, The New Penguin Shakespeare, ed. Stanley Wells (London: Penguin Books, 1969), 13.
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/shakespeare-survey/shakespeare-and-history-divergencies-and-agreements/B065A23215FD86BEE8E1CFD51DC7C1FB Ives EW. Shakespeare and History: Divergencies and Agreements. In: Wells S, ed. Shakespeare Survey. Shakespeare Survey. Cambridge University Press; 1986:19-36]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/457855 Albright, Evelyn May. “Shakespeare’s Richard II, Hayward’s History of Henry IV, and the Essex Conspiracy.” PMLA, vol. 46, no. 3, 1931, pp. 694–719. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/457855. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://dsc.duq.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2800&context=etd Morris, A. (2019). "within the hollow crown": Performing Kingship in Richard II and Henry IV Part One (Master's thesis, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1771]
* [https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1122&context=srhonors_theses Scannell, Sarah J., "Shakespeare's Richard II and Henry V and Political Rebellions in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth I" (2010). Honors Scholar Theses, 138]
* [https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2011.00873.x Luecking Frost, L. (2012), “A Kyng That Ruled All By Lust”: Richard II in Elizabethan Literature. Literature Compass, 9: 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2011.00873.x]
* [https://www.academia.edu/8347491/A_Law_Case_in_Verse_Venus_and_Adonis_and_the_Authorship_Question Stritmatter, R., A Law Case in Verse: Venus and Adonis and the Authorship Question, 2004 University of Tennessee Law Review]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304647742_Prologue_I_am_Richard_II Orgel, Stephen. (2011). Prologue: I am Richard II. 10.1057/9780230307261_2]
* [https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA314252957&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=15256863&sw=w&p=AONE&userGroupName=anon%7Ebf79dda0&aty=open-web-entry Egan, Michael. "The Essex Rebellion and Richard II: why wasn't Shakespeare arrested?" Shakespeare Oxford Newsletter, vol. 48, no. 3, summer-fall 2012, p. 20]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/richard-ii/stagehistory/D62D9CA061F03B2AE8D56E856288EEDA 1. Child H, Shakespeare W. THE STAGE-HISTORY. In: Dover Wilson J, ed. Richard II: The Cambridge Dover Wilson Shakespeare. Cambridge Library Collection - Literary Studies. Cambridge University Press; 2009:lxxvii-xcii]
* [https://www.openstarts.units.it/entities/publication/16d8c447-62f4-48e8-8347-5d56af674aa3/details Snelling, D., 'Prospero on the Coast of Bohemia. "Nihil sed rara et miranda amabat". Diary of Melchior Goldast upon the late Emperor Rudolph II' 1994]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2902265 Gajowski, Evelyn. Shakespeare in Performance: King Richard IIby Margaret Shewring. Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 3, 1998, pp. 328–30. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2902265. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/217842/summary Mosse, Ramona Franziska. Review of Richard II. Shakespeare Bulletin, vol. 25 no. 2, 2007, p. 73-77. Project MUSE, https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/shb.2007.0036]
* [https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/665894?journalCode=rq Petrina and Tosi. Representations of Elizabeth I in Early Modern Culture Elizabeth Pentland Renaissance Quarterly 2012 65:1, 274-276]
* [https://journals.co.za/doi/10.4314/sisa.v26i1.4 The construction of a king : waste, effeminacy and queerness in Shakespeare's Richard II Higginbotham, D.]
* [https://academic.oup.com/book/2363/chapter-abstract/142533948?redirectedFrom=fulltext Erskine-Hill, Howard, 'The Second Tetralogy and After', Poetry and the Realm of Politics: Shakespeare to Dryden (Oxford, 1996; online edn, Oxford Academic, 3 Oct. 2011), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198117315.003.0004]
* [https://www.academia.edu/123917862/Shakespeare_s_Richard_II_in_the_minds_of_the_Elizabethan_audiences Shakespeare’s Richard II in the minds of the Elizabethan audiences]
* [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03064220221084555 Plays, protests and the censor’s pencil]
* [https://www.indexoncensorship.org/2022/03/plays-protests-and-the-censors-pencil/ Plays, protests and the censor’s pencil A brittle Gloriana: staging the deposition of Queen Elizabeth I].
* Saul, N., Richard II
* [https://www.academia.edu/3236651/_A_god_on_earth_thou_art_Richard_II_and_the_nature_of_Kingship “A god on earth thou art”: Richard II and the nature of Kingship]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/457398 Albright, Evelyn May. “Shakespeare’s Richard II and the Essex Conspiracy.” PMLA, vol. 42, no. 3, 1927, pp. 686–720. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/457398. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/critical-survey/37/3/cs370301.xml Holderness, G. (2025). Introduction: Shakespeare's Wars of the Roses. Critical Survey, 37(3), 1-4. Retrieved Apr 22, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.3167/cs.2025.370301]
* [https://www.folger.edu/podcasts/shakespeare-unlimited/tragedy-richard-ii-henry-iv-helen-castor/ Folger: Shakespeare Unlimited: Episode 249]
* [https://www.rachaeldickzen.com/blog/2021/1/10/charlesiii The Historical and Shakespearean References in King Charles III]
* Kermode, The Age of Shakespeare, pg.53.
* [https://heinonline.org/HOL/login-hol?redirect_url=https%3A%2F%2Fheinonline.org%2FHOL%2Fmojo%3F%252Fmojo%3D%26auth_token%3DyhcMOu8W7PCc5OrmTqVnr2qFPpoiOdhM5uQmkQyWufU%253D%26casa_token%3D%26div%3D5%26g_sent%3D1%26paywall_url%3D%26referrer%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fheinonline.org%252FHOL%252FPage%253Fhandle%253Dhein.journals%252Fneastlr1%26timestamp%3D1776855600%26url%3D%252FHOL%252FPage%253Fhandle%253Dhein.journals%252Fneastlr1%2526div%253D5%2526id%253D%2526page%253D Jones, H., ''I AM RICHARD II, KNOW YE NOT THAT?' - WORKS. OF WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE AND THE ART OF. GOVERNANCE''']
* Hattaway, M., William Shakespeare: Richard II (Literature Insights, 9781847600349)
* [https://books.openedition.org/psn/8305 Findlay, A., “Good sometimes queen” (V.1.37). Richard II, Mary Stuart and the Politics of Queenship, 205-219]
* [https://pure.manchester.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/54508829/FULL_TEXT.PDF Pritchard, K., 'Legitimacy, Illegitimacy and Sovereignty in Shakespeare’s British Plays' (2011 University of Manchester PhD]
* CHATELANAT, Marine. Histrionic Future Kings: The Politics of Metadrama in Shakespeare’s Richard III, Richard II, and Henry IV Part 1. Master, 2023.
* [https://www.persee.fr/doc/xvii_0291-3798_2004_num_59_1_1993 Mayer, J-C., 'The "Parliament Sceane" in Shakespeare's King Richard II', XVII-XVIII. Revue de la Société d'études anglo-américaines des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles Année 2004 59 pp. 27-42]
* [https://www.emerald.com/md/article-abstract/38/5/315/285132/Managers-as-kings-Shakespeare-on-modern-leadership?redirectedFrom=fulltext Egan M (2000), "Managers as kings: Shakespeare on modern leadership". Management Decision, Vol. 38 No. 5 pp. 315–327, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740010340490]
* [https://d-nb.info/1279081511/34 Quabeck (2022): William Shakespeare, in: Thomas Gutmann, Eberhard Ortland, Klaus Stierstorfer, eds., Encyclopedia of Law and Literature (last edited 26 October 2022), doi: 10.17879/12009577118]
* [https://lawliberty.org/book-review/was-the-bard-writing-about-the-donald/ Sullivan, V., 'Was the Bard Writing about The Donald?']
* [https://deveresociety.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/FINAL_NL_Apr2022-Haste-July-Letterresponse.pdf Haste, I., 'THE PLAY ON THE EVE OF THE ESSEX REBELLION']
* [https://www.cherylmtaylor.com/2017/11/08/a-companion-to-shakespeares-richard-ii/ A Companion to Shakespeare’s Richard II]
* [https://www.city-journal.org/article/shakespeares-richards Dalrymple, T., Shakespeare’s Richards: The playwright’s two historical dramas offer contrasts between political pathologies]
* [https://hfriedberg.web.wesleyan.edu/engl205/wshakespeare/plotsandrebelions.htm ELIZABETHAN PLOTS AND REBELLIONS]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2869708 Rackin, Phyllis. “The Role of the Audience In Shakespeare’s Richard II.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 3, 1985, pp. 262–81. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2869708. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026.]
* [https://www.psychologytoday.com/ie/blog/whats-in-name/201603/group-think-and-academia-shocking-shakespeare-shenanigans Group Think and Academia: Shocking Shakespeare Shenanigans]
* [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01847678221099975 Hiscopck, A., '"Why I should welcome such a guest as grief [?": Lodging and dislodging in Shakespeare's Richard II']
* [https://academic.oup.com/book/51779/chapter-abstract/420487796?redirectedFrom=fulltext 'Epigraph', Imagining Time in the English Chronicle Play: Historical Futures, 1590-1660 (Oxford, 2023; online edn, Oxford Academic, 19 Oct. 2023), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198872658.002.0009]
* [https://journals.openedition.org/interfaces/319?lang=en Blake & Shakespeare]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/shakespeare-and-the-visual-imagination/richard-iiand-the-politics-of-perspective/23A5D4615E2A8BF9380BAF1ECE99B46D Sillars S. Richard IIand the Politics of Perspective. In: Shakespeare and the Visual Imagination. Cambridge University Press; 2015:133-162.]
* [https://www.persee.fr/doc/xvii_0291-3798_2004_num_59_1_1992 Le miroir des rois: de Richard II à Henry VIII]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/king-richard-ll/introduction/25419329A06BC1C2E4D3DDBF331B7F91 Shakespeare W, McEachern C. Introduction. In: Gurr A, ed. King Richard Ll. The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press; 2018:1-66.]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372862689_A_Critical_Discourse_Study_of_Shakespeare%27s_Theological_Conceptions_in_Acts_IV_and_V_of_Richard_II_The_%27Divine_Mandate%27_of_Richard_Kingship_Falls_Apart A Critical Discourse Study of Shakespeare’s Theological Conceptions in Acts IV and V of Richard II: The ‘Divine Mandate’ of Richard Kingship Falls Apart]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/lal.2004.16.3.313 Richard II, Bracton, and the End of Political Theology]
* [https://dokumen.pub/the-art-of-law-in-shakespeare-9781509905478-9781509905508-9781509905492.html The Art of Law in Shakespeare]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-shakespeare-and-religion/providence-and-divine-right-in-the-english-histories/DBE9BFEBF5C199F9DD72D31ED9C3B041 Mayer J-C. Providence and Divine Right in the English Histories. In: Hamlin H, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Religion. Cambridge Companions to Literature. Cambridge University Press; 2019:151-167]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315698000_THE_CHOMSKY-FOUCAULT_DEBATE_WHERE_DOES_THE_BARD_STAND_IN_RICHARD_II Salami, Ali & Riahi Nouri, Amir. (2016). THE CHOMSKY-FOUCAULT DEBATE: WHERE DOES THE BARD STAND IN RICHARD II?]
* [https://dokumen.pub/shakespeare-richard-ii-9781350363168-9780333416709.html Richard II]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/457907?seq=1 Heffner, Ray. “Shakespeare, Hayward, and Essex.” PMLA, vol. 45, no. 3, 1930, pp. 754–80. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/457907. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-shakespeare-and-war/shakespeare-on-civil-and-dynastic-wars/00D0269CFF998876DB961FB01C22954D Shakespeare on Civil and Dynastic Wars]
* [https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004356900/B9789004356900_012.xml?srsltid=AfmBOopJMjwJAQnUGME9FmT6Gwg0ih9pArbXBdTJbN6YAqbdXqbkGyuo Is a Dramatic Theory of History Possible? Shakespeare’s Richard ii and ‘Historical Truth’]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/24475607 THE CHILD'S TWO BODIES: SHAKESPEARE, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE END OF SUCCESSION]
* [https://dokumen.pub/english-renaissance-drama-an-introduction-to-theatre-and-theatres-in-shakespeares-time-9781847600202-9781847600714.html English Renaissance Drama : An Introduction to Theatre and Theatres in Shakespeare’s Time]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/believing-in-shakespeare/person-plot-place/BD4EF4CBA6E7D8E2ECE5519FA1D08C16 1. McEachern C. Person, Plot, Place. In: Believing in Shakespeare: Studies in Longing. Cambridge University Press; 2018:181-296]
* [https://www.enotes.com/topics/richard-2/criticism/richard-ii-vol-91/criticism-production-reviews-1000228/nigel-saul-review-date-12-may-2000 With an Eye to the Present]
* [https://www.academia.edu/128303633/Shakespeare_s_Other_Eden_Richard_II_by_Ouroboros_Theatre_Company_2013_ Shakespeare’s Other Eden Richard II by Ouroboros Theatre Company (2013)]
* [https://dokumen.pub/shakespeare-upstart-crow-to-sweet-swan-1592-1623-9781472555496-9781408130148-9781408139189.html Shakespeare: Upstart Crow to Sweet Swan 1592-1623]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/41917215 RACKIN, PHYLLIS. “Temporality, Anachronism, and Presence in Shakespeare’s English Histories.” Renaissance Drama, vol. 17, 1986, pp. 101–23. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41917215. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026.]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/greece-and-rome/article/abs/alexander-philotas-and-the-origins-of-modern-historiography/D90568C0A1131952625E0A3B44F43EC8 Stoneman R. Alexander, Philotas, and the origins of modern historiography. Greece and Rome. 2013;60(2):296-312. doi:10.1017/S0017383513000119]
* [https://www.academia.edu/35800720/Shakespeares_Richard_II_and_Elizabethan_politics Shakespeare's Richard II and Elizabethan politics]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/rethinking-historicism-from-shakespeare-to-milton/old-new-now/2E8CBEFFEFB11D8B843BAF2C108E9768 Introduction - Old, New, Now]
* [https://www.academia.edu/24392476/Richard_II_hamartia_and_climax Richard II hamartia and climax]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/babylonian-jews-and-sasanian-imperialism-in-late-antiquity/kings-and-religion-in-the-talmud-and-in-the-imagination-of-sasanian-communities/E2DCC2F3E0FBA74ABE543DDD2DD7F1A7 Kings and Religion in the Talmud and in the Imagination of Sasanian Communities]
* Stephen Greenblatt, “Introduction,” in The Power of Forms in the English Renaissance, ed. Stephen Greenblatt (Norman, OK: 1982), 3-6]
* [https://www.academia.edu/30472558/Americas_Donald_Trump_Shakespeares_Richard_II_15_Dec_2016 America's Donald Trump, Shakespeare's Richard II]
* [https://www.academia.edu/5321346/Looking_Back_Shakespeare_s_Indebtedness_to_Chaucer_and_the_Representations_of_Chivalry_in_King_Richard_II_The_Two_Noble_Kinsmen_and_the_Knight_s_Tale Looking Back: Shakespeare’s Indebtedness to Chaucer and the Representations of Chivalry in King Richard II, The Two Noble Kinsmen and the Knight’s Tale]
* [https://www.academia.edu/92423912/The_Good_Usurper_in_the_eyes_of_God_and_the_people_An_analysis_of_the_role_of_the_usurper_in_Shakespeares_Richard_II_and_Henry_IV_Part_1 The Good Usurper in the eyes of God and the people: An analysis of the role of the usurper in Shakespeare's Richard II and Henry IV Part 1]
* [https://www.academia.edu/91789871/The_Bacon_Shakespeare_Manuscript_Hitherto_known_as_the_Northumberland_Manuscript_which_originally_Contained_Copies_of_his_Shakespeare_Plays_Richard_II_and_Richard_III THE BACON-SHAKESPEARE MANUSCRIPT (HITHERTO KNOWN AS THE NORTHUMBERLAND MANUSCRIPT) WHICH ORIGINALLY CONTAINED COPIES OF HIS SHAKESPEARE PLAYS RICHARD II AND RICHARD III]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/f4gGCAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA88&printsec=frontcover Richard II: Critical Essays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_Companion_to_Shakespeare_s_Works_Volum/JlDNEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA400&printsec=frontcover A Companion to Shakespeare's Works, Volume II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Reread/Z6JhDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA239&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare Reread]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_in_the_Present/yTKWEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PT8&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare in the Present]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Studying_Shakespeare/1N4FBAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA129&printsec=frontcover Studying Shakespeare A Practical Introduction]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Critical_Essays_on_William_Faulkner/kAGBEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PT178&printsec=frontcover Critical Essays on William Faulkner]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare/QY6aEQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA216&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory 1945-2000]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Reign_of_Richard_II/cv0WAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Dodd, G., R2]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Institution_of_Theat/Nkt9DAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA108&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Institution of Theatre]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Theory_of_the_King_s_Two_Bodies_in_t/8SRXAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Theory of the King's Two Bodies in the Age of Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Stealing_the_Story/RaJlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Stealing the Story: Shakespeare's Self-Conscious Use of the Mimetic Tradition in the Tragedies]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Greenwood_Companion_to_Shakespeare_O/JkcgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Greenwood Companion to Shakespeare: Overviews and the history plays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/British_and_Irish_Literature_and_Its_Tim/xH4jAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover British and Irish Literature and Its Times]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Philosophy_of_History_Reve/1jwgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Philosophy of History Revealed in a Detailed Analysis of Henry V and Examined in Other History Plays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_His_Contemporaries/7em7coOthxQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and His Contemporaries]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Politics_of_the_Public_Sphere_in_Ear/0sGHAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Politics of the Public Sphere in Early Modern England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Catholic_Religion/Fl4gAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0&bsq=%22I%20am%20Richard%20II,%20know%20ye%20not%20that?%22 Shakespeare and the Catholic religion]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Proceedings_of_the_British_Academy_Volum/8CsoAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Lectures]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Slander_and_Censorship_in_Late_Sixteenth/wb_oAvuJgbAC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Slander and Censorship in Late Sixteenth Century Literature]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabethan_Literature_and_the_Law_of_Fr/vBFdAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Elizabethan Literature and the Law of Fraudulent Conveyance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Hamlet_History_and_commentary/yxgrAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Hamlet History etc]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare_A_Popular_Life/1BuaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare: a popular life]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_State_of_Mind/pCiIAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover A State of Mind?]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Dramatic_Genres/J5FlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Dramatic Genres]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Literature_Criticism_from_1400_to_1800/O6VkAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Literature Criticism from 1400 to 1800 Volume 89]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_the_Papist/LPwNAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare the Papist]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Goslicius_Ideal_Senator_and_His_Cultural/1jc7AQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Goslicius' Ideal Senator and His Cultural Impact Over the Centuries]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_by_Another_Name/FqllAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover "Shakespeare" by Another Name]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Friends/AlZlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Friends]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Dr_Simon_Forman/qHceAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Dr Simon Forman]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare_the_Wars_of_the_Rose/dZFlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare, the Wars of the Roses and the historians]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespearean_Criticism/2TdlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespearean Criticism]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Poetry_History_and_Antiquarianism_in_Ref/jwIhAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Poetry, History, and Antiquarianism in Reformation England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Prince_of_Love/D0QgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Prince of Love]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Paper_Bullets_of_the_Brain/o0YgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Paper Bullets of the Brain]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/As_You_Like_It/GiBaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover As You Like It: Third Series]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare/WCqaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare, Dominic Shellard]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Poets_and_God/0XZlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Poets and God]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Law_and_Literature/Ax5MAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Law and Literature Volume 16]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Embodied_Word/FV8sAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Embodied Word]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Case_for_Shakespeare/WaRlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Case for Shakespeare: The End of the Authorship Question]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Explorations_in_Renaissance_Culture/_SYrAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Explorations in Renaissance Culture Volumes 33-34]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Touch_of_the_Real/ewdaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Touch of the Real: Essays in Early Modern Culture in Honour of Stephen Greenblatt]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Wotton_and_His_Worlds/ZfgNAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Wotton and his Worlds]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Theatre_and_Religion/wo1lAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Theatre and Religion Lancastrian Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Trying_Treason/TOKxAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Trying Treason]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Willing_Subjects/IEX0sGwT1QQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Willing Subjects]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Symbolism/Bt0ZAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Symbolism]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Performing_Shakespeare/35pQAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Performing Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Soul_of_the_Age/e0UgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Soul of the Age]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/England/aD9nAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabeth_I/-GtnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Elizabeth I]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/King_Richard_II/oGUMX4RntjgC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA25&printsec=frontcover King Richard II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Legal_Imagination/OXPvBqQLw-4C?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA38&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the legal imagination]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Theatre/GxN3ue9_r3oC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA69&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Theatre]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Critical_Essays_on_Shakespeare_s_Richard/AaYoAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Critical Essays on Shakespeare's Richard II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Reign_of_Richard_II_Essays_in_Honour/y3xnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Reign of Richard II: Essays in Honour of May McKisack]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Poetry_and_the_Realm_of_Politics/oQFaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Poetry and the Realm of Politics]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare/BM0mAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespearean_Politics/oTdlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespearean Politics]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_the_Theatrical_Dimension/wl4gAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare, the Theatrical Dimension]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Who_was_Kit_Marlowe/zQ1aAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Kit Marlowe etc]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/From_Page_to_Performance/beQKAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover From Page to Performance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Exploring_Tudor_England/ax56AAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Exploring Tudor England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Movement_Towards_Subversion/vyJaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Movement Towards Subversion]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Typological_Satire/G5BlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Typological Satire]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Recycled/zzNlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare Recycled]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Reinventing_the_Middle_Ages_the_Renaissa/fXFnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Reinventing the Middle Ages & the Renaissance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Mysterious_William_Shakespeare/WnllAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Mysterious William Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/GHhlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Richard II Critical Essays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare/WJvC6gu_I0gC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare: Records and Images]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Actors/HYtlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Actors]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_the_Man/BVdlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare the man]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Henry_V/zXllAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Henry V: A Guide to the Play]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespearean_Contingencies/Cw1NAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespearean Contingencies]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Renaissance_Drama/E60kAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Renaissance Drama 1990]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Language_Discourse_Sign/uH4oAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Language, Discourse, Sign]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Mock_Kings_in_Medieval_Society_and_Renai/T98KAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Mock kings in medieval society and Renaissance drama]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Invention_of_the_Human/ojHirImrtYoC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare: Invention of the Human]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare/wn5lAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Persons_in_Groups/rQ24AAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Persons in Groups]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/All_Semblative_a_Woman_s_Part/0DlaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover All Semblative a Woman's Part?]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Crossing_the_Mirror/qRZNAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Crossing the Mirror]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/De_Vere_is_Shakespeare/dKJlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover De Vere is Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Lambarde_Elizabethan_Antiquary_1/x1RnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Lambarde, Elizabethan Antiquary, 1536-1601]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Power_of_Forms_in_the_English_Renais/cPtZAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Power of Forms in the English Renaissance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Ravishment_and_Rememberance/G31LAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Ravishment and Rememberance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_His_Theatre/8A5ZQq3uOVQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and His Theatre]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Critical_Hermeneutics_and_Shakespeare_s/O10gAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Critical Hermeneutics and Shakespeare's History Plays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Christian_England/K-WfAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Christian England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Religious_Background/xDSaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Religious Background]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shylock/N4RlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shylock]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Shakespeare_Legacy/MM5XAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Shakespeare Legacy]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Renaissance_Genres/0uFZAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Renaissance Genres]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Cannibals_Witches_and_Divorce/qZRpAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Cannibals, Witches, and Divorce]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Problem_of_Religious_Knowledge/C29LAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Problem of Religious Knowledge]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Essex_and_the_Great_Revolt_of_1381/J8RzAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Essex and the Great Revolt of 1381]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Transactions_of_the_London_and_Middlesex/4dtJAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover TLMAS]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Politics_and_the_State/Mn9lAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare, Politics and the State]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Allegories_of_Power_in_the_England_of_El/LIYgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Allegories of Power in the England of Elizabeth]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare/rIVlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Women_s_Matters/PDRlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Women's Matters]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Weak_King_Dilemma_in_the_Shakespeare/0bJlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Weak King Dilemma in the Shakespearean History Play]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Book_Known_as_Q/S2tlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Book Known as Q]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Fields_of_Vision/OD0eAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Fields of Vision]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Ungodly_Delights/RKgcAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Ungodly Delights]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Shakespeare_Handbook/rLRlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Shakespeare HandboOK]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Humanities/y5FZAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Humanities]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II_by_William_Shakespeare/Bb3yAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Richard II by William Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/King_Richard_II/50NnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover King Richard II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Murder_Under_Trust_Or_The_Topical_Macbet/0oNlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Murder under trust]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Shakespearean_Kings/tHBlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Shakespearean Kings]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/America_the_Mabr_e_y_Experience/mRQ3AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover America, the Mabr(e)y Experience: Resistance, Revolution & Civil War]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/ZDEkAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Richard II: An Annotated Bibliography, Volume 2]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Batsford_Companion_to_Medieval_Engla/ev78b9EJQy0C?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Batsford Companion to Medieval England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Unruly_Women/FKFlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Unruly Women]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_Others/iFEgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and Others]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Kings_and_Chroniclers/L1wpAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Kings and Chroniclers]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_Kingdom_for_a_Stage/UzxlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover A Kingdom for a Stage]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_House_of_Commons/Ezz4OZuYVFYC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The History of Parliament: The House of Commons 1558-1603 (3 v.)]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Soul_of_the_Age/nMYCAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover shakespeare, Soul of the Age]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/After_Poststructuralism/TOaEAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0&bsq=%22I%20am%20Richard%20II,%20know%20ye%20not%20that?%22 After Poststructuralism: Interdisciplinarity and Literary Theory]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Unschooled_Mind/C7WnYtt219IC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Unschooled Mind]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabeth_I/hHZnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Eliz I]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Dramas_of_Christian_Time/mnIqAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Dramas of Christian Time]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabeth_I/XjQmAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Elizabeth I: The Shrewdness of Virtue]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/John_Dryden/9Q1aAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover John Dryden]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_Early_Modern_Political_T/DUwhAwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PA259&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and Early Modern Political Thought]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_English_History_Play_in_the_age_of_S/5TT-AQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PA158&printsec=frontcover The English History Play in the Age of Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Political/rEcREQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PA215&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Political]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare_Subject_of_the_Crown/a7G6DAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PT18&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare - Subject of the Crown?]
* [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&client=firefox-b-d&hs=4AQ&sca_esv=6d4ade7bd26771c9&udm=36&biw=2510&bih=1307&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A2000%2Ccd_max%3A2099&sxsrf=ANbL-n6I6Pkwl7mmdHK6N1xPQXLbGBIOSg%3A1776853062010&ei=RqDoaZUvztiFsg_I5bToDw&ved=0ahUKEwiV6tC8nYGUAxVObEEAHcgyDf0Q4dUDCBM&uact=5&oq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&gs_lp=EhBnd3Mtd2l6LW1vZGVsZXNzIiYic2hha2VzcGVhcmUiICsgInBvbGl0aWNhbCBwcm9wYWdhbmRhIjIIECEYoAEYwwRInQlQxgZYuwdwAXgAkAEAmAF_oAHPAaoBAzEuMbgBA8gBAPgBAZgCAqACVsICCxAAGIAEGKIEGLADmAMAiAYBkAYCkgcBMqAHowOyBwExuAdTwgcDMC4yyAcEgAgB&sclient=gws-wiz-modeless The Nazi Appropriation of Shakespeare: Cultural Politics in]
j7fiv6n2zgt4pk61m3nd10dnxdupafr
2812413
2812412
2026-06-01T11:09:07Z
Fortuna imperatrix mundi
1058581
bibliog
2812413
wikitext
text/x-wiki
==References==
==Bibliography==
* [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230307261_2 Orgel, S. (2011). Prologue: I am Richard II. In: Petrina, A., Tosi, L. (eds) Representations of Elizabeth I in Early Modern Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307261_2]
* [https://broadlytextual.com/2017/12/15/i-am-richard-ii-know-ye-not-that-drama-and-political-anxiety-in-shakespeares-london/ Hixon, E., Syracuse Univ]
* Bate, Jonathan (2008). Soul of the Age. London: Penguin. pp. 256–286. ISBN 978-0-670-91482-1.
* [https://theconversation.com/richard-ii-by-william-shakespeare-why-the-divine-right-of-kings-still-matters-186648 McFarlane, K., Univ South Australia]
* [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/31090/summary Lemon, Rebecca. "The Faulty Verdict in "The Crown v. John Hayward"." SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, vol. 41 no. 1, 2001, p. 109-132. Project MUSE, https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sel.2001.0009]
* [https://brill.com/display/book/9789401211666/B9789401211666-s009.xml?language=en&srsltid=AfmBOoqTUaTQr0msNWRdtEZZ9qQ3rNcVkSoBvDPXuGv7nRvHrC8t5OzH Kizelbach, U. (2014), In The Pragmatics of Early Modern Politics: Power and Kingship in Shakespeare’s History Plays. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401211666_009]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/z-kOAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Lopez, R2]
* [https://www.manchesterhive.com/display/9781526130532/9781526130532.00008.xml?print rgel, S. (2017). "I am Richard II". In Spectacular Performances. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press. Retrieved Apr 22, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526130532.00008]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271041996_Was_Elizabeth_I_Richard_II_The_Authenticity_of_Lambarde%27s_%27Conversation%27 Scott-Warren, Jason. (2012). Was Elizabeth I Richard II?: The Authenticity of Lambarde's 'Conversation'. The Review of English Studies. 64. 208-230. 10.1093/res/hgs062]
* Stanley Wells, “Introduction” in Richard II, The New Penguin Shakespeare, ed. Stanley Wells (London: Penguin Books, 1969), 13.
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/shakespeare-survey/shakespeare-and-history-divergencies-and-agreements/B065A23215FD86BEE8E1CFD51DC7C1FB Ives EW. Shakespeare and History: Divergencies and Agreements. In: Wells S, ed. Shakespeare Survey. Shakespeare Survey. Cambridge University Press; 1986:19-36]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/457855 Albright, Evelyn May. “Shakespeare’s Richard II, Hayward’s History of Henry IV, and the Essex Conspiracy.” PMLA, vol. 46, no. 3, 1931, pp. 694–719. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/457855. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://dsc.duq.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2800&context=etd Morris, A. (2019). "within the hollow crown": Performing Kingship in Richard II and Henry IV Part One (Master's thesis, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1771]
* [https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1122&context=srhonors_theses Scannell, Sarah J., "Shakespeare's Richard II and Henry V and Political Rebellions in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth I" (2010). Honors Scholar Theses, 138]
* [https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2011.00873.x Luecking Frost, L. (2012), “A Kyng That Ruled All By Lust”: Richard II in Elizabethan Literature. Literature Compass, 9: 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2011.00873.x]
* [https://www.academia.edu/8347491/A_Law_Case_in_Verse_Venus_and_Adonis_and_the_Authorship_Question Stritmatter, R., A Law Case in Verse: Venus and Adonis and the Authorship Question, 2004 University of Tennessee Law Review]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304647742_Prologue_I_am_Richard_II Orgel, Stephen. (2011). Prologue: I am Richard II. 10.1057/9780230307261_2]
* [https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA314252957&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=15256863&sw=w&p=AONE&userGroupName=anon%7Ebf79dda0&aty=open-web-entry Egan, Michael. "The Essex Rebellion and Richard II: why wasn't Shakespeare arrested?" Shakespeare Oxford Newsletter, vol. 48, no. 3, summer-fall 2012, p. 20]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/richard-ii/stagehistory/D62D9CA061F03B2AE8D56E856288EEDA 1. Child H, Shakespeare W. THE STAGE-HISTORY. In: Dover Wilson J, ed. Richard II: The Cambridge Dover Wilson Shakespeare. Cambridge Library Collection - Literary Studies. Cambridge University Press; 2009:lxxvii-xcii]
* [https://www.openstarts.units.it/entities/publication/16d8c447-62f4-48e8-8347-5d56af674aa3/details Snelling, D., 'Prospero on the Coast of Bohemia. "Nihil sed rara et miranda amabat". Diary of Melchior Goldast upon the late Emperor Rudolph II' 1994]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2902265 Gajowski, Evelyn. Shakespeare in Performance: King Richard IIby Margaret Shewring. Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 3, 1998, pp. 328–30. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2902265. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/217842/summary Mosse, Ramona Franziska. Review of Richard II. Shakespeare Bulletin, vol. 25 no. 2, 2007, p. 73-77. Project MUSE, https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/shb.2007.0036]
* [https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/665894?journalCode=rq Petrina and Tosi. Representations of Elizabeth I in Early Modern Culture Elizabeth Pentland Renaissance Quarterly 2012 65:1, 274-276]
* [https://journals.co.za/doi/10.4314/sisa.v26i1.4 The construction of a king : waste, effeminacy and queerness in Shakespeare's Richard II Higginbotham, D.]
* [https://academic.oup.com/book/2363/chapter-abstract/142533948?redirectedFrom=fulltext Erskine-Hill, Howard, 'The Second Tetralogy and After', Poetry and the Realm of Politics: Shakespeare to Dryden (Oxford, 1996; online edn, Oxford Academic, 3 Oct. 2011), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198117315.003.0004]
* [https://www.academia.edu/123917862/Shakespeare_s_Richard_II_in_the_minds_of_the_Elizabethan_audiences Shakespeare’s Richard II in the minds of the Elizabethan audiences]
* [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03064220221084555 Plays, protests and the censor’s pencil]
* [https://www.indexoncensorship.org/2022/03/plays-protests-and-the-censors-pencil/ Plays, protests and the censor’s pencil A brittle Gloriana: staging the deposition of Queen Elizabeth I].
* Saul, N., Richard II
* [https://www.academia.edu/3236651/_A_god_on_earth_thou_art_Richard_II_and_the_nature_of_Kingship “A god on earth thou art”: Richard II and the nature of Kingship]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/457398 Albright, Evelyn May. “Shakespeare’s Richard II and the Essex Conspiracy.” PMLA, vol. 42, no. 3, 1927, pp. 686–720. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/457398. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/critical-survey/37/3/cs370301.xml Holderness, G. (2025). Introduction: Shakespeare's Wars of the Roses. Critical Survey, 37(3), 1-4. Retrieved Apr 22, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.3167/cs.2025.370301]
* [https://www.folger.edu/podcasts/shakespeare-unlimited/tragedy-richard-ii-henry-iv-helen-castor/ Folger: Shakespeare Unlimited: Episode 249]
* [https://www.rachaeldickzen.com/blog/2021/1/10/charlesiii The Historical and Shakespearean References in King Charles III]
* Kermode, The Age of Shakespeare, pg.53.
* [https://heinonline.org/HOL/login-hol?redirect_url=https%3A%2F%2Fheinonline.org%2FHOL%2Fmojo%3F%252Fmojo%3D%26auth_token%3DyhcMOu8W7PCc5OrmTqVnr2qFPpoiOdhM5uQmkQyWufU%253D%26casa_token%3D%26div%3D5%26g_sent%3D1%26paywall_url%3D%26referrer%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fheinonline.org%252FHOL%252FPage%253Fhandle%253Dhein.journals%252Fneastlr1%26timestamp%3D1776855600%26url%3D%252FHOL%252FPage%253Fhandle%253Dhein.journals%252Fneastlr1%2526div%253D5%2526id%253D%2526page%253D Jones, H., ''I AM RICHARD II, KNOW YE NOT THAT?' - WORKS. OF WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE AND THE ART OF. GOVERNANCE''']
* Hattaway, M., William Shakespeare: Richard II (Literature Insights, 9781847600349)
* [https://books.openedition.org/psn/8305 Findlay, A., “Good sometimes queen” (V.1.37). Richard II, Mary Stuart and the Politics of Queenship, 205-219]
* [https://pure.manchester.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/54508829/FULL_TEXT.PDF Pritchard, K., 'Legitimacy, Illegitimacy and Sovereignty in Shakespeare’s British Plays' (2011 University of Manchester PhD]
* CHATELANAT, Marine. Histrionic Future Kings: The Politics of Metadrama in Shakespeare’s Richard III, Richard II, and Henry IV Part 1. Master, 2023.
* [https://www.persee.fr/doc/xvii_0291-3798_2004_num_59_1_1993 Mayer, J-C., 'The "Parliament Sceane" in Shakespeare's King Richard II', XVII-XVIII. Revue de la Société d'études anglo-américaines des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles Année 2004 59 pp. 27-42]
* [https://www.emerald.com/md/article-abstract/38/5/315/285132/Managers-as-kings-Shakespeare-on-modern-leadership?redirectedFrom=fulltext Egan M (2000), "Managers as kings: Shakespeare on modern leadership". Management Decision, Vol. 38 No. 5 pp. 315–327, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740010340490]
* [https://d-nb.info/1279081511/34 Quabeck (2022): William Shakespeare, in: Thomas Gutmann, Eberhard Ortland, Klaus Stierstorfer, eds., Encyclopedia of Law and Literature (last edited 26 October 2022), doi: 10.17879/12009577118]
* [https://lawliberty.org/book-review/was-the-bard-writing-about-the-donald/ Sullivan, V., 'Was the Bard Writing about The Donald?']
* [https://deveresociety.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/FINAL_NL_Apr2022-Haste-July-Letterresponse.pdf Haste, I., 'THE PLAY ON THE EVE OF THE ESSEX REBELLION']
* [https://www.cherylmtaylor.com/2017/11/08/a-companion-to-shakespeares-richard-ii/ A Companion to Shakespeare’s Richard II]
* [https://www.city-journal.org/article/shakespeares-richards Dalrymple, T., Shakespeare’s Richards: The playwright’s two historical dramas offer contrasts between political pathologies]
* [https://hfriedberg.web.wesleyan.edu/engl205/wshakespeare/plotsandrebelions.htm ELIZABETHAN PLOTS AND REBELLIONS]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2869708 Rackin, Phyllis. “The Role of the Audience In Shakespeare’s Richard II.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 3, 1985, pp. 262–81. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2869708. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026.]
* [https://www.psychologytoday.com/ie/blog/whats-in-name/201603/group-think-and-academia-shocking-shakespeare-shenanigans Group Think and Academia: Shocking Shakespeare Shenanigans]
* [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01847678221099975 Hiscopck, A., '"Why I should welcome such a guest as grief [?": Lodging and dislodging in Shakespeare's Richard II']
* [https://academic.oup.com/book/51779/chapter-abstract/420487796?redirectedFrom=fulltext 'Epigraph', Imagining Time in the English Chronicle Play: Historical Futures, 1590-1660 (Oxford, 2023; online edn, Oxford Academic, 19 Oct. 2023), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198872658.002.0009]
* [https://journals.openedition.org/interfaces/319?lang=en Blake & Shakespeare]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/shakespeare-and-the-visual-imagination/richard-iiand-the-politics-of-perspective/23A5D4615E2A8BF9380BAF1ECE99B46D Sillars S. Richard IIand the Politics of Perspective. In: Shakespeare and the Visual Imagination. Cambridge University Press; 2015:133-162.]
* [https://www.persee.fr/doc/xvii_0291-3798_2004_num_59_1_1992 Le miroir des rois: de Richard II à Henry VIII]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/king-richard-ll/introduction/25419329A06BC1C2E4D3DDBF331B7F91 Shakespeare W, McEachern C. Introduction. In: Gurr A, ed. King Richard Ll. The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press; 2018:1-66.]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372862689_A_Critical_Discourse_Study_of_Shakespeare%27s_Theological_Conceptions_in_Acts_IV_and_V_of_Richard_II_The_%27Divine_Mandate%27_of_Richard_Kingship_Falls_Apart A Critical Discourse Study of Shakespeare’s Theological Conceptions in Acts IV and V of Richard II: The ‘Divine Mandate’ of Richard Kingship Falls Apart]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/lal.2004.16.3.313 Richard II, Bracton, and the End of Political Theology]
* [https://dokumen.pub/the-art-of-law-in-shakespeare-9781509905478-9781509905508-9781509905492.html The Art of Law in Shakespeare]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-shakespeare-and-religion/providence-and-divine-right-in-the-english-histories/DBE9BFEBF5C199F9DD72D31ED9C3B041 Mayer J-C. Providence and Divine Right in the English Histories. In: Hamlin H, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Religion. Cambridge Companions to Literature. Cambridge University Press; 2019:151-167]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315698000_THE_CHOMSKY-FOUCAULT_DEBATE_WHERE_DOES_THE_BARD_STAND_IN_RICHARD_II Salami, Ali & Riahi Nouri, Amir. (2016). THE CHOMSKY-FOUCAULT DEBATE: WHERE DOES THE BARD STAND IN RICHARD II?]
* [https://dokumen.pub/shakespeare-richard-ii-9781350363168-9780333416709.html Richard II]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/457907?seq=1 Heffner, Ray. “Shakespeare, Hayward, and Essex.” PMLA, vol. 45, no. 3, 1930, pp. 754–80. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/457907. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-shakespeare-and-war/shakespeare-on-civil-and-dynastic-wars/00D0269CFF998876DB961FB01C22954D Shakespeare on Civil and Dynastic Wars]
* [https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004356900/B9789004356900_012.xml?srsltid=AfmBOopJMjwJAQnUGME9FmT6Gwg0ih9pArbXBdTJbN6YAqbdXqbkGyuo Is a Dramatic Theory of History Possible? Shakespeare’s Richard ii and ‘Historical Truth’]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/24475607 THE CHILD'S TWO BODIES: SHAKESPEARE, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE END OF SUCCESSION]
* [https://dokumen.pub/english-renaissance-drama-an-introduction-to-theatre-and-theatres-in-shakespeares-time-9781847600202-9781847600714.html English Renaissance Drama : An Introduction to Theatre and Theatres in Shakespeare’s Time]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/believing-in-shakespeare/person-plot-place/BD4EF4CBA6E7D8E2ECE5519FA1D08C16 1. McEachern C. Person, Plot, Place. In: Believing in Shakespeare: Studies in Longing. Cambridge University Press; 2018:181-296]
* [https://www.enotes.com/topics/richard-2/criticism/richard-ii-vol-91/criticism-production-reviews-1000228/nigel-saul-review-date-12-may-2000 With an Eye to the Present]
* [https://www.academia.edu/128303633/Shakespeare_s_Other_Eden_Richard_II_by_Ouroboros_Theatre_Company_2013_ Shakespeare’s Other Eden Richard II by Ouroboros Theatre Company (2013)]
* [https://dokumen.pub/shakespeare-upstart-crow-to-sweet-swan-1592-1623-9781472555496-9781408130148-9781408139189.html Shakespeare: Upstart Crow to Sweet Swan 1592-1623]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/41917215 RACKIN, PHYLLIS. “Temporality, Anachronism, and Presence in Shakespeare’s English Histories.” Renaissance Drama, vol. 17, 1986, pp. 101–23. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41917215. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026.]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/greece-and-rome/article/abs/alexander-philotas-and-the-origins-of-modern-historiography/D90568C0A1131952625E0A3B44F43EC8 Stoneman R. Alexander, Philotas, and the origins of modern historiography. Greece and Rome. 2013;60(2):296-312. doi:10.1017/S0017383513000119]
* [https://www.academia.edu/35800720/Shakespeares_Richard_II_and_Elizabethan_politics Shakespeare's Richard II and Elizabethan politics]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/rethinking-historicism-from-shakespeare-to-milton/old-new-now/2E8CBEFFEFB11D8B843BAF2C108E9768 Introduction - Old, New, Now]
* [https://www.academia.edu/24392476/Richard_II_hamartia_and_climax Richard II hamartia and climax]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/babylonian-jews-and-sasanian-imperialism-in-late-antiquity/kings-and-religion-in-the-talmud-and-in-the-imagination-of-sasanian-communities/E2DCC2F3E0FBA74ABE543DDD2DD7F1A7 Kings and Religion in the Talmud and in the Imagination of Sasanian Communities]
* Stephen Greenblatt, “Introduction,” in The Power of Forms in the English Renaissance, ed. Stephen Greenblatt (Norman, OK: 1982), 3-6]
* [https://www.academia.edu/30472558/Americas_Donald_Trump_Shakespeares_Richard_II_15_Dec_2016 America's Donald Trump, Shakespeare's Richard II]
* [https://www.academia.edu/5321346/Looking_Back_Shakespeare_s_Indebtedness_to_Chaucer_and_the_Representations_of_Chivalry_in_King_Richard_II_The_Two_Noble_Kinsmen_and_the_Knight_s_Tale Looking Back: Shakespeare’s Indebtedness to Chaucer and the Representations of Chivalry in King Richard II, The Two Noble Kinsmen and the Knight’s Tale]
* [https://www.academia.edu/92423912/The_Good_Usurper_in_the_eyes_of_God_and_the_people_An_analysis_of_the_role_of_the_usurper_in_Shakespeares_Richard_II_and_Henry_IV_Part_1 The Good Usurper in the eyes of God and the people: An analysis of the role of the usurper in Shakespeare's Richard II and Henry IV Part 1]
* [https://www.academia.edu/91789871/The_Bacon_Shakespeare_Manuscript_Hitherto_known_as_the_Northumberland_Manuscript_which_originally_Contained_Copies_of_his_Shakespeare_Plays_Richard_II_and_Richard_III THE BACON-SHAKESPEARE MANUSCRIPT (HITHERTO KNOWN AS THE NORTHUMBERLAND MANUSCRIPT) WHICH ORIGINALLY CONTAINED COPIES OF HIS SHAKESPEARE PLAYS RICHARD II AND RICHARD III]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/f4gGCAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA88&printsec=frontcover Richard II: Critical Essays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_Companion_to_Shakespeare_s_Works_Volum/JlDNEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA400&printsec=frontcover A Companion to Shakespeare's Works, Volume II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Reread/Z6JhDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA239&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare Reread]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_in_the_Present/yTKWEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PT8&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare in the Present]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Studying_Shakespeare/1N4FBAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA129&printsec=frontcover Studying Shakespeare A Practical Introduction]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Critical_Essays_on_William_Faulkner/kAGBEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PT178&printsec=frontcover Critical Essays on William Faulkner]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare/QY6aEQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA216&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory 1945-2000]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Reign_of_Richard_II/cv0WAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Dodd, G., R2]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Institution_of_Theat/Nkt9DAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA108&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Institution of Theatre]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Theory_of_the_King_s_Two_Bodies_in_t/8SRXAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Theory of the King's Two Bodies in the Age of Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Stealing_the_Story/RaJlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Stealing the Story: Shakespeare's Self-Conscious Use of the Mimetic Tradition in the Tragedies]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Greenwood_Companion_to_Shakespeare_O/JkcgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Greenwood Companion to Shakespeare: Overviews and the history plays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/British_and_Irish_Literature_and_Its_Tim/xH4jAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover British and Irish Literature and Its Times]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Philosophy_of_History_Reve/1jwgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Philosophy of History Revealed in a Detailed Analysis of Henry V and Examined in Other History Plays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_His_Contemporaries/7em7coOthxQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and His Contemporaries]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Politics_of_the_Public_Sphere_in_Ear/0sGHAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Politics of the Public Sphere in Early Modern England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Catholic_Religion/Fl4gAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0&bsq=%22I%20am%20Richard%20II,%20know%20ye%20not%20that?%22 Shakespeare and the Catholic religion]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Proceedings_of_the_British_Academy_Volum/8CsoAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Lectures]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Slander_and_Censorship_in_Late_Sixteenth/wb_oAvuJgbAC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Slander and Censorship in Late Sixteenth Century Literature]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabethan_Literature_and_the_Law_of_Fr/vBFdAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Elizabethan Literature and the Law of Fraudulent Conveyance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Hamlet_History_and_commentary/yxgrAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Hamlet History etc]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare_A_Popular_Life/1BuaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare: a popular life]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_State_of_Mind/pCiIAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover A State of Mind?]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Dramatic_Genres/J5FlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Dramatic Genres]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Literature_Criticism_from_1400_to_1800/O6VkAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Literature Criticism from 1400 to 1800 Volume 89]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_the_Papist/LPwNAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare the Papist]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Goslicius_Ideal_Senator_and_His_Cultural/1jc7AQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Goslicius' Ideal Senator and His Cultural Impact Over the Centuries]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_by_Another_Name/FqllAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover "Shakespeare" by Another Name]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Friends/AlZlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Friends]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Dr_Simon_Forman/qHceAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Dr Simon Forman]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare_the_Wars_of_the_Rose/dZFlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare, the Wars of the Roses and the historians]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespearean_Criticism/2TdlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespearean Criticism]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Poetry_History_and_Antiquarianism_in_Ref/jwIhAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Poetry, History, and Antiquarianism in Reformation England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Prince_of_Love/D0QgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Prince of Love]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Paper_Bullets_of_the_Brain/o0YgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Paper Bullets of the Brain]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/As_You_Like_It/GiBaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover As You Like It: Third Series]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare/WCqaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare, Dominic Shellard]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Poets_and_God/0XZlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Poets and God]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Law_and_Literature/Ax5MAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Law and Literature Volume 16]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Embodied_Word/FV8sAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Embodied Word]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Case_for_Shakespeare/WaRlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Case for Shakespeare: The End of the Authorship Question]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Explorations_in_Renaissance_Culture/_SYrAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Explorations in Renaissance Culture Volumes 33-34]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Touch_of_the_Real/ewdaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Touch of the Real: Essays in Early Modern Culture in Honour of Stephen Greenblatt]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Wotton_and_His_Worlds/ZfgNAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Wotton and his Worlds]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Theatre_and_Religion/wo1lAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Theatre and Religion Lancastrian Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Trying_Treason/TOKxAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Trying Treason]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Willing_Subjects/IEX0sGwT1QQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Willing Subjects]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Symbolism/Bt0ZAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Symbolism]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Performing_Shakespeare/35pQAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Performing Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Soul_of_the_Age/e0UgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Soul of the Age]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/England/aD9nAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabeth_I/-GtnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Elizabeth I]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/King_Richard_II/oGUMX4RntjgC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA25&printsec=frontcover King Richard II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Legal_Imagination/OXPvBqQLw-4C?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA38&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the legal imagination]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Theatre/GxN3ue9_r3oC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA69&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Theatre]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Critical_Essays_on_Shakespeare_s_Richard/AaYoAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Critical Essays on Shakespeare's Richard II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Reign_of_Richard_II_Essays_in_Honour/y3xnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Reign of Richard II: Essays in Honour of May McKisack]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Poetry_and_the_Realm_of_Politics/oQFaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Poetry and the Realm of Politics]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare/BM0mAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespearean_Politics/oTdlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespearean Politics]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_the_Theatrical_Dimension/wl4gAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare, the Theatrical Dimension]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Who_was_Kit_Marlowe/zQ1aAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Kit Marlowe etc]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/From_Page_to_Performance/beQKAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover From Page to Performance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Exploring_Tudor_England/ax56AAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Exploring Tudor England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Movement_Towards_Subversion/vyJaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Movement Towards Subversion]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Typological_Satire/G5BlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Typological Satire]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Recycled/zzNlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare Recycled]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Reinventing_the_Middle_Ages_the_Renaissa/fXFnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Reinventing the Middle Ages & the Renaissance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Mysterious_William_Shakespeare/WnllAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Mysterious William Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/GHhlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Richard II Critical Essays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare/WJvC6gu_I0gC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare: Records and Images]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Actors/HYtlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Actors]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_the_Man/BVdlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare the man]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Henry_V/zXllAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Henry V: A Guide to the Play]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespearean_Contingencies/Cw1NAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespearean Contingencies]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Renaissance_Drama/E60kAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Renaissance Drama 1990]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Language_Discourse_Sign/uH4oAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Language, Discourse, Sign]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Mock_Kings_in_Medieval_Society_and_Renai/T98KAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Mock kings in medieval society and Renaissance drama]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Invention_of_the_Human/ojHirImrtYoC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare: Invention of the Human]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare/wn5lAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Persons_in_Groups/rQ24AAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Persons in Groups]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/All_Semblative_a_Woman_s_Part/0DlaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover All Semblative a Woman's Part?]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Crossing_the_Mirror/qRZNAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Crossing the Mirror]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/De_Vere_is_Shakespeare/dKJlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover De Vere is Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Lambarde_Elizabethan_Antiquary_1/x1RnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Lambarde, Elizabethan Antiquary, 1536-1601]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Power_of_Forms_in_the_English_Renais/cPtZAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Power of Forms in the English Renaissance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Ravishment_and_Rememberance/G31LAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Ravishment and Rememberance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_His_Theatre/8A5ZQq3uOVQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and His Theatre]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Critical_Hermeneutics_and_Shakespeare_s/O10gAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Critical Hermeneutics and Shakespeare's History Plays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Christian_England/K-WfAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Christian England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Religious_Background/xDSaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Religious Background]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shylock/N4RlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shylock]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Shakespeare_Legacy/MM5XAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Shakespeare Legacy]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Renaissance_Genres/0uFZAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Renaissance Genres]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Cannibals_Witches_and_Divorce/qZRpAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Cannibals, Witches, and Divorce]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Problem_of_Religious_Knowledge/C29LAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Problem of Religious Knowledge]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Essex_and_the_Great_Revolt_of_1381/J8RzAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Essex and the Great Revolt of 1381]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Transactions_of_the_London_and_Middlesex/4dtJAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover TLMAS]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Politics_and_the_State/Mn9lAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare, Politics and the State]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Allegories_of_Power_in_the_England_of_El/LIYgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Allegories of Power in the England of Elizabeth]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare/rIVlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Women_s_Matters/PDRlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Women's Matters]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Weak_King_Dilemma_in_the_Shakespeare/0bJlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Weak King Dilemma in the Shakespearean History Play]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Book_Known_as_Q/S2tlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Book Known as Q]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Fields_of_Vision/OD0eAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Fields of Vision]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Ungodly_Delights/RKgcAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Ungodly Delights]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Shakespeare_Handbook/rLRlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Shakespeare HandboOK]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Humanities/y5FZAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Humanities]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II_by_William_Shakespeare/Bb3yAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Richard II by William Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/King_Richard_II/50NnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover King Richard II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Murder_Under_Trust_Or_The_Topical_Macbet/0oNlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Murder under trust]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Shakespearean_Kings/tHBlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Shakespearean Kings]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/America_the_Mabr_e_y_Experience/mRQ3AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover America, the Mabr(e)y Experience: Resistance, Revolution & Civil War]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/ZDEkAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Richard II: An Annotated Bibliography, Volume 2]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Batsford_Companion_to_Medieval_Engla/ev78b9EJQy0C?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Batsford Companion to Medieval England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Unruly_Women/FKFlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Unruly Women]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_Others/iFEgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and Others]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Kings_and_Chroniclers/L1wpAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Kings and Chroniclers]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_Kingdom_for_a_Stage/UzxlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover A Kingdom for a Stage]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_House_of_Commons/Ezz4OZuYVFYC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The History of Parliament: The House of Commons 1558-1603 (3 v.)]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Soul_of_the_Age/nMYCAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover shakespeare, Soul of the Age]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/After_Poststructuralism/TOaEAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0&bsq=%22I%20am%20Richard%20II,%20know%20ye%20not%20that?%22 After Poststructuralism: Interdisciplinarity and Literary Theory]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Unschooled_Mind/C7WnYtt219IC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Unschooled Mind]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabeth_I/hHZnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Eliz I]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Dramas_of_Christian_Time/mnIqAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Dramas of Christian Time]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabeth_I/XjQmAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Elizabeth I: The Shrewdness of Virtue]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/John_Dryden/9Q1aAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover John Dryden]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_Early_Modern_Political_T/DUwhAwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PA259&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and Early Modern Political Thought]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_English_History_Play_in_the_age_of_S/5TT-AQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PA158&printsec=frontcover The English History Play in the Age of Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Political/rEcREQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PA215&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Political]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare_Subject_of_the_Crown/a7G6DAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PT18&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare - Subject of the Crown?]
* [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&client=firefox-b-d&hs=4AQ&sca_esv=6d4ade7bd26771c9&udm=36&biw=2510&bih=1307&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A2000%2Ccd_max%3A2099&sxsrf=ANbL-n6I6Pkwl7mmdHK6N1xPQXLbGBIOSg%3A1776853062010&ei=RqDoaZUvztiFsg_I5bToDw&ved=0ahUKEwiV6tC8nYGUAxVObEEAHcgyDf0Q4dUDCBM&uact=5&oq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&gs_lp=EhBnd3Mtd2l6LW1vZGVsZXNzIiYic2hha2VzcGVhcmUiICsgInBvbGl0aWNhbCBwcm9wYWdhbmRhIjIIECEYoAEYwwRInQlQxgZYuwdwAXgAkAEAmAF_oAHPAaoBAzEuMbgBA8gBAPgBAZgCAqACVsICCxAAGIAEGKIEGLADmAMAiAYBkAYCkgcBMqAHowOyBwExuAdTwgcDMC4yyAcEgAgB&sclient=gws-wiz-modeless The Nazi Appropriation of Shakespeare: Cultural Politics in]
l83q6zsn2rwe8tolz9glfw755h7h34p
2812414
2812413
2026-06-01T11:11:17Z
Fortuna imperatrix mundi
1058581
notes
2812414
wikitext
text/x-wiki
== Notes ==
==References==
==Bibliography==
* [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230307261_2 Orgel, S. (2011). Prologue: I am Richard II. In: Petrina, A., Tosi, L. (eds) Representations of Elizabeth I in Early Modern Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307261_2]
* [https://broadlytextual.com/2017/12/15/i-am-richard-ii-know-ye-not-that-drama-and-political-anxiety-in-shakespeares-london/ Hixon, E., Syracuse Univ]
* Bate, Jonathan (2008). Soul of the Age. London: Penguin. pp. 256–286. ISBN 978-0-670-91482-1.
* [https://theconversation.com/richard-ii-by-william-shakespeare-why-the-divine-right-of-kings-still-matters-186648 McFarlane, K., Univ South Australia]
* [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/31090/summary Lemon, Rebecca. "The Faulty Verdict in "The Crown v. John Hayward"." SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, vol. 41 no. 1, 2001, p. 109-132. Project MUSE, https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sel.2001.0009]
* [https://brill.com/display/book/9789401211666/B9789401211666-s009.xml?language=en&srsltid=AfmBOoqTUaTQr0msNWRdtEZZ9qQ3rNcVkSoBvDPXuGv7nRvHrC8t5OzH Kizelbach, U. (2014), In The Pragmatics of Early Modern Politics: Power and Kingship in Shakespeare’s History Plays. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401211666_009]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/z-kOAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Lopez, R2]
* [https://www.manchesterhive.com/display/9781526130532/9781526130532.00008.xml?print rgel, S. (2017). "I am Richard II". In Spectacular Performances. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press. Retrieved Apr 22, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526130532.00008]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271041996_Was_Elizabeth_I_Richard_II_The_Authenticity_of_Lambarde%27s_%27Conversation%27 Scott-Warren, Jason. (2012). Was Elizabeth I Richard II?: The Authenticity of Lambarde's 'Conversation'. The Review of English Studies. 64. 208-230. 10.1093/res/hgs062]
* Stanley Wells, “Introduction” in Richard II, The New Penguin Shakespeare, ed. Stanley Wells (London: Penguin Books, 1969), 13.
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/shakespeare-survey/shakespeare-and-history-divergencies-and-agreements/B065A23215FD86BEE8E1CFD51DC7C1FB Ives EW. Shakespeare and History: Divergencies and Agreements. In: Wells S, ed. Shakespeare Survey. Shakespeare Survey. Cambridge University Press; 1986:19-36]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/457855 Albright, Evelyn May. “Shakespeare’s Richard II, Hayward’s History of Henry IV, and the Essex Conspiracy.” PMLA, vol. 46, no. 3, 1931, pp. 694–719. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/457855. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://dsc.duq.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2800&context=etd Morris, A. (2019). "within the hollow crown": Performing Kingship in Richard II and Henry IV Part One (Master's thesis, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1771]
* [https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1122&context=srhonors_theses Scannell, Sarah J., "Shakespeare's Richard II and Henry V and Political Rebellions in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth I" (2010). Honors Scholar Theses, 138]
* [https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2011.00873.x Luecking Frost, L. (2012), “A Kyng That Ruled All By Lust”: Richard II in Elizabethan Literature. Literature Compass, 9: 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2011.00873.x]
* [https://www.academia.edu/8347491/A_Law_Case_in_Verse_Venus_and_Adonis_and_the_Authorship_Question Stritmatter, R., A Law Case in Verse: Venus and Adonis and the Authorship Question, 2004 University of Tennessee Law Review]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304647742_Prologue_I_am_Richard_II Orgel, Stephen. (2011). Prologue: I am Richard II. 10.1057/9780230307261_2]
* [https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA314252957&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=15256863&sw=w&p=AONE&userGroupName=anon%7Ebf79dda0&aty=open-web-entry Egan, Michael. "The Essex Rebellion and Richard II: why wasn't Shakespeare arrested?" Shakespeare Oxford Newsletter, vol. 48, no. 3, summer-fall 2012, p. 20]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/richard-ii/stagehistory/D62D9CA061F03B2AE8D56E856288EEDA 1. Child H, Shakespeare W. THE STAGE-HISTORY. In: Dover Wilson J, ed. Richard II: The Cambridge Dover Wilson Shakespeare. Cambridge Library Collection - Literary Studies. Cambridge University Press; 2009:lxxvii-xcii]
* [https://www.openstarts.units.it/entities/publication/16d8c447-62f4-48e8-8347-5d56af674aa3/details Snelling, D., 'Prospero on the Coast of Bohemia. "Nihil sed rara et miranda amabat". Diary of Melchior Goldast upon the late Emperor Rudolph II' 1994]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2902265 Gajowski, Evelyn. Shakespeare in Performance: King Richard IIby Margaret Shewring. Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 3, 1998, pp. 328–30. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2902265. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/217842/summary Mosse, Ramona Franziska. Review of Richard II. Shakespeare Bulletin, vol. 25 no. 2, 2007, p. 73-77. Project MUSE, https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/shb.2007.0036]
* [https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/665894?journalCode=rq Petrina and Tosi. Representations of Elizabeth I in Early Modern Culture Elizabeth Pentland Renaissance Quarterly 2012 65:1, 274-276]
* [https://journals.co.za/doi/10.4314/sisa.v26i1.4 The construction of a king : waste, effeminacy and queerness in Shakespeare's Richard II Higginbotham, D.]
* [https://academic.oup.com/book/2363/chapter-abstract/142533948?redirectedFrom=fulltext Erskine-Hill, Howard, 'The Second Tetralogy and After', Poetry and the Realm of Politics: Shakespeare to Dryden (Oxford, 1996; online edn, Oxford Academic, 3 Oct. 2011), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198117315.003.0004]
* [https://www.academia.edu/123917862/Shakespeare_s_Richard_II_in_the_minds_of_the_Elizabethan_audiences Shakespeare’s Richard II in the minds of the Elizabethan audiences]
* [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03064220221084555 Plays, protests and the censor’s pencil]
* [https://www.indexoncensorship.org/2022/03/plays-protests-and-the-censors-pencil/ Plays, protests and the censor’s pencil A brittle Gloriana: staging the deposition of Queen Elizabeth I].
* Saul, N., Richard II
* [https://www.academia.edu/3236651/_A_god_on_earth_thou_art_Richard_II_and_the_nature_of_Kingship “A god on earth thou art”: Richard II and the nature of Kingship]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/457398 Albright, Evelyn May. “Shakespeare’s Richard II and the Essex Conspiracy.” PMLA, vol. 42, no. 3, 1927, pp. 686–720. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/457398. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/critical-survey/37/3/cs370301.xml Holderness, G. (2025). Introduction: Shakespeare's Wars of the Roses. Critical Survey, 37(3), 1-4. Retrieved Apr 22, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.3167/cs.2025.370301]
* [https://www.folger.edu/podcasts/shakespeare-unlimited/tragedy-richard-ii-henry-iv-helen-castor/ Folger: Shakespeare Unlimited: Episode 249]
* [https://www.rachaeldickzen.com/blog/2021/1/10/charlesiii The Historical and Shakespearean References in King Charles III]
* Kermode, The Age of Shakespeare, pg.53.
* [https://heinonline.org/HOL/login-hol?redirect_url=https%3A%2F%2Fheinonline.org%2FHOL%2Fmojo%3F%252Fmojo%3D%26auth_token%3DyhcMOu8W7PCc5OrmTqVnr2qFPpoiOdhM5uQmkQyWufU%253D%26casa_token%3D%26div%3D5%26g_sent%3D1%26paywall_url%3D%26referrer%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fheinonline.org%252FHOL%252FPage%253Fhandle%253Dhein.journals%252Fneastlr1%26timestamp%3D1776855600%26url%3D%252FHOL%252FPage%253Fhandle%253Dhein.journals%252Fneastlr1%2526div%253D5%2526id%253D%2526page%253D Jones, H., ''I AM RICHARD II, KNOW YE NOT THAT?' - WORKS. OF WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE AND THE ART OF. GOVERNANCE''']
* Hattaway, M., William Shakespeare: Richard II (Literature Insights, 9781847600349)
* [https://books.openedition.org/psn/8305 Findlay, A., “Good sometimes queen” (V.1.37). Richard II, Mary Stuart and the Politics of Queenship, 205-219]
* [https://pure.manchester.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/54508829/FULL_TEXT.PDF Pritchard, K., 'Legitimacy, Illegitimacy and Sovereignty in Shakespeare’s British Plays' (2011 University of Manchester PhD]
* CHATELANAT, Marine. Histrionic Future Kings: The Politics of Metadrama in Shakespeare’s Richard III, Richard II, and Henry IV Part 1. Master, 2023.
* [https://www.persee.fr/doc/xvii_0291-3798_2004_num_59_1_1993 Mayer, J-C., 'The "Parliament Sceane" in Shakespeare's King Richard II', XVII-XVIII. Revue de la Société d'études anglo-américaines des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles Année 2004 59 pp. 27-42]
* [https://www.emerald.com/md/article-abstract/38/5/315/285132/Managers-as-kings-Shakespeare-on-modern-leadership?redirectedFrom=fulltext Egan M (2000), "Managers as kings: Shakespeare on modern leadership". Management Decision, Vol. 38 No. 5 pp. 315–327, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740010340490]
* [https://d-nb.info/1279081511/34 Quabeck (2022): William Shakespeare, in: Thomas Gutmann, Eberhard Ortland, Klaus Stierstorfer, eds., Encyclopedia of Law and Literature (last edited 26 October 2022), doi: 10.17879/12009577118]
* [https://lawliberty.org/book-review/was-the-bard-writing-about-the-donald/ Sullivan, V., 'Was the Bard Writing about The Donald?']
* [https://deveresociety.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/FINAL_NL_Apr2022-Haste-July-Letterresponse.pdf Haste, I., 'THE PLAY ON THE EVE OF THE ESSEX REBELLION']
* [https://www.cherylmtaylor.com/2017/11/08/a-companion-to-shakespeares-richard-ii/ A Companion to Shakespeare’s Richard II]
* [https://www.city-journal.org/article/shakespeares-richards Dalrymple, T., Shakespeare’s Richards: The playwright’s two historical dramas offer contrasts between political pathologies]
* [https://hfriedberg.web.wesleyan.edu/engl205/wshakespeare/plotsandrebelions.htm ELIZABETHAN PLOTS AND REBELLIONS]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2869708 Rackin, Phyllis. “The Role of the Audience In Shakespeare’s Richard II.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 3, 1985, pp. 262–81. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2869708. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026.]
* [https://www.psychologytoday.com/ie/blog/whats-in-name/201603/group-think-and-academia-shocking-shakespeare-shenanigans Group Think and Academia: Shocking Shakespeare Shenanigans]
* [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01847678221099975 Hiscopck, A., '"Why I should welcome such a guest as grief [?": Lodging and dislodging in Shakespeare's Richard II']
* [https://academic.oup.com/book/51779/chapter-abstract/420487796?redirectedFrom=fulltext 'Epigraph', Imagining Time in the English Chronicle Play: Historical Futures, 1590-1660 (Oxford, 2023; online edn, Oxford Academic, 19 Oct. 2023), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198872658.002.0009]
* [https://journals.openedition.org/interfaces/319?lang=en Blake & Shakespeare]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/shakespeare-and-the-visual-imagination/richard-iiand-the-politics-of-perspective/23A5D4615E2A8BF9380BAF1ECE99B46D Sillars S. Richard IIand the Politics of Perspective. In: Shakespeare and the Visual Imagination. Cambridge University Press; 2015:133-162.]
* [https://www.persee.fr/doc/xvii_0291-3798_2004_num_59_1_1992 Le miroir des rois: de Richard II à Henry VIII]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/king-richard-ll/introduction/25419329A06BC1C2E4D3DDBF331B7F91 Shakespeare W, McEachern C. Introduction. In: Gurr A, ed. King Richard Ll. The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press; 2018:1-66.]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372862689_A_Critical_Discourse_Study_of_Shakespeare%27s_Theological_Conceptions_in_Acts_IV_and_V_of_Richard_II_The_%27Divine_Mandate%27_of_Richard_Kingship_Falls_Apart A Critical Discourse Study of Shakespeare’s Theological Conceptions in Acts IV and V of Richard II: The ‘Divine Mandate’ of Richard Kingship Falls Apart]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/lal.2004.16.3.313 Richard II, Bracton, and the End of Political Theology]
* [https://dokumen.pub/the-art-of-law-in-shakespeare-9781509905478-9781509905508-9781509905492.html The Art of Law in Shakespeare]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-shakespeare-and-religion/providence-and-divine-right-in-the-english-histories/DBE9BFEBF5C199F9DD72D31ED9C3B041 Mayer J-C. Providence and Divine Right in the English Histories. In: Hamlin H, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Religion. Cambridge Companions to Literature. Cambridge University Press; 2019:151-167]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315698000_THE_CHOMSKY-FOUCAULT_DEBATE_WHERE_DOES_THE_BARD_STAND_IN_RICHARD_II Salami, Ali & Riahi Nouri, Amir. (2016). THE CHOMSKY-FOUCAULT DEBATE: WHERE DOES THE BARD STAND IN RICHARD II?]
* [https://dokumen.pub/shakespeare-richard-ii-9781350363168-9780333416709.html Richard II]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/457907?seq=1 Heffner, Ray. “Shakespeare, Hayward, and Essex.” PMLA, vol. 45, no. 3, 1930, pp. 754–80. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/457907. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-shakespeare-and-war/shakespeare-on-civil-and-dynastic-wars/00D0269CFF998876DB961FB01C22954D Shakespeare on Civil and Dynastic Wars]
* [https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004356900/B9789004356900_012.xml?srsltid=AfmBOopJMjwJAQnUGME9FmT6Gwg0ih9pArbXBdTJbN6YAqbdXqbkGyuo Is a Dramatic Theory of History Possible? Shakespeare’s Richard ii and ‘Historical Truth’]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/24475607 THE CHILD'S TWO BODIES: SHAKESPEARE, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE END OF SUCCESSION]
* [https://dokumen.pub/english-renaissance-drama-an-introduction-to-theatre-and-theatres-in-shakespeares-time-9781847600202-9781847600714.html English Renaissance Drama : An Introduction to Theatre and Theatres in Shakespeare’s Time]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/believing-in-shakespeare/person-plot-place/BD4EF4CBA6E7D8E2ECE5519FA1D08C16 1. McEachern C. Person, Plot, Place. In: Believing in Shakespeare: Studies in Longing. Cambridge University Press; 2018:181-296]
* [https://www.enotes.com/topics/richard-2/criticism/richard-ii-vol-91/criticism-production-reviews-1000228/nigel-saul-review-date-12-may-2000 With an Eye to the Present]
* [https://www.academia.edu/128303633/Shakespeare_s_Other_Eden_Richard_II_by_Ouroboros_Theatre_Company_2013_ Shakespeare’s Other Eden Richard II by Ouroboros Theatre Company (2013)]
* [https://dokumen.pub/shakespeare-upstart-crow-to-sweet-swan-1592-1623-9781472555496-9781408130148-9781408139189.html Shakespeare: Upstart Crow to Sweet Swan 1592-1623]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/41917215 RACKIN, PHYLLIS. “Temporality, Anachronism, and Presence in Shakespeare’s English Histories.” Renaissance Drama, vol. 17, 1986, pp. 101–23. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41917215. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026.]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/greece-and-rome/article/abs/alexander-philotas-and-the-origins-of-modern-historiography/D90568C0A1131952625E0A3B44F43EC8 Stoneman R. Alexander, Philotas, and the origins of modern historiography. Greece and Rome. 2013;60(2):296-312. doi:10.1017/S0017383513000119]
* [https://www.academia.edu/35800720/Shakespeares_Richard_II_and_Elizabethan_politics Shakespeare's Richard II and Elizabethan politics]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/rethinking-historicism-from-shakespeare-to-milton/old-new-now/2E8CBEFFEFB11D8B843BAF2C108E9768 Introduction - Old, New, Now]
* [https://www.academia.edu/24392476/Richard_II_hamartia_and_climax Richard II hamartia and climax]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/babylonian-jews-and-sasanian-imperialism-in-late-antiquity/kings-and-religion-in-the-talmud-and-in-the-imagination-of-sasanian-communities/E2DCC2F3E0FBA74ABE543DDD2DD7F1A7 Kings and Religion in the Talmud and in the Imagination of Sasanian Communities]
* Stephen Greenblatt, “Introduction,” in The Power of Forms in the English Renaissance, ed. Stephen Greenblatt (Norman, OK: 1982), 3-6]
* [https://www.academia.edu/30472558/Americas_Donald_Trump_Shakespeares_Richard_II_15_Dec_2016 America's Donald Trump, Shakespeare's Richard II]
* [https://www.academia.edu/5321346/Looking_Back_Shakespeare_s_Indebtedness_to_Chaucer_and_the_Representations_of_Chivalry_in_King_Richard_II_The_Two_Noble_Kinsmen_and_the_Knight_s_Tale Looking Back: Shakespeare’s Indebtedness to Chaucer and the Representations of Chivalry in King Richard II, The Two Noble Kinsmen and the Knight’s Tale]
* [https://www.academia.edu/92423912/The_Good_Usurper_in_the_eyes_of_God_and_the_people_An_analysis_of_the_role_of_the_usurper_in_Shakespeares_Richard_II_and_Henry_IV_Part_1 The Good Usurper in the eyes of God and the people: An analysis of the role of the usurper in Shakespeare's Richard II and Henry IV Part 1]
* [https://www.academia.edu/91789871/The_Bacon_Shakespeare_Manuscript_Hitherto_known_as_the_Northumberland_Manuscript_which_originally_Contained_Copies_of_his_Shakespeare_Plays_Richard_II_and_Richard_III THE BACON-SHAKESPEARE MANUSCRIPT (HITHERTO KNOWN AS THE NORTHUMBERLAND MANUSCRIPT) WHICH ORIGINALLY CONTAINED COPIES OF HIS SHAKESPEARE PLAYS RICHARD II AND RICHARD III]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/f4gGCAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA88&printsec=frontcover Richard II: Critical Essays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_Companion_to_Shakespeare_s_Works_Volum/JlDNEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA400&printsec=frontcover A Companion to Shakespeare's Works, Volume II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Reread/Z6JhDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA239&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare Reread]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_in_the_Present/yTKWEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PT8&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare in the Present]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Studying_Shakespeare/1N4FBAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA129&printsec=frontcover Studying Shakespeare A Practical Introduction]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Critical_Essays_on_William_Faulkner/kAGBEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PT178&printsec=frontcover Critical Essays on William Faulkner]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare/QY6aEQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA216&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory 1945-2000]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Reign_of_Richard_II/cv0WAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Dodd, G., R2]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Institution_of_Theat/Nkt9DAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA108&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Institution of Theatre]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Theory_of_the_King_s_Two_Bodies_in_t/8SRXAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Theory of the King's Two Bodies in the Age of Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Stealing_the_Story/RaJlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Stealing the Story: Shakespeare's Self-Conscious Use of the Mimetic Tradition in the Tragedies]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Greenwood_Companion_to_Shakespeare_O/JkcgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Greenwood Companion to Shakespeare: Overviews and the history plays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/British_and_Irish_Literature_and_Its_Tim/xH4jAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover British and Irish Literature and Its Times]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Philosophy_of_History_Reve/1jwgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Philosophy of History Revealed in a Detailed Analysis of Henry V and Examined in Other History Plays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_His_Contemporaries/7em7coOthxQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and His Contemporaries]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Politics_of_the_Public_Sphere_in_Ear/0sGHAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Politics of the Public Sphere in Early Modern England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Catholic_Religion/Fl4gAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0&bsq=%22I%20am%20Richard%20II,%20know%20ye%20not%20that?%22 Shakespeare and the Catholic religion]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Proceedings_of_the_British_Academy_Volum/8CsoAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Lectures]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Slander_and_Censorship_in_Late_Sixteenth/wb_oAvuJgbAC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Slander and Censorship in Late Sixteenth Century Literature]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabethan_Literature_and_the_Law_of_Fr/vBFdAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Elizabethan Literature and the Law of Fraudulent Conveyance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Hamlet_History_and_commentary/yxgrAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Hamlet History etc]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare_A_Popular_Life/1BuaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare: a popular life]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_State_of_Mind/pCiIAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover A State of Mind?]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Dramatic_Genres/J5FlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Dramatic Genres]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Literature_Criticism_from_1400_to_1800/O6VkAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Literature Criticism from 1400 to 1800 Volume 89]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_the_Papist/LPwNAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare the Papist]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Goslicius_Ideal_Senator_and_His_Cultural/1jc7AQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Goslicius' Ideal Senator and His Cultural Impact Over the Centuries]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_by_Another_Name/FqllAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover "Shakespeare" by Another Name]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Friends/AlZlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Friends]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Dr_Simon_Forman/qHceAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Dr Simon Forman]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare_the_Wars_of_the_Rose/dZFlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare, the Wars of the Roses and the historians]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespearean_Criticism/2TdlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespearean Criticism]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Poetry_History_and_Antiquarianism_in_Ref/jwIhAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Poetry, History, and Antiquarianism in Reformation England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Prince_of_Love/D0QgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Prince of Love]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Paper_Bullets_of_the_Brain/o0YgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Paper Bullets of the Brain]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/As_You_Like_It/GiBaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover As You Like It: Third Series]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare/WCqaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare, Dominic Shellard]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Poets_and_God/0XZlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Poets and God]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Law_and_Literature/Ax5MAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Law and Literature Volume 16]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Embodied_Word/FV8sAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Embodied Word]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Case_for_Shakespeare/WaRlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Case for Shakespeare: The End of the Authorship Question]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Explorations_in_Renaissance_Culture/_SYrAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Explorations in Renaissance Culture Volumes 33-34]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Touch_of_the_Real/ewdaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Touch of the Real: Essays in Early Modern Culture in Honour of Stephen Greenblatt]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Wotton_and_His_Worlds/ZfgNAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Wotton and his Worlds]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Theatre_and_Religion/wo1lAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Theatre and Religion Lancastrian Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Trying_Treason/TOKxAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Trying Treason]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Willing_Subjects/IEX0sGwT1QQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Willing Subjects]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Symbolism/Bt0ZAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Symbolism]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Performing_Shakespeare/35pQAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Performing Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Soul_of_the_Age/e0UgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Soul of the Age]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/England/aD9nAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabeth_I/-GtnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Elizabeth I]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/King_Richard_II/oGUMX4RntjgC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA25&printsec=frontcover King Richard II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Legal_Imagination/OXPvBqQLw-4C?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA38&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the legal imagination]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Theatre/GxN3ue9_r3oC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA69&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Theatre]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Critical_Essays_on_Shakespeare_s_Richard/AaYoAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Critical Essays on Shakespeare's Richard II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Reign_of_Richard_II_Essays_in_Honour/y3xnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Reign of Richard II: Essays in Honour of May McKisack]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Poetry_and_the_Realm_of_Politics/oQFaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Poetry and the Realm of Politics]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare/BM0mAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespearean_Politics/oTdlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespearean Politics]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_the_Theatrical_Dimension/wl4gAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare, the Theatrical Dimension]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Who_was_Kit_Marlowe/zQ1aAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Kit Marlowe etc]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/From_Page_to_Performance/beQKAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover From Page to Performance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Exploring_Tudor_England/ax56AAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Exploring Tudor England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Movement_Towards_Subversion/vyJaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Movement Towards Subversion]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Typological_Satire/G5BlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Typological Satire]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Recycled/zzNlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare Recycled]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Reinventing_the_Middle_Ages_the_Renaissa/fXFnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Reinventing the Middle Ages & the Renaissance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Mysterious_William_Shakespeare/WnllAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Mysterious William Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/GHhlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Richard II Critical Essays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare/WJvC6gu_I0gC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare: Records and Images]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Actors/HYtlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Actors]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_the_Man/BVdlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare the man]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Henry_V/zXllAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Henry V: A Guide to the Play]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespearean_Contingencies/Cw1NAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespearean Contingencies]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Renaissance_Drama/E60kAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Renaissance Drama 1990]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Language_Discourse_Sign/uH4oAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Language, Discourse, Sign]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Mock_Kings_in_Medieval_Society_and_Renai/T98KAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Mock kings in medieval society and Renaissance drama]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Invention_of_the_Human/ojHirImrtYoC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare: Invention of the Human]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare/wn5lAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Persons_in_Groups/rQ24AAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Persons in Groups]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/All_Semblative_a_Woman_s_Part/0DlaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover All Semblative a Woman's Part?]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Crossing_the_Mirror/qRZNAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Crossing the Mirror]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/De_Vere_is_Shakespeare/dKJlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover De Vere is Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Lambarde_Elizabethan_Antiquary_1/x1RnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Lambarde, Elizabethan Antiquary, 1536-1601]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Power_of_Forms_in_the_English_Renais/cPtZAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Power of Forms in the English Renaissance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Ravishment_and_Rememberance/G31LAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Ravishment and Rememberance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_His_Theatre/8A5ZQq3uOVQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and His Theatre]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Critical_Hermeneutics_and_Shakespeare_s/O10gAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Critical Hermeneutics and Shakespeare's History Plays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Christian_England/K-WfAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Christian England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Religious_Background/xDSaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Religious Background]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shylock/N4RlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shylock]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Shakespeare_Legacy/MM5XAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Shakespeare Legacy]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Renaissance_Genres/0uFZAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Renaissance Genres]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Cannibals_Witches_and_Divorce/qZRpAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Cannibals, Witches, and Divorce]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Problem_of_Religious_Knowledge/C29LAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Problem of Religious Knowledge]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Essex_and_the_Great_Revolt_of_1381/J8RzAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Essex and the Great Revolt of 1381]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Transactions_of_the_London_and_Middlesex/4dtJAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover TLMAS]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Politics_and_the_State/Mn9lAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare, Politics and the State]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Allegories_of_Power_in_the_England_of_El/LIYgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Allegories of Power in the England of Elizabeth]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare/rIVlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Women_s_Matters/PDRlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Women's Matters]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Weak_King_Dilemma_in_the_Shakespeare/0bJlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Weak King Dilemma in the Shakespearean History Play]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Book_Known_as_Q/S2tlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Book Known as Q]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Fields_of_Vision/OD0eAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Fields of Vision]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Ungodly_Delights/RKgcAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Ungodly Delights]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Shakespeare_Handbook/rLRlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Shakespeare HandboOK]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Humanities/y5FZAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Humanities]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II_by_William_Shakespeare/Bb3yAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Richard II by William Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/King_Richard_II/50NnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover King Richard II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Murder_Under_Trust_Or_The_Topical_Macbet/0oNlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Murder under trust]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Shakespearean_Kings/tHBlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Shakespearean Kings]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/America_the_Mabr_e_y_Experience/mRQ3AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover America, the Mabr(e)y Experience: Resistance, Revolution & Civil War]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/ZDEkAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Richard II: An Annotated Bibliography, Volume 2]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Batsford_Companion_to_Medieval_Engla/ev78b9EJQy0C?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Batsford Companion to Medieval England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Unruly_Women/FKFlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Unruly Women]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_Others/iFEgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and Others]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Kings_and_Chroniclers/L1wpAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Kings and Chroniclers]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_Kingdom_for_a_Stage/UzxlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover A Kingdom for a Stage]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_House_of_Commons/Ezz4OZuYVFYC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The History of Parliament: The House of Commons 1558-1603 (3 v.)]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Soul_of_the_Age/nMYCAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover shakespeare, Soul of the Age]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/After_Poststructuralism/TOaEAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0&bsq=%22I%20am%20Richard%20II,%20know%20ye%20not%20that?%22 After Poststructuralism: Interdisciplinarity and Literary Theory]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Unschooled_Mind/C7WnYtt219IC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Unschooled Mind]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabeth_I/hHZnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Eliz I]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Dramas_of_Christian_Time/mnIqAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Dramas of Christian Time]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabeth_I/XjQmAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Elizabeth I: The Shrewdness of Virtue]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/John_Dryden/9Q1aAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover John Dryden]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_Early_Modern_Political_T/DUwhAwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PA259&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and Early Modern Political Thought]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_English_History_Play_in_the_age_of_S/5TT-AQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PA158&printsec=frontcover The English History Play in the Age of Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Political/rEcREQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PA215&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Political]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare_Subject_of_the_Crown/a7G6DAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PT18&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare - Subject of the Crown?]
* [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&client=firefox-b-d&hs=4AQ&sca_esv=6d4ade7bd26771c9&udm=36&biw=2510&bih=1307&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A2000%2Ccd_max%3A2099&sxsrf=ANbL-n6I6Pkwl7mmdHK6N1xPQXLbGBIOSg%3A1776853062010&ei=RqDoaZUvztiFsg_I5bToDw&ved=0ahUKEwiV6tC8nYGUAxVObEEAHcgyDf0Q4dUDCBM&uact=5&oq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&gs_lp=EhBnd3Mtd2l6LW1vZGVsZXNzIiYic2hha2VzcGVhcmUiICsgInBvbGl0aWNhbCBwcm9wYWdhbmRhIjIIECEYoAEYwwRInQlQxgZYuwdwAXgAkAEAmAF_oAHPAaoBAzEuMbgBA8gBAPgBAZgCAqACVsICCxAAGIAEGKIEGLADmAMAiAYBkAYCkgcBMqAHowOyBwExuAdTwgcDMC4yyAcEgAgB&sclient=gws-wiz-modeless The Nazi Appropriation of Shakespeare: Cultural Politics in]
6ngxfxyfuso8uob3ll9m4lwm1q84ktr
2812415
2812414
2026-06-01T11:11:38Z
Fortuna imperatrix mundi
1058581
/* Notes */ +
2812415
wikitext
text/x-wiki
== Notes ==
{{reflist|group=note}}
==References==
==Bibliography==
* [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230307261_2 Orgel, S. (2011). Prologue: I am Richard II. In: Petrina, A., Tosi, L. (eds) Representations of Elizabeth I in Early Modern Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307261_2]
* [https://broadlytextual.com/2017/12/15/i-am-richard-ii-know-ye-not-that-drama-and-political-anxiety-in-shakespeares-london/ Hixon, E., Syracuse Univ]
* Bate, Jonathan (2008). Soul of the Age. London: Penguin. pp. 256–286. ISBN 978-0-670-91482-1.
* [https://theconversation.com/richard-ii-by-william-shakespeare-why-the-divine-right-of-kings-still-matters-186648 McFarlane, K., Univ South Australia]
* [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/31090/summary Lemon, Rebecca. "The Faulty Verdict in "The Crown v. John Hayward"." SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, vol. 41 no. 1, 2001, p. 109-132. Project MUSE, https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sel.2001.0009]
* [https://brill.com/display/book/9789401211666/B9789401211666-s009.xml?language=en&srsltid=AfmBOoqTUaTQr0msNWRdtEZZ9qQ3rNcVkSoBvDPXuGv7nRvHrC8t5OzH Kizelbach, U. (2014), In The Pragmatics of Early Modern Politics: Power and Kingship in Shakespeare’s History Plays. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401211666_009]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/z-kOAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Lopez, R2]
* [https://www.manchesterhive.com/display/9781526130532/9781526130532.00008.xml?print rgel, S. (2017). "I am Richard II". In Spectacular Performances. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press. Retrieved Apr 22, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526130532.00008]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271041996_Was_Elizabeth_I_Richard_II_The_Authenticity_of_Lambarde%27s_%27Conversation%27 Scott-Warren, Jason. (2012). Was Elizabeth I Richard II?: The Authenticity of Lambarde's 'Conversation'. The Review of English Studies. 64. 208-230. 10.1093/res/hgs062]
* Stanley Wells, “Introduction” in Richard II, The New Penguin Shakespeare, ed. Stanley Wells (London: Penguin Books, 1969), 13.
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/shakespeare-survey/shakespeare-and-history-divergencies-and-agreements/B065A23215FD86BEE8E1CFD51DC7C1FB Ives EW. Shakespeare and History: Divergencies and Agreements. In: Wells S, ed. Shakespeare Survey. Shakespeare Survey. Cambridge University Press; 1986:19-36]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/457855 Albright, Evelyn May. “Shakespeare’s Richard II, Hayward’s History of Henry IV, and the Essex Conspiracy.” PMLA, vol. 46, no. 3, 1931, pp. 694–719. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/457855. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://dsc.duq.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2800&context=etd Morris, A. (2019). "within the hollow crown": Performing Kingship in Richard II and Henry IV Part One (Master's thesis, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1771]
* [https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1122&context=srhonors_theses Scannell, Sarah J., "Shakespeare's Richard II and Henry V and Political Rebellions in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth I" (2010). Honors Scholar Theses, 138]
* [https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2011.00873.x Luecking Frost, L. (2012), “A Kyng That Ruled All By Lust”: Richard II in Elizabethan Literature. Literature Compass, 9: 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2011.00873.x]
* [https://www.academia.edu/8347491/A_Law_Case_in_Verse_Venus_and_Adonis_and_the_Authorship_Question Stritmatter, R., A Law Case in Verse: Venus and Adonis and the Authorship Question, 2004 University of Tennessee Law Review]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304647742_Prologue_I_am_Richard_II Orgel, Stephen. (2011). Prologue: I am Richard II. 10.1057/9780230307261_2]
* [https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA314252957&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=15256863&sw=w&p=AONE&userGroupName=anon%7Ebf79dda0&aty=open-web-entry Egan, Michael. "The Essex Rebellion and Richard II: why wasn't Shakespeare arrested?" Shakespeare Oxford Newsletter, vol. 48, no. 3, summer-fall 2012, p. 20]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/richard-ii/stagehistory/D62D9CA061F03B2AE8D56E856288EEDA 1. Child H, Shakespeare W. THE STAGE-HISTORY. In: Dover Wilson J, ed. Richard II: The Cambridge Dover Wilson Shakespeare. Cambridge Library Collection - Literary Studies. Cambridge University Press; 2009:lxxvii-xcii]
* [https://www.openstarts.units.it/entities/publication/16d8c447-62f4-48e8-8347-5d56af674aa3/details Snelling, D., 'Prospero on the Coast of Bohemia. "Nihil sed rara et miranda amabat". Diary of Melchior Goldast upon the late Emperor Rudolph II' 1994]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2902265 Gajowski, Evelyn. Shakespeare in Performance: King Richard IIby Margaret Shewring. Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 3, 1998, pp. 328–30. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2902265. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/217842/summary Mosse, Ramona Franziska. Review of Richard II. Shakespeare Bulletin, vol. 25 no. 2, 2007, p. 73-77. Project MUSE, https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/shb.2007.0036]
* [https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/665894?journalCode=rq Petrina and Tosi. Representations of Elizabeth I in Early Modern Culture Elizabeth Pentland Renaissance Quarterly 2012 65:1, 274-276]
* [https://journals.co.za/doi/10.4314/sisa.v26i1.4 The construction of a king : waste, effeminacy and queerness in Shakespeare's Richard II Higginbotham, D.]
* [https://academic.oup.com/book/2363/chapter-abstract/142533948?redirectedFrom=fulltext Erskine-Hill, Howard, 'The Second Tetralogy and After', Poetry and the Realm of Politics: Shakespeare to Dryden (Oxford, 1996; online edn, Oxford Academic, 3 Oct. 2011), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198117315.003.0004]
* [https://www.academia.edu/123917862/Shakespeare_s_Richard_II_in_the_minds_of_the_Elizabethan_audiences Shakespeare’s Richard II in the minds of the Elizabethan audiences]
* [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03064220221084555 Plays, protests and the censor’s pencil]
* [https://www.indexoncensorship.org/2022/03/plays-protests-and-the-censors-pencil/ Plays, protests and the censor’s pencil A brittle Gloriana: staging the deposition of Queen Elizabeth I].
* Saul, N., Richard II
* [https://www.academia.edu/3236651/_A_god_on_earth_thou_art_Richard_II_and_the_nature_of_Kingship “A god on earth thou art”: Richard II and the nature of Kingship]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/457398 Albright, Evelyn May. “Shakespeare’s Richard II and the Essex Conspiracy.” PMLA, vol. 42, no. 3, 1927, pp. 686–720. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/457398. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/critical-survey/37/3/cs370301.xml Holderness, G. (2025). Introduction: Shakespeare's Wars of the Roses. Critical Survey, 37(3), 1-4. Retrieved Apr 22, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.3167/cs.2025.370301]
* [https://www.folger.edu/podcasts/shakespeare-unlimited/tragedy-richard-ii-henry-iv-helen-castor/ Folger: Shakespeare Unlimited: Episode 249]
* [https://www.rachaeldickzen.com/blog/2021/1/10/charlesiii The Historical and Shakespearean References in King Charles III]
* Kermode, The Age of Shakespeare, pg.53.
* [https://heinonline.org/HOL/login-hol?redirect_url=https%3A%2F%2Fheinonline.org%2FHOL%2Fmojo%3F%252Fmojo%3D%26auth_token%3DyhcMOu8W7PCc5OrmTqVnr2qFPpoiOdhM5uQmkQyWufU%253D%26casa_token%3D%26div%3D5%26g_sent%3D1%26paywall_url%3D%26referrer%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fheinonline.org%252FHOL%252FPage%253Fhandle%253Dhein.journals%252Fneastlr1%26timestamp%3D1776855600%26url%3D%252FHOL%252FPage%253Fhandle%253Dhein.journals%252Fneastlr1%2526div%253D5%2526id%253D%2526page%253D Jones, H., ''I AM RICHARD II, KNOW YE NOT THAT?' - WORKS. OF WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE AND THE ART OF. GOVERNANCE''']
* Hattaway, M., William Shakespeare: Richard II (Literature Insights, 9781847600349)
* [https://books.openedition.org/psn/8305 Findlay, A., “Good sometimes queen” (V.1.37). Richard II, Mary Stuart and the Politics of Queenship, 205-219]
* [https://pure.manchester.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/54508829/FULL_TEXT.PDF Pritchard, K., 'Legitimacy, Illegitimacy and Sovereignty in Shakespeare’s British Plays' (2011 University of Manchester PhD]
* CHATELANAT, Marine. Histrionic Future Kings: The Politics of Metadrama in Shakespeare’s Richard III, Richard II, and Henry IV Part 1. Master, 2023.
* [https://www.persee.fr/doc/xvii_0291-3798_2004_num_59_1_1993 Mayer, J-C., 'The "Parliament Sceane" in Shakespeare's King Richard II', XVII-XVIII. Revue de la Société d'études anglo-américaines des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles Année 2004 59 pp. 27-42]
* [https://www.emerald.com/md/article-abstract/38/5/315/285132/Managers-as-kings-Shakespeare-on-modern-leadership?redirectedFrom=fulltext Egan M (2000), "Managers as kings: Shakespeare on modern leadership". Management Decision, Vol. 38 No. 5 pp. 315–327, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740010340490]
* [https://d-nb.info/1279081511/34 Quabeck (2022): William Shakespeare, in: Thomas Gutmann, Eberhard Ortland, Klaus Stierstorfer, eds., Encyclopedia of Law and Literature (last edited 26 October 2022), doi: 10.17879/12009577118]
* [https://lawliberty.org/book-review/was-the-bard-writing-about-the-donald/ Sullivan, V., 'Was the Bard Writing about The Donald?']
* [https://deveresociety.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/FINAL_NL_Apr2022-Haste-July-Letterresponse.pdf Haste, I., 'THE PLAY ON THE EVE OF THE ESSEX REBELLION']
* [https://www.cherylmtaylor.com/2017/11/08/a-companion-to-shakespeares-richard-ii/ A Companion to Shakespeare’s Richard II]
* [https://www.city-journal.org/article/shakespeares-richards Dalrymple, T., Shakespeare’s Richards: The playwright’s two historical dramas offer contrasts between political pathologies]
* [https://hfriedberg.web.wesleyan.edu/engl205/wshakespeare/plotsandrebelions.htm ELIZABETHAN PLOTS AND REBELLIONS]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2869708 Rackin, Phyllis. “The Role of the Audience In Shakespeare’s Richard II.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 3, 1985, pp. 262–81. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2869708. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026.]
* [https://www.psychologytoday.com/ie/blog/whats-in-name/201603/group-think-and-academia-shocking-shakespeare-shenanigans Group Think and Academia: Shocking Shakespeare Shenanigans]
* [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01847678221099975 Hiscopck, A., '"Why I should welcome such a guest as grief [?": Lodging and dislodging in Shakespeare's Richard II']
* [https://academic.oup.com/book/51779/chapter-abstract/420487796?redirectedFrom=fulltext 'Epigraph', Imagining Time in the English Chronicle Play: Historical Futures, 1590-1660 (Oxford, 2023; online edn, Oxford Academic, 19 Oct. 2023), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198872658.002.0009]
* [https://journals.openedition.org/interfaces/319?lang=en Blake & Shakespeare]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/shakespeare-and-the-visual-imagination/richard-iiand-the-politics-of-perspective/23A5D4615E2A8BF9380BAF1ECE99B46D Sillars S. Richard IIand the Politics of Perspective. In: Shakespeare and the Visual Imagination. Cambridge University Press; 2015:133-162.]
* [https://www.persee.fr/doc/xvii_0291-3798_2004_num_59_1_1992 Le miroir des rois: de Richard II à Henry VIII]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/king-richard-ll/introduction/25419329A06BC1C2E4D3DDBF331B7F91 Shakespeare W, McEachern C. Introduction. In: Gurr A, ed. King Richard Ll. The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press; 2018:1-66.]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372862689_A_Critical_Discourse_Study_of_Shakespeare%27s_Theological_Conceptions_in_Acts_IV_and_V_of_Richard_II_The_%27Divine_Mandate%27_of_Richard_Kingship_Falls_Apart A Critical Discourse Study of Shakespeare’s Theological Conceptions in Acts IV and V of Richard II: The ‘Divine Mandate’ of Richard Kingship Falls Apart]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/lal.2004.16.3.313 Richard II, Bracton, and the End of Political Theology]
* [https://dokumen.pub/the-art-of-law-in-shakespeare-9781509905478-9781509905508-9781509905492.html The Art of Law in Shakespeare]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-shakespeare-and-religion/providence-and-divine-right-in-the-english-histories/DBE9BFEBF5C199F9DD72D31ED9C3B041 Mayer J-C. Providence and Divine Right in the English Histories. In: Hamlin H, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Religion. Cambridge Companions to Literature. Cambridge University Press; 2019:151-167]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315698000_THE_CHOMSKY-FOUCAULT_DEBATE_WHERE_DOES_THE_BARD_STAND_IN_RICHARD_II Salami, Ali & Riahi Nouri, Amir. (2016). THE CHOMSKY-FOUCAULT DEBATE: WHERE DOES THE BARD STAND IN RICHARD II?]
* [https://dokumen.pub/shakespeare-richard-ii-9781350363168-9780333416709.html Richard II]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/457907?seq=1 Heffner, Ray. “Shakespeare, Hayward, and Essex.” PMLA, vol. 45, no. 3, 1930, pp. 754–80. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/457907. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-shakespeare-and-war/shakespeare-on-civil-and-dynastic-wars/00D0269CFF998876DB961FB01C22954D Shakespeare on Civil and Dynastic Wars]
* [https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004356900/B9789004356900_012.xml?srsltid=AfmBOopJMjwJAQnUGME9FmT6Gwg0ih9pArbXBdTJbN6YAqbdXqbkGyuo Is a Dramatic Theory of History Possible? Shakespeare’s Richard ii and ‘Historical Truth’]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/24475607 THE CHILD'S TWO BODIES: SHAKESPEARE, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE END OF SUCCESSION]
* [https://dokumen.pub/english-renaissance-drama-an-introduction-to-theatre-and-theatres-in-shakespeares-time-9781847600202-9781847600714.html English Renaissance Drama : An Introduction to Theatre and Theatres in Shakespeare’s Time]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/believing-in-shakespeare/person-plot-place/BD4EF4CBA6E7D8E2ECE5519FA1D08C16 1. McEachern C. Person, Plot, Place. In: Believing in Shakespeare: Studies in Longing. Cambridge University Press; 2018:181-296]
* [https://www.enotes.com/topics/richard-2/criticism/richard-ii-vol-91/criticism-production-reviews-1000228/nigel-saul-review-date-12-may-2000 With an Eye to the Present]
* [https://www.academia.edu/128303633/Shakespeare_s_Other_Eden_Richard_II_by_Ouroboros_Theatre_Company_2013_ Shakespeare’s Other Eden Richard II by Ouroboros Theatre Company (2013)]
* [https://dokumen.pub/shakespeare-upstart-crow-to-sweet-swan-1592-1623-9781472555496-9781408130148-9781408139189.html Shakespeare: Upstart Crow to Sweet Swan 1592-1623]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/41917215 RACKIN, PHYLLIS. “Temporality, Anachronism, and Presence in Shakespeare’s English Histories.” Renaissance Drama, vol. 17, 1986, pp. 101–23. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41917215. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026.]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/greece-and-rome/article/abs/alexander-philotas-and-the-origins-of-modern-historiography/D90568C0A1131952625E0A3B44F43EC8 Stoneman R. Alexander, Philotas, and the origins of modern historiography. Greece and Rome. 2013;60(2):296-312. doi:10.1017/S0017383513000119]
* [https://www.academia.edu/35800720/Shakespeares_Richard_II_and_Elizabethan_politics Shakespeare's Richard II and Elizabethan politics]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/rethinking-historicism-from-shakespeare-to-milton/old-new-now/2E8CBEFFEFB11D8B843BAF2C108E9768 Introduction - Old, New, Now]
* [https://www.academia.edu/24392476/Richard_II_hamartia_and_climax Richard II hamartia and climax]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/babylonian-jews-and-sasanian-imperialism-in-late-antiquity/kings-and-religion-in-the-talmud-and-in-the-imagination-of-sasanian-communities/E2DCC2F3E0FBA74ABE543DDD2DD7F1A7 Kings and Religion in the Talmud and in the Imagination of Sasanian Communities]
* Stephen Greenblatt, “Introduction,” in The Power of Forms in the English Renaissance, ed. Stephen Greenblatt (Norman, OK: 1982), 3-6]
* [https://www.academia.edu/30472558/Americas_Donald_Trump_Shakespeares_Richard_II_15_Dec_2016 America's Donald Trump, Shakespeare's Richard II]
* [https://www.academia.edu/5321346/Looking_Back_Shakespeare_s_Indebtedness_to_Chaucer_and_the_Representations_of_Chivalry_in_King_Richard_II_The_Two_Noble_Kinsmen_and_the_Knight_s_Tale Looking Back: Shakespeare’s Indebtedness to Chaucer and the Representations of Chivalry in King Richard II, The Two Noble Kinsmen and the Knight’s Tale]
* [https://www.academia.edu/92423912/The_Good_Usurper_in_the_eyes_of_God_and_the_people_An_analysis_of_the_role_of_the_usurper_in_Shakespeares_Richard_II_and_Henry_IV_Part_1 The Good Usurper in the eyes of God and the people: An analysis of the role of the usurper in Shakespeare's Richard II and Henry IV Part 1]
* [https://www.academia.edu/91789871/The_Bacon_Shakespeare_Manuscript_Hitherto_known_as_the_Northumberland_Manuscript_which_originally_Contained_Copies_of_his_Shakespeare_Plays_Richard_II_and_Richard_III THE BACON-SHAKESPEARE MANUSCRIPT (HITHERTO KNOWN AS THE NORTHUMBERLAND MANUSCRIPT) WHICH ORIGINALLY CONTAINED COPIES OF HIS SHAKESPEARE PLAYS RICHARD II AND RICHARD III]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/f4gGCAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA88&printsec=frontcover Richard II: Critical Essays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_Companion_to_Shakespeare_s_Works_Volum/JlDNEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA400&printsec=frontcover A Companion to Shakespeare's Works, Volume II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Reread/Z6JhDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA239&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare Reread]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_in_the_Present/yTKWEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PT8&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare in the Present]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Studying_Shakespeare/1N4FBAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA129&printsec=frontcover Studying Shakespeare A Practical Introduction]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Critical_Essays_on_William_Faulkner/kAGBEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PT178&printsec=frontcover Critical Essays on William Faulkner]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare/QY6aEQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA216&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory 1945-2000]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Reign_of_Richard_II/cv0WAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Dodd, G., R2]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Institution_of_Theat/Nkt9DAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA108&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Institution of Theatre]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Theory_of_the_King_s_Two_Bodies_in_t/8SRXAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Theory of the King's Two Bodies in the Age of Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Stealing_the_Story/RaJlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Stealing the Story: Shakespeare's Self-Conscious Use of the Mimetic Tradition in the Tragedies]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Greenwood_Companion_to_Shakespeare_O/JkcgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Greenwood Companion to Shakespeare: Overviews and the history plays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/British_and_Irish_Literature_and_Its_Tim/xH4jAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover British and Irish Literature and Its Times]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Philosophy_of_History_Reve/1jwgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Philosophy of History Revealed in a Detailed Analysis of Henry V and Examined in Other History Plays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_His_Contemporaries/7em7coOthxQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and His Contemporaries]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Politics_of_the_Public_Sphere_in_Ear/0sGHAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Politics of the Public Sphere in Early Modern England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Catholic_Religion/Fl4gAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0&bsq=%22I%20am%20Richard%20II,%20know%20ye%20not%20that?%22 Shakespeare and the Catholic religion]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Proceedings_of_the_British_Academy_Volum/8CsoAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Lectures]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Slander_and_Censorship_in_Late_Sixteenth/wb_oAvuJgbAC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Slander and Censorship in Late Sixteenth Century Literature]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabethan_Literature_and_the_Law_of_Fr/vBFdAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Elizabethan Literature and the Law of Fraudulent Conveyance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Hamlet_History_and_commentary/yxgrAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Hamlet History etc]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare_A_Popular_Life/1BuaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare: a popular life]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_State_of_Mind/pCiIAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover A State of Mind?]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Dramatic_Genres/J5FlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Dramatic Genres]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Literature_Criticism_from_1400_to_1800/O6VkAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Literature Criticism from 1400 to 1800 Volume 89]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_the_Papist/LPwNAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare the Papist]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Goslicius_Ideal_Senator_and_His_Cultural/1jc7AQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Goslicius' Ideal Senator and His Cultural Impact Over the Centuries]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_by_Another_Name/FqllAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover "Shakespeare" by Another Name]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Friends/AlZlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Friends]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Dr_Simon_Forman/qHceAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Dr Simon Forman]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare_the_Wars_of_the_Rose/dZFlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare, the Wars of the Roses and the historians]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespearean_Criticism/2TdlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespearean Criticism]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Poetry_History_and_Antiquarianism_in_Ref/jwIhAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Poetry, History, and Antiquarianism in Reformation England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Prince_of_Love/D0QgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Prince of Love]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Paper_Bullets_of_the_Brain/o0YgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Paper Bullets of the Brain]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/As_You_Like_It/GiBaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover As You Like It: Third Series]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare/WCqaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare, Dominic Shellard]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Poets_and_God/0XZlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Poets and God]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Law_and_Literature/Ax5MAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Law and Literature Volume 16]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Embodied_Word/FV8sAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Embodied Word]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Case_for_Shakespeare/WaRlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Case for Shakespeare: The End of the Authorship Question]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Explorations_in_Renaissance_Culture/_SYrAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Explorations in Renaissance Culture Volumes 33-34]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Touch_of_the_Real/ewdaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Touch of the Real: Essays in Early Modern Culture in Honour of Stephen Greenblatt]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Wotton_and_His_Worlds/ZfgNAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Wotton and his Worlds]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Theatre_and_Religion/wo1lAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Theatre and Religion Lancastrian Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Trying_Treason/TOKxAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Trying Treason]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Willing_Subjects/IEX0sGwT1QQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Willing Subjects]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Symbolism/Bt0ZAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Symbolism]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Performing_Shakespeare/35pQAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Performing Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Soul_of_the_Age/e0UgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Soul of the Age]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/England/aD9nAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabeth_I/-GtnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Elizabeth I]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/King_Richard_II/oGUMX4RntjgC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA25&printsec=frontcover King Richard II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Legal_Imagination/OXPvBqQLw-4C?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA38&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the legal imagination]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Theatre/GxN3ue9_r3oC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA69&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Theatre]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Critical_Essays_on_Shakespeare_s_Richard/AaYoAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Critical Essays on Shakespeare's Richard II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Reign_of_Richard_II_Essays_in_Honour/y3xnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Reign of Richard II: Essays in Honour of May McKisack]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Poetry_and_the_Realm_of_Politics/oQFaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Poetry and the Realm of Politics]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare/BM0mAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespearean_Politics/oTdlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespearean Politics]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_the_Theatrical_Dimension/wl4gAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare, the Theatrical Dimension]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Who_was_Kit_Marlowe/zQ1aAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Kit Marlowe etc]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/From_Page_to_Performance/beQKAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover From Page to Performance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Exploring_Tudor_England/ax56AAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Exploring Tudor England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Movement_Towards_Subversion/vyJaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Movement Towards Subversion]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Typological_Satire/G5BlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Typological Satire]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Recycled/zzNlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare Recycled]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Reinventing_the_Middle_Ages_the_Renaissa/fXFnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Reinventing the Middle Ages & the Renaissance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Mysterious_William_Shakespeare/WnllAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Mysterious William Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/GHhlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Richard II Critical Essays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare/WJvC6gu_I0gC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare: Records and Images]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Actors/HYtlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Actors]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_the_Man/BVdlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare the man]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Henry_V/zXllAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Henry V: A Guide to the Play]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespearean_Contingencies/Cw1NAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespearean Contingencies]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Renaissance_Drama/E60kAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Renaissance Drama 1990]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Language_Discourse_Sign/uH4oAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Language, Discourse, Sign]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Mock_Kings_in_Medieval_Society_and_Renai/T98KAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Mock kings in medieval society and Renaissance drama]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Invention_of_the_Human/ojHirImrtYoC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare: Invention of the Human]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare/wn5lAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Persons_in_Groups/rQ24AAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Persons in Groups]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/All_Semblative_a_Woman_s_Part/0DlaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover All Semblative a Woman's Part?]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Crossing_the_Mirror/qRZNAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Crossing the Mirror]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/De_Vere_is_Shakespeare/dKJlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover De Vere is Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Lambarde_Elizabethan_Antiquary_1/x1RnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Lambarde, Elizabethan Antiquary, 1536-1601]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Power_of_Forms_in_the_English_Renais/cPtZAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Power of Forms in the English Renaissance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Ravishment_and_Rememberance/G31LAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Ravishment and Rememberance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_His_Theatre/8A5ZQq3uOVQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and His Theatre]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Critical_Hermeneutics_and_Shakespeare_s/O10gAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Critical Hermeneutics and Shakespeare's History Plays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Christian_England/K-WfAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Christian England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Religious_Background/xDSaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Religious Background]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shylock/N4RlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shylock]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Shakespeare_Legacy/MM5XAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Shakespeare Legacy]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Renaissance_Genres/0uFZAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Renaissance Genres]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Cannibals_Witches_and_Divorce/qZRpAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Cannibals, Witches, and Divorce]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Problem_of_Religious_Knowledge/C29LAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Problem of Religious Knowledge]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Essex_and_the_Great_Revolt_of_1381/J8RzAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Essex and the Great Revolt of 1381]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Transactions_of_the_London_and_Middlesex/4dtJAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover TLMAS]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Politics_and_the_State/Mn9lAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare, Politics and the State]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Allegories_of_Power_in_the_England_of_El/LIYgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Allegories of Power in the England of Elizabeth]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare/rIVlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Women_s_Matters/PDRlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Women's Matters]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Weak_King_Dilemma_in_the_Shakespeare/0bJlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Weak King Dilemma in the Shakespearean History Play]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Book_Known_as_Q/S2tlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Book Known as Q]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Fields_of_Vision/OD0eAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Fields of Vision]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Ungodly_Delights/RKgcAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Ungodly Delights]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Shakespeare_Handbook/rLRlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Shakespeare HandboOK]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Humanities/y5FZAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Humanities]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II_by_William_Shakespeare/Bb3yAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Richard II by William Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/King_Richard_II/50NnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover King Richard II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Murder_Under_Trust_Or_The_Topical_Macbet/0oNlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Murder under trust]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Shakespearean_Kings/tHBlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Shakespearean Kings]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/America_the_Mabr_e_y_Experience/mRQ3AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover America, the Mabr(e)y Experience: Resistance, Revolution & Civil War]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/ZDEkAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Richard II: An Annotated Bibliography, Volume 2]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Batsford_Companion_to_Medieval_Engla/ev78b9EJQy0C?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Batsford Companion to Medieval England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Unruly_Women/FKFlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Unruly Women]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_Others/iFEgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and Others]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Kings_and_Chroniclers/L1wpAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Kings and Chroniclers]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_Kingdom_for_a_Stage/UzxlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover A Kingdom for a Stage]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_House_of_Commons/Ezz4OZuYVFYC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The History of Parliament: The House of Commons 1558-1603 (3 v.)]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Soul_of_the_Age/nMYCAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover shakespeare, Soul of the Age]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/After_Poststructuralism/TOaEAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0&bsq=%22I%20am%20Richard%20II,%20know%20ye%20not%20that?%22 After Poststructuralism: Interdisciplinarity and Literary Theory]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Unschooled_Mind/C7WnYtt219IC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Unschooled Mind]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabeth_I/hHZnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Eliz I]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Dramas_of_Christian_Time/mnIqAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Dramas of Christian Time]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabeth_I/XjQmAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Elizabeth I: The Shrewdness of Virtue]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/John_Dryden/9Q1aAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover John Dryden]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_Early_Modern_Political_T/DUwhAwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PA259&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and Early Modern Political Thought]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_English_History_Play_in_the_age_of_S/5TT-AQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PA158&printsec=frontcover The English History Play in the Age of Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Political/rEcREQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PA215&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Political]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare_Subject_of_the_Crown/a7G6DAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PT18&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare - Subject of the Crown?]
* [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&client=firefox-b-d&hs=4AQ&sca_esv=6d4ade7bd26771c9&udm=36&biw=2510&bih=1307&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A2000%2Ccd_max%3A2099&sxsrf=ANbL-n6I6Pkwl7mmdHK6N1xPQXLbGBIOSg%3A1776853062010&ei=RqDoaZUvztiFsg_I5bToDw&ved=0ahUKEwiV6tC8nYGUAxVObEEAHcgyDf0Q4dUDCBM&uact=5&oq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&gs_lp=EhBnd3Mtd2l6LW1vZGVsZXNzIiYic2hha2VzcGVhcmUiICsgInBvbGl0aWNhbCBwcm9wYWdhbmRhIjIIECEYoAEYwwRInQlQxgZYuwdwAXgAkAEAmAF_oAHPAaoBAzEuMbgBA8gBAPgBAZgCAqACVsICCxAAGIAEGKIEGLADmAMAiAYBkAYCkgcBMqAHowOyBwExuAdTwgcDMC4yyAcEgAgB&sclient=gws-wiz-modeless The Nazi Appropriation of Shakespeare: Cultural Politics in]
4z3dkrtdt677snv7mibu1ybmfqb0jse
2812416
2812415
2026-06-01T11:11:59Z
Fortuna imperatrix mundi
1058581
/* References */ +
2812416
wikitext
text/x-wiki
== Notes ==
{{reflist|group=note}}
==References==
{{Reflist|20em}}
==Bibliography==
* [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230307261_2 Orgel, S. (2011). Prologue: I am Richard II. In: Petrina, A., Tosi, L. (eds) Representations of Elizabeth I in Early Modern Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307261_2]
* [https://broadlytextual.com/2017/12/15/i-am-richard-ii-know-ye-not-that-drama-and-political-anxiety-in-shakespeares-london/ Hixon, E., Syracuse Univ]
* Bate, Jonathan (2008). Soul of the Age. London: Penguin. pp. 256–286. ISBN 978-0-670-91482-1.
* [https://theconversation.com/richard-ii-by-william-shakespeare-why-the-divine-right-of-kings-still-matters-186648 McFarlane, K., Univ South Australia]
* [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/31090/summary Lemon, Rebecca. "The Faulty Verdict in "The Crown v. John Hayward"." SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, vol. 41 no. 1, 2001, p. 109-132. Project MUSE, https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sel.2001.0009]
* [https://brill.com/display/book/9789401211666/B9789401211666-s009.xml?language=en&srsltid=AfmBOoqTUaTQr0msNWRdtEZZ9qQ3rNcVkSoBvDPXuGv7nRvHrC8t5OzH Kizelbach, U. (2014), In The Pragmatics of Early Modern Politics: Power and Kingship in Shakespeare’s History Plays. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401211666_009]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/z-kOAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Lopez, R2]
* [https://www.manchesterhive.com/display/9781526130532/9781526130532.00008.xml?print rgel, S. (2017). "I am Richard II". In Spectacular Performances. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press. Retrieved Apr 22, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526130532.00008]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271041996_Was_Elizabeth_I_Richard_II_The_Authenticity_of_Lambarde%27s_%27Conversation%27 Scott-Warren, Jason. (2012). Was Elizabeth I Richard II?: The Authenticity of Lambarde's 'Conversation'. The Review of English Studies. 64. 208-230. 10.1093/res/hgs062]
* Stanley Wells, “Introduction” in Richard II, The New Penguin Shakespeare, ed. Stanley Wells (London: Penguin Books, 1969), 13.
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/shakespeare-survey/shakespeare-and-history-divergencies-and-agreements/B065A23215FD86BEE8E1CFD51DC7C1FB Ives EW. Shakespeare and History: Divergencies and Agreements. In: Wells S, ed. Shakespeare Survey. Shakespeare Survey. Cambridge University Press; 1986:19-36]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/457855 Albright, Evelyn May. “Shakespeare’s Richard II, Hayward’s History of Henry IV, and the Essex Conspiracy.” PMLA, vol. 46, no. 3, 1931, pp. 694–719. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/457855. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://dsc.duq.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2800&context=etd Morris, A. (2019). "within the hollow crown": Performing Kingship in Richard II and Henry IV Part One (Master's thesis, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1771]
* [https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1122&context=srhonors_theses Scannell, Sarah J., "Shakespeare's Richard II and Henry V and Political Rebellions in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth I" (2010). Honors Scholar Theses, 138]
* [https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2011.00873.x Luecking Frost, L. (2012), “A Kyng That Ruled All By Lust”: Richard II in Elizabethan Literature. Literature Compass, 9: 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2011.00873.x]
* [https://www.academia.edu/8347491/A_Law_Case_in_Verse_Venus_and_Adonis_and_the_Authorship_Question Stritmatter, R., A Law Case in Verse: Venus and Adonis and the Authorship Question, 2004 University of Tennessee Law Review]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304647742_Prologue_I_am_Richard_II Orgel, Stephen. (2011). Prologue: I am Richard II. 10.1057/9780230307261_2]
* [https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA314252957&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=15256863&sw=w&p=AONE&userGroupName=anon%7Ebf79dda0&aty=open-web-entry Egan, Michael. "The Essex Rebellion and Richard II: why wasn't Shakespeare arrested?" Shakespeare Oxford Newsletter, vol. 48, no. 3, summer-fall 2012, p. 20]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/richard-ii/stagehistory/D62D9CA061F03B2AE8D56E856288EEDA 1. Child H, Shakespeare W. THE STAGE-HISTORY. In: Dover Wilson J, ed. Richard II: The Cambridge Dover Wilson Shakespeare. Cambridge Library Collection - Literary Studies. Cambridge University Press; 2009:lxxvii-xcii]
* [https://www.openstarts.units.it/entities/publication/16d8c447-62f4-48e8-8347-5d56af674aa3/details Snelling, D., 'Prospero on the Coast of Bohemia. "Nihil sed rara et miranda amabat". Diary of Melchior Goldast upon the late Emperor Rudolph II' 1994]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2902265 Gajowski, Evelyn. Shakespeare in Performance: King Richard IIby Margaret Shewring. Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 3, 1998, pp. 328–30. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2902265. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/217842/summary Mosse, Ramona Franziska. Review of Richard II. Shakespeare Bulletin, vol. 25 no. 2, 2007, p. 73-77. Project MUSE, https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/shb.2007.0036]
* [https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/665894?journalCode=rq Petrina and Tosi. Representations of Elizabeth I in Early Modern Culture Elizabeth Pentland Renaissance Quarterly 2012 65:1, 274-276]
* [https://journals.co.za/doi/10.4314/sisa.v26i1.4 The construction of a king : waste, effeminacy and queerness in Shakespeare's Richard II Higginbotham, D.]
* [https://academic.oup.com/book/2363/chapter-abstract/142533948?redirectedFrom=fulltext Erskine-Hill, Howard, 'The Second Tetralogy and After', Poetry and the Realm of Politics: Shakespeare to Dryden (Oxford, 1996; online edn, Oxford Academic, 3 Oct. 2011), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198117315.003.0004]
* [https://www.academia.edu/123917862/Shakespeare_s_Richard_II_in_the_minds_of_the_Elizabethan_audiences Shakespeare’s Richard II in the minds of the Elizabethan audiences]
* [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03064220221084555 Plays, protests and the censor’s pencil]
* [https://www.indexoncensorship.org/2022/03/plays-protests-and-the-censors-pencil/ Plays, protests and the censor’s pencil A brittle Gloriana: staging the deposition of Queen Elizabeth I].
* Saul, N., Richard II
* [https://www.academia.edu/3236651/_A_god_on_earth_thou_art_Richard_II_and_the_nature_of_Kingship “A god on earth thou art”: Richard II and the nature of Kingship]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/457398 Albright, Evelyn May. “Shakespeare’s Richard II and the Essex Conspiracy.” PMLA, vol. 42, no. 3, 1927, pp. 686–720. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/457398. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/critical-survey/37/3/cs370301.xml Holderness, G. (2025). Introduction: Shakespeare's Wars of the Roses. Critical Survey, 37(3), 1-4. Retrieved Apr 22, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.3167/cs.2025.370301]
* [https://www.folger.edu/podcasts/shakespeare-unlimited/tragedy-richard-ii-henry-iv-helen-castor/ Folger: Shakespeare Unlimited: Episode 249]
* [https://www.rachaeldickzen.com/blog/2021/1/10/charlesiii The Historical and Shakespearean References in King Charles III]
* Kermode, The Age of Shakespeare, pg.53.
* [https://heinonline.org/HOL/login-hol?redirect_url=https%3A%2F%2Fheinonline.org%2FHOL%2Fmojo%3F%252Fmojo%3D%26auth_token%3DyhcMOu8W7PCc5OrmTqVnr2qFPpoiOdhM5uQmkQyWufU%253D%26casa_token%3D%26div%3D5%26g_sent%3D1%26paywall_url%3D%26referrer%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fheinonline.org%252FHOL%252FPage%253Fhandle%253Dhein.journals%252Fneastlr1%26timestamp%3D1776855600%26url%3D%252FHOL%252FPage%253Fhandle%253Dhein.journals%252Fneastlr1%2526div%253D5%2526id%253D%2526page%253D Jones, H., ''I AM RICHARD II, KNOW YE NOT THAT?' - WORKS. OF WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE AND THE ART OF. GOVERNANCE''']
* Hattaway, M., William Shakespeare: Richard II (Literature Insights, 9781847600349)
* [https://books.openedition.org/psn/8305 Findlay, A., “Good sometimes queen” (V.1.37). Richard II, Mary Stuart and the Politics of Queenship, 205-219]
* [https://pure.manchester.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/54508829/FULL_TEXT.PDF Pritchard, K., 'Legitimacy, Illegitimacy and Sovereignty in Shakespeare’s British Plays' (2011 University of Manchester PhD]
* CHATELANAT, Marine. Histrionic Future Kings: The Politics of Metadrama in Shakespeare’s Richard III, Richard II, and Henry IV Part 1. Master, 2023.
* [https://www.persee.fr/doc/xvii_0291-3798_2004_num_59_1_1993 Mayer, J-C., 'The "Parliament Sceane" in Shakespeare's King Richard II', XVII-XVIII. Revue de la Société d'études anglo-américaines des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles Année 2004 59 pp. 27-42]
* [https://www.emerald.com/md/article-abstract/38/5/315/285132/Managers-as-kings-Shakespeare-on-modern-leadership?redirectedFrom=fulltext Egan M (2000), "Managers as kings: Shakespeare on modern leadership". Management Decision, Vol. 38 No. 5 pp. 315–327, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740010340490]
* [https://d-nb.info/1279081511/34 Quabeck (2022): William Shakespeare, in: Thomas Gutmann, Eberhard Ortland, Klaus Stierstorfer, eds., Encyclopedia of Law and Literature (last edited 26 October 2022), doi: 10.17879/12009577118]
* [https://lawliberty.org/book-review/was-the-bard-writing-about-the-donald/ Sullivan, V., 'Was the Bard Writing about The Donald?']
* [https://deveresociety.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/FINAL_NL_Apr2022-Haste-July-Letterresponse.pdf Haste, I., 'THE PLAY ON THE EVE OF THE ESSEX REBELLION']
* [https://www.cherylmtaylor.com/2017/11/08/a-companion-to-shakespeares-richard-ii/ A Companion to Shakespeare’s Richard II]
* [https://www.city-journal.org/article/shakespeares-richards Dalrymple, T., Shakespeare’s Richards: The playwright’s two historical dramas offer contrasts between political pathologies]
* [https://hfriedberg.web.wesleyan.edu/engl205/wshakespeare/plotsandrebelions.htm ELIZABETHAN PLOTS AND REBELLIONS]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2869708 Rackin, Phyllis. “The Role of the Audience In Shakespeare’s Richard II.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 3, 1985, pp. 262–81. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2869708. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026.]
* [https://www.psychologytoday.com/ie/blog/whats-in-name/201603/group-think-and-academia-shocking-shakespeare-shenanigans Group Think and Academia: Shocking Shakespeare Shenanigans]
* [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01847678221099975 Hiscopck, A., '"Why I should welcome such a guest as grief [?": Lodging and dislodging in Shakespeare's Richard II']
* [https://academic.oup.com/book/51779/chapter-abstract/420487796?redirectedFrom=fulltext 'Epigraph', Imagining Time in the English Chronicle Play: Historical Futures, 1590-1660 (Oxford, 2023; online edn, Oxford Academic, 19 Oct. 2023), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198872658.002.0009]
* [https://journals.openedition.org/interfaces/319?lang=en Blake & Shakespeare]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/shakespeare-and-the-visual-imagination/richard-iiand-the-politics-of-perspective/23A5D4615E2A8BF9380BAF1ECE99B46D Sillars S. Richard IIand the Politics of Perspective. In: Shakespeare and the Visual Imagination. Cambridge University Press; 2015:133-162.]
* [https://www.persee.fr/doc/xvii_0291-3798_2004_num_59_1_1992 Le miroir des rois: de Richard II à Henry VIII]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/king-richard-ll/introduction/25419329A06BC1C2E4D3DDBF331B7F91 Shakespeare W, McEachern C. Introduction. In: Gurr A, ed. King Richard Ll. The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press; 2018:1-66.]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372862689_A_Critical_Discourse_Study_of_Shakespeare%27s_Theological_Conceptions_in_Acts_IV_and_V_of_Richard_II_The_%27Divine_Mandate%27_of_Richard_Kingship_Falls_Apart A Critical Discourse Study of Shakespeare’s Theological Conceptions in Acts IV and V of Richard II: The ‘Divine Mandate’ of Richard Kingship Falls Apart]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/lal.2004.16.3.313 Richard II, Bracton, and the End of Political Theology]
* [https://dokumen.pub/the-art-of-law-in-shakespeare-9781509905478-9781509905508-9781509905492.html The Art of Law in Shakespeare]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-shakespeare-and-religion/providence-and-divine-right-in-the-english-histories/DBE9BFEBF5C199F9DD72D31ED9C3B041 Mayer J-C. Providence and Divine Right in the English Histories. In: Hamlin H, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Religion. Cambridge Companions to Literature. Cambridge University Press; 2019:151-167]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315698000_THE_CHOMSKY-FOUCAULT_DEBATE_WHERE_DOES_THE_BARD_STAND_IN_RICHARD_II Salami, Ali & Riahi Nouri, Amir. (2016). THE CHOMSKY-FOUCAULT DEBATE: WHERE DOES THE BARD STAND IN RICHARD II?]
* [https://dokumen.pub/shakespeare-richard-ii-9781350363168-9780333416709.html Richard II]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/457907?seq=1 Heffner, Ray. “Shakespeare, Hayward, and Essex.” PMLA, vol. 45, no. 3, 1930, pp. 754–80. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/457907. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-shakespeare-and-war/shakespeare-on-civil-and-dynastic-wars/00D0269CFF998876DB961FB01C22954D Shakespeare on Civil and Dynastic Wars]
* [https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004356900/B9789004356900_012.xml?srsltid=AfmBOopJMjwJAQnUGME9FmT6Gwg0ih9pArbXBdTJbN6YAqbdXqbkGyuo Is a Dramatic Theory of History Possible? Shakespeare’s Richard ii and ‘Historical Truth’]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/24475607 THE CHILD'S TWO BODIES: SHAKESPEARE, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE END OF SUCCESSION]
* [https://dokumen.pub/english-renaissance-drama-an-introduction-to-theatre-and-theatres-in-shakespeares-time-9781847600202-9781847600714.html English Renaissance Drama : An Introduction to Theatre and Theatres in Shakespeare’s Time]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/believing-in-shakespeare/person-plot-place/BD4EF4CBA6E7D8E2ECE5519FA1D08C16 1. McEachern C. Person, Plot, Place. In: Believing in Shakespeare: Studies in Longing. Cambridge University Press; 2018:181-296]
* [https://www.enotes.com/topics/richard-2/criticism/richard-ii-vol-91/criticism-production-reviews-1000228/nigel-saul-review-date-12-may-2000 With an Eye to the Present]
* [https://www.academia.edu/128303633/Shakespeare_s_Other_Eden_Richard_II_by_Ouroboros_Theatre_Company_2013_ Shakespeare’s Other Eden Richard II by Ouroboros Theatre Company (2013)]
* [https://dokumen.pub/shakespeare-upstart-crow-to-sweet-swan-1592-1623-9781472555496-9781408130148-9781408139189.html Shakespeare: Upstart Crow to Sweet Swan 1592-1623]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/41917215 RACKIN, PHYLLIS. “Temporality, Anachronism, and Presence in Shakespeare’s English Histories.” Renaissance Drama, vol. 17, 1986, pp. 101–23. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41917215. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026.]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/greece-and-rome/article/abs/alexander-philotas-and-the-origins-of-modern-historiography/D90568C0A1131952625E0A3B44F43EC8 Stoneman R. Alexander, Philotas, and the origins of modern historiography. Greece and Rome. 2013;60(2):296-312. doi:10.1017/S0017383513000119]
* [https://www.academia.edu/35800720/Shakespeares_Richard_II_and_Elizabethan_politics Shakespeare's Richard II and Elizabethan politics]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/rethinking-historicism-from-shakespeare-to-milton/old-new-now/2E8CBEFFEFB11D8B843BAF2C108E9768 Introduction - Old, New, Now]
* [https://www.academia.edu/24392476/Richard_II_hamartia_and_climax Richard II hamartia and climax]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/babylonian-jews-and-sasanian-imperialism-in-late-antiquity/kings-and-religion-in-the-talmud-and-in-the-imagination-of-sasanian-communities/E2DCC2F3E0FBA74ABE543DDD2DD7F1A7 Kings and Religion in the Talmud and in the Imagination of Sasanian Communities]
* Stephen Greenblatt, “Introduction,” in The Power of Forms in the English Renaissance, ed. Stephen Greenblatt (Norman, OK: 1982), 3-6]
* [https://www.academia.edu/30472558/Americas_Donald_Trump_Shakespeares_Richard_II_15_Dec_2016 America's Donald Trump, Shakespeare's Richard II]
* [https://www.academia.edu/5321346/Looking_Back_Shakespeare_s_Indebtedness_to_Chaucer_and_the_Representations_of_Chivalry_in_King_Richard_II_The_Two_Noble_Kinsmen_and_the_Knight_s_Tale Looking Back: Shakespeare’s Indebtedness to Chaucer and the Representations of Chivalry in King Richard II, The Two Noble Kinsmen and the Knight’s Tale]
* [https://www.academia.edu/92423912/The_Good_Usurper_in_the_eyes_of_God_and_the_people_An_analysis_of_the_role_of_the_usurper_in_Shakespeares_Richard_II_and_Henry_IV_Part_1 The Good Usurper in the eyes of God and the people: An analysis of the role of the usurper in Shakespeare's Richard II and Henry IV Part 1]
* [https://www.academia.edu/91789871/The_Bacon_Shakespeare_Manuscript_Hitherto_known_as_the_Northumberland_Manuscript_which_originally_Contained_Copies_of_his_Shakespeare_Plays_Richard_II_and_Richard_III THE BACON-SHAKESPEARE MANUSCRIPT (HITHERTO KNOWN AS THE NORTHUMBERLAND MANUSCRIPT) WHICH ORIGINALLY CONTAINED COPIES OF HIS SHAKESPEARE PLAYS RICHARD II AND RICHARD III]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/f4gGCAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA88&printsec=frontcover Richard II: Critical Essays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_Companion_to_Shakespeare_s_Works_Volum/JlDNEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA400&printsec=frontcover A Companion to Shakespeare's Works, Volume II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Reread/Z6JhDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA239&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare Reread]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_in_the_Present/yTKWEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PT8&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare in the Present]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Studying_Shakespeare/1N4FBAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA129&printsec=frontcover Studying Shakespeare A Practical Introduction]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Critical_Essays_on_William_Faulkner/kAGBEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PT178&printsec=frontcover Critical Essays on William Faulkner]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare/QY6aEQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA216&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory 1945-2000]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Reign_of_Richard_II/cv0WAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Dodd, G., R2]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Institution_of_Theat/Nkt9DAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA108&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Institution of Theatre]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Theory_of_the_King_s_Two_Bodies_in_t/8SRXAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Theory of the King's Two Bodies in the Age of Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Stealing_the_Story/RaJlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Stealing the Story: Shakespeare's Self-Conscious Use of the Mimetic Tradition in the Tragedies]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Greenwood_Companion_to_Shakespeare_O/JkcgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Greenwood Companion to Shakespeare: Overviews and the history plays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/British_and_Irish_Literature_and_Its_Tim/xH4jAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover British and Irish Literature and Its Times]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Philosophy_of_History_Reve/1jwgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Philosophy of History Revealed in a Detailed Analysis of Henry V and Examined in Other History Plays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_His_Contemporaries/7em7coOthxQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and His Contemporaries]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Politics_of_the_Public_Sphere_in_Ear/0sGHAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Politics of the Public Sphere in Early Modern England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Catholic_Religion/Fl4gAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0&bsq=%22I%20am%20Richard%20II,%20know%20ye%20not%20that?%22 Shakespeare and the Catholic religion]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Proceedings_of_the_British_Academy_Volum/8CsoAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Lectures]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Slander_and_Censorship_in_Late_Sixteenth/wb_oAvuJgbAC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Slander and Censorship in Late Sixteenth Century Literature]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabethan_Literature_and_the_Law_of_Fr/vBFdAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Elizabethan Literature and the Law of Fraudulent Conveyance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Hamlet_History_and_commentary/yxgrAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Hamlet History etc]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare_A_Popular_Life/1BuaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare: a popular life]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_State_of_Mind/pCiIAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover A State of Mind?]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Dramatic_Genres/J5FlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Dramatic Genres]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Literature_Criticism_from_1400_to_1800/O6VkAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Literature Criticism from 1400 to 1800 Volume 89]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_the_Papist/LPwNAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare the Papist]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Goslicius_Ideal_Senator_and_His_Cultural/1jc7AQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Goslicius' Ideal Senator and His Cultural Impact Over the Centuries]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_by_Another_Name/FqllAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover "Shakespeare" by Another Name]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Friends/AlZlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Friends]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Dr_Simon_Forman/qHceAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Dr Simon Forman]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare_the_Wars_of_the_Rose/dZFlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare, the Wars of the Roses and the historians]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespearean_Criticism/2TdlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespearean Criticism]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Poetry_History_and_Antiquarianism_in_Ref/jwIhAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Poetry, History, and Antiquarianism in Reformation England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Prince_of_Love/D0QgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Prince of Love]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Paper_Bullets_of_the_Brain/o0YgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Paper Bullets of the Brain]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/As_You_Like_It/GiBaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover As You Like It: Third Series]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare/WCqaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare, Dominic Shellard]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Poets_and_God/0XZlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Poets and God]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Law_and_Literature/Ax5MAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Law and Literature Volume 16]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Embodied_Word/FV8sAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Embodied Word]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Case_for_Shakespeare/WaRlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Case for Shakespeare: The End of the Authorship Question]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Explorations_in_Renaissance_Culture/_SYrAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Explorations in Renaissance Culture Volumes 33-34]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Touch_of_the_Real/ewdaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Touch of the Real: Essays in Early Modern Culture in Honour of Stephen Greenblatt]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Wotton_and_His_Worlds/ZfgNAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Wotton and his Worlds]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Theatre_and_Religion/wo1lAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Theatre and Religion Lancastrian Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Trying_Treason/TOKxAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Trying Treason]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Willing_Subjects/IEX0sGwT1QQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Willing Subjects]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Symbolism/Bt0ZAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Symbolism]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Performing_Shakespeare/35pQAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Performing Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Soul_of_the_Age/e0UgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Soul of the Age]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/England/aD9nAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabeth_I/-GtnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Elizabeth I]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/King_Richard_II/oGUMX4RntjgC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA25&printsec=frontcover King Richard II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Legal_Imagination/OXPvBqQLw-4C?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA38&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the legal imagination]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Theatre/GxN3ue9_r3oC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA69&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Theatre]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Critical_Essays_on_Shakespeare_s_Richard/AaYoAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Critical Essays on Shakespeare's Richard II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Reign_of_Richard_II_Essays_in_Honour/y3xnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Reign of Richard II: Essays in Honour of May McKisack]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Poetry_and_the_Realm_of_Politics/oQFaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Poetry and the Realm of Politics]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare/BM0mAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespearean_Politics/oTdlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespearean Politics]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_the_Theatrical_Dimension/wl4gAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare, the Theatrical Dimension]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Who_was_Kit_Marlowe/zQ1aAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Kit Marlowe etc]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/From_Page_to_Performance/beQKAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover From Page to Performance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Exploring_Tudor_England/ax56AAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Exploring Tudor England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Movement_Towards_Subversion/vyJaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Movement Towards Subversion]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Typological_Satire/G5BlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Typological Satire]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Recycled/zzNlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare Recycled]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Reinventing_the_Middle_Ages_the_Renaissa/fXFnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Reinventing the Middle Ages & the Renaissance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Mysterious_William_Shakespeare/WnllAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Mysterious William Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/GHhlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Richard II Critical Essays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare/WJvC6gu_I0gC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare: Records and Images]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Actors/HYtlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Actors]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_the_Man/BVdlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare the man]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Henry_V/zXllAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Henry V: A Guide to the Play]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespearean_Contingencies/Cw1NAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespearean Contingencies]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Renaissance_Drama/E60kAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Renaissance Drama 1990]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Language_Discourse_Sign/uH4oAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Language, Discourse, Sign]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Mock_Kings_in_Medieval_Society_and_Renai/T98KAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Mock kings in medieval society and Renaissance drama]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Invention_of_the_Human/ojHirImrtYoC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare: Invention of the Human]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare/wn5lAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Persons_in_Groups/rQ24AAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Persons in Groups]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/All_Semblative_a_Woman_s_Part/0DlaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover All Semblative a Woman's Part?]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Crossing_the_Mirror/qRZNAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Crossing the Mirror]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/De_Vere_is_Shakespeare/dKJlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover De Vere is Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Lambarde_Elizabethan_Antiquary_1/x1RnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Lambarde, Elizabethan Antiquary, 1536-1601]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Power_of_Forms_in_the_English_Renais/cPtZAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Power of Forms in the English Renaissance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Ravishment_and_Rememberance/G31LAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Ravishment and Rememberance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_His_Theatre/8A5ZQq3uOVQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and His Theatre]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Critical_Hermeneutics_and_Shakespeare_s/O10gAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Critical Hermeneutics and Shakespeare's History Plays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Christian_England/K-WfAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Christian England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Religious_Background/xDSaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Religious Background]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shylock/N4RlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shylock]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Shakespeare_Legacy/MM5XAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Shakespeare Legacy]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Renaissance_Genres/0uFZAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Renaissance Genres]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Cannibals_Witches_and_Divorce/qZRpAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Cannibals, Witches, and Divorce]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Problem_of_Religious_Knowledge/C29LAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Problem of Religious Knowledge]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Essex_and_the_Great_Revolt_of_1381/J8RzAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Essex and the Great Revolt of 1381]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Transactions_of_the_London_and_Middlesex/4dtJAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover TLMAS]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Politics_and_the_State/Mn9lAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare, Politics and the State]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Allegories_of_Power_in_the_England_of_El/LIYgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Allegories of Power in the England of Elizabeth]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare/rIVlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Women_s_Matters/PDRlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Women's Matters]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Weak_King_Dilemma_in_the_Shakespeare/0bJlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Weak King Dilemma in the Shakespearean History Play]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Book_Known_as_Q/S2tlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Book Known as Q]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Fields_of_Vision/OD0eAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Fields of Vision]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Ungodly_Delights/RKgcAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Ungodly Delights]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Shakespeare_Handbook/rLRlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Shakespeare HandboOK]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Humanities/y5FZAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Humanities]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II_by_William_Shakespeare/Bb3yAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Richard II by William Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/King_Richard_II/50NnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover King Richard II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Murder_Under_Trust_Or_The_Topical_Macbet/0oNlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Murder under trust]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Shakespearean_Kings/tHBlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Shakespearean Kings]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/America_the_Mabr_e_y_Experience/mRQ3AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover America, the Mabr(e)y Experience: Resistance, Revolution & Civil War]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/ZDEkAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Richard II: An Annotated Bibliography, Volume 2]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Batsford_Companion_to_Medieval_Engla/ev78b9EJQy0C?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Batsford Companion to Medieval England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Unruly_Women/FKFlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Unruly Women]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_Others/iFEgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and Others]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Kings_and_Chroniclers/L1wpAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Kings and Chroniclers]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_Kingdom_for_a_Stage/UzxlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover A Kingdom for a Stage]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_House_of_Commons/Ezz4OZuYVFYC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The History of Parliament: The House of Commons 1558-1603 (3 v.)]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Soul_of_the_Age/nMYCAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover shakespeare, Soul of the Age]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/After_Poststructuralism/TOaEAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0&bsq=%22I%20am%20Richard%20II,%20know%20ye%20not%20that?%22 After Poststructuralism: Interdisciplinarity and Literary Theory]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Unschooled_Mind/C7WnYtt219IC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Unschooled Mind]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabeth_I/hHZnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Eliz I]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Dramas_of_Christian_Time/mnIqAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Dramas of Christian Time]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabeth_I/XjQmAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Elizabeth I: The Shrewdness of Virtue]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/John_Dryden/9Q1aAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover John Dryden]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_Early_Modern_Political_T/DUwhAwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PA259&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and Early Modern Political Thought]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_English_History_Play_in_the_age_of_S/5TT-AQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PA158&printsec=frontcover The English History Play in the Age of Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Political/rEcREQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PA215&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Political]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare_Subject_of_the_Crown/a7G6DAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PT18&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare - Subject of the Crown?]
* [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&client=firefox-b-d&hs=4AQ&sca_esv=6d4ade7bd26771c9&udm=36&biw=2510&bih=1307&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A2000%2Ccd_max%3A2099&sxsrf=ANbL-n6I6Pkwl7mmdHK6N1xPQXLbGBIOSg%3A1776853062010&ei=RqDoaZUvztiFsg_I5bToDw&ved=0ahUKEwiV6tC8nYGUAxVObEEAHcgyDf0Q4dUDCBM&uact=5&oq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&gs_lp=EhBnd3Mtd2l6LW1vZGVsZXNzIiYic2hha2VzcGVhcmUiICsgInBvbGl0aWNhbCBwcm9wYWdhbmRhIjIIECEYoAEYwwRInQlQxgZYuwdwAXgAkAEAmAF_oAHPAaoBAzEuMbgBA8gBAPgBAZgCAqACVsICCxAAGIAEGKIEGLADmAMAiAYBkAYCkgcBMqAHowOyBwExuAdTwgcDMC4yyAcEgAgB&sclient=gws-wiz-modeless The Nazi Appropriation of Shakespeare: Cultural Politics in]
gnppm18qzz6srvmqy1lsca1g0q4vfix
2812417
2812416
2026-06-01T11:12:20Z
Fortuna imperatrix mundi
1058581
/* Bibliography */ +
2812417
wikitext
text/x-wiki
== Notes ==
{{reflist|group=note}}
==References==
{{Reflist|20em}}
==Bibliography==
{{refbegin|30em|indent=yes}}
* [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230307261_2 Orgel, S. (2011). Prologue: I am Richard II. In: Petrina, A., Tosi, L. (eds) Representations of Elizabeth I in Early Modern Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307261_2]
* [https://broadlytextual.com/2017/12/15/i-am-richard-ii-know-ye-not-that-drama-and-political-anxiety-in-shakespeares-london/ Hixon, E., Syracuse Univ]
* Bate, Jonathan (2008). Soul of the Age. London: Penguin. pp. 256–286. ISBN 978-0-670-91482-1.
* [https://theconversation.com/richard-ii-by-william-shakespeare-why-the-divine-right-of-kings-still-matters-186648 McFarlane, K., Univ South Australia]
* [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/31090/summary Lemon, Rebecca. "The Faulty Verdict in "The Crown v. John Hayward"." SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, vol. 41 no. 1, 2001, p. 109-132. Project MUSE, https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sel.2001.0009]
* [https://brill.com/display/book/9789401211666/B9789401211666-s009.xml?language=en&srsltid=AfmBOoqTUaTQr0msNWRdtEZZ9qQ3rNcVkSoBvDPXuGv7nRvHrC8t5OzH Kizelbach, U. (2014), In The Pragmatics of Early Modern Politics: Power and Kingship in Shakespeare’s History Plays. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401211666_009]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/z-kOAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Lopez, R2]
* [https://www.manchesterhive.com/display/9781526130532/9781526130532.00008.xml?print rgel, S. (2017). "I am Richard II". In Spectacular Performances. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press. Retrieved Apr 22, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526130532.00008]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271041996_Was_Elizabeth_I_Richard_II_The_Authenticity_of_Lambarde%27s_%27Conversation%27 Scott-Warren, Jason. (2012). Was Elizabeth I Richard II?: The Authenticity of Lambarde's 'Conversation'. The Review of English Studies. 64. 208-230. 10.1093/res/hgs062]
* Stanley Wells, “Introduction” in Richard II, The New Penguin Shakespeare, ed. Stanley Wells (London: Penguin Books, 1969), 13.
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/shakespeare-survey/shakespeare-and-history-divergencies-and-agreements/B065A23215FD86BEE8E1CFD51DC7C1FB Ives EW. Shakespeare and History: Divergencies and Agreements. In: Wells S, ed. Shakespeare Survey. Shakespeare Survey. Cambridge University Press; 1986:19-36]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/457855 Albright, Evelyn May. “Shakespeare’s Richard II, Hayward’s History of Henry IV, and the Essex Conspiracy.” PMLA, vol. 46, no. 3, 1931, pp. 694–719. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/457855. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://dsc.duq.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2800&context=etd Morris, A. (2019). "within the hollow crown": Performing Kingship in Richard II and Henry IV Part One (Master's thesis, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1771]
* [https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1122&context=srhonors_theses Scannell, Sarah J., "Shakespeare's Richard II and Henry V and Political Rebellions in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth I" (2010). Honors Scholar Theses, 138]
* [https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2011.00873.x Luecking Frost, L. (2012), “A Kyng That Ruled All By Lust”: Richard II in Elizabethan Literature. Literature Compass, 9: 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2011.00873.x]
* [https://www.academia.edu/8347491/A_Law_Case_in_Verse_Venus_and_Adonis_and_the_Authorship_Question Stritmatter, R., A Law Case in Verse: Venus and Adonis and the Authorship Question, 2004 University of Tennessee Law Review]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304647742_Prologue_I_am_Richard_II Orgel, Stephen. (2011). Prologue: I am Richard II. 10.1057/9780230307261_2]
* [https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA314252957&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=15256863&sw=w&p=AONE&userGroupName=anon%7Ebf79dda0&aty=open-web-entry Egan, Michael. "The Essex Rebellion and Richard II: why wasn't Shakespeare arrested?" Shakespeare Oxford Newsletter, vol. 48, no. 3, summer-fall 2012, p. 20]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/richard-ii/stagehistory/D62D9CA061F03B2AE8D56E856288EEDA 1. Child H, Shakespeare W. THE STAGE-HISTORY. In: Dover Wilson J, ed. Richard II: The Cambridge Dover Wilson Shakespeare. Cambridge Library Collection - Literary Studies. Cambridge University Press; 2009:lxxvii-xcii]
* [https://www.openstarts.units.it/entities/publication/16d8c447-62f4-48e8-8347-5d56af674aa3/details Snelling, D., 'Prospero on the Coast of Bohemia. "Nihil sed rara et miranda amabat". Diary of Melchior Goldast upon the late Emperor Rudolph II' 1994]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2902265 Gajowski, Evelyn. Shakespeare in Performance: King Richard IIby Margaret Shewring. Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 3, 1998, pp. 328–30. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2902265. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://muse.jhu.edu/article/217842/summary Mosse, Ramona Franziska. Review of Richard II. Shakespeare Bulletin, vol. 25 no. 2, 2007, p. 73-77. Project MUSE, https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/shb.2007.0036]
* [https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/665894?journalCode=rq Petrina and Tosi. Representations of Elizabeth I in Early Modern Culture Elizabeth Pentland Renaissance Quarterly 2012 65:1, 274-276]
* [https://journals.co.za/doi/10.4314/sisa.v26i1.4 The construction of a king : waste, effeminacy and queerness in Shakespeare's Richard II Higginbotham, D.]
* [https://academic.oup.com/book/2363/chapter-abstract/142533948?redirectedFrom=fulltext Erskine-Hill, Howard, 'The Second Tetralogy and After', Poetry and the Realm of Politics: Shakespeare to Dryden (Oxford, 1996; online edn, Oxford Academic, 3 Oct. 2011), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198117315.003.0004]
* [https://www.academia.edu/123917862/Shakespeare_s_Richard_II_in_the_minds_of_the_Elizabethan_audiences Shakespeare’s Richard II in the minds of the Elizabethan audiences]
* [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03064220221084555 Plays, protests and the censor’s pencil]
* [https://www.indexoncensorship.org/2022/03/plays-protests-and-the-censors-pencil/ Plays, protests and the censor’s pencil A brittle Gloriana: staging the deposition of Queen Elizabeth I].
* Saul, N., Richard II
* [https://www.academia.edu/3236651/_A_god_on_earth_thou_art_Richard_II_and_the_nature_of_Kingship “A god on earth thou art”: Richard II and the nature of Kingship]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/457398 Albright, Evelyn May. “Shakespeare’s Richard II and the Essex Conspiracy.” PMLA, vol. 42, no. 3, 1927, pp. 686–720. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/457398. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/critical-survey/37/3/cs370301.xml Holderness, G. (2025). Introduction: Shakespeare's Wars of the Roses. Critical Survey, 37(3), 1-4. Retrieved Apr 22, 2026, from https://doi.org/10.3167/cs.2025.370301]
* [https://www.folger.edu/podcasts/shakespeare-unlimited/tragedy-richard-ii-henry-iv-helen-castor/ Folger: Shakespeare Unlimited: Episode 249]
* [https://www.rachaeldickzen.com/blog/2021/1/10/charlesiii The Historical and Shakespearean References in King Charles III]
* Kermode, The Age of Shakespeare, pg.53.
* [https://heinonline.org/HOL/login-hol?redirect_url=https%3A%2F%2Fheinonline.org%2FHOL%2Fmojo%3F%252Fmojo%3D%26auth_token%3DyhcMOu8W7PCc5OrmTqVnr2qFPpoiOdhM5uQmkQyWufU%253D%26casa_token%3D%26div%3D5%26g_sent%3D1%26paywall_url%3D%26referrer%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fheinonline.org%252FHOL%252FPage%253Fhandle%253Dhein.journals%252Fneastlr1%26timestamp%3D1776855600%26url%3D%252FHOL%252FPage%253Fhandle%253Dhein.journals%252Fneastlr1%2526div%253D5%2526id%253D%2526page%253D Jones, H., ''I AM RICHARD II, KNOW YE NOT THAT?' - WORKS. OF WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE AND THE ART OF. GOVERNANCE''']
* Hattaway, M., William Shakespeare: Richard II (Literature Insights, 9781847600349)
* [https://books.openedition.org/psn/8305 Findlay, A., “Good sometimes queen” (V.1.37). Richard II, Mary Stuart and the Politics of Queenship, 205-219]
* [https://pure.manchester.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/54508829/FULL_TEXT.PDF Pritchard, K., 'Legitimacy, Illegitimacy and Sovereignty in Shakespeare’s British Plays' (2011 University of Manchester PhD]
* CHATELANAT, Marine. Histrionic Future Kings: The Politics of Metadrama in Shakespeare’s Richard III, Richard II, and Henry IV Part 1. Master, 2023.
* [https://www.persee.fr/doc/xvii_0291-3798_2004_num_59_1_1993 Mayer, J-C., 'The "Parliament Sceane" in Shakespeare's King Richard II', XVII-XVIII. Revue de la Société d'études anglo-américaines des XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles Année 2004 59 pp. 27-42]
* [https://www.emerald.com/md/article-abstract/38/5/315/285132/Managers-as-kings-Shakespeare-on-modern-leadership?redirectedFrom=fulltext Egan M (2000), "Managers as kings: Shakespeare on modern leadership". Management Decision, Vol. 38 No. 5 pp. 315–327, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740010340490]
* [https://d-nb.info/1279081511/34 Quabeck (2022): William Shakespeare, in: Thomas Gutmann, Eberhard Ortland, Klaus Stierstorfer, eds., Encyclopedia of Law and Literature (last edited 26 October 2022), doi: 10.17879/12009577118]
* [https://lawliberty.org/book-review/was-the-bard-writing-about-the-donald/ Sullivan, V., 'Was the Bard Writing about The Donald?']
* [https://deveresociety.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/FINAL_NL_Apr2022-Haste-July-Letterresponse.pdf Haste, I., 'THE PLAY ON THE EVE OF THE ESSEX REBELLION']
* [https://www.cherylmtaylor.com/2017/11/08/a-companion-to-shakespeares-richard-ii/ A Companion to Shakespeare’s Richard II]
* [https://www.city-journal.org/article/shakespeares-richards Dalrymple, T., Shakespeare’s Richards: The playwright’s two historical dramas offer contrasts between political pathologies]
* [https://hfriedberg.web.wesleyan.edu/engl205/wshakespeare/plotsandrebelions.htm ELIZABETHAN PLOTS AND REBELLIONS]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2869708 Rackin, Phyllis. “The Role of the Audience In Shakespeare’s Richard II.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 3, 1985, pp. 262–81. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2869708. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026.]
* [https://www.psychologytoday.com/ie/blog/whats-in-name/201603/group-think-and-academia-shocking-shakespeare-shenanigans Group Think and Academia: Shocking Shakespeare Shenanigans]
* [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01847678221099975 Hiscopck, A., '"Why I should welcome such a guest as grief [?": Lodging and dislodging in Shakespeare's Richard II']
* [https://academic.oup.com/book/51779/chapter-abstract/420487796?redirectedFrom=fulltext 'Epigraph', Imagining Time in the English Chronicle Play: Historical Futures, 1590-1660 (Oxford, 2023; online edn, Oxford Academic, 19 Oct. 2023), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198872658.002.0009]
* [https://journals.openedition.org/interfaces/319?lang=en Blake & Shakespeare]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/shakespeare-and-the-visual-imagination/richard-iiand-the-politics-of-perspective/23A5D4615E2A8BF9380BAF1ECE99B46D Sillars S. Richard IIand the Politics of Perspective. In: Shakespeare and the Visual Imagination. Cambridge University Press; 2015:133-162.]
* [https://www.persee.fr/doc/xvii_0291-3798_2004_num_59_1_1992 Le miroir des rois: de Richard II à Henry VIII]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/king-richard-ll/introduction/25419329A06BC1C2E4D3DDBF331B7F91 Shakespeare W, McEachern C. Introduction. In: Gurr A, ed. King Richard Ll. The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge University Press; 2018:1-66.]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372862689_A_Critical_Discourse_Study_of_Shakespeare%27s_Theological_Conceptions_in_Acts_IV_and_V_of_Richard_II_The_%27Divine_Mandate%27_of_Richard_Kingship_Falls_Apart A Critical Discourse Study of Shakespeare’s Theological Conceptions in Acts IV and V of Richard II: The ‘Divine Mandate’ of Richard Kingship Falls Apart]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/lal.2004.16.3.313 Richard II, Bracton, and the End of Political Theology]
* [https://dokumen.pub/the-art-of-law-in-shakespeare-9781509905478-9781509905508-9781509905492.html The Art of Law in Shakespeare]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-shakespeare-and-religion/providence-and-divine-right-in-the-english-histories/DBE9BFEBF5C199F9DD72D31ED9C3B041 Mayer J-C. Providence and Divine Right in the English Histories. In: Hamlin H, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Religion. Cambridge Companions to Literature. Cambridge University Press; 2019:151-167]
* [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315698000_THE_CHOMSKY-FOUCAULT_DEBATE_WHERE_DOES_THE_BARD_STAND_IN_RICHARD_II Salami, Ali & Riahi Nouri, Amir. (2016). THE CHOMSKY-FOUCAULT DEBATE: WHERE DOES THE BARD STAND IN RICHARD II?]
* [https://dokumen.pub/shakespeare-richard-ii-9781350363168-9780333416709.html Richard II]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/457907?seq=1 Heffner, Ray. “Shakespeare, Hayward, and Essex.” PMLA, vol. 45, no. 3, 1930, pp. 754–80. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/457907. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-shakespeare-and-war/shakespeare-on-civil-and-dynastic-wars/00D0269CFF998876DB961FB01C22954D Shakespeare on Civil and Dynastic Wars]
* [https://brill.com/display/book/edcoll/9789004356900/B9789004356900_012.xml?srsltid=AfmBOopJMjwJAQnUGME9FmT6Gwg0ih9pArbXBdTJbN6YAqbdXqbkGyuo Is a Dramatic Theory of History Possible? Shakespeare’s Richard ii and ‘Historical Truth’]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/24475607 THE CHILD'S TWO BODIES: SHAKESPEARE, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE END OF SUCCESSION]
* [https://dokumen.pub/english-renaissance-drama-an-introduction-to-theatre-and-theatres-in-shakespeares-time-9781847600202-9781847600714.html English Renaissance Drama : An Introduction to Theatre and Theatres in Shakespeare’s Time]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/believing-in-shakespeare/person-plot-place/BD4EF4CBA6E7D8E2ECE5519FA1D08C16 1. McEachern C. Person, Plot, Place. In: Believing in Shakespeare: Studies in Longing. Cambridge University Press; 2018:181-296]
* [https://www.enotes.com/topics/richard-2/criticism/richard-ii-vol-91/criticism-production-reviews-1000228/nigel-saul-review-date-12-may-2000 With an Eye to the Present]
* [https://www.academia.edu/128303633/Shakespeare_s_Other_Eden_Richard_II_by_Ouroboros_Theatre_Company_2013_ Shakespeare’s Other Eden Richard II by Ouroboros Theatre Company (2013)]
* [https://dokumen.pub/shakespeare-upstart-crow-to-sweet-swan-1592-1623-9781472555496-9781408130148-9781408139189.html Shakespeare: Upstart Crow to Sweet Swan 1592-1623]
* [https://www.jstor.org/stable/41917215 RACKIN, PHYLLIS. “Temporality, Anachronism, and Presence in Shakespeare’s English Histories.” Renaissance Drama, vol. 17, 1986, pp. 101–23. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41917215. Accessed 22 Apr. 2026.]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/greece-and-rome/article/abs/alexander-philotas-and-the-origins-of-modern-historiography/D90568C0A1131952625E0A3B44F43EC8 Stoneman R. Alexander, Philotas, and the origins of modern historiography. Greece and Rome. 2013;60(2):296-312. doi:10.1017/S0017383513000119]
* [https://www.academia.edu/35800720/Shakespeares_Richard_II_and_Elizabethan_politics Shakespeare's Richard II and Elizabethan politics]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/rethinking-historicism-from-shakespeare-to-milton/old-new-now/2E8CBEFFEFB11D8B843BAF2C108E9768 Introduction - Old, New, Now]
* [https://www.academia.edu/24392476/Richard_II_hamartia_and_climax Richard II hamartia and climax]
* [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/babylonian-jews-and-sasanian-imperialism-in-late-antiquity/kings-and-religion-in-the-talmud-and-in-the-imagination-of-sasanian-communities/E2DCC2F3E0FBA74ABE543DDD2DD7F1A7 Kings and Religion in the Talmud and in the Imagination of Sasanian Communities]
* Stephen Greenblatt, “Introduction,” in The Power of Forms in the English Renaissance, ed. Stephen Greenblatt (Norman, OK: 1982), 3-6]
* [https://www.academia.edu/30472558/Americas_Donald_Trump_Shakespeares_Richard_II_15_Dec_2016 America's Donald Trump, Shakespeare's Richard II]
* [https://www.academia.edu/5321346/Looking_Back_Shakespeare_s_Indebtedness_to_Chaucer_and_the_Representations_of_Chivalry_in_King_Richard_II_The_Two_Noble_Kinsmen_and_the_Knight_s_Tale Looking Back: Shakespeare’s Indebtedness to Chaucer and the Representations of Chivalry in King Richard II, The Two Noble Kinsmen and the Knight’s Tale]
* [https://www.academia.edu/92423912/The_Good_Usurper_in_the_eyes_of_God_and_the_people_An_analysis_of_the_role_of_the_usurper_in_Shakespeares_Richard_II_and_Henry_IV_Part_1 The Good Usurper in the eyes of God and the people: An analysis of the role of the usurper in Shakespeare's Richard II and Henry IV Part 1]
* [https://www.academia.edu/91789871/The_Bacon_Shakespeare_Manuscript_Hitherto_known_as_the_Northumberland_Manuscript_which_originally_Contained_Copies_of_his_Shakespeare_Plays_Richard_II_and_Richard_III THE BACON-SHAKESPEARE MANUSCRIPT (HITHERTO KNOWN AS THE NORTHUMBERLAND MANUSCRIPT) WHICH ORIGINALLY CONTAINED COPIES OF HIS SHAKESPEARE PLAYS RICHARD II AND RICHARD III]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/f4gGCAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA88&printsec=frontcover Richard II: Critical Essays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_Companion_to_Shakespeare_s_Works_Volum/JlDNEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA400&printsec=frontcover A Companion to Shakespeare's Works, Volume II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Reread/Z6JhDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA239&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare Reread]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_in_the_Present/yTKWEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PT8&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare in the Present]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Studying_Shakespeare/1N4FBAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA129&printsec=frontcover Studying Shakespeare A Practical Introduction]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Critical_Essays_on_William_Faulkner/kAGBEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PT178&printsec=frontcover Critical Essays on William Faulkner]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare/QY6aEQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA216&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory 1945-2000]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Reign_of_Richard_II/cv0WAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Dodd, G., R2]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Institution_of_Theat/Nkt9DAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA108&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Institution of Theatre]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Theory_of_the_King_s_Two_Bodies_in_t/8SRXAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Theory of the King's Two Bodies in the Age of Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Stealing_the_Story/RaJlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Stealing the Story: Shakespeare's Self-Conscious Use of the Mimetic Tradition in the Tragedies]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Greenwood_Companion_to_Shakespeare_O/JkcgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Greenwood Companion to Shakespeare: Overviews and the history plays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/British_and_Irish_Literature_and_Its_Tim/xH4jAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover British and Irish Literature and Its Times]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Philosophy_of_History_Reve/1jwgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Philosophy of History Revealed in a Detailed Analysis of Henry V and Examined in Other History Plays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_His_Contemporaries/7em7coOthxQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and His Contemporaries]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Politics_of_the_Public_Sphere_in_Ear/0sGHAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Politics of the Public Sphere in Early Modern England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Catholic_Religion/Fl4gAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0&bsq=%22I%20am%20Richard%20II,%20know%20ye%20not%20that?%22 Shakespeare and the Catholic religion]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Proceedings_of_the_British_Academy_Volum/8CsoAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Lectures]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Slander_and_Censorship_in_Late_Sixteenth/wb_oAvuJgbAC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Slander and Censorship in Late Sixteenth Century Literature]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabethan_Literature_and_the_Law_of_Fr/vBFdAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Elizabethan Literature and the Law of Fraudulent Conveyance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Hamlet_History_and_commentary/yxgrAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Hamlet History etc]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare_A_Popular_Life/1BuaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare: a popular life]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_State_of_Mind/pCiIAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover A State of Mind?]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Dramatic_Genres/J5FlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Dramatic Genres]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Literature_Criticism_from_1400_to_1800/O6VkAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Literature Criticism from 1400 to 1800 Volume 89]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_the_Papist/LPwNAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare the Papist]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Goslicius_Ideal_Senator_and_His_Cultural/1jc7AQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Goslicius' Ideal Senator and His Cultural Impact Over the Centuries]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_by_Another_Name/FqllAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover "Shakespeare" by Another Name]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Friends/AlZlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Friends]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Dr_Simon_Forman/qHceAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Dr Simon Forman]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare_the_Wars_of_the_Rose/dZFlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare, the Wars of the Roses and the historians]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespearean_Criticism/2TdlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespearean Criticism]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Poetry_History_and_Antiquarianism_in_Ref/jwIhAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Poetry, History, and Antiquarianism in Reformation England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Prince_of_Love/D0QgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Prince of Love]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Paper_Bullets_of_the_Brain/o0YgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Paper Bullets of the Brain]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/As_You_Like_It/GiBaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover As You Like It: Third Series]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare/WCqaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare, Dominic Shellard]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Poets_and_God/0XZlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Poets and God]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Law_and_Literature/Ax5MAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Law and Literature Volume 16]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Embodied_Word/FV8sAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Embodied Word]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Case_for_Shakespeare/WaRlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Case for Shakespeare: The End of the Authorship Question]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Explorations_in_Renaissance_Culture/_SYrAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Explorations in Renaissance Culture Volumes 33-34]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Touch_of_the_Real/ewdaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Touch of the Real: Essays in Early Modern Culture in Honour of Stephen Greenblatt]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Wotton_and_His_Worlds/ZfgNAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Wotton and his Worlds]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Theatre_and_Religion/wo1lAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Theatre and Religion Lancastrian Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Trying_Treason/TOKxAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Trying Treason]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Willing_Subjects/IEX0sGwT1QQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Willing Subjects]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Symbolism/Bt0ZAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Symbolism]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Performing_Shakespeare/35pQAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Performing Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Soul_of_the_Age/e0UgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Soul of the Age]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/England/aD9nAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabeth_I/-GtnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Elizabeth I]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/King_Richard_II/oGUMX4RntjgC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA25&printsec=frontcover King Richard II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Legal_Imagination/OXPvBqQLw-4C?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA38&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the legal imagination]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Theatre/GxN3ue9_r3oC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&pg=PA69&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Theatre]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Critical_Essays_on_Shakespeare_s_Richard/AaYoAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Critical Essays on Shakespeare's Richard II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Reign_of_Richard_II_Essays_in_Honour/y3xnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Reign of Richard II: Essays in Honour of May McKisack]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Poetry_and_the_Realm_of_Politics/oQFaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Poetry and the Realm of Politics]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare/BM0mAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespearean_Politics/oTdlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespearean Politics]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_the_Theatrical_Dimension/wl4gAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare, the Theatrical Dimension]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Who_was_Kit_Marlowe/zQ1aAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Kit Marlowe etc]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/From_Page_to_Performance/beQKAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover From Page to Performance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Exploring_Tudor_England/ax56AAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Exploring Tudor England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Movement_Towards_Subversion/vyJaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Movement Towards Subversion]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Typological_Satire/G5BlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Typological Satire]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Recycled/zzNlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare Recycled]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Reinventing_the_Middle_Ages_the_Renaissa/fXFnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Reinventing the Middle Ages & the Renaissance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Mysterious_William_Shakespeare/WnllAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Mysterious William Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/GHhlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Richard II Critical Essays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare/WJvC6gu_I0gC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare: Records and Images]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Actors/HYtlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Actors]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_the_Man/BVdlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare the man]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Henry_V/zXllAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Henry V: A Guide to the Play]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespearean_Contingencies/Cw1NAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespearean Contingencies]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Renaissance_Drama/E60kAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Renaissance Drama 1990]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Language_Discourse_Sign/uH4oAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Language, Discourse, Sign]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Mock_Kings_in_Medieval_Society_and_Renai/T98KAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Mock kings in medieval society and Renaissance drama]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Invention_of_the_Human/ojHirImrtYoC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare: Invention of the Human]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare/wn5lAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Persons_in_Groups/rQ24AAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Persons in Groups]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/All_Semblative_a_Woman_s_Part/0DlaAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover All Semblative a Woman's Part?]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Crossing_the_Mirror/qRZNAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Crossing the Mirror]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/De_Vere_is_Shakespeare/dKJlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover De Vere is Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Lambarde_Elizabethan_Antiquary_1/x1RnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Lambarde, Elizabethan Antiquary, 1536-1601]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Power_of_Forms_in_the_English_Renais/cPtZAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Power of Forms in the English Renaissance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Ravishment_and_Rememberance/G31LAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Ravishment and Rememberance]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_His_Theatre/8A5ZQq3uOVQC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and His Theatre]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Critical_Hermeneutics_and_Shakespeare_s/O10gAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Critical Hermeneutics and Shakespeare's History Plays]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Christian_England/K-WfAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Christian England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Religious_Background/xDSaAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Religious Background]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shylock/N4RlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shylock]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Shakespeare_Legacy/MM5XAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Shakespeare Legacy]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Renaissance_Genres/0uFZAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Renaissance Genres]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Cannibals_Witches_and_Divorce/qZRpAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Cannibals, Witches, and Divorce]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Problem_of_Religious_Knowledge/C29LAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Problem of Religious Knowledge]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Essex_and_the_Great_Revolt_of_1381/J8RzAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Essex and the Great Revolt of 1381]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Transactions_of_the_London_and_Middlesex/4dtJAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover TLMAS]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Politics_and_the_State/Mn9lAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare, Politics and the State]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Allegories_of_Power_in_the_England_of_El/LIYgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Allegories of Power in the England of Elizabeth]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare/rIVlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Women_s_Matters/PDRlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Women's Matters]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Weak_King_Dilemma_in_the_Shakespeare/0bJlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Weak King Dilemma in the Shakespearean History Play]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Book_Known_as_Q/S2tlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Book Known as Q]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Fields_of_Vision/OD0eAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Fields of Vision]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Ungodly_Delights/RKgcAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Ungodly Delights]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Shakespeare_Handbook/rLRlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Shakespeare HandboOK]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Humanities/y5FZAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Humanities]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II_by_William_Shakespeare/Bb3yAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Richard II by William Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/King_Richard_II/50NnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover King Richard II]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Murder_Under_Trust_Or_The_Topical_Macbet/0oNlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Murder under trust]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Shakespearean_Kings/tHBlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Shakespearean Kings]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/America_the_Mabr_e_y_Experience/mRQ3AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover America, the Mabr(e)y Experience: Resistance, Revolution & Civil War]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Richard_II/ZDEkAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Richard II: An Annotated Bibliography, Volume 2]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Batsford_Companion_to_Medieval_Engla/ev78b9EJQy0C?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Batsford Companion to Medieval England]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_s_Unruly_Women/FKFlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare's Unruly Women]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_Others/iFEgAQAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and Others]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Kings_and_Chroniclers/L1wpAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Kings and Chroniclers]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/A_Kingdom_for_a_Stage/UzxlAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover A Kingdom for a Stage]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_House_of_Commons/Ezz4OZuYVFYC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The History of Parliament: The House of Commons 1558-1603 (3 v.)]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_Soul_of_the_Age/nMYCAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover shakespeare, Soul of the Age]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/After_Poststructuralism/TOaEAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0&bsq=%22I%20am%20Richard%20II,%20know%20ye%20not%20that?%22 After Poststructuralism: Interdisciplinarity and Literary Theory]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Unschooled_Mind/C7WnYtt219IC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover The Unschooled Mind]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabeth_I/hHZnAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Eliz I]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Dramas_of_Christian_Time/mnIqAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Dramas of Christian Time]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Elizabeth_I/XjQmAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover Elizabeth I: The Shrewdness of Virtue]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/John_Dryden/9Q1aAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&dq=%22I+am+Richard+II,+know+ye+not+that%3F%22&printsec=frontcover John Dryden]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_Early_Modern_Political_T/DUwhAwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PA259&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and Early Modern Political Thought]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_English_History_Play_in_the_age_of_S/5TT-AQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PA158&printsec=frontcover The English History Play in the Age of Shakespeare]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Shakespeare_and_the_Political/rEcREQAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PA215&printsec=frontcover Shakespeare and the Political]
* [https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/William_Shakespeare_Subject_of_the_Crown/a7G6DAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&pg=PT18&printsec=frontcover William Shakespeare - Subject of the Crown?]
* [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&client=firefox-b-d&hs=4AQ&sca_esv=6d4ade7bd26771c9&udm=36&biw=2510&bih=1307&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A2000%2Ccd_max%3A2099&sxsrf=ANbL-n6I6Pkwl7mmdHK6N1xPQXLbGBIOSg%3A1776853062010&ei=RqDoaZUvztiFsg_I5bToDw&ved=0ahUKEwiV6tC8nYGUAxVObEEAHcgyDf0Q4dUDCBM&uact=5&oq=%22shakespeare%22+%2B+%22political+propaganda%22&gs_lp=EhBnd3Mtd2l6LW1vZGVsZXNzIiYic2hha2VzcGVhcmUiICsgInBvbGl0aWNhbCBwcm9wYWdhbmRhIjIIECEYoAEYwwRInQlQxgZYuwdwAXgAkAEAmAF_oAHPAaoBAzEuMbgBA8gBAPgBAZgCAqACVsICCxAAGIAEGKIEGLADmAMAiAYBkAYCkgcBMqAHowOyBwExuAdTwgcDMC4yyAcEgAgB&sclient=gws-wiz-modeless The Nazi Appropriation of Shakespeare: Cultural Politics in]
i79lwhdq1nspk0i38iihzu094v1aucq
Template:Proceed
10
329906
2812319
2026-05-31T15:19:26Z
Atcovi
276019
Create.
2812319
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{RoundBoxTop|theme=4}}
[[File:Blue Glass Arrow.svg|middle|50px|link=]]
{{{1}}}
{{RoundBoxBottom}}<noinclude>[[Category:Article message boxes]]</noinclude>
31xyyyzzzdg933tmx8vp7ute5xpessm
Quotes from Cicero's DE ORATORE BOOK 2
0
329907
2812337
2026-05-31T19:21:48Z
Nafindix
2919441
Created page with "Cicero's fictional dialogue about advocacy and the common law. The Latin quotes are selected for interest (int), language (lan), and rhetoric (bea), and are translated into English. The line numbers are from the Loeb edition, and start counting from line 0 of the section. All translations are by Gus Wiseman (Nafindix), with the exception of any contributions from other users. The sources of the Latin quotes are: # Loeb Classical Library 348, Harvard University Press, 1..."
2812337
wikitext
text/x-wiki
Cicero's fictional dialogue about advocacy and the common law.
The Latin quotes are selected for interest (int), language (lan), and rhetoric (bea), and are translated into English. The line numbers are from the Loeb edition, and start counting from line 0 of the section. All translations are by Gus Wiseman (Nafindix), with the exception of any contributions from other users. The sources of the Latin quotes are:
# Loeb Classical Library 348, Harvard University Press, 1942; Latin text with facing English translation by E. W. Sutton.
# M. Tulli Ciceronis Rhetorica. M. Tullius Cicero. A. S. Wilkins, Ed. 1902. - <nowiki>http://data.perseus.org/texts/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi037</nowiki> or <nowiki>http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.02.0120</nowiki>
# The Latin Library. M. TVLLI CICERONIS DE ORATORE AD QVINTVM FRATREM LIBER SECVNDVS. <nowiki>https://www.thelatinlibrary.com/cicero/oratore1.shtml</nowiki>
[image]
==== 4.0 int/bea ====
''Sed fuit hoc in utroque eorum, ut Crassus non tam existimari vellet non didicisse, quam illa despicere, et nostrorum hominum in omni genere prudentiam Graecis anteferre; Antonius autem probabiliorem hoc populo orationem fore censebat suam, si omnino didicisse nunquam putaretur.''
Crassus didn't want so much to appear free of all learning, but simply to despise the Greek treatment, preferring our own; on the other hand, Antonius considered it better if the people thought he had no learning at all.
==== 18.5 int ====
''Omnium autem ineptiarum, quae sunt innumerabiles, haud scio, an nulla sit maior, quam, ut illi solent, quocumque in loco, quoscumque inter homines visum est, de rebus aut difficillimis, aut non necessariis, argutissime disputare.''
Of countless ineptitudes, none is greater than their custom of trying to argue everywhere, with anybody.
==== 35.-3 int/bea ====
''Neque ulla non propria oratoris est res, quae quidem ornate dici graviterque debet.''
There is no argument that an orator cannot deliver with polish.
==== 35.0 bea Huius... ====
''Huius est in dando consilio de maximis rebus cum dignitate explicata sententia; eiusdem et languentis populi incitatio, et effrenati moderatio.''
The orator's work is to advise at the highest level, with gravity, and to rouse or subdue a crowd, ever holding their reins.
==== 35.3 bea Eadem... ====
''Eadem facultate et fraus hominum ad perniciem, et integritas ad salutem vocatur.''
The vector that drives deceitful people to destruction is opposite to the vector that drives faithful people to deliverance.
==== 36.0 lan/bea Historia... ====
''Historia vero testis temporum, lux veritatis, vita memoriae, magistra vitae, nuntia vetustatis, qua voce alia, nisi oratoris, immortalitati commendatur?''
By what voice and motion, if not the orator's, is the light of remembered reality- the harbinger of history- entrusted to immortality?
hvgcjf65d59z9266e3i20umnbym8tq7
2812340
2812337
2026-05-31T19:56:55Z
Nafindix
2919441
2812340
wikitext
text/x-wiki
Cicero's fictional dialogue about advocacy and the common law.
The Latin quotes are selected for interest (int), language (lan), and rhetoric (bea), and are translated into English. The line numbers are from the Loeb edition, and start counting from line 0 of the section. All translations are by Gus Wiseman (Nafindix), with the exception of any contributions from other users. The sources of the Latin quotes are:
# Loeb Classical Library 348, Harvard University Press, 1942; Latin text with facing English translation by E. W. Sutton.
# M. Tulli Ciceronis Rhetorica. M. Tullius Cicero. A. S. Wilkins, Ed. 1902. - <nowiki>http://data.perseus.org/texts/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi037</nowiki> or <nowiki>http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.02.0120</nowiki>
# The Latin Library. M. TVLLI CICERONIS DE ORATORE AD QVINTVM FRATREM LIBER SECVNDVS. <nowiki>https://www.thelatinlibrary.com/cicero/oratore1.shtml</nowiki>
[image]
==== 4.0 int/bea ====
''Sed fuit hoc in utroque eorum, ut Crassus non tam existimari vellet non didicisse, quam illa despicere, et nostrorum hominum in omni genere prudentiam Graecis anteferre; Antonius autem probabiliorem hoc populo orationem fore censebat suam, si omnino didicisse nunquam putaretur.''
Crassus didn't want so much to appear free of all learning, but simply to despise the Greek treatment, preferring our own; on the other hand, Antonius considered it better if the people thought he had no learning at all.
==== 18.5 int ====
''Omnium autem ineptiarum, quae sunt innumerabiles, haud scio, an nulla sit maior, quam, ut illi solent, quocumque in loco, quoscumque inter homines visum est, de rebus aut difficillimis, aut non necessariis, argutissime disputare.''
Of countless ineptitudes, none is greater than their custom of trying to argue everywhere, with anybody.
==== 35.-3 int/bea ====
''Neque ulla non propria oratoris est res, quae quidem ornate dici graviterque debet.''
There is no argument that an orator cannot deliver with polish.
==== 35.0 bea Huius... ====
''Huius est in dando consilio de maximis rebus cum dignitate explicata sententia; eiusdem et languentis populi incitatio, et effrenati moderatio.''
The orator's work is to advise at the highest level, with gravity, and to rouse or subdue a crowd, ever holding their reins.
==== 35.3 bea Eadem... ====
''Eadem facultate et fraus hominum ad perniciem, et integritas ad salutem vocatur.''
The vector that drives deceitful people to destruction is opposite to the vector that drives faithful people to deliverance.
==== 36.0 lan/bea Historia... ====
''Historia vero testis temporum, lux veritatis, vita memoriae, magistra vitae, nuntia vetustatis, qua voce alia, nisi oratoris, immortalitati commendatur?''
By what voice and motion, if not the orator's, is the light of remembered reality- the harbinger of history- entrusted to immortality?
==== 45.-2 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed non omnia, quaecumque loquimur, mihi videntur ad artem et ad praecepta esse revocanda.''
But not everything we say needs to be reduced to art and doctrine.
==== 60.0 int Quid... ====
''Est, fatebor, aliquid tamen: ut, cum in sole ambulem, etiamsi aliam ob causam ambulem, fieri natura tamen, ut colorer: sic, cum istos libros ad Misenum (nam Romae vix licet) studiosius legerim, sentio illorum tactu orationem meam quasi colorari.''
One walking in the sun (for any reason) naturally gets a tan, and after eagerly reading your books at Misenum (they are scarcely allowed at Rome), their very influence seems to have tanned my rhetoric.
==== 61.0 int In... ====
''In philosophos vestros si quando incidi, deceptus indicibus librorum, quod sunt fere inscripti de rebus notis et illustribus, de virtute, de iustitia, de honestate, de voluptate, verbum prorsus nullum intellego: ita sunt angustis et'' ''concisis disputationibus illigati.''
When I light upon your thinkers, if I am deceived by the titles of their books (supposedly about "virtue", "justice", "honesty", "pleasure", and so on), I find only knots so tenuous and fragmentary that I cannot unravel a single word.
==== 66.1 int/bea Si... ====
''Si enim est oratoris, quaecumque res infinite posita sit, de ea posse dicere, dicendum erit ei, quanta sit solis magnitudo, quae forma terrae: de mathematicis, de musicis rebus non poterit, quin dicat, hoc onere suscepto, recusare.''
If it is for the orator to be able to speak continuously on any subject, this must include the size of the sun and the shape of the earth, and an orator could not even refuse to speak about music or pure mathematics, if prompted.
==== 73.-1 bea Omnium... ====
''Omnium sententiarum gravitate, omnium verborum ponderibus est utendum.''
The weight of all opinions– indeed, of all words– should be applied to this.
==== 84.0 lan/bea Sed... ====
''Sed hoc si in iure civili, si etiam in parvis aut mediocribus rebus doctiores assequi possunt, non idem sentio tanta hac in re, tamque immensa, posse fieri.''
Even though, in civil law, and in matters of slight or moderate importance, the learned can achieve this kind of order, I doubt it could hold up in such an immense affair as the present.
==== 98.0 int Atque... ====
''Atque esse tamen multos videmus, qui neminem imitentur et suapte natura, quod velint, sine cuiusquam similitudine consequantur.''
And yet, we see many who imitate nobody and follow their own natural path.
==== 101.3 int/bea In... ====
''nemo potest de ea re, quam non novit, non turpissime dicere.''
No person should talk who has not mastered his/her own subject.
==== 116.-5 int Ita... ====
''Ita omnis ratio dicendi tribus ad persuadendum rebus est nixa: ut probemus vera esse, quae defendimus; ut conciliemus eos nobis, qui audiunt; ut animos eorum, ad quemcumque causa postulabit Motum, vocemus.''
There are three parts to persuasive speech: we demonstrate our position; we win the audience; we get people to make things right.
==== 117.5 int/lan/bea Quod... ====
''Quod etiamsi ad instituendos adolescentulos magis aptum est, ut, simul ac posita causa sit, habeant quo se referant, unde statim expedita possint argumenta depromere, tamen et tardi ingeni est rivulos consectari, fontis rerum non videre, et iam aetatis est ususque nostri a capite quod velimus arcessere et unde omnia manent videre.''
Even if this is more appropriate for raising youths (so that, as soon as a case is put, they have something to refer to from which they can draw out suitable arguments immediately when they are needed in the future), yet it is a sign of slow temperament to cut down the streams of things while not seeing their sources, and it is the privilege of men of our age and experience to summon up what we want from the water's head and see where everything flows.
==== 118.0 lan/bea Et... ====
''Et, primum genus illud earum rerum, quae ad oratorem deferuntur, meditatum nobis in perpetuum ad omnem usum similium rerum esse debebit.''
And, first, the class of all possible subjects of oratory should be ever in our minds, in case of similarities to our case.
==== 124.4 bea Quod... ====
''Quod enim ornamentum, quae vis, qui animus, qua dignitas illi oratori defuit, qui in causa peroranda non dubitavit excitare reum consularem et eius diloricare tunicam et iudicibus cicatrices adversas senis imperatoris ostendere?''
What decoration, what power, what spirit, what honor does that orator lack who does not hesitate to conclude his defense of the former consul by tearing open the old general's shirt and showing the judges his scars?
==== 125.0 bea Potuit... ====
''Potuit hic locus tam anceps, tam inauditus, tam lubricus, tam novus sine quadam incredibili vi ac facultate dicendi tractari?''
Can an argument so divisive, so unheard-of, so slippery, so unfamiliar be handled without incredible strength and skill of speaking?
==== 132.-2 int Subactio... ====
''Subactio autem est usus, auditio, lectio, litterae.''
The cultivation is practice, listening, reading, and writing.
==== 133.0 bea Atque... ====
''Atque hic illud videndum est, in quo summus est error istorum magistrorum, ad quos liberos nostros mittimus, non quo hoc quidem ad dicendum magno opere pertineat, sed tamen ut videatis quam sit genus hoc eorum qui sibi eruditi videntur hebes atque impolitum.''
Make note of this profound error by those to whom we send our sons, not indeed that this has much to do with speaking, but you should see how dull and coarse they are, who consider themselves scholars.
==== 147.3 bea Ubi... ====
''Ubi eum locum omnem cogitatione saepseris, si modo usu rerum percallueris, nihil te effugiet atque omne, quod erit in re, occurret atque incidet.''
If you surround everything with cogitation, and if you are calloused from experience, every aspect of an affair comes up and falls, and nothing escapes you.
k15p3ujifd7em6kio2okk1d2j8sonko
2812342
2812340
2026-05-31T20:33:01Z
Nafindix
2919441
2812342
wikitext
text/x-wiki
Cicero's fictional dialogue about advocacy and the common law.
The Latin quotes are selected for interest (int), language (lan), and rhetoric (bea), and are translated into English. The line numbers are from the Loeb edition, and start counting from line 0 of the section. All translations are by Gus Wiseman (Nafindix), with the exception of any contributions from other users. The sources of the Latin quotes are:
# Loeb Classical Library 348, Harvard University Press, 1942; Latin text with facing English translation by E. W. Sutton.
# M. Tulli Ciceronis Rhetorica. M. Tullius Cicero. A. S. Wilkins, Ed. 1902. - <nowiki>http://data.perseus.org/texts/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi037</nowiki> or <nowiki>http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.02.0120</nowiki>
# The Latin Library. M. TVLLI CICERONIS DE ORATORE AD QVINTVM FRATREM LIBER SECVNDVS. <nowiki>https://www.thelatinlibrary.com/cicero/oratore1.shtml</nowiki>
[image]
==== 4.0 int/bea ====
''Sed fuit hoc in utroque eorum, ut Crassus non tam existimari vellet non didicisse, quam illa despicere, et nostrorum hominum in omni genere prudentiam Graecis anteferre; Antonius autem probabiliorem hoc populo orationem fore censebat suam, si omnino didicisse nunquam putaretur.''
Crassus didn't want so much to appear free of all learning, but simply to despise the Greek treatment, preferring our own; on the other hand, Antonius considered it better if the people thought he had no learning at all.
==== 18.5 int ====
''Omnium autem ineptiarum, quae sunt innumerabiles, haud scio, an nulla sit maior, quam, ut illi solent, quocumque in loco, quoscumque inter homines visum est, de rebus aut difficillimis, aut non necessariis, argutissime disputare.''
Of countless ineptitudes, none is greater than their custom of trying to argue everywhere, with anybody.
==== 35.-3 int/bea ====
''Neque ulla non propria oratoris est res, quae quidem ornate dici graviterque debet.''
There is no argument that an orator cannot deliver with polish.
==== 35.0 bea Huius... ====
''Huius est in dando consilio de maximis rebus cum dignitate explicata sententia; eiusdem et languentis populi incitatio, et effrenati moderatio.''
The orator's work is to advise at the highest level, with gravity, and to rouse or subdue a crowd, ever holding their reins.
==== 35.3 bea Eadem... ====
''Eadem facultate et fraus hominum ad perniciem, et integritas ad salutem vocatur.''
The vector that drives deceitful people to destruction is opposite to the vector that drives faithful people to deliverance.
==== 36.0 lan/bea Historia... ====
''Historia vero testis temporum, lux veritatis, vita memoriae, magistra vitae, nuntia vetustatis, qua voce alia, nisi oratoris, immortalitati commendatur?''
By what voice and motion, if not the orator's, is the light of remembered reality- the harbinger of history- entrusted to immortality?
==== 45.-2 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed non omnia, quaecumque loquimur, mihi videntur ad artem et ad praecepta esse revocanda.''
But not everything we say needs to be reduced to art and doctrine.
==== 60.0 int Quid... ====
''Est, fatebor, aliquid tamen: ut, cum in sole ambulem, etiamsi aliam ob causam ambulem, fieri natura tamen, ut colorer: sic, cum istos libros ad Misenum (nam Romae vix licet) studiosius legerim, sentio illorum tactu orationem meam quasi colorari.''
One walking in the sun (for any reason) naturally gets a tan, and after eagerly reading your books at Misenum (they are scarcely allowed at Rome), their very influence seems to have tanned my rhetoric.
==== 61.0 int In... ====
''In philosophos vestros si quando incidi, deceptus indicibus librorum, quod sunt fere inscripti de rebus notis et illustribus, de virtute, de iustitia, de honestate, de voluptate, verbum prorsus nullum intellego: ita sunt angustis et'' ''concisis disputationibus illigati.''
When I light upon your thinkers, if I am deceived by the titles of their books (supposedly about "virtue", "justice", "honesty", "pleasure", and so on), I find only knots so tenuous and fragmentary that I cannot unravel a single word.
==== 66.1 int/bea Si... ====
''Si enim est oratoris, quaecumque res infinite posita sit, de ea posse dicere, dicendum erit ei, quanta sit solis magnitudo, quae forma terrae: de mathematicis, de musicis rebus non poterit, quin dicat, hoc onere suscepto, recusare.''
If it is for the orator to be able to speak continuously on any subject, this must include the size of the sun and the shape of the earth, and an orator could not even refuse to speak about music or pure mathematics, if prompted.
==== 73.-1 bea Omnium... ====
''Omnium sententiarum gravitate, omnium verborum ponderibus est utendum.''
The weight of all opinions– indeed, of all words– should be applied to this.
==== 84.0 lan/bea Sed... ====
''Sed hoc si in iure civili, si etiam in parvis aut mediocribus rebus doctiores assequi possunt, non idem sentio tanta hac in re, tamque immensa, posse fieri.''
Even though, in civil law, and in matters of slight or moderate importance, the learned can achieve this kind of order, I doubt it could hold up in such an immense affair as the present.
==== 98.0 int Atque... ====
''Atque esse tamen multos videmus, qui neminem imitentur et suapte natura, quod velint, sine cuiusquam similitudine consequantur.''
And yet, we see many who imitate nobody and follow their own natural path.
==== 101.3 int/bea In... ====
''nemo potest de ea re, quam non novit, non turpissime dicere.''
No person should talk who has not mastered his/her own subject.
==== 116.-5 int Ita... ====
''Ita omnis ratio dicendi tribus ad persuadendum rebus est nixa: ut probemus vera esse, quae defendimus; ut conciliemus eos nobis, qui audiunt; ut animos eorum, ad quemcumque causa postulabit Motum, vocemus.''
There are three parts to persuasive speech: we demonstrate our position; we win the audience; we get people to make things right.
==== 117.5 int/lan/bea Quod... ====
''Quod etiamsi ad instituendos adolescentulos magis aptum est, ut, simul ac posita causa sit, habeant quo se referant, unde statim expedita possint argumenta depromere, tamen et tardi ingeni est rivulos consectari, fontis rerum non videre, et iam aetatis est ususque nostri a capite quod velimus arcessere et unde omnia manent videre.''
Even if this is more appropriate for raising youths (so that, as soon as a case is put, they have something to refer to from which they can draw out suitable arguments immediately when they are needed in the future), yet it is a sign of slow temperament to cut down the streams of things while not seeing their sources, and it is the privilege of men of our age and experience to summon up what we want from the water's head and see where everything flows.
==== 118.0 lan/bea Et... ====
''Et, primum genus illud earum rerum, quae ad oratorem deferuntur, meditatum nobis in perpetuum ad omnem usum similium rerum esse debebit.''
And, first, the class of all possible subjects of oratory should be ever in our minds, in case of similarities to our case.
==== 124.4 bea Quod... ====
''Quod enim ornamentum, quae vis, qui animus, qua dignitas illi oratori defuit, qui in causa peroranda non dubitavit excitare reum consularem et eius diloricare tunicam et iudicibus cicatrices adversas senis imperatoris ostendere?''
What decoration, what power, what spirit, what honor does that orator lack who does not hesitate to conclude his defense of the former consul by tearing open the old general's shirt and showing the judges his scars?
==== 125.0 bea Potuit... ====
''Potuit hic locus tam anceps, tam inauditus, tam lubricus, tam novus sine quadam incredibili vi ac facultate dicendi tractari?''
Can an argument so divisive, so unheard-of, so slippery, so unfamiliar be handled without incredible strength and skill of speaking?
==== 132.-2 int Subactio... ====
''Subactio autem est usus, auditio, lectio, litterae.''
The cultivation is practice, listening, reading, and writing.
==== 133.0 bea Atque... ====
''Atque hic illud videndum est, in quo summus est error istorum magistrorum, ad quos liberos nostros mittimus, non quo hoc quidem ad dicendum magno opere pertineat, sed tamen ut videatis quam sit genus hoc eorum qui sibi eruditi videntur hebes atque impolitum.''
Make note of this profound error by those to whom we send our sons, not indeed that this has much to do with speaking, but you should see how dull and coarse they are, who consider themselves scholars.
==== 147.3 bea Ubi... ====
''Ubi eum locum omnem cogitatione saepseris, si modo usu rerum percallueris, nihil te effugiet atque omne, quod erit in re, occurret atque incidet.''
If you surround everything with cogitation, and if you are calloused from experience, every aspect of an affair comes up and falls, and nothing escapes you.
==== 148.2 int Haec... ====
''Haec praecipue colenda est nobis; haec semper adhibenda; haec nihil est quod non assequatur.''
This virtue ("diligentia" or drive) we should foster especially, as it applies to everything, and there is nothing it cannot attain.
==== 148.4 int Causa... ====
''Causa ut penitus, quod initio dixi, nota sit, diligentia est; ut adversarium attente audiamus atque ut eius non solum sententias, sed etiam verba omnia excipiamus, voltus denique perspiciamus omnes, qui sensus animi plerumque indicant, diligentia est.''
Knowing the case deeply is due to our personal drive to research it; due to the same drive we hear not only the speaker's message but every single word; we study every facial expression indicating their thoughts.
==== 150.0 int/bea Inter... ====
''Inter ingenium quidem et diligentiam perpaulum loci reliquum est arti.''
Between talent and drive very little room remains for art.
==== 161.0 bea Carneadi... ====
''Carneadi vero vis incredibilis illa dicendi et varietas perquam esset optando nobis, qui nullam umquam in illis suis disputationibus rem defendit, quam non probarit, nullam oppugnavit, quam non everterit.''
We are delighted by Carneades' incredible force and diversity of speech, a man who never made a disputation he could not prove, and never set a target he could not overturn.
==== 162.0 int/lan/bea Ego... ====
''Ego autem, si quem nunc rudem plane institui ad dicendum velim, his potius tradam assiduis uno opere eandem incudem diem noctemque tundentibus, qui omnes tenuissimas particulas atque omnia minima mansa ut nutrices infantibus pueris in os inserant.''
For myself, if I wanted to train a student in oratory, I would entrust him to these men, who, assiduously hitting the same anvil day-and-night, would only feed him ideas that are easy to chew.
==== 178.2 int/lan Nihil... ====
''Nihil est enim in dicendo, Catule, maius, quam ut faveat oratori is, qui audiet, utque ipse sic moveatur, ut impetu quodam animi et perturbatione, magis quam iudicio aut consilio regatur.''
Nothing is more important in oratory, Catulus, than to win the favor of your listener, so that he is moved by mental impulse or emotion on top of reasoned judgement.
==== 182.7 int Sed... ====
''Sed haec adiuvant in oratore: lenitas vocis, vultus pudoris significatio, verborum comitas; si quid persequare'' ''acrius, ut invitus et coactus facere videare.''
These help the orator: mildness of voice, a modest-seeming face, friendly diction, and the ability to seem to be compelled to act unwillingly.
==== 184.5 int Tantum... ====
''Tantum autem efficitur sensu quodam ac ratione dicendi, ut quasi mores oratoris effingat oratio.''
So much is achieved by taste and style that the speech seems to depict the orator's character.
==== 186.0 int/bea Facilius... ====
''Facilius est enim currentem, ut aunt, incitare quam commovere languentem.''
It is easier to stoke, as they say, one who is already running, than to prod an under performer.
==== 190.0 bea Neque... ====
''Neque est enim facile perficere, ut irascatur cui tu velis, iudex, si tu ipse id lente ferre videare; neque ut oderit eum, quem tu velis, nisi te ipsum flagrantem odio ante viderit; neque ad misericordiam adducetur, nisi tu ei signa doloris tui verbis, sententiis, voce, vultu, collacrimatione denique ostenderis.''
It is not easy to create anger against whomever you want, if you do not seem to care yourself; nor is it easy to create indignation, if your audience cannot perceive your own personal disgust; nor is it easy to create pity, if you cannot embody it yourself using your words, voice, face, and tears.
==== 196.-5 Sensi... ====
''Sensi equidem tum magnopere moveri iudices, cum excitavi maestum ac sordidatum senem et cum ista feci, quae tu, Crasse, laudas, non arte, de qua quid loquar nescio, sed motu magno animi ac dolore, ut discinderem tunicam, ut cicatrices ostenderem.''
I perceived that the judges were very moved then, when I roused the downcast shabby old man, and did something that you, Crassus, praise, not as technique, about which I have no comment, but under great stress of dissatisfaction: I tore open his tunic and showed his scars to the court.
==== 202.-3 bea Ita... ====
''Ita magis affectis animis iudicum quam doctis, tua, Sulpici, est a nobis tum accusatio victa.''
So it was that we defeated your charge, Sulpicius, with the minds of the judges more forced than informed.
==== 215.0 int Quare... ====
''Quare qui aut breviter aut summisse dicunt, docere iudicem possunt, commovere non possunt; in quo sunt omnia.''
So people who speak briefly or quietly are able to inform a judge, but not to excite him (on which all things depend).
==== 216.0 int/lan Illa... ====
''Illa autem, quae aut conciliationis causa leniter, aut permotionis vehemeter aguntur, contrariis commotionibus auferenda sunt, ut odio benevolentia, misericordia invidia tollatur.''
Appeals, whether intended to win favor slowly, or to disturb passionately, should be removed by contrary emotions, as when goodwill is removed by hate, pity by jealousy.
==== 217.0 lan/bea Ego... ====
''Ego vero, inquit Caesar, omni de re facetius puto posse [disputari] ab homine non inurbano, quam de ipsis facetiis disputari.''
Caesar says, "I think a non-dull man can be more witty in any discussion than to discuss actual witticisms."
==== 221.3 int/lan/bea Parcebat... ====
''Parcebat enim adversarii dignitati, in quo ipse conservabat suam; quod est hominibus facetis et dicacibus difficillimum, habere hominum rationem et temporum et ea, quae occurrant, cum salsissime dici possint, tenere.''
He was sparing his enemy's honor, in a way that preserved his own; for it is most difficult for witty and sarcastic men to have regard for men and times and, when something very witty can be said, to hold their tongue.
==== 230.0 int/lan/bea Omnino... ====
''Omnino probabiliora sunt, quae lacessiti dicimus, quam quae priores, nam et ingenii celeritas maior est, quae apparet in respondendo, et humanitatis est responsio.''
The things we say under stress tend to be more impressive, as mental speed is greater in responding, and to respond is human.
==== 231.-4 int/bea Erat... ====
''Erat autem tanta gravitas in Domitio, tanta auctoritas, ut, quod esset ab eo obiectum, lepore magis elevandum, quam contentione frangendum videretur.''
There was such weight in Domitio, such authority, that it seemed better for his charges to be made light of by pleasantry than broken by force.
==== 247.0 int/lan Temporis... ====
''Temporis igitar ratio, et ipsius dicacitatis moderatio et temperantia et raritas dictorum distinguet oratorem a scurra, et quod nos cum causa dicimus, non ut ridiculi videamur, sed ut proficiamus aliquid, illi totum diem et sine causa.''
Regard to occasion, moderation and control of our own sharpened rhetoric, and sparsity of words will distinguish the orator from the buffoon; also, we speak with purpose, not to seem ridiculous but to accomplish some benefit, while they jest all day without cause.
==== 247.7 int Risum... ====
''Risum quaesivit, qui est, mea sententia, vel tenuissimus ingenii fructus.''
He sought comedy, which is, in my view, the meekest fruit of intelligence.
==== 251.-2 int/lan/bea Ne... ====
''Ne multa: nullum genus est ioci, quo non ex eodem severa et gravia sumantur.''
It is enough to say there is no source of humor from which serious and weighty thoughts are not also derived.
==== 251.0 int/bea Atque... ====
''Atque hoc etiam animadvertendum est, non esse omnia ridicula faceta.''
It is also notable that not all that is funny is witty.
==== 253.-4 int/bea Nam... ====
''Nam quod, quibuscumque verbis dixeris, facetum tamen est, re continetur; quod mutatis verbis salem amittit, in verbis habet leporem omnem.''
For what, with whatever words you say it, is still humorous, is contained in the facts; what loses its humor when the words are changed, has all its charm in the words.
==== 255.-5 int/lan Ambiguum... ====
''Ambiguum per se ipsum probatur id quidem, ut ante dixi, vel maxime; ingeniosi enim videtur vim verbi in aliud atque ceteri accipiant, posse ducere; sed admirationem magis quam risum movet, nisi si quando incidit in aliud genus ridiculi.''
The play on words does very well on its own, as I said before, for a man seems to be clever who can divert the power of a word to a place where others cannot; but this wins admiration more than amusement, unless it is also amusing for another reason.
==== 261.-3 int/bea Natura... ====
''Natura enim nos, ut ante dixi, noster delectat error: ex quo, cum quasi decepti sumus expectatione, ridemus.''
As if cheated of our expectation, we laugh, for our error naturally delights us (as I said before).
==== 263.-3 bea Sunt... ====
''Sunt etiam illa venusta, ut in gravibus sententiis, sic in facetiis.''
They are pleasing also, even in weighty discussions.
==== 263.-2 int/bea Dixi... ====
''Dixi enim dudum, materiam aliam esse ioci, aliam severitatis; gravium autem et iocorum unam esse rationem.''
I said before the matter of a joke is different from that of serious work; but of heavy and light the pattern is the same.
==== 267.0 Etiam... ====
''Etiam illa quae minuendi aut augendi causa ad incredibilem admirationem efferuntur: velut tu, Crasse, in concione, 'ita sibi ipsum magnum videri Memmium ut in forum descendens caput ad fornicem Fabii demitteret.'''
Also, there are remarks intended to exaggerate something to an incredible degree; as when you, Crassus, said in a public meeting, "Memmius thinks himself so great that, when descending into the forum, he ducks his head to fit under the Arch of Fabius."
m23m6sxgv1xi03upp18nuwehzgqxk73
2812345
2812342
2026-05-31T20:53:47Z
Nafindix
2919441
2812345
wikitext
text/x-wiki
Cicero's fictional dialogue about advocacy and the common law.
The Latin quotes are selected for interest (int), language (lan), and rhetoric (bea), and are translated into English. The line numbers are from the Loeb edition, and start counting from line 0 of the section. All translations are by Gus Wiseman (Nafindix), with the exception of any contributions from other users. The sources of the Latin quotes are:
# Loeb Classical Library 348, Harvard University Press, 1942; Latin text with facing English translation by E. W. Sutton.
# M. Tulli Ciceronis Rhetorica. M. Tullius Cicero. A. S. Wilkins, Ed. 1902. - <nowiki>http://data.perseus.org/texts/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi037</nowiki> or <nowiki>http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.02.0120</nowiki>
# The Latin Library. M. TVLLI CICERONIS DE ORATORE AD QVINTVM FRATREM LIBER SECVNDVS. <nowiki>https://www.thelatinlibrary.com/cicero/oratore1.shtml</nowiki>
[image]
==== 4.0 int/bea ====
''Sed fuit hoc in utroque eorum, ut Crassus non tam existimari vellet non didicisse, quam illa despicere, et nostrorum hominum in omni genere prudentiam Graecis anteferre; Antonius autem probabiliorem hoc populo orationem fore censebat suam, si omnino didicisse nunquam putaretur.''
Crassus didn't want so much to appear free of all learning, but simply to despise the Greek treatment, preferring our own; on the other hand, Antonius considered it better if the people thought he had no learning at all.
==== 18.5 int ====
''Omnium autem ineptiarum, quae sunt innumerabiles, haud scio, an nulla sit maior, quam, ut illi solent, quocumque in loco, quoscumque inter homines visum est, de rebus aut difficillimis, aut non necessariis, argutissime disputare.''
Of countless ineptitudes, none is greater than their custom of trying to argue everywhere, with anybody.
==== 35.-3 int/bea ====
''Neque ulla non propria oratoris est res, quae quidem ornate dici graviterque debet.''
There is no argument that an orator cannot deliver with polish.
==== 35.0 bea Huius... ====
''Huius est in dando consilio de maximis rebus cum dignitate explicata sententia; eiusdem et languentis populi incitatio, et effrenati moderatio.''
The orator's work is to advise at the highest level, with gravity, and to rouse or subdue a crowd, ever holding their reins.
==== 35.3 bea Eadem... ====
''Eadem facultate et fraus hominum ad perniciem, et integritas ad salutem vocatur.''
The vector that drives deceitful people to destruction is opposite to the vector that drives faithful people to deliverance.
==== 36.0 lan/bea Historia... ====
''Historia vero testis temporum, lux veritatis, vita memoriae, magistra vitae, nuntia vetustatis, qua voce alia, nisi oratoris, immortalitati commendatur?''
By what voice and motion, if not the orator's, is the light of remembered reality- the harbinger of history- entrusted to immortality?
==== 45.-2 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed non omnia, quaecumque loquimur, mihi videntur ad artem et ad praecepta esse revocanda.''
But not everything we say needs to be reduced to art and doctrine.
==== 60.0 int Quid... ====
''Est, fatebor, aliquid tamen: ut, cum in sole ambulem, etiamsi aliam ob causam ambulem, fieri natura tamen, ut colorer: sic, cum istos libros ad Misenum (nam Romae vix licet) studiosius legerim, sentio illorum tactu orationem meam quasi colorari.''
One walking in the sun (for any reason) naturally gets a tan, and after eagerly reading your books at Misenum (they are scarcely allowed at Rome), their very influence seems to have tanned my rhetoric.
==== 61.0 int In... ====
''In philosophos vestros si quando incidi, deceptus indicibus librorum, quod sunt fere inscripti de rebus notis et illustribus, de virtute, de iustitia, de honestate, de voluptate, verbum prorsus nullum intellego: ita sunt angustis et'' ''concisis disputationibus illigati.''
When I light upon your thinkers, if I am deceived by the titles of their books (supposedly about "virtue", "justice", "honesty", "pleasure", and so on), I find only knots so tenuous and fragmentary that I cannot unravel a single word.
==== 66.1 int/bea Si... ====
''Si enim est oratoris, quaecumque res infinite posita sit, de ea posse dicere, dicendum erit ei, quanta sit solis magnitudo, quae forma terrae: de mathematicis, de musicis rebus non poterit, quin dicat, hoc onere suscepto, recusare.''
If it is for the orator to be able to speak continuously on any subject, this must include the size of the sun and the shape of the earth, and an orator could not even refuse to speak about music or pure mathematics, if prompted.
==== 73.-1 bea Omnium... ====
''Omnium sententiarum gravitate, omnium verborum ponderibus est utendum.''
The weight of all opinions– indeed, of all words– should be applied to this.
==== 84.0 lan/bea Sed... ====
''Sed hoc si in iure civili, si etiam in parvis aut mediocribus rebus doctiores assequi possunt, non idem sentio tanta hac in re, tamque immensa, posse fieri.''
Even though, in civil law, and in matters of slight or moderate importance, the learned can achieve this kind of order, I doubt it could hold up in such an immense affair as the present.
==== 98.0 int Atque... ====
''Atque esse tamen multos videmus, qui neminem imitentur et suapte natura, quod velint, sine cuiusquam similitudine consequantur.''
And yet, we see many who imitate nobody and follow their own natural path.
==== 101.3 int/bea In... ====
''nemo potest de ea re, quam non novit, non turpissime dicere.''
No person should talk who has not mastered his/her own subject.
==== 116.-5 int Ita... ====
''Ita omnis ratio dicendi tribus ad persuadendum rebus est nixa: ut probemus vera esse, quae defendimus; ut conciliemus eos nobis, qui audiunt; ut animos eorum, ad quemcumque causa postulabit Motum, vocemus.''
There are three parts to persuasive speech: we demonstrate our position; we win the audience; we get people to make things right.
==== 117.5 int/lan/bea Quod... ====
''Quod etiamsi ad instituendos adolescentulos magis aptum est, ut, simul ac posita causa sit, habeant quo se referant, unde statim expedita possint argumenta depromere, tamen et tardi ingeni est rivulos consectari, fontis rerum non videre, et iam aetatis est ususque nostri a capite quod velimus arcessere et unde omnia manent videre.''
Even if this is more appropriate for raising youths (so that, as soon as a case is put, they have something to refer to from which they can draw out suitable arguments immediately when they are needed in the future), yet it is a sign of slow temperament to cut down the streams of things while not seeing their sources, and it is the privilege of men of our age and experience to summon up what we want from the water's head and see where everything flows.
==== 118.0 lan/bea Et... ====
''Et, primum genus illud earum rerum, quae ad oratorem deferuntur, meditatum nobis in perpetuum ad omnem usum similium rerum esse debebit.''
And, first, the class of all possible subjects of oratory should be ever in our minds, in case of similarities to our case.
==== 124.4 bea Quod... ====
''Quod enim ornamentum, quae vis, qui animus, qua dignitas illi oratori defuit, qui in causa peroranda non dubitavit excitare reum consularem et eius diloricare tunicam et iudicibus cicatrices adversas senis imperatoris ostendere?''
What decoration, what power, what spirit, what honor does that orator lack who does not hesitate to conclude his defense of the former consul by tearing open the old general's shirt and showing the judges his scars?
==== 125.0 bea Potuit... ====
''Potuit hic locus tam anceps, tam inauditus, tam lubricus, tam novus sine quadam incredibili vi ac facultate dicendi tractari?''
Can an argument so divisive, so unheard-of, so slippery, so unfamiliar be handled without incredible strength and skill of speaking?
==== 132.-2 int Subactio... ====
''Subactio autem est usus, auditio, lectio, litterae.''
The cultivation is practice, listening, reading, and writing.
==== 133.0 bea Atque... ====
''Atque hic illud videndum est, in quo summus est error istorum magistrorum, ad quos liberos nostros mittimus, non quo hoc quidem ad dicendum magno opere pertineat, sed tamen ut videatis quam sit genus hoc eorum qui sibi eruditi videntur hebes atque impolitum.''
Make note of this profound error by those to whom we send our sons, not indeed that this has much to do with speaking, but you should see how dull and coarse they are, who consider themselves scholars.
==== 147.3 bea Ubi... ====
''Ubi eum locum omnem cogitatione saepseris, si modo usu rerum percallueris, nihil te effugiet atque omne, quod erit in re, occurret atque incidet.''
If you surround everything with cogitation, and if you are calloused from experience, every aspect of an affair comes up and falls, and nothing escapes you.
==== 148.2 int Haec... ====
''Haec praecipue colenda est nobis; haec semper adhibenda; haec nihil est quod non assequatur.''
This virtue ("diligentia" or drive) we should foster especially, as it applies to everything, and there is nothing it cannot attain.
==== 148.4 int Causa... ====
''Causa ut penitus, quod initio dixi, nota sit, diligentia est; ut adversarium attente audiamus atque ut eius non solum sententias, sed etiam verba omnia excipiamus, voltus denique perspiciamus omnes, qui sensus animi plerumque indicant, diligentia est.''
Knowing the case deeply is due to our personal drive to research it; due to the same drive we hear not only the speaker's message but every single word; we study every facial expression indicating their thoughts.
==== 150.0 int/bea Inter... ====
''Inter ingenium quidem et diligentiam perpaulum loci reliquum est arti.''
Between talent and drive very little room remains for art.
==== 161.0 bea Carneadi... ====
''Carneadi vero vis incredibilis illa dicendi et varietas perquam esset optando nobis, qui nullam umquam in illis suis disputationibus rem defendit, quam non probarit, nullam oppugnavit, quam non everterit.''
We are delighted by Carneades' incredible force and diversity of speech, a man who never made a disputation he could not prove, and never set a target he could not overturn.
==== 162.0 int/lan/bea Ego... ====
''Ego autem, si quem nunc rudem plane institui ad dicendum velim, his potius tradam assiduis uno opere eandem incudem diem noctemque tundentibus, qui omnes tenuissimas particulas atque omnia minima mansa ut nutrices infantibus pueris in os inserant.''
For myself, if I wanted to train a student in oratory, I would entrust him to these men, who, assiduously hitting the same anvil day-and-night, would only feed him ideas that are easy to chew.
==== 178.2 int/lan Nihil... ====
''Nihil est enim in dicendo, Catule, maius, quam ut faveat oratori is, qui audiet, utque ipse sic moveatur, ut impetu quodam animi et perturbatione, magis quam iudicio aut consilio regatur.''
Nothing is more important in oratory, Catulus, than to win the favor of your listener, so that he is moved by mental impulse or emotion on top of reasoned judgement.
==== 182.7 int Sed... ====
''Sed haec adiuvant in oratore: lenitas vocis, vultus pudoris significatio, verborum comitas; si quid persequare'' ''acrius, ut invitus et coactus facere videare.''
These help the orator: mildness of voice, a modest-seeming face, friendly diction, and the ability to seem to be compelled to act unwillingly.
==== 184.5 int Tantum... ====
''Tantum autem efficitur sensu quodam ac ratione dicendi, ut quasi mores oratoris effingat oratio.''
So much is achieved by taste and style that the speech seems to depict the orator's character.
==== 186.0 int/bea Facilius... ====
''Facilius est enim currentem, ut aunt, incitare quam commovere languentem.''
It is easier to stoke, as they say, one who is already running, than to prod an under performer.
==== 190.0 bea Neque... ====
''Neque est enim facile perficere, ut irascatur cui tu velis, iudex, si tu ipse id lente ferre videare; neque ut oderit eum, quem tu velis, nisi te ipsum flagrantem odio ante viderit; neque ad misericordiam adducetur, nisi tu ei signa doloris tui verbis, sententiis, voce, vultu, collacrimatione denique ostenderis.''
It is not easy to create anger against whomever you want, if you do not seem to care yourself; nor is it easy to create indignation, if your audience cannot perceive your own personal disgust; nor is it easy to create pity, if you cannot embody it yourself using your words, voice, face, and tears.
==== 196.-5 Sensi... ====
''Sensi equidem tum magnopere moveri iudices, cum excitavi maestum ac sordidatum senem et cum ista feci, quae tu, Crasse, laudas, non arte, de qua quid loquar nescio, sed motu magno animi ac dolore, ut discinderem tunicam, ut cicatrices ostenderem.''
I perceived that the judges were very moved then, when I roused the downcast shabby old man, and did something that you, Crassus, praise, not as technique, about which I have no comment, but under great stress of dissatisfaction: I tore open his tunic and showed his scars to the court.
==== 202.-3 bea Ita... ====
''Ita magis affectis animis iudicum quam doctis, tua, Sulpici, est a nobis tum accusatio victa.''
So it was that we defeated your charge, Sulpicius, with the minds of the judges more forced than informed.
==== 215.0 int Quare... ====
''Quare qui aut breviter aut summisse dicunt, docere iudicem possunt, commovere non possunt; in quo sunt omnia.''
So people who speak briefly or quietly are able to inform a judge, but not to excite him (on which all things depend).
==== 216.0 int/lan Illa... ====
''Illa autem, quae aut conciliationis causa leniter, aut permotionis vehemeter aguntur, contrariis commotionibus auferenda sunt, ut odio benevolentia, misericordia invidia tollatur.''
Appeals, whether intended to win favor slowly, or to disturb passionately, should be removed by contrary emotions, as when goodwill is removed by hate, pity by jealousy.
==== 217.0 lan/bea Ego... ====
''Ego vero, inquit Caesar, omni de re facetius puto posse [disputari] ab homine non inurbano, quam de ipsis facetiis disputari.''
Caesar says, "I think a non-dull man can be more witty in any discussion than to discuss actual witticisms."
==== 221.3 int/lan/bea Parcebat... ====
''Parcebat enim adversarii dignitati, in quo ipse conservabat suam; quod est hominibus facetis et dicacibus difficillimum, habere hominum rationem et temporum et ea, quae occurrant, cum salsissime dici possint, tenere.''
He was sparing his enemy's honor, in a way that preserved his own; for it is most difficult for witty and sarcastic men to have regard for men and times and, when something very witty can be said, to hold their tongue.
==== 230.0 int/lan/bea Omnino... ====
''Omnino probabiliora sunt, quae lacessiti dicimus, quam quae priores, nam et ingenii celeritas maior est, quae apparet in respondendo, et humanitatis est responsio.''
The things we say under stress tend to be more impressive, as mental speed is greater in responding, and to respond is human.
==== 231.-4 int/bea Erat... ====
''Erat autem tanta gravitas in Domitio, tanta auctoritas, ut, quod esset ab eo obiectum, lepore magis elevandum, quam contentione frangendum videretur.''
There was such weight in Domitio, such authority, that it seemed better for his charges to be made light of by pleasantry than broken by force.
==== 247.0 int/lan Temporis... ====
''Temporis igitar ratio, et ipsius dicacitatis moderatio et temperantia et raritas dictorum distinguet oratorem a scurra, et quod nos cum causa dicimus, non ut ridiculi videamur, sed ut proficiamus aliquid, illi totum diem et sine causa.''
Regard to occasion, moderation and control of our own sharpened rhetoric, and sparsity of words will distinguish the orator from the buffoon; also, we speak with purpose, not to seem ridiculous but to accomplish some benefit, while they jest all day without cause.
==== 247.7 int Risum... ====
''Risum quaesivit, qui est, mea sententia, vel tenuissimus ingenii fructus.''
He sought comedy, which is, in my view, the meekest fruit of intelligence.
==== 251.-2 int/lan/bea Ne... ====
''Ne multa: nullum genus est ioci, quo non ex eodem severa et gravia sumantur.''
It is enough to say there is no source of humor from which serious and weighty thoughts are not also derived.
==== 251.0 int/bea Atque... ====
''Atque hoc etiam animadvertendum est, non esse omnia ridicula faceta.''
It is also notable that not all that is funny is witty.
==== 253.-4 int/bea Nam... ====
''Nam quod, quibuscumque verbis dixeris, facetum tamen est, re continetur; quod mutatis verbis salem amittit, in verbis habet leporem omnem.''
For what, with whatever words you say it, is still humorous, is contained in the facts; what loses its humor when the words are changed, has all its charm in the words.
==== 255.-5 int/lan Ambiguum... ====
''Ambiguum per se ipsum probatur id quidem, ut ante dixi, vel maxime; ingeniosi enim videtur vim verbi in aliud atque ceteri accipiant, posse ducere; sed admirationem magis quam risum movet, nisi si quando incidit in aliud genus ridiculi.''
The play on words does very well on its own, as I said before, for a man seems to be clever who can divert the power of a word to a place where others cannot; but this wins admiration more than amusement, unless it is also amusing for another reason.
==== 261.-3 int/bea Natura... ====
''Natura enim nos, ut ante dixi, noster delectat error: ex quo, cum quasi decepti sumus expectatione, ridemus.''
As if cheated of our expectation, we laugh, for our error naturally delights us (as I said before).
==== 263.-3 bea Sunt... ====
''Sunt etiam illa venusta, ut in gravibus sententiis, sic in facetiis.''
They are pleasing also, even in weighty discussions.
==== 263.-2 int/bea Dixi... ====
''Dixi enim dudum, materiam aliam esse ioci, aliam severitatis; gravium autem et iocorum unam esse rationem.''
I said before the matter of a joke is different from that of serious work; but of heavy and light the pattern is the same.
==== 267.0 Etiam... ====
''Etiam illa quae minuendi aut augendi causa ad incredibilem admirationem efferuntur: velut tu, Crasse, in concione, 'ita sibi ipsum magnum videri Memmium ut in forum descendens caput ad fornicem Fabii demitteret.'''
Also, there are remarks intended to exaggerate something to an incredible degree; as when you, Crassus, said in a public meeting, "Memmius thinks himself so great that, when descending into the forum, he ducks his head to fit under the Arch of Fabius."
==== 295.2 non... ====
''non tam ut prosim causis elaborare soleo quam ut ne quid obsim; non quin enitendum sit in utroque, sed tamen multo est turpius oratori nocuisse videri causae quam non profuisse.''
My custom is to take pains, not so much to help my case, but simply not to hurt it. Of course, both should be pursued, but it is much more disgraceful for an orator to be deemed harmful to his own case than not to have helped it.
==== 301.0 int/bea Etenim... ====
''Etenim permulta sunt in causis in omni parte orationis circumspicienda ne quid offendas, ne quo irruas: saepe aliqui testis aut non laedit aut minus laedit nisi lacessatur; orat reus, urgent advocati ut invehamur, ut maledicamus, denique ut interrogemus: non moveor, non obtempero, non satisfacio- neque tamen ullam assequor laudem, homines enim imperiti facilius quod stulte dixeris reprehendere quam quod sapienter tacueris laudare possunt.''
For there are very many ways throughout a speech not to rush in or fall out: often a witness's silence would do no harm, or less harm, than if they testified; the defendant and his supporters implore us to attack, abuse, interrogate; but I am not moved; I do not submit; I do not apologize; nor do I seek any praise, since ignorant men can more readily blame your stupid behavior than praise you for acting wisely.
==== 307.-4 int/lan Omnis... ====
''Omnis cura mea solet in hoc versari semper—dicam enim saepius—si possim, ut boni efficiam aliquid dicendo, sin id minus, ut certe ne quid mali.''
All my care (as I often say) is embodied in accomplishing something good by speaking, if possible, and if not, in at least doing no harm.
==== 310.-2 bea/int equidem... ====
''equidem cum colligo argumenta causarum, non tam ea numerare soleo quam expendere.''
Indeed, when I gather arguments for a case, my habit is not to count them but to weigh them.
==== 315.0 int Hisce... ====
''Hisce omnibus rebus consideratis tum denique id quod primum est dicendum postremum soleo cogitare, quo utar exordio; nam si quando id primum invenire volui, nullum mihi occurrit nisi aut exile aut nugatorium aut vulgare aut commune.''
With all these things deliberated, I finally consider what comes first: how to begin the oration. For whenever I have looked for an introduction early, nothing has occurred to me that is not thin, trifling, commonplace, ordinary.
==== 333.3 bea sed... ====
''... [sed tamen suadere aliquid aut dissuadere gravissimae mihi personae videtur esse], nam et sapientis est consilium explicare suum de maximis rebus et honesti et diserti, ut mente providere, auctoritate probare, oratione persuadere possis.''
... [Persuading or dissuading seems to be the role of a most respected person, because] making and explaining a plan on the greatest affairs is for a wise person who is also honest and eloquent, who can anticipate the future, affirm his authority, and use rhetoric powerfully.
==== 337.4 int/bea et... ====
''et quamquam una fere vis est eloquentiae, tamen quia summa dignitas est populi, gravissima causa rei publicae, maximi motus multitudinis, genus quoque dicendi grandius quoddam et illustrius esse adhibendum videtur; [maximaque pars orationis admovenda est ad animorum motus non numquam aut cohortatione aut commemoratione aliqua aut in spem aut in metum aut ad cupiditatem aut ad gloriam concitandos, saepe etiam a temeritate, iracundia, spe, iniuria, invidia, crudelitate revocandos].''
Because of the exceptionality of the people, the importance of the interests of the state, and the great motion of the crowd, it seems only appropriate that a higher kind of speech should be used, even though there is only one force of eloquence...
==== 338.0 int/lan Fit... ====
''Fit autem ut, quia maxima quasi oratoris scaena videatur contionis esse, natura ipsa ad ornatius dicendi genus excitemur; habet enim multitudo vim quandam talem ut, quemadmodum tibicen sine tibiis canere, sic orator sine multitudine audiente eloquens esse non possit.''
Because the greatest stage for an orator seems to be a public meeting, it happens naturally that we are roused to a more fancy kind of speaking; for crowds have a certain power allowing an orator to be eloquent, without which one is like a flute player without a flute.
==== 340.0 int/lan Nullo... ====
''Nullo autem loco plus facetiae prosunt et celeritas et breve aliquod dictum nec sine dignitate et cum lepore; nihil enim tam facile quam multitudo a tristitia et saepe ab acerbitate commode et breviter et acute et hilare dicto deducitur.''
But in no place do facetious remarks, a rapid style, and terse, clever, not undignified diction, profit a speaker more; for nothing so easily diverts a crowd from gloom and bitterness as a suitably sharp and cheerful remark.
==== 347.-3 int Magna... ====
''Magna etiam illa laus et admirabilis videri solet tulisse casus sapienter adversos, non fractum esse fortuna, retinuisse in rebus asperis dignitatem; neque tamen illa non ornant, habiti honores, decreta virtutis praemia, res gestae iudiciis hominum comprobatae; in quibus etiam felicitatem ipsam deorum immortalium iudicio tribui laudationis est.''
It is customarily seen as worthy of great and admirable praise to have born a disaster wisely, not to be broken by misfortune, and to have retained dignity in hard times; also recognized are honors held, rewards for virtue, and works ratified by judges of men; mere good fortune, on the other hand, does not deserve praise, and should be attributed to the gods.
==== 350.4 lan Perge... ====
''Pergo vero, inquit Crassus, libenter enim te cognitum iam artificem aliquandoque evolutum illis integumentis dissimulationis tuae nudatumque perspicio; et quod mihi nihil aut quod non multum relinquis, percommode facis, estque mihi gratum.''
Pray continue, said Crassus, for I happily see you now as a wise artist, finally drawn out and stripped of the shield of your pretended ignorance; indeed, it is brilliant that you left nothing or not much to me, and I am thankful for it.
==== 354.-2 int hac... ====
''hac tum re admonitus invenisse fertur ordinem esse maxime qui memoriae lumen afferret.''
Upon this suggestion he is said to have realized that an orderly arrangement is what best brings light to memory.
==== 363.-1 int/bea neque... ====
''neque eo minus eloquentiam tuam et multo magis virtutem et diligentiam admiror et simul gaudeo iudicium'' ''animi mei comprobari quod semper statui neminem sapientiae laudem et eloquentiae sine summo studio et labore et doctrina consequi posse.''
I admire your eloquence not much less and your energy and diligence much more, and at the same time I rejoice in the affirmation of my judgment that, as I always stated, nobody earns praise for wisdom and eloquence without the greatest study, work, and learning.
m1j87zmad8zumgqzda4nctbl617wvkk
2812346
2812345
2026-05-31T21:03:40Z
Nafindix
2919441
2812346
wikitext
text/x-wiki
Cicero's fictional dialogue about advocacy and the common law.
The Latin quotes are selected for interest (int), language (lan), and rhetoric (bea), and are translated into English. The line numbers are from the Loeb edition, and start counting from line 0 of the section. All translations are by Gus Wiseman (Nafindix), with the exception of any contributions from other users. The sources of the Latin quotes are:
# Loeb Classical Library 348, Harvard University Press, 1942; Latin text with facing English translation by E. W. Sutton.
# M. Tulli Ciceronis Rhetorica. M. Tullius Cicero. A. S. Wilkins, Ed. 1902. - <nowiki>http://data.perseus.org/texts/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi037</nowiki> or <nowiki>http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.02.0120</nowiki>
# The Latin Library. M. TVLLI CICERONIS DE ORATORE AD QVINTVM FRATREM LIBER SECVNDVS. <nowiki>https://www.thelatinlibrary.com/cicero/oratore1.shtml</nowiki>
[image]
==== 4.0 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed fuit hoc in utroque eorum, ut Crassus non tam existimari vellet non didicisse, quam illa despicere, et nostrorum hominum in omni genere prudentiam Graecis anteferre; Antonius autem probabiliorem hoc populo orationem fore censebat suam, si omnino didicisse nunquam putaretur.''
Crassus didn't want so much to appear free of all learning, but simply to despise the Greek treatment, preferring our own; on the other hand, Antonius considered it better if the people thought he had no learning at all.
==== 18.5 int Omnium... ====
''Omnium autem ineptiarum, quae sunt innumerabiles, haud scio, an nulla sit maior, quam, ut illi solent, quocumque in loco, quoscumque inter homines visum est, de rebus aut difficillimis, aut non necessariis, argutissime disputare.''
Of countless ineptitudes, none is greater than their custom of trying to argue everywhere, with anybody.
==== 35.-3 int/bea Neque... ====
''Neque ulla non propria oratoris est res, quae quidem ornate dici graviterque debet.''
There is no argument that an orator cannot deliver with polish.
==== 35.0 bea Huius... ====
''Huius est in dando consilio de maximis rebus cum dignitate explicata sententia; eiusdem et languentis populi incitatio, et effrenati moderatio.''
The orator's work is to advise at the highest level, with gravity, and to rouse or subdue a crowd, ever holding their reins.
==== 35.3 bea Eadem... ====
''Eadem facultate et fraus hominum ad perniciem, et integritas ad salutem vocatur.''
The vector that drives deceitful people to destruction is opposite to the vector that drives faithful people to deliverance.
==== 36.0 lan/bea Historia... ====
''Historia vero testis temporum, lux veritatis, vita memoriae, magistra vitae, nuntia vetustatis, qua voce alia, nisi oratoris, immortalitati commendatur?''
By what voice and motion, if not the orator's, is the light of remembered reality- the harbinger of history- entrusted to immortality?
==== 45.-2 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed non omnia, quaecumque loquimur, mihi videntur ad artem et ad praecepta esse revocanda.''
But not everything we say needs to be reduced to art and doctrine.
==== 60.0 int Quid... ====
''Est, fatebor, aliquid tamen: ut, cum in sole ambulem, etiamsi aliam ob causam ambulem, fieri natura tamen, ut colorer: sic, cum istos libros ad Misenum (nam Romae vix licet) studiosius legerim, sentio illorum tactu orationem meam quasi colorari.''
One walking in the sun (for any reason) naturally gets a tan, and after eagerly reading your books at Misenum (they are scarcely allowed at Rome), their very influence seems to have tanned my rhetoric.
==== 61.0 int In... ====
''In philosophos vestros si quando incidi, deceptus indicibus librorum, quod sunt fere inscripti de rebus notis et illustribus, de virtute, de iustitia, de honestate, de voluptate, verbum prorsus nullum intellego: ita sunt angustis et'' ''concisis disputationibus illigati.''
When I light upon your thinkers, if I am deceived by the titles of their books (supposedly about "virtue", "justice", "honesty", "pleasure", and so on), I find only knots so tenuous and fragmentary that I cannot unravel a single word.
==== 66.1 int/bea Si... ====
''Si enim est oratoris, quaecumque res infinite posita sit, de ea posse dicere, dicendum erit ei, quanta sit solis magnitudo, quae forma terrae: de mathematicis, de musicis rebus non poterit, quin dicat, hoc onere suscepto, recusare.''
If it is for the orator to be able to speak continuously on any subject, this must include the size of the sun and the shape of the earth, and an orator could not even refuse to speak about music or pure mathematics, if prompted.
==== 73.-1 bea Omnium... ====
''Omnium sententiarum gravitate, omnium verborum ponderibus est utendum.''
The weight of all opinions– indeed, of all words– should be applied to this.
==== 84.0 lan/bea Sed... ====
''Sed hoc si in iure civili, si etiam in parvis aut mediocribus rebus doctiores assequi possunt, non idem sentio tanta hac in re, tamque immensa, posse fieri.''
Even though, in civil law, and in matters of slight or moderate importance, the learned can achieve this kind of order, I doubt it could hold up in such an immense affair as the present.
==== 98.0 int Atque... ====
''Atque esse tamen multos videmus, qui neminem imitentur et suapte natura, quod velint, sine cuiusquam similitudine consequantur.''
And yet, we see many who imitate nobody and follow their own natural path.
==== 101.3 int/bea In... ====
''nemo potest de ea re, quam non novit, non turpissime dicere.''
No person should talk who has not mastered his/her own subject.
==== 116.-5 int Ita... ====
''Ita omnis ratio dicendi tribus ad persuadendum rebus est nixa: ut probemus vera esse, quae defendimus; ut conciliemus eos nobis, qui audiunt; ut animos eorum, ad quemcumque causa postulabit Motum, vocemus.''
There are three parts to persuasive speech: we demonstrate our position; we win the audience; we get people to make things right.
==== 117.5 int/lan/bea Quod... ====
''Quod etiamsi ad instituendos adolescentulos magis aptum est, ut, simul ac posita causa sit, habeant quo se referant, unde statim expedita possint argumenta depromere, tamen et tardi ingeni est rivulos consectari, fontis rerum non videre, et iam aetatis est ususque nostri a capite quod velimus arcessere et unde omnia manent videre.''
Even if this is more appropriate for raising youths (so that, as soon as a case is put, they have something to refer to from which they can draw out suitable arguments immediately when they are needed in the future), yet it is a sign of slow temperament to cut down the streams of things while not seeing their sources, and it is the privilege of men of our age and experience to summon up what we want from the water's head and see where everything flows.
==== 118.0 lan/bea Et... ====
''Et, primum genus illud earum rerum, quae ad oratorem deferuntur, meditatum nobis in perpetuum ad omnem usum similium rerum esse debebit.''
And, first, the class of all possible subjects of oratory should be ever in our minds, in case of similarities to our case.
==== 124.4 bea Quod... ====
''Quod enim ornamentum, quae vis, qui animus, qua dignitas illi oratori defuit, qui in causa peroranda non dubitavit excitare reum consularem et eius diloricare tunicam et iudicibus cicatrices adversas senis imperatoris ostendere?''
What decoration, what power, what spirit, what honor does that orator lack who does not hesitate to conclude his defense of the former consul by tearing open the old general's shirt and showing the judges his scars?
==== 125.0 bea Potuit... ====
''Potuit hic locus tam anceps, tam inauditus, tam lubricus, tam novus sine quadam incredibili vi ac facultate dicendi tractari?''
Can an argument so divisive, so unheard-of, so slippery, so unfamiliar be handled without incredible strength and skill of speaking?
==== 132.-2 int Subactio... ====
''Subactio autem est usus, auditio, lectio, litterae.''
The cultivation is practice, listening, reading, and writing.
==== 133.0 bea Atque... ====
''Atque hic illud videndum est, in quo summus est error istorum magistrorum, ad quos liberos nostros mittimus, non quo hoc quidem ad dicendum magno opere pertineat, sed tamen ut videatis quam sit genus hoc eorum qui sibi eruditi videntur hebes atque impolitum.''
Make note of this profound error by those to whom we send our sons, not indeed that this has much to do with speaking, but you should see how dull and coarse they are, who consider themselves scholars.
==== 147.3 bea Ubi... ====
''Ubi eum locum omnem cogitatione saepseris, si modo usu rerum percallueris, nihil te effugiet atque omne, quod erit in re, occurret atque incidet.''
If you surround everything with cogitation, and if you are calloused from experience, every aspect of an affair comes up and falls, and nothing escapes you.
==== 148.2 int Haec... ====
''Haec praecipue colenda est nobis; haec semper adhibenda; haec nihil est quod non assequatur.''
This virtue ("diligentia" or drive) we should foster especially, as it applies to everything, and there is nothing it cannot attain.
==== 150.0 int/bea Inter... ====
''Inter ingenium quidem et diligentiam perpaulum loci reliquum est arti.''
Between talent and drive very little room remains for art.
==== 161.0 bea Carneadi... ====
''Carneadi vero vis incredibilis illa dicendi et varietas perquam esset optando nobis, qui nullam umquam in illis suis disputationibus rem defendit, quam non probarit, nullam oppugnavit, quam non everterit.''
We are delighted by Carneades' incredible force and diversity of speech, a man who never made a disputation he could not prove, and never set a target he could not overturn.
==== 162.0 int/lan/bea Ego... ====
''Ego autem, si quem nunc rudem plane institui ad dicendum velim, his potius tradam assiduis uno opere eandem incudem diem noctemque tundentibus, qui omnes tenuissimas particulas atque omnia minima mansa ut nutrices infantibus pueris in os inserant.''
For myself, if I wanted to train a student in oratory, I would entrust him to these men, who, assiduously hitting the same anvil day-and-night, would only feed him ideas that are easy to chew.
==== 178.2 int/lan Nihil... ====
''Nihil est enim in dicendo, Catule, maius, quam ut faveat oratori is, qui audiet, utque ipse sic moveatur, ut impetu quodam animi et perturbatione, magis quam iudicio aut consilio regatur.''
Nothing is more important in oratory, Catulus, than to win the favor of your listener, so that he is moved by mental impulse or emotion on top of reasoned judgement.
==== 182.7 int Sed... ====
''Sed haec adiuvant in oratore: lenitas vocis, vultus pudoris significatio, verborum comitas; si quid persequare'' ''acrius, ut invitus et coactus facere videare.''
These help the orator: mildness of voice, a modest-seeming face, friendly diction, and the ability to seem to be compelled to act unwillingly.
==== 184.5 int Tantum... ====
''Tantum autem efficitur sensu quodam ac ratione dicendi, ut quasi mores oratoris effingat oratio.''
So much is achieved by taste and style that the speech seems to depict the orator's character.
==== 186.0 int/bea Facilius... ====
''Facilius est enim currentem, ut aunt, incitare quam commovere languentem.''
It is easier to stoke, as they say, one who is already running, than to prod an under performer.
==== 190.0 bea Neque... ====
''Neque est enim facile perficere, ut irascatur cui tu velis, iudex, si tu ipse id lente ferre videare; neque ut oderit eum, quem tu velis, nisi te ipsum flagrantem odio ante viderit; neque ad misericordiam adducetur, nisi tu ei signa doloris tui verbis, sententiis, voce, vultu, collacrimatione denique ostenderis.''
It is not easy to create anger against whomever you want, if you do not seem to care yourself; nor is it easy to create indignation, if your audience cannot perceive your own personal disgust; nor is it easy to create pity, if you cannot embody it yourself using your words, voice, face, and tears.
==== 196.-5 Sensi... ====
''Sensi equidem tum magnopere moveri iudices, cum excitavi maestum ac sordidatum senem et cum ista feci, quae tu, Crasse, laudas, non arte, de qua quid loquar nescio, sed motu magno animi ac dolore, ut discinderem tunicam, ut cicatrices ostenderem.''
I perceived that the judges were very moved then, when I roused the downcast shabby old man, and did something that you, Crassus, praise, not as technique, about which I have no comment, but under great stress of dissatisfaction: I tore open his tunic and showed his scars to the court.
==== 202.-3 bea Ita... ====
''Ita magis affectis animis iudicum quam doctis, tua, Sulpici, est a nobis tum accusatio victa.''
So it was that we defeated your charge, Sulpicius, with the minds of the judges more forced than informed.
==== 215.0 int Quare... ====
''Quare qui aut breviter aut summisse dicunt, docere iudicem possunt, commovere non possunt; in quo sunt omnia.''
So people who speak briefly or quietly are able to inform a judge, but not to excite him (on which all things depend).
==== 216.0 int/lan Illa... ====
''Illa autem, quae aut conciliationis causa leniter, aut permotionis vehemeter aguntur, contrariis commotionibus auferenda sunt, ut odio benevolentia, misericordia invidia tollatur.''
Appeals, whether intended to win favor slowly, or to disturb passionately, should be removed by contrary emotions, as when goodwill is removed by hate, pity by jealousy.
==== 217.0 lan/bea Ego... ====
''Ego vero, inquit Caesar, omni de re facetius puto posse [disputari] ab homine non inurbano, quam de ipsis facetiis disputari.''
Caesar says, "I think a non-dull man can be more witty in any discussion than to discuss actual witticisms."
==== 221.3 int/lan/bea Parcebat... ====
''Parcebat enim adversarii dignitati, in quo ipse conservabat suam; quod est hominibus facetis et dicacibus difficillimum, habere hominum rationem et temporum et ea, quae occurrant, cum salsissime dici possint, tenere.''
He was sparing his enemy's honor, in a way that preserved his own; for it is most difficult for witty and sarcastic men to have regard for men and times and, when something very witty can be said, to hold their tongue.
==== 230.0 int/lan/bea Omnino... ====
''Omnino probabiliora sunt, quae lacessiti dicimus, quam quae priores, nam et ingenii celeritas maior est, quae apparet in respondendo, et humanitatis est responsio.''
The things we say under stress tend to be more impressive, as mental speed is greater in responding, and to respond is human.
==== 231.-4 int/bea Erat... ====
''Erat autem tanta gravitas in Domitio, tanta auctoritas, ut, quod esset ab eo obiectum, lepore magis elevandum, quam contentione frangendum videretur.''
There was such weight in Domitio, such authority, that it seemed better for his charges to be made light of by pleasantry than broken by force.
==== 247.0 int/lan Temporis... ====
''Temporis igitar ratio, et ipsius dicacitatis moderatio et temperantia et raritas dictorum distinguet oratorem a scurra, et quod nos cum causa dicimus, non ut ridiculi videamur, sed ut proficiamus aliquid, illi totum diem et sine causa.''
Regard to occasion, moderation and control of our own sharpened rhetoric, and sparsity of words will distinguish the orator from the buffoon; also, we speak with purpose, not to seem ridiculous but to accomplish some benefit, while they jest all day without cause.
==== 247.7 int Risum... ====
''Risum quaesivit, qui est, mea sententia, vel tenuissimus ingenii fructus.''
He sought comedy, which is, in my view, the meekest fruit of intelligence.
==== 251.-2 int/lan/bea Ne... ====
''Ne multa: nullum genus est ioci, quo non ex eodem severa et gravia sumantur.''
It is enough to say there is no source of humor from which serious and weighty thoughts are not also derived.
==== 251.0 int/bea Atque... ====
''Atque hoc etiam animadvertendum est, non esse omnia ridicula faceta.''
It is also notable that not all that is funny is witty.
==== 253.-4 int/bea Nam... ====
''Nam quod, quibuscumque verbis dixeris, facetum tamen est, re continetur; quod mutatis verbis salem amittit, in verbis habet leporem omnem.''
For what, with whatever words you say it, is still humorous, is contained in the facts; what loses its humor when the words are changed, has all its charm in the words.
==== 255.-5 int/lan Ambiguum... ====
''Ambiguum per se ipsum probatur id quidem, ut ante dixi, vel maxime; ingeniosi enim videtur vim verbi in aliud atque ceteri accipiant, posse ducere; sed admirationem magis quam risum movet, nisi si quando incidit in aliud genus ridiculi.''
The play on words does very well on its own, as I said before, for a man seems to be clever who can divert the power of a word to a place where others cannot; but this wins admiration more than amusement, unless it is also amusing for another reason.
==== 261.-3 int/bea Natura... ====
''Natura enim nos, ut ante dixi, noster delectat error: ex quo, cum quasi decepti sumus expectatione, ridemus.''
As if cheated of our expectation, we laugh, for our error naturally delights us (as I said before).
==== 263.-3 bea Sunt... ====
''Sunt etiam illa venusta, ut in gravibus sententiis, sic in facetiis.''
They are pleasing also, even in weighty discussions.
==== 263.-2 int/bea Dixi... ====
''Dixi enim dudum, materiam aliam esse ioci, aliam severitatis; gravium autem et iocorum unam esse rationem.''
I said before the matter of a joke is different from that of serious work; but of heavy and light the pattern is the same.
==== 267.0 Etiam... ====
''Etiam illa quae minuendi aut augendi causa ad incredibilem admirationem efferuntur: velut tu, Crasse, in concione, 'ita sibi ipsum magnum videri Memmium ut in forum descendens caput ad fornicem Fabii demitteret.'''
Also, there are remarks intended to exaggerate something to an incredible degree; as when you, Crassus, said in a public meeting, "Memmius thinks himself so great that, when descending into the forum, he ducks his head to fit under the Arch of Fabius."
==== 295.2 non... ====
''non tam ut prosim causis elaborare soleo quam ut ne quid obsim; non quin enitendum sit in utroque, sed tamen multo est turpius oratori nocuisse videri causae quam non profuisse.''
My custom is to take pains, not so much to help my case, but simply not to hurt it. Of course, both should be pursued, but it is much more disgraceful for an orator to be deemed harmful to his own case than not to have helped it.
==== 301.0 int/bea Etenim... ====
''Etenim permulta sunt in causis in omni parte orationis circumspicienda ne quid offendas, ne quo irruas: saepe aliqui testis aut non laedit aut minus laedit nisi lacessatur; orat reus, urgent advocati ut invehamur, ut maledicamus, denique ut interrogemus: non moveor, non obtempero, non satisfacio- neque tamen ullam assequor laudem, homines enim imperiti facilius quod stulte dixeris reprehendere quam quod sapienter tacueris laudare possunt.''
For there are very many ways throughout a speech not to rush in or fall out: often a witness's silence would do no harm, or less harm, than if they testified; the defendant and his supporters implore us to attack, abuse, interrogate; but I am not moved; I do not submit; I do not apologize; nor do I seek any praise, since ignorant men can more readily blame your stupid behavior than praise you for acting wisely.
==== 307.-4 int/lan Omnis... ====
''Omnis cura mea solet in hoc versari semper—dicam enim saepius—si possim, ut boni efficiam aliquid dicendo, sin id minus, ut certe ne quid mali.''
All my care (as I often say) is embodied in accomplishing something good by speaking, if possible, and if not, in at least doing no harm.
==== 310.-2 bea/int equidem... ====
''equidem cum colligo argumenta causarum, non tam ea numerare soleo quam expendere.''
Indeed, when I gather arguments for a case, my habit is not to count them but to weigh them.
==== 315.0 int Hisce... ====
''Hisce omnibus rebus consideratis tum denique id quod primum est dicendum postremum soleo cogitare, quo utar exordio; nam si quando id primum invenire volui, nullum mihi occurrit nisi aut exile aut nugatorium aut vulgare aut commune.''
With all these things deliberated, I finally consider what comes first: how to begin the oration. For whenever I have looked for an introduction early, nothing has occurred to me that is not thin, trifling, commonplace, ordinary.
==== 333.3 bea sapientis... ====
''sapientis est consilium explicare suum de maximis rebus et honesti et diserti, ut mente providere, auctoritate probare, oratione persuadere possis.''
Making and explaining a plan on the greatest affairs is for a wise person who is also honest and eloquent, who can anticipate the future, affirm his authority, and use rhetoric powerfully.
==== 337.4 int/bea et... ====
''et quamquam una fere vis est eloquentiae, tamen quia summa dignitas est populi, gravissima causa rei publicae, maximi motus multitudinis, genus quoque dicendi grandius quoddam et illustrius esse adhibendum videtur; [maximaque pars orationis admovenda est ad animorum motus non numquam aut cohortatione aut commemoratione aliqua aut in spem aut in metum aut ad cupiditatem aut ad gloriam concitandos, saepe etiam a temeritate, iracundia, spe, iniuria, invidia, crudelitate revocandos].''
Because of the exceptionality of the people, the importance of the interests of the state, and the great motion of the crowd, it seems only appropriate that a higher kind of speech should be used, even though there is only one force of eloquence...
==== 338.0 int/lan Fit... ====
''Fit autem ut, quia maxima quasi oratoris scaena videatur contionis esse, natura ipsa ad ornatius dicendi genus excitemur; habet enim multitudo vim quandam talem ut, quemadmodum tibicen sine tibiis canere, sic orator sine multitudine audiente eloquens esse non possit.''
Because the greatest stage for an orator seems to be a public meeting, it happens naturally that we are roused to a more fancy kind of speaking; for crowds have a certain power allowing an orator to be eloquent, without which one is like a flute player without a flute.
==== 340.0 int/lan Nullo... ====
''Nullo autem loco plus facetiae prosunt et celeritas et breve aliquod dictum nec sine dignitate et cum lepore; nihil enim tam facile quam multitudo a tristitia et saepe ab acerbitate commode et breviter et acute et hilare dicto deducitur.''
But in no place do facetious remarks, a rapid style, and terse, clever, not undignified diction, profit a speaker more; for nothing so easily diverts a crowd from gloom and bitterness as a suitably sharp and cheerful remark.
==== 347.-3 int Magna... ====
''Magna etiam illa laus et admirabilis videri solet tulisse casus sapienter adversos, non fractum esse fortuna, retinuisse in rebus asperis dignitatem; neque tamen illa non ornant, habiti honores, decreta virtutis praemia, res gestae iudiciis hominum comprobatae; in quibus etiam felicitatem ipsam deorum immortalium iudicio tribui laudationis est.''
It is customarily seen as worthy of great and admirable praise to have born a disaster wisely, not to be broken by misfortune, and to have retained dignity in hard times; also recognized are honors held, rewards for virtue, and works ratified by judges of men; mere good fortune, on the other hand, does not deserve praise, and should be attributed to the gods.
==== 350.4 lan Perge... ====
''Pergo vero, inquit Crassus, libenter enim te cognitum iam artificem aliquandoque evolutum illis integumentis dissimulationis tuae nudatumque perspicio; et quod mihi nihil aut quod non multum relinquis, percommode facis, estque mihi gratum.''
Pray continue, said Crassus, for I happily see you now as a wise artist, finally drawn out and stripped of the shield of your pretended ignorance; indeed, it is brilliant that you left nothing or not much to me, and I am thankful for it.
==== 354.-2 int hac... ====
''hac tum re admonitus invenisse fertur ordinem esse maxime qui memoriae lumen afferret.''
Upon this suggestion he is said to have realized that an orderly arrangement is what best brings light to memory.
==== 363.-1 int/bea neque... ====
''neque eo minus eloquentiam tuam et multo magis virtutem et diligentiam admiror et simul gaudeo iudicium'' ''animi mei comprobari quod semper statui neminem sapientiae laudem et eloquentiae sine summo studio et labore et doctrina consequi posse.''
I admire your eloquence not much less and your energy and diligence much more, and at the same time I rejoice in the affirmation of my judgment that, as I always stated, nobody earns praise for wisdom and eloquence without the greatest study, work, and learning.
147lp1ypu06vt24mpwuvszq0ukb9gkf
2812347
2812346
2026-05-31T21:20:11Z
Atcovi
276019
cat(s)
2812347
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{literature}}
Cicero's fictional dialogue about advocacy and the common law.
The Latin quotes are selected for interest (int), language (lan), and rhetoric (bea), and are translated into English. The line numbers are from the Loeb edition, and start counting from line 0 of the section. All translations are by Gus Wiseman (Nafindix), with the exception of any contributions from other users. The sources of the Latin quotes are:
# Loeb Classical Library 348, Harvard University Press, 1942; Latin text with facing English translation by E. W. Sutton.
# M. Tulli Ciceronis Rhetorica. M. Tullius Cicero. A. S. Wilkins, Ed. 1902. - <nowiki>http://data.perseus.org/texts/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi037</nowiki> or <nowiki>http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.02.0120</nowiki>
# The Latin Library. M. TVLLI CICERONIS DE ORATORE AD QVINTVM FRATREM LIBER SECVNDVS. <nowiki>https://www.thelatinlibrary.com/cicero/oratore1.shtml</nowiki>
[image]
==== 4.0 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed fuit hoc in utroque eorum, ut Crassus non tam existimari vellet non didicisse, quam illa despicere, et nostrorum hominum in omni genere prudentiam Graecis anteferre; Antonius autem probabiliorem hoc populo orationem fore censebat suam, si omnino didicisse nunquam putaretur.''
Crassus didn't want so much to appear free of all learning, but simply to despise the Greek treatment, preferring our own; on the other hand, Antonius considered it better if the people thought he had no learning at all.
==== 18.5 int Omnium... ====
''Omnium autem ineptiarum, quae sunt innumerabiles, haud scio, an nulla sit maior, quam, ut illi solent, quocumque in loco, quoscumque inter homines visum est, de rebus aut difficillimis, aut non necessariis, argutissime disputare.''
Of countless ineptitudes, none is greater than their custom of trying to argue everywhere, with anybody.
==== 35.-3 int/bea Neque... ====
''Neque ulla non propria oratoris est res, quae quidem ornate dici graviterque debet.''
There is no argument that an orator cannot deliver with polish.
==== 35.0 bea Huius... ====
''Huius est in dando consilio de maximis rebus cum dignitate explicata sententia; eiusdem et languentis populi incitatio, et effrenati moderatio.''
The orator's work is to advise at the highest level, with gravity, and to rouse or subdue a crowd, ever holding their reins.
==== 35.3 bea Eadem... ====
''Eadem facultate et fraus hominum ad perniciem, et integritas ad salutem vocatur.''
The vector that drives deceitful people to destruction is opposite to the vector that drives faithful people to deliverance.
==== 36.0 lan/bea Historia... ====
''Historia vero testis temporum, lux veritatis, vita memoriae, magistra vitae, nuntia vetustatis, qua voce alia, nisi oratoris, immortalitati commendatur?''
By what voice and motion, if not the orator's, is the light of remembered reality- the harbinger of history- entrusted to immortality?
==== 45.-2 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed non omnia, quaecumque loquimur, mihi videntur ad artem et ad praecepta esse revocanda.''
But not everything we say needs to be reduced to art and doctrine.
==== 60.0 int Quid... ====
''Est, fatebor, aliquid tamen: ut, cum in sole ambulem, etiamsi aliam ob causam ambulem, fieri natura tamen, ut colorer: sic, cum istos libros ad Misenum (nam Romae vix licet) studiosius legerim, sentio illorum tactu orationem meam quasi colorari.''
One walking in the sun (for any reason) naturally gets a tan, and after eagerly reading your books at Misenum (they are scarcely allowed at Rome), their very influence seems to have tanned my rhetoric.
==== 61.0 int In... ====
''In philosophos vestros si quando incidi, deceptus indicibus librorum, quod sunt fere inscripti de rebus notis et illustribus, de virtute, de iustitia, de honestate, de voluptate, verbum prorsus nullum intellego: ita sunt angustis et'' ''concisis disputationibus illigati.''
When I light upon your thinkers, if I am deceived by the titles of their books (supposedly about "virtue", "justice", "honesty", "pleasure", and so on), I find only knots so tenuous and fragmentary that I cannot unravel a single word.
==== 66.1 int/bea Si... ====
''Si enim est oratoris, quaecumque res infinite posita sit, de ea posse dicere, dicendum erit ei, quanta sit solis magnitudo, quae forma terrae: de mathematicis, de musicis rebus non poterit, quin dicat, hoc onere suscepto, recusare.''
If it is for the orator to be able to speak continuously on any subject, this must include the size of the sun and the shape of the earth, and an orator could not even refuse to speak about music or pure mathematics, if prompted.
==== 73.-1 bea Omnium... ====
''Omnium sententiarum gravitate, omnium verborum ponderibus est utendum.''
The weight of all opinions– indeed, of all words– should be applied to this.
==== 84.0 lan/bea Sed... ====
''Sed hoc si in iure civili, si etiam in parvis aut mediocribus rebus doctiores assequi possunt, non idem sentio tanta hac in re, tamque immensa, posse fieri.''
Even though, in civil law, and in matters of slight or moderate importance, the learned can achieve this kind of order, I doubt it could hold up in such an immense affair as the present.
==== 98.0 int Atque... ====
''Atque esse tamen multos videmus, qui neminem imitentur et suapte natura, quod velint, sine cuiusquam similitudine consequantur.''
And yet, we see many who imitate nobody and follow their own natural path.
==== 101.3 int/bea In... ====
''nemo potest de ea re, quam non novit, non turpissime dicere.''
No person should talk who has not mastered his/her own subject.
==== 116.-5 int Ita... ====
''Ita omnis ratio dicendi tribus ad persuadendum rebus est nixa: ut probemus vera esse, quae defendimus; ut conciliemus eos nobis, qui audiunt; ut animos eorum, ad quemcumque causa postulabit Motum, vocemus.''
There are three parts to persuasive speech: we demonstrate our position; we win the audience; we get people to make things right.
==== 117.5 int/lan/bea Quod... ====
''Quod etiamsi ad instituendos adolescentulos magis aptum est, ut, simul ac posita causa sit, habeant quo se referant, unde statim expedita possint argumenta depromere, tamen et tardi ingeni est rivulos consectari, fontis rerum non videre, et iam aetatis est ususque nostri a capite quod velimus arcessere et unde omnia manent videre.''
Even if this is more appropriate for raising youths (so that, as soon as a case is put, they have something to refer to from which they can draw out suitable arguments immediately when they are needed in the future), yet it is a sign of slow temperament to cut down the streams of things while not seeing their sources, and it is the privilege of men of our age and experience to summon up what we want from the water's head and see where everything flows.
==== 118.0 lan/bea Et... ====
''Et, primum genus illud earum rerum, quae ad oratorem deferuntur, meditatum nobis in perpetuum ad omnem usum similium rerum esse debebit.''
And, first, the class of all possible subjects of oratory should be ever in our minds, in case of similarities to our case.
==== 124.4 bea Quod... ====
''Quod enim ornamentum, quae vis, qui animus, qua dignitas illi oratori defuit, qui in causa peroranda non dubitavit excitare reum consularem et eius diloricare tunicam et iudicibus cicatrices adversas senis imperatoris ostendere?''
What decoration, what power, what spirit, what honor does that orator lack who does not hesitate to conclude his defense of the former consul by tearing open the old general's shirt and showing the judges his scars?
==== 125.0 bea Potuit... ====
''Potuit hic locus tam anceps, tam inauditus, tam lubricus, tam novus sine quadam incredibili vi ac facultate dicendi tractari?''
Can an argument so divisive, so unheard-of, so slippery, so unfamiliar be handled without incredible strength and skill of speaking?
==== 132.-2 int Subactio... ====
''Subactio autem est usus, auditio, lectio, litterae.''
The cultivation is practice, listening, reading, and writing.
==== 133.0 bea Atque... ====
''Atque hic illud videndum est, in quo summus est error istorum magistrorum, ad quos liberos nostros mittimus, non quo hoc quidem ad dicendum magno opere pertineat, sed tamen ut videatis quam sit genus hoc eorum qui sibi eruditi videntur hebes atque impolitum.''
Make note of this profound error by those to whom we send our sons, not indeed that this has much to do with speaking, but you should see how dull and coarse they are, who consider themselves scholars.
==== 147.3 bea Ubi... ====
''Ubi eum locum omnem cogitatione saepseris, si modo usu rerum percallueris, nihil te effugiet atque omne, quod erit in re, occurret atque incidet.''
If you surround everything with cogitation, and if you are calloused from experience, every aspect of an affair comes up and falls, and nothing escapes you.
==== 148.2 int Haec... ====
''Haec praecipue colenda est nobis; haec semper adhibenda; haec nihil est quod non assequatur.''
This virtue ("diligentia" or drive) we should foster especially, as it applies to everything, and there is nothing it cannot attain.
==== 150.0 int/bea Inter... ====
''Inter ingenium quidem et diligentiam perpaulum loci reliquum est arti.''
Between talent and drive very little room remains for art.
==== 161.0 bea Carneadi... ====
''Carneadi vero vis incredibilis illa dicendi et varietas perquam esset optando nobis, qui nullam umquam in illis suis disputationibus rem defendit, quam non probarit, nullam oppugnavit, quam non everterit.''
We are delighted by Carneades' incredible force and diversity of speech, a man who never made a disputation he could not prove, and never set a target he could not overturn.
==== 162.0 int/lan/bea Ego... ====
''Ego autem, si quem nunc rudem plane institui ad dicendum velim, his potius tradam assiduis uno opere eandem incudem diem noctemque tundentibus, qui omnes tenuissimas particulas atque omnia minima mansa ut nutrices infantibus pueris in os inserant.''
For myself, if I wanted to train a student in oratory, I would entrust him to these men, who, assiduously hitting the same anvil day-and-night, would only feed him ideas that are easy to chew.
==== 178.2 int/lan Nihil... ====
''Nihil est enim in dicendo, Catule, maius, quam ut faveat oratori is, qui audiet, utque ipse sic moveatur, ut impetu quodam animi et perturbatione, magis quam iudicio aut consilio regatur.''
Nothing is more important in oratory, Catulus, than to win the favor of your listener, so that he is moved by mental impulse or emotion on top of reasoned judgement.
==== 182.7 int Sed... ====
''Sed haec adiuvant in oratore: lenitas vocis, vultus pudoris significatio, verborum comitas; si quid persequare'' ''acrius, ut invitus et coactus facere videare.''
These help the orator: mildness of voice, a modest-seeming face, friendly diction, and the ability to seem to be compelled to act unwillingly.
==== 184.5 int Tantum... ====
''Tantum autem efficitur sensu quodam ac ratione dicendi, ut quasi mores oratoris effingat oratio.''
So much is achieved by taste and style that the speech seems to depict the orator's character.
==== 186.0 int/bea Facilius... ====
''Facilius est enim currentem, ut aunt, incitare quam commovere languentem.''
It is easier to stoke, as they say, one who is already running, than to prod an under performer.
==== 190.0 bea Neque... ====
''Neque est enim facile perficere, ut irascatur cui tu velis, iudex, si tu ipse id lente ferre videare; neque ut oderit eum, quem tu velis, nisi te ipsum flagrantem odio ante viderit; neque ad misericordiam adducetur, nisi tu ei signa doloris tui verbis, sententiis, voce, vultu, collacrimatione denique ostenderis.''
It is not easy to create anger against whomever you want, if you do not seem to care yourself; nor is it easy to create indignation, if your audience cannot perceive your own personal disgust; nor is it easy to create pity, if you cannot embody it yourself using your words, voice, face, and tears.
==== 196.-5 Sensi... ====
''Sensi equidem tum magnopere moveri iudices, cum excitavi maestum ac sordidatum senem et cum ista feci, quae tu, Crasse, laudas, non arte, de qua quid loquar nescio, sed motu magno animi ac dolore, ut discinderem tunicam, ut cicatrices ostenderem.''
I perceived that the judges were very moved then, when I roused the downcast shabby old man, and did something that you, Crassus, praise, not as technique, about which I have no comment, but under great stress of dissatisfaction: I tore open his tunic and showed his scars to the court.
==== 202.-3 bea Ita... ====
''Ita magis affectis animis iudicum quam doctis, tua, Sulpici, est a nobis tum accusatio victa.''
So it was that we defeated your charge, Sulpicius, with the minds of the judges more forced than informed.
==== 215.0 int Quare... ====
''Quare qui aut breviter aut summisse dicunt, docere iudicem possunt, commovere non possunt; in quo sunt omnia.''
So people who speak briefly or quietly are able to inform a judge, but not to excite him (on which all things depend).
==== 216.0 int/lan Illa... ====
''Illa autem, quae aut conciliationis causa leniter, aut permotionis vehemeter aguntur, contrariis commotionibus auferenda sunt, ut odio benevolentia, misericordia invidia tollatur.''
Appeals, whether intended to win favor slowly, or to disturb passionately, should be removed by contrary emotions, as when goodwill is removed by hate, pity by jealousy.
==== 217.0 lan/bea Ego... ====
''Ego vero, inquit Caesar, omni de re facetius puto posse [disputari] ab homine non inurbano, quam de ipsis facetiis disputari.''
Caesar says, "I think a non-dull man can be more witty in any discussion than to discuss actual witticisms."
==== 221.3 int/lan/bea Parcebat... ====
''Parcebat enim adversarii dignitati, in quo ipse conservabat suam; quod est hominibus facetis et dicacibus difficillimum, habere hominum rationem et temporum et ea, quae occurrant, cum salsissime dici possint, tenere.''
He was sparing his enemy's honor, in a way that preserved his own; for it is most difficult for witty and sarcastic men to have regard for men and times and, when something very witty can be said, to hold their tongue.
==== 230.0 int/lan/bea Omnino... ====
''Omnino probabiliora sunt, quae lacessiti dicimus, quam quae priores, nam et ingenii celeritas maior est, quae apparet in respondendo, et humanitatis est responsio.''
The things we say under stress tend to be more impressive, as mental speed is greater in responding, and to respond is human.
==== 231.-4 int/bea Erat... ====
''Erat autem tanta gravitas in Domitio, tanta auctoritas, ut, quod esset ab eo obiectum, lepore magis elevandum, quam contentione frangendum videretur.''
There was such weight in Domitio, such authority, that it seemed better for his charges to be made light of by pleasantry than broken by force.
==== 247.0 int/lan Temporis... ====
''Temporis igitar ratio, et ipsius dicacitatis moderatio et temperantia et raritas dictorum distinguet oratorem a scurra, et quod nos cum causa dicimus, non ut ridiculi videamur, sed ut proficiamus aliquid, illi totum diem et sine causa.''
Regard to occasion, moderation and control of our own sharpened rhetoric, and sparsity of words will distinguish the orator from the buffoon; also, we speak with purpose, not to seem ridiculous but to accomplish some benefit, while they jest all day without cause.
==== 247.7 int Risum... ====
''Risum quaesivit, qui est, mea sententia, vel tenuissimus ingenii fructus.''
He sought comedy, which is, in my view, the meekest fruit of intelligence.
==== 251.-2 int/lan/bea Ne... ====
''Ne multa: nullum genus est ioci, quo non ex eodem severa et gravia sumantur.''
It is enough to say there is no source of humor from which serious and weighty thoughts are not also derived.
==== 251.0 int/bea Atque... ====
''Atque hoc etiam animadvertendum est, non esse omnia ridicula faceta.''
It is also notable that not all that is funny is witty.
==== 253.-4 int/bea Nam... ====
''Nam quod, quibuscumque verbis dixeris, facetum tamen est, re continetur; quod mutatis verbis salem amittit, in verbis habet leporem omnem.''
For what, with whatever words you say it, is still humorous, is contained in the facts; what loses its humor when the words are changed, has all its charm in the words.
==== 255.-5 int/lan Ambiguum... ====
''Ambiguum per se ipsum probatur id quidem, ut ante dixi, vel maxime; ingeniosi enim videtur vim verbi in aliud atque ceteri accipiant, posse ducere; sed admirationem magis quam risum movet, nisi si quando incidit in aliud genus ridiculi.''
The play on words does very well on its own, as I said before, for a man seems to be clever who can divert the power of a word to a place where others cannot; but this wins admiration more than amusement, unless it is also amusing for another reason.
==== 261.-3 int/bea Natura... ====
''Natura enim nos, ut ante dixi, noster delectat error: ex quo, cum quasi decepti sumus expectatione, ridemus.''
As if cheated of our expectation, we laugh, for our error naturally delights us (as I said before).
==== 263.-3 bea Sunt... ====
''Sunt etiam illa venusta, ut in gravibus sententiis, sic in facetiis.''
They are pleasing also, even in weighty discussions.
==== 263.-2 int/bea Dixi... ====
''Dixi enim dudum, materiam aliam esse ioci, aliam severitatis; gravium autem et iocorum unam esse rationem.''
I said before the matter of a joke is different from that of serious work; but of heavy and light the pattern is the same.
==== 267.0 Etiam... ====
''Etiam illa quae minuendi aut augendi causa ad incredibilem admirationem efferuntur: velut tu, Crasse, in concione, 'ita sibi ipsum magnum videri Memmium ut in forum descendens caput ad fornicem Fabii demitteret.'''
Also, there are remarks intended to exaggerate something to an incredible degree; as when you, Crassus, said in a public meeting, "Memmius thinks himself so great that, when descending into the forum, he ducks his head to fit under the Arch of Fabius."
==== 295.2 non... ====
''non tam ut prosim causis elaborare soleo quam ut ne quid obsim; non quin enitendum sit in utroque, sed tamen multo est turpius oratori nocuisse videri causae quam non profuisse.''
My custom is to take pains, not so much to help my case, but simply not to hurt it. Of course, both should be pursued, but it is much more disgraceful for an orator to be deemed harmful to his own case than not to have helped it.
==== 301.0 int/bea Etenim... ====
''Etenim permulta sunt in causis in omni parte orationis circumspicienda ne quid offendas, ne quo irruas: saepe aliqui testis aut non laedit aut minus laedit nisi lacessatur; orat reus, urgent advocati ut invehamur, ut maledicamus, denique ut interrogemus: non moveor, non obtempero, non satisfacio- neque tamen ullam assequor laudem, homines enim imperiti facilius quod stulte dixeris reprehendere quam quod sapienter tacueris laudare possunt.''
For there are very many ways throughout a speech not to rush in or fall out: often a witness's silence would do no harm, or less harm, than if they testified; the defendant and his supporters implore us to attack, abuse, interrogate; but I am not moved; I do not submit; I do not apologize; nor do I seek any praise, since ignorant men can more readily blame your stupid behavior than praise you for acting wisely.
==== 307.-4 int/lan Omnis... ====
''Omnis cura mea solet in hoc versari semper—dicam enim saepius—si possim, ut boni efficiam aliquid dicendo, sin id minus, ut certe ne quid mali.''
All my care (as I often say) is embodied in accomplishing something good by speaking, if possible, and if not, in at least doing no harm.
==== 310.-2 bea/int equidem... ====
''equidem cum colligo argumenta causarum, non tam ea numerare soleo quam expendere.''
Indeed, when I gather arguments for a case, my habit is not to count them but to weigh them.
==== 315.0 int Hisce... ====
''Hisce omnibus rebus consideratis tum denique id quod primum est dicendum postremum soleo cogitare, quo utar exordio; nam si quando id primum invenire volui, nullum mihi occurrit nisi aut exile aut nugatorium aut vulgare aut commune.''
With all these things deliberated, I finally consider what comes first: how to begin the oration. For whenever I have looked for an introduction early, nothing has occurred to me that is not thin, trifling, commonplace, ordinary.
==== 333.3 bea sapientis... ====
''sapientis est consilium explicare suum de maximis rebus et honesti et diserti, ut mente providere, auctoritate probare, oratione persuadere possis.''
Making and explaining a plan on the greatest affairs is for a wise person who is also honest and eloquent, who can anticipate the future, affirm his authority, and use rhetoric powerfully.
==== 337.4 int/bea et... ====
''et quamquam una fere vis est eloquentiae, tamen quia summa dignitas est populi, gravissima causa rei publicae, maximi motus multitudinis, genus quoque dicendi grandius quoddam et illustrius esse adhibendum videtur; [maximaque pars orationis admovenda est ad animorum motus non numquam aut cohortatione aut commemoratione aliqua aut in spem aut in metum aut ad cupiditatem aut ad gloriam concitandos, saepe etiam a temeritate, iracundia, spe, iniuria, invidia, crudelitate revocandos].''
Because of the exceptionality of the people, the importance of the interests of the state, and the great motion of the crowd, it seems only appropriate that a higher kind of speech should be used, even though there is only one force of eloquence...
==== 338.0 int/lan Fit... ====
''Fit autem ut, quia maxima quasi oratoris scaena videatur contionis esse, natura ipsa ad ornatius dicendi genus excitemur; habet enim multitudo vim quandam talem ut, quemadmodum tibicen sine tibiis canere, sic orator sine multitudine audiente eloquens esse non possit.''
Because the greatest stage for an orator seems to be a public meeting, it happens naturally that we are roused to a more fancy kind of speaking; for crowds have a certain power allowing an orator to be eloquent, without which one is like a flute player without a flute.
==== 340.0 int/lan Nullo... ====
''Nullo autem loco plus facetiae prosunt et celeritas et breve aliquod dictum nec sine dignitate et cum lepore; nihil enim tam facile quam multitudo a tristitia et saepe ab acerbitate commode et breviter et acute et hilare dicto deducitur.''
But in no place do facetious remarks, a rapid style, and terse, clever, not undignified diction, profit a speaker more; for nothing so easily diverts a crowd from gloom and bitterness as a suitably sharp and cheerful remark.
==== 347.-3 int Magna... ====
''Magna etiam illa laus et admirabilis videri solet tulisse casus sapienter adversos, non fractum esse fortuna, retinuisse in rebus asperis dignitatem; neque tamen illa non ornant, habiti honores, decreta virtutis praemia, res gestae iudiciis hominum comprobatae; in quibus etiam felicitatem ipsam deorum immortalium iudicio tribui laudationis est.''
It is customarily seen as worthy of great and admirable praise to have born a disaster wisely, not to be broken by misfortune, and to have retained dignity in hard times; also recognized are honors held, rewards for virtue, and works ratified by judges of men; mere good fortune, on the other hand, does not deserve praise, and should be attributed to the gods.
==== 350.4 lan Perge... ====
''Pergo vero, inquit Crassus, libenter enim te cognitum iam artificem aliquandoque evolutum illis integumentis dissimulationis tuae nudatumque perspicio; et quod mihi nihil aut quod non multum relinquis, percommode facis, estque mihi gratum.''
Pray continue, said Crassus, for I happily see you now as a wise artist, finally drawn out and stripped of the shield of your pretended ignorance; indeed, it is brilliant that you left nothing or not much to me, and I am thankful for it.
==== 354.-2 int hac... ====
''hac tum re admonitus invenisse fertur ordinem esse maxime qui memoriae lumen afferret.''
Upon this suggestion he is said to have realized that an orderly arrangement is what best brings light to memory.
==== 363.-1 int/bea neque... ====
''neque eo minus eloquentiam tuam et multo magis virtutem et diligentiam admiror et simul gaudeo iudicium'' ''animi mei comprobari quod semper statui neminem sapientiae laudem et eloquentiae sine summo studio et labore et doctrina consequi posse.''
I admire your eloquence not much less and your energy and diligence much more, and at the same time I rejoice in the affirmation of my judgment that, as I always stated, nobody earns praise for wisdom and eloquence without the greatest study, work, and learning.
[[Category:History of Italy]]
obx8lvzihgoydnivzhdom3nnsza8s0w
2812348
2812347
2026-05-31T21:49:35Z
Nafindix
2919441
2812348
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{literature}}
Cicero's fictional dialogue, mostly delivered in the voice of Marcus Antonius, grandfather of the famous general.
The Latin quotes are selected for interest (int), language (lan), and rhetoric (bea), and are translated into English. The line numbers are from the Loeb edition, and start counting from line 0 of the section. All translations are by Gus Wiseman (Nafindix), with the exception of any contributions from other users. The sources of the Latin quotes are:
# Loeb Classical Library 348, Harvard University Press, 1942; Latin text with facing English translation by E. W. Sutton.
# M. Tulli Ciceronis Rhetorica. M. Tullius Cicero. A. S. Wilkins, Ed. 1902. - <nowiki>http://data.perseus.org/texts/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi037</nowiki> or <nowiki>http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.02.0120</nowiki>
# The Latin Library. M. TVLLI CICERONIS DE ORATORE AD QVINTVM FRATREM LIBER SECVNDVS. <nowiki>https://www.thelatinlibrary.com/cicero/oratore1.shtml</nowiki>
[[File:Octavian_and_Antony_denarius_(obverse).jpg|Octavian and Antony denarius (obverse)]]
==== 4.0 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed fuit hoc in utroque eorum, ut Crassus non tam existimari vellet non didicisse, quam illa despicere, et nostrorum hominum in omni genere prudentiam Graecis anteferre; Antonius autem probabiliorem hoc populo orationem fore censebat suam, si omnino didicisse nunquam putaretur.''
Crassus didn't want so much to appear free of all learning, but simply to despise the Greek treatment, preferring our own; on the other hand, Antonius considered it better if the people thought he had no learning at all.
==== 18.5 int Omnium... ====
''Omnium autem ineptiarum, quae sunt innumerabiles, haud scio, an nulla sit maior, quam, ut illi solent, quocumque in loco, quoscumque inter homines visum est, de rebus aut difficillimis, aut non necessariis, argutissime disputare.''
Of countless ineptitudes, none is greater than their custom of trying to argue everywhere, with anybody.
==== 35.-3 int/bea Neque... ====
''Neque ulla non propria oratoris est res, quae quidem ornate dici graviterque debet.''
There is no argument that an orator cannot deliver with polish.
==== 35.0 bea Huius... ====
''Huius est in dando consilio de maximis rebus cum dignitate explicata sententia; eiusdem et languentis populi incitatio, et effrenati moderatio.''
The orator's work is to advise at the highest level, with gravity, and to rouse or subdue a crowd, ever holding their reins.
==== 35.3 bea Eadem... ====
''Eadem facultate et fraus hominum ad perniciem, et integritas ad salutem vocatur.''
The vector that drives deceitful people to destruction is opposite to the vector that drives faithful people to deliverance.
==== 36.0 lan/bea Historia... ====
''Historia vero testis temporum, lux veritatis, vita memoriae, magistra vitae, nuntia vetustatis, qua voce alia, nisi oratoris, immortalitati commendatur?''
By what voice and motion, if not the orator's, is the light of remembered reality- the harbinger of history- entrusted to immortality?
==== 45.-2 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed non omnia, quaecumque loquimur, mihi videntur ad artem et ad praecepta esse revocanda.''
But not everything we say needs to be reduced to art and doctrine.
==== 60.0 int Quid... ====
''Est, fatebor, aliquid tamen: ut, cum in sole ambulem, etiamsi aliam ob causam ambulem, fieri natura tamen, ut colorer: sic, cum istos libros ad Misenum (nam Romae vix licet) studiosius legerim, sentio illorum tactu orationem meam quasi colorari.''
One walking in the sun (for any reason) naturally gets a tan, and after eagerly reading your books at Misenum (they are scarcely allowed at Rome), their very influence seems to have tanned my rhetoric.
==== 61.0 int In... ====
''In philosophos vestros si quando incidi, deceptus indicibus librorum, quod sunt fere inscripti de rebus notis et illustribus, de virtute, de iustitia, de honestate, de voluptate, verbum prorsus nullum intellego: ita sunt angustis et'' ''concisis disputationibus illigati.''
When I light upon your thinkers, if I am deceived by the titles of their books (supposedly about "virtue", "justice", "honesty", "pleasure", and so on), I find only knots so tenuous and fragmentary that I cannot unravel a single word.
==== 66.1 int/bea Si... ====
''Si enim est oratoris, quaecumque res infinite posita sit, de ea posse dicere, dicendum erit ei, quanta sit solis magnitudo, quae forma terrae: de mathematicis, de musicis rebus non poterit, quin dicat, hoc onere suscepto, recusare.''
If it is for the orator to be able to speak continuously on any subject, this must include the size of the sun and the shape of the earth, and an orator could not even refuse to speak about music or pure mathematics, if prompted.
==== 73.-1 bea Omnium... ====
''Omnium sententiarum gravitate, omnium verborum ponderibus est utendum.''
The weight of all opinions– indeed, of all words– should be applied to this.
==== 84.0 lan/bea Sed... ====
''Sed hoc si in iure civili, si etiam in parvis aut mediocribus rebus doctiores assequi possunt, non idem sentio tanta hac in re, tamque immensa, posse fieri.''
Even though, in civil law, and in matters of slight or moderate importance, the learned can achieve this kind of order, I doubt it could hold up in such an immense affair as the present.
==== 98.0 int Atque... ====
''Atque esse tamen multos videmus, qui neminem imitentur et suapte natura, quod velint, sine cuiusquam similitudine consequantur.''
And yet, we see many who imitate nobody and follow their own natural path.
==== 101.3 int/bea In... ====
''nemo potest de ea re, quam non novit, non turpissime dicere.''
No person should talk who has not mastered his/her own subject.
==== 116.-5 int Ita... ====
''Ita omnis ratio dicendi tribus ad persuadendum rebus est nixa: ut probemus vera esse, quae defendimus; ut conciliemus eos nobis, qui audiunt; ut animos eorum, ad quemcumque causa postulabit Motum, vocemus.''
There are three parts to persuasive speech: we demonstrate our position; we win the audience; we get people to make things right.
==== 117.5 int/lan/bea Quod... ====
''Quod etiamsi ad instituendos adolescentulos magis aptum est, ut, simul ac posita causa sit, habeant quo se referant, unde statim expedita possint argumenta depromere, tamen et tardi ingeni est rivulos consectari, fontis rerum non videre, et iam aetatis est ususque nostri a capite quod velimus arcessere et unde omnia manent videre.''
Even if this is more appropriate for raising youths (so that, as soon as a case is put, they have something to refer to from which they can draw out suitable arguments immediately when they are needed in the future), yet it is a sign of slow temperament to cut down the streams of things while not seeing their sources, and it is the privilege of men of our age and experience to summon up what we want from the water's head and see where everything flows.
==== 118.0 lan/bea Et... ====
''Et, primum genus illud earum rerum, quae ad oratorem deferuntur, meditatum nobis in perpetuum ad omnem usum similium rerum esse debebit.''
And, first, the class of all possible subjects of oratory should be ever in our minds, in case of similarities to our case.
==== 124.4 bea Quod... ====
''Quod enim ornamentum, quae vis, qui animus, qua dignitas illi oratori defuit, qui in causa peroranda non dubitavit excitare reum consularem et eius diloricare tunicam et iudicibus cicatrices adversas senis imperatoris ostendere?''
What decoration, what power, what spirit, what honor does that orator lack who does not hesitate to conclude his defense of the former consul by tearing open the old general's shirt and showing the judges his scars?
==== 125.0 bea Potuit... ====
''Potuit hic locus tam anceps, tam inauditus, tam lubricus, tam novus sine quadam incredibili vi ac facultate dicendi tractari?''
Can an argument so divisive, so unheard-of, so slippery, so unfamiliar be handled without incredible strength and skill of speaking?
==== 132.-2 int Subactio... ====
''Subactio autem est usus, auditio, lectio, litterae.''
The cultivation is practice, listening, reading, and writing.
==== 133.0 bea Atque... ====
''Atque hic illud videndum est, in quo summus est error istorum magistrorum, ad quos liberos nostros mittimus, non quo hoc quidem ad dicendum magno opere pertineat, sed tamen ut videatis quam sit genus hoc eorum qui sibi eruditi videntur hebes atque impolitum.''
Make note of this profound error by those to whom we send our sons, not indeed that this has much to do with speaking, but you should see how dull and coarse they are, who consider themselves scholars.
==== 147.3 bea Ubi... ====
''Ubi eum locum omnem cogitatione saepseris, si modo usu rerum percallueris, nihil te effugiet atque omne, quod erit in re, occurret atque incidet.''
If you surround everything with cogitation, and if you are calloused from experience, every aspect of an affair comes up and falls, and nothing escapes you.
==== 148.2 int Haec... ====
''Haec praecipue colenda est nobis; haec semper adhibenda; haec nihil est quod non assequatur.''
This virtue ("diligentia" or drive) we should foster especially, as it applies to everything, and there is nothing it cannot attain.
==== 150.0 int/bea Inter... ====
''Inter ingenium quidem et diligentiam perpaulum loci reliquum est arti.''
Between talent and drive very little room remains for art.
==== 161.0 bea Carneadi... ====
''Carneadi vero vis incredibilis illa dicendi et varietas perquam esset optando nobis, qui nullam umquam in illis suis disputationibus rem defendit, quam non probarit, nullam oppugnavit, quam non everterit.''
We are delighted by Carneades' incredible force and diversity of speech, a man who never made a disputation he could not prove, and never set a target he could not overturn.
==== 162.0 int/lan/bea Ego... ====
''Ego autem, si quem nunc rudem plane institui ad dicendum velim, his potius tradam assiduis uno opere eandem incudem diem noctemque tundentibus, qui omnes tenuissimas particulas atque omnia minima mansa ut nutrices infantibus pueris in os inserant.''
For myself, if I wanted to train a student in oratory, I would entrust him to these men, who, assiduously hitting the same anvil day-and-night, would only feed him ideas that are easy to chew.
==== 178.2 int/lan Nihil... ====
''Nihil est enim in dicendo, Catule, maius, quam ut faveat oratori is, qui audiet, utque ipse sic moveatur, ut impetu quodam animi et perturbatione, magis quam iudicio aut consilio regatur.''
Nothing is more important in oratory, Catulus, than to win the favor of your listener, so that he is moved by mental impulse or emotion on top of reasoned judgement.
==== 182.7 int Sed... ====
''Sed haec adiuvant in oratore: lenitas vocis, vultus pudoris significatio, verborum comitas; si quid persequare'' ''acrius, ut invitus et coactus facere videare.''
These help the orator: mildness of voice, a modest-seeming face, friendly diction, and the ability to seem to be compelled to act unwillingly.
==== 184.5 int Tantum... ====
''Tantum autem efficitur sensu quodam ac ratione dicendi, ut quasi mores oratoris effingat oratio.''
So much is achieved by taste and style that the speech seems to depict the orator's character.
==== 186.0 int/bea Facilius... ====
''Facilius est enim currentem, ut aunt, incitare quam commovere languentem.''
It is easier to stoke, as they say, one who is already running, than to prod an under performer.
==== 190.0 bea Neque... ====
''Neque est enim facile perficere, ut irascatur cui tu velis, iudex, si tu ipse id lente ferre videare; neque ut oderit eum, quem tu velis, nisi te ipsum flagrantem odio ante viderit; neque ad misericordiam adducetur, nisi tu ei signa doloris tui verbis, sententiis, voce, vultu, collacrimatione denique ostenderis.''
It is not easy to create anger against whomever you want, if you do not seem to care yourself; nor is it easy to create indignation, if your audience cannot perceive your own personal disgust; nor is it easy to create pity, if you cannot embody it yourself using your words, voice, face, and tears.
==== 196.-5 Sensi... ====
''Sensi equidem tum magnopere moveri iudices, cum excitavi maestum ac sordidatum senem et cum ista feci, quae tu, Crasse, laudas, non arte, de qua quid loquar nescio, sed motu magno animi ac dolore, ut discinderem tunicam, ut cicatrices ostenderem.''
I perceived that the judges were very moved then, when I roused the downcast shabby old man, and did something that you, Crassus, praise, not as technique, about which I have no comment, but under great stress of dissatisfaction: I tore open his tunic and showed his scars to the court.
==== 202.-3 bea Ita... ====
''Ita magis affectis animis iudicum quam doctis, tua, Sulpici, est a nobis tum accusatio victa.''
So it was that we defeated your charge, Sulpicius, with the minds of the judges more forced than informed.
==== 215.0 int Quare... ====
''Quare qui aut breviter aut summisse dicunt, docere iudicem possunt, commovere non possunt; in quo sunt omnia.''
So people who speak briefly or quietly are able to inform a judge, but not to excite him (on which all things depend).
==== 216.0 int/lan Illa... ====
''Illa autem, quae aut conciliationis causa leniter, aut permotionis vehemeter aguntur, contrariis commotionibus auferenda sunt, ut odio benevolentia, misericordia invidia tollatur.''
Appeals, whether intended to win favor slowly, or to disturb passionately, should be removed by contrary emotions, as when goodwill is removed by hate, pity by jealousy.
==== 217.0 lan/bea Ego... ====
''Ego vero, inquit Caesar, omni de re facetius puto posse [disputari] ab homine non inurbano, quam de ipsis facetiis disputari.''
Caesar says, "I think a non-dull man can be more witty in any discussion than to discuss actual witticisms."
==== 221.3 int/lan/bea Parcebat... ====
''Parcebat enim adversarii dignitati, in quo ipse conservabat suam; quod est hominibus facetis et dicacibus difficillimum, habere hominum rationem et temporum et ea, quae occurrant, cum salsissime dici possint, tenere.''
He was sparing his enemy's honor, in a way that preserved his own; for it is most difficult for witty and sarcastic men to have regard for men and times and, when something very witty can be said, to hold their tongue.
==== 230.0 int/lan/bea Omnino... ====
''Omnino probabiliora sunt, quae lacessiti dicimus, quam quae priores, nam et ingenii celeritas maior est, quae apparet in respondendo, et humanitatis est responsio.''
The things we say under stress tend to be more impressive, as mental speed is greater in responding, and to respond is human.
==== 231.-4 int/bea Erat... ====
''Erat autem tanta gravitas in Domitio, tanta auctoritas, ut, quod esset ab eo obiectum, lepore magis elevandum, quam contentione frangendum videretur.''
There was such weight in Domitio, such authority, that it seemed better for his charges to be made light of by pleasantry than broken by force.
==== 247.0 int/lan Temporis... ====
''Temporis igitar ratio, et ipsius dicacitatis moderatio et temperantia et raritas dictorum distinguet oratorem a scurra, et quod nos cum causa dicimus, non ut ridiculi videamur, sed ut proficiamus aliquid, illi totum diem et sine causa.''
Regard to occasion, moderation and control of our own sharpened rhetoric, and sparsity of words will distinguish the orator from the buffoon; also, we speak with purpose, not to seem ridiculous but to accomplish some benefit, while they jest all day without cause.
==== 247.7 int Risum... ====
''Risum quaesivit, qui est, mea sententia, vel tenuissimus ingenii fructus.''
He sought comedy, which is, in my view, the meekest fruit of intelligence.
==== 251.-2 int/lan/bea Ne... ====
''Ne multa: nullum genus est ioci, quo non ex eodem severa et gravia sumantur.''
It is enough to say there is no source of humor from which serious and weighty thoughts are not also derived.
==== 251.0 int/bea Atque... ====
''Atque hoc etiam animadvertendum est, non esse omnia ridicula faceta.''
It is also notable that not all that is funny is witty.
==== 253.-4 int/bea Nam... ====
''Nam quod, quibuscumque verbis dixeris, facetum tamen est, re continetur; quod mutatis verbis salem amittit, in verbis habet leporem omnem.''
For what, with whatever words you say it, is still humorous, is contained in the facts; what loses its humor when the words are changed, has all its charm in the words.
==== 255.-5 int/lan Ambiguum... ====
''Ambiguum per se ipsum probatur id quidem, ut ante dixi, vel maxime; ingeniosi enim videtur vim verbi in aliud atque ceteri accipiant, posse ducere; sed admirationem magis quam risum movet, nisi si quando incidit in aliud genus ridiculi.''
The play on words does very well on its own, as I said before, for a man seems to be clever who can divert the power of a word to a place where others cannot; but this wins admiration more than amusement, unless it is also amusing for another reason.
==== 261.-3 int/bea Natura... ====
''Natura enim nos, ut ante dixi, noster delectat error: ex quo, cum quasi decepti sumus expectatione, ridemus.''
As if cheated of our expectation, we laugh, for our error naturally delights us (as I said before).
==== 263.-3 bea Sunt... ====
''Sunt etiam illa venusta, ut in gravibus sententiis, sic in facetiis.''
They are pleasing also, even in weighty discussions.
==== 263.-2 int/bea Dixi... ====
''Dixi enim dudum, materiam aliam esse ioci, aliam severitatis; gravium autem et iocorum unam esse rationem.''
I said before the matter of a joke is different from that of serious work; but of heavy and light the pattern is the same.
==== 267.0 Etiam... ====
''Etiam illa quae minuendi aut augendi causa ad incredibilem admirationem efferuntur: velut tu, Crasse, in concione, 'ita sibi ipsum magnum videri Memmium ut in forum descendens caput ad fornicem Fabii demitteret.'''
Also, there are remarks intended to exaggerate something to an incredible degree; as when you, Crassus, said in a public meeting, "Memmius thinks himself so great that, when descending into the forum, he ducks his head to fit under the Arch of Fabius."
==== 295.2 non... ====
''non tam ut prosim causis elaborare soleo quam ut ne quid obsim; non quin enitendum sit in utroque, sed tamen multo est turpius oratori nocuisse videri causae quam non profuisse.''
My custom is to take pains, not so much to help my case, but simply not to hurt it. Of course, both should be pursued, but it is much more disgraceful for an orator to be deemed harmful to his own case than not to have helped it.
==== 301.0 int/bea Etenim... ====
''Etenim permulta sunt in causis in omni parte orationis circumspicienda ne quid offendas, ne quo irruas: saepe aliqui testis aut non laedit aut minus laedit nisi lacessatur; orat reus, urgent advocati ut invehamur, ut maledicamus, denique ut interrogemus: non moveor, non obtempero, non satisfacio- neque tamen ullam assequor laudem, homines enim imperiti facilius quod stulte dixeris reprehendere quam quod sapienter tacueris laudare possunt.''
For there are very many ways throughout a speech not to rush in or fall out: often a witness's silence would do no harm, or less harm, than if they testified; the defendant and his supporters implore us to attack, abuse, interrogate; but I am not moved; I do not submit; I do not apologize; nor do I seek any praise, since ignorant men can more readily blame your stupid behavior than praise you for acting wisely.
==== 307.-4 int/lan Omnis... ====
''Omnis cura mea solet in hoc versari semper—dicam enim saepius—si possim, ut boni efficiam aliquid dicendo, sin id minus, ut certe ne quid mali.''
All my care (as I often say) is embodied in accomplishing something good by speaking, if possible, and if not, in at least doing no harm.
==== 310.-2 bea/int equidem... ====
''equidem cum colligo argumenta causarum, non tam ea numerare soleo quam expendere.''
Indeed, when I gather arguments for a case, my habit is not to count them but to weigh them.
==== 315.0 int Hisce... ====
''Hisce omnibus rebus consideratis tum denique id quod primum est dicendum postremum soleo cogitare, quo utar exordio; nam si quando id primum invenire volui, nullum mihi occurrit nisi aut exile aut nugatorium aut vulgare aut commune.''
With all these things deliberated, I finally consider what comes first: how to begin the oration. For whenever I have looked for an introduction early, nothing has occurred to me that is not thin, trifling, commonplace, ordinary.
==== 333.3 bea sapientis... ====
''sapientis est consilium explicare suum de maximis rebus et honesti et diserti, ut mente providere, auctoritate probare, oratione persuadere possis.''
Making and explaining a plan on the greatest affairs is for a wise person who is also honest and eloquent, who can anticipate the future, affirm his authority, and use rhetoric powerfully.
==== 337.4 int/bea et... ====
''et quamquam una fere vis est eloquentiae, tamen quia summa dignitas est populi, gravissima causa rei publicae, maximi motus multitudinis, genus quoque dicendi grandius quoddam et illustrius esse adhibendum videtur; [maximaque pars orationis admovenda est ad animorum motus non numquam aut cohortatione aut commemoratione aliqua aut in spem aut in metum aut ad cupiditatem aut ad gloriam concitandos, saepe etiam a temeritate, iracundia, spe, iniuria, invidia, crudelitate revocandos].''
Because of the exceptionality of the people, the importance of the interests of the state, and the great motion of the crowd, it seems only appropriate that a higher kind of speech should be used, even though there is only one force of eloquence...
==== 338.0 int/lan Fit... ====
''Fit autem ut, quia maxima quasi oratoris scaena videatur contionis esse, natura ipsa ad ornatius dicendi genus excitemur; habet enim multitudo vim quandam talem ut, quemadmodum tibicen sine tibiis canere, sic orator sine multitudine audiente eloquens esse non possit.''
Because the greatest stage for an orator seems to be a public meeting, it happens naturally that we are roused to a more fancy kind of speaking; for crowds have a certain power allowing an orator to be eloquent, without which one is like a flute player without a flute.
==== 340.0 int/lan Nullo... ====
''Nullo autem loco plus facetiae prosunt et celeritas et breve aliquod dictum nec sine dignitate et cum lepore; nihil enim tam facile quam multitudo a tristitia et saepe ab acerbitate commode et breviter et acute et hilare dicto deducitur.''
But in no place do facetious remarks, a rapid style, and terse, clever, not undignified diction, profit a speaker more; for nothing so easily diverts a crowd from gloom and bitterness as a suitably sharp and cheerful remark.
==== 347.-3 int Magna... ====
''Magna etiam illa laus et admirabilis videri solet tulisse casus sapienter adversos, non fractum esse fortuna, retinuisse in rebus asperis dignitatem; neque tamen illa non ornant, habiti honores, decreta virtutis praemia, res gestae iudiciis hominum comprobatae; in quibus etiam felicitatem ipsam deorum immortalium iudicio tribui laudationis est.''
It is customarily seen as worthy of great and admirable praise to have born a disaster wisely, not to be broken by misfortune, and to have retained dignity in hard times; also recognized are honors held, rewards for virtue, and works ratified by judges of men; mere good fortune, on the other hand, does not deserve praise, and should be attributed to the gods.
==== 350.4 lan Perge... ====
''Pergo vero, inquit Crassus, libenter enim te cognitum iam artificem aliquandoque evolutum illis integumentis dissimulationis tuae nudatumque perspicio; et quod mihi nihil aut quod non multum relinquis, percommode facis, estque mihi gratum.''
Pray continue, said Crassus, for I happily see you now as a wise artist, finally drawn out and stripped of the shield of your pretended ignorance; indeed, it is brilliant that you left nothing or not much to me, and I am thankful for it.
==== 354.-2 int hac... ====
''hac tum re admonitus invenisse fertur ordinem esse maxime qui memoriae lumen afferret.''
Upon this suggestion he is said to have realized that an orderly arrangement is what best brings light to memory.
==== 363.-1 int/bea neque... ====
''neque eo minus eloquentiam tuam et multo magis virtutem et diligentiam admiror et simul gaudeo iudicium'' ''animi mei comprobari quod semper statui neminem sapientiae laudem et eloquentiae sine summo studio et labore et doctrina consequi posse.''
I admire your eloquence not much less and your energy and diligence much more, and at the same time I rejoice in the affirmation of my judgment that, as I always stated, nobody earns praise for wisdom and eloquence without the greatest study, work, and learning.
[[Category:History of Italy]]
2hyvxa2053ts4j3oj5k3idji06vii8y
2812349
2812348
2026-05-31T21:55:19Z
Atcovi
276019
2812349
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{literature}}
Cicero's fictional dialogue, mostly delivered in the voice of Marcus Antonius, grandfather of the famous general.
The Latin quotes are selected for interest (int), language (lan), and rhetoric (bea), and are translated into English. The line numbers are from the Loeb edition, and start counting from line 0 of the section. All translations are by Gus Wiseman (Nafindix), with the exception of any contributions from other users. The sources of the Latin quotes are:
# Loeb Classical Library 348, Harvard University Press, 1942; Latin text with facing English translation by E. W. Sutton.
# M. Tulli Ciceronis Rhetorica. M. Tullius Cicero. A. S. Wilkins, Ed. 1902. - <nowiki>http://data.perseus.org/texts/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi037</nowiki> or <nowiki>http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.02.0120</nowiki>
# The Latin Library. M. TVLLI CICERONIS DE ORATORE AD QVINTVM FRATREM LIBER SECVNDVS. <nowiki>https://www.thelatinlibrary.com/cicero/oratore1.shtml</nowiki>
[[File:Octavian_and_Antony_denarius_(obverse).jpg|Octavian and Antony denarius (obverse)]]
==== 4.0 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed fuit hoc in utroque eorum, ut Crassus non tam existimari vellet non didicisse, quam illa despicere, et nostrorum hominum in omni genere prudentiam Graecis anteferre; Antonius autem probabiliorem hoc populo orationem fore censebat suam, si omnino didicisse nunquam putaretur.''
Crassus didn't want so much to appear free of all learning, but simply to despise the Greek treatment, preferring our own; on the other hand, Antonius considered it better if the people thought he had no learning at all.
==== 18.5 int Omnium... ====
''Omnium autem ineptiarum, quae sunt innumerabiles, haud scio, an nulla sit maior, quam, ut illi solent, quocumque in loco, quoscumque inter homines visum est, de rebus aut difficillimis, aut non necessariis, argutissime disputare.''
Of countless ineptitudes, none is greater than their custom of trying to argue everywhere, with anybody.
==== 35.-3 int/bea Neque... ====
''Neque ulla non propria oratoris est res, quae quidem ornate dici graviterque debet.''
There is no argument that an orator cannot deliver with polish.
==== 35.0 bea Huius... ====
''Huius est in dando consilio de maximis rebus cum dignitate explicata sententia; eiusdem et languentis populi incitatio, et effrenati moderatio.''
The orator's work is to advise at the highest level, with gravity, and to rouse or subdue a crowd, ever holding their reins.
==== 35.3 bea Eadem... ====
''Eadem facultate et fraus hominum ad perniciem, et integritas ad salutem vocatur.''
The vector that drives deceitful people to destruction is opposite to the vector that drives faithful people to deliverance.
==== 36.0 lan/bea Historia... ====
''Historia vero testis temporum, lux veritatis, vita memoriae, magistra vitae, nuntia vetustatis, qua voce alia, nisi oratoris, immortalitati commendatur?''
By what voice and motion, if not the orator's, is the light of remembered reality- the harbinger of history- entrusted to immortality?
==== 45.-2 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed non omnia, quaecumque loquimur, mihi videntur ad artem et ad praecepta esse revocanda.''
But not everything we say needs to be reduced to art and doctrine.
==== 60.0 int Quid... ====
''Est, fatebor, aliquid tamen: ut, cum in sole ambulem, etiamsi aliam ob causam ambulem, fieri natura tamen, ut colorer: sic, cum istos libros ad Misenum (nam Romae vix licet) studiosius legerim, sentio illorum tactu orationem meam quasi colorari.''
One walking in the sun (for any reason) naturally gets a tan, and after eagerly reading your books at Misenum (they are scarcely allowed at Rome), their very influence seems to have tanned my rhetoric.
==== 61.0 int In... ====
''In philosophos vestros si quando incidi, deceptus indicibus librorum, quod sunt fere inscripti de rebus notis et illustribus, de virtute, de iustitia, de honestate, de voluptate, verbum prorsus nullum intellego: ita sunt angustis et'' ''concisis disputationibus illigati.''
When I light upon your thinkers, if I am deceived by the titles of their books (supposedly about "virtue", "justice", "honesty", "pleasure", and so on), I find only knots so tenuous and fragmentary that I cannot unravel a single word.
==== 66.1 int/bea Si... ====
''Si enim est oratoris, quaecumque res infinite posita sit, de ea posse dicere, dicendum erit ei, quanta sit solis magnitudo, quae forma terrae: de mathematicis, de musicis rebus non poterit, quin dicat, hoc onere suscepto, recusare.''
If it is for the orator to be able to speak continuously on any subject, this must include the size of the sun and the shape of the earth, and an orator could not even refuse to speak about music or pure mathematics, if prompted.
==== 73.-1 bea Omnium... ====
''Omnium sententiarum gravitate, omnium verborum ponderibus est utendum.''
The weight of all opinions– indeed, of all words– should be applied to this.
==== 84.0 lan/bea Sed... ====
''Sed hoc si in iure civili, si etiam in parvis aut mediocribus rebus doctiores assequi possunt, non idem sentio tanta hac in re, tamque immensa, posse fieri.''
Even though, in civil law, and in matters of slight or moderate importance, the learned can achieve this kind of order, I doubt it could hold up in such an immense affair as the present.
==== 98.0 int Atque... ====
''Atque esse tamen multos videmus, qui neminem imitentur et suapte natura, quod velint, sine cuiusquam similitudine consequantur.''
And yet, we see many who imitate nobody and follow their own natural path.
==== 101.3 int/bea In... ====
''nemo potest de ea re, quam non novit, non turpissime dicere.''
No person should talk who has not mastered his/her own subject.
==== 116.-5 int Ita... ====
''Ita omnis ratio dicendi tribus ad persuadendum rebus est nixa: ut probemus vera esse, quae defendimus; ut conciliemus eos nobis, qui audiunt; ut animos eorum, ad quemcumque causa postulabit Motum, vocemus.''
There are three parts to persuasive speech: we demonstrate our position; we win the audience; we get people to make things right.
==== 117.5 int/lan/bea Quod... ====
''Quod etiamsi ad instituendos adolescentulos magis aptum est, ut, simul ac posita causa sit, habeant quo se referant, unde statim expedita possint argumenta depromere, tamen et tardi ingeni est rivulos consectari, fontis rerum non videre, et iam aetatis est ususque nostri a capite quod velimus arcessere et unde omnia manent videre.''
Even if this is more appropriate for raising youths (so that, as soon as a case is put, they have something to refer to from which they can draw out suitable arguments immediately when they are needed in the future), yet it is a sign of slow temperament to cut down the streams of things while not seeing their sources, and it is the privilege of men of our age and experience to summon up what we want from the water's head and see where everything flows.
==== 118.0 lan/bea Et... ====
''Et, primum genus illud earum rerum, quae ad oratorem deferuntur, meditatum nobis in perpetuum ad omnem usum similium rerum esse debebit.''
And, first, the class of all possible subjects of oratory should be ever in our minds, in case of similarities to our case.
==== 124.4 bea Quod... ====
''Quod enim ornamentum, quae vis, qui animus, qua dignitas illi oratori defuit, qui in causa peroranda non dubitavit excitare reum consularem et eius diloricare tunicam et iudicibus cicatrices adversas senis imperatoris ostendere?''
What decoration, what power, what spirit, what honor does that orator lack who does not hesitate to conclude his defense of the former consul by tearing open the old general's shirt and showing the judges his scars?
==== 125.0 bea Potuit... ====
''Potuit hic locus tam anceps, tam inauditus, tam lubricus, tam novus sine quadam incredibili vi ac facultate dicendi tractari?''
Can an argument so divisive, so unheard-of, so slippery, so unfamiliar be handled without incredible strength and skill of speaking?
==== 132.-2 int Subactio... ====
''Subactio autem est usus, auditio, lectio, litterae.''
The cultivation is practice, listening, reading, and writing.
==== 133.0 bea Atque... ====
''Atque hic illud videndum est, in quo summus est error istorum magistrorum, ad quos liberos nostros mittimus, non quo hoc quidem ad dicendum magno opere pertineat, sed tamen ut videatis quam sit genus hoc eorum qui sibi eruditi videntur hebes atque impolitum.''
Make note of this profound error by those to whom we send our sons, not indeed that this has much to do with speaking, but you should see how dull and coarse they are, who consider themselves scholars.
==== 147.3 bea Ubi... ====
''Ubi eum locum omnem cogitatione saepseris, si modo usu rerum percallueris, nihil te effugiet atque omne, quod erit in re, occurret atque incidet.''
If you surround everything with cogitation, and if you are calloused from experience, every aspect of an affair comes up and falls, and nothing escapes you.
==== 148.2 int Haec... ====
''Haec praecipue colenda est nobis; haec semper adhibenda; haec nihil est quod non assequatur.''
This virtue ("diligentia" or drive) we should foster especially, as it applies to everything, and there is nothing it cannot attain.
==== 150.0 int/bea Inter... ====
''Inter ingenium quidem et diligentiam perpaulum loci reliquum est arti.''
Between talent and drive very little room remains for art.
==== 161.0 bea Carneadi... ====
''Carneadi vero vis incredibilis illa dicendi et varietas perquam esset optando nobis, qui nullam umquam in illis suis disputationibus rem defendit, quam non probarit, nullam oppugnavit, quam non everterit.''
We are delighted by Carneades' incredible force and diversity of speech, a man who never made a disputation he could not prove, and never set a target he could not overturn.
==== 162.0 int/lan/bea Ego... ====
''Ego autem, si quem nunc rudem plane institui ad dicendum velim, his potius tradam assiduis uno opere eandem incudem diem noctemque tundentibus, qui omnes tenuissimas particulas atque omnia minima mansa ut nutrices infantibus pueris in os inserant.''
For myself, if I wanted to train a student in oratory, I would entrust him to these men, who, assiduously hitting the same anvil day-and-night, would only feed him ideas that are easy to chew.
==== 178.2 int/lan Nihil... ====
''Nihil est enim in dicendo, Catule, maius, quam ut faveat oratori is, qui audiet, utque ipse sic moveatur, ut impetu quodam animi et perturbatione, magis quam iudicio aut consilio regatur.''
Nothing is more important in oratory, Catulus, than to win the favor of your listener, so that he is moved by mental impulse or emotion on top of reasoned judgement.
==== 182.7 int Sed... ====
''Sed haec adiuvant in oratore: lenitas vocis, vultus pudoris significatio, verborum comitas; si quid persequare'' ''acrius, ut invitus et coactus facere videare.''
These help the orator: mildness of voice, a modest-seeming face, friendly diction, and the ability to seem to be compelled to act unwillingly.
==== 184.5 int Tantum... ====
''Tantum autem efficitur sensu quodam ac ratione dicendi, ut quasi mores oratoris effingat oratio.''
So much is achieved by taste and style that the speech seems to depict the orator's character.
==== 186.0 int/bea Facilius... ====
''Facilius est enim currentem, ut aunt, incitare quam commovere languentem.''
It is easier to stoke, as they say, one who is already running, than to prod an under performer.
==== 190.0 bea Neque... ====
''Neque est enim facile perficere, ut irascatur cui tu velis, iudex, si tu ipse id lente ferre videare; neque ut oderit eum, quem tu velis, nisi te ipsum flagrantem odio ante viderit; neque ad misericordiam adducetur, nisi tu ei signa doloris tui verbis, sententiis, voce, vultu, collacrimatione denique ostenderis.''
It is not easy to create anger against whomever you want, if you do not seem to care yourself; nor is it easy to create indignation, if your audience cannot perceive your own personal disgust; nor is it easy to create pity, if you cannot embody it yourself using your words, voice, face, and tears.
==== 196.-5 Sensi... ====
''Sensi equidem tum magnopere moveri iudices, cum excitavi maestum ac sordidatum senem et cum ista feci, quae tu, Crasse, laudas, non arte, de qua quid loquar nescio, sed motu magno animi ac dolore, ut discinderem tunicam, ut cicatrices ostenderem.''
I perceived that the judges were very moved then, when I roused the downcast shabby old man, and did something that you, Crassus, praise, not as technique, about which I have no comment, but under great stress of dissatisfaction: I tore open his tunic and showed his scars to the court.
==== 202.-3 bea Ita... ====
''Ita magis affectis animis iudicum quam doctis, tua, Sulpici, est a nobis tum accusatio victa.''
So it was that we defeated your charge, Sulpicius, with the minds of the judges more forced than informed.
==== 215.0 int Quare... ====
''Quare qui aut breviter aut summisse dicunt, docere iudicem possunt, commovere non possunt; in quo sunt omnia.''
So people who speak briefly or quietly are able to inform a judge, but not to excite him (on which all things depend).
==== 216.0 int/lan Illa... ====
''Illa autem, quae aut conciliationis causa leniter, aut permotionis vehemeter aguntur, contrariis commotionibus auferenda sunt, ut odio benevolentia, misericordia invidia tollatur.''
Appeals, whether intended to win favor slowly, or to disturb passionately, should be removed by contrary emotions, as when goodwill is removed by hate, pity by jealousy.
==== 217.0 lan/bea Ego... ====
''Ego vero, inquit Caesar, omni de re facetius puto posse [disputari] ab homine non inurbano, quam de ipsis facetiis disputari.''
Caesar says, "I think a non-dull man can be more witty in any discussion than to discuss actual witticisms."
==== 221.3 int/lan/bea Parcebat... ====
''Parcebat enim adversarii dignitati, in quo ipse conservabat suam; quod est hominibus facetis et dicacibus difficillimum, habere hominum rationem et temporum et ea, quae occurrant, cum salsissime dici possint, tenere.''
He was sparing his enemy's honor, in a way that preserved his own; for it is most difficult for witty and sarcastic men to have regard for men and times and, when something very witty can be said, to hold their tongue.
==== 230.0 int/lan/bea Omnino... ====
''Omnino probabiliora sunt, quae lacessiti dicimus, quam quae priores, nam et ingenii celeritas maior est, quae apparet in respondendo, et humanitatis est responsio.''
The things we say under stress tend to be more impressive, as mental speed is greater in responding, and to respond is human.
==== 231.-4 int/bea Erat... ====
''Erat autem tanta gravitas in Domitio, tanta auctoritas, ut, quod esset ab eo obiectum, lepore magis elevandum, quam contentione frangendum videretur.''
There was such weight in Domitio, such authority, that it seemed better for his charges to be made light of by pleasantry than broken by force.
==== 247.0 int/lan Temporis... ====
''Temporis igitar ratio, et ipsius dicacitatis moderatio et temperantia et raritas dictorum distinguet oratorem a scurra, et quod nos cum causa dicimus, non ut ridiculi videamur, sed ut proficiamus aliquid, illi totum diem et sine causa.''
Regard to occasion, moderation and control of our own sharpened rhetoric, and sparsity of words will distinguish the orator from the buffoon; also, we speak with purpose, not to seem ridiculous but to accomplish some benefit, while they jest all day without cause.
==== 247.7 int Risum... ====
''Risum quaesivit, qui est, mea sententia, vel tenuissimus ingenii fructus.''
He sought comedy, which is, in my view, the meekest fruit of intelligence.
==== 251.-2 int/lan/bea Ne... ====
''Ne multa: nullum genus est ioci, quo non ex eodem severa et gravia sumantur.''
It is enough to say there is no source of humor from which serious and weighty thoughts are not also derived.
==== 251.0 int/bea Atque... ====
''Atque hoc etiam animadvertendum est, non esse omnia ridicula faceta.''
It is also notable that not all that is funny is witty.
==== 253.-4 int/bea Nam... ====
''Nam quod, quibuscumque verbis dixeris, facetum tamen est, re continetur; quod mutatis verbis salem amittit, in verbis habet leporem omnem.''
For what, with whatever words you say it, is still humorous, is contained in the facts; what loses its humor when the words are changed, has all its charm in the words.
==== 255.-5 int/lan Ambiguum... ====
''Ambiguum per se ipsum probatur id quidem, ut ante dixi, vel maxime; ingeniosi enim videtur vim verbi in aliud atque ceteri accipiant, posse ducere; sed admirationem magis quam risum movet, nisi si quando incidit in aliud genus ridiculi.''
The play on words does very well on its own, as I said before, for a man seems to be clever who can divert the power of a word to a place where others cannot; but this wins admiration more than amusement, unless it is also amusing for another reason.
==== 261.-3 int/bea Natura... ====
''Natura enim nos, ut ante dixi, noster delectat error: ex quo, cum quasi decepti sumus expectatione, ridemus.''
As if cheated of our expectation, we laugh, for our error naturally delights us (as I said before).
==== 263.-3 bea Sunt... ====
''Sunt etiam illa venusta, ut in gravibus sententiis, sic in facetiis.''
They are pleasing also, even in weighty discussions.
==== 263.-2 int/bea Dixi... ====
''Dixi enim dudum, materiam aliam esse ioci, aliam severitatis; gravium autem et iocorum unam esse rationem.''
I said before the matter of a joke is different from that of serious work; but of heavy and light the pattern is the same.
==== 267.0 Etiam... ====
''Etiam illa quae minuendi aut augendi causa ad incredibilem admirationem efferuntur: velut tu, Crasse, in concione, 'ita sibi ipsum magnum videri Memmium ut in forum descendens caput ad fornicem Fabii demitteret.'''
Also, there are remarks intended to exaggerate something to an incredible degree; as when you, Crassus, said in a public meeting, "Memmius thinks himself so great that, when descending into the forum, he ducks his head to fit under the Arch of Fabius."
==== 295.2 non... ====
''non tam ut prosim causis elaborare soleo quam ut ne quid obsim; non quin enitendum sit in utroque, sed tamen multo est turpius oratori nocuisse videri causae quam non profuisse.''
My custom is to take pains, not so much to help my case, but simply not to hurt it. Of course, both should be pursued, but it is much more disgraceful for an orator to be deemed harmful to his own case than not to have helped it.
==== 301.0 int/bea Etenim... ====
''Etenim permulta sunt in causis in omni parte orationis circumspicienda ne quid offendas, ne quo irruas: saepe aliqui testis aut non laedit aut minus laedit nisi lacessatur; orat reus, urgent advocati ut invehamur, ut maledicamus, denique ut interrogemus: non moveor, non obtempero, non satisfacio- neque tamen ullam assequor laudem, homines enim imperiti facilius quod stulte dixeris reprehendere quam quod sapienter tacueris laudare possunt.''
For there are very many ways throughout a speech not to rush in or fall out: often a witness's silence would do no harm, or less harm, than if they testified; the defendant and his supporters implore us to attack, abuse, interrogate; but I am not moved; I do not submit; I do not apologize; nor do I seek any praise, since ignorant men can more readily blame your stupid behavior than praise you for acting wisely.
==== 307.-4 int/lan Omnis... ====
''Omnis cura mea solet in hoc versari semper—dicam enim saepius—si possim, ut boni efficiam aliquid dicendo, sin id minus, ut certe ne quid mali.''
All my care (as I often say) is embodied in accomplishing something good by speaking, if possible, and if not, in at least doing no harm.
==== 310.-2 bea/int equidem... ====
''equidem cum colligo argumenta causarum, non tam ea numerare soleo quam expendere.''
Indeed, when I gather arguments for a case, my habit is not to count them but to weigh them.
==== 315.0 int Hisce... ====
''Hisce omnibus rebus consideratis tum denique id quod primum est dicendum postremum soleo cogitare, quo utar exordio; nam si quando id primum invenire volui, nullum mihi occurrit nisi aut exile aut nugatorium aut vulgare aut commune.''
With all these things deliberated, I finally consider what comes first: how to begin the oration. For whenever I have looked for an introduction early, nothing has occurred to me that is not thin, trifling, commonplace, ordinary.
==== 333.3 bea sapientis... ====
''sapientis est consilium explicare suum de maximis rebus et honesti et diserti, ut mente providere, auctoritate probare, oratione persuadere possis.''
Making and explaining a plan on the greatest affairs is for a wise person who is also honest and eloquent, who can anticipate the future, affirm his authority, and use rhetoric powerfully.
==== 337.4 int/bea et... ====
''et quamquam una fere vis est eloquentiae, tamen quia summa dignitas est populi, gravissima causa rei publicae, maximi motus multitudinis, genus quoque dicendi grandius quoddam et illustrius esse adhibendum videtur; [maximaque pars orationis admovenda est ad animorum motus non numquam aut cohortatione aut commemoratione aliqua aut in spem aut in metum aut ad cupiditatem aut ad gloriam concitandos, saepe etiam a temeritate, iracundia, spe, iniuria, invidia, crudelitate revocandos].''
Because of the exceptionality of the people, the importance of the interests of the state, and the great motion of the crowd, it seems only appropriate that a higher kind of speech should be used, even though there is only one force of eloquence...
==== 338.0 int/lan Fit... ====
''Fit autem ut, quia maxima quasi oratoris scaena videatur contionis esse, natura ipsa ad ornatius dicendi genus excitemur; habet enim multitudo vim quandam talem ut, quemadmodum tibicen sine tibiis canere, sic orator sine multitudine audiente eloquens esse non possit.''
Because the greatest stage for an orator seems to be a public meeting, it happens naturally that we are roused to a more fancy kind of speaking; for crowds have a certain power allowing an orator to be eloquent, without which one is like a flute player without a flute.
==== 340.0 int/lan Nullo... ====
''Nullo autem loco plus facetiae prosunt et celeritas et breve aliquod dictum nec sine dignitate et cum lepore; nihil enim tam facile quam multitudo a tristitia et saepe ab acerbitate commode et breviter et acute et hilare dicto deducitur.''
But in no place do facetious remarks, a rapid style, and terse, clever, not undignified diction, profit a speaker more; for nothing so easily diverts a crowd from gloom and bitterness as a suitably sharp and cheerful remark.
==== 347.-3 int Magna... ====
''Magna etiam illa laus et admirabilis videri solet tulisse casus sapienter adversos, non fractum esse fortuna, retinuisse in rebus asperis dignitatem; neque tamen illa non ornant, habiti honores, decreta virtutis praemia, res gestae iudiciis hominum comprobatae; in quibus etiam felicitatem ipsam deorum immortalium iudicio tribui laudationis est.''
It is customarily seen as worthy of great and admirable praise to have born a disaster wisely, not to be broken by misfortune, and to have retained dignity in hard times; also recognized are honors held, rewards for virtue, and works ratified by judges of men; mere good fortune, on the other hand, does not deserve praise, and should be attributed to the gods.
==== 350.4 lan Perge... ====
''Pergo vero, inquit Crassus, libenter enim te cognitum iam artificem aliquandoque evolutum illis integumentis dissimulationis tuae nudatumque perspicio; et quod mihi nihil aut quod non multum relinquis, percommode facis, estque mihi gratum.''
Pray continue, said Crassus, for I happily see you now as a wise artist, finally drawn out and stripped of the shield of your pretended ignorance; indeed, it is brilliant that you left nothing or not much to me, and I am thankful for it.
==== 354.-2 int hac... ====
''hac tum re admonitus invenisse fertur ordinem esse maxime qui memoriae lumen afferret.''
Upon this suggestion he is said to have realized that an orderly arrangement is what best brings light to memory.
==== 363.-1 int/bea neque... ====
''neque eo minus eloquentiam tuam et multo magis virtutem et diligentiam admiror et simul gaudeo iudicium'' ''animi mei comprobari quod semper statui neminem sapientiae laudem et eloquentiae sine summo studio et labore et doctrina consequi posse.''
I admire your eloquence not much less and your energy and diligence much more, and at the same time I rejoice in the affirmation of my judgment that, as I always stated, nobody earns praise for wisdom and eloquence without the greatest study, work, and learning.
[[Category:History of Italy]]
[[Category:Quotes]]
2ulvu7yzcnozu1kxdui79zsu6bgimog
2812356
2812349
2026-05-31T23:53:59Z
Nafindix
2919441
2812356
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{literature}}
Cicero's fictional dialogue, mostly delivered in the voice of Marcus Antonius, grandfather of the famous general.
The Latin quotes are selected for interest (int), language (lan), and rhetoric (bea), and are translated into English. The line numbers are from the Loeb edition, and start counting from line 0 of the section. All translations are by Gus Wiseman (Nafindix), with the exception of any contributions from other users. The sources of the Latin quotes are:
# Loeb Classical Library 348, Harvard University Press, 1942; Latin text with facing English translation by E. W. Sutton.
# M. Tulli Ciceronis Rhetorica. M. Tullius Cicero. A. S. Wilkins, Ed. 1902. - <nowiki>http://data.perseus.org/texts/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi037</nowiki> or <nowiki>http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.02.0120</nowiki>
# The Latin Library. M. TVLLI CICERONIS DE ORATORE AD QVINTVM FRATREM LIBER SECVNDVS. <nowiki>https://www.thelatinlibrary.com/cicero/oratore1.shtml</nowiki>
[[File:Marc Antony's Oration at Caesar's Funeral by George Edward Robertson.jpg|thumb]]
==== 4.0 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed fuit hoc in utroque eorum, ut Crassus non tam existimari vellet non didicisse, quam illa despicere, et nostrorum hominum in omni genere prudentiam Graecis anteferre; Antonius autem probabiliorem hoc populo orationem fore censebat suam, si omnino didicisse nunquam putaretur.''
Crassus didn't want so much to appear free of all learning, but simply to despise the Greek treatment, preferring our own; on the other hand, Antonius considered it better if the people thought he had no learning at all.
==== 18.5 int Omnium... ====
''Omnium autem ineptiarum, quae sunt innumerabiles, haud scio, an nulla sit maior, quam, ut illi solent, quocumque in loco, quoscumque inter homines visum est, de rebus aut difficillimis, aut non necessariis, argutissime disputare.''
Of countless ineptitudes, none is greater than their custom of trying to argue everywhere, with anybody.
==== 35.-3 int/bea Neque... ====
''Neque ulla non propria oratoris est res, quae quidem ornate dici graviterque debet.''
There is no argument that an orator cannot deliver with polish.
==== 35.0 bea Huius... ====
''Huius est in dando consilio de maximis rebus cum dignitate explicata sententia; eiusdem et languentis populi incitatio, et effrenati moderatio.''
The orator's work is to advise at the highest level, with gravity, and to rouse or subdue a crowd, ever holding their reins.
==== 35.3 bea Eadem... ====
''Eadem facultate et fraus hominum ad perniciem, et integritas ad salutem vocatur.''
The vector that drives deceitful people to destruction is opposite to the vector that drives faithful people to deliverance.
==== 36.0 lan/bea Historia... ====
''Historia vero testis temporum, lux veritatis, vita memoriae, magistra vitae, nuntia vetustatis, qua voce alia, nisi oratoris, immortalitati commendatur?''
By what voice and motion, if not the orator's, is the light of remembered reality- the harbinger of history- entrusted to immortality?
==== 45.-2 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed non omnia, quaecumque loquimur, mihi videntur ad artem et ad praecepta esse revocanda.''
But not everything we say needs to be reduced to art and doctrine.
==== 60.0 int Quid... ====
''Est, fatebor, aliquid tamen: ut, cum in sole ambulem, etiamsi aliam ob causam ambulem, fieri natura tamen, ut colorer: sic, cum istos libros ad Misenum (nam Romae vix licet) studiosius legerim, sentio illorum tactu orationem meam quasi colorari.''
One walking in the sun (for any reason) naturally gets a tan, and after eagerly reading your books at Misenum (they are scarcely allowed at Rome), their very influence seems to have tanned my rhetoric.
==== 61.0 int In... ====
''In philosophos vestros si quando incidi, deceptus indicibus librorum, quod sunt fere inscripti de rebus notis et illustribus, de virtute, de iustitia, de honestate, de voluptate, verbum prorsus nullum intellego: ita sunt angustis et'' ''concisis disputationibus illigati.''
When I light upon your thinkers, if I am deceived by the titles of their books (supposedly about "virtue", "justice", "honesty", "pleasure", and so on), I find only knots so tenuous and fragmentary that I cannot unravel a single word.
==== 66.1 int/bea Si... ====
''Si enim est oratoris, quaecumque res infinite posita sit, de ea posse dicere, dicendum erit ei, quanta sit solis magnitudo, quae forma terrae: de mathematicis, de musicis rebus non poterit, quin dicat, hoc onere suscepto, recusare.''
If it is for the orator to be able to speak continuously on any subject, this must include the size of the sun and the shape of the earth, and an orator could not even refuse to speak about music or pure mathematics, if prompted.
==== 73.-1 bea Omnium... ====
''Omnium sententiarum gravitate, omnium verborum ponderibus est utendum.''
The weight of all opinions– indeed, of all words– should be applied to this.
==== 84.0 lan/bea Sed... ====
''Sed hoc si in iure civili, si etiam in parvis aut mediocribus rebus doctiores assequi possunt, non idem sentio tanta hac in re, tamque immensa, posse fieri.''
Even though, in civil law, and in matters of slight or moderate importance, the learned can achieve this kind of order, I doubt it could hold up in such an immense affair as the present.
==== 98.0 int Atque... ====
''Atque esse tamen multos videmus, qui neminem imitentur et suapte natura, quod velint, sine cuiusquam similitudine consequantur.''
And yet, we see many who imitate nobody and follow their own natural path.
==== 101.3 int/bea In... ====
''nemo potest de ea re, quam non novit, non turpissime dicere.''
No person should talk who has not mastered his/her own subject.
==== 116.-5 int Ita... ====
''Ita omnis ratio dicendi tribus ad persuadendum rebus est nixa: ut probemus vera esse, quae defendimus; ut conciliemus eos nobis, qui audiunt; ut animos eorum, ad quemcumque causa postulabit Motum, vocemus.''
There are three parts to persuasive speech: we demonstrate our position; we win the audience; we get people to make things right.
==== 117.5 int/lan/bea Quod... ====
''Quod etiamsi ad instituendos adolescentulos magis aptum est, ut, simul ac posita causa sit, habeant quo se referant, unde statim expedita possint argumenta depromere, tamen et tardi ingeni est rivulos consectari, fontis rerum non videre, et iam aetatis est ususque nostri a capite quod velimus arcessere et unde omnia manent videre.''
Even if this is more appropriate for raising youths (so that, as soon as a case is put, they have something to refer to from which they can draw out suitable arguments immediately when they are needed in the future), yet it is a sign of slow temperament to cut down the streams of things while not seeing their sources, and it is the privilege of men of our age and experience to summon up what we want from the water's head and see where everything flows.
==== 118.0 lan/bea Et... ====
''Et, primum genus illud earum rerum, quae ad oratorem deferuntur, meditatum nobis in perpetuum ad omnem usum similium rerum esse debebit.''
And, first, the class of all possible subjects of oratory should be ever in our minds, in case of similarities to our case.
==== 124.4 bea Quod... ====
''Quod enim ornamentum, quae vis, qui animus, qua dignitas illi oratori defuit, qui in causa peroranda non dubitavit excitare reum consularem et eius diloricare tunicam et iudicibus cicatrices adversas senis imperatoris ostendere?''
What decoration, what power, what spirit, what honor does that orator lack who does not hesitate to conclude his defense of the former consul by tearing open the old general's shirt and showing the judges his scars?
==== 125.0 bea Potuit... ====
''Potuit hic locus tam anceps, tam inauditus, tam lubricus, tam novus sine quadam incredibili vi ac facultate dicendi tractari?''
Can an argument so divisive, so unheard-of, so slippery, so unfamiliar be handled without incredible strength and skill of speaking?
==== 132.-2 int Subactio... ====
''Subactio autem est usus, auditio, lectio, litterae.''
The cultivation is practice, listening, reading, and writing.
==== 133.0 bea Atque... ====
''Atque hic illud videndum est, in quo summus est error istorum magistrorum, ad quos liberos nostros mittimus, non quo hoc quidem ad dicendum magno opere pertineat, sed tamen ut videatis quam sit genus hoc eorum qui sibi eruditi videntur hebes atque impolitum.''
Make note of this profound error by those to whom we send our sons, not indeed that this has much to do with speaking, but you should see how dull and coarse they are, who consider themselves scholars.
==== 147.3 bea Ubi... ====
''Ubi eum locum omnem cogitatione saepseris, si modo usu rerum percallueris, nihil te effugiet atque omne, quod erit in re, occurret atque incidet.''
If you surround everything with cogitation, and if you are calloused from experience, every aspect of an affair comes up and falls, and nothing escapes you.
==== 148.2 int Haec... ====
''Haec praecipue colenda est nobis; haec semper adhibenda; haec nihil est quod non assequatur.''
This virtue ("diligentia" or drive) we should foster especially, as it applies to everything, and there is nothing it cannot attain.
==== 150.0 int/bea Inter... ====
''Inter ingenium quidem et diligentiam perpaulum loci reliquum est arti.''
Between talent and drive very little room remains for art.
==== 161.0 bea Carneadi... ====
''Carneadi vero vis incredibilis illa dicendi et varietas perquam esset optando nobis, qui nullam umquam in illis suis disputationibus rem defendit, quam non probarit, nullam oppugnavit, quam non everterit.''
We are delighted by Carneades' incredible force and diversity of speech, a man who never made a disputation he could not prove, and never set a target he could not overturn.
==== 162.0 int/lan/bea Ego... ====
''Ego autem, si quem nunc rudem plane institui ad dicendum velim, his potius tradam assiduis uno opere eandem incudem diem noctemque tundentibus, qui omnes tenuissimas particulas atque omnia minima mansa ut nutrices infantibus pueris in os inserant.''
For myself, if I wanted to train a student in oratory, I would entrust him to these men, who, assiduously hitting the same anvil day-and-night, would only feed him ideas that are easy to chew.
==== 178.2 int/lan Nihil... ====
''Nihil est enim in dicendo, Catule, maius, quam ut faveat oratori is, qui audiet, utque ipse sic moveatur, ut impetu quodam animi et perturbatione, magis quam iudicio aut consilio regatur.''
Nothing is more important in oratory, Catulus, than to win the favor of your listener, so that he is moved by mental impulse or emotion on top of reasoned judgement.
==== 182.7 int Sed... ====
''Sed haec adiuvant in oratore: lenitas vocis, vultus pudoris significatio, verborum comitas; si quid persequare'' ''acrius, ut invitus et coactus facere videare.''
These help the orator: mildness of voice, a modest-seeming face, friendly diction, and the ability to seem to be compelled to act unwillingly.
==== 184.5 int Tantum... ====
''Tantum autem efficitur sensu quodam ac ratione dicendi, ut quasi mores oratoris effingat oratio.''
So much is achieved by taste and style that the speech seems to depict the orator's character.
==== 186.0 int/bea Facilius... ====
''Facilius est enim currentem, ut aunt, incitare quam commovere languentem.''
It is easier to stoke, as they say, one who is already running, than to prod an under performer.
==== 190.0 bea Neque... ====
''Neque est enim facile perficere, ut irascatur cui tu velis, iudex, si tu ipse id lente ferre videare; neque ut oderit eum, quem tu velis, nisi te ipsum flagrantem odio ante viderit; neque ad misericordiam adducetur, nisi tu ei signa doloris tui verbis, sententiis, voce, vultu, collacrimatione denique ostenderis.''
It is not easy to create anger against whomever you want, if you do not seem to care yourself; nor is it easy to create indignation, if your audience cannot perceive your own personal disgust; nor is it easy to create pity, if you cannot embody it yourself using your words, voice, face, and tears.
==== 196.-5 Sensi... ====
''Sensi equidem tum magnopere moveri iudices, cum excitavi maestum ac sordidatum senem et cum ista feci, quae tu, Crasse, laudas, non arte, de qua quid loquar nescio, sed motu magno animi ac dolore, ut discinderem tunicam, ut cicatrices ostenderem.''
I perceived that the judges were very moved then, when I roused the downcast shabby old man, and did something that you, Crassus, praise, not as technique, about which I have no comment, but under great stress of dissatisfaction: I tore open his tunic and showed his scars to the court.
==== 202.-3 bea Ita... ====
''Ita magis affectis animis iudicum quam doctis, tua, Sulpici, est a nobis tum accusatio victa.''
So it was that we defeated your charge, Sulpicius, with the minds of the judges more forced than informed.
==== 215.0 int Quare... ====
''Quare qui aut breviter aut summisse dicunt, docere iudicem possunt, commovere non possunt; in quo sunt omnia.''
So people who speak briefly or quietly are able to inform a judge, but not to excite him (on which all things depend).
==== 216.0 int/lan Illa... ====
''Illa autem, quae aut conciliationis causa leniter, aut permotionis vehemeter aguntur, contrariis commotionibus auferenda sunt, ut odio benevolentia, misericordia invidia tollatur.''
Appeals, whether intended to win favor slowly, or to disturb passionately, should be removed by contrary emotions, as when goodwill is removed by hate, pity by jealousy.
==== 217.0 lan/bea Ego... ====
''Ego vero, inquit Caesar, omni de re facetius puto posse [disputari] ab homine non inurbano, quam de ipsis facetiis disputari.''
Caesar says, "I think a non-dull man can be more witty in any discussion than to discuss actual witticisms."
==== 221.3 int/lan/bea Parcebat... ====
''Parcebat enim adversarii dignitati, in quo ipse conservabat suam; quod est hominibus facetis et dicacibus difficillimum, habere hominum rationem et temporum et ea, quae occurrant, cum salsissime dici possint, tenere.''
He was sparing his enemy's honor, in a way that preserved his own; for it is most difficult for witty and sarcastic men to have regard for men and times and, when something very witty can be said, to hold their tongue.
==== 230.0 int/lan/bea Omnino... ====
''Omnino probabiliora sunt, quae lacessiti dicimus, quam quae priores, nam et ingenii celeritas maior est, quae apparet in respondendo, et humanitatis est responsio.''
The things we say under stress tend to be more impressive, as mental speed is greater in responding, and to respond is human.
==== 231.-4 int/bea Erat... ====
''Erat autem tanta gravitas in Domitio, tanta auctoritas, ut, quod esset ab eo obiectum, lepore magis elevandum, quam contentione frangendum videretur.''
There was such weight in Domitio, such authority, that it seemed better for his charges to be made light of by pleasantry than broken by force.
==== 247.0 int/lan Temporis... ====
''Temporis igitar ratio, et ipsius dicacitatis moderatio et temperantia et raritas dictorum distinguet oratorem a scurra, et quod nos cum causa dicimus, non ut ridiculi videamur, sed ut proficiamus aliquid, illi totum diem et sine causa.''
Regard to occasion, moderation and control of our own sharpened rhetoric, and sparsity of words will distinguish the orator from the buffoon; also, we speak with purpose, not to seem ridiculous but to accomplish some benefit, while they jest all day without cause.
==== 247.7 int Risum... ====
''Risum quaesivit, qui est, mea sententia, vel tenuissimus ingenii fructus.''
He sought comedy, which is, in my view, the meekest fruit of intelligence.
==== 251.-2 int/lan/bea Ne... ====
''Ne multa: nullum genus est ioci, quo non ex eodem severa et gravia sumantur.''
It is enough to say there is no source of humor from which serious and weighty thoughts are not also derived.
==== 251.0 int/bea Atque... ====
''Atque hoc etiam animadvertendum est, non esse omnia ridicula faceta.''
It is also notable that not all that is funny is witty.
==== 253.-4 int/bea Nam... ====
''Nam quod, quibuscumque verbis dixeris, facetum tamen est, re continetur; quod mutatis verbis salem amittit, in verbis habet leporem omnem.''
For what, with whatever words you say it, is still humorous, is contained in the facts; what loses its humor when the words are changed, has all its charm in the words.
==== 255.-5 int/lan Ambiguum... ====
''Ambiguum per se ipsum probatur id quidem, ut ante dixi, vel maxime; ingeniosi enim videtur vim verbi in aliud atque ceteri accipiant, posse ducere; sed admirationem magis quam risum movet, nisi si quando incidit in aliud genus ridiculi.''
The play on words does very well on its own, as I said before, for a man seems to be clever who can divert the power of a word to a place where others cannot; but this wins admiration more than amusement, unless it is also amusing for another reason.
==== 261.-3 int/bea Natura... ====
''Natura enim nos, ut ante dixi, noster delectat error: ex quo, cum quasi decepti sumus expectatione, ridemus.''
As if cheated of our expectation, we laugh, for our error naturally delights us (as I said before).
==== 263.-3 bea Sunt... ====
''Sunt etiam illa venusta, ut in gravibus sententiis, sic in facetiis.''
They are pleasing also, even in weighty discussions.
==== 263.-2 int/bea Dixi... ====
''Dixi enim dudum, materiam aliam esse ioci, aliam severitatis; gravium autem et iocorum unam esse rationem.''
I said before the matter of a joke is different from that of serious work; but of heavy and light the pattern is the same.
==== 267.0 Etiam... ====
''Etiam illa quae minuendi aut augendi causa ad incredibilem admirationem efferuntur: velut tu, Crasse, in concione, 'ita sibi ipsum magnum videri Memmium ut in forum descendens caput ad fornicem Fabii demitteret.'''
Also, there are remarks intended to exaggerate something to an incredible degree; as when you, Crassus, said in a public meeting, "Memmius thinks himself so great that, when descending into the forum, he ducks his head to fit under the Arch of Fabius."
==== 295.2 non... ====
''non tam ut prosim causis elaborare soleo quam ut ne quid obsim; non quin enitendum sit in utroque, sed tamen multo est turpius oratori nocuisse videri causae quam non profuisse.''
My custom is to take pains, not so much to help my case, but simply not to hurt it. Of course, both should be pursued, but it is much more disgraceful for an orator to be deemed harmful to his own case than not to have helped it.
==== 301.0 int/bea Etenim... ====
''Etenim permulta sunt in causis in omni parte orationis circumspicienda ne quid offendas, ne quo irruas: saepe aliqui testis aut non laedit aut minus laedit nisi lacessatur; orat reus, urgent advocati ut invehamur, ut maledicamus, denique ut interrogemus: non moveor, non obtempero, non satisfacio- neque tamen ullam assequor laudem, homines enim imperiti facilius quod stulte dixeris reprehendere quam quod sapienter tacueris laudare possunt.''
For there are very many ways throughout a speech not to rush in or fall out: often a witness's silence would do no harm, or less harm, than if they testified; the defendant and his supporters implore us to attack, abuse, interrogate; but I am not moved; I do not submit; I do not apologize; nor do I seek any praise, since ignorant men can more readily blame your stupid behavior than praise you for acting wisely.
==== 307.-4 int/lan Omnis... ====
''Omnis cura mea solet in hoc versari semper—dicam enim saepius—si possim, ut boni efficiam aliquid dicendo, sin id minus, ut certe ne quid mali.''
All my care (as I often say) is embodied in accomplishing something good by speaking, if possible, and if not, in at least doing no harm.
==== 310.-2 bea/int equidem... ====
''equidem cum colligo argumenta causarum, non tam ea numerare soleo quam expendere.''
Indeed, when I gather arguments for a case, my habit is not to count them but to weigh them.
==== 315.0 int Hisce... ====
''Hisce omnibus rebus consideratis tum denique id quod primum est dicendum postremum soleo cogitare, quo utar exordio; nam si quando id primum invenire volui, nullum mihi occurrit nisi aut exile aut nugatorium aut vulgare aut commune.''
With all these things deliberated, I finally consider what comes first: how to begin the oration. For whenever I have looked for an introduction early, nothing has occurred to me that is not thin, trifling, commonplace, ordinary.
==== 333.3 bea sapientis... ====
''sapientis est consilium explicare suum de maximis rebus et honesti et diserti, ut mente providere, auctoritate probare, oratione persuadere possis.''
Making and explaining a plan on the greatest affairs is for a wise person who is also honest and eloquent, who can anticipate the future, affirm his authority, and use rhetoric powerfully.
==== 337.4 int/bea et... ====
''et quamquam una fere vis est eloquentiae, tamen quia summa dignitas est populi, gravissima causa rei publicae, maximi motus multitudinis, genus quoque dicendi grandius quoddam et illustrius esse adhibendum videtur; [maximaque pars orationis admovenda est ad animorum motus non numquam aut cohortatione aut commemoratione aliqua aut in spem aut in metum aut ad cupiditatem aut ad gloriam concitandos, saepe etiam a temeritate, iracundia, spe, iniuria, invidia, crudelitate revocandos].''
Because of the exceptionality of the people, the importance of the interests of the state, and the great motion of the crowd, it seems only appropriate that a higher kind of speech should be used, even though there is only one force of eloquence...
==== 338.0 int/lan Fit... ====
''Fit autem ut, quia maxima quasi oratoris scaena videatur contionis esse, natura ipsa ad ornatius dicendi genus excitemur; habet enim multitudo vim quandam talem ut, quemadmodum tibicen sine tibiis canere, sic orator sine multitudine audiente eloquens esse non possit.''
Because the greatest stage for an orator seems to be a public meeting, it happens naturally that we are roused to a more fancy kind of speaking; for crowds have a certain power allowing an orator to be eloquent, without which one is like a flute player without a flute.
==== 340.0 int/lan Nullo... ====
''Nullo autem loco plus facetiae prosunt et celeritas et breve aliquod dictum nec sine dignitate et cum lepore; nihil enim tam facile quam multitudo a tristitia et saepe ab acerbitate commode et breviter et acute et hilare dicto deducitur.''
But in no place do facetious remarks, a rapid style, and terse, clever, not undignified diction, profit a speaker more; for nothing so easily diverts a crowd from gloom and bitterness as a suitably sharp and cheerful remark.
==== 347.-3 int Magna... ====
''Magna etiam illa laus et admirabilis videri solet tulisse casus sapienter adversos, non fractum esse fortuna, retinuisse in rebus asperis dignitatem; neque tamen illa non ornant, habiti honores, decreta virtutis praemia, res gestae iudiciis hominum comprobatae; in quibus etiam felicitatem ipsam deorum immortalium iudicio tribui laudationis est.''
It is customarily seen as worthy of great and admirable praise to have born a disaster wisely, not to be broken by misfortune, and to have retained dignity in hard times; also recognized are honors held, rewards for virtue, and works ratified by judges of men; mere good fortune, on the other hand, does not deserve praise, and should be attributed to the gods.
==== 350.4 lan Perge... ====
''Pergo vero, inquit Crassus, libenter enim te cognitum iam artificem aliquandoque evolutum illis integumentis dissimulationis tuae nudatumque perspicio; et quod mihi nihil aut quod non multum relinquis, percommode facis, estque mihi gratum.''
Pray continue, said Crassus, for I happily see you now as a wise artist, finally drawn out and stripped of the shield of your pretended ignorance; indeed, it is brilliant that you left nothing or not much to me, and I am thankful for it.
==== 354.-2 int hac... ====
''hac tum re admonitus invenisse fertur ordinem esse maxime qui memoriae lumen afferret.''
Upon this suggestion he is said to have realized that an orderly arrangement is what best brings light to memory.
==== 363.-1 int/bea neque... ====
''neque eo minus eloquentiam tuam et multo magis virtutem et diligentiam admiror et simul gaudeo iudicium'' ''animi mei comprobari quod semper statui neminem sapientiae laudem et eloquentiae sine summo studio et labore et doctrina consequi posse.''
I admire your eloquence not much less and your energy and diligence much more, and at the same time I rejoice in the affirmation of my judgment that, as I always stated, nobody earns praise for wisdom and eloquence without the greatest study, work, and learning.
[[Category:History of Italy]]
[[Category:Quotes]]
ep0hrzit57da76l33pf6c4d5ujb5eoz
2812384
2812356
2026-06-01T01:04:08Z
Nafindix
2919441
2812384
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{literature}}
Cicero's fictional dialogue, mostly delivered in the voice of Marcus Antonius, grandfather of the famous general.
The Latin quotes are selected for interest (int), language (lan), and rhetoric (bea), and are translated into English. The line numbers are from the Loeb edition, and start counting from line 0 of the section. All translations are by Gus Wiseman (Nafindix), with the exception of any contributions from other users. The sources of the Latin quotes are:
# Loeb Classical Library 348, Harvard University Press, 1942; Latin text with facing English translation by E. W. Sutton.
# M. Tulli Ciceronis Rhetorica. M. Tullius Cicero. A. S. Wilkins, Ed. 1902. - <nowiki>http://data.perseus.org/texts/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi037</nowiki> or <nowiki>http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.02.0120</nowiki>
# The Latin Library. M. TVLLI CICERONIS DE ORATORE AD QVINTVM FRATREM LIBER SECVNDVS. <nowiki>https://www.thelatinlibrary.com/cicero/oratore1.shtml</nowiki>
[[File:Marc Antony's Oration at Caesar's Funeral by George Edward Robertson.jpg|thumb]]
==== 4.0 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed fuit hoc in utroque eorum, ut Crassus non tam existimari vellet non didicisse, quam illa despicere, et nostrorum hominum in omni genere prudentiam Graecis anteferre; Antonius autem probabiliorem hoc populo orationem fore censebat suam, si omnino didicisse nunquam putaretur.''
Crassus didn't want so much to appear free of all learning, but simply to despise the Greek treatment, preferring our own; on the other hand, Antonius considered it better if the people thought he had no learning at all.
==== 18.5 int Omnium... ====
''Omnium autem ineptiarum, quae sunt innumerabiles, haud scio, an nulla sit maior, quam, ut illi solent, quocumque in loco, quoscumque inter homines visum est, de rebus aut difficillimis, aut non necessariis, argutissime disputare.''
Of countless ineptitudes, none is greater than their custom of trying to argue everywhere, with anybody.
==== 35.-3 int/bea Neque... ====
''Neque ulla non propria oratoris est res, quae quidem ornate dici graviterque debet.''
There is no argument that an orator cannot deliver with polish.
==== 35.0 bea Huius... ====
''Huius est in dando consilio de maximis rebus cum dignitate explicata sententia; eiusdem et languentis populi incitatio, et effrenati moderatio.''
The orator's work is to advise at the highest level, with gravity, and to rouse or subdue a crowd, ever holding the reins.
==== 35.3 bea Eadem... ====
''Eadem facultate et fraus hominum ad perniciem, et integritas ad salutem vocatur.''
The vector that drives deceitful people to destruction is opposite to the vector that drives faithful people to deliverance.
==== 36.0 lan/bea Historia... ====
''Historia vero testis temporum, lux veritatis, vita memoriae, magistra vitae, nuntia vetustatis, qua voce alia, nisi oratoris, immortalitati commendatur?''
By what voice and motion, if not the orator's, is the light of remembered reality– the harbinger of history– entrusted to immortality?
==== 45.-2 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed non omnia, quaecumque loquimur, mihi videntur ad artem et ad praecepta esse revocanda.''
But not everything we say needs to be reduced to art and doctrine.
==== 60.0 int Quid... ====
''Est, fatebor, aliquid tamen: ut, cum in sole ambulem, etiamsi aliam ob causam ambulem, fieri natura tamen, ut colorer: sic, cum istos libros ad Misenum (nam Romae vix licet) studiosius legerim, sentio illorum tactu orationem meam quasi colorari.''
One walking in the sun (for any reason) naturally gets a tan, and after eagerly reading your books at Misenum (they are scarcely allowed at Rome), their very influence seems to have tanned my speech.
==== 61.0 int In... ====
''In philosophos vestros si quando incidi, deceptus indicibus librorum, quod sunt fere inscripti de rebus notis et illustribus, de virtute, de iustitia, de honestate, de voluptate, verbum prorsus nullum intellego: ita sunt angustis et'' ''concisis disputationibus illigati.''
When I light upon your thinkers, if I am deceived by the titles of their books (supposedly about "virtue", "justice", "honesty", "pleasure", and so on), I find only knots so tenuous and fragmentary that I cannot unravel a single word.
==== 66.1 int/bea Si... ====
''Si enim est oratoris, quaecumque res infinite posita sit, de ea posse dicere, dicendum erit ei, quanta sit solis magnitudo, quae forma terrae: de mathematicis, de musicis rebus non poterit, quin dicat, hoc onere suscepto, recusare.''
If it is for the orator to be able to speak continuously on any subject, this must include the size of the sun and the shape of the earth, and an orator could not even refuse to speak about music or pure mathematics, if prompted.
==== 84.0 lan/bea Sed... ====
''Sed hoc si in iure civili, si etiam in parvis aut mediocribus rebus doctiores assequi possunt, non idem sentio tanta hac in re, tamque immensa, posse fieri.''
Even though, in civil law, and in matters of slight or moderate importance, the learned can achieve this kind of order, I doubt it could hold up in such an immense affair as the present.
==== 98.0 int Atque... ====
''Atque esse tamen multos videmus, qui neminem imitentur et suapte natura, quod velint, sine cuiusquam similitudine consequantur.''
And yet, we see many who imitate nobody and follow their own natural path.
==== 101.3 int/bea In... ====
''nemo potest de ea re, quam non novit, non turpissime dicere.''
No person should talk who has not mastered his/her own subject.
==== 116.-5 int Ita... ====
''Ita omnis ratio dicendi tribus ad persuadendum rebus est nixa: ut probemus vera esse, quae defendimus; ut conciliemus eos nobis, qui audiunt; ut animos eorum, ad quemcumque causa postulabit Motum, vocemus.''
There are three parts to persuasive speech: we demonstrate our position; we win the audience; we get people to make things right.
==== 117.5 int/lan/bea Quod... ====
''Quod etiamsi ad instituendos adolescentulos magis aptum est, ut, simul ac posita causa sit, habeant quo se referant, unde statim expedita possint argumenta depromere, tamen et tardi ingeni est rivulos consectari, fontis rerum non videre, et iam aetatis est ususque nostri a capite quod velimus arcessere et unde omnia manent videre.''
Even if this is more appropriate for raising youths (so that, as soon as a case is put, they have something to refer to from which they can draw out suitable arguments immediately when they are needed in the future), yet it is a sign of slow temperament to cut down the streams of things while not seeing their sources, and it is the privilege of men of our age and experience to summon up what we want from the water's head and see where everything flows.
==== 124.4 bea Quod... ====
''Quod enim ornamentum, quae vis, qui animus, qua dignitas illi oratori defuit, qui in causa peroranda non dubitavit excitare reum consularem et eius diloricare tunicam et iudicibus cicatrices adversas senis imperatoris ostendere?''
What decoration, what power, what spirit, what honor does that orator lack who does not hesitate to conclude his defense of the former consul by tearing open the old general's shirt and showing the judges his scars?
==== 125.0 bea Potuit... ====
''Potuit hic locus tam anceps, tam inauditus, tam lubricus, tam novus sine quadam incredibili vi ac facultate dicendi tractari?''
Can an argument so divisive, so unheard-of, so slippery, so unfamiliar be handled without incredible strength and skill of speaking?
==== 132.-2 int Subactio... ====
''Subactio autem est usus, auditio, lectio, litterae.''
The cultivation is practice, listening, reading, and writing.
==== 133.0 bea Atque... ====
''Atque hic illud videndum est, in quo summus est error istorum magistrorum, ad quos liberos nostros mittimus, non quo hoc quidem ad dicendum magno opere pertineat, sed tamen ut videatis quam sit genus hoc eorum qui sibi eruditi videntur hebes atque impolitum.''
Make note of this profound error by those to whom we send our sons, not indeed that this has much to do with speaking, but you should see how dull and coarse they are, who consider themselves scholars.
==== 147.3 bea Ubi... ====
''Ubi eum locum omnem cogitatione saepseris, si modo usu rerum percallueris, nihil te effugiet atque omne, quod erit in re, occurret atque incidet.''
If you surround everything with cogitation, and if you are calloused from experience, every aspect of an affair comes up and falls, and nothing escapes you.
==== 148.2 int Haec... ====
''Haec praecipue colenda est nobis; haec semper adhibenda; haec nihil est quod non assequatur.''
This virtue ("diligentia" or drive) we should foster especially, as it applies to everything, and there is nothing it cannot attain.
==== 150.0 int/bea Inter... ====
''Inter ingenium quidem et diligentiam perpaulum loci reliquum est arti.''
Between talent and drive very little room remains for art.
==== 161.0 bea Carneadi... ====
''Carneadi vero vis incredibilis illa dicendi et varietas perquam esset optando nobis, qui nullam umquam in illis suis disputationibus rem defendit, quam non probarit, nullam oppugnavit, quam non everterit.''
We are delighted by Carneades' incredible force and diversity of speech, a man who never made a disputation he could not prove, and never set a target he could not overturn.
==== 162.0 int/lan/bea Ego... ====
''Ego autem, si quem nunc rudem plane institui ad dicendum velim, his potius tradam assiduis uno opere eandem incudem diem noctemque tundentibus, qui omnes tenuissimas particulas atque omnia minima mansa ut nutrices infantibus pueris in os inserant.''
For myself, if I wanted to train a student in oratory, I would entrust him to these men, who, assiduously hitting the same anvil day-and-night, would only feed him ideas that are easy to chew.
==== 178.2 int/lan Nihil... ====
''Nihil est enim in dicendo, Catule, maius, quam ut faveat oratori is, qui audiet, utque ipse sic moveatur, ut impetu quodam animi et perturbatione, magis quam iudicio aut consilio regatur.''
Nothing is more important in oratory, Catulus, than to win the favor of your listener, so that he is moved by mental impulse or emotion on top of reasoned judgement.
==== 182.7 int Sed... ====
''Sed haec adiuvant in oratore: lenitas vocis, vultus pudoris significatio, verborum comitas; si quid persequare'' ''acrius, ut invitus et coactus facere videare.''
These help the orator: mildness of voice, a modest-seeming face, friendly diction, and the ability to seem to be compelled to act unwillingly.
==== 184.5 int Tantum... ====
''Tantum autem efficitur sensu quodam ac ratione dicendi, ut quasi mores oratoris effingat oratio.''
So much is achieved by taste and style that the speech seems to depict the orator's character.
==== 186.0 int/bea Facilius... ====
''Facilius est enim currentem, ut aunt, incitare quam commovere languentem.''
It is easier to stoke, as they say, one who is already running, than to prod an under performer.
==== 190.0 bea Neque... ====
''Neque est enim facile perficere, ut irascatur cui tu velis, iudex, si tu ipse id lente ferre videare; neque ut oderit eum, quem tu velis, nisi te ipsum flagrantem odio ante viderit; neque ad misericordiam adducetur, nisi tu ei signa doloris tui verbis, sententiis, voce, vultu, collacrimatione denique ostenderis.''
It is not easy to create anger against whomever you want, if you do not seem to care yourself; nor is it easy to create indignation, if your audience cannot perceive your own personal disgust; nor is it easy to create pity, if you cannot embody it yourself using your words, voice, face, and tears.
==== 202.-3 bea Ita... ====
''Ita magis affectis animis iudicum quam doctis, tua, Sulpici, est a nobis tum accusatio victa.''
So it was that we defeated your charge, Sulpicius, with the minds of the judges more forced than informed.
==== 215.0 int Quare... ====
''Quare qui aut breviter aut summisse dicunt, docere iudicem possunt, commovere non possunt; in quo sunt omnia.''
So people who speak briefly or quietly are able to inform a judge, but not to excite him (on which all things depend).
==== 216.0 int/lan Illa... ====
''Illa autem, quae aut conciliationis causa leniter, aut permotionis vehemeter aguntur, contrariis commotionibus auferenda sunt, ut odio benevolentia, misericordia invidia tollatur.''
Appeals, whether intended to win favor slowly, or to disturb passionately, should be removed by contrary emotions, as when goodwill is removed by hate, pity by jealousy.
==== 221.3 int/lan/bea Parcebat... ====
''Parcebat enim adversarii dignitati, in quo ipse conservabat suam; quod est hominibus facetis et dicacibus difficillimum, habere hominum rationem et temporum et ea, quae occurrant, cum salsissime dici possint, tenere.''
He was sparing his enemy's honor, in a way that preserved his own; for it is most difficult for witty and sarcastic men to have regard for men and times and, when something very witty can be said, to hold their tongue.
==== 230.0 int/lan/bea Omnino... ====
''Omnino probabiliora sunt, quae lacessiti dicimus, quam quae priores, nam et ingenii celeritas maior est, quae apparet in respondendo, et humanitatis est responsio.''
The things we say under stress tend to be more impressive, as mental speed is greater in responding, and to respond is human.
==== 231.-4 int/bea Erat... ====
''Erat autem tanta gravitas in Domitio, tanta auctoritas, ut, quod esset ab eo obiectum, lepore magis elevandum, quam contentione frangendum videretur.''
There was such weight in Domitio, such authority, that it seemed better for his charges to be made light of by pleasantry than broken by force.
==== 247.0 int/lan Temporis... ====
''Temporis igitar ratio, et ipsius dicacitatis moderatio et temperantia et raritas dictorum distinguet oratorem a scurra, et quod nos cum causa dicimus, non ut ridiculi videamur, sed ut proficiamus aliquid, illi totum diem et sine causa.''
Regard to occasion, moderation and control of our own sharpened rhetoric, and sparsity of words will distinguish the orator from the buffoon; also, we speak with purpose, not to seem ridiculous but to accomplish some benefit, while they jest all day without cause.
==== 247.7 int Risum... ====
''Risum quaesivit, qui est, mea sententia, vel tenuissimus ingenii fructus.''
He sought comedy, which is, in my view, the meekest fruit of intelligence.
==== 251.-2 int/lan/bea Ne... ====
''Ne multa: nullum genus est ioci, quo non ex eodem severa et gravia sumantur.''
It is enough to say there is no source of humor from which serious and weighty thoughts are not also derived.
==== 251.0 int/bea Atque... ====
''Atque hoc etiam animadvertendum est, non esse omnia ridicula faceta.''
It is also notable that not all that is funny is witty.
==== 253.-4 int/bea Nam... ====
''Nam quod, quibuscumque verbis dixeris, facetum tamen est, re continetur; quod mutatis verbis salem amittit, in verbis habet leporem omnem.''
The humor of a quip that is still funny even when worded differently is contained in the facts; what loses its affect when the words are changed has all its charm in the words.
==== 255.-5 int/lan Ambiguum... ====
''Ambiguum per se ipsum probatur id quidem, ut ante dixi, vel maxime; ingeniosi enim videtur vim verbi in aliud atque ceteri accipiant, posse ducere; sed admirationem magis quam risum movet, nisi si quando incidit in aliud genus ridiculi.''
The play on words does very well on its own, as I said before, for a man seems to be clever who can divert the power of a word to a place where others cannot; but this wins admiration more than amusement, unless it is also amusing for another reason.
==== 261.-3 int/bea Natura... ====
''Natura enim nos, ut ante dixi, noster delectat error: ex quo, cum quasi decepti sumus expectatione, ridemus.''
As if cheated of our expectation, we laugh, for our error naturally delights us (as I said before).
==== 263.-3 bea Sunt... ====
''Sunt etiam illa venusta, ut in gravibus sententiis, sic in facetiis.''
They are pleasing also, even in weighty discussions.
==== 263.-2 int/bea Dixi... ====
''Dixi enim dudum, materiam aliam esse ioci, aliam severitatis; gravium autem et iocorum unam esse rationem.''
I said before the matter of a joke is different from that of serious work; but of heavy and light the pattern is the same.
==== 267.0 Etiam... ====
''Etiam illa quae minuendi aut augendi causa ad incredibilem admirationem efferuntur: velut tu, Crasse, in concione, 'ita sibi ipsum magnum videri Memmium ut in forum descendens caput ad fornicem Fabii demitteret.'''
Also, there are remarks intended to exaggerate something to an incredible degree; as when you, Crassus, said in a public meeting, "Memmius thinks himself so great that, when descending into the forum, he ducks his head to fit under the Arch of Fabius."
==== 295.2 non... ====
''non tam ut prosim causis elaborare soleo quam ut ne quid obsim; non quin enitendum sit in utroque, sed tamen multo est turpius oratori nocuisse videri causae quam non profuisse.''
My custom is to take pains, not so much to help my case, but simply not to hurt it. Of course, both should be pursued, but it is much more disgraceful for an orator to be deemed harmful to his own case than not to have helped it.
==== 301.0 int/bea Etenim... ====
''Etenim permulta sunt in causis in omni parte orationis circumspicienda ne quid offendas, ne quo irruas: saepe aliqui testis aut non laedit aut minus laedit nisi lacessatur; orat reus, urgent advocati ut invehamur, ut maledicamus, denique ut interrogemus: non moveor, non obtempero, non satisfacio- neque tamen ullam assequor laudem, homines enim imperiti facilius quod stulte dixeris reprehendere quam quod sapienter tacueris laudare possunt.''
For there are very many ways throughout a speech not to rush in or fall out: often a witness's silence would do no harm, or less harm, than if they testified; the defendant and his supporters implore us to attack, abuse, interrogate; but I am not moved; I do not submit; I do not apologize; nor do I seek any praise, since ignorant men can more readily blame your stupid behavior than praise you for acting wisely.
==== 307.-4 int/lan Omnis... ====
''Omnis cura mea solet in hoc versari semper—dicam enim saepius—si possim, ut boni efficiam aliquid dicendo, sin id minus, ut certe ne quid mali.''
All my care (as I often say) is embodied in accomplishing something good by speaking, if possible, and if not, in at least doing no harm.
==== 310.-2 bea/int equidem... ====
''equidem cum colligo argumenta causarum, non tam ea numerare soleo quam expendere.''
Indeed, when I gather arguments for a case, my habit is not to count them but to weigh them.
==== 315.0 int Hisce... ====
''Hisce omnibus rebus consideratis tum denique id quod primum est dicendum postremum soleo cogitare, quo utar exordio; nam si quando id primum invenire volui, nullum mihi occurrit nisi aut exile aut nugatorium aut vulgare aut commune.''
With all these things deliberated, I finally consider what comes first: how to begin the oration. For whenever I have looked for an introduction early, nothing has occurred to me that is not thin, trifling, commonplace, or ordinary.
==== 333.3 bea sapientis... ====
''sapientis est consilium explicare suum de maximis rebus et honesti et diserti, ut mente providere, auctoritate probare, oratione persuadere possis.''
Making and explaining a plan on the greatest affairs is for a wise person who is also honest and eloquent, who can anticipate the future, affirm his/her authority, and use rhetoric powerfully.
==== 337.4 int/bea et... ====
''et quamquam una fere vis est eloquentiae, tamen quia summa dignitas est populi, gravissima causa rei publicae, maximi motus multitudinis, genus quoque dicendi grandius quoddam et illustrius esse adhibendum videtur...''
Because of the exceptionality of the people, the importance of the interests of the state, and the great motion of the crowd, it seems only appropriate that a higher kind of speech should be used, even though there is only one force of eloquence.
==== 338.0 int/lan Fit... ====
''Fit autem ut, quia maxima quasi oratoris scaena videatur contionis esse, natura ipsa ad ornatius dicendi genus excitemur; habet enim multitudo vim quandam talem ut, quemadmodum tibicen sine tibiis canere, sic orator sine multitudine audiente eloquens esse non possit.''
Because the greatest stage for an orator seems to be a public meeting, it happens naturally that we are roused to a more fancy kind of speaking; for crowds have a certain power allowing an orator to be eloquent, without which one is like a flute player without a flute.
==== 340.0 int/lan Nullo... ====
''Nullo autem loco plus facetiae prosunt et celeritas et breve aliquod dictum nec sine dignitate et cum lepore; nihil enim tam facile quam multitudo a tristitia et saepe ab acerbitate commode et breviter et acute et hilare dicto deducitur.''
But in no place do facetious remarks, a rapid style, and terse, clever, not undignified diction, profit a speaker more; for nothing so easily diverts a crowd from gloom and bitterness as a suitably sharp and cheerful remark.
==== 347.-3 int Magna... ====
''Magna etiam illa laus et admirabilis videri solet tulisse casus sapienter adversos, non fractum esse fortuna, retinuisse in rebus asperis dignitatem; neque tamen illa non ornant, habiti honores, decreta virtutis praemia, res gestae iudiciis hominum comprobatae; in quibus etiam felicitatem ipsam deorum immortalium iudicio tribui laudationis est.''
It is customarily seen as worthy of great and admirable praise to have born a disaster wisely, not to be broken by misfortune, and to have retained dignity in hard times; also recognized are honors held, rewards for virtue, and works ratified by judges of men; mere good fortune, on the other hand, does not deserve praise, and should be attributed to the gods.
==== 350.4 lan Perge... ====
''Pergo vero, inquit Crassus, libenter enim te cognitum iam artificem aliquandoque evolutum illis integumentis dissimulationis tuae nudatumque perspicio; et quod mihi nihil aut quod non multum relinquis, percommode facis, estque mihi gratum.''
Pray continue, said Crassus, for I happily see you now as a wise artist, finally drawn out and stripped of the shield of your pretended ignorance; indeed, it is brilliant that you left nothing or not much to me, and I am thankful for it.
==== 354.-2 int hac... ====
''hac tum re admonitus invenisse fertur ordinem esse maxime qui memoriae lumen afferret.''
Upon this suggestion he is said to have realized that an orderly arrangement is what best brings light to memory.
==== 363.-1 int/bea neque... ====
''neque eo minus eloquentiam tuam et multo magis virtutem et diligentiam admiror et simul gaudeo iudicium'' ''animi mei comprobari quod semper statui neminem sapientiae laudem et eloquentiae sine summo studio et labore et doctrina consequi posse.''
I admire your eloquence not much less, and your energy and diligence much more, and at the same time I rejoice in the affirmation of my judgment that, as I always stated, nobody earns praise for wisdom and eloquence without the greatest study, work, and learning.
[[Category:History of Italy]]
[[Category:Quotes]]
er58iy2me00212bzvigojii53nady72
2812385
2812384
2026-06-01T01:20:39Z
Nafindix
2919441
2812385
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{literature}}
Cicero's fictional dialogue, mostly delivered in the voice of Marcus Antonius, grandfather of the famous general.
The Latin quotes are selected for interest (int), language (lan), and rhetoric (bea), and are translated into English. The line numbers are from the Loeb edition, and start counting from line 0 of the section. All translations are by Gus Wiseman (Nafindix), with the exception of any contributions from other users. The sources of the Latin quotes are:
# Loeb Classical Library 348, Harvard University Press, 1942; Latin text with facing English translation by E. W. Sutton.
# M. Tulli Ciceronis Rhetorica. M. Tullius Cicero. A. S. Wilkins, Ed. 1902. - <nowiki>http://data.perseus.org/texts/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi037</nowiki> or <nowiki>http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.02.0120</nowiki>
# The Latin Library. M. TVLLI CICERONIS DE ORATORE AD QVINTVM FRATREM LIBER SECVNDVS. <nowiki>https://www.thelatinlibrary.com/cicero/oratore1.shtml</nowiki>
[[File:Marc Antony's Oration at Caesar's Funeral by George Edward Robertson.jpg|thumb]]
==== 4.0 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed fuit hoc in utroque eorum, ut Crassus non tam existimari vellet non didicisse, quam illa despicere, et nostrorum hominum in omni genere prudentiam Graecis anteferre; Antonius autem probabiliorem hoc populo orationem fore censebat suam, si omnino didicisse nunquam putaretur.''
Crassus didn't want so much to appear free of all learning, but simply to despise the Greek treatment, preferring our own; on the other hand, Antonius considered it better if the people thought he had no learning at all.
==== 18.5 int Omnium... ====
''Omnium autem ineptiarum, quae sunt innumerabiles, haud scio, an nulla sit maior, quam, ut illi solent, quocumque in loco, quoscumque inter homines visum est, de rebus aut difficillimis, aut non necessariis, argutissime disputare.''
Of countless ineptitudes, none is greater than their custom of trying to argue everywhere, with anybody.
==== 35.-3 int/bea Neque... ====
''Neque ulla non propria oratoris est res, quae quidem ornate dici graviterque debet.''
There is no argument that an orator cannot deliver with polish.
==== 35.0 bea Huius... ====
''Huius est in dando consilio de maximis rebus cum dignitate explicata sententia; eiusdem et languentis populi incitatio, et effrenati moderatio.''
The orator's work is to advise at the highest level, with gravity, and to rouse or subdue a crowd, ever holding the reins.
==== 35.3 bea Eadem... ====
''Eadem facultate et fraus hominum ad perniciem, et integritas ad salutem vocatur.''
The vector that drives deceitful people to destruction is opposite to the vector that drives faithful people to deliverance.
==== 36.0 lan/bea Historia... ====
''Historia vero testis temporum, lux veritatis, vita memoriae, magistra vitae, nuntia vetustatis, qua voce alia, nisi oratoris, immortalitati commendatur?''
By what voice and motion, if not the orator's, is the light of remembered reality– the harbinger of history– entrusted to immortality?
==== 45.-2 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed non omnia, quaecumque loquimur, mihi videntur ad artem et ad praecepta esse revocanda.''
But not everything we say needs to be reduced to art and doctrine.
==== 60.0 int Quid... ====
''Est, fatebor, aliquid tamen: ut, cum in sole ambulem, etiamsi aliam ob causam ambulem, fieri natura tamen, ut colorer: sic, cum istos libros ad Misenum (nam Romae vix licet) studiosius legerim, sentio illorum tactu orationem meam quasi colorari.''
One walking in the sun (for any reason) naturally gets a tan, and after eagerly reading your books at Misenum (they are scarcely allowed at Rome), their very influence seems to have tanned my speech.
==== 61.0 int In... ====
''In philosophos vestros si quando incidi, deceptus indicibus librorum, quod sunt fere inscripti de rebus notis et illustribus, de virtute, de iustitia, de honestate, de voluptate, verbum prorsus nullum intellego: ita sunt angustis et'' ''concisis disputationibus illigati.''
When I light upon your thinkers, if I am deceived by the titles of their books (supposedly about "virtue", "justice", "honesty", "pleasure", and so on), I find only knots so tenuous and fragmentary that I cannot unravel a single word.
==== 66.1 int/bea Si... ====
''Si enim est oratoris, quaecumque res infinite posita sit, de ea posse dicere, dicendum erit ei, quanta sit solis magnitudo, quae forma terrae: de mathematicis, de musicis rebus non poterit, quin dicat, hoc onere suscepto, recusare.''
If it is for the orator to be able to speak continuously on any subject, this must include the size of the sun and the shape of the earth, and an orator could not even refuse to speak about music or pure mathematics, if prompted.
==== 84.0 lan/bea Sed... ====
''Sed hoc si in iure civili, si etiam in parvis aut mediocribus rebus doctiores assequi possunt, non idem sentio tanta hac in re, tamque immensa, posse fieri.''
Even though, in civil law, and in matters of slight or moderate importance, the learned can achieve this kind of order, I doubt it could hold up in such an immense affair as the present.
==== 98.0 int Atque... ====
''Atque esse tamen multos videmus, qui neminem imitentur et suapte natura, quod velint, sine cuiusquam similitudine consequantur.''
And yet, we see many who imitate nobody and follow their own natural path.
==== 101.3 int/bea In... ====
''nemo potest de ea re, quam non novit, non turpissime dicere.''
No person should talk who has not mastered his/her own subject.
==== 116.-5 int Ita... ====
''Ita omnis ratio dicendi tribus ad persuadendum rebus est nixa: ut probemus vera esse, quae defendimus; ut conciliemus eos nobis, qui audiunt; ut animos eorum, ad quemcumque causa postulabit Motum, vocemus.''
There are three parts to persuasive speech: we demonstrate our position; we win the audience; we get people to make things right.
==== 117.5 int/lan/bea Quod... ====
''Quod etiamsi ad instituendos adolescentulos magis aptum est, ut, simul ac posita causa sit, habeant quo se referant, unde statim expedita possint argumenta depromere, tamen et tardi ingeni est rivulos consectari, fontis rerum non videre, et iam aetatis est ususque nostri a capite quod velimus arcessere et unde omnia manent videre.''
Even if this is more appropriate for raising youths (so that, as soon as a case is put, they have something to refer to from which they can draw out suitable arguments immediately when they are needed in the future), yet it is a sign of slow temperament to cut down the streams of things while not seeing their sources, and it is the privilege of men of our age and experience to summon up what we want from the water's head and see where everything flows.
==== 124.4 bea Quod... ====
''Quod enim ornamentum, quae vis, qui animus, qua dignitas illi oratori defuit, qui in causa peroranda non dubitavit excitare reum consularem et eius diloricare tunicam et iudicibus cicatrices adversas senis imperatoris ostendere?''
What decoration, what power, what spirit, what honor does that orator lack who does not hesitate to conclude his defense of the former consul by tearing open the old general's shirt and showing the judges his scars?
==== 125.0 bea Potuit... ====
''Potuit hic locus tam anceps, tam inauditus, tam lubricus, tam novus sine quadam incredibili vi ac facultate dicendi tractari?''
Can an argument so divisive, so unheard-of, so slippery, so unfamiliar be handled without incredible strength and skill of speaking?
==== 132.-2 int Subactio... ====
''Subactio autem est usus, auditio, lectio, litterae.''
The cultivation is practice, listening, reading, and writing.
==== 133.0 bea Atque... ====
''Atque hic illud videndum est, in quo summus est error istorum magistrorum, ad quos liberos nostros mittimus, non quo hoc quidem ad dicendum magno opere pertineat, sed tamen ut videatis quam sit genus hoc eorum qui sibi eruditi videntur hebes atque impolitum.''
Make note of this profound error by those to whom we send our sons, not indeed that this has much to do with speaking, but you should see how dull and coarse they are, who consider themselves scholars.
==== 147.3 bea Ubi... ====
''Ubi eum locum omnem cogitatione saepseris, si modo usu rerum percallueris, nihil te effugiet atque omne, quod erit in re, occurret atque incidet.''
If you surround everything with cogitation, and if you are calloused from experience, every aspect of an affair comes up and falls, and nothing escapes you.
==== 148.2 int Haec... ====
''Haec praecipue colenda est nobis; haec semper adhibenda; haec nihil est quod non assequatur.''
This virtue ("diligentia" or drive) we should foster especially, as it applies to everything, and there is nothing it cannot attain.
==== 150.0 int/bea Inter... ====
''Inter ingenium quidem et diligentiam perpaulum loci reliquum est arti.''
Between talent and drive very little room remains for art.
==== 161.0 bea Carneadi... ====
''Carneadi vero vis incredibilis illa dicendi et varietas perquam esset optando nobis, qui nullam umquam in illis suis disputationibus rem defendit, quam non probarit, nullam oppugnavit, quam non everterit.''
We are delighted by Carneades' incredible force and diversity of speech, a man who never made a disputation he could not prove, and never set a target he could not overturn.
==== 162.0 int/lan/bea Ego... ====
''Ego autem, si quem nunc rudem plane institui ad dicendum velim, his potius tradam assiduis uno opere eandem incudem diem noctemque tundentibus, qui omnes tenuissimas particulas atque omnia minima mansa ut nutrices infantibus pueris in os inserant.''
For myself, if I wanted to train a student in oratory, I would entrust him to these men, who, assiduously hitting the same anvil day-and-night, would only feed him ideas that are easy to chew.
==== 178.2 int/lan Nihil... ====
''Nihil est enim in dicendo, Catule, maius, quam ut faveat oratori is, qui audiet, utque ipse sic moveatur, ut impetu quodam animi et perturbatione, magis quam iudicio aut consilio regatur.''
Nothing is more important in oratory, Catulus, than to win the favor of your listener, so that he is moved by mental impulse or emotion on top of reasoned judgement.
==== 182.7 int Sed... ====
''Sed haec adiuvant in oratore: lenitas vocis, vultus pudoris significatio, verborum comitas; si quid persequare'' ''acrius, ut invitus et coactus facere videare.''
These help the orator: mildness of voice, a modest-seeming face, friendly diction, and the ability to seem to be compelled to act unwillingly.
==== 184.5 int Tantum... ====
''Tantum autem efficitur sensu quodam ac ratione dicendi, ut quasi mores oratoris effingat oratio.''
So much is achieved by taste and style that the speech seems to depict the orator's character.
==== 186.0 int/bea Facilius... ====
''Facilius est enim currentem, ut aunt, incitare quam commovere languentem.''
It is easier to stoke, as they say, one who is already running, than to prod an under performer.
==== 190.0 bea Neque... ====
''Neque est enim facile perficere, ut irascatur cui tu velis, iudex, si tu ipse id lente ferre videare; neque ut oderit eum, quem tu velis, nisi te ipsum flagrantem odio ante viderit; neque ad misericordiam adducetur, nisi tu ei signa doloris tui verbis, sententiis, voce, vultu, collacrimatione denique ostenderis.''
It is not easy to create anger against whomever you want, if you do not seem to care yourself; nor is it easy to create indignation, if your audience cannot perceive your own personal disgust; nor is it easy to create pity, if you cannot embody it yourself using your words, voice, face, and tears.
==== 202.-3 bea Ita... ====
''Ita magis affectis animis iudicum quam doctis, tua, Sulpici, est a nobis tum accusatio victa.''
So it was that we defeated your charge, Sulpicius, with the minds of the judges more forced than informed.
==== 215.0 int Quare... ====
''Quare qui aut breviter aut summisse dicunt, docere iudicem possunt, commovere non possunt; in quo sunt omnia.''
So people who speak briefly or quietly are able to inform a judge, but not to excite him (on which all things depend).
==== 216.0 int/lan Illa... ====
''Illa autem, quae aut conciliationis causa leniter, aut permotionis vehemeter aguntur, contrariis commotionibus auferenda sunt, ut odio benevolentia, misericordia invidia tollatur.''
Appeals, whether intended to win favor slowly, or to disturb passionately, should be removed by contrary emotions, as when goodwill is removed by hate, pity by jealousy.
==== 221.3 int/lan/bea Parcebat... ====
''Parcebat enim adversarii dignitati, in quo ipse conservabat suam; quod est hominibus facetis et dicacibus difficillimum, habere hominum rationem et temporum et ea, quae occurrant, cum salsissime dici possint, tenere.''
He was sparing his enemy's honor, in a way that preserved his own; for it is most difficult for witty and sarcastic men to have regard for men and times and, when something very witty can be said, to hold their tongue.
==== 230.0 int/lan/bea Omnino... ====
''Omnino probabiliora sunt, quae lacessiti dicimus, quam quae priores, nam et ingenii celeritas maior est, quae apparet in respondendo, et humanitatis est responsio.''
The things we say under stress tend to be more impressive, as mental speed is greater in responding, and to respond is human.
==== 231.-4 int/bea Erat... ====
''Erat autem tanta gravitas in Domitio, tanta auctoritas, ut, quod esset ab eo obiectum, lepore magis elevandum, quam contentione frangendum videretur.''
There was such weight in Domitio, such authority, that it seemed better for his charges to be made light of by pleasantry than broken by force.
==== 247.0 int/lan Temporis... ====
''Temporis igitar ratio, et ipsius dicacitatis moderatio et temperantia et raritas dictorum distinguet oratorem a scurra, et quod nos cum causa dicimus, non ut ridiculi videamur, sed ut proficiamus aliquid, illi totum diem et sine causa.''
Regard to occasion, moderation and control of our own sharpened rhetoric, and sparsity of words will distinguish the orator from the buffoon; also, we speak with purpose, not to seem ridiculous but to accomplish some benefit, while they jest all day without cause.
==== 247.7 int Risum... ====
''Risum quaesivit, qui est, mea sententia, vel tenuissimus ingenii fructus.''
He sought comedy, which is, in my view, the meekest fruit of intelligence.
==== 251.-2 int/lan/bea Ne... ====
''Ne multa: nullum genus est ioci, quo non ex eodem severa et gravia sumantur.''
It is enough to say there is no source of humor from which serious and weighty thoughts are not also derived.
==== 251.0 int/bea Atque... ====
''Atque hoc etiam animadvertendum est, non esse omnia ridicula faceta.''
It is also notable that not all that is funny is witty.
==== 253.-4 int/bea Nam... ====
''Nam quod, quibuscumque verbis dixeris, facetum tamen est, re continetur; quod mutatis verbis salem amittit, in verbis habet leporem omnem.''
The humor of a quip that is still funny even when worded differently is contained in the facts; what loses its affect when the words are changed has all its charm in the words.
==== 255.-5 int/lan Ambiguum... ====
''Ambiguum per se ipsum probatur id quidem, ut ante dixi, vel maxime; ingeniosi enim videtur vim verbi in aliud atque ceteri accipiant, posse ducere; sed admirationem magis quam risum movet, nisi si quando incidit in aliud genus ridiculi.''
The play on words does very well on its own, as I said before, for a man seems to be clever who can divert the power of a word to a place where others cannot; but this wins admiration more than amusement, unless it is also amusing for another reason.
==== 261.-3 int/bea Natura... ====
''Natura enim nos, ut ante dixi, noster delectat error: ex quo, cum quasi decepti sumus expectatione, ridemus.''
As if cheated of our expectation, we laugh, for our error naturally delights us (as I said before).
==== 263.-3 bea Sunt... ====
''Sunt etiam illa venusta, ut in gravibus sententiis, sic in facetiis.''
They are pleasing also, even in weighty discussions.
==== 263.-2 int/bea Dixi... ====
''Dixi enim dudum, materiam aliam esse ioci, aliam severitatis; gravium autem et iocorum unam esse rationem.''
I said before the matter of a joke is different from that of serious work; but of heavy and light the pattern is the same.
==== 267.0 Etiam... ====
''Etiam illa quae minuendi aut augendi causa ad incredibilem admirationem efferuntur: velut tu, Crasse, in concione, 'ita sibi ipsum magnum videri Memmium ut in forum descendens caput ad fornicem Fabii demitteret.'''
Also, there are remarks intended to exaggerate something to an incredible degree; as when you, Crassus, said in a public meeting, "Memmius thinks himself so great that, when descending into the forum, he ducks his head to fit under the Arch of Fabius."
==== 295.2 non... ====
''non tam ut prosim causis elaborare soleo quam ut ne quid obsim; non quin enitendum sit in utroque, sed tamen multo est turpius oratori nocuisse videri causae quam non profuisse.''
My custom is to take pains, not so much to help my case, but simply not to hurt it. Of course, both should be pursued, but it is much more disgraceful for an orator to be deemed harmful to his own case than not to have helped it.
==== 301.0 int/bea Etenim... ====
''Etenim permulta sunt in causis in omni parte orationis circumspicienda ne quid offendas, ne quo irruas: saepe aliqui testis aut non laedit aut minus laedit nisi lacessatur; orat reus, urgent advocati ut invehamur, ut maledicamus, denique ut interrogemus: non moveor, non obtempero, non satisfacio- neque tamen ullam assequor laudem, homines enim imperiti facilius quod stulte dixeris reprehendere quam quod sapienter tacueris laudare possunt.''
For there are very many ways throughout a speech not to rush in or fall out: often a witness's silence would do no harm, or less harm, than if they testified; the defendant and his supporters implore us to attack, abuse, interrogate; but I am not moved; I do not submit; I do not apologize; nor do I seek any praise, since ignorant men can more readily blame your stupid behavior than praise you for acting wisely.
==== 307.-4 int/lan Omnis... ====
''Omnis cura mea solet in hoc versari semper—dicam enim saepius—si possim, ut boni efficiam aliquid dicendo, sin id minus, ut certe ne quid mali.''
All my care (as I often say) is embodied in accomplishing something good by speaking, if possible, and if not, in at least doing no harm.
==== 310.-2 bea/int equidem... ====
''equidem cum colligo argumenta causarum, non tam ea numerare soleo quam expendere.''
Indeed, when I gather arguments for a case, my habit is not to count them but to weigh them.
==== 315.0 int Hisce... ====
''Hisce omnibus rebus consideratis tum denique id quod primum est dicendum postremum soleo cogitare, quo utar exordio; nam si quando id primum invenire volui, nullum mihi occurrit nisi aut exile aut nugatorium aut vulgare aut commune.''
With all these things deliberated, I finally consider what comes first: how to begin the oration. For whenever I have looked for an introduction early, nothing has occurred to me that is not thin, trifling, commonplace, or ordinary.
==== 333.3 bea sapientis... ====
''sapientis est consilium explicare suum de maximis rebus et honesti et diserti, ut mente providere, auctoritate probare, oratione persuadere possis.''
Making and explaining a plan on the greatest affairs is for a wise person who is also honest and eloquent, who can anticipate the future, affirm his/her authority, and use rhetoric powerfully.
==== 337.4 int/bea et... ====
''et quamquam una fere vis est eloquentiae, tamen quia summa dignitas est populi, gravissima causa rei publicae, maximi motus multitudinis, genus quoque dicendi grandius quoddam et illustrius esse adhibendum videtur...''
Because of the exceptionality of the people, the importance of the interests of the state, and the great motion of the crowd, it seems only appropriate that a higher kind of speech should be used, even though there is only one force of eloquence.
==== 338.0 int/lan Fit... ====
''Fit autem ut, quia maxima quasi oratoris scaena videatur contionis esse, natura ipsa ad ornatius dicendi genus excitemur; habet enim multitudo vim quandam talem ut, quemadmodum tibicen sine tibiis canere, sic orator sine multitudine audiente eloquens esse non possit.''
Because the greatest stage for an orator seems to be a public meeting, it happens naturally that we are roused to a more fancy kind of speaking; for crowds have a certain power allowing an orator to be eloquent, without which one is like a flute player without a flute.
==== 340.0 int/lan Nullo... ====
''Nullo autem loco plus facetiae prosunt et celeritas et breve aliquod dictum nec sine dignitate et cum lepore; nihil enim tam facile quam multitudo a tristitia et saepe ab acerbitate commode et breviter et acute et hilare dicto deducitur.''
But in no place do facetious remarks, a rapid style, and terse, clever, not undignified diction, profit a speaker more; for nothing so easily diverts a crowd from gloom and bitterness as a suitably sharp and cheerful remark.
==== 347.-3 int Magna... ====
''Magna etiam illa laus et admirabilis videri solet tulisse casus sapienter adversos, non fractum esse fortuna, retinuisse in rebus asperis dignitatem; neque tamen illa non ornant, habiti honores, decreta virtutis praemia, res gestae iudiciis hominum comprobatae; in quibus etiam felicitatem ipsam deorum immortalium iudicio tribui laudationis est.''
It is customarily seen as worthy of great and admirable praise to have born a disaster wisely, not to be broken by misfortune, and to have retained dignity in hard times; also recognized are honors held, rewards for virtue, and works ratified by judges of men; mere good fortune, on the other hand, does not deserve praise, and should be attributed to the gods.
==== 350.4 lan Perge... ====
''Pergo vero, inquit Crassus, libenter enim te cognitum iam artificem aliquandoque evolutum illis integumentis dissimulationis tuae nudatumque perspicio; et quod mihi nihil aut quod non multum relinquis, percommode facis, estque mihi gratum.''
Pray continue, said Crassus, for I happily see you now as a wise artist, finally drawn out and stripped of the shield of your pretended ignorance; indeed, it is brilliant that you left nothing or not much to me, and I am thankful for it.
==== 354.-2 int hac... ====
''hac tum re admonitus invenisse fertur ordinem esse maxime qui memoriae lumen afferret.''
Upon this suggestion he is said to have realized that an orderly arrangement is what best brings light to memory.
==== 363.-1 int/bea neque... ====
''neque eo minus eloquentiam tuam et multo magis virtutem et diligentiam admiror et simul gaudeo iudicium'' ''animi mei comprobari quod semper statui neminem sapientiae laudem et eloquentiae sine summo studio et labore et doctrina consequi posse.''
I admire your eloquence not much less, and your energy and diligence much more, and at the same time I rejoice in the affirmation of my judgment that, as I always stated, nobody earns praise for wisdom and eloquence without the greatest study, work, and learning.
=== See also: ===
* [[Cicero/Quotes from Cicero's Philippics]]
* [[Cicero/Quotes from Cicero's de Senectute]]
* [[Cicero/Quotes from Cicero's de Amicitia]]
* [[Cicero/Quotes from Cicero's de Divinatione]]
* [[Cicero/Quotes from Cicero's pro Milone]]
* [[Quotes from Cicero's in Pisonem]]
* [[Quotes from Cicero's pro Fonteio]]
* [[Quotes from Cicero's Pro C. Rabirio Postumo]]
* [[Quotes from Cicero's Pro M. Marcello]]
* [[Quotes from Cicero's Pro Ligario]]
* [[Quotes from Cicero's Pro Rege Deiotaro]]
* [[Quotes from Caesar's Civil Wars, Book I]]
* [[Quotes from Caesar's Civil Wars, Book II]]
* [[Quotes from Caesar's Civil Wars, Book III]]
* [[Quotes from Cicero's Pro Flacco]]
* [[Quotes from Cicero's Pro Murena]]
* [https://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Quotes_from_Cicero%27s_DE_ORATORE_BOOK_I&veaction=edit Quotes from Cicero's DE ORATORE BOOK I]
[[Category:History of Italy]]
[[Category:Quotes]]
bp90uxxcen9no0gploxtrdlyb7ynt0m
2812386
2812385
2026-06-01T01:24:09Z
Nafindix
2919441
2812386
wikitext
text/x-wiki
{{literature}}
Cicero's fictional dialogue, mostly delivered in the voice of Marcus Antonius, grandfather of the famous general.
The Latin quotes are selected for interest (int), language (lan), and rhetoric (bea), and are translated into English. The line numbers are from the Loeb edition, and start counting from line 0 of the section. All translations are by Gus Wiseman (Nafindix), with the exception of any contributions from other users. The sources of the Latin quotes are:
# Loeb Classical Library 348, Harvard University Press, 1942; Latin text with facing English translation by E. W. Sutton.
# M. Tulli Ciceronis Rhetorica. M. Tullius Cicero. A. S. Wilkins, Ed. 1902. - <nowiki>http://data.perseus.org/texts/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi037</nowiki> or <nowiki>http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.02.0120</nowiki>
# The Latin Library. M. TVLLI CICERONIS DE ORATORE AD QVINTVM FRATREM LIBER SECVNDVS. <nowiki>https://www.thelatinlibrary.com/cicero/oratore1.shtml</nowiki>
[[File:Marc Antony's Oration at Caesar's Funeral by George Edward Robertson.jpg|thumb]]
==== 4.0 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed fuit hoc in utroque eorum, ut Crassus non tam existimari vellet non didicisse, quam illa despicere, et nostrorum hominum in omni genere prudentiam Graecis anteferre; Antonius autem probabiliorem hoc populo orationem fore censebat suam, si omnino didicisse nunquam putaretur.''
Crassus didn't want so much to appear free of all learning, but simply to despise the Greek treatment, preferring our own; on the other hand, Antonius considered it better if the people thought he had no learning at all.
==== 18.5 int Omnium... ====
''Omnium autem ineptiarum, quae sunt innumerabiles, haud scio, an nulla sit maior, quam, ut illi solent, quocumque in loco, quoscumque inter homines visum est, de rebus aut difficillimis, aut non necessariis, argutissime disputare.''
Of countless ineptitudes, none is greater than their custom of trying to argue everywhere, with anybody.
==== 35.-3 int/bea Neque... ====
''Neque ulla non propria oratoris est res, quae quidem ornate dici graviterque debet.''
There is no argument that an orator cannot deliver with polish.
==== 35.0 bea Huius... ====
''Huius est in dando consilio de maximis rebus cum dignitate explicata sententia; eiusdem et languentis populi incitatio, et effrenati moderatio.''
The orator's work is to advise at the highest level, with gravity, and to rouse or subdue a crowd, ever holding the reins.
==== 35.3 bea Eadem... ====
''Eadem facultate et fraus hominum ad perniciem, et integritas ad salutem vocatur.''
The vector that drives deceitful people to destruction is opposite to the vector that drives faithful people to deliverance.
==== 36.0 lan/bea Historia... ====
''Historia vero testis temporum, lux veritatis, vita memoriae, magistra vitae, nuntia vetustatis, qua voce alia, nisi oratoris, immortalitati commendatur?''
By what voice and motion, if not the orator's, is the light of remembered reality– the harbinger of history– entrusted to immortality?
==== 45.-2 int/bea Sed... ====
''Sed non omnia, quaecumque loquimur, mihi videntur ad artem et ad praecepta esse revocanda.''
But not everything we say needs to be reduced to art and doctrine.
==== 60.0 int Quid... ====
''Est, fatebor, aliquid tamen: ut, cum in sole ambulem, etiamsi aliam ob causam ambulem, fieri natura tamen, ut colorer: sic, cum istos libros ad Misenum (nam Romae vix licet) studiosius legerim, sentio illorum tactu orationem meam quasi colorari.''
One walking in the sun (for any reason) naturally gets a tan, and after eagerly reading your books at Misenum (they are scarcely allowed at Rome), their very influence seems to have tanned my speech.
==== 61.0 int In... ====
''In philosophos vestros si quando incidi, deceptus indicibus librorum, quod sunt fere inscripti de rebus notis et illustribus, de virtute, de iustitia, de honestate, de voluptate, verbum prorsus nullum intellego: ita sunt angustis et'' ''concisis disputationibus illigati.''
When I light upon your thinkers, if I am deceived by the titles of their books (supposedly about "virtue", "justice", "honesty", "pleasure", and so on), I find only knots so tenuous and fragmentary that I cannot unravel a single word.
==== 66.1 int/bea Si... ====
''Si enim est oratoris, quaecumque res infinite posita sit, de ea posse dicere, dicendum erit ei, quanta sit solis magnitudo, quae forma terrae: de mathematicis, de musicis rebus non poterit, quin dicat, hoc onere suscepto, recusare.''
If it is for the orator to be able to speak continuously on any subject, this must include the size of the sun and the shape of the earth, and an orator could not even refuse to speak about music or pure mathematics, if prompted.
==== 84.0 lan/bea Sed... ====
''Sed hoc si in iure civili, si etiam in parvis aut mediocribus rebus doctiores assequi possunt, non idem sentio tanta hac in re, tamque immensa, posse fieri.''
Even though, in civil law, and in matters of slight or moderate importance, the learned can achieve this kind of order, I doubt it could hold up in such an immense affair as the present.
==== 98.0 int Atque... ====
''Atque esse tamen multos videmus, qui neminem imitentur et suapte natura, quod velint, sine cuiusquam similitudine consequantur.''
And yet, we see many who imitate nobody and follow their own natural path.
==== 101.3 int/bea In... ====
''nemo potest de ea re, quam non novit, non turpissime dicere.''
No person should talk who has not mastered his/her own subject.
==== 116.-5 int Ita... ====
''Ita omnis ratio dicendi tribus ad persuadendum rebus est nixa: ut probemus vera esse, quae defendimus; ut conciliemus eos nobis, qui audiunt; ut animos eorum, ad quemcumque causa postulabit Motum, vocemus.''
There are three parts to persuasive speech: we demonstrate our position; we win the audience; we get people to make things right.
==== 117.5 int/lan/bea Quod... ====
''Quod etiamsi ad instituendos adolescentulos magis aptum est, ut, simul ac posita causa sit, habeant quo se referant, unde statim expedita possint argumenta depromere, tamen et tardi ingeni est rivulos consectari, fontis rerum non videre, et iam aetatis est ususque nostri a capite quod velimus arcessere et unde omnia manent videre.''
Even if this is more appropriate for raising youths (so that, as soon as a case is put, they have something to refer to from which they can draw out suitable arguments immediately when they are needed in the future), yet it is a sign of slow temperament to cut down the streams of things while not seeing their sources, and it is the privilege of men of our age and experience to summon up what we want from the water's head and see where everything flows.
==== 124.4 bea Quod... ====
''Quod enim ornamentum, quae vis, qui animus, qua dignitas illi oratori defuit, qui in causa peroranda non dubitavit excitare reum consularem et eius diloricare tunicam et iudicibus cicatrices adversas senis imperatoris ostendere?''
What decoration, what power, what spirit, what honor does that orator lack who does not hesitate to conclude his defense of the former consul by tearing open the old general's shirt and showing the judges his scars?
==== 125.0 bea Potuit... ====
''Potuit hic locus tam anceps, tam inauditus, tam lubricus, tam novus sine quadam incredibili vi ac facultate dicendi tractari?''
Can an argument so divisive, so unheard-of, so slippery, so unfamiliar be handled without incredible strength and skill of speaking?
==== 132.-2 int Subactio... ====
''Subactio autem est usus, auditio, lectio, litterae.''
The cultivation is practice, listening, reading, and writing.
==== 133.0 bea Atque... ====
''Atque hic illud videndum est, in quo summus est error istorum magistrorum, ad quos liberos nostros mittimus, non quo hoc quidem ad dicendum magno opere pertineat, sed tamen ut videatis quam sit genus hoc eorum qui sibi eruditi videntur hebes atque impolitum.''
Make note of this profound error by those to whom we send our sons, not indeed that this has much to do with speaking, but you should see how dull and coarse they are, who consider themselves scholars.
==== 147.3 bea Ubi... ====
''Ubi eum locum omnem cogitatione saepseris, si modo usu rerum percallueris, nihil te effugiet atque omne, quod erit in re, occurret atque incidet.''
If you surround everything with cogitation, and if you are calloused from experience, every aspect of an affair comes up and falls, and nothing escapes you.
==== 148.2 int Haec... ====
''Haec praecipue colenda est nobis; haec semper adhibenda; haec nihil est quod non assequatur.''
This virtue ("diligentia" or drive) we should foster especially, as it applies to everything, and there is nothing it cannot attain.
==== 150.0 int/bea Inter... ====
''Inter ingenium quidem et diligentiam perpaulum loci reliquum est arti.''
Between talent and drive very little room remains for art.
==== 161.0 bea Carneadi... ====
''Carneadi vero vis incredibilis illa dicendi et varietas perquam esset optando nobis, qui nullam umquam in illis suis disputationibus rem defendit, quam non probarit, nullam oppugnavit, quam non everterit.''
We are delighted by Carneades' incredible force and diversity of speech, a man who never made a disputation he could not prove, and never set a target he could not overturn.
==== 162.0 int/lan/bea Ego... ====
''Ego autem, si quem nunc rudem plane institui ad dicendum velim, his potius tradam assiduis uno opere eandem incudem diem noctemque tundentibus, qui omnes tenuissimas particulas atque omnia minima mansa ut nutrices infantibus pueris in os inserant.''
For myself, if I wanted to train a student in oratory, I would entrust him to these men, who, assiduously hitting the same anvil day-and-night, would only feed him ideas that are easy to chew.
==== 178.2 int/lan Nihil... ====
''Nihil est enim in dicendo, Catule, maius, quam ut faveat oratori is, qui audiet, utque ipse sic moveatur, ut impetu quodam animi et perturbatione, magis quam iudicio aut consilio regatur.''
Nothing is more important in oratory, Catulus, than to win the favor of your listener, so that he is moved by mental impulse or emotion on top of reasoned judgement.
==== 182.7 int Sed... ====
''Sed haec adiuvant in oratore: lenitas vocis, vultus pudoris significatio, verborum comitas; si quid persequare'' ''acrius, ut invitus et coactus facere videare.''
These help the orator: mildness of voice, a modest-seeming face, friendly diction, and the ability to seem to be compelled to act unwillingly.
==== 184.5 int Tantum... ====
''Tantum autem efficitur sensu quodam ac ratione dicendi, ut quasi mores oratoris effingat oratio.''
So much is achieved by taste and style that the speech seems to depict the orator's character.
==== 186.0 int/bea Facilius... ====
''Facilius est enim currentem, ut aunt, incitare quam commovere languentem.''
It is easier to stoke, as they say, one who is already running, than to prod an under performer.
==== 190.0 bea Neque... ====
''Neque est enim facile perficere, ut irascatur cui tu velis, iudex, si tu ipse id lente ferre videare; neque ut oderit eum, quem tu velis, nisi te ipsum flagrantem odio ante viderit; neque ad misericordiam adducetur, nisi tu ei signa doloris tui verbis, sententiis, voce, vultu, collacrimatione denique ostenderis.''
It is not easy to create anger against whomever you want, if you do not seem to care yourself; nor is it easy to create indignation, if your audience cannot perceive your own personal disgust; nor is it easy to create pity, if you cannot embody it yourself using your words, voice, face, and tears.
==== 202.-3 bea Ita... ====
''Ita magis affectis animis iudicum quam doctis, tua, Sulpici, est a nobis tum accusatio victa.''
So it was that we defeated your charge, Sulpicius, with the minds of the judges more forced than informed.
==== 215.0 int Quare... ====
''Quare qui aut breviter aut summisse dicunt, docere iudicem possunt, commovere non possunt; in quo sunt omnia.''
So people who speak briefly or quietly are able to inform a judge, but not to excite him (on which all things depend).
==== 216.0 int/lan Illa... ====
''Illa autem, quae aut conciliationis causa leniter, aut permotionis vehemeter aguntur, contrariis commotionibus auferenda sunt, ut odio benevolentia, misericordia invidia tollatur.''
Appeals, whether intended to win favor slowly, or to disturb passionately, should be removed by contrary emotions, as when goodwill is removed by hate, pity by jealousy.
==== 221.3 int/lan/bea Parcebat... ====
''Parcebat enim adversarii dignitati, in quo ipse conservabat suam; quod est hominibus facetis et dicacibus difficillimum, habere hominum rationem et temporum et ea, quae occurrant, cum salsissime dici possint, tenere.''
He was sparing his enemy's honor, in a way that preserved his own; for it is most difficult for witty and sarcastic men to have regard for men and times and, when something very witty can be said, to hold their tongue.
==== 230.0 int/lan/bea Omnino... ====
''Omnino probabiliora sunt, quae lacessiti dicimus, quam quae priores, nam et ingenii celeritas maior est, quae apparet in respondendo, et humanitatis est responsio.''
The things we say under stress tend to be more impressive, as mental speed is greater in responding, and to respond is human.
==== 231.-4 int/bea Erat... ====
''Erat autem tanta gravitas in Domitio, tanta auctoritas, ut, quod esset ab eo obiectum, lepore magis elevandum, quam contentione frangendum videretur.''
There was such weight in Domitio, such authority, that it seemed better for his charges to be made light of by pleasantry than broken by force.
==== 247.0 int/lan Temporis... ====
''Temporis igitar ratio, et ipsius dicacitatis moderatio et temperantia et raritas dictorum distinguet oratorem a scurra, et quod nos cum causa dicimus, non ut ridiculi videamur, sed ut proficiamus aliquid, illi totum diem et sine causa.''
Regard to occasion, moderation and control of our own sharpened rhetoric, and sparsity of words will distinguish the orator from the buffoon; also, we speak with purpose, not to seem ridiculous but to accomplish some benefit, while they jest all day without cause.
==== 247.7 int Risum... ====
''Risum quaesivit, qui est, mea sententia, vel tenuissimus ingenii fructus.''
He sought comedy, which is, in my view, the meekest fruit of intelligence.
==== 251.-2 int/lan/bea Ne... ====
''Ne multa: nullum genus est ioci, quo non ex eodem severa et gravia sumantur.''
It is enough to say there is no source of humor from which serious and weighty thoughts are not also derived.
==== 251.0 int/bea Atque... ====
''Atque hoc etiam animadvertendum est, non esse omnia ridicula faceta.''
It is also notable that not all that is funny is witty.
==== 253.-4 int/bea Nam... ====
''Nam quod, quibuscumque verbis dixeris, facetum tamen est, re continetur; quod mutatis verbis salem amittit, in verbis habet leporem omnem.''
The humor of a quip that is still funny even when worded differently is contained in the facts; what loses its affect when the words are changed has all its charm in the words.
==== 255.-5 int/lan Ambiguum... ====
''Ambiguum per se ipsum probatur id quidem, ut ante dixi, vel maxime; ingeniosi enim videtur vim verbi in aliud atque ceteri accipiant, posse ducere; sed admirationem magis quam risum movet, nisi si quando incidit in aliud genus ridiculi.''
The play on words does very well on its own, as I said before, for a man seems to be clever who can divert the power of a word to a place where others cannot; but this wins admiration more than amusement, unless it is also amusing for another reason.
==== 261.-3 int/bea Natura... ====
''Natura enim nos, ut ante dixi, noster delectat error: ex quo, cum quasi decepti sumus expectatione, ridemus.''
As if cheated of our expectation, we laugh, for our error naturally delights us (as I said before).
==== 263.-3 bea Sunt... ====
''Sunt etiam illa venusta, ut in gravibus sententiis, sic in facetiis.''
They are pleasing also, even in weighty discussions.
==== 263.-2 int/bea Dixi... ====
''Dixi enim dudum, materiam aliam esse ioci, aliam severitatis; gravium autem et iocorum unam esse rationem.''
I said before the matter of a joke is different from that of serious work; but of heavy and light the pattern is the same.
==== 267.0 Etiam... ====
''Etiam illa quae minuendi aut augendi causa ad incredibilem admirationem efferuntur: velut tu, Crasse, in concione, 'ita sibi ipsum magnum videri Memmium ut in forum descendens caput ad fornicem Fabii demitteret.'''
Also, there are remarks intended to exaggerate something to an incredible degree; as when you, Crassus, said in a public meeting, "Memmius thinks himself so great that, when descending into the forum, he ducks his head to fit under the Arch of Fabius."
==== 295.2 non... ====
''non tam ut prosim causis elaborare soleo quam ut ne quid obsim; non quin enitendum sit in utroque, sed tamen multo est turpius oratori nocuisse videri causae quam non profuisse.''
My custom is to take pains, not so much to help my case, but simply not to hurt it. Of course, both should be pursued, but it is much more disgraceful for an orator to be deemed harmful to his own case than not to have helped it.
==== 301.0 int/bea Etenim... ====
''Etenim permulta sunt in causis in omni parte orationis circumspicienda ne quid offendas, ne quo irruas: saepe aliqui testis aut non laedit aut minus laedit nisi lacessatur; orat reus, urgent advocati ut invehamur, ut maledicamus, denique ut interrogemus: non moveor, non obtempero, non satisfacio- neque tamen ullam assequor laudem, homines enim imperiti facilius quod stulte dixeris reprehendere quam quod sapienter tacueris laudare possunt.''
For there are very many ways throughout a speech not to rush in or fall out: often a witness's silence would do no harm, or less harm, than if they testified; the defendant and his supporters implore us to attack, abuse, interrogate; but I am not moved; I do not submit; I do not apologize; nor do I seek any praise, since ignorant men can more readily blame your stupid behavior than praise you for acting wisely.
==== 307.-4 int/lan Omnis... ====
''Omnis cura mea solet in hoc versari semper—dicam enim saepius—si possim, ut boni efficiam aliquid dicendo, sin id minus, ut certe ne quid mali.''
All my care (as I often say) is embodied in accomplishing something good by speaking, if possible, and if not, in at least doing no harm.
==== 310.-2 bea/int equidem... ====
''equidem cum colligo argumenta causarum, non tam ea numerare soleo quam expendere.''
Indeed, when I gather arguments for a case, my habit is not to count them but to weigh them.
==== 315.0 int Hisce... ====
''Hisce omnibus rebus consideratis tum denique id quod primum est dicendum postremum soleo cogitare, quo utar exordio; nam si quando id primum invenire volui, nullum mihi occurrit nisi aut exile aut nugatorium aut vulgare aut commune.''
With all these things deliberated, I finally consider what comes first: how to begin the oration. For whenever I have looked for an introduction early, nothing has occurred to me that is not thin, trifling, commonplace, or ordinary.
==== 333.3 bea sapientis... ====
''sapientis est consilium explicare suum de maximis rebus et honesti et diserti, ut mente providere, auctoritate probare, oratione persuadere possis.''
Making and explaining a plan on the greatest affairs is for a wise person who is also honest and eloquent, who can anticipate the future, affirm his/her authority, and use rhetoric powerfully.
==== 337.4 int/bea et... ====
''et quamquam una fere vis est eloquentiae, tamen quia summa dignitas est populi, gravissima causa rei publicae, maximi motus multitudinis, genus quoque dicendi grandius quoddam et illustrius esse adhibendum videtur...''
Because of the exceptionality of the people, the importance of the interests of the state, and the great motion of the crowd, it seems only appropriate that a higher kind of speech should be used, even though there is only one force of eloquence.
==== 338.0 int/lan Fit... ====
''Fit autem ut, quia maxima quasi oratoris scaena videatur contionis esse, natura ipsa ad ornatius dicendi genus excitemur; habet enim multitudo vim quandam talem ut, quemadmodum tibicen sine tibiis canere, sic orator sine multitudine audiente eloquens esse non possit.''
Because the greatest stage for an orator seems to be a public meeting, it happens naturally that we are roused to a more fancy kind of speaking; for crowds have a certain power allowing an orator to be eloquent, without which one is like a flute player without a flute.
==== 340.0 int/lan Nullo... ====
''Nullo autem loco plus facetiae prosunt et celeritas et breve aliquod dictum nec sine dignitate et cum lepore; nihil enim tam facile quam multitudo a tristitia et saepe ab acerbitate commode et breviter et acute et hilare dicto deducitur.''
But in no place do facetious remarks, a rapid style, and terse, clever, not undignified diction, profit a speaker more; for nothing so easily diverts a crowd from gloom and bitterness as a suitably sharp and cheerful remark.
==== 347.-3 int Magna... ====
''Magna etiam illa laus et admirabilis videri solet tulisse casus sapienter adversos, non fractum esse fortuna, retinuisse in rebus asperis dignitatem; neque tamen illa non ornant, habiti honores, decreta virtutis praemia, res gestae iudiciis hominum comprobatae; in quibus etiam felicitatem ipsam deorum immortalium iudicio tribui laudationis est.''
It is customarily seen as worthy of great and admirable praise to have born a disaster wisely, not to be broken by misfortune, and to have retained dignity in hard times; also recognized are honors held, rewards for virtue, and works ratified by judges of men; mere good fortune, on the other hand, does not deserve praise, and should be attributed to the gods.
==== 350.4 lan Perge... ====
''Pergo vero, inquit Crassus, libenter enim te cognitum iam artificem aliquandoque evolutum illis integumentis dissimulationis tuae nudatumque perspicio; et quod mihi nihil aut quod non multum relinquis, percommode facis, estque mihi gratum.''
Pray continue, said Crassus, for I happily see you now as a wise artist, finally drawn out and stripped of the shield of your pretended ignorance; indeed, it is brilliant that you left nothing or not much to me, and I am thankful for it.
==== 354.-2 int hac... ====
''hac tum re admonitus invenisse fertur ordinem esse maxime qui memoriae lumen afferret.''
Upon this suggestion he is said to have realized that an orderly arrangement is what best brings light to memory.
==== 363.-1 int/bea neque... ====
''neque eo minus eloquentiam tuam et multo magis virtutem et diligentiam admiror et simul gaudeo iudicium'' ''animi mei comprobari quod semper statui neminem sapientiae laudem et eloquentiae sine summo studio et labore et doctrina consequi posse.''
I admire your eloquence not much less, and your energy and diligence much more, and at the same time I rejoice in the affirmation of my judgment that, as I always stated, nobody earns praise for wisdom and eloquence without the greatest study, work, and learning.
=== See also: ===
* [[Cicero/Quotes from Cicero's Philippics]]
* [[Cicero/Quotes from Cicero's de Senectute]]
* [[Cicero/Quotes from Cicero's de Amicitia]]
* [[Cicero/Quotes from Cicero's de Divinatione]]
* [[Cicero/Quotes from Cicero's pro Milone]]
* [[Quotes from Cicero's in Pisonem]]
* [[Quotes from Cicero's pro Fonteio]]
* [[Quotes from Cicero's Pro C. Rabirio Postumo]]
* [[Quotes from Cicero's Pro M. Marcello]]
* [[Quotes from Cicero's Pro Ligario]]
* [[Quotes from Cicero's Pro Rege Deiotaro]]
* [[Quotes from Caesar's Civil Wars, Book I]]
* [[Quotes from Caesar's Civil Wars, Book II]]
* [[Quotes from Caesar's Civil Wars, Book III]]
* [[Quotes from Cicero's Pro Flacco]]
* [[Quotes from Cicero's Pro Murena]]
* [[Quotes from Cicero's DE ORATORE BOOK I]]
[[Category:History of Italy]]
[[Category:Quotes]]
if1yisrvb7ao08f652p4lkhaipuowy7
File:Schematic Diagram Masoretic Text Early Patriarchs 40.png
6
329908
2812357
2026-05-31T23:54:46Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
The author of the Masoretic Text envisions early Judaic history, from the creation of Adam to the Exodus from Egypt, as occurring within a period of 2666 years.
2812357
wikitext
text/x-wiki
== Summary ==
The author of the Masoretic Text envisions early Judaic history, from the creation of Adam to the Exodus from Egypt, as occurring within a period of 2666 years.
== Licensing ==
{{self|GFDL|cc-by-4.0}}
bmnb6awfpjthprycz88ag25xngk4suf
2812358
2812357
2026-05-31T23:55:52Z
CanonicalMormon
2646631
This file is now on Wikimedia Commons at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Schematic_Diagram_Masoretic_Text_Early_Patriarchs_40.png (moved with FileImporter).
2812358
wikitext
text/x-wiki
== Summary ==
The author of the Masoretic Text envisions early Judaic history, from the creation of Adam to the Exodus from Egypt, as occurring within a period of 2666 years.
== Licensing ==
{{self|GFDL|cc-by-4.0}}
{{NowCommons|Schematic Diagram Masoretic Text Early Patriarchs 40.png}}
3eo5207sl0d1mq3bxov4iqwp4bckmxv
File:VLSI.Arith.2B.CLA.20260601.pdf
6
329909
2812388
2026-06-01T01:27:13Z
Young1lim
21186
{{Information
|Description=Carry Lookahead Adders 2B simplified (20260601 - 20260530)
|Source={{own|Young1lim}}
|Date=2026-05-30
|Author=Young W. Lim
|Permission={{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-4.0,3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}
}}
2812388
wikitext
text/x-wiki
== Summary ==
{{Information
|Description=Carry Lookahead Adders 2B simplified (20260601 - 20260530)
|Source={{own|Young1lim}}
|Date=2026-05-30
|Author=Young W. Lim
|Permission={{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-4.0,3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}
}}
== Licensing ==
{{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-4.0,3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}
gmy7s2jwrcgondoljin06wb7m8bfplp
File:LCal.9A.Recursion.20260601.pdf
6
329910
2812411
2026-06-01T09:45:44Z
Young1lim
21186
{{Information
|Description=LCal.9A: Recursion (20260601 - 20260526)
|Source={{own|Young1lim}}
|Date=2026-06-01
|Author=Young W. Lim
|Permission={{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-4.0,3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}
}}
2812411
wikitext
text/x-wiki
== Summary ==
{{Information
|Description=LCal.9A: Recursion (20260601 - 20260526)
|Source={{own|Young1lim}}
|Date=2026-06-01
|Author=Young W. Lim
|Permission={{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-4.0,3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}
}}
== Licensing ==
{{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-4.0,3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}
opfkdyzfqqrymh2wgxteiovjlnsji1a
File:Data.Object.1A.20260601.pdf
6
329911
2812419
2026-06-01T11:17:38Z
Young1lim
21186
{{Information
|Description=Data.1A: Data Object (20260601 - 20260526)
|Source={{own|Young1lim}}
|Date=2026-06-01
|Author=Young W. Lim
|Permission={{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-4.0,3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}
}}
2812419
wikitext
text/x-wiki
== Summary ==
{{Information
|Description=Data.1A: Data Object (20260601 - 20260526)
|Source={{own|Young1lim}}
|Date=2026-06-01
|Author=Young W. Lim
|Permission={{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-4.0,3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}
}}
== Licensing ==
{{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-4.0,3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}
t2m813i6g5tlxipqbz9eesjnci51w97