Ungerija

<mediawiki xmlns="http://www.mediawiki.org/xml/export-0.11/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.mediawiki.org/xml/export-0.11/ http://www.mediawiki.org/xml/export-0.11.xsd" version="0.11" xml:lang="mt">
  <siteinfo>
    <sitename>Wikipedija</sitename>
    <dbname>mtwiki</dbname>
    <base>https://mt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Il-Pa%C4%A1na_prin%C4%8Bipali</base>
    <generator>MediaWiki 1.47.0-wmf.3</generator>
    <case>first-letter</case>
    <namespaces>
      <namespace key="-2" case="first-letter">Medja</namespace>
      <namespace key="-1" case="first-letter">Speċjali</namespace>
      <namespace key="0" case="first-letter" />
      <namespace key="1" case="first-letter">Diskussjoni</namespace>
      <namespace key="2" case="first-letter">Utent</namespace>
      <namespace key="3" case="first-letter">Diskussjoni utent</namespace>
      <namespace key="4" case="first-letter">Wikipedija</namespace>
      <namespace key="5" case="first-letter">Diskussjoni Wikipedija</namespace>
      <namespace key="6" case="first-letter">Stampa</namespace>
      <namespace key="7" case="first-letter">Diskussjoni stampa</namespace>
      <namespace key="8" case="first-letter">MediaWiki</namespace>
      <namespace key="9" case="first-letter">Diskussjoni MediaWiki</namespace>
      <namespace key="10" case="first-letter">Mudell</namespace>
      <namespace key="11" case="first-letter">Diskussjoni mudell</namespace>
      <namespace key="12" case="first-letter">Għajnuna</namespace>
      <namespace key="13" case="first-letter">Diskussjoni għajnuna</namespace>
      <namespace key="14" case="first-letter">Kategorija</namespace>
      <namespace key="15" case="first-letter">Diskussjoni kategorija</namespace>
      <namespace key="100" case="first-letter">Portal</namespace>
      <namespace key="101" case="first-letter">Diskussjoni portal</namespace>
      <namespace key="710" case="first-letter">TimedText</namespace>
      <namespace key="711" case="first-letter">TimedText talk</namespace>
      <namespace key="828" case="first-letter">Module</namespace>
      <namespace key="829" case="first-letter">Module talk</namespace>
      <namespace key="1728" case="first-letter">Event</namespace>
      <namespace key="1729" case="first-letter">Event talk</namespace>
    </namespaces>
  </siteinfo>
  <page>
    <title>Ungerija</title>
    <ns>0</ns>
    <id>8313</id>
    <revision>
      <id>330233</id>
      <parentid>319998</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-26T21:48:20Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>ĠanniĠuzeppi</username>
        <id>27231</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330233</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="82433" sha1="p4wptx28fxe9q9bgnafr5nfysgq4lmw" xml:space="preserve">{{Infobox Pajjiż
|isem_twil_konvenzjonali     = Ungerija
|isem_nattiv                 = ''Magyarország''
|isem_komuni                 = Ungerija
|stampa_bandiera             = Flag of Hungary.svg
|stampa_emblema              = Coat of Arms of Hungary.svg
|daqs_simbolu                = 65px
|stampa_mappa                = EU-Hungary.svg
|deskrizzjoni_mappa          = 
|ħolqa_bandiera              = Bandiera tal-Ungerija
|ħolqa_emblema               = Emblema tal-Ungerija
|ħolqa_demografija           = Demografija tal-Ungerija
|mottu_nazzjonali            =
|innu_nazzjonali             = ''[[Himnusz]]''&lt;br/&gt;&lt;small&gt;''Innu''&lt;/small&gt;
|lingwi_uffiċjali            = [[Lingwa Ungeriża|Ungeriż]]
|gruppi_etniċi               = 
|kapitali                    = [[Budapest]]
| latd = 47 |latm=26 |latNS=N |lonġd=19 |lonġm=15 |lonġEW=E
|l-ikbar_belt                = [[Budapest]]
|tip_gvern                   = [[Repubblika parlamentari]]
|titlu_kap1                  = [[Lista ta' kapijiet ta' stat tal-Ungerija|President]]
|titlu_kap2                  = [[Lista ta' Prim Ministri tal-Ungerija|Prim Ministru]]
|titlu_kap3                  = [[Lista ta' Kelliema tal-Assemblea Nazzjonali tal-Ungerija|Kelliem tal-Parlament]]
|isem_kap1                   = [[Tamás Sulyok]]
|isem_kap2                   = [[Péter Magyar]]
|isem_kap3                   = [[László Kövér]]
|poż_erja                    = 109
|erja_km2                    = 93,030
|erja_mi_kw                  = 35,919
|perċentwal_ilma             = 0.74%
|sena_stima_popolazzjoni     = 2012
|stima_popolazzjoni          = 9,942,000&lt;ref name=&quot;KSH&quot;&gt;[http://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xstadat/xstadat_evkozi/e_wdsd001.html KSH ]. 15 ta' Awwissu 2012.&lt;/ref&gt;
|poż_stima_popolazzjoni      = 84 &lt;!--pożizzjoni bbażata fuq l-istati sovrani biss--&gt;
|ċensiment_popolazzjoni      = 9,937,628&lt;ref&gt;[http://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/nepsz2011/nepsz_sajto_20130328.pdf Hungarian Central Statistical Office Census Data 2011]. 28 ta' Marzu 2013.&lt;/ref&gt;
|sena_ċensiment_popolazzjoni = 2011
|densità_popolazzjoni_km2    = 107.2
|densità_popolazzjoni_mi_kw  = 279.0
|poż_densità_popolazzjoni    = 94
|sena_PGD_PSX                = 2012
|PGD_PSX                     = $195.630 biljun&lt;ref name=imf2&gt;{{ċita web |url= http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/01/weodata/weorept.aspx?sy=2011&amp;ey=2018&amp;scsm=1&amp;ssd=1&amp;sort=country&amp;ds=.&amp;br=1&amp;pr1.x=53&amp;pr1.y=8&amp;c=278%2C283%2C128%2C944&amp;s=NGDPD%2CNGDPDPC%2CPPPGDP%2CPPPPC%2CLP&amp;grp=0&amp;a= |titlu= Ungerija |editur=International Monetary Fund |data = Ottubru 2012 |aċċessdata= 18 ta' Jannar, 2013}}&lt;/ref&gt;
|poż_PGD_PSX                 = 
|PGD_PSX_per_capita          = $19,637&lt;ref name=imf2/&gt;
|poż_PGD_PSX_per_capita      = 
|sena_IŻU                    = 2013
|IŻU                         = {{increase}} 0.831&lt;ref name=&quot;HDI&quot;&gt;{{ċita web |url=http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR2013_EN_Statistics.pdf |titlu=Human Development Report 2013 |sena=2013 |editur=Ġnus Magħquda |aċċessdata=14 ta' Marzu 2013}}&lt;/ref&gt;
|poż_IŻU                     = 37
|kategorija_IŻU              = &lt;span style=&quot;color:#090;&quot;&gt;għoli ħafna&lt;/span&gt;
|tip_sovranità               = [[Storja tal-Ungerija|Formazzjoni]]
|avveniment_stabbilit1       = [[Prinċipalità tal-Ungerija|Fondazzjoni]]
|data_stabbilit1             = 895
|avveniment_stabbilit2       = [[Renju tal-Ungerija (1000–1538)|Renju kristjan]]
|data_stabbilit2             = 1000
|avveniment_stabbilit3       = Seċessjoni mill-[[Awstrija-Ungerija]]
|data_stabbilit3             = 1918
|avveniment_stabbilit4       = Repubblika kurrenti
|data_stabbilit4             = 23 ta' Ottubru 1989
|valuta                      = [[Forint]]
|kodiċi_valuta               = HUF
|żona_ħin                    = [[Ħin tal-Ewropa Ċentrali|CET]]
|differenza_ħku              = +1
|żona_ħin_legali             = [[Ħin tas-sajf tal-Ewropa Ċentrali|CEST]]
|differenza_żona_ħin_legali  = +2
|cctld                       = [[.hu]]&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;
|kodiċi_telefoniku           = +36
|sena_PGD_nominali           = 2012
|PGD_nominali                = $126.873 biljun&lt;ref name=imf2/&gt;
|poż_PGD_nominali            = 
|PGD_nominali_per_capita     = $12,735&lt;ref name=imf2/&gt;
|poż_PGD_nominali_per_capita = 
|nota1                       = Ukoll [[.eu]], li hi maqsuma flimkien mal-istati membri l-oħra tal-[[Unjoni Ewropea]].
}}
L-'''Ungerija''' ([[Lingwa Ungeriża|Ungeriż]]: ''Magyarország'') hija [[pajjiż interkjuż]] fl-[[Ewropa Ċentrali]].&lt;ref&gt;{{ċita web|url=https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/hu.html|titlu=Geography ::Hungary|editur=cia.gov|aċċessdata=31 ta' Awwissu 2011|data-aċċess=2013-08-12|arkivju-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170907162215/https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/hu.html|arkivju-data=2017-09-07|url-status=dead}}&lt;/ref&gt; Il-pajjiż jinsab fil-[[Pjanura Pannonika]] u huwa mdawwar mis-[[Slovakkja]] lejn it-tramuntana, l-[[Ukraina]] u r-[[Rumanija]] lejn il-lvant, is-[[Serbja]] u l-[[Kroazja]] lejn in-nofsinhar, is-[[Slovenja]] lejn il-lbiċ u l-[[Awstrija]] lejn il-punent. Il-belt kapitali u l-akbar belt hija [[Budapest]]. L-Ungerija hija membru tal-[[Unjoni Ewropea]], tan-[[NATO]], tal-[[Organizzazzjoni għall-Kooperazzjoni u Żvilupp Ekonomiku|OECD]], tal-[[Grupp Visegrád]], u tal-[[Ftehim Schengen]]. Il-[[lingwa uffiċjali]] hija l-[[Lingwa Ungeriża|Ungeriż]], magħrufa ukoll bħala ''Magyar'', li hija parti mill-[[Lingwi Finno-Ugriċi|Grupp Finno-Ugriċi]] u hija l-aktar lingwa mhux [[Lingwi Indo-Ewropej|Indo-Ewropea]] mitkellma fl-Ewropa.&lt;ref&gt;{{ċita ktieb|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=nlWU3CkTAi4C&amp;lpg=PA82&amp;ots=wiY3TdhJ5F&amp;dq=%22largest%20non-indo%20european%22%20europe%20hungarian&amp;pg=PA82#v=onepage&amp;q=%22largest%20non-indo%20european%22%20europe%20hungarian&amp;f=false |titlu=Globally speaking: motives for adopting English vocabulary in other languages – Google Books |editur=Google Books |aċċessdata=20 ta' Settembru 2010}}&lt;/ref&gt;

== Etimoloġija ==
L-&quot;H&quot; f'isem l-Ungerija probabbilment ġej minn assoċjazzjonijiet storiċi mal-Huns, li kienu stabbilixxew fl-Ungerija qabel l-Avari Il-bqija tal-kelma ġejja mill-forma Latinizzata tal-Grieg Biżantin Oungroi (Οὔγγροι). L-isem Grieg jista' jittieħed mill-Islavo Qadim ągrinŭ, imbagħad meħud mill-Ogur-Turk Onogur ('għaxar [tribujiet tal-] Ogurians'). Onogur kien l-isem kollettiv tat-tribujiet li aktar tard ingħaqdu mal-konfederazzjoni tribali Bulgara li ħakmet il-partijiet tal-Lvant tal-Ungerija wara l-Avari. Peter B. Golden jikkunsidra wkoll is-suġġeriment ta' Árpád Berta li l-isem ġej minn ongar Tork Khazarian (oŋ &quot;dritt&quot;, oŋar- &quot;biex tagħmel xi ħaġa aħjar, poġġiha (fl-ordni), oŋgar- &quot;biex tagħmel xi ħaġa aħjar, poġġiha (fi ordni) ), oŋaru &quot;lejn il-lemin&quot;) &quot;ġwienaħ tal-lemin&quot;. Dan jindika l-idea li l-Unjoni Magyar qabel il-Konkwista ffurmat il-“ġwienaħ tal-lemin” (= ġwienaħ tal-punent) tal-forzi militari Khazarian.

L-endonimu Ungeriż huwa Magyarország, magħmul minn magyar ('Ungeriż') u ország ('pajjiż'). L-isem &quot;Magyar&quot;, li jirreferi għan-nies tal-pajjiż, jirrifletti b'mod aktar preċiż l-isem tal-pajjiż f'xi lingwi oħra bħat-Tork, il-Persjan u lingwi oħra bħal Magyaristan jew Land of Magyars jew simili. Il-kelma Magyar hija meħuda mill-isem ta' wieħed mis-seba' tribujiet semi-nomadiċi Ungeriżi ewlenin, Magyeri. L-ewwel element maġi probabbilment ġej mill-Proto-Ugriku *mäńć- 'bniedem, persuna', li jinsab ukoll f'isem il-poplu Mansi (mäńćī, mańśi, måńś). It-tieni element eri, 'raġel, irġiel, nisel', jibqa' ħaj bl-Ungeriż ferj 'raġel', u huwa imqabbad ma' Mari erge 'iben', Finlandiż Arkajku yrkä 'żagħżugħ'.

== Storja ==
=== Qabel 895 ===
[[Stampa:Pannonia térkép 2. század.jpg|thumb|left|Provinċji Rumani u bliet barbari fi u madwar il-Baċir tal-Karpazji fis-seklu 2 AD.]]
L-Imperu Ruman rebaħ it-territorju bejn l-Alpi u ż-żona fil-punent tax-Xmara Danubju bejn is-16 u l-15 QK, bid-Danubju jkun il-fruntiera tal-imperu. Fl-14 QK Fis-sena 30 QK, Pannonia, il-parti tal-punent tal-Baċir tal-Karpazji, li tinkludi l-Ungerija tal-punent tal-lum, ġiet rikonoxxuta mill-Imperatur Awgustu fir-Res Gestae Divi Augusti bħala parti mill-Imperu Ruman. Iż-żona tax-Xlokk ta' Pannonia kienet organizzata bħala l-provinċja Rumana ta' Moesia fis-sena 6 QK. Żona fil-lvant tax-Xmara Tisza saret il-provinċja Rumana tad-Dacia fl-106 AD, li kien jinkludi l-Ungerija tal-Lvant tal-lum. Baqgħet taħt il-ħakma Rumana sa 271. Minn 235, l-Imperu Ruman għadda minn żminijiet ta' turbulenza, ikkawżati minn rivolti, rivalitajiet, u suċċessjoni mgħaġġla ta' imperaturi. L-Imperu Ruman tal-Punent waqa' fis-seklu 5 taħt l-istress ta' tribujiet Ġermaniċi li jemigraw u l-pressjoni mill-Karpjani.

Dan il-perjodu ġab ħafna invażuri fl-Ewropa Ċentrali, ibda mill-Imperu Hunnic (c. 370-469). L-iktar ħakkiem qawwi tal-Imperu Huniku kien Attila l-Hun (434-453), li aktar tard sar figura ċentrali fil-mitoloġija Ungeriża. Wara d-diżintegrazzjoni tal-Imperu Huniku, il-Ġepidi, tribù Ġermaniku tal-Lvant, li kienu vassalli tal-Huni, stabbilixxew is-saltna tagħhom stess fil-Baċir tal-Karpazji. Gruppi oħra li waslu fil-Baċir tal-Karpazji matul il-Perjodu tal-Migrazzjoni kienu l-Goti, Vandali, Lombardi, u Slavi.

Fis-snin 560, l-Avars waqqfu l-Avar Khanate, stat li żamm is-supremazija fir-reġjun għal aktar minn żewġ sekli. Il-Franki taħt Karlu Manju għelbu lill-Avari f'serje ta' kampanji matul is-snin 790. Bejn l-804 u l-829, l-Ewwel Imperu Bulgaru rebaħ l-artijiet fil-Lvant tad-Danubju u ħa f'idejh il-ħakma tat-tribujiet Slavi lokali u l-fdalijiet tal-avari. F'nofs is-seklu 9, il-Prinċipat ta' Balaton, magħruf ukoll bħala Lower Pannonian, ġie stabbilit fil-punent tad-Danubju bħala parti mill-Marċ Franki ta' Pannonian.

=== Medju Evu (895-1526) ===
[[Stampa:Kalandozasok.jpg|thumb|Rejds Ungeriżi fis-sekli 9 u 10]]
It-twaqqif tal-Istat Ungeriż huwa relatat mal-conquerors Ungeriżi, li waslu mill-steppa Pontiku-Kaspju bħala konfederazzjoni ta' seba 'tribujiet. L-evidenza ġenetika u lingwistika tissuġġerixxi li l-Ungeriżi oriġinaw fil-lvant tal-Urali tan-Nofsinhar, fil-punent tas-Siberja. Iktar tard emigraw lejn il-punent u abitaw iż-żona tal-foresti bejn ix-Xmara Volga u l-Muntanji Urali, fejn ħalltu ma' tribujiet Torok u Iranjani. L-Ungeriżi waslu fil-Baċir tal-Karpazji bħala qafas ta' imperu steppa ċentralizzat b'saħħtu taħt it-tmexxija tal-Gran Prinċep Álmos u ibnu Árpád: fundaturi tad-dinastija Árpád, id-dinastija governattiva Ungeriża u l-istat Ungeriż. Id-dinastija Árpád sostniet dixxendenza diretta minn Attila l-Hun. L-Ungeriżi ħadu l-pussess taż-żona b'mod ippjanat, b'perjodu twil ta' okkupazzjoni bejn 862 u 895.

Il-Prinċipat tal-Ungerija li qed jikber (&quot;il-Punent tat-Turkija&quot; f'sorsi Griegi medjevali) wettaq kampanji u rejds ta' suċċess u ħarxa, minn Kostantinopli sa Spanja tal-lum. L-Ungeriżi għelbu tliet armati imperjali ewlenin Franki tal-Lvant bejn 907 u 910. Telfa fil-Battalja ta 'Lechfeld fl-955 mmarkat tmiem proviżorju għall-biċċa l-kbira tal-kampanji f'territorji barranin, għall-inqas lejn il-punent.

==== L-era tar-rejiet ta' Árpádia ====
[[Stampa:Istvan-ChroniconPictum.jpg|thumb|left|Ir-Re San Stiefnu, l-ewwel re tal-Ungerija, ikkonverta n-nazzjon għall-Kristjaneżmu.]]
Fl-972, il-prinċep ħakkiem (Ungeriż: fejedelem) Géza tad-dinastija Árpád beda uffiċjalment jintegra l-Ungerija fl-Ewropa tal-Punent Kristjana. Ibnu, San Stiefnu I, sar l-ewwel re tal-Ungerija wara li għeleb lil ziju pagan Koppány. Taħt il-ħakma ta' Stiefnu, l-Ungerija kienet rikonoxxuta bħala Saltna Appostolika Kattolika.  Fuq talba tal-Papa Silvestru II, Stiefnu rċieva l-insinji tar-royalties (inkluż probabbilment porzjon tal-Kuruna Mqaddsa tal-Ungerija) tal-papat.

Fl-1006, Stiefnu kkonsolida s-setgħa tiegħu u beda riformi radikali biex jibdel lill-Ungerija fi stat feudali tal-punent. Il-pajjiż beda juża l-Latin għal skopijiet amministrattivi u, sal-1844, il-Latin baqa’ l-lingwa uffiċjali tal-amministrazzjoni. Ir-Re San Ladislaw temm ix-xogħol tar-Re San Stiefnu, ikkonsolida l-qawwa tal-istat Ungeriż u saħħaħ il-Kristjaneżmu. Il-personalità kariżmatika, it-tmexxija strateġika, u t-talenti militari tiegħu rriżultaw fit-tmiem ta' ġlidiet interni għall-poter u theddid militari barrani. Il-mara tar-re Kroat Demetrius Zvonimir kienet oħt Władysław. Fuq talba ta' Helen, Władysław intervjena fil-kunflitt u invada l-Kroazja fl-1091. Ir-Renju tal-Kroazja daħal f'unjoni personali mar-Renju tal-Ungerija fl-1102 bl-inkurunazzjoni tar-Re Coloman bħala “re tal-Kroazja u tad-Dalmazja” fl-1102 fl- Bijograd .

L-aktar re b'saħħtu u sinjur tad-dinastija Árpád kien Béla III, li kellu l-ekwivalenti ta' 23 tunnellata ta' fidda fis-sena, skont rekord tad-dħul kontemporanju. Dan qabeż id-dħul tar-re Franċiż (stmat għal 17-il tunnellata) u kien id-doppju tad-dħul tal-Kuruna Ingliża.] Andrew II ħareġ id-Diploma Andreanum li assigura l-privileġġi speċjali tas-Sassoni Transilvanjani u hija meqjusa bħala l-ewwel liġi tal-istat domestiku ta' id-dinja. Mexxa l-Ħames Kruċjata lejn l-Art Imqaddsa fl-1217, u stabbilixxa l-akbar armata rjali fl-istorja tal-Kruċjati. Il-Bolla tad-Deheb tiegħu tal-1222 kienet l-ewwel kostituzzjoni fl-Ewropa kontinentali. Nobbli iżgħar bdew jilmentaw ukoll ma’ Andrew, prattika li evolviet fl-istituzzjoni tal-parlament (parlamentum publicum).

Fl-1241-1242, is-saltna ngħatat daqqa qawwija mill-invażjoni Mongola (Tatar). Sa nofs il-popolazzjoni tal-Ungerija ta' 2 miljuni sfaw vittma tal-invażjoni. Ir-Re Béla IV ħalla l-Cumani u l-Ġassins, li kienu qed jaħarbu mill-Mongols, fil-pajjiż. Hekk kif għaddew is-sekli, saru kompletament assimilati. Wara li l-Mongols irtiraw, ir-Re Béla ordna l-kostruzzjoni ta' mijiet ta' kastelli u fortifikazzjonijiet tal-ġebel biex jiddefendu kontra t-tieni invażjoni Mongola possibbli. Il-Mongoli rritornaw lejn l-Ungerija fl-1285, iżda twaqqfu minn sistemi ġodda ta' kastell tal-ġebel u tattiċi ġodda (bl-użu ta' proporzjon akbar ta' kavallieri armati ħafna). Il-forza tal-invażjoni Mongola ġiet megħluba qrib Pest mill-armata rjali tar-Re Władysław IV. Bħal invażjonijiet aktar tard, kien faċilment imwarrab, u l-Mongols tilfu ħafna mill-forza ta' invażjoni tagħhom.

==== Età tar-rejiet eletti ====
[[Stampa:Europe mediterranean 1097.jpg|thumb|left|Ewropa fl-1097]]
[[Stampa:A Szent Korona elölről 2.jpg|thumb|Il-Kuruna Mqaddsa (Szent Korona), wieħed mis-simboli ewlenin tal-Ungerija]]
[[Stampa:Kenyérmezői csata.jpg|thumb|left|Il-Battalja tal-Qasam tal-Ħobż (Ungeriż: Kenyérmezei csata), minn Eduard Gurk]]
[[Stampa:Portrait of Matthias Corvinus, King of Hungary.jpg|thumb|Ritratt Rinaxximentali ta' Matthias Corvinus, re tal-Ungerija u l-Kroazja (1458-1490), re tal-Boemja (1469-1490) u arċiduka tal-Awstrija (1487-1490)]]
Ir-Renju tal-Ungerija kiseb waħda mill-akbar kisbiet tiegħu matul ir-rejiet Árpád, iżda l-qawwa rjali ddgħajjef fi tmiem il-ħakma tagħhom fl-1301. dixxendent bilineali tad-dinastija Árpád, irrestawra b'suċċess il-poter rjali u għeleb lill-oligarki rivali tiegħu, l-hekk imsejħa &quot;rejiet żgħar&quot;. It-tieni re Angevin Ungeriż, Louis il-Kbir (1342-1382), mexxa bosta kampanji militari ta' suċċess mil-Litwanja lejn in-Nofsinhar tal-Italja (ir-Renju ta' Napli) u kien ukoll sultan tal-Polonja mill-1370. Wara li r-Re Louis miet mingħajr werriet maskili, il-pajjiż ġie stabbilizzat biss meta t-tron sar minn Siġimund tal-Lussemburgu (1387–1437), li fl-1433 sar ukoll Imperatur tas-Santu Ruman. L-ewwel traduzzjoni tal-Bibbja għall-Ungeriż tlestiet fl-1439. Għal nofs sena fl-1437, kien hemm rewwixta tal-bdiewa antifewdali u antiklerikali fit-Transilvanja, li kienet influwenzata ħafna mill-ideat Hussiti. Minn familja nobbli żgħira fit-Transilvania, Juan Hunyadi sar wieħed mill-aktar Mulej qawwija fil-pajjiż, grazzi għall-ħiliet tiegħu bħala kmandant merċenarju. Ġie elett gvernatur u mbagħad reġent. Kien kruċjat ta' suċċess kontra t-Torok Ottomani, waħda mill-akbar rebħiet tiegħu kienet l-assedju ta' Belgrad fl-1456.

L-aħħar re qawwi tal-Ungerija medjevali kien ir-re tar-Rinaxximent Matthias Corvino (1458-1490), iben John Hunyadi. L-elezzjoni tiegħu kienet l-ewwel darba li membru tan-nobbli tela' fuq it-tron irjali Ungeriż mingħajr sfond dinastiku. Huwa kien mexxej militari ta' suċċess u patrun imdawwal tal-arti u t-tagħlim. Il-librerija tagħha, il-Bibliotheca Corviniana, kienet l-akbar ġabra ta' kronaki storiċi, xogħlijiet filosofiċi u xjentifiċi fl-Ewropa fis-seklu 15, u t-tieni l-akbar wara l-Librerija tal-Vatikan. L-oġġetti mill-Bibliotheca Corviniana ġew iskritti fir-Reġistru tal-Memorja tad-Dinja tal-UNESCO fl-2005. Serfs u nies komuni kkunsidrawh bħala ħakkiem ġust għax ipproteġihom minn talbiet eċċessivi u abbużi oħra mill-magnati. Taħt il-ħakma tiegħu, fl-1479, l-armata Ungeriża qerdet it-truppi Ottomani u Wallachi fil-Battalja tal-Qasam tal-Ħobż. Barra minn Malta għeleb lill-armati imperjali Pollakki u Ġermaniżi ta' Frederick fi Wroclaw (Wroclaw). L-armata permanenti merċenarja ta' Matthias, l-Armata l-Iswed tal-Ungerija, kienet armata kbira mhux tas-soltu għal żmienha u rebħet Vjenna, kif ukoll partijiet mill-Awstrija u l-Boemja.

Ir-Re Matthias miet mingħajr tfal leġittimi, u l-magnati Ungeriżi fittxew is-sħubija fit-tron tal-Pollakk Władysław II (1490-1516), allegatament minħabba l-influwenza dgħajfa tiegħu fuq l-aristokrazija Ungeriża. Ir-rwol internazzjonali tal-Ungerija naqas, l-istabbiltà politika tagħha batt, u l-progress soċjali staġna. Fl-1514, ir-Re Władysław II imdgħajjef u anzjan iffaċċja ribelljoni tal-bdiewa maġġuri mmexxija minn György Dózsa, li tgħaffeġ bla ħniena min-nobbli, immexxija minn John Zápolya. Id-degradazzjoni li tirriżulta fl-ordni witta t-triq għall-preeminenza Ottomana. Fl-1521, l-aktar fortizza Ungeriża b’saħħitha fin-nofsinhar, Nándorfehérvár (illum Belgrad, is-Serbja), waqgħet f'idejn l-Ottomani. It-tfaċċar bikri tal-Protestantiżmu kompliet għall-agħar ir-relazzjonijiet interni fil-pajjiż.

=== Gwerer Ottomani (1526-1699) ===
[[Stampa:Székely, Bertalan - The Women of Eger - Google Art Project.jpg|thumb|“In-Nisa ta' Eger”, pittura taż-żejt tal-1867 li tfakkar l-Assedju ta' Eger, rebħa kbira kontra l-Ottomani.]]
[[Stampa:Tabula hungariae.jpg|thumb|Tabula Hungariae, ta' 1528]]
Wara xi 150 sena ta' gwerer mal-Ungeriżi u stati oħra, l-Ottomani rebħu rebħa deċiżiva fuq l-armata Ungeriża fil-Battalja ta' Mohács fl-1526, fejn inqatel ir-Re Louis II waqt li kien qed jaħrab. Fost kaos politiku, in-nobbiltà Ungeriża maqsuma eleġġet żewġ rejiet fl-istess ħin, John Zápolya u Ferdinand I tad-dinastija tal-Habsburg. Bil-konkwista ta' Buda mit-Torok fl-1541, l-Ungerija kienet maqsuma fi tliet partijiet u baqgħet hekk sa tmiem is-seklu 17. Il-parti tal-majjistral, imsejħa Ungerija Rjali, ġiet annessa mill-Habsburgs li ħakmu bħala rejiet tal-Ungerija. Il-parti tal-lvant tar-renju saret indipendenti bħala l-Prinċipat tat-Transilvanja, taħt is-suzeranità Ottomana (u aktar tard Habsburg). Iż-żona ċentrali li fadal, inkluża l-kapitali Buda, kienet magħrufa bħala l-Pashalik ta' Buda.

Fl-1686, l-armata tal-Lega Mqaddsa, li kienet tinkludi aktar minn 74,000 raġel minn diversi nazzjonijiet, reġgħet ħadet lil Buda mingħand l-Ottomani. Wara ftit telfiet oħra mgħaffġa mill-Ottomani fis-snin ta' wara, ir-Renju kollu tal-Ungerija ttieħed mill-ħakma Ottomana fl-1718. L-aħħar inkursjoni fl-Ungerija mill-vassalli Ottomani, it-Tatari tal-Krimea, saret fl-1717. Limited Habsburg Counter- L-isforzi tar-riforma fis-seklu 17 ikkonvertiw il-biċċa l-kbira tar-renju għall-Kattoliċiżmu. Il-kompożizzjoni etnika tal-Ungerija inbidlet fundamentalment bħala riżultat tal-gwerra fit-tul mat-Torok. Ħafna mill-pajjiż kien meqrud, it-tkabbir tal-popolazzjoni kien iżżejjed, u ħafna insedjamenti iżgħar tilfu. Il-gvern Awstro-Hapsburg stabbilixxa gruppi kbar ta' Serbi u Slavi oħra fin-Nofsinhar depopolat, u stabbilixxa Ġermaniżi (imsejħin Swabians tad-Danubju) f’diversi żoni, iżda l-Ungeriżi ma tħallewx joqgħodu jew jirrisistemaw fin-nofsinhar tal-baċin tal-Karpazji.

=== Mis-seklu 18 sal-Ewwel Gwerra Dinjija (1699-1918) ===
[[Stampa:Mányoki, Ádam - Portrait of Prince Ferenc Rákóczi II - Google Art Project.jpg|thumb|Franġisku II Rákóczi, mexxej tal-gwerra tal-indipendenza kontra l-ħakma tal-Habsburg (1703-1711)]]
[[Stampa:Jakobey Buda ostroma 2.jpg|thumb|L-assedju ta' Buda f'Mejju 1849]]
[[Stampa:E. Poulton Portrait of Lajos Kossuth 1860s.jpg|thumb|Lajos Kossuth, reġent-president matul ir-Rivoluzzjoni Ungeriża tal-1848]]
Bejn l-1703 u l-1711, seħħet gwerra ta' indipendenza fuq skala kbira mmexxija minn Franġisku II Rákóczi, li wara d-detronizzazzjoni tal-Habsburgi fl-1707 fid-Dieta ta' Ónod, ħa l-poter proviżorjament bħala prinċep li jmexxi matul il-perjodu tal-gwerra, iżda rrifjuta l-kuruna Ungeriża. u t-titolu ta' &quot;king.&quot; Ir-rewwixti damu s-snin. L-armata Ungeriża ta' Kuruc, għalkemm ħadet il-biċċa l-kbira tal-pajjiż, tilfet il-battalja ewlenija f'Trencsén (1708). Tliet snin wara, minħabba ż-żieda fid-deżert, id-disfattiżmu u l-moral baxx, il-forzi ta' Kuruc ċedew.

Matul il-Gwerer Napoleoniċi u wara, id-Dieta Ungeriża kienet ilha ma tiltaqaʼ għal għexieren ta' snin. Fl-1820, l-imperatur kien sfurzat isejjaħ id-Dieta, li wasslet għal perjodu ta' riformi (1825–1848, Ungeriż: reformkor). Il-Parlament Ungeriż reġa' ltaqa' fl-1825 biex jieħu ħsieb il-ħtiġijiet finanzjarji. Ħareġ partit liberali li ffoka fuq l-għoti ta' servizzi lill-bdiewa. Lajos Kossuth ħareġ bħala mexxej tan-nobbli t'isfel fil-Parlament. Beda żieda qawwija notevoli hekk kif in-nazzjon ikkonċentra l-forzi tiegħu fuq il-modernizzazzjoni minkejja li l-monarki tal-Habsburg jostakolaw il-liġijiet liberali importanti kollha relatati mad-drittijiet ċivili u politiċi u r-riformi ekonomiċi. Ħafna riformisti (Lajos Kossuth, Mihály Táncsics) intbagħtu l-ħabs mill-awtoritajiet.

Fil-15 ta' Marzu, 1848, dimostrazzjonijiet tal-massa f'Pest u Buda ppermettew lir-riformisti Ungeriżi jimbuttaw lista ta' 12-il talba. Taħt il-Gvernatur u President Lajos Kossuth u l-Prim Ministru Lajos Batthyány, id-Dar tal-Habsburg ġiet detronizzata. Il-ħakkiem tal-Habsburg u l-konsulenti tiegħu mmanipulaw bis-sengħa lill-bdiewa Kroati, Serbi u Rumeni, immexxija minn qassisin u uffiċjali leali bis-sħiħ lejn l-Habsburgi, biex jirribellaw kontra l-gvern Ungeriż, għalkemm l-Ungeriżi kienu appoġġjati mill-maġġoranza l-kbira tas-Slovakk, Ġermaniż u Russino. u mil-Lhud kollha tas-saltna, kif ukoll minn għadd kbir ta' voluntiera Pollakki, Awstrijaċi u Taljani. F'Lulju 1849, il-Parlament Ungeriż ipproklama u ppromulga l-ewwel liġijiet fid-dinja dwar id-drittijiet etniċi u tal-minoranzi. Ħafna membri tan-nazzjonalitajiet kisbu l-ogħla pożizzjonijiet mixtieqa fi ħdan il-militar Ungeriż, bħal János Damjanich u Józef Bem. Il-forzi Ungeriżi (Honvédség) għelbu lill-armati Awstrijaċi. Biex jikkumbattu s-suċċessi tal-armata rivoluzzjonarja Ungeriża, l-Imperatur tal-Habsburg Franz Joseph I talab għajnuna mingħand il-“ġendarmi tal-Ewropa”, it-Tsar Nikola I, li l-armati zaristi russi tiegħu invadew l-Ungerija. Dan wassal biex Artúr Görgey jċedi f'Awwissu 1849. Il-mexxej tal-armata Awstrijaka, Julius Jacob von Haynau, sar gvernatur tal-Ungerija għal ftit xhur u ordna l-eżekuzzjoni tat-13-il Martri ta' Arad, mexxejja tal-armata Ungeriża, u tal- Il-Prim Ministru Batthyány f'Ottubru 1849. Kossuth ħarab fl-eżilju. Wara l-gwerra tal-1848-1849, il-pajjiż kollu kien f'&quot;reżistenza passiva.&quot;

Minħabba problemi esterni u interni, ir-riformi dehru inevitabbli, u t-telfiet militari ewlenin tal-Awstrija ġiegħlu lill-Habsburgi jinnegozjaw il-Kompromess Awstro-Ungeriż tal-1867, li bih ġiet iffurmata l-monarkija doppja tal-Awstrija-Ungerija. Dan l-imperu kellu t-tieni l-akbar żona fl-Ewropa (wara r-Russja Tsarista), u kien it-tielet l-aktar popolat (wara r-Russja u l-Imperu Ġermaniż). Iż-żewġ renji kienu mmexxija separatament minn żewġ parlamenti minn żewġ bliet kapitali, b'monarka komuni u politiki esterni u militari komuni. Ekonomikament, l-imperu kien unjoni doganali. Il-Kostituzzjoni l-antika Ungeriża ġiet restawrata u Franġisku Ġużepp I ġie inkurunat Re tal-Ungerija. L-era rat żvilupp ekonomiku impressjonanti. L-ekonomija Ungeriża li qabel kienet lura saret relattivament moderna u industrijalizzata fil-bidu tas-seklu 20, għalkemm l-agrikoltura baqgħet dominanti sal-1890. Fl-1873, l-eks kapitali Buda u Óbuda ġew magħquda uffiċjalment ma 'Pest, u ħolqu l-metropoli l-ġdida ta' Budapest. Ħafna mill-istituzzjonijiet statali tal-Ungerija u s-sistema amministrattiva moderna ġew stabbiliti matul dan il-perjodu.

[[Stampa:Austria-Hungary map.svg|thumb|L-Artijiet tal-Kuruna ta' San Stiefnu kienu jikkonsistu mit-territorji tar-Renju tal-Ungerija (16) u r-Renju tal-Kroazja-Slavonja (17).]]

Wara l-qtil tal-Arċiduka Franz Ferdinand f'Sarajevo, il-Prim Ministru István Tisza u l-kabinett tiegħu ppruvaw jipprevjenu t-tifqigħa u l-eskalazzjoni ta' gwerra fl-Ewropa, iżda l-isforzi diplomatiċi tagħhom ma rnexxewx. L-Awstrija-Ungerija rreklutat aktar minn 4 miljun suldat mir-Renju tal-Ungerija għan-naħa tal-Ġermanja, il-Bulgarija u l-Imperu Ottoman. Truppi reklutati fir-Renju tal-Ungerija qattgħu ftit ħin jiddefendu t-territorju Ungeriż attwali, bl-eċċezzjonijiet tal-Offensiva ta' Brusilov f'Ġunju 1916 u ftit xhur wara meta' l-armata Rumena għamlet attakk fuq it-Transilvanja, it-tnejn li huma ġew imwarrba. Il-Poteri Ċentrali rebħu s-Serbja. Ir-Rumanija ddikjarat gwerra. Il-Poteri Ċentrali rebħu n-Nofsinhar tar-Rumanija u l-kapitali Rumena Bukarest. Fl-1916 miet Franz Joseph u l-monarka l-ġdid Karlu IV kien jissimpatizza mal-paċifisti. B’diffikultà kbira, il-Poteri Ċentrali waqfu u rripellaw l-attakki tar-Russja Tsarista.

Il-Front tal-Lvant tal-Poteri Alleati (Entente) waqa' għal kollox. L-Imperu Awstro-Ungeriż irtira mill-pajjiżi kollha megħluba. Minkejja suċċess kbir fuq il-Front tal-Lvant, il-Ġermanja sofriet telfa sħiħa fuq il-Front tal-Punent. Sal-1918, is-sitwazzjoni ekonomika kienet marret għall-agħar (movimenti tax-xellug u kontra l-gwerra organizzaw strajks fil-fabbriki) u rewwixti fl-armata saru komuni. Fil-kapitali, il-movimenti liberali tax-xellug Awstrijaċi u Ungeriżi u l-mexxejja tagħhom appoġġaw is-separatiżmu tal-minoranzi etniċi. L-Awstrija-Ungerija ffirmat armistizju ġenerali f'Padova fit-3 ta' Novembru, 1918. F'Ottubru 1918, l-unjoni tal-Ungerija mal-Awstrija ġiet xolta.

=== Bejn il-gwerer dinjija (1918-1941) ===
[[Stampa:Trianon consequences.png|thumb|left|Bit-Trattat ta' Trianon, l-Ungerija tilfet 72% tat-territorju tagħha, il-portijiet tal-baħar tagħha u 3,425,000 Ungeriż etniku. Fl-aħmar Maġġoranza żoni Ungeriżi (skond iċ-ċensiment 1910) separati mill-Ungerija]]
Wara l-Ewwel Gwerra Dinjija, l-Ungerija għaddiet minn perjodu ta' taqlib politiku profond, li beda bir-Rivoluzzjoni tal-Aster fl-1918, li ġabet il-poter lis-soċjal-demokratiku Mihály Károlyi bħala Prim Ministru. L-Armata Rjali Ungeriża ta' Honvéd għad kellha aktar minn 1,400,000 suldat meta Károlyi ġie installat. Károlyi ċeda għat-talba tal-President Amerikan Woodrow Wilson għall-paċifismu billi ordna d-diżarm tal-armata Ungeriża.  Id-diżarm kien ifisser li l-Ungerija tibqa' mingħajr difiża nazzjonali fi żmien ta' vulnerabbiltà partikolari. Matul il-ħakma tal-kabinett paċifista ta 'Károlyi, l-Ungerija tilfet il-kontroll fuq madwar 75% tat-territorji tagħha ta' qabel il-gwerra (325,411 kilometru kwadru (125,642 sq mi)) mingħajr ġlied u kienet soġġetta għal okkupazzjoni barranija. Il-Little Entente, meta ħassu opportunità, invadiet il-pajjiż minn tliet naħat: ir-Rumanija invadiet it-Transilvanja, iċ-Ċekoslovakkja annesset l-Ungerija ta' Fuq (is-Slovakkja tal-lum), u koalizzjoni konġunta Serba-Franċiża annesset Vojvodina u reġjuni oħra tan-Nofsinhar. F'Marzu 1919, komunisti mmexxija minn Béla Kun waqqgħu l-gvern ta' Károlyi u pproklamaw ir-Repubblika Sovjetika Ungeriża (Tanácsköztársaság), segwita minn kampanja eżawrjenti ta' Terrur Aħmar. Minkejja xi suċċessi fuq il-front Ċekoslovakk, il-forzi ta’ Kun fl-aħħar mill-aħħar ma setgħux jirreżistu l-invażjoni Rumena; F'Awwissu 1919, truppi Rumeni okkupaw Budapest u keċċew lil Kun.

[[Stampa:Portraits de Miklós Horthy.jpg|thumb|Miklós Horthy, reġent tar-Renju tal-Ungerija (1920-1944)]]

F'Novembru 1919, forzi tal-lemin immexxija mill-ex ammirall Awstro-Ungeriż Miklós Horthy daħlu f'Budapest; Eżawriti mill-gwerra u l-konsegwenzi tagħha, il-popolazzjoni aċċettat it-tmexxija ta' Horthy. F'Jannar 1920, saru l-elezzjonijiet parlamentari u Horthy ġie pproklamat reġent tar-Renju tal-Ungerija stabbilit mill-ġdid, li inawgura l-hekk imsejħa &quot;era Horthy&quot; (Horthy-kor). Il-gvern il-ġdid ħadem malajr biex jinnormalizza r-relazzjonijiet barranin; Il-qtil extraġudizzjarju ta' komunisti u Lhud suspettati dam tajjeb fl-1920. Fl-4 ta' Ġunju, 1920, it-Trattat ta' Trianon stabbilixxa fruntieri ġodda għall-Ungerija. Il-pajjiż tilef 71% tat-territorju tiegħu u 66% tal-popolazzjoni tiegħu ta' qabel il-gwerra, kif ukoll ħafna sorsi ta' materja prima u l-uniku port tiegħu f'Fiume. Għalkemm ir-reviżjoni tat-trattat malajr żdiedet fil-quċċata tal-aġenda politika nazzjonali, il-gvern ta' Horthy ma' kienx lest li jirrikorri għal intervent militari biex jagħmel dan.

L-ewwel snin tar-reġim ta' Horthy kienu kkaratterizzati minn attentati ta' kolp ta' stat minn Karlu IV, ir-rikorrent Awstro-Ungeriż; ir-repressjoni kontinwa tal-komunisti; u kriżi tal-migrazzjoni skattata mill-bidliet territorjali ta' Trianon. L-azzjonijiet tal-gvern komplew jiċċaqilqu lejn il-lemin bil-mogħdija ta' liġijiet anti-Semitiċi u, minħabba l-iżolament kontinwu tal-Little Entente, il-gravità ekonomika u politika lejn l-Italja u l-Ġermanja. Id-Depressjoni l-Kbira kompliet taggrava s-sitwazzjoni u żiedet il-popolarità tal-politiċi faxxisti, bħal Gyula Gömbös u Ferenc Szálasi, li wiegħdu rkupru ekonomiku u soċjali. L-aġenda nazzjonalista ta' Horthy laħqet il-quċċata tagħha fl-1938 u fl-1940, meta n-Nażisti ppremjaw il-politika barranija ferm favur il-Ġermanja tal-Ungerija fl-Ewwel u t-Tieni Vienna Awards, u b'mod paċifiku rrestawraw iż-żoni ta' maġġoranza etnika Ungeriża mitlufa wara Trianon. Fl-1939, l-Ungerija rkuprat aktar territorju miċ-Ċekoslovakkja bil-forza. L-Ungerija ingħaqdet formalment mal-Poteri tal-Assi fl-20 ta' Novembru 1940 u fl-1941 ipparteċipat fl-invażjoni tal-Jugoslavja, u rkuprat xi wħud mit-territorji preċedenti tagħha fin-nofsinhar.

=== Tieni Gwerra Dinjija (1941-1945) ===
[[Stampa:Hungary 1941-44 Administrative Map.png|thumb|left|Ir-Renju tal-Ungerija, 1941-1944]]
L-Ungerija daħlet formalment fit-Tieni Gwerra Dinjija bħala qawwa tal-Assi fis-26 ta' Ġunju, 1941, u ddikjarat gwerra lill-Unjoni Sovjetika wara li ajruplani mhux identifikati bbumbardjaw Kassa, Munkács u Rahó. Truppi Ungeriżi ġġieldu fuq il-Front tal-Lvant għal sentejn. Minkejja s-suċċess bikri fil-Battalja ta' Uman, il-gvern beda jfittex patt ta' paċi sigriet mal-Alleati wara li t-Tieni Armata sofriet telf katastrofiku fix-Xmara Don f'Jannar 1943. Malli saru jafu dwar id-deżert ippjanat, it-truppi Ġermaniżi okkupaw l-Ungerija fid-19 ta' Marzu. , 1944 biex tiġi żgurata l-konformità ma' Horthy. F'Ottubru, hekk kif il-front Sovjetiku resaq u l-gvern għamel aktar sforzi biex jinżel mill-gwerra, it-truppi Ġermaniżi keċċew lil Horthy u installaw gvern pupazzi taħt il-Partit Faxxista Arrow Cross ta' Szálasi. Szálasi wiegħed il-kapaċitajiet kollha tal-pajjiż għas-servizz tal-magna tal-gwerra Ġermaniża. Sa Ottubru 1944, is-Sovjetiċi kienu laħqu x-Xmara Tisza u, minkejja xi telf, irnexxielhom jdawru u jassedjaw Budapest f'Diċembru.

Fit-13 ta' Frar, 1945, Budapest ċediet; F'April, it-truppi Ġermaniżi ħallew il-pajjiż taħt okkupazzjoni militari Sovjetika. 200,000 Ungeriż tkeċċew miċ-Ċekoslovakkja bi skambju għal 70,000 Slovakk li jgħixu fl-Ungerija. 202,000 Ġermaniż etniku tkeċċew lejn il-Ġermanja, u permezz tat-Trattati ta' Paċi ta' Pariġi tal-1947, l-Ungerija reġgħet ġiet ridotta għall-fruntieri immedjati tagħha ta' wara Trianon.

[[Stampa:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-680-8285A-08, Budapest, Festnahme von Juden.jpg|thumb|Nisa Lhudija arrestati fi Triq Wesselényi f'Budapest waqt l-Olokawst, bejn l-20 u t-22 ta' Ottubru, 1944]]

Il-gwerra ħalliet lill-Ungerija meqruda, qerdet aktar minn 60% tal-ekonomija u kkawżat telf sinifikanti ta' ħajjiet. Minbarra l-aktar minn 600,000 Lhudi Ungeriż maqtula, 280,000 Ungeriż ieħor ġew stuprati, maqtula, u eżegwiti jew deportati għal xogħol furzat Wara l-okkupazzjoni Ġermaniża, l-Ungerija pparteċipat fl-Olokawst, u ddeportat kważi 440,000 Lhudi, l-aktar lejn Auschwitz. Kważi kollha nqatlu. Il-kompliċità tal-gvern ta' Horthy fl-Olokawst tibqa' punt ta' kontroversja u kontroversja.

=== Dittatorjat Komunista ===
Wara t-telfa tal-Ġermanja Nażista, l-Ungerija saret stat satellita tal-Unjoni Sovjetika. It-tmexxija Sovjetika għażlet lil Mátyás Rákosi biex imexxi l-Istalinizzazzjoni tal-pajjiż, u Rákosi de facto ħakmet l-Ungerija mill-1949 sal-1956. Il-politika tal-militarizzazzjoni, l-industrijalizzazzjoni, il-kollettivizzazzjoni u l-kumpens tal-gwerra tal-gvern tiegħu wasslu għal tnaqqis serju fl-istandards tal-għajxien. B'imitazzjoni tal-KGB ta' Stalin, il-gvern ta' Rákosi stabbilixxa pulizija politika sigrieta, l-ÁVH, biex jinforza r-reġim; Madwar 350,000 uffiċjal u intellettwali ġew il-ħabs jew eżegwiti bejn l-1948 u l-1956. Ħafna nies li jaħsbu, demokratiċi, u dinjitarji tal-era ta' Horthy ġew arrestati b'mod sigriet u internati extraġudizzjarjament f'gulags domestiċi u barranin. Madwar 600,000 Ungeriż ġew deportati lejn kampijiet tax-xogħol Sovjetiċi, fejn mill-inqas 200,000 mietu.

[[Stampa:Szétlőtt harckocsi a Móricz Zsigmond körtéren.jpg|thumb|Tank Sovjetiku meqrud f'Budapest matul ir-Rivoluzzjoni tal-1956 tar-Rivista Time tal-1956 kien il-ġellied tal-libertà Ungeriż.]]

Wara l-mewt ta' Stalin fl-1953, l-Unjoni Sovjetika wettqet programm ta' de-Stalinizzazzjoni li kien kontra Rákosi u wassal għat-tkeċċija tiegħu. It-tkessiħ politiku li segwa ra ż-żieda ta' Imre Nagy fil-pożizzjoni ta' Prim Ministru. Nagy wiegħed il-liberalizzazzjoni tas-suq u l-ftuħ politiku. Rákosi eventwalment irnexxielu jiskredita lil Nagy u minfloku ma' Ernő Gerő aktar iebsa. L-Ungerija ngħaqdet mal-Patt ta' Varsavja f'Mejju 1955, hekk kif żdiedet is-skuntentizza soċjali mar-reġim. Wara l-isparar ta' dimostrazzjonijiet paċifiċi minn suldati Sovjetiċi u pulizija sigrieta, u dimostrazzjonijiet madwar il-pajjiż kollu fit-23 ta' Ottubru, 1956, id-dimostranti niżlu fit-toroq ta' Budapest, u bdew ir-Rivoluzzjoni tal-1956.

Fi sforz biex irażżan il-kaos, Nagy irritorna bħala Prim Ministru, wiegħed elezzjonijiet ħielsa, u ħarġet lill-Ungerija mill-Patt ta' Varsavja. Madankollu, il-vjolenza kompliet hekk kif ħarġu milizzji rivoluzzjonarji kontra l-armata Sovjetika u l-ÁVH; Ir-reżistenza, ta' madwar 3,000 b’saħħitha, ġġieldet kontra t-tankijiet Sovjetiċi bl-użu ta' cocktails Molotov u machine guns. Għalkemm il-preponderanza Sovjetika kienet immensa, huma sofrew telf kbir, u sat-30 ta' Ottubru, 1956, il-biċċa l-kbira tat-truppi Sovjetiċi kienu rtiraw minn Budapest biex jgħammru l-kampanja. Għal xi żmien, it-tmexxija Sovjetika ma kinitx ċerta kif tirreaġixxi, iżda eventwalment iddeċidiet li tintervjeni biex tevita d-destabilizzazzjoni tal-blokk Sovjetiku. Fl-4 ta' Novembru, rinforzi ta' aktar minn 150,000 suldat u 2,500 tank daħlu fil-pajjiż mill-Unjoni Sovjetika. Kważi 20,000 Ungeriż mietu jirreżistu l-intervent, filwaqt li 21,600 oħra wara ġew il-ħabs għal raġunijiet politiċi. Madwar 13,000 persuna ġew internati u 230 tqiegħdu taħt proċess u eżegwiti. Nagy ġie pproċessat bil-moħbi, misjub ħati, ikkundannat għall-mewt, u eżegwit bi mdendla f'Ġunju 1958. Hekk kif il-fruntieri nfetħu fil-qosor, kważi kwart ta' miljun ruħ ħarbu mill-pajjiż hekk kif ir-rivoluzzjoni ġiet imrażżna.

Wara t-tieni perjodu iqsar ta' okkupazzjoni militari Sovjetika, János Kádár, l-eks Ministru tal-Istat ta' Nagy, intgħażel mit-tmexxija Sovjetika biex imexxi l-gvern il-ġdid u jippresiedi l-Partit il-ġdid tal-Ħaddiema Soċjalisti Russu. Kádár malajr innormalizza s-sitwazzjoni.

Fis-snin tmenin, il-livelli tal-għajxien reġgħu waqgħu drastikament minħabba riċessjoni globali li l-komuniżmu ma setax iwieġeb għaliha. Meta Kádár miet fl-1989, l-Unjoni Sovjetika kienet fi tnaqqis qawwi u ġenerazzjoni żagħżugħa ta’ riformaturi rat il-liberalizzazzjoni bħala s-soluzzjoni għall-problemi ekonomiċi u soċjali.

=== Tielet Repubblika (1989-preżent) ===
It-tranżizzjoni tal-Ungerija mill-komuniżmu għall-kapitaliżmu (rendszerváltás, &quot;bidla fir-reġim&quot;) kienet paċifika u mmexxija minn staġnar ekonomiku, pressjoni politika domestika, u relazzjonijiet li jinbidlu ma' pajjiżi oħra tal-Patt ta' Varsavja. Għalkemm il-Partit tal-Ħaddiema Soċjalisti Ungeriżi beda taħditiet roundtable ma' diversi gruppi tal-oppożizzjoni f'Marzu 1989, id-difna ta' Imre Nagy bħala martri rivoluzzjonarju f'Ġunju ta' dik is-sena hija meqjusa b’mod wiesa’ bħala t-tmiem simboliku tal-komuniżmu fl-Ungerija. F'Mejju 1990 saru elezzjonijiet ħielsa u l-Forum Demokratiku Ungeriż, grupp ta' oppożizzjoni konservattiv ewlieni, ġie elett kap ta' gvern ta' koalizzjoni. József Antall sar l-ewwel Prim Ministru elett demokratikament mit-Tieni Gwerra Dinjija.

L-aħħar truppi Sovjetiċi telqu mill-pajjiż fid-19 ta' Ġunju 1991, u temmew l-okkupazzjoni Sovjetika tal-Ungerija mill-1956.

Fl-1991, l-Ungerija sofriet riċessjoni ekonomika wara l-eliminazzjoni tas-sussidji statali u l-privatizzazzjoni rapida. Il-miżuri ta' awsterità tal-gvern ta' Antall ma' kinux popolari u l-eredi legali u politiku tal-Partit Komunista, il-Partit Soċjalista, rebaħ l-elezzjonijiet tal-1994. F'kull ċiklu elettorali, il-partit fil-gvern ġie mwaqqa' u l-oppożizzjoni ġiet eletta. Madankollu, bħall-biċċa l-kbira tal-istati Ewropej post-komunisti oħra, l-Ungerija b'mod ġenerali segwiet aġenda integrazzjonista, ingħaqdet man-NATO fl-1999 u mal-Unjoni Ewropea fl-2004. Bħala membru tan-NATO, l-Ungerija pparteċipat fil-Gwerer Jugoslavi.

Il-Prim Ministru Ungeriż Viktor Orbán ilu fil-poter għal 14-il sena mingħajr interruzzjoni u b'kontroversja konsiderevoli. Huwa l-ħames mandat tiegħu, ir-raba’ konsekuttiv.

Il-partit tiegħu Fidesz irnexxielu jittrasforma l-Ungerija permezz ta' bidliet fil-Kostituzzjoni u s-sistema elettorali. B'differenza għal formazzjonijiet politiċi oħra tal-lemin estrem, li diġà twieldu b'din l-ideoloġija estrema, Orbán sar radikalizzat maż-żmien.

Ir-Reġim Orbán ġie definit, b'mod aktar sottili, bħala &quot;demokrazija illiberali.&quot; Oħrajn tkellmu dwar “demokratiku” biex jispjegaw it-taħlita bejn id-demokrazija formali u d-dittatorjat.

Is-sistema mibnija minn Orbán u l-partit tiegħu, Fidesz, li ilu jiggverna b'maġġoranza assoluta, għal aktar minn għaxar snin.

== Is-sistema politika ==
[[Stampa:1956flag.jpg|thumb|Bandiera tar-Rivoluzzjoni tal-1956 quddiem il-bini tal-Parlament Ungeriż]]
L-Ungerija hija [[repubblika parlamentari]] b’kap tal-gvern - il-[[prim ministru]] - li jeżerċita s-[[setgħa eżekuttiva]] u [[kap tal-istat]] - il-[[president]] - li r-responsabbiltajiet primarji tiegħu huma rappreżentattivi. L-Ungerija hija maqsuma fi 19-il [[provinċja]], [[Budapest]], u 23 [[belt]] b’awtorità fil-livell tal-[[kontea]].&lt;ref name=EU&gt;[https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/countries/member-countries/hungary_mt Ungerija], europa.eu&lt;/ref&gt;

==Il-kummerċ u l-ekonomija==
L-aktar setturi importanti tal-ekonomija tal-Ungerija fl-2018 kienu l-[[industrija]] (25.9%), il-kummerċ bl-ingrossa u bl-imnut, it-[[trasport]], l-akkomodazzjoni u s-[[servizzi]] tal-ikel (18.5%), l-amministrazzjoni pubblika, id-difiża, l-edukazzjoni, is-saħħa tal-bniedem u l-attivitajiet ta’ xogħol soċjali (16.8%).&lt;ref name=EU/&gt;

Il-kummerċ fi ħdan l-UE jammonta għal 82% tal-esportazzjonijiet tal-Ungerija (il-[[Ġermanja]] 27%, ir-[[Rumanija]], is-[[Slovakkja]], l-[[Awstrija]] u l-[[Italja]] 5% kull wieħed), filwaqt li barra mill-UE 2% jmorru kemm fl-[[Istati Uniti]] u kif ukoll fl-[[Ukrajna]].&lt;ref name=EU/&gt;

F’termini ta' importazzjonijiet, 75% jiġu minn Stati Membri tal-UE (il-[[Ġermanja]] 25%, l-[[Awstrija]] 6% u l-[[Polonja]] u n-[[Pajjiżi l-Baxxi]] 5%), filwaqt li barra mill-UE 6% jiġu miċ-[[Ċina]] u 5% mir-[[Russja]].&lt;ref name=EU/&gt;

==L-Ungerija fl-UE==

Hemm 21 membru fil-[[Parlament Ewropew]] mill-Ungerija. 

Fil-[[Kunsill tal-UE]], il-ministri nazzjonali jiltaqgħu b'mod regolari biex jadottaw il-liġijiet tal-UE u jikkoordinaw il-politiki. Il-laqgħat tal-Kunsill jattendu għalihom regolarment rappreżentanti tal-gvern Ungeriż, skont il-qasam tal-politika li jkun qed jiġi indirizzat.
Il-Kunsill tal-UE m’għandux persuna waħda permanenti bħala president (bħal pereżempju, il-Kummissjoni jew il-Parlament). Minflok, ix-xogħol jitmexxa mill-pajjiż li jkollu l-Presidenza tal-Kunsill, li jinbidel kull sitt xhur.
Matul dawn is-6 xhur, il-ministri mill-gvern ta’ dak il-pajjiż jippresiedu u jgħinu jiddeterminaw l-aġenda tal-laqgħat tal-Kunsill f’kull qasam ta’ politika, u jiffaċilitaw id-djalogu ma’ istituzzjonijiet oħra tal-UE.
Dati tal-presidenzi Ungeriżi: Jan-Ġun 2011

Il-Kummissarju nominat mill-Ungerija għall-[[Kummissjoni Ewropea]] hu [[Olivér Várhelyi]], li hu responsabbli għall-Viċinat u n-[[Negozjati għat-Tkabbir]].

Il-Kummissjoni hija rrappreżentata f’kull pajjiż tal-UE minn uffiċċju lokali, imsejjaħ “rappreżentanza”.

L-Ungerija għandha 12-il rappreżentant fil-[[Kumitat Ekonomiku u Soċjali Ewropew]]. Dan il-korp konsultattiv – li jirrappreżenta lil dawk li jħaddmu, il-ħaddiema u gruppi oħra ta’ interess – huwa kkonsultat dwar il-liġijiet proposti, biex ikun hemm idea aħjar tal-bidliet possibbli tas-sitwazzjonijiet soċjali u tax-xogħol fil-pajjiżi membri.

L-Ungerija għandha 12-il rappreżentant fil-[[Kumitat Ewropew tar-Reġjuni]], l-assemblea tar-rappreżentanti reġjonali u lokali tal-UE. Dan il-korp konsultattiv jiġi kkonsultat dwar il-liġijiet proposti, biex jiżgura li dawn il-liġijiet iqisu l-perspettiva minn kull reġjun tal-UE.

L-Ungerija tikkomunika wkoll mal-istituzzjonijiet tal-UE permezz tar-rappreżentanza permanenti tagħha fi [[Brussell]]. Bħala l-“ambaxxata għall-UE” tal-Ungerija, il-kompitu ewlieni tagħha hu li tiżgura li l-interessi u l-politiki tal-pajjiż huma segwiti b’mod effettiv kemm jista’ jkun fl-UE.&lt;ref name=EU/&gt;

===Il-Baġits u l-Finanzjament===
L-ammont li jħallas kull pajjiż tal-UE fil-baġit tal-UE huwa kkalkulat b’mod ġust, skont il-mezzi. Aktar ma tkun kbira l-ekonomija tal-pajjiż, aktar iħallas – u viċi versa.
L-għan tal-baġit tal-UE mhuwiex li jipprova jqassam mill-ġdid il-ġid, iżda pjuttost jiffoka fuq il-ħtiġijiet tal-Ewropej b’mod ġenerali. 

Ċifri tal-2018 għall-Ungerija:
* Nefqa totali tal-UE fl-Ungerija – € 6.298 biljun (ekwivalenti għal 4.97% tal-ekonomija Ungeriża)
* Kontribuzzjoni totali għall-baġit tal-UE – € 1.076 biljun (ekwivalenti għal 0.85% tal-ekonomija Ungeriża)

Il-flus imħallsa fil-baġit tal-UE mill-Ungerija jgħinu biex jiġu ffinanzjati programmi u proġetti fil-pajjiżi kollha tal-UE – bħall-bini ta' toroq, is-sussidjar ta' riċerkaturi u l-ħarsien tal-ambjent.&lt;ref name=EU/&gt;

== Organizzazzjoni territorjali ==
[[Stampa:RegionsHungary.png|thumb|left|Organizzazzjoni territorjali]]
[[Stampa:Hungary local administration.png|thumb|Muniċipalitajiet tal-Ungerija]]
L-Ungerija huwa maqsum f'7 reġjuni li mbagħad hija suddiviża amministrattivament f'għoxrin reġjun, li minnhom dsatax huma kontej (&quot;megyék&quot;, singular: &quot;megye&quot;) u l-oħra hija l-belt kapitali (&quot;főváros&quot;): Budapest.

== Ġeografija ==
[[Stampa:Hungary physical map.svg|thumb|left|Mappa Topografika tal-Ungerija]]
[[File:Hungary-geographic map-en.svg|thumb|Mappa ġeografika tal-Ungerija]]
[[Stampa:Kekesteto1.JPG|thumb|left|Kékes hija l-ogħla muntanja fl-Ungerija, fil-Muntanji Mátra tal-Kontea ta' Heves. Hija t-tielet l-aktar attrazzjoni turistika popolari tal-Ungerija, wara l-Lag Balaton u d-Danubju, u għandha numru ta' lukandi u slopes tal-iski. Hemm ukoll torri tat-telekomunikazzjoni fis-summit. 1,014 m s. n. m., L-isem Kékes ġej mill-kulur tal-għodu, ħafna drabi blu. Fl-Ungeriż, il-kelma kék tfisser 'blu', filwaqt li kékes impliċitament tfisser 'blu'.]]
[[Stampa:Neusiedler Lake satellite.png|thumb|left|Lag Neusiedl ([[Lingwa Ġermaniża|Ġermaniż]]: Neusiedler See), offertő ([[Ungeriż]]: fertő (tó)]]
[[File:Balaton Hungary Landscape.jpg|thumb|Lag Balatón]]
L-Ungerija hija pajjiż mingħajr kosta. Il-ġeografija tagħha tradizzjonalment ġiet definita miż-żewġ passaġġi tal-ilma prinċipali tagħha, ix-xmajjar Danubju u Tisza. Id-diviżjoni tripartitika komuni—Dunántúl (“lil hinn mid-Danubju”, Transdanubia), Tiszántúl (“lil hinn mit-Tisza”) u Duna–Tisza köze (“bejn id-Danubju u t-Tisza”)—hija riflessjoni ta' dan. Id-Danubju jgħaddi mit-tramuntana għan-nofsinhar miċ-ċentru tal-Ungerija tal-lum, u l-pajjiż kollu jinsab fi ħdan il-konfini tiegħu.

Transdanubia, li tiġġebbed miċ-ċentru tal-pajjiż lejn l-Awstrija, hija reġjun primarjament muntanjuż b'terren varjat minn muntanji baxxi. Dawn jinkludu l-aktar medda tal-Lvant tal-Alpi, Alpokalja, fil-punent tal-pajjiż, il-Muntanji Transdanubia fir-reġjun ċentrali tat-Transdanubia, u l-muntanji Mecsek u Villány fin-nofsinhar. L-ogħla punt fiż-żona huwa Írott-kő fl-Alpi, f'882 metru (2,894 pied). Il-Pjanura Żgħira Ungeriża (Kisalföld) tinsab fit-Tramuntana ta' Transdanubia. Il-Lag Balaton u l-Lag Hévíz, l-akbar lag fl-Ewropa Ċentrali u l-akbar lag termali fid-dinja rispettivament, jinsabu wkoll fit-Transdanubia.

Iż-żoni Duna–Tisza köze u Tiszántúl huma prinċipalment ikkaratterizzati mill-Pjanura l-Kbira Ungeriża (Alföld), li testendi tul il-biċċa l-kbira tal-partijiet tal-Lvant u tax-Xlokk tal-pajjiż. Fit-tramuntana tal-pjanura jinsabu l-għoljiet tal-Karpazji fi strixxa wiesgħa qrib il-fruntiera mas-Slovakkja. Il-muntanja Kékes, f'1,014 m (3,327 pied), hija l-ogħla muntanja fl-Ungerija u tinsab hemmhekk.

Fitoġeografikament, l-Ungerija tappartjeni għall-provinċja tal-Ewropa Ċentrali tar-Reġjun Ċirkumboreal fi ħdan ir-Renju Boreali. Skont il-WWF, it-territorju tal-Ungerija jappartjeni għall-ekoreġjun terrestri tal-Foresti Imħallta Pannoniċi. Huwa kiseb punteġġ medju tal-Indiċi tal-Integrità tal-Pajsaġġ tal-Foresti tal-2019 ta' 2.25/10, u kklassifikah fil-156 post globalment minn 172 pajjiż.

L-Ungerija għandha 10 parks nazzjonali, 145 riżerva naturali minuri u 35 żona ta' protezzjoni tal-pajsaġġ.

==== Fruntiera ====
L-Ungerija fruntieri totali: 2,106 km, pajjiżi tal-fruntiera (7): Awstrija 321 km; Kroazja 348 km; Rumanija 424 km; Serbja 164 km; Slovakkja 627 km; Slovenja 94 km; Ukraina 128 km.

=== Klima ===
[[File:Hungary map of Köppen climate classification.svg|thumb|left|Mappa tal-Klima Koppen-Geiger tal-Ungerija]]
[[File:Koppen-Geiger Map HUN present.svg|thumb|Mappa tal-Klima Koppen-Geiger tal-Ungerija]]
L-Ungerija għandha klima moderata staġjonali, bi sjuf ġeneralment sħan b'livelli baxxi ta' umdità ġenerali iżda xita frekwenti u xtiewi kesħin bil-borra. It-temperatura medja annwali hija 9.7 °C (49.5 °F). Temperaturi estremi huma 41.9 °C (107.4 °F) fl-20 ta' Lulju 2007 f'Kiskunhalas fis-sajf u -35 °C (−31.0 °F) fis-16 ta' Frar 1940 f'Miskolc fix-xitwa. It-temperatura għolja medja fis-sajf hija minn 23 sa 28 °C (73 sa 82 °F) u t-temperatura medja baxxa fix-xitwa hija minn -3 sa -7 °C (27 sa 19 °F). Il-medja annwali tax-xita hija madwar 600 mm (23.6 in).

L-Ungerija tinsab fis-sitt post fl-indiċi tal-protezzjoni ambjentali GW/CAN.

=== Demografija ===
[[Stampa:Population density in Hungary.png|thumb|Id-densità tal-popolazzjoni fl-Ungerija skont id-distretti]]
Il-popolazzjoni tal-Ungerija kienet 9,689,000 mill-2021, skont l-Uffiċċju Ċentrali tal-Istatistika Ungeriż, li jagħmilha l-ħames l-iktar pajjiż popolat fl-Ewropa Ċentrali u tal-Lvant, u stat membru ta' daqs medju tal-Unjoni Ewropea. Bħal f’pajjiżi oħra tal-eks blokk tal-Lvant. Id-densità tal-popolazzjoni hija ta' 107 abitant għal kull kilometru kwadru, li hija madwar darbtejn ogħla mill-medja dinjija. Madwar 70% tal-popolazzjoni tgħix fi bliet u rħula b'mod ġenerali, li hija ferm ogħla mir-rata globali ta' 56%, iżda taħt il-biċċa l-kbira tal-pajjiżi żviluppati; kwart tal-Ungeriżi jgħixu fiż-żona metropolitana ta' Budapest, fir-reġjun taċ-ċentru tat-tramuntana.

Bħal ħafna mill-pajjiżi Ewropej, l-Ungerija qed tesperjenza fertilità taħt is-sostituzzjoni; ir-rata ta' fertilità totali stmata tagħha ta' 1.43 tifel/tifla għal kull mara hija ferm taħt ir-rata ta' sostituzzjoni ta' 2.1.  Konsegwentement, il-popolazzjoni tagħha kienet qed tonqos gradwalment u qed tixjieħ malajr; L-età medja hija 42.7 sena, waħda mill-ogħla fid-dinja. Din ix-xejra ġiet aggravata minn rata għolja ta' emigrazzjoni, b'mod partikolari fost l-adulti żgħażagħ, u politiki kontra l-immigrazzjoni, li aċċelleraw fis-snin disgħin iżda minn dak iż-żmien naqsu xi ftit.

L-Ungerija tirrikonoxxi żewġ gruppi ta' minoranzi ewlenin, imsejħa “minoranzi nazzjonali” minħabba li l-antenati tagħhom għexu fir-reġjuni rispettivi tagħhom għal sekli sħaħ: komunità Ġermaniża ta' madwar 130,000 ruħ li tgħix madwar il-pajjiż kollu u minoranza Romani ta' madwar 300,000 persuna residenti primarjament fil-parti tat-Tramuntana tal-pajjiż. il-pajjiż. Xi studji jindikaw li n-numru  ta'Roma fl-Ungerija huwa konsiderevolment ogħla (876,000 ruħ, madwar 9 % tal-popolazzjoni). Skont iċ-ċensiment tal-2011, kien hemm 8,314,029 (83,7 %) Ungeriżi etniċi, 308,957 (3,1 %) Roma, 131,951 (1,3 %) Ġermaniżi, 29,647 (0,3 %) Slovakki, 5 (20,3 %) Slovakki, 203 % Rumeni, 203 %. 23,561 (0.2%) Kroat fl-Ungerija; 1,455,883 persuna (14.7% tal-popolazzjoni totali) ma ddikjarawx l-etniċità tagħhom. L-Ungeriżi għalhekk kienu jiffurmaw aktar minn 90% tan-nies li ddikjaraw l-etniċità tagħhom. Fl-Ungerija, in-nies jistgħu jiddikjaraw aktar minn etniċità waħda, għalhekk is-somma tal-etniċità hija akbar mill-popolazzjoni totali.

=== Lingwi ===
[[Stampa:MagyarsOutsideHungary.png|thumb|Reġjuni tal-Ewropa ċentrali u tal-Lvant bħalissa abitati minn kelliema Ungeriżi]]
L-Ungeriż huwa l-lingwa mitkellma uffiċjali u predominanti. L-Ungeriż huwa t-13-il lingwa materna l-aktar mitkellma fl-Ewropa b'madwar 13-il miljun kelliema nattivi u hija waħda mill-24 lingwa uffiċjali u ta' ħidma tal-Unjoni Ewropea. Barra mill-Ungerija, titkellem ukoll f'pajjiżi ġirien u minn komunitajiet tad-dijaspora Ungeriża madwar id-dinja. Skont iċ-ċensiment tal-2011, 9,896,333 persuna (99.6%) jitkellmu bl-Ungeriż fl-Ungerija, li minnhom 9,827,875 persuna (99%) jitkellmuha bħala l-ewwel lingwa tagħhom, filwaqt li 68,458 persuna (0.7%) jitkellmuha bħala t-tieni lingwa. L-Ingliż (1,589,180 kelliem, 16.0%) u l-Ġermaniż (1,111,997 kelliem, 11.2%) huma l-aktar lingwi barranin mitkellma, filwaqt li hemm diversi lingwi minoritarji rikonoxxuti fl-Ungerija (l-Armenjan, il-Bulgaru, il-Kroat, il-Ġermaniż, il-Grieg, ir-Rumen, ir-Roman), Russu, Serb, Slovakk, Sloven u Ukrajn).

L-Ungeriż huwa lingwa tal-familja tal-lingwa Uralika, mhux relatata ma' kwalunkwe lingwa ġar u relatata mill-bogħod mal-Finlandiż u l-Estonjan. Hija l-aktar waħda numeruża mil-lingwi Uraliċi f'termini ta' numru ta' kelliema u l-unika waħda mitkellma fl-Ewropa ċentrali. L-Ungeriż Standard huwa bbażat fuq il-varjetà mitkellma f'Budapest. Għalkemm japplika l-użu tad-djalett standard, l-Ungeriż għandu diversi djaletti urbani u rurali.

=== Reliġjon ===
L-Ungerija hija pajjiż storikament Kristjan. L-istorjografija Ungeriża tidentifika t-twaqqif tal-Istat Ungeriż bil-magħmudija u l-inkurunazzjoni ta' Stiefnu I bil-Kuruna Mqaddsa fis-sena 1000 AD. C. Stephen ippromulga l-Kattoliċiżmu bħala r-reliġjon tal-istat u s-suċċessuri tiegħu kienu tradizzjonalment magħrufa bħala r-Rejiet Appostoliċi. Il-Knisja Kattolika fl-Ungerija baqgħet b'saħħitha matul is-sekli u l-Arċisqof ta' Esztergom ingħata privileġġi temporanji straordinarji bħala Prinċep Primat (hercegprímás) tal-Ungerija.

[[Stampa:Pannonhalma - Bencés apátság.jpg|thumb|left|Archabbey ta' Pannonhalma]]
[[Stampa:Benczúr - Painting of St Stephen in the Basilica of Budapest.jpg|thumb|left|Ir-Re San Stiefnu joffri l-kuruna Ungeriża lill-Verġni Marija – pittura ta' Gyula Benczúr, fil-Bażilika ta' San Stiefnu, Budapest]]
[[Stampa:Bencés főapátsági templom (4640. számú műemlék) 35.jpg|thumb|left|Archabbey ta' Pannonhalma]]
[[Stampa:Főszékesegyház (6238. számú műemlék) 22.jpg|thumb|Bażilika ta' Esztergom, fejn tinsab il-kwartieri ġenerali tal-Knisja Kattolika Ungeriża.]]

Għalkemm l-Ungerija kontemporanja m'għandha l-ebda reliġjon uffiċjali u tirrikonoxxi l-libertà tar-reliġjon bħala dritt fundamentali, il-kostituzzjoni &quot;tirrikonoxxi r-rwol tal-Kristjaneżmu fil-bini tan-nazzjon&quot; fil-preambolu tagħha u fl-Artikolu VII jgħid li &quot;l-Istat jista' jikkoopera mal-knejjes għal għanijiet komunitarji. Iċ-ċensiment tal-2022 wera li 42.5% tal-Ungeriżi kienu Insara, li l-maġġoranza tagħhom kienu Kattoliċi Rumani (római katolikusok) (27.5%) u Kalvinisti Riformati Ungeriżi (formatusok) (9.8%), flimkien ma’ Luterani (evangélikusok) (1.8%), Kattoliċi Griegi (1.7%) u Insara oħra (1.7%). Il-komunitajiet Lhudija (0.1%), Buddisti (0.1%) u Iżlamiċi (0.1%) huma minoranzi żgħar. 40.1% tal-popolazzjoni ma ddikjarawx affiljazzjoni reliġjuża, filwaqt li 16.1% iddikjaraw lilhom infushom b'mod espliċitu irreliġjużi.

Matul l-istadji inizjali tar-Riforma Protestanta, ħafna mill-Ungeriżi adottaw l-ewwel Luteraniżmu u mbagħad il-Kalviniżmu fil-forma tal-Knisja Riformata Ungeriża. Fit-tieni nofs tas-seklu 16, il-Ġiżwiti mexxew kampanja ta' Kontra-Riforma u l-popolazzjoni għal darb'oħra saret predominantement Kattolika. Madankollu, din il-kampanja kienet biss parzjalment ta' suċċess u n-nobbli Ungeriż (prinċipalment Riformat) setgħet tiżgura l-libertà tal-qima għall-Protestanti. Fil-prattika, dan kien ifisser cuius regio, eius religio; għalhekk, il-biċċa l-kbira tal-lokalitajiet individwali fl-Ungerija xorta jistgħu jiġu identifikati bħala storikament Kattoliċi, Luterani, jew Riformati. Ir-reġjuni tal-Lvant tal-pajjiż, speċjalment madwar Debrecen (&quot;Ruma Kalvinista&quot;), għadhom kważi kompletament Riformati, karatteristika li jaqsmu mar-reġjuni storikament kontigwi etnikament Ungeriżi madwar il-fruntiera Rumena. Il-Kristjaneżmu Ortodoss fl-Ungerija huwa assoċjat mal-minoranzi etniċi tal-pajjiż: Armeni, Bulgari, Griegi, Rumeni, Russi, Ukraini u Serbi.

Storikament, l-Ungerija kienet dar għal komunità Lhudija sinifikanti, b'popolazzjoni ta' qabel it-Tieni Gwerra Dinjija ta' aktar minn 800,000; Madankollu, huwa stmat li ftit aktar minn 564,000 Lhudi Ungeriż inqatlu bejn l-1941 u l-1945 waqt l-Olokawst fl-Ungerija. Bejn il-15 ta' Mejju u d-9 ta' Lulju, 1944 biss, ġew deportati aktar minn 434,000 Lhudi. Mill-aktar minn 800,000 Lhudi li għexu fil-fruntieri tal-Ungerija bejn l-1941 u l-1944, xi 255,500 huwa maħsub li baqgħu ħajjin. Bħalissa hemm madwar 120,000 Lhudi fl-Ungerija.

=== Edukazzjoni ===
L-edukazzjoni hija prinċipalment pubblika, ġestita mill-Ministeru tal-Edukazzjoni. L-edukazzjoni ta' qabel l-iskola u ta' qabel l-iskola hija obbligatorja u tingħata lit-tfal kollha ta' bejn tlieta u sitt snin, u wara l-attendenza tal-iskola hija obbligatorja wkoll sal-età ta' sittax-il sena. L-edukazzjoni primarja normalment iddum tmien snin. L-edukazzjoni sekondarja tinkludi tliet tipi tradizzjonali ta' skejjel iffukati fuq livelli akkademiċi differenti: il-Gymnasium jirreġistra l-aktar tfal talent u jipprepara studenti għal studji universitarji; L-iskejjel sekondarji vokazzjonali għal studenti intermedji jdumu erba' snin, u l-iskola teknika tipprepara lill-istudenti għal edukazzjoni u xogħol vokazzjonali. Is-sistema hija parzjalment flessibbli u hemm pontijiet. L-Istudju Internazzjonali dwar ix-Xejriet tal-Matematika u x-Xjenza kklassifika lill-istudenti ta' bejn it-13 u l-14-il sena fl-Ungerija fost l-aqwa fid-dinja fil-matematika u x-xjenza.
&lt;gallery&gt;
Stampa:DE-foepulet.jpg|L-Università ta' Debrecen hija l-eqdem istituzzjoni ta' edukazzjoni għolja li ilha taħdem kontinwament fl-Ungerija mill-1538.
Stampa:Iskolaépület (527. számú műemlék).jpg|Budapest Business School, l-ewwel skola pubblika tan-negozju fid-dinja, imwaqqfa fl-1857
Stampa:Hungary Pecs 2005 June 076University.jpg|L-Università ta' Pécs hija l-eqdem università fl-Ungerija. Din twaqqfet fl-1367 mir-Re Louis il-Kbir.
Stampa:ElteFotoThalerTamas1.jpg|L-Università Eötvös Loránd hija waħda mill-akbar u l-aktar istituzzjonijiet prestiġjużi.
&lt;/gallery&gt;

Ħafna mill-universitajiet huma istituzzjonijiet pubbliċi u l-istudenti tradizzjonalment jistudjaw mingħajr ma jħallsu miżati. Ir-rekwiżit ġenerali għall-università huwa l-Matura. Is-sistema pubblika ta' edukazzjoni għolja Ungeriża tinkludi universitajiet u istituti oħra ta' edukazzjoni għolja li joffru kemm kurrikuli kif ukoll lawrji relatati sad-dottorat u jikkontribwixxu wkoll għal attivitajiet ta' riċerka. L-assigurazzjoni tas-saħħa għall-istudenti hija b'xejn sa tmiem l-istudji tagħhom. L-Ingliż u l-Ġermaniż huma lingwi importanti fl-edukazzjoni għolja Ungeriża; Hemm għadd ta' programmi ta' lawrja mgħallma f'dawn il-lingwi, li jattiraw eluf ta' studenti ta' skambju kull sena. L-edukazzjoni għolja u t-taħriġ tal-Ungerija ġew ikklassifikati fl-44 post minn 148 pajjiż fir-Rapport Globali tal-Kompetittività tal-2014.

L-Ungerija għandha tradizzjoni twila ta' edukazzjoni ogħla u ekonomija stabbilita tal-għarfien. Diversi universitajiet huma fost l-eqdem universitajiet li joperaw kontinwament fid-dinja, inklużi l-Università ta' Pécs (imwaqqfa fl-1367), l-Università ta' Óbuda (1395) u l-Universitas Istropolitana (1465). L-Università ta' Nagyszombat twaqqfet fl-1635 u marret f'Buda fl-1777, u bħalissa tissejjaħ Eötvös Loránd University. L-ewwel istitut tat-teknoloġija fid-dinja twaqqaf f'Selmecbánya fl-1735; is-suċċessur legali tagħha hija l-Università ta' Miskolc. L-Università tat-Teknoloġija u l-Ekonomija ta' Budapest hija meqjusa bħala l-eqdem istitut tat-teknoloġija fid-dinja b'grad u struttura universitarja, il-predeċessur legali tagħha, l-Institutum Geometrico-Hydrotechnicum, twaqqfet fl-1782 mill-Imperatur Joseph II.

L-Ungerija tinsab fir-raba' post (fuq il-ġar ir-Rumanija u wara l-Istati Uniti) fl-għadd ta' midalji ta' kull żmien fl-Olimpjadi Internazzjonali tal-Matematika, b'total ta' 336 midalja.

Fl-Ungerija hemm 64 istituzzjoni ta' edukazzjoni għolja akkreditati u 4 istituzzjonijiet ta' edukazzjoni għolja barranin.

F'Budapest hemm aktar minn 40 università u fakultà, fosthom jispikkaw l-Università Eötvös Loránd, l-Università tal-Ewropa Ċentrali u l-Università tat-Teknoloġija u l-Ekonomija ta' Budapest.

=== Saħħa ===
[[Stampa:Zuglo uzsoki korhaz (1).jpg|thumb|Isptar Uzsoki, Budapest]]
L-Ungerija żżomm sistema tal-kura tas-saħħa universali ffinanzjata fil-biċċa l-kbira mill-assigurazzjoni tas-saħħa nazzjonali tal-gvern. Skont l-OECD, 100% tal-popolazzjoni hija koperta minn assigurazzjoni tas-saħħa universali, li hija b'xejn għat-tfal, studenti, irtirati, nies bi dħul baxx, persuni b'diżabilità, u impjegati tal-knisja. L-Ungerija tonfoq 7.2% tal-PGD fuq il-kura tas-saħħa, tonfoq $2,045 per capita, li minnhom $1,365 huma pprovduti mill-gvern.

L-Ungerija hija waħda mid-destinazzjonijiet ewlenin għat-turiżmu mediku fl-Ewropa, partikolarment fis-settur tas-snien, li fih is-sehem tagħha huwa ta' 42% fl-Ewropa u 21% madwar id-dinja. Il-kirurġija plastika hija wkoll settur ewlieni, bi 30% tal-klijenti ġejjin minn barra. L-Ungerija hija magħrufa għall-kultura spa tagħha u hija dar għal bosta spas mediċinali, li jattiraw &quot;turiżmu spa&quot;.

Bħal fil-pajjiżi żviluppati, il-mard kardjovaskulari huwa kawża ewlenija ta' mortalità, li jammonta għal 49.4% (62,979) tal-imwiet kollha fl-2013. Madankollu, dan in-numru laħaq il-quċċata fl-1985 b'79,355 mewt, u ilu jonqos kontinwament mill-waqgħa tal-komuniżmu. It-tieni kawża ewlenija tal-mewt hija l-kanċer għal 33,274 (26.2%), li l-imwiet minn inċidenti niżlu minn 8,760 fl-1990 għal 3,654 fl-2013; In-numru ta' suwiċidji naqas b’mod preċipitat minn 4,911 fl-1983 għal 2,093 fl-2013 (21.1 għal kull 100,000 ruħ), l-inqas mill-1956. Hemm disparitajiet konsiderevoli fis-saħħa bejn il-partijiet tal-punent u tal-Lvant tal-Ungerija; Mard tal-qalb, pressjoni għolja, puplesija, u suwiċidju huma komuni fir-reġjun tal-Gran Plain, fil-biċċa l-kbira agrikolu, bi dħul baxx, fil-Lvant, iżda rari fiż-żoni tal-klassi tan-nofs u bi dħul għoli tal-Punent tat-Transdanubia u l-Ungerija Ċentrali.

L-Ungerija tinsab fis-17-il post fost l-aktar pajjiżi sikuri fid-dinja, b'rata ta' omiċidju ta’ 1.3 għal kull 100,000 ruħ.

== Kultura ==
=== Arkitettura ===
[[Stampa:Szent Istvan Bazilika Budapest.jpg|thumb|left|Il-Bażilika ta' San Stiefnu (Ungeriż: Szent István-bazilika) fi stil Neoklassiku (1851–1906) hija bażilika Kattolika Rumana f'Budapest, l-Ungerija.]]
[[Stampa:Esterházy-kastély (4051. számú műemlék) 2.jpg|thumb|Il-Palazz Eszterháza, il-&quot;Versailles Ungeriża&quot;]]
L-Ungerija hija d-dar tal-akbar sinagoga fl-Ewropa, mibnija fl-1859 fi stil neo-Moorish b'kapaċità għal 3,000 ruħ; l-akbar banju mediċinali fl-Ewropa, tlesta fl-1913 fi stil Rinaxximent modern u li jinsab fil-Park tal-Belt ta' Budapest; waħda mill-akbar bażiliki fl-Ewropa; it-tieni l-akbar abbey territorjali fid-dinja; u l-akbar nekropoli Kristjana bikrija barra l-Italja. Stili arkitettoniċi notevoli jinkludu storiciżmu u varjanti ta' art nouveau. B'kuntrast mal-istoriċiżmu, l-art nouveau Ungeriż huwa bbażat fuq karatteristiċi arkitettoniċi nazzjonali. Meta wieħed iqis l-oriġini tal-Lvant tal-Ungeriżi, Ödön Lechner, l-iktar figura importanti tal-art nouveau Ungeriż, inizjalment kien ispirat mill-arkitettura Indjana u Sirjana u aktar tard minn disinji dekorattivi tradizzjonali Ungeriżi. B'dan il-mod, huwa ħoloq sinteżi oriġinali ta' stili arkitettoniċi. Billi applikahom għal elementi arkitettoniċi tridimensjonali, ipproduċa verżjoni tal-art nouveau li kienet speċifika għall-Ungerija. Li jitbiegħed mill-istil ta 'Lechner, iżda ispirat mill-approċċ tiegħu, il-grupp ta' &quot;Żgħażagħ&quot; (Fiatalok), li kien jinkludi Károly Kós u Dezsö Zrumeczky, uża l-istrutturi karatteristiċi u l-forom tal-arkitettura tradizzjonali Ungeriża biex jintlaħaq l-istess għan.

[[Stampa:Apátsági templom (8941. számú műemlék) 7.jpg|thumb|Abbey Romanesk Ják, mibnija bejn l-1220 u l-1256]]

Minbarra ż-żewġ stili ewlenin, f'Budapest tista' tara wkoll verżjonijiet lokali ta' tendenzi minn pajjiżi Ewropej oħra. Is-Sezession ta' Vjenna, il-Jugendstil Ġermaniż, l-Art Nouveau tal-Belġju u Franza, u l-influwenza tal-arkitettura Ingliża u Finlandiża huma riflessi f'bini mibni fil-bidu tas-seklu 20. Béla Lajta inizjalment adotta l-istil ta' Lechner, aktar tard ispirat mix-xejriet Ingliżi u Finlandiżi; Wara li sar interessat fl-istil Eġizzjan, fl-aħħar wasal għall-arkitettura moderna. Aladár Árkay segwa prattikament l-istess triq. István Medgyaszay żviluppa l-istil tiegħu stess, li kien differenti minn dak ta' Lechner, billi juża motivi tradizzjonali stilizzati biex joħloq disinji dekorattivi fil-konkrit. Fil-qasam tal-arti applikata, dawk l-aktar responsabbli għall-promozzjoni tat-tixrid tal-Art Nouveau kienu l-Iskola u l-Mużew tal-Arti Dekorattiva, inawgurati fl-1896.

Fiċ-ċentru ta' Budapest kważi l-binjiet kollha għandhom madwar mitt sena, b’ħitan ħoxnin, soqfa għoljin u motivi fuq il-ħitan ta' quddiem.

=== Mużika ===
[[Stampa:Budapest Opera 1.jpg|thumb|Id-Dar tal-Opra tal-Istat Ungeriż f'Andrássy út (Sit ta' Wirt Dinji)]]
Il-mużika Ungeriża tikkonsisti prinċipalment minn mużika folkloristika tradizzjonali Ungeriża u kompożituri notevoli bħal Franz Liszt u Béla Bartók, meqjusa fost l-akbar kompożituri Ungeriżi. Kompożituri rinomati oħra jinkludu Ernst von Dohnányi, Franz Schmidt, Zoltán Kodály, Gabriel von Wayditch, Rudolf Wagner-Régeny, László Lajtha, Franz Lehár, Imre Kálmán, Sándor Veress u Miklós Rózsa. Il-mużika tradizzjonali Ungeriża għandha tendenza li jkollha ritmu daktiliku qawwi, peress li l-lingwa dejjem tisħaq fuq l-ewwel sillaba ta' kull kelma.

L-Ungerija għandha kompożituri rinomati tal-mużika klassika kontemporanja, inklużi György Ligeti, György Kurtág, Péter Eötvös, Zoltán Kodály u Zoltán Jeney. Bartók kien wieħed mill-aktar mużiċisti importanti tas-seklu 20. Il-mużika tiegħu ġiet rivitalizzata mit-temi, il-modi u l-mudelli ritmiċi tat-tradizzjonijiet mużikali folkloristiċi Ungeriżi u ġirien li studja, li huwa sintetizza b'influwenzi minn kontemporanji tiegħu fl-istil distintiv tiegħu stess. Il-mużika folk hija parti prominenti mill-identità nazzjonali u kienet sinifikanti f’żoni rurali preċedenti li jappartjenu, sa mit-Trattat ta' Trianon tal-1920, għal pajjiżi ġirien bħar-Rumanija, is-Slovakkja, il-Polonja u speċjalment fin-Nofsinhar tas-Slovakkja u t-Transilvanja. Wara t-twaqqif ta' akkademja tal-mużika mmexxija minn Liszt u Ferenc Erkel, l-Ungerija pproduċiet numru sinifikanti ta' mużiċisti tal-arti:


* Pjanisti: Ernő von Dohnányi, Ervin Nyiregyházi, Andor Földes, Tamás Vásáry, György Sándor, Géza Anda, Annie Fischer, György Cziffra, Edward Kilényi, Bálint Vázsonyi, András Schiff, Zoltán Kocsis, Dezőán Rdó u oħrajn.
* Vjolinisti: Joseph Joachim, Leopold Auer, Jenő Hubay, Jelly d'Arányi, Joseph Szigeti, Sándor Végh, Emil Telmanyi, Ede Zathurecky, Zsigmondy, Franz von Vecsey, Zoltán Székely, Tibor Varga u l-ġodda Antal Szalai, Kristó Szabaditi, Vilmos Szabadi et al.
Kantanti tal-opra: Astrid Varnay, József Simándy, Júlia Várady, Júlia Hamari, Kolos Kováts (Bluebeard in Bartók's Bluebeard)
* Diretturi: Eugene Ormandy, George Szell, Antal Doráti, János Ferencsik, Fritz Reiner, Sir Georg Solti, István Kertész, Ferenc Fricsay, Zoltán Rozsnyai, Sándor Végh, Árpád Joó, Ádám Fischer, Iván Fischer, Péter Eötvöcs, Zomátvösis Vásáry, Gilbert Varga u oħrajn
* String Quartet: Budapest Quartet, Hungarian Quartet, Végh Quartet, Takács Quartet, Kodály Quartet, Éder Quartet, Festetics Quartet,

[[Stampa:Bartók Béla 1927.jpg|thumb|Il-kompożitur Béla Bartók]]

Broughton isostni li &quot;l-ħoss infettiv tal-Ungerija kien sorprendentement influwenti f'pajjiżi ġirien (forsi grazzi għal storja komuni Awstro-Ungeriża) u mhux rari li tisma' melodiji li jdoqqu Ungeriż fir-Rumanija, is-Slovakkja u l-Polonja.&quot; Huwa b'saħħtu wkoll fiż-żona ta' Szabolcs-Szatmár u fil-parti tal-Lbiċ ta' Transdanubia, ħdejn il-fruntiera mal-Kroazja. Il-Karnival ta' Busójárás f'Mohács huwa avveniment ewlieni tal-mużika folkloristika Ungeriża, li qabel kien fih l-Orkestra Bogyiszló li ilha stabbilita u meqjusa ħafna.

Il-mużika klassika Ungeriża ilha &quot;esperiment, magħmul minn sfond Ungeriż u fuq ħamrija Ungeriża, biex tinħoloq kultura mużikali konxja [bl-użu] tad-dinja mużikali tal-kanzunetta folkloristika.&quot; Għalkemm il-klassi għolja Ungeriża ilha għal żmien twil kellha konnessjonijiet kulturali u politiċi mal-bqija tal-Ewropa, li wasslu għal influss ta' ideat mużikali Ewropej, il-bdiewa rurali żammew it-tradizzjonijiet tagħhom stess b’tali mod li sal-aħħar tas-seklu 19 il-kompożituri Ungeriżi kienu kapaċi jieħdu ħsiebhom. mużika rurali tal-bdiewa biex (mill-ġdid) toħloq stil klassiku Ungeriż. Pereżempju, Bartók ġabar kanzunetti folkloristiċi minn madwar l-Ewropa ċentrali u tal-Lvant, inklużi r-Rumanija u s-Slovakkja, filwaqt li Kodály kien aktar interessat li joħloq stil mużikali distintiv Ungeriż.

Matul l-era tal-ħakma komunista fl-Ungerija, Kumitat tal-Kanzunetta eżamina u ċensura l-mużika popolari għal traċċi ta' sovverżjoni u impurità ideoloġika. Madankollu, minn dakinhar, l-industrija tal-mużika Ungeriża bdiet tirkupra, u pproduċiet artisti ta' suċċess fl-oqsma tal-jazz bħat-trumpeter Rudolf Tomsits, il-pjanista u kompożitur Károly Binder u, f'forma modernizzata ta' folk Ungeriż, Ferenc Sebő u Márta Sebestyén. . It-tliet ġganti tal-blat Ungeriż, Illés, Metró u Omega, jibqgħu popolari ħafna, speċjalment Omega, li għandu fannijiet fil-Ġermanja u lil hinn, kif ukoll fl-Ungerija. Baned underground anzjani bħal Beatrice, mis-snin tmenin, jibqgħu popolari wkoll.

=== Letteratura ===
[[Stampa:Szekely Hungarian Rovas alphabet Szekely magyar rovas ABC.svg|thumb|L-alfabett runic Ungeriż-Scelic ġie adottat fil-pajjiż matul ir-renju tar-Re San Stiefnu (1000-1038).]]
Fi żminijiet bikrija, l-Ungeriż kien miktub b'kitba bħal runiku (għalkemm ma kienx użat għal skopijiet letterarji f'interpretazzjoni moderna). Il-pajjiż qaleb għall-alfabett Latin wara li ġie Kristjanizzat taħt ir-renju ta’ Stiefnu I tal-Ungerija fis-seklu 11. L-eqdem rekord miktub bl-Ungeriż li baqa' ħaj huwa framment tal-Karta Fundattiva tal-Abbazia ta’ Tihany (1055) li fih diversi termini Ungeriżi, fosthom il-kliem feheruuaru rea meneh hodu utu rea, “mit-triq militari ta’ Fehérvár”. Il-kumplament tad-dokument kien miktub bil-Latin.

L-eqdem test sħiħ li baqa' ħaj bl-Ungeriż huwa l-Priedka tal-Funeral u t-Talb ( Halotti beszéd és könyörgés) (1192-1195), traduzzjoni ta’ priedka bil-Latin. L-eqdem poeżija bl-Ungeriż li baqgħu ħajjin hija l-Lamentazzjonijiet Qadim Ungeriżi ta' Marija (Ómagyar Mária-siralom), traduzzjoni wkoll (mhux stretta ħafna) mil-Latin, mis-seklu 13. Hija wkoll l-eqdem poeżija Uralika li baqgħu ħajjin. Fost l-ewwel kronaki dwar l-istorja Ungeriża hemm Gesta Hungarorum (Exploits of the Hungarians) mill-awtur mhux magħruf normalment imsejjaħ Anonymus, u Gesta Hunnorum et Hungarorum (Exploits of the Huns and Hungarians) ta' Simon Kézai. It-tnejn huma bil-Latin. Dawn il-kronaki jħalltu l-istorja mal-leġġendi, għalhekk storikament mhux dejjem ikunu awtentiċi. Kronaka oħra hija l-Képes krónika (Kronika Illustrata), li nkitbet għal Louis il-Kbir.

Il-letteratura Rinaxximentali ffjorixxiet taħt ir-renju tar-Re Matthias. Janus Pannonius, għalkemm kiteb bil-Latin, huwa meqjus bħala wieħed mill-aktar nies importanti fil-letteratura Ungeriża, peress li huwa l-uniku poeta umanista Ungeriż sinifikanti ta' dak iż-żmien. L-ewwel stampar twaqqfet ukoll matul ir-renju ta' Matthias, minn András Hess f’Buda. L-ewwel ktieb stampat fl-Ungerija kien il-Chronica Hungarorum. L-aktar poeti importanti ta' dak iż-żmien kienu Bálint Balassi u Miklós Zrínyi. Il-poeżija ta' Balassi turi influwenzi medjevali, il-poeżiji tiegħu jistgħu jinqasmu fi tliet taqsimiet: poeżiji tal-imħabba, poeżiji tal-gwerra u poeżiji reliġjużi. L-aktar xogħol sinifikanti ta' Zrínyi, l-epika Szigeti veszedelem (Il-Periklu ta' Sziget, miktub fl-1648/49) huwa miktub b’mod simili għall-Iljade u jirrakkonta l-Battalja erojka ta' Szigetvár, fejn il-bużnannu tiegħu miet waqt li kien qed jiddefendi l-Kastell ta' Szigetvár. Fost ix-xogħlijiet letterarji reliġjużi, l-aktar importanti hija t-traduzzjoni tal-Bibbja minn GásPAR Károlyi (it-tieni traduzzjoni Ungeriża tal-Bibbja fl-istorja), ir-ragħaj Protestant ta' Gönc, fl-1590. It-traduzzjoni tissejjaħ il-Bibbja Vizsoly, fl-unur tal-belt fejn ġie ppubblikat għall-ewwel darba.

Il-Illuminiżmu Ungeriż seħħ madwar ħamsin sena wara l-Illuminiżmu Franċiż. L-ewwel kittieba infurmati kienu l-gwardjani tal-ġisem ta' Maria Theresa (György Bessenyei, János Batsányi u oħrajn). L-akbar poeti ta’ dak iż-żmien kienu Mihály Csokonai u Dániel Berzsenyi. L-akbar figura tar-riforma tal-lingwa kienet Ferenc Kazinczy. Minn dan iż-żmien 'il quddiem, il-lingwa Ungeriża saret fattibbli għal kull tip ta' spjegazzjonijiet xjentifiċi u, barra minn hekk, inħoloq ħafna kliem ġdid biex jiddeskrivi invenzjonijiet ġodda.

Il-letteratura Ungeriża dan l-aħħar kisbet xi reputazzjoni barra mill-fruntieri tal-Ungerija (l-aktar grazzi għat-traduzzjonijiet tagħha għall-Ġermaniż, il-Franċiż u l-Ingliż). Xi awturi Ungeriżi moderni saru dejjem aktar popolari fil-Ġermanja u fl-Italja, speċjalment Sándor Márai, Péter Esterházy, Péter Nádas u Imre Kertész. Dan tal-aħħar huwa kittieb Lhudi kontemporanju li baqa’ ħaj mill-Olokawst u rebaħ il-Premju Nobel għal-Letteratura fl-2002. L-eqdem klassiċi tal-letteratura u l-poeżija Ungeriża baqgħu kważi totalment mhux magħrufa barra mill-Ungerija. János Arany, poeta famuż Ungeriż tas-seklu 19, jibqa' maħbub ħafna fl-Ungerija (speċjalment il-kollezzjoni tiegħu ta' ballads), fost &quot;klassiċi veri&quot; oħra bħal Sándor Petőfi, il-poeta tar-Rivoluzzjoni tal-1848, Endre Ady, Mihály Babits, Dezső Kosztolányi , Attila. József, Miklós Radnóti u János Pilinszky. Awturi Ungeriżi magħrufa oħra huma Mór Jókai. Frigyes Karinthy, László Krasznahorkai, Ferenc Móra, Géza Gárdonyi, Zsigmond Móricz, Ephraim Kishon, Géza Gárdonyi, Arthur Koestler, Ferenc Molnár, Elie Wiesel, Kálmán Mikszáth, Gyula Illyés, Miklós, Stephen S.

=== Kċina ===
[[Stampa:Dobos cake (Gerbeaud Confectionery Budapest Hungary).jpg|thumb|Kejk Dobos]]
Dixxijiet tradizzjonali, bħall-goulash famuż mad-dinja kollha (gulyás stew jew soppa gulyás), jidhru b'mod prominenti fil-kċina Ungeriża. Il-platti huma spiss imħawwar bil-paprika (bżar aħmar mitħun), innovazzjoni Ungeriża. It-trab tal-paprika, miksub minn tip speċjali ta' bżar, huwa wieħed mill-aktar ħwawar komuni użati fil-kċina tipika Ungeriża. Krema qarsa ħoxna u ħoxna msejħa tejföl spiss tintuża biex ittaffi t-togħma ta 'dixx. Il-famuża soppa tal-ħut tax-xmara sħuna Ungeriża, imsejħa soppa tas-sajjieda jew halászlé, normalment hija taħlita rikka ta 'diversi tipi ta' ħut poached.

Dixxijiet tipiċi oħra huma t-tiġieġ tal-paprika, il-foie gras tal-fwied tal-wiżż, il-pörkölt stew, il-vadas (stuffat tal-kaċċa biż-zalza tal-ħaxix u l-pulpetti), it-trota bil-lewż u l-pulpetti mielħa u ħelwin, bħal túrós csusza (pulpetti bil-ġobon quark frisk u krema qarsa ħoxna) . Id-deżerti jinkludu l-kejk emblematiku ta' Dobos, strudels (rétes) mimlijin bit-tuffieħ, ċirasa, żerriegħa tal-peprin jew ġobon, pancake Gundel, għaġina tal-għanbaqar (szilvás gombóc), għaġina somlói, sopop tad-deżerta bħal ċirasa qarsa kiesħa u puree tal-qastan ħelu (gescoztenedüré), qastan imfarrak biz-zokkor u r-rum u maqsum fi frak, miksi bil-krema bit-tarjola). Perec u kifli huma pasti popolari ħafna.

Iċ-csárda hija l-aktar tip karatteristiku ta' taverna Ungeriża, taverna ta' stil antik li toffri kċina u xorb tradizzjonali. Borozó normalment jirreferi għal taverna tal-inbid qadim komdu, pince hija birra jew kantina tal-inbid u söröző huwa pub li joffri birra tal-abbozz u xi drabi ikel. Il-bisztró huwa ristorant tal-baġit li ħafna drabi joffri self-service. Il-buffet huwa l-irħas post, għalkemm jista 'jkollok tiekol bilwieqfa ma' bank. Pasti, kejkijiet u kafè huma servuti f'ħanut tal-għaġina msejjaħ cukrászda, filwaqt li eszpresszó huwa ħanut tal-kafè.

[[Stampa:Tokaji 6p 1989.jpg|thumb|L-inbid famuż Tokaji, li Louis XIV ta’ Franza sejjaħ Vinum Regum, Rex Vinorum (&quot;Inbid tar-Rejiet, Re tal-Inbejjed&quot;)]]

Pálinka huwa brandy tal-frott, distillat minn frott imkabbar fil-ġonna tal-frott li jinsabu fil-Pjanura l-Kbira Ungeriża. Huwa likur li joriġina fl-Ungerija u jiġi f'varjetà ta' togħmiet inklużi berquq (barack) u ċirasa (cseresznye). Madankollu, l-għanbaqar (szilva) hija l-aktar togħma popolari. Il-birra tmur tajjeb ma 'ħafna platti tradizzjonali Ungeriżi. Il-ħames ditti ewlenin tal-birra Ungeriżi huma: Borsodi, Soproni, Arany Ászok, Kõbányai u Dreher. In-nies tradizzjonalment ma jaqbdux in-nuċċalijiet jew il-maggijiet tagħhom meta jixorbu l-birra. Teżisti leġġenda urbana fil-kultura Ungeriża li l-ġeneri Awstrijaċi ċekknu tazzi tal-birra biex jiċċelebraw l-eżekuzzjoni tat-13-il Martri ta’ Arad fl-1849. Ħafna nies għadhom isegwu t-tradizzjoni, għalkemm iż-żgħażagħ spiss jiċħduha, billi jsostnu li l-vot waħdu kien maħsub li jdum 150. snin.

L-Ungerija hija ideali għall-produzzjoni tal-inbid, u l-pajjiż jista 'jinqasam f'ħafna reġjuni. Ir-Rumani ġabu dwieli lejn Pannonia, u sal-5 seklu WK, hemm rekords ta' dwieli estensivi f’dik li llum hija l-Ungerija. L-Ungeriżi ġabu l-għarfien tagħhom dwar il-produzzjoni tal-inbid mill-Lvant. Skont Ibn Rustah, it-tribujiet Ungeriżi kienu familjari mal-produzzjoni tal-inbid ħafna qabel il-konkwista tagħhom tal-Baċir tal-Karpazji. Ir-reġjuni tal-inbid differenti joffru varjetà wiesgħa ta' stili: il-prodotti ewlenin tal-pajjiż huma bojod niexef eleganti, b’ġisem sħiħ b’aċidità tajba, għalkemm hemm ukoll abjad ħelu kumpless (Tokaj), eleganti (Eger) u ħomor robusti u b'ġisem sħiħ ( Villány u Szekszárd ). Il-varjetajiet ewlenin huma: Olaszrizling, Hárslevelű, Furmint, Pinot gris jew Szürkebarát, Chardonnay (abjad), Kékfrankos (jew Blaufrankisch bil-Ġermaniż), Kadarka, Portugieser, Zweigelt, Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Franc u Merlot. L-inbejjed l-aktar famużi fl-Ungerija huma Tokaji Aszú u Egri Bikavér. L-inbid Tokaji irċieva tifħir minn bosta kittieba u kompożituri kbar. Għal aktar minn 150 sena, intużat taħlita ta' erbgħin ħaxix Ungeriż biex jinħoloq likur unicum, likur morr ta' kulur skur li jista' jinxtorob bħala aperitif jew wara ikla.

=== Arti folkloristika ===
[[Stampa:Voivodina Hungarians national costume and dance 6.jpg|thumb|Ungeriżi bi ħwejjeġ tradizzjonali/kostumi folkloristiċi jiżfnu ċ-csárdás]]
L-Ugros (żfin tal-qbiż) huma żfin ta' stil antik li jmorru lura għall-Medju Evu. Ugros jistgħu jinkludu żfin solo jew sieħba akkumpanjati minn mużika antika, żfin tar-ragħaj u żfin tar-ragħaj u żfin tar-rġiel solisti oħra ta' Transilvanja, u żfin tal-marċ, flimkien ma' fdalijiet ta' żfin ta' armi medjevali. Karikázó huwa żfin ċirku magħmul minn nisa akkumpanjat mill-kant ta' kanzunetti popolari. Csárdás huma żfin ta' stil aktar ġodda żviluppati fis-sekli 18 u 19, li fihom kostumi irrakkmati u mużika enerġetika. Miż-żfin tal-boot kkomplikati tal-irġiel saż-żfin taċ-ċirku tal-qedem tan-nisa, iċ-csárdás juru l-eżuberanza infettiva taż-żfin folkloristiku Ungeriż li għadu ċċelebrat fl-irħula. Il-verbunkos huwa żfin solo maskili li evolviet mill-wirjiet tar-reklutaġġ tal-armata Awstro-Ungeriża. Il-legényes huma żfin solo tal-irġiel imwettaq mill-poplu etniku Ungeriż li jgħix fir-reġjun ta' Kalotaszeg tat-Transilvanja. Għalkemm ġeneralment tiżfen minn rġiel żgħażagħ, tista 'wkoll tiżfen minn irġiel anzjani. Iż-żfin normalment isir minn żeffien wieħed kull darba, quddiem banda. In-nisa jipparteċipaw fiż-żfin billi joqogħdu f’ringieli fuq naħa waħda u jkantaw jew jgħajtu versi waqt li l-irġiel jiżfnu. Kull raġel iwettaq serje ta' punti (frażijiet taż-żfin), ġeneralment erba' sa' tmienja mingħajr ripetizzjoni. Kull punt jikkonsisti f'erba' partijiet, li kull waħda minnhom idum erba’ taħbita. L-ewwel parti ġeneralment tkun l-istess għal kulħadd (hemm biss ftit varjazzjonijiet).

L-istil attwali tal-arti folkloristika Ungeriża ħa forma fil-bidu tas-seklu 18, li inkorpora elementi Rinaxximentali u Barokk, skont iż-żona, kif ukoll influwenzi Persjani Sassani. Fjuri u weraq, xi drabi għasfur jew ornament spirali, huma t-temi dekorattivi ewlenin. L-aktar ornament komuni huwa fjura b'ċentru li jixbah l-għajn t ' rix tal-pagun. Kważi l-manifestazzjonijiet kollha tal-arti folkloristika pprattikata x'imkien ieħor fl-Ewropa ffjorixxu wkoll fost il-bdiewa Magyar xi darba jew oħra, il-fuħħar u t-tessuti tagħhom kienu l-aktar żviluppati minn kulħadd. L-aktar kisbiet notevoli fl-arti tat-tessuti tagħhom huma rakkmu, li jvarja minn reġjun għal reġjun. Dawk minn Kalotaszeg huma prodotti charming ta'd isinn orjentali, meħjuta prinċipalment f'kulur wieħed: aħmar, blu jew iswed. B'linji rotob, ir-rakkmu huwa applikat għal ċraret tal-artal, pillowcases u lożor.

L-aqwa rakkmu huwa prodott fir-reġjuni ta' Sárköz u Matyóföld. Il-kpiepel tan-nisa spiss ikollhom motivi suwed u bojod delikati daqs il-bizzilla u jagħtu xhieda tas-sens artistiku mill-isbaħ u sottili tan-nies. Il-motifi irrakkmati applikati għall-ilbies tan-nisa ġew trasferiti wkoll għal tvalji u runners tal-mejda adattati għall-użu modern bħala dekorazzjoni tal-ħajt.

==Referenzi==
{{Referenzi}}

{{Pajjiżi tal-Unjoni Ewropea}}
{{Ewropa}}
{{NATO}}

[[Kategorija:Ungerija]]
[[Kategorija:Pajjiżi interkjużi]]
[[Kategorija:Repubbliki]]
[[Kategorija:Pajjiżi stabbiliti fl-1989]]
[[Kategorija:Pajjiżi tal-Ewropa]]</text>
      <sha1>p4wptx28fxe9q9bgnafr5nfysgq4lmw</sha1>
    </revision>
  </page>
  <page>
    <title>Nikol Cauchi</title>
    <ns>0</ns>
    <id>15798</id>
    <revision>
      <id>330243</id>
      <parentid>290269</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:22:20Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330243</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="2799" sha1="tobewqd9e28gylbqnppr82mpks7wnzx" xml:space="preserve">{{Infobox bijografija}}{{Wikifikazzjoni}}

'''Nikol Ġużeppi Cauchi''' ([[Għarb]], [[2 ta' Marzu]] [[1929]] – [[15 ta' Novembru]] [[2010]]) kien is-seba' [[Djoċesi ta' Għawdex|Isqof ta' Għawdex]].

== Bijografija ==

Nikol twieled fit-2 ta' Marzu, 1929, ġewwa r-raħal [[Għawdex|Għawdxi]] tal-[[Għarb]]. Bin Ġużepp u Ġużeppa mwielda Portelli. Hu kien l-ikbar fost il-ħames ħutu.

== Saċerdot ==

Studja fis-[[Seminarju]] tal-Qalb ta’ Ġesù, Għawdex u ġie ordnat saċerdot nhar id-29 ta’ Marzu 1952. Wara mar jistudja fl-Università Gregorjana Pontifiċja f’[[Ruma]] fejn iggradwa bħala Duttur fil-Filosofija u kiseb Liċenzjat fix-Xjenzi Soċjali bejn l-1952-1956.

Mons. Cauchi għamel xogħol pastorali wkoll fil-Parroċċa ta’ Ladispoli ġewwa Ruma, u lura f’Għawdex, kien appuntat lekċerer tal-Filosofija fis-Seminarju. Serva wkoll bħala kappillan tal-Parroċċa tal-Fontana bejn l-1956 u l-1963, kien Fundatur u l-ewwel President tal-MAS (Moviment Azzjoni Soċjali), Għawdex fl-1958; ikkopera fit-twaqqif tal-Kunsill Ċiviku ta’ Għawdex, li kien semi-awtonomu fl-1961.

== Isqof ta' Għawdex ==

Mons. Cauchi ġie appuntat Isqof Titulari u Amministratur Apostoliku ta’ Għawdex nhar it-2 ta’ Marzu, u ġie ikkonsagrat isqof, fid-9 t’April 1967. Imbagħad, huwa ġie nominat isqof ta’ Għawdex nhar l-20 ta’ Lulju 1972 u d-dħul uffiċjali tiegħu fil-Katidral ta’ Ghawdex kien nhar l-
10 ta’ Settembru 1972.

Cauchi spiċċa minn Isqof ta' Għawdex f'Novembru tal-2005, wara li kien ilu 33 sena f'din il-kariga.

== Fondazzjoni Nikol Cauchi ==

Fl-2009, fl-okkażjoni ta' għeluq it-80 sena tal-Isqof Emeritus Nikol Cauchi, l-Isqof ta' Għawdex [[Mario Grech]] waqqaf Fondazzjoni li ġġib ismu. It-twaqqif tal-Fondazzjoni kienet tħabbret waqt Pontifikal li sar fil-Katidral ta' Għawdex, bħala radd ta' ħajr għall-Isqof Cauchi. L-Isqof Grech kien qal li d-Djoċesi Għawdxija waqqfet din il-Fondazzjoni biex iżżomm ħajja t-tifkira tal-Isqof Cauchi u bħala turija ta' gratitudni, rispett u mħabba lejn l-Isqof Nikol Cauchi. L-għan tal-Fondazzjoni hu li tippromwovi d-djalogu bejn il-fidi u l-kultura, kif ukoll biex jiġu organizzati inizjattivi soċjo-kulturali u reliġjużi.

== Mewt ==

L-Isqof Cauchi ddaħħal l-Isptar Ġenerali ta' Għawdex lejn l-aħħar ta' Ottubru 2010, wara li sofra problemi b'qalbu. Huwa miet nhar il-15 ta' Novembru 2010 fl-Isptar Mater Dei. Il-funeral tiegħu sar jumejn wara fil-Katidral t'Għawdex.

{{DEFAULTSORT:Cauchi, Nikol}}
[[Kategorija:Twieldu fl-1929]]
[[Kategorija:Mietu fl-2010]]
[[Kategorija:Isqfijiet ta' Għawdex]]
[[Kategorija:Isqfijiet Maltin]]
[[Kategorija:Isqfijiet Kattoliċi Rumani tas-Seklu XX]]
[[Kategorija:Isqfijiet Kattoliċi Rumani tas-Seklu XXI]]
[[Kategorija:Għawdxin]]</text>
      <sha1>tobewqd9e28gylbqnppr82mpks7wnzx</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330244</id>
      <parentid>330243</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:22:31Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330244</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="2803" sha1="a22vr5pwpq5ul9272zaqjj4atafoufz" xml:space="preserve">{{Infobox bijografija}}{{Wikifikazzjoni}}

'''Nikol Ġużeppi Cauchi''' ([[Għarb]], [[2 ta' Marzu]] [[1929]] – [[15 ta' Novembru]] [[2010]]) kien is-seba' [[Djoċesi ta' Għawdex|Isqof ta' Għawdex]].

== Bijografija ==

Nikol twieled fit-2 ta' Marzu, 1929, ġewwa r-raħal [[Għawdex|Għawdxi]] tal-[[Għarb]]. Bin Ġużepp u Ġużeppa mwielda Portelli. Hu kien l-ikbar fost il-ħames ħutu.

== Saċerdot ==

Studja fis-[[Seminarju]] tal-Qalb ta’ Ġesù, Għawdex u ġie ordnat saċerdot nhar id-29 ta’ Marzu 1952. Wara mar jistudja fl-Università Gregorjana Pontifiċja f’[[Ruma]] fejn iggradwa bħala Duttur fil-Filosofija u kiseb Liċenzjat fix-Xjenzi Soċjali bejn l-1952-1956.

Mons. Cauchi għamel xogħol pastorali wkoll fil-Parroċċa ta’ Ladispoli ġewwa [[Ruma]], u lura f’Għawdex, kien appuntat lekċerer tal-Filosofija fis-Seminarju. Serva wkoll bħala kappillan tal-Parroċċa tal-Fontana bejn l-1956 u l-1963, kien Fundatur u l-ewwel President tal-MAS (Moviment Azzjoni Soċjali), Għawdex fl-1958; ikkopera fit-twaqqif tal-Kunsill Ċiviku ta’ Għawdex, li kien semi-awtonomu fl-1961.

== Isqof ta' Għawdex ==

Mons. Cauchi ġie appuntat Isqof Titulari u Amministratur Apostoliku ta’ Għawdex nhar it-2 ta’ Marzu, u ġie ikkonsagrat isqof, fid-9 t’April 1967. Imbagħad, huwa ġie nominat isqof ta’ Għawdex nhar l-20 ta’ Lulju 1972 u d-dħul uffiċjali tiegħu fil-Katidral ta’ Ghawdex kien nhar l-
10 ta’ Settembru 1972.

Cauchi spiċċa minn Isqof ta' Għawdex f'Novembru tal-2005, wara li kien ilu 33 sena f'din il-kariga.

== Fondazzjoni Nikol Cauchi ==

Fl-2009, fl-okkażjoni ta' għeluq it-80 sena tal-Isqof Emeritus Nikol Cauchi, l-Isqof ta' Għawdex [[Mario Grech]] waqqaf Fondazzjoni li ġġib ismu. It-twaqqif tal-Fondazzjoni kienet tħabbret waqt Pontifikal li sar fil-Katidral ta' Għawdex, bħala radd ta' ħajr għall-Isqof Cauchi. L-Isqof Grech kien qal li d-Djoċesi Għawdxija waqqfet din il-Fondazzjoni biex iżżomm ħajja t-tifkira tal-Isqof Cauchi u bħala turija ta' gratitudni, rispett u mħabba lejn l-Isqof Nikol Cauchi. L-għan tal-Fondazzjoni hu li tippromwovi d-djalogu bejn il-fidi u l-kultura, kif ukoll biex jiġu organizzati inizjattivi soċjo-kulturali u reliġjużi.

== Mewt ==

L-Isqof Cauchi ddaħħal l-Isptar Ġenerali ta' Għawdex lejn l-aħħar ta' Ottubru 2010, wara li sofra problemi b'qalbu. Huwa miet nhar il-15 ta' Novembru 2010 fl-Isptar Mater Dei. Il-funeral tiegħu sar jumejn wara fil-Katidral t'Għawdex.

{{DEFAULTSORT:Cauchi, Nikol}}
[[Kategorija:Twieldu fl-1929]]
[[Kategorija:Mietu fl-2010]]
[[Kategorija:Isqfijiet ta' Għawdex]]
[[Kategorija:Isqfijiet Maltin]]
[[Kategorija:Isqfijiet Kattoliċi Rumani tas-Seklu XX]]
[[Kategorija:Isqfijiet Kattoliċi Rumani tas-Seklu XXI]]
[[Kategorija:Għawdxin]]</text>
      <sha1>a22vr5pwpq5ul9272zaqjj4atafoufz</sha1>
    </revision>
  </page>
  <page>
    <title>Ħonduras</title>
    <ns>0</ns>
    <id>20168</id>
    <revision>
      <id>330232</id>
      <parentid>328973</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-26T21:46:27Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>ĠanniĠuzeppi</username>
        <id>27231</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330232</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="162208" sha1="4waa1w28iq5adfh431xr3pzzoqxfgr9" xml:space="preserve">{{stub|ġeografija}}
{{Infobox Pajjiż
|isem_twil_konvenzjonali     = Repubblika tal-Ħonduras
|isem_nattiv                 = ''República de Honduras''
|isem_komuni                 = Ħonduras
|stampa_bandiera             = Flag of Honduras (1949–2022, 2026–present).svg
|stampa_emblema              = Coat of arms of Honduras.svg
|stampa_mappa                = HND orthographic.svg
|deskrizzjoni_mappa          =
|ħolqa_bandiera              = Bandiera tal-Ħonduras
|ħolqa_emblema               = Emblema tal-Ħonduras
|ħolqa_demografija           = Demografija tal-Ħonduras
|mottu_nazzjonali            = &quot;Libre, Soberana e Independiente&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;Ħieles, Sovran u Indipendenti&quot;
|innu_nazzjonali             = ''[[Himno Nacional de Honduras]]''&lt;br /&gt;''Innu Nazzjonali tal-Ħonduras''
[[File:Honduras National Anthem.ogg]]
|lingwi_uffiċjali            = [[Lingwa Spanjola|Spanjol]]
|gruppi_etniċi               = 
|kapitali                    = [[Tegucigalpa]]
|l-ikbar_belt                = [[Tegucigalpa]]
|latd=14 |latm=6 |latNS=N |lonġd=87 |lonġm=13 |lonġEW=W
|tip_gvern                   = [[Repubblika Kostituzzjonali]]
|titlu_kap1                  = [[President tal-Ħonduras|President]]
|titlu_kap2                  = [[Viċi President tal-Ħonduras|Viċi President]]
|titlu_kap3                  = [[President tal-Kungress Nazzjonali tal-Ħonduras|President tal-&lt;br /&gt;Kungress Nazzjonali]]
|titlu_kap4                  = 
|isem_kap1                   = [[Nasry Asfura]]
|isem_kap2                   = 
[[María Antonieta Mejía]]
[[Carlos Flores Guifarro]]
[[Diana Herrera]]
|isem_kap3                   = [[Tomás Zambrano]]
|isem_kap4                   = 
|żona_kklassifika            = 102
|poż_erja                    = 101 &lt;!--pożizzjoni bbażata fuq l-istati sovrani biss--&gt;
|erja_km2                    = 112,492
|erja_mi_kw                  = 43,278
|perċentwal_ilma             = 
|sena_stima_popolazzjoni     = 2023
|stima_popolazzjoni          = 9,571,352
|poż_stima_popolazzjoni      = 95 &lt;!--pożizzjoni bbażata fuq l-istati sovrani biss--&gt;
|ċensiment_popolazzjoni      = 
|sena_ċensiment_popolazzjoni = 
|densità_popolazzjoni_km2    = 85
|densità_popolazzjoni_mi_kw  = 220.1
|poż_densità_popolazzjoni    = 128 &lt;!--pożizzjoni bbażata fuq l-istati sovrani biss--&gt;
|sena_PGD_PSX                = 2011
|PGD_PSX                     = $35.697 biljun
|poż_PGD_PSX                 = 
|PGD_PSX_per_capita          = $4,345
|poż_PGD_PSX_per_capita      = 
|sena_IŻU                    = 2010
|IŻU                         = {{profitt}} 0.574&lt;ref name=&quot;HDI&quot;&gt;{{ċita web |url=http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2010_EN_Table1.pdf |titlu=Rapport tal-Iżvilupp Uman 2010 |sena=2010 |pubblikatur=Nazzjonijiet Uniti |data-aċċess=2010-11-05 |lingwa=en}}&lt;/ref&gt;
|poż_IŻU                     = 106
|kategorija_IŻU              = &lt;span style=&quot;color:#fc0&quot;&gt;medju&lt;/span&gt;
|tip_sovranità               = [[Indipendenza]] minn [[Spanja]]
|avveniment_stabbilit1       = Iddikjarata&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt; minn Spanja
|data_stabbilit1             = 15 ta Settembru, 1921
|avveniment_stabbilit2 = Iddikjarata mill-&lt;br /&gt;[[L-Ewwel Imperu Messikan|Ewwel Imperu Messikan]]
|data_stabbilit2 = 1 ta' Lulju 1823
|avveniment_stabbilit3 = Iddikjarata, bħala Ħonduras, mir-[[Repubblika Federali tal-Amerika Ċentrali]]
|data_stabbilit3 = 5 ta' Novembru, 1938
|valuta                      = [[Lempira tal-Ħonduras|Lempira]]
|kodiċi_valuta               = HNL
|żona_ħin                    = [[Żona tal-Ħin Ċentrali|CST]]
|differenza_ħku              = -6
|cctld                       = [[.hn]]
|kodiċi_telefoniku           = +504
|sena_PGD_nominali           = 2011
|PGD_nominali                = $17.381 biljun
|poż_PGD_nominali            = 
|PGD_nominali_per_capita     = $2,115
|poż_PGD_nominali_per_capita = 
|nota1                       = Bħala parti mir-[[Repubblika Federali tal-Amerika Ċentrali]].
|noti                        = 
|total_popolazzjoni=9,571,352}}
ir-'''Repubblika tal-Ħonduras''' ([[Lingwa Spanjola|Spanjol]]: ''República de Honduras''), hu pajjiż li jinsab fl-[[Amerika Ċentrali]]. F'ċertu żminijiet kien imsejjaħ '''Ħonduras Spanjola''' biex jiġi distint mill-''[[Ħonduras Brittanika]]'', li sar l-istat modern ta' kuljum fil-[[Beliże]].&lt;ref&gt;{{ċita web |url=http://www.aboututila.com/UtilaInfo/William-Strong/AI-Environmental.htm |titlu=Archeological Investigations in the Bay Islands, Spanish Honduras |sit=Aboututila.com |data-aċċess=2010-06-27 |lingwa=Ingliż |arkivju-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100922124508/http://aboututila.com/UtilaInfo/William-Strong/AI-Environmental.htm |arkivju-data=2010-09-22 |url-status=dead }}&lt;/ref&gt; Il-pajjiż huwa mdawwar lejn il-punent mill-[[Gwatemala]], [[El Salvador]] għall-lbiċ, [[Nikaragwa]] fix-Xlokk, l-Oċean Paċifiku fin-nofsinhar fil-[[Golf ta' Fonseca]], u l-[[Golf tal-Ħonduras]] lejn it-tramuntana, fejn hemm daħla kbira tal-[[Baħar Karibew]].

It-territorju kontinentali tiegħu huwa mdawwar fit-tramuntana u l-lvant mill-Baħar Karibew, fix-xlokk min-Nikaragwa, fil-lbiċ mill-Golf ta' Fonseca, tributarju tal-Oċean Paċifiku, fin-nofsinhar minn El Salvador, u fil-punent mill-Gwatemala. Il-fruntieri marittimi tiegħu huma kondiviżi mal-Messiku, il-Belize, Kuba, ir-Renju Unit (permezz tal-Gżejjer Cayman), il-Gwatemala, il-Ġamajka, il-Kolombja, in-Nikaragwa, u El Salvador. L-erja totali tal-art tal-Honduras, inklużi l-gżejjer kollha tagħha, hija ta' 112,777 km².

L-organizzazzjoni territorjali tal-Honduras taqsam il-pajjiż, politikament u amministrattivament, fi 18-il dipartiment, li huma suddiviżi aktar f'298 muniċipalità. Il-forma ta' gvern hija repubblikana, demokratika, u rappreżentattiva. Hija eżerċitata minn tliet fergħat: Leġiżlattiva, Eżekuttiva, u Ġudizzjarja, li huma komplementari u indipendenti, mingħajr ebda relazzjoni ta' subordinazzjoni għal xulxin.

Il-popolazzjoni tal-Honduras taqbeż l-10 miljun abitant, primarjament involuti f'attivitajiet agrikoli, kif ukoll fil-kummerċ, il-manifattura, u s-servizzi pubbliċi, fost setturi oħra. L-aktar dipartiment densament popolat fil-Ħonduras huwa Cortés, b'400.3 abitant għal kull kilometru kwadru. Il-pajjiż huwa multietniku. Il-popolazzjoni mestizo tikkostitwixxi l-maġġoranza. Hemm ukoll popolazzjonijiet minn diversi gruppi indiġeni, inklużi l-Lenca, in-Nahua, il-Miskito, it-Tolupan, iċ-Ch'orti' Maya, il-Pech, it-Tawahka, il-Garifuna, komunitajiet suwed li jitkellmu bl-Ingliż, u ż-Zambos li jitkellmu bl-Ispanjol u bil-Miskito.

It-territorju tal-Honduras huwa imħatteb ħafna; jikkonsisti minn firxiet ta' muntanji għoljin, plateaus elevati, u widien fondi li fihom pjanuri estensivi u fertili maqsuma minn xmajjar ta' daqsijiet varji, li wħud minnhom huma navigabbli, li kollha jikkontribwixxu għall-bijodiversità rikka tiegħu. Huwa stmat li l-Honduras għandu mill-inqas 8,000 speċi ta' pjanti, madwar 250 speċi ta’ rettili u anfibji, aktar minn 700 speċi ta' għasafar, u 110 speċi ta' mammiferi, imqassma fir-reġjuni differenti tiegħu. Xi speċi huma endemiċi.

L-Amerika Ċentrali, li l-Honduras huwa parti minnha, iddikjarat l-indipendenza tagħha minn Spanja u l-Viċerjalità ta’ Spanja l-Ġdida (Messiku) fil-15 ta’ Settembru 1821. Wara li l-Messiku kiseb ukoll l-indipendenza tiegħu, l-Amerika Ċentrali ġiet annessa mill-ġdid u aktar tard saret definittivament indipendenti. Fl-1838, il-Honduras sar indipendenti mill-Amerika Ċentrali, u ftit wara, f’Jannar 1839, l-ewwel kostituzzjoni tal-pajjiż ġiet adottata formalment. Il-Ġeneral Francisco Ferrera sar l-ewwel president kostituzzjonali tal-pajjiż (1841-1843).

L-ewwel partit politiku, il-Partit Liberali tal-Ħonduras, twaqqaf fl-1891, segwit mill-Partit Nazzjonali tal-Ħonduras fl-1902.

L-elezzjonijiet ġenerali tal-1981 u l-kostituzzjoni tal-1982 immarkaw il-bidu  ta' dak li hu magħruf bħala l-Era Demokratika.

==Storja==
===Soċjetajiet Pre-Hispaniċi fil-Ħonduras===
[[File:Copán Ballcourt.jpg|thumb|Grawnd tal-ballball f'Copán.]]
[[File:Vaso trípode, con personajes, cerámica, cultura Maya-Ulúa (Honduras), Museo Chileno de Arte Precolombino, Santiago, Chile.jpg|thumb|Reċipjent tripod mill-kultura Maya-Ulúa.]]
[[File:CPN Rosalila 01.jpg|thumb|Riproduzzjoni tat-Tempju ta' Rosalila.]]
[[File:CPN ST B 01.jpg|thumb|Stela Maja ta' Copán (Estela Maya de Copán/Copan Maya Stela).]]
Qabel il-konkwista Spanjola, it-territorju li llum huwa l-Ħonduras kien abitat minn popli indiġeni kkaratterizzati minn żewġ tipi kulturali distinti, iffurmati bħala riżultat tal-migrazzjonijiet li popolaw il-kontinent Amerikan fi żminijiet pre-Kolombjani.

Il-kulturi Maya u Mexica kienu mmexxija mill-hekk imsejjaħ &quot;mod ta' produzzjoni Asjatiku&quot;, li l-karatteristika l-aktar prominenti tiegħu kienet ekonomija sedentarja bbażata fuq il-produzzjoni agrikola, b'relazzjonijiet ta' produzzjoni kollettiva ċentralizzati f'poter wieħed eżerċitat minn grupp ta' uffiċjali ċivili, reliġjużi u militari. Għalhekk, ma kinux soċjetajiet egalitarji. Id-diviżjoni tal-klassijiet kienet stabbilita bejn dawk li kellhom il-poter u l-maġġoranza tal-popolazzjoni.

Stela Maya minn Copán.

Dawn il-kulturi kisbu progress kbir f'diversi oqsma tal-għarfien uman, immexxija mill-iżvilupp ta' agrikoltura diversa (fażola, kawkaw, bżar aħmar, eċċ.) u kellhom sistemi estensivi ta' irrigazzjoni. B'dan il-mod, żguraw ikel adegwat għall-popolazzjonijiet kbar tagħhom. Applikaw ukoll tekniki raffinati ħafna fl-insiġ u ċ-ċeramika. Żviluppaw kummerċ intens u varjat. Huma kisbu livell għoli ta'  żvilupp xjentifiku fil-matematika u l-astronomija, kif ukoll fl-arkitettura u l-iskultura, li użaw fil-kostruzzjoni ta' bliet kbar.

Fil-majjistral tal-Ħonduras, il-poplu Ch'orti' kien predominanti, grupp Mayan li jinsab f'Copán u Ocotepeque, flimkien mal-Lenca, li estendew fid-dipartimenti ta' Santa Bárbara, Lempira, Intibucá, La Paz, Comayagua, Francisco Morazán, u Valle, u parti minn dak li llum huwa El Salvador.

Il-bqija tat-territorju Honduras kien abitat minn popli mill-parti tan-nofsinhar tal-kontinent, b'kultura nomadika u semi-nomada, immexxija minn sistemi ta' produzzjoni komunali primittivi. Fost dawn il-popli kien hemm it-Tolupan (imsejjaħ ukoll Xicaque), il-Pech (imsejjaħ ukoll Paya), it-Tawahka, u l-Miskito, li flimkien iffurmaw il-maġġoranza tal-popolazzjoni tal-pajjiż. Wara t-tieni nofs tas-seklu 18, gruppi etniċi oħra ffurmaw tul il-kosta tal-Karibew: il-Garifuna u l-popolazzjoni sewda li titkellem bl-Ingliż u bil-Creole.

[[File:Pinturas Rupestres Santa Elena Honduras.JPG|thumb|left|Pittura fuq il-blat f'Santa Elena, il-Ħonduras.]]

L-akbar popolazzjoni kienet il-Lenca, li, fi żmien il-wasla tal-Ispanjoli, kienu l-aktar grupp mifrux u organizzat fil-pajjiż. Huma għexu f'insedjamenti kbar, b'medja ta' 350 dar u ferm aktar minn 500 abitant. Għalkemm hemm dibattitu xjentifiku dwar l-antenati u l-oriġini Lenca, skont Rodolfo Barón Castro, huma d-dixxendenti diretti tal-Maya li ma segwewx l-eżodu li temm l-Imperu l-Qadim. Studji oħra jindikaw li huma dixxendenti ta' gruppi Olmec li emigraw min-Nofsinhar tal-Messiku matul il-perjodu Preklassiku. Fi żmien il-wasla tal-Ispanjoli, huma kienu stabbiliti fit-territorju li llum jinkludi r-Repubbliki ta' El Salvador u l-Honduras.

Iż-żona Maya tinkludi dak li issa huma l-pajjiżi tal-Honduras, il-Gwatemala, El Salvador, u n-Nofsinhar tal-Messiku. Il-Maya ffjorixxew f'dawn il-pajjiżi matul l-ewwel ħmistax-il seklu tal-era Kristjana. Kawżi mhux magħrufa sal-lum wasslu għall-abbandun u l-qerda ta' Copán u bliet Maya oħra, li sa żmien il-konkwista Spanjola ma kienu xejn aktar minn fdalijiet. Il-ġuħ, il-pesti, u l-gwerer interni ġew proposti bħala l-kawżi tal-abbandun tagħhom.

[[File:Columbus Taking Possession.jpg|thumb|Rappreżentazzjoni ta' Kristofru Kolombu u r-raba' wasla tiegħu fil-kontinent Amerikan li seħħet f'Cape Honduras fl-1 ta' Ottubru 1502.]]

===Konkwista Spanjola===
Cortés introduċa l-bhejjem u waqqaf il-belt ta' La Natividad de Nuestra Señora, ħdejn Puerto Caballos. Qabel ma rritorna lejn il-Messiku (1526), ħatar lil Hernando de Saavedra gvernatur tal-Ħonduras u ħalla struzzjonijiet biex jittratta tajjeb lill-popli indiġeni.

Fis-26 ta' Ottubru, 1526, Diego López de Salcedo nħatar gvernatur tal-Ħonduras mill-Kuruna Spanjola, u ħa post Saavedra. Id-deċennju ta’ wara kien immarkat mill-ambizzjonijiet personali tal-gvernaturi u l-konkwistaturi, li interferew mal-organizzazzjoni tal-gvern. L-Ispanjoli stabbiliti rribellaw kontra l-mexxejja tagħhom, u l-popli indiġeni qamu kontra sidienhom u kontra l-maltrattament.

Mal-mewt ta' Salcedo (1530), l-Ispanjoli ta' oriġini Ewropea saru l-arbitri tal-poter. Huma ħatru u neħħew gvernaturi. Quddiem din is-sitwazzjoni, il-kolonji nfushom talbu lil Pedro de Alvarado biex itemm l-anarkija. Bil-wasla ta' Alvarado fl-1536, il-kaos naqas, u l-Ħonduras waqa’ taħt l-awtorità tagħhom.

Fl-1537, Francisco de Montejo nħatar gvernatur. Mal-wasla tiegħu fil-Ħonduras, huwa annulla l-għotjiet tal-art li għamel Alvarado. Il-kaptan tiegħu, Alonso de Cáceres, kien responsabbli għas-soppressjoni tar-rivoluzzjoni indiġena tal-1537–1538, immexxija mill-Kap Lempira. Fl-1539, Montejo u Alvarado kellhom nuqqas ta’ qbil serju dwar ir-reġjun, li ġibed l-attenzjoni tal-Kunsill tal-Indji. Montejo telaq lejn Chiapas, u Alvarado sar gvernatur tal-Ħonduras.[30] Wara dan, Pedro de Alvarado, bl-approvazzjoni tar-Re ta’ Spanja, annessa l-Ħonduras mal-Gwatemala.

F'Marzu 1524, Gil González Dávila sar l-ewwel Spanjol li wasal fil-Ħonduras bl-intenzjoni li jikkonkwista. Huwa waqqaf il-belt ta' San Gil de Buena Vista u daħal fit-territorju Honduras, jikkalma lill-popli indiġeni, jiġġieled kontra l-Ispanjoli li kkontestaw it-talba tiegħu għall-art, u bit-tama li jsib l-iżbokk tal-Lag Nikaragwa.

Aktar tard, Hernán Cortés, imħeġġeġ minn rapporti li kien irċieva dwar il-ġid kbir tal-pajjiż, bagħat żewġ spedizzjonijiet, waħda bl-art u l-oħra bil-baħar. Huwa fada l-ewwel waħda lil Pedro de Alvarado u t-tieni waħda lil Cristóbal de Olid. Iżda dan tal-aħħar ittradih. Għal din ir-raġuni, Cortés telaq mill-Messiku fit-tmexxija ta' spedizzjoni li damet kważi sentejn u ntemmet, wara għadd kbir ta' perikli u tbatijiet, fi Trujillo, il-Ħonduras.

===Ħonduras Ispaniku===
[[File:Fuerte San Cristóbal Gracias Honduras 20.jpg|thumb|Il-Forti Saint Cristóbal (Fuerte San Cristóbal/Fort Saint Cristobal)  fil-Punent tal-pajjiż.]]

It-telfa ta' Lempira u t-tnaqqis fit-taqbid bejn l-Ispanjoli kkontribwew għall-konkwista u ż-żieda fl-attività ekonomika fil-Ħonduras. Sa tmiem is-snin 1540, il-Ħonduras dehret lesta għall-iżvilupp u l-prosperità, b'Gracias stabbilita bħala l-kapitali tal-Audiencia reġjonali tal-Gwatemala. Madankollu, din id-deċiżjoni ħolqot riżentiment fiċ-ċentri aktar popolati tal-Gwatemala u El Salvador. Fl-1549, il-kapitali tal-Audiencia ġiet trasferita lejn Antigua, il-Gwatemala, u l-Ħonduras baqgħet provinċja fi ħdan il-Kaptaniċja Ġenerali tal-Gwatemala sal-1821.

L-ewwel ċentri tal-minjieri tal-pajjiż kienu jinsabu fi Gracias. Sal-1538, dawn iċ-ċentri kienu qed jipproduċu kwantitajiet sinifikanti ta' deheb. Fl-1540, dan inbidel bl-iskoperta tad-deheb u l-fidda fil-wied tax-Xmara Guayape. Dan ikkontribwixxa għat-tnaqqis ta' Gracias u ż-żieda ta' Comayagua bħala ċ-ċentru ewlieni tal-popolazzjoni tal-Ħonduras. Iż-żieda fid-domanda għax-xogħol aċċellerat it-tnaqqis tal-popolazzjoni indiġena. B'riżultat ta' dan, skjavi mill-Afrika ġew miġjuba fil-pajjiż. Instabu depożiti oħra tad-deheb ħdejn San Pedro Sula u l-port ta' Trujillo.

[[File:San Fernando de Omoa Fortress, Honduras.jpg|thumb|left|Fortizza ta' Saintn Fernando ta' Omoa (Fortaleza de San Fernando de Omoa/Daint fernando of Omoa Fortress) fl-Cortés).]]

Il-produzzjoni tal-minjieri bdiet tonqos fl-1560, u magħha, l-importanza tal-Honduras għall-kuruna. Fil-bidu tal-1569, skoperti ġodda tal-fidda reġgħu taw il-ħajja lill-ekonomija fil-qosor, u wasslu għat-twaqqif ta' Tegucigalpa, li malajr bdiet tikkompeti ma' Comayagua bħala l-aktar belt importanti tal-provinċja. Il-boom tal-fidda laħaq il-quċċata fl-1584, u d-dipressjoni ekonomika reġgħet lura ftit wara. L-isforzi tal-minjieri fil-Honduras kienu mxekkla min-nuqqas ta' kapital, ħaddiema, u diffikultajiet topografiċi. Il-merkurju, vitali għall-produzzjoni tal-fidda, kien skars, u l-uffiċjali kienu negliġenti.

[[File:Fuerte de San Cristóbal en Gracias, Honduras.jpg|thumb|left|Forti Saint Cristóbal (Fuerte San Cristóbal/Fort Saint Cristobal) in Gracias (Lempira).]]

Waħda mill-problemi ewlenin għall-ħakkiema Spanjoli tal-Ħonduras kienet l-attività Ingliża fit-Tramuntana tal-Ħonduras. Din l-attività bdiet fis-seklu 16 u kompliet fis-seklu 19. Fis-snin bikrin, il-pirati Ewropej attakkaw ta' spiss insedjamenti fuq il-kosta Karibew tal-Ħonduras, pereżempju, il-Battalja ta' Puerto Caballos (1603), parti mill-Gwerra Anglo-Spanjola (1585–1604). Fl-1643, spedizzjoni Ingliża qerdet il-belt ta' Trujillo, il-port ewlieni tal-Ħonduras. Barra minn hekk, l-Ingliżi għamlu sforzi enormi biex jistabbilixxu kolonji mis-seklu 17 ’il quddiem fil-Gżejjer tal-Bajja u fit-Tramuntana tal-Ħonduras bl-għajnuna tas-Sambos u l-Miskitos, li attakkaw insedjamenti Spanjoli. Minħabba l-kosta tal-Paċifiku tagħha, inbnew vapuri u portijiet għall-kummerċ tal-Manila Galleon mal-Filippini u l-Messiku, u l-kummerċ seħħ fil-Ħonduras.

Fil-bidu tas-seklu 18, id-dinastija Bourbon, marbuta mal-ħakkiema ta’ Franza, ħadet post l-Asburgi fuq it-tron ta' Spanja. Id-dinastija l-ġdida bdiet sensiela ta' riformi madwar l-imperu, imfassla biex jagħmlu l-amministrazzjoni aktar effiċjenti u kosteffettiva, u biex jiffaċilitaw id-difiża tal-kolonji. Fost dawn ir-riformi kien hemm tnaqqis fit-taxxa fuq il-metalli prezzjużi u fl-ispiża tal-merkurju, li kien monopolju rjali. Fil-Ħonduras, dawn ir-riformi kkontribwew għall-qawmien mill-ġdid tal-industrija tal-minjieri fis-snin tletin tas-seklu 18. Taħt il-Borboni, il-gvern Spanjol għamel diversi sforzi biex jerġa' jikseb kontroll fuq il-kosta tal-Karibew.

Fl-1752, inbniet il-fortizza ta' San Fernando de Omoa. Fl-1780, l-Ispanjoli rritornaw lejn Trujillo, li beda jiżviluppa bħala bażi ta' operazzjonijiet kontra l-insedjamenti Brittaniċi fil-lvant. Matul is-snin tmenin tas-seklu 18, l-Ispanjoli reġgħu ħadu l-kontroll tal-Gżejjer tal-Bajja u keċċew lill-biċċa l-kbira tal-Brittaniċi u l-alleati tagħhom mir-reġjun tar-Río Negro. Il-Konvenzjoni Anglo-Spanjola tal-1786 irrikonoxxiet b’mod definittiv is-sovranità Spanjola fuq il-kosta tal-Karibew.

===L-indipendenza===
[[File:J.C.del Valle.jpg|thumb|L-Amerika Ċentrali kisbet l-indipendenza tagħha minn Spanja fil-15 ta' Settembru 1821. José Cecilio del Valle tal-Ħonduras kien filosfu, politiku, avukat u ġurnalist, wieħed mill-aktar figuri importanti fl-Amerika Ċentrali matul it-tranżizzjoni mill-ħakma kolonjali għall-indipendenza.]]
Għal kważi tliet sekli, il-Ħonduras kien parti mill-Kaptanerija Ġenerali tal-Gwatemala, għalhekk l-indipendenza tiegħu kienet iddur madwar il-movimenti favur l-indipendenza fil-provinċji l-oħra. Wara l-okkupazzjoni Franċiża ta' Spanja, l-ewwel atti ta' insurrezzjoni favur l-indipendenza tal-Amerika Ċentrali seħħew fin-Nikaragwa, El Salvador, u l-Gwatemala (1811-1813). Fil-Ħonduras, l-Ispanjoli rrikorrew għall-perpetwazzjoni tal-kontroll tagħhom fuq il-poter biex jrażżnu l-moviment tal-indipendenza.

Mill-1813 sal-1820, ma seħħew l-ebda avvenimenti notevoli oħra relatati mal-indipendenza fl-Amerika Ċentrali. Ma kienx qabel kmieni fl-1821, meta l-Messiku, permezz tal-Pjan ta’ Iguala, iddikjara l-indipendenza sħiħa tiegħu minn Spanja fl-24 ta' Frar, li nkisbet l-indipendenza tal-Amerika Ċentrali. Dan l-avveniment aċċellera l-indipendenza tal-Amerika Ċentrali, li ġiet ikkonsummata fil-15 ta' Settembru, 1821, b’dikjarazzjoni abbozzata minn José Cecilio del Valle.

L-ewforija tal-indipendenza kienet ta' żmien qasir, għax f’Jannar 1822, fuq l-inizjattiva tal-konservattivi u l-Imperatur Agustín de Iturbide, il-Provinċji Uniti tal-Amerika Ċentrali ngħaqdu mal-Imperu Messikan. Din l-għaqda damet sal-waqgħa  ta'Iturbide f’Marzu 1823.

L-istati tal-Istmu, mill-Panama sal-Gwatemala, jistgħu forsi jiffurmaw konfederazzjoni. Dan il-post magnífico bejn iż-żewġ oċeani kbar jista’, maż-żmien, isir imperu dinji. Il-kanali tiegħu se jqassru d-distanzi, isaħħu r-rabtiet kummerċjali mal-Ewropa, l-Amerika, u l-Asja, u jġibu tribut minn madwar id-dinja kollha lejn dan ir-reġjun prosperu. Forsi xi darba l-kapitali tad-dinja tkun tinsab hemm, hekk kif Kostantinu l-Kbir iddikjara Kostantinopli bħala l-kapitali tad-dinja tal-qedem. Simón Bolívar (1815)

===L-istabbiliment tar-Repubblika Federali===
[[File:Francisco Morazán Quesada.JPG|thumb|Il-Ġeneral Francisco Morazán, mexxej Honduras li serva bħala president tal-Federazzjoni tal-Amerika Ċentrali.]]
[[File:Flag of the United Provinces of Central America.svg|thumb|Bandiera tal-Provinċji Uniti tal-Amerika Ċentrali.]]


F'Marzu 1824, tlaqqa' kungress fil-Gwatemala u waqqaf ir-Repubblika Federali tal-Amerika Ċentrali, magħmula mill-Gwatemala, il-Ħonduras, El Salvador, in-Nikaragwa, u l-Kosta Rika. Ir-repubblika l-ġdida kellha eżistenza qasira, u wara diversi gwerer ċivili, l-unjoni xoljiet fis-26 ta' Ottubru 1838, bil-ħames stati jsiru ħames stati indipendenti.

Uħud mill-istati tal-Amerika Ċentrali ppruvaw jirrikostitwixxu r-Repubblika Federali tal-Amerika Ċentrali diversi drabi. Madankollu, dawn it-tentattivi fallew u swew il-ħajjiet ta' diversi mill-inizjaturi tagħhom. Tentattiv finali sar fl-1895 taħt l-influwenza ta' Policarpo Bonilla, president tal-Ħonduras. F'din l-okkażjoni, ġie ffirmat trattat man-Nikaragwa u El Salvador, li skontu t-tliet repubbliki ffurmaw federazzjoni taħt l-isem tar-Repubblika l-Kbira tal-Amerika Ċentrali.

It-tliet repubbliki saru stati, u s-sovranità fuq il-federazzjoni ngħatat lil Dieta magħmula minn tliet membri, wieħed minn kull stat, li kellha tiltaqa' kull sena fil-kapitali tal-istati federali. Fuq stedina ta' din id-Dieta, it-tliet stati ħatru delegazzjoni li ltaqgħet bħala Assemblea Kostitwenti f'Managua u stabbilixxiet Kostituzzjoni, li taħt it-termini tagħha t-tliet stati adottaw l-isem Stati Uniti tal-Amerika Ċentrali fl-1 ta’ Novembru 1898.

Din il-Kostituzzjoni, li f'moħħ dawk li fassluha rrappreżentat konsolidazzjoni tat-tliet stati federali u riorganizzazzjoni rapida tar-Repubblika l-kbira tal-Amerika Ċentrali, immaġinata minn Francisco Morazán, kellha tmiem traġiku. L-għada li ltaqgħet l-Assemblea Kostitwenti, faqqa' moviment rivoluzzjonarju, ostili għall-federazzjoni l-ġdida, f'San Salvador, li rriżulta f'amministrazzjoni ġdida f'dak l-istat. L-ewwel pass tagħha kien li tirtira mill-Unjoni, u din is-separazzjoni wasslet għax-xoljiment tal-Istati Uniti tal-Amerika Ċentrali, hekk kif, fuq l-eżempju ta' El Salvador, l-istati tal-Ħonduras u n-Nikaragwa reġgħu assumew is-sovranità tagħhom.

===Il-Presidenza ta' Santos Guardiola===
[[File:Jose Santos Guardiola.jpg|thumb|Il-President tal-istat indipendenti tal-Ħonduras, José Santos Guardiola.]]
Wara t-twaqqigħ ta' Cabañas, il-Ġeneral José Santos Guardiola mar il-Ħonduras. Fl-10 ta' Novembru, wasal f'Tegucigalpa u nieda l-kandidatura presidenzjali tiegħu. Saru l-elezzjonijiet, u peress li l-ebda kandidat ma rċieva maġġoranza assoluta, l-Assemblea Ġenerali eleġġiet lill-Ġeneral konservattiv Santos Guardiola bħala president u lil José María Lazo bħala viċi president. Il-Ġeneral José Santos Guardiola ħa l-presidenza tal-Ħonduras fis-17 ta' Frar 1856, u b'hekk wettaq aspirazzjoni li ilha miżmuma u li ġiet ripetutament imfixkla.

Matul l-amministrazzjoni ta' Guardiola, l-ekonomija tal-pajjiż kienet prekarja, sal-punt li l-president kien imġiegħel joħroġ muniti tar-ram. Fuq nota oħra, l-amministrazzjoni ta' Guardiola kienet waħda mill-aktar liberali fl-istorja tal-Ħonduras; minkejja li kien membru tal-Partit Konservattiv, Santos Guardiola ta l-libertà tal-istampa. Espandiet ukoll il-libertà tal-espressjoni individwali u inkludiet sidien tal-art tal-klassi tan-nofs fost il-votanti, minbarra li rregola r-relazzjonijiet bejn l-istat u l-knisja. Iżda l-aktar kisba importanti tagħha kienet it-Trattat ta' Comayagua li bih il-gvern Brittaniku għadda l-Gżejjer tal-Bajja u parti mit-territorju tar-Renju tan-Mosquito lill-Ħonduras.

Fl-aħħar, l-antiklerikaliżmu miftuħ ta' Guardiola wasslu biex jibda l-hekk imsejħa “Gwerra tal-Missirijiet” f’April 1861. Dan, imbagħad, ikkontribwixxa għall-assassinju tiegħu fil-11 ta' Jannar, 1862, minn idejn il-gwardja tal-unur presidenzjali tiegħu stess. Dan id-delitt xokkja profondament lill-pajjiż. Is-Senatur José Francisco Montes Fonseca ħa l-kmand, iżda malajr iddelegah lill-Ġeneral José María Medina, u minnu, kif stipulat mil-liġi, għadda ftit wara għand il-Viċi President, Victoriano Castellanos Cortés.

Minħabba l-gwerer u l-ġlidiet għall-poter kontinwi, il-Ħonduras kien mgħaddas fl-arretratezza. Castellanos “ħadem biex jikkalma t-tempra, inissel il-fiduċja, u jippromwovi l-progress possibbli... u kien ikun iwettaq ħafna kieku ma laħqitx il-mewt... fil-11 ta' Diċembru ta' dik l-istess sena.”

===Il-Kostituzzjoni tal-1865 u t-tmiem tas-seklu===
[[File:Panorama of Tegucigalpa, Honduras (1889).jpg|thumb|Xbieha ta' Tegucigalpa fis-seklu 19.]]
Wara l-mewt ta' Victoriano Castellanos, Francisco Montes reġa' lura fil-poter. Iżda meta faqqgħet il-gwerra bejn El Salvador u l-Gwatemala fl-1863, Montes ingħaqad mal-kawża liberali Salvadorjana. Truppi tal-gvern Gwatemalan ta' Rafael Carrera invadew il-Ħonduras u pproklamaw lill-Ġeneral José María Medina, li kien akkumpanja lill-invażuri, bħala president f'Ġunju 1863.

Medina laqqa' Assemblea Kostitwenti Nazzjonali li rrevokat il-Kostituzzjoni tal-1840. Il-Kostituzzjoni tal-1865 ġiet adottata minflokha. Din il-Kostituzzjoni, għall-ewwel darba, adottat id-denominazzjoni ta' “Repubblika” għall-pajjiż. Is-sistema leġiżlattiva bikamerali implimentata minn Juan Lindo ġiet abolita, u ġiet stabbilita sistema unikamerali. Għall-ewwel darba fil-liġi kostituzzjonali Honduraża, il-projbizzjoni tar-rielezzjoni presidenzjali ġiet imnaqqxa.

F'Diċembru ta' dik l-istess sena, Medina ċeda l-presidenza lis-Senatur Francisco Inestroza sabiex ikunu jistgħu jsiru l-elezzjonijiet. Kif mistenni, l-elezzjonijiet iffavorixxew lill-Ġeneral Medina. Il-Ġeneral Florencio Xatruch intgħażel bħala viċi president. Medina ħa l-presidenza fil-15 ta' Frar, 1864, f'Gracias.

Matul l-ewwel mandat presidenzjali tiegħu, Medina ffaċċja reżistenza fl-1865 mir-ribelli ta’ Olancho; U biex irażżanhom u jeqred il-ħażen, huwa ordna li r-ribelli jiġu segwiti bla heda, u ħafna minnhom ġew sparati jew imdendlin.

Hekk kif il-mandat tiegħu wasal fi tmiemu, Medina talab riforma tal-Artikolu 33 tal-Kostituzzjoni, li pprojbixxa r-rielezzjoni tiegħu. Għal dan il-għan, huwa ħeġġeġ lill-muniċipalitajiet biex jissottomettu talba lill-fergħa eżekuttiva biex jemendaw l-artikolu. Konsegwentement, huwa sejjaħ Kungress straordinarju, li min-naħa tiegħu sejjaħ għal assemblea kostitwenti. Fit-8 ta' Awwissu, 1869, l-artikolu ġie emendat, u b'hekk Medina seta' jiġi rielett.

Matul it-tieni mandat tiegħu, id-dipartiment ta' La Mosquitia nħoloq fit-22 ta' Novembru, 1868. Dan il-perjodu ra wkoll wieħed mill-ewwel atti ta’ korruzzjoni fil-pajjiż. Self ġie nnegozjat fl-Ewropa &quot;taħt kundizzjonijiet sfavorevoli ħafna għall-Honduras, maħsub biex tinbena l-ferrovija interoċeanika; bilkemm ippermetta t-tlestija ta' sezzjoni waħda tal-ferrovija u għamel ħsara kbira lill-kreditu Honduras barra l-pajjiż.&quot;

Wara ż-żewġ mandati presidenzjali ta' Medina, kien hemm skuntentizza mifruxa fil-pajjiż. Anke hekk, il-president ma kienx lest li jċedi l-poter u rrikorra għal plebisċitu f’laqgħat miftuħa tal-muniċipju biex jibqa' fil-kariga. Ir-riżultat tal-plebisċitu kien kif xtaq il-Ġeneral Medina. Fis-26 ta’ Marzu 1870, reġa’ ħa l-poter.

Madankollu, fl-1883, Dr. Soto wkoll tilef il-favur ta' Barrios u kien imġiegħel jirriżenja. Is-suċċessur tiegħu, il-Ġeneral Luis Bográn, baqa' fil-kariga sal-1891 meta l-Ġeneral Ponciano Leiva—li kien mexxa fil-qosor tliet darbiet bejn l-1873 u l-1876—reġa' lura fil-poter f'elezzjonijiet immanipulati. Minkejja li kien liberali, Leiva pprova jmexxi bħala dittatur assolut. Huwa xolja l-Partit Liberali tal-Ħonduras (PLH) u ddeporta l-mexxejja tiegħu.

Dan irriżulta f'rawnd ġdid ta' kunflitt, li fih il-Partit Liberali rikostitwit fl-aħħar mill-aħħar ħareġ rebbieħ. Il-PLH kien immexxi minn Policarpo Bonilla, bl-appoġġ tad-dittatur liberali tan-Nikaragwa, José Santos Zelaya.

Meta Bonilla ħa l-poter fl-1894, huwa beda jimplimenta ċertu grad ta' ordni fil-politika Ħondurasa.
===seklu 20===
[[File:Manuel Bonilla.jpg|thumb|Manuel Bonilla, 1911.]]
Il-President Terencio Sierra kien l-ewwel ħakkiem Honduran tas-seklu 20, fejn ħa l-presidenza minn Policarpo Bonilla fl-1899. Matul l-amministrazzjoni tiegħu, seħħ wieħed mill-aktar avvenimenti sinifikanti fl-istorja ekonomika u politika tal-pajjiż. &quot;L-aħwa Vaccaro, familja ta' oriġini Taljana li nnegozjaw il-banana fi New Orleans, irċevew konċessjonijiet tal-art fuq il-Kosta tat-Tramuntana... Il-kumpanija Vaccaro, bħal detenturi oħra ta' konċessjonijiet fuq il-Kosta tat-Tramuntana aktar tard, ħadet vantaġġ mill-privileġġi mogħtija mill-konċessjonijiet biex tesporta l-banana minn La Ceiba.&quot;

Ladarba ntemm il-mandat presidenzjali tiegħu, Sierra pprova jibqa' fil-poter, iżda tneħħa mill-Ġeneral Manuel Bonilla. Dan il-ħakkiem wera li kien ħabib aħjar tal-kumpaniji tal-banana minn Terencio Sierra nnifsu. Matul l-amministrazzjoni tiegħu, dawn il-kumpaniji kisbu eżenzjonijiet mit-taxxa u permess biex jibnu baċiri u toroq. Ukoll, konċessjonijiet biex jibnu kanali artifiċjali għat-trasport tal-banana u biex jikkanalizzaw ix-xmajjar Salado u El Porvenir, kif ukoll permess biex jiksbu l-ittri għall-kostruzzjoni tal-ferrovija l-ġdida.

===Dittatorjat ta' Carías Andino===
[[File:Pres. Andino of Honduras LCCN2016878325.jpg|thumb|Carías Andino, 1936.]]
Minkejja l-inkwiet dejjem jikber u t-tensjonijiet ekonomiċi severi, l-elezzjonijiet tal-1932 kienu relattivament paċifiċi u ġusti. Fi Frar 1932, il-Partit Nazzjonali tal-Ħonduras (PNH) innomina lil Carías bħala l-kandidat presidenzjali tiegħu; inizjalment, kienu għażlu lil Venancio Callejas bħala l-kandidat viċi presidenzjali tagħhom, iżda meta dan irrifjuta, Abraham Williams ġie nnominat minflok. Il-Liberali, min-naħa tagħhom, innominaw lil Ángel Zúñiga Huete bħala l-kandidat tagħhom. Fi tmiem il-konkors elettorali, Carías rebaħ l-elezzjoni b'marġni ta' madwar 20,000 vot. Il-Ġeneral ħa l-kariga fis-16 ta' Novembru 1932, u b'hekk beda dak li aktar tard sar l-itwal gvern b'terminu wieħed fl-istorja tal-Ħonduras.

Għall-ewwel, kien maħsub li l-gvern ta' Carías, bħal dawk ta' qablu, ma kienx destinat li jdum ħafna. Ftit qabel l-inawgurazzjoni tiegħu, il-Liberali dissidenti kienu qamu f'ribelljoni. Carías innifsu ħa l-kmand tal-forzi tal-gvern, kiseb armi f'El Salvador, u fi żmien qasir għaffeġ ir-ribelljoni.

Matul l-ewwel parti tal-amministrazzjoni tiegħu, Carías iffoka fuq il-prevenzjoni tal-kollass finanzjarju, it-titjib tal-forzi armati, u l-bini tat-toroq, filwaqt li fl-istess ħin ħejja t-triq biex jestendi ż-żjara tiegħu fil-poter.

Is-sitwazzjoni ekonomika baqgħet ħażina matul is-snin tletin. Minbarra t-tnaqqis drastiku fl-esportazzjonijiet tal-banana kkawżat mid-dipressjoni, l-industrija tal-banana kienet mhedda fl-1935 minn epidemiji bħall-marda tas-Sigatoka. Fi żmien sena, żoni vasti, inklużi dawk fir-reġjun ta' Trujillo, ġew abbandunati, u eluf ta' Hondurani tilfu l-impjieg tagħhom. Sal-1937, il-marda kienet ġiet ikkontrollata, iżda ħafna żoni affettwati baqgħu improduttivi. B'riżultat ta' dan, il-Honduras tilfet porzjon sinifikanti mis-suq internazzjonali

Carías kien għamel sforzi biex itejjeb il-Forzi Armati saħansitra qabel ma sar president. Ladarba sar president, il-motivazzjoni tiegħu biex ikompli xogħlu żdiedet. Huwa ta attenzjoni speċjali lill-Forza tal-Ajru li kienet qed tonqos, billi waqqaf l-Iskola tal-Avjazzjoni Militari (1934) u ħatar kurunell Amerikan bħala l-kmandant tagħha.

Maż-żmien, Carías mexa bil-mod iżda b'mod kostanti biex jikkonsolida l-poter tiegħu. Huwa kiseb l-appoġġ tal-kumpaniji tal-banana billi oppona strajkijiet u inkwiet ieħor tax-xogħol. Huwa saħħaħ il-pożizzjoni tiegħu fiċ-ċrieki finanzjarji domestiċi u barranin permezz ta' politiki ekonomiċi konservattivi. Anke fl-aqwa tad-Depressjoni, huwa kompla jagħmel ħlasijiet regolari fuq id-dejn barrani, billi żamm strettament mat-termini tal-ftehim mad-detenturi tal-bonds Brittaniċi. Huwa ssodisfa wkoll kredituri oħra. Żewġ self żgħir tħallsu lura kompletament fl-1935.

===Nofs is-seklu 20===
[[File:La ceiba.jpg|thumb|L-Istazzjon tal-Ferrovija f'La Ceiba fil-bidu tas-seklu 20.]]

Kumpaniji Amerikani, bħall-United Fruit Company, l-Standard Fruit Company, u l-Cuyamel Fruit Company, iddominaw l-ekonomija Hondurana, billi stabbilew pjantaġġuni enormi tal-banana tul il-kosta tat-tramuntana. Dawn il-kumpaniji malajr għamlu l-banana l-esportazzjoni ewlenija tal-Honduras bi skambju għal konċessjonijiet kbar. Għalhekk, il-kapital barrani, il-ħajja fil-pjantaġġuni tal-banana, u l-konservattivi kienu fatturi determinanti fil-politika Hondurana mill-aħħar tas-seklu 19 sa nofs is-seklu 20.

[[File:Tegucigalpa Presidential Palace.jpg|thumb|L-eks Palazz Presidenzjali tal-Ħonduras.]]

Il-Ġeneral Tiburcio Carías Andino mexxa l-Honduras b'mod dittatorjali matul id-Depressjoni l-Kbira, sal-1948. Fl-1955, wara żewġ amministrazzjonijiet awtoritarji u strajk tal-ħaddiema tal-banana, uffiċjali militari żgħażagħ riformisti għamlu kolp ta' stat li installa ġunta proviżorja u witta t-triq għall-elezzjonijiet tal-assemblea kostitwenti fl-1957.

Din l-assemblea ħatret lil Ramón Villeda Morales bħala president u ttrasformat ruħha f'leġiżlatura nazzjonali b'mandat ta' sitt snin. Fl-1963, uffiċjali militari konservattivi ressqu 'l quddiem l-elezzjonijiet kostituzzjonali u neħħew lil Villeda f'kolp ta' stat imdemmi. Il-Ġeneral Oswaldo López Arellano mexxa l-forzi armati u mexxa sal-1970.

L-iskuntentizza popolari kompliet.

===Il-gwerra tal-1969===
[[File:Chance vought corsair f4u-5n FAH-609.jpg|thumb|Il-famuż Honduran Corsair 609, użat matul il-gwerra tal-1969, Air Museum of Tegucigalpa, M.D.C.]]
Fl-1968, ir-reġim ta' López Arellano deher li kien fi problemi serji. Is-sitwazzjoni ekonomika diżastruża wasslet għal tilwim industrijali, inkwiet politiku, u anke kritika minn gruppi konservattivi bħal FENAGH. Is-sitwazzjoni politika ddeterjorat, bil-gvern Honduran u xi gruppi privati jagħtu t-tort tal-problemi ekonomiċi tal-pajjiż lill-madwar 300,000 immigrant Salvadoran mingħajr dokumenti fil-Honduras. FENAGH akkużat lill-immigranti Salvadorani b’invażjonijiet illegali tal-art.

It-tensjonijiet eskalaw f'Ġunju 1969, hekk kif it-timijiet nazzjonali taż-żewġ pajjiżi kienu qed jippreparaw biex jiffaċċjaw lil xulxin fit-tħejjija għat-Tazza tad-Dinja tal-1970. Seħħew xi inkwiet waqt l-ewwel logħba f’Tegucigalpa. Iżda s-sitwazzjoni marret għall-agħar konsiderevolment waqt il-logħba tar-ritorn f’San Salvador. Il-partitarji Hondurani ġew trattati ħażin, il-bandiera Hondurana u l-innu nazzjonali ġew insultati, u l-emozzjonijiet kienu qawwija fiż-żewġ pajjiżi.

Biex tpattija, il-Hondurani aġixxew b'mod vjolenti kontra ħafna residenti Salvadorani fil-Honduras, inklużi diversi viċi-konsli. L-istampa fiż-żewġ nazzjonijiet ikkontribwiet għal klima dejjem tikber ta' isterija, u b’hekk, fis-27 ta' Ġunju, 1969, il-Honduras qatgħet ir-relazzjonijiet diplomatiċi ma' El Salvador. Kmieni filgħodu tal-14 ta' Lulju, 1969, bdiet azzjoni militari konġunta, li saret magħrufa bħala l-“Gwerra tal-Futbol”. Il-forza tal-ajru Salvadorjana attakkat miri ġewwa l-Honduras. Bl-istess mod, l-armata Salvadorjana nediet offensivi kbar tul l-awtostrada ewlenija li tgħaqqad iż-żewġ nazzjonijiet u kontra l-gżejjer Honduras fil-Golf ta' Fonseca.

It-tensjonijiet eskalaw wara l-gwerra tal-fruntiera tal-1969 ma' El Salvador, magħrufa bħala l-&quot;Gwerra tal-Futbol&quot; jew il-&quot;Gwerra tal-Mitt Siegħa&quot; (għax damet erbat ijiem u kkoinċidiet ma' logħba tal-futbol bejn iż-żewġ pajjiżi). L-F4U-5 Corsair Honduran, reġistrazzjoni FAH 609, sar famuż matul dan il-kunflitt meta l-Kurunell Fernando Soto Henríquez waqqa' tliet F-51 Mustangs Salvadorani (kien hemm madwar għoxrin ajruplan, iżda dan biss huwa ppreservat[64]). President ċivili, Ramón Ernesto Cruz tal-Partit Nazzjonali, ħa l-poter fil-qosor fl-1971 iżda ma setax jiggverna b'mod effettiv. Fl-1971, l-Istati Uniti ċedew il-Gżejjer Swan lill-Honduras wara li ffirmaw it-Trattat tal-Gżejjer Swan.

Fl-1972, il-Ġeneral López wettaq kolp ta' stat ieħor. López adotta politiki aktar progressivi, inkluża r-riforma agrarja, iżda sa nofs is-snin sebgħin, skandli ta' korruzzjoni waqqgħu r-reġim tiegħu.

Ir-reġimi tal-Ġeneral Juan Alberto Melgar Castro (1975-1978) u l-Ġeneral Policarpo Paz García (1978-1982) fil-parti l-kbira ssorveljaw l-iżvilupp tal-infrastruttura fiżika u s-sistema tat-telekomunikazzjoni attwali tal-Honduras.

Il-pajjiż esperjenza wkoll l-aktar tkabbir ekonomiku mgħaġġel tiegħu matul dan il-perjodu, immexxi minn żieda fid-domanda internazzjonali għall-prodotti tiegħu u d-disponibbiltà ta’ self kummerċjali barrani.

Fl-1982, ġiet stabbilita kostituzzjoni ġdida biex terġa’ tiġi stabbilita s-saltna tad-dritt. Din il-kostituzzjoni kienet ir-riżultat ta’ negozjati bejn il-forzi politiċi u l-militar. Din naqqset it-terminu presidenzjali, stabbilixxiet il-projbizzjoni tar-rielezzjoni, u tat lill-Forzi Armati tal-Honduras is-sorveljanza tas-sistema f’każ li xi ħadd jipprova jdgħajjef id-demokrazija jew jabolixxi l-Kostituzzjoni tal-Honduras tal-1982.

===Il-Kostituzzjoni tal-1982===
Taħt il-kostituzzjoni l-ġdida, il-liberali Roberto Suazo Córdova ġie elett president kostituzzjonali, fejn wiegħed rivoluzzjoni ta' onestà u xogħol iebes. Madankollu, il-presidenza tiegħu ċċentrat madwar avvenimenti mmirati biex irażżnu l-espansjoniżmu Sovjetiku fir-reġjun, orkestrati mill-Istati Uniti. Wara r-rebħa Sandinista fin-Nikaragwa u l-instabbiltà politika f'El Salvador, il-President tal-Istati Uniti Ronald Reagan, determinat li ma jittollerax reġimi soċjalisti fir-reġjun, ra l-Honduras bħala l-pjattaforma perfetta għat-tnedija ta' kontro-rivoluzzjoni.

Bil-kompliċità ta' Suazo Córdova u l-kmandant tal-forzi armati, Gustavo Álvarez Martínez, is-CIA ffinanzjat u mexxiet il-formazzjoni ta' armata kontro-rivoluzzjonarja Nikaragwana f'Olancho u El Paraíso, bil-għan li tfastidja lill-gvern Sandinista. Din l-aġenzija tal-Istati Uniti assistiet ukoll lill-militar Salvadoran fil-ġlieda tiegħu kontra r-ribelli tax-xellug.
[[File:Mitch 1998-10-26 2028Z.jpg|thumb|L-Uragan Mitch, li laqat il-Ħonduras fl-1998, ħalla aktar minn 5,000 mejta u għamel ħsara kbira lill-infrastruttura tal-pajjiż.]]
[[File:Comandancia General de las FFAAH.jpg|thumb|Il-Bini tal-Kmand tal-Forzi Armati f'Tegucigalpa.]]

L-elezzjonijiet ta’ Novembru 1989 iffavorixxew lill-kandidat tal-Partit Nazzjonali, Rafael Leonardo Callejas. Matul l-amministrazzjoni tiegħu, Callejas implimenta l-ewwel politiki neoliberali fil-pajjiż, imfassla mill-Fond Monetarju Internazzjonali u l-Bank Dinji. F’Marzu 1990, daħlet fis-seħħ il-Liġi dwar ir-Riorganizzazzjoni Strutturali, li żvalutat il-Lempira, naqqset it-tariffi, u implimentat miżuri oħra.

Sa tmiem il-mandat tiegħu, il-politiki neoliberali ta' Callejas irriżultaw fi prestazzjoni makroekonomika pjuttost modesta, bi tkabbir annwali ta' 1.5% biss. Internazzjonalment, l-amministrazzjoni ta' Callejas kisbet rebħa sinifikanti, bil-Honduras tirċievi tliet kwarti tat-territorji li kienu ilhom f'tilwima ma' El Salvador mill-1969.

Fl-1994, il-Liberali reġgħu lura fil-poter bir-rebħa ta' Carlos Roberto Reina. Il-president il-ġdid “ħa passi deċiżivi biex jissubordina għall-poter ċivili l-aħħar mekkaniżmi li kien fadal li bihom il-Forzi Armati kienu ssorveljaw gvernijiet kostituzzjonali suċċessivi.” Huwa ħoloq ukoll il-Pulizija Ċivili u abolixxa s-servizz militari obbligatorju fis-6 ta' April 1995.

&quot;Fir-rigward tal-ekonomija, ir-riżultati mħallta kienu soġġetti għal diversi interpretazzjonijiet. Reina għażlet politiki ta' awsterità finanzjarja u tnaqqis fil-forza tax-xogħol tas-servizz ċivili, skont prinċipji liberali, għalkemm dawn kienu kkomplementati minn programmi soċjali biex itaffu l-impatt tat-trasformazzjonijiet strutturali bil-mod, programmi li għalihom kiseb l-approvazzjoni tal-IMF.&quot;


Il-liberali Carlos Roberto Flores Facussé ħa l-kariga fl-1998. “Flores inawgura programmi ta' riforma u modernizzazzjoni għall-gvern u l-ekonomija Hondurana, b’enfasi fuq l-għajnuna lill-ifqar ċittadini tal-Honduras, iżda l-gvern tiegħu kien affettwat mid-diżastru naturali tal-Uragan Mitch, li qered il-pajjiż ftit xhur wara li ħa l-kariga.”

“Il-ġestjoni diliġenti tiegħu tar-rikostruzzjoni, li involviet għajnuna internazzjonali abbundanti, mitigat ħsara umanitarja akbar, u l-amministrazzjoni tiegħu ma kinitx imtappna mill-korruzzjoni. L-irkupru ekonomiku kien aktar mgħaġġel milli mistenni, iżda l-faqar u l-inugwaljanza ma naqsux bl-istess mod. Min-naħa l-oħra, il-gvern tiegħu naqas ukoll milli jrażżan il-vjolenza soċjali rampanti.”

===Perjodu kontemporanju===
[[File:Flores w clinton.jpg|thumb|Il-Presidenti Bill Clinton u Carlos Flores Facussé.]]

L-ewwel elezzjonijiet tas-seklu 21, li saru fil-25 ta' Novembru 2001, ġabu lin-negozjant Ricardo Maduro tal-Partit Nazzjonali fil-poter b'52.2% tal-voti, meta mqabbel ma' 44.2% għall-Professur Rafael Pineda Ponce. L-għan ewlieni ta' Maduro kien il-ġlieda kontra l-mewġa ta' kriminalità li kienet qed taħkem il-pajjiż.

Eżempju ta' politiku u negozjant favur is-suq, Maduro ġġieled il-vjolenza tal-gangijiet taż-żgħażagħ u kiseb suċċessi aktar viżibbli fl-istabbilizzazzjoni tal-ekonomija u t-tnaqqis tad-dejn estern. Madankollu, il-problema tal-faqar baqgħet mhux solvuta. Internazzjonalment, Maduro daħħal lill-Honduras fil-ftehim kummerċjali tas-CAFTA u skjera l-Battaljun Xatruch fl-Iraq.

Fi tmiem l-2009, f'nofs din il-kriżi, il-Honduras kellha l-elezzjonijiet tagħha, u r-rebbieħ kien Porfirio Lobo Sosa, il-kandidat tal-Partit Nazzjonali tradizzjonalment tal-lemin u konservattiv. Lobo Sosa, negozjant agrikolu mid-dipartiment ta’ Olancho, ħaddan diskors ċentrista u konċiljatorju.

Fl-1 ta' Ġunju, 2011, il-Honduras ġiet ammessa mill-ġdid fl-OAS.

==Gvern u politika==
Il-Ħonduras storikament kienet ikkaratterizzata minn konservattiżmu soċjali u politiku qawwi, imħallat ma' perjodi ta' riforma u tensjonijiet interni. L-Artikolu 4 tal-Kostituzzjoni tar-Repubblika tal-Ħonduras jistabbilixxi li &quot;l-forma ta' gvern hija repubblikana, demokratika, u rappreżentattiva.&quot; Din hija eżerċitata minn tliet fergħat: leġiżlattiva, eżekuttiva, u ġudizzjarja, li huma komplementari u indipendenti, u mingħajr relazzjonijiet ġerarkiċi. Jiddikjara wkoll li r-rotazzjoni tal-presidenza hija obbligatorja, u li l-ksur ta' din ir-regola jikkostitwixxi tradiment.

L-Artikolu 5 tal-istess kostituzzjoni jistipula li l-gvern irid ikun ibbażat fuq il-prinċipju tad-demokrazija parteċipattiva, li minnha hija derivata l-integrazzjoni nazzjonali. Dan jimplika l-parteċipazzjoni tas-setturi politiċi kollha... sabiex jiġi żgurat u msaħħaħ il-progress tal-Ħonduras ibbażat fuq l-istabbiltà politika u r-rikonċiljazzjoni nazzjonali.

t-terminu presidenzjali fil-Ħonduras huwa ta' erba' snin u l-president jiġi elett direttament. Il-president ikun akkumpanjat minn tliet nominati presidenzjali—li jservu bħala viċi presidenti—u f'każ ta' assenza temporanja jew permanenti tal-president, wieħed minnhom jassumi l-presidenza; in-nominati presidenzjali jservu wkoll termini ta' erba' snin.

[[File:Congreso nacional de Honduras.jpg|thumb|Il-Bini tal-Kungress Nazzjonali tal-Ħonduras (Edificio del Congreso Nacional de Honduras/Building of the National Congress of Honduras)]]

Il-poter leġiżlattiv huwa eżerċitat minn Kungress tad-Deputati eletti b'rappreżentanza proporzjonali. Dan jiltaqa' f'sessjoni ordinarja f'Tegucigalpa fil-25 ta' Jannar ta' kull sena, mingħajr avviż minn qabel, u jaġġorna fil-31 ta' Ottubru tal-istess sena. Il-Kungress Nazzjonali għandu s-setgħat li ġejjin: li joħloq, jippromulga, jinterpreta, jemenda, u jħassar liġijiet; li jlaqqa', jissospendi, u jaġġorna s-sessjonijiet tiegħu; li jippromulga l-Liġi Organika tiegħu; u li japplika s-sanzjonijiet stabbiliti fiha għal dawk li jiksruha; u li jlaqqa' sessjonijiet straordinarji skont il-Kostituzzjoni.

[[File:Corte Suprema de Justicia de Honduras.jpg|thumb|Bini tal-Qorti Suprema]]

Il-Qorti Suprema tal-Ġustizzja tal-Honduras tinsab f'Tegucigalpa u hija magħmula minn ħmistax-il imħallef sħiħ u seba' mħallfin supplenti, eletti mill-Kungress Nazzjonali. Hija maqsuma f'kmamar, skont ir-Regolamenti Interni tal-Qorti. Il-Ġudikatura Honduras hija magħmula mill-Qorti Suprema tal-Ġustizzja, il-Qrati tal-Appell, il-Qrati tal-Prim'Istanza, il-Qrati tas-Sentenzi, u l-qrati inferjuri stabbiliti bil-liġi. Il-Prim Imħallef tal-Qorti Suprema huwa elett mill-Kungress Nazzjonali għal mandat ta' seba' snin.

Il-mandat tal-imħallfin tal-Qorti Suprema huwa ta' seba' snin, u jistgħu jiġu eletti mill-ġdid.

&lt;center&gt;
{|class=&quot;wikitable&quot; border=&quot;1&quot;
|+ '''Partiti Politiċi tar-Repubblika tal-Ħonduras'''
!Akronimu
!Isem
!Fondazzjoni
|-
|PLH||[[Partit Liberali tal-Ħonduras]]||&lt;center&gt;1891
|-
|PNH||[[Partit Nazzjonali tal-Ħonduras]]||&lt;center&gt;1902
|-
|PDCH||[[Partit Demokratiku Kristjan tal-Ħonduras]]||&lt;center&gt;1968
|-
|PINU||[[Partit tal-Innovazzjoni u l-Għaqda|Innovazzjoni u Għaqda-Partit Soċjal Demokratiku]]||&lt;center&gt;1974
|-
|}
&lt;/center&gt;

===Relazzjonijiet barranin===
Ir-relazzjonijiet barranin tal-Honduras jinkludu r-relazzjonijiet tal-pajjiż mal-bqija tad-dinja, inklużi l-isferi politiċi, ekonomiċi, kummerċjali, militari, legali, ġeopolitiċi u ġeostrateġiċi. Mill-bidu tagħha, il-Honduras kienet attur ewlieni fl-Amerika Ċentrali u kellha rwol sinifikanti fix-xena politika globali, għalkemm l-orjentazzjoni u l-alleanzi tagħha varjaw konsiderevolment matul iż-żmien u taħt amministrazzjonijiet differenti.

Il-Honduras hija pajjiż tradizzjonalment allinjat mal-Istati Uniti. Washington iddefendiet l-interessi tagħha fil-pajjiż, billi qieset dan bħala bażi biex iżżomm l-influwenza tagħha fl-Amerika Ċentrali. F'nofs is-snin tmenin, l-Istati Uniti bniet il-kumpless militari ta' Palmerola fuq ħamrija Honduras, li serva bħala pjattaforma loġistika għall-iskjerament tat-truppi tagħha fir-reġjun.

[[File:Diplomatic missions of Honduras.png|thumb|Mappa tal-missjonijiet diplomatiċi tal-Ħonduras.]]

Ir-relazzjonijiet barranin tal-Honduras huma mmaniġġjati mill-Ministeru tal-Affarijiet Barranin tal-Honduras. Bħalissa, il-ministru tiegħu huwa Eduardo Enrique Reina.

L-Istitut Salvadorjan tal-Benesseri tal-Għalliema, l-Istitut Nazzjonali tal-Irtirar u l-Pensjonijiet għall-Impjegati u l-Uffiċjali tal-Fergħa Eżekuttiva, l-Istitut tas-Sigurtà Soċjali għall-Professjonisti Legali, l-Istitut tas-Sigurtà Soċjali għall-Impjegati tal-Università Nazzjonali Awtonoma tal-Honduras, u l-Istitut Nazzjonali tas-Sigurtà Soċjali tal-Għalliema huma membri attivi tal-Konferenza Inter-Amerikana dwar is-Sigurtà Soċjali (CISS).

==Etimoloġija==
Matul il-perjodu kolonjali, it-territorju Honduras kien magħruf ukoll bħala Hibueras jew Higüeras, u xi konkwistaturi saħansitra sejħulu &quot;Extremadura l-Ġdida.&quot; Fi żminijiet pre-Ispaniċi (u aktar tard, fil-viċi-rejaltà bikrija), in-nies Nahua tat-Triple Alliance u Cuzcatlán sejħu t-territorju li issa jinkludi l-Honduras &quot;Weyimollan,&quot; li bin-Nahuatl tfisser &quot;Post tal-Istufati l-Kbar,&quot; isem li ġie korrott bl-Ispanjol għal &quot;Guaymuras.&quot;

L-isem Honduras jirreferi għall-fond jew il-fond li n-navigaturi Spanjoli ltaqgħu magħhom tul il-kosti tiegħu. Ipoteżi mifruxa ħafna tattribwixxi l-isem lil Kristofru Kolombu, li suppost esklama, &quot;Grazzi Alla ħriġna minn dawn il-fond!&quot; u b'hekk semma t-territorju u wkoll Cape Gracias a Dios (Grazzi lil Alla). Madankollu, l-isem Honduras qatt ma jintuża fil-kitbiet jew fis-sommarji ta' Kolombu. Skont Élisée Reclus, l-isem huwa attribwit lil Bartolomé de las Casas, iżda Rolando Zelaya y Ferrera indika li huwa probabbli ħafna li l-ewwel li użaw l-isem tal-Honduras kienu Juan Díaz de Solís u Vicente Yáñez Pinzón, li fl-1508 iddeċidew li jesploraw ir-reġjun waħedhom.

==Organizzazzjoni territorjali==
Il-Ħonduras hija maqsuma fi 18-il dipartiment, kull wieħed b'gvernatur maħtur mill-president. Id-dipartimenti huma maqsuma f'muniċipalitajiet, li huma mbagħad maqsuma fi bliet u rħula. Il-belt kapitali tar-Repubblika hija Tegucigalpa, li, flimkien mal-belt ta' Comayagüela, tifforma d-Distrett Ċentrali, fil-ġurisdizzjoni tad-dipartiment ta' Francisco Morazán.
&lt;center&gt;
{| class=&quot;wikitable&quot; style=&quot;font-size:90%&quot; width=500px
!colspan=6| Departamentos de Honduras 
|-
|colspan=6 |{{Mapa de Honduras con departamentos}}
|-
!Departamento
![[ISO 3166-2:HN|ISO:HN]]&lt;ref&gt;[[ISO 3166-2:HN]] ([[International Organization for Standardization|ISO]] [[ISO 3166-2|3166-2]]) Códigos para los departamentos de Honduras.&lt;/ref&gt;
!Cabecera
!Población (2023)
!Superficie (km²)
!Densidad
|-
| [[Departamento de Atlántida|Atlántida]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |HN-AT
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[La Ceiba]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |506 044
| align=&quot;center&quot; |4372
| align=&quot;center&quot; |115.7
|-
| [[Departamento de Choluteca|Choluteca]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |HN-CH
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[Choluteca]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |489 926
| align=&quot;center&quot; |4360
| align=&quot;center&quot; |112.4
|-
| [[Departamento de Colón|Colón]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |HN-CL
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[Trujillo (Honduras)|Trujillo]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |359 000
| align=&quot;center&quot; |8249
| align=&quot;center&quot; |43.5
|-
| [[Departamento de Comayagua|Comayagua]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |HN-CM
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[Comayagua]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |590 367
| align=&quot;center&quot; |5124
| align=&quot;center&quot; |115.2
|-
| [[Departamento de Copán|Copán]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |HN-CP
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[Santa Rosa de Copán]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |429 167
| align=&quot;center&quot; |3242
| align=&quot;center&quot; |132.4
|-
| [[Departamento de Cortés|Cortés]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |HN-CR
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[San Pedro Sula]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |1 876 658
| align=&quot;center&quot; |3923
| align=&quot;center&quot; |478.4
|-
| [[Departamento de El Paraíso|El Paraíso]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |HN-EP
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[Yuscarán]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |515 736
| align=&quot;center&quot; |7489
| align=&quot;center&quot; |68.9
|-
| [[Departamento de Francisco Morazán|Francisco Morazán]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |HN-FM
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[Tegucigalpa]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |1 741 653
| align=&quot;center&quot; |8619
| align=&quot;center&quot; |202.1
|-
| [[Departamento de Gracias a Dios|Gracias a Dios]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |HN-GD
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[Puerto Lempira]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |109 689
| align=&quot;center&quot; |16&amp;nbsp;997
| align=&quot;center&quot; |6.5
|-
| [[Departamento de Intibucá|Intibucá]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |HN-IN
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[La Esperanza (Intibucá)|La Esperanza]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |277 711
| align=&quot;center&quot; |3123
| align=&quot;center&quot; |88.9
|-
| [[Departamento de Islas de la Bahía|Islas de la Bahía (Bay Islands/Gżira tal-Bahia)]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |HN-IB
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[Roatán (municipio)|Roatán]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |79 945
| align=&quot;center&quot; |236
| align=&quot;center&quot; |338.8
|-
| [[Departamento de La Paz (Honduras)|La Paz]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |HN-LP
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[La Paz (La Paz)|La Paz]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |234 504
| align=&quot;center&quot; |2525
| align=&quot;center&quot; |92.9
|-
| [[Departamento de Lempira|Lempira]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |HN-LM
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[Gracias (Lempira)|Gracias]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |380 532
| align=&quot;center&quot; |4228
| align=&quot;center&quot; |90.0
|-
| [[Departamento de Ocotepeque|Ocotepeque]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |HN-OC
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[Ocotepeque (Ocotepeque)|Ocotepeque]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |173 313
| align=&quot;center&quot; |1630
| align=&quot;center&quot; |106.3
|-
| [[Departamento de Olancho|Olancho]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |HN-OL
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[Juticalpa]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |600 519
| align=&quot;center&quot; |23&amp;nbsp;905
| align=&quot;center&quot; |25.1
|-
| [[Departamento de Santa Bárbara (Honduras)|Santa Bárbara]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |HN-SB
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[Santa Bárbara (Santa Bárbara)|Santa Bárbara]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |488 040
| align=&quot;center&quot; |5024
| align=&quot;center&quot; |97.1
|-
| [[Departamento de Valle|Valle]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |HN-VL
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[Nacaome]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |195 747
| align=&quot;center&quot; |1665
| align=&quot;center&quot; |117.6
|-
| [[Departamento de Yoro|Yoro]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |HN-YO
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[Yoro (Yoro)|Yoro]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |652 982
| align=&quot;center&quot; |7781
| align=&quot;center&quot; |83.9
|- 
| colspan=&quot;8&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; style=&quot;font-size: smaller:&quot; |'''*''' Fuente: Proyección del 2023&lt;ref name=&quot;citypopulation.de&quot;&gt;[https://www.citypopulation.de/en/honduras/admin/ Proyección del 2020] - Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Honduras&lt;/ref&gt;
|}
&lt;/center&gt;

==Simboli nazzjonali==
* Bandiera Nazzjonali: Id-Digriet Leġiżlattiv Nru. 7, tas-16 ta' Frar 1866, stabbilixxa l-kulur bħala blu turkważ. Il-ħames stilel jirrappreżentaw l-għaqda u l-fraternità fost in-nazzjonijiet tal-Amerika Ċentrali, l-abjad jissimbolizza l-paċi, u l-blu turkważ jirrappreżenta s-sema nazzjonali.

* Stemma Nazzjonali: Maħluqa għall-ewwel darba f'Ottubru 1825 bid-Digriet Nru. 16, matul il-gvern ta' Dionisio de Herrera, l-ewwel Kap tal-Istat tal-Honduras (Barahona Donaire, 1985).

* Għasfur Nazzjonali: Il-makaw iskarlatina (Ara macao), jew makaw aħmar, kif inhu magħruf komunement fil-Ħonduras. Iddikjarat l-Għasfur Nazzjonali fit-28 ta' Ġunju, 1993, bid-Digriet Leġiżlattiv Nru. 36-93.

* Mammiferu Nazzjonali: Iċ-ċerv denbu abjad (Odocoileus virginianus). Iddikjarat il-Mammiferu Nazzjonali fl-istess digriet bħall-Għasfur Nazzjonali.

* Siġra Nazzjonali: Is-siġra tal-arżnu, iddikjarata bil-Ftehim Nru. 429, maħruġ fl-14 ta' Mejju, 1928. Dan jiddikjara li s-Siġra Nazzjonali hija: &quot;is-siġra tal-arżnu li tidher simbolikament fuq l-Istemma Araldika tagħna.&quot; Madankollu, l-arżnu huwa ġeneru, mhux speċi; u d-digriet attwali għall-istemma araldika nazzjonali ma jispeċifikax liema speċi ta' arżnu għandha tidher, u dan wassal għal konfużjoni. L-ispeċi l-aktar assoċjata mas-siġra nazzjonali hija Pinus oocarpa, peress li hija waħda mill-aktar abbundanti fil-pajjiż.

* Fjura Nazzjonali: L-Orkidea (Rhyncholaelia digbyana). Qabel dan, il-Fjura Nazzjonali kienet il-warda, iddikjarata bħala tali bid-digriet leġiżlattiv nru 17. Fil-25 ta' Novembru 1969, din inbidlet għall-orkidea, peress li hija indiġena għall-Ħonduras.

&lt;center&gt;
&lt;!--Ismijiet tal-ispeċi kif jissejħu fil-Ħonduras--&gt;
&lt;gallery&gt;
File:Araraazul-14.jpg|[[Ara macao|Guara Roja]]
File:Quivira-Whitetail-Buck.jpg|[[Odocoileus virginianus|Venado cola blanca]]
File:Pinus oocarpa Perquín.jpg|[[Pino]]
File:Brassavola digbyana1.jpg|[[Rhyncholaelia digbyana|Orquídea]]
&lt;/gallery&gt;
&lt;/center&gt;

===Ġeoloġija===
[[File:Mapa Geografica de Honduras 33.PNG|thumb|left|Topografija tal-Ħonduras]]

Il-Ħonduras tinsab fuq l-usa’ parti tal-istmu tal-Amerika Ċentrali. Hija mdawra fit-tramuntana mill-Oċean Atlantiku, fil-lvant mill-istess oċean u r-Repubblika tan-Nikaragwa, fin-nofsinhar min-Nikaragwa, il-Golf ta' Fonseca, u r-Repubblika ta' El Salvador, u fil-punent mill-Gwatemala. L-erja totali tal-Ħonduras, inklużi l-gżejjer kollha tagħha, hija ta' 112,777 km². Il-kosta tagħha għandha tul totali ta' 823 km, li minnhom 669 km jmissu mal-Baħar Karibew u 163 km jmissu mal-Golf ta' Fonseca fl-Oċean Paċifiku.


[[File:Isla del Tigre vista desde Coyolito.jpg|thumb|Gżira ta' Tiger (Isla del Tigre/Tiger Island)]]

Id-demarkazzjoni tal-fruntiera ma' El Salvador ġiet stabbilita wara l-ftehimiet ta' paċi ffirmati f'Lima, il-Perù fl-1980 miż-żewġ pajjiżi. Il-konfini ġew definiti aktar bid-deċiżjoni tal-Qorti Internazzjonali tal-Ġustizzja fl-Olanda fil-11 ta' Settembru 1992. Din l-istess qorti rratifikat ukoll, fl-1960, id-demarkazzjoni tal-fruntiera man-Nikaragwa, li kienet ġiet stabbilita fl-1906 bid-deċiżjoni ta' arbitraġġ ta' Alfonso XIII, Re ta' Spanja.

Fit-8 ta' Ottubru 2007, il-Qorti Internazzjonali tal-Ġustizzja stabbilixxiet il-fruntiera marittima bejn il-Honduras u l-Gwatemala fi 15-il grad latitudni tat-tramuntana u 83 grad lonġitudni tal-punent, u tat lill-Honduras is-sovranità fuq il-gżejjer ta' Bobel Cay, Port Royal Cay, Savanna Cay, u South Cay, filwaqt li Edinburgh Cay baqgħet fuq in-naħa tan-Nikaragwa. Il-fruntiera mal-Gwatemala ġiet definita mid-deċiżjoni tat-Tribunal Hughes maħruġa f'Washington fl-1933.

Fil-Baħar Karibew, il-Honduras tippossjedi l-arċipelagu tal-Gżejjer tal-Bajja, magħmul minn Utila, Roatán, u Guanaja. Swan Island u l-Cayos Cochinos, fost oħrajn, ukoll jappartjenu għall-Ħonduras. Fil-Golf ta' Fonseca, li jaqsam man-Nikaragwa u El Salvador, il-Ħonduras għandha l-gżejjer ta’ Zacate Grande, Isla del Tigre, Garrobo, Exposición, Güegüensis, u gżejjer oħra iżgħar bħal Isla Conejo.

=== Klima ===
[[File:Honduras Köppen.svg|thumb|left|Tipi ta' Klima fil-Ħonduras]]
Il-Ħonduras għandha klimi tropikali umdi jew niexfa (Köppen, Aw/Am/Af) (taħt l-1000 m 'il fuq mil-livell tal-baħar) u klimi temperati fil-muntanji, inklużi klimi subtropikali (Köppen, Cwa/Cwb) u klimi oċeaniċi temperati tal-artijiet għoljin (Köppen, Cfb) ('il fuq minn 1250 m 'il fuq mil-livell tal-baħar sa 2870 m 'il fuq mil-livell tal-baħar). Fil-klimi ekwatorjali tax-xita u oċeaniċi temperati, hemm staġun tax-xita wieħed biss is-sena kollha minħabba x-xita uniformi. Il-bqija tal-pajjiż l-aktar għandu żewġ staġuni definiti sew: l-istaġun xott u l-istaġun tax-xita. L-istaġun tax-xita jibda f'Mejju u jestendi sa Lulju, b'pawża matul Awwissu. Ġeneralment jerġa' jibda f'Settembru u jdum sa Novembru, meta jibda l-istaġun xott. Dan l-istaġun jestendi sal-xahar ta' April jew Mejju.

It-temperatura għolja medja madwar il-pajjiż hija ta' 32 °C (90 °F), u t-temperatura baxxa medja hija ta' 20 °C (68 °F).

It-temperatura medja annwali fl-intern tal-Honduras hija ta' 21 °C (70 °F).

Ix-xita medja annwali hija ta' 1000 mm (40 pulzier) fil-muntanji u 2500 mm (100 pulzier) fil-widien tal-kosta tat-tramuntana.

Iż-żoni aktar baxxi tar-reġjun kostali għandhom temperatura medja annwali ta' 27 °C (80 °F) b'umdità għolja.

Ir-reġjun kostali tal-Atlantiku ġeneralment jesperjenza klima ta’ foresta tropikali, b’temperatura medja ta’ 27°C, temperatura massima medja ta’ 30°C, u temperatura minima medja ta’ 20.7°C. L-istaġun tax-xita jibda f’Ġunju u tipikament idum sa Diċembru. Ix-xita medja annwali hija ta’ 2643 mm. Ir-reġjun tat-tramuntana, li jinkludi d-dipartimenti ta’ Cortés u Yoro, jirċievi xita medja annwali ta’ 1200 mm fuq kważi ħames xhur tas-sena. L-umdità medja hija ta’ 75%. It-temperatura medja annwali f’dan ir-reġjun hija ta’ 26°C, b’temperatura massima ta’ 30°C u temperatura minima ta’ 21°C.


Ir-reġjun tan-nofsinhar tal-Ħonduras għandu klima ta' savanna tropikali. Dan ir-reġjun ġeneralment jesperjenza staġun niexef għal sitt xhur jew aktar. Matul l-istaġun tax-xita, ir-reġjun tan-nofsinhar jakkumula medja ta' 1680 mm ta' xita. It-temperatura medja hija ta' 29.1 °C, b'massimu ta' 35°C u minimu ta' 23.4 °C. Ir-reġjun ċentrali, li jinkludi d-dipartimenti ta' Francisco Morazán, Comayagua, u La Paz, għandu temperatura medja ta’ 22.4 °C, b’massimu ta’ 27.2 °C u minimu ta’ 17.4 °C. Ix-xita medja hija ta' madwar 1000 mm fuq aktar minn tliet xhur tas-sena.

La Esperanza hija magħrufa madwar il-pajjiż bħala l-aktar belt kiesħa fil-Honduras. Billi tinsab f’altitudni ogħla minn bliet oħra fil-Honduras, tesperjenza temperaturi aktar baxxi mill-medja f'żoni oħra, u saħansitra rreġistrat temperaturi taħt iż-żero.

L-aktar temperatura baxxa li qatt ġiet irreġistrata fil-pajjiż kienet ta' -2 °C, fuq l-għolja El Pital, ftit kilometri minn Nueva Ocotepeque.

&lt;gallery mode=&quot;packed-hover&quot; caption=&quot;Pajsaġġi bijoklimatiċi tal-Ħonduras&quot;&gt;
File:Nature Santa Ana Francisco Morazan Honduras.jpg|[[Bosque seco|Bosque de coniferas]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Valle de Ángeles]]
File:Laguna de Chiligatoro La esperanza Intibuca.jpg|[[Clima oceanico]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Intibucá (municipio)|Intibucá]]
File:Amanecer en el Cerro Las Minas, el punto mas alto de Honduras.JPG|[[Clima templado subhúmedo|Clima subhumedo de montaña]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Cerro Las Minas|Pico Celaque]]
File:Westbay2106.jpg|[[Clima ecuatorial lluvioso]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Roatán]]
File:Parque Nacional Punta Izopo 01.jpg|[[Humedal]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Parque Nacional Punta Izopo]]
File:Pico-Bonito (12122463094).jpg|[[Selva tropical]]&lt;br /&gt;[[La Ceiba]]
File:Pedernales La Paz Honduras.jpg|[[Bosque laurifolio]]&lt;br /&gt;[[La Paz (ciudad de Honduras)|La Paz]]
File:Rural Choluteca.jpg|[[Clima tropical]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Choluteca]]
File:Temperate Marine Oceanic climate (Cfb) Forest in Siguatepeque, Honduras.jpg|[[Clima subtropical]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Siguatepeque]]
File:Lago Yojoa.jpg|[[Clima monzónico|Tropical Monzónico Am]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Lago de Yojoa]]
File:Isla Zacate Grande.jpg|[[Manglar]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Gżira ta' Kbir Zacate (Isla Zacate Grande/Greater Zacate Island)]]
&lt;/gallery&gt;

=== Relief u ġeoloġija ===
Aktar minn 65% tal-Ħonduras huwa muntanjuż, b'elevazzjoni medja ta' 1,000 metru 'l fuq mil-livell tal-baħar. Il-Kordillera tal-Amerika Ċentrali taqsam il-pajjiż fi tliet reġjuni: tal-Lvant, Ċentrali, u tal-Punent. Ġeomorfoloġikament, il-Honduras huwa maqsum fi tliet żoni: il-Pjanura Kostali tat-Tramuntana, il-Pjanura Kostali tan-Nofsinhar, u r-Reġjun Muntanjuż (li jinkludi l-firxiet muntanjużi tat-Tramuntana, ċentrali, u tan-Nofsinhar).

Il-firxiet muntanjużi ewlenin tal-firxa tat-Tramuntana huma: Espíritu Santo, li jinsab bejn id-dipartimenti ta' Santa Bárbara u Copán, ħdejn il-fruntiera mal-Gwatemala; Omoa, li jinsab bejn Santa Bárbara u Cortés; u Nombre de Dios, li jinsab f'Yoro u Atlántida, fejn il-muntanja imponenti Pico Bonito titla' sa 2,435 metru 'l fuq mil-livell tal-baħar.

Il-firxiet ewlenin tal-Kordillera Ċentrali jinkludu: Montecillos, li jinkludi l-muntanji ta' Meámbar, Maroncho, u La Nieve. F'dawn il-muntanji, l-altitudni massima tilħaq 2,744 metru 'l fuq mil-livell tal-baħar fil-Qċaċet ta' Maroncho. Meded muntanjużi oħra fil-Kordillera Ċentrali jinkludu: Mico Quemado, Gallinero, Sulaco, Agalta, Comayagua, Atima, La Esperanza, Punta Piedra, Misoco, u Almendárez.

Il-Kordillera tan-Nofsinhar tinkludi l-firxa muntanjuża ta' Celaque, fejn il-quċċata ta' Cerro Las Minas hija l-ogħla punt fil-pajjiż b'2,870 metru 'l fuq mil-livell tal-baħar. Firxiet oħra f'din il-firxa muntanjuża jinkludu: Dipilto, li testendi mid-dipartimenti ta' Choluteca, Olancho, Gracias a Dios, u El Paraíso; Lepaterique, li hija parti minn Francisco Morazán, El Paraíso, u Comayagua; Puca jew Opalaca, li tinsab bejn Lempira u Santa Bárbara; u Merendón, li tinsab f'Ocotepeque, Santa Bárbara, u Copán. Inklużi wkoll hemm il-muntanji tar-reġjun tas-Sierra f'La Paz u Intibucá.

[[File:HN049Du-sAB DistTownVu.jpg|thumb|Lempira (Honduras)]]
[[File:Honduras Topography.png|thumb|Topografija tal-Ħonduras.]]
[[File:Pulhapanzak Catarata.jpg|thumb|Il-Kaskati ta' Pulhapanzak (Cataratas de Pulhapanzak/Pulhapanzak Watefall)]]

Il-medda tas-Sierra del Gallinero testendi mill-bidu tax-Xmara Gila fid-Dipartiment ta' Copán, bejn il-muniċipalitajiet ta' La Unión u Cabañas, taqsam id-Dipartimenti ta' Copán u Santa Bárbara sal-muniċipalità ta' Concepción del Norte. Il-plateau ta' Santa Rosa, fejn tinsab il-belt ta' Santa Rosa de Copán, tinsab hawn.

Il-medda tas-Sierra de Atima testendi mil-Lbiċ għall-Grigal, tibda fil-Muntanja Joconal, fit-Tramuntana tal-muniċipalità ta' Lepaera, Lempira, u taqsam id-Dipartiment kollu ta' Santa Bárbara, u tispiċċa ħdejn Villanueva, Cortés. Il-medda tas-Sierra de Montecillos testendi mid-Dipartiment ta' Cortés, tgħaddi minn Comayagua u tilħaq id-Dipartiment ta' La Paz. Fi ħdan il-medda tas-Sierra de Montecillos hemm il-muntanji ta' Meámbar, Maroncho, u La Nieve. L-ogħla punt f'dawn il-meded jilħaq 2,744 metru 'l fuq mil-livell tal-baħar fil-Qċaċet ta' Maroncho. &quot;Fil-bażi tal-lvant tal-linja tas-Sierra de Montecillos, fejn l-interruzzjoni tal-firxiet tal-muntanji hija kompluta, tinsab il-pjanura ta' Comayagua.&quot;

Il-medda muntanjuża Sierra de Comayagua tinsab f'Comayagua u hija mdawra fit-tramuntana mill-Wied ta' Sulaco u fin-nofsinhar minn Amarateca, li jifridha mill-medda muntanjuża Hierbabuena f'Francisco Morazán, fin-nofsinhar tal-belt ta' Talanga. Il-bliet ta' Minas de Oro, Esquías, u San Luis (Comayagua) jinsabu tul in-naħa tat-tramuntana tagħha.

Il-medda muntanjuża Sierra de Mico Quemado tinsab fil-punent tad-Dipartiment ta' Yoro. Dawn il-muntanji jinsabu fil-lvant tal-belt ta' El Progreso. Hija mdawra mill-Wied tax-Xmara Ulúa jew Sula fil-punent, mix-Xmara Humuya fin-nofsinhar, mill-Wied ta' Olomán (imnixxef mix-Xmara Cuyamapa) fil-lvant, u mix-Xmara Guaymas, tributarja tal-Laguna Toloa, fit-tramuntana. Il-Pjanura Kostali tat-Tramuntana, min-naħa l-oħra, hija twila madwar 670 km u testendi mill-fruntiera mal-Gwatemala sa La Mosquitia, il-fruntiera man-Nikaragwa. Din l-istrixxa ta' art tinkludi 16% tat-territorju Honduras u hija l-aktar żona agrikola produttiva tal-pajjiż.

Il-Pjanuri tal-Paċifiku jokkupaw biss 2% tat-territorju Honduras. Hawnhekk, il-klima hija tas-savana, b'żewġ staġuni distinti: l-istaġun xott u l-istaġun tax-xita. Ix-xmajjar Choluteca, Nacaome, Goascorán, u Negro jgħaddu miż-żona, u jikkontribwixxu għall-iżvilupp agrikolu tagħha.

=== Flora u fawna ===
Il-Ħonduras tiftaħar b'bijodiversità eċċezzjonalment għolja meta mqabbla mad-daqs tagħha. Il-post tropikali privileġġjat tagħha bejn żewġ oċeani u t-topografija diversa tagħha joħolqu varjetà wiesgħa ta' ħabitats, minn foresti tas-sħab sa sikka tal-qroll, li jrawmu diversità rikka ta' flora u fawna.

Il-Ħonduras għandha 43,352 km² ta' foresti (4,335,200 ettaru), b'53% tat-territorju tagħha mgħotti minn foresti, u kklassifikat fil-74 post globalment. Il-foresti tagħha jinkludu ħames tipi differenti: foresta tropikali, foresta tas-sħab, foresta niexfa, foresta tal-mangrovja, u foresta tal-arżnu.

Ir-Riżerva tal-Bijosfera Río Plátano tispikka, li tkopri erja ta' 5,251 km² jew 390,000 ettaru ta' foresta tropikali tax-xmajjar, b'flora u fawna abbundanti u dar għal aktar minn 2,000 persuna indiġena. Xi wħud mix-xmajjar fil-bijosfera jinkludu r-Río Plátano u l-baċiri tax-xmajjar Guampu, Panluya, u Sicre.

Iż-żoni tal-foresti tal-Honduras qed jonqsu kull sena minħabba d-deforestazzjoni u l-ħruq, li mhux biss qed inaqqsu l-bijodiversità iżda jaffettwaw ukoll is-sorsi tal-ilma li fuqhom jiddependu l-abitanti tagħha. Il-Honduras għandha biss 200 km² ta’ ilma tal-wiċċ, l-iżgħar fl-Amerika Ċentrali kollha.

Skont l-Istrateġija u l-Pjan ta’ Azzjoni Nazzjonali għall-Bijodiversità (ENBRA-SERNA/DBIO, 2001), hemm total ta’ 7,524 speċi fil-Honduras, li 170 minnhom għandhom distribuzzjoni limitata. Dan it-total jinkludi 744 speċi ta’ għasafar, li 59 minnhom huma kkunsidrati mhedda fil-pajjiż; 231 speċi ta’ mammiferi, li minnhom 3 huma endemiċi, 19 huma mhedda, u 8 huma fil-periklu; 116-il speċi ta’ anfibji; u 200 speċi ta’ rettili. Hemm 197 speċi ta’ ħut magħrufa fl-Oċean Atlantiku u 387 fl-Oċean Paċifiku. Peress li l-artropodi huma l-inqas taxa magħrufa fid-dinja, huwa stmat li jista’ jkun hemm madwar 30,000 speċi fil-Honduras. S’issa, ġew identifikati 2,500.

&lt;gallery mode=&quot;packed-hover&quot; caption=&quot;Flora u Fawna tal-Ħonduras&quot;&gt;
File:Agaveespinho2.jpg|[[Agave]]
File:Tillandsia flabellata0.jpg|''[[Tillandsia flabellata]]''
File:AnthuriumAndraenum.jpg|[[Anthurium]]
File:American Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua Fruit Context 2500px.jpg|[[Liquidambar]]
File:Amazilia luciae.JPG|[[Amazilia luciae]]
File:White-faced capuchin monkey 6.jpeg|''[[Cebus capucinus]]''
File:PortraitOfAnIguana.jpg|[[Iguana]]
File:Obscured jaguar.jpg|[[Panthera onca|Jaguar]]
File:StripedDolpin.jpg|[[Delfín]]
File:Collared Peccary.jpg|''[[Tayassu tajacu]]''
File:Boa constrictor, Vaňkovka, Brno (2).jpg|[[Boa constrictor]]
File:Caretta caretta01.jpg|''[[Caretta caretta]]''
File:A Coney in a Vase Sponge.jpg|''[[Cephalopholis fulva]]''
File:Braunrückentukan edit.jpg|[[Ramphastidae|Tucan]]
File:Ara ambigua - Ara zeleny Zoo Hodonin.jpg|''[[Ara ambigua]]''
File:Harpia harpyja -Belize Zoo-8.jpg|''[[Harpia harpyja]]''
File:Pionus senilis guatemala 2.jpg|''[[Pionus senilis]]''
File:Roatan Coral Snake (Micrurus ruatanus).jpg|[[Micrurus ruatanus]]
File:Cruziohyla calcarifer.jpg|''[[Cruziohyla calcarifer]]''
File:Rhinoclemmys funerea.jpg|[[Rhinoclemmys funerea]]
&lt;/gallery&gt;

Il-kosti tal-Ħonduras huma mgħaddsa fit-tramuntana u l-lvant mill-Baħar Karibew u fin-nofsinhar mill-Golf ta’ Fonseca. Fl-ilmijiet turkważ ħdejn il-Baħar Karibew, wieħed jista' japprezza, permezz tal-għadis, is-sikek tal-qroll bid-diversità tagħhom ta’ alka kalkarja, alka ħamra (Rhodophyta), mergħat tal-ħaxix tal-baħar, u pjanti akkwatiċi oħra li jiffurmaw ekosistema naturali.

Fost il-fawna li tista' tinstab tul il-kosta tal-Ħonduras hemm klieb il-baħar tal-balieni, delfini, varjetà ta’ ħut tropikali, gambli (Caridea), u ħafna speċi oħra.
=== Idrografija ===
{{Prinċipali|Idrografija tal-Ħonduras}}

[[File:Cayos Cochinos Lighthouse view.jpg|thumb|[[Cayos Cochinos]]]]

Is-sistema idrografika tal-Ħonduras hija magħmula minn dsatax-il sistema ta' xmajjar li joriġinaw fil-pajjiż u jispiċċaw fiż-żewġ oċeani. Tlettax-il sistema ta' xmajjar, li jvarjaw fit-tul minn 550 sa 25 km, jispiċċaw fil-Baħar Karibew, bil-baċiri tagħhom jirrappreżentaw 82.72% tat-territorju nazzjonali. Sitt sistemi, li jirrappreżentaw 17.28%, jispiċċaw fl-Oċean Paċifiku permezz tal-Golf ta' Fonseca. Ix-xmajjar tal-Ħonduras li jispiċċaw fil-Baħar Karibew jinkludu x-Chamelecón, Ulúa, Aguán, Lean, Sico, Tinto, u Negro, kif ukoll ix-xmajjar Patuca, Plátano, u Segovia, fost oħrajn. Ix-xmajjar Choluteca, Negro, Goascorán, u Nacaome jispiċċaw fl-Oċean Paċifiku. Ix-xmajjar li joħorġu fil-Karibew huma l-itwal u l-aktar voluminużi fil-pajjiż. Parti kbira mill-ilma tal-Honduras tinsab fix-xmajjar, nixxigħat, lagi, estwarji, u laguni; madankollu, il-volum tal-ilma ta' taħt l-art huwa akbar mill-ilma tal-wiċċ. Fiż-żona tat-tramuntana, 70% tal-ilma ta' taħt l-art jiġi kkunsmat, u dan jikkawża li l-livell tal-ilma tal-ilma jonqos minħabba l-estrazzjoni tal-ilma minn mijiet ta' bjar għall-konsum industrijali u mill-bniedem. Dawn il-bjar jiġbdu l-ilma mill-livell tal-ilma, u dan l-ilma jirritorna bħala ilma mormi li fih skart solidu, u jikkontamina dawn is-sorsi tal-ilma.

[[File:Río Patuca|thumb|230px|[[Xmara Patuca]] (Río Patuca/Patuca River).]]

Ix-Xmara Coco (Río Coco/Coco River) jew Segovia hija twila 550 km u tkopri erja ta '5,684 km². Ix-Xmara Patuca, bit-tul tagħha ta' 500 km, tkopri l-akbar baċin (23,511 km²). It-tieni l-akbar huwa x-Xmara Ulúa, li tkopri baċin ta' 21,964 km² b'tul ta' 300 km. Il-ġganti l-oħra tal-pajjiż huma l-Chamelecón, twil 200 km; it-Tinto jew Negro, 215 km; u l-Aguán, li, f'275 km, ikopri baċin ta' aktar minn 10,523 km². Xmajjar oħra daqstant importanti fuq ix-xaqliba tal-Karibew tal-Honduras huma r-Río Plátano (100 km), il-Cangrejal, il-Cuyamel, u l-Motagua, li jkopri baċin internazzjonali ta' 2,008 km². Ix-xmara Patuca, li tgħaddi fil-parti l-kbira tal-grigal tal-Ħonduras, toriġina mill-konfluwenza tax-xmajjar Guayambre, Jalán, Guayape, u Telica, u titkabbar b'ħafna tributarji oħra, li wħud minnhom huma sinifikanti. Wara li tgħaddi mid-dipartimenti ta' Olancho u Gracias a Dios, tisfa' fil-Golf ta' Fonseca permezz ta' żewġ fergħat: waħda tisfa' fil-Laguna ta' Brus u l-oħra fil-Baħar Karibew. Din ix-xmara għandha tul massimu ta' 500 km u tkopri baċir ta' 24,695 km².

Ix-xmajjar ewlenin tal-baċir tal-Golf ta' Fonseca huma ftit, żgħar, u għandhom inqas fluss meta mqabbla ma' dawk tal-Karibew. L-itwal waħda hija x-Xmara Choluteca, li tgħaddi għal 250 km, tkopri baċir ta' aktar minn 7,500 km² u żona agrikola ta' 2,132 km². Li jmiss hija x-Xmara Goascorán, twila 115 km, li tkopri baċir ta' 1,920 km². Ix-Xmara Nacaome hija twila 90 km u x-Xmara Negro hija twila 85 km. Min-naħa l-oħra, ix-Xmara Lempa tkopri erja internazzjonali ta' 5,612 km².

=== Xmajjar tal-Karibew ===
&lt;div align=center&gt; 
{| class=&quot;toc&quot; cellpadding=0 cellspacing=2 width=220px style=&quot;float:right; margin: 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em 1em; padding: 0.5e text- align:left;clear:all; margin- left:10px; font- size:90%&quot;
|colspan=4 style=&quot;background:#black; color:white;&quot; align=center bgcolor=&quot;blue&quot;|'''Xmajjar ewlenin tal-Ħonduras'''
|- 
|colspan=4 align=center|[[File:Río Ulúa.png|200px]]
|- 
! style=&quot;background:#e8e8e8;&quot; | '''Isem'''
! style=&quot;background:#e8e8e8;&quot; | '''Tul ([[km]])'''
|- sfond:#efefef
|[[Río Coco|Coco]] jew Segovia || tallinja=lemin| 550
|- sfond:#e9e9e9;
| [[Xmara Patuca|Patuca]] || align=right|500
|- sfond:#e9e9e9
| [[Xmara Ulúa|Ulúa]] || tallinja=lemin| 300
|- sfond:#efefef
||[[Xmara Choluteca|Choluteca]]|| tallinja=lemin| 250 
|- sfond:#efefef
||[[Xmara Aguán|Aguán]]|| tallinja=lemin| 225 
|- sfond:#efefef
|[[Río Sico, Aħmar jew Iswed|Aħmar]] jew Iswed || align=&quot;dritt&quot; | 215
|
|- sfond:#e9e9e9
| [[Xmara Chamelecón|Chamelecón]]|| align=right| 200
|- background:#efefef
|[[Xmara Goascorán|Goascorán]]|| align=right|115
|- background:#e9e9e9;

[[Xmara Nacaome|Nacaome]]|| align=right| 90 
|- background:#e9e9e9
|[[Xmara Plátano|Plátano]]|| align=right| 85
|- 
|colspan=2 style=&quot;background:#e9e9e9;&quot; align=left|&lt;small&gt;Nota: id-distanzi kollha huma esklussivament fit-territorju Honduran.&lt;/small&gt; 
|- 
|}
&lt;/div&gt;

Il-biċċa l-kbira tax-xmajjar Hondurani jispiċċaw fil-Baħar Karibew; huma l-itwal u l-aktar voluminużi fil-pajjiż. Dawn ix-xmajjar &quot;juru stadji ta' żgħożija, maturità, u xjuħija fiċ-ċiklu tal-erożjoni tagħhom.&quot; &lt;ref name=&quot;Encyclopedia of_1&quot;&gt;Enċiklopedija tal-Honduras. Grupo Océano, Daniel Torras, 2001. Barċellona, Spanja. ISBN 84-494-1943-3&lt;/ref&gt; L-aktar xmajjar importanti fuq l-għolja tal-Karibew huma: ix-Xmara Chamelecón, ix-Xmara Ulúa, ix-Xmara Aguán, ix-Xmara Lean, ix-Xmara Sico, Tinto, jew Negro, ix-Xmara Patuca, u x-Xmara Coco.

Ix-Xmara Coco, Wanks, jew Segovia hija l-aħħar mix-xmajjar fuq il-kosta tat-tramuntana tal-Honduras u t-tieni l-itwal xmara fl-Amerika Ċentrali (550 km), wara x-Xmara Usumacinta fil-Gwatemala u l-Messiku. Din ix-xmara tifforma parti mill-fruntiera bejn il-Honduras u n-Nikaragwa; toriġina fil-medda tal-muntanji La Botija fid-Dipartiment ta' Choluteca; It-tributarji tagħha jinkludu l-Poteca, ir-Rus Rus, u l-Bocay. Meta s-Segovia tisfa’ fl-oċean, tagħmel dan minn żewġ fergħat ewlenin: l-akbar waħda tiġri lejn Cape Gracias a Dios, fejn jispiċċa t-territorju Honduras.

Ix-Chamalecón hija xmara pjuttost twila (200 km); madankollu, tgħaddi minn sezzjoni relattivament dejqa tal-pajjiż, u dan jispjega l-volum relattivament żgħir ta’ ilma tagħha. Il-kurrent tagħha huwa mgħaġġel u mimli b’ilma baxx. Titla’ fuq l-għolja tal-lvant tal-Muntanja Gallinero, fil-medda tal-muntanji Merendón, ftit legs lejn il-majjistral ta’ Santa Rosa de Copán; issaqqi d-dipartimenti ta’ Copán, Santa Bárbara, u Cortés, u tiġri f’riġlejn il-Muntanja Omoa lejn in-nofsinhar, separata minn linja ta’ għoljiet mix-Xmara Santiago, li tgħaddi parallela magħha. L-għoljiet jispiċċaw fil-Wied ta’ Sula, u x-Xmara Chamalecón tisfa’ fil-parti tal-lvant tal-Laguna ta’ Alvarado.

[[File:Barra-de-los-rios-ulua y chamelecon.jpg|200px|thumb|Barra de los ríos [[río Ulúa|Ulúa]] y [[río Chamelecón|Chamelecón]].]]
&quot;L-Ulua hija l-aktar xmara wiesgħa fil-Honduras u konsegwentement dik li tbattal l-akbar volum ta 'ilma fl-oċean, fil-lvant tal-Chamelecón, ħlief forsi s-Segovia, wara li tkun għaddiet medda kbira ta' territorju, li tinkludi kważi terz minnha. Hija ffurmata mill-konfluwenza tax-xmajjar Blanco, Humuya, u Sutoro, &quot;.

[[File:Mosquito coast.jpg|right|thumb|200px|Ħalq ix-Xmara [[Coco]]]]
&quot;Ix-Xmara Tinto jew Negro toriġina fil-medda muntanjuża ta' Fray Pedro fil-medda muntanjuża ta' [[Agalta]]. Tul il-korsa tagħha, hija magħrufa bħala x-Xmara Sico, Tinto jew Negro|Sico]]. Qrib il-kosta, tinqasam fi tliet fergħat: waħda tisfa' fil-laguna ta' Criba... u t-tnejn l-oħra joħorġu direttament fil-baħar. It-tul totali tagħha huwa ta' madwar 215 km. Il-medda tar-ramel tax-xmara hija mhux maħduma u varjabbli, u l-fond tagħha jvarja skont l-istaġuni.&quot;

Ix-Xmara Lean toriġina fil-majjistral tal-belt ta' [[Yoro (Yoro)|Yoro]], fil-muntanji Nombre de Dios; hija twila 60 km. Tkopri żona agrikola ta' 883 km², u l-baċir tagħha jkopri 1885 km². F'ħalqha, tifforma l-medda tar-ramel ta' Colorado fid-dipartiment ta' Atlántida.

Ix-Xmara Aguán jew Romano, xmara kbira u wiesgħa li toriġina fil-muntanji ta' Sulaco, ħdejn Yorito, fid-dipartiment ta' Yoro, u wara li tivvjaġġa distanza totali ta' madwar 222 km, tisfaċċa fil-baħar fil-Lvant ta' Trujillo u Punta Castilla. &quot;F'ħalqha tinqasam f'għadd kbir ta' fergħat, u tifforma delta wiesgħa; il-wied tagħha huwa wieħed mill-akbar u l-aktar fertili fil-pajjiż.&quot;

=== Protezzjoni tal-Bijodiversità Honduraża ===
Il-leġiżlazzjoni Honduraża tistipula li l-isfruttament ta' annimali li ma jagħmlux ħsara jew dawk li jiffurmaw parti mill-bijodiversità huwa protett, u l-obbligu li jiġu protetti jaqa' fuq il-Hondurażi. Artikolu 188. QBID ILLEGALI TA' ANIMALI SELVAĠĠI. Piena ta' erba' sa seba' snin. Artikolu 189. KUMMERĊ ILLEGALI FL-ANIMALI SELVAĠĠI. Piena ta' erba' sa disa' snin. Artikolu 190. ĦSARA KKAWŻATA LILL-ANIMALI SELVAĠĠI. Piena ta' sena sa tliet snin.

Matul l-istorja demokratika tal-Honduraża, mill-1982 'l hawn, ftit fondazzjonijiet u istituzzjonijiet ġew stabbiliti bil-għan li jipproteġu l-annimali selvaġġi u l-bijodiversità naturali. L-kenn tal-annimali għall-klieb, qtates, eċċ., jinsab f'kundizzjoni deplorabbli, u ma jistax jieħu ħsieb daqstant annimali mitlufin. Barra minn hekk, l-aġenzija responsabbli għal din il-protezzjoni, is-Segretarjat tar-Riżorsi Naturali, ma tipprovdix il-finanzjament neċessarju u obbligatorju biex dawn l-istituzzjonijiet jiffunzjonaw b'mod korrett, bħall-Fond tal-Wirt u l-Fond taż-Żoni Protetti u l-Ħajja Selvaġġa (FAPVS), li huma saħansitra mhedda mill-kaċċaturi u l-isfruttaturi tan-natura Hondurana.

=== Lagi ===
[[File:Yojoa Lake.jpg|thumbnail|left|Lag Yojoa, l-uniku wieħed fil-pajjiż.]]
Il-Honduras għandu lag naturali wieħed biss; madankollu, hemm diversi laguni ta’ daqs konsiderevoli tul il-kosta tat-tramuntana tal-pajjiż. Fil-partijiet ċentrali u tan-nofsinhar tal-pajjiż, hemm laguni żgħar u staġjonali, li jfisser li ħafna minnhom jinxfu fis-sajf.

Il-Lag Yojoa huwa l-uniku lag naturali fil-Honduras u jinsab bejn id-dipartimenti ta' Cortés, Comayagua, u Santa Bárbara, f'altitudni ta' 650 metru ’l fuq mil-livell tal-baħar. Għandu perimetru ta' 50 km, erja tal-wiċċ ta' madwar 90 km², u jinsab f'żona b'ħafna xita, b'medja annwali ta' 3000 mm. L-isem tal-lag joriġina mill-kliem Mayan &quot;Yoco-Ha,&quot; li jfisser &quot;ilma akkumulat fuq l-art.&quot;

Jingħata l-ilma minn nixxigħat taħt l-art li joriġinaw mill-muntanji ta' Santa Bárbara u Azul Meambar; Għandu tliet ħruġ: wieħed viżibbli fin-nofsinhar, ix-Xmara Jaitique, u tnejn taħt l-art, ix-Xmajjar Zacapa u Lindo fit-tramuntana, li joħorġu mill-muntanja Peña Blanca. Il-ħruġ kollu tiegħu joħroġ fix-Xmara Ulúa.

Diversi lagi artifiċjali jeżistu fil-pajjiż bħala riżultat tal-kostruzzjoni ta' digi idroelettriċi, l-aktar notevoli r-riserva tax-Xmara Humuya, maħluqa wara t-tlestija tad-diga idroelettrika Francisco Morazán f'sit magħruf bħala El Cajón, li huwa wkoll l-isem popolari tiegħu. Sbatax-il kilometru ’l bogħod hemm il-kaskati ta' Pulhapanzak, waqgħa ta' 43 metru, fuq ix-Xmara Lindo.

Mill-inqas 177 xmara ġew affettwati fl-aħħar deċennji. Il-ħamrija tinxef, u l-għelejjel jagħtu inqas rendiment, u dan iwassal għall-fqir ta’ xi bdiewa.

=== Laguni ===
&lt;div align=center&gt; 
{| class=&quot;toc&quot; cellpadding=0 cellspacing=2 width=220px style=&quot;float:right; margin: 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em 1em; padding: 0.5e text- align:left;clear:all; margin- left:10px; font- size:90%&quot;
|colspan=4 style=&quot;background:#black; color:white;&quot; align=center bgcolor=&quot;blue&quot;|'''Algunas lagunas del territorio hondureño'''
|- 
|colspan=4 align=center|
|- 
! style=&quot;background:#e8e8e8;&quot; | '''Nombre'''
! style=&quot;background:#e8e8e8;&quot; | '''Ubicación departamental'''
|- background:#efefef
|Caratasca|| align=right|Gracias a Dios
|- background:#e9e9e9;
| Laguna de Brus|| align=right|Gracias a Dios 
|- background:#e9e9e9
|Ébano y Criba || align=right| Gracias a Dios
|-
|Laguna de Tansin
|Gracias a Dios
|- background:#efefef
|Guaymoreto|| align=right|Colón
|- background:#efefef
|Los Micos|| align=right|Atlántida
|- background:#efefef
|Alvarado|| align=right|Cortés
|- background:#e9e9e9
|Tinta|| align=right|Atlántida
|- background:#efefef
|Ticamaya || align=right|Cortés
|- background:#e9e9e9;
|Jucutuma|| align=right|Cortés
|- background:#e9e9e9
|Toloa || align=right|Atlántida 
|- 
&lt;/small&gt; 
|- 
|}
&lt;/div

Il-Laguna ta' Caratasca hija ta' daqs konsiderevoli, li tvarja fil-wisa'. Hija ffurmata minn sistema ta' laguni maqsuma minn kanali naturali. Fin-nofsinhar u l-lvant tal-laguna hemm il-laguni Warunta, Tansin, u Tilbalaca, kollha ta’ ilma ħelu għax huma mitmugħa mix-xmajjar Warunta, Mocorón, u Ibantara, kif ukoll il-laguni Cauquira u Cohunta. Lejn il-punent hemm il-Laguna ta' Tara, li tisfaċċa fil-baħar minn Tabacunta.

Il-Laguna l-kbira ta’ Caratasca tinsab fiċ-ċentru tal-kumpless tal-laguna. Għandha ilma salmastru u hija separata mill-baħar minn strixxa dejqa ta’ art. Hija twila sitta u sittin kilometru b’wisa’ erbatax-il kilometru. Il-kumpless tal-laguna ta' Caratasca għandu żewġ daħliet għall-baħar: waħda fil-punent minn Tabacunta u l-oħra mill-bank tar-ramel ta’ Caratasca, li huwa wiesa' kilometru u fond erba' metri.

Il-Laguna ta' Brus tinsab fil-punent tal-Laguna ta' Caratasca, li minnha hija separata mix-Xmara Patuca. Hija twila 28 kilometru u wiesgħa 7 kilometri, u hija separata mill-baħar mill-bank tar-ramel bl-istess isem. Fin-nofsinhar tal-bank tar-ramel hemm żewġ gżejjer żgħar. Ix-Xmara Sigre tidħol fil-laguna, kif tagħmel, lejn il-lvant, fergħa tax-Xmara Patuca magħrufa bħala t-Tum Tum Crick.

Il-Laguna Ebony tikkonnettja mal-Laguna żgħira ta' Criba lejn il-punent. Dawn il-laguni huma konnessi mal-baħar permezz ta' kanal tad-dħul li huwa twil 500 metru u għandu fond ta' 1.4 metru matul l-istaġun xott. Il-Maċedonja Cay jew Gżira tinsab faċċata tal-bank tar-ramel tal-laguna. Il-Laguna Ebony hija twila 12-il kilometru. L-ilmijiet tax-Xmara Tinto jidħlu fil-Laguna ta' Criba, li hija wkoll mitmugħa minn nixxigħat li jinżlu mill-Muntanja Baltimore. Hemm sitt gżejjer żgħar fil-Laguna Ebony.

=== Laguni Żgħar ===
[[File:Amanecer_Laguna_de_Alvarado.JPG|thumbnail|Il-Laguna ta' Alvarado f'Puerto Cortés.]]
Il-Laguna ta' Guaymoreto tinsab fil-grigal tal-belt ta' Trujillo u tikkonnettja mal-bajja permezz ta' kanal naturali aċċessibbli għal dgħajjes żgħar. It-tul massimu tagħha huwa ta' 9 km. Isimha ġej mill-kelma Guaymuras, l-isem li bih il-popli indiġeni kienu jafu lill-Honduras fi żminijiet pre-Kolombjani. Ġiet iddikjarata Rifuġju Nazzjonali għall-Ħajja Selvaġġa permezz tal-Ftehim Eżekuttiv Nru 1118-92, wara li laħqet in-numru 30 fil-lista tal-għeġubijiet tal-Honduras.

Il-Laguna ta' Alvarado tinsab fil-majjistral tal-Honduras fid-dipartiment ta' Cortés, fil-muniċipalità ta' Puerto Cortés. Hija tinsab fil-latitudni tat-tramuntana ta' 15°50′35″ u lonġitudni tal-punent ta' 87°54′48″. Għandha kanal ta' aċċess permanenti għall-Baħar Karibew, li huwa twil 894 metru. Il-Laguna ta' Alvarado għandha erja tal-wiċċ ta' 8.4 km², fond medju ta' 4.5 metri, u fond massimu ta' 6 metri.

Laguna Quemada, magħrufa wkoll bħala Laguna de Los Micos, għandha erja tal-wiċċ ta' 41.71 km², erja ta' baċir ta' 389.37 km², u 45.54 km² ta' art li tvarja. Il-fond medju huwa ta' 3.8 metri, b'fond massimu ta' 16-il metru. It-temperatura medja hija ta' 28 grad Celsius. Hija tinsab fil-punent tal-belt ta' Tela fid-dipartiment ta' Atlántida, fil-bokka tax-Xmara San Alejo. L-isem indiġenu tagħha huwa Lagunu Babunu, li fil-lingwa Garifuna jfisser &quot;laguna tax-xadini&quot;.

Laguni iżgħar oħra jinkludu: Laguna Tinta, li tinsab bejn Punta Sal u x-Xmara Tinto; Laguna de Ticamaya, li tinsab fil-grigal tal-belt ta' San Pedro Sula; Laguna de Jucutuma, li tinsab ħdejn il-belt ta' La Lima, Cortés; u l-Laguna de Toloa, li tinsab fl-iktar parti tal-punent tad-Dipartiment ta' Atlántida, bejn il-Laguna de Los Micos u x-Xmara Ulúa. Hija twila 5 kilometri u wiesgħa 3 kilometri u hija konnessa max-Xmara Ulúa permezz ta' kanal.

== Economija ==
{| border=&quot;2&quot; cellpadding=&quot;4&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;&quot; style=&quot;margin: 1em 1em 1em 0; background: #f9f9f9; border: 1px #ccc solid; border-collapse: collapse; font-size: 95%;&quot; align=&quot;left&quot;
|-bgcolor=&quot;#800020&quot; style=&quot;color:white&quot;
! colspan=&quot;4&quot;| Exportaciones de Honduras en 2019 a 
|-
|-bgcolor=&quot;#800020&quot; style=&quot;color:white&quot;
! N.º||País || Valor de exportaciones&lt;br /&gt;(en dólares) || Porcentaje 
|-
| align=center|1.º|| {{USA}} || [[USD]] 2000 millones ||  44 %
|-
| align=center|2.º|| {{DEU}} || [[USD]] 326 millones || 7.2 %
|-
| align=center|3.º || {{SLV}} || [[USD]] 274 millones ||  6.1 %
|-
| align=center|4.º|| {{GTM}} || [[USD]] 227 millones ||  5.0 %
|-
| align=center|5.º||{{NIC}} || [[USD]] 212 millones ||  4.7&amp;nbsp;%
|-
| align=center|6.º||{{MEX}} || [[USD]] 161 millones ||  3.5&amp;nbsp;%
|-
| align=center|7.º||{{NLD}} || [[USD]] 132 millones ||  2.9&amp;nbsp;%
|-
| align=center|8.º|| {{CRI}} || [[USD]] 107 millones ||  2.4&amp;nbsp;%
|-
| align=center|9.º|| {{CHN}} || [[USD]] 91.7 millones ||  2.0&amp;nbsp;%
|-
| align=center|10.º|| {{BEL}} || [[USD]] 80.9 millones ||  1.8&amp;nbsp;%
|-
| colspan=&quot;4&quot;|&lt;small&gt;Fuente: [[Economía|Observatorio de Economía y Complejidad]] (2014)&lt;ref&gt;{{cite web |url=https://oec.world/es/visualize/tree_map/sitc/export/hnd/show/all/2014/ |title=Where does Honduras export to? (2014) |work=Observatory of Economic Complexity |date=}}&lt;/ref&gt; &lt;/small&gt;
|}

73% tal-popolazzjoni tal-pajjiż hija fqira, u 53% jgħixu f'faqar estrem, skont l-Istitut Nazzjonali tal-Istatistika (INE) tal-Honduras. Il-pajjiż huwa wieħed mill-aktar inugwali fl-Amerika Latina.

[[File:Honduras treemap es.png|thumbnail|180px|left|Rappreżentazzjoni grafika tal-prodotti tal-esportazzjoni tal-pajjiż fi 28 kategorija kkodifikati bil-kulur.]]
[[File:Chiquita bananas.jpg|right|thumb|190px|Il-banana hija wieħed mill-prodotti ewlenin tal-esportazzjoni tal-Honduras.]]

Il-Honduras tiddependi ħafna fuq ir-rimessi minn barra l-pajjiż, li huma pproġettati li jikkontribwixxu 27% tal-PDG fl-2025, u jaqbżu bil-bosta d-dħul minn setturi essenzjali oħra, bħall-esportazzjonijiet.

L-agrikoltura saret is-sinsla tal-ekonomija Hondurana fl-aħħar tas-seklu 19 u matul is-seklu 20. Filwaqt li l-importanza tagħha naqset xi ftit, l-għelejjel tal-banana u tal-kafè kienu jammontaw għal 30% tal-esportazzjonijiet tal-pajjiż fi żminijiet riċenti (2004). Bħalissa, il-gvern Honduran qed iwettaq proġetti biex jippromwovi u jespandi s-settur industrijali, jiddiversifika l-agrikoltura, itejjeb l-infrastruttura tat-trasport, u jiżviluppa proġetti idroelettriċi.

L-agrikoltura Hondurana ġiet affettwata b'mod partikolari mill-Ftehim ta' Kummerċ Ħieles (FTA) iffirmat fl-2005 mal-Istati Uniti, peress li mhuwiex kompetittiv man-negozju agrikolu tal-Istati Uniti. Illum, il-biċċa l-kbira tal-ikel ikkunsmat fil-Honduras huwa importat.

Fil-kuntest makroekonomiku; il-Honduras daħlet fi ftehimiet ta' kummerċ ħieles mal-Amerika Ċentrali, ir-Repubblika Dominikana, u l-Istati Uniti. Huwa kruċjali wkoll li jiġi enfasizzat l-ammont astronomiku ta' rimessi mibgħuta lill-pajjiż minn Hondurani li jgħixu u jaħdmu barra minn Malta, speċjalment fl-Istati Uniti. Pereżempju, fl-2006, l-ammont mibgħut minn dawn il-Hondurani kien ta' $2.359 biljun.

[[File:Roasted coffee beans.jpg|thumbnail|Il-kafè huwa wieħed mill-pilastri tal-ekonomija Hondurana.]]

It-tkabbir reali tal-PDG fl-2010 huwa stmat għal 2.5 fil-mija, meta mqabbel ma' 1.9 fil-mija fl-2009, appoġġjat mill-irkupru fil-konsum u l-investiment domestiku, kif ukoll l-esportazzjonijiet grazzi għall-irkupru tas-swieq esterni ewlenin tagħha, bħall-Kosta Rika, l-Ewropa, u l-Istati Uniti. Il-Bank Ċentrali jistma li l-inflazzjoni għalqet Diċembru f'livelli qrib is-sitt fil-mija fis-sena, meta mqabbla ma' 0.9 fil-mija tnax-il xahar qabel, bħala riżultat tal-irkupru ekonomiku u l-influwenza taż-żieda fil-prezzijiet taż-żejt u tal-ikel bażiku, speċjalment il-qamħ u r-ross.

Il-kafè jirrappreżenta 26.9 fil-mija tal-esportazzjonijiet, segwit mill-banana b'10.4 fil-mija, u ż-żejt tal-palm, li akkumula 6.9 fil-mija f'Settembru 2019. Dawn huma l-prodotti ewlenin tal-esportazzjoni, skont l-Osservatorju UNAH.

Mill-1901 sal-1913, l-Istati Uniti kienu responsabbli għal kważi l-esportazzjonijiet kollha tal-Honduras, u qabżu l-50% f'kull sena. L-inqas ċifra kienet ta’ 66.1% fl-1901, filwaqt li laħqet 92.2% fl-1908. L-esportazzjonijiet li fadal kienu maqsuma bejn il-Ġermanja u l-Gran Brittanja. L-esportazzjonijiet lejn il-Ġermanja baqgħu relattivament kostanti matul it-13-il sena, u varjaw bejn 2.2% u 5.3%.

70% tal-popolazzjoni taħdem fis-settur informali (jiġifieri m’għandhom l-ebda kuntratt jew protezzjoni soċjali ta’ ebda tip u jgħixu minn ħalqhom).

L-Istitut Nazzjonali tal-Istatistika (INE) innota fl-2025 li “l-aktar familji sinjuri fil-pajjiż jaqilgħu 101 darba aktar mill-ifqar, differenza li tirrifletti konċentrazzjoni qawwija ta’ dħul u [[inugwaljanza ekonomika]] għolja.”

=== Baġit ===
Il-baġit nazzjonali għall-2015 kien ta' 185,482 miljun lempiras (9 biljun dollaru Amerikan); huwa maqsum bejn it-tliet fergħat tal-gvern Honduran.

Il-programm ta' Investiment Pubbliku ammonta għal 10,163 miljun lempiras. Hemm żewġ sorsi ta' finanzjament:

* Fondi Nazzjonali: Dawn huma self u fondi nazzjonali. 62% huma allokati għall-iżvilupp uman u 38% għall-investiment fl-infrastruttura.

* Riżorsi Esterni: 72% tal-fondi minn sorsi esterni huma allokati għall-investiment fl-infrastruttura; toroq, portijiet, u infrastruttura b'mod ġenerali. It-28% li jifdal huma allokati għall-iżvilupp uman.

It-total taż-żewġ fondi jintuża kif ġej: 44% huwa investit fl-iżvilupp uman u 56% fl-infrastruttura. L-investiment pubbliku totali huwa qrib is-17-il biljun lempiras. &lt;ref&gt;http://www.elheraldo.hn/pais/906374-466/educaci%C3%B3n-y-salud-prioridades-del-presupuesto&lt;/ref&gt;

6% tal-baġit miksub minn riżorsi esterni se jiġi allokat għal tliet oqsma:

* Investiment soċjali,
* Infrastruttura (inklużi t-toroq),
* Investiment fi proġetti idroelettriċi; fost dawn hemm Patuca III u Cañaveral.

=== Prestazzjoni Agrikola ===
[[File:Lake Yojoa.jpg|right|thumb|250px|Uċuħ tar-raba’ ħdejn il-Lag Yojoa.]]
Is-setturi bl-akbar piż fil-kompożizzjoni tal-PDG agrikolu huma: a) kafè, b) għelejjel tat-tuberi, ħaxix, legumi, u frott, c) trobbija tal-baqar, d) qmuħ bażiċi, e) banana, u f) għelejjel agro-industrijali. Skont il-Ministeru tal-Agrikoltura (SAG), f’dawn l-aħħar deċennji l-Prodott Domestiku Gross Agrikolu wera mġiba volatili b’reazzjoni għal xokkijiet interni u esterni. Matul il-perjodu 2000-2010, il-PDG kiber b’rata medja annwali ta’ 3.7%. Fl-2009, il-PDG agrikolu kien jirrappreżenta 12.7% tal-PDG totali. Fis-snin ta’ wara, it-tkabbir tas-settur ingħata spinta minn titjib fil-proċessi tat-tħawwil u l-ħsad, żieda fil-produttività, u l-espansjoni taż-żoni kkultivati.

Matul il-perjodu 2006-2010, il-PDG agrikolu kiber b'18.6% kumulattiv, b'rata medja annwali ta' 4.7%, ogħla miż-żieda miksuba fil-perjodu ta' ħames snin mill-2000-2005, li kienet ta' 10.8%, b'rata ta' tkabbir annwali ta' 2.7%. Il-prestazzjoni tal-agrikoltura matul il-perjodu 2005-2009 kienet irregolari. Bejn l-2006 u l-2007, ġiet irreġistrata żieda qawwija meta mqabbla mal-2004-2005, bħala riżultat ta' politiki li jappoġġjaw il-produzzjoni għal bdiewa żgħar u ta' daqs medju flimkien maż-żieda fil-prezzijiet tal-prodotti agrikoli.

Madankollu, il-maltempati tropikali li affettwaw il-pajjiż f'Ottubru 2008 ikkawżaw kontrazzjoni li wasslet għal tnaqqis fil-produzzjoni u l-esportazzjonijiet tal-banana, u min-naħa tagħha, skoraġġew lill-produtturi tal-kafè milli jesportaw minħabba prezzijiet baxxi u domanda esterna mnaqqsa. It-tkabbir kien ta' 2.4% fl-2008, iżda 0.3% biss fl-2009.

== Edukazzjoni ==
L-edukazzjoni fil-Ħonduras hija maqsuma skont il-bżonnijiet ta’ tagħlim u l-etajiet tal-istudenti fil-livelli li ġejjin: edukazzjoni preprimarja, primarja, sekondarja, u għolja.

Fl-2000, iċ-ċensimenti tal-istudenti mwettqa mill-Ministeru tal-Edukazzjoni Pubblika rriflettew id-dejta li ġejja: 120,141 student fi skola preprimarja, 1,108,387 student fi skola primarja, u 310,053 student fi skola sekondarja.

Minħabba li ftit studenti jlestu l-edukazzjoni sekondarja jew jattendu l-università, il-pajjiż jonqsu wkoll forza tax-xogħol ippreparata biex tmexxi l-iżvilupp ekonomiku tiegħu.

=== Edukazzjoni Preskolari ===
L-edukazzjoni preskolari hija bla ħlas u obbligatorja. L-iskop tagħha huwa li trawwem it-tkabbir u l-iżvilupp komprensiv tal-abbiltajiet fiżiċi, motorji, soċjo-emozzjonali, lingwistiċi u konjittivi tat-tfal, li jippermettu l-integrazzjoni sħiħa tagħhom fil-kuntest tal-iskola u tal-komunità. Dan il-livell ikopri studenti bejn l-etajiet ta’ erba’ (4), ħames (5) u sitt (6) snin.

Biex jidħlu fl-edukazzjoni primarja, fejn teżisti kopertura, l-istudenti jridu jkunu lestew mill-inqas sena (1) ta’ edukazzjoni preskolari.

=== Edukazzjoni Primarja ===
L-edukazzjoni primarja hija l-livell edukattiv iffukat fuq l-iżvilupp komprensiv tal-istudenti fid-dimensjonijiet fiżiċi, emozzjonali, konjittivi, soċjali, kulturali, morali u spiritwali tagħhom. Tiżviluppa l-abbiltajiet tagħhom skont l-għarfien, il-ħiliet u l-attitudnijiet definiti fil-kurrikulu preskritt għal dan il-livell, li jippermettilhom ikomplu l-edukazzjoni formali tagħhom.

L-edukazzjoni primarja hija bla ħlas u obbligatorja. Din tikkonsisti f’disa’ (9) snin, b’etajiet ta’ referenza minn sitt (6) sa erbatax (14) snin, u hija maqsuma fi tliet (3) ċikli sekwenzjali u kontinwi ta’ tliet (3) snin kull wieħed. Minbarra l-evalwazzjoni annwali, kull ċiklu se jiġi evalwat kollu kemm hu.

==== L-Ewwel Ċiklu ====
* L-Ewwel Grad
* It-Tieni Grad
* It-Tielet Grad

==== It-Tieni Ċiklu ====
* Ir-Raba' Grad
* Il-Ħames Grad
* Is-Sitt Grad

==== It-Tielet Ċiklu ====
* Is-Seba' Grad
* It-Tmien Grad
* Id-Disa' Grad

=== Edukazzjoni Sekondarja ===

L-edukazzjoni sekondarja għandha l-għan li tipprovdi l-esperjenza formattiva meħtieġa biex wieħed jidħol fid-dinja tax-xogħol u jsegwi edukazzjoni għolja, permezz tal-akkwist u l-iżvilupp ta' għarfien, ħiliet, u attitudnijiet rilevanti għall-ħajja personali u soċjali, kif ukoll għall-iżvilupp ekonomiku, soċjokulturali, xjentifiku, u teknoloġiku tal-pajjiż.

Tinkludi l-etajiet ta' ħmistax (15) sa sbatax (17) sena, u t-tlestija tagħha tirriżulta fl-għoti ta' diploma skont il-livell akkademiku tad-diploma tal-iskola sekondarja tagħhom (li ddum sentejn jew tlieta), kif determinat mill-Ministeru tal-Edukazzjoni.

L-edukazzjoni sekondarja hija bla ħlas u obbligatorja. Il-modalitajiet u l-ispeċjalizzazzjonijiet f'dan il-livell huma bbażati fuq kriterji pedagoġiċi, tekniċi, u xjentifiċi.


==== Programmi Professjonali ====
# Diploma tal-Iskola Sekondarja fix-Xjenzi u l-Umanistika
# Diploma tal-Iskola Sekondarja Teknika fis-Saħħa u n-Nutrizzjoni
# Diploma tal-Iskola Sekondarja Teknika fil-Promozzjoni Soċjali
# Diploma tal-Iskola Sekondarja Teknika fl-Amministrazzjoni tan-Negozju
# Diploma tal-Iskola Sekondarja Teknika fix-Xjenza tal-Kompjuter
# Diploma tal-Iskola Sekondarja Teknika fil-Kontabilità u l-Finanzi

==== Programmi Tekniċi ====
# Diploma tal-Iskola Sekondarja Teknika fix-Xjenza tal-Kompjuter b'Speċjalizzazzjoni fir-Robotika
# Diploma tal-Iskola Sekondarja Teknika fl-Elettronika
# Diploma tal-Iskola Sekondarja Teknika fir-Refriġerazzjoni
# Diploma tal-Iskola Sekondarja Teknika fl-Agrikoltura

==== Programmi Speċjali ====
# Baċellerat Tekniku Professjonali fil-Ġestjoni tal-Lukandi
# Baċellerat Tekniku Professjonali fl-Istudji Segretarjali Eżekuttivi Bilingwi
# Baċellerat Tekniku Professjonali fil-Banek u l-Finanzi

=== Edukazzjoni Ogħla ===
{{AP|Edukazzjoni Ogħla}}

Din hija offruta lil studenti li għandhom bejn 17 u 18-il sena u aktar; hija edukazzjoni ta' livell universitarju. Il-livell intermedju ta' edukazzjoni ogħla jinkludi programmi universitarji li jwasslu għal lawrji tal-Baċellerat u tal-Assoċjat.

Bħalissa, il-gradwati tal-iskola sekondarja għandhom l-opportunità li jagħmlu eżamijiet ta' qabel l-università biex jidentifikaw l-aptitudnijiet tagħhom għall-qasam ta' studju magħżul tagħhom. Mal-iskrizzjoni, l-istudenti jibdew jirċievu korsijiet bażiċi qabel ma jidħlu fil-fakultà magħżula tagħhom. Wara li jlestu l-perjodi meħtieġa, jiksbu l-lawrja tal-Baċellerat jew tal-Assoċjat tagħhom, modalità oħra li tagħmel l-edukazzjoni ogħla aktar aċċessibbli għall-popolazzjoni.

L-Edukazzjoni Ogħla tinkludi speċjalizzazzjonijiet fil-livelli tal-undergraduate u tal-università teknika permezz ta' diplomi, programmi postgraduate, lawrji tal-masters, u dottorati.

==== Universitajiet ====
Il-lista li ġejja turi l-klassifika sħiħa tal-Webometrics tal-2021 tal-universitajiet għas-sittax-il università li joffru edukazzjoni għolja fir-Repubblika tal-Ħonduras. Imħejjija mill-Kunsill Nazzjonali Spanjol għar-Riċerka (CSIC), il-klassifika tikkunsidra tliet assi għall-punteġġ tal-universitajiet differenti. L-eċċellenza akkademika tirrappreżenta 40% tal-punteġġ (perċentwal tal-aktar artikli akkademiċi u xjentifiċi ċċitati f'sebgħa u għoxrin dixxiplina tad-database tal-laboratorju scimago) 50% tal-punteġġ huwa bbażat fuq il-viżibilità tal-impatt tal-kontenut u fl-aħħar 10% tal-punteġġ huwa bbażat fuq l-aqwa riċerkaturi akkademiċi-xjentifiċi li għandha kull Università.

{| class=&quot;wikitable&quot; style=&quot;font-size: 112%;&quot;
|-
| colspan=&quot;8&quot;  align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;color:black; background:aqua;width:55em&quot;| '''Ranking Mundial Webometrics 2021 de Universidades Hondureñas''' &lt;ref&gt;{{cita web|url=https://www.webometrics.info/en/Latin_America/Honduras|título=Ranking Web de Universidades, Webometrics 2021, Honduras|fechaacceso=14 de Septiembre de 2021}}&lt;/ref&gt;
|-
|style=&quot;color:white; background:DarkBlue;width:1em&quot;  |&lt;center&gt; '''Clasificación&lt;br&gt;nacional'''
|style=&quot;color:black; background:white;width:1em&quot; |&lt;center&gt;'''Clasificación&lt;br&gt;mundial'''
|style=&quot;color:white; background:DarkBlue;width:4em&quot;  |&lt;center&gt;'''Universidad'''
|style=&quot;color:black; background:white;width:4em&quot;  |&lt;center&gt;'''Logo'''
|style=&quot;color:white; background:DarkBlue;width:4em&quot;  |&lt;center&gt;'''Web'''
|style=&quot;color:black; background:white;width:4em&quot; |&lt;center&gt;'''Sede'''
|style=&quot;color:white; background:DarkBlue;width:4em&quot; |&lt;center&gt;'''Lema'''
|style=&quot;color:black; background:white;width:4em&quot; |&lt;center&gt;'''Fundación'''
|-
|colspan=&quot;9&quot;|&lt;div style=&quot;width:60em; height: 35em; overflow: auto; background: white; border: 5px solid #00FFFF;&quot;&gt;
{| class=&quot;wikitable sortable&quot;
|-
|{{align|center|'''1'''}} 
| {{align|center|'''3802'''}}
|[[Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras]] 
| align=&quot;center&quot;| [[Archivo:Escudo de la UNAH.svg|150px]]
| [https://www.unah.edu.hn/ https://www.unah.edu.hn/&lt;br&gt;(Estatal)] 
| {{flag|HON}} [[Tegucigalpa]]
|Lucem Aspicio&lt;br&gt;«Aspiro a la luz»
|1847
|-
| {{align|center|'''2'''}} 
| {{align|center|'''5237'''}}
|[[Escuela Agrícola Panamericana]] 
| align=&quot;center&quot;| 
| [https://www.zamorano.edu/ www.eap.edu.hn/&lt;br&gt;(Privada)] 
| {{flag|HON}} [[San Antonio de Oriente]]
|El trabajo todo lo vence
|1942
|-
|{{align|center|'''3'''}} 
| {{align|center|'''5936'''}}
|[[Universidad Tecnológica Centroamericana]] 
| align=&quot;center&quot;| [[Archivo:Logo UNITEC.png|150px]]
|[https://www.unitec.edu/ https://www.unitec.edu.hn/&lt;br&gt;(Privada)]
|{{flag|HON}} [[Tegucigalpa]]
|Retemos el futuro
|1987
|-
| {{align|center|'''4'''}}  
| {{align|center| 7481}} 
|[[Universidad Pedagógica Nacional Francisco Morazán]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |
| [https://www.upnfm.edu.hn/ www.upnfm.edu.hn/ (Estatal)]
|{{flag|HON}} [[Tegucigalpa]] / [[San Pedro Sula]] / [[La Ceiba]] 
|«Educar es transformar»
|1956
|-
| {{align|center|'''5'''}} 
| {{align|center| 10331}} 
| [[Universidad Católica de Honduras]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |
|[https://www.unicah.edu/ www.unicah.edu.hn&lt;br&gt;(Privada)] 
| {{flag|HON}} [[Tegucigalpa]]
|«Sueña sin miedo y estudia sin límites»
|1992
|-
| {{align|center|'''6'''}} 
| {{align|center| 11651}} 
| [[Universidad Tecnológica de Honduras]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |
|[https://www.uth.hn/ https://www.uth.edu.hn/&lt;br&gt;(Privada)] 
| {{flag|HON}} [[San Pedro Sula]]
|«Tu universidad hondureño»
|1986
|-
| {{align|center|'''7'''}} 
| {{align|center| 15248}} 
| [[Universidad de San Pedro Sula]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[Archivo:USAP_HONDURAS.png|130px]]
|[http://www.usap.edu/ http://www.usap.edu.hn/&lt;br&gt;(Privada)] 
| {{flag|HON}} [[San Pedro Sula]]
|«Sabiduría, verdad, honor»
|1978
|-
| {{align|center|'''8'''}} 
| {{align|center| 15914}} 
| [[Universidad Nacional de Agricultura y Agronomía (Honduras)]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; | 
|[http://www.unag.edu.hn/ www.unag.edu.hn/&lt;br&gt;(Estatal)] 
| {{flag|HON}} [[Catacamas]]
|Aprender haciendo
|1950
|-
| {{align|center|'''9'''}} 
| {{align|center| 17683}} 
| [[Universidad José Cecilio del Valle]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |[[Archivo:Logo UJCV.jpg|65px]]
|[https://ujcv.edu.hn/ https://ujcv.edu.hn/&lt;br&gt;(Privada)] 
|{{flag|HON}} [[Tegucigalpa]]
|«Tu futuro está aquí»
|1978
|-
| {{align|center|'''10'''}} 
| {{align|center| 20606}} 
| Universidad Cristiana Evangélica Nuevo Milenio
| align=&quot;center&quot; |
|[https://web.ucenm.net/ www.ucenm.net/&lt;br&gt;(Privada)] 
| {{flag|HON}} [[La Lima (Honduras)|La Lima]]
| Justicia, Integridad y Respeto
|2001
|-
| {{align|center|'''11'''}} 
| {{align|center| 20648}} 
| [[Universidad Metropolitana de Honduras]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |
|[https://www.unimetro.edu.hn/ www.unimetro.edu.hn/&lt;br&gt;(Privada)] 
| {{flag|HON}} [[Tegucigalpa]]
|«Innovación, Valores, Liderazgo»
|2002
|-
| {{align|center|'''12'''}} 
| {{align|center| 22983}} 
| Universidad Politécnica de Ingeniería Honduras
| align=&quot;center&quot; |
|[https://www.upi.edu.hn/ www.upi.edu.hn/&lt;br&gt;(Privada)] 
|{{flag|HON}} [[Tegucigalpa]]
|Tu Futuro Con Nosotros
|2005
|-
| {{align|center|'''13'''}} 
| {{align|center| 23713}} 
| Centro de Diseño, Arquitectura y Construcción
| align=&quot;center&quot; |
|[https://www.cedac.edu.hn/ www.cedac.edu.hn/&lt;br&gt;(Privada)] 
|{{flag|HON}} [[Tegucigalpa]]
|La Universidad del Diseño
| 1996
|-
| {{align|center|'''14'''}} 
| {{align|center| 23966}} 
| CEUTEC Centro Universitario Tecnológico
| [[Archivo:CEUTEC_HONDURAS.png|170px]]
|[https://www.ceutec.hn/ www.ceutec.hn/&lt;br&gt;(Privada)] 
|{{flag|HON}} [[Tegucigalpa]], [[San Pedro Sula]], [[La Ceiba]]
| Excelencia,Espíritu emprendedor e Innovación
|1996
|-
| {{align|center|'''15'''}} 
| {{align|center| 24854}} 
| Instituto Superior Tecnológico Jesús de Nazareth
| align=&quot;center&quot; |
|[https://ujn.edu.hn/ www.ujn.edu.hn/&lt;br&gt;(Privada)] 
|{{flag|HON}} [[San Pedro Sula]]
|Pensando en ti, apoyamos tu futuro
|2004
|-
| {{align|center|'''16'''}} 
| {{align|center| 26264}} 
| [[Universidad Nacional de Ciencias Forestales]]
| align=&quot;center&quot; |
|[http://www.unacifor.edu.hn/ www.unacifor.edu.hn/&lt;br&gt;(Privada)] 
|{{flag|HON}} [[Siguatepeque]]
|«In Arbore Vita Hominum Est»
|1969
|-
|}
&lt;/div&gt;
|- class=&quot;sortbottom&quot;
| colspan=&quot;6&quot; style=font-size:.8;background-color:#f8f9fa;line-height:140%; |
'''Referencias'''&lt;br&gt;
* [https://www.webometrics.info/en/Latin_America/Honduras Clasificación CSIC Universidades 2021/Honduras]
* [https://www.scimagoir.com/ Datos de Scimago LAB]
|}

=== Sena Skolastika ===
Fir-Repubblika tal-Ħonduras, is-sena skolastika tibda fi Frar u tintemm f'Novembru, tinkludi total ta' erbgħin ġimgħa ta' klassijiet u għandha tikkonsisti f'minimu ta' madwar mitejn jum ta' skola, fil-livell tal-edukazzjoni pubblika.

== Sigurtà ==
Mill-2014, kien l-aktar pajjiż perikoluż fid-dinja, iżda dan mhux dejjem kien il-każ, peress li kiseb l-indipendenza tiegħu b'mod paċifiku fl-1821. Għal ħafna mis-seklu 20, ir-rata ta' omiċidji kienet inqas minn għaxar persuni għal kull 100,000 abitant, u dan jagħmilha waħda mill-aktar pajjiżi paċifiċi fuq il-pjaneta.

Minn dakinhar 'l hawn, iċ-ċifri ilhom jiżdiedu, u dan jikkoinċidi mat-tkabbir tat-traffikar tad-droga fil-pajjiż, li huwa fattur ieħor ewlieni li jikkontribwixxi. L-influwenza ta' gangs jew gruppi ta' kriminalità organizzata fil-pajjiż hija kawża sinifikanti oħra tal-għadd għoli ta' omiċidji, skont studji mill-Uffiċċju tan-Nazzjonijiet Uniti dwar id-Droga u l-Kriminalità (UNODC). Fl-1990, ir-rata ta' omiċidji kienet diġà ta' għaxar omiċidji għal kull 100,000 abitant, u fi tliet snin biss, iċ-ċifra ttriplikat, u laħqet 30 omiċidju għal kull 100,000 abitant sal-1994. Iż-żieda kienet esponenzjali f'dawn l-aħħar snin, u laħqet kważi żieda ta’ 1000% u laħqet aktar minn 90 omiċidju għal kull 100,000 abitant fl-2012, u b'hekk saret il-pajjiż bl-ogħla rata ta' omiċidji fid-dinja, b’ċifri rekord kemm lokalment kif ukoll globalment mill-1998. Madankollu, l-istatistika tal-2017 minn InSight Crime turi tnaqqis ta' 26% meta mqabbla mal-2016, u tpoġġi r-rata ta' omiċidji f’42.8 għal kull 100,000 abitant, li hija tama.

l-baġit militari tal-Ħonduras ittriplika mill-2009. L-Istati Uniti jipprovdu wkoll assistenza militari lill-istat Honduras u jużaw bażijiet militari fil-pajjiż bħala bażi tat-tnedija għal interventi fir-reġjun.

== Minjieri == 
Fl-1594, il-belt tal-minjieri ta' Santa Lucía, ħdejn il-belt ta' Tegucigalpa, irċeviet mingħand ir-Re ta' Spanja, bħala kumpens għall-minerali prezzjuż sfruttat, xi qniepen, kalċi, tabernaklu u salib għall-popolazzjoni.

Matul l-amministrazzjoni Spanjola bejn is-sekli 18 u 19, u waqt li kien qed iservi bħala gvernatur-intendent tal-provinċja tal-Ħonduras, il-Kurunell Ramón de Anguiano ssottometta talba fil-25 ta' Marzu u l-25 ta' Mejju, 1799, biex iġib elf Afrikan skjavjat biex jaħdmu fil-minjieri Honduras. Fil-25 ta' Frar, 1800, Anguiano ppreżenta lill-monarka ta' Madrid il-proġett għall-ħolqien ta' Bank Nazzjonali ta' San Carlos, li l-iskop tiegħu jkun li jipprovdi kreditu lill-minaturi u l-bdiewa tal-provinċja.

Meta ġiet organizzata r-Repubblika tal-Ħonduras, matul il-presidenza tal-Ġeneral Luis Bográn, ġie ppubblikat il-Kodiċi tal-Minjieri tal-Ħonduras tal-1886, u aktar tard, fl-1 ta' Jannar 1899, daħal fis-seħħ il-Kodiċi tal-Minjieri l-ġdid tal-Ħonduras tal-1898, li rregola l-isfruttament tad-depożiti tal-minjieri tal-pajjiż. Bejn l-1876 u l-1915, ingħataw 276 konċessjoni lil kumpaniji Ingliżi, Amerikani, u xi wħud mill-Ħonduras li kienu proprjetà ta' Hondurani sinjuri, bħal Marco Aurelio Soto, Enrique Gutiérrez Lozano, Luis Bográn, u Abelardo Zelaya, fost oħrajn li kkontribwew kapital li eventwalment ġie assorbit minn negozjanti Amerikani li monopolizzaw is-settur tal-minjieri u ffurmaw il-Kumpanija tas-Sindakat tal-Amerika Ċentrali. Il-minjieri kienu importanti ħafna għall-Ħonduras fl-aħħar żewġ deċennji tas-seklu 19, u kienu jirrappreżentaw medja ta' 50% tal-esportazzjonijiet. Minn dawk il-50%, il-Kumpanija tal-Minjieri ta' Rosario qabdet 90% tal-profitti, li jirrappreżentaw 45% tal-esportazzjonijiet totali tal-pajjiż. F'Jannar 2013, il-Kungress Nazzjonali tal-Ħonduras approva Liġi Ġenerali ġdida dwar il-Minjieri, u nħoloq l-Istitut tal-Ġeoloġija u l-Minjieri.

L-esportazzjonijiet tal-minjieri huma pproġettati li jilħqu l-$293 miljun fl-2021. L-NGO Fosdeh iddikjarat f'rapport li &quot;proġetti ta' estrazzjoni ta' minerali u idrokarburi qed ibiddlu l-ġeografija tal-pajjiż&quot;: bil-konċessjonijiet tal-minjieri għaddejjin, iż-żona magħżula għall-estrazzjoni tista' tilħaq il-5% tat-territorju nazzjonali fis-snin li ġejjin.

== Turiżmu ==
L-Istitut Honduran tat-Turiżmu (IHT) għandu l-missjoni li &quot;jmexxi l-iżvilupp tat-turiżmu nazzjonali permezz ta' attivitajiet ta' ppjanar, jippromwovi l-iżvilupp u d-diversifikazzjoni tal-offerti tat-turiżmu, jappoġġja l-operat tas-servizzi tat-turiżmu, u jippromwovi t-turiżmu, filwaqt li jikkoordina l-azzjonijiet ta' aġenziji u livelli governattivi differenti.&quot;

Skont il-viżjoni tal-IHT, dan se jwassal biex il-Honduras issir &quot;il-pajjiż ewlieni fit-turiżmu fil-livell reġjonali sal-2021, wara li tkun żviluppat u diversifikat is-swieq, il-prodotti u d-destinazzjonijiet tagħha. In-negozji se jkunu aktar kompetittivi kemm nazzjonalment kif ukoll internazzjonalment.&quot; L-IHT jiddikjara wkoll li &quot;t-turiżmu se jiġi rikonoxxut bħala element ewlieni fl-iżvilupp ekonomiku, u t-tkabbir tiegħu se jkun ibbażat fuq ir-rispett għall-ambjenti naturali, kulturali u soċjali, u jikkontribwixxi għat-tisħiħ tal-identità nazzjonali.&quot;

Għalkemm il-Honduras bħalissa tinsab fl-aħħar post fil-wasliet tat-turisti fl-Amerika Ċentrali, tinsab fir-raba' post fid-dħul mill-kambju barrani, wara l-Costa Rica, il-Panama u l-Gwatemala (2009).

Ir-reġjun li jikkontribwixxi l-aktar turisti lejn il-Honduras jibqa' l-Amerika Ċentrali, li jirrappreżenta 46% tat-total. It-tieni l-aktar reġjun importanti huwa l-Amerika ta' Fuq, b'39% tat-turisti totali, il-maġġoranza l-kbira ġejjin mill-Istati Uniti. 10.1% tat-turisti ġejjin mill-Ewropa u 4.2% minn pajjiżi oħra madwar id-dinja.

Il-Honduras għandu ħafna postijiet li jattiraw vjaġġaturi avventurużi. Minn treks fil-ġungla u scuba diving għal żjarat f'siti Mayan antiki u rħula indiġeni. Il-pajjiż jiftaħar b'40 żona protetta, 20 park nazzjonali, u żewġ siti ta' Wirt Dinji tal-UNESCO: Copán u r-Riżerva tal-Bijosfera Río Plátano.

Il-Gżejjer tal-Bajja, li jirċievu aktar minn 50% tat-turisti li jżuru l-Honduras, joffru lukandi u kċina ta' klassi dinjija. Sa ċertu punt, dan huwa minnu wkoll fi bliet turistiċi akbar bħal Copán Ruinas, Tela, San Pedro Sula, Tegucigalpa, iż-żona tal-Lag Yojoa, u La Ceiba. Ladarba t-turisti jivvjaġġaw lil hinn minn din ir-rotta turistika ewlenija, għandhom ikunu lesti li joqogħdu għal akkomodazzjoni bażika u infrastruttura turistika inqas żviluppata. Li tasal il-Ħonduras huwa faċli ħafna, b'ħafna titjiriet diretti lejn San Pedro Sula, Tegucigalpa, u Roatán.

&lt;gallery mode=&quot;packed-hover&quot; caption=&quot;Destinazzjonijiet Turistiċi tal-Ħonduras&quot;&gt;
Fajl:Fuerte San Cristóbal Gracias Honduras 13.jpg|[[Dipartiment ta' Lempira|Lempira]]
Fajl:Exterior Fuerte de Omoa Honduras.jpg|[[Fortizza ta' San Fernando]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Omoa]]
Fajl:CPN GREAT PLAZA 03.jpg|[[Copán (sit arkeoloġiku)|Fdalijiet ta' Copán]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Dipartiment ta' Copán|Copán]]
Fajl:Roatan West End 95 we 006.jpg|[[Roatán]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Dipartiment tal-Gżejjer tal-Bajja|Gżejjer tal-Bajja]]
Fajl:General panorama sps 05.jpg|[[San Pedro Sula]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Dipartiment ta' Cortés|Cortés]]
Fajl:Il-Kaskati ta' Pulhapanzak (III).JPG|[[Il-Kaskati ta' Pulhapanzak]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Dipartiment ta' Cortés|Cortés]]
File:Cusuco National Park, Honduras.jpg|[[Cusuco National Park]]&lt;br /&gt;[[San Pedro Sula]]
File:San Lorenzo Pier Honduras.jpg|[[San Lorenzo (Honduras)|San Lorenzo]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Dipartiment tal-Valle|Valle]]
File:Amapala Port Honduras.jpg|[[Amapala]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Dipartiment tal-Valle|Valle]]
File:Talgua Caves.jpg|[[Talgua Caves]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Catacamas]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Dipartiment ta' Olancho|Olancho]]
File:Basilica Virgen de Suyapa.jpg|[[Basilica de Suyapa|Basilica Virgen de Suyapa]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Tegucigalpa]]
File:Santa Lucia Francisco Morazan view.jpg|[[Santa Lucía (Honduras)|Santa Lucía]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Dipartiment ta' Francisco Morazán|Francisco Morazán]]
File:El Malecon Puerto Cortes Honduras.jpg|[[Puerto Cortés]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Dipartiment ta' Cortés|Cortés]]
&lt;/gallerija&gt;

== Xjenza u Teknoloġija ==
Fl-20 ta' Frar 1957, twaqqfet il-Kumpanija Nazzjonali tal-Enerġija Elettrika (ENEE). Ir-responsabbiltà tagħha kienet li tipprovdi l-elettriku lill-popolazzjoni. Preċedentement, l-ewwel installazzjoni elettrika twettqet f'San Juancito, żona tal-minjieri Hondurana fiċ-ċentru tal-pajjiż fejn kienu jgħixu ħafna Amerikani. Fil-bidu tas-seklu 20, diversi bliet Hondurani b'poter tal-akkwist installaw impjanti żgħar tal-enerġija, imħaddma kemm mill-injam kif ukoll mill-enerġija idroelettrika, li jisfruttaw il-forza tax-xmajjar. Sussegwentement, it-tkabbir tal-popolazzjoni u l-ħtieġa industrijali għal aktar elettriku wasslu lill-gvern biex jikkuntratta kumpaniji privati biex jinstallaw impjanti tal-enerġija ġeotermali. Dawn, flimkien mal-enerġija ġġenerata mill-Impjant Idroelettriku Francisco Morazán, ma jipprovdux biżżejjed lill-pajjiż.

[[File:Pavana I Power Plant in Honduras.jpg|thumbnail|PAVANA 1 Power Plant, li jiġġenera 39.5MW]]
L-ewwel installazzjoni ta' enerġija rinnovabbli kienet il-[[Cerro de Hula Wind Farm]]. Biha, ġie vverifikat l-użu ta' kurrenti tal-arja biex jiġġeneraw enerġija nadifa. Madankollu, bħalissa, l-ispiża għolja kemm tal-installazzjoni kif ukoll tal-manutenzjoni ta’ dawn il-parks tagħmilha impossibbli li tiġi sostitwita l-elettriku ġġenerat mill-fluss tax-xmajjar Hondurasi.

Manuel Bueso Pineda u ħuh Abraham Bueso Pineda kienu responsabbli mill-Minjiera ta' San Andrés de la Nueva Zaragoza fid-dipartiment ta' Copán. Din il-minjiera, skoperta u sfruttata sa minn żminijiet kolonjali, kienet is-suġġett ta' stħarriġ mill-ajru mwettaq f’nofs is-snin disgħin mill-kumpanija Kanadiża Greenstone Minera. L-istħarriġ żvela depożitu minerali kbir taħt ir-raħal ta' San Andrés, fil-muniċipalità ta' La Unión (Copán). Konsegwentement, ir-raħal kollu twaqqa' u ġie rilokat ftit kilometri ’l isfel mill-għolja minn fejn kien twaqqaf mill-Ispanjoli.

Skont l-Indiċi tal-Innovazzjoni Globali, ippubblikat mill-Organizzazzjoni Dinjija tal-Proprjetà Intellettwali, fl-2024 il-Honduras ikklassifika fil-119-il post fl-innovazzjoni minn 139 pajjiż madwar id-dinja. Fl-2024 kiseb il-pożizzjoni 114, filwaqt li fl-2023 okkupa l-pożizzjoni 116 u l-pożizzjoni 113 fl-2022.

== Infrastruttura ==
=== Trasport ===
==== Trasport bl-Ajru ====
{{AP|Appendiċi:Ajruporti fil-Ħonduras}}
[[File:Ramón Villeda Morales International Airport San Pedro Sula Honduras.jpg|230px|right|thumbnail|L-[[Ajruport Internazzjonali Ramón Villeda Morales]] f'[[San Pedro Sula]], flimkien mal-[[Ajruport Internazzjonali ta' Comayagua]], huma ż-żewġ ajruporti ewlenin fil-pajjiż.]]

Il-Ħonduras għandha ħames ajruporti internazzjonali:
* [[Comayagua International Airport]] (XPL) fi [[Comayagua]].

* [[Ajruport Internazzjonali ta' Golosón]] (LCE) f'[[La Ceiba]].

* [[Ajruport Internazzjonali Juan Manuel Gálvez]] (RTB) f'[[Roatán]].

* Ajruport Internazzjonali Ramón Villeda Morales (SAP) f'San Pedro Sula.

* L-Ajruport Internazzjonali ta' Toncontín (TGU) f'Comayagüela.

Iż-żewġ ajruporti ewlenin fil-pajjiż huma Ramón Villeda Morales u Comayagua (Palmerola). L-Ajruport Internazzjonali Ramón Villeda Morales iservi lil San Pedro Sula u l-parti tat-tramuntana tal-pajjiż, filwaqt li l-Ajruport Internazzjonali ta' Comayagua jservi lil Comayagua, Tegucigalpa, u r-reġjuni ċentrali, tan-nofsinhar, u tal-lvant. Iż-żewġ ajruporti għandhom titjiriet diretti lejn bosta bliet fl-Amerika Ċentrali u l-Istati Uniti.

==== Trasport Ferrovjarju ====
[[File:Station_SanPedroSula.JPG|thumbnail|L-[[Istazzjon ta' San Pedro Sula]], l-eks stazzjon ċentrali tal-[[Ferrovija Nazzjonali tal-Ħonduras]].]]
Is-sistema ferrovjarja tal-pajjiż tinkludi 785 km ta' linji, maqsuma f'żewġ sistemi. Il-[[Ferrovija Nazzjonali tal-Ħonduras]] (FNH) għandha kważi 600 km ta' linji. Nofs din is-sistema hija wiesgħa 1,067 metru (kejl dejqa) u n-nofs l-ieħor huwa wiesa' 0,914 metru. Is-sistema l-oħra hija twila 190 km u hija proprjetà tat-[[Tela Railroad Company]], sussidjarja ta' Chiquita Brands International. Iż-żewġ sistemi jinsabu fiż-żoni kostali tat-tramuntana ċentrali u l-majjistral tal-Honduras u jservu primarjament għat-trasport tal-banana.

==== Trasport Marittimu ====
[[File:Carnival Legend Roatan, Honduras.jpg|right|thumbnail|230px|Cruise in [[Roatan]].]]
Il-Honduras għandha sitt portijiet: ħamsa fit-tramuntana b'aċċess għall-[[Oċean Atlantiku]] u San Lorenzo b'aċċess għall-[[Oċean Paċifiku]]. Il-portijiet fil-Honduras huma:

* [[Puerto Cortés]]
* [[Puerto Castilla (Honduras)|Puerto Castilla]] 
* [[La Ceiba]] 
* [[Roatan]] 
* [[Tela (Honduras)|Tela]]
* [[San Lorenzo (Honduras)|San Lorenzo]]

Puerto Cortés huwa l-aktar port importanti fil-pajjiż, u flimkien ma' Puerto Castilla u San Lorenzo, jittratta kważi l-kummerċ marittimu kollu tal-Honduras. Il-portijiet ta’ La Ceiba, Roatán, u Tela jispeċjalizzaw fit-turiżmu, u jirċievu żjarat kull ġimgħa minn vapuri tal-kruċieri internazzjonali bil-kapaċità li jittrasportaw bejn 400 u 800 turist internazzjonali. Puerto Cortés jiftaħar b’waħda mill-aktar faċilitajiet portwali moderni fl-Amerika Ċentrali. Għal din ir-raġuni, u minħabba l-post ġeografiku tiegħu, huwa wieħed mit-tliet portijiet tal-Amerika Latina li huma parti mill-Inizjattiva tas-Sigurtà tal-Kontenituri (CSI) u l-Inizjattiva tas-Sigurtà tal-Merkanzija (SFI).

Puerto Castilla (fuq l-Atlantiku) u San Lorenzo (fuq il-Paċifiku) jintużaw primarjament għall-immaniġġjar tal-esportazzjonijiet taz-zokkor u l-gambli, fost affarijiet oħra. Il-portijiet ta’ La Ceiba, Roatán, u Tela (il-Honduras) jispeċjalizzaw fit-turiżmu, u jirċievu żjarat kull ġimgħa minn vapuri tal-kruċieri internazzjonali bil-kapaċità li jittrasportaw bejn 400 u 800 turist internazzjonali.

==== Trasport bit-Triq ====
[[File:AnilloPerifericoTegucigalpa.jpg|thumbnail|right|230px|Veduta tat-triq ċirkolari f'[[Tegucigalpa]].]]

Il-Honduras għandha aktar minn 15,400 km ta' toroq. L-awtostrada ewlenija tal-pajjiż testendi minn Puerto Cortés fuq il-kosta tal-Karibew, tgħaddi minn San Pedro Sula, Comayagüela, u Tegucigalpa. Tilħaq Nacaome u Choluteca fin-nofsinhar tal-pajjiż, fejn taqsam ukoll l-Awtostrada Pan-Amerikana.

Ix-xogħlijiet tal-infrastruttura jmorru lura għal żminijiet pre-Ispaniċi, iżda evolvew matul il-konkwista u l-indipendenza tal-Honduras. L-istorja tal-ippjanar urban fil-Honduras tmur lura għas-seklu 5, fil-[[Copán (sit arkeoloġiku)|belt ta' Copán]], meta l-kultura Maya kienet fl-aqwa tagħha. Matul il-konkwista tal-Honduras tal-lum, waslu forom ġodda ta' urbaniżmu, li tjiebu wara l-indipendenza.

L-awtostrada ewlenija fl-Amerika Ċentrali hija l-Awtostrada Pan-Amerikana, li tgħaddi mill-pajjiżi kollha tal-Amerika Ċentrali u tgħaqqad l-Amerika ta’ Fuq mal-Amerika t’Isfel. Barra minn hekk, kull pajjiż għandu l-awtostradi ewlenin tiegħu stess u n-netwerks tat-toroq primarji u sekondarji li jgħaqqdu l-ibliet u l-portijiet kollha tiegħu. L-awtostradi ewlenin tal-Honduras huma kif ġej:

Rotta Tramuntana-Nofsinhar: El Salvador - Dipartiment ta' Choluteca - Nikaragwa

Is-sezzjoni uffiċjali tal-Awtostrada Pan-Amerikana fil-Honduras tibda fil-fruntiera ta' El Amatillo (fruntiera ma' El Salvador), tkompli lejn Nacaome, Jícaro Galán, fejn tgħaqqad mal-Awtostrada tan-Nofsinhar, tkompli lejn Choluteca, San Marcos de Colón, u l-fruntiera ta' El Espino (fruntiera man-Nikaragwa).

Rotot oħra li jgħaqqdu n-nazzjonijiet tal-Amerika Ċentrali fil-Honduras huma:

* Il-fruntiera ta' El Poy minn El Salvador sa Tegucigalpa, tkompli lejn in-Nikaragwa.

* Il-qsim tal-fruntiera mal-Gwatemala f'Aguas Calientes, Corinto, jew El Florido, li jgħaddi mill-bliet ta' Nueva Ocotepeque u Santa Minn Rosa de Copán, San Pedro Sula, Siguatepeque, u Comayagua, ir-rotta tkompli lejn id-Distrett Ċentrali (Honduras), imbagħad tul it-Triq Ċirkolari Periferali ta' Tegucigalpa, tgħaddi minn Tegucigalpa permezz tal-interkonnettur reġjonali jew il-Boulevard tal-Forzi Armati, li jilħaq il-qofol tiegħu fl-awtostrada tal-lvant li tgħaqqad il-bliet ta' Danlí (Dipartiment ta' El Paraíso) u l-qsim tal-fruntiera ta' Las Manos fil-lvant, li jmiss man-Nikaragwa.

* Minn Nacaome, ir-rotta tgħaddi wkoll minn San Lorenzo (Honduras) u d-Dipartiment ta' Choluteca, u tkompli lejn żewġ qsim tal-fruntiera oħra tan-Nikaragwa: La Fraternidad u El Guasaule.

=== Irrigazzjoni fil-Ħonduras ===
Il-Ħonduras għandha tradizzjoni twila fid-disinn u l-kostruzzjoni ta' xogħlijiet idro-agrikoli, li tmur lura għal żminijiet pre-Ispaniċi. Din it-tradizzjoni kompliet tiżviluppa matul il-perjodu kolonjali u wara l-indipendenza. Madankollu, ma kienx qabel l-indipendenza li bdiet il-kostruzzjoni ta' proġetti ta' irrigazzjoni fuq skala kbira.

=== Telekomunikazzjonijiet ===
Il-midja stampata bdiet fil-Ħonduras b'*La Gaceta*, il-pubblikazzjoni uffiċjali tal-gvern. Francisco Morazán, li kien introduċa l-ewwel stamperija fil-pajjiż, ħareġ l-ewwel avviżi nazzjonali fl-1830. L-eqdem gazzetta tal-era moderna hija *La Prensa*, imwaqqfa fis-26 ta' Ottubru, 1964. Din il-gazzetta, flimkien ma’ *El Tiempo*, toriġina mill-edizzjonijiet tagħha minn San Pedro Sula. Gazzetti importanti oħra jinkludu *El Heraldo* u *La Tribuna* ta' Tegucigalpa. Gazzetti online bħal HonduDiario.com, Diario C24 Honduras, u Proceso Digital, fost oħrajn, huma wkoll parti mill-midja stampata. Il-biċċa l-kbira tal-gazzetti Hondurasi jistgħu jinqraw b'xejn online.

L-ewwel linji tat-telegrafu fil-pajjiż inbnew fl-1876. Dawn il-linji kienu jgħaqqdu l-bliet ta' Comayagua u La Paz. Aktar tard, inbniet linja tat-telegrafu biex tgħaqqad lil Comayagua ma’ Tegucigalpa, u fl-1880, il-belt ta’ San Pedro Sula ġiet konnessa man-netwerk. Fl-1928, id-Direttorat Ġenerali tat-Telegrafi ngħata l-isem ġdid ta’ Direttorat Ġenerali tat-Telegrafi u t-Telefons.

L-ewwel konċessjonijiet tas-servizz tat-telefon ingħataw fl-1891, iżda s-servizz awtomatiku beda fl-1932 bl-installazzjoni ta' skambju tat-telefon b’1,000 linja f’Tegucigalpa. Fl-1976, inħolqot il-Kumpanija tat-Telekomunikazzjoni Hondurana (Hondutel) u bdiet topera s-sena ta' wara. Bħalissa, Hondutel toffri servizzi tat-telefon fissi u mingħajr fili (821,200 linja fl-2007), servizz tal-internet ADSL (Linja Diġitali Asimmetrika tal-Abbonat), servizzi ta' kards imħallsa minn qabel, u servizzi oħra.

Bil-ftuħ tas-settur tat-telekomunikazzjoni fil-Ħonduras, l-investiment barrani bbenefika. Illum, diversi kumpaniji speċjalizzati f'dan il-qasam joperaw fil-pajjiż, bħal Cable Color u Amnet, kif ukoll Tigo u Claro, li jipprovdu lill-popolazzjoni b'servizzi tat-telefon ċellulari.

Fl-2008, 13.1 minn kull 100 Honduran użaw l-internet regolarment. Madankollu, 0.8% biss kienu abbonati ta' linja fissa għal dan is-servizz. Dan minħabba l-popolarità tal-internet cafes f'diversi kwartieri u distretti madwar il-bliet tal-pajjiż.

Il-poplu Honduran beda jaċċessa l-aħbarijiet permezz tat-televiżjoni fl-1959 bil-wasla ta' TVC Channel 5 minn Televicentro. Dan il-kanal aktar tard ingħaqad ma' TVC Channel 3, TVC Channel 7, u MegaTV. Fl-2010, tnieda TVC-HD (High Definition), inizjalment disponibbli biss għall-abbonati ta' Tigo/Amnet u Cablecolor. Bil-mod il-mod, ġew miżjuda kanali oħra man-netwerk tal-aħbarijiet tal-pajjiż, inklużi Voz e Imagen Centroamericana, Canal 11 Honduras, Hondured Canal 13, Canal 6 Honduras, Cholusat Sur Canal 36, Televisión Nacional de Honduras, u Globo TV, fost oħrajn.

Huwa stmat li t-telekomunikazzjonijiet jirrappreżentaw 7.1% tal-PDG tal-Honduras (2008).

====== Gazzetti ====== 
{|class=&quot;wikitable&quot;
|+Gazzetti ewlenin fil-Ħonduras
!Gazzetta
!Logo
!Fondazzjoni
|-
|L-Istampa
|[[File:La Prensa (Honduras).svg|100x100px]]
|1964
|-
|Il-Ħarald
|[[File:El Heraldo (Honduras).svg]]
|1979
|-
|It-Tribune
|[[File:La Tribuna (Honduras).svg|100x100px]]
|1976
|-
|Temp ta' Kuljum
||[[File:Diario Tiempo (Honduras).svg]]
|1970
|-
|Gazzetta El País
|[[File:Logo_Diario_El_Pais_Honduras.png|100x100px]]
|2017
|-
|Djarju Għaxar
||[[File:Diario Diez logo.png|100x100px]]
|2006
|-
|Djarju C24 Ħonduras
|[[File:Diario_C24_Honduras_(_Periodico_).jpg|100x100px]]
|2025
|}

=== Enerġija ===
[[File:El Cajón Dam.jpg|250px|thumbnail|left|L-[[Impjant Idroelettriku Francisco Morazán]], l-[[impjant idroelettriku]] l-akbar fil-pajjiż.]]

Il-Honduras tikseb l-enerġija tagħha minn erba' sorsi: [[idrokarburi]], [[enerġija idroelettrika]], [[riħ]], u [[bijomassa (enerġija)|bijomassa]]. Sal-1990, 99% tal-elettriku kien ġej minn impjanti idroelettriċi tal-istat. Għalkemm, minħabba l-kundizzjonijiet topografiċi u ta' preċipitazzjoni, hemm potenzjal enormi għall-ġenerazzjoni idroelettrika, dan ma ġiex utilizzat kif suppost.

In-nuqqas ta' investiment pubbliku u privat f'sorsi ta' [[enerġija rinnovabbli]] fisser li d-domanda għall-enerġija li qamet f'dawn l-aħħar snin ġiet sodisfatta minn impjanti tal-enerġija termali li jaħdmu b'fjuwils fossili. Bħalissa, 65% tal-enerġija kkunsmata ġejja minn dawn l-impjanti.

36% tal-idrokarburi jintużaw fil-ġenerazzjoni tal-elettriku; il-bqija jiġi kkunsmat primarjament mit-trasport. Il-Ħonduras ma tipproduċix idrokarburi, għalhekk din id-dipendenza tħalli impatt sinifikanti fuq il-bilanċ kummerċjali tagħha. Il-pajjiż jonfoq madwar $1.25 biljun fuq ix-xiri taż-żejt (2006) (13% tad-dħul tiegħu).

Bħalissa, hemm proġetti għaddejjin biex jintużaw sorsi ta' enerġija alternattivi, minbarra l-enerġija idroelettrika. Il-Kumpanija Nazzjonali tal-Enerġija Elettrika (ENEE), l-entità primarjament responsabbli għall-produzzjoni, il-kummerċjalizzazzjoni, it-trażmissjoni, u d-distribuzzjoni tal-elettriku fil-Honduras, qed tippjana l-kostruzzjoni tal-proġett Patuca III, flimkien mal-proġetti Patuca I u II (spiża: $1.2 biljun), bil-għan li tiġġenera 600 MW ta' enerġija nadifa.

L-ewwel razzett tar-riħ tal-Honduras, li jinsab f'Cerro de Hula, beda jipproduċi 67 MW ta' elettriku f'Ottubru 2011. Dan il-proġett (spiża: $290 miljun) issa għandu kapaċità ta' 102 MW u tlesta f'Diċembru 2011. Bl-istess mod, il-proġetti ta' Jicatuyo u Los Llanitos għaddejjin, b'investiment previst ta' $750 miljun.

F'Mejju 2015, il-Honduras inawgurat l-akbar impjant tal-enerġija solari fotovoltajka fl-Amerika Latina. B'kapaċità installata li tipproduċi 100 megawatt (MW) fis-sena minn żewġ impjanti ta' 50 MW, u l-potenzjal li jilħaq sa 140 MW skont id-domanda, il-kumpless ta' proprjetà privata beda jopera fir-raħal ta' La Llave, fil-muniċipalità ta' Nacaome, fid-dipartiment tan-nofsinhar ta' Valle. L-impjant fotovoltajku Honduras jaqbeż lil dawk fiċ-Ċilì, il-mexxej tal-Amerika Latina f'dan is-settur.

== Demografija ==
[[File:Pyramide Honduras.PNG|thumbnail|Struttura demografika tal-Honduras skont l-età u s-sess fl-2005.]]

L-ewwel ċensiment tal-popolazzjoni Hondurasa twettaq mill-Isqof Fernando Cardiñanos fl-1791, li rriżulta f'għadd ta' ftit aktar minn 90,000 abitant. Minn dakinhar 'il quddiem, il-popolazzjoni Hondurasa kibret b'mod kostanti. Sal-1887, il-Honduras diġà kellha 330,000 abitant. Sal-1940, l-għadd ta' Hondurani kien żdied għal aktar minn miljun. Skont id-dejta pprovduta miċ-Ċentru tal-Popolazzjoni tal-Amerika Ċentrali tal-Università tal-Costa Rica u l-Kummissjoni Ekonomika għall-Amerika Latina u l-Karibew (ECLAC), il-Honduras għandha waħda mill-ogħla rati ta' tkabbir annwali tal-popolazzjoni fl-Amerika Latina.

Il-popolazzjoni totali tal-Honduras kienet ta' 9,304,380 abitant (2020). Minn dan in-numru, 5,117,430 persuna jiffurmaw il-popolazzjoni urbana u 4,186,950 il-popolazzjoni rurali, skont iċ-ċensiment tal-popolazzjoni u d-djar tal-Istitut Nazzjonali tal-Istatistika tal-Honduras. Id-dipartiment bl-akbar popolazzjoni fil-Honduras huwa Francisco Morazán, b'1,674,986 abitant. Id-dipartiment bl-iżgħar popolazzjoni fil-Honduras huwa Islas de la Bahía b'74,938 abitant (38,554 mara u 36,384 raġel).

Il-maġġoranza tal-popolazzjoni hija magħmula minn nies bejn l-20 u d-59 sena (4,653,664). Dan huwa segwit minn tfal bejn l-etajiet ta' 0 u 9 snin (2,114,366). Imbagħad hemm l-adolexxenti (10-19) b'1,944,492. Dan jagħmel il-Honduras popolazzjoni relattivament żagħżugħa. Skont iċ-ċifri ppubblikati minn din il-projezzjoni taċ-ċensiment (INE. Projezzjoni taċ-Ċensiment tal-Popolazzjoni u l-Akkomodazzjoni), 770,906 persuna biss jiffurmaw il-grupp taċ-ċittadini anzjani (60+).

Dan it-tkabbir mgħaġġel tal-popolazzjoni fil-Honduras irriżulta fi tnaqqis fid-dħul per capita u żieda fil-pressjoni fuq l-aċċess għas-servizzi bażiċi. Dan wassal għal eluf ta' Hondurans biex jemigraw lejn pajjiżi bħall-Istati Uniti fit-tfittxija għal kundizzjonijiet ta' għajxien aħjar. Barra minn hekk, dan it-tkabbir tal-popolazzjoni aċċellera l-proċess ta' urbanizzazzjoni fi bliet ewlenin bħal San Pedro Sula u Tegucigalpa.


=== Bliet ewlenin ===
{| class=&quot;infobox&quot; style=&quot;text-align:center; width:97%; margin-right:10px; font-size:90%&quot;
! colspan=11 style= &quot;color:white;&quot; align=center bgcolor=#2F4F4F |L-aktar bliet popolati fil-Ħonduras
|-
! rowspan=&quot;13&quot; width:100 |&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tegucigalpa downtown panoramic 2026.jpg|borde|110x110px]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Tegucigalpa]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Archivo:Panoramica general sps 05.jpg|borde|130x130px]]&lt;br /&gt;[[San Pedro Sula]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Archivo:Choloma City.jpg|borde|110x110px]]&lt;br /&gt;[[Choloma]]&lt;br /&gt;
! align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f5f5f5;&quot; |
! align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f5f5f5;&quot; |Belt
! align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f5f5f5;&quot; |Dipartiment
! colspan=&quot;2&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f5f5f5;&quot; |Popolazzjoni
| align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f5f5f5;&quot; |
! align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f5f5f5;&quot; |Belt
! align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f5f5f5;&quot; |Dipartiment
! align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f5f5f5;&quot; |Popolazzjoni
|-
| align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f0f0f0;&quot; | 1 || align=&quot;left&quot; |[[Tegucigalpa]]|| align=&quot;left&quot; |[[Departamento de Francisco Morazán|Francisco Morazán]]|| align=&quot;right&quot; | 1&amp;nbsp;306&amp;nbsp;738 ||&amp;nbsp;|| align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f0f0f0;&quot; | 6 || align=&quot;left&quot; |[[El Progreso (Honduras)|El Progreso]]|| align=&quot;left&quot; |[[Departamento de Yoro|Yoro]]|| align=&quot;right&quot; | 200&amp;nbsp;010
|-
| align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f0f0f0;&quot; | 2 || align=&quot;left&quot; |[[San Pedro Sula]]|| align=&quot;left&quot; |[[Departamento de Cortés|Cortés]]|| align=&quot;right&quot; | 991&amp;nbsp;900 ||&amp;nbsp;|| align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f0f0f0;&quot; | 7 || align=&quot;left&quot; |[[Villanueva (Honduras)|Villanueva]]|| align=&quot;left&quot; |[[Departamento de Cortés|Cortés]]|| align=&quot;right&quot; | 177&amp;nbsp;699
|-
| align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f0f0f0;&quot; | 3 || align=&quot;left&quot; |[[Choloma]]|| align=&quot;left&quot; |[[Departamento de Cortés|Cortés]]|| align=&quot;right&quot; | 275&amp;nbsp;724 ||&amp;nbsp;|| align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f0f0f0;&quot; | 8 || align=&quot;left&quot; |[[Comayagua]]|| align=&quot;left&quot; |[[Departamento de Comayagua|Comayagua]]|| align=&quot;right&quot; | 172&amp;nbsp;069
|-
| align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f0f0f0;&quot; | 4 || align=&quot;left&quot; |Danlí|| align=&quot;left&quot; |[[Departamento de El Paraíso|El Paraíso]]|| align=&quot;right&quot; | 222&amp;nbsp;211 ||&amp;nbsp;|| align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f0f0f0;&quot; | 9 || align=&quot;left&quot; |[[Choluteca]]|| align=&quot;left&quot; |[[Departamento de Choluteca|Choluteca]]|| align=&quot;right&quot; | 168&amp;nbsp;898
|-
| align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f0f0f0;&quot; | 5 || align=&quot;left&quot; |[[La Ceiba]]|| align=&quot;left&quot; |[[Departamento de Atlántida|Atlántida]]|| align=&quot;right&quot; | 222&amp;nbsp;055 ||&amp;nbsp;|| align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f0f0f0;&quot; | 10 || align=&quot;left&quot; |[[Juticalpa]]|| align=&quot;left&quot; |[[Departamento de Olancho|Olancho]]|| align=&quot;right&quot; | 152&amp;nbsp;711
|-
| colspan=&quot;11&quot; align=&quot;center&quot; style=&quot;background:#f5f5f5;&quot; |{{small|'''Fuente: Proyección del 2020 - INE.&lt;ref name=&quot;citypopulation.de&quot;/&gt;}}
|}
{{clear}}

=== Etnografija ===
{{Gráfico circular|thumb=right|título=Composición étnica de Honduras (censo de 2013)&lt;ref name=&quot;Censo 2013&quot;&gt;{{cita web |url=http://170.238.108.229/index.php/catalog/69/vargrp/VG8 |título=Honduras - XVII Censo de Población y VI de Vivienda 2013 |fechaacceso=13 de agosto de 2018 |fecha=16 de noviembre de 2015 |editorial=Instituto Nacional de Estadística de Honduras |fechaarchivo=25 de febrero de 2021 |urlarchivo=https://web.archive.org/web/20210225073620/http://170.238.108.229/index.php/catalog/69/vargrp/VG8 |deadurl=yes }}&lt;/ref&gt;
|etiqueta1 = [[Mestizos]] (82.93 %)
|valor1 = 82.93
|color1 = #CBA481
|etiqueta2 = [[Ħonduran Abjad|Abjad]] (7.87 %)
|valor2 = 7.87
|color2 = #FBC5A7
|etiqueta3 = [[Popli Indiġeni tal-Ħonduras|Popli Indiġeni]] (7.25 %)
|valor3 = 7.25
|color3 = #BE7343
|etiqueta4 = [[Hondureños negros|Negros]] (1.39 %)
|valor4 = 1.39
|color4 = #62402F
|etiqueta5 = Otros (0.55 %)
|valor5 = 0.55
|color5 = Lightgray
}}

«Honduras es un país multiétnico, multicultural y [[multilingüe]] que se compone de cuatro grandes familias étnicas: mestizos o blancos que son la mayoría, los indígenas ([[lenca]]s, [[misquito]]s, [[tolupanes]], [[chortís]], [[pech]] o payas, tawahkas), los [[Garífuna (etnia)|garífunas]] y los criollo-anglohablantes. Las etnias indígenas y los garífunas constituyen la herencia cultural de Honduras y representan cerca del 7&amp;nbsp;% de la población del país».&lt;ref name=&quot;Pobreza etnica de Honduras &quot;&gt;{{Cita web
	| url =	http://www.bvsde.paho.org/bvsacd/cd47/etnica.pdf
	| título =	Pobreza étnica de Honduras
	| editor =	Utta von Gleish, Ernesto Gálvez
	| fecha =	1999
	| fechaacceso =	24 de febrero de 2011
	| urlarchivo =	https://web.archive.org/web/20110722033451/http://www.bvsde.paho.org/bvsacd/cd47/etnica.pdf
	| fechaarchivo =	22 de julio de 2011
	}}&lt;/ref&gt;

Entre los grupos con menos población se encuentran: Los chortis, con una población de aproximadamente 38&amp;nbsp;587&lt;ref name=&quot;Historia de la cultura y de la educación&quot;&gt;{{
Cita web
	| url =		http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&amp;q=cache:9epAvFVUO7IJ:historia.fcs.ucr.ac.cr/articulos/2008/especial2008/articulos/04-Cultural/41.pdf+Historia+Cultural+de+honduras&amp;hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;pid=bl&amp;srcid=ADGEEShOl-xMZLqYmqakvWGd0mU3JqoaqZJTkisVkB1CFhYI0KzMrvGKDk6TfjttkK9gV9UgybLi9P6ma0rstETEYtYNvH6zuHjL2cv62nSnOmZ3gpkFibAOeTKLxQY0UnEnDYomKHEY&amp;sig=AHIEtbTjE0Sac2-kfdN4BLY94rxt-hQfMQ
	| título =	Historia de la cultura y de la educación
	| nombre =	Antonio Ramón
	| apellidos =	Vallejo Cerna
	| editorial =	[[Universidad de Costa Rica]]
	| fecha =	30 de mayo de 2008
	| fechaacceso =	24 de febrero de 2011}}&lt;/ref&gt; radican en los departamentos de [[Departamento de Copán|Copán]] y [[Departamento de Ocotepeque|Ocotepeque]]. Los misquitos, de aproximadamente 57&amp;nbsp;000 personas, radican en el departamento de Gracias a Dios. Asimismo, los pech o payas (4300) viven en [[Departamento de Olancho|Olancho]], Colón y Gracias a Dios.&lt;ref name=&quot;Ethno-demography of pech ethnic group, Honduras&quot;&gt;{{
Cita web
	| url =		http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;channel=s&amp;hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;biw=1280&amp;bih=806&amp;q=Ethno-demography+of+pech+ethnic+group%2C+Honduras
	| título =	Ethno-demography of pech ethnic group, Honduras
	| nombre =	Juan Carlos
	| apellidos =	Vargas Aguilar
	| editorial =	Centro centroamericano de población
	| ubicación =	Costa Rica
	| fecha =	1 de enero de 2006
	| fechaacceso =	24 de febrero de 2011}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref name=&quot;Pobreza étnica de Honduras &quot;&gt;{{Cita web
	| url =	http://www.bvsde.paho.org/bvsacd/cd47/etnica.pdf
	| título =	Pobreza étnica de Honduras
	| editor =	Utta von Gleish, Ernesto Gálvez
	| fecha =	1999
	| fechaacceso =	24 de febrero de 2011
	| urlarchivo =	https://web.archive.org/web/20110722033451/http://www.bvsde.paho.org/bvsacd/cd47/etnica.pdf
	| fechaarchivo =	22 de julio de 2011
	}}&lt;/ref&gt; Mientras que la población tawahka pasó de ciento sesenta personas a cerca de 2758&amp;nbsp;personas durante el siglo&amp;nbsp;XXI.&lt;ref name=&quot;Historia de la cultura y de la educación&quot;/&gt; Este grupo étnico practica una agricultura itinerante de subsistencia.

Los [[lenca]]s, la etnia más numerosa ({{Esd|313 000}}),&lt;ref name=&quot;Historia de la cultura y de la educación&quot;/&gt; se encuentran localizados en los departamentos de La Paz, [[Departamento de Comayagua|Comayagua]], [[Departamento de Intibucá|Intibucá]], Lempira y Santa Bárbara. Viven en aldeas y caseríos muy cercanos a las carreteras y «a pesar de que los lencas fueron diezmados durante el siglo XVI, algunas de sus comunidades actuales todavía tienen una cultura que les distingue parcialmente de sus vecinos campesinos o ladinos...».&lt;ref name=&quot;Arquitectura de los grupos étnicos de Honduras&quot;&gt;{{
Cita libro
	| url =		http://books.google.com/books?id=ZV0wx5Gl0YcC&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;dq=Salinas,+Iris+Milady&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=zZpoTfu7HY70swPSsOCmBA&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=2&amp;ved=0CDMQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false
	| título =	Pueblos indígenas y garífuna de Honduras
	| fechaacceso =	24 de febrero de 2011
	| nombre =	Iris Milady
	| apellidos =	Salinas
	| fecha =	1991
	| editorial =	Editorial Guaymuras
	| ubicación =	Tegucigalpa
	| isbn =	99926-28-02-2 1991}}&lt;/ref&gt;

Los pueblos garífunas ({{Esd|98 000}}) se encuentran localizados a lo largo de la costa norte de Honduras; desde Masca en el Departamento de Cortés, hasta Tocomacho en el departamento de Colón. «Aunque es el grupo étnico relativamente más joven» de haberse establecido en Honduras, ya pasaron a formar parte importante de la «idiosincrasia» del país.&lt;ref name=&quot;Arquitectura de los grupos étnicos de Honduras&quot;/&gt;

Los jicaques o Tolupanes ({{Esd|19 000 personas}}) de los departamentos de Cortés y Atlántida han perdido su lengua y su cultura jicaque. Todos se sienten ladinos y están totalmente integrados en la sociedad campesina hondureña. Los jicaques de la montana de la flor, son unos trescientos cincuenta. El 90&amp;nbsp;% son monolingües del jicaque.&lt;ref name=&quot;Estado, Sociedad y lenguaje&quot;&gt;{{
Cita web
	| url =		http://books.google.com/books?id=MdK6MzUM7DQC&amp;pg=PA351&amp;lpg=PA351&amp;dq=Todos+se+sienten+ladinos+y+estan+totalmente+integrados+en+la+sociedad+campesina+hondure%C3%B1a.&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=VQJqC2htxC&amp;sig=oCmjrkYXDvHGuzfffWkquJaxJPs&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=QJ5oTf27Aoq-sAOd4NimBA&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CBYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false
	| título =	Estado, Sociedad y lenguaje
	| fechaacceso =	24 de febrero de 2011
	| nombre =	Atanasio
	| apellidos =	Herranz
	| fecha =	1991
	| editorial =	Editorial Guaymuras
	| ubicación =	Tegucigalpa
	| isbn =	99926-15-46-X
	| cita =	Todos se sienten ladinos y están totalmente integrados en la sociedad campesina hondureña}}&lt;/ref&gt;

Los habitantes de las Islas de la Bahía, comúnmente llamados isleños ({{Esd|13 854}}),&lt;ref name=&quot;Historia de la cultura y de la educación&quot;/&gt; «refleja sus orígenes como esclavos ingleses, hablan un dialecto inglés característico del occidente del Caribe, son de religión cristiana-evangélica y se autoidentifican con la cultura angloamericana del Caribe contemporáneo».&lt;ref name=&quot;Negros de habla inglesa o creoles&quot;&gt;{{Cita web
	| url =	http://www.unesco.org.uy/phi/aguaycultura/fileadmin/phi/aguaycultura/Honduras/FICHA_NEGROS_DE_HABLA_INGLESA.pdf
	| título =	Negros de habla inglesa o creoles
	| editorial =	[[UNESCO]]
	| fecha =	1999
	| fechaacceso =	24 de febrero de 2011
	| fechaarchivo =	30 de diciembre de 2011
	| urlarchivo =	https://web.archive.org/web/20111230181842/http://www.unesco.org.uy/phi/aguaycultura/fileadmin/phi/aguaycultura/Honduras/FICHA_NEGROS_DE_HABLA_INGLESA.pdf
	| deadurl =	yes
	}}&lt;/ref&gt;

Rigward il-gvern tar-Repubblika tal-Honduras, l-Artikolu 6 tal-Kostituzzjoni jistabbilixxi li:

Il-lingwa uffiċjali tal-Honduras hija l-Ispanjol. L-Istat għandu jipproteġi l-purità tagħha u jippromwovi t-tagħlim tagħha.

Madankollu, minħabba t-telf tal-lingwi tagħhom mill-popli Lenca u Ch'orti', u l-periklu ta' estinzjoni li qed jiffaċċjaw lingwi bħal dik tal-Paya, il-Kostituzzjoni, permezz tal-Artikolu 172, tqis li huwa neċessarju:

Il-ġid antropoloġiku, arkeoloġiku, storiku u artistiku kollu tal-Honduras jifforma parti mill-wirt kulturali tan-nazzjon. Il-Liġi għandha tistabbilixxi r-regolamenti li jservu bħala l-bażi għall-konservazzjoni, ir-restawr, il-manutenzjoni u r-restituzzjoni tiegħu, kif xieraq. Huwa d-dmir tal-Hondurasi kollha li jiżguraw il-konservazzjoni tiegħu u jipprevjenu t-tneħħija tiegħu.

Bl-istess mod, il-Kostituzzjoni timpenja ruħha li tippreserva u tippromwovi l-kultura nazzjonali.

=== Distribuzzjoni tal-Età ===
* Irġiel: 4,095,813
* Nisa: 4,047,651
* 0-14-il sena: 36.7% (irġiel 1,528,271 / nisa 1,464,428)
* 15-64 sena: 59.5% (irġiel 2,431,607 / nisa 2,412,951)
* 65 sena u aktar: 3.8% (irġiel 136,035 / nisa 170,272) (stima tal-2012)

L-Indjani Amerikani fil-Ħonduras huma aktar minn 210,000, li jirrappreżentaw 2.3% tal-popolazzjoni Hondurasa. Huma ilhom jgħixu fit-territorju Honduras għal aktar minn għoxrin millennju. Matul il-kolonizzazzjoni, xi wħud mill-gruppi tagħhom ġew skjavi, imkeċċija minn artijiethom, jew Dawk assimilati mill-kolonizzaturi u gruppi oħra komplew jgħixu fl-artijiet antenati tagħhom, u żammew il-kultura, il-lingwa u r-reliġjon oriġinali tagħhom; dawn il-gruppi huma kif ġej:

{| klassi=&quot;wikitable&quot;
|-
! Grupp etniku!! Numru ta' Abitanti!! Dipartimenti fejn joqogħdu
|-
| [[Lenca]]s || 110,000 || [[Dipartiment ta' Lempira|Lempira]], [[Dipartiment ta' Intibucá|Intibucá]], [[Dipartiment ta' La Paz (Ħonduras)|La Paz]] (Bandiera tal-Ħonduras)
|-
| [[Chortís]] || 24,000 ||  Copán, Ocotepeque, Cortés 
|-
| Tawahka || 6000 || La Mosquitia (Thank God), Olancho
|-
| Tolupanes || 15&amp;nbsp;000 || Yoro, Olancho, Atlántida, Colón, Francisco Morazán.
|-
| Peċ || 4,000 || Grazzi lil Alla, Olancho u Colón
|-
| Miskito || 50,000 || Grazzi lil Alla
|}

=== Tranżizzjoni Demografika ===
Matul is-seklu 21, il-popolazzjoni Hondurana se tgħaddi minn proċess ta’ tranżizzjoni demografika fejn il-popolazzjoni ta’ aktar minn sittin sena se tiżdied. Min-naħa l-oħra, il-pajjiż huwa wieħed mill-iżgħar fl-Amerika Latina, b’età medjana stmata ta’ tnejn u għoxrin sena. Il-Honduras huwa t-tieni l-aktar pajjiż popolat fl-Amerika Ċentrali, wara l-Gwatemala, u mill-1991, il-pajjiż qabeż lil El Salvador fil-popolazzjoni. Bħan-Nikaragwa, il-popolazzjoni tal-pajjiż mistennija aktar mid-doppju fl-ewwel nofs tas-seklu 21, u bħall-Gwatemala, l-emigrazzjoni ma taffettwax it-tkabbir tal-popolazzjoni. Madankollu, minħabba li r-rata tat-twelid hija aktar baxxa minn dik tal-Gwatemala, il-pajjiż mhux se jikber daqs il-ġar tiegħu, il-Gwatemala. Sal-2050, il-pajjiż se jkollu aktar minn tlettax-il miljun abitant (l-istess popolazzjoni bħall-Gwatemala fl-2010). Sal-2070 il-pajjiż xorta se jikber b'16.8 miljun abitant, u dan ikun il-quċċata tal-popolazzjoni tiegħu, qabel ma naqas fl-2080 iżda bi tnaqqis ta' -0.1% biss, sal-2090 ir-rata ta' tnaqqis se tkun biss ta' -0.6% u sal-2100 għal -1.8%.

{| class=&quot;wikitable&quot; border=&quot;1&quot;
!''' Sena
!''' Popolazzjoni Totali
!''' Popolazzjoni 'l fuq minn 60
!''' Perċentwal
|-
| 2000
| 6&amp;nbsp;485&amp;nbsp;500
| 335&amp;nbsp;200
| 5.2&amp;nbsp;%
|-
| 2025
| 10&amp;nbsp;656&amp;nbsp;100
| 917&amp;nbsp;100
| 8.6&amp;nbsp;%
|-
| 2050
| 13&amp;nbsp;771&amp;nbsp;300
| 2&amp;nbsp;425&amp;nbsp;800
| 17.6&amp;nbsp;%
|-
|}

=== Reliġjon ===
Reliġjon fil-Ħonduras
Fil-Ħonduras, hemm libertà tar-reliġjon, għalkemm il-maġġoranza tal-popolazzjoni tistqarr il-Kristjaneżmu, bil-Knisja Kattolika li għandha l-aktar segwaċi, li tirrappreżenta 46% tal-popolazzjoni.

Minn nofs is-seklu 20, kien hemm żieda fil-knejjes Protestanti, speċifikament dawk tal-fergħa Evanġelika, li issa jiffurmaw 43% tal-popolazzjoni. Għalhekk, 89% tal-popolazzjoni Hondurasa tidentifika ruħha mal-Kristjaneżmu, kemm Kattoliku kif ukoll Protestant, u ħafna Hondurasi jaderixxu ma' dan tal-aħħar. Għalkemm hemm prattikanti tal-Ġudaiżmu, l-Islam, u l-Wicca, għalkemm f'numri iżgħar, il-preżenza tagħhom kważi ma tinnota xejn. Madwar 11% tal-popolazzjoni ma temminx f'xi reliġjon, ċifra li tidher mhux tas-soltu iżda kienet ogħla fis-snin riċenti.

=== Lingwi ===

L-Ispanjol huwa l-lingwa uffiċjali u tal-maġġoranza, mitkellma minn prattikament il-popolazzjoni kollha, bl-eċċezzjoni ta' xi gruppi etniċi bħall-Miskito, il-Lenca, u t-Tawahka, fost oħrajn. Hemm ukoll komunitajiet li jitkellmu bl-Ingliż, l-aktar fuq il-kosta tat-tramuntana tal-Ħonduras, bl-aktar sinifikanti jkunu fid-Dipartiment tal-Gżejjer tal-Bajja.

=== Żvilupp tal-Bniedem ===
Skont ir-Rapport dwar l-Iżvilupp tal-Bniedem tal-2020 mill-Programm ta' Żvilupp tan-Nazzjonijiet Uniti, il-Ħonduras huwa pajjiż bi żvilupp uman medju b'Indiċi tal-Iżvilupp tal-Bniedem (HDI) ta' 0.634.

== Kultura u Arti ==
=== Folklor === Bosta karattri huma parti mill-folklor u t-twemmin popolari tal-Honduras. Xi figuri leġġendarji prominenti jinkludu:
* Il-Cadejo
* Il-Goblin
* Il-Bgħula Herred
* Il-Bulero
* Is-Siguanaba Maħmuġa
* Il-Karrettun Fantasma
* L-Għajjat
* It-Timbo
* Il-Picudo
* L-Istorja ta' Macario
* Iċ-Ċiklopi tal-Ġungla Miskito
* La Llorona
* La Taconuda
* Il-Laguna Selvaġġa
* Il-Leġġenda tal-Indjan li Ttrasforma f'Tigra (Rancho Grande, Esquías, Comayagua)
* El Candú
* El Pitero
* Fjuri Mimé
* El Bananero
* &quot;L-Indjani Żgħar&quot;
*&quot;Ir-Raġel Kostali&quot;
*&quot;L-Imbeżża'&quot;
*&quot;Corrido lejn il-Honduras&quot;
*&quot;Il-Valona&quot;
*&quot;Agrett Kannella Żgħir&quot;
*&quot;Għar-Rumor tal-Ġungli Hondurasi&quot;

=== Gastronomija ===
Il-kċina Hondurana għandha l-għeruq tagħha fid-dieta Mesoamerikana pre-Ispanika, fejn diversi speċi ta’ pjanti, annimali, u ħut kienu jintużaw, ħafna drabi bħala rimedji naturali jew mediċini. Xi wħud mill-ispeċi ta’ pjanti użati ħafna kienu jinkludu qamħirrum, fażola, soursop, squash, qara ħamra, kassava, tadam, patata, patata ħelwa, vanilla, kannella, u karawett, fost oħrajn. Kienu jintużaw ukoll xi frott, bħall-ananas, l-avokado, il-papajja, u l-gwava, li kienu jinħasdu fil-foresti tropikali.

Il-platti ppreparati b’dan l-ikel kienu elaborati ħafna, inklużi tortillas tal-qamħirrum (magħmula bil-qamħirrum nixtamalizzat), burritos (magħmula bil-fażola msajra mgeżwra f’tortilla), popcorn, tamales, u xorb bħal ċikkulata sħuna, pinole, u atole.

Matul l-era tal-kumpaniji Amerikani tal-banana, ġew introdotti drawwiet tad-dieta ġodda fir-reġjun. Id-dqiq tal-qamħirrum ġie sostitwit bid-dqiq tal-qamħ fil-biċċa l-kbira tal-platti lokali. Wieħed mir-riżultati mhux mistennija kien il-feġġ tal-ikel l-aktar tipiku u maħbub tal-kosta tat-tramuntana tal-Honduras: baleadas. Fost l-ikel u x-xorb tal-kċina Honduraża, jispikkaw dawn li ġejjin:

{{Immaġni multipla

| table_position = lemin

| direzzjoni = orizzontali

| titlu =

| ritratt1 = Totopostes.jpg

| wisa'1 = 183

| test1 = &lt;center&gt;Totopostes, deżerta tipika minn Copán&lt;/center&gt;

| ritratt2 =

| wisa'2 = 190

text2 = &lt;center&gt;Skont riċerka minn National Geographic, il-kawkaw jew iċ-ċikkulata oriġinaw fil-Ħonduras&lt;/center&gt;
}}'''Xorb'''
* Atol tal-qamħirrum
* Atol shuco (ġeneralment servut f'qargħa morro)
* Horchata (magħmula bir-ross u ż-żerriegħa tal-morro)
* Kafè
* Xarba taċ-chia
* Gifiti
* Meraq tal-kannamieli
* Pinole
* Pozol
* Rompopo (eggnog)
* Inbid tal-patata
'''Ikel'''
* Ross bil-qamħirrum u t-tiġieġ
* Baleada (tip ta' tamale)
* Laħam grilled
* Laħam imnixxef fix-xemx
* Chanfaina jew candinga (tip ta' stuffat)
* Zalzett fuq il-barbecue
* Kustilja tal-majjal Moqlija
* Casamiento (ross u fażola)
* Qamħirrum mgħolli fuq il-qalba mgħottija bil-butir (krema) jew marġerina
* Jamo
* Montucas u tamales tal-qamħirrum
* Nacatamales
* Pollo chuco

=== Arti Viżiva ===
'''Żfin u Żfin Folkloristiku ta' Oriġini Lenca'''
[[File: Garrobo.png|thumb|250px|Grafika Popolari ta' &quot;Iż-Żifna Garrobo&quot; minn Arturo Sosa għas-[[CCET]].]]
* Iż-Żifna Garrobo
* Iż-Żifna tal-Kuruni
* Iż-Żifna tas-Subien Żgħar Moreno
* Iż-Żifna tal-Bajda
* Iż-Żifna tal-Bandiera
* Iż-Żifna tax-Xjaten Żgħar
'''Żfin u Żfin Folkloristiku Garifuna'''
* Punta
* Parrandas
* Mascarones
* El Barreño
* El Sueñito

=== Pittura ===
[[File:Lost City of the Monkey God.png|thumb|Illustrazzjoni Artifiċjali tal-[[White City (Honduras)|&quot;White City jew City of the Monkey God&quot;]].]]
Il-pittura fit-territorju tal-Honduras tal-lum ilha teżisti minn żminijiet pre-Kolombjani, u l-firxa vera tagħha għadha qed tiġi esplorata. Ir-riżorsi u l-impenn meħtieġa biex jiġu skoperti dawn l-għeruq tal-kultura pre-Kolombjana fil-Honduras kienu nieqsa, kif muri minn sforzi ta' riċerka reċenti fil-White City fir-reġjun ta' Mosquitia fil-Lvant tal-Honduras.

Mal-wasla tal-kolonizzaturi Ewropej, ġew introdotti diversi tekniki matul il-kolonizzazzjoni Spanjola. Dawn it-tekniki għaddew minn modifiki bħala riżultat tat-taħlit kulturali, u wara l-indipendenza, dawn il-modifiki ġew approfonditi aktar minn fatturi kemm endoġeni kif ukoll eżoġeni li rriżultaw mit-trasformazzjonijiet li seħħew f'dak iż-żmien.

[[File:National School of Fine Arts.JPG|thumb|left|Kwartieri Ġenerali tal-[[National School of Fine Arts (Honduras)|Skola Nazzjonali tal-Arti]] f'[[Comayagüela]].]]
Il-Honduras huwa pajjiż multietniku, u għalhekk wieħed multikulturali. Din id-diversità tal-ambjent naturali u uman tal-Honduras ikkontribwiet għall-emerġenza ta' forom diversi ta' espressjoni f'diversi oqsma artistiċi, kemm tradizzjonali kif ukoll kontemporanji. Il-Ministeru tal-Kultura, l-Arti, u l-Isport huwa responsabbli għall-protezzjoni tal-wirt storiku u kulturali tal-pajjiż.

Huwa wkoll l-aġenzija inkarigata mill-promozzjoni ta' attivitajiet artistiċi, kulturali, u sportivi fil-livell nazzjonali.

L-Organizzazzjoni tal-Istati Ibero-Amerikani (OEI), permezz taċ-ċensiment kulturali Honduran tagħha, identifikat 1,496 espressjoni kulturali mqassma f'200 muniċipalità fit-18-il dipartiment tal-pajjiż. Dawn huma suddiviżi f'espressjonijiet folkloristiċi tradizzjonali u espressjonijiet kontemporanji. 1,300 minnhom jikkorrispondu għal espressjonijiet folkloristiċi tradizzjonali u 196 għal dawk kontemporanji. Skont l-OEI, l-espressjonijiet folkloristiċi tradizzjonali fil-Honduras huma bbażati fuq il-kontribuzzjonijiet tal-gruppi Indiġeni u Garifuna. L-espressjonijiet kontemporanji, min-naħa l-oħra, huma marbuta aktar mill-qrib maċ-ċentri urbani u orjentati lejn il-professjonalizzazzjoni tal-arti.

L-artisti u l-istudjużi tal-arti Hondurans jaqblu li żvolta storika għal stadju ġdid fl-espressjoni artistika u kulturali nazzjonali bdiet bit-tmiem tad-dittatorjat f'nofs is-seklu 20. Din il-bidla politika mmarkat il-bidu ta' perjodu ta' liberazzjoni fl-espressjoni artistika u intellettwali Honduran u l-introduzzjoni ta' tekniki u xejriet ġodda fl-arti nazzjonali. Mill-196 manifestazzjoni kontemporanja identifikati, hemm 29 grupp teatrali, 5 gruppi taż-żfin, 60 orkestra u kor, 48 assoċjazzjoni kulturali, 24 skola tal-arti, u 31 gallerija jew spazju alternattiv.

==== Mużewijiet ====
[[File:National_Art_Gallery_in_Tegucigalpa_(34328491).jpg|thumb|190px|xellug|Il-Gallerija Nazzjonali tal-Arti f'Tegucigalpa.]]
[[File:Museo_de_Comayagua.jpg|thumbnail|lemin|Il-Mużew ta' Comayagua, mużew arkeoloġiku f'Comayagua.]]

Il-Ħonduras tiftaħar varjetà wiesgħa ta 'mużewijiet, li jinsabu primarjament f'Tegucigalpa, Comayagua, u San Pedro Sula. Uħud mill-mużewijiet l-aktar famużi tal-pajjiż jinkludu:

* Arkivji Nazzjonali tal-Ħonduras
* Librerija Nazzjonali tal-Ħonduras
* Librerija Queen Sofia (Ħonduras)
* San Francisco Barracks
* Gallerija Nazzjonali tal-Arti (Ħonduras)
* Mużew tal-Ajru tal-Ħonduras
* Mużew tal-Antropoloġija u l-Istorja (il-Ħonduras)
* Mużew Kolonjali tal-Arti Reliġjuża
* Mużew Comayagua
* Mużew Storiku u Ċiviku Casa Cabañas
* Mużew tal-Poplu tal-Honduras
* Mużew għall-Identità Nazzjonali
* Mużew Numismatiku Rigoberto Borjas


== Arkitettura ==

Skont il-perit Norma Isabel Lagos V., l-oriġini tal-arkitettura fil-Ħonduras imorru lura għall-wasla tal-ewwel gruppi umani, u hija tqis li huwa xieraq li l-istorja tal-arkitettura nazzjonali tiġi kklassifikata fi tliet perjodi ewlenin: Pre-Kolombjan, Kolonjali, u Repubblikana. L-awtriċi msemmija hawn fuq tirrimarka li l-biċċa l-kbira tax-xogħlijiet arkitettoniċi pre-Kolombjani jibqgħu moħbija u mhux magħrufa, u huma s-suġġett ta’ studju arkeoloġiku, li l-akbar eżempju tiegħu huwa l-Park Arkeoloġiku ta' Copán, Sit ta' Wirt Dinji.

Il-Ħonduras għandha tip ta' arkitettura mhux monumentali msejħa Arkitettura Vernakulari, li hija distinta mill-karattru utilitarju u rurali tagħha. Tirrifletti l-mod ta' ħajja tradizzjonali tagħna, l-ambjent tagħna, l-użu tar-riżorsi naturali, u aspetti oħra tal-kultura Hondurasa. Eżempji ta' din l-arkitettura jinkludu kurituri ta' quddiem u ta' wara u ħitan mibnija mit-trab (adobe u wattle and daub).

[[File:05.Copán (38).JPG|thumbnail|left|Pjazza u ball court f’[[Copán (sit arkeoloġiku)]] ]]

L-arkitettura tal-perjodu kolonjali nħolqot kemm mill-Ewropej kif ukoll mill-indiġeni, u tirrifletti simbjożi kulturali fejn il-kanoni estetiċi tar-Rinaxximent Spanjol u l-Barokk ingħaqdu ma' gosti u arti indiġeni. Xi wħud mill-aktar eżempji magħrufa ta' din l-arkitettura jinkludu l-Katidral tal-Immakulata Kunċizzjoni f’Comayagua u l-Knisja ta' San Miguel Arcángel f’Tegucigalpa, il-Knisja ta' San Manuel Colohete fid-dipartiment ta' Lempira bil-motivi Mudéjar tagħha, Santa Magdalena f’Macholoa, Santa Bárbara, il-Fortizza ta' San Fernando de Omoa, u ċ-ċentru storiku ta' Trujillo, l-ewwel sede tal-gvern għall-Kuruna Spanjola.

Ta’ nota partikolari matul dan il-perjodu kienet il-kostruzzjoni tat-Teżor Irjali ta' Comayagua, ikkummissjonat lill-bennej ewlieni Baltasar de Madariaga. Il-bini sar wieħed mill-aqwa eżempji ta’ arkitettura mibnija matul il-Kaptanerija Ġenerali tal-Gwatemala, billi ħallat elementi minn Antigua u l-Amerika t’Isfel. L-Imgħallem Madariaga introduċa l-użu bikri tad-daħla tal-arkata mistilineari għall-kuritur, stil li kien diġà popolarizza meta kien qed jibni l-arkati ewlenin tal-knejjes ta' San Manuel de Colohete u Macholoa.

Il-perjodu Repubblikan ra bidliet arkitettoniċi sinifikanti, li bdew bi stil neoklassiku u storiku tal-aħħar tas-seklu 19 u l-bidu tas-seklu 20, li laħqu l-qofol tagħhom fl-arkitettura rivoluzzjonarja Modernista jew tal-Istil Internazzjonali tal-ħadid, ħġieġ, u konkrit rinfurzat. Dan il-mument storiku ra l-emerġenza ta’ periti professjonali kkunsidrati bħala pijunieri fil-qasam tagħhom.

Fil-bidu tas-seklu 20, il-kostruzzjoni ta' xogħlijiet arkitettoniċi fi stili eklettiċi u storiċi bdiet fil-Ħonduras. L-aktar periti prominenti tal-era jinkludu l-ġeometru Taljan Augusto Brezzani, li ddisinja l-Palazz Presidenzjali (1916-1919) u l-Palazz tad-Distrett Ċentrali (1937) f’kollaborazzjoni ma’ Samuel Salgado, li ddisinja wkoll id-dar Villa Roy (1936). Cristóbal Prats bena t-Teatru Manuel Bonilla fl-istil Neoklassiku, u Alfredo Zepeda bena l-Pont Carías b'ispirazzjoni Art Deco. Il-perit Bustillo Oliva ddisinja l-bini tal-Muniċipju ta' San Pedro Sula b'influwenzi Art Deco.

== Rebbieħa u Nominati tal-Premju Honduran ==
=== Nominati għall-Premju Nobel ===
Il-Honduras kellha tliet nominazzjonijiet għall-Premju Nobel, waħda minnhom fix-xjenza:
* 1974: L-Arġentina Díaz Lozano (Premju Nobel fil-Letteratura).

* 1998: Salvador Moncada (Premju Nobel fil-Fiżjoloġija jew il-Mediċina).

* 2021: Elena Bottazzi (Premju Nobel għall-Paċi).

[[File:John Vane and Dr. Salvador Moncada.jpg|thumb|left|John Vane u l-farmakologu Honduran [[Sir]] [[Salvador Moncada]].]]

=== Premju Prince of Asturias ===

Honduran irċieva l-[[Premju Prince of Asturias]] għar-riċerka medika tiegħu:
* 1990: [[Salvador Moncada]] ([[Premju Prince of Asturias għar-Riċerka Xjentifika u Teknika|Premju Prince of Asturias għar-Riċerka Xjentifika u Teknika]]).

=== Premju Pulitzer ===
Hondurjan ingħata l-[[Premju Pulitzer]]:
* Marcio Sánchez, fotografu għal [[Associated Press]] (AP), li ngħata għar-ritratt tiegħu tal-[[protesti dwar il-mewt ta’ George Floyd]].

== Sports ==
=== Arti Marzjali === Fil-Ħonduras, jiġu pprattikati ħafna arti marzjali, bħal Karate, Taekwondo, Judo, Kung Fu, Lima Lama, u sports ta' kuntatt bħal Kempo, Boxing, Kickboxing, u Muay Thai (Thai Boxing). It-Tai Chi qed jiġi introdott ukoll bħalissa. Storikament, il-Karate kien l-aktar mifrux nazzjonalment, għalkemm il-Kempo esperjenza tkabbir sinifikanti f'dawn l-aħħar snin. Il-Muay Thai żviluppa malajr f'dawn l-aħħar snin u kiseb popolarità konsiderevoli fil-Ħonduras. Teófimo López sar l-ewwel champion dinji Honduran fil-boxing professjonali; bħalissa għandu t-titlu dinji WBO fid-diviżjoni super lightweight.


=== Ċess fil-Ħonduras ===
Iċ-ċess professjonali fil-Ħonduras beda fl-1973 bit-twaqqif tas-San Pedro Sula Chess League. Il-Federazzjoni Nazzjonali taċ-Ċess twaqqfet fl-1993. Fl-2004, Ricardo Urbina sar l-ewwel Master Internazzjonali taċ-ċess fil-Ħonduras, u sal-lum għadu l-uniku plejer li għandu t-titlu ta' Master Internazzjonali fil-pajjiż.


=== Għawm ===
L-għawm huwa sport popolari fil-Honduras, b'diversi faċilitajiet bħall-Kumpless José Simón Azcona (Villaġġ Olimpiku, Tegucigalpa), Cybex, u l-Klabb tal-Bank Ċentrali tal-Ħonduras (BCH).

Il-Ħonduras ipparteċipa f’bosta avvenimenti sportivi tal-Amerika Ċentrali u tal-Karibew u kien rappreżentat ukoll fil-Logħob Olimpiku mill-għawwiema Allan Gutiérrez, Karen Vilorio, u Sara Pastrana.

It-timijiet tagħhom huma:
* Tiburones de Honduras (Sharks tal-Honduras)

* Delfines Mayas (Dniefel Maya)

* Delfines Sampedranos (Dniefel ta' San Pedro Sula)

* Delfines Inmude (Dniefel Inmude)

* Cybex

* Ranas Azules (Żrinġijiet Blu)

* Estrellas Marinas (Stilel tal-Baħar)

=== Futbol === 
Il-futbol huwa l-aktar sport popolari fil-pajjiż. Il-Lega Nazzjonali tal-Futbol tal-Honduras, b'logħbiet li jintlagħbu kull ġimgħa, għandha numru kbir ta' segwaċi. L-aqwa rappreżentant internazzjonali tal-pajjiż huwa t-tim nazzjonali tal-futbol tal-Honduras, li kkwalifika għal tliet Tazzi tad-Dinja (1982, 2010, u 2014). Serva wkoll bħala trampolina għal ħafna mill-plejers tiegħu biex jilħqu kampjonati ewlenin madwar id-dinja. Sport importanti ieħor li jintlagħab fil-pajjiż jinkludi l-baseball, il-basketball, l-atletika, u l-volleyball. It-tennis tal-mejda jintlagħab ukoll, fost oħrajn, fuq skala iżgħar. Mauricio Dubón huwa plejer tal-baseball tal-Honduras li jilgħab fl-outfield għall-Houston Astros tal-Major League Baseball (MLB) u huwa l-ewwel Honduras li rebaħ is-Serje Dinjija tal-2022.

Il-futbol Amerikan jintlagħab ukoll fil-Honduras. Għalkemm m'hemm l-ebda kampjonat professjonali, l-isport għandu tradizzjoni qawwija fil-kulleġġ, u ż-żoni urbani għandhom numru kbir ta' timijiet taż-żgħażagħ. Il-Federazzjoni Nazzjonali tal-Futbol Amerikan tal-Ħonduras (FENAFAH), li ilha affiljata mal-konfederazzjoni sportiva awtonoma tal-Ħonduras, CONDEPAH, minn Jannar 2007, ġiet rikonoxxuta uffiċjalment mill-Kungress Nazzjonali mill-2002. L-ogħla livell ta’ kompetizzjoni tal-futbol Amerikan fil-Ħonduras huwa fil-livell kolleġġjali, li jintlagħab permezz tat-Troyanos American Football League, maħluqa fl-2002. Mill-1944 sal-1951, Steve Van Buren sar l-ewwel Ħonduran li lagħab professjonalment fil-National Football League, mal-Philadelphia Eagles.

== Referenzi ==
{{Referenzi}}

{{Amerika ta' Fuq}}
{{Amerika Ċentrali}}

[[Kategorija:Ħonduras]]
[[Kategorija:Pajjiżi tal-Karibew]]
[[Kategorija:Pajjiżi fl-Amerika Ċentrali]]


== Referenzi ==
{{Referenzi}}

{{Amerika ta' Fuq}}
{{Amerika Ċentrali}}

[[Kategorija:Ħonduras]]
[[Kategorija:Pajjiżi tal-Karibew]]
[[Kategorija:Pajjiżi fl-Amerika Ċentrali]]</text>
      <sha1>4waa1w28iq5adfh431xr3pzzoqxfgr9</sha1>
    </revision>
  </page>
  <page>
    <title>Leo Brincat</title>
    <ns>0</ns>
    <id>23454</id>
    <revision>
      <id>330238</id>
      <parentid>313208</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:19:22Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330238</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="2134" sha1="8fnrcpb2a9xc3bvoxtpvqe2rd7sjqrs" xml:space="preserve">{{wikifikazzjoni}}
{{L-ewwel bil-Malti}}
'''Leo Brincat''' (Bormla, 26 ta' Settembru 1949) kien [[Ministru tal-Finanzi]] bejn l-1997 u l-1998 u Ministru tal-Ambjent bejn l-2013 u 2016. Fl-2016 kien maħtur bħala l-Membru Malti tal-Qorti Ewropea tal-Awdituri.

Bin Pawlu u Carmen imwielda Attard, studja l-Liċeo bejn l-1959 u l-1964; u l-Business Studies fl-MCAST fl-1965.

== Politika ==
Fl-1976, huwa daħal fl-Eżekuttiv tal-Partit Laburista u bejn l-1977-1981 kien Uffiċjal tal-Propaganda tal-Partit. Mill-1978 sal-1981 kien President tal-Partit u Segretarju Internazzjonali, sa mill-1982.

Huwa kien elett Membru tal-Parlament f'isem il-Partit Laburista fl-1982. Mill-1982 sal-1983 kien membru tad-Delegazzjoni għall-Kunsill tal-Ewropa. Fl-aħħar sena ta' Gvern Laburista mmexxi minn Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici kien maħtur Segretarju Parlamentari għad-Djar (1986-1987).

Kien rappreżentant tal-Partit fis-Socialist International. 

Huwa reġa' kien elett fl-elezzjonijiet tal-1987, 1992 u 1996.

Sa mill-1992 kien il-Kelliem tal-Oppożizzjoni għat-Turiżmu. 

Kien chairman tal-Interprint Ltd, u Direttur tal-Medigrain. Kien Direttur tal-Libyan-Arab Maltese Holding Company. Kien Kap tar-Research &amp; Advisory Unit tal-Mid-Med Bank.

Fl-1997, serva bħala Ministru tal-Finanzi. 

Fil-leġislatura 2008-2013, huwa kien il-Kelliem Ewlieni għall-Oppożizzjoni għall-Ambjent. Barra dan kien responsabbli ukoll minn Enerġija Alternattiva u Waste Managment. Kien ukoll chairman tal-Kumitat tal-Kontijiet Pubbliċi. 

Fl-elezzjoni tal-2013 kkontesta fuq żewġ distretti d-disa' u l-għaxar distrett. Huwa kien elett mid-disa' distrett fejn fl-ewwel għadd kiseb 2,275 vot. F'Marzu 2013, huwa kien maħtur Ministru tal-Ambjent, l-Iżvilupp Sostenibbli u t-Tibdil fil-Klima.

== Ħajja Personali ==
Huwa jikteb artikli ta' analiżi politika barranija, iħobb jaqra bijografiji politiċi, u jsegwi mużika kontemporanja.

Huwa żżewweġ lil Patricia fl-1974, u għandu tifla waħda, Erika.

{{DEFAULTSORT:Brincat, Leo}}
[[Kategorija:Politiċi tal-Partit Laburista (Malta)]]
[[Kategorija:Nies ħajjin]]
[[Kategorija:Twieldu fl-1949]]</text>
      <sha1>8fnrcpb2a9xc3bvoxtpvqe2rd7sjqrs</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330239</id>
      <parentid>330238</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:19:39Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330239</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="2138" sha1="of5sd06ge48kly8wlnlsucz5i2638oz" xml:space="preserve">{{wikifikazzjoni}}
{{L-ewwel bil-Malti}}
'''Leo Brincat''' (Bormla, 26 ta' Settembru 1949) kien [[Ministru tal-Finanzi]] bejn l-1997 u l-1998 u Ministru tal-Ambjent bejn l-2013 u 2016. Fl-2016 kien maħtur bħala l-Membru Malti [[tal-Qorti Ewropea tal-Awdituri]].

Bin Pawlu u Carmen imwielda Attard, studja l-Liċeo bejn l-1959 u l-1964; u l-Business Studies fl-MCAST fl-1965.

== Politika ==
Fl-1976, huwa daħal fl-Eżekuttiv tal-Partit Laburista u bejn l-1977-1981 kien Uffiċjal tal-Propaganda tal-Partit. Mill-1978 sal-1981 kien President tal-Partit u Segretarju Internazzjonali, sa mill-1982.

Huwa kien elett Membru tal-Parlament f'isem il-Partit Laburista fl-1982. Mill-1982 sal-1983 kien membru tad-Delegazzjoni għall-Kunsill tal-Ewropa. Fl-aħħar sena ta' Gvern Laburista mmexxi minn Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici kien maħtur Segretarju Parlamentari għad-Djar (1986-1987).

Kien rappreżentant tal-Partit fis-Socialist International. 

Huwa reġa' kien elett fl-elezzjonijiet tal-1987, 1992 u 1996.

Sa mill-1992 kien il-Kelliem tal-Oppożizzjoni għat-Turiżmu. 

Kien chairman tal-Interprint Ltd, u Direttur tal-Medigrain. Kien Direttur tal-Libyan-Arab Maltese Holding Company. Kien Kap tar-Research &amp; Advisory Unit tal-Mid-Med Bank.

Fl-1997, serva bħala Ministru tal-Finanzi. 

Fil-leġislatura 2008-2013, huwa kien il-Kelliem Ewlieni għall-Oppożizzjoni għall-Ambjent. Barra dan kien responsabbli ukoll minn Enerġija Alternattiva u Waste Managment. Kien ukoll chairman tal-Kumitat tal-Kontijiet Pubbliċi. 

Fl-elezzjoni tal-2013 kkontesta fuq żewġ distretti d-disa' u l-għaxar distrett. Huwa kien elett mid-disa' distrett fejn fl-ewwel għadd kiseb 2,275 vot. F'Marzu 2013, huwa kien maħtur Ministru tal-Ambjent, l-Iżvilupp Sostenibbli u t-Tibdil fil-Klima.

== Ħajja Personali ==
Huwa jikteb artikli ta' analiżi politika barranija, iħobb jaqra bijografiji politiċi, u jsegwi mużika kontemporanja.

Huwa żżewweġ lil Patricia fl-1974, u għandu tifla waħda, Erika.

{{DEFAULTSORT:Brincat, Leo}}
[[Kategorija:Politiċi tal-Partit Laburista (Malta)]]
[[Kategorija:Nies ħajjin]]
[[Kategorija:Twieldu fl-1949]]</text>
      <sha1>of5sd06ge48kly8wlnlsucz5i2638oz</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330240</id>
      <parentid>330239</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:20:03Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330240</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="2152" sha1="dk0hr3q7aaf7li06kk4cbrg75byxdms" xml:space="preserve">{{wikifikazzjoni}}
{{L-ewwel bil-Malti}}
'''Leo Brincat''' (Bormla, 26 ta' Settembru 1949) kien [[Ministru tal-Finanzi]] bejn l-1997 u l-1998 u Ministru tal-Ambjent bejn l-2013 u 2016. Fl-2016 kien maħtur bħala l-Membru Malti [[tal-Qorti Ewropea tal-Awdituri]].

Bin Pawlu u Carmen imwielda [[Ħ'Attard|Attard]], studja l-Liċeo bejn l-1959 u l-1964; u l-Business Studies fl-MCAST fl-1965.

== Politika ==
Fl-1976, huwa daħal fl-Eżekuttiv tal-Partit Laburista u bejn l-1977-1981 kien Uffiċjal tal-Propaganda tal-Partit. Mill-1978 sal-1981 kien President tal-Partit u Segretarju Internazzjonali, sa mill-1982.

Huwa kien elett Membru tal-Parlament f'isem il-Partit Laburista fl-1982. Mill-1982 sal-1983 kien membru tad-Delegazzjoni għall-Kunsill tal-Ewropa. Fl-aħħar sena ta' Gvern Laburista mmexxi minn Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici kien maħtur Segretarju Parlamentari għad-Djar (1986-1987).

Kien rappreżentant tal-Partit fis-Socialist International. 

Huwa reġa' kien elett fl-elezzjonijiet tal-1987, 1992 u 1996.

Sa mill-1992 kien il-Kelliem tal-Oppożizzjoni għat-Turiżmu. 

Kien chairman tal-Interprint Ltd, u Direttur tal-Medigrain. Kien Direttur tal-Libyan-Arab Maltese Holding Company. Kien Kap tar-Research &amp; Advisory Unit tal-Mid-Med Bank.

Fl-1997, serva bħala Ministru tal-Finanzi. 

Fil-leġislatura 2008-2013, huwa kien il-Kelliem Ewlieni għall-Oppożizzjoni għall-Ambjent. Barra dan kien responsabbli ukoll minn Enerġija Alternattiva u Waste Managment. Kien ukoll chairman tal-Kumitat tal-Kontijiet Pubbliċi. 

Fl-elezzjoni tal-2013 kkontesta fuq żewġ distretti d-disa' u l-għaxar distrett. Huwa kien elett mid-disa' distrett fejn fl-ewwel għadd kiseb 2,275 vot. F'Marzu 2013, huwa kien maħtur Ministru tal-Ambjent, l-Iżvilupp Sostenibbli u t-Tibdil fil-Klima.

== Ħajja Personali ==
Huwa jikteb artikli ta' analiżi politika barranija, iħobb jaqra bijografiji politiċi, u jsegwi mużika kontemporanja.

Huwa żżewweġ lil Patricia fl-1974, u għandu tifla waħda, Erika.

{{DEFAULTSORT:Brincat, Leo}}
[[Kategorija:Politiċi tal-Partit Laburista (Malta)]]
[[Kategorija:Nies ħajjin]]
[[Kategorija:Twieldu fl-1949]]</text>
      <sha1>dk0hr3q7aaf7li06kk4cbrg75byxdms</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330241</id>
      <parentid>330240</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:20:26Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330241</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="2160" sha1="9wzwqcpx5qn7xq9w6m3yv6gfixocrgp" xml:space="preserve">{{wikifikazzjoni}}
{{L-ewwel bil-Malti}}
'''Leo Brincat''' (Bormla, 26 ta' Settembru 1949) kien [[Ministru tal-Finanzi]] bejn l-1997 u l-1998 u Ministru tal-Ambjent bejn l-2013 u 2016. Fl-2016 kien maħtur bħala l-Membru Malti [[tal-Qorti Ewropea tal-Awdituri]].

Bin Pawlu u Carmen imwielda [[Ħ'Attard|Attard]], studja l-Liċeo bejn l-1959 u l-1964; u l-Business Studies fl-MCAST fl-1965.

== Politika ==
Fl-1976, huwa daħal fl-Eżekuttiv tal-Partit [[Laburista]] u bejn l-1977-1981 kien Uffiċjal tal-Propaganda tal-Partit. Mill-1978 sal-1981 kien President tal-Partit u Segretarju Internazzjonali, sa mill-1982.

Huwa kien elett Membru tal-Parlament f'isem il-Partit Laburista fl-1982. Mill-1982 sal-1983 kien membru tad-Delegazzjoni għall-Kunsill tal-Ewropa. Fl-aħħar sena ta' Gvern Laburista mmexxi minn Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici kien maħtur Segretarju Parlamentari għad-Djar (1986-1987).

Kien rappreżentant tal-Partit fis-[[Socialist International]]. 

Huwa reġa' kien elett fl-elezzjonijiet tal-1987, 1992 u 1996.

Sa mill-1992 kien il-Kelliem tal-Oppożizzjoni għat-Turiżmu. 

Kien chairman tal-Interprint Ltd, u Direttur tal-Medigrain. Kien Direttur tal-Libyan-Arab Maltese Holding Company. Kien Kap tar-Research &amp; Advisory Unit tal-Mid-Med Bank.

Fl-1997, serva bħala Ministru tal-Finanzi. 

Fil-leġislatura 2008-2013, huwa kien il-Kelliem Ewlieni għall-Oppożizzjoni għall-Ambjent. Barra dan kien responsabbli ukoll minn Enerġija Alternattiva u Waste Managment. Kien ukoll chairman tal-Kumitat tal-Kontijiet Pubbliċi. 

Fl-elezzjoni tal-2013 kkontesta fuq żewġ distretti d-disa' u l-għaxar distrett. Huwa kien elett mid-disa' distrett fejn fl-ewwel għadd kiseb 2,275 vot. F'Marzu 2013, huwa kien maħtur Ministru tal-Ambjent, l-Iżvilupp Sostenibbli u t-Tibdil fil-Klima.

== Ħajja Personali ==
Huwa jikteb artikli ta' analiżi politika barranija, iħobb jaqra bijografiji politiċi, u jsegwi mużika kontemporanja.

Huwa żżewweġ lil Patricia fl-1974, u għandu tifla waħda, Erika.

{{DEFAULTSORT:Brincat, Leo}}
[[Kategorija:Politiċi tal-Partit Laburista (Malta)]]
[[Kategorija:Nies ħajjin]]
[[Kategorija:Twieldu fl-1949]]</text>
      <sha1>9wzwqcpx5qn7xq9w6m3yv6gfixocrgp</sha1>
    </revision>
  </page>
  <page>
    <title>Maria Pronchishcheva</title>
    <ns>0</ns>
    <id>24996</id>
    <revision>
      <id>330234</id>
      <parentid>282073</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T00:00:25Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Nyuhn</username>
        <id>28117</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330234</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="1519" sha1="gackkpxwf6p4bpg1t99uf66740o0qff" xml:space="preserve">{{Infobox bijografija}}
'''Tatiana Fyodorovna Pronchishcheva''' (bir-[[Lingwa Russa|Russu]]: Татьяна Прончищева; twieldet qabel l-1713 – mietet fit-23 ta' Settembru 1736), magħrufa wkoll bħala '''Maria Pronchishcheva''', kienet esploratriċi [[Russja|Russa]]. 

Fl-1735 mar-raġel tagħha, [[Vasili Pronchishchev]], niżlet ix-[[Xmara Lena]] minn [[Yakutsk]] fuq dgħajsa żgħira bil-qlugħ. Huma waqfu għax-xitwa fil-bokka tax-[[Xmara Olenek]]. Ħafna membri tal-ekwipaġġ mardu u mietu, l-aktar minħabba l-[[qrugħ]]. Minkejja d-diffikultajiet, fl-1736, huma laħqu x-xatt tal-Lvant tal-[[Peniżola Taymyr]] u marru fit-Tramuntana tul il-kosta tagħha. Fl-aħħar Pronchishcheva u r-raġel tagħha ċedew għall-iskorbutu u mietu fit-triq lura.&lt;ref&gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20041227081456/http://www.vor.ru/Events/program9.html Historical data]&lt;/ref&gt; 

Tatiana hija meqjusa bħala l-ewwel esploratur polari femminili. Il-[[Bajja Pronchishcheva]] fil-[[Baħar Laptev]] hija msemmi għaliha. 

[[Stampa:Могила_прончищевых_1921.jpg|daqsminuri|250px| Stampa tal-1921 tas-sit tad-dfin ta' Vasili u Tatiana Pronchishchev f'[[Ust-Olenyok]]. Il-qabar tmexxa wara li l-iġsma ġew exhumati fl-1999.&lt;ref&gt;[http://www.shparo.com/proncheshev/proncheshev_overview.htm Burial site excavations]&lt;/ref&gt;]]

== Referenzi ==
{{referenzi}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Pronchishcheva, Tatiana}}
[[Kategorija:Twieldu fl-1710]]
[[Kategorija:Mietu fl-1736]]
[[Kategorija:Nies Russi]]
[[Kategorija:Esploraturi]]</text>
      <sha1>gackkpxwf6p4bpg1t99uf66740o0qff</sha1>
    </revision>
  </page>
  <page>
    <title>Utent:Trigcly</title>
    <ns>2</ns>
    <id>25623</id>
    <revision>
      <id>330227</id>
      <parentid>330206</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-26T13:01:22Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Trigcly</username>
        <id>17859</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>aġġornament</comment>
      <origin>330227</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="59161" sha1="6cjoc1cqjkqt7992lkbvuc0wqg8u5rv" xml:space="preserve">== '''Artikli ġodda (2004)''' ==

=== &lt;u&gt;'''A'''&lt;/u&gt; ===

* [[Aapravasi Ghat]]
* [[Aasivissuit-Nipisat: Territorju tal-Kaċċa tal-Inuit bejn is-Silġ u l-Baħar]]
* [[Abbazija ta' Corvey]]
* [[Abbazija ta' Fontenay]]
* [[Abbazija ta' Lorsch]]
* [[Abbazija ta' Pannonhalma]]
*[[Abbazija ta' Saint-Savin-sur-Gartempe]]
*[[Abbazija ta' Sankt Gallen]]
*[[Abbazija ta’ Vézelay|Abbazija ta' Vezelay]]
*[[Abu al-Fida]]
*[[Abu Mena]]
*[[Abu Simbel]]
*[[Ċentru Storiku ta' Acre|Acre]]
*[[Afag Bashirgyzy]]
*[[Aflaj tal-Oman]]
*[[Afrodisja]]
*[[Agadez]]
*[[Agostino Carracci]]
*[[Agostino Matrenza]]
*[[Ahwar tan-Nofsinhar tal-Iraq]]
*[[Aigai]]
*[[Aït Benhaddou]]
*[[Akkwedott ta' Padre Tembleque]]
*[[Akkwedott ta' Pontcysyllte]]
*[[Akshata Murthy]]
*[[Aksum]]
*[[Al Qal'a ta' Beni Hammad]]
*[[Al Zubarah]]
*[[Al-Maghtas]]
*[[Alatyr]]
*[[Albéric Magnard]]
*[[Alberobello]]
*[[Albi]]
*[[Alcalá de Henares]]
*[[Alcide d'Orbigny]]
*[[Aleksandr Yakovlevich Khinchin]]
*[[Alenush Terian]]
*[[Aleppo]]
*[[Alessandro Scarlatti]]
*[[Alessandro Volta]]
*[[Alexander Pushkin]]
*[[Alexander Wolszczan]]
*[[Aleksandra Smiljanić]]
*[[Alfred Hermann Fried]]
*[[Alfred Nobel]]
*[[Alfredo Casella]]
*[[Alois Dryák]]
*[[Alto Douro]]
*[[Amazigh Marokkin Standard]]
*[[Ambohimanga]]
*[[Ambra Sabatini]]
*[[Amerigo Vespucci]]
*[[Amerigo Vespucci (vapur għoli)|''Amerigo Vespucci'' (vapur għoli)]]
* [[L-Amerika t'Isfel|Amerka t’Isfel]]

* [[L-Amerika ta' Fuq|Amerka ta’ Fuq]]
*[[Amilcare Ponchielli]]
*[[Anastasia Golovina]]
*[[Anders Jonas Ångström]]
*[[André Citroën]]
*[[André Weil]]
*[[Anfibju]]
*[[Anfiteatru ta' El Jem]]
*[[Angelina Mango]]
* [[Angkor Wat]]
* [[Angra do Heroísmo]]
* [[Ani]]
* [[Anjar]]
* [[Anna Brigadere]]
* [[Anna Kyriakou]]
*[[Anna Seghers]]
*[[Anna Sychravová]]
*[[Anne-Sophie Mutter]]
*[[Anse aux Meadows]]
* [[Antartika]]
* [[Anticosti]]
* [[Antigua Guatemala]]
*[[Antoine de Jussieu]]
*[[Antoine de Saint-Exupéry]]
*[[Antoinette Miggiani]]
*[[Anton Diabelli]]
*[[Anuradhapura]]
*[[Aplogruppi Y-DNA fit-tribujiet tal-Każakistan]]
*[[Aporofobija]]
*[[Aquileia]]
*[[Arċipelagu ta' Bijagós]]
*[[Arċipelagu ta' Revillagigedo]]
*[[Arċipelagu ta' Vega]]
*[[Arena Tettonika Żvizzera ta' Sardona]]
*[[Arequipa]]
*[[Arġentier]]
*[[Arġentier (tad-deheb)]]
*[[Ark Ġeodetiku ta’ Struve|Ark Ġeodetiku ta' Struve]]
*[[Arkata Trijonfali ta' Orange]]
*[[Arkeoloġija]]
*[[Arkitett]]
*[[Arkitettura Mudéjar ta' Aragona]]
*[[Arkitettura tas-Seklu 20 ta' Frank Lloyd Wright]]
*[[Arles]]
*[[Armata tat-Terrakotta]]
*[[Arslantepe]]
*[[Art tal-Inċens]]
*[[Arthur Schnitzler]]
*[[Arti Paleolitika fl-Għerien tat-Tramuntana ta' Spanja]]
*[[Artiġjan]]
*[[Artijiet Għoljin Ċentrali tas-Sri Lanka]]
*[[As-Salt]]
*[[Asmara]]
* [[Assisi]]
* [[Assi Ċentrali ta' Beijing]]
* [[Assur]]
* [[Astrofiżika]]
*[[Asuman Baytop]]
*[[Athos]]
*[[Attrazzjonijiet Ewlenin tar-Renju Antik ta' Saba f'Marib]]
*[[Auschwitz]]
*[[Austin Camilleri]]
*[[Ávila]]
*[[Avukat]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;B&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Baalbek]]
* [[Babilonja]]
* [[Baċir tal-Lag ta' Uvs]]
* [[Baċir tax-Xogħol fil-Minjieri ta' Nord-Pas de Calais]]
* [[Baeza]]
* [[Bagan]]
* [[Baħar l-Abjad]]
* [[Baħar l-Iswed]]
*[[Baħar ta' Wadden]]
*[[Baħar tar-Ramel tan-Namibja]]
*[[Bajja ta' Dungonab]]
*[[Bajja ta' Ha Long]]
*[[Bajja ta' Tallinn]]
*[[Bajja tal-Klieb il-Baħar]]
*[[Bajjad]]
*[[Baleron]]
*[[Bamberg]]
*[[Ban Chiang]]
*[[Banská Štiavnica]]
*[[Barbier]]
*[[Bardejov]]
*[[Barokk]]
*[[Bartolomé de Escobedo]]
*[[Bath, Somerset]]
*[[Batlejka]]
*[[Battaljun Mediku tal-Ospedalieri]]
*[[Battir]]
*[[Bauhaus u s-Siti tal-Moviment f'Weimar, f'Dessau u f'Bernau]]
*[[Baxkortostan]]
*[[Bażi tad-Data tal-Osservazzjoni tal-Kometi]]
*[[Bażilika Ewfrasjana ta’ Poreč|Bażilika Ewfrasjana ta' Poreč]]
*[[Bażilika ta' San Eġidju]]
*[[Beatriz Carrillo]]
*[[Beemster]]
*[[Béguinage]]
*[[Belintersat-1]]
*[[BelKA]]
*[[Belt Bajda ta' Tel Aviv – il-Moviment Modern]]
*[[Belt Kolonjali ta' Santo Domingo]]
*[[Belt Projbita]]
*[[Belt Storika ta' Ahmadabad]]
*[[Belt Storika tal-Kajr]]
*[[Belt Storika tal-Moskej ta' Bagerhat]]
*[[Belt ta' Guanajuato]]
*[[Belt ta' New York]]
*[[Belt ta' Vicenza u l-Vilel ta' Palladio fil-Veneto|Belt ta' Viċenza u l-Vilel ta' Palladio fil-Veneto]]
*[[Belt Universitarja ta' Caracas]]
*[[Bennej]]
*[[Berġa tal-Italja, il-Belt Valletta]]
*[[Berġa tal-Italja, il-Birgu]]
*[[Bergpark Wilhelmshöhe]]
*[[Bernard Grech]]
*[[Betlem]]
*[[Betti Alver]]
*[[Burkhan Khaldun]]
*[[Bidwi]]
*[[Bieb il-Belt]]
*[[Binjiet Gotiċi Vittorjani u tal-Art Deco ta' Mumbai]]
*[[Binjiet Tradizzjonali tal-Asante]]
*[[BirdLife International]]
*[[Blat Imkenni ta' Bhimbetka]]
*[[Bliet Antiki tal-Pyu]]
*[[Bliet Kapitali u Oqbra tar-Renju Antik ta' Koguryo]]
*[[Bliet Storiċi tal-Istrett ta' Malakka]]
*[[Bobby Charlton]]
*[[Bolgar]]
*[[Bordeaux]]
*[[Borobudur]]
*[[Borża ta' Malta]]
*[[Bosra]]
*[[Bridgetown]]
*[[Brook Taylor]]
*[[Brú na Bóinne]]
*[[Bruno Pizzul]]
*[[Bryggen]]
*[[Bucha]]
*[[Buddha Ġgantesk ta' Leshan]]
*[[Bugeddum Armen]]
*[[Bukhara]]
*[[Burt Bacharach]]
*[[Buskett]]
*[[Butrint]]
*[[Byblos]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;Ċ/C&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Cáceres (Spanja)]]
* [[Calakmul]]
* [[Camagüey]]
* [[Camino Real de Tierra Adentro]]
* [[Campeche]]
* [[Canal du Midi]]
* [[Canaletto]]
* [[Caral]]
* [[Carcassonne]]
*[[Carl Bosch]]
*[[Carl David Anderson]]
*[[Carl Linnaeus]]
*[[Carla Fracci]]
*[[Carlo Collodi]]
*[[Caroline Mikkelsen]]
*[[Casco Viejo, il-Panama]]
*[[Castel del Monte, Puglia]]
*[[Çatalhöyük]]
*[[Causses u Cévennes]]
*[[Ċellola]]
*[[Ċensu Apap]]
*[[Ċentru Kulturali ta' Heydar Aliyev]]
*[[Ċentru Storiku ta' Lijiang]]
*[[Ċentru Storiku ta' Macao]]
*[[Ċentru Storiku ta' Rauma]]
*[[Ċentru Storiku ta' Salvador de Bahia]]
*[[Český Krumlov]]
*[[Ċetta Chevalier]]
*[[Chaîne des Puys]]
*[[Chakapuli]]
*[[Chan Chan]]
*[[Changdeokgung]]
*[[Chankillo]]
*[[Charles Jean de la Vallée-Poussin]]
*[[Charles-Amédée-Philippe van Loo]]
*[[Charles Nicolle]]
*[[Charles Richter]]
*[[Charles Xuereb]]
*[[Charlie Watts]]
*[[Chavín]]
*[[Choeung Ek]]
*[[Chersonesus Tawrika]]
*[[Chichén Itzá]]
*[[Chilehaus]]
*[[Choirokoitia]]
*[[Christiansfeld]]
*[[Christopher Polhem]]
*[[Chun Wang]]
*[[Cidade Velha]]
*[[Cienfuegos]]
*[[Ċikli ta' affreski tas-seklu 14 ta' Padova]]
*[[Cinque Terre]]
*[[Ċirkewwa]]
*[[Ċittadella Imperjali ta' Thăng Long]]
*[[Ċittadella ta' Erbil]]
*[[Ċittadella tad-Dinastija Hồ]]
*[[Claude Joseph Rouget de Lisle]]
*[[Climats u Terroirs ta' Bourgogne]]
*[[Colonia del Sacramento]]
*[[Copan]]
*[[Córdoba, Spanja]]
*[[Coro]]
*[[Crespi d'Adda]]
*[[Ċrieki tal-Ġebel tas-Senegambja]]
*[[Cristofano Allori]]
*[[Cuenca, l-Ekwador]]
*[[Cuenca (Spanja)]]
*[[Cueva de las Manos]]
*[[Cumalıkızık]]
*[[Curzio Maltese]]
*[[Cusco]]
*[[Cynthia Turner]]
*[[Cyrene]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;D&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Daiga Mieriņa]]
* [[Damasku]]
* [[Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit]]
* [[Danxia]]
*[[Dar ta’ Rietveld Schröder|Dar ta' Rietveld Schröder]]
*[[Dar tal-Kimeri]]
*[[Dar tat-Twelid ta' Martin Luteru]]
*[[Dar u Studjo ta' Luis Barragán]]
*[[Delos]]
*[[Delphi]]
*[[Delta ta' Saloum]]
*[[Delta ta' Okavango]]
*[[Delta tad-Danubju]]
*[[Delta tax-xmara Kızılırmak]]
*[[Demokrazija]]
*[[Dengfeng]]
*[[Dentist]]
*[[Denys Shmyhal]]
*[[Déodat Gratet de Dolomieu]]
*[[Deżert ta' Badain Jaran]]
*[[Deżert ta' Lut]]
*[[Deżerta tal-isfarġel]]
*[[Dholavira]]
*[[Diamantina]]
*[[Diana, Prinċipessa ta' Wales]]
*[[Diaolou]]
*[[Diga ta' Karakaya]]
*[[Dikjarazzjoni tal-Indipendenza tal-Ukrajna]]
*[[Dimitrana Ivanova]]
*[[Distrett ta' At-Turaif]]
*[[Diy-Gid-Biy]]
*[[Dizzjunarju]]
*[[Djalett]]
*[[Djar Ewlenin ta' Victor Horta fi Brussell]]
*[[Djémila]]
*[[Djerba]]
*[[DNA]]
*[[Dolċier]]
*[[Dolmen ta' Menga]]
*[[Dolmen ta' Viera]]
*[[Dolomiti]]
*[[Domenico Allegri]]
*[[Domenico Scarlatti]]
*[[Domowina]]
*[[Domus de Janas]]
*[[Domus Rumana]]
*[[Donatello]]
*[[Dougga]]
*[[Draginja Vuksanović-Stanković]]
*[[Dubrovnik]]
*[[Durmitor]]
* [[Dwejra]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;E&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Edgar Preca]]
* [[Edward Sexton]]
* [[Edinburgu]]
* [[Edward de Bono]]
* [[Edwin Hubble]]
* [[Efesu]]
* [[Eise Eisinga]]
*[[Ekonomista]]
*[[Ekosistema u Relitt tal-Pajsaġġ Kulturali ta' Lopé-Okanda]]
*[[El Escorial]]
*[[El Jadida]]
*[[El Tajin]]
*[[El Torcal]]
*[[Eladio Dieste]]
*[[Eleonora Jenko Groyer]]
*[[Elisha Graves Otis]]
*[[Elvas]]
*[[Emil Nolde]]
*[[Emma Andrijewska]]
*[[Emma Muscat]]
*[[Ernst Schröder]]
*[[Esperantoloġija]]
*[[Essaouira]]
*[[Estrazzjoni terminoloġika]]
*[[Ethel Anderson]]
*[[Eugenija Šimkūnaitė]]
*[[Eugenio Montale]]
*[[Eva Ahnert-Rohlfs]]
*[[Evelyn Bonaci]]
*[[Évora]]
*[[Ewropa tal-Lvant]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;F&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Fabbrika ta' Fagus]]
* [[Fabbrika ta' Van Nelle]]
* [[Fabbrika tal-Azzar ta' Völklingen]]
* [[Fabbrika tal-Ħadid ta' Engelsberg]]
* [[Fabbrika tal-Ħarir ta' Tomioka]]
* [[Fabbrika tal-Injam u tal-Kartun ta' Verla]]
* [[Fabbriki tal-Wied ta' Derwent]]
* [[Fanal ta' Cordouan]]
* [[Fanjingshan]]
* [[Fasil Ghebbi]]
* [[Fatehpur Sikri]]
* [[Fdalijiet Arkeoloġiċi ta' Moenjodaro]]
* [[Fdalijiet ta' Gedi]]
* [[Fdalijiet ta' León Viejo]]
* [[Fdalijiet ta' Loropéni]]
* [[Fdalijiet tal-Vihara Buddista f'Paharpur]]
* [[Fehme Agani]]
*[[Femminiżmu tar-Rom]]
*[[Fenno-Skandinavja]]
*[[Fernando Botero]]
*[[Ferrara]]
*[[Ferruccio Lamborghini]]
*[[Festival ta' Sanremo]]
*[[Fiera Internazzjonali ta' Rachid Karami f'Tripoli]]
*[[Figolla]]
*[[Firenze]]
*[[Fjord tas-Silġ ta' Ilulissat]]
*[[Fjords Norveġiżi tal-Punent]]
*[[Flora Martirosian]]
*[[Fondoq ta' Ironbridge]]
*[[Foresti Antiki u Primordjali tal-Fagu tal-Karpazji u ta' Reġjuni Oħra tal-Ewropa]]
*[[Foresti Irkanjani]]
*[[Foresti Muntanjużi ta' Odzala-Kokoua]]
*[[Foresti Sagri ta' Kaya tal-Mijikenda]]
*[[Foresti tas-Siġar tar-Rand ta' Madeira]]
*[[Foresti Tropikali ta' Gondwana]]
*[[Foresti Tropikali tal-Atsinanana]]
*[[Foresti Tropikali u Artijiet Mistagħdra Kolkiċi]]
*[[Foresti Verġni ta' Komi]]
*[[Formazzjonijiet u Għerien Karstiċi Evaporitiċi tar-Reġjun ta' Emilia Romagna]]
*[[Forti l-Aħmar]]
* [[Forti ta' Agra]]
*[[Forti ta' Bahla]]
*[[Forti ta' Galle]]
*[[Forti ta' Ġesù]]
*[[Forti ta' Rohtas]]
*[[Fortifikazzjonijiet fuq in-Naħa tal-Karibew tal-Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo]]
*[[Fortifikazzjonijiet ta’ Kotor|Fortifikazzjonijiet ta' Kotor]]
*[[Fortifikazzjonijiet ta' Vauban]]
*[[Fortijiet fl-Għoljiet ta' Rajasthan]]
*[[Fortijiet u Kastelli tal-Ghana]]
*[[Fortizza ta' Diyarbakır]]
*[[Fortizza ta' Hwaseong]]
*[[Fortizza ta' Pirot]]
*[[Fortizza ta' San Nikola]]
*[[Fortizza ta' Suomenlinna]]
*[[Fortizzi ta' Dacia fil-Muntanji Orăștie]]
*[[Fortizzi Tondi tal-Vikingi]]
*[[Foss ta' Messel]]
*[[Fotografu]]
*[[Francesco Guardi]]
*[[François-Alphonse Forel]]
*[[François Couperin]]
*[[François Girardon]]
*[[Francois Mauriac]]
*[[Franco Migliacci]]
*[[Franġisk Zahra]]
*[[Frank Drake]]
*[[Franz Beckenbauer]]
*[[Franz Kafka]]
*[[Franz Ritter von Hauer]]
*[[Franz von Suppé]]
*[[Frawla]]
*[[Fray Bentos]]
*[[Frédéric Bartholdi]]
*[[Friedrich Georg Wilhelm von Struve]]
*[[Fritz Albert Lipmann]]
*[[Frosta tal-Għid]]
* [[Frott]]
* [[Fruntieri Rumani Ġermaniċi t'Isfel]]
* [[Fruntieri Rumani ta' Dacia]]
* [[Fruntieri Rumani tad-Danubju]]
* [[Fruntieri tal-Imperu Ruman]]
*[[Fuji]]
*[[Furnar]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;Ġ&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Ġardinar]]
*[[Ġebla ta' Rosetta]]
* [[Ġebla tal-Ġeneral]]
* [[Ġeoloġija]]
* [[Ġeriko tal-Qedem]]
* [[Ġerusalemm]]
* [[Ġibjun ta' Bovilla]]
* [[Ġibjun ta' Kiev]]
* [[Ġnien Botaniku ta' Padova]]
* [[Ġnien Persjan]]
* [[Ġobon ta' Jāņi]]
* [[Ġonna Botaniċi Rjali ta' Kew]]
* [[Ġonna Botaniċi ta' Singapore]]
* [[Ġonna Klassiċi ta' Suzhou]]
* [[Ġonna ta' Hevsel]]
* [[Ġonna ta' Shalimar]]
*[[Ġurnalist]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;G&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Gammelstad]]
* [[Gamzigrad]]
* [[Gati tal-Punent]]
* [[Gebel Barkal]]
* [[Geirangerfjord]]
* [[Genova: It-Toroq Ġodda u s-Sistema tal-Palazzi tal-Listi]]
*[[Georg Ohm]]
*[[Georg von Békésy]]
*[[George Gallup]]
*[[Georges Bernanos]]
*[[Georges J.F. Kohler]]
*[[Gerbrand van den Eeckhout]]
*[[Getbol, il-Pjanuri tal-Marea tal-Korea t'Isfel]]
*[[Ghadamès]]
*[[Giacomo Barozzi da Vignola]]
*[[Giacomo Zanella]]
*[[Giampiero Galeazzi]]
*[[Gianni Vella]]
*[[Gigi Riva]]
*[[Giorgia Meloni]]
*[[Giorgio Vasari]]
*[[Giosuè Carducci]]
*[[Giotto]]
*[[Giovanni Arduino]]
*[[Giovanni Battista Belzoni]]
*[[Giovanni Boccaccio]]
*[[Giovanni Paisiello]]
*[[Giovanni Papini]]
*[[Giulio Natta]]
*[[Gjirokastër]]
*[[Glossarju]]
*[[Göbekli Tepe]]
*[[Goffredo Mameli]]
*[[Goiás]]
*[[Golf ta' California]]
*[[Golf ta' Porto]]
*[[Gonbad-e Qābus]]
*[[Gordion]]
*[[Gösta Mittag-Leffler]]
*[[Gotiku]]
*[[Gozinaki]]
*[[Gran Ordni tar-Re Tomislav]]
*[[Grand Pré]]
*[[Grand-Bassam]]
*[[Grand Place, Brussell]]
*[[Graz]]
*[[Grazia Deledda]]
*[[Greenland]]
*[[Gregorio Allegri]]
*[[Gremxula ta' Malta]]
*[[Grotta ta' Chauvet]]
*[[Grotti ta' Longmen]]
*[[Grotti ta' Yungang]]
*[[Grupp ta' Monumenti ta' Khajuraho]]
*[[Grupp ta' Monumenti ta' Mahabalipuram]]
*[[Guillaume Cornelis van Beverloo]]
*[[Guimarães]]
*[[Gustave Charpentier]]
* [[Gżejjer Eolji]]
* [[Gżejjer Falkland]]
* [[Gżejjer Galapagos]]
* [[Gżejjer Marquesas]]
* [[Gżejjer Solovetsky]]
* [[Gżejjer Sub-Antartiċi ta' New Zealand]]
* [[Gżejjer ta' Amami-Ōshima, ta' Tokunoshima u ta' Iriomote, u t-Tramuntana ta' Okinawa]]
* [[Gżejjer ta' Ogasawara]]
* [[Gżejjer tal-Blat]]
* [[Gżejjer tal-Qroll ta' Aldabra]]
* [[Gżejjer tal-Qroll ta' Bikini]]
* [[Gżejjer tal-Qroll ta' Rocas]]
* [[Gżejjer tan-Nofsinhar u Ibħra Awstrali Franċiżi]]
* [[Gżira Heard u l-Gżejjer McDonald]]
* [[Gżira Inaċċessibbli]]
* [[Gżira Sagra ta' Okinoshima u Siti Assoċjati fir-Reġjun ta' Munakata]]
* [[Gżira ta' Cocos]]
* [[Gżira ta' Fraser]]
* [[Gżira ta' Gorée]]
* [[Gżira ta' Henderson]]
*[[Gżira ta' Jeju]]
*[[Gżira ta' Kunta Kinteh]]
*[[Gżira ta' Lord Howe]]
*[[Gżira ta' Macquarie]]
*[[Gżira ta' Mozambique]]
*[[Gżira ta' Pico]]
*[[Gżira ta' Robben]]
*[[Gżira ta' Saint-Louis]]
*[[Gżira ta' Tiwai]]
*[[Gżira ta' Wrangel]]
*[[Gżira tal-Mużewijiet]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;GĦ&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Għajn Tuffieħa]]
* [[Għalliem]]
*[[Għar Dalam]]
*[[Għar ta' Altamira]]
*[[Għar ta' Gorham]]
*[[Għar ta' Karain]]
*[[Għar ta' Optymistychna]]
*[[Għar ta' Vjetrenica]]
*[[Għar tal-Apokalissi]]
*[[Għar tal-Irħam]]
*[[Għar tas-Silġ ta' Dobšiná]]
*[[Għarb]]
*[[Għelieqi Mtarrġa tar-Ross tal-Cordilleras tal-Filippini]]
*[[Għerien Karstiċi ta' Aggtelek u tas-Slovakkja]]
*[[Għerien ta' Ajanta]]
*[[Għerien ta' Elephanta]]
*[[Għerien ta' Ellora]]
*[[Għerien ta' Mogao]]
*[[Għerien ta’ Škocjan|Għerien ta' Škocjan]]
*[[Għerien u Arti tal-Era Glaċjali fil-Jura tas-Swabja]]
*[[Għid]]
*[[Għoljiet, Djar u Kantini ta' Champagne]]
*[[Għoljiet Sagri ta' Piemonte u ta' Lombardia]]
*[[Għoljiet ta' Donets]]
*[[Għoljiet ta' Matobo]]
*[[Għoljiet tal-Prosecco ta' Conegliano u Valdobbiadene]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;H&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Hagia Sophia]]
* [[Hahoe]]
* [[Haley Bugeja]]
* [[Halloumi]]
* [[Hallstatt]]
* [[Hampi]]
*[[Hans Geiger]]
*[[Hans Memling]]
*[[Hans Spemann]]
*[[Harar]]
*[[Harry Belafonte]]
*[[Hatı Çırpan]]
*[[Hatra]]
*[[Hattusha]]
*[[Hawa Mahal]]
*[[Hebron]]
*[[Hedeby]]
*[[Hegmataneh]]
*[[Hegra]]
*[[Heinrich Hertz]]
*[[Helena Kottler Vurnik]]
*[[Henri Fantin-Latour]]
*[[Henri Frederic Amiel]]
*[[Hermannus Contractus]]
*[[Hideki Shirakawa]]
*[[Hideki Yukawa]]
*[[Hildesheim]]
*[[Höga Kusten]]
*[[Hoh Xil]]
*[[Hội An]]
*[[Holašovice]]
*[[Hollókő]]
*[[Hongcun]]
*[[Hospicio Cabañas]]
*[[Hospital de Sant Pau]]
*[[Hovgården]]
*[[Howard Carter]]
*[[Hryhorii Kvitka-Osnovianenko]]
*[[Huangshan]]
*[[Hubert de Givenchy]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;Ħ&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Ħaġar Megalitiku ta' Carnac]]
* [[Ħaġar ta' Jelling]]
* [[Ħajja]]
*[[Ħajt il-Kbir taċ-Ċina]]
*[[Ħitan Rumani ta' Lugo]]
*[[Ħsad tal-Perli fil-Bahrain]]
*[[Ħuta]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;I&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Ibn Battuta]]
* [[ICOMOS]]
* [[Idolu ta' Shigir]]
* [[Idrija]]
* [[Idrijski žlikrofi]]
* [[Ilha Grande]]
* [[Il'ja Prigožini]]
* [[Impjant Nukleari ta' Zaporizhzhia]]
*[[Impjant tal-Ippompjar bl-Istim ta' Wouda]]
*[[Impjanti tan-Nitrat tal-Potassju ta' Humberstone u ta' Santa Laura]]
*[[Inara Luigas]]
*[[Inċiżjonijiet fuq il-Blat f’Valcamonica|Inċiżjonijiet fuq il-Blat f'Valcamonica]]
*[[Independence Hall]]
*[[Indiċi]]
*[[Industrija tal-lavanja f'Wales]]
*[[Ingredjent]]
*[[Intaljatur]]
*[[Internet]]
*[[Ipoġew ta’ Ħal Saflieni|Ipoġew ta' Ħal Saflieni]]
* [[Ipproċessar testwali]]
* [[Irdumijiet ta' Bandiagara]]
* [[Iremel]]
* [[Irħula Antiki ta' Djenné]]
* [[Irħula Kbar bi Spa fl-Ewropa]]
* [[Irpin]]
* [[Irziezet Imżejnin ta' Hälsingland]]
*[[Isabella d'Este]]
*[[ISBN]]
*[[Istitut tar-Riċerka dwar il-Foresti tal-Malażja]]
*[[Istmu Kuronjan]]
*[[Ivan Turgenev]]
*[[Ivrea]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;J&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Jacinto Benavente]]
* [[Jaipur]]
* [[Jakob Bogdani]]
* [[Jan Novák]]
*[[Jantar Mantar, Jaipur]]
*[[Jarrod Sammut]]
*[[Jean Antoine Houdon]]
*[[Jean Dieudonné]]
*[[Jean Picard]]
*[[Jebel Faya]]
*[[Jeddah]]
*[[Jodensavanne]]
*[[Joggins]]
*[[Johann Christian Bach]]
*[[Johan Jensen]]
*[[John Edward Critien]]
*[[John Kendrew]]
*[[John Strutt Rayleigh]]
*[[Jongmyo]]
*[[Jørgen Pedersen Gram]]
*[[Josef Hoffman]]
*[[Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac]]
*[[Joya de Cerén]]
*[[Jože Plečnik]]
*[[Jules Pascin]]
*[[Julia Malinova]]
*[[Julia Sanina]]
*[[Júlia Sigmond]]
*[[Julio Baghy]]
*[[Julius Wagner-Jauregg]]
*[[Jum il-Ġifa]]
*[[Jum il-Lingwa Erżjana]]
*[[Jum l-Ewropa]]
*[[Jum Zamenhof]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;K&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Kaċċa bl-ajkli]]
* [[Kairouan]]
* [[Kaja Kallas]]
*[[Kalwaria Zebrzydowska]]
*[[Kampnari tal-Belġju u ta' Franza]]
*[[Kanal il-Kbir (iċ-Ċina)]]
*[[Kanal ta' Rideau]]
*[[Kanali ta' Amsterdam]]
*[[Kandy]]
*[[Kappella]]
*[[Karavanseraj Persjani]]
*[[Karbalayi Safikhan Karabakhi]]
*[[Karl Ferdinand Braun]]
*[[Karl Weierstrass]]
*[[Karlskrona]]
*[[Karlu III]]
*[[Kasbah tal-Alġier]]
*[[Kaskati ta' Galdelsha]]
*[[Kaskati ta' Vitorja]]
*[[Kastell ta' Ankara]]
*[[Kastell ta' Durham]]
*[[Kastell ta' Himeji]]
*[[Kastell ta’ Kroměříž|Kastell ta' Kroměříž]]
*[[Kastell ta' Kronborg]]
*[[Kastell ta' Kuressaare]]
*[[Kastell ta’ Litomyšl|Kastell ta' Litomyšl]]
*[[Kastell ta' Lubart]]
*[[Kastell ta’ Malbork|Kastell ta' Malbork]]
*[[Kastell ta' Nesvizh]]
*[[Kastell ta' Neuschwanstein]]
*[[Kastell ta' Paphos]]
*[[Kastell ta' San Pedro de la Roca]]
*[[Kastell ta' Spiš]]
*[[Kastell ta' Wartburg]]
*[[Kastell ta' Zerzevan]]
*[[Kastelli ta' Augustusburg u Falkenlust fi Brühl]]
*[[Kastelli ta' Bellinzona]]
*[[Kastelli u Swar tal-Irħula tar-Re Dwardu fi Gwynedd]]
*[[Katarina Vitale]]
* [[Katidral]]
*[[Katidral ta' Aachen]]
*[[Katidral ta' Amiens]]
*[[Katidral ta' Bourges]]
*[[Katidral ta' Burgos]]
*[[Katidral ta' Canterbury]]
*[[Katidral ta' Chartres]]
*[[Katidral ta' Köln]]
*[[Katidral ta' León, Nikaragwa]]
*[[Katidral ta' Naumburg]]
*[[Katidral ta' Reims]]
*[[Katidral ta' Roskilde]]
*[[Katidral ta' Santa Sofija (Kiev)]]
*[[Katidral ta’ Šibenik|Katidral ta' Šibenik]]
*[[Katidral ta' Speyer]]
*[[Katidral ta' Tournai]]
*[[Katidral ta' Zvartnots]]
*[[Katidral tat-Trasfigurazzjoni, Dnipro]]
*[[Katina Muntanjuża ta' Ennedi]]
*[[Katina Muntanjuża ta’ Meskheti]]
*[[Katina Muntanjuża ta' Mulanje]]
*[[Katsiaryna Barysevich]]
*[[Kauksi Ülle]]
*[[Kaunas]]
*[[Kavallier ta' Madara]]
* [[Kavallier ta’ San Ġakbu|Kavallier ta' San Ġakbu]]
* [[Kawkasu tal-Punent]]
* [[KazCosmos]]
*[[Kelma]]
*[[Kerkuane]]
*[[Kernavė]]
*[[Kewkbet is-Safar]]
*[[Khafre]]
*[[Khami]]
*[[Khinalug]]
*[[Khiva]]
*[[Khor Rori]]
*[[Khorramabad]]
*[[Khuttal]]
*[[Kibbeh]]
*[[Kiki Kogelnik]]
*[[Kinderdijk]]
*[[Kirurgu]]
*[[Kizhi Pogost]]
*[[Kladruby nad Labem]]
* [[Klima ta' Malta]]
* [[Klondike]]
* [[Kluane / Wrangell–St. Elias / Bajja tal-Glaċieri / Tatshenshini-Alsek]]
* [[Knarik Vardanyan]]
* [[Knejjes Barokki tal-Filippini]]
* [[Knejjes Imħaffrin fil-Blat ta' Ivanovo]]
* [[Knejjes Imħaffrin fil-Blat ta' Lalibela]]
*[[Knejjes Impittrin fir-Reġjun ta’ Troodos|Knejjes Impittrin fir-Reġjun ta' Troodos]]
*[[Knejjes Rumaneski Katalani tal-Vall de Boí]]
*[[Knejjes ta' Chiloé]]
*[[Knejjes tal-Injam ta' Maramureș]]
*[[Knejjes tal-Injam tal-Karpazji Slovakki]]
*[[Knejjes tal-Injam tan-Nofsinhar ta’ Małopolskie]]
*[[Knejjes tal-Iskola tal-Arkitettura ta' Pskov]]
*[[Knejjes tal-Moldavja]]
*[[Knejjes tal-Paċi]]
*[[Knejjes u Kunventi ta' Goa]]
*[[Knisja Antika ta' Petäjävesi]]
*[[Knisja ta' Atlántida]]
*[[Knisja ta' Boyana]]
*[[Knisja ta' San Ġwann f'Kaneo]]
*[[Knisja ta' San Nikola tas-Saqaf]]
*[[Knisja ta' Santa Margerita]]
*[[Knisja ta' Santa Marija tal-Grazzji (Milan)|Knisja ta' Santa Marija tal-Grazzji, Milan]]
*[[Knisja tal-Injam ta' Urnes]]
*[[Knisja tal-Paċi fi Świdnica]]
*[[Knisja tal-Pellegrinaġġ ta' San Ġwann ta' Nepomuk|Knisja tal-Pellegrinaġġ ta’ San Ġwann ta' Nepomuk]]
*[[Knisja tal-Pellegrinaġġi ta' Wies]]
*[[Knisja tal-Verġni Marija ta' Arakos]]
*[[Knisja tal-Vitorja]]
*[[Koh Ker]]
*[[Kok]]
*[[Kolomenskoye]]
*[[Kolonja tal-Artisti ta' Darmstadt]]
*[[Kolonji tal-Benevolenza]]
*[[Kolonna ta' Ġuljanu]]
*[[Kolonna tat-Trinità Mqaddsa, Olomouc]]
* [[Kolossew]]
* [[Konso]]
*[[Konversazzjoni]]
*[[Korfù]]
*[[Kosta Ġurassika]]
*[[Kosta ta' Amalfi]]
*[[Kosta ta' Ningaloo]]
*[[Kostituzzjoni ta’ Malta|Kostituzzjoni ta' Malta]]
*[[Kotlovina]]
*[[Koutammakou]]
*[[Krak des Chevaliers]]
*[[Krakovja]]
*[[Krater ta' Logoisk]]
*[[Krater ta' Vredefort]]
*[[Kremlin ta' Kazan]]
*[[Kremlin ta’ Moska|Kremlin ta' Moska]]
*[[Kreta]]
*[[Krisztina Tóth]]
*[[Krzemionki]]
*[[Ksour Antiki ta' Ouadane, Chinguetti, Tichitt u Oualata]]
*[[Kubdari]]
*[[Kujataa]]
*[[Kulangsu]]
*[[Kuldīga]]
*[[Kulleġġ Navali Rjali Antik]]
*[[Kultura ta' Chaco]]
*[[Kultura ta' Chinchorro]]
*[[Kultura ta' Liangzhu]]
*[[Kumpanija Ferrovjarja Retika]]
*[[Kumpless Modern ta' Pampulha]]
*[[Kumpless Monumentali ta' Brâncuși f'Târgu Jiu]]
*[[Kumpless ta' Konservazzjoni tal-Amażonja Ċentrali]]
*[[Kumpless ta' W-Arly-Pendjari]]
*[[Kumpless tal-Bażar Storiku ta' Tabriz]]
*[[Kumpless tal-Foresti ta' Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai]]
*[[Kumpless tal-Foresta ta' Kaeng Krachan]]
*[[Kumpless tal-Kastell ta' Mir]]
*[[Kumpless tal-Khānegāh u tas-Santwarju tax-Xejikk Safi al-din f'Ardabil]]
*[[Kumpless tal-Monumenti ta' Huế]]
*[[Kumpless tal-Muntanji u tat-Tempji ta' Chengde]]
*[[Kumpless tal-Oqbra ta' Koguryo]]
*[[Kumpless tal-Pajsaġġ ta' Tràng An]]
*[[Kumpless u l-Estancias tal-Ġiżwiti ta' Córdoba]]
*[[Kumplessi Monastiċi Armeni tal-Iran]]
*[[Kumplessi Petroglifiċi tal-Altai tal-Mongolja]]
*[[Kumplessi Sagri tal-Hoysala]]
*[[Kumitat tal-Wirt Dinji]]
*[[Kunvent Benedittin ta' San Ġwann f'Müstair]]
*[[Kunvent ta' Kristu f'Tomar]]
*[[Kunvent ta' Spiš]]
*[[Kunvent ta’ Novodevichy|Kunvent ta' Novodevichy]]
*[[Kunya-Urgench]]
*[[Kuruna ta' Zvonimir]]
*[[Kutná Hora]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;L&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[L-Arti]]
* [[L-Ewwel Mara jew Raġel ta' Malta]]
* [[Lag ta' Baikal]]
* [[Lag ta' Brebeneskul]]
* [[Lag ta' Kezenoyam]]
* [[Lag ta' Laach]]
* [[Lag tal-Punent, Hangzhou]]
* [[Lagi ta' Ounianga]]
* [[Lag ta' Skadar]]
* [[Lagi ta' Willandra]]
* [[Lake District]]
* [[Lamu]]
*[[Landier]]
*[[Lapponja Żvediża]]
*[[Las Médulas]]
*[[Lascaux]]
*[[Lavaux]]
*[[Lavra tat-Trinità ta' San Serġjo]]
*[[Lazzaro Pisani]]
*[[Le Corbusier]]
*[[Le Havre]]
*[[Le Locle]]
*[[Leptis Magna]]
*[[Lessikoloġija]]
* [[Lessiku]]
* [[Letoon]]
* [[Lev Davidovich Landau]]
* [[Lev Semenovič Pontrjagin]]
* [[Levoča, il-Kastell ta' Spiš u l-monumenti kulturali assoċjati]]
* [[Levuka]]
* [[Leyla Mammadbeyova]]
* [[Liftijiet Idrawliċi tal-Canal du Centre]]
*[[Lika Kavzharadze]]
*[[Lima]]
*[[Lingwa Erżjana]]
*[[Lingwa Ġermaniża]]
*[[Linja ferrovjarja ta’ Semmering|Linja ferrovjarja ta' Semmering]]
*[[Linja Ferrovjarja Trans-Iranjana]]
*[[Linji Ferrovjarji tal-Muntanji tal-Indja]]
*[[Linji ta' Nazca]]
*[[Linji tal-Ilma Difensivi Olandiżi]]
*[[Lista ta’ binjiet ta’ Gaudí]]
*[[Lista ta' kumpaniji elenkati fil-Borża ta' Malta]]
*[[Lista ta' Membri tal-Parlament ta' Malta, 2017–2022]]
*[[Lista ta' peniżoli]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji f'Andorra]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji f'Ċipru]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji f'Iżrael]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji f'Kuba]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji f'Madagascar]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji f'Malta]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji f'San Marino]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fi Franza]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fi Spanja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji taċ-Ċekja|Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fiċ-Ċekja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fiċ-Ċilì]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fiċ-Ċina]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fid-Danimarka]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Bangladesh]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Belarussja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Belġju]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Bożnija-Ħerzegovina]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Brażil]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Bulgarija]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Filippini]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Finlandja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Ġappun]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Ġermanja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Ġordan]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Georgia]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Greċja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Jemen]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Kambodja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Kanada]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Karibew]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Każakistan]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Kenja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Kirgistan]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Kolombja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Korea t'Isfel]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Korea ta' Fuq]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Kroazja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Laos]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Latvja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Litwanja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Lussemburgu]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Lvant tal-Asja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Lvant tal-Ewropa]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Maċedonja ta' Fuq]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Malażja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Marokk]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Mauritania]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Messiku]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Moldova]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Mongolja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Montenegro]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Myanmar]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Pakistan]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Palestina]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Perù]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Polonja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Portugall]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Punent tal-Asja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Punent tal-Ewropa]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Vjetnam]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fin-Nepal]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fin-Netherlands]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fin-Nofsinhar tal-Asja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fin-Nofsinhar tal-Ewropa]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fin-Norveġja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fir-Renju Unit]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fir-Rumanija]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fir-Russja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fis-Serbja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fis-Sirja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fis-Slovakkja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fis-Slovenja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fis-Sri Lanka]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fit-Taġikistan]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fit-Tajlandja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fit-Tanzanija]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fit-Tramuntana tal-Asja u fl-Asja Ċentrali]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fit-Tramuntana tal-Ewropa]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fit-Tuneżija]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fit-Turkija]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fit-Turkmenistan]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fix-Xlokk tal-Asja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Afganistan]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Afrika]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Afrika t'Isfel]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Albanija]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Amerka Ċentrali]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Amerka t'Isfel]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Amerka ta' Fuq]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Arabja Sawdija]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Arġentina]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Armenja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Awstralja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Awstrija]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Ażerbajġan]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Eġittu]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Estonja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Etjopja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Indja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Indoneżja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Iran]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Irlanda]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Istati Għarab]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Istati Uniti]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Italja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Iżlanda]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Iżvezja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Iżvizzera]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Oċeanja]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Ukrajna]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Ungerija]]
*[[Lista ta' Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fl-Użbekistan]]
*[[Liz Truss]]
*[[Loġġa tal-Ħarir]]
*[[Longobardi fl-Italja: Postijiet tal-Poter (568-774 W.K.)]]
*[[Lorenzo de' Medici]]
*[[Lorenzo Gafà]]
*[[Lorenzo Valla]]
*[[Luang Prabang]]
*[[Lübeck]]
*[[Lucavsala]]
*[[Lucia Piussi]]
*[[Lučka Kajfež Bogataj]]
*[[Ludmila tal-Boemja]]
*[[Ludovico Ariosto]]
*[[Ludovico Carracci]]
*[[Ludwik Lejzer Zamenhof]]
*[[Luigi Boccherini]]
*[[Luigi Galvani]]
*[[Luigi Pirandello]]
*[[Lumbini]]
*[[Luna 26]]
*[[Lunenburg]]
*[[Lvant ta' Rennell]]
*[[Lviv]]
*[[Lyon]]
*[[Lyubov Panchenko]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;M&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Maċedonit]]
* [[Machu Picchu]]
* [[Madinat Al-Zahra]]
*[[Mafkar tal-Paċi ta' Hiroshima]]
*[[Magda Šaturová-Seppová]]
*[[Maison Carrée]]
* [[Malta taħt il-Franċiżi]]
*[[Maltin]]
*[[Måneskin]]
*[[Manhush]]
*[[Manto Mavrogenous]]
*[[Mantova]]
*[[Margaret Abela]]
*[[Maria De Filippi]]
*[[Maria Dobroniega ta' Kiev]]
*[[Maria Grollmuß]]
*[[Marian Smoluchowski]]
*[[Mario Draghi]]
*[[Mário Zagallo]]
*[[Marrakesh]]
*[[Marta Kos]]
*[[Martinu I ta' Sqallija]]
*[[Mary Chronopoulou]]
*[[Mary Fenech Adami]]
*[[Mary Moser]]
*[[Masada]]
*[[Masġar tal-Palm ta' Elche]]
*[[Maurizio Costanzo]]
*[[Mawżolew ta’ Khoja Ahmed Yasawi]]
*[[Maymand]]
*[[Mbanza Kongo]]
*[[Medalja ta' Marian Smoluchowski]]
*[[Medina ta' Sousse]]
*[[Mehmet Ali Ağca]]
*[[Melka Kunture]]
*[[Mérida (Spanja)]]
*[[Merill]]
*[[Meroe]]
*[[Merv]]
*[[Meteora]]
*[[Michael Refalo]]
*[[Michail Glinka]]
*[[Mikhail Ostrogradsky]]
*[[Milan]]
*[[Mileva Filipović]]
*[[Mimoza Kusari-Lila]]
*[[Mina tal-Imħabba ta' Klevan]]
*[[Minaret ta' Jam]]
*[[Minjiera Storika tal-Fidda f'Tarnowskie Góry]]
*[[Minjiera tal-Faħam ta' Ombilin]]
*[[Minjiera tal-Fidda ta' Iwami Ginzan]]
*[[Minjiera tal-Melħ ta’ Wieliczka]]
*[[Minjiera tar-Ram ta' Falun]]
*[[Minjieri tad-Deheb tal-Gżira ta' Sado]]
*[[Minjieri taż-Żnied Neolitiċi ta' Spiennes]]
*[[Mira Alečković]]
*[[Mirella Freni]]
*[[Miroslav Řepa]]
*[[Missjonijiet Franġiskani fis-Sierra Gorda ta' Querétaro]]
*[[Missjonijiet ta' San Antonio]]
*[[Missjonijiet tal-Ġiżwiti fost il-Guarani]]
*[[Missjonijiet tal-Ġiżwiti ta' Chiquitos]]
*[[Missjonijiet tal-Ġiżwiti ta' La Santísima Trinidad de Paraná u Jesús de Tavarangue]]
*[[Mnajdra]]
*[[Modena]]
*[[Mogħdija tal-Ġgant]]
*[[Moidam]]
*[[Monasteri fuq ix-xaqlibiet ta' Popocatépetl]]
*[[Monasteri ta' Yuso u ta' Suso]]
*[[Monasteru ta' Alcobaça]]
*[[Monasteru ta' Batalha]]
*[[Monasteru ta' Ferapontov]]
*[[Monasteru ta' Gelati]]
*[[Monasteru ta' Geghard]]
*[[Monasteru ta’ Gračanica|Monasteru ta' Gračanica]]
*[[Monasteru ta' Haghpat]]
*[[Monasteru ta' Hoge]]
*[[Monasteru ta' Horezu]]
*[[Monasteru ta' Hosios Loukas]]
*[[Monasteru ta' Maulbronn]]
*[[Monasteru ta' Neghuts]]
*[[Monasteru ta' Poblet]]
*[[Monasteru ta' Rila]]
*[[Monasteru ta' San Ġwann it-Teologu]]
*[[Monasteru ta' San Ilarjun]]
*[[Monasteru ta' Sanahin]]
*[[Monasteru ta' Santa Katarina]]
*[[Monasteru ta' Sopoćani]]
*[[Monasteru ta' Studenica]]
*[[Monasteru ta' Voroneț]]
*[[Monasteru tal-Ġlormini]]
*[[Monasteru Rjali ta' Santa Marija ta' Guadalupe]]
*[[Monika Kryemadhi]]
*[[Møns Klint]]
*[[Mont-Saint-Michel]]
*[[Monte Albán]]
*[[Monte San Giorgio]]
*[[Monte Titano]]
*[[Monticello]]
* [[Monument]]
* [[Monument Nazzjonali ta' Żimbabwe l-Kbir]]
* [[Monumenti Bojod ta' Vladimir u ta' Suzdal]]
* [[Monumenti Buddisti fl-inħawi ta' Hōryū-ji]]
* [[Monumenti Paleokristjani u Biżantini ta' Thessaloniki]]
* [[Monumenti Rumani, il-Katidral ta' San Pietru u l-Knisja tal-Madonna fi Trier]]
* [[Monumenti Storiċi f'Novgorod u fl-Inħawi]]
* [[Monumenti Storiċi ta' Kjoto Antika (Bliet ta' Kjoto, Uji u Ōtsu)]]
* [[Monumenti Storiċi ta' Makli]]
*[[Monumenti Storiċi ta' Nara]]
*[[Monumenti ta' Oviedo u tar-Renju tal-Asturjas]]
*[[Monumenti tal-Ġebel taċ-Ċriev]]
*[[Monumenti u Siti Storiċi f'Kaesong]]
*[[Monumenti u Siti Storiċi ta' Hiraizumi]]
*[[Morelia]]
*[[Moritz Cantor]]
*[[Moskea Antika ta' Edirne]]
*[[Moskea l-Kbira u Sptar ta' Divriği]]
*[[Moskea ta' Arif Agha]]
*[[Moskea ta’ Selimiye, Edirne]]
*[[Moskea tal-Ġimgħa ta' Esfahan]]
*[[Moskea tat-Tatari]]
*[[Moskej bi stil Sudaniż fit-Tramuntana tal-Kosta tal-Avorju]]
*[[Moskej tal-Pilastri tal-Injam tal-Anatolja Medjevali]]
*[[Motoori Norinaga]]
*[[Mramorje]]
*[[Mtskheta]]
*[[Mtsvane]]
*[[Muhammad al-Idrisi]]
*[[Muħammed]]
*[[Muniċipju ta' Bremen]]
*[[Muntanja Pelée]]
*[[Muntanja Qingcheng]]
*[[Muntanja ta' Kumgang]]
*[[Muntanja Wutai]]
*[[Muntanji Blu u John Crow]]
*[[Muntanji Makhonjwa ta' Barberton]]
*[[Muntanji ta' Homolje]]
*[[Muntanji tad-Deheb ta' Altai]]
*[[Muntanji tal-Krimea]]
*[[Muntanji Wudang]]
*[[Muntanji Wuyi]]
*[[Mużew Nazzjonali tal-Montenegro]]
*[[Mużew ta' Plantin-Moretus]]
*[[Mużew ta' Trojja]]
*[[Myśliwska]]
*[[Mystras]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;N&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Nærøyfjord]]
* [[Nadur]]
* [[Naftalan]]
* [[Nagorno-Karabakh]]
* [[Naħla tal-għasel ta' Malta]]
* [[Nalanda Mahavihara]]
* [[Namhansanseong]]
* [[Nancy]]
* [[Nan Madol]]
*[[Napli]]
*[[Naryn-Kala]]
*[[Nataliya Kobrynska]]
*[[Nea Moni ta' Chios]]
*[[Nekropoli]]
*[[Nekropoli ta' Beit She'arim]]
*[[Nekropoli ta' Monterozzi]]
*[[Nemrut Dağı]]
*[[Nessebar]]
*[[New Lanark]]
*[[New Secret (jott)]]
*[[Nexhmije Pagarusha]]
*[[Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc]]
*[[Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot]]
*[[Nicolas Flamel]]
*[[Nicolau Coelho]]
*[[Nida]]
*[[Nika Križnar]]
*[[Nikkō]]
*[[Nino Ramishvili]]
*[[Nisa (Turkmenistan)]]
*[[Nisa f’Malta]]
*[[Nisa fl-elezzjonijiet ġenerali ta’ Malta]]
*[[Nizza]]
*[[Norman Morrison]]
*[[Nutar]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;O&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Oażi ta' Al-Ahsa]]
* [[Olga Tass]]
*[[Olimpja]]
*[[Olinda]]
*[[Ophrys caucasica|''Ophrys caucasica'']]
*[[Oplontis]]
*[[Opri Venezjani tad-Difiża bejn is-sekli 15 u 17: Stato da Terra – Stato da Mar tal-Punent]]
*[[Oqbra imperjali tad-dinastija Xixia]]
*[[Oqbra imperjali tad-dinastiji Ming u Qing]]
*[[Oqbra Rjali tad-Dinastija Joseon]]
*[[Oqbra ta' Mozu]]
*[[Oqbra tar-Rejiet ta' Buganda f'Kasubi]]
*[[Orthohantavirus]]
*[[Ortografija Litwana]]
*[[Osservatorji Astronomiċi tal-Università Federali ta' Kazan]]
*[[Osservatorju ta' Črni Vrh]]
*[[Osservatorju ta' Jodrell Bank]]
*[[Osservatorju ta' Rozhen]]
*[[Osun-Osogbo]]
*[[Otto Toeplitz]]
*[[Ouro Preto]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;P&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Pablo Neruda]]
* [[Pagoda ta' Vinh Nghiem]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Agrikolu tan-Nofsinhar ta' Öland]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Arkeoloġiku tal-Ewwel Pjantaġġuni tal-Kafè fix-Xlokk ta' Kuba]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Arkeoloġiku tas-Sassanidi fil-Provinċja ta' Fars]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Industrijali ta' Blaenavon]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Karstiku tan-Nofsinhar taċ-Ċina]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Kulturali ta' ǂKhomani]]
* [[Pajsaġġi Kulturali ta' Bassari, Fula u Bedik]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Kulturali ta' Budj Bim]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Kulturali ta' Gedeo]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Kulturali ta' Hawraman/Uramanat]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Kulturali ta' Le Morne]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Kulturali ta’ Lednice-Valtice]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Kulturali ta' Sukur]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Kulturali tal-Għelieqi Mtarrġa tar-Ross ta' Honghe Hani]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Kulturali tal-Kafè tal-Kolombja]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Kulturali tal-Lag ta' Kenozero]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Kulturali tal-Wied ta' Orkhon]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Kulturali tat-Tinqix fuq il-Blat f'Gobustan]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Kulturali tat-Tpittir fuq il-Blat ta' Zuojiang]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Kulturali u Botaniku ta' Richtersveld]]
* [[Pajsaġġ Kulturali u l-Fdalijiet Arkeoloġiċi tal-Wied ta' Bamiyan]]
* [[Pajsaġġi Militari tal-Imperu Maratha fl-Indja]]
* [[Pajsaġġ tal-Kaċċa Medjevali fit-Tramuntana ta' Zealand]]
* [[Pajsaġġ tal-Vinji ta' Piemonte: Langhe-Roero u Monferrato]]
* [[Pajsaġġ tax-Xogħol fil-Minjieri ta' Cornwall u l-Punent ta' Devon]]
* [[Pajsaġġi ta' Dauria]]
* [[Pál Maléter]]
* [[Palazz Irjali ta' Aranjuez]]
*[[Palazz Irjali ta' Caserta]]
*[[Palazz Mariinskyi]]
*[[Palazz ta' Blenheim]]
*[[Palazz ta’ Djoklezjanu|Palazz ta' Djoklezjanu]]
*[[Palazz ta' Drottningholm]]
*[[Palazz ta' Eggenberg]]
*[[Palazz ta' Fontainebleau]]
*[[Palazz ta' Golestan]]
*[[Palazz ta' Ishak Paşa]]
*[[Palazz ta' Mafra]]
*[[Palazz ta' Orbeliani]]
*[[Palazz ta' Potala]]
*[[Palazz ta’ Schönbrunn|Palazz ta' Schönbrunn]]
*[[Palazz ta’ Stoclet|Palazz ta' Stoclet]]
*[[Palazz ta' Versailles]]
*[[Palazz tal-Khan]]
*[[Palazz tas-Sajf]]
*[[Palazz tax-Shirvanshah]]
*[[Palazzi Minojċi]]
*[[Palazzi Rjali ta' Abomey]]
*[[Palazzi u Parks ta' Potsdam u Berlin]]
*[[Palenque]]
*[[Palermo Għarbija-Normanna u l-Katidrali ta' Cefalù u Monreale]]
*[[Palestina]]
*[[Palianytsia]]
*[[Palmaria]]
*[[Palmyra]]
*[[Pamukkale]]
*[[Panamá Viejo]]
*[[Papa Ljun XIV]]
*[[Papahānaumokuākea]]
*[[Paquimé]]
*[[Paramaribo]]
*[[Park Arkeoloġiku Nazzjonali ta' Tierradentro]]
*[[Park Arkeoloġiku ta' Champaner-Pavagadh]]
*[[Park Arkeoloġiku ta' Hili]]
*[[Park Arkeoloġiku ta' San Agustín]]
*[[Park Irjali ta' Studley]]
*[[Park Naturali Nazzjonali tal-Karpazji]]
*[[Park Naturali ta' Dinara]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Karula]]
*[[Park Naturali ta' Korab-Koritnik]]
*[[Park Naturali tal-Iskolli tal-Qroll ta' Tubbataha]]
*[[Park Naturali tal-Pilastri ta' Lena]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali Impenetrabbli ta' Bwindi]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali Olimpiku]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali Storiku]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali Storiku ta' Göreme]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali Storiku ta' Trakai]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Alejandro de Humboldt]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Banc d'Arguin]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Beit Guvrin-Maresha]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta’ Belovezhskaya Pushcha]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Canaima]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Chapada dos Veadeiros]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Chiribiquete]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Chitwan]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Cilento, Vallo di Diano u Alburni]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Coiba]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Comoé]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Darien]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Defileul Jiului]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Desembarco del Granma]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Doñana]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Everglades]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta’ Fertő-Hanság]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Garajonay]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Garamba]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Great Smoky Mountains]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Gros Morne]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Gunung Mulu]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Hortobágy]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Huascarán]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Ichkeul]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Iguaçu]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Iguazú]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Ivindo]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Kahuzi-Biega]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Kakadu]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Kaziranga]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Khangchendzonga]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Kilimanjaro]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Kinabalu]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Kiskunság]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Komodo]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Lahemaa]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Lençóis Maranhenses]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Lorentz]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Los Alerces]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Los Glaciares]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Los Katíos]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Lushan]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Mammoth Cave]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Manas]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Manú]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Manovo-Gounda St Floris]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Mesa Verde]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Miguasha]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Morne Trois Pitons]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Murujuga]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Nahanni]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Niah]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Niokolo-Koba]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Noel Kempff Mercado]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Nyungwe]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Phong Nha – Kẻ Bàng]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Þingvellir]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Pirin]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Purnululu]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Rapa Nui]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Rio Abiseo]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Sagarmatha]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Salonga]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Sangay]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Sanqingshan]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Serengeti]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Serra da Capivara]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Simien]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Taï]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Talampaya]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Teide]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Tongariro]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Ujung Kulon]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Una]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Vatnajökull]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Virunga]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Yellowstone]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Yosemite]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tal-Biżonti tal-Boskijiet]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tal-Foresta Pluvjali ta' Gola]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tal-Fortizza tal-Għolja ta' Brimstone]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tal-Għadajjar ta' Mana]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tal-Għerien ta' Carlsbad]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tal-Għerien ta' Naracoorte]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tal-Għerien ta' Peruaçu]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tal-Grand Canyon]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tal-Himalayas il-Kbar]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tal-Katina Muntanjuża ta' Rodopi]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tal-Lag tal-Malawi]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tal-Lagi ta’ Plitvice]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tal-Muntanja Dajti]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tal-Muntanja tal-Kenja]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tal-Muntanja Tomorr]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tal-Muntanji ta' Bale]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tal-Muntanji ta' Rwenzori]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tal-Vulkani ta' Hawaii]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tas-Sundarbans]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tat-Taġikistan]]
*[[Park Nazzjonali tax-Xmara ta' Taħt l-Art ta' Puerto Princesa]]
*[[Park Provinċjali ta' Ischigualasto]]
*[[Park Provinċjali ta' Writing-on-Stone]]
*[[Park Provinċjali tad-Dinosawri]]
*[[Park Storiku ta' Ayutthaya]]
*[[Park Storiku ta' Phu Phrabat]]
*[[Park Storiku ta' Si Thep]]
*[[Park Storiku ta' Sukhothai]]
*[[Park ta' Maloti-Drakensberg]]
*[[Park ta’ Muskau|Park ta' Muskau]]
*[[Park tal-Art Mistagħdra ta' iSimangaliso]]
*[[Park tal-Mafkar tar-Rewwixta u tar-Rivoluzzjoni]]
*[[Park Trinazzjonali ta' Sangha]]
*[[Parks Internazzjonali tal-Paċi ta' Waterton-tal-Glaċieri]]
*[[Parks Nazzjonali ta' Nanda Devi u tal-Wied tal-Fjuri]]
*[[Parks Nazzjonali tal-Lag ta' Turkana]]
*[[Parks Nazzjonali u Statali tas-Siġar tal-Injam tal-Aħmar]]
*[[Parks tal-Muntanji tar-Rockies Kanadiżi]]
*[[Parmigianino]]
*[[Parrukkier]]
*[[Pasargadae]]
*[[Paseo del Prado]]
*[[Patoloġija]]
*[[Pattadakal]]
*[[Paulo Coelho]]
*[[Pavlo Lee]]
*[[Pécs]]
*[[Pellegrinaġġ ta’ San Ġakbu]]
*[[Peña de los Enamorados]]
*[[Peniżola]]
*[[Peniżola Valdés]]
*[[Pergamon]]
*[[Peri-Khan Sofiyeva]]
*[[Persepolis]]
*[[Peter Carl Fabergé]]
*[[Péter Magyar]]
*[[Pëtr Kapica]]
*[[Petra]]
*[[Petra Brocková]]
*[[Petroglifiċi ta' Bangudae]]
*[[Petroglifiċi tal-Lag ta' Onega u l-Baħar Abjad]]
*[[Philipp Otto Runge]]
*[[Philippi]]
*[[Pienza]]
*[[Piero Angela]]
*[[Pierre Fatou]]
*[[Pietro Longhi]]
*[[Pietru l-Kbir]]
*[[Pimachiowin Aki]]
*[[Ping Yao]]
*[[Pippo Baudo]]
*[[Pirinej-Monte Perdido]]
*[[Pitons]]
*[[Pitons, Cirques u Rdumijiet tal-Gżira ta' Réunion]]
*[[Pjanta]]
*[[Pjanura ta' Bărăgan]]
*[[Pjanura ta’ Stari Grad]]
*[[Pjanura tal-Ġarer]]
*[[Pjazza]]
*[[Pjazza ta' Naqsh-e Jahan]]
* [[Pjazza tal-Mirakli]]
* [[Pkhali]]
*[[Plamer]]
*[[Planetarju Rjali ta' Eise Eisinga]]
*[[Pobiti Kamani]]
*[[Politika]]
*[[Polonnaruwa]]
*[[Pont Antik ta’ Mostar]]
*[[Pont ta' Forth]]
*[[Pont ta' Malabadi]]
*[[Pont ta' Mehmed Paša Sokolović]]
*[[Pont ta' Vizcaya]]
*[[Pont tal-Fjuri]]
*[[Pont tal-Paċi, Tbilisi]]
*[[Porfirio Barba-Jacob]]
*[[Port Royal]]
*[[Port ta' Mariupol]]
*[[Port ta’ Marsamxett]]
*[[Porta Nigra]]
*[[Portiċi ta' Bologna]]
*[[Porto]]
*[[Postijiet Sagri tal-Bahá'i]]
*[[Potosí]]
*[[Pożati]]
*[[Prambanan]]
*[[Professjoni]]
*[[Proklos]]
*[[Promontorju ta' Putorana]]
*[[Provins]]
*[[Pu'er]]
*[[Puebla (belt)]]
*[[Pythagoreion]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;Q&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Qabar ta' Askia]]
* [[Qabar ta' Humayun]]
* [[Qabar Traċjan ta' Kazanlak]]
* [[Qabar Traċjan ta' Sveshtari]]
* [[Qabża tal-Biżonti Sfrakassati]]
* [[Qal'at al-Bahrain]]
* [[Qala (Għawdex)]]
* [[Qalba Neolitika tal-Gżejjer Orkney]]
* [[Qalhat]]
* [[Qanat]]
* [[Qaryat al-Faw]]
* [[Qaytarma]]
* [[Qorti Rjali ta' Tiébélé]]
* [[Il-Qtugħ ir-Ras ta’ San Ġwann|Qtugħ ir-Ras ta’ San Ġwann Battista (Caravaggio)]]
* [[Quanzhou]]
* [[Quebrada de Humahuaca]]
* [[Quedlinburg]]
* [[Quirigua]]
* [[Quito]]
* [[Quseir Amra]]
* [[Qutb Minar]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;R&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Rachid Chouhal]]
* [[Raħal Storiku ta' St. George u l-Fortifikazzjonijiet Relatati, Bermuda]]
* [[Rammelsberg]]
* [[Ramses II]]
* [[Rani-ki-Vav]]
* [[Ras'ken' Ozks]]
* [[Ravenna]]
* [[Ravesa Lleshi]]
* [[Red Bay]]
* [[Regensburg]]
* [[Reġjun Naturali, Kulturali u Storiku ta’ Kotor]]
* [[Reġjun tal-Estrazzjoni tal-Minerali ta' Erzgebirge/Krušnohoří]]
* [[Reġjun tal-Inbid ta' Tokaj]]
*[[Reichenau]]
*[[Relattività (Maurits Cornelis Escher)]]
*[[Rembrandt]]
*[[Renata Scotto]]
*[[Renju ta' Mapungubwe]]
*[[Renju tal-Ġonna ta' Dessau-Wörlitz]]
*[[Repubblika Sovjetika ta’ Don|Repubblika Sovjetika ta' Don]]
*[[Residenza ta' Würzburg]]
*[[Residenza tal-Metropolitani ta' Bukovina u tad-Dalmazja]]
*[[Residenzi tal-Familja Savoia]]
*[[Residenzi tal-Moderniżmu f'Berlin]]
*[[Rettilu]]
*[[Rewwixta tal-Qassisin]]
*[[Riga]]
*[[Risco Caído]]
*[[Riversleigh]]
*[[Riżerva Ekoloġika ta' Mistaken Point]]
*[[Riżerva Forestali ta' Sinharaja]]
*[[Riżerva Naturali Stretta tal-Muntanja ta' Nimba]]
*[[Riżerva Naturali Stretta tat-Tsingy ta' Bemaraha]]
*[[Riżerva Naturali ta' Bashkiriya]]
*[[Riżerva Naturali ta' Darwin]]
*[[Riżerva Naturali ta’ Kaniv]]
*[[Riżerva Naturali ta' Nahal Me'arot]]
*[[Riżerva Naturali ta' Okapi]]
*[[Riżerva Naturali ta' Selous]]
*[[Riżerva Naturali ta' Srebarna]]
*[[Riżerva Naturali ta' Tigrovaya Balka]]
*[[Riżerva Naturali ta’ Yulen]]
*[[Riżerva Naturali tal-Flora fil-Ġibs]]
*[[Riżerva Naturali tas-Suriname Ċentrali]]
*[[Riżerva ta' Bijosfera ta' El Pinacate u Gran Desierto de Altar]]
*[[Riżerva ta' Bijosfera ta' Río Plátano]]
*[[Riżerva tal-Bijosfera ta' Tehuacán-Cuicatlán]]
*[[Riżerva tal-Bijosfera tal-Baħar l-Iswed]]
*[[Riżerva tal-Bijosfera tal-Friefet Monarki]]
*[[Riżerva tal-Bijosfera Transkonfinali Ohrid-Prespa]]
*[[Riżerva tal-Fawna ta' Dja]]
*[[Riżervi Naturali ta' Air u ta' Ténéré]]
*[[Riżervi tal-Foresti Atlantiċi tal-Kosta tal-Iskoperti]]
*[[Riżervi tal-Foresti Atlantiċi tax-Xlokk]]
*[[Riżervi tal-Katina Muntanjuża ta' Talamanca-La Amistad]]
*[[Robert Fico]]
*[[Robert Wilhelm Bunsen]]
*[[Roberto Burle Marx]]
*[[Rodi (belt)]]
* [[Roi Mata]]
* [[Roșia Montană]]
* [[Ronald Searle]]
* [[Røros]]
* [[Rotta tal-Inċens – Bliet tad-Deżert f'Negev]]
* [[Rotta Wixárika tas-Siti Sagri lejn Wirikuta]]
* [[Rotot ta’ Santiago de Compostela fi Franza]]
* [[Royal Exhibition Building]]
* [[Róža Domašcyna]]
*[[Rudolf Diesel]]
*[[Ruggiero Leoncavallo]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;S&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Sabratha]]
* [[Saeva Dupka]]
* [[Safranbolu]]
* [[Saint-Émilion]]
* [[Sajjied]]
*[[Sala taċ-Ċentenarju]]
*[[Salamanca]]
*[[Salib ta' Santa Ewfrosina]]
*[[Salini Rjali ta' Arc-et-Senans]]
*[[Salme Kann]]
*[[Saltaire]]
*[[Salvatore Accardo]]
*[[Salzburg]]
*[[Samantha Cristoforetti]]
*[[Samarkanda]]
*[[Samarra]]
*[[Sambor Prei Kuk]]
*[[Sammallahdenmäki]]
*[[Samuel Deguara]]
*[[San Cristóbal de La Laguna]]
*[[San Gimignano]]
*[[San Lawrenz (Għawdex)]]
*[[San Miguel de Allende]]
*[[San Pietruburgu]]
*[[Sana'a]]
*[[Sanchi]]
*[[Sandra Milo]]
*[[Sandra Mondaini]]
*[[Sandro Botticelli]]
*[[Sangiran]]
*[[Sansa, il-Monasteri Buddisti tal-Muntanji tal-Korea t'Isfel]]
*[[Santa Cruz de Mompox]]
*[[Santiago de Compostela]]
*[[Santiago de Querétaro]]
*[[Santiniketan]]
*[[Santwarji tal-Għasafar tal-Passa tul il-Kosta tal-Baħar Isfar u l-Golf ta' Bohai]]
*[[Santwarji tal-Pandas Ġganteski ta' Sichuan]]
*[[Santwarji tan-Natura Selvaġġa ta' Thungyai-Huai Kha Khaeng]]
*[[Santwarju Nazzjonali tal-Għasafar ta' Djoudj]]
*[[Santwarju ta' Bom Jesus de Matosinhos]]
*[[Santwarju ta' Bom Jesus do Monte]]
*[[Santwarju ta' Itsukushima]]
*[[Santwarju tal-Balieni ta' El Vizcaino]]
*[[Santwarju ta' Mỹ Sơn]]
*[[Santwarju tal-Fawna u tal-Flora ta' Malpelo]]
*[[Santwarju tan-Natura Selvaġġa tal-Katina Muntanjuża ta' Hamiguitan]]
*[[São Cristóvão]]
*[[São Luís]]
*[[Sarazm]]
*[[Sardis]]
* [[Saryarka]]
* [[Sassi ta' Matera]]
* [[Satsivi]]
*[[Schokland]]
*[[Seba’ Għeġubijiet Ġodda tad-Dinja]]
*[[Sebastian Brant]]
*[[Segovia]]
*[[Seka Sablić]]
*[[Sengħa]]
*[[Seokguram]]
*[[Seowon]]
*[[Severo Ochoa]]
*[[Sevil Shhaideh]]
*[[Sewell]]
*[[Sferi tal-Ġebel tal-Costa Rica]]
*[[SGang Gwaay]]
*[[Shahr-e Sukhteh]]
*[[Shahrisabz]]
*[[Shaken Aimanov]]
*[[Shales ta' Maotianshan]]
*[[Sheki]]
*[[Shennongjia]]
*[[Shibam]]
*[[Shirakami-Sanchi]]
*[[Shiretoko]]
*[[Sian Ka'an]]
*[[Šibenik]]
*[[Sibila Petlevski]]
*[[Sidney Webb]]
*[[Siega Verde]]
*[[Siena]]
*[[Sighișoara]]
*[[Sigiriya]]
*[[Siġra tal-Ballut ta' Stelmužė]]
*[[Siġra tal-ballut ta' Tamme-Lauri]]
*[[Sikhote-Alin]]
*[[Simon Kldiashvili]]
*[[Sinagoga Antika (Erfurt)]]
*[[Sinéad O'Connor]]
*[[Sintra]]
*[[Siracusa]]
*[[Sistema Idrawlika Storika ta' Shushtar]]
*[[Sistema tal-Ġestjoni tal-Ilma ta' Augsburg]]
*[[Sistema tat-Toroq tal-Inka]]
*[[Sit Agrikolu Bikri ta' Kuk]]
*[[Sit arkeoloġiku ta' Al-Balid|Sit Arkeoloġiku ta' Al-Balid]]
*[[Sit Arkeoloġiku ta' Atapuerca]]
*[[Sit Arkeoloġiku ta’ Paphos]]
*[[Sit Arkeoloġiku tal-Maħżen ta' Valongo]]
*[[Sit Storiku Nazzjonali ta' San Juan]]
*[[Sit Storiku Statali tat-Tumbati tal-Ħamrija ta' Cahokia]]
* [[Sit ta' Wirt Dinji]]
* [[Sit ta' Wirt Industrijali ta' Rjukan-Notodden]]
*[[Sit tad-Dolmens ta' Antequera]]
*[[Sit tar-Raġel ta' Peking f'Zhoukoudian]]
*[[Siti tad-Dolmens ta' Gochang, Hwasun u Ganghwa]]
*[[Siti Arkeoloġiċi ta' Bat, Al-Khutm u Al-Ayn]]
*[[Siti Arkeoloġiċi ta' Tarraco]]
*[[Siti Awstraljani tal-Fossili tal-Mammiferi]]
*[[Siti Ewlenin tal-Estrazzjoni fil-Wallonja]]
*[[Siti Funebri u Mfakar tal-Ewwel Gwerra Dinjija (il-Front tal-Punent)]]
*[[Siti Kristjani Moħbija fir-Reġjun ta' Nagasaki]]
*[[Siti Metallurġiċi Antiki tal-Burkina Faso]]
*[[Siti Penitenzjarji Awstraljani]]
*[[Siti preistoriċi bil-puntali madwar l-Alpi|Siti Preistoriċi bil-Puntali Madwar l-Alpi]]
*[[Siti Preistoriċi ta' Jōmon fit-Tramuntana tal-Ġappun]]
*[[Siti Sagri u Rotot ta' Pellegrinaġġ fil-Katina Muntanjuża ta' Kii]]
*[[Siti tal-Fossili tal-Ominidi tal-Afrika t'Isfel]]
*[[Siti tar-Rivoluzzjoni Industrijali Meiji tal-Ġappun]]
*[[Siti tat-Tpittir fuq il-Blat ta' Kondoa]]
*[[Siti tat-Tusi]]
*[[Skarpan]]
*[[Skellig Michael]]
*[[Skogskyrkogården]]
*[[Skojjattlu tal-art ta' Tian Shan]]
*[[Skola Superjuri tal-Mekkanika tal-Armata]]
*[[Skoll il-Kbir tal-Qroll]]
*[[Skoll tal-Qroll ta' New Caledonia]]
*[[Skoll tal-Qroll tal-Belize]]
*[[Skorba]]
*[[Skrivan]]
*[[Slavko Brezoski]]
*[[Socotra]]
*[[Soltaniyeh]]
*[[Songo Mnara]]
*[[Sophia Loren]]
*[[Sophie Germain]]
*[[Sophie Liebknecht]]
*[[Söyembikä]]
*[[Speicherstadt]]
*[[Spinalonga]]
*[[Sputnik 5]]
*[[Stari Ras]]
*[[Statwa]]
*[[Statwa ta' Roland ta' Bremen]]
*[[Statwa tal-Libertà]]
*[[Stazzjon ta' Chhatrapati Shivaji]]
*[[Stazzjon tar-Radju ta' Grimeton]]
*[[Stećak]]
*[[Stepan Erzya]]
*[[Stevns Klint]]
*[[Stonehenge]]
*[[Stone Town]]
*[[Strett ta' Hormuz]]
*[[Su Nuraxi]]
*[[Subak]]
*[[Sulaiman-Too]]
*[[Sundarbans]]
*[[Supra (festa)]]
*[[Suq Ċentrali ta' Ljubljana]]
*[[Surtsey]]
*[[Susa]]
*[[Svaneti]]
*[[Svetlana Antonovska]]
*[[Sviyazhsk]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;T&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Ta' Bakkja]]
* [[Ta' Ħaġrat]]
* [[Ta' Kandja]]
*[[Tabib]]
*[[Tadrart Acacus]]
*[[Taħdit]]
*[[Taishan]]
*[[Taj Mahal]]
*[[Takalik Abaj]]
*[[Takht-e Soleyman]]
*[[Takht-i-Bahi]]
*[[Takkanot Shum]]
*[[Taksim]]
*[[Tallinn]]
*[[Tamgaly]]
*[[Tanġier]]
*[[Taos Pueblo]]
*[[Taputapuātea]]
*[[Tarraco]]
*[[Tarzna Navali ta' Antigua u s-Siti Arkeoloġiċi Relatati]]
*[[Tassili n'Ajjer]]
*[[Taxila]]
*[[Tchogha Zanbil]]
*[[Te Wahipounamu]]
*[[Teatru Akkademiku Reġjonali ta' Donetsk]]
*[[Teatru Antik ta’ Epidaurus|Teatru Antik ta' Epidaurus]]
*[[Teatru Rjal]]
*[[Teatru Ruman ta' Orange]]
*[[Teatru tal-Opri Margravjali]]
*[[Teatru tal-Opri ta' Sydney]]
*[[Tebe (Eġittu)]]
*[[Tekniku]]
*[[Telč]]
*[[Tempji Ħajjin Kbar taċ-Ċola]]
* [[Tempji Megalitiċi ta’ Malta u Għawdex|Tempji Megalitiċi ta' Malta u Għawdex]]
* [[Tempji ta' Ħal Tarxien]]
*[[Tempju ta' Apollo Epikurju f’Bassae|Tempju ta' Apollo Epikurju f'Bassae]]
*[[Tempju ta' Asklepju ta' Epidaurus]]
*[[Tempju ta' Haeinsa]]
*[[Tempju ta' Kakatiya Rudreshwara]]
*[[Tempju ta' Mahabodhi]]
*[[Tempju ta' Preah Vihear]]
*[[Tempju tal-Ġenna]]
*[[Tempju tal-Għar ta' Dambulla]]
*[[Tempju tax-Xemx ta' Konarak]]
*[[Tempju u Ċimiterju ta' Konfuċju u l-Villa tal-Familja Kong f'Qufu]]
*[[Teotihuacan]]
*[[Tequila (Belt)]]
* [[Terminoloġija]]
* [[Tetiana Ostashchenko]]
* [[Tétouan]]
*[[Teżawru]]
*[[Theobald Boehm]]
*[[Theodore Géricault]]
*[[Thimlich Ohinga]]
*[[Tholos ta' El Romeral]]
*[[Thomas à Kempis]]
*[[Thoros ta' Edessa]]
*[[Tian Shan]]
* [[Tieqa tad-Dwejra]]
* [[Tieqa ta' Wied il-Mielaħ]]
* [[Tikal]]
* [[Timbuktu]]
* [[Timgad]]
* [[Tina Turner]]
* [[Tinetto]]
* [[Tino]]
* [[Tinqix fuq il-Blat f'Alta]]
*[[Tinqix fuq il-Blat f'Tanum]]
*[[Tinqix fuq il-Blat fir-Reġjun ta' Ha'il]]
*[[Tinqix fuq il-Blat ta' Dazu]]
*[[Tinqix ta' Bisotun]]
*[[Tipasa]]
*[[Tiryns]]
*[[Tiwanaku]]
*[[Tiya]]
*[[Tlacotalpan]]
*[[TNMK]]
*[[Tobias Michael Carel Asser]]
*[[Toledo]]
*[[Tomaso Antonio Vitali]]
*[[Tomiri]]
*[[Toroq tal-Ħarir: il-Kuritur ta' Zarafshan-Karakum]]
*[[Toroq tal-Ħarir: in-Network ta' Rotot tal-Kuritur ta' Chang'an-Tianshan]]
* [[Torri Mmejjel ta' Pisa]]
* [[Torri ta' Belém]]
*[[Torri ta' Erkole]]
*[[Torri ta' Londra]]
*[[Torri tax-Xebba (Baku)]]
*[[Torrijiet residenzjali tas-Svan|Torrijiet Residenzjali tas-Svan]]
*[[Toruń]]
*[[Tpittir fuq il-Blat ta' Sierra de San Francisco]]
*[[Tpittir fuq il-Blat tal-Baċir Mediterran Iberiku]]
*[[Tpittir fuq il-Blat tal-Għar ta' Shulgan-Tash]]
*[[Trattat ta' Kaunas]]
*[[Třebíč]]
*[[Trinidad, Kuba]]
*[[Trogir]]
*[[Trojja]]
*[[Tropiċi Mistagħdra ta' Queensland]]
*[[Tserkva ta' Santa Marija, Owczary]]
*[[Tserkva ta' Santa Marija Omm Alla, Chotyniec]]
*[[Tserkva tal-Injam tal-Karpazji fil-Polonja u fl-Ukrajna]]
*[[Tsodilo]]
*[[Tubeteika]]
*[[Tulou ta' Fujian|''Tulou'' ta' Fujian]]
*[[Tumbati Ċerimonjali tal-Ħamrija ta' Hopewell]]
*[[Tumbati Funebri ta' Dilmun]]
*[[Tumbati Funebri ta' Gaya]]
*[[Tumbati Monumentali tal-Ħamrija ta' Poverty Point]]
*[[Turan]]
*[[Tutankhamun]]
*[[Twyfelfontein]]
*[[Tyre]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;U&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Úbeda]]
* [[Ugo Foscolo]]
*[[Uluru]]
*[[Um er-Rasas]]
*[[Umm Al-Jimāl]]
*[[UNESCO]]
*[[Università Iżlamika Russa]]
*[[Università Nazzjonali Awtonoma tal-Messiku]]
*[[Università ta' Al-Qarawiġin|Università ta' Al-Qarawijin]]
*[[Università ta' Coimbra]]
*[[Unjoni Sovjetika]]
*[[Urbino]]
*[['Uruq Bani Mu'arid]]
*[[Uxmal]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;V&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Val d'Orcia]]
*[[Val di Noto]]
*[[Valentyna Radzymovska]]
*[[Valeria Bruni Tedeschi]]
*[[Vallée de Mai]]
*[[Vasco da Gama]]
*[[Vat Phou]]
*[[Velimir Khlebnikov]]
*[[Venera 7]]
*[[Verona]]
*[[Via Appia]]
*[[Victoria Amelina]]
*[[Vigan]]
*[[Vincent van Gogh]]
*[[Vilel u Ġonna tal-Familja Medici]]
*[[Villa d'Este]]
*[[Villa Romana del Casale]]
*[[Villa ta' Adrijanu]]
*[[Villa Tugendhat]]
*[[Villaġġi Antiki tat-Tramuntana tas-Sirja]]
*[[Villaġġi bil-Knejjes Iffortifikati f'Transilvanja]]
*[[Villaġġi Storiċi ta' Shirakawa-gō u Gokayama]]
*[[Vilnius]]
*[[Visby]]
*[[Vitaliy Kim]]
*[[Vito Volterra]]
*[[Vittorio De Sica]]
*[[Vjenna]]
*[[Vladimir Ashkenazy]]
*[[Vlkolínec]]
*[[Volodymyr Zelenskyy]]
*[[Volubilis]]
*[[Võros]]
*[[Vulkan tat-Tajn ta’ Lökbatan]]
*[[Vulkani ta' Kamchatka]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;W&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Wachau]]
* [[Wadi Al-Hitan]]
*[[Wadi Rum]]
*[[Wales]]
*[[Weimar Klassika]]
*[[Werrej]]
*[[Wied Superjuri tar-Renu Nofsani]]
*[[Wied t'Isfel tal-Awash]]
*[[Wied ta' Kathmandu]]
*[[Wied ta' Loire]]
*[[Wied ta' Madriu-Perafita-Claror]]
*[[Wied ta' M'zab]]
*[[Wied ta' Qadisha]]
*[[Wied ta' Viñales]]
*[[Wied tal-Fondoq il-Kbir]]
*[[Wied tat-Tempji]]
*[[Wilhelm Grimm]]
*[[Wilhelm Röntgen]]
*[[Willem de Sitter]]
*[[Willemstad]]
*[[William Boeing]]
*[[Wirt Arkeoloġiku tal-Wied ta' Lenggong]]
*[[Wirt tal-Foresti Tropikali ta' Sumatra]]
*[[Wismar]]
*[[Władysław Horodecki]]
*[[Wolfgang Paul]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;X&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Xanadu]]
* [[Xanthos]]
* [[Xatt it-Tiben]]
*[[Xeff]]
*[[Xidi]]
*[[Xmara Omo]]
*[[Xochicalco]]
*[[Xogħlijiet ta' Jože Plečnik f'Ljubljana – Disinn Urban Iċċentrat fuq il-Bniedem]]
*[[Xogħol Arkitettoniku ta' Le Corbusier]]
*[[Xjenza spazjali]]
*[[Xtatol]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;Y&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Yagul]]
* [[Yakushima]]
* [[Yana Zinkevych]]
* [[Yangdong]]
* [[Yarmak]]
* [[Yaroslavl]]
* [[Yazd]]
* [[Yeni-Kale]]
* [[Yin Xu]]
* [[Yllka Mujo]]
* [[Yogyakarta]]
*[[Yuliya Gushchina]]
*[[Yuri Lysianskyi]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;Ż&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Żapoteki]]
* [[Żiemel Abjad ta' Osmington]]
* [[Żona Kulturali ta' Ḥimā]]
*[[Żona l-Kbira tal-Muntanji Blu]]
*[[Żona Naturali Selvaġġa tat-Tażmanja]]
*[[Żona Protetta ta' Jungfrau-Aletsch]]
*[[Żona Protetta ta' Pliva, Janj u r-Riżerva ta' Janjske Otoke]]
*[[Żona Protetta tal-Gżejjer Phoenix]]
*[[Żona ta' Interess Xeniku u Storiku ta' Huanglong]]
*[[Żona ta' Interess Xeniku u Storiku tal-Wied ta' Jiuzhaigou]]
*[[Żona ta' Interess Xeniku u Storiku ta' Wulingyuan]]
*[[Żona ta' Konservazzjoni ta' Guanacaste]]
*[[Żona ta' Konservazzjoni ta' Ngorongoro]]
*[[Żona ta' Konservazzjoni ta' Pantanal]]
*[[Żona tat-Tpittir fuq il-Blat ta' Chongoni]]
*[[Żoni Protetti tar-Reġjun tal-Fjuri tal-Kap]]
*[[Żoni Protetti tat-Tliet Xmajjar Paralleli ta' Yunnan]]
*[[Żoni Storiċi ta' Baekje]]
*[[Żoni Storiċi ta' Gyeongju]]
*[[Żooloġija]]

=== '''&lt;u&gt;Z&lt;/u&gt;''' ===

* [[Zabid]]
* [[Zacatecas (belt)]]
* [[Zagori]]
* [[Zamość]]
* [[Žatec]]
* [[Žehra]]
* [[Ziba Ganiyeva]]
* [[Zivana]]
* [[Zlata Kolarić-Kišur]]
*[[Zofia Zamenhof]]
*[[Zollverein]]
*[[Zond 5]]
*[[Zsuzsanna Lorántffy]]</text>
      <sha1>6cjoc1cqjkqt7992lkbvuc0wqg8u5rv</sha1>
    </revision>
  </page>
  <page>
    <title>Mafkar tal-Paċi ta' Hiroshima</title>
    <ns>0</ns>
    <id>27614</id>
    <revision>
      <id>330236</id>
      <parentid>315147</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:18:08Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330236</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="9880" sha1="tsrimj43bu51oqw8ke3i59j7idw6tmk" xml:space="preserve">[[Stampa:Genbaku Dome04-r.JPG|daqsminuri|290x290px|Il-Koppla ta' Genbaku]]
Il-'''Mafkar tal-Paċi ta' Hiroshima''' (広島平和記念碑, ''Hiroshima Heiwa Kinenhi''), oriġinarjament is-'''Sala tal-Promozzjoni Industrijali Prefetturali ta' Hiroshima''', u issa msejjaħ komunement il-'''Koppla ta'''' '''Genbaku''', il-'''Koppla tal-Bomba Atomika''' (原爆ドーム, ''Genbaku Dōmu''), huwa parti mill-Park tal-Mafkar tal-Paċi ta' [[Hiroshima]] f'Hiroshima, il-[[Ġappun]] u tniżżel fil-lista tas-[[Sit ta' Wirt Dinji|Siti ta' Wirt Dinji]] tal-[[UNESCO]] fl-1996.&lt;ref name=&quot;:0&quot;&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/775/|titlu=Hiroshima Peace Memorial (Genbaku Dome)|kunjom=Centre|isem=UNESCO World Heritage|sit=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2021-11-27}}&lt;/ref&gt; Il-fdal tas-sala jservi bħala mafkar għall-iktar minn 140,000 ruħ li nqatlu fil-bumbardament atomiku ta' [[Hiroshima]] fi tmiem [[it-Tieni Gwerra Dinjija]].&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=http://rekishi.jkn21.com/|titlu=&quot;原爆ドーム&quot; [A-Bomb Dome]. Nihon Daihyakka Zensho (Nipponika) (in Japanese). Tokyo: Shogakukan. 2012.|data=2007-08-25|sit=web.archive.org|data-aċċess=2021-11-27|arkivju-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070825113418/http://rekishi.jkn21.com/|arkivju-data=2007-08-25|url-status=bot: unknown}}&lt;/ref&gt;

== Storja ==
Il-binja tas-Sala tal-Wiri tal-Prodotti oriġinarjament ġiet iddisinjata mill-[[arkitett]] [[Ċekja|Ċek]] [[Jan Letzel]]. Id-disinn kien jinkludi koppla li tispikka fl-ogħla parti tal-binja. Il-binja tlestiet f'April 1915 u ssejħet il-binja tal-Wiri Kummerċjali Prefetturali ta' Hiroshima. Formalment infetħet għall-pubbliku f'Awwissu ta' dik is-sena. Fl-1921, l-isem inbidel għal Sala tal-Wiri tal-Prodotti Prefetturali ta' Hiroshima, u mill-ġdid fl-1933, għal Sala tal-Promozzjoni Industrijali Prefetturali ta' Hiroshima (bil-Ġappuniż: 広島県産業奨励館; Hiroshima-ken Sangyo Shourei-kan). Il-binja kienet tinsab f'distrett kummerċjali kbir maġenb il-[[Pont ta' Aioi]] u kienet tintuża primarjament għall-wirjiet ta[[L-Arti|l-arti]] u edukattivi.&lt;ref&gt;Logan, William (2008). ''Places of Pain and Shame: Dealing with 'Difficult Heritage'''. Routledge.&lt;/ref&gt;

=== Bumbardament Atomiku ===
[[Stampa:Hiroshima Dome 1945.gif|xellug|daqsminuri|Il-Koppla ta' Genbaku qalb il-qerda f'Ottubru 1945. Ritratt ta' [[Shigeo Hayashi]], wieħed miż-żewġ fotografi mit-timijiet ta' stħarriġ akkademiku.]]
Fit-08:15 tas-6 ta' Awwissu 1945, l-ewwel bomba atomika li qatt intużat fi gwerra twaqqgħet mill-Forzi tal-Ajru tal-Armata tal-[[Stati Uniti|Istati Uniti]] mill-''Enola Gay'', inġenju tal-ajru militari bumbardatur tat-tip B-29. Il-qawwa tal-bomba atomika effettivament qerdet għalkollox il-belt ta' Hiroshima.&lt;ref&gt;Schofield, John and Cocroft, Wayne (eds.) (2009). ''A Fearsome Heritage: Diverse Legacies of the Cold War''. Left Coast Press.&lt;/ref&gt;

Qabel, fil-25 ta' Lulju, il-Ġeneral [[Carl Spaatz]], il-kmandant tal-Forzi tal-Ajru Strateġiċi tal-Istati Uniti fil-[[Oċean Paċifiku|Paċifiku]], irċieva ordnijiet biex iwettaq attakk b'&quot;bomba speċjali&quot; fuq bliet magħżula fil-Ġappun. L-ewwel belt fil-mira li ntgħażlet kienet Hiroshima, li kellha port importanti fin-Nofsinhar ta' Honshu u kienet il-kwartieri ġenerali tat-Tieni Armata Ġenerali Ġappuniża b'persunal ta' 40,000 militar fil-belt. Il-bomba ġiet assemblata b'segretezza u ġiet mgħobbija fuq l-''Enola Gay''. Il-bomba, imlaqqma &quot;Tifel Ċkejken&quot; (bl-[[Lingwa Ingliża|Ingliż]]: Little Boy), kellha qawwa ekwivalenti għal 15,000 tunnellata ta' TNT. L-ajruplan militari waqqa' l-bomba fuq il-belt fit-08:15:17, ħin lokali, fis-6 ta' Awwissu 1945. Madwar 43 sekonda wara li twaqqgħet, il-bomba ħadet fuq il-belt, u ma laqtitx il-mira tagħha direttament b'240 metru. Il-bomba kienet maħsuba biex tieħu fuq il-Pont ta' Aioi, iżda minflok splodiet direttament fuq l-Isptar ta' Shima, li kien jinsab qrib ħafna tal-Koppla ta' Genbaku. Minħabba li l-isplużjoni seħħet kważi fuqha eżatt, il-binja rnexxielha żżomm l-għamla tagħha mingħajr ma tiġġarraf għalkollox.&lt;ref&gt;Ide, Kanako (Winter 2007). &quot;A Symbol of Peace and Peace Education: The Genbaku Dome in Hiroshima&quot;. ''Journal of Aesthetic Education''. 4. '''41''' (4): 12–23.&lt;/ref&gt; Il-kolonni vertikali tal-binja rnexxielhom jirreżistu l-forza vertikali kważi 'l isfel għalkollox tal-isplużjoni, u partijiet ħitan esterni tal-konkoż u tal-brikks baqgħu intatti. Iċ-ċentru tal-isplużjoni seħħ 150 metru orizzontalment u 600 metru vertikalment mill-Koppla ta' Genbaku. Kull min kien fil-binja nqatel minnufih. Il-binja rnexxielha tibqa' wieqfa wkoll bis-saħħa tad-disinn tagħha biex tkun reżistenti għat-[[Terremot|terremoti]]; fil-fatt felħet għal terremoti qabel u wara l-bumbardament.&lt;ref&gt;Milam, Michael C. (July–August 2010). &quot;Hiroshima and Nagasaki&quot;. ''Humanist''. Buffalo, NY: American Humanist Association and the American Ethical Union. '''70''' (4): 32–35.&lt;/ref&gt;

=== Wara l-Bumbardament Atomiku ===

==== Preservazzjoni ====
[[Stampa:Hiromuseum.jpg|daqsminuri|297x297px|Il-Binja tas-Sala tal-Wiri tal-Prodotti fil-kundizzjoni oriġinali tagħha (1921-1933).]]
Minħabba l-kostruzzjoni tagħha bil-ġebel u bl-azzar, il-binja kienet waħda mill-ftit strutturi li baqgħu weqfin ħdejn l-ipoċentru tal-bomba. Il-binja malajr bdiet tissejjaħ il-Koppla ta' Genbaku jew il-Koppla tal-Bomba Atomika, minħabba l-qafas espost tal-metall tal-koppla fil-quċċata tal-binja. L-istruttura kienet skedata biex tiġi demolita mal-bqija tal-fdalijiet ta' binjiet, iżda l-maġġoranza tal-binja baqgħet intatta, u b'hekk il-pjanijiet ta' demolizzjoni ġew posposti. Il-Koppla ta' Genbaku saret suġġett kontroversjali. Uħud min-nies tal-post riedu li titwaqqa', filwaqt li oħrajn riedu li tiġi ppreservata bħala mafkar tal-bumbardament u simbolu tal-paċi. Fl-aħħar mill-aħħar, meta bdiet ir-rikostruzzjoni ta' Hiroshima, il-fdalijiet tal-qafas tal-binja ġew ippreservati.

Mill-1950 sal-1964, il-Park tal-Mafkar tal-Paċi ta' Hiroshima ġie stabbilit madwar il-Koppla ta' Genbaku. Il-Kunsill tal-Belt ta' Hiroshima adotta riżoluzzjoni fl-1966 dwar il-preservazzjoni permanenti tal-Koppla ta' Genbaku, uffiċjalment imsejħa l-Mafkar tal-Paċi ta' Hiroshima. Il-binja għadha l-għeliem primarju tal-park.
L-erożjoni u d-deterjorament tal-Koppla ta' Genbaku baqgħu sejrin fil-perjodu ta' wara l-gwerra. Fl-1966, il-Kunsill tal-Belt ta' Hiroshima ddikjara li kien biħsiebu jippreserva l-istruttura b'mod indefinit. L-ewwel sindku ta' Hiroshima elett b'vot popolari, [[Shinzo Hamai]] (1905-1968) talab għal fondi għall-isforz ta' preservazzjoni domestikament u internazzjonalment. Matul vjaġġ f'[[Tokjo|Tokyo]], Hamai beda jiġbor il-fondi direttament fit-toroq tal-[[belt kapitali]]. Ix-xogħol ta' preservazzjoni fuq il-Koppla ta' Genbaku tlesta fl-1967. Saru żewġ proġetti żgħar ta' preservazzjoni fuq il-binja biex tiġi stabilizzata l-koppla, l-iktar bejn Ottubru 1989 u Marzu 1990.

Il-Koppla ta' Genbaku għadha kważi fl-istess kundizzjoni ta' wara l-bumbardament tas-6 ta' Awwissu 1945. Il-bidliet li saru fil-fdalijiet, bil-ħsieb li tiġi żgurata l-istabbiltà tal-istruttura, kienu mill-inqas.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=http://www.pcf.city.hiroshima.jp/virtual/VirtualMuseum_e/exhibit_e/exh0702_e/exh070201_e.html#01|titlu=Let's look at the Special Exhibit|sit=www.pcf.city.hiroshima.jp|data-aċċess=2021-11-27|arkivju-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180927221740/http://www.pcf.city.hiroshima.jp/virtual/VirtualMuseum_e/exhibit_e/exh0702_e/exh070201_e.html#01|arkivju-data=2018-09-27|url-status=dead}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=http://rekishi.jkn21.com/|titlu=&quot;浜井信三&quot; [Shinzo Hamai]. Nihon Jinmei Daijiten (bil-Ġappuniż). Tokyo: Shogakukan. 2012.|data=2007-08-25|sit=web.archive.org|data-aċċess=2021-11-27|arkivju-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070825113418/http://rekishi.jkn21.com/|arkivju-data=2007-08-25|url-status=bot: unknown}}&lt;/ref&gt;

== Sit ta' Wirt Dinji ==
F'Diċembru 1996, il-Koppla ta' Genbaku ġiet irreġistrata fil-lista tas-Siti ta' Wirt Dinji tal-UNESCO abbażi tal-Konvenzjoni għall-Protezzjoni tal-Wirt Kulturali u Naturali Dinji.&lt;ref name=&quot;:0&quot; /&gt; L-inklużjoni tagħha fil-lista tas-Siti ta' Wirt Dinji tal-UNESCO kienet ibbażata fuq ir-reżistenza tagħha għall-forza distruttiva tal-bomba atomika, l-ewwel użu ta' armi nukleari fuq popolazzjoni umana, u r-rappreżentanza tagħha bħala simbolu tal-paċi.

Id-delegati tal-Kumitat tal-Wirt Dinji miċ-[[Ċina]] u mill-Istati Uniti kellhom riżervi rigward il-konferma tal-mafkar bħala Sit ta' Wirt Dinji. Iċ-Ċina kkwotat il-possibbiltà li l-[[monument]] jintuża bħala skuża biex iċekken il-fatt li l-pajjiżi vittmi tal-aggressjoni tal-Ġappun ġarrbu l-ikbar telf ta' ħajjiet matul il-gwerra, u l-Istati Uniti ddikjaraw li mafkar għal sit tal-gwerra jħalli barra l-kuntest storiku meħtieġ. L-Istati Uniti ma assoċjawx ruħhom mad-deċiżjoni li l-Mafkar tal-Paċi ta' Hiroshima jsir Sit ta' Wirt Dinji.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/archive/repco96x.htm#annex5|titlu=WH Committee: Report of the 20th Session, Merida 1996|sit=whc.unesco.org|data-aċċess=2021-11-27}}&lt;/ref&gt;

Il-valur universali straordinarju tas-sit ġie rrikonoxxut abbażi ta' kriterju wieħed tal-għażla tal-UNESCO: il-'''kriterju (vi)''' &quot;Assoċjazzjoni diretta jew tanġibbli ma' avvenimenti jew ma' tradizzjonijiet ħajjin, ma' ideat jew ma' twemmin, jew ma' xogħlijiet artistiċi jew letterarji ta' valur universali straordinarju&quot;.&lt;ref name=&quot;:0&quot; /&gt;
[[Stampa:HiroshimaPeaceMemorialPanorama-2.jpg|nofs|daqsminuri|696x696px|Veduta panoramika tal-Makfar tal-Paċi ta' Hiroshima]]

== Referenzi ==

[[Kategorija:Siti ta' Wirt Dinji Kulturali]]
[[Kategorija:Ġappun]]
[[Kategorija:Monumenti]]
[[Kategorija:Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Ġappun]]</text>
      <sha1>tsrimj43bu51oqw8ke3i59j7idw6tmk</sha1>
    </revision>
  </page>
  <page>
    <title>Pythagoreion</title>
    <ns>0</ns>
    <id>31998</id>
    <revision>
      <id>330235</id>
      <parentid>315019</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:16:36Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330235</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="3539" sha1="7v8d6uv4wnzv0tadt9hmu2mxydojutm" xml:space="preserve">[[Stampa:SamosAntiqueFortificationWalls.jpg|daqsminuri|Il-Pythagoreion.]]
Il-'''Pythagoreion''' huwa sit [[Arkeoloġija|arkeoloġiku]] tal-belt antika ta' Samos f'[[Samos]], il-[[Greċja]]. Is-sit jinsab fl-inħawi tal-belt moderna ta' [[Pythagoreio]], u minnu oriġina isem il-belt moderna. Is-sit arkeoloġiku fih [[Monument|monumenti]] Griegi u [[Imperu Ruman|Rumani]] antiki kif ukoll mina famuża tal-qedem, magħrufa bħala l-Mina ta' Eupalinos jew l-Akkwedott ta' Eupalinos. Flimkien mal-[[Heraion ta' Samos]], il-Pythagoreion tniżżel fil-lista tas-[[Sit ta' Wirt Dinji|Siti ta' Wirt Dinji]] tal-[[UNESCO]] fl-1992 bħala xhieda tal-importanza [[Kultura|kulturali]], militari u ekonomika ta' Samos fi żmien il-qedem u fil-Greċja Klassika bikrija.&lt;ref name=&quot;:0&quot;&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/595/|titlu=Pythagoreion and Heraion of Samos|kunjom=Centre|isem=UNESCO World Heritage|sit=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2024-04-20}}&lt;/ref&gt;

== Storja u deskrizzjoni ==
L-iżjed sejbiet arkeoloġiċi bikrin fis-sit imorru lura għar-raba' millenju [[Ante Christum natum|Q.K]]., matul żmien in-[[Neolitiku|Neolitiċi]]. Madankollu, l-insedjament beda għall-ħabta tas-seklu 15 Q.K., meta l-Minoani kkolonizzaw il-gżira ta' Samos. Wara l-Gwerra ta' [[Trojja]], l-importanza navali u ekonomika ta' Samos kibret sa ma laħqet il-quċċata tagħha fis-seklu 6 Q.K. Għalkemm inħakmet mill-[[Persjani]] ftit wara, il-belt baqgħet ċentru kummerċjali influwenti sas-seklu 3 [[WK|W.K]].

Il-belt antika hija mdawra minn fortifikazzjonijiet li jmorru lura għall-Perjodu Klassiku, jiġifieri għall-ħabta tas-sekli 5 u 4 Q.K. L-iskavi fil-belt stess ħarġu fid-dieher il-pjanta tat-toroq tal-belt antika, inkluż sistema tad-dranaġġ u binjiet pubbliċi kif ukoll [[Reliġjon|reliġjużi]]. Barra minn hekk, il-fdalijiet ta' binjiet Rumani nstabu u għadhom fis-sit, inkluż agora, banjijiet pubbliċi, stadium, u djar residenzjali.

Dan l-aħħar inbena [[mużew]] tas-sit li jinsab fiċ-ċentru tal-belt moderna. Fih hemm għall-wiri iktar minn 3,000 oġġett li jippreżentaw l-[[evoluzzjoni]] kulturali tal-belt antika ta' Samos u tal-inħawi rurali tal-madwar mir-raba' millenju Q.K. sas-seklu 7 W.K.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://archaeologicalmuseums.gr/en/museum/5df34af3deca5e2d79e8c13d/archaeological-museum-of-pythagoreion|titlu=Archaeological Museum of Pythagoreion {{!}} Directorate of Archaeological Museums, Exhibitions and Educational Programs|kunjom=Programs|isem=Directorate of Archaeological Museums, Exhibitions and Educational|sit=Greek Archaeological Museums|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2024-04-20}}&lt;/ref&gt;

== Sit ta' Wirt Dinji ==
Il-Pythagoreion u l-Heraion ta' Samos ġew iddeżinjati bħala Sit ta' Wirt Dinji tal-UNESCO fl-1992.&lt;ref name=&quot;:0&quot; /&gt;

Il-valur universali straordinarju tas-sit ġie rrikonoxxut abbażi ta' żewġ kriterji tal-għażla tal-UNESCO: il-'''kriterju (ii)''' &quot;Wirja ta' skambju importanti ta' valuri umani, tul perjodu ta' żmien jew fi ħdan żona kulturali fid-[[Id-Dinja|dinja]], dwar l-iżviluppi fl-arkitettura jew it-teknoloġija, l-[[arti]] monumentali, l-ippjanar tal-bliet jew id-disinn tal-pajsaġġ&quot;; u l-'''kriterju (iii)''' &quot;Xhieda unika jew minn tal-inqas eċċezzjonali ta' tradizzjoni kulturali jew ta' ċivilizzazzjoni li għadha ħajja jew li għebet&quot;.&lt;ref name=&quot;:0&quot; /&gt;

== Referenzi ==

[[Kategorija:Siti arkeoloġiċi]]
[[Kategorija:Siti ta' Wirt Dinji Kulturali]]
[[Kategorija:Greċja]]
[[Kategorija:Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Greċja]]</text>
      <sha1>7v8d6uv4wnzv0tadt9hmu2mxydojutm</sha1>
    </revision>
  </page>
  <page>
    <title>Da Nang</title>
    <ns>0</ns>
    <id>32315</id>
    <revision>
      <id>330237</id>
      <parentid>318581</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:18:32Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330237</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="32266" sha1="tiefsihypzo5ruvyp23n4ig3nq78kg7" xml:space="preserve">{{Infobox city|coatofarms=Emblem of Danang City.svg}}

'''Đà Nẵng''' jew '''Da Nang''' &lt;ref name=&quot;LAROUSSE&quot;&gt;{{Ċita web|url=http://www.larousse.fr/encyclopedie/ville/Da_Nang/115572|titlu=Da Nang|pubblikatur=Encyclopédie Larousse|data-aċċess=26 octobre 2016}}&lt;/ref&gt;, li qabel kienet tissejjaħ fil-West '''Tourane''' &lt;ref name=&quot;LAROUSSE&quot; /&gt; (imsemmi wkoll ''Touron'' &lt;ref&gt;[[Conrad Malte-Brun]], ''Géographie universelle'', volume 4, Dufour, 1856, page 58&lt;/ref&gt; ), hija belt fir- reġjun tal-Kosta Ċentrali tal [[Vjetnam|-Vjetnam]] t'Isfel. Il-belt antika msejħa [[Indrapura]], kapitali ta' Champā bejn l-875 u l-978, tinsab ħdejn il-belt.

Da Nang jinsab madwar {{unité|600|km}}  minn [[Hanoi]] (bħala d-dritta taċ-ċawla) u Ho Chi Minh City. Kien okkupat mill-Franċiżi mbagħad mill-Amerikani. Illum hija t-tielet l-akbar belt fil-pajjiż. Ftit meqjusa bħala belt provinċjali, il-belt qed tesperjenza boom ekonomiku simbolizzat mill-bosta skyscrapers reċenti tagħha. 

Huwa qrib is-siti storiċi tas- Santwarju Mỹ Sơn u Hội An . Waħda mill-ġawhar tal-belt hija l-mużew tal-iskultura Cham tagħha maħluq minn Henri Parmentier fl-1915 u li jippreżenta l-isbaħ kollezzjoni tal-antikitajiet tal-kultura Cham fid-dinja &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=http://lecourrier.vn/un-musee-centenaire-qui-preserve-la-sculpture-cham/183977.html|titlu=Un musée centenaire qui préserve la sculpture cham|sit=[[Le Courrier du Vietnam]]|data-aċċess=07-08-2020}}.&lt;/ref&gt; .

Il-belt kienet kolonja Franċiża mill-1787 sal-1795, bl-arċipelagu Poulo Condor, imbagħad fi ħdan l-Indokina Franċiża, mill-1884 sal-1954. : hija għalhekk il-belt tal-Vjetnam li kienet l-ewwel li ġiet okkupata mill-Franċiżi, ħafna qabel Saigon &lt;ref name=&quot;:0&quot;&gt;{{Ċita ktieb|kunjom=Faure|isem=Alexis|data=1891|sena=1891|titlu=Mgr Pigneau de Behaine, évêque d'Adran : les Français en Cochinchine au XVIIIe siècle|url=https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k97418458|lingwa=FR|edizzjoni=A. Challamel|post=Paris|paġna=123|data-aċċess=2024-03-25}}&lt;/ref&gt; . 

Đà Nẵng tinsab ħdejn Huế, l-eks-kapitali imperjali sal-Imperatur Bao Dai fuq l-estwarju tax-Xmara Han u fil-qiegħ tal-muntanji Sơn Trà.

== Storja ==
'''&lt;big&gt;Il-Vjetnam tal-qedem&lt;/big&gt;'''

L-oriġini tal-belt tmur lura għar-renju tal-qedem ta’ Champa, stabbilit fl-192 AD. Fl-aqwa tagħha, l-isfera ta 'influwenza ta' Chams kienet miġbud minn Huế sa [[Vũng Tàu]]. Il-belt ta 'Indrapura, fis-sit tar-raħal modern ta' Dong Duong fil-Provinċja ta 'Quảng Nam (madwar 50 km (31 mi) minn Da Nang), kienet il-kapitali ta' Champa minn madwar 875 sa madwar 1000 AD. Fir-reġjun ta’ Da Nang kien hemm ukoll il-belt antika Cham ta’ Singhapura (“Belt ta’ l-Iljun”), li l-post tagħha ġie identifikat ma’ sit arkeoloġiku fir-raħal modern ta’ Trà Kiệu, u l-wied ta’ Mỹ Sơn, fejn għadd ta’ tempji u torrijiet mħassra għadhom jistgħu jitqiesu&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://facultystaff.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/KingdomOfChampa.html|titlu=Kingdom of Champa|data=2012-05-03|sit=web.archive.org|data-aċċess=2024-12-10|arkivju-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120503061157/https://facultystaff.richmond.edu/~ebolt/history398/KingdomOfChampa.html|arkivju-data=2012-05-03|url-status=dead}}&lt;/ref&gt;.

Fl-aħħar nofs tas-seklu 10, ir-rejiet ta 'Indrapura daħlu f'kunflitt ma' Đại Việt, li mbagħad kienu bbażati f'Hoa Lư qrib [[Hanoi]] moderna. Champa kienet indipendenti, sabet ruħha fil-bżonn li tiddefendi t-territorju tagħha biex iżżomm it-theddida maħluqa mill-Imperu Khmer fil-punent, u tespandi t-territorju tagħha lejn it-tramuntana, bit-tama li tirbaħ in-nazzjon Vjetnamiż. Hemmhekk, bir-Renju Vjetnamiż f'taqlib wara l-qtil ta' Đinh Tiên Hoàng, Champa għamel tentattiv bla suċċess biex jinvadi Đại Việt fl-979 bl-appoġġ taċ-[[Ċina]], iżda falla minħabba d-difiża qawwija tat-territorju Vjetnamiż taħt il-kmand ta 'Lê Hoàn. Fl-982, tliet ambaxxaturi mibgħuta f'Champa mill-Imperatur Lê Hoàn tad-Đại Việt (fundatur tad-dinastija Lê Bikrija) ġew miżmuma f'Indrapura. Lê Hoàn iddeċieda li jmur fuq l-offensiva, li jkeċċi Indrapura u joqtol lill-Cham King Parameshvaravarman I. Bħala riżultat ta 'dawn l-intoppi, il-Cham eventwalment abbanduna Indrapura madwar 1000 AD.

Il-kampanja Đại Việt kontra Champa kompliet lejn l-aħħar tas-seklu 11, meta l-Cham kienu sfurzati jċedu t-tliet provinċji tat-Tramuntana tagħhom lill-ħakkiema tad-dinastija Lý. Ftit wara, il-bdiewa Vjetnamiżi bdew jiċċaqilqu lejn l-artijiet ta’ qabel Cham li kienu għadhom ma ġewx tilfu, biddluhom f’għelieqi tar-ross u mxew bla waqfien lejn in-nofsinhar, delta b’delta, tul il-pjanura kostali dejqa. L-espansjoni tan-nofsinhar ta' Đại Việt (magħrufa bħala Nam Tiến) kompliet għal diversi sekli, u laħqet il-qofol tagħha fl-annessjoni tal-biċċa l-kbira tat-territorji Cham sa tmiem is-seklu 15. 

Iċ-Ċittadella ta' Điện Hải nbniet għall-ewwel darba fl-1813 bħala fortizza tal-fuħħar li tinsab fit-tramuntana tal-pożizzjoni preżenti tagħha, biċ-ċittadella ta' An Hải fuq ix-xatt tal-lvant mibnija mill-Imperatur Gia Long biex tipproteġi l-port, u sal-1819, kemm Điện Hải kif ukoll An Hải ċitadelli kienu nbnew mill-ġdid fil-briks. Fl-1823, iben u s-suċċessur ta' Gia Long Minh Mạng bena mill-ġdid il-fortizza oriġinali ta' Điện Hải fuq muntanja għolja fil-post attwali, u ġiet imtejba minn fortizza (đồn) għal ċittadella (thành) fl-1835&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.historicvietnam.com/dien-hai-citadel/|titlu=Dien Hai – Da Nang's Forgotten Vauban Citadel|kunjom=timdolinghcmc@gmail.com|data=2020-01-01|lingwa=en-US|data-aċċess=2024-12-10}}&lt;/ref&gt;.

'''&lt;big&gt;Kuntatt tal-Punent&lt;/big&gt;'''

Wieħed mill-ewwel Ewropej li żaru Da Nang kien l-esploratur Portugiż António de Faria, li ankra f’Da Nang fl-1535. Faria kien wieħed mill-ewwel Punenti li kiteb dwar iż-żona u, permezz tal-influwenza tiegħu, il-bastimenti Portugiżi bdew isejħu regolarment f’[[Hội. An]], li dak iż-żmien kien port ferm aktar importanti minn Da Nang. Matul is-sekli 17 u 18, kummerċjanti u missjunarji Franċiżi u Spanjoli regolarment waslu fuq l-art f’[[Hội An]], eżatt fin-nofsinhar ta’ Đà Nẵng. Amerikan, John White, wasal f’Da Nang (dak iż-żmien imsejjaħ Turon) fit-18 ta’ Ġunju 1819 fil-brig Franklin ta’ Salem, Massachusetts, u ġie avżat li l-pajjiż kien qed jirkupra minn gwerer devastanti, u li dak ftit oġġetti kienu ġew prodotti fil- żona kienet diġà allokata. Vapuri Amerikani oħra li waslu ftit wara kienu l-Marmion ta’ [[Boston]], u l-Aurora u Beverly ta’ Salem&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita ktieb|kunjom=Trow|isem=Charles Edward|data=1905|titlu=The old shipmasters of Salem, with mention of eminent merchants|url=https://archive.org/stream/cu31924028839152/cu31924028839152_djvu.txt|pubblikatur=New York and London : G.P. Putnam's Sons}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.angelfire.com/vt/hongnam/hoianhistory.html|titlu=HOI AN's History|sit=www.angelfire.com|data-aċċess=2024-12-10}}&lt;/ref&gt;.

Il-kundizzjonijiet kienu tali minħabba l-gwerer li ma setgħux iwettqu kummerċ, u l-missjonijiet sussegwenti tal-aġent tal-Kumpanija tal-Lvant tal-Indja John Crawfurd fl-1823 u ż-żewġ missjonijiet tal-aġent ta’ Andrew Jackson, id-diplomatiku Amerikan Edmund Roberts, fl-1833 u fl-1836 ma setgħux jiżguraw ftehimiet kummerċjali minħabba l-kwalità eċċezzjonalment fqira tal-port. Wara l-editt tal-Imperatur Minh Mạng fl-1835, li jipprojbixxi lill-bastimenti [[Ewropa|Ewropej]] milli jaslu fuq l-art jew li jsegwu l-kummerċ ħlief f'Đà Nẵng, il-port tiegħu malajr ħadu post lil Hội An bħala l-akbar port kummerċjali fir-reġjun ċentrali&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita ktieb|kunjom=Tarling|isem=Nicholas|data=1992|titlu=The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia: Volume 2, The Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries|url=https://books.google.fr/books?id=pBfsaw64rjMC&amp;pg=PA42&amp;redir_esc=y#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false|lingwa=en|iktar=Google-Books-ID: pBfsaw64rjMC|pubblikatur=Cambridge University Press}}&lt;/ref&gt;.

'''&lt;big&gt;Indokina Franċiża&lt;/big&gt;'''
[[Stampa:Battle of Tourane Vietnamese depiction with French legend 1859.jpg|daqsminuri|Mappa Vjetnamiża ta' Tourane Bay, vapuri alleati viżibbli.]] 


Fl-1847, bastimenti Franċiżi mibgħuta mill-Ammirall Cécille ibbumbardjaw Đà Nẵng, apparentement fuq il-bażi ta' allegata persekuzzjoni ta' missjunarji Kattoliċi Rumani. F'Awwissu 1858, għal darb'oħra apparentement fuq il-bażi ta' persekuzzjoni reliġjuża, truppi Franċiżi, immexxija mill-Ammirall Charles Rigault de Genouilly, u taħt l-ordnijiet ta '[[Napuljun III]], niżlu f'Đà Nẵng bħala parti mill-Kampanja punittiva ta' Cochinchina.

Il-Franċiżi għelbu lill-Vjetnamiż stazzjonati f'Da Nang, u okkupaw malajr il-belt u l-peniżola ta' Tiên Sa (il-peniżola ta' Sơn Trà tal-lum). Il-forzi li jokkupaw malajr tpoġġew taħt assedju mill-armata Vjetnamiża taħt il-kmand ta’ Nguyễn Tri Phương, u eventwalment ġew sfurzati jirtiraw f’Marzu 1860. Il-Franċiżi setgħu jinvadu l-fortizza tan-nofsinhar ta’ [[Ho Chi Minh (belt)|Saigon]] u, f’Ġunju 1862, diversi provinċji ta’ in-Nofsinhar tal-Vjetnam ġew ċeduti lill-Franċiżi bħala Cochinchina bl-iffirmar tat-Trattat ta '[[Ho Chi Minh (belt)|Saigon]].&lt;gallery class=&quot;center&quot; mode=&quot;packed&quot; heights=&quot;100&quot;&gt;
Stampa:French ships at Danang 1858.jpg|Vapuri tal-gwerra Franċiżi 'l barra minn ''Đà Nẵng'' (Tourane) Settembru 1858. Dak li beda bħala kampanja punittiva kontra l-Vjetnamiżi, kien inbidel f'telfa twila, qarsa u għalja għall-Forza Franko-Spanjola.
Stampa:French bombing Tourane 1958.png|Bombardament taċ-ċittadella ta' An Hải u taċ-ċittadella ta' Điện Hải mill-Alleanza Franco-Spanja.
Stampa:French capture of Danang 1858.jpg|Il-baħar Franċiż niżel fuq Da Nang
Stampa:Bản vẽ thành An Hải, Đà Nẵng. Bản vẽ của thành được vẽ vào năm thứ 11 (1831) của triều đại Minh Mạng.jpg|Pjanta taċ-ċittadella ta’ An Hải fl-1831
&lt;/gallery&gt;Permezz ta’ żewġ deċennji oħra ta’ kunflitt, il-Franċiżi gradwalment saħħew is-setgħa tagħhom fuq il-[[Vjetnam]], u laħqet il-qofol tagħha fl-istabbiliment tal-Indokina Franċiża (bil-Franċiż: Union de l'Indochine Française) f’Ottubru 1887. Sentejn wara, fl-1889, il-kolonisti Franċiżi isemmu l-belt mill-ġdid. Tourane, poġġiha taħt il-kontroll tal-gvernatur ġenerali tal-[[Indokina Franċiża]]. 

Hija bdiet titqies bħala waħda mill-ħames bliet ewlenin tal-Indokina, fost Hanoi, Saigon–Cholon, Haiphong, u Huế. Fl-1903, il-gvern kolonjali awtorizza lil Société des docks et houillères de Tourane biex tipproċedi bil-kostruzzjoni tat-tramm, bil-medda preliminari tagħha ta’ 9.5 kilometri (bejn Observatory Point u Tourane Mỹ Khê) infetħet fid-9 ta’ Novembru 1905. Taħt il-ġestjoni tal-istat, “ Tramway de l'Îlot de l'Observatoire” infetħet għall-pubbliku fl-1 ta' Ottubru 1907, tiġġebbed sa Faifo (Hoi An) via Montagne de Marbre (Muntanji tal-Irħam), li joperaw sal-31 ta’ Diċembru 1915&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.historicvietnam.com/by-tram-to-hoi-an/|titlu=By Tram to Hoi An|kunjom=timdolinghcmc@gmail.com|data=2019-07-10|lingwa=en-US|data-aċċess=2024-12-10}}&lt;/ref&gt;.

'''&lt;big&gt;Ir-Repubblika tal-Vjetnam (il-Vjetnam tas-Sud)&lt;/big&gt;'''
[[Stampa:HMM-261 helicopters refuel at Da Nang Air Base.jpg|nofs|daqsminuri|Ħelikopters tal-Istati Uniti fil-Bażi tal-Ajru ta’ Da Nang, 1965]]


Matul [[il-Gwerra tal-Vjetnam]], dak li issa huwa l-Ajruport Internazzjonali ta 'Da Nang kien bażi tal-ajru ewlenija użata mill-Forzi tal-Ajru tal-Vjetnam t'Isfel u tal-[[Stati Uniti|Istati Uniti]]. 

Il-bażi saret waħda mill-aktar ċentri tal-ajruplani fid-dinja matul il-gwerra, u laħqet medja ta’ 2,595 operazzjoni tat-traffiku tal-ajruplani kuljum, aktar minn kwalunkwe ajruport u bażi tal-ajru oħra fid-dinja f’dak iż-żmien. L-aħħar operazzjonijiet tal-ġlieda kontra l-art tal-Istati Uniti fil-Vjetnam waqfu fit-13 ta’ Awwissu 1972, meta forza residwa tal-196 Brigata tal-Infanteria Ħafifa waqfet f’Đà Nẵng. B Battery 3rd Battaljun, 82nd Field Artillery Regiment sparaw l-aħħar rawnd tal-artillerija tal-Istati Uniti u t-3rd Battaljun, 21st Infantry Regiment temmew l-aħħar rondi tagħhom. Din il-forza residwa kienet magħrufa bħala &quot;Operazzjoni Gimlet&quot;. Wara l-irtirar tal-[[Stati Uniti|Istati Uniti]] mill-kunflitt, fl-istadju finali tal-konkwista tal-[[Vjetnam]] t'Isfel mill-Vjetnam ta' Fuq, Da Nang waqgħet f'idejn il-forzi komunisti 29-30 ta' Marzu 1975. Il-[[Vjetnam]] ħareġ żewġ bolli postali speċjali biex jikkommemoraw dan l-avveniment, fit-&quot;total tiegħu&quot; sett ta’ bolli tal-ħelsien” maħruġ fl-14 ta’ Diċembru 1976&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://m.kienthuc.net.vn/kho-tri-thuc/soi-san-bay-nuoc-man-o-da-nang-thoi-chien-tranh-vn-1069615.html|titlu=Soi sân bay Nước Mặn ở Đà Nẵng thời chiến tranh VN|kunjom=https://kienthuc.net.vn|data=2018-06-14|sit=BaÌo Tri thuÌ›Ìc vaÌ€ CuoÌ£Ì‚c soÌ‚Ìng|data-aċċess=2024-12-10}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.historicvietnam.com/k20-resistance-base-in-da-nang/|titlu=K20 Resistance Base in Da Nang|kunjom=timdolinghcmc@gmail.com|data=2019-12-15|lingwa=en-US|data-aċċess=2024-12-10}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita ktieb|data=2004|titlu=AACS Alumni Association|url=https://books.google.fr/books?id=raDlmenz-csC&amp;pg=PA41&amp;redir_esc=y#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false|lingwa=en|pubblikatur=Turner Publishing Company}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita ktieb|kunjom=Delezen|isem=John Edmund|data=2015-09-01|titlu=Eye of the Tiger: Memoir of a United States Marine, Third Force Recon Company, Vietnam|url=https://books.google.fr/books?id=AQ1hqyF1aOAC&amp;pg=PA54&amp;redir_esc=y#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false|lingwa=en|iktar=Google-Books-ID: AQ1hqyF1aOAC|pubblikatur=McFarland}}&lt;/ref&gt;. 

Marble Mountain Air Facility, mibnija fl-1965, kienet tinsab ukoll f'Da Nang.

'''&lt;big&gt;Wara l-1975&lt;/big&gt;''' 

Mill-era tal-kostruzzjoni tar-Repubblika Soċjalista tal-Vjetnam, Danang saret essenzjalment it-tielet belt wara [[Ho Chi Minh (belt)|Ho Chi Minh Belt]] u [[Hanoi]] biex tkun ċentru urban importanti tar-reġjun ċentrali tal-Vjetnam. Danang tiftaħar bosta istituti edukattivi kif ukoll siti importanti tal-ekonomija&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://m.vovworld.vn/en-US/discovery-vietnam/da-nang-city-on-its-way-to-becoming-vietnams-third-special-urban-area-1072757.vov#ref-https://en.m.wikipedia.org/|titlu=}}&lt;/ref&gt;.

== Ġeografija ==
Da Nang hija l-akbar belt fiċ-ċentru tal-[[Vjetnam]] u wieħed mill-aktar portijiet importanti tal-pajjiż. Il-belt hija mdawra b'muntanji fil-punent, u l-Baħar taċ-[[Ċina]] tan-Nofsinhar fil-lvant. Da Nang tmiss mal-Provinċja ta' Thừa Thiên-Huế tul il-Pass ta' Hải Vân fit-tramuntana, flimkien mal-Provinċja ta' Quảng Nam fin-nofsinhar u l-punent. Huwa 764 km (475 mi) fin-nofsinhar ta '[[Hanoi]], u 964 km (599 mi) fit-tramuntana ta' [[Ho Chi Minh (belt)|Ho Chi Minh Belt]]. Il-belt għandha erja totali ta 'art ta' 1,283.42 km2 (495.53 sq mi), li minnhom 241.51 km2 (93.25 sq mi) huma distretti urbani u 1,041.91 km2 (402.28 sq mi) huma distretti rurali.

== Klima ==
Da Nang għandha klima monsoon tropikali b'żewġ staġuni: tifun u staġun imxarrab minn Settembru sa Diċembru u staġun niexef minn Jannar sa Awwissu. It-temperaturi għandhom medja annwali ta' madwar 26 °C (79 °F). Il-mewġ tal-kesħa jista’ kultant iseħħ, għalkemm huma ta’ żmien qasir. It-temperaturi huma l-ogħla bejn Ġunju u Awwissu b’temperaturi medji ta’ 28 sa 30 °C (82 sa 86 °F), u l-aktar baxxi bejn Diċembru u Frar (temperatura medja ta’ 18 sa 23 °C (64 sa 73 °F)). F'Ba Na Hills, it-temperaturi huma aktar baxxi b'medja annwali ta '20 °C (68 °F). Il-medja annwali għall-umdità hija 81%, bl-ogħla livelli bejn Ottubru u Jannar (li jilħqu 84–86%) u l-baxx bejn Ġunju u Awwissu (li jilħaq 75–77%). 

Bħala medja, Da Nang tirċievi 2,205 mm (86.8 in) ta 'xita. Ix-xita tipikament hija l-ogħla bejn Settembru u Novembru (li jvarjaw minn 550 sa 1,000 mm (22 sa 39 in)) u l-inqas bejn Frar u April (li jvarjaw minn 23 sa 40 mm (0.91 sa 1.57 in)). Da Nang jirċievi medja ta’ 2162 siegħa ta’ dawl tax-xemx fis-sena, b’ogħla livelli bejn 234 u 277 siegħa fix-xahar f’Mejju u Ġunju u baxxi bejn 69 u 165 siegħa fix-xahar f’Novembru u Diċembru&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://danang.gov.vn/web/en/detail?id=26029&amp;_c=16407111|titlu=Location and natural conditions - Danang Portal English|data=2018-10-09|sit=web.archive.org|data-aċċess=2024-12-10|arkivju-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181009042731/https://danang.gov.vn/web/en/detail?id=26029&amp;_c=16407111|arkivju-data=2018-10-09|url-status=dead}}&lt;/ref&gt;.

== Politika ==
[[Stampa:Tòa Thị chính Đà Nẵng 2.jpeg|nofs|daqsminuri|Il-Kumitat Popolari tal-Belt ta 'Da Nang]]


L-organu ewlieni tal-Partit Komunista f'Da Nang City huwa l-kumitat eżekuttiv tal-Partit Komunista. Is-Segretarju attwali huwa Nguyen Van Quang. 

Il-fergħa leġiżlattiva tal-belt hija l-Kunsill Popolari tal-Belt ta 'Da Nang. Iċ-chairman attwali huwa Luong Nguyen Minh Triet. 

Il-fergħa eżekuttiva tal-belt hija l-Kumitat Popolari tal-Belt ta 'Da Nang. Iċ-chairman attwali huwa Le Trung Chinh.

== Ekonomija ==
[[Stampa:Da Nang, Vietnam (48879172367).jpg|nofs|daqsminuri|Skyscrapers, veduta bil-lejl]]


Da Nang huwa ċ-ċentru industrijali ewlieni tal-Vjetnam ċentrali. Il-PGD per capita tiegħu kien 19-il miljun VND fl-2007, wieħed mill-ogħla fil-Vjetnam (wara Hồ Chí Minh City, Hanoi, Bình Dương Province, u Đồng Nai Province). Sal-2009, dan kien żdied għal 27.3 miljun VND. 

Da Nang mexxa l-klassifiki tal-Indiċi tal-Kompetittività Provinċjali fl-2008, 2009, u 2010 (u kien it-tieni wara l-Provinċja ta’ Bình Dương fit-tliet snin ta’ qabel), bbenefika l-aktar minn infrastruttura tajba, prestazzjoni tajba fit-taħriġ tax-xogħol, trasparenza, tmexxija provinċjali proattiva u baxxa. spejjeż tad-dħul. 

Fuq l-Indiċi tal-Kompetittività Provinċjali tal-Vjetnam 2023, għodda ewlenija għall-evalwazzjoni tal-ambjent tan-negozju fil-provinċji tal-Vjetnam, Danang irċieva punteġġ ta '68.79. Dan kien titjib żgħir mill-2022 li fih il-provinċja rċeviet punteġġ ta '68.52. Fl-2023, il-provinċja rċeviet l-ogħla punteġġi tagħha fuq il-kriterji ta' 'Ħlasijiet Informali' u 'Liġi u Ordni' u l-inqas fuq 'Policy Bias' u 'Aċċess Għall-Art'&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://the-shiv.com/doing-business-in-danang-vietnam/|titlu=Doing Business in Danang, Vietnam 2024|kunjom=the-shiv|data=2024-08-19|sit=the-shiv|lingwa=en-AU|data-aċċess=2024-12-10}}&lt;/ref&gt;.

'''&lt;big&gt;Agrikoltura, forestrija, sajd&lt;/big&gt;''' 

Minkejja l-istatus tagħha bħala belt, 37,800 ruħ f'Da Nang kienu impjegati fl-agrikoltura, il-forestrija u s-sajd mill-2007, u pproduċew 45,000 t ta 'ross u 41,000 t ta' ħut. Madankollu, l-impjiegi f'dawn is-setturi kellhom xejra negattiva ċara fl-ewwel deċennju tas-seklu 21. Il-produzzjoni grossa kienet qed tonqos ukoll matul it-tieni nofs tad-deċennju. Minħabba n-nuqqas ta' art agrikola ta' Da Nang (9200ha mill-2007) u l-post tagħha fil-kosta, is-sajd kien qed jikkontribwixxi aktar għall-ekonomija milli l-agrikoltura, bi produzzjoni grossa aktar mid-doppju ta' dik tal-agrikoltura.

== Kultura ==
'''&lt;big&gt;Turiżmu&lt;/big&gt;'''&lt;gallery class=&quot;center&quot; mode=&quot;packed&quot; heights=&quot;100&quot;&gt;
Stampa:Da Nang Dragon Bridge 2020 IMG 4019.jpg|Da Nang Dragon Bridge
Stampa:Da Nang Bay (42941981330).jpg|Bajja ta' Da Nang
Stampa:Marble Mountain Gate, Da Nang.jpg|A gateway li jwassal għall Huyen Khong Cave fil-Muntanji Irħam
Stampa:Nhà thờ Con Gà Đà Nẵng.jpg|Knisja tat-Tiġieġ Da Nang
&lt;/gallery&gt;Is-settur tat-turiżmu huwa komponent vitali tal-ekonomija ta 'Da Nang. L-istatus tiegħu bħala ċentru tat-trasport għaċ-ċentru tal-Vjetnam u l-prossimità tiegħu għal diversi Siti ta’ Wirt Dinji tal-UNESCO, inkluża l-Belt Imperjali ta’ Hue, il-Belt il-Qadima ta’ Hoi An, u l-fdalijiet ta’ My Son iħaddmu ħafna mill-attività turistika tagħha. 

Mỹ Sơn huwa sit arkeoloġiku li jmur lura għal aktar minn elf sena, f'Quang Nam. Jinsab f'wied imbiegħed imforestat xi 70 km fil-punent ta 'Da Nang, din il-kapitali preċedenti u ċentru reliġjuż tar-renju Champa darba kien fih aktar minn 70 tempju stil u stupas. Għalkemm sar ħsara kbira minn rejds bil-bombi fis-sittinijiet, is-sit għad għandu aktar minn 20 struttura u kien iddikjarat Sit ta’ Wirt Dinji tal-UNESCO fl-1999. Xmara Hàn fil-qalba ta 'Da Nang. Li jmorru mir-raba 'sa l-14-il seklu, ix-xogħol ta' l-arti senswali fuq dawn ix-xogħlijiet juri attivitajiet ta 'kuljum kif ukoll temi reliġjużi Hindu u Buddisti.

Il-Muntanji Irħam huma outcrops tal-ġebla tal-franka tal-blat li joħorġu mill-bajja eżatt fin-nofsinhar ta 'Da Nang. Il-mogħdijiet iwasslu għall-quċċata tal-irdumijiet imsaġar, li jipprovdu veduti ta 'Non Nuoc Beach u l-Baħar taċ-Ċina tan-Nofsinhar. L-għerien fl-irdumijiet kienu oriġinarjament abitati min-nies Cham. Aktar tard, id-dinastija Nguyen bniet pagodi numerużi fost l-għerien. Il-Muntanji tal-Irħam huma dar għal diversi artiġjani li jipproduċu skultura u xogħol tal-arti fil-bażi tagħha f'Non Nuoc Village. 

Non Nuoc Beach hija bajja bir-ramel abjad fil-periferija ta 'Đà Nẵng li hija magħrufa għall-istorja tagħha bħala destinazzjoni R&amp;R għat-truppi Amerikani matul il-Gwerra tal-Vjetnam. Illum, il-bajja, flimkien mal-bajja ta’ Mỹ Khê fit-tramuntana, huma dar għal resorts għaljin, surfing, u faċilitajiet ta’ divertiment. Ba Na Hills huwa resort fil-muntanji b'sistema ta' cable car twila 5 km li ġġorr il-mistednin sal-quċċata ta' Ba Na f'1487m 'il fuq mil-livell tal-baħar. Son Tra Mountain, ftit mili biss 'il bogħod miċ-ċentru tal-belt b'xi nixxigħat selvaġġi u resorts tul il-baħar.

Il-belt kostali ċentrali ta 'Da Nang rat tkabbir sinifikanti fil-wasliet ta' turisti internazzjonali fl-2017, skont id-Dipartiment tat-Turiżmu tal-belt. Fl-2017, madwar 6.6 miljun viżitatur waslu f'Da Nang, żieda ta '19% fuq is-sena ta' qabel u 4.8% ogħla mill-mira annwali tagħha. Iċ-ċifra kienet tinkludi 4.3 miljun turist domestiku, żieda ta’ 11.3% sena wara sena&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://vietnamtourism.gov.vn/english/index.php/items/12422|titlu=}}&lt;/ref&gt;. 

Il-belt ċentrali kisbet aktar minn VND19.4 triljun (US$ 853.96 miljun) fi dħul, żieda ta’ 20.6% mill-2016. L-istatistika turi wkoll li l-belt rat żieda impressjonanti fin-numru ta’ viżitaturi bl-ajru li kien ta’ aktar minn 1.58 miljun, sa 74.4% filwaqt li viżitaturi bil-karozza permezz tat-Tajlandja u l-Laos kien stmat għal 14,120.

== Edukazzjoni ==
Hemm diversi universitajiet li jinsabu f'Da Nang, b'kampus f'ħafna postijiet madwar il-belt, kif ukoll kampus satellita fir-reġjuni tal-madwar.

Il-belt għandha 17-il skola għolja, li minnhom Le Quy Don High School for the Gifted hija fost l-iskejjel sekondarji ewlenin fil-Vjetnam. 

Hemm ukoll preżenza mdaqqsa ta 'rappreżentanti tal-edukazzjoni barranin f'Da Nang. Campus France hija aġenzija tal-gvern Franċiż f'Da Nang, li tippromwovi t-tagħlim tal-lingwa Franċiża u tappoġġja lill-istudenti fil-post ta 'opportunitajiet ta' studju fi [[Franza]]. L-Istitut tal-Lingwa Ingliża huwa ċentru ta’ tagħlim mibni mill-Università ta’ Queensland, l-Awstralja, li jimmira għat-tagħlim tal-Ingliż minbarra li jservi bħala fornitur tal-ittestjar tal-IELTS. Singapore International School hija skola internazzjonali f'Da Nang&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=http://www.vietnam.campusfrance.org/vi/node/41301|sit=web.archive.org|data-aċċess=2024-12-10|titlu=Archive copy|arkivju-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181122200307/http://www.vietnam.campusfrance.org/vi/node/41301|arkivju-data=2018-11-22|url-status=dead}}&lt;/ref&gt;.

== Etniċitajiet ==
Hemm aktar minn 37 etniċi u barranin li jgħixu flimkien fil-belt. Fosthom, il-grupp etniku Kinh huwa l-akbar b'883,343 ruħ, segwit miċ-Ċiniżi b'2,974 ruħ, il-grupp etniku Co Tu b'1,198 ruħ, u gruppi etniċi minoritarji oħra bħat-Tay b'224 ruħ, l-Ede b'222 ruħ, il-Muong b'183 ruħ, u l-Gia Rai b'154 ruħ... l-iżgħar gruppi etniċi huma l-Chơ Ro, Hani, Si La u Ơ Đu b'persuna waħda biss kull wieħed&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=http://cema.gov.vn/modules.php?name=Content&amp;op=details&amp;mid=7812|titlu=Trang tin điện tử của Ủy ban Dân tộc - THÀNH PHỐ ĐÀ NẴNG|data=2012-03-21|sit=web.archive.org|data-aċċess=2024-12-10|arkivju-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120321123940/http://cema.gov.vn/modules.php?name=Content&amp;op=details&amp;mid=7812|arkivju-data=2012-03-21|url-status=dead}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://toquoc.vn/da-nang-dinh-bo-ban-99235449.htm|titlu=}}&lt;/ref&gt;.

== Trasport ==
'''&lt;big&gt;Bl-ajru&lt;/big&gt;'''
[[Stampa:Da Nang International Airport, Vietnam.jpg|nofs|daqsminuri|Ajruport Internazzjonali ta 'Da Nang]]


L-Ajruport Internazzjonali ta 'Da Nang, li jinsab fiċ-ċentru tal-belt, huwa t-tielet l-akbar ajruport internazzjonali fil-Vjetnam. Huwa portal importanti għall-aċċess ċentrali tal-[[Vjetnam]]. L-ajruport kien magħruf bħala l-Bażi tal-Ajru ta’ Da Nang matul [[il-Gwerra tal-Vjetnam]], li matulha kien deskritt bħala l-iktar ajruport traffikuż fid-dinja. Matul ix-xahar ta’ Mejju 1968, il-bażi laħqet medja ta’ 2,595 operazzjoni tat-traffiku tal-ajru kuljum, aktar minn kull ajruport fid-dinja. 

Minn Ġunju 2011, l-ajruport għandu konnessjonijiet domestiċi għal [[Hanoi]], [[Ho Chi Minh (belt)|Ho Chi Minh Belt]], Haiphong, Vinh, Buon Ma Thuot, Da Lat, Nha Trang, u Can Tho, kif ukoll konnessjonijiet internazzjonali għal [[Seoul]] ([[Korea t'Isfel]]), [[Tokjo|Tokyo]] ([[Ġappun]]), [[Singapor]], u [[Tajpej]] ([[Tajwan]]). Mis-16 ta' Diċembru 2011, Air Asia, trasportatur tal-[[Malażja]] low-cost, bdiet toffri erba' titjiriet fil-ġimgħa bejn Đà Nẵng u [[Kuala Lumpur]]. 

F'Diċembru 2011 infetaħ terminal internazzjonali ġdid li jippermetti aktar konnessjonijiet ma' destinazzjonijiet bħal [[Phnom Penh]] ([[Kambodja]]), it-[[Tajlandja]], [[Ħong Kong]], il-[[Ġappun]], u [[Awstralja|l-Awstralja]]. Minn Novembru 2015, l-ajruport internazzjonali ta 'Da Nang ilu għaddej minn rinnovamenti estensivi.

'''&lt;big&gt;Bl-art&lt;/big&gt;'''
[[Stampa:Hai Van Tunnel North Entrance.jpg|nofs|daqsminuri|Entratura tat-Tramuntana tal-Mina Hai Van]]


Da Nang huwa stazzjon ewlieni tul il-Ferroviji tat-Tramuntana-Nofsinhar, magħruf ukoll bħala r-Reunification Express. L-Awtostradi Nazzjonali 1 u 14B jgħaddu mill-belt, u jipprovdu konnessjonijiet tat-toroq għal Hanoi fit-tramuntana u l-Belt Ho Chi Minh fin-nofsinhar, kif ukoll l-Artijiet Għolja Ċentrali u l-Laos fil-punent. Il-Pass Hai huwa pass muntanjuż li jifred il-Provinċja ta' Da Nang u Thừa Thiên Huế, minn fejn tgħaddi l-Highway 1A. Biex tnaqqas il-ħin tat-tranżitu u l-periklu għas-sewwieqa milli jinnavigaw fit-triq tal-muntanji li ddawwar, inbniet il-Mina ta’ Hải Vân, li fetħet fl-2005. Hija l-itwal mina fix-Xlokk tal-Asja b’6.28 km, u tippermetti lis-sewwieqa jiffrankaw bejn 30. minuti u siegħa fuq il-ħinijiet tal-ivvjaġġar fuq ir-rotta l-antika ta’ Hải Vân Pass. Expressway bejn Da Nang u Quang Ngai fil-qrib temmet il-kostruzzjoni tagħha fl-2018. Diversi pontijiet jaqsmu x-Xmara Han u t-tributarji tagħha f'Da Nang, inkluż il-Pont emblematiku tax-Xmara Han, il-Pont Tran Thi Ly, il-Pont Nguyen Van Troi, il-Pont Tuyen Son u l-Pont Thuan Phuoc li tlesta reċentement, li huwa l-itwal pont sospensjoni fil-Vjetnam. 

Il-Pont tax-Xmara Dragon se jaqsam ix-Xmara Han fir-roundabout ta 'Le Dinh Duong/Bach Dang, u joffri lit-turisti li ġejjin mill-Ajruport Internazzjonali ta' Đà Nẵng rotta aktar diretta lejn il-bajjiet My Khe u Non Nuoc, tul ix-xifer tal-Lvant tal-belt&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://goodmorning-hoian.com/en/must-do-things-in-da-nang/|titlu=19 Must-Do Things in Da Nang|kunjom=Src='https://Secure.gravatar.com/Avatar/71cd1f928b8bcc79854795724c4b8944?s=80|isem=&lt;img Alt=''|kunjom2=#038;d=mm|kunjom3=Srcset='https://Secure.gravatar.com/Avatar/71cd1f928b8bcc79854795724c4b8944?s=160|isem3=#038;r=g'|kunjom4=#038;d=mm|kunjom5=In 2011|isem5=#038;r=g 2x' class='avatar avatar-80 photo' height='80' width='80' decoding='async'/&gt; Laurent Olhman|kunjom6=In 2012|isem6=I. fell in love with Vietnam after traveling extensively across the country for a month|data=2024-04-14|lingwa=en-US|data-aċċess=2024-12-10}}&lt;/ref&gt;.

'''&lt;big&gt;Bil-baħar&lt;/big&gt;'''

Is-sistema tal-port ta 'Da Nang hija t-tielet l-akbar fil-[[Vjetnam]] wara [[Ho Chi Minh (belt)|Ho Chi Minh Belt]] u Haiphong. Fl-2008, il-port ta 'Da Nang ttrattat 2.7 miljun tunnellata ta' merkanzija, li minnhom 1.2 miljun tunnellata kienu esportazzjonijiet, 525,900 tunnellata kienu importazzjonijiet, u 985,600 tunnellata kienu merkanzija domestika. Aktar minn 29,600 passiġġier għaddew mill-port fl-2008, żieda sinifikanti fuq is-snin preċedenti. Is-sistema tal-port tikkonsisti f'żewġ żoni: Tiên Sa Seaport, u Song Hàn Terminal. Tien Sa Seaport għandu fond ta 'navigazzjoni ta' 11 m (36 pied), u huwa kapaċi jirċievi tankers ta 'medda medja ta' sa 45,000 DWT, kif ukoll vapuri tal-kontejners u vapuri tal-kruċieri kbar. L-approċċ lejn Song Hàn Terminal huwa twil 12 nmi (22 km) b'fond tan-navigazzjoni ta '6–7 m (20–23 pied), u jista' jakkomoda bastimenti sa 5,000 DWT. Vietnam National Shipping Lines (Vinalines) hija l-awtorità tal-port għas-sistema tal-port ta 'Đà Nẵng. 

Minkejja l-fatt li l-infrastruttura tal-port mhix iddisinjata speċifikament biex takkomoda vapuri tal-kruċieri, in-numru ta 'vapuri tal-kruċieri kbar li jittrakkjaw fil-Port ta' Da Nang żdied f'dawn l-aħħar snin. Fl-ewwel xahrejn tal-2010 biss, 12-il bastiment tal-kruċiera ittrakkaw f'Da Nang, li iġorru 6,477 passiġġier&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.baogiaothong.vn/chan-may-can-gi-de-thanh-cang-du-thuyen-192231129002148164.htm|titlu=Chân Mây cần gì để thành cảng du thuyền?|kunjom=baogiaothong.vn|sit=Báo Giao thông|lingwa=vi|data-aċċess=2024-12-10}}&lt;/ref&gt;. 

Il-bastimenti tal-kruċieri jittrakkjaw ukoll fil-Port ta' Chân Mây, li jinsab 50 km minn Da Nang permezz tal-Mina ta' Hải Vân.

== Relazzjonijiet interistituzzjonali ==
'''&lt;big&gt;Bliet tewmin&lt;/big&gt;'''

* {{Flagicon|LAO}} [[Champasak]] ([[Laos]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|CAM}} [[Battambang]] ([[Kambodja]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|KOR}} [[Changwon]] ([[Korea t'Isfel]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|KOR}} [[Daegu]] ([[Korea t'Isfel]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|VIE}} [[Haiphong]] ([[Vjetnam]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|THA}} [[Khon Kaen]] ([[Tajlandja]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|THA}} [[Mukdahan]] ([[Tajlandja]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|LAO}} [[Savannakhet]] ([[Laos]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|USA}} [[Oakland]] ([[Stati Uniti]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|USA}} [[Pittsburgh]] ([[Stati Uniti]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|MAR}} [[Tanġier]] ([[Marokk]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|ROM}} [[Timișoara]] ([[Rumanija]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|MEX}} [[Toluca]] ([[Messiku]]).

'''&lt;big&gt;Koperazzjoni u ħbiberija&lt;/big&gt;'''

* {{Flagicon|LAO}} [[Attapeu]] ([[Laos]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|SWE}} Borås ([[Żvezja]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|BLR}} [[Reġjun ta' Grodno]] ([[Belarussja]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|KOR}} [[Hwaseong]] ([[Korea t'Isfel]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|USA}} [[Houston]] ([[Stati Uniti]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|IND}} [[Kolkata]] ([[Indja]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|SVK}} [[Košice]] ([[Slovakkja]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|MAC}} Makaw ([[Ċina]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|FRA}} [[Nantes]] ([[Franza]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|AUS}} [[Newcastle]] ([[Awstralja]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|FRA}} [[Nord Pas de Calais]] ([[Franza]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|AUS}} [[Queensland]] ([[Awstralja]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|NLD}} [[Rotterdam]] ([[Pajjiżi l-Baxxi]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|JPN}} [[Sakai]] ([[Ġappun]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|LAO}} Salavan ([[Laos]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|FIN}} Salo ([[Finlandja]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|LAO}} [[Sekong]] ([[Laos]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|CHN}} [[Provinċja ta 'Shandong]] ([[Ċina]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|AUS}} [[South Awstralja]] ([[Awstralja]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|GER}} [[Stuttgart]] ([[Ġermanja]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|IND}} Surat ([[Indja]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|BEL}} [[Reġjun tal-Vallonja]] ([[Belġju]]) ;
* {{Flagicon|RUS}} [[Yaroslavl Oblast]] ([[Russja]]).

== Referenzi ==</text>
      <sha1>tiefsihypzo5ruvyp23n4ig3nq78kg7</sha1>
    </revision>
  </page>
  <page>
    <title>Park Nazzjonali ta' Serra da Capivara</title>
    <ns>0</ns>
    <id>33812</id>
    <revision>
      <id>330242</id>
      <parentid>324835</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:21:37Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330242</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="6196" sha1="domuzfize87xhu6ah973t2t43ynd5l6" xml:space="preserve">[[Stampa:Canoas - Vale Verde.JPG|daqsminuri|Vale Verde.]]
Il-'''Park Nazzjonali ta' Serra da Capivara''' (bil-[[Lingwa Portugiża|Portugiż]]: ''Parque Nacional Serra da Capivara'', IPA: [ˈpaʁki nɐsjoˈnaw ˈsɛʁɐ dɐ kɐpiˈvaɾɐ]) huwa park nazzjonali fir-reġjun tal-Grigal tal-[[Brażil]]. Fl-inħawi hemm bosta [[Pittura|pitturi]] [[Preistorja|preistoriċi]].

L-isem tal-katina muntanjuża li jiddefinixxi l-park, &quot;Serra da Capivara&quot;, litteralment ifisser &quot;Għoljiet ta' Capivara&quot; [[Portugall|bil-Portugiż]]. F'dawn l-inħawi hemm l-ikbar u l-eqdem konċentrazzjoni ta' siti preistoriċi fl-Amerki. Studji [[Xjenza|xjentifiċi]] jikkonfermaw li l-katina muntanjuża ta' Capivara kienet densament popolata fl-era pre-Cabralina.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita aħbar|data=2014-03-28|titlu=Discoveries Challenge Beliefs on Humans’ Arrival in the Americas (Published 2014)|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/28/world/americas/discoveries-challenge-beliefs-on-humans-arrival-in-the-americas.html|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2025-08-17}}&lt;/ref&gt;

== Pożizzjoni ==
Il-park nazzjonali jinsab fil-istat tal-Grigal ta' Piauí, bejn il-latitudnijiet 8° 26' 50&quot; u 8° 54' 23&quot; fin-Nofsinhar u l-lonġitudnijiet 42° 19' 47&quot; u 42° 45' 51&quot; fil-Punent. Jinsab fi ħdan iż-żoni muniċipali ta' São Raimundo Nonato, São João do Piauí, Coronel José Dias u Canto do Buriti, u għandu erja ta' 1,291.4 kilometru kwadru (319,000 akru).

Il-Kuritur [[Ekoloġija|Ekoloġiku]] ta' Capivara-Confusões, li nħoloq fl-2006, jikkollega l-park mal-[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Serra das Confusões]].

== [[Storja]] ==
[[File:Pedra_Furada_-_Serra_da_Capivara_I.jpg|ħolqa=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pedra_Furada_-_Serra_da_Capivara_I.jpg|daqsminuri|Pedra Furada.]]
Il-park inħoloq biex jiġu protetti l-artefatti u l-pitturi preistoriċi li nstabu fih. Sar [[Sit ta' Wirt Dinji]] tal-[[UNESCO]] fl-1991.&lt;ref name=&quot;:0&quot;&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/606/|titlu=Serra da Capivara National Park|kunjom=Centre|isem=UNESCO World Heritage|sit=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2023-09-22}}&lt;/ref&gt; L-arkeologu ewlieni tiegħu kien [[Niède Guidon]] u l-iżjed sit [[Arkeoloġija|arkeoloġiku]] magħruf tiegħu huwa Pedra Furada.

Studji xjentifiċi jikkonfermaw li l-katina muntanjuża ta' Capivara kienet densament popolata fl-era pre-Kolumbjana. Sit ftit iktar reċenti huwa Toca da Tira Peia, fejn instabu għodod tal-ġebel li jaf imorru lura għal kważi 22,000 sena ilu. Is-sit ġie datat permezz tal-luminexxenza stimolata b'mod ottiku.&lt;ref&gt;Lahaye, Christelle; Hernandez, Marion; Boëda, Eric; Felice, Gisele D.; Guidon, Niède; Hoeltz, Sirlei; Lourdeau, Antoine; Pagli, Marina; Pessis, Anne-Marie; Rasse, Michel; Viana, Sibeli (2013). &quot;Human occupation in South America by 20,000 BC: the Toca da Tira Peia site, Piauí, Brazil&quot;. ''Journal of Archaeological Science''. '''40''' (6): 2840–2847. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2013.02.019. ISSN 0305-4403.&lt;/ref&gt;

Siti arkeoloġiċi importanti oħra fl-inħawi huma Toca da Pena, Baxao da Esperanca u Sitio do Meio. Is-sit ta' Lapa do Boquete jinsab lejn in-Nofsinhar.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=http://anthropogenesis.kinshipstudies.org/blog/2013/04/24/the-toca-da-tira-peia-site-and-the-end-of-the-ice-age-in-american-archaeology/|titlu=The Toca da Tira Peia Site and the End of an Ice Age in American Archaeology|kunjom=Dziebel|isem=German|data=2013-04-24|lingwa=en-US|data-aċċess=2025-08-17}}&lt;/ref&gt;

== Natura selvaġġa ==
Fil-park instab li l-kapuċċini bid-daqna (xadini) għandhom &quot;l-ikbar sett ta' għodod magħruf fost ix-xadini kapuċċini selvaġġi&quot;. Fost l-għodod tal-ġebel tagħhom hemm dawk għall-foraġġ, għat-theddid u għall-wirjiet sesswali, filwaqt li jużaw stikek bħala għodod tal-mess. Barra minn hekk, meta jkunu mal-art, iħaffru b'idejhom wara li jkunu rattbu l-ħamrija bl-għodod tal-ġebel biex ifittxu l-għeruq u l-artropodi.&lt;ref&gt;Falótico, Tiago; Siqueira, José O.; Ottoni, Eduardo B. (2017). &quot;Digging up food: excavation stone tool use by wild capuchin monkeys&quot;. ''Scientific Reports''. '''7''' (1). doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06541-0. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 5524703. &lt;nowiki&gt;PMID 28740211&lt;/nowiki&gt;.&lt;/ref&gt;

== Sítio do Meio ==
Sítio do Meio huwa t-tieni l-iżjed xelter tal-blat importanti fl-inħawi wara Pedra Furada. Ġie datat li jmur lura għall-Plejstoċen mill-artefatti li nstabu fih. Dawn l-artefatti tal-ġebel huma ppreservati aħjar minħabba l-assenza ta' kaskati. Mill-inqas 98 għodda tal-ġebel jidher li huma eqdem minn 12,500 sena qabel il-preżent. Jagħmlu parti mill-fażi Plejstoċenika Superjuri ta' Pedra Furada Nru 3.&lt;ref&gt;AIMOLA, Giulia et al. ''Final Pleistocene and Early Holocene at Sitio do Meio, Piauí, Brazil: Stratigraphy and comparison with Pedra Furada.'' Journal of Lithic Studies, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 2, p. 5-24, sep. 2014. ISSN 2055-0472.&lt;/ref&gt;

== Sit ta' Wirt Dinji ==
Il-Park Nazzjonali ta' Serra da Capivara ġie ddeżinjat bħala Sit ta' Wirt Dinji tal-UNESCO fl-1991.&lt;ref name=&quot;:0&quot; /&gt;

Il-valur universali straordinarju tas-sit ġie rrikonoxxut abbażi ta' kriterju wieħed tal-għażla tal-UNESCO: il-'''kriterju (iii)''' &quot;Xhieda unika jew minn tal-inqas eċċezzjonali ta' tradizzjoni [[Kultura|kulturali]] jew ta' ċivilizzazzjoni li għadha ħajja jew li għebet&quot;.&lt;ref name=&quot;:0&quot; /&gt;

== Gallerija ==
&lt;gallery&gt;
File:Serra_da_Capivara_-_Painting_7.JPG|ħolqa=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Serra_da_Capivara_-_Painting_7.JPG
File:Serra_da_Capivara_-_Painting_8.JPG|ħolqa=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Serra_da_Capivara_-_Painting_8.JPG
File:Serra_da_Capivara_-_Several_Paintings_3.jpg|ħolqa=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Serra_da_Capivara_-_Several_Paintings_3.jpg
File:Punições_(14205232887).jpg|ħolqa=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Puni%C3%A7%C3%B5es_(14205232887).jpg
File:Sítio_Arqueológico_Serra_da_Capivara_IV.jpg|ħolqa=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:S%C3%ADtio_Arqueol%C3%B3gico_Serra_da_Capivara_IV.jpg
&lt;/gallery&gt;

== Referenzi ==

[[Kategorija:Siti ta' Wirt Dinji Kulturali]]
[[Kategorija:Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Brażil]]
[[Kategorija:Parks Nazzjonali]]
[[Kategorija:Preistorja]]
[[Kategorija:Siti arkeoloġiċi]]
[[Kategorija:Brażil]]</text>
      <sha1>domuzfize87xhu6ah973t2t43ynd5l6</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330256</id>
      <parentid>330242</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T04:57:18Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Trigcly</username>
        <id>17859</id>
      </contributor>
      <minor />
      <comment>Din il-ħolqa ġa tinsab fil-bidu tat-test.</comment>
      <origin>330256</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="6182" sha1="s64hsyx4mbr3sd8z5nx6adqr7pn3b4s" xml:space="preserve">[[Stampa:Canoas - Vale Verde.JPG|daqsminuri|Vale Verde.]]
Il-'''Park Nazzjonali ta' Serra da Capivara''' (bil-[[Lingwa Portugiża|Portugiż]]: ''Parque Nacional Serra da Capivara'', IPA: [ˈpaʁki nɐsjoˈnaw ˈsɛʁɐ dɐ kɐpiˈvaɾɐ]) huwa park nazzjonali fir-reġjun tal-Grigal tal-[[Brażil]]. Fl-inħawi hemm bosta [[Pittura|pitturi]] [[Preistorja|preistoriċi]].

L-isem tal-katina muntanjuża li jiddefinixxi l-park, &quot;Serra da Capivara&quot;, litteralment ifisser &quot;Għoljiet ta' Capivara&quot; bil-Portugiż. F'dawn l-inħawi hemm l-ikbar u l-eqdem konċentrazzjoni ta' siti preistoriċi fl-Amerki. Studji [[Xjenza|xjentifiċi]] jikkonfermaw li l-katina muntanjuża ta' Capivara kienet densament popolata fl-era pre-Cabralina.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita aħbar|data=2014-03-28|titlu=Discoveries Challenge Beliefs on Humans’ Arrival in the Americas (Published 2014)|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/28/world/americas/discoveries-challenge-beliefs-on-humans-arrival-in-the-americas.html|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2025-08-17}}&lt;/ref&gt;

== Pożizzjoni ==
Il-park nazzjonali jinsab fil-istat tal-Grigal ta' Piauí, bejn il-latitudnijiet 8° 26' 50&quot; u 8° 54' 23&quot; fin-Nofsinhar u l-lonġitudnijiet 42° 19' 47&quot; u 42° 45' 51&quot; fil-Punent. Jinsab fi ħdan iż-żoni muniċipali ta' São Raimundo Nonato, São João do Piauí, Coronel José Dias u Canto do Buriti, u għandu erja ta' 1,291.4 kilometru kwadru (319,000 akru).

Il-Kuritur [[Ekoloġija|Ekoloġiku]] ta' Capivara-Confusões, li nħoloq fl-2006, jikkollega l-park mal-[[Park Nazzjonali ta' Serra das Confusões]].

== [[Storja]] ==
[[File:Pedra_Furada_-_Serra_da_Capivara_I.jpg|ħolqa=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pedra_Furada_-_Serra_da_Capivara_I.jpg|daqsminuri|Pedra Furada.]]
Il-park inħoloq biex jiġu protetti l-artefatti u l-pitturi preistoriċi li nstabu fih. Sar [[Sit ta' Wirt Dinji]] tal-[[UNESCO]] fl-1991.&lt;ref name=&quot;:0&quot;&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/606/|titlu=Serra da Capivara National Park|kunjom=Centre|isem=UNESCO World Heritage|sit=UNESCO World Heritage Centre|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2023-09-22}}&lt;/ref&gt; L-arkeologu ewlieni tiegħu kien [[Niède Guidon]] u l-iżjed sit [[Arkeoloġija|arkeoloġiku]] magħruf tiegħu huwa Pedra Furada.

Studji xjentifiċi jikkonfermaw li l-katina muntanjuża ta' Capivara kienet densament popolata fl-era pre-Kolumbjana. Sit ftit iktar reċenti huwa Toca da Tira Peia, fejn instabu għodod tal-ġebel li jaf imorru lura għal kważi 22,000 sena ilu. Is-sit ġie datat permezz tal-luminexxenza stimolata b'mod ottiku.&lt;ref&gt;Lahaye, Christelle; Hernandez, Marion; Boëda, Eric; Felice, Gisele D.; Guidon, Niède; Hoeltz, Sirlei; Lourdeau, Antoine; Pagli, Marina; Pessis, Anne-Marie; Rasse, Michel; Viana, Sibeli (2013). &quot;Human occupation in South America by 20,000 BC: the Toca da Tira Peia site, Piauí, Brazil&quot;. ''Journal of Archaeological Science''. '''40''' (6): 2840–2847. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2013.02.019. ISSN 0305-4403.&lt;/ref&gt;

Siti arkeoloġiċi importanti oħra fl-inħawi huma Toca da Pena, Baxao da Esperanca u Sitio do Meio. Is-sit ta' Lapa do Boquete jinsab lejn in-Nofsinhar.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=http://anthropogenesis.kinshipstudies.org/blog/2013/04/24/the-toca-da-tira-peia-site-and-the-end-of-the-ice-age-in-american-archaeology/|titlu=The Toca da Tira Peia Site and the End of an Ice Age in American Archaeology|kunjom=Dziebel|isem=German|data=2013-04-24|lingwa=en-US|data-aċċess=2025-08-17}}&lt;/ref&gt;

== Natura selvaġġa ==
Fil-park instab li l-kapuċċini bid-daqna (xadini) għandhom &quot;l-ikbar sett ta' għodod magħruf fost ix-xadini kapuċċini selvaġġi&quot;. Fost l-għodod tal-ġebel tagħhom hemm dawk għall-foraġġ, għat-theddid u għall-wirjiet sesswali, filwaqt li jużaw stikek bħala għodod tal-mess. Barra minn hekk, meta jkunu mal-art, iħaffru b'idejhom wara li jkunu rattbu l-ħamrija bl-għodod tal-ġebel biex ifittxu l-għeruq u l-artropodi.&lt;ref&gt;Falótico, Tiago; Siqueira, José O.; Ottoni, Eduardo B. (2017). &quot;Digging up food: excavation stone tool use by wild capuchin monkeys&quot;. ''Scientific Reports''. '''7''' (1). doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06541-0. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 5524703. &lt;nowiki&gt;PMID 28740211&lt;/nowiki&gt;.&lt;/ref&gt;

== Sítio do Meio ==
Sítio do Meio huwa t-tieni l-iżjed xelter tal-blat importanti fl-inħawi wara Pedra Furada. Ġie datat li jmur lura għall-Plejstoċen mill-artefatti li nstabu fih. Dawn l-artefatti tal-ġebel huma ppreservati aħjar minħabba l-assenza ta' kaskati. Mill-inqas 98 għodda tal-ġebel jidher li huma eqdem minn 12,500 sena qabel il-preżent. Jagħmlu parti mill-fażi Plejstoċenika Superjuri ta' Pedra Furada Nru 3.&lt;ref&gt;AIMOLA, Giulia et al. ''Final Pleistocene and Early Holocene at Sitio do Meio, Piauí, Brazil: Stratigraphy and comparison with Pedra Furada.'' Journal of Lithic Studies, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 2, p. 5-24, sep. 2014. ISSN 2055-0472.&lt;/ref&gt;

== Sit ta' Wirt Dinji ==
Il-Park Nazzjonali ta' Serra da Capivara ġie ddeżinjat bħala Sit ta' Wirt Dinji tal-UNESCO fl-1991.&lt;ref name=&quot;:0&quot; /&gt;

Il-valur universali straordinarju tas-sit ġie rrikonoxxut abbażi ta' kriterju wieħed tal-għażla tal-UNESCO: il-'''kriterju (iii)''' &quot;Xhieda unika jew minn tal-inqas eċċezzjonali ta' tradizzjoni [[Kultura|kulturali]] jew ta' ċivilizzazzjoni li għadha ħajja jew li għebet&quot;.&lt;ref name=&quot;:0&quot; /&gt;

== Gallerija ==
&lt;gallery&gt;
File:Serra_da_Capivara_-_Painting_7.JPG|ħolqa=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Serra_da_Capivara_-_Painting_7.JPG
File:Serra_da_Capivara_-_Painting_8.JPG|ħolqa=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Serra_da_Capivara_-_Painting_8.JPG
File:Serra_da_Capivara_-_Several_Paintings_3.jpg|ħolqa=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Serra_da_Capivara_-_Several_Paintings_3.jpg
File:Punições_(14205232887).jpg|ħolqa=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Puni%C3%A7%C3%B5es_(14205232887).jpg
File:Sítio_Arqueológico_Serra_da_Capivara_IV.jpg|ħolqa=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:S%C3%ADtio_Arqueol%C3%B3gico_Serra_da_Capivara_IV.jpg
&lt;/gallery&gt;

== Referenzi ==

[[Kategorija:Siti ta' Wirt Dinji Kulturali]]
[[Kategorija:Siti ta' Wirt Dinji fil-Brażil]]
[[Kategorija:Parks Nazzjonali]]
[[Kategorija:Preistorja]]
[[Kategorija:Siti arkeoloġiċi]]
[[Kategorija:Brażil]]</text>
      <sha1>s64hsyx4mbr3sd8z5nx6adqr7pn3b4s</sha1>
    </revision>
  </page>
  <page>
    <title>Nies Maltin li mietu fl-2026</title>
    <ns>0</ns>
    <id>34089</id>
    <revision>
      <id>330230</id>
      <parentid>330141</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-26T13:06:21Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>ToniSant</username>
        <id>4257</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>/* Mejju */ +RIP Benny</comment>
      <origin>330230</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="30566" sha1="kkpeq1uzg670jn7l6w3349moc472biw" xml:space="preserve">'''Din hija lista ta' nies notevoli Maltin li mietu fl-2026.'''

F'din il-lista jidhru biss ismijiet ta' nies li l-mewt tagħhom hija kkonfermata peremezz ta' rapport/i minn sorsi verifikabbli. Żidiet bla referenza għal sors verifikabbli jitneħħew minn hawn u jitpoġġew fil-[[Diskussjoni:Nies Maltin li mietu fl-2026|paġna ta' diskussjoni]] sakemm jiġu verifikati sew. 

Dwar kull persuna jinġabru biss dawn id-dettalji hawn:

* Data: Isem u Kunjom, età (jew &quot;??&quot; meta din mhux magħrufa), għal xiex inhi magħrufa l-persuna, kawża tal-mewt (m'għandu jiddaħħal xejn meta mhux magħrufa uffiċjalment) - tagħrif ieħor f'każ ta' persuna li mhux inkluża f'Wikidata (eż. data tat-twelid), referenzi (għandu jkun hemm aktar minn waħda f'każ ta' nies aktar notevoli)

'''''Nota:''' id-data tal-mewt m'għandix tkun dik ta' meta tħabbret imma ta' meta seħħet.''

----

== Jannar ==

* 2: [[Tony Carr]], 98, mużiċist &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/tony-carr-pioneering-maltese-jazz-drummer-dies.1121949|titlu=Tony Carr, Maltese jazz drummer to the stars, dies|kunjom=Borg|isem=Emma|data=2026-01-02|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-01-02}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/il-perkussjonist-tony-carr-george-caruana-jmut-fl-eta-ta-98-sena/|titlu=Il-perkussjonist Tony Carr (George Caruana) jmut fl-età ta’ 98 sena|kunjom=Zammit|isem=Frederick|data=2 Jannar 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://themalteseherald.com/2026/01/02/tony-carr-passes-away/|titlu=Renowned Maltese drummer, Tony Carr, passes away aged 98|kunjom=Fenech|isem=Gerald|data=2026-01-02|lingwa=en-GB|data-aċċess=2026-01-02}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.maltatoday.com.mt/news/national/138938/maltese_jazz_great_tony_carr_dies_aged_98|titlu=Maltese jazz great Tony Carr dies aged 98|kunjom=Meilak|isem=Nicole|data=2 Jannar 2026|sit=MaltaToday.com.mt|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2026-01-02}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2026-01-02/local-news/Maltese-jazz-legend-Tony-Carr-passes-away-aged-98-6736286044|titlu=Maltese jazz legend, Tony Carr, passes away aged 98 - The Malta Independent|sit=www.independent.com.mt|data-aċċess=2026-01-03}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://tvmnews.mt/news/imut-ta-98-sena-d-drummer-malti-tony-carr/|titlu=Imut ta' 98 sena d-drummer Malti Tony Carr|data=2026-01-02|lingwa=en-US|data-aċċess=2026-01-03}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://one.com.mt/imut-ta-98-sena-d-drummer-famuz-malti-tony-carr-li-daqq-mal-akbar-stilel-muzikali/|titlu=Imut ta’ 98 sena d-drummer famuż Malti Tony Carr li daqq mal-akbar stilel mużikali|kunjom=Caruana|isem=Josef|data=3 Jannar 2026|sit=ONEnews|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.melodija.eu/post/tony-carr-george-caruana-maltese-jazz-pioneer-dies-at-98|titlu=Tony Carr (George Caruana): Maltese Jazz Pioneer Dies at 98|kunjom=Mifsud|isem=Noel|data=2026-01-05|sit=Melodija|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2026-01-05}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.sussexexpress.co.uk/news/fond-tribute-on-death-of-drummer-who-played-with-the-greats-5465983|titlu=Fond tribute on death of drummer who played with the greats|kunjom=Hewitt|isem=Phil|data=2026-01-10|sit=SussexWorld|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2026-01-10}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 5: [[George Spiteri]], 90, mużiċist u l-ewwel leader tal-[[Orkestra Filarmonika ta' Malta]] (twieled: 20 ta’ Lulju 1935) &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/announcements-january-6-2026.1122080|titlu=Announcements − January 6, 2026|kunjom=|isem=|data=2026-01-06|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-01-06}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/imut-george-spiteri-l-ewwel-leader-tal-orkestra-filarmonika-ta-malta/|titlu=Imut George Spiteri, l-ewwel leader tal-Orkestra Filarmonika ta’ Malta|kunjom=Zammit|isem=Frederick|data=6 Jannar 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.facebook.com/reel/1540894257190704/?t=49|titlu=MPO: Protagonisti - George Spiteri|kunjom=Farrugia|isem=Joe Julian|data=6 Jannar 2026|sit=Facebook}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/a-real-gentleman-good-musician-violinist-george-spiteri-dies-aged-90.1122103|titlu='A real gentleman': trailblazing violinist George Spiteri dies at 90|kunjom=Cummings|isem=James|data=2026-01-06|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-01-06}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 6: [[Thomas Farrell]], 89, għalliem u l-ewwel sindku ta' Ħaż Żabbar &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/thomas-farrell-first-mayor-zabbar-dies-aged-89.1122141|titlu=Thomas Farrell, first mayor of Żabbar, dies aged 89|kunjom=|isem=|data=2026-01-07|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-01-07}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 14: [[Paul Chetcuti Caruana]], 77, tabib u politiku &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://one.com.mt/tithabbar-il-mewt-tal-eks-deputat-laburista-t-tabib-paul-chetcuti-caruana/|titlu=Titħabbar il-mewt tal-eks Deputat Laburista t-Tabib Paul Chetcuti Caruana|kunjom=Portelli|isem=Eman|data=14 Jannar 2026|sit=ONEnews|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/former-mp-paul-chetcuti-caruana-dies.1122497|titlu=Mosta doctor Paul Chetcuti Caruana, targeted by 1977 letter bomb, dies aged 77|kunjom=Calleja|isem=Claudia|data=2026-01-14|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-01-15}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2026-01-14/local-news/Paul-Chetcuti-Caruana-who-survived-letter-bomb-attempt-in-1977-dies-6736286334|titlu=Paul Chetcuti Caruana, who survived letter-bomb attempt in 1977, dies - The Malta Independent|sit=www.independent.com.mt|data-aċċess=2026-01-15}}&lt;/ref&gt; &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/parliament-pays-tribute-mosta-doctor-pl-mp-paul-chetcuti-caruana.1123482|titlu=Parliament pays tribute to Mosta doctor and PL MP Paul Chetcuti Caruana|kunjom=Magri|isem=Giulia|data=2026-02-02|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-02-02}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 20: [[Matthew Wismayer]], 53, fundatur ta' Schools for Africa (Malta) Foundation &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/matthew-wismayer-schools-africa-foundation-entrepreneur-dies.1122791|titlu=Matthew Wismayer, who turned a cancer diagnosis into inspiration, dies aged 53|kunjom=Debono|isem=Fiona Galea|data=2026-01-20|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-01-22}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://tvmnews.mt/news/imut-matthew-wismayer-il-mohh-wara-progett-biex-jigu-meghjuna-tfal-fl-afrika/|titlu=Imut Matthew Wismayer, il-moħħ wara proġett biex jiġu megħjuna tfal fl-Afrika|kunjom=|isem=|data=2026-01-20|lingwa=mt|data-aċċess=2026-01-22}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://lovinmalta.com/malta/founder-of-prince-princess-malta-matthew-wismayer-passes-away/|titlu=Founder Of 'Prince &amp; Princess Malta' Matthew Wismayer Passes Away|kunjom=Spiteri|isem=Rebecca Scalvini|data=2026-01-20|lingwa=en-GB|data-aċċess=2026-01-22}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://whoswho.mt/en/matthew-wismayer-passes-away-aged-53|titlu=Maltese Entrepreneur Matthew Wismayer passes away at 53|sit=whoswho.mt|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2026-01-22}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/announcements-january-21-2026.1122811|titlu=Announcements – January 21, 2026|kunjom=|isem=|data=2026-01-21|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-01-22}}&lt;/ref&gt; 
* 21: [[George Callus]], ??, ko-fundatur tal-Comtec &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://whoswho.mt/en/comtec-co-founder-george-callus-has-passed-away|titlu=Comtec Co-Founder George Callus has passed away|sit=whoswho.mt|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2026-01-22}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/imut-ir-ragel-ta-amy-callus-orlando-mrs-axiak-ta-simpatici/|titlu=Imut ir-raġel ta’ Amy Callus Orlando, Mrs Axiak ta’ Simpatiċi|kunjom=Zammit|isem=Frederick|data=21 Jannar 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://gwida.mt/nimmissjak-immens-ghaziz-l-attrici-amy-callus-thabbar-it-telfa-ta-zewgha-george/|titlu=&quot;Nimmissjak Immens, Għażiż&quot; - L-Attriċi Amy Callus Tħabbar It-Telfa Ta' Żewġha George|kunjom=Zarb|isem=Kyle|data=2026-01-22|lingwa=mt|data-aċċess=2026-01-22}}&lt;/ref&gt; 

== Frar ==

* 4: [[Alfred Abela]], 80, eks-assistent kummissarju tal-pulizija &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://one.com.mt/tithabbar-il-mewt-tal-eks-assistent-kummissarju-tal-pulizija-alfred-abela/|titlu=Titħabbar il-mewt tal-eks Assistent Kummissarju tal-Pulizija Alfred Abela|kunjom=Portelli|isem=Eman|data=4 Frar 2026|sit=ONEnews|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 5: [[Philip Farrugia Randon]], 76, avukat u kittieb li ħoloq il-karattru ta' Puttinu &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/dedicated-patriot-philip-farrugia-randon-dies.1123612|titlu='Dedicated patriot' Philip Farrugia Randon dies|kunjom=|isem=|data=2026-02-05|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-02-05}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/announcements-february-6-2026.1123652|titlu=Announcements − February 6, 2026|kunjom=|isem=|data=2026-02-06|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-02-06}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://tvmnews.mt/news/imut-dr-philip-farrugia-randon-avukat-u-awtur-li-holoq-il-karattru-puttinu/|titlu=Imut Dr Philip Farrugia Randon, avukat u awtur li ħoloq il-karattru Puttinu|kunjom=Micallef|isem=Gaetano|data=2026-02-05|sit=TVMnews|lingwa=mt|data-aċċess=2026-02-08}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/appreciation-philip-farrugia-randon.1124083|titlu=Appreciation: Philip Farrugia Randon|kunjom=De Bono|isem=Anthony|data=2026-02-15|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-02-15}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 5: [[Helen Micallef]], 75, kantanta &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/helen-micallef-eurovision-1972-singer-dies-aged-75.1123643|titlu=Helen Micallef, Eurovision 1972 singer, dies aged 75|kunjom=Bonanno|isem=Matthew|data=2026-02-05|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-02-05}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/tmut-helen-micallef-l-ewwel-maltija-fil-eurovision/|titlu=Tmut Helen Micallef, l-ewwel kantanta Maltija fil-Eurovision|kunjom=Zammit|isem=Frederick|data=5 Frar 2025|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.maltatoday.com.mt/news/national/139589/veteran_singer_helen_micallef_dies_aged_75|titlu=Veteran singer Helen Micallef dies aged 75|kunjom=Meilak|isem=Nicole|data=5 Frar 2026|sit=MaltaToday.com.mt|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2026-02-06}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/helen-micallef-tinghata-l-ahhar-tislima-ghada-s-sibt/|titlu=Helen Micallef tingħata l-aħħar tislima għada s-Sibt|kunjom=Zammit|isem=Frederick|data=6 Frar 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2026-02-05/local-news/Helen-Micallef-first-Maltese-woman-at-Eurovision-dies-at-75-6736286990|titlu=Helen Micallef, first Maltese woman at Eurovision, dies at 75 - The Malta Independent|sit=www.independent.com.mt|data-aċċess=2026-02-06}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://one.com.mt/iccelebrata-l-hajja-tal-kantanta-helen-micallef/|titlu=Iċċelebrata l-ħajja tal-kantanta Helen Micallef|kunjom=Falzon|isem=Anton|data=7 Frar 2026|sit=ONEnews|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 8: [[Paul Aquilina]], 94, Ġiżwita Malti bbażat fl-Indja &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/tithabbar-il-mewt-ta-fr-paul-aquilina-l-ahhar-patri-gizwita-malti-fl-indja/|titlu=Imut Fr Paul Aquilina – l-aħħar Ġiżwita Malti fl-Indja|kunjom=Camilleri|isem=Neil|data=8 Frar 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/l-ahhar-patri-gizwita-malti-fl-indja-jkanta-l-ghanjiet-tal-milied/|titlu=L-aħħar Patri Ġiżwita Malti fl-Indja jkanta l-Għanjiet tal-Milied|kunjom=Zammit|isem=Frederick|data=25 Diċembru 2025|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/mort-l-indja-biex-narah-jordna-sacerdot-u-kantajt-bil-malti-waqt-il-funeral-ta-fr-aquilina/|titlu=“Mort l-Indja nara żagħżugħ jiġi ordnat qassis, u spiċċajt inkanta bil-Malti fil-funeral ta’ Fr Aquilina”|kunjom=Zammit|isem=Frederick|data=11 Frar 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/announcements-february-15-2026.1124084|titlu=Announcements – February 15, 2026|kunjom=|isem=|data=2026-02-15|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-02-15}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 10: [[Lina Brockdorff|Lina Brockdorff,]] 95, kittieba &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/awardwinning-writer-lina-brockdorff-dies-aged-96.1123850|titlu=Novelist and playwright Lina Brockdorff dies aged 95|kunjom=Borg|isem=Emma|data=2026-02-10|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-02-10}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://tvmnews.mt/news/tmut-l-awtrici-lina-brockdorff-fl-eta-ta-95-sena/|titlu=Tmut l-awtriċi Lina Brockdorff fl-età ta' 95 sena|data=2026-02-10|sit=TVMnews|lingwa=mt|data-aċċess=2026-02-10}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/thabbret-il-mewt-tax-xandara-u-l-kittieba-lina-brockdorff/|titlu=Tħabbret il-mewt tax-xandara u l-kittieba Lina Brockdorff|kunjom=Lia|isem=Gabriel|data=10 Frar 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2026-02-10/local-news/Maltese-novelist-and-playwright-Lina-Brockdorff-dies-aged-95-6736287109|titlu=Maltese novelist and playwright Lina Brockdorff dies aged 95 - The Malta Independent|sit=www.independent.com.mt|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2026-02-10}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 10: [[Achille Cauchi]], 86, monsinjur Għawdxi, ħu l-Isqof [[Nikol Cauchi]] &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/imut-monsinjur-achille-cauchi/|titlu=Imut Monsinjur Achille Cauchi|kunjom=Zammit|isem=Frederick|data=11 Frar 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://rip.com.mt/obituary/mons-achille-cauchi-10-02-2026|titlu=Mons. Achille Cauchi - RIP.com.mt|kunjom=Gatt|isem=Thomas|sit=rip.com.mt|lingwa=mt|data-aċċess=2026-02-16}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 15: [[Laurence Grech]], 77, ġurnalist u eks-editur tas-Sunday Times of Malta &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/former-times-malta-editor-laurence-grech-dies-aged-77.1124107|titlu=Former Times of Malta editor Laurence Grech dies, aged 77|kunjom=Carabott|isem=Sarah|data=2026-02-15|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-02-15}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/imut-laurence-grech-il-ggant-tal-gurnalizmu-l-eks-editur-tat-times-of-malta/|titlu=Imut Laurence Grech, “il-ġgant tal-ġurnaliżmu”, l-eks-editur tat-Times of Malta|data=15 Frar 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/announcements-february-16-2026.1124125|titlu=Announcements – February 16, 2026|kunjom=|isem=|data=2026-02-16|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-02-16}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://rip.com.mt/obituary/laurence-grech-15-02-2026|titlu=Laurence Grech - RIP.com.mt|kunjom=Gatt|isem=Thomas|sit=rip.com.mt|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2026-02-16}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 15: [[Esmeralda Galea Camilleri]], 37, mużiċista &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://gwida.mt/hafna-mahsuda-bil-mewt-tal-muzicista-brava-esmeralda-galea-camilleri/|titlu=Ħafna Maħsuda Bil-Mewt Tal-Mużiċista Brava Esmeralda Galea Camilleri|kunjom=Bayliss|isem=Emil Calleja|data=2026-02-16|lingwa=mt|data-aċċess=2026-02-16}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/kont-titpaxxa-tismaghha-tmut-il-muzicista-esmeralda-galea-camilleri/|titlu=“Kont titpaxxa tismagħha” – tmut il-mużiċista Esmeralda Galea Camilleri|kunjom=Zammit|isem=Frederick|data=16 Frar 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 16: [[Mario Bonnici]], 76, kantant &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/il-kanzunetta-li-kont-iddedikaktli-se-tibqa-fqalbi-imut-il-kantant-mario-bonnici/|titlu=“Il-kanzunetta li kont iddedikajtli se tibqa’ f’qalbi” – imut il-kantant Mario Bonnici|kunjom=Zammit|isem=Frederick|data=17 Frar 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 18: [[Julian Attard]], 44, amministratur tal-futbol ma' [[Marsaxlokk FC]] u [[Floriana FC]] (twieled fis-27 ta' Novembru 1981) &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://sport.timesofmalta.com/2026/02/18/former-marsaxlokk-and-floriana-fc-administrator-julian-attard-dies/|titlu=Former Marsaxlokk and Floriana FC administrator Julian Attard dies|kunjom=Lia|isem=Gianluca|data=2026-02-18|lingwa=en-US|data-aċċess=2026-02-18}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/hallejtna-kmieni-wisq-habib-imut-julian-attard-tat-tim-tal-futbol-ta-marsaxlokk/|titlu=“Ħallejtna kmieni wisq ħabib” – imut Julian Attard, tat-tim tal-futbol ta’ Marsaxlokk|kunjom=Zammit|isem=Frederick|data=18 Frar 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 23: [[Manuel Casha]], 81, mużiċist, kittieb, u folklorista &lt;ref&gt; {{Ċita web|url=https://one.com.mt/tithabbar-il-mewt-tal-kittieb-u-muzicist-manuel-casha-fl-awstralja/ |sit=ONEnews|data=24 Frar 2026|isem=Josef|kunjom=Caruana|lingwa=mt|titlu=Titħabbar il-mewt tal-kittieb u mużiċist Manuel Casha fl-Awstralja}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 28: [[Mario Buhagiar]], 81 professur tal-istorja tal-arti &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/mario-buhagiar-founder-art-history-department-dies-aged-81.1124795|titlu=Mario Buhagiar, founder of art history department dies aged 81|kunjom=Carabott|isem=Sarah|data=2026-03-01|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-03-01}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://themalteseherald.com/2026/03/02/prof-mario-buhagiar/|titlu=Founder of the arts History Department – Professor Mario Buhagiar passes away|kunjom=Fenech|isem=Gerald|data=2 Marzu 2026|sit=The Maltese Herald|lingwa=en}}&lt;/ref&gt;

== Marzu ==

* 8: [[Joseph Gatt (Caritas)|Joseph Gatt]], 81, pijunier fir-riabilitazzjoni tad-drogati f'Malta &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/joseph-gatt-drug-rehabilitation-pioneer-dies-aged-81.1125168|titlu=Joseph Gatt, drug rehabilitation pioneer, dies aged 81|kunjom=Cummings|isem=James|data=2026-03-08|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-03-08}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/segwi-meta-konna-fl-infern-habba-d-droga-joe-kien-anglu-kustodju/|titlu=Segwi: “Meta konna fl-infern ħabba d-droga Joe kien anġlu kustodju”|kunjom=Lia|isem=Gabriel|data=9 Marzu 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 13: [[Luciano Bonello Bianco]], 72, propjetarju ta' Luciano Restaurant &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url= https://timesofmalta.com/article/announcements-march-15-2026.1125478 |titlu=Announcements|sit=Times of Malta|data-aċċess=2026-03-15}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 21: [[Charles Micallef St John]], 81, kittieb u eks-kunsillier tal-Gżira &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/imut-l-awtur-charles-micallef-st-john/|titlu=Imut l-awtur Charles Micallef St John|kunjom=Camilleri|isem=Neil|data=21 Marzu 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://netnews.com.mt/2026/03/21/imut-l-awtur-chaf-st-john/|titlu=Imut l-awtur Charles Micallef St. John|kunjom=Balbi|isem=Nicole Sciberras|data=2026-03-21|sit=NETnews|lingwa=mt|data-aċċess=2026-03-23}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 22: [[Calvin Brincat]], 32, parteċipant fil-programm tat-television ''Hazzzard'', kanċer &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://tvmnews.mt/news/imut-calvin-brincat-li-ggieled-2-tipi-ta-kancer-u-kien-ippartecipa-fhazzzard/|titlu=Imut Calvin Brincat li ġġieled 2 tipi ta' kanċer u kien ipparteċipa f'HazZzard|data=2026-03-23|sit=TVMnews|lingwa=mt|data-aċċess=2026-03-23}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/imut-iz-zaghzugh-calvin-brincat-ta-hazzzard/|titlu=Imut iż-żagħżugħ Calvin Brincat ta’ HazZzard|kunjom=Lia|isem=Gabriel|data=23 Marzu 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/tributes-paid-truly-sensitive-soul-cancer-patient-calvin-brincat.1125893|titlu=Tributes paid to 'truly sensitive soul', cancer victim Calvin Brincat|kunjom=Cummings|isem=James|data=2026-03-23|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-03-23}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 29: [[Elio Lombardi]], 92, kittieb u direttur tal-films &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/prolific-filmmaker-author-elio-lombardi-dies-aged-92.1126197|titlu=Prolific film-maker, author Elio Lombardi dies aged 92|kunjom=|isem=|data=2026-03-29|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-03-29}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://tvmnews.mt/news/imut-l-awtur-tal-kotba-u-direttur-tal-films-elio-lombardi/|titlu=Imut l-awtur tal-kotba u direttur tal-films Elio Lombardi|kunjom=Micallef|isem=Gaetano|data=2026-03-29|sit=TVMnews|lingwa=mt|data-aċċess=2026-03-29}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://netnews.com.mt/2026/03/29/tithabbar-il-mewt-ta-elio-lombardi-fl-eta-ta-92-sena/|titlu=Titħabbar il-mewt ta' Elio Lombardi fl-età ta' 92 sena|kunjom=Catania|isem=Francesco|data=2026-03-29|sit=NETnews|lingwa=mt|data-aċċess=2026-03-29}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://one.com.mt/tithabbar-il-mewt-tal-kittieb-u-attur-elio-lombardi-fl-eta-ta-92-sena/|titlu=Titħabbar il-mewt tal-kittieb u attur Elio Lombardi fl-età ta’ 92 Sena|kunjom=Farrugia|isem=Shanaya|data=29 Marzu 2026|sit=ONEnews|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/imut-elio-lombardi-figura-prominenti-fil-films-u-l-letteratura-maltija/|titlu=Imut Elio Lombardi, figura prominenti fil-films u l-letteratura Maltija|kunjom=Cachia|isem=Paul|data=29 Marzu 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2026-03-29/local-news/Maltese-author-and-film-director-Elio-Lombardi-dies-aged-92-6736288379|titlu=Maltese author and film director Elio Lombardi dies aged 92 - The Malta Independent|sit=www.independent.com.mt|data-aċċess=2026-03-29}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/thabbar-meta-se-jinghata-l-ahhar-tislima-elio-lombardi/|titlu=Tħabbar meta se jingħata l-aħħar tislima Elio Lombardi|kunjom=Lia|isem=Gabriel|data=1 April 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/ara-elio-dejjem-gharaf-li-kien-mimli-doni-minn-alla/|titlu=Ara: “Elio dejjem għaraf li kien mimli doni minn Alla”|kunjom=Zammit|isem=Frederick|data=8 April 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://one.com.mt/tinghata-l-ahhar-tislima-lil-elio-lombardi-ikona-fid-drama-maltija/|titlu=Tingħata l-aħħar tislima lil Elio Lombardi … ikona fid-drama Maltija|kunjom=Camilleri|isem=Enrique|data=8 April 2026|sit=ONEnews|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;

== April ==

* 2: [[Edmond Zarb]], 81, kittieb u mużiċist &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://netnews.com.mt/2026/04/02/tithabbar-il-mewt-tal-muzicist-u-awtur-edmond-zarb/|titlu=Titħabbar il-mewt tal-mużiċist u awtur Edmond Zarb|kunjom=Catania|isem=Francesco|data=2026-04-02|lingwa=mt|data-aċċess=2026-04-02}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/tajt-kontribut-lill-kultura-maltija-imut-l-awtur-u-pjanist-edmond-zarb|titlu=“Tajt kontribut lill-kultura Maltija” – imut l-awtur u pjanist Edmond Zarb|kunjom=Zammit|isem=Frederick|data=2 April 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 6: [[Graziella Castillo]], 47, direttur tal-Aġenzija Appoġġ &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/graziella-castillo-director-agenzija-appogg-dies-aged-47.1126547|titlu=Graziella Castillo, director of Agenzija Appoġġ, dies aged 47|kunjom=|isem=|data=2026-04-06|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-04-07}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/tmut-graziella-castillo-direttrici-tal-agenzija-appogg/|titlu=Tmut Graziella Castillo – Direttriċi tal-Aġenzija Appoġġ|data=6 April 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 11: [[Colin Willis]], 81, eks-kummissajru Awstraljan għal Malta u attur &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2026-04-13/local-news/Well-known-actor-Colin-Willis-passes-away-aged-81-6736288759|titlu=Well-known actor Colin Willis passes away aged 81 - The Malta Independent|sit=www.independent.com.mt|data-aċċess=2026-04-13}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 12: [[Aurelio Belli]], 49, mużiċist u arranġatur &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/musician-mpo-manager-aurelio-belli-dies-aged-49.1126829|titlu=Musician and MPO manager Aurelio Belli dies, aged 49|kunjom=Cummings|isem=James|data=2026-04-12|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-04-12}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://slippedisc.com/2026/04/malta-mourns-maestro-49/|titlu=Malta mourns maestro, 49|kunjom=lebrecht|isem=Norman|data=12 April 2026|sit=Slipped Disc|lingwa=en}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2026-04-12/local-news/Maestro-Aurelio-Belli-dies-aged-49-6736288731|titlu=Maestro Aurelio Belli dies, aged 49 - The Malta Independent|sit=www.independent.com.mt|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2026-04-12}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.maltatoday.com.mt/news/national/140933/maestro_aurelio_belli_dies_at_49_|titlu=Maestro Aurelio Belli dies at 49|kunjom=Zammit|isem=Juliana|data=12 April 2026|sit=MaltaToday.com.mt|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2026-04-12}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/imut-il-maestro-aurelio-belli/|titlu=Imut il-Maestro Aurelio Belli|kunjom=Camilleri|isem=Neil|data=12 April 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://tvmnews.mt/news/imut-is-surmast-aurelio-belli/|titlu=Imut is-Surmast Aurelio Belli|kunjom=|isem=|data=2026-04-12|sit=TVMnews|lingwa=mt|data-aċċess=2026-04-12}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://one.com.mt/tithabbar-il-mewt-tal-maestro-aurelio-belli-fl-eta-ta-49-sena/|titlu=Titħabbar il-mewt tal-Maestro Aurelio Belli fl-età ta’ 49 sena|kunjom=Sacco Baldacchino|isem=Kimberley|data=12 April 2026|sit=ONEnews|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://netnews.com.mt/2026/04/12/tithabbar-il-mewt-tas-surmast-aurelio-belli/|titlu=Titħabbar il-mewt tas-Surmast Aurelio Belli|kunjom=Catania|isem=Francesco|data=2026-04-12|sit=NETnews|lingwa=mt|data-aċċess=2026-04-12}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/il-maestro-aurelio-belli-jinghata-l-ahhar-tislima|titlu=Tislima lill-Maestro Aurelio Belli: “Mela s-silenzju b’ħajja ta’ noti”|kunjom=Mamo|isem=Christine|data=18 April 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 19: [[Desmond Morris]], 98, etoloġista Ingliż li għex f'Malta (1968–1974) &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/desmond-morris-famous-zoologist-author-painter-malta-past-dies-98.1127264|titlu=Desmond Morris, famous zoologist, author and painter with Malta past, dies at 98|kunjom=Debono|isem=Fiona Galea|data=2026-04-21|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-04-21}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 24: [[Mary Grech]], 88, attriċi u xandara &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/veteran-actress-mary-grech-dies-aged-88.1127413|titlu=Veteran actress Mary Grech dies aged 88|kunjom=|isem=|data=2026-04-24|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-04-24}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/tmut-l-attrici-u-prezentatrici-mary-grech/|titlu=Tmut l-attriċi u preżentatriċi Mary Grech|kunjom=Zammit|isem=Frederick|data=24 April 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://tvmnews.mt/news/tmut-l-eks-prezentattrici-televiziva-mary-grech/|titlu=Tmut l-eks preżentattriċi televiżiva Mary Grech|kunjom=Attard|isem=Francesca|data=2026-04-24|sit=TVMnews|lingwa=mt|data-aċċess=2026-04-24}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://netnews.com.mt/2026/04/24/tmut-mary-grech-pijufniera-tax-xandir-u-fost-l-ewwel-ucuh-tat-televizjoni-maltija/|titlu=Tmut Mary Grech, attriċi, pijuniera tax-xandir u fost l-ewwel uċuħ tat-televiżjoni Maltija|kunjom=Abdilla|isem=Raymond|data=2026-04-24|sit=NETnews|lingwa=mt|data-aċċess=2026-04-24}}&lt;/ref&gt;

== Mejju ==

* 1: [[Dolindo Cassar]], 83, xandar u eks-president tas-[[Soċjetà Filarmonika La Stella]] u tat-[[Teatru Astra]] &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://gwida.mt/tislima-lil-dolindo-cassar-li-ghadda-ghall-hajja-ta-dejjem-figura-li-halliet-marka-kbira-fil-kultura-ghawdxija/|titlu=Tislima Lil Dolindo Cassar Li Għadda Għall-Ħajja Ta’ Dejjem - Figura Li Ħalliet Marka Kbira Fil-Kultura Għawdxija|kunjom=Bayliss|isem=Emil Calleja|data=2026-05-05|sit=Gwida|lingwa=mt|data-aċċess=2026-05-05}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.stgeorge.org.mt/events/funeral-of-dolindo-cassar/|titlu=Funeral of DOLINDO CASSAR|data=2026-05-03|lingwa=en-GB|data-aċċess=2026-05-05}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 14: [[Noel Galea Bason]], 71, skultur &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://netnews.com.mt/2026/05/15/imut-l-artist-noel-galea-bason/|titlu=Imut l-artist Noel Galea Bason|kunjom=|isem=|data=2026-05-15|sit=NETnews|lingwa=mt|data-aċċess=2026-05-15}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/artist-noel-galea-bason-dies-aged-71.1128464|titlu=Artist Noel Galea Bason dies aged 71|kunjom=Carabott|isem=Sarah|data=2026-05-15|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-05-15}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/imut-noel-galea-bason-furjaniz-moghni-btalenti-artistici-varji/|titlu=Imut Noel Galea Bason, Furjaniż mogħni b’talenti artistiċi varji|kunjom=Lia|isem=Gabriel|data=15 Mejju 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 19: [[Norbert Ellul Vincenti]], 88, patri Franġiskan, għalliem u kittieb &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://netnews.com.mt/2026/05/19/imut-p-norbert-ellul-vincenti-ofm/|titlu=Imut P. Norbert Ellul Vincenti OFM|kunjom=|isem=|data=2026-05-19|sit=NETnews|lingwa=mt|data-aċċess=2026-05-19}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/imut-patri-norbert-ellul-vincenti/|titlu=Imut Patri Norbert Ellul Vincenti|kunjom=Zammit|isem=Frederick|data=19 Mejju 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;
* 26: [[Benny Muscat]], 86, sid ta' diversi ristorant &lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://timesofmalta.com/article/goodbye-nonno-renowned-restaurateur-benny-muscat-dies.1129052|titlu='Goodbye Nonno' – renowned restaurateur Benny Muscat dies|kunjom=Debono|isem=Fiona Galea|data=2026-05-26|sit=Times of Malta|lingwa=en-gb|data-aċċess=2026-05-26}}&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://newsbook.com.mt/imut-benny-muscat-il-qalb-wara-ta-marija-palazzo-pescatore-u-trattoria-del-nonno/|titlu=Imut Benny Muscat, il-qalb wara Ta’ Marija, Palazzo Pescatore u Trattoria del Nonno|kunjom=Zammit|isem=Frederick|data=26 Mejju 2026|sit=Newsbook|lingwa=mt}}&lt;/ref&gt;

== Ara aktar ==

* [[:Kategorija:Mietu fl-2026]] - tinkludi ħoloq għal artikli fil-Wikipedija dwar nies li mietu fl-2026

== Referenzi ==
{{Referenzi}}

[[Kategorija:Nies Maltin]]
[[Kategorija:2026 f'Malta]]
[[Kategorija:Imwiet f'Malta]]
[[Kategorija:Mietu fl-2026|*]]
[[Kategorija:Listi ta' mwiet bis-sena]]</text>
      <sha1>kkpeq1uzg670jn7l6w3349moc472biw</sha1>
    </revision>
  </page>
  <page>
    <title>Wikipedija:Rebbiegħa CEE 2026</title>
    <ns>4</ns>
    <id>34234</id>
    <revision>
      <id>330228</id>
      <parentid>330094</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-26T13:04:59Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Trigcly</username>
        <id>17859</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>/* Parteċipanti */</comment>
      <origin>330228</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="14027" sha1="hwnqyjkhd5ntzi6veljqzalojifxq24" xml:space="preserve">[[File:Rebbiegħa CEE logo.jpg|300px|lemin|Il-logo ta' Rebbiegħa CEE]]
'''Rebbiegħa CEE 2026''' ta' Wikimedia hija inizjattiva ta' Wikipedisti mill-[[Ewropa Ċentrali]] u l-[[Ewropa tal-Lvant]] bl-għan li jinħloqu paġni dwar nies, suġġetti jew oġġetti minn din il-parti tad-dinja. Malta qed tieħu sehem għar-raba' darba din is-sena permezz tal-għaqda volontarja [[metawiki:Wikimedia Community User Group Malta|Wikimedia Community Malta]], li hija affiljata mal-[[foundationsite: |Wikimedia Foundation]]. Dan jorbot mal-ħidma sistematika mibdija fl-2020 minn din l-għaqda biex jinħolqu paġni bil-Malti fuq il-Wikipedija dwar nies, suġġetti u oġġetti li m'għandhomx x'jaqsmu direttament ma' Malta. Matul is-snin dan sar, u qed ikompli jsir, f'kollaborazzjoni mal-Kummissjoni Ewropea, u Dipartiment tat-Traduzzjoni fl-Università ta' Malta.

 '''''Matul ix-xhur ta' Marzu, April u Mejju qed norganizzaw ukoll numru ta' workshops u edit-a-toni.  [http://www.wikimalta.org Id-dettalji hawn].'''''

== Sfond ==
F'dawn l-aħħar 100 sena, l-[[Ewropa Ċentrali]] u l-[[Ewropa tal-Lvant]] għaddew minn għadd ta' rebbigħat mhux daqstant sbieħ li ħolqu ħafna diżgwid, kunflitti u diżappunti. Fost dawn nistgħu nsemmu ir-[[Rebbiegħa ta' Praga]] fl-1968, il-kunflitt fin-[[Nagorno-Karabakh]] tal-1988, l-eskalazzjoni tal-kunflitt [[Transnistrija]]n fl-1992, jew il-gwerra li faqqgħet fl-[[Ukrajna]] fl-2014.

Għaldaqstant, ir-Rebbiegħa CEE ta' Wikimedia għandha l-għan li tappoġġja u tippromovi gruppi lokali fil-ħolqien ta' paġni fil-Wikipedija u proġetti oħra ta' Wikimedia biex jiżdied l-għarfien reċiproku ta' xulxin u jitkattar l-għerf ħieles f'dawn ir-reġjuni.

== Lista ta' artikli mill-pajjiżi u reġjuni ==
Il-lista ta' paġni mill-pajjiżi u r-reġjuni isservi ta' punt tat-tluq u orjentazzjoni għal ħolqien u titjib tal-paġni - anke jekk il-paġni kollha dwar pajjiżi fl-Ewropa Ċentrali u tal-Lvant (inkluż il-Kawkasja) jgħoddu fil-konkors. Il-biċċa l-kbira tal-paġni jinstabu fil-Wikipedia bl-Ingliż u spiss huwa faċli ferm li jiġu tradotti minn hemm. 

'''Paġni dwar suġġetti marbuta direttament ma' Malta ma jgħoddux fil-punti li tista' tirbaħ f'dan il-konkors jekk int utent Malti/ja.'''
&lt;gallery mode=packed-hover heights=70px style=&quot;background-color: #ddd;&quot;&gt;
File:Flag_of_Albania.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Albania|Albanija]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Albania]]|alt=Albanija
File:Flag_of_Armenia.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Armenia|Armenja]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Armenia]]|alt=Armenja
File:Flag_of_Austria.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Austria|Awstrija]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Austria]]|alt=Awstija
File:Flag_of_Azerbaijan.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Azerbaijan|Ażerbajġan]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Azerbaijan]]|alt=Ażerbajġan
File:Flag of Bashkortostan.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia CEE Spring 2026/Structure/Bashkortostan|Baxkortostan]]|link=
[[:meta:Wikimedia CEE Spring 2020/Structure/Bashkortostan]]|alt=Baxkortostan
File:Flag_of_Belarus.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Belarus|Bjelorussja]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Belarus]]|alt=Bjelorussja
File:Flag of Bosnia and Herzegovina.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Bosnia and Herzegovina|Bożnija u Ħerżegovina]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Bosnia and Herzegovina]]|alt=Bożnija u Ħerżegovina
File:Flag_of_Bulgaria.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Bulgaria|Bulgarija]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Bulgaria]]|alt=Bulgarija
File:Flag_of_Cyprus.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Cyprus|Ċipru]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Cyprus]]|alt=Ċipru
File:Flag of Don Cossacks.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Don region|Don-Region]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Don region]]|alt=Don-Region
File:Flag_of_Esperanto.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Esperanto|Esperanto]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Esperanto]]|alt=Esperanto
File:Flag_of_Estonia.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Estonia|Estonja]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Estonia]]|alt=Estonja
File:Erzya Flag.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Erzya|Erzya]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Erzya]]|alt=Erzya
File:Flag_of_Georgia.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Georgia|Ġeorġja]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Georgia]]|alt=Ġeorġja
File:Flag_of_Greece.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Greece|Greċja]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Greece]]|alt=Greċja
File:Flag_of_Kazakhstan.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Kazakhstan|Każakistan]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Kazakhstan]]|alt=Każakistan
File:Flag_of_Kosovo.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Kosovo|Kosovo]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Kosovo]]|alt=Kosovo
File:Flag of the Crimean Tatar people.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Crimean Tatar|Tatari tal-Krimea]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Crimean Tatar]]|alt=Tatari tal-Krimea
File:Flag_of_Croatia.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Croatia|Kroazja]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Croatia]]|alt=Kroazja
File:Flag_of_Latvia.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Latvia|Latvja]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Latvia]]|alt=Latvja
File:Flag_of_Lithuania.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Lithuania|Litwanja]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Lithuania]]|alt=Litwanja
File:Flag_of_Malta.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Malta|Malta]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Malta]]|alt=Malta
File:Flag of Montenegro.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia CEE Spring 2026/Structure/Montenegro|Montenegro]]|link=
[[:meta:Wikimedia CEE Spring 2026/Structure/Montenegro]]|alt=Montenegro
File:Flag_of_North_Macedonia.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/North Macedonia|Maċedonja ta' Fuq]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/North Macedonia]]|alt=Maċedonja ta' Fuq
File:Flag_of_Poland.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Poland|Polonja]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Poland]]|alt=Polonja
File:Flag_of_the_Romani_people.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Roma|Roma]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Roma]]|alt=Roma
File:Flag_of_Romania.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Romanian|Rumanija]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Romanian]]|alt=Rumanija
File:Flag_of_Russia.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Russian Federation|Russja]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Russian Federation]]|alt=Russja
File:Flag_of_Serbia.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Serbia|Serbja]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Serbia]]|alt=Serbja
File:Sorbs flag medium.png|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Sorbian|Sorbi]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Sorbian]]|alt=Sorbi
File:Flag of Slovenia.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Slovenia|Slovenja]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Slovenien]]|alt=Slovenja
File:Flag of Slovakia.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Slovakia|Slovakkja]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Slowakei]]|alt=Slovakkja
File:Flag of Tatarstan.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Tatar|Tatari]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Tatar]]|alt=Tatari
File:Flag of Czech Republic.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Czechia|Ċekja]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Czechia]]|alt=Ċekja
File:Flag_of_Turkey.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Turkey|Turkija]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Turkey]]|alt=Turkija
File:Flag_of_Ukraine.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Ukraine|Ukrajna]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Ukraine]]|alt=Ukrajna
File:Flag_of_Hungary.svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Hungary|Ungarija]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Hungary]]|alt=Ungarija
File:Flag of Võro (2).svg|&lt;br /&gt;[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Võro|Võro]]|link=[[:meta:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Structure/Võro]]|alt=Võro
&lt;/gallery&gt;

== Għajnuna ==
* Gwida essenzjali: [[Għajnuna:Gwida_essenzjali|Tgħallem kif tikteb paġni u ttejjeb il-Wikipedija]]
* Paġna Meta: [[meta:Wikimedia CEE Spring 2026|Wikimedia CEE Spring 2026]]

== Konkors ==
===L-Għan===
L-għan ta' dan il-konkors huwa li jinħolqu u jittejbu paġni dwar pajjiżi mill-Ewropa Ċentrali u tal-Lvant. Għalkemm kull kontribut relevanti jiġi ġġudikat bħala parti mill-konkors, peress li hemm ħafna xi jsir f'dan il-qasam fuq il-Wikipedija bil-Malti, xogħol fuq paġni fil-lista tal-100 proposti jingħata punteġġ akbar, kif spjegat aktar l-isfel.

===Żmien===
Il-konkors jibda f'nofsillejl tal-21 ta' Marzu u jkompli sa nofsillejl tal-20 ta' Ġunju. 

''Iż-żmien ikopri l-istaġun kollu tar-rebbiegħa.''

===Regolamenti===
1. Kulħadd jista' jieħu sehem fil-konkors, ħlief għall-organizzaturi lokali u internazzjonali.  L-organizzaturi jistgħu jipparteċipaw bla ma jikkompetu.

2. Biex tikkompeti trid tirreġistra formalment. Biex tirreġistra għall-konkors ikteb ismek hawn taħt kif indikat fit-taqsima tal-Parteċipanti.

3. [[Mudell:CEE_Spring_2026|Uża l-Mudell]] -- huwa essenzjali li tuża l-Mudell '''&lt;nowiki&gt;{{CEE Spring 2026 | utent = ismek | pajjiż = Malta}}&lt;/nowiki&gt;''' fuq il-paġna tad-diskussjoni ta' kull pagna li taħdem fuqha biex il-kontribuzzjoni tiegħek tkun tgħodd fil-konkors. Dan huwa l-unika mod biex l-organizzaturi jkunu jafu li qed tieħu sehem fil-konkors. Ara/uża ukoll [[:metawikimedia:Wikimedia_CEE_Spring_2026/Tools|il-mudelli ta' lingwi oħra]] jekk tagħżel li tikteb bihom apparti l-Malti.

===Punteġġi===
* Għal kull artikolu li toħloq tieħu żewġ punti
* Għal kull artikolu li toħloq mil-lista uffiċjali tieħu tliet punti oħra (ħames punti b'kollox)
* Għal kull artikolu li ttejjeb tieħu punt
* Għal kull artikolu li ttejjeb mil-lista uffiċjali tieħu erba' punti oħra (ħames punti b'kollox)

'''Paġni dwar suġġetti marbuta direttament ma' Malta ma jgħoddux fil-punti li tista' tirbaħ f'dan il-konkors jekk int utent Malti/ja.'''

Kull mistoqsija għandha titpoġġa fuq il-paġna tad-diskussjoni.

===Premjijiet===
''Il-premijiet huma pprovduti minn Wikimedia Community Malta permezz ta' għotja mill-Wikimedia Foundation:''
* L-ewwel post: €100 token għal xiri ta' kotba minn Amazon jew €200 token li jissarraf għand pubblikaturi Maltin*
* It-tieni post: €60 token għal xiri ta' kotba minn Amazon jew €120 token li jissarraf għand pubblikaturi Maltin*
* It-tielet post: €40 token għal xiri ta' kotba minn Amazon jew €80 token li jissarraf għand pubblikaturi Maltin*

=== Parteċipanti ===
Daħħal ismek fit-tabella t'hawn taħt. Daħħal l-isem tal-paġna jew paġni li tkun ħdimt fit-tieni kolonna. Fit-tielet kolonna tista ddaħħal paġni li għadek qed taħdem fuqhom. Tista' ddaħħal ukoll il-punti għax-xogħol li tkun għamilt fl-aħħar kolonna; dawn jiġu vverifikati mill-organizzaturi fi tmiem il-konkors u rranġati jekk ikun hemm bżonn.

Jekk issib xi diffikulta bit-tabella kkuntattja lil [[User_talk:ToniSant|Toni Sant]] jew [[User_talk:Nevborg|Nevborg]] li huma l-organizzaturi u jidhru f'din it-tabella mingħajr punti għax mhux eliġibbli biex jikkompetu.

&lt;!-- Results table --&gt;
{| class=&quot;wikitable sortable&quot;
|- align=&quot;left&quot;
! Utent
! Paġna/pagni mibdija u/jew imtejba
! Xogħol għaddej
! Punti
|-
|[[Utent:Nevborg|Nevborg]]
|[[Zlata Filipović]], [[Goran Bregović]], [[Sofija Jovanović]], [[Selma Rıza]], [[Staka Skenderova]]
|[[Nikola Tesla]]
|xejn
|-
|[[Utent:ToniSant|ToniSant]]
|[[Rebbiegħa ta' Praga]]
|[[Beer Barrell Polka]]
|xejn
|-
|[[Utent:Trigcly|Trigcly]]
|[[Park Naturali ta' Korab-Koritnik]], [[Park Nazzjonali tal-Muntanja Dajti]], [[Park Nazzjonali tal-Muntanja Tomorr]], [[Lag ta' Skadar]], [[Monasteru ta' Neghuts]], [[Monasteru ta' Hoge]], [[Kiki Kogelnik]], [[Kibbeh]], [[Siġra tal-Ballut ta' Stelmužė]], [[Pont tal-Fjuri]], [[Jan Novák]], [[Simon Kldiashvili]], [[Medalja ta' Marian Smoluchowski]], [[Bażi tad-Data tal-Osservazzjoni tal-Kometi]], [[Osservatorju ta' Črni Vrh]], [[Kaċċa bl-ajkli]], [[Anna Kyriakou]], [[Ġobon ta' Jāņi]], [[Park Nazzjonali ta' Karula]], [[Belintersat-1]], [[Péter Magyar]], [[Università Iżlamika Russa]], [[Stepan Erzya]], [[Park Nazzjonali tal-Katina Muntanjuża ta' Rodopi]], [[Lag ta' Brebeneskul]], [[Kastell ta' Ankara]], [[Park Nazzjonali ta' Una]], [[Slavko Brezoski]], [[KazCosmos]], [[Aporofobija]], [[Idrijski žlikrofi]], [[Lag ta' Kezenoyam]], [[Bugeddum Armen]], [[Naftalan]], [[Frosta tal-Għid]], [[Lokša]], [[Zivana]], [[Mehmet Ali Ağca]], [[Thoros ta' Edessa]], [[Arthur Schnitzler]], [[Riżerva Naturali ta' Darwin]], [[Satsivi]], [[Chakapuli]], [[Kubdari]], [[Pkhali]], [[Gozinaki]], [[Mtsvane]], [[Supra (festa)]], [[Demokrazija]]
|xejn
|226
|-
|
|
|
|
|}

=== Rebbieħa ===
* L-ewwel post - tba
* It-tieni post - tba
* It-tielet post - tba

* Premju ta' solidarjetà - tba

''Il-pubblikaturi tal-kotba Maltin li naħdmu magħhom huma Kite Group, Midsea Books, u Merlin Publishers, skont l-għażla tar-rebbieħ/a.''

[[Kategorija:Wikipedija:Wikimedia CEE Spring]]
[[Kategorija:Wikimedia CEE Spring 2026]]</text>
      <sha1>hwnqyjkhd5ntzi6veljqzalojifxq24</sha1>
    </revision>
  </page>
  <page>
    <title>Demokrazija</title>
    <ns>0</ns>
    <id>34460</id>
    <revision>
      <id>330224</id>
      <timestamp>2026-05-26T12:24:59Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Trigcly</username>
        <id>17859</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>Kontenut inizjali</comment>
      <origin>330224</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="90158" sha1="g9melo13nxcbzinzdyyrzi1q91d89ko" xml:space="preserve">Id-'''demokrazija''' hija forma ta' governanza li permezz tagħha l-poter [[Politika|politiku]] jinkiseb min-nies jew mill-popolazzjoni ta' stat. Skont definizzjoni minimalista tad-demokrazija, il-mexxejja jiġu eletti permezz ta' elezzjonijiet kompetittivi filwaqt li d-definizzjonijiet iktar wesgħin jew massimalisti jorbtu d-demokrazija mal-garanziji tal-libertajiet ċivili u d-drittijiet tal-[[bniedem]] apparti l-elezzjonijiet kompetittivi.

F'demokrazija diretta, il-poplu jkollu l-awtorità diretta li jagħmel deliberazzjonijiet u li jiddeċiedi dwar il-leġiżlazzjoni. F'demokrazija rappreżentattiva, il-poplu jagħżel l-uffiċjali tal-governanza permezz ta' elezzjonijiet. Id-definizzjoni ta' &quot;poplu&quot; u l-modi kif l-awtorità tiġi kondiviża fi ħdan il-poplu jew iddelegata minnu nbidlu mal-milja taż-żminijiet u b'rati li jvarjaw minn pajjiż għal ieħor. Il-karatteristiċi tad-demokrazija spiss jinkludu l-libertà tal-ġemgħa, il-libertà tal-assoċjazzjoni, il-proprjetà personali, il-libertà tar-[[reliġjon]] u tal-kelma, iċ-ċittadinanza, il-kunsens ta' dawk li jiġu ggvernati, id-drittijiet tal-votazzjoni, il-libertà miċ-ċaħda governattiva mhux ġustifikata tad-dritt tal-ħajja u talfreedom from unwarranted governmental deprivation of the right to life and liberty, and minority rights.

The notion of democracy has evolved considerably over time. Throughout history, one can find evidence of direct democracy, in which communities make decisions through popular assembly. Today, the dominant form of democracy is representative democracy, where citizens elect government officials to govern on their behalf such as in a parliamentary or presidential democracy. In the common variant of liberal democracy, the powers of the majority are exercised within the framework of a representative democracy, but a constitution and supreme court limit the majority and protect the minority—usually through securing the enjoyment by all of certain individual rights, such as freedom of speech or freedom of association.

The term appeared in the 5th century BC in Greek city-states, notably Classical Athens, to mean &quot;rule of the people&quot;, in contrast to aristocracy (ἀριστοκρατία, ''aristokratía''), meaning &quot;rule of an elite&quot;. In virtually all democratic governments throughout ancient and modern history, democratic citizenship was initially restricted to an elite class, which was later extended to all adult citizens. In most modern democracies, this was achieved through the suffrage movements of the 19th and 20th centuries.

Democracy contrasts with forms of government where power is not vested in the general population of a state, such as authoritarian systems. Historically a rare and vulnerable form of government, democratic systems of government have become more prevalent since the 19th century, in particular with various waves of democratization. Democracy garners considerable legitimacy in the modern world, as public opinion across regions tends to strongly favor democratic systems of government relative to alternatives, and as even authoritarian states try to present themselves as democratic. Democracy more consistently results in improved health, education and economic outcomes. According to the V-Dem Democracy indices and The Economist Democracy Index, less than half the world's population lives in a democracy as of 2022. At the same time, while representative democracy is widely valued, Pew Research Center found that dissatisfaction with democratic performance is common even in many established democracies.

== Characteristics ==
Although democracy is in purely representative democracies understood to be defined by voting, no consensus exists on a precise definition of democracy  (see also ''In the search of common understanding'' below), There are many approaches. A study identified 2,234 adjectives used to describe democracy in the English language.

Yet, there is a more profound understanding – like that of Abraham Lincoln:

: ''&quot;Government of the people, by the people, for the people&quot;''

or of Karl Popper saying that the ''&quot;classical&quot;'' view of democracy is, ''&quot;in brief, the theory that'':

: ''democracy is the rule of the people and that the people have a right to rule''.

Democratic principles are reflected in all eligible citizens being equal before the law and having equal access to legislative processes.

For example, in a representative democracy, every vote has (in theory) equal weight, and the freedom of eligible citizens is secured by legitimised rights and liberties which are typically enshrined in a constitution, while other uses of &quot;democracy&quot; may encompass direct democracy, in which citizens vote on issues directly. According to the United Nations, democracy &quot;provides an environment that respects human rights and fundamental freedoms, and in which the freely expressed will of people is exercised.&quot;

One theory holds that democracy requires three fundamental principles: upward control (sovereignty residing at the lowest levels of authority), political equality, and social norms by which individuals and institutions only consider acceptable acts that reflect the first two principles of upward control and political equality. Legal equality, political freedom and rule of law are often identified by commentators as foundational characteristics for a well-functioning democracy.

In some countries, notably in the United Kingdom (which originated the Westminster system), the dominant principle is that of parliamentary sovereignty, while maintaining judicial independence. In India, parliamentary sovereignty is subject to the Constitution of India which includes judicial review. Though the term &quot;democracy&quot; is typically used in the context of a political state, the principles also are potentially applicable to private organisations, such as clubs, societies and firms.

Democracies may use many different decision-making methods, but majority rule is the dominant form. Without compensation, like legal protections of individual or group rights, political minorities can be oppressed by the &quot;tyranny of the majority&quot;. Majority rule involves a competitive approach, opposed to consensus democracy, creating the need that elections, and generally deliberation, be substantively and procedurally &quot;fair&quot;, i.e., just and equitable. In some countries, freedom of political expression, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press are considered important to ensure that voters are well informed, enabling them to vote according to their own interests and beliefs.

It has also been suggested that a basic feature of democracy is the capacity of all voters to participate freely and fully in the life of their society. With its emphasis on notions of social contract and the collective will of all the voters, democracy can also be characterised as a form of political collectivism because it is defined as a form of government in which all eligible citizens have an equal say in lawmaking.

Republics, though often popularly associated with democracy because of the shared principle of rule by consent of the governed, are not necessarily democracies, as republicanism does not specify ''how'' the people are to rule. Classically the term &quot;republic&quot; encompassed both democracies and aristocracies and their mixtures. In a modern sense the republican form of government is a form of government without a monarch. Because of this, democracies can be republics or constitutional monarchies, such as the United Kingdom, where the monarch is not a ruler.

== History ==
Main article: History of democracy
[[/wiki/File:Age_of_democracy_polity,_World,_2020_(cropped).svg|ħolqa=|lemin|daqsminuri|Age of democracy polity]]
Democratic assemblies are as old as the human species and are found throughout human history, but up until the nineteenth century, major political figures have largely opposed democracy. Republican theorists linked democracy to small size: as political units grew in size, the likelihood increased that the government would turn despotic. At the same time, small political units were vulnerable to conquest. Montesquieu wrote, &quot;If a republic be small, it is destroyed by a foreign force; if it is large, it is ruined by an internal imperfection.&quot; According to Johns Hopkins University political scientist Daniel Deudney, the creation of the United States, with its large size and its system of checks and balances, was a solution to the dual problems of size. Forms of democracy occurred organically in societies around the world that had no contact with each other.

=== Origins ===

==== Greece and Rome ====
See also: Athenian democracy

The term ''democracy'' first appeared in ancient Greek political and philosophical thought in the city-state of Athens during classical antiquity. The word comes from ''dêmos'' '(common) people' and ''krátos'' 'force/might'. Under Cleisthenes, what is generally held as the first example of a type of democracy in the sixth-century BC (508–507 BC) was established in Athens. Cleisthenes is referred to as &quot;the father of Athenian democracy&quot;. The first attested use of the word democracy is found in prose works of the 430s BC, such as Herodotus' ''Histories'', but its usage was older by several decades, as two Athenians born in the 470s were named Democrates, a new political name—likely in support of democracy—given at a time of debates over constitutional issues in Athens. Aeschylus also strongly alludes to the word in his play ''The Suppliants'', staged in c.463 BC, where he mentions &quot;the demos's ruling hand&quot; [''demou kratousa cheir'']. Before that time, the word used to define the new political system of Cleisthenes was probably isonomia, meaning political equality.

Athenian democracy took the form of direct democracy, and it had two distinguishing features: the random selection of ordinary citizens to fill the few existing government administrative and judicial offices, and a legislative assembly consisting of all Athenian citizens. All eligible citizens were allowed to speak and vote in the assembly, which set the laws of the city-state. However, Athenian citizenship excluded women, slaves, foreigners (μέτοικοι / ''métoikoi''), and youths below the age of military service.&lt;sup&gt;[''contradictory'']&lt;/sup&gt; Effectively, only 1 in 4 residents in Athens qualified as citizens. Owning land was not a requirement for citizenship. The exclusion of large parts of the population from the citizen body is closely related to the ancient understanding of citizenship. In most of antiquity the benefit of citizenship was tied to the obligation to fight war campaigns.

Athenian democracy was not only ''direct'' in the sense that decisions were made by the assembled people, but also the ''most direct'' in the sense that the people through the assembly, boule and courts of law controlled the entire political process and a large proportion of citizens were involved constantly in the public business. Even though the rights of the individual were not secured by the Athenian constitution in the modern sense (the ancient Greeks had no word for &quot;rights&quot;), those who were citizens of Athens enjoyed their liberties not in opposition to the government but by living in a city that was not subject to another power and by not being subjects themselves to the rule of another person.

Range voting appeared in Sparta as early as 700 BC. The Spartan ecclesia was an assembly of the people, held once a month, in which every male citizen of at least 20 years of age could participate. In the assembly, Spartans elected leaders and cast votes by range voting and shouting (the vote is then decided on how loudly the crowd shouts). Aristotle called this &quot;childish&quot;, as compared with the stone voting ballots used by the Athenian citizenry. Sparta adopted it because of its simplicity, and to prevent any biased voting, buying, or cheating that was predominant in the early democratic elections.

In addition, the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom created a system with a democratic element in the form of many different popular assamblies.

Even though the Roman Republic contributed significantly to many aspects of democracy, only a fraction of Romans were citizens with votes in elections for magistrates. The votes of the powerful were given more weight through a system of weighted voting, so most high officials, including members of the Senate, came from a few wealthy and noble families. The Roman model of governance inspired many political thinkers over the centuries.

==== Ancient India ====
Vaishali, capital city of the Vajjika League (Vrijji mahajanapada) of India, is considered one of the first examples of a republic around the 6th century BC.

==== Americas ====
Other cultures, such as the Iroquois in the Americas also developed a form of democratic society between 1450 and 1660 (and possibly in 1142), well before contact with the Europeans. This democracy continues to the present day and is the world's oldest standing representative democracy.

==== Africa ====
Main article: Gadaa

=== Middle Ages ===
While most regions in Europe during the Middle Ages were ruled by clergy or feudal lords, there existed various systems involving elections or assemblies, although often only involving a small part of the population. In Scandinavia, bodies known as things consisted of freemen presided by a lawspeaker. These deliberative bodies were responsible for settling political questions, and variants included the Althing in Iceland and the Løgting in the Faeroe Islands. The veche, found in Eastern Europe, was a similar body to the Scandinavian thing. In the Roman Catholic Church, the pope has been elected by a papal conclave composed of cardinals since 1059. The first documented parliamentary body in Europe was the Cortes of León. Established by Alfonso IX in 1188, the Cortes had authority over setting taxation, foreign affairs and legislating, though the exact nature of its role remains disputed. The Republic of Ragusa, established in 1358 and centered around the city of Dubrovnik, provided representation and voting rights to its male aristocracy only. Various Italian city-states and polities had republic forms of government. For instance, the Republic of Florence, established in 1115, was led by the Signoria whose members were chosen by sortition. In the 10th–15th century Frisia, a distinctly non-feudal society, the right to vote on local matters and on county officials was based on land size. The Kouroukan Fouga divided the Mali Empire into ruling clans (lineages) that were represented at a great assembly called the ''Gbara''. However, the charter made Mali more similar to a constitutional monarchy than a democratic republic.

The Parliament of England had its roots in the restrictions on the power of kings written into Magna Carta (1215), which explicitly protected certain rights of the King's subjects and implicitly supported what became the English writ of habeas corpus, safeguarding individual freedom against unlawful imprisonment with the right to appeal. The first representative national assembly in England was Simon de Montfort's Parliament in 1265. The emergence of petitioning is some of the earliest evidence of parliament being used as a forum to address the general grievances of ordinary people. However, the power to call parliament remained at the pleasure of the monarch.

Studies have linked the emergence of parliamentary institutions in Europe during the medieval period to urban agglomeration and the creation of new classes, such as artisans, as well as the presence of nobility and religious elites. Scholars have also linked the emergence of representative government to Europe's relative political fragmentation. Political scientist David Stasavage links the fragmentation of Europe, and its subsequent democratization, to the manner in which the Roman Empire collapsed: Roman territory was conquered by small fragmented groups of Germanic tribes, thus leading to the creation of small political units where rulers were relatively weak and needed the consent of the governed to ward off foreign threats.

In Poland, noble democracy was characterized by an increase in the activity of the middle nobility, which wanted to increase their share in exercising power at the expense of the magnates. Magnates dominated the most important offices in the state (secular and ecclesiastical) and sat on the royal council, later the senate. The growing importance of the middle nobility had an impact on the establishment of the institution of the land ''sejmik'' (local assembly), which subsequently obtained more rights. During the fifteenth and first half of the sixteenth century, sejmiks received more and more power and became the most important institutions of local power. In 1454, Casimir IV Jagiellon granted the sejmiks the right to decide on taxes and to convene a mass mobilization in the Nieszawa Statutes. He also pledged not to create new laws without their consent.

=== Modern era ===

==== Early modern period ====
In 17th century England, there was renewed interest in Magna Carta. The Parliament of England passed the Petition of Right in 1628 which established certain liberties for subjects. The English Civil War (1642–1651) was fought between the King and an oligarchic but elected Parliament, during which the idea of a political party took form with groups debating rights to political representation during the Putney Debates of 1647. Subsequently, the Protectorate (1653–59) and the English Restoration (1660) restored more autocratic rule, although Parliament passed the Habeas Corpus Act in 1679 which strengthened the convention that forbade detention lacking sufficient cause or evidence. After the Glorious Revolution of 1688, the Bill of Rights was enacted in 1689 which codified certain rights and liberties and is still in effect. The Bill set out the requirement for regular elections, rules for freedom of speech in Parliament and limited the power of the monarch, ensuring that, unlike much of Europe at the time, royal absolutism would not prevail. Economic historians Douglass North and Barry Weingast have characterized the institutions implemented in the Glorious Revolution as a resounding success in terms of restraining the government and ensuring protection for property rights.

Renewed interest in the Magna Carta, the English Civil War, and the Glorious Revolution in the 17th century prompted the growth of political philosophy on the British Isles. Thomas Hobbes was the first philosopher to articulate a detailed social contract theory. Writing in the ''Leviathan'' (1651), Hobbes theorized that individuals living in the state of nature led lives that were &quot;solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short&quot; and constantly waged a war of all against all. In order to prevent the occurrence of an anarchic state of nature, Hobbes reasoned that individuals ceded their rights to a strong, authoritarian power. In other words, Hobbes advocated for an absolute monarchy which, in his opinion, was the best form of government. Later, philosopher and physician John Locke would posit a different interpretation of social contract theory. Writing in his ''Two Treatises of Government'' (1689), Locke posited that all individuals possessed the inalienable rights to life, liberty and estate (property). According to Locke, individuals would voluntarily come together to form a state for the purposes of defending their rights. Particularly important for Locke were property rights, whose protection Locke deemed to be a government's primary purpose. Furthermore, Locke asserted that governments were legitimate only if they held the consent of the governed. For Locke, citizens had the right to revolt against a government that acted against their interest or became tyrannical. Although they were not widely read during his lifetime, Locke's works are considered the founding documents of liberal thought and profoundly influenced the leaders of the American Revolution and later the French Revolution. His liberal democratic framework of governance remains the preeminent form of democracy in the world.

In the Cossack republics of Ukraine in the 16th and 17th centuries, the Cossack Hetmanate and Zaporizhian Sich, the holder of the highest post of Hetman was elected by the representatives from the country's districts.

In North America, representative government began in Jamestown, Virginia, with the election of the House of Burgesses (forerunner of the Virginia General Assembly) in 1619. English Puritans who migrated from 1620 established colonies in New England whose local governance was democratic; the hard power of these local assemblies varied greatly throughout the colonial time period however officially they held only small amounts of devolved power, as ultimate authority belonged to the Crown and Parliament. The Puritans (Pilgrim Fathers), Baptists, and Quakers who founded these colonies applied the democratic organisation of their congregations also to the administration of their communities in worldly matters.

==== 18th and 19th centuries ====
The first Parliament of Great Britain was established in 1707, after the merger of the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland under the Acts of Union. Two key documents of the UK's uncodified constitution, the English Declaration of Right, 1689 (restated in the Bill of Rights 1689) and the Scottish Claim of Right 1689, had both cemented Parliament's position as the supreme law-making body and said that the &quot;election of members of Parliament ought to be free&quot;. However, Parliament was only elected by male property owners, which amounted to 3% of the population in 1780. The first known British person of African heritage to vote in a general election, Ignatius Sancho, voted in 1774 and 1780.

During the Age of Liberty in Sweden (1718–1772), civil rights were expanded and power shifted from the monarch to parliament. The taxed peasantry was represented in parliament, although with little influence, but commoners without taxed property had no suffrage.

The creation of the short-lived Corsican Republic in 1755 was an early attempt to adopt a democratic constitution (all men and women above age of 25 could vote). This Corsican Constitution was the first based on Enlightenment principles and included female suffrage, something that was not included in most other democracies until the 20th century.

Colonial America had similar property qualifications as Britain, and in the period before 1776 the abundance and availability of land meant that large numbers of colonists met such requirements with at least 60 per cent of adult white males able to vote. The great majority of white men were farmers who met the property ownership or taxpaying requirements. With few exceptions, no blacks or women could vote. Vermont, which, on declaring independence of Great Britain in 1777, adopted a constitution modelled on Pennsylvania's citizenship and democratic suffrage for males with or without property. The United States Constitution of 1787 is the oldest surviving, still active, governmental codified constitution. The Constitution provided for an elected government and protected civil rights and liberties, but did not end slavery nor extend voting rights in the United States, instead leaving the issue of suffrage to the individual states. Generally, states limited suffrage to white male property owners and taxpayers. At the time of the first Presidential election in 1789, about 6% of the population was eligible to vote. The Naturalization Act of 1790 limited U.S. citizenship to whites only. The Bill of Rights in 1791 set limits on government power to protect personal freedoms but had little impact on judgements by the courts for the first 130 years after ratification.

In 1789, Revolutionary France adopted the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen and, although short-lived, the National Convention was elected by all men in 1792. The Polish-Lithuanian Constitution of 3 May 1791 sought to implement a more effective constitutional monarchy, introduced political equality between townspeople and nobility, and placed the peasants under the protection of the government, mitigating the worst abuses of serfdom. In force for less than 19 months, it was declared null and void by the Grodno Sejm that met in 1793. Nonetheless, the 1791 Constitution helped keep alive Polish aspirations for the eventual restoration of the country's sovereignty over a century later.

In the United States, the 1828 presidential election was the first in which non-property-holding white males could vote in the vast majority of states. Voter turnout soared during the 1830s, reaching about 80% of the adult white male population in the 1840 presidential election. North Carolina was the last state to abolish property qualification in 1856 resulting in a close approximation to universal white male suffrage (however tax-paying requirements remained in five states in 1860 and survived in two states until the 20th century). In the 1860 United States census, the slave population had grown to four million, and in Reconstruction after the Civil War, three constitutional amendments were passed: the 13th Amendment (1865) that ended slavery; the 14th Amendment (1869) that gave black people citizenship, and the 15th Amendment (1870) that gave black males a nominal right to vote. Full enfranchisement of citizens was not secured until after the civil rights movement gained passage by the US Congress of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The voting franchise in the United Kingdom was expanded and made more uniform in a series of reforms that began with the Reform Act 1832 and continued into the 20th century, notably with the Representation of the People Act 1918 and the Equal Franchise Act 1928. Universal male suffrage was established in France in March 1848 in the wake of the French Revolution of 1848. During that year, several revolutions broke out in Europe as rulers were confronted with popular demands for liberal constitutions and more democratic government.

In 1876, the Ottoman Empire transitioned from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional one, and held two elections the next year to elect members to her newly formed parliament. Provisional Electoral Regulations were issued, stating that the elected members of the Provincial Administrative Councils would elect members to the first Parliament. Later that year, a new constitution was promulgated, which provided for a bicameral Parliament with a Senate appointed by the Sultan and a popularly elected Chamber of Deputies. Only men above the age of 30 who were competent in Turkish and had full civil rights were allowed to stand for election. Reasons for disqualification included holding dual citizenship, being employed by a foreign government, being bankrupt, employed as a servant, or having &quot;notoriety for ill deeds&quot;. Full universal suffrage was achieved in 1934.

In 1893, the self-governing colony New Zealand became the first country in the world (except for the short-lived 18th-century Corsican Republic) to establish active universal suffrage by recognizing women as having the right to vote.

==== 20th and 21st centuries ====
20th-century transitions to liberal democracy have come in successive &quot;waves of democracy&quot;, variously resulting from wars, revolutions, decolonisation, and religious and economic circumstances. Global waves of &quot;democratic regression&quot; reversing democratization, have also occurred in the 1920s and 30s, in the 1960s and 1970s, and in the 2010s.

World War I and the dissolution of the autocratic Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian empires resulted in the creation of new nation-states in Europe, most of them at least nominally democratic. In the 1920s democratic movements flourished and women's suffrage advanced, but the Great Depression brought disenchantment and most of the countries of Europe, Latin America, and Asia turned to strong-man rule or dictatorships. Fascism and dictatorships flourished in Nazi Germany, Italy, Spain and Portugal, as well as non-democratic governments in the Baltics, the Balkans, Brazil, Cuba, China, and Japan, among others.

World War II brought a definitive reversal of this trend in Western Europe. The democratisation of the American, British, and French sectors of occupied Germany (disputed), Austria, Italy, and the occupied Japan served as a model for the later theory of government change. However, most of Eastern Europe, including the Soviet sector of Germany fell into the non-democratic Soviet-dominated bloc.

The war was followed by decolonisation, and again most of the new independent states had nominally democratic constitutions. India emerged as the world's largest democracy and continues to be so. Countries that were once part of the British Empire often adopted the British Westminster system.

In 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights mandated democracy:&lt;blockquote&gt;3. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.&lt;/blockquote&gt;— Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 21, United Nations, 1948

By 1960, the vast majority of country-states were nominally democracies, although most of the world's populations lived in nominal democracies that experienced sham elections, and other forms of subterfuge (particularly in &quot;Communist&quot; states and the former colonies). A subsequent wave of democratisation brought substantial gains toward true liberal democracy for many states, dubbed &quot;third wave of democracy&quot;. Portugal, Spain, and several of the military dictatorships in South America returned to civilian rule in the 1970s and 1980s. This was followed by countries in East and South Asia by the mid-to-late 1980s. Economic malaise in the 1980s, along with resentment of Soviet oppression, contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union, the associated end of the Cold War, and the democratisation and liberalisation of the former Eastern bloc countries. The most successful of the new democracies were those geographically and culturally closest to western Europe, and they are now either part of the European Union or candidate states. In 1986, after the toppling of the most prominent Asian dictatorship, the only democratic state of its kind at the time emerged in the Philippines with the rise of Corazon Aquino, who would later be known as the mother of Asian democracy.

The liberal trend spread to some states in Africa in the 1990s, most prominently in South Africa. Some recent examples of attempts of liberalisation include the Indonesian Revolution of 1998, the Bulldozer Revolution in Yugoslavia, the Rose Revolution in Georgia, the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, the Cedar Revolution in Lebanon, the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan, and the Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia.

According to Freedom House, in 2007 there were 123 electoral democracies (up from 40 in 1972). According to ''World Forum on Democracy'', electoral democracies now represent 120 of the 192 existing countries and constitute 58.2 per cent of the world's population. At the same time liberal democracies i.e. countries Freedom House regards as free and respectful of basic human rights and the rule of law are 85 in number and represent 38 per cent of the global population. Also in 2007 the United Nations declared 15 September the International Day of Democracy.

Many countries reduced their voting age to 18 years; the major democracies began to do so in the 1970s starting in Western Europe and North America.&lt;sup&gt;[''failed verification'']&lt;/sup&gt; Most electoral democracies continue to exclude those younger than 18 from voting. The voting age has been lowered to 16 for national elections in a number of countries, including Brazil, Austria, Cuba, and Nicaragua. In California, a 2004 proposal to permit a quarter vote at 14 and a half vote at 16 was ultimately defeated. In 2008, the German parliament proposed but shelved a bill that would grant the vote to each citizen at birth, to be used by a parent until the child claims it for themselves.

According to Freedom House, starting in 2005, there have been 17 consecutive years in which declines in political rights and civil liberties throughout the world have outnumbered improvements, as populist and nationalist political forces have gained ground everywhere from Poland (under the Law and Justice party) to the Philippines (under Rodrigo Duterte). In a Freedom House report released in 2018, Democracy Scores for most countries declined for the 12th consecutive year. ''The Christian Science Monitor'' reported that nationalist and populist political ideologies were gaining ground, at the expense of rule of law, in countries like Poland, Turkey and Hungary. For example, in Poland, the President appointed 27 new Supreme Court judges over legal objections from the European Commission. In Turkey, thousands of judges were removed from their positions following a failed coup attempt during a government crackdown .

&quot;Democratic backsliding&quot; in the 2010s were attributed to economic inequality and social discontent, personalism, poor government's management of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as other factors such as manipulation of civil society, &quot;toxic polarization&quot;, foreign disinformation campaigns, racism and nativism, excessive executive power, and decreased power of the opposition. Within English-speaking Western democracies, &quot;protection-based&quot; attitudes combining cultural conservatism and leftist economic attitudes were the strongest predictor of support for authoritarian modes of governance.

== Theory ==
&quot;Democratic theory&quot; redirects here. For other uses, see Democracy (disambiguation).

=== Early theory ===
Aristotle's '''democratic theory''' contrasted rule by the many (democracy/timocracy), with rule by the few (oligarchy/aristocracy/elitism), and with rule by a single person (tyranny/autocracy/absolute monarchy). He also thought that there was a good and a bad variant of each system (he considered democracy to be the degenerate counterpart to timocracy).

A common view among early and renaissance Republican theorists was that democracy could only survive in small political communities. Heeding the lessons of the Roman Republic's shift to monarchism as it grew larger or smaller, these Republican theorists held that the expansion of territory and population inevitably led to tyranny. Democracy was therefore highly fragile and rare historically, as it could only survive in small political units, which due to their size were vulnerable to conquest by larger political units. Montesquieu famously said, &quot;if a republic is small, it is destroyed by an outside force; if it is large, it is destroyed by an internal vice.&quot; Jean-Jacques Rousseau asserted, &quot;It is, therefore the natural property of small states to be governed as a republic, of middling ones to be subject to a monarch, and of large empires to be swayed by a despotic prince.&quot;

=== Contemporary theory ===
Among modern political theorists, there are different fundamental conceptions of democracy.

==== Aggregation ====
The theory of aggregative democracy claims that the aim of the democratic processes is to solicit citizens' preferences and aggregate them together to determine what social policies society should adopt. Therefore, proponents of this view hold that democratic participation should primarily focus on voting, where the policy with the most votes gets implemented. Different variants of aggregative democracy exist.

According to the minimalist democracy conception, elections are a mechanism for competition between politicians. Joseph Schumpeter articulated this view famously in his book ''Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy''.

Anthony Downs argues that ideological political parties are necessary to act as a mediating broker between individuals and governments. On the other hand, direct democracy, where citizens vote directly on legislative proposals, can show better aggregation in cases of differences in preferences between elites and voters.

===== Median mandate =====
According to the median voter theorem the political representativeness can be evaluated by comparing how close laws and policies are to the views of the median voter along the political spectrum. The ''median mandate'' views the preferences of the median voter as granting political legitimacy.

==== Polyarchy ====
Main article: Polyarchy

Robert A. Dahl argues that the fundamental democratic principle is that, when it comes to binding collective decisions, each person in a political community is entitled to have his/her interests be given equal consideration. He uses the term polyarchy (&quot;rule by many&quot;) to refer to societies in which there exists a certain set of institutions and procedures which are perceived as leading to such democracy. First and foremost among these institutions is the regular occurrence of free and open elections which are used to select representatives who then manage all or most of the public policy of the society. However, these polyarchic procedures may not create a full democracy if, for example, poverty prevents political participation. Similarly, Ronald Dworkin argues that &quot;democracy is a substantive, not a merely procedural, ideal.&quot;

==== Deliberation ====
Main article: Deliberative democracy

Deliberative democracy is based on the notion that democracy is government by deliberation. Unlike aggregative democracy, deliberative democracy holds that, for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by authentic deliberation, not merely the aggregation of preferences that occurs in voting. Authentic deliberation is deliberation among decision-makers that is free from distortions of unequal political power, such as power a decision-maker obtained through economic wealth or the support of interest groups. If the decision-makers cannot reach consensus after authentically deliberating on a proposal, then they vote on the proposal using a form of majority rule. Citizens assemblies are considered by many scholars as practical examples of deliberative democracy, with a recent OECD report identifying citizens assemblies as an increasingly popular mechanism to involve citizens in governmental decision-making. Proponents of direct democracy view citizens do not rule themselves unless they directly decide laws and policies. Political activity can be valuable in itself, it socialises and educates citizens, and popular participation can check powerful elites.

==== Types of governmental democracies ====
Main article: Types of democracy

Democracy has taken a number of forms, both in theory and practice. Some varieties of democracy provide better representation and more freedom for their citizens than others. However, if any democracy is not structured to prohibit the government from excluding the people from the legislative process, or any branch of government from altering the separation of powers in its favour, then a branch of the system can accumulate too much power and destroy the democracy.

The following kinds of democracy are not exclusive of one another: many specify details of aspects that are independent of one another and can co-exist in a single system.

===== Basic forms =====
Several variants of democracy exist, but there are two basic forms, both of which concern how the whole body of all eligible citizens executes its will. One form of democracy is direct democracy, in which all eligible citizens have active participation in the political decision making, for example voting on policy initiatives directly. In most modern democracies, the whole body of eligible citizens remain the sovereign power but political power is exercised indirectly through elected representatives; this is called a representative democracy.

If the head of state is democratically elected then the polity is called a democratic republic

====== Direct ======
Main article: Direct democracy

Direct democracy is a political system where the citizens participate in the decision-making personally, contrary to relying on intermediaries or representatives. Proponents like Jean-Jacques Rousseau argue the direct approach increases legitimacy. A direct democracy gives the voting population the power to:

* Change constitutional laws,
* Put forth initiatives, referendums and suggestions for laws

Within modern-day representative governments, certain electoral tools like referendums, citizens' initiatives and recall elections are referred to as forms of direct democracy. However, some advocates of direct democracy argue for local assemblies of face-to-face discussion. Direct democracy as a government system currently exists in the Swiss cantons of Appenzell Innerrhoden and Glarus, the Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities, communities affiliated with the CIPO-RFM, the Bolivian city councils of FEJUVE, and Kurdish cantons of Rojava.

====== Semi-direct ======
Some modern democracies that are predominantly representative in nature also heavily rely upon forms of political action that are directly democratic. These democracies, which combine elements of representative democracy and direct democracy, are termed ''semi-direct democracies'' or ''participatory democracies''. Examples include Switzerland and some U.S. states, where frequent use is made of referendums and initiatives.

The Swiss confederation is a semi-direct democracy. At the federal level, citizens can propose changes to the constitution (federal popular initiative) or ask for a referendum to be held on any law voted by the parliament. Between January 1995 and June 2005, Swiss citizens voted 31 times, to answer 103 questions (during the same period, French citizens participated in only two referendums). Although in the past 120 years less than 250 initiatives have been put to referendum.

Examples include the extensive use of referendums in the US state of California, which is a state that has more than 20 million voters.

In New England, town meetings are often used, especially in rural areas, to manage local government. This creates a hybrid form of government, with a local direct democracy and a representative state government. For example, most Vermont towns hold annual town meetings in March in which town officers are elected, budgets for the town and schools are voted on, and citizens have the opportunity to speak and be heard on political matters.

====== Lot system ======
The use of a lot system, a characteristic of Athenian democracy, is a feature of some versions of direct democracies. In this system, important governmental and administrative tasks are performed by citizens picked from a lottery.

====== Representative ======
Main article: Representative democracy

Representative democracy involves the election of government officials by the people being represented. The most common mechanisms involve election of the candidate with a majority or a plurality of the votes. Most western countries have representative systems.

Representatives may be elected or become diplomatic representatives by a particular district (or constituency), or represent the entire electorate through proportional systems, with some using a combination of the two. Some representative democracies also incorporate elements of direct democracy, such as referendums. A characteristic of representative democracy is that while the representatives are elected by the people to act in the people's interest, they retain the freedom to exercise their own judgement as how best to do so. Such reasons have driven criticism upon representative democracy, pointing out the contradictions of representation mechanisms with democracy.

====== Parliamentary ======
Main article: Parliamentary system

Parliamentary democracy is a representative democracy where government is appointed by or can be dismissed by, representatives as opposed to a &quot;presidential rule&quot; wherein the president is both head of state and the head of government and is elected by the voters. Under a parliamentary democracy, government is exercised by delegation to an executive ministry and subject to ongoing review, checks and balances by the legislative parliament elected by the people.

In a parliamentary system, the prime minister may be dismissed by the legislature at any point in time for not meeting the expectations of the legislature. This is done through a vote of no confidence where the legislature decides whether or not to remove the prime minister from office with majority support for dismissal. In some countries, the prime minister can also call an election at any point in time, typically when the prime minister believes that they are in good favour with the public as to get re-elected. In other parliamentary democracies, extra elections are virtually never held, a minority government being preferred until the next ordinary elections. An important feature of the parliamentary democracy is the concept of the &quot;loyal opposition&quot;. The essence of the concept is that the second largest political party (or opposition) opposes the governing party (or coalition), while still remaining loyal to the state and its democratic principles.

====== Presidential ======
Main article: Presidential system

Presidential democracy is a system where the public elects the president through an election. The president serves as both the head of state and head of government controlling most of the executive powers. The president serves for a specific term and cannot exceed that amount of time. The legislature often has limited ability to remove a president from office. Elections typically have a fixed date and are not easily changed. The president has direct control over the cabinet, specifically appointing the cabinet members.

The executive usually has the responsibility to execute or implement legislation and may have the limited legislative powers, such as a veto. However, a legislative branch passes legislation and budgets. This provides some measure of separation of powers. In consequence, however, the president and the legislature may end up in the control of separate parties, allowing one to block the other and thereby interfere with the orderly operation of the state. This may be the reason why presidential democracy is not very common outside the Americas, Africa, and Central and Southeast Asia.

A semi-presidential system is a system of democracy in which the government includes both a prime minister and a president. The particular powers held by the prime minister and president vary by country.

==== Typology ====

===== Constitutional monarchy =====
Main article: Constitutional monarchy

Many countries such as the United Kingdom, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Scandinavian countries, Thailand, Japan and Bhutan turned powerful monarchs into constitutional monarchs (often gradually) with limited or symbolic roles. For example, in the predecessor states to the United Kingdom, constitutional monarchy began to emerge and has continued uninterrupted since the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and passage of the Bill of Rights 1689. Strongly limited constitutional monarchies, such as the United Kingdom, have been referred to as crowned republics by writers such as H. G. Wells.

In other countries, the monarchy was abolished along with the aristocratic system (as in France, China, Russia, Germany, Austria, Hungary, Italy, Greece, and Egypt). An elected person, with or without significant powers, became the head of state in these countries.

Elite upper houses of legislatures, which often had lifetime or hereditary tenure, were common in many states. Over time, these either had their powers limited (as with the British House of Lords) or else became elective and remained powerful (as with the Australian Senate).

===== Republic =====
Main article: Republicanism

The term ''republic'' has many different meanings, but today often refers to a representative democracy with an elected head of state, such as a president, serving for a limited term, in contrast to states with a hereditary monarch as a head of state, even if these states also are representative democracies with an elected or appointed head of government such as a prime minister.

The Founding Fathers of the United States often criticised direct democracy; James Madison argued, especially in ''The Federalist'' No. 10, that what distinguished a direct ''democracy'' from a ''republic'' was that the former depended on small size and suffered more violently from the effects of faction, whereas a republic could get stronger as it got larger and combats faction by its very structure. Accordingly, during Philadelphia convention Madison called election of representatives by large territories &quot;the only defence against the inconveniencies of democracy consistent with the democratic form of Govt.&quot;

Professors Richard Ellis of Willamette University and Michael Nelson of Rhodes College argue that much constitutional thought, from Madison to Lincoln and beyond, has focused on &quot;the problem of majority tyranny&quot;. They conclude, &quot;The principles of republican government embedded in the Constitution represent an effort by the framers to ensure that the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness would not be trampled by majorities.&quot; What was critical to American values, John Adams insisted, was that the government be &quot;bound by fixed laws, which the people have a voice in making, and a right to defend.&quot; As Benjamin Franklin was exiting after writing the US Constitution, Elizabeth Willing Powel asked him &quot;Well, Doctor, what have we got—a republic or a monarchy?&quot;. He replied &quot;A republic—if you can keep it.&quot;

===== Liberal =====
Main article: Liberal democracy

A liberal democracy is a representative democracy which enshrines a liberal political philosophy, where the ability of the elected representatives to exercise decision-making power is subject to the rule of law, moderated by a constitution or laws such as the protection of the rights and freedoms of individuals, and constrained on the extent to which the will of the majority can be exercised against the rights of minorities.

===== Socialist =====
Main article: Socialist democracy

Socialist thought has several different views on democracy, for example social democracy or democratic socialism. Many democratic socialists and social democrats believe in a form of participatory, industrial, economic and/or workplace democracy combined with a representative democracy.

===== Marxist =====
Main article: Democracy in Marxism

Marxist theory supports a democratic society centering the working class. Some Marxists and Trotskyists believe in direct democracy or workers' councils (which are sometimes called soviets). This system can begin with workplace democracy and can manifest itself as soviet democracy or dictatorship of the proletariat. Trotskyist groups have interpreted socialist democracy to be synonymous with multi-party far-left representation, autonomous union organizations, worker's control of production, internal party democracy and the mass participation of the working masses. Some communist parties support a soviet republic with democratic centralism. Within democracy in Marxism there can be hostility to what is commonly called &quot;liberal democracy&quot;.

===== Anarchist =====
Anarchists are split in this domain, depending on whether they believe that a majority-rule is tyrannic or not. To many anarchists, the only form of democracy considered acceptable is direct democracy. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon argued that the only acceptable form of direct democracy is one in which it is recognised that majority decisions are not binding on the minority, even when unanimous. However, anarcho-communist Murray Bookchin criticised individualist anarchists for opposing democracy, and says &quot;majority rule&quot; is consistent with anarchism.

Some anarcho-communists oppose the majoritarian nature of direct democracy, feeling that it can impede individual liberty and opt-in favour of a non-majoritarian form of consensus democracy, similar to Proudhon's position on direct democracy.

===== Sortition =====
Main article: Sortition

Sortition is the process of choosing decision-making bodies via a random selection. These bodies can be more representative of the opinions and interests of the people at large than an elected legislature or other decision-maker. The technique was in widespread use in Athenian Democracy and Renaissance Florence and is still used in modern jury selection and citizens' assemblies.

===== Consociational =====
Main article: Consociational democracy

Consociational democracy, also called consociationalism, is a form of democracy based on power-sharing formula between elites representing the social groups within the society. In 1969, Arendt Lijphart argued this would stabilize democracies with factions. A consociational democracy allows for simultaneous majority votes in two or more ethno-religious constituencies, and policies are enacted only if they gain majority support from both or all of them. The Qualified majority voting rule in European Council of Ministers is a consociational democracy approach for supranational democracies. This system in Treaty of Rome allocates votes to member states in part according to their population, but heavily weighted in favour of the smaller states. A consociational democracy requires consensus of representatives, while consensus democracy requires consensus of electorate.&lt;sup&gt;[''needs update'']&lt;/sup&gt;

===== Majoritarian =====
Majoritarian democracy is a form of democracy based upon a principle of majority rule. Majoritarian democracy contrasts with consensus democracy, rule by as many people as possible.

===== Consensus =====
Main article: Consensus democracy

Consensus democracy requires consensus decision-making and supermajority to obtain a larger support than majority. In contrast, in majoritarian democracy minority opinions can potentially be ignored by vote-winning majorities. Constitutions typically require consensus or supermajorities.

===== Ethnic =====
These paragraphs are an excerpt from Ethnic democracy.[edit]

The term ethnic democracy, as used by some political scientists, purports to describe a governance system that combines a structured ethnic dominance with democratic, political and civil rights for all. Both the dominant ethnic group—typically an ethnic majority—and the minority ethnic groups have citizenship and are able to fully participate in the political process. However, critics of the &quot;ethnic democracy&quot; model argue it is a contradiction in terms, and thus conceptually inadequate or confusing; these critics allege that purported ethnic democracies, most notably Israel, are not democratic at all, or are at best a sort of semi-democracy.

===== Inclusive =====
Main article: Inclusive democracy

Inclusive democracy is a political theory and political project that aims for direct democracy in all fields of social life: political democracy in the form of face-to-face assemblies which are confederated, economic democracy in a stateless, moneyless and marketless economy, democracy in the social realm, i.e. self-management in places of work and education, and ecological democracy which aims to reintegrate society and nature. The theoretical project of inclusive democracy emerged from the work of political philosopher Takis Fotopoulos in &quot;Towards An Inclusive Democracy&quot; and was further developed in the journal ''Democracy &amp; Nature'' and its successor ''The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy''.

===== Participatory =====
Main article: Participatory politics

A parpolity or participatory polity is a theoretical form of democracy that is ruled by a nested council structure. The guiding philosophy is that people should have decision-making power in proportion to how much they are affected by the decision. Local councils of 25–50 people are completely autonomous on issues that affect only them, and these councils send delegates to higher level councils who are again autonomous regarding issues that affect only the population affected by that council.

A council court of randomly chosen citizens serves as a check on the tyranny of the majority, and rules on which body gets to vote on which issue. Delegates may vote differently from how their sending council might wish but are mandated to communicate the wishes of their sending council. Delegates are recallable at any time. Referendums are possible at any time via votes of lower-level councils, however, not everything is a referendum as this is most likely a waste of time. A parpolity is meant to work in tandem with a participatory economy.

===== Procedural =====
Procedural democracy or proceduralist democracy, proceduralism or hollow democracy is a term used to denote the particular procedures, such as regular elections based on universal suffrage, that produce an electorally-legitimated government. Procedural democracy, with its centering of electoral processes as the basis of democratic legitimacy, is often contrasted with substantive or participatory democracy, which centers the equal participation of all groups in society in the political process as the basis of legitimacy.

===== Radical =====
Main article: Radical democracy

Radical democracy is based on the idea that there are hierarchical and oppressive power relations that exist in society. Radical democracy's role is to make visible and challenge those relations by allowing for difference, dissent and antagonisms in decision-making processes.

===== Religious =====
These paragraphs are an excerpt from Religious democracy.[edit]

Religious democracy is a form of democracy where the values of a particular religion or state religion are preferred. The term applies to all democratic countries in which religion is incorporated into the form of government.

===== Cosmopolitan =====
Main article: Cosmopolitan democracy

Cosmopolitan democracy, also known as ''global democracy'' or ''world federalism'', is a political system in which democracy is implemented on a global scale, either directly or through representatives. An important justification for this kind of system is that the decisions made in national or regional democracies often affect people outside the constituency who, by definition, cannot vote. By contrast, in a cosmopolitan democracy, the people who are affected by decisions also have a say in them.

According to its supporters, any attempt to solve global problems is undemocratic without some form of cosmopolitan democracy. The general principle of cosmopolitan democracy is to expand some or all of the values and norms of democracy, including the rule of law; the non-violent resolution of conflicts; and equality among citizens, beyond the limits of the state. To be fully implemented, this would require reforming existing international organisations, e.g., the United Nations, as well as the creation of new institutions such as a World Parliament, which ideally would enhance public control over, and accountability in, international politics.

Cosmopolitan democracy has been promoted, among others, by physicist Albert Einstein, writer Kurt Vonnegut, columnist George Monbiot, and professors David Held and Daniele Archibugi. The creation of the International Criminal Court in 2003 was seen as a major step forward by many supporters of this type of cosmopolitan democracy.

===== Creative =====
Main article: Creative democracy

Creative democracy is advocated by American philosopher John Dewey. The main idea about creative democracy is that democracy encourages individual capacity building and the interaction among the society. Dewey argues that democracy is a way of life in his work of &quot;Creative Democracy: The Task Before Us&quot; and an experience built on faith in human nature, faith in human beings, and faith in working with others. Democracy, in Dewey's view, is a moral ideal requiring actual effort and work by people; it is not an institutional concept that exists outside of ourselves. &quot;The task of democracy&quot;, Dewey concludes, &quot;is forever that of creation of a freer and more humane experience in which all share and to which all contribute&quot;.

===== Guided =====
Main article: Guided democracy

Guided democracy is a form of democracy that incorporates regular popular elections, but which often carefully &quot;guides&quot; the choices offered to the electorate in a manner that may reduce the ability of the electorate to truly determine the type of government exercised over them. Such democracies typically have only one central authority which is often not subject to meaningful public review by any other governmental authority. Russian-style democracy has often been referred to as a &quot;guided democracy&quot;. Russian politicians have referred to their government as having only one center of power/ authority, as opposed to most other forms of democracy which usually attempt to incorporate two or more naturally competing sources of authority within the same government.

=== In the search of common understanding ===
The search for a common approach to conceptualize, measure and compare democracy remains a challenge in modern political science. This challenge strikes through to measuring, assessing and comparing the quality of democracy, as Seva Gunitsky pointed in 2015 in the Washington Post, based upon his research for ''Ranking the World – Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance'', that measuring democracy can mislead as much as clarify – a problem for academics, policy-makers and anyone who cares about democracy.

In his contribution ''Lost in the Gray Zone: Competing Measures of Democracy in the Former Soviet Republics'' to ''Ranking the World'', he, on the example of former Soviet republics, examines fundamental problems with measures of democracy, observing that indices often disagree and occasionally draw contradictory conclusions from observing the same event. He argues, that this reflects inherent tradeoffs in conceptualizing democratic governance, which arise from fundamental normative disagreements about a highly contested concept.

In 2011, Michael Coppedge, John Gerring et al. proposed an approach to such conceptualization and measurement. In their paper ''Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach'' they review some of the weaknesses among contemporary and older approaches, then lay out their approach, characterizing it as ''historical'', ''multidimensional'', ''disaggregated'', and ''transparent''. The authors propose to create a new set of four features to conceptualize and measure democracy. First, ''historical'', extending indicators of democracy back through modern history, wherever possible. Second, a ''multidimensional'' approach to the problem of conceptualizing democracy. Third, to collect information relevant to democracy at a highly ''disaggregated'' level. Fourth, ''transparent'', a strategy for data collection and presentation that should enhance the precision, validity, transparency, and legitimacy of the resulting indicators. They also sum up the conceptions, and/or aspects, of democracy into six – ''electoral'', ''liberal'', ''majoritarian'', ''participatory'', ''deliberative'', and ''egalitarian'', which taken together offer a fairly comprehensive accounting of the concept of democracy as it is employed today (see overview in the table below).
{| class=&quot;wikitable&quot;
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |Conceptions of democracy by Michael Coppedge, John Gerring et al., 2011
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
| 
| 
|Principles
|Question
|Institutions
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|I.
|'''Electoral'''
|Contestation, competition
|Are government offices filled by free and fair multiparty elections?
|Elections, political parties, competitiveness and turnover
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|II.
|'''Liberal'''
|Limited government, multiple veto points, horizontal accountability, individual rights, civil liberties, transparency
|Is political power decentralized &amp; constrained?
|Multiple, independent, and decentralized, with special focus on the role of the media, interest groups, the judiciary, and a written constitution with explicit guarantees
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|III.
|'''Majoritarian'''
|Majority rule, centralization, vertical accountability
|Does the majority (or plurality) rule?
|Consolidated and centralized, with special focus on the role of political parties
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|IV.
|'''Participatory'''
|Government by the people
|Do ordinary citizens participate in politics?
|Election law, civil society, local government, direct democracy
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|V.
|'''Deliberative'''
|Government by reason
|Are political decisions the product of public deliberation?
|Media, hearings, panels, other deliberative bodies
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|VI.
|'''Egalitarian'''
|Political equality
|Are all citizens equally empowered?
|Designed to ensure equal participation, representation, protection, and politically relevant resources
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|}

=== Measurement of democracy ===
Main article: Measurement of democracy

Measurement of democracy varies according to the different fundamental conceptions of democracy. Minimalist democracy evaluations focus on free and fair elections, while maximalist democracy evaluates additional values, such as human rights, deliberation, economic outcomes or state capacity.

== Non-governmental democracy ==
Aside from the public sphere, similar democratic principles and mechanisms of voting and representation have been used to govern other kinds of groups. Many non-governmental organisations decide policy and leadership by voting. Most trade unions and cooperatives are governed by democratic elections. Corporations are ultimately governed by their shareholders through shareholder democracy. Corporations may also employ systems such as workplace democracy to handle internal governance. Amitai Etzioni has postulated a system that fuses elements of democracy with sharia law, termed Islamic democracy or ''Islamocracy''. There is also a growing number of Democratic educational institutions such as Sudbury schools that are co-governed by students and staff.

=== Shareholder democracy ===
Main article: Shareholder democracy

Shareholder democracy is a concept relating to the governance of corporations by their shareholders. In the United States, shareholders are typically granted voting rights according to the one share, one vote principle. Shareholders may vote annually to elect the company's board of directors, who themselves may choose the company's executives. The shareholder democracy framework may be inaccurate for companies which have different classes of stock that further alter the distribution of voting rights.

== Justification ==
Several justifications for democracy have been postulated.

=== Legitimacy ===
Social contract theory argues that the legitimacy of government is based on consent of the governed, i.e. an election, and that political decisions must reflect the general will. The public legitimacy of democracy varies by country, in some countries religious texts have more public support than the will of the people.

=== Better decision-making ===
Condorcet's jury theorem is logical proof that if each decision-maker has a better than chance probability of making the right decision, then having the largest number of decision-makers, i.e. a democracy, will result in the best decisions. This has also been argued by theories of the wisdom of the crowd. Democracy tends to improve conflict resolution.

=== Economic success ===
Main article: Democracy and economic growth

In ''Why Nations Fail'', economists Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson argue that democracies are more economically successful because undemocratic political systems tend to limit markets and favor monopolies at the expense of the creative destruction which is necessary for sustained economic growth.

A 2019 study by Acemoglu and others estimated that countries switching to democratic from authoritarian rule had on average a 20% higher GDP after 25 years than if they had remained authoritarian. The study examined 122 transitions to democracy and 71 transitions to authoritarian rule, occurring from 1960 to 2010. Acemoglu said this was because democracies tended to invest more in health care and human capital, and reduce special treatment of regime allies.

A 2023 study analyzed the long-term effects of democracy on economic prosperity using new data on GDP per capita and democracy for a dataset between 1789 and 2019. The results indicate that democracy substantially increases economic development.

Unemployment is associated with anti-democratic beliefs.

== Criticism ==
This section is an excerpt from Criticism of democracy.[edit]

Democracy as a concept and as a practical form of government has been the subject of critique throughout history. Some critics consider that democratic regimes often fail to be true to the highest principles expected of them, while others reject the values promoted by constitutional democracy in whole or part.

Opposition to democracy goes as far back as Plato, who argued for a 'government of the best qualified'. More recently, James Madison extensively studied historic attempts at and arguments on democracy in his preparation for the Constitutional Convention, and Winston Churchill remarked that &quot;no one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.&quot;

Critics argue that modern democracies may fail to be sufficiently democratic and instead function in practice as oligarchies, insofar as governments are more responsive to the preferences of economic elites than to those of ordinary citizens. Numerous empirical studies across various western democracies including the United States, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Canada, Norway and Germany have consistently found that elected representatives tend to respond more to the preferences of very affluent citizens for policy outcomes than those of the average voter.

Some critics of democracy have highlighted the concept's inconsistencies, paradoxes, and limits: drawing contrasts with other forms of government, such as epistocracy or lottocracy. Others have characterized most modern democracies as democratic polyarchies and democratic aristocracies. Yet others have identified fascist moments in modern democracies. They have termed the societies produced by modern democracies as neo-feudal and have contrasted democracy with fascism, anarcho-capitalism, theocracy, and absolute monarchy.

== Democratic transitions ==
Main article: Democratic transition

A democratic transition describes a phase in a country's political system, often created as a result of an incomplete change from an authoritarian regime to a democratic one (or vice versa).

=== Democratization ===
Main article: Democratization

Democratization, or democratisation, is the structural government transition from an authoritarian government to a more democratic political regime, including substantive political changes moving in a democratic direction. The opposite process of democratic transition is known as democratic backsliding or autocratization. Whether and to what extent democratization occurs can be influenced by various factors, including economic development, historical legacies, civil society, and international processes. Some accounts of democratization emphasize how elites drove democratization, whereas other accounts emphasize grassroots bottom-up processes. How democratization occurs has also been used to explain other political phenomena, such as whether a country goes to a war or whether its economy grows.

Several philosophers and researchers have outlined historical and social factors seen as supporting the evolution of democracy. Other commentators have mentioned the influence of economic development. In a related theory, Ronald Inglehart suggests that improved living-standards in modern developed countries can convince people that they can take their basic survival for granted, leading to increased emphasis on self-expression values, which correlates closely with democracy.

Douglas M. Gibler and Andrew Owsiak in their study argued about the importance of peace and stable borders for the development of democracy. It has often been assumed that democracy causes peace, but this study shows that, historically, peace has almost always predated the establishment of democracy.

Carroll Quigley concludes that the characteristics of weapons are the main predictor of democracy: Democracy—this scenario—tends to emerge only when the best weapons available are easy for individuals to obtain and use. By the 1800s, guns were the best personal weapons available, and in the United States of America (already nominally democratic), almost everyone could afford to buy a gun, and could learn how to use it fairly easily. Governments could not do any better: it became the age of mass armies of citizen soldiers with guns. Similarly, Periclean Greece was an age of the citizen soldier and democracy.

Other theories stressed the relevance of education and of human capital—and within them of cognitive ability to increasing tolerance, rationality, political literacy and participation. Two effects of education and cognitive ability are distinguished:&lt;sup&gt;[''need quotation to verify'']&lt;/sup&gt;

* a cognitive effect (competence to make rational choices, better information-processing)
* an ethical effect (support of democratic values, freedom, human rights etc.), which itself depends on intelligence.

Evidence consistent with conventional theories of why democracy emerges and is sustained has been hard to come by. Statistical analyses have challenged modernisation theory by demonstrating that there is no reliable evidence for the claim that democracy is more likely to emerge when countries become wealthier, more educated, or less unequal. In fact, empirical evidence shows that economic growth and education may not lead to increased demand for democratization as modernization theory suggests: historically, most countries attained high levels of access to primary education well before transitioning to democracy. Rather than acting as a catalyst for democratization, in some situations education provision may instead be used by non-democratic regimes to indoctrinate their subjects and strengthen their power.

The assumed link between education and economic growth is called into question when analyzing empirical evidence. Across different countries, the correlation between education attainment and math test scores is very weak (.07). A similarly weak relationship exists between per-pupil expenditures and math competency (.26). Additionally, historical evidence suggests that average human capital (measured using literacy rates) of the masses does not explain the onset of industrialization in France from 1750 to 1850 despite arguments to the contrary. Together, these findings show that education does not always promote human capital and economic growth as is generally argued to be the case. Instead, the evidence implies that education provision often falls short of its expressed goals, or, alternatively, that political actors use education to promote goals other than economic growth and development.

Some scholars have searched for the &quot;deep&quot; determinants of contemporary political institutions, be they geographical or demographic.

An example of this is the disease environment. Places with different mortality rates had different populations and productivity levels around the world. For example, in Africa, the tsetse fly—which afflicts humans and livestock—reduced the ability of Africans to plough the land. This made Africa less settled. As a consequence, political power was less concentrated. This also affected the colonial institutions European countries established in Africa. Whether colonial settlers could live or not in a place made them develop different institutions which led to different economic and social paths. This also affected the distribution of power and the collective actions people could take. As a result, some African countries ended up having democracies and others autocracies.

An example of geographical determinants for democracy is having access to coastal areas and rivers. This natural endowment has a positive relation with economic development thanks to the benefits of trade. Trade brought economic development, which in turn, broadened power. Rulers wanting to increase revenues had to protect property-rights to create incentives for people to invest. As more people had more power, more concessions had to be made by the ruler and in many&lt;sup&gt;[''quantify'']&lt;/sup&gt; places this process lead to democracy. These determinants defined the structure of the society moving the balance of political power.

Robert Michels asserts that although democracy can never be fully realised, democracy may be developed automatically in the act of striving for democracy:&lt;blockquote&gt;The peasant in the fable, when on his deathbed, tells his sons that a treasure is buried in the field. After the old man's death the sons dig everywhere in order to discover the treasure. They do not find it. But their indefatigable labor improves the soil and secures for them a comparative well-being. The treasure in the fable may well symbolise democracy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Democracy in modern times has almost always faced opposition from the previously existing government, and many times it has faced opposition from social elites. The implementation of a democratic government from a non-democratic state is typically brought by peaceful or violent democratic revolution.

The V-Dem Institute found 2026 ongoing democratization in 18 countries: Benin, Bolivia, Botswana, Bazil, Dominican Republic, Fiji, Guatemala, Lesotho, Mauritius, Montenegro, Poland, Seychelles, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Timor-Leste, Thailand, The Gambia, and Zambia.

===== Democracy promotion =====
Main article: Democracy promotion

Promotion of democracy can increase the quality of already existing democracies, reduce political apathy, and the chance of democratic backsliding. Democracy promotion measures include voting advice applications, participatory democracy, increasing electoral integrity, youth suffrage and civic education, reducing barriers to entry for new political parties, increasing proportionality, reducing presidentialism and aligning with median voter preferences.

=== Autocratization ===
Further information: Democratic backsliding by country

Democratic backsliding is a form of autocratization, a process of structural government transition toward authoritarianism in which the exercise of political power becomes less limited and more arbitrary and repressive. Democratic backsliding specifically assumes a starting point of a democratic system. The process typically restricts the space for public contest and political participation in the process of government selection. Democratic backsliding involves the weakening of democratic institutions, such as the peaceful transition of power or free and fair elections, or the violation of individual rights that underpin democracies, especially freedom of expression. Democratic backsliding is the opposite of democratization.&lt;sup&gt;[''citation needed'']&lt;/sup&gt;

Steven Levitsky says: &quot;It's not up to voters to defend a democracy. That's asking far, far too much of voters, to cast their ballot on the basis of some set of abstract principles or procedures. With the exception of a handful of cases, voters never, ever — in any society, in any culture — prioritize democracy over all else. Individual voters worry about much more mundane things, as is their right. It is up to élites and institutions to protect democracy — not voters.&quot;

The V-Dem Institute found 2026 ongoing democratic backsliding in 44 countries: Afghanistan, Argentina, Armenia, Belarus, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Central African Republic, Croatia, Georgia, Greece, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, El Salvador, Haiti, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Italy, Ivory Coast, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Mali, Madagascar, Mauretania, Mexico, Moldova, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Niger, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Slovakia, Slovenia, Senegal, Serbia, Romania, Togo, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and United States.

===== Disruption =====
Some democratic governments have experienced sudden state collapse and regime change to an undemocratic form of government. Domestic military coups or rebellions are the most common means by which democratic governments have been overthrown. (See List of coups and coup attempts by country and List of civil wars.) Examples include the Spanish Civil War, the Coup of 18 Brumaire that ended the French First Republic, and the 28 May 1926 coup d'état which ended the First Portuguese Republic. Some military coups are supported by foreign governments, such as the 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état and the 1953 Iranian coup d'état. Other types of a sudden end to democracy include:

* Invasion, for example the German occupation of Czechoslovakia, and the fall of South Vietnam.
* Self-coup, in which the leader of the government extra-legally seizes all power or unlawfully extends the term in office. This can be done through:
** Suspension of the constitution by decree, such as with the 1992 Peruvian coup d'état
** An &quot;electoral self-coup&quot; using election fraud to obtain re-election of a previously fairly elected official or political party. For example, in the 1999 Ukrainian presidential election, 2003 Russian legislative election, and 2004 Russian presidential election.
* Royal coup, in which a monarch not normally involved in government seizes all power. For example, the 6 January Dictatorship, begun in 1929 when King Alexander I of Yugoslavia dismissed parliament and started ruling by decree.

Democratic backsliding can end democracy in a gradual manner, by increasing emphasis on national security and eroding free and fair elections, freedom of expression, independence of the judiciary, rule of law. A famous example is the Enabling Act of 1933, which lawfully ended democracy in Weimar Germany and marked the transition to Nazi Germany.

Temporary or long-term political violence and government interference can prevent free and fair elections, which erode the democratic nature of governments. This has happened on a local level even in well-established democracies like the United States; for example, the Wilmington insurrection of 1898 and African-American disfranchisement after the Reconstruction era.

== Influence of the media ==
Further information: Mediatization (media), Crowd manipulation, Media manipulation, and Post-truth politics

The theory of democracy relies on the implicit assumption that voters are well informed about social issues, policies, and candidates so that they can make a truly informed decision. Since the late 20th century there has been a growing concern that voters may be poorly informed due to the news media's focusing more on entertainment and gossip and less on serious journalistic research on political issues.

The media professors Michael Gurevitch and Jay Blumler have proposed a number of functions that the mass media are expected to fulfill in a democracy:

* Surveillance of the sociopolitical environment
* Meaningful agenda setting
* Platforms for an intelligible and illuminating advocacy
* Dialogue across a diverse range of views
* Mechanisms for holding officials to account for how they have exercised power
* Incentives for citizens to learn, choose, and become involved
* A principled resistance to the efforts of forces outside the media to subvert their independence, integrity, and ability to serve the audience
* A sense of respect for the audience member, as potentially concerned and able to make sense of his or her political environment

This proposal has inspired a lot of discussions over whether the news media are actually fulfilling the requirements that a well functioning democracy requires. Commercial mass media are generally not accountable to anybody but their owners, and they have no obligation to serve a democratic function. They are controlled mainly by economic market forces. Fierce economic competition may force the mass media to divert themselves from any democratic ideals and focus entirely on how to survive the competition.

The tabloidization and popularization of the news media is seen in an increasing focus on human examples rather than statistics and principles. There is more focus on politicians as personalities and less focus on political issues in the popular media. Election campaigns are covered more as horse races and less as debates about ideologies and issues. The dominating media focus on spin, conflict, and competitive strategies has made voters perceive the politicians as egoists rather than idealists. This fosters mistrust and a cynical attitude to politics, less civic engagement, and less interest in voting. The ability to find effective political solutions to social problems is hampered when problems tend to be blamed on individuals rather than on structural causes. This person-centered focus may have far-reaching consequences not only for domestic problems but also for foreign policy when international conflicts are blamed on foreign heads of state rather than on political and economic structures. A strong media focus on fear and terrorism has allowed military logic to penetrate public institutions, leading to increased surveillance and the erosion of civil rights.

The responsiveness and accountability of the democratic system is compromised when lack of access to substantive, diverse, and undistorted information is handicapping the citizens' capability of evaluating the political process. The fast pace and trivialization in the competitive news media is dumbing down the political debate. Thorough and balanced investigation of complex political issues does not fit into this format. The political communication is characterized by short time horizons, short slogans, simple explanations, and simple solutions. This is conducive to political populism rather than serious deliberation.

Commercial mass media are often differentiated along the political spectrum so that people can hear mainly opinions that they already agree with. Too much controversy and diverse opinions are not always profitable for the commercial news media. Political polarization is emerging when different people read different news and watch different TV channels. This polarization has been worsened by the emergence of the social media that allow people to communicate mainly with groups of like-minded people, the so-called echo chambers. Extreme political polarization may undermine the trust in democratic institutions, leading to erosion of civil rights and free speech and in some cases even reversion to autocracy.

Many media scholars have discussed non-commercial news media with public service obligations as a means to improve the democratic process by providing the kind of political contents that a free market does not provide. The World Bank has recommended public service broadcasting in order to strengthen democracy in developing countries. These broadcasting services should be accountable to an independent regulatory body that is adequately protected from interference from political and economic interests. Public service media have an obligation to provide reliable information to voters. Many countries have publicly funded radio and television stations with public service obligations, especially in Europe and Japan, while such media are weak or non-existent in other countries including the US. Several studies have shown that the stronger the dominance of commercial broadcast media over public service media, the less the amount of policy-relevant information in the media and the more focus on horse race journalism, personalities, and the pecadillos of politicians. Public service broadcasters are characterized by more policy-relevant information and more respect for journalistic norms and impartiality than the commercial media. However, the trend of deregulation has put the public service model under increased pressure from competition with commercial media.

The emergence of the internet and the social media has profoundly altered the conditions for political communication. The social media have given ordinary citizens easy access to voice their opinion and share information while bypassing the filters of the large news media. This is often seen as an advantage for democracy. The new possibilities for communication have fundamentally changed the way social movements and protest movements operate and organize. The internet and social media have provided powerful new tools for democracy movements in developing countries and emerging democracies, enabling them to bypass censorship, voice their opinions, and organize protests.

A serious problem with the social media is that they have no truth filters. The established news media have to guard their reputation as trustworthy, while ordinary citizens may post unreliable information. In fact, studies show that false stories are going more viral than true stories. The proliferation of false stories and conspiracy theories may undermine public trust in the political system and public officials.

Reliable information sources are essential for the democratic process. Less democratic governments rely heavily on censorship, propaganda, and misinformation in order to stay in power, while independent sources of information are able to undermine their legitimacy.

== Referenzi ==</text>
      <sha1>g9melo13nxcbzinzdyyrzi1q91d89ko</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330225</id>
      <parentid>330224</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-26T13:00:11Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Trigcly</username>
        <id>17859</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>żieda kontenut</comment>
      <origin>330225</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="89240" sha1="14lcpr7gdhev5oeryr68dvsz9lwf0hy" xml:space="preserve">Id-'''demokrazija''' hija forma ta' governanza li permezz tagħha l-poter [[Politika|politiku]] jinkiseb min-nies jew mill-popolazzjoni ta' stat. Skont definizzjoni minimalista tad-demokrazija, il-mexxejja jiġu eletti permezz ta' elezzjonijiet kompetittivi filwaqt li d-definizzjonijiet iktar wesgħin jew massimalisti jorbtu d-demokrazija mal-garanziji tal-libertajiet ċivili u d-drittijiet tal-[[bniedem]] apparti l-elezzjonijiet kompetittivi.

F'demokrazija diretta, il-poplu jkollu l-awtorità diretta li jagħmel deliberazzjonijiet u li jiddeċiedi dwar il-leġiżlazzjoni. F'demokrazija rappreżentattiva, il-poplu jagħżel l-uffiċjali tal-governanza permezz ta' elezzjonijiet. Id-definizzjoni ta' &quot;poplu&quot; u l-modi kif l-awtorità tiġi kondiviża fi ħdan il-poplu jew iddelegata minnu nbidlu mal-milja taż-żminijiet u b'rati li jvarjaw minn pajjiż għal ieħor. Il-karatteristiċi tad-demokrazija spiss jinkludu l-libertà tal-ġemgħa, il-libertà tal-assoċjazzjoni, il-proprjetà personali, il-libertà tar-[[reliġjon]] u tal-kelma, iċ-ċittadinanza, il-kunsens ta' dawk li jiġu ggvernati, id-drittijiet tal-votazzjoni, il-libertà miċ-ċaħda governattiva mhux ġustifikata tad-dritt tal-ħajja u tal-libertà, u d-drittijiet tal-minoranzi.

In-nozzjoni tad-demokrazija evolviet b'mod konsiderevoli maż-żmien. Matul l-[[Storja|istorja]], wieħed jista' jsib evidenza ta' demokrazija diretta, fejn il-komunitajiet kienu jieħdu deċiżjonijiet permezz ta' ġemgħat popolari. Illum il-ġurnata, il-forma dominanti tad-demokrazija hija d-demokrazija rappreżentattiva, fejn iċ-ċittadini jeleġġu lill-uffiċjali tal-gvern biex jiggvernaw f'isimhom, pereżempju f'demokrazija parlamentari jew presidenzjali. Fil-varjant komuni tad-demokrazija liberali, is-setgħat tal-maġġoranza jiġu eżerċitati fi ħdan il-qafas ta' demokrazija rappreżentattiva, iżda l-kostituzzjoni u l-qorti suprema jillimitaw lill-maġġoranza u jipproteġu lill-minoranzi — normalment billi jiġi żgurat li kulħadd igawdi minn ċerti drittijiet individwali, bħal-libertà tal-kelma jew il-libertà tal-assoċjazzjoni.

It-terminu tfaċċa fis-seklu 5 [[Ante Christum natum|Q.K]]. fil-bliet-stati [[Greċja antika|Griegi]], b'mod partikolari f'[[Ateni]] Klassika, u kien ifisser &quot;it-tmexxija tal-poplu&quot;, b'kuntrast mal-aristokrazija (bil-[[Lingwa Griega|Grieg]]: ἀριστοκρατία, ''aristokratía''), li tfisser &quot;it-tmexxija tal-elit&quot;. Prattikament fil-gvernijiet demokratiċi kollha tul l-istorja tal-qedem u moderna, iċ-ċittadinanza demokratika inizjalment kienet ristretta għal klassi tal-elit, li iktar 'il quddiem ġiet estiża għaċ-ċittadini adulti kollha. Fil-biċċa l-kbira tad-demokraziji moderni, dan inkiseb permezz tal-movimenti tas-suffraġju tas-sekli 19 u 20.

Id-demokrazija tikkuntrasta mal-forom ta' governanza fejn il-poter ma jinbitx mill-popolazzjoni ġenerali ta' stat, pereżempju s-sistemi awtoritarji. Storikament is-sistemi demokratiċi kienu forma rari u vulnerabbli ta' governanza, iżda dawn saru iktar prevalenti mis-seklu 19 'l hawn, b'mod partikolari permezz ta' diversi mewġiet ta' demokratizzazzjoni. Id-demokrazija għandha leġittimità konsiderevoli fid-dinja moderna, peress li l-opinjoni pubblika fir-reġjuni dinjin normalment huma favur is-sistemi demokratiċi ta' governanza meta mqabbla mal-alternattivi, u peress li saħansitra l-istati awtoritarji jippruvaw ipinġu lilhom infushom bħala demokratiċi. Id-demokrazija b'mod iktar konsistenti tirriżulta f'saħħa, f'[[edukazzjoni]] u f'eżiti ekonomiċi mtejba. Skont l-indiċijiet ta' ''V-Dem Democracy'' u l-Indiċi tad-Demokrazija ta' ''The Economist'', inqas minn nofs il-popolazzjoni tad-dinja tgħix f'demokrazija mill-2022. Fl-istess ħin, filwaqt li d-demokrazija rappreżentattivi tingħata valur siewi b'mod mifrux, iċ-Ċentru tar-Riċerka ta' Pew sab li l-garr rigward il-prestazzjoni demokratika huwa komuni saħansitra f'bosta demokraziji stabbiliti.

== Karatteristiċi ==
Although democracy is in purely representative democracies understood to be defined by voting, no consensus exists on a precise definition of democracy  (see also ''In the search of common understanding'' below), There are many approaches. A study identified 2,234 adjectives used to describe democracy in the English language.

Yet, there is a more profound understanding – like that of Abraham Lincoln:

: ''&quot;Government of the people, by the people, for the people&quot;''

or of Karl Popper saying that the ''&quot;classical&quot;'' view of democracy is, ''&quot;in brief, the theory that'':

: ''democracy is the rule of the people and that the people have a right to rule''.

Democratic principles are reflected in all eligible citizens being equal before the law and having equal access to legislative processes.

For example, in a representative democracy, every vote has (in theory) equal weight, and the freedom of eligible citizens is secured by legitimised rights and liberties which are typically enshrined in a constitution, while other uses of &quot;democracy&quot; may encompass direct democracy, in which citizens vote on issues directly. According to the United Nations, democracy &quot;provides an environment that respects human rights and fundamental freedoms, and in which the freely expressed will of people is exercised.&quot;

One theory holds that democracy requires three fundamental principles: upward control (sovereignty residing at the lowest levels of authority), political equality, and social norms by which individuals and institutions only consider acceptable acts that reflect the first two principles of upward control and political equality. Legal equality, political freedom and rule of law are often identified by commentators as foundational characteristics for a well-functioning democracy.

In some countries, notably in the United Kingdom (which originated the Westminster system), the dominant principle is that of parliamentary sovereignty, while maintaining judicial independence. In India, parliamentary sovereignty is subject to the Constitution of India which includes judicial review. Though the term &quot;democracy&quot; is typically used in the context of a political state, the principles also are potentially applicable to private organisations, such as clubs, societies and firms.

Democracies may use many different decision-making methods, but majority rule is the dominant form. Without compensation, like legal protections of individual or group rights, political minorities can be oppressed by the &quot;tyranny of the majority&quot;. Majority rule involves a competitive approach, opposed to consensus democracy, creating the need that elections, and generally deliberation, be substantively and procedurally &quot;fair&quot;, i.e., just and equitable. In some countries, freedom of political expression, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press are considered important to ensure that voters are well informed, enabling them to vote according to their own interests and beliefs.

It has also been suggested that a basic feature of democracy is the capacity of all voters to participate freely and fully in the life of their society. With its emphasis on notions of social contract and the collective will of all the voters, democracy can also be characterised as a form of political collectivism because it is defined as a form of government in which all eligible citizens have an equal say in lawmaking.

Republics, though often popularly associated with democracy because of the shared principle of rule by consent of the governed, are not necessarily democracies, as republicanism does not specify ''how'' the people are to rule. Classically the term &quot;republic&quot; encompassed both democracies and aristocracies and their mixtures. In a modern sense the republican form of government is a form of government without a monarch. Because of this, democracies can be republics or constitutional monarchies, such as the United Kingdom, where the monarch is not a ruler.

== Storja ==
Democratic assemblies are as old as the human species and are found throughout human history, but up until the nineteenth century, major political figures have largely opposed democracy. Republican theorists linked democracy to small size: as political units grew in size, the likelihood increased that the government would turn despotic. At the same time, small political units were vulnerable to conquest. Montesquieu wrote, &quot;If a republic be small, it is destroyed by a foreign force; if it is large, it is ruined by an internal imperfection.&quot; According to Johns Hopkins University political scientist Daniel Deudney, the creation of the United States, with its large size and its system of checks and balances, was a solution to the dual problems of size. Forms of democracy occurred organically in societies around the world that had no contact with each other.

=== Oriġini ===

==== Greċja u Ruma ====
The term ''democracy'' first appeared in ancient Greek political and philosophical thought in the city-state of Athens during classical antiquity. The word comes from ''dêmos'' '(common) people' and ''krátos'' 'force/might'. Under Cleisthenes, what is generally held as the first example of a type of democracy in the sixth-century BC (508–507 BC) was established in Athens. Cleisthenes is referred to as &quot;the father of Athenian democracy&quot;. The first attested use of the word democracy is found in prose works of the 430s BC, such as Herodotus' ''Histories'', but its usage was older by several decades, as two Athenians born in the 470s were named Democrates, a new political name—likely in support of democracy—given at a time of debates over constitutional issues in Athens. Aeschylus also strongly alludes to the word in his play ''The Suppliants'', staged in c.463 BC, where he mentions &quot;the demos's ruling hand&quot; [''demou kratousa cheir'']. Before that time, the word used to define the new political system of Cleisthenes was probably isonomia, meaning political equality.

Athenian democracy took the form of direct democracy, and it had two distinguishing features: the random selection of ordinary citizens to fill the few existing government administrative and judicial offices, and a legislative assembly consisting of all Athenian citizens. All eligible citizens were allowed to speak and vote in the assembly, which set the laws of the city-state. However, Athenian citizenship excluded women, slaves, foreigners (μέτοικοι / ''métoikoi''), and youths below the age of military service.&lt;sup&gt;[''contradictory'']&lt;/sup&gt; Effectively, only 1 in 4 residents in Athens qualified as citizens. Owning land was not a requirement for citizenship. The exclusion of large parts of the population from the citizen body is closely related to the ancient understanding of citizenship. In most of antiquity the benefit of citizenship was tied to the obligation to fight war campaigns.

Athenian democracy was not only ''direct'' in the sense that decisions were made by the assembled people, but also the ''most direct'' in the sense that the people through the assembly, boule and courts of law controlled the entire political process and a large proportion of citizens were involved constantly in the public business. Even though the rights of the individual were not secured by the Athenian constitution in the modern sense (the ancient Greeks had no word for &quot;rights&quot;), those who were citizens of Athens enjoyed their liberties not in opposition to the government but by living in a city that was not subject to another power and by not being subjects themselves to the rule of another person.

Range voting appeared in Sparta as early as 700 BC. The Spartan ecclesia was an assembly of the people, held once a month, in which every male citizen of at least 20 years of age could participate. In the assembly, Spartans elected leaders and cast votes by range voting and shouting (the vote is then decided on how loudly the crowd shouts). Aristotle called this &quot;childish&quot;, as compared with the stone voting ballots used by the Athenian citizenry. Sparta adopted it because of its simplicity, and to prevent any biased voting, buying, or cheating that was predominant in the early democratic elections.

In addition, the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom created a system with a democratic element in the form of many different popular assamblies.

Even though the Roman Republic contributed significantly to many aspects of democracy, only a fraction of Romans were citizens with votes in elections for magistrates. The votes of the powerful were given more weight through a system of weighted voting, so most high officials, including members of the Senate, came from a few wealthy and noble families. The Roman model of governance inspired many political thinkers over the centuries.

==== Indja tal-qedem ====
Vaishali, capital city of the Vajjika League (Vrijji mahajanapada) of India, is considered one of the first examples of a republic around the 6th century BC.

==== Amerki ====
Other cultures, such as the Iroquois in the Americas also developed a form of democratic society between 1450 and 1660 (and possibly in 1142), well before contact with the Europeans. This democracy continues to the present day and is the world's oldest standing representative democracy.

=== Medju Evu ===
While most regions in Europe during the Middle Ages were ruled by clergy or feudal lords, there existed various systems involving elections or assemblies, although often only involving a small part of the population. In Scandinavia, bodies known as things consisted of freemen presided by a lawspeaker. These deliberative bodies were responsible for settling political questions, and variants included the Althing in Iceland and the Løgting in the Faeroe Islands. The veche, found in Eastern Europe, was a similar body to the Scandinavian thing. In the Roman Catholic Church, the pope has been elected by a papal conclave composed of cardinals since 1059. The first documented parliamentary body in Europe was the Cortes of León. Established by Alfonso IX in 1188, the Cortes had authority over setting taxation, foreign affairs and legislating, though the exact nature of its role remains disputed. The Republic of Ragusa, established in 1358 and centered around the city of Dubrovnik, provided representation and voting rights to its male aristocracy only. Various Italian city-states and polities had republic forms of government. For instance, the Republic of Florence, established in 1115, was led by the Signoria whose members were chosen by sortition. In the 10th–15th century Frisia, a distinctly non-feudal society, the right to vote on local matters and on county officials was based on land size. The Kouroukan Fouga divided the Mali Empire into ruling clans (lineages) that were represented at a great assembly called the ''Gbara''. However, the charter made Mali more similar to a constitutional monarchy than a democratic republic.

The Parliament of England had its roots in the restrictions on the power of kings written into Magna Carta (1215), which explicitly protected certain rights of the King's subjects and implicitly supported what became the English writ of habeas corpus, safeguarding individual freedom against unlawful imprisonment with the right to appeal. The first representative national assembly in England was Simon de Montfort's Parliament in 1265. The emergence of petitioning is some of the earliest evidence of parliament being used as a forum to address the general grievances of ordinary people. However, the power to call parliament remained at the pleasure of the monarch.

Studies have linked the emergence of parliamentary institutions in Europe during the medieval period to urban agglomeration and the creation of new classes, such as artisans, as well as the presence of nobility and religious elites. Scholars have also linked the emergence of representative government to Europe's relative political fragmentation. Political scientist David Stasavage links the fragmentation of Europe, and its subsequent democratization, to the manner in which the Roman Empire collapsed: Roman territory was conquered by small fragmented groups of Germanic tribes, thus leading to the creation of small political units where rulers were relatively weak and needed the consent of the governed to ward off foreign threats.

In Poland, noble democracy was characterized by an increase in the activity of the middle nobility, which wanted to increase their share in exercising power at the expense of the magnates. Magnates dominated the most important offices in the state (secular and ecclesiastical) and sat on the royal council, later the senate. The growing importance of the middle nobility had an impact on the establishment of the institution of the land ''sejmik'' (local assembly), which subsequently obtained more rights. During the fifteenth and first half of the sixteenth century, sejmiks received more and more power and became the most important institutions of local power. In 1454, Casimir IV Jagiellon granted the sejmiks the right to decide on taxes and to convene a mass mobilization in the Nieszawa Statutes. He also pledged not to create new laws without their consent.

=== Era moderna ===

==== Perjodu modern bikri ====
In 17th century England, there was renewed interest in Magna Carta. The Parliament of England passed the Petition of Right in 1628 which established certain liberties for subjects. The English Civil War (1642–1651) was fought between the King and an oligarchic but elected Parliament, during which the idea of a political party took form with groups debating rights to political representation during the Putney Debates of 1647. Subsequently, the Protectorate (1653–59) and the English Restoration (1660) restored more autocratic rule, although Parliament passed the Habeas Corpus Act in 1679 which strengthened the convention that forbade detention lacking sufficient cause or evidence. After the Glorious Revolution of 1688, the Bill of Rights was enacted in 1689 which codified certain rights and liberties and is still in effect. The Bill set out the requirement for regular elections, rules for freedom of speech in Parliament and limited the power of the monarch, ensuring that, unlike much of Europe at the time, royal absolutism would not prevail. Economic historians Douglass North and Barry Weingast have characterized the institutions implemented in the Glorious Revolution as a resounding success in terms of restraining the government and ensuring protection for property rights.

Renewed interest in the Magna Carta, the English Civil War, and the Glorious Revolution in the 17th century prompted the growth of political philosophy on the British Isles. Thomas Hobbes was the first philosopher to articulate a detailed social contract theory. Writing in the ''Leviathan'' (1651), Hobbes theorized that individuals living in the state of nature led lives that were &quot;solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short&quot; and constantly waged a war of all against all. In order to prevent the occurrence of an anarchic state of nature, Hobbes reasoned that individuals ceded their rights to a strong, authoritarian power. In other words, Hobbes advocated for an absolute monarchy which, in his opinion, was the best form of government. Later, philosopher and physician John Locke would posit a different interpretation of social contract theory. Writing in his ''Two Treatises of Government'' (1689), Locke posited that all individuals possessed the inalienable rights to life, liberty and estate (property). According to Locke, individuals would voluntarily come together to form a state for the purposes of defending their rights. Particularly important for Locke were property rights, whose protection Locke deemed to be a government's primary purpose. Furthermore, Locke asserted that governments were legitimate only if they held the consent of the governed. For Locke, citizens had the right to revolt against a government that acted against their interest or became tyrannical. Although they were not widely read during his lifetime, Locke's works are considered the founding documents of liberal thought and profoundly influenced the leaders of the American Revolution and later the French Revolution. His liberal democratic framework of governance remains the preeminent form of democracy in the world.

In the Cossack republics of Ukraine in the 16th and 17th centuries, the Cossack Hetmanate and Zaporizhian Sich, the holder of the highest post of Hetman was elected by the representatives from the country's districts.

In North America, representative government began in Jamestown, Virginia, with the election of the House of Burgesses (forerunner of the Virginia General Assembly) in 1619. English Puritans who migrated from 1620 established colonies in New England whose local governance was democratic; the hard power of these local assemblies varied greatly throughout the colonial time period however officially they held only small amounts of devolved power, as ultimate authority belonged to the Crown and Parliament. The Puritans (Pilgrim Fathers), Baptists, and Quakers who founded these colonies applied the democratic organisation of their congregations also to the administration of their communities in worldly matters.

==== Sekli 18 u 19 ====
The first Parliament of Great Britain was established in 1707, after the merger of the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland under the Acts of Union. Two key documents of the UK's uncodified constitution, the English Declaration of Right, 1689 (restated in the Bill of Rights 1689) and the Scottish Claim of Right 1689, had both cemented Parliament's position as the supreme law-making body and said that the &quot;election of members of Parliament ought to be free&quot;. However, Parliament was only elected by male property owners, which amounted to 3% of the population in 1780. The first known British person of African heritage to vote in a general election, Ignatius Sancho, voted in 1774 and 1780.

During the Age of Liberty in Sweden (1718–1772), civil rights were expanded and power shifted from the monarch to parliament. The taxed peasantry was represented in parliament, although with little influence, but commoners without taxed property had no suffrage.

The creation of the short-lived Corsican Republic in 1755 was an early attempt to adopt a democratic constitution (all men and women above age of 25 could vote). This Corsican Constitution was the first based on Enlightenment principles and included female suffrage, something that was not included in most other democracies until the 20th century.

Colonial America had similar property qualifications as Britain, and in the period before 1776 the abundance and availability of land meant that large numbers of colonists met such requirements with at least 60 per cent of adult white males able to vote. The great majority of white men were farmers who met the property ownership or taxpaying requirements. With few exceptions, no blacks or women could vote. Vermont, which, on declaring independence of Great Britain in 1777, adopted a constitution modelled on Pennsylvania's citizenship and democratic suffrage for males with or without property. The United States Constitution of 1787 is the oldest surviving, still active, governmental codified constitution. The Constitution provided for an elected government and protected civil rights and liberties, but did not end slavery nor extend voting rights in the United States, instead leaving the issue of suffrage to the individual states. Generally, states limited suffrage to white male property owners and taxpayers. At the time of the first Presidential election in 1789, about 6% of the population was eligible to vote. The Naturalization Act of 1790 limited U.S. citizenship to whites only. The Bill of Rights in 1791 set limits on government power to protect personal freedoms but had little impact on judgements by the courts for the first 130 years after ratification.

In 1789, Revolutionary France adopted the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen and, although short-lived, the National Convention was elected by all men in 1792. The Polish-Lithuanian Constitution of 3 May 1791 sought to implement a more effective constitutional monarchy, introduced political equality between townspeople and nobility, and placed the peasants under the protection of the government, mitigating the worst abuses of serfdom. In force for less than 19 months, it was declared null and void by the Grodno Sejm that met in 1793. Nonetheless, the 1791 Constitution helped keep alive Polish aspirations for the eventual restoration of the country's sovereignty over a century later.

In the United States, the 1828 presidential election was the first in which non-property-holding white males could vote in the vast majority of states. Voter turnout soared during the 1830s, reaching about 80% of the adult white male population in the 1840 presidential election. North Carolina was the last state to abolish property qualification in 1856 resulting in a close approximation to universal white male suffrage (however tax-paying requirements remained in five states in 1860 and survived in two states until the 20th century). In the 1860 United States census, the slave population had grown to four million, and in Reconstruction after the Civil War, three constitutional amendments were passed: the 13th Amendment (1865) that ended slavery; the 14th Amendment (1869) that gave black people citizenship, and the 15th Amendment (1870) that gave black males a nominal right to vote. Full enfranchisement of citizens was not secured until after the civil rights movement gained passage by the US Congress of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The voting franchise in the United Kingdom was expanded and made more uniform in a series of reforms that began with the Reform Act 1832 and continued into the 20th century, notably with the Representation of the People Act 1918 and the Equal Franchise Act 1928. Universal male suffrage was established in France in March 1848 in the wake of the French Revolution of 1848. During that year, several revolutions broke out in Europe as rulers were confronted with popular demands for liberal constitutions and more democratic government.

In 1876, the Ottoman Empire transitioned from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional one, and held two elections the next year to elect members to her newly formed parliament. Provisional Electoral Regulations were issued, stating that the elected members of the Provincial Administrative Councils would elect members to the first Parliament. Later that year, a new constitution was promulgated, which provided for a bicameral Parliament with a Senate appointed by the Sultan and a popularly elected Chamber of Deputies. Only men above the age of 30 who were competent in Turkish and had full civil rights were allowed to stand for election. Reasons for disqualification included holding dual citizenship, being employed by a foreign government, being bankrupt, employed as a servant, or having &quot;notoriety for ill deeds&quot;. Full universal suffrage was achieved in 1934.

In 1893, the self-governing colony New Zealand became the first country in the world (except for the short-lived 18th-century Corsican Republic) to establish active universal suffrage by recognizing women as having the right to vote.

==== Sekli 20 u 21 ====
20th-century transitions to liberal democracy have come in successive &quot;waves of democracy&quot;, variously resulting from wars, revolutions, decolonisation, and religious and economic circumstances. Global waves of &quot;democratic regression&quot; reversing democratization, have also occurred in the 1920s and 30s, in the 1960s and 1970s, and in the 2010s.

World War I and the dissolution of the autocratic Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian empires resulted in the creation of new nation-states in Europe, most of them at least nominally democratic. In the 1920s democratic movements flourished and women's suffrage advanced, but the Great Depression brought disenchantment and most of the countries of Europe, Latin America, and Asia turned to strong-man rule or dictatorships. Fascism and dictatorships flourished in Nazi Germany, Italy, Spain and Portugal, as well as non-democratic governments in the Baltics, the Balkans, Brazil, Cuba, China, and Japan, among others.

World War II brought a definitive reversal of this trend in Western Europe. The democratisation of the American, British, and French sectors of occupied Germany (disputed), Austria, Italy, and the occupied Japan served as a model for the later theory of government change. However, most of Eastern Europe, including the Soviet sector of Germany fell into the non-democratic Soviet-dominated bloc.

The war was followed by decolonisation, and again most of the new independent states had nominally democratic constitutions. India emerged as the world's largest democracy and continues to be so. Countries that were once part of the British Empire often adopted the British Westminster system.

In 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights mandated democracy:&lt;blockquote&gt;3. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.&lt;/blockquote&gt;— Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 21, United Nations, 1948

By 1960, the vast majority of country-states were nominally democracies, although most of the world's populations lived in nominal democracies that experienced sham elections, and other forms of subterfuge (particularly in &quot;Communist&quot; states and the former colonies). A subsequent wave of democratisation brought substantial gains toward true liberal democracy for many states, dubbed &quot;third wave of democracy&quot;. Portugal, Spain, and several of the military dictatorships in South America returned to civilian rule in the 1970s and 1980s. This was followed by countries in East and South Asia by the mid-to-late 1980s. Economic malaise in the 1980s, along with resentment of Soviet oppression, contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union, the associated end of the Cold War, and the democratisation and liberalisation of the former Eastern bloc countries. The most successful of the new democracies were those geographically and culturally closest to western Europe, and they are now either part of the European Union or candidate states. In 1986, after the toppling of the most prominent Asian dictatorship, the only democratic state of its kind at the time emerged in the Philippines with the rise of Corazon Aquino, who would later be known as the mother of Asian democracy.

The liberal trend spread to some states in Africa in the 1990s, most prominently in South Africa. Some recent examples of attempts of liberalisation include the Indonesian Revolution of 1998, the Bulldozer Revolution in Yugoslavia, the Rose Revolution in Georgia, the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, the Cedar Revolution in Lebanon, the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan, and the Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia.

According to Freedom House, in 2007 there were 123 electoral democracies (up from 40 in 1972). According to ''World Forum on Democracy'', electoral democracies now represent 120 of the 192 existing countries and constitute 58.2 per cent of the world's population. At the same time liberal democracies i.e. countries Freedom House regards as free and respectful of basic human rights and the rule of law are 85 in number and represent 38 per cent of the global population. Also in 2007 the United Nations declared 15 September the International Day of Democracy.

Many countries reduced their voting age to 18 years; the major democracies began to do so in the 1970s starting in Western Europe and North America.&lt;sup&gt;[''failed verification'']&lt;/sup&gt; Most electoral democracies continue to exclude those younger than 18 from voting. The voting age has been lowered to 16 for national elections in a number of countries, including Brazil, Austria, Cuba, and Nicaragua. In California, a 2004 proposal to permit a quarter vote at 14 and a half vote at 16 was ultimately defeated. In 2008, the German parliament proposed but shelved a bill that would grant the vote to each citizen at birth, to be used by a parent until the child claims it for themselves.

According to Freedom House, starting in 2005, there have been 17 consecutive years in which declines in political rights and civil liberties throughout the world have outnumbered improvements, as populist and nationalist political forces have gained ground everywhere from Poland (under the Law and Justice party) to the Philippines (under Rodrigo Duterte). In a Freedom House report released in 2018, Democracy Scores for most countries declined for the 12th consecutive year. ''The Christian Science Monitor'' reported that nationalist and populist political ideologies were gaining ground, at the expense of rule of law, in countries like Poland, Turkey and Hungary. For example, in Poland, the President appointed 27 new Supreme Court judges over legal objections from the European Commission. In Turkey, thousands of judges were removed from their positions following a failed coup attempt during a government crackdown .

&quot;Democratic backsliding&quot; in the 2010s were attributed to economic inequality and social discontent, personalism, poor government's management of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as other factors such as manipulation of civil society, &quot;toxic polarization&quot;, foreign disinformation campaigns, racism and nativism, excessive executive power, and decreased power of the opposition. Within English-speaking Western democracies, &quot;protection-based&quot; attitudes combining cultural conservatism and leftist economic attitudes were the strongest predictor of support for authoritarian modes of governance.

== Teorija ==
=== Teorija bikrija ===
Aristotle's '''democratic theory''' contrasted rule by the many (democracy/timocracy), with rule by the few (oligarchy/aristocracy/elitism), and with rule by a single person (tyranny/autocracy/absolute monarchy). He also thought that there was a good and a bad variant of each system (he considered democracy to be the degenerate counterpart to timocracy).

A common view among early and renaissance Republican theorists was that democracy could only survive in small political communities. Heeding the lessons of the Roman Republic's shift to monarchism as it grew larger or smaller, these Republican theorists held that the expansion of territory and population inevitably led to tyranny. Democracy was therefore highly fragile and rare historically, as it could only survive in small political units, which due to their size were vulnerable to conquest by larger political units. Montesquieu famously said, &quot;if a republic is small, it is destroyed by an outside force; if it is large, it is destroyed by an internal vice.&quot; Jean-Jacques Rousseau asserted, &quot;It is, therefore the natural property of small states to be governed as a republic, of middling ones to be subject to a monarch, and of large empires to be swayed by a despotic prince.&quot;

=== Teorija kontemporanja ===
Fost it-teoriċi politiċi moderni, jeżistu kunċetti fundamentali differenti tad-demokrazija.

==== Aggregazzjoni ====
The theory of aggregative democracy claims that the aim of the democratic processes is to solicit citizens' preferences and aggregate them together to determine what social policies society should adopt. Therefore, proponents of this view hold that democratic participation should primarily focus on voting, where the policy with the most votes gets implemented. Different variants of aggregative democracy exist.

According to the minimalist democracy conception, elections are a mechanism for competition between politicians. Joseph Schumpeter articulated this view famously in his book ''Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy''.

Anthony Downs argues that ideological political parties are necessary to act as a mediating broker between individuals and governments. On the other hand, direct democracy, where citizens vote directly on legislative proposals, can show better aggregation in cases of differences in preferences between elites and voters.

===== Mandat medjan =====
According to the median voter theorem the political representativeness can be evaluated by comparing how close laws and policies are to the views of the median voter along the political spectrum. The ''median mandate'' views the preferences of the median voter as granting political legitimacy.

==== Poliarkija ====
Robert A. Dahl argues that the fundamental democratic principle is that, when it comes to binding collective decisions, each person in a political community is entitled to have his/her interests be given equal consideration. He uses the term polyarchy (&quot;rule by many&quot;) to refer to societies in which there exists a certain set of institutions and procedures which are perceived as leading to such democracy. First and foremost among these institutions is the regular occurrence of free and open elections which are used to select representatives who then manage all or most of the public policy of the society. However, these polyarchic procedures may not create a full democracy if, for example, poverty prevents political participation. Similarly, Ronald Dworkin argues that &quot;democracy is a substantive, not a merely procedural, ideal.&quot;

==== Deliberazzjoni ====
Deliberative democracy is based on the notion that democracy is government by deliberation. Unlike aggregative democracy, deliberative democracy holds that, for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by authentic deliberation, not merely the aggregation of preferences that occurs in voting. Authentic deliberation is deliberation among decision-makers that is free from distortions of unequal political power, such as power a decision-maker obtained through economic wealth or the support of interest groups. If the decision-makers cannot reach consensus after authentically deliberating on a proposal, then they vote on the proposal using a form of majority rule. Citizens assemblies are considered by many scholars as practical examples of deliberative democracy, with a recent OECD report identifying citizens assemblies as an increasingly popular mechanism to involve citizens in governmental decision-making. Proponents of direct democracy view citizens do not rule themselves unless they directly decide laws and policies. Political activity can be valuable in itself, it socialises and educates citizens, and popular participation can check powerful elites.

==== Tipi ta' demokraziji governattivi ====
Democracy has taken a number of forms, both in theory and practice. Some varieties of democracy provide better representation and more freedom for their citizens than others. However, if any democracy is not structured to prohibit the government from excluding the people from the legislative process, or any branch of government from altering the separation of powers in its favour, then a branch of the system can accumulate too much power and destroy the democracy.

The following kinds of democracy are not exclusive of one another: many specify details of aspects that are independent of one another and can co-exist in a single system.

===== Forom bażiċi =====
Several variants of democracy exist, but there are two basic forms, both of which concern how the whole body of all eligible citizens executes its will. One form of democracy is direct democracy, in which all eligible citizens have active participation in the political decision making, for example voting on policy initiatives directly. In most modern democracies, the whole body of eligible citizens remain the sovereign power but political power is exercised indirectly through elected representatives; this is called a representative democracy.

If the head of state is democratically elected then the polity is called a democratic republic

====== Demokrazija diretta ======
Direct democracy is a political system where the citizens participate in the decision-making personally, contrary to relying on intermediaries or representatives. Proponents like Jean-Jacques Rousseau argue the direct approach increases legitimacy. A direct democracy gives the voting population the power to:

* Change constitutional laws,
* Put forth initiatives, referendums and suggestions for laws

Within modern-day representative governments, certain electoral tools like referendums, citizens' initiatives and recall elections are referred to as forms of direct democracy. However, some advocates of direct democracy argue for local assemblies of face-to-face discussion. Direct democracy as a government system currently exists in the Swiss cantons of Appenzell Innerrhoden and Glarus, the Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities, communities affiliated with the CIPO-RFM, the Bolivian city councils of FEJUVE, and Kurdish cantons of Rojava.

====== Demokrazija semidiretta ======
Some modern democracies that are predominantly representative in nature also heavily rely upon forms of political action that are directly democratic. These democracies, which combine elements of representative democracy and direct democracy, are termed ''semi-direct democracies'' or ''participatory democracies''. Examples include Switzerland and some U.S. states, where frequent use is made of referendums and initiatives.

The Swiss confederation is a semi-direct democracy. At the federal level, citizens can propose changes to the constitution (federal popular initiative) or ask for a referendum to be held on any law voted by the parliament. Between January 1995 and June 2005, Swiss citizens voted 31 times, to answer 103 questions (during the same period, French citizens participated in only two referendums). Although in the past 120 years less than 250 initiatives have been put to referendum.

Examples include the extensive use of referendums in the US state of California, which is a state that has more than 20 million voters.

In New England, town meetings are often used, especially in rural areas, to manage local government. This creates a hybrid form of government, with a local direct democracy and a representative state government. For example, most Vermont towns hold annual town meetings in March in which town officers are elected, budgets for the town and schools are voted on, and citizens have the opportunity to speak and be heard on political matters.

====== Sistema tax-xorti ======
The use of a lot system, a characteristic of Athenian democracy, is a feature of some versions of direct democracies. In this system, important governmental and administrative tasks are performed by citizens picked from a lottery.

====== Demokrazija rappreżentattiva ======
Representative democracy involves the election of government officials by the people being represented. The most common mechanisms involve election of the candidate with a majority or a plurality of the votes. Most western countries have representative systems.

Representatives may be elected or become diplomatic representatives by a particular district (or constituency), or represent the entire electorate through proportional systems, with some using a combination of the two. Some representative democracies also incorporate elements of direct democracy, such as referendums. A characteristic of representative democracy is that while the representatives are elected by the people to act in the people's interest, they retain the freedom to exercise their own judgement as how best to do so. Such reasons have driven criticism upon representative democracy, pointing out the contradictions of representation mechanisms with democracy.

====== Demokrazija Parlamentari ======
Parliamentary democracy is a representative democracy where government is appointed by or can be dismissed by, representatives as opposed to a &quot;presidential rule&quot; wherein the president is both head of state and the head of government and is elected by the voters. Under a parliamentary democracy, government is exercised by delegation to an executive ministry and subject to ongoing review, checks and balances by the legislative parliament elected by the people.

In a parliamentary system, the prime minister may be dismissed by the legislature at any point in time for not meeting the expectations of the legislature. This is done through a vote of no confidence where the legislature decides whether or not to remove the prime minister from office with majority support for dismissal. In some countries, the prime minister can also call an election at any point in time, typically when the prime minister believes that they are in good favour with the public as to get re-elected. In other parliamentary democracies, extra elections are virtually never held, a minority government being preferred until the next ordinary elections. An important feature of the parliamentary democracy is the concept of the &quot;loyal opposition&quot;. The essence of the concept is that the second largest political party (or opposition) opposes the governing party (or coalition), while still remaining loyal to the state and its democratic principles.

====== Demokrazija Presidenzjali ======
Presidential democracy is a system where the public elects the president through an election. The president serves as both the head of state and head of government controlling most of the executive powers. The president serves for a specific term and cannot exceed that amount of time. The legislature often has limited ability to remove a president from office. Elections typically have a fixed date and are not easily changed. The president has direct control over the cabinet, specifically appointing the cabinet members.

The executive usually has the responsibility to execute or implement legislation and may have the limited legislative powers, such as a veto. However, a legislative branch passes legislation and budgets. This provides some measure of separation of powers. In consequence, however, the president and the legislature may end up in the control of separate parties, allowing one to block the other and thereby interfere with the orderly operation of the state. This may be the reason why presidential democracy is not very common outside the Americas, Africa, and Central and Southeast Asia.

A semi-presidential system is a system of democracy in which the government includes both a prime minister and a president. The particular powers held by the prime minister and president vary by country.

==== Tipoloġija ====

===== Monarkija kostituzzjonali =====
Many countries such as the United Kingdom, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Scandinavian countries, Thailand, Japan and Bhutan turned powerful monarchs into constitutional monarchs (often gradually) with limited or symbolic roles. For example, in the predecessor states to the United Kingdom, constitutional monarchy began to emerge and has continued uninterrupted since the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and passage of the Bill of Rights 1689. Strongly limited constitutional monarchies, such as the United Kingdom, have been referred to as crowned republics by writers such as H. G. Wells.

In other countries, the monarchy was abolished along with the aristocratic system (as in France, China, Russia, Germany, Austria, Hungary, Italy, Greece, and Egypt). An elected person, with or without significant powers, became the head of state in these countries.

Elite upper houses of legislatures, which often had lifetime or hereditary tenure, were common in many states. Over time, these either had their powers limited (as with the British House of Lords) or else became elective and remained powerful (as with the Australian Senate).

===== Demokrazija repubblika =====
The term ''republic'' has many different meanings, but today often refers to a representative democracy with an elected head of state, such as a president, serving for a limited term, in contrast to states with a hereditary monarch as a head of state, even if these states also are representative democracies with an elected or appointed head of government such as a prime minister.

The Founding Fathers of the United States often criticised direct democracy; James Madison argued, especially in ''The Federalist'' No. 10, that what distinguished a direct ''democracy'' from a ''republic'' was that the former depended on small size and suffered more violently from the effects of faction, whereas a republic could get stronger as it got larger and combats faction by its very structure. Accordingly, during Philadelphia convention Madison called election of representatives by large territories &quot;the only defence against the inconveniencies of democracy consistent with the democratic form of Govt.&quot;

Professors Richard Ellis of Willamette University and Michael Nelson of Rhodes College argue that much constitutional thought, from Madison to Lincoln and beyond, has focused on &quot;the problem of majority tyranny&quot;. They conclude, &quot;The principles of republican government embedded in the Constitution represent an effort by the framers to ensure that the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness would not be trampled by majorities.&quot; What was critical to American values, John Adams insisted, was that the government be &quot;bound by fixed laws, which the people have a voice in making, and a right to defend.&quot; As Benjamin Franklin was exiting after writing the US Constitution, Elizabeth Willing Powel asked him &quot;Well, Doctor, what have we got—a republic or a monarchy?&quot;. He replied &quot;A republic—if you can keep it.&quot;

===== Demokrazija liberali =====
A liberal democracy is a representative democracy which enshrines a liberal political philosophy, where the ability of the elected representatives to exercise decision-making power is subject to the rule of law, moderated by a constitution or laws such as the protection of the rights and freedoms of individuals, and constrained on the extent to which the will of the majority can be exercised against the rights of minorities.

===== Demokrazija Soċjalista =====
Socialist thought has several different views on democracy, for example social democracy or democratic socialism. Many democratic socialists and social democrats believe in a form of participatory, industrial, economic and/or workplace democracy combined with a representative democracy.

===== Demokrazija Marxista =====
Marxist theory supports a democratic society centering the working class. Some Marxists and Trotskyists believe in direct democracy or workers' councils (which are sometimes called soviets). This system can begin with workplace democracy and can manifest itself as soviet democracy or dictatorship of the proletariat. Trotskyist groups have interpreted socialist democracy to be synonymous with multi-party far-left representation, autonomous union organizations, worker's control of production, internal party democracy and the mass participation of the working masses. Some communist parties support a soviet republic with democratic centralism. Within democracy in Marxism there can be hostility to what is commonly called &quot;liberal democracy&quot;.

===== Demokrazija Anarkista =====
Anarchists are split in this domain, depending on whether they believe that a majority-rule is tyrannic or not. To many anarchists, the only form of democracy considered acceptable is direct democracy. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon argued that the only acceptable form of direct democracy is one in which it is recognised that majority decisions are not binding on the minority, even when unanimous. However, anarcho-communist Murray Bookchin criticised individualist anarchists for opposing democracy, and says &quot;majority rule&quot; is consistent with anarchism.

Some anarcho-communists oppose the majoritarian nature of direct democracy, feeling that it can impede individual liberty and opt-in favour of a non-majoritarian form of consensus democracy, similar to Proudhon's position on direct democracy.

===== Demokrazija każwali =====
Sortition is the process of choosing decision-making bodies via a random selection. These bodies can be more representative of the opinions and interests of the people at large than an elected legislature or other decision-maker. The technique was in widespread use in Athenian Democracy and Renaissance Florence and is still used in modern jury selection and citizens' assemblies.

===== Demokrazija Kostituzzjonali =====
Consociational democracy, also called consociationalism, is a form of democracy based on power-sharing formula between elites representing the social groups within the society. In 1969, Arendt Lijphart argued this would stabilize democracies with factions. A consociational democracy allows for simultaneous majority votes in two or more ethno-religious constituencies, and policies are enacted only if they gain majority support from both or all of them. The Qualified majority voting rule in European Council of Ministers is a consociational democracy approach for supranational democracies. This system in Treaty of Rome allocates votes to member states in part according to their population, but heavily weighted in favour of the smaller states. A consociational democracy requires consensus of representatives, while consensus democracy requires consensus of electorate.

===== Demokrazija maġġoritarja =====
Majoritarian democracy is a form of democracy based upon a principle of majority rule. Majoritarian democracy contrasts with consensus democracy, rule by as many people as possible.

===== Konsensus =====
Consensus democracy requires consensus decision-making and supermajority to obtain a larger support than majority. In contrast, in majoritarian democracy minority opinions can potentially be ignored by vote-winning majorities. Constitutions typically require consensus or supermajorities.

===== Demokrazija etnika =====
The term ethnic democracy, as used by some political scientists, purports to describe a governance system that combines a structured ethnic dominance with democratic, political and civil rights for all. Both the dominant ethnic group—typically an ethnic majority—and the minority ethnic groups have citizenship and are able to fully participate in the political process. However, critics of the &quot;ethnic democracy&quot; model argue it is a contradiction in terms, and thus conceptually inadequate or confusing; these critics allege that purported ethnic democracies, most notably Israel, are not democratic at all, or are at best a sort of semi-democracy.

===== Demokrazija inklużiva =====
Inclusive democracy is a political theory and political project that aims for direct democracy in all fields of social life: political democracy in the form of face-to-face assemblies which are confederated, economic democracy in a stateless, moneyless and marketless economy, democracy in the social realm, i.e. self-management in places of work and education, and ecological democracy which aims to reintegrate society and nature. The theoretical project of inclusive democracy emerged from the work of political philosopher Takis Fotopoulos in &quot;Towards An Inclusive Democracy&quot; and was further developed in the journal ''Democracy &amp; Nature'' and its successor ''The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy''.

===== Politika parteċipattiva =====
A parpolity or participatory polity is a theoretical form of democracy that is ruled by a nested council structure. The guiding philosophy is that people should have decision-making power in proportion to how much they are affected by the decision. Local councils of 25–50 people are completely autonomous on issues that affect only them, and these councils send delegates to higher level councils who are again autonomous regarding issues that affect only the population affected by that council.

A council court of randomly chosen citizens serves as a check on the tyranny of the majority, and rules on which body gets to vote on which issue. Delegates may vote differently from how their sending council might wish but are mandated to communicate the wishes of their sending council. Delegates are recallable at any time. Referendums are possible at any time via votes of lower-level councils, however, not everything is a referendum as this is most likely a waste of time. A parpolity is meant to work in tandem with a participatory economy.

===== Demokrazija proċedurali =====
Procedural democracy or proceduralist democracy, proceduralism or hollow democracy is a term used to denote the particular procedures, such as regular elections based on universal suffrage, that produce an electorally-legitimated government. Procedural democracy, with its centering of electoral processes as the basis of democratic legitimacy, is often contrasted with substantive or participatory democracy, which centers the equal participation of all groups in society in the political process as the basis of legitimacy.

===== Demokrazija radikali =====
Radical democracy is based on the idea that there are hierarchical and oppressive power relations that exist in society. Radical democracy's role is to make visible and challenge those relations by allowing for difference, dissent and antagonisms in decision-making processes.

===== Demokrazija reliġjuża =====
Religious democracy is a form of democracy where the values of a particular religion or state religion are preferred. The term applies to all democratic countries in which religion is incorporated into the form of government.

===== Demokrazija kożmopolitana =====
Cosmopolitan democracy, also known as ''global democracy'' or ''world federalism'', is a political system in which democracy is implemented on a global scale, either directly or through representatives. An important justification for this kind of system is that the decisions made in national or regional democracies often affect people outside the constituency who, by definition, cannot vote. By contrast, in a cosmopolitan democracy, the people who are affected by decisions also have a say in them.

According to its supporters, any attempt to solve global problems is undemocratic without some form of cosmopolitan democracy. The general principle of cosmopolitan democracy is to expand some or all of the values and norms of democracy, including the rule of law; the non-violent resolution of conflicts; and equality among citizens, beyond the limits of the state. To be fully implemented, this would require reforming existing international organisations, e.g., the United Nations, as well as the creation of new institutions such as a World Parliament, which ideally would enhance public control over, and accountability in, international politics.

Cosmopolitan democracy has been promoted, among others, by physicist Albert Einstein, writer Kurt Vonnegut, columnist George Monbiot, and professors David Held and Daniele Archibugi. The creation of the International Criminal Court in 2003 was seen as a major step forward by many supporters of this type of cosmopolitan democracy.

===== Demokrazija kreattiva =====
Creative democracy is advocated by American philosopher John Dewey. The main idea about creative democracy is that democracy encourages individual capacity building and the interaction among the society. Dewey argues that democracy is a way of life in his work of &quot;Creative Democracy: The Task Before Us&quot; and an experience built on faith in human nature, faith in human beings, and faith in working with others. Democracy, in Dewey's view, is a moral ideal requiring actual effort and work by people; it is not an institutional concept that exists outside of ourselves. &quot;The task of democracy&quot;, Dewey concludes, &quot;is forever that of creation of a freer and more humane experience in which all share and to which all contribute&quot;.

===== Demokrazija ggwidata =====
Guided democracy is a form of democracy that incorporates regular popular elections, but which often carefully &quot;guides&quot; the choices offered to the electorate in a manner that may reduce the ability of the electorate to truly determine the type of government exercised over them. Such democracies typically have only one central authority which is often not subject to meaningful public review by any other governmental authority. Russian-style democracy has often been referred to as a &quot;guided democracy&quot;. Russian politicians have referred to their government as having only one center of power/ authority, as opposed to most other forms of democracy which usually attempt to incorporate two or more naturally competing sources of authority within the same government.

=== Tfittxija ta' fehim komuni ===
The search for a common approach to conceptualize, measure and compare democracy remains a challenge in modern political science. This challenge strikes through to measuring, assessing and comparing the quality of democracy, as Seva Gunitsky pointed in 2015 in the Washington Post, based upon his research for ''Ranking the World – Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance'', that measuring democracy can mislead as much as clarify – a problem for academics, policy-makers and anyone who cares about democracy.

In his contribution ''Lost in the Gray Zone: Competing Measures of Democracy in the Former Soviet Republics'' to ''Ranking the World'', he, on the example of former Soviet republics, examines fundamental problems with measures of democracy, observing that indices often disagree and occasionally draw contradictory conclusions from observing the same event. He argues, that this reflects inherent tradeoffs in conceptualizing democratic governance, which arise from fundamental normative disagreements about a highly contested concept.

In 2011, Michael Coppedge, John Gerring et al. proposed an approach to such conceptualization and measurement. In their paper ''Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach'' they review some of the weaknesses among contemporary and older approaches, then lay out their approach, characterizing it as ''historical'', ''multidimensional'', ''disaggregated'', and ''transparent''. The authors propose to create a new set of four features to conceptualize and measure democracy. First, ''historical'', extending indicators of democracy back through modern history, wherever possible. Second, a ''multidimensional'' approach to the problem of conceptualizing democracy. Third, to collect information relevant to democracy at a highly ''disaggregated'' level. Fourth, ''transparent'', a strategy for data collection and presentation that should enhance the precision, validity, transparency, and legitimacy of the resulting indicators. They also sum up the conceptions, and/or aspects, of democracy into six – ''electoral'', ''liberal'', ''majoritarian'', ''participatory'', ''deliberative'', and ''egalitarian'', which taken together offer a fairly comprehensive accounting of the concept of democracy as it is employed today (see overview in the table below).
{| class=&quot;wikitable&quot;
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |Conceptions of democracy by Michael Coppedge, John Gerring et al., 2011
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
| 
| 
|Principles
|Question
|Institutions
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|I.
|'''Electoral'''
|Contestation, competition
|Are government offices filled by free and fair multiparty elections?
|Elections, political parties, competitiveness and turnover
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|II.
|'''Liberal'''
|Limited government, multiple veto points, horizontal accountability, individual rights, civil liberties, transparency
|Is political power decentralized &amp; constrained?
|Multiple, independent, and decentralized, with special focus on the role of the media, interest groups, the judiciary, and a written constitution with explicit guarantees
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|III.
|'''Majoritarian'''
|Majority rule, centralization, vertical accountability
|Does the majority (or plurality) rule?
|Consolidated and centralized, with special focus on the role of political parties
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|IV.
|'''Participatory'''
|Government by the people
|Do ordinary citizens participate in politics?
|Election law, civil society, local government, direct democracy
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|V.
|'''Deliberative'''
|Government by reason
|Are political decisions the product of public deliberation?
|Media, hearings, panels, other deliberative bodies
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|VI.
|'''Egalitarian'''
|Political equality
|Are all citizens equally empowered?
|Designed to ensure equal participation, representation, protection, and politically relevant resources
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|}

=== Measurement of democracy ===
Main article: Measurement of democracy

Measurement of democracy varies according to the different fundamental conceptions of democracy. Minimalist democracy evaluations focus on free and fair elections, while maximalist democracy evaluates additional values, such as human rights, deliberation, economic outcomes or state capacity.

== Demokrazija mhux governattiva ==
Aside from the public sphere, similar democratic principles and mechanisms of voting and representation have been used to govern other kinds of groups. Many non-governmental organisations decide policy and leadership by voting. Most trade unions and cooperatives are governed by democratic elections. Corporations are ultimately governed by their shareholders through shareholder democracy. Corporations may also employ systems such as workplace democracy to handle internal governance. Amitai Etzioni has postulated a system that fuses elements of democracy with sharia law, termed Islamic democracy or ''Islamocracy''. There is also a growing number of Democratic educational institutions such as Sudbury schools that are co-governed by students and staff.

=== Demokrazija tal-azzjonisti ===
Shareholder democracy is a concept relating to the governance of corporations by their shareholders. In the United States, shareholders are typically granted voting rights according to the one share, one vote principle. Shareholders may vote annually to elect the company's board of directors, who themselves may choose the company's executives. The shareholder democracy framework may be inaccurate for companies which have different classes of stock that further alter the distribution of voting rights.

== Ġustifikazzjoni ==
Ingħataw diversi ġustifikazzjonijiet għad-demokrazija.

=== Leġittimità ===
Social contract theory argues that the legitimacy of government is based on consent of the governed, i.e. an election, and that political decisions must reflect the general will. The public legitimacy of democracy varies by country, in some countries religious texts have more public support than the will of the people.

=== Teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet aħjar ===
Condorcet's jury theorem is logical proof that if each decision-maker has a better than chance probability of making the right decision, then having the largest number of decision-makers, i.e. a democracy, will result in the best decisions. This has also been argued by theories of the wisdom of the crowd. Democracy tends to improve conflict resolution.

=== Suċċess ekonomiku ===
In ''Why Nations Fail'', economists Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson argue that democracies are more economically successful because undemocratic political systems tend to limit markets and favor monopolies at the expense of the creative destruction which is necessary for sustained economic growth.

A 2019 study by Acemoglu and others estimated that countries switching to democratic from authoritarian rule had on average a 20% higher GDP after 25 years than if they had remained authoritarian. The study examined 122 transitions to democracy and 71 transitions to authoritarian rule, occurring from 1960 to 2010. Acemoglu said this was because democracies tended to invest more in health care and human capital, and reduce special treatment of regime allies.

A 2023 study analyzed the long-term effects of democracy on economic prosperity using new data on GDP per capita and democracy for a dataset between 1789 and 2019. The results indicate that democracy substantially increases economic development.

Unemployment is associated with anti-democratic beliefs.

== Kritika ==
Democracy as a concept and as a practical form of government has been the subject of critique throughout history. Some critics consider that democratic regimes often fail to be true to the highest principles expected of them, while others reject the values promoted by constitutional democracy in whole or part.

Opposition to democracy goes as far back as Plato, who argued for a 'government of the best qualified'. More recently, James Madison extensively studied historic attempts at and arguments on democracy in his preparation for the Constitutional Convention, and Winston Churchill remarked that &quot;no one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.&quot;

Critics argue that modern democracies may fail to be sufficiently democratic and instead function in practice as oligarchies, insofar as governments are more responsive to the preferences of economic elites than to those of ordinary citizens. Numerous empirical studies across various western democracies including the United States, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Canada, Norway and Germany have consistently found that elected representatives tend to respond more to the preferences of very affluent citizens for policy outcomes than those of the average voter.

Some critics of democracy have highlighted the concept's inconsistencies, paradoxes, and limits: drawing contrasts with other forms of government, such as epistocracy or lottocracy. Others have characterized most modern democracies as democratic polyarchies and democratic aristocracies. Yet others have identified fascist moments in modern democracies. They have termed the societies produced by modern democracies as neo-feudal and have contrasted democracy with fascism, anarcho-capitalism, theocracy, and absolute monarchy.

== Tranżizzjonijiet demokratiċi ==
A democratic transition describes a phase in a country's political system, often created as a result of an incomplete change from an authoritarian regime to a democratic one (or vice versa).

=== Demokratizzazzjoni ===
Democratization, or democratisation, is the structural government transition from an authoritarian government to a more democratic political regime, including substantive political changes moving in a democratic direction. The opposite process of democratic transition is known as democratic backsliding or autocratization. Whether and to what extent democratization occurs can be influenced by various factors, including economic development, historical legacies, civil society, and international processes. Some accounts of democratization emphasize how elites drove democratization, whereas other accounts emphasize grassroots bottom-up processes. How democratization occurs has also been used to explain other political phenomena, such as whether a country goes to a war or whether its economy grows.

Several philosophers and researchers have outlined historical and social factors seen as supporting the evolution of democracy. Other commentators have mentioned the influence of economic development. In a related theory, Ronald Inglehart suggests that improved living-standards in modern developed countries can convince people that they can take their basic survival for granted, leading to increased emphasis on self-expression values, which correlates closely with democracy.

Douglas M. Gibler and Andrew Owsiak in their study argued about the importance of peace and stable borders for the development of democracy. It has often been assumed that democracy causes peace, but this study shows that, historically, peace has almost always predated the establishment of democracy.

Carroll Quigley concludes that the characteristics of weapons are the main predictor of democracy: Democracy—this scenario—tends to emerge only when the best weapons available are easy for individuals to obtain and use. By the 1800s, guns were the best personal weapons available, and in the United States of America (already nominally democratic), almost everyone could afford to buy a gun, and could learn how to use it fairly easily. Governments could not do any better: it became the age of mass armies of citizen soldiers with guns. Similarly, Periclean Greece was an age of the citizen soldier and democracy.

Other theories stressed the relevance of education and of human capital—and within them of cognitive ability to increasing tolerance, rationality, political literacy and participation. Two effects of education and cognitive ability are distinguished:&lt;sup&gt;[''need quotation to verify'']&lt;/sup&gt;

* a cognitive effect (competence to make rational choices, better information-processing)
* an ethical effect (support of democratic values, freedom, human rights etc.), which itself depends on intelligence.

Evidence consistent with conventional theories of why democracy emerges and is sustained has been hard to come by. Statistical analyses have challenged modernisation theory by demonstrating that there is no reliable evidence for the claim that democracy is more likely to emerge when countries become wealthier, more educated, or less unequal. In fact, empirical evidence shows that economic growth and education may not lead to increased demand for democratization as modernization theory suggests: historically, most countries attained high levels of access to primary education well before transitioning to democracy. Rather than acting as a catalyst for democratization, in some situations education provision may instead be used by non-democratic regimes to indoctrinate their subjects and strengthen their power.

The assumed link between education and economic growth is called into question when analyzing empirical evidence. Across different countries, the correlation between education attainment and math test scores is very weak (.07). A similarly weak relationship exists between per-pupil expenditures and math competency (.26). Additionally, historical evidence suggests that average human capital (measured using literacy rates) of the masses does not explain the onset of industrialization in France from 1750 to 1850 despite arguments to the contrary. Together, these findings show that education does not always promote human capital and economic growth as is generally argued to be the case. Instead, the evidence implies that education provision often falls short of its expressed goals, or, alternatively, that political actors use education to promote goals other than economic growth and development.

Some scholars have searched for the &quot;deep&quot; determinants of contemporary political institutions, be they geographical or demographic.

An example of this is the disease environment. Places with different mortality rates had different populations and productivity levels around the world. For example, in Africa, the tsetse fly—which afflicts humans and livestock—reduced the ability of Africans to plough the land. This made Africa less settled. As a consequence, political power was less concentrated. This also affected the colonial institutions European countries established in Africa. Whether colonial settlers could live or not in a place made them develop different institutions which led to different economic and social paths. This also affected the distribution of power and the collective actions people could take. As a result, some African countries ended up having democracies and others autocracies.

An example of geographical determinants for democracy is having access to coastal areas and rivers. This natural endowment has a positive relation with economic development thanks to the benefits of trade. Trade brought economic development, which in turn, broadened power. Rulers wanting to increase revenues had to protect property-rights to create incentives for people to invest. As more people had more power, more concessions had to be made by the ruler and in many places this process lead to democracy. These determinants defined the structure of the society moving the balance of political power.


Robert Michels asserts that although democracy can never be fully realised, democracy may be developed automatically in the act of striving for democracy:&lt;blockquote&gt;The peasant in the fable, when on his deathbed, tells his sons that a treasure is buried in the field. After the old man's death the sons dig everywhere in order to discover the treasure. They do not find it. But their indefatigable labor improves the soil and secures for them a comparative well-being. The treasure in the fable may well symbolise democracy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Democracy in modern times has almost always faced opposition from the previously existing government, and many times it has faced opposition from social elites. The implementation of a democratic government from a non-democratic state is typically brought by peaceful or violent democratic revolution.

The V-Dem Institute found 2026 ongoing democratization in 18 countries: Benin, Bolivia, Botswana, Bazil, Dominican Republic, Fiji, Guatemala, Lesotho, Mauritius, Montenegro, Poland, Seychelles, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Timor-Leste, Thailand, The Gambia, and Zambia.

===== Promozzjoni tad-demokrazija =====
Promotion of democracy can increase the quality of already existing democracies, reduce political apathy, and the chance of democratic backsliding. Democracy promotion measures include voting advice applications, participatory democracy, increasing electoral integrity, youth suffrage and civic education, reducing barriers to entry for new political parties, increasing proportionality, reducing presidentialism and aligning with median voter preferences.

=== Awtokratizzazzjoni ===
Democratic backsliding is a form of autocratization, a process of structural government transition toward authoritarianism in which the exercise of political power becomes less limited and more arbitrary and repressive. Democratic backsliding specifically assumes a starting point of a democratic system. The process typically restricts the space for public contest and political participation in the process of government selection. Democratic backsliding involves the weakening of democratic institutions, such as the peaceful transition of power or free and fair elections, or the violation of individual rights that underpin democracies, especially freedom of expression. Democratic backsliding is the opposite of democratization.&lt;sup&gt;[''citation needed'']&lt;/sup&gt;

Steven Levitsky says: &quot;It's not up to voters to defend a democracy. That's asking far, far too much of voters, to cast their ballot on the basis of some set of abstract principles or procedures. With the exception of a handful of cases, voters never, ever — in any society, in any culture — prioritize democracy over all else. Individual voters worry about much more mundane things, as is their right. It is up to élites and institutions to protect democracy — not voters.&quot;

The V-Dem Institute found 2026 ongoing democratic backsliding in 44 countries: Afghanistan, Argentina, Armenia, Belarus, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Central African Republic, Croatia, Georgia, Greece, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, El Salvador, Haiti, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Italy, Ivory Coast, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Mali, Madagascar, Mauretania, Mexico, Moldova, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Niger, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Slovakia, Slovenia, Senegal, Serbia, Romania, Togo, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and United States.

===== Tfixkil =====
Some democratic governments have experienced sudden state collapse and regime change to an undemocratic form of government. Domestic military coups or rebellions are the most common means by which democratic governments have been overthrown. (See List of coups and coup attempts by country and List of civil wars.) Examples include the Spanish Civil War, the Coup of 18 Brumaire that ended the French First Republic, and the 28 May 1926 coup d'état which ended the First Portuguese Republic. Some military coups are supported by foreign governments, such as the 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état and the 1953 Iranian coup d'état. Other types of a sudden end to democracy include:

* Invasion, for example the German occupation of Czechoslovakia, and the fall of South Vietnam.
* Self-coup, in which the leader of the government extra-legally seizes all power or unlawfully extends the term in office. This can be done through:
** Suspension of the constitution by decree, such as with the 1992 Peruvian coup d'état
** An &quot;electoral self-coup&quot; using election fraud to obtain re-election of a previously fairly elected official or political party. For example, in the 1999 Ukrainian presidential election, 2003 Russian legislative election, and 2004 Russian presidential election.
* Royal coup, in which a monarch not normally involved in government seizes all power. For example, the 6 January Dictatorship, begun in 1929 when King Alexander I of Yugoslavia dismissed parliament and started ruling by decree.

Democratic backsliding can end democracy in a gradual manner, by increasing emphasis on national security and eroding free and fair elections, freedom of expression, independence of the judiciary, rule of law. A famous example is the Enabling Act of 1933, which lawfully ended democracy in Weimar Germany and marked the transition to Nazi Germany.

Temporary or long-term political violence and government interference can prevent free and fair elections, which erode the democratic nature of governments. This has happened on a local level even in well-established democracies like the United States; for example, the Wilmington insurrection of 1898 and African-American disfranchisement after the Reconstruction era.

== Influwenza tal-midja ==
The theory of democracy relies on the implicit assumption that voters are well informed about social issues, policies, and candidates so that they can make a truly informed decision. Since the late 20th century there has been a growing concern that voters may be poorly informed due to the news media's focusing more on entertainment and gossip and less on serious journalistic research on political issues.

The media professors Michael Gurevitch and Jay Blumler have proposed a number of functions that the mass media are expected to fulfill in a democracy:

* Surveillance of the sociopolitical environment
* Meaningful agenda setting
* Platforms for an intelligible and illuminating advocacy
* Dialogue across a diverse range of views
* Mechanisms for holding officials to account for how they have exercised power
* Incentives for citizens to learn, choose, and become involved
* A principled resistance to the efforts of forces outside the media to subvert their independence, integrity, and ability to serve the audience
* A sense of respect for the audience member, as potentially concerned and able to make sense of his or her political environment

This proposal has inspired a lot of discussions over whether the news media are actually fulfilling the requirements that a well functioning democracy requires. Commercial mass media are generally not accountable to anybody but their owners, and they have no obligation to serve a democratic function. They are controlled mainly by economic market forces. Fierce economic competition may force the mass media to divert themselves from any democratic ideals and focus entirely on how to survive the competition.

The tabloidization and popularization of the news media is seen in an increasing focus on human examples rather than statistics and principles. There is more focus on politicians as personalities and less focus on political issues in the popular media. Election campaigns are covered more as horse races and less as debates about ideologies and issues. The dominating media focus on spin, conflict, and competitive strategies has made voters perceive the politicians as egoists rather than idealists. This fosters mistrust and a cynical attitude to politics, less civic engagement, and less interest in voting. The ability to find effective political solutions to social problems is hampered when problems tend to be blamed on individuals rather than on structural causes. This person-centered focus may have far-reaching consequences not only for domestic problems but also for foreign policy when international conflicts are blamed on foreign heads of state rather than on political and economic structures. A strong media focus on fear and terrorism has allowed military logic to penetrate public institutions, leading to increased surveillance and the erosion of civil rights.

The responsiveness and accountability of the democratic system is compromised when lack of access to substantive, diverse, and undistorted information is handicapping the citizens' capability of evaluating the political process. The fast pace and trivialization in the competitive news media is dumbing down the political debate. Thorough and balanced investigation of complex political issues does not fit into this format. The political communication is characterized by short time horizons, short slogans, simple explanations, and simple solutions. This is conducive to political populism rather than serious deliberation.

Commercial mass media are often differentiated along the political spectrum so that people can hear mainly opinions that they already agree with. Too much controversy and diverse opinions are not always profitable for the commercial news media. Political polarization is emerging when different people read different news and watch different TV channels. This polarization has been worsened by the emergence of the social media that allow people to communicate mainly with groups of like-minded people, the so-called echo chambers. Extreme political polarization may undermine the trust in democratic institutions, leading to erosion of civil rights and free speech and in some cases even reversion to autocracy.

Many media scholars have discussed non-commercial news media with public service obligations as a means to improve the democratic process by providing the kind of political contents that a free market does not provide. The World Bank has recommended public service broadcasting in order to strengthen democracy in developing countries. These broadcasting services should be accountable to an independent regulatory body that is adequately protected from interference from political and economic interests. Public service media have an obligation to provide reliable information to voters. Many countries have publicly funded radio and television stations with public service obligations, especially in Europe and Japan, while such media are weak or non-existent in other countries including the US. Several studies have shown that the stronger the dominance of commercial broadcast media over public service media, the less the amount of policy-relevant information in the media and the more focus on horse race journalism, personalities, and the pecadillos of politicians. Public service broadcasters are characterized by more policy-relevant information and more respect for journalistic norms and impartiality than the commercial media. However, the trend of deregulation has put the public service model under increased pressure from competition with commercial media.

The emergence of the internet and the social media has profoundly altered the conditions for political communication. The social media have given ordinary citizens easy access to voice their opinion and share information while bypassing the filters of the large news media. This is often seen as an advantage for democracy. The new possibilities for communication have fundamentally changed the way social movements and protest movements operate and organize. The internet and social media have provided powerful new tools for democracy movements in developing countries and emerging democracies, enabling them to bypass censorship, voice their opinions, and organize protests.

A serious problem with the social media is that they have no truth filters. The established news media have to guard their reputation as trustworthy, while ordinary citizens may post unreliable information. In fact, studies show that false stories are going more viral than true stories. The proliferation of false stories and conspiracy theories may undermine public trust in the political system and public officials.

Reliable information sources are essential for the democratic process. Less democratic governments rely heavily on censorship, propaganda, and misinformation in order to stay in power, while independent sources of information are able to undermine their legitimacy.

== Referenzi ==</text>
      <sha1>14lcpr7gdhev5oeryr68dvsz9lwf0hy</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330226</id>
      <parentid>330225</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-26T13:00:38Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Trigcly</username>
        <id>17859</id>
      </contributor>
      <minor />
      <comment>added [[Category:Greċja antika]] using [[Help:Gadget-HotCat|HotCat]]</comment>
      <origin>330226</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="89271" sha1="c2y0t56e2ra3g1zcxo65yts7uo8g5lo" xml:space="preserve">Id-'''demokrazija''' hija forma ta' governanza li permezz tagħha l-poter [[Politika|politiku]] jinkiseb min-nies jew mill-popolazzjoni ta' stat. Skont definizzjoni minimalista tad-demokrazija, il-mexxejja jiġu eletti permezz ta' elezzjonijiet kompetittivi filwaqt li d-definizzjonijiet iktar wesgħin jew massimalisti jorbtu d-demokrazija mal-garanziji tal-libertajiet ċivili u d-drittijiet tal-[[bniedem]] apparti l-elezzjonijiet kompetittivi.

F'demokrazija diretta, il-poplu jkollu l-awtorità diretta li jagħmel deliberazzjonijiet u li jiddeċiedi dwar il-leġiżlazzjoni. F'demokrazija rappreżentattiva, il-poplu jagħżel l-uffiċjali tal-governanza permezz ta' elezzjonijiet. Id-definizzjoni ta' &quot;poplu&quot; u l-modi kif l-awtorità tiġi kondiviża fi ħdan il-poplu jew iddelegata minnu nbidlu mal-milja taż-żminijiet u b'rati li jvarjaw minn pajjiż għal ieħor. Il-karatteristiċi tad-demokrazija spiss jinkludu l-libertà tal-ġemgħa, il-libertà tal-assoċjazzjoni, il-proprjetà personali, il-libertà tar-[[reliġjon]] u tal-kelma, iċ-ċittadinanza, il-kunsens ta' dawk li jiġu ggvernati, id-drittijiet tal-votazzjoni, il-libertà miċ-ċaħda governattiva mhux ġustifikata tad-dritt tal-ħajja u tal-libertà, u d-drittijiet tal-minoranzi.

In-nozzjoni tad-demokrazija evolviet b'mod konsiderevoli maż-żmien. Matul l-[[Storja|istorja]], wieħed jista' jsib evidenza ta' demokrazija diretta, fejn il-komunitajiet kienu jieħdu deċiżjonijiet permezz ta' ġemgħat popolari. Illum il-ġurnata, il-forma dominanti tad-demokrazija hija d-demokrazija rappreżentattiva, fejn iċ-ċittadini jeleġġu lill-uffiċjali tal-gvern biex jiggvernaw f'isimhom, pereżempju f'demokrazija parlamentari jew presidenzjali. Fil-varjant komuni tad-demokrazija liberali, is-setgħat tal-maġġoranza jiġu eżerċitati fi ħdan il-qafas ta' demokrazija rappreżentattiva, iżda l-kostituzzjoni u l-qorti suprema jillimitaw lill-maġġoranza u jipproteġu lill-minoranzi — normalment billi jiġi żgurat li kulħadd igawdi minn ċerti drittijiet individwali, bħal-libertà tal-kelma jew il-libertà tal-assoċjazzjoni.

It-terminu tfaċċa fis-seklu 5 [[Ante Christum natum|Q.K]]. fil-bliet-stati [[Greċja antika|Griegi]], b'mod partikolari f'[[Ateni]] Klassika, u kien ifisser &quot;it-tmexxija tal-poplu&quot;, b'kuntrast mal-aristokrazija (bil-[[Lingwa Griega|Grieg]]: ἀριστοκρατία, ''aristokratía''), li tfisser &quot;it-tmexxija tal-elit&quot;. Prattikament fil-gvernijiet demokratiċi kollha tul l-istorja tal-qedem u moderna, iċ-ċittadinanza demokratika inizjalment kienet ristretta għal klassi tal-elit, li iktar 'il quddiem ġiet estiża għaċ-ċittadini adulti kollha. Fil-biċċa l-kbira tad-demokraziji moderni, dan inkiseb permezz tal-movimenti tas-suffraġju tas-sekli 19 u 20.

Id-demokrazija tikkuntrasta mal-forom ta' governanza fejn il-poter ma jinbitx mill-popolazzjoni ġenerali ta' stat, pereżempju s-sistemi awtoritarji. Storikament is-sistemi demokratiċi kienu forma rari u vulnerabbli ta' governanza, iżda dawn saru iktar prevalenti mis-seklu 19 'l hawn, b'mod partikolari permezz ta' diversi mewġiet ta' demokratizzazzjoni. Id-demokrazija għandha leġittimità konsiderevoli fid-dinja moderna, peress li l-opinjoni pubblika fir-reġjuni dinjin normalment huma favur is-sistemi demokratiċi ta' governanza meta mqabbla mal-alternattivi, u peress li saħansitra l-istati awtoritarji jippruvaw ipinġu lilhom infushom bħala demokratiċi. Id-demokrazija b'mod iktar konsistenti tirriżulta f'saħħa, f'[[edukazzjoni]] u f'eżiti ekonomiċi mtejba. Skont l-indiċijiet ta' ''V-Dem Democracy'' u l-Indiċi tad-Demokrazija ta' ''The Economist'', inqas minn nofs il-popolazzjoni tad-dinja tgħix f'demokrazija mill-2022. Fl-istess ħin, filwaqt li d-demokrazija rappreżentattivi tingħata valur siewi b'mod mifrux, iċ-Ċentru tar-Riċerka ta' Pew sab li l-garr rigward il-prestazzjoni demokratika huwa komuni saħansitra f'bosta demokraziji stabbiliti.

== Karatteristiċi ==
Although democracy is in purely representative democracies understood to be defined by voting, no consensus exists on a precise definition of democracy  (see also ''In the search of common understanding'' below), There are many approaches. A study identified 2,234 adjectives used to describe democracy in the English language.

Yet, there is a more profound understanding – like that of Abraham Lincoln:

: ''&quot;Government of the people, by the people, for the people&quot;''

or of Karl Popper saying that the ''&quot;classical&quot;'' view of democracy is, ''&quot;in brief, the theory that'':

: ''democracy is the rule of the people and that the people have a right to rule''.

Democratic principles are reflected in all eligible citizens being equal before the law and having equal access to legislative processes.

For example, in a representative democracy, every vote has (in theory) equal weight, and the freedom of eligible citizens is secured by legitimised rights and liberties which are typically enshrined in a constitution, while other uses of &quot;democracy&quot; may encompass direct democracy, in which citizens vote on issues directly. According to the United Nations, democracy &quot;provides an environment that respects human rights and fundamental freedoms, and in which the freely expressed will of people is exercised.&quot;

One theory holds that democracy requires three fundamental principles: upward control (sovereignty residing at the lowest levels of authority), political equality, and social norms by which individuals and institutions only consider acceptable acts that reflect the first two principles of upward control and political equality. Legal equality, political freedom and rule of law are often identified by commentators as foundational characteristics for a well-functioning democracy.

In some countries, notably in the United Kingdom (which originated the Westminster system), the dominant principle is that of parliamentary sovereignty, while maintaining judicial independence. In India, parliamentary sovereignty is subject to the Constitution of India which includes judicial review. Though the term &quot;democracy&quot; is typically used in the context of a political state, the principles also are potentially applicable to private organisations, such as clubs, societies and firms.

Democracies may use many different decision-making methods, but majority rule is the dominant form. Without compensation, like legal protections of individual or group rights, political minorities can be oppressed by the &quot;tyranny of the majority&quot;. Majority rule involves a competitive approach, opposed to consensus democracy, creating the need that elections, and generally deliberation, be substantively and procedurally &quot;fair&quot;, i.e., just and equitable. In some countries, freedom of political expression, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press are considered important to ensure that voters are well informed, enabling them to vote according to their own interests and beliefs.

It has also been suggested that a basic feature of democracy is the capacity of all voters to participate freely and fully in the life of their society. With its emphasis on notions of social contract and the collective will of all the voters, democracy can also be characterised as a form of political collectivism because it is defined as a form of government in which all eligible citizens have an equal say in lawmaking.

Republics, though often popularly associated with democracy because of the shared principle of rule by consent of the governed, are not necessarily democracies, as republicanism does not specify ''how'' the people are to rule. Classically the term &quot;republic&quot; encompassed both democracies and aristocracies and their mixtures. In a modern sense the republican form of government is a form of government without a monarch. Because of this, democracies can be republics or constitutional monarchies, such as the United Kingdom, where the monarch is not a ruler.

== Storja ==
Democratic assemblies are as old as the human species and are found throughout human history, but up until the nineteenth century, major political figures have largely opposed democracy. Republican theorists linked democracy to small size: as political units grew in size, the likelihood increased that the government would turn despotic. At the same time, small political units were vulnerable to conquest. Montesquieu wrote, &quot;If a republic be small, it is destroyed by a foreign force; if it is large, it is ruined by an internal imperfection.&quot; According to Johns Hopkins University political scientist Daniel Deudney, the creation of the United States, with its large size and its system of checks and balances, was a solution to the dual problems of size. Forms of democracy occurred organically in societies around the world that had no contact with each other.

=== Oriġini ===

==== Greċja u Ruma ====
The term ''democracy'' first appeared in ancient Greek political and philosophical thought in the city-state of Athens during classical antiquity. The word comes from ''dêmos'' '(common) people' and ''krátos'' 'force/might'. Under Cleisthenes, what is generally held as the first example of a type of democracy in the sixth-century BC (508–507 BC) was established in Athens. Cleisthenes is referred to as &quot;the father of Athenian democracy&quot;. The first attested use of the word democracy is found in prose works of the 430s BC, such as Herodotus' ''Histories'', but its usage was older by several decades, as two Athenians born in the 470s were named Democrates, a new political name—likely in support of democracy—given at a time of debates over constitutional issues in Athens. Aeschylus also strongly alludes to the word in his play ''The Suppliants'', staged in c.463 BC, where he mentions &quot;the demos's ruling hand&quot; [''demou kratousa cheir'']. Before that time, the word used to define the new political system of Cleisthenes was probably isonomia, meaning political equality.

Athenian democracy took the form of direct democracy, and it had two distinguishing features: the random selection of ordinary citizens to fill the few existing government administrative and judicial offices, and a legislative assembly consisting of all Athenian citizens. All eligible citizens were allowed to speak and vote in the assembly, which set the laws of the city-state. However, Athenian citizenship excluded women, slaves, foreigners (μέτοικοι / ''métoikoi''), and youths below the age of military service.&lt;sup&gt;[''contradictory'']&lt;/sup&gt; Effectively, only 1 in 4 residents in Athens qualified as citizens. Owning land was not a requirement for citizenship. The exclusion of large parts of the population from the citizen body is closely related to the ancient understanding of citizenship. In most of antiquity the benefit of citizenship was tied to the obligation to fight war campaigns.

Athenian democracy was not only ''direct'' in the sense that decisions were made by the assembled people, but also the ''most direct'' in the sense that the people through the assembly, boule and courts of law controlled the entire political process and a large proportion of citizens were involved constantly in the public business. Even though the rights of the individual were not secured by the Athenian constitution in the modern sense (the ancient Greeks had no word for &quot;rights&quot;), those who were citizens of Athens enjoyed their liberties not in opposition to the government but by living in a city that was not subject to another power and by not being subjects themselves to the rule of another person.

Range voting appeared in Sparta as early as 700 BC. The Spartan ecclesia was an assembly of the people, held once a month, in which every male citizen of at least 20 years of age could participate. In the assembly, Spartans elected leaders and cast votes by range voting and shouting (the vote is then decided on how loudly the crowd shouts). Aristotle called this &quot;childish&quot;, as compared with the stone voting ballots used by the Athenian citizenry. Sparta adopted it because of its simplicity, and to prevent any biased voting, buying, or cheating that was predominant in the early democratic elections.

In addition, the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom created a system with a democratic element in the form of many different popular assamblies.

Even though the Roman Republic contributed significantly to many aspects of democracy, only a fraction of Romans were citizens with votes in elections for magistrates. The votes of the powerful were given more weight through a system of weighted voting, so most high officials, including members of the Senate, came from a few wealthy and noble families. The Roman model of governance inspired many political thinkers over the centuries.

==== Indja tal-qedem ====
Vaishali, capital city of the Vajjika League (Vrijji mahajanapada) of India, is considered one of the first examples of a republic around the 6th century BC.

==== Amerki ====
Other cultures, such as the Iroquois in the Americas also developed a form of democratic society between 1450 and 1660 (and possibly in 1142), well before contact with the Europeans. This democracy continues to the present day and is the world's oldest standing representative democracy.

=== Medju Evu ===
While most regions in Europe during the Middle Ages were ruled by clergy or feudal lords, there existed various systems involving elections or assemblies, although often only involving a small part of the population. In Scandinavia, bodies known as things consisted of freemen presided by a lawspeaker. These deliberative bodies were responsible for settling political questions, and variants included the Althing in Iceland and the Løgting in the Faeroe Islands. The veche, found in Eastern Europe, was a similar body to the Scandinavian thing. In the Roman Catholic Church, the pope has been elected by a papal conclave composed of cardinals since 1059. The first documented parliamentary body in Europe was the Cortes of León. Established by Alfonso IX in 1188, the Cortes had authority over setting taxation, foreign affairs and legislating, though the exact nature of its role remains disputed. The Republic of Ragusa, established in 1358 and centered around the city of Dubrovnik, provided representation and voting rights to its male aristocracy only. Various Italian city-states and polities had republic forms of government. For instance, the Republic of Florence, established in 1115, was led by the Signoria whose members were chosen by sortition. In the 10th–15th century Frisia, a distinctly non-feudal society, the right to vote on local matters and on county officials was based on land size. The Kouroukan Fouga divided the Mali Empire into ruling clans (lineages) that were represented at a great assembly called the ''Gbara''. However, the charter made Mali more similar to a constitutional monarchy than a democratic republic.

The Parliament of England had its roots in the restrictions on the power of kings written into Magna Carta (1215), which explicitly protected certain rights of the King's subjects and implicitly supported what became the English writ of habeas corpus, safeguarding individual freedom against unlawful imprisonment with the right to appeal. The first representative national assembly in England was Simon de Montfort's Parliament in 1265. The emergence of petitioning is some of the earliest evidence of parliament being used as a forum to address the general grievances of ordinary people. However, the power to call parliament remained at the pleasure of the monarch.

Studies have linked the emergence of parliamentary institutions in Europe during the medieval period to urban agglomeration and the creation of new classes, such as artisans, as well as the presence of nobility and religious elites. Scholars have also linked the emergence of representative government to Europe's relative political fragmentation. Political scientist David Stasavage links the fragmentation of Europe, and its subsequent democratization, to the manner in which the Roman Empire collapsed: Roman territory was conquered by small fragmented groups of Germanic tribes, thus leading to the creation of small political units where rulers were relatively weak and needed the consent of the governed to ward off foreign threats.

In Poland, noble democracy was characterized by an increase in the activity of the middle nobility, which wanted to increase their share in exercising power at the expense of the magnates. Magnates dominated the most important offices in the state (secular and ecclesiastical) and sat on the royal council, later the senate. The growing importance of the middle nobility had an impact on the establishment of the institution of the land ''sejmik'' (local assembly), which subsequently obtained more rights. During the fifteenth and first half of the sixteenth century, sejmiks received more and more power and became the most important institutions of local power. In 1454, Casimir IV Jagiellon granted the sejmiks the right to decide on taxes and to convene a mass mobilization in the Nieszawa Statutes. He also pledged not to create new laws without their consent.

=== Era moderna ===

==== Perjodu modern bikri ====
In 17th century England, there was renewed interest in Magna Carta. The Parliament of England passed the Petition of Right in 1628 which established certain liberties for subjects. The English Civil War (1642–1651) was fought between the King and an oligarchic but elected Parliament, during which the idea of a political party took form with groups debating rights to political representation during the Putney Debates of 1647. Subsequently, the Protectorate (1653–59) and the English Restoration (1660) restored more autocratic rule, although Parliament passed the Habeas Corpus Act in 1679 which strengthened the convention that forbade detention lacking sufficient cause or evidence. After the Glorious Revolution of 1688, the Bill of Rights was enacted in 1689 which codified certain rights and liberties and is still in effect. The Bill set out the requirement for regular elections, rules for freedom of speech in Parliament and limited the power of the monarch, ensuring that, unlike much of Europe at the time, royal absolutism would not prevail. Economic historians Douglass North and Barry Weingast have characterized the institutions implemented in the Glorious Revolution as a resounding success in terms of restraining the government and ensuring protection for property rights.

Renewed interest in the Magna Carta, the English Civil War, and the Glorious Revolution in the 17th century prompted the growth of political philosophy on the British Isles. Thomas Hobbes was the first philosopher to articulate a detailed social contract theory. Writing in the ''Leviathan'' (1651), Hobbes theorized that individuals living in the state of nature led lives that were &quot;solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short&quot; and constantly waged a war of all against all. In order to prevent the occurrence of an anarchic state of nature, Hobbes reasoned that individuals ceded their rights to a strong, authoritarian power. In other words, Hobbes advocated for an absolute monarchy which, in his opinion, was the best form of government. Later, philosopher and physician John Locke would posit a different interpretation of social contract theory. Writing in his ''Two Treatises of Government'' (1689), Locke posited that all individuals possessed the inalienable rights to life, liberty and estate (property). According to Locke, individuals would voluntarily come together to form a state for the purposes of defending their rights. Particularly important for Locke were property rights, whose protection Locke deemed to be a government's primary purpose. Furthermore, Locke asserted that governments were legitimate only if they held the consent of the governed. For Locke, citizens had the right to revolt against a government that acted against their interest or became tyrannical. Although they were not widely read during his lifetime, Locke's works are considered the founding documents of liberal thought and profoundly influenced the leaders of the American Revolution and later the French Revolution. His liberal democratic framework of governance remains the preeminent form of democracy in the world.

In the Cossack republics of Ukraine in the 16th and 17th centuries, the Cossack Hetmanate and Zaporizhian Sich, the holder of the highest post of Hetman was elected by the representatives from the country's districts.

In North America, representative government began in Jamestown, Virginia, with the election of the House of Burgesses (forerunner of the Virginia General Assembly) in 1619. English Puritans who migrated from 1620 established colonies in New England whose local governance was democratic; the hard power of these local assemblies varied greatly throughout the colonial time period however officially they held only small amounts of devolved power, as ultimate authority belonged to the Crown and Parliament. The Puritans (Pilgrim Fathers), Baptists, and Quakers who founded these colonies applied the democratic organisation of their congregations also to the administration of their communities in worldly matters.

==== Sekli 18 u 19 ====
The first Parliament of Great Britain was established in 1707, after the merger of the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland under the Acts of Union. Two key documents of the UK's uncodified constitution, the English Declaration of Right, 1689 (restated in the Bill of Rights 1689) and the Scottish Claim of Right 1689, had both cemented Parliament's position as the supreme law-making body and said that the &quot;election of members of Parliament ought to be free&quot;. However, Parliament was only elected by male property owners, which amounted to 3% of the population in 1780. The first known British person of African heritage to vote in a general election, Ignatius Sancho, voted in 1774 and 1780.

During the Age of Liberty in Sweden (1718–1772), civil rights were expanded and power shifted from the monarch to parliament. The taxed peasantry was represented in parliament, although with little influence, but commoners without taxed property had no suffrage.

The creation of the short-lived Corsican Republic in 1755 was an early attempt to adopt a democratic constitution (all men and women above age of 25 could vote). This Corsican Constitution was the first based on Enlightenment principles and included female suffrage, something that was not included in most other democracies until the 20th century.

Colonial America had similar property qualifications as Britain, and in the period before 1776 the abundance and availability of land meant that large numbers of colonists met such requirements with at least 60 per cent of adult white males able to vote. The great majority of white men were farmers who met the property ownership or taxpaying requirements. With few exceptions, no blacks or women could vote. Vermont, which, on declaring independence of Great Britain in 1777, adopted a constitution modelled on Pennsylvania's citizenship and democratic suffrage for males with or without property. The United States Constitution of 1787 is the oldest surviving, still active, governmental codified constitution. The Constitution provided for an elected government and protected civil rights and liberties, but did not end slavery nor extend voting rights in the United States, instead leaving the issue of suffrage to the individual states. Generally, states limited suffrage to white male property owners and taxpayers. At the time of the first Presidential election in 1789, about 6% of the population was eligible to vote. The Naturalization Act of 1790 limited U.S. citizenship to whites only. The Bill of Rights in 1791 set limits on government power to protect personal freedoms but had little impact on judgements by the courts for the first 130 years after ratification.

In 1789, Revolutionary France adopted the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen and, although short-lived, the National Convention was elected by all men in 1792. The Polish-Lithuanian Constitution of 3 May 1791 sought to implement a more effective constitutional monarchy, introduced political equality between townspeople and nobility, and placed the peasants under the protection of the government, mitigating the worst abuses of serfdom. In force for less than 19 months, it was declared null and void by the Grodno Sejm that met in 1793. Nonetheless, the 1791 Constitution helped keep alive Polish aspirations for the eventual restoration of the country's sovereignty over a century later.

In the United States, the 1828 presidential election was the first in which non-property-holding white males could vote in the vast majority of states. Voter turnout soared during the 1830s, reaching about 80% of the adult white male population in the 1840 presidential election. North Carolina was the last state to abolish property qualification in 1856 resulting in a close approximation to universal white male suffrage (however tax-paying requirements remained in five states in 1860 and survived in two states until the 20th century). In the 1860 United States census, the slave population had grown to four million, and in Reconstruction after the Civil War, three constitutional amendments were passed: the 13th Amendment (1865) that ended slavery; the 14th Amendment (1869) that gave black people citizenship, and the 15th Amendment (1870) that gave black males a nominal right to vote. Full enfranchisement of citizens was not secured until after the civil rights movement gained passage by the US Congress of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The voting franchise in the United Kingdom was expanded and made more uniform in a series of reforms that began with the Reform Act 1832 and continued into the 20th century, notably with the Representation of the People Act 1918 and the Equal Franchise Act 1928. Universal male suffrage was established in France in March 1848 in the wake of the French Revolution of 1848. During that year, several revolutions broke out in Europe as rulers were confronted with popular demands for liberal constitutions and more democratic government.

In 1876, the Ottoman Empire transitioned from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional one, and held two elections the next year to elect members to her newly formed parliament. Provisional Electoral Regulations were issued, stating that the elected members of the Provincial Administrative Councils would elect members to the first Parliament. Later that year, a new constitution was promulgated, which provided for a bicameral Parliament with a Senate appointed by the Sultan and a popularly elected Chamber of Deputies. Only men above the age of 30 who were competent in Turkish and had full civil rights were allowed to stand for election. Reasons for disqualification included holding dual citizenship, being employed by a foreign government, being bankrupt, employed as a servant, or having &quot;notoriety for ill deeds&quot;. Full universal suffrage was achieved in 1934.

In 1893, the self-governing colony New Zealand became the first country in the world (except for the short-lived 18th-century Corsican Republic) to establish active universal suffrage by recognizing women as having the right to vote.

==== Sekli 20 u 21 ====
20th-century transitions to liberal democracy have come in successive &quot;waves of democracy&quot;, variously resulting from wars, revolutions, decolonisation, and religious and economic circumstances. Global waves of &quot;democratic regression&quot; reversing democratization, have also occurred in the 1920s and 30s, in the 1960s and 1970s, and in the 2010s.

World War I and the dissolution of the autocratic Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian empires resulted in the creation of new nation-states in Europe, most of them at least nominally democratic. In the 1920s democratic movements flourished and women's suffrage advanced, but the Great Depression brought disenchantment and most of the countries of Europe, Latin America, and Asia turned to strong-man rule or dictatorships. Fascism and dictatorships flourished in Nazi Germany, Italy, Spain and Portugal, as well as non-democratic governments in the Baltics, the Balkans, Brazil, Cuba, China, and Japan, among others.

World War II brought a definitive reversal of this trend in Western Europe. The democratisation of the American, British, and French sectors of occupied Germany (disputed), Austria, Italy, and the occupied Japan served as a model for the later theory of government change. However, most of Eastern Europe, including the Soviet sector of Germany fell into the non-democratic Soviet-dominated bloc.

The war was followed by decolonisation, and again most of the new independent states had nominally democratic constitutions. India emerged as the world's largest democracy and continues to be so. Countries that were once part of the British Empire often adopted the British Westminster system.

In 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights mandated democracy:&lt;blockquote&gt;3. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.&lt;/blockquote&gt;— Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 21, United Nations, 1948

By 1960, the vast majority of country-states were nominally democracies, although most of the world's populations lived in nominal democracies that experienced sham elections, and other forms of subterfuge (particularly in &quot;Communist&quot; states and the former colonies). A subsequent wave of democratisation brought substantial gains toward true liberal democracy for many states, dubbed &quot;third wave of democracy&quot;. Portugal, Spain, and several of the military dictatorships in South America returned to civilian rule in the 1970s and 1980s. This was followed by countries in East and South Asia by the mid-to-late 1980s. Economic malaise in the 1980s, along with resentment of Soviet oppression, contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union, the associated end of the Cold War, and the democratisation and liberalisation of the former Eastern bloc countries. The most successful of the new democracies were those geographically and culturally closest to western Europe, and they are now either part of the European Union or candidate states. In 1986, after the toppling of the most prominent Asian dictatorship, the only democratic state of its kind at the time emerged in the Philippines with the rise of Corazon Aquino, who would later be known as the mother of Asian democracy.

The liberal trend spread to some states in Africa in the 1990s, most prominently in South Africa. Some recent examples of attempts of liberalisation include the Indonesian Revolution of 1998, the Bulldozer Revolution in Yugoslavia, the Rose Revolution in Georgia, the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, the Cedar Revolution in Lebanon, the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan, and the Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia.

According to Freedom House, in 2007 there were 123 electoral democracies (up from 40 in 1972). According to ''World Forum on Democracy'', electoral democracies now represent 120 of the 192 existing countries and constitute 58.2 per cent of the world's population. At the same time liberal democracies i.e. countries Freedom House regards as free and respectful of basic human rights and the rule of law are 85 in number and represent 38 per cent of the global population. Also in 2007 the United Nations declared 15 September the International Day of Democracy.

Many countries reduced their voting age to 18 years; the major democracies began to do so in the 1970s starting in Western Europe and North America.&lt;sup&gt;[''failed verification'']&lt;/sup&gt; Most electoral democracies continue to exclude those younger than 18 from voting. The voting age has been lowered to 16 for national elections in a number of countries, including Brazil, Austria, Cuba, and Nicaragua. In California, a 2004 proposal to permit a quarter vote at 14 and a half vote at 16 was ultimately defeated. In 2008, the German parliament proposed but shelved a bill that would grant the vote to each citizen at birth, to be used by a parent until the child claims it for themselves.

According to Freedom House, starting in 2005, there have been 17 consecutive years in which declines in political rights and civil liberties throughout the world have outnumbered improvements, as populist and nationalist political forces have gained ground everywhere from Poland (under the Law and Justice party) to the Philippines (under Rodrigo Duterte). In a Freedom House report released in 2018, Democracy Scores for most countries declined for the 12th consecutive year. ''The Christian Science Monitor'' reported that nationalist and populist political ideologies were gaining ground, at the expense of rule of law, in countries like Poland, Turkey and Hungary. For example, in Poland, the President appointed 27 new Supreme Court judges over legal objections from the European Commission. In Turkey, thousands of judges were removed from their positions following a failed coup attempt during a government crackdown .

&quot;Democratic backsliding&quot; in the 2010s were attributed to economic inequality and social discontent, personalism, poor government's management of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as other factors such as manipulation of civil society, &quot;toxic polarization&quot;, foreign disinformation campaigns, racism and nativism, excessive executive power, and decreased power of the opposition. Within English-speaking Western democracies, &quot;protection-based&quot; attitudes combining cultural conservatism and leftist economic attitudes were the strongest predictor of support for authoritarian modes of governance.

== Teorija ==
=== Teorija bikrija ===
Aristotle's '''democratic theory''' contrasted rule by the many (democracy/timocracy), with rule by the few (oligarchy/aristocracy/elitism), and with rule by a single person (tyranny/autocracy/absolute monarchy). He also thought that there was a good and a bad variant of each system (he considered democracy to be the degenerate counterpart to timocracy).

A common view among early and renaissance Republican theorists was that democracy could only survive in small political communities. Heeding the lessons of the Roman Republic's shift to monarchism as it grew larger or smaller, these Republican theorists held that the expansion of territory and population inevitably led to tyranny. Democracy was therefore highly fragile and rare historically, as it could only survive in small political units, which due to their size were vulnerable to conquest by larger political units. Montesquieu famously said, &quot;if a republic is small, it is destroyed by an outside force; if it is large, it is destroyed by an internal vice.&quot; Jean-Jacques Rousseau asserted, &quot;It is, therefore the natural property of small states to be governed as a republic, of middling ones to be subject to a monarch, and of large empires to be swayed by a despotic prince.&quot;

=== Teorija kontemporanja ===
Fost it-teoriċi politiċi moderni, jeżistu kunċetti fundamentali differenti tad-demokrazija.

==== Aggregazzjoni ====
The theory of aggregative democracy claims that the aim of the democratic processes is to solicit citizens' preferences and aggregate them together to determine what social policies society should adopt. Therefore, proponents of this view hold that democratic participation should primarily focus on voting, where the policy with the most votes gets implemented. Different variants of aggregative democracy exist.

According to the minimalist democracy conception, elections are a mechanism for competition between politicians. Joseph Schumpeter articulated this view famously in his book ''Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy''.

Anthony Downs argues that ideological political parties are necessary to act as a mediating broker between individuals and governments. On the other hand, direct democracy, where citizens vote directly on legislative proposals, can show better aggregation in cases of differences in preferences between elites and voters.

===== Mandat medjan =====
According to the median voter theorem the political representativeness can be evaluated by comparing how close laws and policies are to the views of the median voter along the political spectrum. The ''median mandate'' views the preferences of the median voter as granting political legitimacy.

==== Poliarkija ====
Robert A. Dahl argues that the fundamental democratic principle is that, when it comes to binding collective decisions, each person in a political community is entitled to have his/her interests be given equal consideration. He uses the term polyarchy (&quot;rule by many&quot;) to refer to societies in which there exists a certain set of institutions and procedures which are perceived as leading to such democracy. First and foremost among these institutions is the regular occurrence of free and open elections which are used to select representatives who then manage all or most of the public policy of the society. However, these polyarchic procedures may not create a full democracy if, for example, poverty prevents political participation. Similarly, Ronald Dworkin argues that &quot;democracy is a substantive, not a merely procedural, ideal.&quot;

==== Deliberazzjoni ====
Deliberative democracy is based on the notion that democracy is government by deliberation. Unlike aggregative democracy, deliberative democracy holds that, for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by authentic deliberation, not merely the aggregation of preferences that occurs in voting. Authentic deliberation is deliberation among decision-makers that is free from distortions of unequal political power, such as power a decision-maker obtained through economic wealth or the support of interest groups. If the decision-makers cannot reach consensus after authentically deliberating on a proposal, then they vote on the proposal using a form of majority rule. Citizens assemblies are considered by many scholars as practical examples of deliberative democracy, with a recent OECD report identifying citizens assemblies as an increasingly popular mechanism to involve citizens in governmental decision-making. Proponents of direct democracy view citizens do not rule themselves unless they directly decide laws and policies. Political activity can be valuable in itself, it socialises and educates citizens, and popular participation can check powerful elites.

==== Tipi ta' demokraziji governattivi ====
Democracy has taken a number of forms, both in theory and practice. Some varieties of democracy provide better representation and more freedom for their citizens than others. However, if any democracy is not structured to prohibit the government from excluding the people from the legislative process, or any branch of government from altering the separation of powers in its favour, then a branch of the system can accumulate too much power and destroy the democracy.

The following kinds of democracy are not exclusive of one another: many specify details of aspects that are independent of one another and can co-exist in a single system.

===== Forom bażiċi =====
Several variants of democracy exist, but there are two basic forms, both of which concern how the whole body of all eligible citizens executes its will. One form of democracy is direct democracy, in which all eligible citizens have active participation in the political decision making, for example voting on policy initiatives directly. In most modern democracies, the whole body of eligible citizens remain the sovereign power but political power is exercised indirectly through elected representatives; this is called a representative democracy.

If the head of state is democratically elected then the polity is called a democratic republic

====== Demokrazija diretta ======
Direct democracy is a political system where the citizens participate in the decision-making personally, contrary to relying on intermediaries or representatives. Proponents like Jean-Jacques Rousseau argue the direct approach increases legitimacy. A direct democracy gives the voting population the power to:

* Change constitutional laws,
* Put forth initiatives, referendums and suggestions for laws

Within modern-day representative governments, certain electoral tools like referendums, citizens' initiatives and recall elections are referred to as forms of direct democracy. However, some advocates of direct democracy argue for local assemblies of face-to-face discussion. Direct democracy as a government system currently exists in the Swiss cantons of Appenzell Innerrhoden and Glarus, the Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities, communities affiliated with the CIPO-RFM, the Bolivian city councils of FEJUVE, and Kurdish cantons of Rojava.

====== Demokrazija semidiretta ======
Some modern democracies that are predominantly representative in nature also heavily rely upon forms of political action that are directly democratic. These democracies, which combine elements of representative democracy and direct democracy, are termed ''semi-direct democracies'' or ''participatory democracies''. Examples include Switzerland and some U.S. states, where frequent use is made of referendums and initiatives.

The Swiss confederation is a semi-direct democracy. At the federal level, citizens can propose changes to the constitution (federal popular initiative) or ask for a referendum to be held on any law voted by the parliament. Between January 1995 and June 2005, Swiss citizens voted 31 times, to answer 103 questions (during the same period, French citizens participated in only two referendums). Although in the past 120 years less than 250 initiatives have been put to referendum.

Examples include the extensive use of referendums in the US state of California, which is a state that has more than 20 million voters.

In New England, town meetings are often used, especially in rural areas, to manage local government. This creates a hybrid form of government, with a local direct democracy and a representative state government. For example, most Vermont towns hold annual town meetings in March in which town officers are elected, budgets for the town and schools are voted on, and citizens have the opportunity to speak and be heard on political matters.

====== Sistema tax-xorti ======
The use of a lot system, a characteristic of Athenian democracy, is a feature of some versions of direct democracies. In this system, important governmental and administrative tasks are performed by citizens picked from a lottery.

====== Demokrazija rappreżentattiva ======
Representative democracy involves the election of government officials by the people being represented. The most common mechanisms involve election of the candidate with a majority or a plurality of the votes. Most western countries have representative systems.

Representatives may be elected or become diplomatic representatives by a particular district (or constituency), or represent the entire electorate through proportional systems, with some using a combination of the two. Some representative democracies also incorporate elements of direct democracy, such as referendums. A characteristic of representative democracy is that while the representatives are elected by the people to act in the people's interest, they retain the freedom to exercise their own judgement as how best to do so. Such reasons have driven criticism upon representative democracy, pointing out the contradictions of representation mechanisms with democracy.

====== Demokrazija Parlamentari ======
Parliamentary democracy is a representative democracy where government is appointed by or can be dismissed by, representatives as opposed to a &quot;presidential rule&quot; wherein the president is both head of state and the head of government and is elected by the voters. Under a parliamentary democracy, government is exercised by delegation to an executive ministry and subject to ongoing review, checks and balances by the legislative parliament elected by the people.

In a parliamentary system, the prime minister may be dismissed by the legislature at any point in time for not meeting the expectations of the legislature. This is done through a vote of no confidence where the legislature decides whether or not to remove the prime minister from office with majority support for dismissal. In some countries, the prime minister can also call an election at any point in time, typically when the prime minister believes that they are in good favour with the public as to get re-elected. In other parliamentary democracies, extra elections are virtually never held, a minority government being preferred until the next ordinary elections. An important feature of the parliamentary democracy is the concept of the &quot;loyal opposition&quot;. The essence of the concept is that the second largest political party (or opposition) opposes the governing party (or coalition), while still remaining loyal to the state and its democratic principles.

====== Demokrazija Presidenzjali ======
Presidential democracy is a system where the public elects the president through an election. The president serves as both the head of state and head of government controlling most of the executive powers. The president serves for a specific term and cannot exceed that amount of time. The legislature often has limited ability to remove a president from office. Elections typically have a fixed date and are not easily changed. The president has direct control over the cabinet, specifically appointing the cabinet members.

The executive usually has the responsibility to execute or implement legislation and may have the limited legislative powers, such as a veto. However, a legislative branch passes legislation and budgets. This provides some measure of separation of powers. In consequence, however, the president and the legislature may end up in the control of separate parties, allowing one to block the other and thereby interfere with the orderly operation of the state. This may be the reason why presidential democracy is not very common outside the Americas, Africa, and Central and Southeast Asia.

A semi-presidential system is a system of democracy in which the government includes both a prime minister and a president. The particular powers held by the prime minister and president vary by country.

==== Tipoloġija ====

===== Monarkija kostituzzjonali =====
Many countries such as the United Kingdom, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Scandinavian countries, Thailand, Japan and Bhutan turned powerful monarchs into constitutional monarchs (often gradually) with limited or symbolic roles. For example, in the predecessor states to the United Kingdom, constitutional monarchy began to emerge and has continued uninterrupted since the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and passage of the Bill of Rights 1689. Strongly limited constitutional monarchies, such as the United Kingdom, have been referred to as crowned republics by writers such as H. G. Wells.

In other countries, the monarchy was abolished along with the aristocratic system (as in France, China, Russia, Germany, Austria, Hungary, Italy, Greece, and Egypt). An elected person, with or without significant powers, became the head of state in these countries.

Elite upper houses of legislatures, which often had lifetime or hereditary tenure, were common in many states. Over time, these either had their powers limited (as with the British House of Lords) or else became elective and remained powerful (as with the Australian Senate).

===== Demokrazija repubblika =====
The term ''republic'' has many different meanings, but today often refers to a representative democracy with an elected head of state, such as a president, serving for a limited term, in contrast to states with a hereditary monarch as a head of state, even if these states also are representative democracies with an elected or appointed head of government such as a prime minister.

The Founding Fathers of the United States often criticised direct democracy; James Madison argued, especially in ''The Federalist'' No. 10, that what distinguished a direct ''democracy'' from a ''republic'' was that the former depended on small size and suffered more violently from the effects of faction, whereas a republic could get stronger as it got larger and combats faction by its very structure. Accordingly, during Philadelphia convention Madison called election of representatives by large territories &quot;the only defence against the inconveniencies of democracy consistent with the democratic form of Govt.&quot;

Professors Richard Ellis of Willamette University and Michael Nelson of Rhodes College argue that much constitutional thought, from Madison to Lincoln and beyond, has focused on &quot;the problem of majority tyranny&quot;. They conclude, &quot;The principles of republican government embedded in the Constitution represent an effort by the framers to ensure that the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness would not be trampled by majorities.&quot; What was critical to American values, John Adams insisted, was that the government be &quot;bound by fixed laws, which the people have a voice in making, and a right to defend.&quot; As Benjamin Franklin was exiting after writing the US Constitution, Elizabeth Willing Powel asked him &quot;Well, Doctor, what have we got—a republic or a monarchy?&quot;. He replied &quot;A republic—if you can keep it.&quot;

===== Demokrazija liberali =====
A liberal democracy is a representative democracy which enshrines a liberal political philosophy, where the ability of the elected representatives to exercise decision-making power is subject to the rule of law, moderated by a constitution or laws such as the protection of the rights and freedoms of individuals, and constrained on the extent to which the will of the majority can be exercised against the rights of minorities.

===== Demokrazija Soċjalista =====
Socialist thought has several different views on democracy, for example social democracy or democratic socialism. Many democratic socialists and social democrats believe in a form of participatory, industrial, economic and/or workplace democracy combined with a representative democracy.

===== Demokrazija Marxista =====
Marxist theory supports a democratic society centering the working class. Some Marxists and Trotskyists believe in direct democracy or workers' councils (which are sometimes called soviets). This system can begin with workplace democracy and can manifest itself as soviet democracy or dictatorship of the proletariat. Trotskyist groups have interpreted socialist democracy to be synonymous with multi-party far-left representation, autonomous union organizations, worker's control of production, internal party democracy and the mass participation of the working masses. Some communist parties support a soviet republic with democratic centralism. Within democracy in Marxism there can be hostility to what is commonly called &quot;liberal democracy&quot;.

===== Demokrazija Anarkista =====
Anarchists are split in this domain, depending on whether they believe that a majority-rule is tyrannic or not. To many anarchists, the only form of democracy considered acceptable is direct democracy. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon argued that the only acceptable form of direct democracy is one in which it is recognised that majority decisions are not binding on the minority, even when unanimous. However, anarcho-communist Murray Bookchin criticised individualist anarchists for opposing democracy, and says &quot;majority rule&quot; is consistent with anarchism.

Some anarcho-communists oppose the majoritarian nature of direct democracy, feeling that it can impede individual liberty and opt-in favour of a non-majoritarian form of consensus democracy, similar to Proudhon's position on direct democracy.

===== Demokrazija każwali =====
Sortition is the process of choosing decision-making bodies via a random selection. These bodies can be more representative of the opinions and interests of the people at large than an elected legislature or other decision-maker. The technique was in widespread use in Athenian Democracy and Renaissance Florence and is still used in modern jury selection and citizens' assemblies.

===== Demokrazija Kostituzzjonali =====
Consociational democracy, also called consociationalism, is a form of democracy based on power-sharing formula between elites representing the social groups within the society. In 1969, Arendt Lijphart argued this would stabilize democracies with factions. A consociational democracy allows for simultaneous majority votes in two or more ethno-religious constituencies, and policies are enacted only if they gain majority support from both or all of them. The Qualified majority voting rule in European Council of Ministers is a consociational democracy approach for supranational democracies. This system in Treaty of Rome allocates votes to member states in part according to their population, but heavily weighted in favour of the smaller states. A consociational democracy requires consensus of representatives, while consensus democracy requires consensus of electorate.

===== Demokrazija maġġoritarja =====
Majoritarian democracy is a form of democracy based upon a principle of majority rule. Majoritarian democracy contrasts with consensus democracy, rule by as many people as possible.

===== Konsensus =====
Consensus democracy requires consensus decision-making and supermajority to obtain a larger support than majority. In contrast, in majoritarian democracy minority opinions can potentially be ignored by vote-winning majorities. Constitutions typically require consensus or supermajorities.

===== Demokrazija etnika =====
The term ethnic democracy, as used by some political scientists, purports to describe a governance system that combines a structured ethnic dominance with democratic, political and civil rights for all. Both the dominant ethnic group—typically an ethnic majority—and the minority ethnic groups have citizenship and are able to fully participate in the political process. However, critics of the &quot;ethnic democracy&quot; model argue it is a contradiction in terms, and thus conceptually inadequate or confusing; these critics allege that purported ethnic democracies, most notably Israel, are not democratic at all, or are at best a sort of semi-democracy.

===== Demokrazija inklużiva =====
Inclusive democracy is a political theory and political project that aims for direct democracy in all fields of social life: political democracy in the form of face-to-face assemblies which are confederated, economic democracy in a stateless, moneyless and marketless economy, democracy in the social realm, i.e. self-management in places of work and education, and ecological democracy which aims to reintegrate society and nature. The theoretical project of inclusive democracy emerged from the work of political philosopher Takis Fotopoulos in &quot;Towards An Inclusive Democracy&quot; and was further developed in the journal ''Democracy &amp; Nature'' and its successor ''The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy''.

===== Politika parteċipattiva =====
A parpolity or participatory polity is a theoretical form of democracy that is ruled by a nested council structure. The guiding philosophy is that people should have decision-making power in proportion to how much they are affected by the decision. Local councils of 25–50 people are completely autonomous on issues that affect only them, and these councils send delegates to higher level councils who are again autonomous regarding issues that affect only the population affected by that council.

A council court of randomly chosen citizens serves as a check on the tyranny of the majority, and rules on which body gets to vote on which issue. Delegates may vote differently from how their sending council might wish but are mandated to communicate the wishes of their sending council. Delegates are recallable at any time. Referendums are possible at any time via votes of lower-level councils, however, not everything is a referendum as this is most likely a waste of time. A parpolity is meant to work in tandem with a participatory economy.

===== Demokrazija proċedurali =====
Procedural democracy or proceduralist democracy, proceduralism or hollow democracy is a term used to denote the particular procedures, such as regular elections based on universal suffrage, that produce an electorally-legitimated government. Procedural democracy, with its centering of electoral processes as the basis of democratic legitimacy, is often contrasted with substantive or participatory democracy, which centers the equal participation of all groups in society in the political process as the basis of legitimacy.

===== Demokrazija radikali =====
Radical democracy is based on the idea that there are hierarchical and oppressive power relations that exist in society. Radical democracy's role is to make visible and challenge those relations by allowing for difference, dissent and antagonisms in decision-making processes.

===== Demokrazija reliġjuża =====
Religious democracy is a form of democracy where the values of a particular religion or state religion are preferred. The term applies to all democratic countries in which religion is incorporated into the form of government.

===== Demokrazija kożmopolitana =====
Cosmopolitan democracy, also known as ''global democracy'' or ''world federalism'', is a political system in which democracy is implemented on a global scale, either directly or through representatives. An important justification for this kind of system is that the decisions made in national or regional democracies often affect people outside the constituency who, by definition, cannot vote. By contrast, in a cosmopolitan democracy, the people who are affected by decisions also have a say in them.

According to its supporters, any attempt to solve global problems is undemocratic without some form of cosmopolitan democracy. The general principle of cosmopolitan democracy is to expand some or all of the values and norms of democracy, including the rule of law; the non-violent resolution of conflicts; and equality among citizens, beyond the limits of the state. To be fully implemented, this would require reforming existing international organisations, e.g., the United Nations, as well as the creation of new institutions such as a World Parliament, which ideally would enhance public control over, and accountability in, international politics.

Cosmopolitan democracy has been promoted, among others, by physicist Albert Einstein, writer Kurt Vonnegut, columnist George Monbiot, and professors David Held and Daniele Archibugi. The creation of the International Criminal Court in 2003 was seen as a major step forward by many supporters of this type of cosmopolitan democracy.

===== Demokrazija kreattiva =====
Creative democracy is advocated by American philosopher John Dewey. The main idea about creative democracy is that democracy encourages individual capacity building and the interaction among the society. Dewey argues that democracy is a way of life in his work of &quot;Creative Democracy: The Task Before Us&quot; and an experience built on faith in human nature, faith in human beings, and faith in working with others. Democracy, in Dewey's view, is a moral ideal requiring actual effort and work by people; it is not an institutional concept that exists outside of ourselves. &quot;The task of democracy&quot;, Dewey concludes, &quot;is forever that of creation of a freer and more humane experience in which all share and to which all contribute&quot;.

===== Demokrazija ggwidata =====
Guided democracy is a form of democracy that incorporates regular popular elections, but which often carefully &quot;guides&quot; the choices offered to the electorate in a manner that may reduce the ability of the electorate to truly determine the type of government exercised over them. Such democracies typically have only one central authority which is often not subject to meaningful public review by any other governmental authority. Russian-style democracy has often been referred to as a &quot;guided democracy&quot;. Russian politicians have referred to their government as having only one center of power/ authority, as opposed to most other forms of democracy which usually attempt to incorporate two or more naturally competing sources of authority within the same government.

=== Tfittxija ta' fehim komuni ===
The search for a common approach to conceptualize, measure and compare democracy remains a challenge in modern political science. This challenge strikes through to measuring, assessing and comparing the quality of democracy, as Seva Gunitsky pointed in 2015 in the Washington Post, based upon his research for ''Ranking the World – Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance'', that measuring democracy can mislead as much as clarify – a problem for academics, policy-makers and anyone who cares about democracy.

In his contribution ''Lost in the Gray Zone: Competing Measures of Democracy in the Former Soviet Republics'' to ''Ranking the World'', he, on the example of former Soviet republics, examines fundamental problems with measures of democracy, observing that indices often disagree and occasionally draw contradictory conclusions from observing the same event. He argues, that this reflects inherent tradeoffs in conceptualizing democratic governance, which arise from fundamental normative disagreements about a highly contested concept.

In 2011, Michael Coppedge, John Gerring et al. proposed an approach to such conceptualization and measurement. In their paper ''Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach'' they review some of the weaknesses among contemporary and older approaches, then lay out their approach, characterizing it as ''historical'', ''multidimensional'', ''disaggregated'', and ''transparent''. The authors propose to create a new set of four features to conceptualize and measure democracy. First, ''historical'', extending indicators of democracy back through modern history, wherever possible. Second, a ''multidimensional'' approach to the problem of conceptualizing democracy. Third, to collect information relevant to democracy at a highly ''disaggregated'' level. Fourth, ''transparent'', a strategy for data collection and presentation that should enhance the precision, validity, transparency, and legitimacy of the resulting indicators. They also sum up the conceptions, and/or aspects, of democracy into six – ''electoral'', ''liberal'', ''majoritarian'', ''participatory'', ''deliberative'', and ''egalitarian'', which taken together offer a fairly comprehensive accounting of the concept of democracy as it is employed today (see overview in the table below).
{| class=&quot;wikitable&quot;
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |Conceptions of democracy by Michael Coppedge, John Gerring et al., 2011
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
| 
| 
|Principles
|Question
|Institutions
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|I.
|'''Electoral'''
|Contestation, competition
|Are government offices filled by free and fair multiparty elections?
|Elections, political parties, competitiveness and turnover
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|II.
|'''Liberal'''
|Limited government, multiple veto points, horizontal accountability, individual rights, civil liberties, transparency
|Is political power decentralized &amp; constrained?
|Multiple, independent, and decentralized, with special focus on the role of the media, interest groups, the judiciary, and a written constitution with explicit guarantees
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|III.
|'''Majoritarian'''
|Majority rule, centralization, vertical accountability
|Does the majority (or plurality) rule?
|Consolidated and centralized, with special focus on the role of political parties
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|IV.
|'''Participatory'''
|Government by the people
|Do ordinary citizens participate in politics?
|Election law, civil society, local government, direct democracy
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|V.
|'''Deliberative'''
|Government by reason
|Are political decisions the product of public deliberation?
|Media, hearings, panels, other deliberative bodies
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|VI.
|'''Egalitarian'''
|Political equality
|Are all citizens equally empowered?
|Designed to ensure equal participation, representation, protection, and politically relevant resources
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|}

=== Measurement of democracy ===
Main article: Measurement of democracy

Measurement of democracy varies according to the different fundamental conceptions of democracy. Minimalist democracy evaluations focus on free and fair elections, while maximalist democracy evaluates additional values, such as human rights, deliberation, economic outcomes or state capacity.

== Demokrazija mhux governattiva ==
Aside from the public sphere, similar democratic principles and mechanisms of voting and representation have been used to govern other kinds of groups. Many non-governmental organisations decide policy and leadership by voting. Most trade unions and cooperatives are governed by democratic elections. Corporations are ultimately governed by their shareholders through shareholder democracy. Corporations may also employ systems such as workplace democracy to handle internal governance. Amitai Etzioni has postulated a system that fuses elements of democracy with sharia law, termed Islamic democracy or ''Islamocracy''. There is also a growing number of Democratic educational institutions such as Sudbury schools that are co-governed by students and staff.

=== Demokrazija tal-azzjonisti ===
Shareholder democracy is a concept relating to the governance of corporations by their shareholders. In the United States, shareholders are typically granted voting rights according to the one share, one vote principle. Shareholders may vote annually to elect the company's board of directors, who themselves may choose the company's executives. The shareholder democracy framework may be inaccurate for companies which have different classes of stock that further alter the distribution of voting rights.

== Ġustifikazzjoni ==
Ingħataw diversi ġustifikazzjonijiet għad-demokrazija.

=== Leġittimità ===
Social contract theory argues that the legitimacy of government is based on consent of the governed, i.e. an election, and that political decisions must reflect the general will. The public legitimacy of democracy varies by country, in some countries religious texts have more public support than the will of the people.

=== Teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet aħjar ===
Condorcet's jury theorem is logical proof that if each decision-maker has a better than chance probability of making the right decision, then having the largest number of decision-makers, i.e. a democracy, will result in the best decisions. This has also been argued by theories of the wisdom of the crowd. Democracy tends to improve conflict resolution.

=== Suċċess ekonomiku ===
In ''Why Nations Fail'', economists Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson argue that democracies are more economically successful because undemocratic political systems tend to limit markets and favor monopolies at the expense of the creative destruction which is necessary for sustained economic growth.

A 2019 study by Acemoglu and others estimated that countries switching to democratic from authoritarian rule had on average a 20% higher GDP after 25 years than if they had remained authoritarian. The study examined 122 transitions to democracy and 71 transitions to authoritarian rule, occurring from 1960 to 2010. Acemoglu said this was because democracies tended to invest more in health care and human capital, and reduce special treatment of regime allies.

A 2023 study analyzed the long-term effects of democracy on economic prosperity using new data on GDP per capita and democracy for a dataset between 1789 and 2019. The results indicate that democracy substantially increases economic development.

Unemployment is associated with anti-democratic beliefs.

== Kritika ==
Democracy as a concept and as a practical form of government has been the subject of critique throughout history. Some critics consider that democratic regimes often fail to be true to the highest principles expected of them, while others reject the values promoted by constitutional democracy in whole or part.

Opposition to democracy goes as far back as Plato, who argued for a 'government of the best qualified'. More recently, James Madison extensively studied historic attempts at and arguments on democracy in his preparation for the Constitutional Convention, and Winston Churchill remarked that &quot;no one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.&quot;

Critics argue that modern democracies may fail to be sufficiently democratic and instead function in practice as oligarchies, insofar as governments are more responsive to the preferences of economic elites than to those of ordinary citizens. Numerous empirical studies across various western democracies including the United States, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Canada, Norway and Germany have consistently found that elected representatives tend to respond more to the preferences of very affluent citizens for policy outcomes than those of the average voter.

Some critics of democracy have highlighted the concept's inconsistencies, paradoxes, and limits: drawing contrasts with other forms of government, such as epistocracy or lottocracy. Others have characterized most modern democracies as democratic polyarchies and democratic aristocracies. Yet others have identified fascist moments in modern democracies. They have termed the societies produced by modern democracies as neo-feudal and have contrasted democracy with fascism, anarcho-capitalism, theocracy, and absolute monarchy.

== Tranżizzjonijiet demokratiċi ==
A democratic transition describes a phase in a country's political system, often created as a result of an incomplete change from an authoritarian regime to a democratic one (or vice versa).

=== Demokratizzazzjoni ===
Democratization, or democratisation, is the structural government transition from an authoritarian government to a more democratic political regime, including substantive political changes moving in a democratic direction. The opposite process of democratic transition is known as democratic backsliding or autocratization. Whether and to what extent democratization occurs can be influenced by various factors, including economic development, historical legacies, civil society, and international processes. Some accounts of democratization emphasize how elites drove democratization, whereas other accounts emphasize grassroots bottom-up processes. How democratization occurs has also been used to explain other political phenomena, such as whether a country goes to a war or whether its economy grows.

Several philosophers and researchers have outlined historical and social factors seen as supporting the evolution of democracy. Other commentators have mentioned the influence of economic development. In a related theory, Ronald Inglehart suggests that improved living-standards in modern developed countries can convince people that they can take their basic survival for granted, leading to increased emphasis on self-expression values, which correlates closely with democracy.

Douglas M. Gibler and Andrew Owsiak in their study argued about the importance of peace and stable borders for the development of democracy. It has often been assumed that democracy causes peace, but this study shows that, historically, peace has almost always predated the establishment of democracy.

Carroll Quigley concludes that the characteristics of weapons are the main predictor of democracy: Democracy—this scenario—tends to emerge only when the best weapons available are easy for individuals to obtain and use. By the 1800s, guns were the best personal weapons available, and in the United States of America (already nominally democratic), almost everyone could afford to buy a gun, and could learn how to use it fairly easily. Governments could not do any better: it became the age of mass armies of citizen soldiers with guns. Similarly, Periclean Greece was an age of the citizen soldier and democracy.

Other theories stressed the relevance of education and of human capital—and within them of cognitive ability to increasing tolerance, rationality, political literacy and participation. Two effects of education and cognitive ability are distinguished:&lt;sup&gt;[''need quotation to verify'']&lt;/sup&gt;

* a cognitive effect (competence to make rational choices, better information-processing)
* an ethical effect (support of democratic values, freedom, human rights etc.), which itself depends on intelligence.

Evidence consistent with conventional theories of why democracy emerges and is sustained has been hard to come by. Statistical analyses have challenged modernisation theory by demonstrating that there is no reliable evidence for the claim that democracy is more likely to emerge when countries become wealthier, more educated, or less unequal. In fact, empirical evidence shows that economic growth and education may not lead to increased demand for democratization as modernization theory suggests: historically, most countries attained high levels of access to primary education well before transitioning to democracy. Rather than acting as a catalyst for democratization, in some situations education provision may instead be used by non-democratic regimes to indoctrinate their subjects and strengthen their power.

The assumed link between education and economic growth is called into question when analyzing empirical evidence. Across different countries, the correlation between education attainment and math test scores is very weak (.07). A similarly weak relationship exists between per-pupil expenditures and math competency (.26). Additionally, historical evidence suggests that average human capital (measured using literacy rates) of the masses does not explain the onset of industrialization in France from 1750 to 1850 despite arguments to the contrary. Together, these findings show that education does not always promote human capital and economic growth as is generally argued to be the case. Instead, the evidence implies that education provision often falls short of its expressed goals, or, alternatively, that political actors use education to promote goals other than economic growth and development.

Some scholars have searched for the &quot;deep&quot; determinants of contemporary political institutions, be they geographical or demographic.

An example of this is the disease environment. Places with different mortality rates had different populations and productivity levels around the world. For example, in Africa, the tsetse fly—which afflicts humans and livestock—reduced the ability of Africans to plough the land. This made Africa less settled. As a consequence, political power was less concentrated. This also affected the colonial institutions European countries established in Africa. Whether colonial settlers could live or not in a place made them develop different institutions which led to different economic and social paths. This also affected the distribution of power and the collective actions people could take. As a result, some African countries ended up having democracies and others autocracies.

An example of geographical determinants for democracy is having access to coastal areas and rivers. This natural endowment has a positive relation with economic development thanks to the benefits of trade. Trade brought economic development, which in turn, broadened power. Rulers wanting to increase revenues had to protect property-rights to create incentives for people to invest. As more people had more power, more concessions had to be made by the ruler and in many places this process lead to democracy. These determinants defined the structure of the society moving the balance of political power.


Robert Michels asserts that although democracy can never be fully realised, democracy may be developed automatically in the act of striving for democracy:&lt;blockquote&gt;The peasant in the fable, when on his deathbed, tells his sons that a treasure is buried in the field. After the old man's death the sons dig everywhere in order to discover the treasure. They do not find it. But their indefatigable labor improves the soil and secures for them a comparative well-being. The treasure in the fable may well symbolise democracy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Democracy in modern times has almost always faced opposition from the previously existing government, and many times it has faced opposition from social elites. The implementation of a democratic government from a non-democratic state is typically brought by peaceful or violent democratic revolution.

The V-Dem Institute found 2026 ongoing democratization in 18 countries: Benin, Bolivia, Botswana, Bazil, Dominican Republic, Fiji, Guatemala, Lesotho, Mauritius, Montenegro, Poland, Seychelles, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Timor-Leste, Thailand, The Gambia, and Zambia.

===== Promozzjoni tad-demokrazija =====
Promotion of democracy can increase the quality of already existing democracies, reduce political apathy, and the chance of democratic backsliding. Democracy promotion measures include voting advice applications, participatory democracy, increasing electoral integrity, youth suffrage and civic education, reducing barriers to entry for new political parties, increasing proportionality, reducing presidentialism and aligning with median voter preferences.

=== Awtokratizzazzjoni ===
Democratic backsliding is a form of autocratization, a process of structural government transition toward authoritarianism in which the exercise of political power becomes less limited and more arbitrary and repressive. Democratic backsliding specifically assumes a starting point of a democratic system. The process typically restricts the space for public contest and political participation in the process of government selection. Democratic backsliding involves the weakening of democratic institutions, such as the peaceful transition of power or free and fair elections, or the violation of individual rights that underpin democracies, especially freedom of expression. Democratic backsliding is the opposite of democratization.&lt;sup&gt;[''citation needed'']&lt;/sup&gt;

Steven Levitsky says: &quot;It's not up to voters to defend a democracy. That's asking far, far too much of voters, to cast their ballot on the basis of some set of abstract principles or procedures. With the exception of a handful of cases, voters never, ever — in any society, in any culture — prioritize democracy over all else. Individual voters worry about much more mundane things, as is their right. It is up to élites and institutions to protect democracy — not voters.&quot;

The V-Dem Institute found 2026 ongoing democratic backsliding in 44 countries: Afghanistan, Argentina, Armenia, Belarus, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Central African Republic, Croatia, Georgia, Greece, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, El Salvador, Haiti, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Italy, Ivory Coast, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Mali, Madagascar, Mauretania, Mexico, Moldova, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Niger, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Slovakia, Slovenia, Senegal, Serbia, Romania, Togo, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and United States.

===== Tfixkil =====
Some democratic governments have experienced sudden state collapse and regime change to an undemocratic form of government. Domestic military coups or rebellions are the most common means by which democratic governments have been overthrown. (See List of coups and coup attempts by country and List of civil wars.) Examples include the Spanish Civil War, the Coup of 18 Brumaire that ended the French First Republic, and the 28 May 1926 coup d'état which ended the First Portuguese Republic. Some military coups are supported by foreign governments, such as the 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état and the 1953 Iranian coup d'état. Other types of a sudden end to democracy include:

* Invasion, for example the German occupation of Czechoslovakia, and the fall of South Vietnam.
* Self-coup, in which the leader of the government extra-legally seizes all power or unlawfully extends the term in office. This can be done through:
** Suspension of the constitution by decree, such as with the 1992 Peruvian coup d'état
** An &quot;electoral self-coup&quot; using election fraud to obtain re-election of a previously fairly elected official or political party. For example, in the 1999 Ukrainian presidential election, 2003 Russian legislative election, and 2004 Russian presidential election.
* Royal coup, in which a monarch not normally involved in government seizes all power. For example, the 6 January Dictatorship, begun in 1929 when King Alexander I of Yugoslavia dismissed parliament and started ruling by decree.

Democratic backsliding can end democracy in a gradual manner, by increasing emphasis on national security and eroding free and fair elections, freedom of expression, independence of the judiciary, rule of law. A famous example is the Enabling Act of 1933, which lawfully ended democracy in Weimar Germany and marked the transition to Nazi Germany.

Temporary or long-term political violence and government interference can prevent free and fair elections, which erode the democratic nature of governments. This has happened on a local level even in well-established democracies like the United States; for example, the Wilmington insurrection of 1898 and African-American disfranchisement after the Reconstruction era.

== Influwenza tal-midja ==
The theory of democracy relies on the implicit assumption that voters are well informed about social issues, policies, and candidates so that they can make a truly informed decision. Since the late 20th century there has been a growing concern that voters may be poorly informed due to the news media's focusing more on entertainment and gossip and less on serious journalistic research on political issues.

The media professors Michael Gurevitch and Jay Blumler have proposed a number of functions that the mass media are expected to fulfill in a democracy:

* Surveillance of the sociopolitical environment
* Meaningful agenda setting
* Platforms for an intelligible and illuminating advocacy
* Dialogue across a diverse range of views
* Mechanisms for holding officials to account for how they have exercised power
* Incentives for citizens to learn, choose, and become involved
* A principled resistance to the efforts of forces outside the media to subvert their independence, integrity, and ability to serve the audience
* A sense of respect for the audience member, as potentially concerned and able to make sense of his or her political environment

This proposal has inspired a lot of discussions over whether the news media are actually fulfilling the requirements that a well functioning democracy requires. Commercial mass media are generally not accountable to anybody but their owners, and they have no obligation to serve a democratic function. They are controlled mainly by economic market forces. Fierce economic competition may force the mass media to divert themselves from any democratic ideals and focus entirely on how to survive the competition.

The tabloidization and popularization of the news media is seen in an increasing focus on human examples rather than statistics and principles. There is more focus on politicians as personalities and less focus on political issues in the popular media. Election campaigns are covered more as horse races and less as debates about ideologies and issues. The dominating media focus on spin, conflict, and competitive strategies has made voters perceive the politicians as egoists rather than idealists. This fosters mistrust and a cynical attitude to politics, less civic engagement, and less interest in voting. The ability to find effective political solutions to social problems is hampered when problems tend to be blamed on individuals rather than on structural causes. This person-centered focus may have far-reaching consequences not only for domestic problems but also for foreign policy when international conflicts are blamed on foreign heads of state rather than on political and economic structures. A strong media focus on fear and terrorism has allowed military logic to penetrate public institutions, leading to increased surveillance and the erosion of civil rights.

The responsiveness and accountability of the democratic system is compromised when lack of access to substantive, diverse, and undistorted information is handicapping the citizens' capability of evaluating the political process. The fast pace and trivialization in the competitive news media is dumbing down the political debate. Thorough and balanced investigation of complex political issues does not fit into this format. The political communication is characterized by short time horizons, short slogans, simple explanations, and simple solutions. This is conducive to political populism rather than serious deliberation.

Commercial mass media are often differentiated along the political spectrum so that people can hear mainly opinions that they already agree with. Too much controversy and diverse opinions are not always profitable for the commercial news media. Political polarization is emerging when different people read different news and watch different TV channels. This polarization has been worsened by the emergence of the social media that allow people to communicate mainly with groups of like-minded people, the so-called echo chambers. Extreme political polarization may undermine the trust in democratic institutions, leading to erosion of civil rights and free speech and in some cases even reversion to autocracy.

Many media scholars have discussed non-commercial news media with public service obligations as a means to improve the democratic process by providing the kind of political contents that a free market does not provide. The World Bank has recommended public service broadcasting in order to strengthen democracy in developing countries. These broadcasting services should be accountable to an independent regulatory body that is adequately protected from interference from political and economic interests. Public service media have an obligation to provide reliable information to voters. Many countries have publicly funded radio and television stations with public service obligations, especially in Europe and Japan, while such media are weak or non-existent in other countries including the US. Several studies have shown that the stronger the dominance of commercial broadcast media over public service media, the less the amount of policy-relevant information in the media and the more focus on horse race journalism, personalities, and the pecadillos of politicians. Public service broadcasters are characterized by more policy-relevant information and more respect for journalistic norms and impartiality than the commercial media. However, the trend of deregulation has put the public service model under increased pressure from competition with commercial media.

The emergence of the internet and the social media has profoundly altered the conditions for political communication. The social media have given ordinary citizens easy access to voice their opinion and share information while bypassing the filters of the large news media. This is often seen as an advantage for democracy. The new possibilities for communication have fundamentally changed the way social movements and protest movements operate and organize. The internet and social media have provided powerful new tools for democracy movements in developing countries and emerging democracies, enabling them to bypass censorship, voice their opinions, and organize protests.

A serious problem with the social media is that they have no truth filters. The established news media have to guard their reputation as trustworthy, while ordinary citizens may post unreliable information. In fact, studies show that false stories are going more viral than true stories. The proliferation of false stories and conspiracy theories may undermine public trust in the political system and public officials.

Reliable information sources are essential for the democratic process. Less democratic governments rely heavily on censorship, propaganda, and misinformation in order to stay in power, while independent sources of information are able to undermine their legitimacy.

== Referenzi ==

[[Kategorija:Greċja antika]]</text>
      <sha1>c2y0t56e2ra3g1zcxo65yts7uo8g5lo</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330231</id>
      <parentid>330226</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-26T14:11:32Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Trigcly</username>
        <id>17859</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>/* Karatteristiċi */ żieda kontenut</comment>
      <origin>330231</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="89820" sha1="irklj3motvofjhb4lcayzj6s28seh97" xml:space="preserve">Id-'''demokrazija''' hija forma ta' governanza li permezz tagħha l-poter [[Politika|politiku]] jinkiseb min-nies jew mill-popolazzjoni ta' stat. Skont definizzjoni minimalista tad-demokrazija, il-mexxejja jiġu eletti permezz ta' elezzjonijiet kompetittivi filwaqt li d-definizzjonijiet iktar wesgħin jew massimalisti jorbtu d-demokrazija mal-garanziji tal-libertajiet ċivili u d-drittijiet tal-[[bniedem]] apparti l-elezzjonijiet kompetittivi.

F'demokrazija diretta, il-poplu jkollu l-awtorità diretta li jagħmel deliberazzjonijiet u li jiddeċiedi dwar il-leġiżlazzjoni. F'demokrazija rappreżentattiva, il-poplu jagħżel l-uffiċjali tal-governanza permezz ta' elezzjonijiet. Id-definizzjoni ta' &quot;poplu&quot; u l-modi kif l-awtorità tiġi kondiviża fi ħdan il-poplu jew iddelegata minnu nbidlu mal-milja taż-żminijiet u b'rati li jvarjaw minn pajjiż għal ieħor. Il-karatteristiċi tad-demokrazija spiss jinkludu l-libertà tal-ġemgħa, il-libertà tal-assoċjazzjoni, il-proprjetà personali, il-libertà tar-[[reliġjon]] u tal-kelma, iċ-ċittadinanza, il-kunsens ta' dawk li jiġu ggvernati, id-drittijiet tal-votazzjoni, il-libertà miċ-ċaħda governattiva mhux ġustifikata tad-dritt tal-ħajja u tal-libertà, u d-drittijiet tal-minoranzi.

In-nozzjoni tad-demokrazija evolviet b'mod konsiderevoli maż-żmien. Matul l-[[Storja|istorja]], wieħed jista' jsib evidenza ta' demokrazija diretta, fejn il-komunitajiet kienu jieħdu deċiżjonijiet permezz ta' ġemgħat popolari. Illum il-ġurnata, il-forma dominanti tad-demokrazija hija d-demokrazija rappreżentattiva, fejn iċ-ċittadini jeleġġu lill-uffiċjali tal-gvern biex jiggvernaw f'isimhom, pereżempju f'demokrazija parlamentari jew presidenzjali. Fil-varjant komuni tad-demokrazija liberali, is-setgħat tal-maġġoranza jiġu eżerċitati fi ħdan il-qafas ta' demokrazija rappreżentattiva, iżda l-kostituzzjoni u l-qorti suprema jillimitaw lill-maġġoranza u jipproteġu lill-minoranzi — normalment billi jiġi żgurat li kulħadd igawdi minn ċerti drittijiet individwali, bħal-libertà tal-kelma jew il-libertà tal-assoċjazzjoni.

It-terminu tfaċċa fis-seklu 5 [[Ante Christum natum|Q.K]]. fil-bliet-stati [[Greċja antika|Griegi]], b'mod partikolari f'[[Ateni]] Klassika, u kien ifisser &quot;it-tmexxija tal-poplu&quot;, b'kuntrast mal-aristokrazija (bil-[[Lingwa Griega|Grieg]]: ἀριστοκρατία, ''aristokratía''), li tfisser &quot;it-tmexxija tal-elit&quot;. Prattikament fil-gvernijiet demokratiċi kollha tul l-istorja tal-qedem u moderna, iċ-ċittadinanza demokratika inizjalment kienet ristretta għal klassi tal-elit, li iktar 'il quddiem ġiet estiża għaċ-ċittadini adulti kollha. Fil-biċċa l-kbira tad-demokraziji moderni, dan inkiseb permezz tal-movimenti tas-suffraġju tas-sekli 19 u 20.

Id-demokrazija tikkuntrasta mal-forom ta' governanza fejn il-poter ma jinbitx mill-popolazzjoni ġenerali ta' stat, pereżempju s-sistemi awtoritarji. Storikament is-sistemi demokratiċi kienu forma rari u vulnerabbli ta' governanza, iżda dawn saru iktar prevalenti mis-seklu 19 'l hawn, b'mod partikolari permezz ta' diversi mewġiet ta' demokratizzazzjoni. Id-demokrazija għandha leġittimità konsiderevoli fid-dinja moderna, peress li l-opinjoni pubblika fir-reġjuni dinjin normalment huma favur is-sistemi demokratiċi ta' governanza meta mqabbla mal-alternattivi, u peress li saħansitra l-istati awtoritarji jippruvaw ipinġu lilhom infushom bħala demokratiċi. Id-demokrazija b'mod iktar konsistenti tirriżulta f'saħħa, f'[[edukazzjoni]] u f'eżiti ekonomiċi mtejba. Skont l-indiċijiet ta' ''V-Dem Democracy'' u l-Indiċi tad-Demokrazija ta' ''The Economist'', inqas minn nofs il-popolazzjoni tad-dinja tgħix f'demokrazija mill-2022. Fl-istess ħin, filwaqt li d-demokrazija rappreżentattivi tingħata valur siewi b'mod mifrux, iċ-Ċentru tar-Riċerka ta' Pew sab li l-garr rigward il-prestazzjoni demokratika huwa komuni saħansitra f'bosta demokraziji stabbiliti.

== Karatteristiċi ==
Għalkemm id-demokrazija fid-demokraziji purament rappreżentattivi hija mifhuma b'rabta mal-votazzjoni, ma jeżisti l-ebda konsensus dwar definizzjoni preċiża tad-demokrazija. Jeżistu wisq approċċi. Kien hemm studju li identifika 2,234 aġġettiv li jintuża għad-deskrizzjoni tad-demokrazija bil-[[lingwa Ingliża]].

Minkejja dan, hemm fehim iktar profond – bħal dak ta' [[Abraham Lincoln]]:

: ''&quot;Governanza tan-nies, min-nies, għan-nies&quot;''

jew dik ta' [[Karl Popper]] li ssostni li l-ħarsa &quot;klassika&quot; lejn id-demokrazija hi, &quot;fil-qosor, it-teorija li d-demokrazija hija t-tmexxija tal-poplu u li l-poplu għandu d-dritt li jiggverna hu.

Il-prinċipji demokratiċi huma riflessi fiċ-ċittadini eliġibbli kollha, ilkoll indaqs quddiem il-[[Dritt|liġi]] u lkoll b'aċċess ugwali għall-proċessi leġiżlattivi.

Pereżempju, f'demokrazija rappreżentattiva, kull vot (fit-teorija) għandu l-istess piż, u l-libertà taċ-ċittadini eliġibbli hija żgurata permezz ta' drittijiet u libertajiet leġittimizzati li tipikament ikunu mnaqqxa f'kostituzzjoni, filwaqt li użi oħra tad-&quot;demokrazija&quot; jaf jħaddnu d-demokrazija diretta, fejn iċ-ċittadini jivvutaw direttament fuq id-diversi kwistjonijiet li jinqalgħu. Skont in-[[Ġnus Magħquda|Nazzjonijiet Uniti]], id-demokrazija &quot;tipprovdi ambjent li jirrispetta d-drittijiet tal-bniedem u l-libertajiet fundamentali, u fejn ir-rieda espressa liberament tal-poplu tiġi eżerċitata&quot;.

Skont teorija partikolari d-demokrazija tirrikjedi tliet prinċipji fundamentali: il-kontroll 'il fuq (sovranità fl-iżjed livelli baxxi tal-awtorità), l-ugwaljanza politika, u n-normi soċjali li permezz tagħhom l-individwi u l-istituzzjonijiet iqisu biss atti aċċettabbli li jirriflettu l-ewwel żewġ prinċipji tal-kontroll 'il fuq u l-ugwaljanza politika. L-ugwaljanza legali, il-libertà politika u l-istat ta' dritt sikwit jiġu identifikati bħala l-karatteristiċi ewlenin ta' demokrazija li tiffunzjona sew.

F'xi pajjiżi, b'mod partikolari fir-[[Renju Unit]] (minn fejn oriġinat is-sistema ta' Westminster), il-prinċipju dominanti hu dak tas-sovranità Parlamentari, filwaqt li tinżamm l-indipendenza ġudizzjarja. Fl-[[Indja]], is-sovranità Parlamentari hija soġġetta għall-Kostituzzjoni tal-Indja li tinkludi rieżami ġudizzjarju. Għalkemm it-terminu &quot;demokrazija&quot; tipikament jintuża fil-kuntest ta' stat politiku, il-prinċipji wkoll huma applikabbli potenzjalment għall-organizzazzjonijiet privati, bħal klabbs, għaqdiet u ditti.

Id-demokraziji jistgħu jużaw bosta metodi differenti ta' teħid tad-deċiżjonijiet, iżda t-tmexxija tal-maġġoranza hija l-forma dominanti. Mingħajr kumpens, bħal protezzjonijiet legali tad-drittijiet individwali jew kollettivi, il-minoranzi politiċi jistgħu jiġu mgħakksa mit-&quot;tirannija tal-maġġoranza&quot;. It-tmexxija tal-maġġoranza tinvolvi approċċ kompetittiv, għad-differenza tad-demokrazija tal-konsensus, u b'hekk tinħoloq il-ħtieġa li l-elezzjonijiet, u ġeneralment id-deliberazzjoni, ikunu sostantivament u proċeduralment &quot;ġusti&quot; u ekwi. Fżxi pajjiżi, il-libertà tal-espressjoni politika, il-libertà tal-kelma u l-libertà tal-istampa jitqiesu bħala importanti biex jiġi żgurat li l-votanti jkunu infurmati sew, u b'hekk ikunu jistgħu jivvutaw skont l-interessi u t-twemmin tagħhom stess.

Ġie ssuġġerit ukoll li karatteristika bażika tad-demokrazija hija l-kapaċità li l-votanti kollha jipparteċipaw b'mod ħieles u sħiħ fil-[[ħajja]] tas-soċjetà tagħhom. Bl-enfasi fuq in-nozzjonijiet tal-kuntratt soċjali u r-rieda kollettiva tal-votanti kollha, id-demokrazija tista' tkun ikkaratterizzata wkoll bħala forma ta' kollettiviżmu politiku peress li tiġi definita bħala forma ta' governanza fejn iċ-ċittadini eliġibbli kollha jkollhom vuċi ugwali fit-tfassil tal-liġijiet.

Ir-repubbliki, għalkemm spiss ikunu assoċjati popolarment mad-demokrazija minħabba l-prinċipju kondiviż tal-kunsens mogħti minn dawk li jiġu ggvernati għat-tmexxija, mhux neċessarjament ikunu demokraziji, għax ir-repubblikaniżmu ma jispeċifikax ''kif'' in-nies għandhom imexxu. Tradizzjonalment it-terminu &quot;repubblika&quot; kien iħaddan kemm id-demokraziji kif ukoll l-aristokraziji u l-varjanti tagħhom. F'sens modern, il-forma ta' governanza repubblikana hija forma ta' governanza mingħajr monarka. Minħabba f'hekk, id-demokraziji jistgħu jkunu repubbliki jew monarkiji kostituzzjonali, bħar-Renju Unit, fejn il-monarka ma jkunx il-mexxej.

== Storja ==
Democratic assemblies are as old as the human species and are found throughout human history, but up until the nineteenth century, major political figures have largely opposed democracy. Republican theorists linked democracy to small size: as political units grew in size, the likelihood increased that the government would turn despotic. At the same time, small political units were vulnerable to conquest. Montesquieu wrote, &quot;If a republic be small, it is destroyed by a foreign force; if it is large, it is ruined by an internal imperfection.&quot; According to Johns Hopkins University political scientist Daniel Deudney, the creation of the United States, with its large size and its system of checks and balances, was a solution to the dual problems of size. Forms of democracy occurred organically in societies around the world that had no contact with each other.

=== Oriġini ===

==== Greċja u Ruma ====
The term ''democracy'' first appeared in ancient Greek political and philosophical thought in the city-state of Athens during classical antiquity. The word comes from ''dêmos'' '(common) people' and ''krátos'' 'force/might'. Under Cleisthenes, what is generally held as the first example of a type of democracy in the sixth-century BC (508–507 BC) was established in Athens. Cleisthenes is referred to as &quot;the father of Athenian democracy&quot;. The first attested use of the word democracy is found in prose works of the 430s BC, such as Herodotus' ''Histories'', but its usage was older by several decades, as two Athenians born in the 470s were named Democrates, a new political name—likely in support of democracy—given at a time of debates over constitutional issues in Athens. Aeschylus also strongly alludes to the word in his play ''The Suppliants'', staged in c.463 BC, where he mentions &quot;the demos's ruling hand&quot; [''demou kratousa cheir'']. Before that time, the word used to define the new political system of Cleisthenes was probably isonomia, meaning political equality.

Athenian democracy took the form of direct democracy, and it had two distinguishing features: the random selection of ordinary citizens to fill the few existing government administrative and judicial offices, and a legislative assembly consisting of all Athenian citizens. All eligible citizens were allowed to speak and vote in the assembly, which set the laws of the city-state. However, Athenian citizenship excluded women, slaves, foreigners (μέτοικοι / ''métoikoi''), and youths below the age of military service.&lt;sup&gt;[''contradictory'']&lt;/sup&gt; Effectively, only 1 in 4 residents in Athens qualified as citizens. Owning land was not a requirement for citizenship. The exclusion of large parts of the population from the citizen body is closely related to the ancient understanding of citizenship. In most of antiquity the benefit of citizenship was tied to the obligation to fight war campaigns.

Athenian democracy was not only ''direct'' in the sense that decisions were made by the assembled people, but also the ''most direct'' in the sense that the people through the assembly, boule and courts of law controlled the entire political process and a large proportion of citizens were involved constantly in the public business. Even though the rights of the individual were not secured by the Athenian constitution in the modern sense (the ancient Greeks had no word for &quot;rights&quot;), those who were citizens of Athens enjoyed their liberties not in opposition to the government but by living in a city that was not subject to another power and by not being subjects themselves to the rule of another person.

Range voting appeared in Sparta as early as 700 BC. The Spartan ecclesia was an assembly of the people, held once a month, in which every male citizen of at least 20 years of age could participate. In the assembly, Spartans elected leaders and cast votes by range voting and shouting (the vote is then decided on how loudly the crowd shouts). Aristotle called this &quot;childish&quot;, as compared with the stone voting ballots used by the Athenian citizenry. Sparta adopted it because of its simplicity, and to prevent any biased voting, buying, or cheating that was predominant in the early democratic elections.

In addition, the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom created a system with a democratic element in the form of many different popular assamblies.

Even though the Roman Republic contributed significantly to many aspects of democracy, only a fraction of Romans were citizens with votes in elections for magistrates. The votes of the powerful were given more weight through a system of weighted voting, so most high officials, including members of the Senate, came from a few wealthy and noble families. The Roman model of governance inspired many political thinkers over the centuries.

==== Indja tal-qedem ====
Vaishali, capital city of the Vajjika League (Vrijji mahajanapada) of India, is considered one of the first examples of a republic around the 6th century BC.

==== Amerki ====
Other cultures, such as the Iroquois in the Americas also developed a form of democratic society between 1450 and 1660 (and possibly in 1142), well before contact with the Europeans. This democracy continues to the present day and is the world's oldest standing representative democracy.

=== Medju Evu ===
While most regions in Europe during the Middle Ages were ruled by clergy or feudal lords, there existed various systems involving elections or assemblies, although often only involving a small part of the population. In Scandinavia, bodies known as things consisted of freemen presided by a lawspeaker. These deliberative bodies were responsible for settling political questions, and variants included the Althing in Iceland and the Løgting in the Faeroe Islands. The veche, found in Eastern Europe, was a similar body to the Scandinavian thing. In the Roman Catholic Church, the pope has been elected by a papal conclave composed of cardinals since 1059. The first documented parliamentary body in Europe was the Cortes of León. Established by Alfonso IX in 1188, the Cortes had authority over setting taxation, foreign affairs and legislating, though the exact nature of its role remains disputed. The Republic of Ragusa, established in 1358 and centered around the city of Dubrovnik, provided representation and voting rights to its male aristocracy only. Various Italian city-states and polities had republic forms of government. For instance, the Republic of Florence, established in 1115, was led by the Signoria whose members were chosen by sortition. In the 10th–15th century Frisia, a distinctly non-feudal society, the right to vote on local matters and on county officials was based on land size. The Kouroukan Fouga divided the Mali Empire into ruling clans (lineages) that were represented at a great assembly called the ''Gbara''. However, the charter made Mali more similar to a constitutional monarchy than a democratic republic.

The Parliament of England had its roots in the restrictions on the power of kings written into Magna Carta (1215), which explicitly protected certain rights of the King's subjects and implicitly supported what became the English writ of habeas corpus, safeguarding individual freedom against unlawful imprisonment with the right to appeal. The first representative national assembly in England was Simon de Montfort's Parliament in 1265. The emergence of petitioning is some of the earliest evidence of parliament being used as a forum to address the general grievances of ordinary people. However, the power to call parliament remained at the pleasure of the monarch.

Studies have linked the emergence of parliamentary institutions in Europe during the medieval period to urban agglomeration and the creation of new classes, such as artisans, as well as the presence of nobility and religious elites. Scholars have also linked the emergence of representative government to Europe's relative political fragmentation. Political scientist David Stasavage links the fragmentation of Europe, and its subsequent democratization, to the manner in which the Roman Empire collapsed: Roman territory was conquered by small fragmented groups of Germanic tribes, thus leading to the creation of small political units where rulers were relatively weak and needed the consent of the governed to ward off foreign threats.

In Poland, noble democracy was characterized by an increase in the activity of the middle nobility, which wanted to increase their share in exercising power at the expense of the magnates. Magnates dominated the most important offices in the state (secular and ecclesiastical) and sat on the royal council, later the senate. The growing importance of the middle nobility had an impact on the establishment of the institution of the land ''sejmik'' (local assembly), which subsequently obtained more rights. During the fifteenth and first half of the sixteenth century, sejmiks received more and more power and became the most important institutions of local power. In 1454, Casimir IV Jagiellon granted the sejmiks the right to decide on taxes and to convene a mass mobilization in the Nieszawa Statutes. He also pledged not to create new laws without their consent.

=== Era moderna ===

==== Perjodu modern bikri ====
In 17th century England, there was renewed interest in Magna Carta. The Parliament of England passed the Petition of Right in 1628 which established certain liberties for subjects. The English Civil War (1642–1651) was fought between the King and an oligarchic but elected Parliament, during which the idea of a political party took form with groups debating rights to political representation during the Putney Debates of 1647. Subsequently, the Protectorate (1653–59) and the English Restoration (1660) restored more autocratic rule, although Parliament passed the Habeas Corpus Act in 1679 which strengthened the convention that forbade detention lacking sufficient cause or evidence. After the Glorious Revolution of 1688, the Bill of Rights was enacted in 1689 which codified certain rights and liberties and is still in effect. The Bill set out the requirement for regular elections, rules for freedom of speech in Parliament and limited the power of the monarch, ensuring that, unlike much of Europe at the time, royal absolutism would not prevail. Economic historians Douglass North and Barry Weingast have characterized the institutions implemented in the Glorious Revolution as a resounding success in terms of restraining the government and ensuring protection for property rights.

Renewed interest in the Magna Carta, the English Civil War, and the Glorious Revolution in the 17th century prompted the growth of political philosophy on the British Isles. Thomas Hobbes was the first philosopher to articulate a detailed social contract theory. Writing in the ''Leviathan'' (1651), Hobbes theorized that individuals living in the state of nature led lives that were &quot;solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short&quot; and constantly waged a war of all against all. In order to prevent the occurrence of an anarchic state of nature, Hobbes reasoned that individuals ceded their rights to a strong, authoritarian power. In other words, Hobbes advocated for an absolute monarchy which, in his opinion, was the best form of government. Later, philosopher and physician John Locke would posit a different interpretation of social contract theory. Writing in his ''Two Treatises of Government'' (1689), Locke posited that all individuals possessed the inalienable rights to life, liberty and estate (property). According to Locke, individuals would voluntarily come together to form a state for the purposes of defending their rights. Particularly important for Locke were property rights, whose protection Locke deemed to be a government's primary purpose. Furthermore, Locke asserted that governments were legitimate only if they held the consent of the governed. For Locke, citizens had the right to revolt against a government that acted against their interest or became tyrannical. Although they were not widely read during his lifetime, Locke's works are considered the founding documents of liberal thought and profoundly influenced the leaders of the American Revolution and later the French Revolution. His liberal democratic framework of governance remains the preeminent form of democracy in the world.

In the Cossack republics of Ukraine in the 16th and 17th centuries, the Cossack Hetmanate and Zaporizhian Sich, the holder of the highest post of Hetman was elected by the representatives from the country's districts.

In North America, representative government began in Jamestown, Virginia, with the election of the House of Burgesses (forerunner of the Virginia General Assembly) in 1619. English Puritans who migrated from 1620 established colonies in New England whose local governance was democratic; the hard power of these local assemblies varied greatly throughout the colonial time period however officially they held only small amounts of devolved power, as ultimate authority belonged to the Crown and Parliament. The Puritans (Pilgrim Fathers), Baptists, and Quakers who founded these colonies applied the democratic organisation of their congregations also to the administration of their communities in worldly matters.

==== Sekli 18 u 19 ====
The first Parliament of Great Britain was established in 1707, after the merger of the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland under the Acts of Union. Two key documents of the UK's uncodified constitution, the English Declaration of Right, 1689 (restated in the Bill of Rights 1689) and the Scottish Claim of Right 1689, had both cemented Parliament's position as the supreme law-making body and said that the &quot;election of members of Parliament ought to be free&quot;. However, Parliament was only elected by male property owners, which amounted to 3% of the population in 1780. The first known British person of African heritage to vote in a general election, Ignatius Sancho, voted in 1774 and 1780.

During the Age of Liberty in Sweden (1718–1772), civil rights were expanded and power shifted from the monarch to parliament. The taxed peasantry was represented in parliament, although with little influence, but commoners without taxed property had no suffrage.

The creation of the short-lived Corsican Republic in 1755 was an early attempt to adopt a democratic constitution (all men and women above age of 25 could vote). This Corsican Constitution was the first based on Enlightenment principles and included female suffrage, something that was not included in most other democracies until the 20th century.

Colonial America had similar property qualifications as Britain, and in the period before 1776 the abundance and availability of land meant that large numbers of colonists met such requirements with at least 60 per cent of adult white males able to vote. The great majority of white men were farmers who met the property ownership or taxpaying requirements. With few exceptions, no blacks or women could vote. Vermont, which, on declaring independence of Great Britain in 1777, adopted a constitution modelled on Pennsylvania's citizenship and democratic suffrage for males with or without property. The United States Constitution of 1787 is the oldest surviving, still active, governmental codified constitution. The Constitution provided for an elected government and protected civil rights and liberties, but did not end slavery nor extend voting rights in the United States, instead leaving the issue of suffrage to the individual states. Generally, states limited suffrage to white male property owners and taxpayers. At the time of the first Presidential election in 1789, about 6% of the population was eligible to vote. The Naturalization Act of 1790 limited U.S. citizenship to whites only. The Bill of Rights in 1791 set limits on government power to protect personal freedoms but had little impact on judgements by the courts for the first 130 years after ratification.

In 1789, Revolutionary France adopted the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen and, although short-lived, the National Convention was elected by all men in 1792. The Polish-Lithuanian Constitution of 3 May 1791 sought to implement a more effective constitutional monarchy, introduced political equality between townspeople and nobility, and placed the peasants under the protection of the government, mitigating the worst abuses of serfdom. In force for less than 19 months, it was declared null and void by the Grodno Sejm that met in 1793. Nonetheless, the 1791 Constitution helped keep alive Polish aspirations for the eventual restoration of the country's sovereignty over a century later.

In the United States, the 1828 presidential election was the first in which non-property-holding white males could vote in the vast majority of states. Voter turnout soared during the 1830s, reaching about 80% of the adult white male population in the 1840 presidential election. North Carolina was the last state to abolish property qualification in 1856 resulting in a close approximation to universal white male suffrage (however tax-paying requirements remained in five states in 1860 and survived in two states until the 20th century). In the 1860 United States census, the slave population had grown to four million, and in Reconstruction after the Civil War, three constitutional amendments were passed: the 13th Amendment (1865) that ended slavery; the 14th Amendment (1869) that gave black people citizenship, and the 15th Amendment (1870) that gave black males a nominal right to vote. Full enfranchisement of citizens was not secured until after the civil rights movement gained passage by the US Congress of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The voting franchise in the United Kingdom was expanded and made more uniform in a series of reforms that began with the Reform Act 1832 and continued into the 20th century, notably with the Representation of the People Act 1918 and the Equal Franchise Act 1928. Universal male suffrage was established in France in March 1848 in the wake of the French Revolution of 1848. During that year, several revolutions broke out in Europe as rulers were confronted with popular demands for liberal constitutions and more democratic government.

In 1876, the Ottoman Empire transitioned from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional one, and held two elections the next year to elect members to her newly formed parliament. Provisional Electoral Regulations were issued, stating that the elected members of the Provincial Administrative Councils would elect members to the first Parliament. Later that year, a new constitution was promulgated, which provided for a bicameral Parliament with a Senate appointed by the Sultan and a popularly elected Chamber of Deputies. Only men above the age of 30 who were competent in Turkish and had full civil rights were allowed to stand for election. Reasons for disqualification included holding dual citizenship, being employed by a foreign government, being bankrupt, employed as a servant, or having &quot;notoriety for ill deeds&quot;. Full universal suffrage was achieved in 1934.

In 1893, the self-governing colony New Zealand became the first country in the world (except for the short-lived 18th-century Corsican Republic) to establish active universal suffrage by recognizing women as having the right to vote.

==== Sekli 20 u 21 ====
20th-century transitions to liberal democracy have come in successive &quot;waves of democracy&quot;, variously resulting from wars, revolutions, decolonisation, and religious and economic circumstances. Global waves of &quot;democratic regression&quot; reversing democratization, have also occurred in the 1920s and 30s, in the 1960s and 1970s, and in the 2010s.

World War I and the dissolution of the autocratic Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian empires resulted in the creation of new nation-states in Europe, most of them at least nominally democratic. In the 1920s democratic movements flourished and women's suffrage advanced, but the Great Depression brought disenchantment and most of the countries of Europe, Latin America, and Asia turned to strong-man rule or dictatorships. Fascism and dictatorships flourished in Nazi Germany, Italy, Spain and Portugal, as well as non-democratic governments in the Baltics, the Balkans, Brazil, Cuba, China, and Japan, among others.

World War II brought a definitive reversal of this trend in Western Europe. The democratisation of the American, British, and French sectors of occupied Germany (disputed), Austria, Italy, and the occupied Japan served as a model for the later theory of government change. However, most of Eastern Europe, including the Soviet sector of Germany fell into the non-democratic Soviet-dominated bloc.

The war was followed by decolonisation, and again most of the new independent states had nominally democratic constitutions. India emerged as the world's largest democracy and continues to be so. Countries that were once part of the British Empire often adopted the British Westminster system.

In 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights mandated democracy:&lt;blockquote&gt;3. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.&lt;/blockquote&gt;— Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 21, United Nations, 1948

By 1960, the vast majority of country-states were nominally democracies, although most of the world's populations lived in nominal democracies that experienced sham elections, and other forms of subterfuge (particularly in &quot;Communist&quot; states and the former colonies). A subsequent wave of democratisation brought substantial gains toward true liberal democracy for many states, dubbed &quot;third wave of democracy&quot;. Portugal, Spain, and several of the military dictatorships in South America returned to civilian rule in the 1970s and 1980s. This was followed by countries in East and South Asia by the mid-to-late 1980s. Economic malaise in the 1980s, along with resentment of Soviet oppression, contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union, the associated end of the Cold War, and the democratisation and liberalisation of the former Eastern bloc countries. The most successful of the new democracies were those geographically and culturally closest to western Europe, and they are now either part of the European Union or candidate states. In 1986, after the toppling of the most prominent Asian dictatorship, the only democratic state of its kind at the time emerged in the Philippines with the rise of Corazon Aquino, who would later be known as the mother of Asian democracy.

The liberal trend spread to some states in Africa in the 1990s, most prominently in South Africa. Some recent examples of attempts of liberalisation include the Indonesian Revolution of 1998, the Bulldozer Revolution in Yugoslavia, the Rose Revolution in Georgia, the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, the Cedar Revolution in Lebanon, the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan, and the Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia.

According to Freedom House, in 2007 there were 123 electoral democracies (up from 40 in 1972). According to ''World Forum on Democracy'', electoral democracies now represent 120 of the 192 existing countries and constitute 58.2 per cent of the world's population. At the same time liberal democracies i.e. countries Freedom House regards as free and respectful of basic human rights and the rule of law are 85 in number and represent 38 per cent of the global population. Also in 2007 the United Nations declared 15 September the International Day of Democracy.

Many countries reduced their voting age to 18 years; the major democracies began to do so in the 1970s starting in Western Europe and North America.&lt;sup&gt;[''failed verification'']&lt;/sup&gt; Most electoral democracies continue to exclude those younger than 18 from voting. The voting age has been lowered to 16 for national elections in a number of countries, including Brazil, Austria, Cuba, and Nicaragua. In California, a 2004 proposal to permit a quarter vote at 14 and a half vote at 16 was ultimately defeated. In 2008, the German parliament proposed but shelved a bill that would grant the vote to each citizen at birth, to be used by a parent until the child claims it for themselves.

According to Freedom House, starting in 2005, there have been 17 consecutive years in which declines in political rights and civil liberties throughout the world have outnumbered improvements, as populist and nationalist political forces have gained ground everywhere from Poland (under the Law and Justice party) to the Philippines (under Rodrigo Duterte). In a Freedom House report released in 2018, Democracy Scores for most countries declined for the 12th consecutive year. ''The Christian Science Monitor'' reported that nationalist and populist political ideologies were gaining ground, at the expense of rule of law, in countries like Poland, Turkey and Hungary. For example, in Poland, the President appointed 27 new Supreme Court judges over legal objections from the European Commission. In Turkey, thousands of judges were removed from their positions following a failed coup attempt during a government crackdown .

&quot;Democratic backsliding&quot; in the 2010s were attributed to economic inequality and social discontent, personalism, poor government's management of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as other factors such as manipulation of civil society, &quot;toxic polarization&quot;, foreign disinformation campaigns, racism and nativism, excessive executive power, and decreased power of the opposition. Within English-speaking Western democracies, &quot;protection-based&quot; attitudes combining cultural conservatism and leftist economic attitudes were the strongest predictor of support for authoritarian modes of governance.

== Teorija ==
=== Teorija bikrija ===
Aristotle's '''democratic theory''' contrasted rule by the many (democracy/timocracy), with rule by the few (oligarchy/aristocracy/elitism), and with rule by a single person (tyranny/autocracy/absolute monarchy). He also thought that there was a good and a bad variant of each system (he considered democracy to be the degenerate counterpart to timocracy).

A common view among early and renaissance Republican theorists was that democracy could only survive in small political communities. Heeding the lessons of the Roman Republic's shift to monarchism as it grew larger or smaller, these Republican theorists held that the expansion of territory and population inevitably led to tyranny. Democracy was therefore highly fragile and rare historically, as it could only survive in small political units, which due to their size were vulnerable to conquest by larger political units. Montesquieu famously said, &quot;if a republic is small, it is destroyed by an outside force; if it is large, it is destroyed by an internal vice.&quot; Jean-Jacques Rousseau asserted, &quot;It is, therefore the natural property of small states to be governed as a republic, of middling ones to be subject to a monarch, and of large empires to be swayed by a despotic prince.&quot;

=== Teorija kontemporanja ===
Fost it-teoriċi politiċi moderni, jeżistu kunċetti fundamentali differenti tad-demokrazija.

==== Aggregazzjoni ====
The theory of aggregative democracy claims that the aim of the democratic processes is to solicit citizens' preferences and aggregate them together to determine what social policies society should adopt. Therefore, proponents of this view hold that democratic participation should primarily focus on voting, where the policy with the most votes gets implemented. Different variants of aggregative democracy exist.

According to the minimalist democracy conception, elections are a mechanism for competition between politicians. Joseph Schumpeter articulated this view famously in his book ''Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy''.

Anthony Downs argues that ideological political parties are necessary to act as a mediating broker between individuals and governments. On the other hand, direct democracy, where citizens vote directly on legislative proposals, can show better aggregation in cases of differences in preferences between elites and voters.

===== Mandat medjan =====
According to the median voter theorem the political representativeness can be evaluated by comparing how close laws and policies are to the views of the median voter along the political spectrum. The ''median mandate'' views the preferences of the median voter as granting political legitimacy.

==== Poliarkija ====
Robert A. Dahl argues that the fundamental democratic principle is that, when it comes to binding collective decisions, each person in a political community is entitled to have his/her interests be given equal consideration. He uses the term polyarchy (&quot;rule by many&quot;) to refer to societies in which there exists a certain set of institutions and procedures which are perceived as leading to such democracy. First and foremost among these institutions is the regular occurrence of free and open elections which are used to select representatives who then manage all or most of the public policy of the society. However, these polyarchic procedures may not create a full democracy if, for example, poverty prevents political participation. Similarly, Ronald Dworkin argues that &quot;democracy is a substantive, not a merely procedural, ideal.&quot;

==== Deliberazzjoni ====
Deliberative democracy is based on the notion that democracy is government by deliberation. Unlike aggregative democracy, deliberative democracy holds that, for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by authentic deliberation, not merely the aggregation of preferences that occurs in voting. Authentic deliberation is deliberation among decision-makers that is free from distortions of unequal political power, such as power a decision-maker obtained through economic wealth or the support of interest groups. If the decision-makers cannot reach consensus after authentically deliberating on a proposal, then they vote on the proposal using a form of majority rule. Citizens assemblies are considered by many scholars as practical examples of deliberative democracy, with a recent OECD report identifying citizens assemblies as an increasingly popular mechanism to involve citizens in governmental decision-making. Proponents of direct democracy view citizens do not rule themselves unless they directly decide laws and policies. Political activity can be valuable in itself, it socialises and educates citizens, and popular participation can check powerful elites.

==== Tipi ta' demokraziji governattivi ====
Democracy has taken a number of forms, both in theory and practice. Some varieties of democracy provide better representation and more freedom for their citizens than others. However, if any democracy is not structured to prohibit the government from excluding the people from the legislative process, or any branch of government from altering the separation of powers in its favour, then a branch of the system can accumulate too much power and destroy the democracy.

The following kinds of democracy are not exclusive of one another: many specify details of aspects that are independent of one another and can co-exist in a single system.

===== Forom bażiċi =====
Several variants of democracy exist, but there are two basic forms, both of which concern how the whole body of all eligible citizens executes its will. One form of democracy is direct democracy, in which all eligible citizens have active participation in the political decision making, for example voting on policy initiatives directly. In most modern democracies, the whole body of eligible citizens remain the sovereign power but political power is exercised indirectly through elected representatives; this is called a representative democracy.

If the head of state is democratically elected then the polity is called a democratic republic

====== Demokrazija diretta ======
Direct democracy is a political system where the citizens participate in the decision-making personally, contrary to relying on intermediaries or representatives. Proponents like Jean-Jacques Rousseau argue the direct approach increases legitimacy. A direct democracy gives the voting population the power to:

* Change constitutional laws,
* Put forth initiatives, referendums and suggestions for laws

Within modern-day representative governments, certain electoral tools like referendums, citizens' initiatives and recall elections are referred to as forms of direct democracy. However, some advocates of direct democracy argue for local assemblies of face-to-face discussion. Direct democracy as a government system currently exists in the Swiss cantons of Appenzell Innerrhoden and Glarus, the Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities, communities affiliated with the CIPO-RFM, the Bolivian city councils of FEJUVE, and Kurdish cantons of Rojava.

====== Demokrazija semidiretta ======
Some modern democracies that are predominantly representative in nature also heavily rely upon forms of political action that are directly democratic. These democracies, which combine elements of representative democracy and direct democracy, are termed ''semi-direct democracies'' or ''participatory democracies''. Examples include Switzerland and some U.S. states, where frequent use is made of referendums and initiatives.

The Swiss confederation is a semi-direct democracy. At the federal level, citizens can propose changes to the constitution (federal popular initiative) or ask for a referendum to be held on any law voted by the parliament. Between January 1995 and June 2005, Swiss citizens voted 31 times, to answer 103 questions (during the same period, French citizens participated in only two referendums). Although in the past 120 years less than 250 initiatives have been put to referendum.

Examples include the extensive use of referendums in the US state of California, which is a state that has more than 20 million voters.

In New England, town meetings are often used, especially in rural areas, to manage local government. This creates a hybrid form of government, with a local direct democracy and a representative state government. For example, most Vermont towns hold annual town meetings in March in which town officers are elected, budgets for the town and schools are voted on, and citizens have the opportunity to speak and be heard on political matters.

====== Sistema tax-xorti ======
The use of a lot system, a characteristic of Athenian democracy, is a feature of some versions of direct democracies. In this system, important governmental and administrative tasks are performed by citizens picked from a lottery.

====== Demokrazija rappreżentattiva ======
Representative democracy involves the election of government officials by the people being represented. The most common mechanisms involve election of the candidate with a majority or a plurality of the votes. Most western countries have representative systems.

Representatives may be elected or become diplomatic representatives by a particular district (or constituency), or represent the entire electorate through proportional systems, with some using a combination of the two. Some representative democracies also incorporate elements of direct democracy, such as referendums. A characteristic of representative democracy is that while the representatives are elected by the people to act in the people's interest, they retain the freedom to exercise their own judgement as how best to do so. Such reasons have driven criticism upon representative democracy, pointing out the contradictions of representation mechanisms with democracy.

====== Demokrazija Parlamentari ======
Parliamentary democracy is a representative democracy where government is appointed by or can be dismissed by, representatives as opposed to a &quot;presidential rule&quot; wherein the president is both head of state and the head of government and is elected by the voters. Under a parliamentary democracy, government is exercised by delegation to an executive ministry and subject to ongoing review, checks and balances by the legislative parliament elected by the people.

In a parliamentary system, the prime minister may be dismissed by the legislature at any point in time for not meeting the expectations of the legislature. This is done through a vote of no confidence where the legislature decides whether or not to remove the prime minister from office with majority support for dismissal. In some countries, the prime minister can also call an election at any point in time, typically when the prime minister believes that they are in good favour with the public as to get re-elected. In other parliamentary democracies, extra elections are virtually never held, a minority government being preferred until the next ordinary elections. An important feature of the parliamentary democracy is the concept of the &quot;loyal opposition&quot;. The essence of the concept is that the second largest political party (or opposition) opposes the governing party (or coalition), while still remaining loyal to the state and its democratic principles.

====== Demokrazija Presidenzjali ======
Presidential democracy is a system where the public elects the president through an election. The president serves as both the head of state and head of government controlling most of the executive powers. The president serves for a specific term and cannot exceed that amount of time. The legislature often has limited ability to remove a president from office. Elections typically have a fixed date and are not easily changed. The president has direct control over the cabinet, specifically appointing the cabinet members.

The executive usually has the responsibility to execute or implement legislation and may have the limited legislative powers, such as a veto. However, a legislative branch passes legislation and budgets. This provides some measure of separation of powers. In consequence, however, the president and the legislature may end up in the control of separate parties, allowing one to block the other and thereby interfere with the orderly operation of the state. This may be the reason why presidential democracy is not very common outside the Americas, Africa, and Central and Southeast Asia.

A semi-presidential system is a system of democracy in which the government includes both a prime minister and a president. The particular powers held by the prime minister and president vary by country.

==== Tipoloġija ====

===== Monarkija kostituzzjonali =====
Many countries such as the United Kingdom, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Scandinavian countries, Thailand, Japan and Bhutan turned powerful monarchs into constitutional monarchs (often gradually) with limited or symbolic roles. For example, in the predecessor states to the United Kingdom, constitutional monarchy began to emerge and has continued uninterrupted since the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and passage of the Bill of Rights 1689. Strongly limited constitutional monarchies, such as the United Kingdom, have been referred to as crowned republics by writers such as H. G. Wells.

In other countries, the monarchy was abolished along with the aristocratic system (as in France, China, Russia, Germany, Austria, Hungary, Italy, Greece, and Egypt). An elected person, with or without significant powers, became the head of state in these countries.

Elite upper houses of legislatures, which often had lifetime or hereditary tenure, were common in many states. Over time, these either had their powers limited (as with the British House of Lords) or else became elective and remained powerful (as with the Australian Senate).

===== Demokrazija repubblika =====
The term ''republic'' has many different meanings, but today often refers to a representative democracy with an elected head of state, such as a president, serving for a limited term, in contrast to states with a hereditary monarch as a head of state, even if these states also are representative democracies with an elected or appointed head of government such as a prime minister.

The Founding Fathers of the United States often criticised direct democracy; James Madison argued, especially in ''The Federalist'' No. 10, that what distinguished a direct ''democracy'' from a ''republic'' was that the former depended on small size and suffered more violently from the effects of faction, whereas a republic could get stronger as it got larger and combats faction by its very structure. Accordingly, during Philadelphia convention Madison called election of representatives by large territories &quot;the only defence against the inconveniencies of democracy consistent with the democratic form of Govt.&quot;

Professors Richard Ellis of Willamette University and Michael Nelson of Rhodes College argue that much constitutional thought, from Madison to Lincoln and beyond, has focused on &quot;the problem of majority tyranny&quot;. They conclude, &quot;The principles of republican government embedded in the Constitution represent an effort by the framers to ensure that the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness would not be trampled by majorities.&quot; What was critical to American values, John Adams insisted, was that the government be &quot;bound by fixed laws, which the people have a voice in making, and a right to defend.&quot; As Benjamin Franklin was exiting after writing the US Constitution, Elizabeth Willing Powel asked him &quot;Well, Doctor, what have we got—a republic or a monarchy?&quot;. He replied &quot;A republic—if you can keep it.&quot;

===== Demokrazija liberali =====
A liberal democracy is a representative democracy which enshrines a liberal political philosophy, where the ability of the elected representatives to exercise decision-making power is subject to the rule of law, moderated by a constitution or laws such as the protection of the rights and freedoms of individuals, and constrained on the extent to which the will of the majority can be exercised against the rights of minorities.

===== Demokrazija Soċjalista =====
Socialist thought has several different views on democracy, for example social democracy or democratic socialism. Many democratic socialists and social democrats believe in a form of participatory, industrial, economic and/or workplace democracy combined with a representative democracy.

===== Demokrazija Marxista =====
Marxist theory supports a democratic society centering the working class. Some Marxists and Trotskyists believe in direct democracy or workers' councils (which are sometimes called soviets). This system can begin with workplace democracy and can manifest itself as soviet democracy or dictatorship of the proletariat. Trotskyist groups have interpreted socialist democracy to be synonymous with multi-party far-left representation, autonomous union organizations, worker's control of production, internal party democracy and the mass participation of the working masses. Some communist parties support a soviet republic with democratic centralism. Within democracy in Marxism there can be hostility to what is commonly called &quot;liberal democracy&quot;.

===== Demokrazija Anarkista =====
Anarchists are split in this domain, depending on whether they believe that a majority-rule is tyrannic or not. To many anarchists, the only form of democracy considered acceptable is direct democracy. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon argued that the only acceptable form of direct democracy is one in which it is recognised that majority decisions are not binding on the minority, even when unanimous. However, anarcho-communist Murray Bookchin criticised individualist anarchists for opposing democracy, and says &quot;majority rule&quot; is consistent with anarchism.

Some anarcho-communists oppose the majoritarian nature of direct democracy, feeling that it can impede individual liberty and opt-in favour of a non-majoritarian form of consensus democracy, similar to Proudhon's position on direct democracy.

===== Demokrazija każwali =====
Sortition is the process of choosing decision-making bodies via a random selection. These bodies can be more representative of the opinions and interests of the people at large than an elected legislature or other decision-maker. The technique was in widespread use in Athenian Democracy and Renaissance Florence and is still used in modern jury selection and citizens' assemblies.

===== Demokrazija Kostituzzjonali =====
Consociational democracy, also called consociationalism, is a form of democracy based on power-sharing formula between elites representing the social groups within the society. In 1969, Arendt Lijphart argued this would stabilize democracies with factions. A consociational democracy allows for simultaneous majority votes in two or more ethno-religious constituencies, and policies are enacted only if they gain majority support from both or all of them. The Qualified majority voting rule in European Council of Ministers is a consociational democracy approach for supranational democracies. This system in Treaty of Rome allocates votes to member states in part according to their population, but heavily weighted in favour of the smaller states. A consociational democracy requires consensus of representatives, while consensus democracy requires consensus of electorate.

===== Demokrazija maġġoritarja =====
Majoritarian democracy is a form of democracy based upon a principle of majority rule. Majoritarian democracy contrasts with consensus democracy, rule by as many people as possible.

===== Konsensus =====
Consensus democracy requires consensus decision-making and supermajority to obtain a larger support than majority. In contrast, in majoritarian democracy minority opinions can potentially be ignored by vote-winning majorities. Constitutions typically require consensus or supermajorities.

===== Demokrazija etnika =====
The term ethnic democracy, as used by some political scientists, purports to describe a governance system that combines a structured ethnic dominance with democratic, political and civil rights for all. Both the dominant ethnic group—typically an ethnic majority—and the minority ethnic groups have citizenship and are able to fully participate in the political process. However, critics of the &quot;ethnic democracy&quot; model argue it is a contradiction in terms, and thus conceptually inadequate or confusing; these critics allege that purported ethnic democracies, most notably Israel, are not democratic at all, or are at best a sort of semi-democracy.

===== Demokrazija inklużiva =====
Inclusive democracy is a political theory and political project that aims for direct democracy in all fields of social life: political democracy in the form of face-to-face assemblies which are confederated, economic democracy in a stateless, moneyless and marketless economy, democracy in the social realm, i.e. self-management in places of work and education, and ecological democracy which aims to reintegrate society and nature. The theoretical project of inclusive democracy emerged from the work of political philosopher Takis Fotopoulos in &quot;Towards An Inclusive Democracy&quot; and was further developed in the journal ''Democracy &amp; Nature'' and its successor ''The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy''.

===== Politika parteċipattiva =====
A parpolity or participatory polity is a theoretical form of democracy that is ruled by a nested council structure. The guiding philosophy is that people should have decision-making power in proportion to how much they are affected by the decision. Local councils of 25–50 people are completely autonomous on issues that affect only them, and these councils send delegates to higher level councils who are again autonomous regarding issues that affect only the population affected by that council.

A council court of randomly chosen citizens serves as a check on the tyranny of the majority, and rules on which body gets to vote on which issue. Delegates may vote differently from how their sending council might wish but are mandated to communicate the wishes of their sending council. Delegates are recallable at any time. Referendums are possible at any time via votes of lower-level councils, however, not everything is a referendum as this is most likely a waste of time. A parpolity is meant to work in tandem with a participatory economy.

===== Demokrazija proċedurali =====
Procedural democracy or proceduralist democracy, proceduralism or hollow democracy is a term used to denote the particular procedures, such as regular elections based on universal suffrage, that produce an electorally-legitimated government. Procedural democracy, with its centering of electoral processes as the basis of democratic legitimacy, is often contrasted with substantive or participatory democracy, which centers the equal participation of all groups in society in the political process as the basis of legitimacy.

===== Demokrazija radikali =====
Radical democracy is based on the idea that there are hierarchical and oppressive power relations that exist in society. Radical democracy's role is to make visible and challenge those relations by allowing for difference, dissent and antagonisms in decision-making processes.

===== Demokrazija reliġjuża =====
Religious democracy is a form of democracy where the values of a particular religion or state religion are preferred. The term applies to all democratic countries in which religion is incorporated into the form of government.

===== Demokrazija kożmopolitana =====
Cosmopolitan democracy, also known as ''global democracy'' or ''world federalism'', is a political system in which democracy is implemented on a global scale, either directly or through representatives. An important justification for this kind of system is that the decisions made in national or regional democracies often affect people outside the constituency who, by definition, cannot vote. By contrast, in a cosmopolitan democracy, the people who are affected by decisions also have a say in them.

According to its supporters, any attempt to solve global problems is undemocratic without some form of cosmopolitan democracy. The general principle of cosmopolitan democracy is to expand some or all of the values and norms of democracy, including the rule of law; the non-violent resolution of conflicts; and equality among citizens, beyond the limits of the state. To be fully implemented, this would require reforming existing international organisations, e.g., the United Nations, as well as the creation of new institutions such as a World Parliament, which ideally would enhance public control over, and accountability in, international politics.

Cosmopolitan democracy has been promoted, among others, by physicist Albert Einstein, writer Kurt Vonnegut, columnist George Monbiot, and professors David Held and Daniele Archibugi. The creation of the International Criminal Court in 2003 was seen as a major step forward by many supporters of this type of cosmopolitan democracy.

===== Demokrazija kreattiva =====
Creative democracy is advocated by American philosopher John Dewey. The main idea about creative democracy is that democracy encourages individual capacity building and the interaction among the society. Dewey argues that democracy is a way of life in his work of &quot;Creative Democracy: The Task Before Us&quot; and an experience built on faith in human nature, faith in human beings, and faith in working with others. Democracy, in Dewey's view, is a moral ideal requiring actual effort and work by people; it is not an institutional concept that exists outside of ourselves. &quot;The task of democracy&quot;, Dewey concludes, &quot;is forever that of creation of a freer and more humane experience in which all share and to which all contribute&quot;.

===== Demokrazija ggwidata =====
Guided democracy is a form of democracy that incorporates regular popular elections, but which often carefully &quot;guides&quot; the choices offered to the electorate in a manner that may reduce the ability of the electorate to truly determine the type of government exercised over them. Such democracies typically have only one central authority which is often not subject to meaningful public review by any other governmental authority. Russian-style democracy has often been referred to as a &quot;guided democracy&quot;. Russian politicians have referred to their government as having only one center of power/ authority, as opposed to most other forms of democracy which usually attempt to incorporate two or more naturally competing sources of authority within the same government.

=== Tfittxija ta' fehim komuni ===
The search for a common approach to conceptualize, measure and compare democracy remains a challenge in modern political science. This challenge strikes through to measuring, assessing and comparing the quality of democracy, as Seva Gunitsky pointed in 2015 in the Washington Post, based upon his research for ''Ranking the World – Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance'', that measuring democracy can mislead as much as clarify – a problem for academics, policy-makers and anyone who cares about democracy.

In his contribution ''Lost in the Gray Zone: Competing Measures of Democracy in the Former Soviet Republics'' to ''Ranking the World'', he, on the example of former Soviet republics, examines fundamental problems with measures of democracy, observing that indices often disagree and occasionally draw contradictory conclusions from observing the same event. He argues, that this reflects inherent tradeoffs in conceptualizing democratic governance, which arise from fundamental normative disagreements about a highly contested concept.

In 2011, Michael Coppedge, John Gerring et al. proposed an approach to such conceptualization and measurement. In their paper ''Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach'' they review some of the weaknesses among contemporary and older approaches, then lay out their approach, characterizing it as ''historical'', ''multidimensional'', ''disaggregated'', and ''transparent''. The authors propose to create a new set of four features to conceptualize and measure democracy. First, ''historical'', extending indicators of democracy back through modern history, wherever possible. Second, a ''multidimensional'' approach to the problem of conceptualizing democracy. Third, to collect information relevant to democracy at a highly ''disaggregated'' level. Fourth, ''transparent'', a strategy for data collection and presentation that should enhance the precision, validity, transparency, and legitimacy of the resulting indicators. They also sum up the conceptions, and/or aspects, of democracy into six – ''electoral'', ''liberal'', ''majoritarian'', ''participatory'', ''deliberative'', and ''egalitarian'', which taken together offer a fairly comprehensive accounting of the concept of democracy as it is employed today (see overview in the table below).
{| class=&quot;wikitable&quot;
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |Conceptions of democracy by Michael Coppedge, John Gerring et al., 2011
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
| 
| 
|Principles
|Question
|Institutions
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|I.
|'''Electoral'''
|Contestation, competition
|Are government offices filled by free and fair multiparty elections?
|Elections, political parties, competitiveness and turnover
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|II.
|'''Liberal'''
|Limited government, multiple veto points, horizontal accountability, individual rights, civil liberties, transparency
|Is political power decentralized &amp; constrained?
|Multiple, independent, and decentralized, with special focus on the role of the media, interest groups, the judiciary, and a written constitution with explicit guarantees
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|III.
|'''Majoritarian'''
|Majority rule, centralization, vertical accountability
|Does the majority (or plurality) rule?
|Consolidated and centralized, with special focus on the role of political parties
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|IV.
|'''Participatory'''
|Government by the people
|Do ordinary citizens participate in politics?
|Election law, civil society, local government, direct democracy
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|V.
|'''Deliberative'''
|Government by reason
|Are political decisions the product of public deliberation?
|Media, hearings, panels, other deliberative bodies
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|VI.
|'''Egalitarian'''
|Political equality
|Are all citizens equally empowered?
|Designed to ensure equal participation, representation, protection, and politically relevant resources
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|}

=== Measurement of democracy ===
Main article: Measurement of democracy

Measurement of democracy varies according to the different fundamental conceptions of democracy. Minimalist democracy evaluations focus on free and fair elections, while maximalist democracy evaluates additional values, such as human rights, deliberation, economic outcomes or state capacity.

== Demokrazija mhux governattiva ==
Aside from the public sphere, similar democratic principles and mechanisms of voting and representation have been used to govern other kinds of groups. Many non-governmental organisations decide policy and leadership by voting. Most trade unions and cooperatives are governed by democratic elections. Corporations are ultimately governed by their shareholders through shareholder democracy. Corporations may also employ systems such as workplace democracy to handle internal governance. Amitai Etzioni has postulated a system that fuses elements of democracy with sharia law, termed Islamic democracy or ''Islamocracy''. There is also a growing number of Democratic educational institutions such as Sudbury schools that are co-governed by students and staff.

=== Demokrazija tal-azzjonisti ===
Shareholder democracy is a concept relating to the governance of corporations by their shareholders. In the United States, shareholders are typically granted voting rights according to the one share, one vote principle. Shareholders may vote annually to elect the company's board of directors, who themselves may choose the company's executives. The shareholder democracy framework may be inaccurate for companies which have different classes of stock that further alter the distribution of voting rights.

== Ġustifikazzjoni ==
Ingħataw diversi ġustifikazzjonijiet għad-demokrazija.

=== Leġittimità ===
Social contract theory argues that the legitimacy of government is based on consent of the governed, i.e. an election, and that political decisions must reflect the general will. The public legitimacy of democracy varies by country, in some countries religious texts have more public support than the will of the people.

=== Teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet aħjar ===
Condorcet's jury theorem is logical proof that if each decision-maker has a better than chance probability of making the right decision, then having the largest number of decision-makers, i.e. a democracy, will result in the best decisions. This has also been argued by theories of the wisdom of the crowd. Democracy tends to improve conflict resolution.

=== Suċċess ekonomiku ===
In ''Why Nations Fail'', economists Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson argue that democracies are more economically successful because undemocratic political systems tend to limit markets and favor monopolies at the expense of the creative destruction which is necessary for sustained economic growth.

A 2019 study by Acemoglu and others estimated that countries switching to democratic from authoritarian rule had on average a 20% higher GDP after 25 years than if they had remained authoritarian. The study examined 122 transitions to democracy and 71 transitions to authoritarian rule, occurring from 1960 to 2010. Acemoglu said this was because democracies tended to invest more in health care and human capital, and reduce special treatment of regime allies.

A 2023 study analyzed the long-term effects of democracy on economic prosperity using new data on GDP per capita and democracy for a dataset between 1789 and 2019. The results indicate that democracy substantially increases economic development.

Unemployment is associated with anti-democratic beliefs.

== Kritika ==
Democracy as a concept and as a practical form of government has been the subject of critique throughout history. Some critics consider that democratic regimes often fail to be true to the highest principles expected of them, while others reject the values promoted by constitutional democracy in whole or part.

Opposition to democracy goes as far back as Plato, who argued for a 'government of the best qualified'. More recently, James Madison extensively studied historic attempts at and arguments on democracy in his preparation for the Constitutional Convention, and Winston Churchill remarked that &quot;no one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.&quot;

Critics argue that modern democracies may fail to be sufficiently democratic and instead function in practice as oligarchies, insofar as governments are more responsive to the preferences of economic elites than to those of ordinary citizens. Numerous empirical studies across various western democracies including the United States, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Canada, Norway and Germany have consistently found that elected representatives tend to respond more to the preferences of very affluent citizens for policy outcomes than those of the average voter.

Some critics of democracy have highlighted the concept's inconsistencies, paradoxes, and limits: drawing contrasts with other forms of government, such as epistocracy or lottocracy. Others have characterized most modern democracies as democratic polyarchies and democratic aristocracies. Yet others have identified fascist moments in modern democracies. They have termed the societies produced by modern democracies as neo-feudal and have contrasted democracy with fascism, anarcho-capitalism, theocracy, and absolute monarchy.

== Tranżizzjonijiet demokratiċi ==
A democratic transition describes a phase in a country's political system, often created as a result of an incomplete change from an authoritarian regime to a democratic one (or vice versa).

=== Demokratizzazzjoni ===
Democratization, or democratisation, is the structural government transition from an authoritarian government to a more democratic political regime, including substantive political changes moving in a democratic direction. The opposite process of democratic transition is known as democratic backsliding or autocratization. Whether and to what extent democratization occurs can be influenced by various factors, including economic development, historical legacies, civil society, and international processes. Some accounts of democratization emphasize how elites drove democratization, whereas other accounts emphasize grassroots bottom-up processes. How democratization occurs has also been used to explain other political phenomena, such as whether a country goes to a war or whether its economy grows.

Several philosophers and researchers have outlined historical and social factors seen as supporting the evolution of democracy. Other commentators have mentioned the influence of economic development. In a related theory, Ronald Inglehart suggests that improved living-standards in modern developed countries can convince people that they can take their basic survival for granted, leading to increased emphasis on self-expression values, which correlates closely with democracy.

Douglas M. Gibler and Andrew Owsiak in their study argued about the importance of peace and stable borders for the development of democracy. It has often been assumed that democracy causes peace, but this study shows that, historically, peace has almost always predated the establishment of democracy.

Carroll Quigley concludes that the characteristics of weapons are the main predictor of democracy: Democracy—this scenario—tends to emerge only when the best weapons available are easy for individuals to obtain and use. By the 1800s, guns were the best personal weapons available, and in the United States of America (already nominally democratic), almost everyone could afford to buy a gun, and could learn how to use it fairly easily. Governments could not do any better: it became the age of mass armies of citizen soldiers with guns. Similarly, Periclean Greece was an age of the citizen soldier and democracy.

Other theories stressed the relevance of education and of human capital—and within them of cognitive ability to increasing tolerance, rationality, political literacy and participation. Two effects of education and cognitive ability are distinguished:&lt;sup&gt;[''need quotation to verify'']&lt;/sup&gt;

* a cognitive effect (competence to make rational choices, better information-processing)
* an ethical effect (support of democratic values, freedom, human rights etc.), which itself depends on intelligence.

Evidence consistent with conventional theories of why democracy emerges and is sustained has been hard to come by. Statistical analyses have challenged modernisation theory by demonstrating that there is no reliable evidence for the claim that democracy is more likely to emerge when countries become wealthier, more educated, or less unequal. In fact, empirical evidence shows that economic growth and education may not lead to increased demand for democratization as modernization theory suggests: historically, most countries attained high levels of access to primary education well before transitioning to democracy. Rather than acting as a catalyst for democratization, in some situations education provision may instead be used by non-democratic regimes to indoctrinate their subjects and strengthen their power.

The assumed link between education and economic growth is called into question when analyzing empirical evidence. Across different countries, the correlation between education attainment and math test scores is very weak (.07). A similarly weak relationship exists between per-pupil expenditures and math competency (.26). Additionally, historical evidence suggests that average human capital (measured using literacy rates) of the masses does not explain the onset of industrialization in France from 1750 to 1850 despite arguments to the contrary. Together, these findings show that education does not always promote human capital and economic growth as is generally argued to be the case. Instead, the evidence implies that education provision often falls short of its expressed goals, or, alternatively, that political actors use education to promote goals other than economic growth and development.

Some scholars have searched for the &quot;deep&quot; determinants of contemporary political institutions, be they geographical or demographic.

An example of this is the disease environment. Places with different mortality rates had different populations and productivity levels around the world. For example, in Africa, the tsetse fly—which afflicts humans and livestock—reduced the ability of Africans to plough the land. This made Africa less settled. As a consequence, political power was less concentrated. This also affected the colonial institutions European countries established in Africa. Whether colonial settlers could live or not in a place made them develop different institutions which led to different economic and social paths. This also affected the distribution of power and the collective actions people could take. As a result, some African countries ended up having democracies and others autocracies.

An example of geographical determinants for democracy is having access to coastal areas and rivers. This natural endowment has a positive relation with economic development thanks to the benefits of trade. Trade brought economic development, which in turn, broadened power. Rulers wanting to increase revenues had to protect property-rights to create incentives for people to invest. As more people had more power, more concessions had to be made by the ruler and in many places this process lead to democracy. These determinants defined the structure of the society moving the balance of political power.


Robert Michels asserts that although democracy can never be fully realised, democracy may be developed automatically in the act of striving for democracy:&lt;blockquote&gt;The peasant in the fable, when on his deathbed, tells his sons that a treasure is buried in the field. After the old man's death the sons dig everywhere in order to discover the treasure. They do not find it. But their indefatigable labor improves the soil and secures for them a comparative well-being. The treasure in the fable may well symbolise democracy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Democracy in modern times has almost always faced opposition from the previously existing government, and many times it has faced opposition from social elites. The implementation of a democratic government from a non-democratic state is typically brought by peaceful or violent democratic revolution.

The V-Dem Institute found 2026 ongoing democratization in 18 countries: Benin, Bolivia, Botswana, Bazil, Dominican Republic, Fiji, Guatemala, Lesotho, Mauritius, Montenegro, Poland, Seychelles, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Timor-Leste, Thailand, The Gambia, and Zambia.

===== Promozzjoni tad-demokrazija =====
Promotion of democracy can increase the quality of already existing democracies, reduce political apathy, and the chance of democratic backsliding. Democracy promotion measures include voting advice applications, participatory democracy, increasing electoral integrity, youth suffrage and civic education, reducing barriers to entry for new political parties, increasing proportionality, reducing presidentialism and aligning with median voter preferences.

=== Awtokratizzazzjoni ===
Democratic backsliding is a form of autocratization, a process of structural government transition toward authoritarianism in which the exercise of political power becomes less limited and more arbitrary and repressive. Democratic backsliding specifically assumes a starting point of a democratic system. The process typically restricts the space for public contest and political participation in the process of government selection. Democratic backsliding involves the weakening of democratic institutions, such as the peaceful transition of power or free and fair elections, or the violation of individual rights that underpin democracies, especially freedom of expression. Democratic backsliding is the opposite of democratization.&lt;sup&gt;[''citation needed'']&lt;/sup&gt;

Steven Levitsky says: &quot;It's not up to voters to defend a democracy. That's asking far, far too much of voters, to cast their ballot on the basis of some set of abstract principles or procedures. With the exception of a handful of cases, voters never, ever — in any society, in any culture — prioritize democracy over all else. Individual voters worry about much more mundane things, as is their right. It is up to élites and institutions to protect democracy — not voters.&quot;

The V-Dem Institute found 2026 ongoing democratic backsliding in 44 countries: Afghanistan, Argentina, Armenia, Belarus, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Central African Republic, Croatia, Georgia, Greece, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, El Salvador, Haiti, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Italy, Ivory Coast, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Mali, Madagascar, Mauretania, Mexico, Moldova, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Niger, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Slovakia, Slovenia, Senegal, Serbia, Romania, Togo, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and United States.

===== Tfixkil =====
Some democratic governments have experienced sudden state collapse and regime change to an undemocratic form of government. Domestic military coups or rebellions are the most common means by which democratic governments have been overthrown. (See List of coups and coup attempts by country and List of civil wars.) Examples include the Spanish Civil War, the Coup of 18 Brumaire that ended the French First Republic, and the 28 May 1926 coup d'état which ended the First Portuguese Republic. Some military coups are supported by foreign governments, such as the 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état and the 1953 Iranian coup d'état. Other types of a sudden end to democracy include:

* Invasion, for example the German occupation of Czechoslovakia, and the fall of South Vietnam.
* Self-coup, in which the leader of the government extra-legally seizes all power or unlawfully extends the term in office. This can be done through:
** Suspension of the constitution by decree, such as with the 1992 Peruvian coup d'état
** An &quot;electoral self-coup&quot; using election fraud to obtain re-election of a previously fairly elected official or political party. For example, in the 1999 Ukrainian presidential election, 2003 Russian legislative election, and 2004 Russian presidential election.
* Royal coup, in which a monarch not normally involved in government seizes all power. For example, the 6 January Dictatorship, begun in 1929 when King Alexander I of Yugoslavia dismissed parliament and started ruling by decree.

Democratic backsliding can end democracy in a gradual manner, by increasing emphasis on national security and eroding free and fair elections, freedom of expression, independence of the judiciary, rule of law. A famous example is the Enabling Act of 1933, which lawfully ended democracy in Weimar Germany and marked the transition to Nazi Germany.

Temporary or long-term political violence and government interference can prevent free and fair elections, which erode the democratic nature of governments. This has happened on a local level even in well-established democracies like the United States; for example, the Wilmington insurrection of 1898 and African-American disfranchisement after the Reconstruction era.

== Influwenza tal-midja ==
The theory of democracy relies on the implicit assumption that voters are well informed about social issues, policies, and candidates so that they can make a truly informed decision. Since the late 20th century there has been a growing concern that voters may be poorly informed due to the news media's focusing more on entertainment and gossip and less on serious journalistic research on political issues.

The media professors Michael Gurevitch and Jay Blumler have proposed a number of functions that the mass media are expected to fulfill in a democracy:

* Surveillance of the sociopolitical environment
* Meaningful agenda setting
* Platforms for an intelligible and illuminating advocacy
* Dialogue across a diverse range of views
* Mechanisms for holding officials to account for how they have exercised power
* Incentives for citizens to learn, choose, and become involved
* A principled resistance to the efforts of forces outside the media to subvert their independence, integrity, and ability to serve the audience
* A sense of respect for the audience member, as potentially concerned and able to make sense of his or her political environment

This proposal has inspired a lot of discussions over whether the news media are actually fulfilling the requirements that a well functioning democracy requires. Commercial mass media are generally not accountable to anybody but their owners, and they have no obligation to serve a democratic function. They are controlled mainly by economic market forces. Fierce economic competition may force the mass media to divert themselves from any democratic ideals and focus entirely on how to survive the competition.

The tabloidization and popularization of the news media is seen in an increasing focus on human examples rather than statistics and principles. There is more focus on politicians as personalities and less focus on political issues in the popular media. Election campaigns are covered more as horse races and less as debates about ideologies and issues. The dominating media focus on spin, conflict, and competitive strategies has made voters perceive the politicians as egoists rather than idealists. This fosters mistrust and a cynical attitude to politics, less civic engagement, and less interest in voting. The ability to find effective political solutions to social problems is hampered when problems tend to be blamed on individuals rather than on structural causes. This person-centered focus may have far-reaching consequences not only for domestic problems but also for foreign policy when international conflicts are blamed on foreign heads of state rather than on political and economic structures. A strong media focus on fear and terrorism has allowed military logic to penetrate public institutions, leading to increased surveillance and the erosion of civil rights.

The responsiveness and accountability of the democratic system is compromised when lack of access to substantive, diverse, and undistorted information is handicapping the citizens' capability of evaluating the political process. The fast pace and trivialization in the competitive news media is dumbing down the political debate. Thorough and balanced investigation of complex political issues does not fit into this format. The political communication is characterized by short time horizons, short slogans, simple explanations, and simple solutions. This is conducive to political populism rather than serious deliberation.

Commercial mass media are often differentiated along the political spectrum so that people can hear mainly opinions that they already agree with. Too much controversy and diverse opinions are not always profitable for the commercial news media. Political polarization is emerging when different people read different news and watch different TV channels. This polarization has been worsened by the emergence of the social media that allow people to communicate mainly with groups of like-minded people, the so-called echo chambers. Extreme political polarization may undermine the trust in democratic institutions, leading to erosion of civil rights and free speech and in some cases even reversion to autocracy.

Many media scholars have discussed non-commercial news media with public service obligations as a means to improve the democratic process by providing the kind of political contents that a free market does not provide. The World Bank has recommended public service broadcasting in order to strengthen democracy in developing countries. These broadcasting services should be accountable to an independent regulatory body that is adequately protected from interference from political and economic interests. Public service media have an obligation to provide reliable information to voters. Many countries have publicly funded radio and television stations with public service obligations, especially in Europe and Japan, while such media are weak or non-existent in other countries including the US. Several studies have shown that the stronger the dominance of commercial broadcast media over public service media, the less the amount of policy-relevant information in the media and the more focus on horse race journalism, personalities, and the pecadillos of politicians. Public service broadcasters are characterized by more policy-relevant information and more respect for journalistic norms and impartiality than the commercial media. However, the trend of deregulation has put the public service model under increased pressure from competition with commercial media.

The emergence of the internet and the social media has profoundly altered the conditions for political communication. The social media have given ordinary citizens easy access to voice their opinion and share information while bypassing the filters of the large news media. This is often seen as an advantage for democracy. The new possibilities for communication have fundamentally changed the way social movements and protest movements operate and organize. The internet and social media have provided powerful new tools for democracy movements in developing countries and emerging democracies, enabling them to bypass censorship, voice their opinions, and organize protests.

A serious problem with the social media is that they have no truth filters. The established news media have to guard their reputation as trustworthy, while ordinary citizens may post unreliable information. In fact, studies show that false stories are going more viral than true stories. The proliferation of false stories and conspiracy theories may undermine public trust in the political system and public officials.

Reliable information sources are essential for the democratic process. Less democratic governments rely heavily on censorship, propaganda, and misinformation in order to stay in power, while independent sources of information are able to undermine their legitimacy.

== Referenzi ==

[[Kategorija:Greċja antika]]</text>
      <sha1>irklj3motvofjhb4lcayzj6s28seh97</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330257</id>
      <parentid>330231</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T05:47:18Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Trigcly</username>
        <id>17859</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>/* Storja */</comment>
      <origin>330257</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="90713" sha1="a25uvuanswgaf383t7c0wqxxarg6lox" xml:space="preserve">Id-'''demokrazija''' hija forma ta' governanza li permezz tagħha l-poter [[Politika|politiku]] jinkiseb min-nies jew mill-popolazzjoni ta' stat. Skont definizzjoni minimalista tad-demokrazija, il-mexxejja jiġu eletti permezz ta' elezzjonijiet kompetittivi filwaqt li d-definizzjonijiet iktar wesgħin jew massimalisti jorbtu d-demokrazija mal-garanziji tal-libertajiet ċivili u d-drittijiet tal-[[bniedem]] apparti l-elezzjonijiet kompetittivi.

F'demokrazija diretta, il-poplu jkollu l-awtorità diretta li jagħmel deliberazzjonijiet u li jiddeċiedi dwar il-leġiżlazzjoni. F'demokrazija rappreżentattiva, il-poplu jagħżel l-uffiċjali tal-governanza permezz ta' elezzjonijiet. Id-definizzjoni ta' &quot;poplu&quot; u l-modi kif l-awtorità tiġi kondiviża fi ħdan il-poplu jew iddelegata minnu nbidlu mal-milja taż-żminijiet u b'rati li jvarjaw minn pajjiż għal ieħor. Il-karatteristiċi tad-demokrazija spiss jinkludu l-libertà tal-ġemgħa, il-libertà tal-assoċjazzjoni, il-proprjetà personali, il-libertà tar-[[reliġjon]] u tal-[[kelma]], iċ-ċittadinanza, il-kunsens ta' dawk li jiġu ggvernati, id-drittijiet tal-votazzjoni, il-libertà miċ-ċaħda governattiva mhux ġustifikata tad-dritt tal-ħajja u tal-libertà, u d-drittijiet tal-minoranzi.

In-nozzjoni tad-demokrazija evolviet b'mod konsiderevoli maż-żmien. Matul l-[[Storja|istorja]], wieħed jista' jsib evidenza ta' demokrazija diretta, fejn il-komunitajiet kienu jieħdu deċiżjonijiet permezz ta' ġemgħat popolari. Illum il-ġurnata, il-forma dominanti tad-demokrazija hija d-demokrazija rappreżentattiva, fejn iċ-ċittadini jeleġġu lill-uffiċjali tal-gvern biex jiggvernaw f'isimhom, pereżempju f'demokrazija parlamentari jew presidenzjali. Fil-varjant komuni tad-demokrazija liberali, is-setgħat tal-maġġoranza jiġu eżerċitati fi ħdan il-qafas ta' demokrazija rappreżentattiva, iżda l-kostituzzjoni u l-qorti suprema jillimitaw lill-maġġoranza u jipproteġu lill-minoranzi — normalment billi jiġi żgurat li kulħadd igawdi minn ċerti drittijiet individwali, bħal-libertà tal-kelma jew il-libertà tal-assoċjazzjoni.

It-terminu tfaċċa fis-seklu 5 [[Ante Christum natum|Q.K]]. fil-bliet-stati [[Greċja antika|Griegi]], b'mod partikolari f'[[Ateni]] Klassika, u kien ifisser &quot;it-tmexxija tal-poplu&quot;, b'kuntrast mal-aristokrazija (bil-[[Lingwa Griega|Grieg]]: ἀριστοκρατία, ''aristokratía''), li tfisser &quot;it-tmexxija tal-elit&quot;. Prattikament fil-gvernijiet demokratiċi kollha tul l-istorja tal-qedem u moderna, iċ-ċittadinanza demokratika inizjalment kienet ristretta għal klassi tal-elit, li iktar 'il quddiem ġiet estiża għaċ-ċittadini adulti kollha. Fil-biċċa l-kbira tad-demokraziji moderni, dan inkiseb permezz tal-movimenti tas-suffraġju tas-sekli 19 u 20.

Id-demokrazija tikkuntrasta mal-forom ta' governanza fejn il-poter ma jinbitx mill-popolazzjoni ġenerali ta' stat, pereżempju s-sistemi awtoritarji. Storikament is-sistemi demokratiċi kienu forma rari u vulnerabbli ta' governanza, iżda dawn saru iktar prevalenti mis-seklu 19 'l hawn, b'mod partikolari permezz ta' diversi mewġiet ta' demokratizzazzjoni. Id-demokrazija għandha leġittimità konsiderevoli fid-dinja moderna, peress li l-opinjoni pubblika fir-reġjuni dinjin normalment huma favur is-sistemi demokratiċi ta' governanza meta mqabbla mal-alternattivi, u peress li saħansitra l-istati awtoritarji jippruvaw ipinġu lilhom infushom bħala demokratiċi. Id-demokrazija b'mod iktar konsistenti tirriżulta f'saħħa, f'[[edukazzjoni]] u f'eżiti ekonomiċi mtejba. Skont l-indiċijiet ta' ''V-Dem Democracy'' u l-Indiċi tad-Demokrazija ta' ''The Economist'', inqas minn nofs il-popolazzjoni tad-dinja tgħix f'demokrazija mill-2022. Fl-istess ħin, filwaqt li d-demokrazija rappreżentattivi tingħata valur siewi b'mod mifrux, iċ-Ċentru tar-Riċerka ta' Pew sab li l-garr rigward il-prestazzjoni demokratika huwa komuni saħansitra f'bosta demokraziji stabbiliti.

== Karatteristiċi ==
Għalkemm id-demokrazija fid-demokraziji purament rappreżentattivi hija mifhuma b'rabta mal-votazzjoni, ma jeżisti l-ebda konsensus dwar definizzjoni preċiża tad-demokrazija. Jeżistu wisq approċċi. Kien hemm studju li identifika 2,234 aġġettiv li jintuża għad-deskrizzjoni tad-demokrazija bil-[[lingwa Ingliża]].

Minkejja dan, hemm fehim iktar profond – bħal dak ta' [[Abraham Lincoln]]:

: ''&quot;Governanza tan-nies, min-nies, għan-nies&quot;''

jew dik ta' [[Karl Popper]] li ssostni li l-ħarsa &quot;klassika&quot; lejn id-demokrazija hi, &quot;fil-qosor, it-teorija li d-demokrazija hija t-tmexxija tal-poplu u li l-poplu għandu d-dritt li jiggverna hu.

Il-prinċipji demokratiċi huma riflessi fiċ-ċittadini eliġibbli kollha, ilkoll indaqs quddiem il-[[Dritt|liġi]] u lkoll b'aċċess ugwali għall-proċessi leġiżlattivi.

Pereżempju, f'demokrazija rappreżentattiva, kull vot (fit-teorija) għandu l-istess piż, u l-libertà taċ-ċittadini eliġibbli hija żgurata permezz ta' drittijiet u libertajiet leġittimizzati li tipikament ikunu mnaqqxa f'kostituzzjoni, filwaqt li użi oħra tad-&quot;demokrazija&quot; jaf jħaddnu d-demokrazija diretta, fejn iċ-ċittadini jivvutaw direttament fuq id-diversi kwistjonijiet li jinqalgħu. Skont in-[[Ġnus Magħquda|Nazzjonijiet Uniti]], id-demokrazija &quot;tipprovdi ambjent li jirrispetta d-drittijiet tal-bniedem u l-libertajiet fundamentali, u fejn ir-rieda espressa liberament tal-poplu tiġi eżerċitata&quot;.

Skont teorija partikolari d-demokrazija tirrikjedi tliet prinċipji fundamentali: il-kontroll 'il fuq (sovranità fl-iżjed livelli baxxi tal-awtorità), l-ugwaljanza politika, u n-normi soċjali li permezz tagħhom l-individwi u l-istituzzjonijiet iqisu biss atti aċċettabbli li jirriflettu l-ewwel żewġ prinċipji tal-kontroll 'il fuq u l-ugwaljanza politika. L-ugwaljanza legali, il-libertà politika u l-istat ta' dritt sikwit jiġu identifikati bħala l-karatteristiċi ewlenin ta' demokrazija li tiffunzjona sew.

F'xi pajjiżi, b'mod partikolari fir-[[Renju Unit]] (minn fejn oriġinat is-sistema ta' Westminster), il-prinċipju dominanti hu dak tas-sovranità Parlamentari, filwaqt li tinżamm l-indipendenza ġudizzjarja. Fl-[[Indja]], is-sovranità Parlamentari hija soġġetta għall-Kostituzzjoni tal-Indja li tinkludi rieżami ġudizzjarju. Għalkemm it-terminu &quot;demokrazija&quot; tipikament jintuża fil-kuntest ta' stat politiku, il-prinċipji wkoll huma applikabbli potenzjalment għall-organizzazzjonijiet privati, bħal klabbs, għaqdiet u ditti.

Id-demokraziji jistgħu jużaw bosta metodi differenti ta' teħid tad-deċiżjonijiet, iżda t-tmexxija tal-maġġoranza hija l-forma dominanti. Mingħajr kumpens, bħal protezzjonijiet legali tad-drittijiet individwali jew kollettivi, il-minoranzi politiċi jistgħu jiġu mgħakksa mit-&quot;tirannija tal-maġġoranza&quot;. It-tmexxija tal-maġġoranza tinvolvi approċċ kompetittiv, għad-differenza tad-demokrazija tal-konsensus, u b'hekk tinħoloq il-ħtieġa li l-elezzjonijiet, u ġeneralment id-deliberazzjoni, ikunu sostantivament u proċeduralment &quot;ġusti&quot; u ekwi. Fżxi pajjiżi, il-libertà tal-espressjoni politika, il-libertà tal-kelma u l-libertà tal-istampa jitqiesu bħala importanti biex jiġi żgurat li l-votanti jkunu infurmati sew, u b'hekk ikunu jistgħu jivvutaw skont l-interessi u t-twemmin tagħhom stess.

Ġie ssuġġerit ukoll li karatteristika bażika tad-demokrazija hija l-kapaċità li l-votanti kollha jipparteċipaw b'mod ħieles u sħiħ fil-[[ħajja]] tas-soċjetà tagħhom. Bl-enfasi fuq in-nozzjonijiet tal-kuntratt soċjali u r-rieda kollettiva tal-votanti kollha, id-demokrazija tista' tkun ikkaratterizzata wkoll bħala forma ta' kollettiviżmu politiku peress li tiġi definita bħala forma ta' governanza fejn iċ-ċittadini eliġibbli kollha jkollhom vuċi ugwali fit-tfassil tal-liġijiet.

Ir-repubbliki, għalkemm spiss ikunu assoċjati popolarment mad-demokrazija minħabba l-prinċipju kondiviż tal-kunsens mogħti minn dawk li jiġu ggvernati għat-tmexxija, mhux neċessarjament ikunu demokraziji, għax ir-repubblikaniżmu ma jispeċifikax ''kif'' in-nies għandhom imexxu. Tradizzjonalment it-terminu &quot;repubblika&quot; kien iħaddan kemm id-demokraziji kif ukoll l-aristokraziji u l-varjanti tagħhom. F'sens modern, il-forma ta' governanza repubblikana hija forma ta' governanza mingħajr monarka. Minħabba f'hekk, id-demokraziji jistgħu jkunu repubbliki jew monarkiji kostituzzjonali, bħar-Renju Unit, fejn il-monarka ma jkunx il-mexxej.

== Storja ==
Il-ġemgħat demokratiċi għandhom żmien daqs kemm għandha żmien l-ispeċi umana u ilhom jeżistu tul l-istorja umana, iżda sas-seklu 19, il-figuri [[Politiku|politiċi]] ewlenin fil-biċċa l-kbira opponew id-demokrazija. It-teoriċi repubblikani rabtu d-demokrazija ma' daqs ċkejken: iktar ma kienu jikbru fid-daqs l-unitajiet politiċi, iktar kienet tiżdied il-probabbiltà li l-gvern isir tiranniku. Fl-istess waqt, l-unitajiet politiċi żgħar kienu vulnerabbli għall-ħakma. Montesquieu kiteb, &quot;Jekk repubblika tkun żgħira, tinqered minn qawwa barranija; jekk tkun kbira, tinqered mill-imperfezzjoni interna&quot;. Skont ix-xjenzat politiku tal-Università ta' Johns Hopkins [[Daniel Deudney]], il-ħolqien tal-[[Stati Uniti|Istati Uniti]], bid-daqs kbir u s-sistema ta' kontrolli u bilanċi tagħha, kienet soluzzjoni għall-problemi doppji tad-daqs. Fis-soċjetajiet ta' madwar id-dinja seħħew forom ta' demokrazija b'mod organiku li ma kellhom l-ebda kuntatt ma' xulxin.

=== Oriġini ===

==== [[Greċja]] u [[Ruma]] ====
It-terminu ''demokrazija'' tfaċċa għall-ewwel darba fil-ħsieb politiku u [[Filosofija|filosofiku]] tal-Greċja Antika fil-belt-stat ta' Ateni fl-antikità klassika. Il-kelma ġejja minn ''dêmos'' li tfisser &quot;nies (komuni)&quot; u minn ''krátos'' li tfisser &quot;qawwa/setgħa&quot;. Taħt Cleisthenes, f'Ateni ġie stabbilit dak li huwa maħsub bħala l-ewwel eżempju ta' tip ta' demokrazija fis-seklu 6 Q.K. (508–507 Q.K.). Cleisthenes huwa meqjus bħala &quot;l-missier tad-demokrazija ta' Ateni&quot;. L-ewwel użu attestat tal-kelma demokrazija jinsab fix-xogħlijiet ta' proża tal-ħabta tal-430 Q.K., bħall-''Istorji'' ta' Erodotu, iżda l-użu tagħha kien eqdem b'diversi deċennji, peress li żewġ persuni minn Ateni li twieldu għall-ħabta tal-470 Q.K. kien jisimhom Democrates, isem politiku ġdid — x'aktarx b'appoġġ għad-demokrazija — li ngħata fi żmien ta' dibattiti dwar kwistjonijiet kostituzzjonali f'Ateni. Aeschylus jalludi bis-saħħa wkoll għall-kelma fid-dramm tiegħu ''Is-Supplikanti'', li ttella' għall-ħabta tal-463 Q.K., fejn isemmi &quot;l-id tat-tmexxija tal-kotra&quot; [''demou kratousa cheir'']. Qabel dak iż-żmien, il-kelma li kienet tiddefinixxi s-sistema politika ġdida ta' Cleisthenes x'aktarx li kienet ''isonomija'', li tfisser ugwaljanza politika.

Id-demokrazija ta' Ateni ħadet is-sura ta' demokrazija diretta, u kellha żewġ karatteristiċi li jiddistingwuha: l-għażla aleatorja ta' ċittadini ordinarji biex jimlew il-ftit karigi amministrattivi u ġudizzjarji eżistenti tal-gvern, u ġemgħa leġiżlattiva li kienet tikkonsisti mill-maġġoranza taċ-ċittadini ta' Ateni. Iċ-ċittadini eliġibbli kollha kienu jitħallew jitkellmu u jivvutaw fil-ġemgħa jew fl-assemblea, fejn kienu jiġu stabbiliti l-liġijiet tal-belt-stat. Madankollu, iċ-ċittadinanza ta' Ateni ma kinitx tingħata lin-[[Mara|nisa]], lill-[[Skjavitù|ilsiera]], lill-barranin (μέτοικοι / ''métoikoi''), u liż-żgħażagħ taħt l-età tas-servizz militari. Effettivament, resident wieħed minn kull erba' f'Ateni kienu jikkwalifikaw bħala ċittadini. Is-sjieda tal-art ma kinitx rekwiżit għaċ-ċittadinanza. L-esklużjoni ta' partijiet kbar tal-popolazzjoni mill-korp taċ-ċittadini hija marbuta mill-qrib mal-fehim tal-qedem taċ-ċittadinanza. Fil-biċċa l-kbira ta' żmien il-qedem, il-benefiċċju taċ-ċittadinanza kien marbut mal-obbligu tal-ġlied fil-kampanji militari.

Id-demokrazija ta' Aterni mhux biss kienet ''diretta'' fis-sens li d-deċiżjonijiet kienu jittieħdu mill-ġemgħa, iżda anke l-''iżjed diretta'' fis-sens li l-ġemgħa permezz tal-istrutturi bħall-assemblea, is-senat u l-qrati legali kienet tikkontrolla l-proċess politiku kollu u proporzjon kbir taċ-ċittadini kienu jkunu involuti b'mod kostanti fl-affarijiet pubbliċi. Minkejja li d-drittijiet tal-individwu ma kinux żgurati mill-kostituzzjoni ta' Ateni fis-sens modern (il-Griegi tal-qedem ma kellhomx kelma għal &quot;drittijiet&quot;), dawk li kienu ċittadini ta' Ateni kienu jgawdu l-libertajiet tagħhom mhux f'oppożizzjoni għall-gvern iżda billi jgħixu f'belt li ma kinitx soġġetta għal xi setgħa oħra u billi huma stess ma kinux soġġetti għat-tmexxija ta' ħaddieħor.

Il-votazzjoni tfaċċat fi [[Sparta]] saħansitra fis-700 Q.K. L-ekkleżjastiċi ta' Sparta kienu ġemgħa tal-poplu, li kienet tiltaqa' darba fix-xahar, fejn kull ċittadini maskili ta' mill-inqas 20 sena seta' jipparteċipa. Fl-assemblea, l-Ispartani kienu jeleġġu l-mexxejja u jixħtu l-voti tagħhom bl-għajjat (il-votazzjoni kienet tiġi deċiża skont l-ikbar għajta tal-folla). [[Aristotli]] ddeskriva dan il-metodu bħala &quot;tat-tfal&quot;, meta mqabbel mas-sistema tal-votazzjoni fuq poloz tal-ġebel użata miċ-ċittadini ta' Ateni. Sparta adottat din is-sistema minħabba s-sempliċità tagħha, u biex jiġi evitat kull tip ta' preġudizzju, xiri jew qerq fil-votazzjoni, li kienu predominanti fl-elezzjonijiet demokratiċi bikrin.

Barra minn hekk, id-depożizzjoni tar-Renju Ruman ħolqot sistema b'element demokratiku fil-forma ta' bosta ġemgħat popolari differenti.

Minkejja li r-Repubblika Rumana tat kontribut sinifikanti għal bosta aspetti tad-demokrazija, frazzjon biss mir-Rumani kienu ċittadini li kellhom il-vot fl-elezzjonijiet għall-maġistrati. Il-voti tas-setgħana kienu jingħataw iktar piż permezz ta' sistema ta' votazzjoni ponderata, għaldaqstant il-biċċa l-kbira tal-uffiċjali għoljin, inkluż il-membri tas-Senat, kienu jiġu minn ftit familji għonja u nobbli. Il-mudell Ruman ta' governanza ispira bosta ħassieba politiċi tul is-sekli.

==== Indja tal-qedem ====
Vaishali, il-[[belt kapitali]] tal-Lega ta' Vajjika (Vrijji mahajanapada) tal-Indja, titqies bħala wieħed mill-ewwel eżempji ta' repubblika għall-ħabta tas-seklu 6 Q.K.

==== Amerki ====
[[Kultura|Kulturi]] oħra, bħall-Iroquois fl-Amerki, żviluppaw ukoll forma ta' soċjetà demokratika bejn l-1450 u l-1660 (u possibbilment fl-1142), ferm qabel ma kellhom kuntatt mal-[[Ewropa|Ewropej]]. Din id-demokrazija għadha preżenti sal-lum u hija l-iżjed demokrazija rappreżentattiva antika eżistenti fid-dinja.

=== [[Medjuevu|Medju Evu]] ===
While most regions in Europe during the Middle Ages were ruled by clergy or feudal lords, there existed various systems involving elections or assemblies, although often only involving a small part of the population. In Scandinavia, bodies known as things consisted of freemen presided by a lawspeaker. These deliberative bodies were responsible for settling political questions, and variants included the Althing in Iceland and the Løgting in the Faeroe Islands. The veche, found in Eastern Europe, was a similar body to the Scandinavian thing. In the Roman Catholic Church, the pope has been elected by a papal conclave composed of cardinals since 1059. The first documented parliamentary body in Europe was the Cortes of León. Established by Alfonso IX in 1188, the Cortes had authority over setting taxation, foreign affairs and legislating, though the exact nature of its role remains disputed. The Republic of Ragusa, established in 1358 and centered around the city of Dubrovnik, provided representation and voting rights to its male aristocracy only. Various Italian city-states and polities had republic forms of government. For instance, the Republic of Florence, established in 1115, was led by the Signoria whose members were chosen by sortition. In the 10th–15th century Frisia, a distinctly non-feudal society, the right to vote on local matters and on county officials was based on land size. The Kouroukan Fouga divided the Mali Empire into ruling clans (lineages) that were represented at a great assembly called the ''Gbara''. However, the charter made Mali more similar to a constitutional monarchy than a democratic republic.

The Parliament of England had its roots in the restrictions on the power of kings written into Magna Carta (1215), which explicitly protected certain rights of the King's subjects and implicitly supported what became the English writ of habeas corpus, safeguarding individual freedom against unlawful imprisonment with the right to appeal. The first representative national assembly in England was Simon de Montfort's Parliament in 1265. The emergence of petitioning is some of the earliest evidence of parliament being used as a forum to address the general grievances of ordinary people. However, the power to call parliament remained at the pleasure of the monarch.

Studies have linked the emergence of parliamentary institutions in Europe during the medieval period to urban agglomeration and the creation of new classes, such as artisans, as well as the presence of nobility and religious elites. Scholars have also linked the emergence of representative government to Europe's relative political fragmentation. Political scientist David Stasavage links the fragmentation of Europe, and its subsequent democratization, to the manner in which the Roman Empire collapsed: Roman territory was conquered by small fragmented groups of Germanic tribes, thus leading to the creation of small political units where rulers were relatively weak and needed the consent of the governed to ward off foreign threats.

In Poland, noble democracy was characterized by an increase in the activity of the middle nobility, which wanted to increase their share in exercising power at the expense of the magnates. Magnates dominated the most important offices in the state (secular and ecclesiastical) and sat on the royal council, later the senate. The growing importance of the middle nobility had an impact on the establishment of the institution of the land ''sejmik'' (local assembly), which subsequently obtained more rights. During the fifteenth and first half of the sixteenth century, sejmiks received more and more power and became the most important institutions of local power. In 1454, Casimir IV Jagiellon granted the sejmiks the right to decide on taxes and to convene a mass mobilization in the Nieszawa Statutes. He also pledged not to create new laws without their consent.

=== Era moderna ===

==== Perjodu modern bikri ====
In 17th century England, there was renewed interest in Magna Carta. The Parliament of England passed the Petition of Right in 1628 which established certain liberties for subjects. The English Civil War (1642–1651) was fought between the King and an oligarchic but elected Parliament, during which the idea of a political party took form with groups debating rights to political representation during the Putney Debates of 1647. Subsequently, the Protectorate (1653–59) and the English Restoration (1660) restored more autocratic rule, although Parliament passed the Habeas Corpus Act in 1679 which strengthened the convention that forbade detention lacking sufficient cause or evidence. After the Glorious Revolution of 1688, the Bill of Rights was enacted in 1689 which codified certain rights and liberties and is still in effect. The Bill set out the requirement for regular elections, rules for freedom of speech in Parliament and limited the power of the monarch, ensuring that, unlike much of Europe at the time, royal absolutism would not prevail. Economic historians Douglass North and Barry Weingast have characterized the institutions implemented in the Glorious Revolution as a resounding success in terms of restraining the government and ensuring protection for property rights.

Renewed interest in the Magna Carta, the English Civil War, and the Glorious Revolution in the 17th century prompted the growth of political philosophy on the British Isles. Thomas Hobbes was the first philosopher to articulate a detailed social contract theory. Writing in the ''Leviathan'' (1651), Hobbes theorized that individuals living in the state of nature led lives that were &quot;solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short&quot; and constantly waged a war of all against all. In order to prevent the occurrence of an anarchic state of nature, Hobbes reasoned that individuals ceded their rights to a strong, authoritarian power. In other words, Hobbes advocated for an absolute monarchy which, in his opinion, was the best form of government. Later, philosopher and physician John Locke would posit a different interpretation of social contract theory. Writing in his ''Two Treatises of Government'' (1689), Locke posited that all individuals possessed the inalienable rights to life, liberty and estate (property). According to Locke, individuals would voluntarily come together to form a state for the purposes of defending their rights. Particularly important for Locke were property rights, whose protection Locke deemed to be a government's primary purpose. Furthermore, Locke asserted that governments were legitimate only if they held the consent of the governed. For Locke, citizens had the right to revolt against a government that acted against their interest or became tyrannical. Although they were not widely read during his lifetime, Locke's works are considered the founding documents of liberal thought and profoundly influenced the leaders of the American Revolution and later the French Revolution. His liberal democratic framework of governance remains the preeminent form of democracy in the world.

In the Cossack republics of Ukraine in the 16th and 17th centuries, the Cossack Hetmanate and Zaporizhian Sich, the holder of the highest post of Hetman was elected by the representatives from the country's districts.

In North America, representative government began in Jamestown, Virginia, with the election of the House of Burgesses (forerunner of the Virginia General Assembly) in 1619. English Puritans who migrated from 1620 established colonies in New England whose local governance was democratic; the hard power of these local assemblies varied greatly throughout the colonial time period however officially they held only small amounts of devolved power, as ultimate authority belonged to the Crown and Parliament. The Puritans (Pilgrim Fathers), Baptists, and Quakers who founded these colonies applied the democratic organisation of their congregations also to the administration of their communities in worldly matters.

==== Sekli 18 u 19 ====
The first Parliament of Great Britain was established in 1707, after the merger of the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland under the Acts of Union. Two key documents of the UK's uncodified constitution, the English Declaration of Right, 1689 (restated in the Bill of Rights 1689) and the Scottish Claim of Right 1689, had both cemented Parliament's position as the supreme law-making body and said that the &quot;election of members of Parliament ought to be free&quot;. However, Parliament was only elected by male property owners, which amounted to 3% of the population in 1780. The first known British person of African heritage to vote in a general election, Ignatius Sancho, voted in 1774 and 1780.

During the Age of Liberty in Sweden (1718–1772), civil rights were expanded and power shifted from the monarch to parliament. The taxed peasantry was represented in parliament, although with little influence, but commoners without taxed property had no suffrage.

The creation of the short-lived Corsican Republic in 1755 was an early attempt to adopt a democratic constitution (all men and women above age of 25 could vote). This Corsican Constitution was the first based on Enlightenment principles and included female suffrage, something that was not included in most other democracies until the 20th century.

Colonial America had similar property qualifications as Britain, and in the period before 1776 the abundance and availability of land meant that large numbers of colonists met such requirements with at least 60 per cent of adult white males able to vote. The great majority of white men were farmers who met the property ownership or taxpaying requirements. With few exceptions, no blacks or women could vote. Vermont, which, on declaring independence of Great Britain in 1777, adopted a constitution modelled on Pennsylvania's citizenship and democratic suffrage for males with or without property. The United States Constitution of 1787 is the oldest surviving, still active, governmental codified constitution. The Constitution provided for an elected government and protected civil rights and liberties, but did not end slavery nor extend voting rights in the United States, instead leaving the issue of suffrage to the individual states. Generally, states limited suffrage to white male property owners and taxpayers. At the time of the first Presidential election in 1789, about 6% of the population was eligible to vote. The Naturalization Act of 1790 limited U.S. citizenship to whites only. The Bill of Rights in 1791 set limits on government power to protect personal freedoms but had little impact on judgements by the courts for the first 130 years after ratification.

In 1789, Revolutionary France adopted the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen and, although short-lived, the National Convention was elected by all men in 1792. The Polish-Lithuanian Constitution of 3 May 1791 sought to implement a more effective constitutional monarchy, introduced political equality between townspeople and nobility, and placed the peasants under the protection of the government, mitigating the worst abuses of serfdom. In force for less than 19 months, it was declared null and void by the Grodno Sejm that met in 1793. Nonetheless, the 1791 Constitution helped keep alive Polish aspirations for the eventual restoration of the country's sovereignty over a century later.

In the United States, the 1828 presidential election was the first in which non-property-holding white males could vote in the vast majority of states. Voter turnout soared during the 1830s, reaching about 80% of the adult white male population in the 1840 presidential election. North Carolina was the last state to abolish property qualification in 1856 resulting in a close approximation to universal white male suffrage (however tax-paying requirements remained in five states in 1860 and survived in two states until the 20th century). In the 1860 United States census, the slave population had grown to four million, and in Reconstruction after the Civil War, three constitutional amendments were passed: the 13th Amendment (1865) that ended slavery; the 14th Amendment (1869) that gave black people citizenship, and the 15th Amendment (1870) that gave black males a nominal right to vote. Full enfranchisement of citizens was not secured until after the civil rights movement gained passage by the US Congress of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The voting franchise in the United Kingdom was expanded and made more uniform in a series of reforms that began with the Reform Act 1832 and continued into the 20th century, notably with the Representation of the People Act 1918 and the Equal Franchise Act 1928. Universal male suffrage was established in France in March 1848 in the wake of the French Revolution of 1848. During that year, several revolutions broke out in Europe as rulers were confronted with popular demands for liberal constitutions and more democratic government.

In 1876, the Ottoman Empire transitioned from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional one, and held two elections the next year to elect members to her newly formed parliament. Provisional Electoral Regulations were issued, stating that the elected members of the Provincial Administrative Councils would elect members to the first Parliament. Later that year, a new constitution was promulgated, which provided for a bicameral Parliament with a Senate appointed by the Sultan and a popularly elected Chamber of Deputies. Only men above the age of 30 who were competent in Turkish and had full civil rights were allowed to stand for election. Reasons for disqualification included holding dual citizenship, being employed by a foreign government, being bankrupt, employed as a servant, or having &quot;notoriety for ill deeds&quot;. Full universal suffrage was achieved in 1934.

In 1893, the self-governing colony New Zealand became the first country in the world (except for the short-lived 18th-century Corsican Republic) to establish active universal suffrage by recognizing women as having the right to vote.

==== Sekli 20 u 21 ====
20th-century transitions to liberal democracy have come in successive &quot;waves of democracy&quot;, variously resulting from wars, revolutions, decolonisation, and religious and economic circumstances. Global waves of &quot;democratic regression&quot; reversing democratization, have also occurred in the 1920s and 30s, in the 1960s and 1970s, and in the 2010s.

World War I and the dissolution of the autocratic Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian empires resulted in the creation of new nation-states in Europe, most of them at least nominally democratic. In the 1920s democratic movements flourished and women's suffrage advanced, but the Great Depression brought disenchantment and most of the countries of Europe, Latin America, and Asia turned to strong-man rule or dictatorships. Fascism and dictatorships flourished in Nazi Germany, Italy, Spain and Portugal, as well as non-democratic governments in the Baltics, the Balkans, Brazil, Cuba, China, and Japan, among others.

World War II brought a definitive reversal of this trend in Western Europe. The democratisation of the American, British, and French sectors of occupied Germany (disputed), Austria, Italy, and the occupied Japan served as a model for the later theory of government change. However, most of Eastern Europe, including the Soviet sector of Germany fell into the non-democratic Soviet-dominated bloc.

The war was followed by decolonisation, and again most of the new independent states had nominally democratic constitutions. India emerged as the world's largest democracy and continues to be so. Countries that were once part of the British Empire often adopted the British Westminster system.

In 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights mandated democracy:&lt;blockquote&gt;3. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.&lt;/blockquote&gt;— Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 21, United Nations, 1948

By 1960, the vast majority of country-states were nominally democracies, although most of the world's populations lived in nominal democracies that experienced sham elections, and other forms of subterfuge (particularly in &quot;Communist&quot; states and the former colonies). A subsequent wave of democratisation brought substantial gains toward true liberal democracy for many states, dubbed &quot;third wave of democracy&quot;. Portugal, Spain, and several of the military dictatorships in South America returned to civilian rule in the 1970s and 1980s. This was followed by countries in East and South Asia by the mid-to-late 1980s. Economic malaise in the 1980s, along with resentment of Soviet oppression, contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union, the associated end of the Cold War, and the democratisation and liberalisation of the former Eastern bloc countries. The most successful of the new democracies were those geographically and culturally closest to western Europe, and they are now either part of the European Union or candidate states. In 1986, after the toppling of the most prominent Asian dictatorship, the only democratic state of its kind at the time emerged in the Philippines with the rise of Corazon Aquino, who would later be known as the mother of Asian democracy.

The liberal trend spread to some states in Africa in the 1990s, most prominently in South Africa. Some recent examples of attempts of liberalisation include the Indonesian Revolution of 1998, the Bulldozer Revolution in Yugoslavia, the Rose Revolution in Georgia, the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, the Cedar Revolution in Lebanon, the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan, and the Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia.

According to Freedom House, in 2007 there were 123 electoral democracies (up from 40 in 1972). According to ''World Forum on Democracy'', electoral democracies now represent 120 of the 192 existing countries and constitute 58.2 per cent of the world's population. At the same time liberal democracies i.e. countries Freedom House regards as free and respectful of basic human rights and the rule of law are 85 in number and represent 38 per cent of the global population. Also in 2007 the United Nations declared 15 September the International Day of Democracy.

Many countries reduced their voting age to 18 years; the major democracies began to do so in the 1970s starting in Western Europe and North America.&lt;sup&gt;[''failed verification'']&lt;/sup&gt; Most electoral democracies continue to exclude those younger than 18 from voting. The voting age has been lowered to 16 for national elections in a number of countries, including Brazil, Austria, Cuba, and Nicaragua. In California, a 2004 proposal to permit a quarter vote at 14 and a half vote at 16 was ultimately defeated. In 2008, the German parliament proposed but shelved a bill that would grant the vote to each citizen at birth, to be used by a parent until the child claims it for themselves.

According to Freedom House, starting in 2005, there have been 17 consecutive years in which declines in political rights and civil liberties throughout the world have outnumbered improvements, as populist and nationalist political forces have gained ground everywhere from Poland (under the Law and Justice party) to the Philippines (under Rodrigo Duterte). In a Freedom House report released in 2018, Democracy Scores for most countries declined for the 12th consecutive year. ''The Christian Science Monitor'' reported that nationalist and populist political ideologies were gaining ground, at the expense of rule of law, in countries like Poland, Turkey and Hungary. For example, in Poland, the President appointed 27 new Supreme Court judges over legal objections from the European Commission. In Turkey, thousands of judges were removed from their positions following a failed coup attempt during a government crackdown .

&quot;Democratic backsliding&quot; in the 2010s were attributed to economic inequality and social discontent, personalism, poor government's management of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as other factors such as manipulation of civil society, &quot;toxic polarization&quot;, foreign disinformation campaigns, racism and nativism, excessive executive power, and decreased power of the opposition. Within English-speaking Western democracies, &quot;protection-based&quot; attitudes combining cultural conservatism and leftist economic attitudes were the strongest predictor of support for authoritarian modes of governance.

== Teorija ==
=== Teorija bikrija ===
Aristotle's '''democratic theory''' contrasted rule by the many (democracy/timocracy), with rule by the few (oligarchy/aristocracy/elitism), and with rule by a single person (tyranny/autocracy/absolute monarchy). He also thought that there was a good and a bad variant of each system (he considered democracy to be the degenerate counterpart to timocracy).

A common view among early and renaissance Republican theorists was that democracy could only survive in small political communities. Heeding the lessons of the Roman Republic's shift to monarchism as it grew larger or smaller, these Republican theorists held that the expansion of territory and population inevitably led to tyranny. Democracy was therefore highly fragile and rare historically, as it could only survive in small political units, which due to their size were vulnerable to conquest by larger political units. Montesquieu famously said, &quot;if a republic is small, it is destroyed by an outside force; if it is large, it is destroyed by an internal vice.&quot; Jean-Jacques Rousseau asserted, &quot;It is, therefore the natural property of small states to be governed as a republic, of middling ones to be subject to a monarch, and of large empires to be swayed by a despotic prince.&quot;

=== Teorija kontemporanja ===
Fost it-teoriċi politiċi moderni, jeżistu kunċetti fundamentali differenti tad-demokrazija.

==== Aggregazzjoni ====
The theory of aggregative democracy claims that the aim of the democratic processes is to solicit citizens' preferences and aggregate them together to determine what social policies society should adopt. Therefore, proponents of this view hold that democratic participation should primarily focus on voting, where the policy with the most votes gets implemented. Different variants of aggregative democracy exist.

According to the minimalist democracy conception, elections are a mechanism for competition between politicians. Joseph Schumpeter articulated this view famously in his book ''Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy''.

Anthony Downs argues that ideological political parties are necessary to act as a mediating broker between individuals and governments. On the other hand, direct democracy, where citizens vote directly on legislative proposals, can show better aggregation in cases of differences in preferences between elites and voters.

===== Mandat medjan =====
According to the median voter theorem the political representativeness can be evaluated by comparing how close laws and policies are to the views of the median voter along the political spectrum. The ''median mandate'' views the preferences of the median voter as granting political legitimacy.

==== Poliarkija ====
Robert A. Dahl argues that the fundamental democratic principle is that, when it comes to binding collective decisions, each person in a political community is entitled to have his/her interests be given equal consideration. He uses the term polyarchy (&quot;rule by many&quot;) to refer to societies in which there exists a certain set of institutions and procedures which are perceived as leading to such democracy. First and foremost among these institutions is the regular occurrence of free and open elections which are used to select representatives who then manage all or most of the public policy of the society. However, these polyarchic procedures may not create a full democracy if, for example, poverty prevents political participation. Similarly, Ronald Dworkin argues that &quot;democracy is a substantive, not a merely procedural, ideal.&quot;

==== Deliberazzjoni ====
Deliberative democracy is based on the notion that democracy is government by deliberation. Unlike aggregative democracy, deliberative democracy holds that, for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by authentic deliberation, not merely the aggregation of preferences that occurs in voting. Authentic deliberation is deliberation among decision-makers that is free from distortions of unequal political power, such as power a decision-maker obtained through economic wealth or the support of interest groups. If the decision-makers cannot reach consensus after authentically deliberating on a proposal, then they vote on the proposal using a form of majority rule. Citizens assemblies are considered by many scholars as practical examples of deliberative democracy, with a recent OECD report identifying citizens assemblies as an increasingly popular mechanism to involve citizens in governmental decision-making. Proponents of direct democracy view citizens do not rule themselves unless they directly decide laws and policies. Political activity can be valuable in itself, it socialises and educates citizens, and popular participation can check powerful elites.

==== Tipi ta' demokraziji governattivi ====
Democracy has taken a number of forms, both in theory and practice. Some varieties of democracy provide better representation and more freedom for their citizens than others. However, if any democracy is not structured to prohibit the government from excluding the people from the legislative process, or any branch of government from altering the separation of powers in its favour, then a branch of the system can accumulate too much power and destroy the democracy.

The following kinds of democracy are not exclusive of one another: many specify details of aspects that are independent of one another and can co-exist in a single system.

===== Forom bażiċi =====
Several variants of democracy exist, but there are two basic forms, both of which concern how the whole body of all eligible citizens executes its will. One form of democracy is direct democracy, in which all eligible citizens have active participation in the political decision making, for example voting on policy initiatives directly. In most modern democracies, the whole body of eligible citizens remain the sovereign power but political power is exercised indirectly through elected representatives; this is called a representative democracy.

If the head of state is democratically elected then the polity is called a democratic republic

====== Demokrazija diretta ======
Direct democracy is a political system where the citizens participate in the decision-making personally, contrary to relying on intermediaries or representatives. Proponents like Jean-Jacques Rousseau argue the direct approach increases legitimacy. A direct democracy gives the voting population the power to:

* Change constitutional laws,
* Put forth initiatives, referendums and suggestions for laws

Within modern-day representative governments, certain electoral tools like referendums, citizens' initiatives and recall elections are referred to as forms of direct democracy. However, some advocates of direct democracy argue for local assemblies of face-to-face discussion. Direct democracy as a government system currently exists in the Swiss cantons of Appenzell Innerrhoden and Glarus, the Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities, communities affiliated with the CIPO-RFM, the Bolivian city councils of FEJUVE, and Kurdish cantons of Rojava.

====== Demokrazija semidiretta ======
Some modern democracies that are predominantly representative in nature also heavily rely upon forms of political action that are directly democratic. These democracies, which combine elements of representative democracy and direct democracy, are termed ''semi-direct democracies'' or ''participatory democracies''. Examples include Switzerland and some U.S. states, where frequent use is made of referendums and initiatives.

The Swiss confederation is a semi-direct democracy. At the federal level, citizens can propose changes to the constitution (federal popular initiative) or ask for a referendum to be held on any law voted by the parliament. Between January 1995 and June 2005, Swiss citizens voted 31 times, to answer 103 questions (during the same period, French citizens participated in only two referendums). Although in the past 120 years less than 250 initiatives have been put to referendum.

Examples include the extensive use of referendums in the US state of California, which is a state that has more than 20 million voters.

In New England, town meetings are often used, especially in rural areas, to manage local government. This creates a hybrid form of government, with a local direct democracy and a representative state government. For example, most Vermont towns hold annual town meetings in March in which town officers are elected, budgets for the town and schools are voted on, and citizens have the opportunity to speak and be heard on political matters.

====== Sistema tax-xorti ======
The use of a lot system, a characteristic of Athenian democracy, is a feature of some versions of direct democracies. In this system, important governmental and administrative tasks are performed by citizens picked from a lottery.

====== Demokrazija rappreżentattiva ======
Representative democracy involves the election of government officials by the people being represented. The most common mechanisms involve election of the candidate with a majority or a plurality of the votes. Most western countries have representative systems.

Representatives may be elected or become diplomatic representatives by a particular district (or constituency), or represent the entire electorate through proportional systems, with some using a combination of the two. Some representative democracies also incorporate elements of direct democracy, such as referendums. A characteristic of representative democracy is that while the representatives are elected by the people to act in the people's interest, they retain the freedom to exercise their own judgement as how best to do so. Such reasons have driven criticism upon representative democracy, pointing out the contradictions of representation mechanisms with democracy.

====== Demokrazija Parlamentari ======
Parliamentary democracy is a representative democracy where government is appointed by or can be dismissed by, representatives as opposed to a &quot;presidential rule&quot; wherein the president is both head of state and the head of government and is elected by the voters. Under a parliamentary democracy, government is exercised by delegation to an executive ministry and subject to ongoing review, checks and balances by the legislative parliament elected by the people.

In a parliamentary system, the prime minister may be dismissed by the legislature at any point in time for not meeting the expectations of the legislature. This is done through a vote of no confidence where the legislature decides whether or not to remove the prime minister from office with majority support for dismissal. In some countries, the prime minister can also call an election at any point in time, typically when the prime minister believes that they are in good favour with the public as to get re-elected. In other parliamentary democracies, extra elections are virtually never held, a minority government being preferred until the next ordinary elections. An important feature of the parliamentary democracy is the concept of the &quot;loyal opposition&quot;. The essence of the concept is that the second largest political party (or opposition) opposes the governing party (or coalition), while still remaining loyal to the state and its democratic principles.

====== Demokrazija Presidenzjali ======
Presidential democracy is a system where the public elects the president through an election. The president serves as both the head of state and head of government controlling most of the executive powers. The president serves for a specific term and cannot exceed that amount of time. The legislature often has limited ability to remove a president from office. Elections typically have a fixed date and are not easily changed. The president has direct control over the cabinet, specifically appointing the cabinet members.

The executive usually has the responsibility to execute or implement legislation and may have the limited legislative powers, such as a veto. However, a legislative branch passes legislation and budgets. This provides some measure of separation of powers. In consequence, however, the president and the legislature may end up in the control of separate parties, allowing one to block the other and thereby interfere with the orderly operation of the state. This may be the reason why presidential democracy is not very common outside the Americas, Africa, and Central and Southeast Asia.

A semi-presidential system is a system of democracy in which the government includes both a prime minister and a president. The particular powers held by the prime minister and president vary by country.

==== Tipoloġija ====

===== Monarkija kostituzzjonali =====
Many countries such as the United Kingdom, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Scandinavian countries, Thailand, Japan and Bhutan turned powerful monarchs into constitutional monarchs (often gradually) with limited or symbolic roles. For example, in the predecessor states to the United Kingdom, constitutional monarchy began to emerge and has continued uninterrupted since the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and passage of the Bill of Rights 1689. Strongly limited constitutional monarchies, such as the United Kingdom, have been referred to as crowned republics by writers such as H. G. Wells.

In other countries, the monarchy was abolished along with the aristocratic system (as in France, China, Russia, Germany, Austria, Hungary, Italy, Greece, and Egypt). An elected person, with or without significant powers, became the head of state in these countries.

Elite upper houses of legislatures, which often had lifetime or hereditary tenure, were common in many states. Over time, these either had their powers limited (as with the British House of Lords) or else became elective and remained powerful (as with the Australian Senate).

===== Demokrazija repubblika =====
The term ''republic'' has many different meanings, but today often refers to a representative democracy with an elected head of state, such as a president, serving for a limited term, in contrast to states with a hereditary monarch as a head of state, even if these states also are representative democracies with an elected or appointed head of government such as a prime minister.

The Founding Fathers of the United States often criticised direct democracy; James Madison argued, especially in ''The Federalist'' No. 10, that what distinguished a direct ''democracy'' from a ''republic'' was that the former depended on small size and suffered more violently from the effects of faction, whereas a republic could get stronger as it got larger and combats faction by its very structure. Accordingly, during Philadelphia convention Madison called election of representatives by large territories &quot;the only defence against the inconveniencies of democracy consistent with the democratic form of Govt.&quot;

Professors Richard Ellis of Willamette University and Michael Nelson of Rhodes College argue that much constitutional thought, from Madison to Lincoln and beyond, has focused on &quot;the problem of majority tyranny&quot;. They conclude, &quot;The principles of republican government embedded in the Constitution represent an effort by the framers to ensure that the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness would not be trampled by majorities.&quot; What was critical to American values, John Adams insisted, was that the government be &quot;bound by fixed laws, which the people have a voice in making, and a right to defend.&quot; As Benjamin Franklin was exiting after writing the US Constitution, Elizabeth Willing Powel asked him &quot;Well, Doctor, what have we got—a republic or a monarchy?&quot;. He replied &quot;A republic—if you can keep it.&quot;

===== Demokrazija liberali =====
A liberal democracy is a representative democracy which enshrines a liberal political philosophy, where the ability of the elected representatives to exercise decision-making power is subject to the rule of law, moderated by a constitution or laws such as the protection of the rights and freedoms of individuals, and constrained on the extent to which the will of the majority can be exercised against the rights of minorities.

===== Demokrazija Soċjalista =====
Socialist thought has several different views on democracy, for example social democracy or democratic socialism. Many democratic socialists and social democrats believe in a form of participatory, industrial, economic and/or workplace democracy combined with a representative democracy.

===== Demokrazija Marxista =====
Marxist theory supports a democratic society centering the working class. Some Marxists and Trotskyists believe in direct democracy or workers' councils (which are sometimes called soviets). This system can begin with workplace democracy and can manifest itself as soviet democracy or dictatorship of the proletariat. Trotskyist groups have interpreted socialist democracy to be synonymous with multi-party far-left representation, autonomous union organizations, worker's control of production, internal party democracy and the mass participation of the working masses. Some communist parties support a soviet republic with democratic centralism. Within democracy in Marxism there can be hostility to what is commonly called &quot;liberal democracy&quot;.

===== Demokrazija Anarkista =====
Anarchists are split in this domain, depending on whether they believe that a majority-rule is tyrannic or not. To many anarchists, the only form of democracy considered acceptable is direct democracy. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon argued that the only acceptable form of direct democracy is one in which it is recognised that majority decisions are not binding on the minority, even when unanimous. However, anarcho-communist Murray Bookchin criticised individualist anarchists for opposing democracy, and says &quot;majority rule&quot; is consistent with anarchism.

Some anarcho-communists oppose the majoritarian nature of direct democracy, feeling that it can impede individual liberty and opt-in favour of a non-majoritarian form of consensus democracy, similar to Proudhon's position on direct democracy.

===== Demokrazija każwali =====
Sortition is the process of choosing decision-making bodies via a random selection. These bodies can be more representative of the opinions and interests of the people at large than an elected legislature or other decision-maker. The technique was in widespread use in Athenian Democracy and Renaissance Florence and is still used in modern jury selection and citizens' assemblies.

===== Demokrazija Kostituzzjonali =====
Consociational democracy, also called consociationalism, is a form of democracy based on power-sharing formula between elites representing the social groups within the society. In 1969, Arendt Lijphart argued this would stabilize democracies with factions. A consociational democracy allows for simultaneous majority votes in two or more ethno-religious constituencies, and policies are enacted only if they gain majority support from both or all of them. The Qualified majority voting rule in European Council of Ministers is a consociational democracy approach for supranational democracies. This system in Treaty of Rome allocates votes to member states in part according to their population, but heavily weighted in favour of the smaller states. A consociational democracy requires consensus of representatives, while consensus democracy requires consensus of electorate.

===== Demokrazija maġġoritarja =====
Majoritarian democracy is a form of democracy based upon a principle of majority rule. Majoritarian democracy contrasts with consensus democracy, rule by as many people as possible.

===== Konsensus =====
Consensus democracy requires consensus decision-making and supermajority to obtain a larger support than majority. In contrast, in majoritarian democracy minority opinions can potentially be ignored by vote-winning majorities. Constitutions typically require consensus or supermajorities.

===== Demokrazija etnika =====
The term ethnic democracy, as used by some political scientists, purports to describe a governance system that combines a structured ethnic dominance with democratic, political and civil rights for all. Both the dominant ethnic group—typically an ethnic majority—and the minority ethnic groups have citizenship and are able to fully participate in the political process. However, critics of the &quot;ethnic democracy&quot; model argue it is a contradiction in terms, and thus conceptually inadequate or confusing; these critics allege that purported ethnic democracies, most notably Israel, are not democratic at all, or are at best a sort of semi-democracy.

===== Demokrazija inklużiva =====
Inclusive democracy is a political theory and political project that aims for direct democracy in all fields of social life: political democracy in the form of face-to-face assemblies which are confederated, economic democracy in a stateless, moneyless and marketless economy, democracy in the social realm, i.e. self-management in places of work and education, and ecological democracy which aims to reintegrate society and nature. The theoretical project of inclusive democracy emerged from the work of political philosopher Takis Fotopoulos in &quot;Towards An Inclusive Democracy&quot; and was further developed in the journal ''Democracy &amp; Nature'' and its successor ''The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy''.

===== Politika parteċipattiva =====
A parpolity or participatory polity is a theoretical form of democracy that is ruled by a nested council structure. The guiding philosophy is that people should have decision-making power in proportion to how much they are affected by the decision. Local councils of 25–50 people are completely autonomous on issues that affect only them, and these councils send delegates to higher level councils who are again autonomous regarding issues that affect only the population affected by that council.

A council court of randomly chosen citizens serves as a check on the tyranny of the majority, and rules on which body gets to vote on which issue. Delegates may vote differently from how their sending council might wish but are mandated to communicate the wishes of their sending council. Delegates are recallable at any time. Referendums are possible at any time via votes of lower-level councils, however, not everything is a referendum as this is most likely a waste of time. A parpolity is meant to work in tandem with a participatory economy.

===== Demokrazija proċedurali =====
Procedural democracy or proceduralist democracy, proceduralism or hollow democracy is a term used to denote the particular procedures, such as regular elections based on universal suffrage, that produce an electorally-legitimated government. Procedural democracy, with its centering of electoral processes as the basis of democratic legitimacy, is often contrasted with substantive or participatory democracy, which centers the equal participation of all groups in society in the political process as the basis of legitimacy.

===== Demokrazija radikali =====
Radical democracy is based on the idea that there are hierarchical and oppressive power relations that exist in society. Radical democracy's role is to make visible and challenge those relations by allowing for difference, dissent and antagonisms in decision-making processes.

===== Demokrazija reliġjuża =====
Religious democracy is a form of democracy where the values of a particular religion or state religion are preferred. The term applies to all democratic countries in which religion is incorporated into the form of government.

===== Demokrazija kożmopolitana =====
Cosmopolitan democracy, also known as ''global democracy'' or ''world federalism'', is a political system in which democracy is implemented on a global scale, either directly or through representatives. An important justification for this kind of system is that the decisions made in national or regional democracies often affect people outside the constituency who, by definition, cannot vote. By contrast, in a cosmopolitan democracy, the people who are affected by decisions also have a say in them.

According to its supporters, any attempt to solve global problems is undemocratic without some form of cosmopolitan democracy. The general principle of cosmopolitan democracy is to expand some or all of the values and norms of democracy, including the rule of law; the non-violent resolution of conflicts; and equality among citizens, beyond the limits of the state. To be fully implemented, this would require reforming existing international organisations, e.g., the United Nations, as well as the creation of new institutions such as a World Parliament, which ideally would enhance public control over, and accountability in, international politics.

Cosmopolitan democracy has been promoted, among others, by physicist Albert Einstein, writer Kurt Vonnegut, columnist George Monbiot, and professors David Held and Daniele Archibugi. The creation of the International Criminal Court in 2003 was seen as a major step forward by many supporters of this type of cosmopolitan democracy.

===== Demokrazija kreattiva =====
Creative democracy is advocated by American philosopher John Dewey. The main idea about creative democracy is that democracy encourages individual capacity building and the interaction among the society. Dewey argues that democracy is a way of life in his work of &quot;Creative Democracy: The Task Before Us&quot; and an experience built on faith in human nature, faith in human beings, and faith in working with others. Democracy, in Dewey's view, is a moral ideal requiring actual effort and work by people; it is not an institutional concept that exists outside of ourselves. &quot;The task of democracy&quot;, Dewey concludes, &quot;is forever that of creation of a freer and more humane experience in which all share and to which all contribute&quot;.

===== Demokrazija ggwidata =====
Guided democracy is a form of democracy that incorporates regular popular elections, but which often carefully &quot;guides&quot; the choices offered to the electorate in a manner that may reduce the ability of the electorate to truly determine the type of government exercised over them. Such democracies typically have only one central authority which is often not subject to meaningful public review by any other governmental authority. Russian-style democracy has often been referred to as a &quot;guided democracy&quot;. Russian politicians have referred to their government as having only one center of power/ authority, as opposed to most other forms of democracy which usually attempt to incorporate two or more naturally competing sources of authority within the same government.

=== Tfittxija ta' fehim komuni ===
The search for a common approach to conceptualize, measure and compare democracy remains a challenge in modern political science. This challenge strikes through to measuring, assessing and comparing the quality of democracy, as Seva Gunitsky pointed in 2015 in the Washington Post, based upon his research for ''Ranking the World – Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance'', that measuring democracy can mislead as much as clarify – a problem for academics, policy-makers and anyone who cares about democracy.

In his contribution ''Lost in the Gray Zone: Competing Measures of Democracy in the Former Soviet Republics'' to ''Ranking the World'', he, on the example of former Soviet republics, examines fundamental problems with measures of democracy, observing that indices often disagree and occasionally draw contradictory conclusions from observing the same event. He argues, that this reflects inherent tradeoffs in conceptualizing democratic governance, which arise from fundamental normative disagreements about a highly contested concept.

In 2011, Michael Coppedge, John Gerring et al. proposed an approach to such conceptualization and measurement. In their paper ''Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach'' they review some of the weaknesses among contemporary and older approaches, then lay out their approach, characterizing it as ''historical'', ''multidimensional'', ''disaggregated'', and ''transparent''. The authors propose to create a new set of four features to conceptualize and measure democracy. First, ''historical'', extending indicators of democracy back through modern history, wherever possible. Second, a ''multidimensional'' approach to the problem of conceptualizing democracy. Third, to collect information relevant to democracy at a highly ''disaggregated'' level. Fourth, ''transparent'', a strategy for data collection and presentation that should enhance the precision, validity, transparency, and legitimacy of the resulting indicators. They also sum up the conceptions, and/or aspects, of democracy into six – ''electoral'', ''liberal'', ''majoritarian'', ''participatory'', ''deliberative'', and ''egalitarian'', which taken together offer a fairly comprehensive accounting of the concept of democracy as it is employed today (see overview in the table below).
{| class=&quot;wikitable&quot;
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |Conceptions of democracy by Michael Coppedge, John Gerring et al., 2011
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
| 
| 
|Principles
|Question
|Institutions
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|I.
|'''Electoral'''
|Contestation, competition
|Are government offices filled by free and fair multiparty elections?
|Elections, political parties, competitiveness and turnover
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|II.
|'''Liberal'''
|Limited government, multiple veto points, horizontal accountability, individual rights, civil liberties, transparency
|Is political power decentralized &amp; constrained?
|Multiple, independent, and decentralized, with special focus on the role of the media, interest groups, the judiciary, and a written constitution with explicit guarantees
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|III.
|'''Majoritarian'''
|Majority rule, centralization, vertical accountability
|Does the majority (or plurality) rule?
|Consolidated and centralized, with special focus on the role of political parties
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|IV.
|'''Participatory'''
|Government by the people
|Do ordinary citizens participate in politics?
|Election law, civil society, local government, direct democracy
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|V.
|'''Deliberative'''
|Government by reason
|Are political decisions the product of public deliberation?
|Media, hearings, panels, other deliberative bodies
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|VI.
|'''Egalitarian'''
|Political equality
|Are all citizens equally empowered?
|Designed to ensure equal participation, representation, protection, and politically relevant resources
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|}

=== Measurement of democracy ===
Main article: Measurement of democracy

Measurement of democracy varies according to the different fundamental conceptions of democracy. Minimalist democracy evaluations focus on free and fair elections, while maximalist democracy evaluates additional values, such as human rights, deliberation, economic outcomes or state capacity.

== Demokrazija mhux governattiva ==
Aside from the public sphere, similar democratic principles and mechanisms of voting and representation have been used to govern other kinds of groups. Many non-governmental organisations decide policy and leadership by voting. Most trade unions and cooperatives are governed by democratic elections. Corporations are ultimately governed by their shareholders through shareholder democracy. Corporations may also employ systems such as workplace democracy to handle internal governance. Amitai Etzioni has postulated a system that fuses elements of democracy with sharia law, termed Islamic democracy or ''Islamocracy''. There is also a growing number of Democratic educational institutions such as Sudbury schools that are co-governed by students and staff.

=== Demokrazija tal-azzjonisti ===
Shareholder democracy is a concept relating to the governance of corporations by their shareholders. In the United States, shareholders are typically granted voting rights according to the one share, one vote principle. Shareholders may vote annually to elect the company's board of directors, who themselves may choose the company's executives. The shareholder democracy framework may be inaccurate for companies which have different classes of stock that further alter the distribution of voting rights.

== Ġustifikazzjoni ==
Ingħataw diversi ġustifikazzjonijiet għad-demokrazija.

=== Leġittimità ===
Social contract theory argues that the legitimacy of government is based on consent of the governed, i.e. an election, and that political decisions must reflect the general will. The public legitimacy of democracy varies by country, in some countries religious texts have more public support than the will of the people.

=== Teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet aħjar ===
Condorcet's jury theorem is logical proof that if each decision-maker has a better than chance probability of making the right decision, then having the largest number of decision-makers, i.e. a democracy, will result in the best decisions. This has also been argued by theories of the wisdom of the crowd. Democracy tends to improve conflict resolution.

=== Suċċess ekonomiku ===
In ''Why Nations Fail'', economists Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson argue that democracies are more economically successful because undemocratic political systems tend to limit markets and favor monopolies at the expense of the creative destruction which is necessary for sustained economic growth.

A 2019 study by Acemoglu and others estimated that countries switching to democratic from authoritarian rule had on average a 20% higher GDP after 25 years than if they had remained authoritarian. The study examined 122 transitions to democracy and 71 transitions to authoritarian rule, occurring from 1960 to 2010. Acemoglu said this was because democracies tended to invest more in health care and human capital, and reduce special treatment of regime allies.

A 2023 study analyzed the long-term effects of democracy on economic prosperity using new data on GDP per capita and democracy for a dataset between 1789 and 2019. The results indicate that democracy substantially increases economic development.

Unemployment is associated with anti-democratic beliefs.

== Kritika ==
Democracy as a concept and as a practical form of government has been the subject of critique throughout history. Some critics consider that democratic regimes often fail to be true to the highest principles expected of them, while others reject the values promoted by constitutional democracy in whole or part.

Opposition to democracy goes as far back as Plato, who argued for a 'government of the best qualified'. More recently, James Madison extensively studied historic attempts at and arguments on democracy in his preparation for the Constitutional Convention, and Winston Churchill remarked that &quot;no one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.&quot;

Critics argue that modern democracies may fail to be sufficiently democratic and instead function in practice as oligarchies, insofar as governments are more responsive to the preferences of economic elites than to those of ordinary citizens. Numerous empirical studies across various western democracies including the United States, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Canada, Norway and Germany have consistently found that elected representatives tend to respond more to the preferences of very affluent citizens for policy outcomes than those of the average voter.

Some critics of democracy have highlighted the concept's inconsistencies, paradoxes, and limits: drawing contrasts with other forms of government, such as epistocracy or lottocracy. Others have characterized most modern democracies as democratic polyarchies and democratic aristocracies. Yet others have identified fascist moments in modern democracies. They have termed the societies produced by modern democracies as neo-feudal and have contrasted democracy with fascism, anarcho-capitalism, theocracy, and absolute monarchy.

== Tranżizzjonijiet demokratiċi ==
A democratic transition describes a phase in a country's political system, often created as a result of an incomplete change from an authoritarian regime to a democratic one (or vice versa).

=== Demokratizzazzjoni ===
Democratization, or democratisation, is the structural government transition from an authoritarian government to a more democratic political regime, including substantive political changes moving in a democratic direction. The opposite process of democratic transition is known as democratic backsliding or autocratization. Whether and to what extent democratization occurs can be influenced by various factors, including economic development, historical legacies, civil society, and international processes. Some accounts of democratization emphasize how elites drove democratization, whereas other accounts emphasize grassroots bottom-up processes. How democratization occurs has also been used to explain other political phenomena, such as whether a country goes to a war or whether its economy grows.

Several philosophers and researchers have outlined historical and social factors seen as supporting the evolution of democracy. Other commentators have mentioned the influence of economic development. In a related theory, Ronald Inglehart suggests that improved living-standards in modern developed countries can convince people that they can take their basic survival for granted, leading to increased emphasis on self-expression values, which correlates closely with democracy.

Douglas M. Gibler and Andrew Owsiak in their study argued about the importance of peace and stable borders for the development of democracy. It has often been assumed that democracy causes peace, but this study shows that, historically, peace has almost always predated the establishment of democracy.

Carroll Quigley concludes that the characteristics of weapons are the main predictor of democracy: Democracy—this scenario—tends to emerge only when the best weapons available are easy for individuals to obtain and use. By the 1800s, guns were the best personal weapons available, and in the United States of America (already nominally democratic), almost everyone could afford to buy a gun, and could learn how to use it fairly easily. Governments could not do any better: it became the age of mass armies of citizen soldiers with guns. Similarly, Periclean Greece was an age of the citizen soldier and democracy.

Other theories stressed the relevance of education and of human capital—and within them of cognitive ability to increasing tolerance, rationality, political literacy and participation. Two effects of education and cognitive ability are distinguished:&lt;sup&gt;[''need quotation to verify'']&lt;/sup&gt;

* a cognitive effect (competence to make rational choices, better information-processing)
* an ethical effect (support of democratic values, freedom, human rights etc.), which itself depends on intelligence.

Evidence consistent with conventional theories of why democracy emerges and is sustained has been hard to come by. Statistical analyses have challenged modernisation theory by demonstrating that there is no reliable evidence for the claim that democracy is more likely to emerge when countries become wealthier, more educated, or less unequal. In fact, empirical evidence shows that economic growth and education may not lead to increased demand for democratization as modernization theory suggests: historically, most countries attained high levels of access to primary education well before transitioning to democracy. Rather than acting as a catalyst for democratization, in some situations education provision may instead be used by non-democratic regimes to indoctrinate their subjects and strengthen their power.

The assumed link between education and economic growth is called into question when analyzing empirical evidence. Across different countries, the correlation between education attainment and math test scores is very weak (.07). A similarly weak relationship exists between per-pupil expenditures and math competency (.26). Additionally, historical evidence suggests that average human capital (measured using literacy rates) of the masses does not explain the onset of industrialization in France from 1750 to 1850 despite arguments to the contrary. Together, these findings show that education does not always promote human capital and economic growth as is generally argued to be the case. Instead, the evidence implies that education provision often falls short of its expressed goals, or, alternatively, that political actors use education to promote goals other than economic growth and development.

Some scholars have searched for the &quot;deep&quot; determinants of contemporary political institutions, be they geographical or demographic.

An example of this is the disease environment. Places with different mortality rates had different populations and productivity levels around the world. For example, in Africa, the tsetse fly—which afflicts humans and livestock—reduced the ability of Africans to plough the land. This made Africa less settled. As a consequence, political power was less concentrated. This also affected the colonial institutions European countries established in Africa. Whether colonial settlers could live or not in a place made them develop different institutions which led to different economic and social paths. This also affected the distribution of power and the collective actions people could take. As a result, some African countries ended up having democracies and others autocracies.

An example of geographical determinants for democracy is having access to coastal areas and rivers. This natural endowment has a positive relation with economic development thanks to the benefits of trade. Trade brought economic development, which in turn, broadened power. Rulers wanting to increase revenues had to protect property-rights to create incentives for people to invest. As more people had more power, more concessions had to be made by the ruler and in many places this process lead to democracy. These determinants defined the structure of the society moving the balance of political power.


Robert Michels asserts that although democracy can never be fully realised, democracy may be developed automatically in the act of striving for democracy:&lt;blockquote&gt;The peasant in the fable, when on his deathbed, tells his sons that a treasure is buried in the field. After the old man's death the sons dig everywhere in order to discover the treasure. They do not find it. But their indefatigable labor improves the soil and secures for them a comparative well-being. The treasure in the fable may well symbolise democracy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Democracy in modern times has almost always faced opposition from the previously existing government, and many times it has faced opposition from social elites. The implementation of a democratic government from a non-democratic state is typically brought by peaceful or violent democratic revolution.

The V-Dem Institute found 2026 ongoing democratization in 18 countries: Benin, Bolivia, Botswana, Bazil, Dominican Republic, Fiji, Guatemala, Lesotho, Mauritius, Montenegro, Poland, Seychelles, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Timor-Leste, Thailand, The Gambia, and Zambia.

===== Promozzjoni tad-demokrazija =====
Promotion of democracy can increase the quality of already existing democracies, reduce political apathy, and the chance of democratic backsliding. Democracy promotion measures include voting advice applications, participatory democracy, increasing electoral integrity, youth suffrage and civic education, reducing barriers to entry for new political parties, increasing proportionality, reducing presidentialism and aligning with median voter preferences.

=== Awtokratizzazzjoni ===
Democratic backsliding is a form of autocratization, a process of structural government transition toward authoritarianism in which the exercise of political power becomes less limited and more arbitrary and repressive. Democratic backsliding specifically assumes a starting point of a democratic system. The process typically restricts the space for public contest and political participation in the process of government selection. Democratic backsliding involves the weakening of democratic institutions, such as the peaceful transition of power or free and fair elections, or the violation of individual rights that underpin democracies, especially freedom of expression. Democratic backsliding is the opposite of democratization.&lt;sup&gt;[''citation needed'']&lt;/sup&gt;

Steven Levitsky says: &quot;It's not up to voters to defend a democracy. That's asking far, far too much of voters, to cast their ballot on the basis of some set of abstract principles or procedures. With the exception of a handful of cases, voters never, ever — in any society, in any culture — prioritize democracy over all else. Individual voters worry about much more mundane things, as is their right. It is up to élites and institutions to protect democracy — not voters.&quot;

The V-Dem Institute found 2026 ongoing democratic backsliding in 44 countries: Afghanistan, Argentina, Armenia, Belarus, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Central African Republic, Croatia, Georgia, Greece, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, El Salvador, Haiti, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Italy, Ivory Coast, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Mali, Madagascar, Mauretania, Mexico, Moldova, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Niger, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Slovakia, Slovenia, Senegal, Serbia, Romania, Togo, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and United States.

===== Tfixkil =====
Some democratic governments have experienced sudden state collapse and regime change to an undemocratic form of government. Domestic military coups or rebellions are the most common means by which democratic governments have been overthrown. (See List of coups and coup attempts by country and List of civil wars.) Examples include the Spanish Civil War, the Coup of 18 Brumaire that ended the French First Republic, and the 28 May 1926 coup d'état which ended the First Portuguese Republic. Some military coups are supported by foreign governments, such as the 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état and the 1953 Iranian coup d'état. Other types of a sudden end to democracy include:

* Invasion, for example the German occupation of Czechoslovakia, and the fall of South Vietnam.
* Self-coup, in which the leader of the government extra-legally seizes all power or unlawfully extends the term in office. This can be done through:
** Suspension of the constitution by decree, such as with the 1992 Peruvian coup d'état
** An &quot;electoral self-coup&quot; using election fraud to obtain re-election of a previously fairly elected official or political party. For example, in the 1999 Ukrainian presidential election, 2003 Russian legislative election, and 2004 Russian presidential election.
* Royal coup, in which a monarch not normally involved in government seizes all power. For example, the 6 January Dictatorship, begun in 1929 when King Alexander I of Yugoslavia dismissed parliament and started ruling by decree.

Democratic backsliding can end democracy in a gradual manner, by increasing emphasis on national security and eroding free and fair elections, freedom of expression, independence of the judiciary, rule of law. A famous example is the Enabling Act of 1933, which lawfully ended democracy in Weimar Germany and marked the transition to Nazi Germany.

Temporary or long-term political violence and government interference can prevent free and fair elections, which erode the democratic nature of governments. This has happened on a local level even in well-established democracies like the United States; for example, the Wilmington insurrection of 1898 and African-American disfranchisement after the Reconstruction era.

== Influwenza tal-midja ==
The theory of democracy relies on the implicit assumption that voters are well informed about social issues, policies, and candidates so that they can make a truly informed decision. Since the late 20th century there has been a growing concern that voters may be poorly informed due to the news media's focusing more on entertainment and gossip and less on serious journalistic research on political issues.

The media professors Michael Gurevitch and Jay Blumler have proposed a number of functions that the mass media are expected to fulfill in a democracy:

* Surveillance of the sociopolitical environment
* Meaningful agenda setting
* Platforms for an intelligible and illuminating advocacy
* Dialogue across a diverse range of views
* Mechanisms for holding officials to account for how they have exercised power
* Incentives for citizens to learn, choose, and become involved
* A principled resistance to the efforts of forces outside the media to subvert their independence, integrity, and ability to serve the audience
* A sense of respect for the audience member, as potentially concerned and able to make sense of his or her political environment

This proposal has inspired a lot of discussions over whether the news media are actually fulfilling the requirements that a well functioning democracy requires. Commercial mass media are generally not accountable to anybody but their owners, and they have no obligation to serve a democratic function. They are controlled mainly by economic market forces. Fierce economic competition may force the mass media to divert themselves from any democratic ideals and focus entirely on how to survive the competition.

The tabloidization and popularization of the news media is seen in an increasing focus on human examples rather than statistics and principles. There is more focus on politicians as personalities and less focus on political issues in the popular media. Election campaigns are covered more as horse races and less as debates about ideologies and issues. The dominating media focus on spin, conflict, and competitive strategies has made voters perceive the politicians as egoists rather than idealists. This fosters mistrust and a cynical attitude to politics, less civic engagement, and less interest in voting. The ability to find effective political solutions to social problems is hampered when problems tend to be blamed on individuals rather than on structural causes. This person-centered focus may have far-reaching consequences not only for domestic problems but also for foreign policy when international conflicts are blamed on foreign heads of state rather than on political and economic structures. A strong media focus on fear and terrorism has allowed military logic to penetrate public institutions, leading to increased surveillance and the erosion of civil rights.

The responsiveness and accountability of the democratic system is compromised when lack of access to substantive, diverse, and undistorted information is handicapping the citizens' capability of evaluating the political process. The fast pace and trivialization in the competitive news media is dumbing down the political debate. Thorough and balanced investigation of complex political issues does not fit into this format. The political communication is characterized by short time horizons, short slogans, simple explanations, and simple solutions. This is conducive to political populism rather than serious deliberation.

Commercial mass media are often differentiated along the political spectrum so that people can hear mainly opinions that they already agree with. Too much controversy and diverse opinions are not always profitable for the commercial news media. Political polarization is emerging when different people read different news and watch different TV channels. This polarization has been worsened by the emergence of the social media that allow people to communicate mainly with groups of like-minded people, the so-called echo chambers. Extreme political polarization may undermine the trust in democratic institutions, leading to erosion of civil rights and free speech and in some cases even reversion to autocracy.

Many media scholars have discussed non-commercial news media with public service obligations as a means to improve the democratic process by providing the kind of political contents that a free market does not provide. The World Bank has recommended public service broadcasting in order to strengthen democracy in developing countries. These broadcasting services should be accountable to an independent regulatory body that is adequately protected from interference from political and economic interests. Public service media have an obligation to provide reliable information to voters. Many countries have publicly funded radio and television stations with public service obligations, especially in Europe and Japan, while such media are weak or non-existent in other countries including the US. Several studies have shown that the stronger the dominance of commercial broadcast media over public service media, the less the amount of policy-relevant information in the media and the more focus on horse race journalism, personalities, and the pecadillos of politicians. Public service broadcasters are characterized by more policy-relevant information and more respect for journalistic norms and impartiality than the commercial media. However, the trend of deregulation has put the public service model under increased pressure from competition with commercial media.

The emergence of the internet and the social media has profoundly altered the conditions for political communication. The social media have given ordinary citizens easy access to voice their opinion and share information while bypassing the filters of the large news media. This is often seen as an advantage for democracy. The new possibilities for communication have fundamentally changed the way social movements and protest movements operate and organize. The internet and social media have provided powerful new tools for democracy movements in developing countries and emerging democracies, enabling them to bypass censorship, voice their opinions, and organize protests.

A serious problem with the social media is that they have no truth filters. The established news media have to guard their reputation as trustworthy, while ordinary citizens may post unreliable information. In fact, studies show that false stories are going more viral than true stories. The proliferation of false stories and conspiracy theories may undermine public trust in the political system and public officials.

Reliable information sources are essential for the democratic process. Less democratic governments rely heavily on censorship, propaganda, and misinformation in order to stay in power, while independent sources of information are able to undermine their legitimacy.

== Referenzi ==

[[Kategorija:Greċja antika]]</text>
      <sha1>a25uvuanswgaf383t7c0wqxxarg6lox</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330258</id>
      <parentid>330257</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T06:43:27Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Trigcly</username>
        <id>17859</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>/* Medju Evu */</comment>
      <origin>330258</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="91340" sha1="oe5iehjrqvzu66h07iacoyutkkahjtu" xml:space="preserve">Id-'''demokrazija''' hija forma ta' governanza li permezz tagħha l-poter [[Politika|politiku]] jinkiseb min-nies jew mill-popolazzjoni ta' stat. Skont definizzjoni minimalista tad-demokrazija, il-mexxejja jiġu eletti permezz ta' elezzjonijiet kompetittivi filwaqt li d-definizzjonijiet iktar wesgħin jew massimalisti jorbtu d-demokrazija mal-garanziji tal-libertajiet ċivili u d-drittijiet tal-[[bniedem]] apparti l-elezzjonijiet kompetittivi.

F'demokrazija diretta, il-poplu jkollu l-awtorità diretta li jagħmel deliberazzjonijiet u li jiddeċiedi dwar il-leġiżlazzjoni. F'demokrazija rappreżentattiva, il-poplu jagħżel l-uffiċjali tal-governanza permezz ta' elezzjonijiet. Id-definizzjoni ta' &quot;poplu&quot; u l-modi kif l-awtorità tiġi kondiviża fi ħdan il-poplu jew iddelegata minnu nbidlu mal-milja taż-żminijiet u b'rati li jvarjaw minn pajjiż għal ieħor. Il-karatteristiċi tad-demokrazija spiss jinkludu l-libertà tal-ġemgħa, il-libertà tal-assoċjazzjoni, il-proprjetà personali, il-libertà tar-[[reliġjon]] u tal-[[kelma]], iċ-ċittadinanza, il-kunsens ta' dawk li jiġu ggvernati, id-drittijiet tal-votazzjoni, il-libertà miċ-ċaħda governattiva mhux ġustifikata tad-dritt tal-ħajja u tal-libertà, u d-drittijiet tal-minoranzi.

In-nozzjoni tad-demokrazija evolviet b'mod konsiderevoli maż-żmien. Matul l-[[Storja|istorja]], wieħed jista' jsib evidenza ta' demokrazija diretta, fejn il-komunitajiet kienu jieħdu deċiżjonijiet permezz ta' ġemgħat popolari. Illum il-ġurnata, il-forma dominanti tad-demokrazija hija d-demokrazija rappreżentattiva, fejn iċ-ċittadini jeleġġu lill-uffiċjali tal-gvern biex jiggvernaw f'isimhom, pereżempju f'demokrazija parlamentari jew presidenzjali. Fil-varjant komuni tad-demokrazija liberali, is-setgħat tal-maġġoranza jiġu eżerċitati fi ħdan il-qafas ta' demokrazija rappreżentattiva, iżda l-kostituzzjoni u l-qorti suprema jillimitaw lill-maġġoranza u jipproteġu lill-minoranzi — normalment billi jiġi żgurat li kulħadd igawdi minn ċerti drittijiet individwali, bħal-libertà tal-kelma jew il-libertà tal-assoċjazzjoni.

It-terminu tfaċċa fis-seklu 5 [[Ante Christum natum|Q.K]]. fil-bliet-stati [[Greċja antika|Griegi]], b'mod partikolari f'[[Ateni]] Klassika, u kien ifisser &quot;it-tmexxija tal-poplu&quot;, b'kuntrast mal-aristokrazija (bil-[[Lingwa Griega|Grieg]]: ἀριστοκρατία, ''aristokratía''), li tfisser &quot;it-tmexxija tal-elit&quot;. Prattikament fil-gvernijiet demokratiċi kollha tul l-istorja tal-qedem u moderna, iċ-ċittadinanza demokratika inizjalment kienet ristretta għal klassi tal-elit, li iktar 'il quddiem ġiet estiża għaċ-ċittadini adulti kollha. Fil-biċċa l-kbira tad-demokraziji moderni, dan inkiseb permezz tal-movimenti tas-suffraġju tas-sekli 19 u 20.

Id-demokrazija tikkuntrasta mal-forom ta' governanza fejn il-poter ma jinbitx mill-popolazzjoni ġenerali ta' stat, pereżempju s-sistemi awtoritarji. Storikament is-sistemi demokratiċi kienu forma rari u vulnerabbli ta' governanza, iżda dawn saru iktar prevalenti mis-seklu 19 'l hawn, b'mod partikolari permezz ta' diversi mewġiet ta' demokratizzazzjoni. Id-demokrazija għandha leġittimità konsiderevoli fid-dinja moderna, peress li l-opinjoni pubblika fir-reġjuni dinjin normalment huma favur is-sistemi demokratiċi ta' governanza meta mqabbla mal-alternattivi, u peress li saħansitra l-istati awtoritarji jippruvaw ipinġu lilhom infushom bħala demokratiċi. Id-demokrazija b'mod iktar konsistenti tirriżulta f'saħħa, f'[[edukazzjoni]] u f'eżiti ekonomiċi mtejba. Skont l-indiċijiet ta' ''V-Dem Democracy'' u l-Indiċi tad-Demokrazija ta' ''The Economist'', inqas minn nofs il-popolazzjoni tad-dinja tgħix f'demokrazija mill-2022. Fl-istess ħin, filwaqt li d-demokrazija rappreżentattivi tingħata valur siewi b'mod mifrux, iċ-Ċentru tar-Riċerka ta' Pew sab li l-garr rigward il-prestazzjoni demokratika huwa komuni saħansitra f'bosta demokraziji stabbiliti.

== Karatteristiċi ==
Għalkemm id-demokrazija fid-demokraziji purament rappreżentattivi hija mifhuma b'rabta mal-votazzjoni, ma jeżisti l-ebda konsensus dwar definizzjoni preċiża tad-demokrazija. Jeżistu wisq approċċi. Kien hemm studju li identifika 2,234 aġġettiv li jintuża għad-deskrizzjoni tad-demokrazija bil-[[lingwa Ingliża]].

Minkejja dan, hemm fehim iktar profond – bħal dak ta' [[Abraham Lincoln]]:

: ''&quot;Governanza tan-nies, min-nies, għan-nies&quot;''

jew dik ta' [[Karl Popper]] li ssostni li l-ħarsa &quot;klassika&quot; lejn id-demokrazija hi, &quot;fil-qosor, it-teorija li d-demokrazija hija t-tmexxija tal-poplu u li l-poplu għandu d-dritt li jiggverna hu.

Il-prinċipji demokratiċi huma riflessi fiċ-ċittadini eliġibbli kollha, ilkoll indaqs quddiem il-[[Dritt|liġi]] u lkoll b'aċċess ugwali għall-proċessi leġiżlattivi.

Pereżempju, f'demokrazija rappreżentattiva, kull vot (fit-teorija) għandu l-istess piż, u l-libertà taċ-ċittadini eliġibbli hija żgurata permezz ta' drittijiet u libertajiet leġittimizzati li tipikament ikunu mnaqqxa f'kostituzzjoni, filwaqt li użi oħra tad-&quot;demokrazija&quot; jaf jħaddnu d-demokrazija diretta, fejn iċ-ċittadini jivvutaw direttament fuq id-diversi kwistjonijiet li jinqalgħu. Skont in-[[Ġnus Magħquda|Nazzjonijiet Uniti]], id-demokrazija &quot;tipprovdi ambjent li jirrispetta d-drittijiet tal-bniedem u l-libertajiet fundamentali, u fejn ir-rieda espressa liberament tal-poplu tiġi eżerċitata&quot;.

Skont teorija partikolari d-demokrazija tirrikjedi tliet prinċipji fundamentali: il-kontroll 'il fuq (sovranità fl-iżjed livelli baxxi tal-awtorità), l-ugwaljanza politika, u n-normi soċjali li permezz tagħhom l-individwi u l-istituzzjonijiet iqisu biss atti aċċettabbli li jirriflettu l-ewwel żewġ prinċipji tal-kontroll 'il fuq u l-ugwaljanza politika. L-ugwaljanza legali, il-libertà politika u l-istat ta' dritt sikwit jiġu identifikati bħala l-karatteristiċi ewlenin ta' demokrazija li tiffunzjona sew.

F'xi pajjiżi, b'mod partikolari fir-[[Renju Unit]] (minn fejn oriġinat is-sistema ta' Westminster), il-prinċipju dominanti hu dak tas-sovranità Parlamentari, filwaqt li tinżamm l-indipendenza ġudizzjarja. Fl-[[Indja]], is-sovranità Parlamentari hija soġġetta għall-Kostituzzjoni tal-Indja li tinkludi rieżami ġudizzjarju. Għalkemm it-terminu &quot;demokrazija&quot; tipikament jintuża fil-kuntest ta' stat politiku, il-prinċipji wkoll huma applikabbli potenzjalment għall-organizzazzjonijiet privati, bħal klabbs, għaqdiet u ditti.

Id-demokraziji jistgħu jużaw bosta metodi differenti ta' teħid tad-deċiżjonijiet, iżda t-tmexxija tal-maġġoranza hija l-forma dominanti. Mingħajr kumpens, bħal protezzjonijiet legali tad-drittijiet individwali jew kollettivi, il-minoranzi politiċi jistgħu jiġu mgħakksa mit-&quot;tirannija tal-maġġoranza&quot;. It-tmexxija tal-maġġoranza tinvolvi approċċ kompetittiv, għad-differenza tad-demokrazija tal-konsensus, u b'hekk tinħoloq il-ħtieġa li l-elezzjonijiet, u ġeneralment id-deliberazzjoni, ikunu sostantivament u proċeduralment &quot;ġusti&quot; u ekwi. Fżxi pajjiżi, il-libertà tal-espressjoni politika, il-libertà tal-kelma u l-libertà tal-istampa jitqiesu bħala importanti biex jiġi żgurat li l-votanti jkunu infurmati sew, u b'hekk ikunu jistgħu jivvutaw skont l-interessi u t-twemmin tagħhom stess.

Ġie ssuġġerit ukoll li karatteristika bażika tad-demokrazija hija l-kapaċità li l-votanti kollha jipparteċipaw b'mod ħieles u sħiħ fil-[[ħajja]] tas-soċjetà tagħhom. Bl-enfasi fuq in-nozzjonijiet tal-kuntratt soċjali u r-rieda kollettiva tal-votanti kollha, id-demokrazija tista' tkun ikkaratterizzata wkoll bħala forma ta' kollettiviżmu politiku peress li tiġi definita bħala forma ta' governanza fejn iċ-ċittadini eliġibbli kollha jkollhom vuċi ugwali fit-tfassil tal-liġijiet.

Ir-repubbliki, għalkemm spiss ikunu assoċjati popolarment mad-demokrazija minħabba l-prinċipju kondiviż tal-kunsens mogħti minn dawk li jiġu ggvernati għat-tmexxija, mhux neċessarjament ikunu demokraziji, għax ir-repubblikaniżmu ma jispeċifikax ''kif'' in-nies għandhom imexxu. Tradizzjonalment it-terminu &quot;repubblika&quot; kien iħaddan kemm id-demokraziji kif ukoll l-aristokraziji u l-varjanti tagħhom. F'sens modern, il-forma ta' governanza repubblikana hija forma ta' governanza mingħajr monarka. Minħabba f'hekk, id-demokraziji jistgħu jkunu repubbliki jew monarkiji kostituzzjonali, bħar-Renju Unit, fejn il-monarka ma jkunx il-mexxej.

== Storja ==
Il-ġemgħat demokratiċi għandhom żmien daqs kemm għandha żmien l-ispeċi umana u ilhom jeżistu tul l-istorja umana, iżda sas-seklu 19, il-figuri [[Politiku|politiċi]] ewlenin fil-biċċa l-kbira opponew id-demokrazija. It-teoriċi repubblikani rabtu d-demokrazija ma' daqs ċkejken: iktar ma kienu jikbru fid-daqs l-unitajiet politiċi, iktar kienet tiżdied il-probabbiltà li l-gvern isir tiranniku. Fl-istess waqt, l-unitajiet politiċi żgħar kienu vulnerabbli għall-ħakma. Montesquieu kiteb, &quot;Jekk repubblika tkun żgħira, tinqered minn qawwa barranija; jekk tkun kbira, tinqered mill-imperfezzjoni interna&quot;. Skont ix-xjenzat politiku tal-Università ta' Johns Hopkins [[Daniel Deudney]], il-ħolqien tal-[[Stati Uniti|Istati Uniti]], bid-daqs kbir u s-sistema ta' kontrolli u bilanċi tagħha, kienet soluzzjoni għall-problemi doppji tad-daqs. Fis-soċjetajiet ta' madwar id-dinja seħħew forom ta' demokrazija b'mod organiku li ma kellhom l-ebda kuntatt ma' xulxin.

=== Oriġini ===

==== [[Greċja]] u [[Ruma]] ====
It-terminu ''demokrazija'' tfaċċa għall-ewwel darba fil-ħsieb politiku u [[Filosofija|filosofiku]] tal-Greċja Antika fil-belt-stat ta' Ateni fl-antikità klassika. Il-kelma ġejja minn ''dêmos'' li tfisser &quot;nies (komuni)&quot; u minn ''krátos'' li tfisser &quot;qawwa/setgħa&quot;. Taħt Cleisthenes, f'Ateni ġie stabbilit dak li huwa maħsub bħala l-ewwel eżempju ta' tip ta' demokrazija fis-seklu 6 Q.K. (508–507 Q.K.). Cleisthenes huwa meqjus bħala &quot;l-missier tad-demokrazija ta' Ateni&quot;. L-ewwel użu attestat tal-kelma demokrazija jinsab fix-xogħlijiet ta' proża tal-ħabta tal-430 Q.K., bħall-''Istorji'' ta' Erodotu, iżda l-użu tagħha kien eqdem b'diversi deċennji, peress li żewġ persuni minn Ateni li twieldu għall-ħabta tal-470 Q.K. kien jisimhom Democrates, isem politiku ġdid — x'aktarx b'appoġġ għad-demokrazija — li ngħata fi żmien ta' dibattiti dwar kwistjonijiet kostituzzjonali f'Ateni. Aeschylus jalludi bis-saħħa wkoll għall-kelma fid-dramm tiegħu ''Is-Supplikanti'', li ttella' għall-ħabta tal-463 Q.K., fejn isemmi &quot;l-id tat-tmexxija tal-kotra&quot; [''demou kratousa cheir'']. Qabel dak iż-żmien, il-kelma li kienet tiddefinixxi s-sistema politika ġdida ta' Cleisthenes x'aktarx li kienet ''isonomija'', li tfisser ugwaljanza politika.

Id-demokrazija ta' Ateni ħadet is-sura ta' demokrazija diretta, u kellha żewġ karatteristiċi li jiddistingwuha: l-għażla aleatorja ta' ċittadini ordinarji biex jimlew il-ftit karigi amministrattivi u ġudizzjarji eżistenti tal-gvern, u ġemgħa leġiżlattiva li kienet tikkonsisti mill-maġġoranza taċ-ċittadini ta' Ateni. Iċ-ċittadini eliġibbli kollha kienu jitħallew jitkellmu u jivvutaw fil-ġemgħa jew fl-assemblea, fejn kienu jiġu stabbiliti l-liġijiet tal-belt-stat. Madankollu, iċ-ċittadinanza ta' Ateni ma kinitx tingħata lin-[[Mara|nisa]], lill-[[Skjavitù|ilsiera]], lill-barranin (μέτοικοι / ''métoikoi''), u liż-żgħażagħ taħt l-età tas-servizz militari. Effettivament, resident wieħed minn kull erba' f'Ateni kienu jikkwalifikaw bħala ċittadini. Is-sjieda tal-art ma kinitx rekwiżit għaċ-ċittadinanza. L-esklużjoni ta' partijiet kbar tal-popolazzjoni mill-korp taċ-ċittadini hija marbuta mill-qrib mal-fehim tal-qedem taċ-ċittadinanza. Fil-biċċa l-kbira ta' żmien il-qedem, il-benefiċċju taċ-ċittadinanza kien marbut mal-obbligu tal-ġlied fil-kampanji militari.

Id-demokrazija ta' Aterni mhux biss kienet ''diretta'' fis-sens li d-deċiżjonijiet kienu jittieħdu mill-ġemgħa, iżda anke l-''iżjed diretta'' fis-sens li l-ġemgħa permezz tal-istrutturi bħall-assemblea, is-senat u l-qrati legali kienet tikkontrolla l-proċess politiku kollu u proporzjon kbir taċ-ċittadini kienu jkunu involuti b'mod kostanti fl-affarijiet pubbliċi. Minkejja li d-drittijiet tal-individwu ma kinux żgurati mill-kostituzzjoni ta' Ateni fis-sens modern (il-Griegi tal-qedem ma kellhomx kelma għal &quot;drittijiet&quot;), dawk li kienu ċittadini ta' Ateni kienu jgawdu l-libertajiet tagħhom mhux f'oppożizzjoni għall-gvern iżda billi jgħixu f'belt li ma kinitx soġġetta għal xi setgħa oħra u billi huma stess ma kinux soġġetti għat-tmexxija ta' ħaddieħor.

Il-votazzjoni tfaċċat fi [[Sparta]] saħansitra fis-700 Q.K. L-ekkleżjastiċi ta' Sparta kienu ġemgħa tal-poplu, li kienet tiltaqa' darba fix-xahar, fejn kull ċittadini maskili ta' mill-inqas 20 sena seta' jipparteċipa. Fl-assemblea, l-Ispartani kienu jeleġġu l-mexxejja u jixħtu l-voti tagħhom bl-għajjat (il-votazzjoni kienet tiġi deċiża skont l-ikbar għajta tal-folla). [[Aristotli]] ddeskriva dan il-metodu bħala &quot;tat-tfal&quot;, meta mqabbel mas-sistema tal-votazzjoni fuq poloz tal-ġebel użata miċ-ċittadini ta' Ateni. Sparta adottat din is-sistema minħabba s-sempliċità tagħha, u biex jiġi evitat kull tip ta' preġudizzju, xiri jew qerq fil-votazzjoni, li kienu predominanti fl-elezzjonijiet demokratiċi bikrin.

Barra minn hekk, id-depożizzjoni tar-Renju Ruman ħolqot sistema b'element demokratiku fil-forma ta' bosta ġemgħat popolari differenti.

Minkejja li r-Repubblika Rumana tat kontribut sinifikanti għal bosta aspetti tad-demokrazija, frazzjon biss mir-Rumani kienu ċittadini li kellhom il-vot fl-elezzjonijiet għall-maġistrati. Il-voti tas-setgħana kienu jingħataw iktar piż permezz ta' sistema ta' votazzjoni ponderata, għaldaqstant il-biċċa l-kbira tal-uffiċjali għoljin, inkluż il-membri tas-Senat, kienu jiġu minn ftit familji għonja u nobbli. Il-mudell Ruman ta' governanza ispira bosta ħassieba politiċi tul is-sekli.

==== Indja tal-qedem ====
Vaishali, il-[[belt kapitali]] tal-Lega ta' Vajjika (Vrijji mahajanapada) tal-Indja, titqies bħala wieħed mill-ewwel eżempji ta' repubblika għall-ħabta tas-seklu 6 Q.K.

==== Amerki ====
[[Kultura|Kulturi]] oħra, bħall-Iroquois fl-Amerki, żviluppaw ukoll forma ta' soċjetà demokratika bejn l-1450 u l-1660 (u possibbilment fl-1142), ferm qabel ma kellhom kuntatt mal-[[Ewropa|Ewropej]]. Din id-demokrazija għadha preżenti sal-lum u hija l-iżjed demokrazija rappreżentattiva antika eżistenti fid-dinja.

=== [[Medjuevu|Medju Evu]] ===
Filwaqt li l-biċċa l-kbira tar-reġjuni fl-Ewropa matul il-Medju Evu kienu mmexxijin mill-kleru jew minn sinjuri fewdali, kienu jeżistu diversi sistemi li kienu jinvolvu l-elezzjonijiet jew il-ġemgħat, għalkemm spiss kienu jinvolvu parti żgħira mill-popolazzjoni. Fl-Iskandinavja, kien hemm korpi magħrufa ta' nies ħielsa ppreseduti minn kelliem tal-liġi. Dawn il-korpi ta' deliberazzjoni kienu responsabbli għas-soluzzjoni ta' kwistjonijiet politiċi, u xi varjanti kienu jinkludu l-Althing fl-[[Iżlanda]] u l-Løgting fil-[[Gżejjer Faroe|Gżejjer Faeroe]]. Il-''veche'', fil-[[Ewropa tal-Lvant|Lvant tal-Ewropa]], kien korp simili għal dawk tal-Iskandinavja. Fil-[[Knisja Kattolika]] Rumana, il-[[Papa]] ilu jiġi elett minn [[konklav]] Papali magħmul mill-kardinali mill-1059. L-ewwel korp Parlamentari ddokumentat fl-Ewropa kien il-Cortes ta' [[León]]. Stabbilit minn [[Alfonsu IX|Alfonso IX]] fl-1188, il-Cortes kellu l-awtorità għall-iffissar tat-tassazzjoni, għall-affarijiet barranin u għal-leġiżlazzjoni, għalkemm in-natura eżatta tar-rwol tiegħu għadha kkontestata. Ir-Repubblika ta' [[Ragusa]], stabbilita fl-1358 u ċċentrata madwar il-belt ta' [[Dubrovnik]], ipprovdiet drittijiet ta' rappreżentanza u ta' votazzjoni lill-aristokrazija maskili tagħha biss. Diversi bliet-stati u sistemi ta' governanza Taljani kellhom forom ta' governanza repubblikani. Pereżempju, ir-Repubblika ta' [[Firenze]], stabbilita fl-1115, kienet immexxija mis-Signoria u l-membri tagħha kienu jintgħażlu bix-xorti. Fil-Frisja tas-sekli 10–15, soċjetà mhux fewdali distinta, id-dritt tal-votazzjoni dwar kwistjonijiet lokali u dwar l-uffiċjali tal-kontea kien ibbażat fuq id-daqs tal-art. Il-''Kouroukan Fouga'' qasam l-Imperu tal-[[Mali]] fi klans tat-tmexxija li kienu rrappreżentati f'ġemgħa kbira msejħa l-''Gbara''. Madankollu, id-dokument wassal biex il-Mali jkun iktar simili għal monarkija kostituzzjonali milli repubblika demokratika.

Il-Parlament tal-[[Renju Unit|Ingilterra]] kellu l-għeruq tiegħu fir-restrizzjonijiet tal-poter tar-rejiet miktubin fil-''Magna Carta'' (1215), li b'mod espliċitu ħarset ċerti drittijiet tas-sudditi tar-Re u b'mod impliċitu appoġġat dak li mbagħad sar id-digriet Ingliż tal-''habeas corpus'', li jissalvagwardja l-libertà individwali mill-ħabs illegali u li jagħti d-dritt tal-appell. L-ewwel assemblea nazzjonali rappreżentattiva fl-Ingilterra kienet il-Parlament ta' [[Simon de Montfort]] fl-1265. Il-preżenza tat-tressiq tal-petizzjonijiet hija fost l-iżjed evidenza bikrija tal-użu tal-Parlament bħala forum biex jiġi indirizzat it-tħassib ġenerali tan-nies ordinarji. Madankollu, is-setgħa tas-sejħa tal-Parlament baqgħet f'idejn il-monarka.

Xi studji kkollegaw l-istabbiliment tal-istituzzjonijiet Parlamentari fl-Ewropa matul il-Medju Evu mal-agglomerazzjonijiet urbani u mal-ħolqien ta' klassijiet ġodda, bħall-[[Artiġjan|artiġjani]], kif ukoll mal-preżenza tan-nobbli u tal-eliti reliġjużi. L-istudjużi kkollegaw ukoll l-istabbiliment tal-governanza rappreżentattiva mal-frammentazzjoni politika relattiva tal-Ewropa. Ix-xjenzat politiku [[David Stasavage]] jikkollega l-frammentazzjoni tal-Ewropa, u d-demokratizzazzjoni sussegwenti tagħha, mal-mod kif sfaxxa l-[[Imperu Ruman]]: it-territorju Ruman inħakem minn gruppi frammentati żgħar ta' tribujiet Ġermaniċi, u dan wassal għall-ħolqien ta' unitajiet politiċi żgħar fejn il-mexxejja kienu relattivament dgħajfin u kienu jeħtieġu l-kunsens taċ-ċittadini tagħhom biex jifilħu għat-theddidiet barranin.

Fil-[[Polonja]], id-demokrazija nobbli kienet ikkaratterizzata minn żieda fl-attività tan-nobbiltà nofsanija, li riedet iżżid is-sehem tagħha fl-eżerċitar tal-poter għas-spejjeż tal-manjati. Il-manjati ddominaw l-iżjed karigi importanti fl-istat (lajċi u ekkleżjastiċi) u kienu jinġabru fil-kunsill irjali, li iktar 'il quddiem sar is-senat. L-importanza dejjem tikber tan-nobbiltà nofsanija kellha impatt fuq l-istabbiliment tal-istituzzjoni tal-art magħrufa bħala s-''sejmik'' (assemblea lokali), li sussegwentement kisbet iktar drittijiet. Matul is-seklu 15 u l-ewwel nofs tas-seklu 16, is-sejmiks ingħataw iktar u iktar poter u saru l-iżjed istituzzjonijiet importanti tal-poter lokali. Fl-1454, [[Casimir IV Jagiellon]] ta lis-sejmiks id-dritt li jiddeċiedu dwar it-taxxi u li jorganizzaw mobilizzazzjoni tal-massa fl-Istatuti ta' Nieszawa. Huwa wiegħed ukoll li ma kienx se joħloq liġijiet ġodda mingħajr il-kunsens tagħhom.

=== Era moderna ===

==== Perjodu modern bikri ====
In 17th century England, there was renewed interest in Magna Carta. The Parliament of England passed the Petition of Right in 1628 which established certain liberties for subjects. The English Civil War (1642–1651) was fought between the King and an oligarchic but elected Parliament, during which the idea of a political party took form with groups debating rights to political representation during the Putney Debates of 1647. Subsequently, the Protectorate (1653–59) and the English Restoration (1660) restored more autocratic rule, although Parliament passed the Habeas Corpus Act in 1679 which strengthened the convention that forbade detention lacking sufficient cause or evidence. After the Glorious Revolution of 1688, the Bill of Rights was enacted in 1689 which codified certain rights and liberties and is still in effect. The Bill set out the requirement for regular elections, rules for freedom of speech in Parliament and limited the power of the monarch, ensuring that, unlike much of Europe at the time, royal absolutism would not prevail. Economic historians Douglass North and Barry Weingast have characterized the institutions implemented in the Glorious Revolution as a resounding success in terms of restraining the government and ensuring protection for property rights.

Renewed interest in the Magna Carta, the English Civil War, and the Glorious Revolution in the 17th century prompted the growth of political philosophy on the British Isles. Thomas Hobbes was the first philosopher to articulate a detailed social contract theory. Writing in the ''Leviathan'' (1651), Hobbes theorized that individuals living in the state of nature led lives that were &quot;solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short&quot; and constantly waged a war of all against all. In order to prevent the occurrence of an anarchic state of nature, Hobbes reasoned that individuals ceded their rights to a strong, authoritarian power. In other words, Hobbes advocated for an absolute monarchy which, in his opinion, was the best form of government. Later, philosopher and physician John Locke would posit a different interpretation of social contract theory. Writing in his ''Two Treatises of Government'' (1689), Locke posited that all individuals possessed the inalienable rights to life, liberty and estate (property). According to Locke, individuals would voluntarily come together to form a state for the purposes of defending their rights. Particularly important for Locke were property rights, whose protection Locke deemed to be a government's primary purpose. Furthermore, Locke asserted that governments were legitimate only if they held the consent of the governed. For Locke, citizens had the right to revolt against a government that acted against their interest or became tyrannical. Although they were not widely read during his lifetime, Locke's works are considered the founding documents of liberal thought and profoundly influenced the leaders of the American Revolution and later the French Revolution. His liberal democratic framework of governance remains the preeminent form of democracy in the world.

In the Cossack republics of Ukraine in the 16th and 17th centuries, the Cossack Hetmanate and Zaporizhian Sich, the holder of the highest post of Hetman was elected by the representatives from the country's districts.

In North America, representative government began in Jamestown, Virginia, with the election of the House of Burgesses (forerunner of the Virginia General Assembly) in 1619. English Puritans who migrated from 1620 established colonies in New England whose local governance was democratic; the hard power of these local assemblies varied greatly throughout the colonial time period however officially they held only small amounts of devolved power, as ultimate authority belonged to the Crown and Parliament. The Puritans (Pilgrim Fathers), Baptists, and Quakers who founded these colonies applied the democratic organisation of their congregations also to the administration of their communities in worldly matters.

==== Sekli 18 u 19 ====
The first Parliament of Great Britain was established in 1707, after the merger of the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland under the Acts of Union. Two key documents of the UK's uncodified constitution, the English Declaration of Right, 1689 (restated in the Bill of Rights 1689) and the Scottish Claim of Right 1689, had both cemented Parliament's position as the supreme law-making body and said that the &quot;election of members of Parliament ought to be free&quot;. However, Parliament was only elected by male property owners, which amounted to 3% of the population in 1780. The first known British person of African heritage to vote in a general election, Ignatius Sancho, voted in 1774 and 1780.

During the Age of Liberty in Sweden (1718–1772), civil rights were expanded and power shifted from the monarch to parliament. The taxed peasantry was represented in parliament, although with little influence, but commoners without taxed property had no suffrage.

The creation of the short-lived Corsican Republic in 1755 was an early attempt to adopt a democratic constitution (all men and women above age of 25 could vote). This Corsican Constitution was the first based on Enlightenment principles and included female suffrage, something that was not included in most other democracies until the 20th century.

Colonial America had similar property qualifications as Britain, and in the period before 1776 the abundance and availability of land meant that large numbers of colonists met such requirements with at least 60 per cent of adult white males able to vote. The great majority of white men were farmers who met the property ownership or taxpaying requirements. With few exceptions, no blacks or women could vote. Vermont, which, on declaring independence of Great Britain in 1777, adopted a constitution modelled on Pennsylvania's citizenship and democratic suffrage for males with or without property. The United States Constitution of 1787 is the oldest surviving, still active, governmental codified constitution. The Constitution provided for an elected government and protected civil rights and liberties, but did not end slavery nor extend voting rights in the United States, instead leaving the issue of suffrage to the individual states. Generally, states limited suffrage to white male property owners and taxpayers. At the time of the first Presidential election in 1789, about 6% of the population was eligible to vote. The Naturalization Act of 1790 limited U.S. citizenship to whites only. The Bill of Rights in 1791 set limits on government power to protect personal freedoms but had little impact on judgements by the courts for the first 130 years after ratification.

In 1789, Revolutionary France adopted the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen and, although short-lived, the National Convention was elected by all men in 1792. The Polish-Lithuanian Constitution of 3 May 1791 sought to implement a more effective constitutional monarchy, introduced political equality between townspeople and nobility, and placed the peasants under the protection of the government, mitigating the worst abuses of serfdom. In force for less than 19 months, it was declared null and void by the Grodno Sejm that met in 1793. Nonetheless, the 1791 Constitution helped keep alive Polish aspirations for the eventual restoration of the country's sovereignty over a century later.

In the United States, the 1828 presidential election was the first in which non-property-holding white males could vote in the vast majority of states. Voter turnout soared during the 1830s, reaching about 80% of the adult white male population in the 1840 presidential election. North Carolina was the last state to abolish property qualification in 1856 resulting in a close approximation to universal white male suffrage (however tax-paying requirements remained in five states in 1860 and survived in two states until the 20th century). In the 1860 United States census, the slave population had grown to four million, and in Reconstruction after the Civil War, three constitutional amendments were passed: the 13th Amendment (1865) that ended slavery; the 14th Amendment (1869) that gave black people citizenship, and the 15th Amendment (1870) that gave black males a nominal right to vote. Full enfranchisement of citizens was not secured until after the civil rights movement gained passage by the US Congress of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The voting franchise in the United Kingdom was expanded and made more uniform in a series of reforms that began with the Reform Act 1832 and continued into the 20th century, notably with the Representation of the People Act 1918 and the Equal Franchise Act 1928. Universal male suffrage was established in France in March 1848 in the wake of the French Revolution of 1848. During that year, several revolutions broke out in Europe as rulers were confronted with popular demands for liberal constitutions and more democratic government.

In 1876, the Ottoman Empire transitioned from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional one, and held two elections the next year to elect members to her newly formed parliament. Provisional Electoral Regulations were issued, stating that the elected members of the Provincial Administrative Councils would elect members to the first Parliament. Later that year, a new constitution was promulgated, which provided for a bicameral Parliament with a Senate appointed by the Sultan and a popularly elected Chamber of Deputies. Only men above the age of 30 who were competent in Turkish and had full civil rights were allowed to stand for election. Reasons for disqualification included holding dual citizenship, being employed by a foreign government, being bankrupt, employed as a servant, or having &quot;notoriety for ill deeds&quot;. Full universal suffrage was achieved in 1934.

In 1893, the self-governing colony New Zealand became the first country in the world (except for the short-lived 18th-century Corsican Republic) to establish active universal suffrage by recognizing women as having the right to vote.

==== Sekli 20 u 21 ====
20th-century transitions to liberal democracy have come in successive &quot;waves of democracy&quot;, variously resulting from wars, revolutions, decolonisation, and religious and economic circumstances. Global waves of &quot;democratic regression&quot; reversing democratization, have also occurred in the 1920s and 30s, in the 1960s and 1970s, and in the 2010s.

World War I and the dissolution of the autocratic Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian empires resulted in the creation of new nation-states in Europe, most of them at least nominally democratic. In the 1920s democratic movements flourished and women's suffrage advanced, but the Great Depression brought disenchantment and most of the countries of Europe, Latin America, and Asia turned to strong-man rule or dictatorships. Fascism and dictatorships flourished in Nazi Germany, Italy, Spain and Portugal, as well as non-democratic governments in the Baltics, the Balkans, Brazil, Cuba, China, and Japan, among others.

World War II brought a definitive reversal of this trend in Western Europe. The democratisation of the American, British, and French sectors of occupied Germany (disputed), Austria, Italy, and the occupied Japan served as a model for the later theory of government change. However, most of Eastern Europe, including the Soviet sector of Germany fell into the non-democratic Soviet-dominated bloc.

The war was followed by decolonisation, and again most of the new independent states had nominally democratic constitutions. India emerged as the world's largest democracy and continues to be so. Countries that were once part of the British Empire often adopted the British Westminster system.

In 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights mandated democracy:&lt;blockquote&gt;3. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.&lt;/blockquote&gt;— Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 21, United Nations, 1948

By 1960, the vast majority of country-states were nominally democracies, although most of the world's populations lived in nominal democracies that experienced sham elections, and other forms of subterfuge (particularly in &quot;Communist&quot; states and the former colonies). A subsequent wave of democratisation brought substantial gains toward true liberal democracy for many states, dubbed &quot;third wave of democracy&quot;. Portugal, Spain, and several of the military dictatorships in South America returned to civilian rule in the 1970s and 1980s. This was followed by countries in East and South Asia by the mid-to-late 1980s. Economic malaise in the 1980s, along with resentment of Soviet oppression, contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union, the associated end of the Cold War, and the democratisation and liberalisation of the former Eastern bloc countries. The most successful of the new democracies were those geographically and culturally closest to western Europe, and they are now either part of the European Union or candidate states. In 1986, after the toppling of the most prominent Asian dictatorship, the only democratic state of its kind at the time emerged in the Philippines with the rise of Corazon Aquino, who would later be known as the mother of Asian democracy.

The liberal trend spread to some states in Africa in the 1990s, most prominently in South Africa. Some recent examples of attempts of liberalisation include the Indonesian Revolution of 1998, the Bulldozer Revolution in Yugoslavia, the Rose Revolution in Georgia, the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, the Cedar Revolution in Lebanon, the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan, and the Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia.

According to Freedom House, in 2007 there were 123 electoral democracies (up from 40 in 1972). According to ''World Forum on Democracy'', electoral democracies now represent 120 of the 192 existing countries and constitute 58.2 per cent of the world's population. At the same time liberal democracies i.e. countries Freedom House regards as free and respectful of basic human rights and the rule of law are 85 in number and represent 38 per cent of the global population. Also in 2007 the United Nations declared 15 September the International Day of Democracy.

Many countries reduced their voting age to 18 years; the major democracies began to do so in the 1970s starting in Western Europe and North America.&lt;sup&gt;[''failed verification'']&lt;/sup&gt; Most electoral democracies continue to exclude those younger than 18 from voting. The voting age has been lowered to 16 for national elections in a number of countries, including Brazil, Austria, Cuba, and Nicaragua. In California, a 2004 proposal to permit a quarter vote at 14 and a half vote at 16 was ultimately defeated. In 2008, the German parliament proposed but shelved a bill that would grant the vote to each citizen at birth, to be used by a parent until the child claims it for themselves.

According to Freedom House, starting in 2005, there have been 17 consecutive years in which declines in political rights and civil liberties throughout the world have outnumbered improvements, as populist and nationalist political forces have gained ground everywhere from Poland (under the Law and Justice party) to the Philippines (under Rodrigo Duterte). In a Freedom House report released in 2018, Democracy Scores for most countries declined for the 12th consecutive year. ''The Christian Science Monitor'' reported that nationalist and populist political ideologies were gaining ground, at the expense of rule of law, in countries like Poland, Turkey and Hungary. For example, in Poland, the President appointed 27 new Supreme Court judges over legal objections from the European Commission. In Turkey, thousands of judges were removed from their positions following a failed coup attempt during a government crackdown .

&quot;Democratic backsliding&quot; in the 2010s were attributed to economic inequality and social discontent, personalism, poor government's management of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as other factors such as manipulation of civil society, &quot;toxic polarization&quot;, foreign disinformation campaigns, racism and nativism, excessive executive power, and decreased power of the opposition. Within English-speaking Western democracies, &quot;protection-based&quot; attitudes combining cultural conservatism and leftist economic attitudes were the strongest predictor of support for authoritarian modes of governance.

== Teorija ==
=== Teorija bikrija ===
Aristotle's '''democratic theory''' contrasted rule by the many (democracy/timocracy), with rule by the few (oligarchy/aristocracy/elitism), and with rule by a single person (tyranny/autocracy/absolute monarchy). He also thought that there was a good and a bad variant of each system (he considered democracy to be the degenerate counterpart to timocracy).

A common view among early and renaissance Republican theorists was that democracy could only survive in small political communities. Heeding the lessons of the Roman Republic's shift to monarchism as it grew larger or smaller, these Republican theorists held that the expansion of territory and population inevitably led to tyranny. Democracy was therefore highly fragile and rare historically, as it could only survive in small political units, which due to their size were vulnerable to conquest by larger political units. Montesquieu famously said, &quot;if a republic is small, it is destroyed by an outside force; if it is large, it is destroyed by an internal vice.&quot; Jean-Jacques Rousseau asserted, &quot;It is, therefore the natural property of small states to be governed as a republic, of middling ones to be subject to a monarch, and of large empires to be swayed by a despotic prince.&quot;

=== Teorija kontemporanja ===
Fost it-teoriċi politiċi moderni, jeżistu kunċetti fundamentali differenti tad-demokrazija.

==== Aggregazzjoni ====
The theory of aggregative democracy claims that the aim of the democratic processes is to solicit citizens' preferences and aggregate them together to determine what social policies society should adopt. Therefore, proponents of this view hold that democratic participation should primarily focus on voting, where the policy with the most votes gets implemented. Different variants of aggregative democracy exist.

According to the minimalist democracy conception, elections are a mechanism for competition between politicians. Joseph Schumpeter articulated this view famously in his book ''Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy''.

Anthony Downs argues that ideological political parties are necessary to act as a mediating broker between individuals and governments. On the other hand, direct democracy, where citizens vote directly on legislative proposals, can show better aggregation in cases of differences in preferences between elites and voters.

===== Mandat medjan =====
According to the median voter theorem the political representativeness can be evaluated by comparing how close laws and policies are to the views of the median voter along the political spectrum. The ''median mandate'' views the preferences of the median voter as granting political legitimacy.

==== Poliarkija ====
Robert A. Dahl argues that the fundamental democratic principle is that, when it comes to binding collective decisions, each person in a political community is entitled to have his/her interests be given equal consideration. He uses the term polyarchy (&quot;rule by many&quot;) to refer to societies in which there exists a certain set of institutions and procedures which are perceived as leading to such democracy. First and foremost among these institutions is the regular occurrence of free and open elections which are used to select representatives who then manage all or most of the public policy of the society. However, these polyarchic procedures may not create a full democracy if, for example, poverty prevents political participation. Similarly, Ronald Dworkin argues that &quot;democracy is a substantive, not a merely procedural, ideal.&quot;

==== Deliberazzjoni ====
Deliberative democracy is based on the notion that democracy is government by deliberation. Unlike aggregative democracy, deliberative democracy holds that, for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by authentic deliberation, not merely the aggregation of preferences that occurs in voting. Authentic deliberation is deliberation among decision-makers that is free from distortions of unequal political power, such as power a decision-maker obtained through economic wealth or the support of interest groups. If the decision-makers cannot reach consensus after authentically deliberating on a proposal, then they vote on the proposal using a form of majority rule. Citizens assemblies are considered by many scholars as practical examples of deliberative democracy, with a recent OECD report identifying citizens assemblies as an increasingly popular mechanism to involve citizens in governmental decision-making. Proponents of direct democracy view citizens do not rule themselves unless they directly decide laws and policies. Political activity can be valuable in itself, it socialises and educates citizens, and popular participation can check powerful elites.

==== Tipi ta' demokraziji governattivi ====
Democracy has taken a number of forms, both in theory and practice. Some varieties of democracy provide better representation and more freedom for their citizens than others. However, if any democracy is not structured to prohibit the government from excluding the people from the legislative process, or any branch of government from altering the separation of powers in its favour, then a branch of the system can accumulate too much power and destroy the democracy.

The following kinds of democracy are not exclusive of one another: many specify details of aspects that are independent of one another and can co-exist in a single system.

===== Forom bażiċi =====
Several variants of democracy exist, but there are two basic forms, both of which concern how the whole body of all eligible citizens executes its will. One form of democracy is direct democracy, in which all eligible citizens have active participation in the political decision making, for example voting on policy initiatives directly. In most modern democracies, the whole body of eligible citizens remain the sovereign power but political power is exercised indirectly through elected representatives; this is called a representative democracy.

If the head of state is democratically elected then the polity is called a democratic republic

====== Demokrazija diretta ======
Direct democracy is a political system where the citizens participate in the decision-making personally, contrary to relying on intermediaries or representatives. Proponents like Jean-Jacques Rousseau argue the direct approach increases legitimacy. A direct democracy gives the voting population the power to:

* Change constitutional laws,
* Put forth initiatives, referendums and suggestions for laws

Within modern-day representative governments, certain electoral tools like referendums, citizens' initiatives and recall elections are referred to as forms of direct democracy. However, some advocates of direct democracy argue for local assemblies of face-to-face discussion. Direct democracy as a government system currently exists in the Swiss cantons of Appenzell Innerrhoden and Glarus, the Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities, communities affiliated with the CIPO-RFM, the Bolivian city councils of FEJUVE, and Kurdish cantons of Rojava.

====== Demokrazija semidiretta ======
Some modern democracies that are predominantly representative in nature also heavily rely upon forms of political action that are directly democratic. These democracies, which combine elements of representative democracy and direct democracy, are termed ''semi-direct democracies'' or ''participatory democracies''. Examples include Switzerland and some U.S. states, where frequent use is made of referendums and initiatives.

The Swiss confederation is a semi-direct democracy. At the federal level, citizens can propose changes to the constitution (federal popular initiative) or ask for a referendum to be held on any law voted by the parliament. Between January 1995 and June 2005, Swiss citizens voted 31 times, to answer 103 questions (during the same period, French citizens participated in only two referendums). Although in the past 120 years less than 250 initiatives have been put to referendum.

Examples include the extensive use of referendums in the US state of California, which is a state that has more than 20 million voters.

In New England, town meetings are often used, especially in rural areas, to manage local government. This creates a hybrid form of government, with a local direct democracy and a representative state government. For example, most Vermont towns hold annual town meetings in March in which town officers are elected, budgets for the town and schools are voted on, and citizens have the opportunity to speak and be heard on political matters.

====== Sistema tax-xorti ======
The use of a lot system, a characteristic of Athenian democracy, is a feature of some versions of direct democracies. In this system, important governmental and administrative tasks are performed by citizens picked from a lottery.

====== Demokrazija rappreżentattiva ======
Representative democracy involves the election of government officials by the people being represented. The most common mechanisms involve election of the candidate with a majority or a plurality of the votes. Most western countries have representative systems.

Representatives may be elected or become diplomatic representatives by a particular district (or constituency), or represent the entire electorate through proportional systems, with some using a combination of the two. Some representative democracies also incorporate elements of direct democracy, such as referendums. A characteristic of representative democracy is that while the representatives are elected by the people to act in the people's interest, they retain the freedom to exercise their own judgement as how best to do so. Such reasons have driven criticism upon representative democracy, pointing out the contradictions of representation mechanisms with democracy.

====== Demokrazija Parlamentari ======
Parliamentary democracy is a representative democracy where government is appointed by or can be dismissed by, representatives as opposed to a &quot;presidential rule&quot; wherein the president is both head of state and the head of government and is elected by the voters. Under a parliamentary democracy, government is exercised by delegation to an executive ministry and subject to ongoing review, checks and balances by the legislative parliament elected by the people.

In a parliamentary system, the prime minister may be dismissed by the legislature at any point in time for not meeting the expectations of the legislature. This is done through a vote of no confidence where the legislature decides whether or not to remove the prime minister from office with majority support for dismissal. In some countries, the prime minister can also call an election at any point in time, typically when the prime minister believes that they are in good favour with the public as to get re-elected. In other parliamentary democracies, extra elections are virtually never held, a minority government being preferred until the next ordinary elections. An important feature of the parliamentary democracy is the concept of the &quot;loyal opposition&quot;. The essence of the concept is that the second largest political party (or opposition) opposes the governing party (or coalition), while still remaining loyal to the state and its democratic principles.

====== Demokrazija Presidenzjali ======
Presidential democracy is a system where the public elects the president through an election. The president serves as both the head of state and head of government controlling most of the executive powers. The president serves for a specific term and cannot exceed that amount of time. The legislature often has limited ability to remove a president from office. Elections typically have a fixed date and are not easily changed. The president has direct control over the cabinet, specifically appointing the cabinet members.

The executive usually has the responsibility to execute or implement legislation and may have the limited legislative powers, such as a veto. However, a legislative branch passes legislation and budgets. This provides some measure of separation of powers. In consequence, however, the president and the legislature may end up in the control of separate parties, allowing one to block the other and thereby interfere with the orderly operation of the state. This may be the reason why presidential democracy is not very common outside the Americas, Africa, and Central and Southeast Asia.

A semi-presidential system is a system of democracy in which the government includes both a prime minister and a president. The particular powers held by the prime minister and president vary by country.

==== Tipoloġija ====

===== Monarkija kostituzzjonali =====
Many countries such as the United Kingdom, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Scandinavian countries, Thailand, Japan and Bhutan turned powerful monarchs into constitutional monarchs (often gradually) with limited or symbolic roles. For example, in the predecessor states to the United Kingdom, constitutional monarchy began to emerge and has continued uninterrupted since the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and passage of the Bill of Rights 1689. Strongly limited constitutional monarchies, such as the United Kingdom, have been referred to as crowned republics by writers such as H. G. Wells.

In other countries, the monarchy was abolished along with the aristocratic system (as in France, China, Russia, Germany, Austria, Hungary, Italy, Greece, and Egypt). An elected person, with or without significant powers, became the head of state in these countries.

Elite upper houses of legislatures, which often had lifetime or hereditary tenure, were common in many states. Over time, these either had their powers limited (as with the British House of Lords) or else became elective and remained powerful (as with the Australian Senate).

===== Demokrazija repubblika =====
The term ''republic'' has many different meanings, but today often refers to a representative democracy with an elected head of state, such as a president, serving for a limited term, in contrast to states with a hereditary monarch as a head of state, even if these states also are representative democracies with an elected or appointed head of government such as a prime minister.

The Founding Fathers of the United States often criticised direct democracy; James Madison argued, especially in ''The Federalist'' No. 10, that what distinguished a direct ''democracy'' from a ''republic'' was that the former depended on small size and suffered more violently from the effects of faction, whereas a republic could get stronger as it got larger and combats faction by its very structure. Accordingly, during Philadelphia convention Madison called election of representatives by large territories &quot;the only defence against the inconveniencies of democracy consistent with the democratic form of Govt.&quot;

Professors Richard Ellis of Willamette University and Michael Nelson of Rhodes College argue that much constitutional thought, from Madison to Lincoln and beyond, has focused on &quot;the problem of majority tyranny&quot;. They conclude, &quot;The principles of republican government embedded in the Constitution represent an effort by the framers to ensure that the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness would not be trampled by majorities.&quot; What was critical to American values, John Adams insisted, was that the government be &quot;bound by fixed laws, which the people have a voice in making, and a right to defend.&quot; As Benjamin Franklin was exiting after writing the US Constitution, Elizabeth Willing Powel asked him &quot;Well, Doctor, what have we got—a republic or a monarchy?&quot;. He replied &quot;A republic—if you can keep it.&quot;

===== Demokrazija liberali =====
A liberal democracy is a representative democracy which enshrines a liberal political philosophy, where the ability of the elected representatives to exercise decision-making power is subject to the rule of law, moderated by a constitution or laws such as the protection of the rights and freedoms of individuals, and constrained on the extent to which the will of the majority can be exercised against the rights of minorities.

===== Demokrazija Soċjalista =====
Socialist thought has several different views on democracy, for example social democracy or democratic socialism. Many democratic socialists and social democrats believe in a form of participatory, industrial, economic and/or workplace democracy combined with a representative democracy.

===== Demokrazija Marxista =====
Marxist theory supports a democratic society centering the working class. Some Marxists and Trotskyists believe in direct democracy or workers' councils (which are sometimes called soviets). This system can begin with workplace democracy and can manifest itself as soviet democracy or dictatorship of the proletariat. Trotskyist groups have interpreted socialist democracy to be synonymous with multi-party far-left representation, autonomous union organizations, worker's control of production, internal party democracy and the mass participation of the working masses. Some communist parties support a soviet republic with democratic centralism. Within democracy in Marxism there can be hostility to what is commonly called &quot;liberal democracy&quot;.

===== Demokrazija Anarkista =====
Anarchists are split in this domain, depending on whether they believe that a majority-rule is tyrannic or not. To many anarchists, the only form of democracy considered acceptable is direct democracy. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon argued that the only acceptable form of direct democracy is one in which it is recognised that majority decisions are not binding on the minority, even when unanimous. However, anarcho-communist Murray Bookchin criticised individualist anarchists for opposing democracy, and says &quot;majority rule&quot; is consistent with anarchism.

Some anarcho-communists oppose the majoritarian nature of direct democracy, feeling that it can impede individual liberty and opt-in favour of a non-majoritarian form of consensus democracy, similar to Proudhon's position on direct democracy.

===== Demokrazija każwali =====
Sortition is the process of choosing decision-making bodies via a random selection. These bodies can be more representative of the opinions and interests of the people at large than an elected legislature or other decision-maker. The technique was in widespread use in Athenian Democracy and Renaissance Florence and is still used in modern jury selection and citizens' assemblies.

===== Demokrazija Kostituzzjonali =====
Consociational democracy, also called consociationalism, is a form of democracy based on power-sharing formula between elites representing the social groups within the society. In 1969, Arendt Lijphart argued this would stabilize democracies with factions. A consociational democracy allows for simultaneous majority votes in two or more ethno-religious constituencies, and policies are enacted only if they gain majority support from both or all of them. The Qualified majority voting rule in European Council of Ministers is a consociational democracy approach for supranational democracies. This system in Treaty of Rome allocates votes to member states in part according to their population, but heavily weighted in favour of the smaller states. A consociational democracy requires consensus of representatives, while consensus democracy requires consensus of electorate.

===== Demokrazija maġġoritarja =====
Majoritarian democracy is a form of democracy based upon a principle of majority rule. Majoritarian democracy contrasts with consensus democracy, rule by as many people as possible.

===== Konsensus =====
Consensus democracy requires consensus decision-making and supermajority to obtain a larger support than majority. In contrast, in majoritarian democracy minority opinions can potentially be ignored by vote-winning majorities. Constitutions typically require consensus or supermajorities.

===== Demokrazija etnika =====
The term ethnic democracy, as used by some political scientists, purports to describe a governance system that combines a structured ethnic dominance with democratic, political and civil rights for all. Both the dominant ethnic group—typically an ethnic majority—and the minority ethnic groups have citizenship and are able to fully participate in the political process. However, critics of the &quot;ethnic democracy&quot; model argue it is a contradiction in terms, and thus conceptually inadequate or confusing; these critics allege that purported ethnic democracies, most notably Israel, are not democratic at all, or are at best a sort of semi-democracy.

===== Demokrazija inklużiva =====
Inclusive democracy is a political theory and political project that aims for direct democracy in all fields of social life: political democracy in the form of face-to-face assemblies which are confederated, economic democracy in a stateless, moneyless and marketless economy, democracy in the social realm, i.e. self-management in places of work and education, and ecological democracy which aims to reintegrate society and nature. The theoretical project of inclusive democracy emerged from the work of political philosopher Takis Fotopoulos in &quot;Towards An Inclusive Democracy&quot; and was further developed in the journal ''Democracy &amp; Nature'' and its successor ''The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy''.

===== Politika parteċipattiva =====
A parpolity or participatory polity is a theoretical form of democracy that is ruled by a nested council structure. The guiding philosophy is that people should have decision-making power in proportion to how much they are affected by the decision. Local councils of 25–50 people are completely autonomous on issues that affect only them, and these councils send delegates to higher level councils who are again autonomous regarding issues that affect only the population affected by that council.

A council court of randomly chosen citizens serves as a check on the tyranny of the majority, and rules on which body gets to vote on which issue. Delegates may vote differently from how their sending council might wish but are mandated to communicate the wishes of their sending council. Delegates are recallable at any time. Referendums are possible at any time via votes of lower-level councils, however, not everything is a referendum as this is most likely a waste of time. A parpolity is meant to work in tandem with a participatory economy.

===== Demokrazija proċedurali =====
Procedural democracy or proceduralist democracy, proceduralism or hollow democracy is a term used to denote the particular procedures, such as regular elections based on universal suffrage, that produce an electorally-legitimated government. Procedural democracy, with its centering of electoral processes as the basis of democratic legitimacy, is often contrasted with substantive or participatory democracy, which centers the equal participation of all groups in society in the political process as the basis of legitimacy.

===== Demokrazija radikali =====
Radical democracy is based on the idea that there are hierarchical and oppressive power relations that exist in society. Radical democracy's role is to make visible and challenge those relations by allowing for difference, dissent and antagonisms in decision-making processes.

===== Demokrazija reliġjuża =====
Religious democracy is a form of democracy where the values of a particular religion or state religion are preferred. The term applies to all democratic countries in which religion is incorporated into the form of government.

===== Demokrazija kożmopolitana =====
Cosmopolitan democracy, also known as ''global democracy'' or ''world federalism'', is a political system in which democracy is implemented on a global scale, either directly or through representatives. An important justification for this kind of system is that the decisions made in national or regional democracies often affect people outside the constituency who, by definition, cannot vote. By contrast, in a cosmopolitan democracy, the people who are affected by decisions also have a say in them.

According to its supporters, any attempt to solve global problems is undemocratic without some form of cosmopolitan democracy. The general principle of cosmopolitan democracy is to expand some or all of the values and norms of democracy, including the rule of law; the non-violent resolution of conflicts; and equality among citizens, beyond the limits of the state. To be fully implemented, this would require reforming existing international organisations, e.g., the United Nations, as well as the creation of new institutions such as a World Parliament, which ideally would enhance public control over, and accountability in, international politics.

Cosmopolitan democracy has been promoted, among others, by physicist Albert Einstein, writer Kurt Vonnegut, columnist George Monbiot, and professors David Held and Daniele Archibugi. The creation of the International Criminal Court in 2003 was seen as a major step forward by many supporters of this type of cosmopolitan democracy.

===== Demokrazija kreattiva =====
Creative democracy is advocated by American philosopher John Dewey. The main idea about creative democracy is that democracy encourages individual capacity building and the interaction among the society. Dewey argues that democracy is a way of life in his work of &quot;Creative Democracy: The Task Before Us&quot; and an experience built on faith in human nature, faith in human beings, and faith in working with others. Democracy, in Dewey's view, is a moral ideal requiring actual effort and work by people; it is not an institutional concept that exists outside of ourselves. &quot;The task of democracy&quot;, Dewey concludes, &quot;is forever that of creation of a freer and more humane experience in which all share and to which all contribute&quot;.

===== Demokrazija ggwidata =====
Guided democracy is a form of democracy that incorporates regular popular elections, but which often carefully &quot;guides&quot; the choices offered to the electorate in a manner that may reduce the ability of the electorate to truly determine the type of government exercised over them. Such democracies typically have only one central authority which is often not subject to meaningful public review by any other governmental authority. Russian-style democracy has often been referred to as a &quot;guided democracy&quot;. Russian politicians have referred to their government as having only one center of power/ authority, as opposed to most other forms of democracy which usually attempt to incorporate two or more naturally competing sources of authority within the same government.

=== Tfittxija ta' fehim komuni ===
The search for a common approach to conceptualize, measure and compare democracy remains a challenge in modern political science. This challenge strikes through to measuring, assessing and comparing the quality of democracy, as Seva Gunitsky pointed in 2015 in the Washington Post, based upon his research for ''Ranking the World – Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance'', that measuring democracy can mislead as much as clarify – a problem for academics, policy-makers and anyone who cares about democracy.

In his contribution ''Lost in the Gray Zone: Competing Measures of Democracy in the Former Soviet Republics'' to ''Ranking the World'', he, on the example of former Soviet republics, examines fundamental problems with measures of democracy, observing that indices often disagree and occasionally draw contradictory conclusions from observing the same event. He argues, that this reflects inherent tradeoffs in conceptualizing democratic governance, which arise from fundamental normative disagreements about a highly contested concept.

In 2011, Michael Coppedge, John Gerring et al. proposed an approach to such conceptualization and measurement. In their paper ''Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach'' they review some of the weaknesses among contemporary and older approaches, then lay out their approach, characterizing it as ''historical'', ''multidimensional'', ''disaggregated'', and ''transparent''. The authors propose to create a new set of four features to conceptualize and measure democracy. First, ''historical'', extending indicators of democracy back through modern history, wherever possible. Second, a ''multidimensional'' approach to the problem of conceptualizing democracy. Third, to collect information relevant to democracy at a highly ''disaggregated'' level. Fourth, ''transparent'', a strategy for data collection and presentation that should enhance the precision, validity, transparency, and legitimacy of the resulting indicators. They also sum up the conceptions, and/or aspects, of democracy into six – ''electoral'', ''liberal'', ''majoritarian'', ''participatory'', ''deliberative'', and ''egalitarian'', which taken together offer a fairly comprehensive accounting of the concept of democracy as it is employed today (see overview in the table below).
{| class=&quot;wikitable&quot;
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |Conceptions of democracy by Michael Coppedge, John Gerring et al., 2011
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
| 
| 
|Principles
|Question
|Institutions
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|I.
|'''Electoral'''
|Contestation, competition
|Are government offices filled by free and fair multiparty elections?
|Elections, political parties, competitiveness and turnover
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|II.
|'''Liberal'''
|Limited government, multiple veto points, horizontal accountability, individual rights, civil liberties, transparency
|Is political power decentralized &amp; constrained?
|Multiple, independent, and decentralized, with special focus on the role of the media, interest groups, the judiciary, and a written constitution with explicit guarantees
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|III.
|'''Majoritarian'''
|Majority rule, centralization, vertical accountability
|Does the majority (or plurality) rule?
|Consolidated and centralized, with special focus on the role of political parties
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|IV.
|'''Participatory'''
|Government by the people
|Do ordinary citizens participate in politics?
|Election law, civil society, local government, direct democracy
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|V.
|'''Deliberative'''
|Government by reason
|Are political decisions the product of public deliberation?
|Media, hearings, panels, other deliberative bodies
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|VI.
|'''Egalitarian'''
|Political equality
|Are all citizens equally empowered?
|Designed to ensure equal participation, representation, protection, and politically relevant resources
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|}

=== Measurement of democracy ===
Main article: Measurement of democracy

Measurement of democracy varies according to the different fundamental conceptions of democracy. Minimalist democracy evaluations focus on free and fair elections, while maximalist democracy evaluates additional values, such as human rights, deliberation, economic outcomes or state capacity.

== Demokrazija mhux governattiva ==
Aside from the public sphere, similar democratic principles and mechanisms of voting and representation have been used to govern other kinds of groups. Many non-governmental organisations decide policy and leadership by voting. Most trade unions and cooperatives are governed by democratic elections. Corporations are ultimately governed by their shareholders through shareholder democracy. Corporations may also employ systems such as workplace democracy to handle internal governance. Amitai Etzioni has postulated a system that fuses elements of democracy with sharia law, termed Islamic democracy or ''Islamocracy''. There is also a growing number of Democratic educational institutions such as Sudbury schools that are co-governed by students and staff.

=== Demokrazija tal-azzjonisti ===
Shareholder democracy is a concept relating to the governance of corporations by their shareholders. In the United States, shareholders are typically granted voting rights according to the one share, one vote principle. Shareholders may vote annually to elect the company's board of directors, who themselves may choose the company's executives. The shareholder democracy framework may be inaccurate for companies which have different classes of stock that further alter the distribution of voting rights.

== Ġustifikazzjoni ==
Ingħataw diversi ġustifikazzjonijiet għad-demokrazija.

=== Leġittimità ===
Social contract theory argues that the legitimacy of government is based on consent of the governed, i.e. an election, and that political decisions must reflect the general will. The public legitimacy of democracy varies by country, in some countries religious texts have more public support than the will of the people.

=== Teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet aħjar ===
Condorcet's jury theorem is logical proof that if each decision-maker has a better than chance probability of making the right decision, then having the largest number of decision-makers, i.e. a democracy, will result in the best decisions. This has also been argued by theories of the wisdom of the crowd. Democracy tends to improve conflict resolution.

=== Suċċess ekonomiku ===
In ''Why Nations Fail'', economists Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson argue that democracies are more economically successful because undemocratic political systems tend to limit markets and favor monopolies at the expense of the creative destruction which is necessary for sustained economic growth.

A 2019 study by Acemoglu and others estimated that countries switching to democratic from authoritarian rule had on average a 20% higher GDP after 25 years than if they had remained authoritarian. The study examined 122 transitions to democracy and 71 transitions to authoritarian rule, occurring from 1960 to 2010. Acemoglu said this was because democracies tended to invest more in health care and human capital, and reduce special treatment of regime allies.

A 2023 study analyzed the long-term effects of democracy on economic prosperity using new data on GDP per capita and democracy for a dataset between 1789 and 2019. The results indicate that democracy substantially increases economic development.

Unemployment is associated with anti-democratic beliefs.

== Kritika ==
Democracy as a concept and as a practical form of government has been the subject of critique throughout history. Some critics consider that democratic regimes often fail to be true to the highest principles expected of them, while others reject the values promoted by constitutional democracy in whole or part.

Opposition to democracy goes as far back as Plato, who argued for a 'government of the best qualified'. More recently, James Madison extensively studied historic attempts at and arguments on democracy in his preparation for the Constitutional Convention, and Winston Churchill remarked that &quot;no one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.&quot;

Critics argue that modern democracies may fail to be sufficiently democratic and instead function in practice as oligarchies, insofar as governments are more responsive to the preferences of economic elites than to those of ordinary citizens. Numerous empirical studies across various western democracies including the United States, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Canada, Norway and Germany have consistently found that elected representatives tend to respond more to the preferences of very affluent citizens for policy outcomes than those of the average voter.

Some critics of democracy have highlighted the concept's inconsistencies, paradoxes, and limits: drawing contrasts with other forms of government, such as epistocracy or lottocracy. Others have characterized most modern democracies as democratic polyarchies and democratic aristocracies. Yet others have identified fascist moments in modern democracies. They have termed the societies produced by modern democracies as neo-feudal and have contrasted democracy with fascism, anarcho-capitalism, theocracy, and absolute monarchy.

== Tranżizzjonijiet demokratiċi ==
A democratic transition describes a phase in a country's political system, often created as a result of an incomplete change from an authoritarian regime to a democratic one (or vice versa).

=== Demokratizzazzjoni ===
Democratization, or democratisation, is the structural government transition from an authoritarian government to a more democratic political regime, including substantive political changes moving in a democratic direction. The opposite process of democratic transition is known as democratic backsliding or autocratization. Whether and to what extent democratization occurs can be influenced by various factors, including economic development, historical legacies, civil society, and international processes. Some accounts of democratization emphasize how elites drove democratization, whereas other accounts emphasize grassroots bottom-up processes. How democratization occurs has also been used to explain other political phenomena, such as whether a country goes to a war or whether its economy grows.

Several philosophers and researchers have outlined historical and social factors seen as supporting the evolution of democracy. Other commentators have mentioned the influence of economic development. In a related theory, Ronald Inglehart suggests that improved living-standards in modern developed countries can convince people that they can take their basic survival for granted, leading to increased emphasis on self-expression values, which correlates closely with democracy.

Douglas M. Gibler and Andrew Owsiak in their study argued about the importance of peace and stable borders for the development of democracy. It has often been assumed that democracy causes peace, but this study shows that, historically, peace has almost always predated the establishment of democracy.

Carroll Quigley concludes that the characteristics of weapons are the main predictor of democracy: Democracy—this scenario—tends to emerge only when the best weapons available are easy for individuals to obtain and use. By the 1800s, guns were the best personal weapons available, and in the United States of America (already nominally democratic), almost everyone could afford to buy a gun, and could learn how to use it fairly easily. Governments could not do any better: it became the age of mass armies of citizen soldiers with guns. Similarly, Periclean Greece was an age of the citizen soldier and democracy.

Other theories stressed the relevance of education and of human capital—and within them of cognitive ability to increasing tolerance, rationality, political literacy and participation. Two effects of education and cognitive ability are distinguished:&lt;sup&gt;[''need quotation to verify'']&lt;/sup&gt;

* a cognitive effect (competence to make rational choices, better information-processing)
* an ethical effect (support of democratic values, freedom, human rights etc.), which itself depends on intelligence.

Evidence consistent with conventional theories of why democracy emerges and is sustained has been hard to come by. Statistical analyses have challenged modernisation theory by demonstrating that there is no reliable evidence for the claim that democracy is more likely to emerge when countries become wealthier, more educated, or less unequal. In fact, empirical evidence shows that economic growth and education may not lead to increased demand for democratization as modernization theory suggests: historically, most countries attained high levels of access to primary education well before transitioning to democracy. Rather than acting as a catalyst for democratization, in some situations education provision may instead be used by non-democratic regimes to indoctrinate their subjects and strengthen their power.

The assumed link between education and economic growth is called into question when analyzing empirical evidence. Across different countries, the correlation between education attainment and math test scores is very weak (.07). A similarly weak relationship exists between per-pupil expenditures and math competency (.26). Additionally, historical evidence suggests that average human capital (measured using literacy rates) of the masses does not explain the onset of industrialization in France from 1750 to 1850 despite arguments to the contrary. Together, these findings show that education does not always promote human capital and economic growth as is generally argued to be the case. Instead, the evidence implies that education provision often falls short of its expressed goals, or, alternatively, that political actors use education to promote goals other than economic growth and development.

Some scholars have searched for the &quot;deep&quot; determinants of contemporary political institutions, be they geographical or demographic.

An example of this is the disease environment. Places with different mortality rates had different populations and productivity levels around the world. For example, in Africa, the tsetse fly—which afflicts humans and livestock—reduced the ability of Africans to plough the land. This made Africa less settled. As a consequence, political power was less concentrated. This also affected the colonial institutions European countries established in Africa. Whether colonial settlers could live or not in a place made them develop different institutions which led to different economic and social paths. This also affected the distribution of power and the collective actions people could take. As a result, some African countries ended up having democracies and others autocracies.

An example of geographical determinants for democracy is having access to coastal areas and rivers. This natural endowment has a positive relation with economic development thanks to the benefits of trade. Trade brought economic development, which in turn, broadened power. Rulers wanting to increase revenues had to protect property-rights to create incentives for people to invest. As more people had more power, more concessions had to be made by the ruler and in many places this process lead to democracy. These determinants defined the structure of the society moving the balance of political power.


Robert Michels asserts that although democracy can never be fully realised, democracy may be developed automatically in the act of striving for democracy:&lt;blockquote&gt;The peasant in the fable, when on his deathbed, tells his sons that a treasure is buried in the field. After the old man's death the sons dig everywhere in order to discover the treasure. They do not find it. But their indefatigable labor improves the soil and secures for them a comparative well-being. The treasure in the fable may well symbolise democracy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Democracy in modern times has almost always faced opposition from the previously existing government, and many times it has faced opposition from social elites. The implementation of a democratic government from a non-democratic state is typically brought by peaceful or violent democratic revolution.

The V-Dem Institute found 2026 ongoing democratization in 18 countries: Benin, Bolivia, Botswana, Bazil, Dominican Republic, Fiji, Guatemala, Lesotho, Mauritius, Montenegro, Poland, Seychelles, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Timor-Leste, Thailand, The Gambia, and Zambia.

===== Promozzjoni tad-demokrazija =====
Promotion of democracy can increase the quality of already existing democracies, reduce political apathy, and the chance of democratic backsliding. Democracy promotion measures include voting advice applications, participatory democracy, increasing electoral integrity, youth suffrage and civic education, reducing barriers to entry for new political parties, increasing proportionality, reducing presidentialism and aligning with median voter preferences.

=== Awtokratizzazzjoni ===
Democratic backsliding is a form of autocratization, a process of structural government transition toward authoritarianism in which the exercise of political power becomes less limited and more arbitrary and repressive. Democratic backsliding specifically assumes a starting point of a democratic system. The process typically restricts the space for public contest and political participation in the process of government selection. Democratic backsliding involves the weakening of democratic institutions, such as the peaceful transition of power or free and fair elections, or the violation of individual rights that underpin democracies, especially freedom of expression. Democratic backsliding is the opposite of democratization.&lt;sup&gt;[''citation needed'']&lt;/sup&gt;

Steven Levitsky says: &quot;It's not up to voters to defend a democracy. That's asking far, far too much of voters, to cast their ballot on the basis of some set of abstract principles or procedures. With the exception of a handful of cases, voters never, ever — in any society, in any culture — prioritize democracy over all else. Individual voters worry about much more mundane things, as is their right. It is up to élites and institutions to protect democracy — not voters.&quot;

The V-Dem Institute found 2026 ongoing democratic backsliding in 44 countries: Afghanistan, Argentina, Armenia, Belarus, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Central African Republic, Croatia, Georgia, Greece, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, El Salvador, Haiti, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Italy, Ivory Coast, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Mali, Madagascar, Mauretania, Mexico, Moldova, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Niger, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Slovakia, Slovenia, Senegal, Serbia, Romania, Togo, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and United States.

===== Tfixkil =====
Some democratic governments have experienced sudden state collapse and regime change to an undemocratic form of government. Domestic military coups or rebellions are the most common means by which democratic governments have been overthrown. (See List of coups and coup attempts by country and List of civil wars.) Examples include the Spanish Civil War, the Coup of 18 Brumaire that ended the French First Republic, and the 28 May 1926 coup d'état which ended the First Portuguese Republic. Some military coups are supported by foreign governments, such as the 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état and the 1953 Iranian coup d'état. Other types of a sudden end to democracy include:

* Invasion, for example the German occupation of Czechoslovakia, and the fall of South Vietnam.
* Self-coup, in which the leader of the government extra-legally seizes all power or unlawfully extends the term in office. This can be done through:
** Suspension of the constitution by decree, such as with the 1992 Peruvian coup d'état
** An &quot;electoral self-coup&quot; using election fraud to obtain re-election of a previously fairly elected official or political party. For example, in the 1999 Ukrainian presidential election, 2003 Russian legislative election, and 2004 Russian presidential election.
* Royal coup, in which a monarch not normally involved in government seizes all power. For example, the 6 January Dictatorship, begun in 1929 when King Alexander I of Yugoslavia dismissed parliament and started ruling by decree.

Democratic backsliding can end democracy in a gradual manner, by increasing emphasis on national security and eroding free and fair elections, freedom of expression, independence of the judiciary, rule of law. A famous example is the Enabling Act of 1933, which lawfully ended democracy in Weimar Germany and marked the transition to Nazi Germany.

Temporary or long-term political violence and government interference can prevent free and fair elections, which erode the democratic nature of governments. This has happened on a local level even in well-established democracies like the United States; for example, the Wilmington insurrection of 1898 and African-American disfranchisement after the Reconstruction era.

== Influwenza tal-midja ==
The theory of democracy relies on the implicit assumption that voters are well informed about social issues, policies, and candidates so that they can make a truly informed decision. Since the late 20th century there has been a growing concern that voters may be poorly informed due to the news media's focusing more on entertainment and gossip and less on serious journalistic research on political issues.

The media professors Michael Gurevitch and Jay Blumler have proposed a number of functions that the mass media are expected to fulfill in a democracy:

* Surveillance of the sociopolitical environment
* Meaningful agenda setting
* Platforms for an intelligible and illuminating advocacy
* Dialogue across a diverse range of views
* Mechanisms for holding officials to account for how they have exercised power
* Incentives for citizens to learn, choose, and become involved
* A principled resistance to the efforts of forces outside the media to subvert their independence, integrity, and ability to serve the audience
* A sense of respect for the audience member, as potentially concerned and able to make sense of his or her political environment

This proposal has inspired a lot of discussions over whether the news media are actually fulfilling the requirements that a well functioning democracy requires. Commercial mass media are generally not accountable to anybody but their owners, and they have no obligation to serve a democratic function. They are controlled mainly by economic market forces. Fierce economic competition may force the mass media to divert themselves from any democratic ideals and focus entirely on how to survive the competition.

The tabloidization and popularization of the news media is seen in an increasing focus on human examples rather than statistics and principles. There is more focus on politicians as personalities and less focus on political issues in the popular media. Election campaigns are covered more as horse races and less as debates about ideologies and issues. The dominating media focus on spin, conflict, and competitive strategies has made voters perceive the politicians as egoists rather than idealists. This fosters mistrust and a cynical attitude to politics, less civic engagement, and less interest in voting. The ability to find effective political solutions to social problems is hampered when problems tend to be blamed on individuals rather than on structural causes. This person-centered focus may have far-reaching consequences not only for domestic problems but also for foreign policy when international conflicts are blamed on foreign heads of state rather than on political and economic structures. A strong media focus on fear and terrorism has allowed military logic to penetrate public institutions, leading to increased surveillance and the erosion of civil rights.

The responsiveness and accountability of the democratic system is compromised when lack of access to substantive, diverse, and undistorted information is handicapping the citizens' capability of evaluating the political process. The fast pace and trivialization in the competitive news media is dumbing down the political debate. Thorough and balanced investigation of complex political issues does not fit into this format. The political communication is characterized by short time horizons, short slogans, simple explanations, and simple solutions. This is conducive to political populism rather than serious deliberation.

Commercial mass media are often differentiated along the political spectrum so that people can hear mainly opinions that they already agree with. Too much controversy and diverse opinions are not always profitable for the commercial news media. Political polarization is emerging when different people read different news and watch different TV channels. This polarization has been worsened by the emergence of the social media that allow people to communicate mainly with groups of like-minded people, the so-called echo chambers. Extreme political polarization may undermine the trust in democratic institutions, leading to erosion of civil rights and free speech and in some cases even reversion to autocracy.

Many media scholars have discussed non-commercial news media with public service obligations as a means to improve the democratic process by providing the kind of political contents that a free market does not provide. The World Bank has recommended public service broadcasting in order to strengthen democracy in developing countries. These broadcasting services should be accountable to an independent regulatory body that is adequately protected from interference from political and economic interests. Public service media have an obligation to provide reliable information to voters. Many countries have publicly funded radio and television stations with public service obligations, especially in Europe and Japan, while such media are weak or non-existent in other countries including the US. Several studies have shown that the stronger the dominance of commercial broadcast media over public service media, the less the amount of policy-relevant information in the media and the more focus on horse race journalism, personalities, and the pecadillos of politicians. Public service broadcasters are characterized by more policy-relevant information and more respect for journalistic norms and impartiality than the commercial media. However, the trend of deregulation has put the public service model under increased pressure from competition with commercial media.

The emergence of the internet and the social media has profoundly altered the conditions for political communication. The social media have given ordinary citizens easy access to voice their opinion and share information while bypassing the filters of the large news media. This is often seen as an advantage for democracy. The new possibilities for communication have fundamentally changed the way social movements and protest movements operate and organize. The internet and social media have provided powerful new tools for democracy movements in developing countries and emerging democracies, enabling them to bypass censorship, voice their opinions, and organize protests.

A serious problem with the social media is that they have no truth filters. The established news media have to guard their reputation as trustworthy, while ordinary citizens may post unreliable information. In fact, studies show that false stories are going more viral than true stories. The proliferation of false stories and conspiracy theories may undermine public trust in the political system and public officials.

Reliable information sources are essential for the democratic process. Less democratic governments rely heavily on censorship, propaganda, and misinformation in order to stay in power, while independent sources of information are able to undermine their legitimacy.

== Referenzi ==

[[Kategorija:Greċja antika]]</text>
      <sha1>oe5iehjrqvzu66h07iacoyutkkahjtu</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330259</id>
      <parentid>330258</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T09:56:42Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Trigcly</username>
        <id>17859</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>/* Perjodu modern bikri */</comment>
      <origin>330259</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="91705" sha1="5bkko8sw30sktn6w05b9h5v40a6lans" xml:space="preserve">Id-'''demokrazija''' hija forma ta' governanza li permezz tagħha l-poter [[Politika|politiku]] jinkiseb min-nies jew mill-popolazzjoni ta' stat. Skont definizzjoni minimalista tad-demokrazija, il-mexxejja jiġu eletti permezz ta' elezzjonijiet kompetittivi filwaqt li d-definizzjonijiet iktar wesgħin jew massimalisti jorbtu d-demokrazija mal-garanziji tal-libertajiet ċivili u d-drittijiet tal-[[bniedem]] apparti l-elezzjonijiet kompetittivi.

F'demokrazija diretta, il-poplu jkollu l-awtorità diretta li jagħmel deliberazzjonijiet u li jiddeċiedi dwar il-leġiżlazzjoni. F'demokrazija rappreżentattiva, il-poplu jagħżel l-uffiċjali tal-governanza permezz ta' elezzjonijiet. Id-definizzjoni ta' &quot;poplu&quot; u l-modi kif l-awtorità tiġi kondiviża fi ħdan il-poplu jew iddelegata minnu nbidlu mal-milja taż-żminijiet u b'rati li jvarjaw minn pajjiż għal ieħor. Il-karatteristiċi tad-demokrazija spiss jinkludu l-libertà tal-ġemgħa, il-libertà tal-assoċjazzjoni, il-proprjetà personali, il-libertà tar-[[reliġjon]] u tal-[[kelma]], iċ-ċittadinanza, il-kunsens ta' dawk li jiġu ggvernati, id-drittijiet tal-votazzjoni, il-libertà miċ-ċaħda governattiva mhux ġustifikata tad-dritt tal-ħajja u tal-libertà, u d-drittijiet tal-minoranzi.

In-nozzjoni tad-demokrazija evolviet b'mod konsiderevoli maż-żmien. Matul l-[[Storja|istorja]], wieħed jista' jsib evidenza ta' demokrazija diretta, fejn il-komunitajiet kienu jieħdu deċiżjonijiet permezz ta' ġemgħat popolari. Illum il-ġurnata, il-forma dominanti tad-demokrazija hija d-demokrazija rappreżentattiva, fejn iċ-ċittadini jeleġġu lill-uffiċjali tal-gvern biex jiggvernaw f'isimhom, pereżempju f'demokrazija parlamentari jew presidenzjali. Fil-varjant komuni tad-demokrazija liberali, is-setgħat tal-maġġoranza jiġu eżerċitati fi ħdan il-qafas ta' demokrazija rappreżentattiva, iżda l-kostituzzjoni u l-qorti suprema jillimitaw lill-maġġoranza u jipproteġu lill-minoranzi — normalment billi jiġi żgurat li kulħadd igawdi minn ċerti drittijiet individwali, bħal-libertà tal-kelma jew il-libertà tal-assoċjazzjoni.

It-terminu tfaċċa fis-seklu 5 [[Ante Christum natum|Q.K]]. fil-bliet-stati [[Greċja antika|Griegi]], b'mod partikolari f'[[Ateni]] Klassika, u kien ifisser &quot;it-tmexxija tal-poplu&quot;, b'kuntrast mal-aristokrazija (bil-[[Lingwa Griega|Grieg]]: ἀριστοκρατία, ''aristokratía''), li tfisser &quot;it-tmexxija tal-elit&quot;. Prattikament fil-gvernijiet demokratiċi kollha tul l-istorja tal-qedem u moderna, iċ-ċittadinanza demokratika inizjalment kienet ristretta għal klassi tal-elit, li iktar 'il quddiem ġiet estiża għaċ-ċittadini adulti kollha. Fil-biċċa l-kbira tad-demokraziji moderni, dan inkiseb permezz tal-movimenti tas-suffraġju tas-sekli 19 u 20.

Id-demokrazija tikkuntrasta mal-forom ta' governanza fejn il-poter ma jinbitx mill-popolazzjoni ġenerali ta' stat, pereżempju s-sistemi awtoritarji. Storikament is-sistemi demokratiċi kienu forma rari u vulnerabbli ta' governanza, iżda dawn saru iktar prevalenti mis-seklu 19 'l hawn, b'mod partikolari permezz ta' diversi mewġiet ta' demokratizzazzjoni. Id-demokrazija għandha leġittimità konsiderevoli fid-dinja moderna, peress li l-opinjoni pubblika fir-reġjuni dinjin normalment huma favur is-sistemi demokratiċi ta' governanza meta mqabbla mal-alternattivi, u peress li saħansitra l-istati awtoritarji jippruvaw ipinġu lilhom infushom bħala demokratiċi. Id-demokrazija b'mod iktar konsistenti tirriżulta f'saħħa, f'[[edukazzjoni]] u f'eżiti ekonomiċi mtejba. Skont l-indiċijiet ta' ''V-Dem Democracy'' u l-Indiċi tad-Demokrazija ta' ''The Economist'', inqas minn nofs il-popolazzjoni tad-dinja tgħix f'demokrazija mill-2022. Fl-istess ħin, filwaqt li d-demokrazija rappreżentattivi tingħata valur siewi b'mod mifrux, iċ-Ċentru tar-Riċerka ta' Pew sab li l-garr rigward il-prestazzjoni demokratika huwa komuni saħansitra f'bosta demokraziji stabbiliti.

== Karatteristiċi ==
Għalkemm id-demokrazija fid-demokraziji purament rappreżentattivi hija mifhuma b'rabta mal-votazzjoni, ma jeżisti l-ebda konsensus dwar definizzjoni preċiża tad-demokrazija. Jeżistu wisq approċċi. Kien hemm studju li identifika 2,234 aġġettiv li jintuża għad-deskrizzjoni tad-demokrazija bil-[[lingwa Ingliża]].

Minkejja dan, hemm fehim iktar profond – bħal dak ta' [[Abraham Lincoln]]:

: ''&quot;Governanza tan-nies, min-nies, għan-nies&quot;''

jew dik ta' [[Karl Popper]] li ssostni li l-ħarsa &quot;klassika&quot; lejn id-demokrazija hi, &quot;fil-qosor, it-teorija li d-demokrazija hija t-tmexxija tal-poplu u li l-poplu għandu d-dritt li jiggverna hu.

Il-prinċipji demokratiċi huma riflessi fiċ-ċittadini eliġibbli kollha, ilkoll indaqs quddiem il-[[Dritt|liġi]] u lkoll b'aċċess ugwali għall-proċessi leġiżlattivi.

Pereżempju, f'demokrazija rappreżentattiva, kull vot (fit-teorija) għandu l-istess piż, u l-libertà taċ-ċittadini eliġibbli hija żgurata permezz ta' drittijiet u libertajiet leġittimizzati li tipikament ikunu mnaqqxa f'kostituzzjoni, filwaqt li użi oħra tad-&quot;demokrazija&quot; jaf jħaddnu d-demokrazija diretta, fejn iċ-ċittadini jivvutaw direttament fuq id-diversi kwistjonijiet li jinqalgħu. Skont in-[[Ġnus Magħquda|Nazzjonijiet Uniti]], id-demokrazija &quot;tipprovdi ambjent li jirrispetta d-drittijiet tal-bniedem u l-libertajiet fundamentali, u fejn ir-rieda espressa liberament tal-poplu tiġi eżerċitata&quot;.

Skont teorija partikolari d-demokrazija tirrikjedi tliet prinċipji fundamentali: il-kontroll 'il fuq (sovranità fl-iżjed livelli baxxi tal-awtorità), l-ugwaljanza politika, u n-normi soċjali li permezz tagħhom l-individwi u l-istituzzjonijiet iqisu biss atti aċċettabbli li jirriflettu l-ewwel żewġ prinċipji tal-kontroll 'il fuq u l-ugwaljanza politika. L-ugwaljanza legali, il-libertà politika u l-istat ta' dritt sikwit jiġu identifikati bħala l-karatteristiċi ewlenin ta' demokrazija li tiffunzjona sew.

F'xi pajjiżi, b'mod partikolari fir-[[Renju Unit]] (minn fejn oriġinat is-sistema ta' Westminster), il-prinċipju dominanti hu dak tas-sovranità Parlamentari, filwaqt li tinżamm l-indipendenza ġudizzjarja. Fl-[[Indja]], is-sovranità Parlamentari hija soġġetta għall-Kostituzzjoni tal-Indja li tinkludi rieżami ġudizzjarju. Għalkemm it-terminu &quot;demokrazija&quot; tipikament jintuża fil-kuntest ta' stat politiku, il-prinċipji wkoll huma applikabbli potenzjalment għall-organizzazzjonijiet privati, bħal klabbs, għaqdiet u ditti.

Id-demokraziji jistgħu jużaw bosta metodi differenti ta' teħid tad-deċiżjonijiet, iżda t-tmexxija tal-maġġoranza hija l-forma dominanti. Mingħajr kumpens, bħal protezzjonijiet legali tad-drittijiet individwali jew kollettivi, il-minoranzi politiċi jistgħu jiġu mgħakksa mit-&quot;tirannija tal-maġġoranza&quot;. It-tmexxija tal-maġġoranza tinvolvi approċċ kompetittiv, għad-differenza tad-demokrazija tal-konsensus, u b'hekk tinħoloq il-ħtieġa li l-elezzjonijiet, u ġeneralment id-deliberazzjoni, ikunu sostantivament u proċeduralment &quot;ġusti&quot; u ekwi. Fżxi pajjiżi, il-libertà tal-espressjoni politika, il-libertà tal-kelma u l-libertà tal-istampa jitqiesu bħala importanti biex jiġi żgurat li l-votanti jkunu infurmati sew, u b'hekk ikunu jistgħu jivvutaw skont l-interessi u t-twemmin tagħhom stess.

Ġie ssuġġerit ukoll li karatteristika bażika tad-demokrazija hija l-kapaċità li l-votanti kollha jipparteċipaw b'mod ħieles u sħiħ fil-[[ħajja]] tas-soċjetà tagħhom. Bl-enfasi fuq in-nozzjonijiet tal-kuntratt soċjali u r-rieda kollettiva tal-votanti kollha, id-demokrazija tista' tkun ikkaratterizzata wkoll bħala forma ta' kollettiviżmu politiku peress li tiġi definita bħala forma ta' governanza fejn iċ-ċittadini eliġibbli kollha jkollhom vuċi ugwali fit-tfassil tal-liġijiet.

Ir-repubbliki, għalkemm spiss ikunu assoċjati popolarment mad-demokrazija minħabba l-prinċipju kondiviż tal-kunsens mogħti minn dawk li jiġu ggvernati għat-tmexxija, mhux neċessarjament ikunu demokraziji, għax ir-repubblikaniżmu ma jispeċifikax ''kif'' in-nies għandhom imexxu. Tradizzjonalment it-terminu &quot;repubblika&quot; kien iħaddan kemm id-demokraziji kif ukoll l-aristokraziji u l-varjanti tagħhom. F'sens modern, il-forma ta' governanza repubblikana hija forma ta' governanza mingħajr monarka. Minħabba f'hekk, id-demokraziji jistgħu jkunu repubbliki jew monarkiji kostituzzjonali, bħar-Renju Unit, fejn il-monarka ma jkunx il-mexxej.

== Storja ==
Il-ġemgħat demokratiċi għandhom żmien daqs kemm għandha żmien l-ispeċi umana u ilhom jeżistu tul l-istorja umana, iżda sas-seklu 19, il-figuri [[Politiku|politiċi]] ewlenin fil-biċċa l-kbira opponew id-demokrazija. It-teoriċi repubblikani rabtu d-demokrazija ma' daqs ċkejken: iktar ma kienu jikbru fid-daqs l-unitajiet politiċi, iktar kienet tiżdied il-probabbiltà li l-gvern isir tiranniku. Fl-istess waqt, l-unitajiet politiċi żgħar kienu vulnerabbli għall-ħakma. Montesquieu kiteb, &quot;Jekk repubblika tkun żgħira, tinqered minn qawwa barranija; jekk tkun kbira, tinqered mill-imperfezzjoni interna&quot;. Skont ix-xjenzat politiku tal-Università ta' Johns Hopkins [[Daniel Deudney]], il-ħolqien tal-[[Stati Uniti|Istati Uniti]], bid-daqs kbir u s-sistema ta' kontrolli u bilanċi tagħha, kienet soluzzjoni għall-problemi doppji tad-daqs. Fis-soċjetajiet ta' madwar id-dinja seħħew forom ta' demokrazija b'mod organiku li ma kellhom l-ebda kuntatt ma' xulxin.

=== Oriġini ===

==== [[Greċja]] u [[Ruma]] ====
It-terminu ''demokrazija'' tfaċċa għall-ewwel darba fil-ħsieb politiku u [[Filosofija|filosofiku]] tal-Greċja Antika fil-belt-stat ta' Ateni fl-antikità klassika. Il-kelma ġejja minn ''dêmos'' li tfisser &quot;nies (komuni)&quot; u minn ''krátos'' li tfisser &quot;qawwa/setgħa&quot;. Taħt Cleisthenes, f'Ateni ġie stabbilit dak li huwa maħsub bħala l-ewwel eżempju ta' tip ta' demokrazija fis-seklu 6 Q.K. (508–507 Q.K.). Cleisthenes huwa meqjus bħala &quot;l-missier tad-demokrazija ta' Ateni&quot;. L-ewwel użu attestat tal-kelma demokrazija jinsab fix-xogħlijiet ta' proża tal-ħabta tal-430 Q.K., bħall-''Istorji'' ta' Erodotu, iżda l-użu tagħha kien eqdem b'diversi deċennji, peress li żewġ persuni minn Ateni li twieldu għall-ħabta tal-470 Q.K. kien jisimhom Democrates, isem politiku ġdid — x'aktarx b'appoġġ għad-demokrazija — li ngħata fi żmien ta' dibattiti dwar kwistjonijiet kostituzzjonali f'Ateni. Aeschylus jalludi bis-saħħa wkoll għall-kelma fid-dramm tiegħu ''Is-Supplikanti'', li ttella' għall-ħabta tal-463 Q.K., fejn isemmi &quot;l-id tat-tmexxija tal-kotra&quot; [''demou kratousa cheir'']. Qabel dak iż-żmien, il-kelma li kienet tiddefinixxi s-sistema politika ġdida ta' Cleisthenes x'aktarx li kienet ''isonomija'', li tfisser ugwaljanza politika.

Id-demokrazija ta' Ateni ħadet is-sura ta' demokrazija diretta, u kellha żewġ karatteristiċi li jiddistingwuha: l-għażla aleatorja ta' ċittadini ordinarji biex jimlew il-ftit karigi amministrattivi u ġudizzjarji eżistenti tal-gvern, u ġemgħa leġiżlattiva li kienet tikkonsisti mill-maġġoranza taċ-ċittadini ta' Ateni. Iċ-ċittadini eliġibbli kollha kienu jitħallew jitkellmu u jivvutaw fil-ġemgħa jew fl-assemblea, fejn kienu jiġu stabbiliti l-liġijiet tal-belt-stat. Madankollu, iċ-ċittadinanza ta' Ateni ma kinitx tingħata lin-[[Mara|nisa]], lill-[[Skjavitù|ilsiera]], lill-barranin (μέτοικοι / ''métoikoi''), u liż-żgħażagħ taħt l-età tas-servizz militari. Effettivament, resident wieħed minn kull erba' f'Ateni kienu jikkwalifikaw bħala ċittadini. Is-sjieda tal-art ma kinitx rekwiżit għaċ-ċittadinanza. L-esklużjoni ta' partijiet kbar tal-popolazzjoni mill-korp taċ-ċittadini hija marbuta mill-qrib mal-fehim tal-qedem taċ-ċittadinanza. Fil-biċċa l-kbira ta' żmien il-qedem, il-benefiċċju taċ-ċittadinanza kien marbut mal-obbligu tal-ġlied fil-kampanji militari.

Id-demokrazija ta' Aterni mhux biss kienet ''diretta'' fis-sens li d-deċiżjonijiet kienu jittieħdu mill-ġemgħa, iżda anke l-''iżjed diretta'' fis-sens li l-ġemgħa permezz tal-istrutturi bħall-assemblea, is-senat u l-qrati legali kienet tikkontrolla l-proċess politiku kollu u proporzjon kbir taċ-ċittadini kienu jkunu involuti b'mod kostanti fl-affarijiet pubbliċi. Minkejja li d-drittijiet tal-individwu ma kinux żgurati mill-kostituzzjoni ta' Ateni fis-sens modern (il-Griegi tal-qedem ma kellhomx kelma għal &quot;drittijiet&quot;), dawk li kienu ċittadini ta' Ateni kienu jgawdu l-libertajiet tagħhom mhux f'oppożizzjoni għall-gvern iżda billi jgħixu f'belt li ma kinitx soġġetta għal xi setgħa oħra u billi huma stess ma kinux soġġetti għat-tmexxija ta' ħaddieħor.

Il-votazzjoni tfaċċat fi [[Sparta]] saħansitra fis-700 Q.K. L-ekkleżjastiċi ta' Sparta kienu ġemgħa tal-poplu, li kienet tiltaqa' darba fix-xahar, fejn kull ċittadini maskili ta' mill-inqas 20 sena seta' jipparteċipa. Fl-assemblea, l-Ispartani kienu jeleġġu l-mexxejja u jixħtu l-voti tagħhom bl-għajjat (il-votazzjoni kienet tiġi deċiża skont l-ikbar għajta tal-folla). [[Aristotli]] ddeskriva dan il-metodu bħala &quot;tat-tfal&quot;, meta mqabbel mas-sistema tal-votazzjoni fuq poloz tal-ġebel użata miċ-ċittadini ta' Ateni. Sparta adottat din is-sistema minħabba s-sempliċità tagħha, u biex jiġi evitat kull tip ta' preġudizzju, xiri jew qerq fil-votazzjoni, li kienu predominanti fl-elezzjonijiet demokratiċi bikrin.

Barra minn hekk, id-depożizzjoni tar-Renju Ruman ħolqot sistema b'element demokratiku fil-forma ta' bosta ġemgħat popolari differenti.

Minkejja li r-Repubblika Rumana tat kontribut sinifikanti għal bosta aspetti tad-demokrazija, frazzjon biss mir-Rumani kienu ċittadini li kellhom il-vot fl-elezzjonijiet għall-maġistrati. Il-voti tas-setgħana kienu jingħataw iktar piż permezz ta' sistema ta' votazzjoni ponderata, għaldaqstant il-biċċa l-kbira tal-uffiċjali għoljin, inkluż il-membri tas-Senat, kienu jiġu minn ftit familji għonja u nobbli. Il-mudell Ruman ta' governanza ispira bosta ħassieba politiċi tul is-sekli.

==== Indja tal-qedem ====
Vaishali, il-[[belt kapitali]] tal-Lega ta' Vajjika (Vrijji mahajanapada) tal-Indja, titqies bħala wieħed mill-ewwel eżempji ta' repubblika għall-ħabta tas-seklu 6 Q.K.

==== Amerki ====
[[Kultura|Kulturi]] oħra, bħall-Iroquois fl-Amerki, żviluppaw ukoll forma ta' soċjetà demokratika bejn l-1450 u l-1660 (u possibbilment fl-1142), ferm qabel ma kellhom kuntatt mal-[[Ewropa|Ewropej]]. Din id-demokrazija għadha preżenti sal-lum u hija l-iżjed demokrazija rappreżentattiva antika eżistenti fid-dinja.

=== [[Medjuevu|Medju Evu]] ===
Filwaqt li l-biċċa l-kbira tar-reġjuni fl-Ewropa matul il-Medju Evu kienu mmexxijin mill-kleru jew minn sinjuri fewdali, kienu jeżistu diversi sistemi li kienu jinvolvu l-elezzjonijiet jew il-ġemgħat, għalkemm spiss kienu jinvolvu parti żgħira mill-popolazzjoni. Fl-Iskandinavja, kien hemm korpi magħrufa ta' nies ħielsa ppreseduti minn kelliem tal-liġi. Dawn il-korpi ta' deliberazzjoni kienu responsabbli għas-soluzzjoni ta' kwistjonijiet politiċi, u xi varjanti kienu jinkludu l-Althing fl-[[Iżlanda]] u l-Løgting fil-[[Gżejjer Faroe|Gżejjer Faeroe]]. Il-''veche'', fil-[[Ewropa tal-Lvant|Lvant tal-Ewropa]], kien korp simili għal dawk tal-Iskandinavja. Fil-[[Knisja Kattolika]] Rumana, il-[[Papa]] ilu jiġi elett minn [[konklav]] Papali magħmul mill-kardinali mill-1059. L-ewwel korp Parlamentari ddokumentat fl-Ewropa kien il-Cortes ta' [[León]]. Stabbilit minn [[Alfonsu IX|Alfonso IX]] fl-1188, il-Cortes kellu l-awtorità għall-iffissar tat-tassazzjoni, għall-affarijiet barranin u għal-leġiżlazzjoni, għalkemm in-natura eżatta tar-rwol tiegħu għadha kkontestata. Ir-Repubblika ta' [[Ragusa]], stabbilita fl-1358 u ċċentrata madwar il-belt ta' [[Dubrovnik]], ipprovdiet drittijiet ta' rappreżentanza u ta' votazzjoni lill-aristokrazija maskili tagħha biss. Diversi bliet-stati u sistemi ta' governanza Taljani kellhom forom ta' governanza repubblikani. Pereżempju, ir-Repubblika ta' [[Firenze]], stabbilita fl-1115, kienet immexxija mis-Signoria u l-membri tagħha kienu jintgħażlu bix-xorti. Fil-Frisja tas-sekli 10–15, soċjetà mhux fewdali distinta, id-dritt tal-votazzjoni dwar kwistjonijiet lokali u dwar l-uffiċjali tal-kontea kien ibbażat fuq id-daqs tal-art. Il-''Kouroukan Fouga'' qasam l-Imperu tal-[[Mali]] fi klans tat-tmexxija li kienu rrappreżentati f'ġemgħa kbira msejħa l-''Gbara''. Madankollu, id-dokument wassal biex il-Mali jkun iktar simili għal monarkija kostituzzjonali milli repubblika demokratika.

Il-Parlament tal-[[Renju Unit|Ingilterra]] kellu l-għeruq tiegħu fir-restrizzjonijiet tal-poter tar-rejiet miktubin fil-''Magna Carta'' (1215), li b'mod espliċitu ħarset ċerti drittijiet tas-sudditi tar-Re u b'mod impliċitu appoġġat dak li mbagħad sar id-digriet Ingliż tal-''habeas corpus'', li jissalvagwardja l-libertà individwali mill-ħabs illegali u li jagħti d-dritt tal-appell. L-ewwel assemblea nazzjonali rappreżentattiva fl-Ingilterra kienet il-Parlament ta' [[Simon de Montfort]] fl-1265. Il-preżenza tat-tressiq tal-petizzjonijiet hija fost l-iżjed evidenza bikrija tal-użu tal-Parlament bħala forum biex jiġi indirizzat it-tħassib ġenerali tan-nies ordinarji. Madankollu, is-setgħa tas-sejħa tal-Parlament baqgħet f'idejn il-monarka.

Xi studji kkollegaw l-istabbiliment tal-istituzzjonijiet Parlamentari fl-Ewropa matul il-Medju Evu mal-agglomerazzjonijiet urbani u mal-ħolqien ta' klassijiet ġodda, bħall-[[Artiġjan|artiġjani]], kif ukoll mal-preżenza tan-nobbli u tal-eliti reliġjużi. L-istudjużi kkollegaw ukoll l-istabbiliment tal-governanza rappreżentattiva mal-frammentazzjoni politika relattiva tal-Ewropa. Ix-xjenzat politiku [[David Stasavage]] jikkollega l-frammentazzjoni tal-Ewropa, u d-demokratizzazzjoni sussegwenti tagħha, mal-mod kif sfaxxa l-[[Imperu Ruman]]: it-territorju Ruman inħakem minn gruppi frammentati żgħar ta' tribujiet Ġermaniċi, u dan wassal għall-ħolqien ta' unitajiet politiċi żgħar fejn il-mexxejja kienu relattivament dgħajfin u kienu jeħtieġu l-kunsens taċ-ċittadini tagħhom biex jifilħu għat-theddidiet barranin.

Fil-[[Polonja]], id-demokrazija nobbli kienet ikkaratterizzata minn żieda fl-attività tan-nobbiltà nofsanija, li riedet iżżid is-sehem tagħha fl-eżerċitar tal-poter għas-spejjeż tal-manjati. Il-manjati ddominaw l-iżjed karigi importanti fl-istat (lajċi u ekkleżjastiċi) u kienu jinġabru fil-kunsill irjali, li iktar 'il quddiem sar is-senat. L-importanza dejjem tikber tan-nobbiltà nofsanija kellha impatt fuq l-istabbiliment tal-istituzzjoni tal-art magħrufa bħala s-''sejmik'' (assemblea lokali), li sussegwentement kisbet iktar drittijiet. Matul is-seklu 15 u l-ewwel nofs tas-seklu 16, is-sejmiks ingħataw iktar u iktar poter u saru l-iżjed istituzzjonijiet importanti tal-poter lokali. Fl-1454, [[Casimir IV Jagiellon]] ta lis-sejmiks id-dritt li jiddeċiedu dwar it-taxxi u li jorganizzaw mobilizzazzjoni tal-massa fl-Istatuti ta' Nieszawa. Huwa wiegħed ukoll li ma kienx se joħloq liġijiet ġodda mingħajr il-kunsens tagħhom.

=== Era moderna ===

==== Perjodu modern bikri ====
Fl-Ingilterra tas-[[seklu 17]], kien hemm interess imġedded fil-Manja Karta. Il-Parlament tal-Ingilterra għadda l-Petizzjoni tad-Drittijiet fl-1628 li stabbiliet ċerti libertajiet għas-sudditi. Il-Gwerra Ċivili Ingliża (1642–1651) ġiet miġġielda bejn ir-Re u Parlament oligarkiku iżda elett, u matul dan iż-żmien iffurmat l-idea ta' partit politiku, bi gruppi jiddibattu d-drittijiet għar-rappreżentanza politika matul id-Dibattiti ta' Putney tal-1647. Sussegwentement, il-Protettorat (1653–59) u l-Integrazzjoni mill-Ġdid Ingliża (1660) integraw iktar tmexxija awtokratika, għalkemm il-Parlament għadda l-Att dwar il-''Habeas Corpus'' fl-1679 li saħħaħ il-konvenzjoni li pprojbixxiet id-detenzjoni mingħajr biżżejjed raġunijiet jew evidenza. Wara r-Rivoluzzjoni Glorjuża tal-1688, il-Liġi tad-Drittijiet ġiet ippromulgata fl-1689 u din ikkodifikat ċerti drittijiet u libertajiet u għadha fis-seħħ. Il-liġi stabbiliet ir-rekwiżiti li jsiru elezzjonijiet regolari, ir-regoli għal-libertà tal-kelma fil-Parlament u limitat il-poter tal-monarka, u b'hekk żgurat, għad-differenza tal-biċċa l-kbira tal-Ewropa ta' dak iż-żmien, li l-assolutiżmu rjali ma jipprevalix. L-istoriċi ekonomiċi [[Douglass North]] u [[Barry Weingast]] ikkaratterizzaw l-istituzzjonijiet implimentati fir-Rivoluzzjoni Glorjuża bħala suċċess kbir f'termini tar-restrizzjonijiet tal-governanza u l-iżgurar tal-protezzjoni tad-drittijiet tal-proprjetà.

L-interess imġedded fil-Manja Karta, il-Gwerra Ċivili Ingliża, u r-Rivoluzzjoni Glorjuża fis-seklu 17 xprunaw it-tkabbir ta' filosofija politika fil-Gżejjer Brittaniċi. [[Thomas Hobbes]] kien l-ewwel filosfu li fassal teorija dettaljata dwar il-kuntratt soċjali. Fil-''Leviathan'' (1651), Hobbes ħareġ bit-teorija li l-individwi li jgħixu fin-natura kienu jgħixu ħajja &quot;solitarja, fqira, kerha, iebsa u qasira&quot; u kienu jagħmlu gwerer kontinwi kontra kulħadd. Sabiex tiġi evitata l-okkorrenza tal-istat anarkiku tan-natura, Hobbes irraġuna li l-individwi kienu jċedu d-drittijiet tagħhom lil qawwa awtoritarja setgħana. Fi kliem ieħor, Hobbes tkellem favur monarkija assoluta, li fl-opinjoni tiegħu kienet l-aqwa forma ta' governanza. Iktar 'il quddiem, il-filosfu u t-[[tabib]] [[John Locke]] ħareġ b'interpretazzjoni differenti dwar it-teorija tal-kuntratt soċjali. Fiż-''Żewġ Trattati tal-Governanza'' (1689) tiegħu, Locke sostna li l-individwi kollha kellhom id-drittijiet inaljenabbli għall-ħajja, għal-libertà u għall-proprjetà. Skont Locke, l-individwi kienu jinġabru volontarjament flimkien biex jiffurmaw stat bl-għan li jiddefendu drittijiethom. Għal Locke kienu partikolarment importanti d-drittijiet tal-proprjetà, li skont Locke kienu jirrikjedu l-ħarsien, li kien l-iskop primarju tal-gvern. Barra minn hekk, Locke sostna li l-gvernijiet kienu leġittimi biss jekk kellhom il-kunsens ta' dawk li kienu ggvernati. Skont Locke, iċ-ċittadini kellhom id-dritt jirribellaw kontra l-gvern jekk dan kien jaġixxi kontra l-interessi tagħhom jew isir tiranniku. Għalkemm ma tantx kienu moqrija matul ħajtu, ix-xogħlijiet ta' Locke jitqiesu bħala d-dokumenti li jsejsu l-ħsieb liberali u influwenzaw ferm il-mexxejja tar-Rivoluzzjoni Amerikana u iktar 'il quddiem ir-[[Rivoluzzjoni Franċiża]]. Il-qafas demokratiku liberali tiegħu tal-governanza għadu l-forma ewlenija tad-demokrazija fid-dinja.

Fir-repubbliki tal-Cossack tal-[[Ukrajna]] fis-sekli 16 u 17, l-Etmanat tal-Cossack u s-Sich ta' Zaporizhia, id-detentur tal-ogħla kariga ta' Hetman kien jiġi elett mir-rappreżentanti tad-distretti tal-pajjiż.

Fl-[[L-Amerika ta' Fuq|Amerka ta' Fuq]], il-governanza rappreżentattiva bdiet f'Jamestown, Virginia, bl-elezzjoni tal-Kamra tal-Burgesses (il-prekursur tal-Assemblea Ġenerali ta' Virginia) fl-1619. Il-Puritani Ingliżi li għamlu migrazzjoni mill-1620 stabbilew kolonji f'New England, fejn kien hemm governanza lokali demokratika; il-poter ta' dawn l-assemblej lokali kien ivarja ferm tul il-perjodu kolonjali. Madankollu, uffiċjalment kellhom ammonti żgħar ta' poter devolut, peress li l-awtorità aħħarija kienet f'idejn il-monarkija u l-Parlament. Il-Puritani, il-Battisti u l-Quakers li stabbilew dawn il-kolonji applikaw l-organizzazzjoni demokratika tal-kongregazzjonijiet tagħhom anke għall-amministrazzjoni tal-komunitajiet tagħhom fil-ħajja ta' kuljum.

==== Sekli 18 u 19 ====
The first Parliament of Great Britain was established in 1707, after the merger of the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland under the Acts of Union. Two key documents of the UK's uncodified constitution, the English Declaration of Right, 1689 (restated in the Bill of Rights 1689) and the Scottish Claim of Right 1689, had both cemented Parliament's position as the supreme law-making body and said that the &quot;election of members of Parliament ought to be free&quot;. However, Parliament was only elected by male property owners, which amounted to 3% of the population in 1780. The first known British person of African heritage to vote in a general election, Ignatius Sancho, voted in 1774 and 1780.

During the Age of Liberty in Sweden (1718–1772), civil rights were expanded and power shifted from the monarch to parliament. The taxed peasantry was represented in parliament, although with little influence, but commoners without taxed property had no suffrage.

The creation of the short-lived Corsican Republic in 1755 was an early attempt to adopt a democratic constitution (all men and women above age of 25 could vote). This Corsican Constitution was the first based on Enlightenment principles and included female suffrage, something that was not included in most other democracies until the 20th century.

Colonial America had similar property qualifications as Britain, and in the period before 1776 the abundance and availability of land meant that large numbers of colonists met such requirements with at least 60 per cent of adult white males able to vote. The great majority of white men were farmers who met the property ownership or taxpaying requirements. With few exceptions, no blacks or women could vote. Vermont, which, on declaring independence of Great Britain in 1777, adopted a constitution modelled on Pennsylvania's citizenship and democratic suffrage for males with or without property. The United States Constitution of 1787 is the oldest surviving, still active, governmental codified constitution. The Constitution provided for an elected government and protected civil rights and liberties, but did not end slavery nor extend voting rights in the United States, instead leaving the issue of suffrage to the individual states. Generally, states limited suffrage to white male property owners and taxpayers. At the time of the first Presidential election in 1789, about 6% of the population was eligible to vote. The Naturalization Act of 1790 limited U.S. citizenship to whites only. The Bill of Rights in 1791 set limits on government power to protect personal freedoms but had little impact on judgements by the courts for the first 130 years after ratification.

In 1789, Revolutionary France adopted the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen and, although short-lived, the National Convention was elected by all men in 1792. The Polish-Lithuanian Constitution of 3 May 1791 sought to implement a more effective constitutional monarchy, introduced political equality between townspeople and nobility, and placed the peasants under the protection of the government, mitigating the worst abuses of serfdom. In force for less than 19 months, it was declared null and void by the Grodno Sejm that met in 1793. Nonetheless, the 1791 Constitution helped keep alive Polish aspirations for the eventual restoration of the country's sovereignty over a century later.

In the United States, the 1828 presidential election was the first in which non-property-holding white males could vote in the vast majority of states. Voter turnout soared during the 1830s, reaching about 80% of the adult white male population in the 1840 presidential election. North Carolina was the last state to abolish property qualification in 1856 resulting in a close approximation to universal white male suffrage (however tax-paying requirements remained in five states in 1860 and survived in two states until the 20th century). In the 1860 United States census, the slave population had grown to four million, and in Reconstruction after the Civil War, three constitutional amendments were passed: the 13th Amendment (1865) that ended slavery; the 14th Amendment (1869) that gave black people citizenship, and the 15th Amendment (1870) that gave black males a nominal right to vote. Full enfranchisement of citizens was not secured until after the civil rights movement gained passage by the US Congress of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The voting franchise in the United Kingdom was expanded and made more uniform in a series of reforms that began with the Reform Act 1832 and continued into the 20th century, notably with the Representation of the People Act 1918 and the Equal Franchise Act 1928. Universal male suffrage was established in France in March 1848 in the wake of the French Revolution of 1848. During that year, several revolutions broke out in Europe as rulers were confronted with popular demands for liberal constitutions and more democratic government.

In 1876, the Ottoman Empire transitioned from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional one, and held two elections the next year to elect members to her newly formed parliament. Provisional Electoral Regulations were issued, stating that the elected members of the Provincial Administrative Councils would elect members to the first Parliament. Later that year, a new constitution was promulgated, which provided for a bicameral Parliament with a Senate appointed by the Sultan and a popularly elected Chamber of Deputies. Only men above the age of 30 who were competent in Turkish and had full civil rights were allowed to stand for election. Reasons for disqualification included holding dual citizenship, being employed by a foreign government, being bankrupt, employed as a servant, or having &quot;notoriety for ill deeds&quot;. Full universal suffrage was achieved in 1934.

In 1893, the self-governing colony New Zealand became the first country in the world (except for the short-lived 18th-century Corsican Republic) to establish active universal suffrage by recognizing women as having the right to vote.

==== Sekli 20 u 21 ====
20th-century transitions to liberal democracy have come in successive &quot;waves of democracy&quot;, variously resulting from wars, revolutions, decolonisation, and religious and economic circumstances. Global waves of &quot;democratic regression&quot; reversing democratization, have also occurred in the 1920s and 30s, in the 1960s and 1970s, and in the 2010s.

World War I and the dissolution of the autocratic Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian empires resulted in the creation of new nation-states in Europe, most of them at least nominally democratic. In the 1920s democratic movements flourished and women's suffrage advanced, but the Great Depression brought disenchantment and most of the countries of Europe, Latin America, and Asia turned to strong-man rule or dictatorships. Fascism and dictatorships flourished in Nazi Germany, Italy, Spain and Portugal, as well as non-democratic governments in the Baltics, the Balkans, Brazil, Cuba, China, and Japan, among others.

World War II brought a definitive reversal of this trend in Western Europe. The democratisation of the American, British, and French sectors of occupied Germany (disputed), Austria, Italy, and the occupied Japan served as a model for the later theory of government change. However, most of Eastern Europe, including the Soviet sector of Germany fell into the non-democratic Soviet-dominated bloc.

The war was followed by decolonisation, and again most of the new independent states had nominally democratic constitutions. India emerged as the world's largest democracy and continues to be so. Countries that were once part of the British Empire often adopted the British Westminster system.

In 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights mandated democracy:&lt;blockquote&gt;3. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.&lt;/blockquote&gt;— Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 21, United Nations, 1948

By 1960, the vast majority of country-states were nominally democracies, although most of the world's populations lived in nominal democracies that experienced sham elections, and other forms of subterfuge (particularly in &quot;Communist&quot; states and the former colonies). A subsequent wave of democratisation brought substantial gains toward true liberal democracy for many states, dubbed &quot;third wave of democracy&quot;. Portugal, Spain, and several of the military dictatorships in South America returned to civilian rule in the 1970s and 1980s. This was followed by countries in East and South Asia by the mid-to-late 1980s. Economic malaise in the 1980s, along with resentment of Soviet oppression, contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union, the associated end of the Cold War, and the democratisation and liberalisation of the former Eastern bloc countries. The most successful of the new democracies were those geographically and culturally closest to western Europe, and they are now either part of the European Union or candidate states. In 1986, after the toppling of the most prominent Asian dictatorship, the only democratic state of its kind at the time emerged in the Philippines with the rise of Corazon Aquino, who would later be known as the mother of Asian democracy.

The liberal trend spread to some states in Africa in the 1990s, most prominently in South Africa. Some recent examples of attempts of liberalisation include the Indonesian Revolution of 1998, the Bulldozer Revolution in Yugoslavia, the Rose Revolution in Georgia, the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, the Cedar Revolution in Lebanon, the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan, and the Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia.

According to Freedom House, in 2007 there were 123 electoral democracies (up from 40 in 1972). According to ''World Forum on Democracy'', electoral democracies now represent 120 of the 192 existing countries and constitute 58.2 per cent of the world's population. At the same time liberal democracies i.e. countries Freedom House regards as free and respectful of basic human rights and the rule of law are 85 in number and represent 38 per cent of the global population. Also in 2007 the United Nations declared 15 September the International Day of Democracy.

Many countries reduced their voting age to 18 years; the major democracies began to do so in the 1970s starting in Western Europe and North America.&lt;sup&gt;[''failed verification'']&lt;/sup&gt; Most electoral democracies continue to exclude those younger than 18 from voting. The voting age has been lowered to 16 for national elections in a number of countries, including Brazil, Austria, Cuba, and Nicaragua. In California, a 2004 proposal to permit a quarter vote at 14 and a half vote at 16 was ultimately defeated. In 2008, the German parliament proposed but shelved a bill that would grant the vote to each citizen at birth, to be used by a parent until the child claims it for themselves.

According to Freedom House, starting in 2005, there have been 17 consecutive years in which declines in political rights and civil liberties throughout the world have outnumbered improvements, as populist and nationalist political forces have gained ground everywhere from Poland (under the Law and Justice party) to the Philippines (under Rodrigo Duterte). In a Freedom House report released in 2018, Democracy Scores for most countries declined for the 12th consecutive year. ''The Christian Science Monitor'' reported that nationalist and populist political ideologies were gaining ground, at the expense of rule of law, in countries like Poland, Turkey and Hungary. For example, in Poland, the President appointed 27 new Supreme Court judges over legal objections from the European Commission. In Turkey, thousands of judges were removed from their positions following a failed coup attempt during a government crackdown .

&quot;Democratic backsliding&quot; in the 2010s were attributed to economic inequality and social discontent, personalism, poor government's management of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as other factors such as manipulation of civil society, &quot;toxic polarization&quot;, foreign disinformation campaigns, racism and nativism, excessive executive power, and decreased power of the opposition. Within English-speaking Western democracies, &quot;protection-based&quot; attitudes combining cultural conservatism and leftist economic attitudes were the strongest predictor of support for authoritarian modes of governance.

== Teorija ==
=== Teorija bikrija ===
Aristotle's '''democratic theory''' contrasted rule by the many (democracy/timocracy), with rule by the few (oligarchy/aristocracy/elitism), and with rule by a single person (tyranny/autocracy/absolute monarchy). He also thought that there was a good and a bad variant of each system (he considered democracy to be the degenerate counterpart to timocracy).

A common view among early and renaissance Republican theorists was that democracy could only survive in small political communities. Heeding the lessons of the Roman Republic's shift to monarchism as it grew larger or smaller, these Republican theorists held that the expansion of territory and population inevitably led to tyranny. Democracy was therefore highly fragile and rare historically, as it could only survive in small political units, which due to their size were vulnerable to conquest by larger political units. Montesquieu famously said, &quot;if a republic is small, it is destroyed by an outside force; if it is large, it is destroyed by an internal vice.&quot; Jean-Jacques Rousseau asserted, &quot;It is, therefore the natural property of small states to be governed as a republic, of middling ones to be subject to a monarch, and of large empires to be swayed by a despotic prince.&quot;

=== Teorija kontemporanja ===
Fost it-teoriċi politiċi moderni, jeżistu kunċetti fundamentali differenti tad-demokrazija.

==== Aggregazzjoni ====
The theory of aggregative democracy claims that the aim of the democratic processes is to solicit citizens' preferences and aggregate them together to determine what social policies society should adopt. Therefore, proponents of this view hold that democratic participation should primarily focus on voting, where the policy with the most votes gets implemented. Different variants of aggregative democracy exist.

According to the minimalist democracy conception, elections are a mechanism for competition between politicians. Joseph Schumpeter articulated this view famously in his book ''Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy''.

Anthony Downs argues that ideological political parties are necessary to act as a mediating broker between individuals and governments. On the other hand, direct democracy, where citizens vote directly on legislative proposals, can show better aggregation in cases of differences in preferences between elites and voters.

===== Mandat medjan =====
According to the median voter theorem the political representativeness can be evaluated by comparing how close laws and policies are to the views of the median voter along the political spectrum. The ''median mandate'' views the preferences of the median voter as granting political legitimacy.

==== Poliarkija ====
Robert A. Dahl argues that the fundamental democratic principle is that, when it comes to binding collective decisions, each person in a political community is entitled to have his/her interests be given equal consideration. He uses the term polyarchy (&quot;rule by many&quot;) to refer to societies in which there exists a certain set of institutions and procedures which are perceived as leading to such democracy. First and foremost among these institutions is the regular occurrence of free and open elections which are used to select representatives who then manage all or most of the public policy of the society. However, these polyarchic procedures may not create a full democracy if, for example, poverty prevents political participation. Similarly, Ronald Dworkin argues that &quot;democracy is a substantive, not a merely procedural, ideal.&quot;

==== Deliberazzjoni ====
Deliberative democracy is based on the notion that democracy is government by deliberation. Unlike aggregative democracy, deliberative democracy holds that, for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by authentic deliberation, not merely the aggregation of preferences that occurs in voting. Authentic deliberation is deliberation among decision-makers that is free from distortions of unequal political power, such as power a decision-maker obtained through economic wealth or the support of interest groups. If the decision-makers cannot reach consensus after authentically deliberating on a proposal, then they vote on the proposal using a form of majority rule. Citizens assemblies are considered by many scholars as practical examples of deliberative democracy, with a recent OECD report identifying citizens assemblies as an increasingly popular mechanism to involve citizens in governmental decision-making. Proponents of direct democracy view citizens do not rule themselves unless they directly decide laws and policies. Political activity can be valuable in itself, it socialises and educates citizens, and popular participation can check powerful elites.

==== Tipi ta' demokraziji governattivi ====
Democracy has taken a number of forms, both in theory and practice. Some varieties of democracy provide better representation and more freedom for their citizens than others. However, if any democracy is not structured to prohibit the government from excluding the people from the legislative process, or any branch of government from altering the separation of powers in its favour, then a branch of the system can accumulate too much power and destroy the democracy.

The following kinds of democracy are not exclusive of one another: many specify details of aspects that are independent of one another and can co-exist in a single system.

===== Forom bażiċi =====
Several variants of democracy exist, but there are two basic forms, both of which concern how the whole body of all eligible citizens executes its will. One form of democracy is direct democracy, in which all eligible citizens have active participation in the political decision making, for example voting on policy initiatives directly. In most modern democracies, the whole body of eligible citizens remain the sovereign power but political power is exercised indirectly through elected representatives; this is called a representative democracy.

If the head of state is democratically elected then the polity is called a democratic republic

====== Demokrazija diretta ======
Direct democracy is a political system where the citizens participate in the decision-making personally, contrary to relying on intermediaries or representatives. Proponents like Jean-Jacques Rousseau argue the direct approach increases legitimacy. A direct democracy gives the voting population the power to:

* Change constitutional laws,
* Put forth initiatives, referendums and suggestions for laws

Within modern-day representative governments, certain electoral tools like referendums, citizens' initiatives and recall elections are referred to as forms of direct democracy. However, some advocates of direct democracy argue for local assemblies of face-to-face discussion. Direct democracy as a government system currently exists in the Swiss cantons of Appenzell Innerrhoden and Glarus, the Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities, communities affiliated with the CIPO-RFM, the Bolivian city councils of FEJUVE, and Kurdish cantons of Rojava.

====== Demokrazija semidiretta ======
Some modern democracies that are predominantly representative in nature also heavily rely upon forms of political action that are directly democratic. These democracies, which combine elements of representative democracy and direct democracy, are termed ''semi-direct democracies'' or ''participatory democracies''. Examples include Switzerland and some U.S. states, where frequent use is made of referendums and initiatives.

The Swiss confederation is a semi-direct democracy. At the federal level, citizens can propose changes to the constitution (federal popular initiative) or ask for a referendum to be held on any law voted by the parliament. Between January 1995 and June 2005, Swiss citizens voted 31 times, to answer 103 questions (during the same period, French citizens participated in only two referendums). Although in the past 120 years less than 250 initiatives have been put to referendum.

Examples include the extensive use of referendums in the US state of California, which is a state that has more than 20 million voters.

In New England, town meetings are often used, especially in rural areas, to manage local government. This creates a hybrid form of government, with a local direct democracy and a representative state government. For example, most Vermont towns hold annual town meetings in March in which town officers are elected, budgets for the town and schools are voted on, and citizens have the opportunity to speak and be heard on political matters.

====== Sistema tax-xorti ======
The use of a lot system, a characteristic of Athenian democracy, is a feature of some versions of direct democracies. In this system, important governmental and administrative tasks are performed by citizens picked from a lottery.

====== Demokrazija rappreżentattiva ======
Representative democracy involves the election of government officials by the people being represented. The most common mechanisms involve election of the candidate with a majority or a plurality of the votes. Most western countries have representative systems.

Representatives may be elected or become diplomatic representatives by a particular district (or constituency), or represent the entire electorate through proportional systems, with some using a combination of the two. Some representative democracies also incorporate elements of direct democracy, such as referendums. A characteristic of representative democracy is that while the representatives are elected by the people to act in the people's interest, they retain the freedom to exercise their own judgement as how best to do so. Such reasons have driven criticism upon representative democracy, pointing out the contradictions of representation mechanisms with democracy.

====== Demokrazija Parlamentari ======
Parliamentary democracy is a representative democracy where government is appointed by or can be dismissed by, representatives as opposed to a &quot;presidential rule&quot; wherein the president is both head of state and the head of government and is elected by the voters. Under a parliamentary democracy, government is exercised by delegation to an executive ministry and subject to ongoing review, checks and balances by the legislative parliament elected by the people.

In a parliamentary system, the prime minister may be dismissed by the legislature at any point in time for not meeting the expectations of the legislature. This is done through a vote of no confidence where the legislature decides whether or not to remove the prime minister from office with majority support for dismissal. In some countries, the prime minister can also call an election at any point in time, typically when the prime minister believes that they are in good favour with the public as to get re-elected. In other parliamentary democracies, extra elections are virtually never held, a minority government being preferred until the next ordinary elections. An important feature of the parliamentary democracy is the concept of the &quot;loyal opposition&quot;. The essence of the concept is that the second largest political party (or opposition) opposes the governing party (or coalition), while still remaining loyal to the state and its democratic principles.

====== Demokrazija Presidenzjali ======
Presidential democracy is a system where the public elects the president through an election. The president serves as both the head of state and head of government controlling most of the executive powers. The president serves for a specific term and cannot exceed that amount of time. The legislature often has limited ability to remove a president from office. Elections typically have a fixed date and are not easily changed. The president has direct control over the cabinet, specifically appointing the cabinet members.

The executive usually has the responsibility to execute or implement legislation and may have the limited legislative powers, such as a veto. However, a legislative branch passes legislation and budgets. This provides some measure of separation of powers. In consequence, however, the president and the legislature may end up in the control of separate parties, allowing one to block the other and thereby interfere with the orderly operation of the state. This may be the reason why presidential democracy is not very common outside the Americas, Africa, and Central and Southeast Asia.

A semi-presidential system is a system of democracy in which the government includes both a prime minister and a president. The particular powers held by the prime minister and president vary by country.

==== Tipoloġija ====

===== Monarkija kostituzzjonali =====
Many countries such as the United Kingdom, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Scandinavian countries, Thailand, Japan and Bhutan turned powerful monarchs into constitutional monarchs (often gradually) with limited or symbolic roles. For example, in the predecessor states to the United Kingdom, constitutional monarchy began to emerge and has continued uninterrupted since the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and passage of the Bill of Rights 1689. Strongly limited constitutional monarchies, such as the United Kingdom, have been referred to as crowned republics by writers such as H. G. Wells.

In other countries, the monarchy was abolished along with the aristocratic system (as in France, China, Russia, Germany, Austria, Hungary, Italy, Greece, and Egypt). An elected person, with or without significant powers, became the head of state in these countries.

Elite upper houses of legislatures, which often had lifetime or hereditary tenure, were common in many states. Over time, these either had their powers limited (as with the British House of Lords) or else became elective and remained powerful (as with the Australian Senate).

===== Demokrazija repubblika =====
The term ''republic'' has many different meanings, but today often refers to a representative democracy with an elected head of state, such as a president, serving for a limited term, in contrast to states with a hereditary monarch as a head of state, even if these states also are representative democracies with an elected or appointed head of government such as a prime minister.

The Founding Fathers of the United States often criticised direct democracy; James Madison argued, especially in ''The Federalist'' No. 10, that what distinguished a direct ''democracy'' from a ''republic'' was that the former depended on small size and suffered more violently from the effects of faction, whereas a republic could get stronger as it got larger and combats faction by its very structure. Accordingly, during Philadelphia convention Madison called election of representatives by large territories &quot;the only defence against the inconveniencies of democracy consistent with the democratic form of Govt.&quot;

Professors Richard Ellis of Willamette University and Michael Nelson of Rhodes College argue that much constitutional thought, from Madison to Lincoln and beyond, has focused on &quot;the problem of majority tyranny&quot;. They conclude, &quot;The principles of republican government embedded in the Constitution represent an effort by the framers to ensure that the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness would not be trampled by majorities.&quot; What was critical to American values, John Adams insisted, was that the government be &quot;bound by fixed laws, which the people have a voice in making, and a right to defend.&quot; As Benjamin Franklin was exiting after writing the US Constitution, Elizabeth Willing Powel asked him &quot;Well, Doctor, what have we got—a republic or a monarchy?&quot;. He replied &quot;A republic—if you can keep it.&quot;

===== Demokrazija liberali =====
A liberal democracy is a representative democracy which enshrines a liberal political philosophy, where the ability of the elected representatives to exercise decision-making power is subject to the rule of law, moderated by a constitution or laws such as the protection of the rights and freedoms of individuals, and constrained on the extent to which the will of the majority can be exercised against the rights of minorities.

===== Demokrazija Soċjalista =====
Socialist thought has several different views on democracy, for example social democracy or democratic socialism. Many democratic socialists and social democrats believe in a form of participatory, industrial, economic and/or workplace democracy combined with a representative democracy.

===== Demokrazija Marxista =====
Marxist theory supports a democratic society centering the working class. Some Marxists and Trotskyists believe in direct democracy or workers' councils (which are sometimes called soviets). This system can begin with workplace democracy and can manifest itself as soviet democracy or dictatorship of the proletariat. Trotskyist groups have interpreted socialist democracy to be synonymous with multi-party far-left representation, autonomous union organizations, worker's control of production, internal party democracy and the mass participation of the working masses. Some communist parties support a soviet republic with democratic centralism. Within democracy in Marxism there can be hostility to what is commonly called &quot;liberal democracy&quot;.

===== Demokrazija Anarkista =====
Anarchists are split in this domain, depending on whether they believe that a majority-rule is tyrannic or not. To many anarchists, the only form of democracy considered acceptable is direct democracy. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon argued that the only acceptable form of direct democracy is one in which it is recognised that majority decisions are not binding on the minority, even when unanimous. However, anarcho-communist Murray Bookchin criticised individualist anarchists for opposing democracy, and says &quot;majority rule&quot; is consistent with anarchism.

Some anarcho-communists oppose the majoritarian nature of direct democracy, feeling that it can impede individual liberty and opt-in favour of a non-majoritarian form of consensus democracy, similar to Proudhon's position on direct democracy.

===== Demokrazija każwali =====
Sortition is the process of choosing decision-making bodies via a random selection. These bodies can be more representative of the opinions and interests of the people at large than an elected legislature or other decision-maker. The technique was in widespread use in Athenian Democracy and Renaissance Florence and is still used in modern jury selection and citizens' assemblies.

===== Demokrazija Kostituzzjonali =====
Consociational democracy, also called consociationalism, is a form of democracy based on power-sharing formula between elites representing the social groups within the society. In 1969, Arendt Lijphart argued this would stabilize democracies with factions. A consociational democracy allows for simultaneous majority votes in two or more ethno-religious constituencies, and policies are enacted only if they gain majority support from both or all of them. The Qualified majority voting rule in European Council of Ministers is a consociational democracy approach for supranational democracies. This system in Treaty of Rome allocates votes to member states in part according to their population, but heavily weighted in favour of the smaller states. A consociational democracy requires consensus of representatives, while consensus democracy requires consensus of electorate.

===== Demokrazija maġġoritarja =====
Majoritarian democracy is a form of democracy based upon a principle of majority rule. Majoritarian democracy contrasts with consensus democracy, rule by as many people as possible.

===== Konsensus =====
Consensus democracy requires consensus decision-making and supermajority to obtain a larger support than majority. In contrast, in majoritarian democracy minority opinions can potentially be ignored by vote-winning majorities. Constitutions typically require consensus or supermajorities.

===== Demokrazija etnika =====
The term ethnic democracy, as used by some political scientists, purports to describe a governance system that combines a structured ethnic dominance with democratic, political and civil rights for all. Both the dominant ethnic group—typically an ethnic majority—and the minority ethnic groups have citizenship and are able to fully participate in the political process. However, critics of the &quot;ethnic democracy&quot; model argue it is a contradiction in terms, and thus conceptually inadequate or confusing; these critics allege that purported ethnic democracies, most notably Israel, are not democratic at all, or are at best a sort of semi-democracy.

===== Demokrazija inklużiva =====
Inclusive democracy is a political theory and political project that aims for direct democracy in all fields of social life: political democracy in the form of face-to-face assemblies which are confederated, economic democracy in a stateless, moneyless and marketless economy, democracy in the social realm, i.e. self-management in places of work and education, and ecological democracy which aims to reintegrate society and nature. The theoretical project of inclusive democracy emerged from the work of political philosopher Takis Fotopoulos in &quot;Towards An Inclusive Democracy&quot; and was further developed in the journal ''Democracy &amp; Nature'' and its successor ''The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy''.

===== Politika parteċipattiva =====
A parpolity or participatory polity is a theoretical form of democracy that is ruled by a nested council structure. The guiding philosophy is that people should have decision-making power in proportion to how much they are affected by the decision. Local councils of 25–50 people are completely autonomous on issues that affect only them, and these councils send delegates to higher level councils who are again autonomous regarding issues that affect only the population affected by that council.

A council court of randomly chosen citizens serves as a check on the tyranny of the majority, and rules on which body gets to vote on which issue. Delegates may vote differently from how their sending council might wish but are mandated to communicate the wishes of their sending council. Delegates are recallable at any time. Referendums are possible at any time via votes of lower-level councils, however, not everything is a referendum as this is most likely a waste of time. A parpolity is meant to work in tandem with a participatory economy.

===== Demokrazija proċedurali =====
Procedural democracy or proceduralist democracy, proceduralism or hollow democracy is a term used to denote the particular procedures, such as regular elections based on universal suffrage, that produce an electorally-legitimated government. Procedural democracy, with its centering of electoral processes as the basis of democratic legitimacy, is often contrasted with substantive or participatory democracy, which centers the equal participation of all groups in society in the political process as the basis of legitimacy.

===== Demokrazija radikali =====
Radical democracy is based on the idea that there are hierarchical and oppressive power relations that exist in society. Radical democracy's role is to make visible and challenge those relations by allowing for difference, dissent and antagonisms in decision-making processes.

===== Demokrazija reliġjuża =====
Religious democracy is a form of democracy where the values of a particular religion or state religion are preferred. The term applies to all democratic countries in which religion is incorporated into the form of government.

===== Demokrazija kożmopolitana =====
Cosmopolitan democracy, also known as ''global democracy'' or ''world federalism'', is a political system in which democracy is implemented on a global scale, either directly or through representatives. An important justification for this kind of system is that the decisions made in national or regional democracies often affect people outside the constituency who, by definition, cannot vote. By contrast, in a cosmopolitan democracy, the people who are affected by decisions also have a say in them.

According to its supporters, any attempt to solve global problems is undemocratic without some form of cosmopolitan democracy. The general principle of cosmopolitan democracy is to expand some or all of the values and norms of democracy, including the rule of law; the non-violent resolution of conflicts; and equality among citizens, beyond the limits of the state. To be fully implemented, this would require reforming existing international organisations, e.g., the United Nations, as well as the creation of new institutions such as a World Parliament, which ideally would enhance public control over, and accountability in, international politics.

Cosmopolitan democracy has been promoted, among others, by physicist Albert Einstein, writer Kurt Vonnegut, columnist George Monbiot, and professors David Held and Daniele Archibugi. The creation of the International Criminal Court in 2003 was seen as a major step forward by many supporters of this type of cosmopolitan democracy.

===== Demokrazija kreattiva =====
Creative democracy is advocated by American philosopher John Dewey. The main idea about creative democracy is that democracy encourages individual capacity building and the interaction among the society. Dewey argues that democracy is a way of life in his work of &quot;Creative Democracy: The Task Before Us&quot; and an experience built on faith in human nature, faith in human beings, and faith in working with others. Democracy, in Dewey's view, is a moral ideal requiring actual effort and work by people; it is not an institutional concept that exists outside of ourselves. &quot;The task of democracy&quot;, Dewey concludes, &quot;is forever that of creation of a freer and more humane experience in which all share and to which all contribute&quot;.

===== Demokrazija ggwidata =====
Guided democracy is a form of democracy that incorporates regular popular elections, but which often carefully &quot;guides&quot; the choices offered to the electorate in a manner that may reduce the ability of the electorate to truly determine the type of government exercised over them. Such democracies typically have only one central authority which is often not subject to meaningful public review by any other governmental authority. Russian-style democracy has often been referred to as a &quot;guided democracy&quot;. Russian politicians have referred to their government as having only one center of power/ authority, as opposed to most other forms of democracy which usually attempt to incorporate two or more naturally competing sources of authority within the same government.

=== Tfittxija ta' fehim komuni ===
The search for a common approach to conceptualize, measure and compare democracy remains a challenge in modern political science. This challenge strikes through to measuring, assessing and comparing the quality of democracy, as Seva Gunitsky pointed in 2015 in the Washington Post, based upon his research for ''Ranking the World – Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance'', that measuring democracy can mislead as much as clarify – a problem for academics, policy-makers and anyone who cares about democracy.

In his contribution ''Lost in the Gray Zone: Competing Measures of Democracy in the Former Soviet Republics'' to ''Ranking the World'', he, on the example of former Soviet republics, examines fundamental problems with measures of democracy, observing that indices often disagree and occasionally draw contradictory conclusions from observing the same event. He argues, that this reflects inherent tradeoffs in conceptualizing democratic governance, which arise from fundamental normative disagreements about a highly contested concept.

In 2011, Michael Coppedge, John Gerring et al. proposed an approach to such conceptualization and measurement. In their paper ''Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach'' they review some of the weaknesses among contemporary and older approaches, then lay out their approach, characterizing it as ''historical'', ''multidimensional'', ''disaggregated'', and ''transparent''. The authors propose to create a new set of four features to conceptualize and measure democracy. First, ''historical'', extending indicators of democracy back through modern history, wherever possible. Second, a ''multidimensional'' approach to the problem of conceptualizing democracy. Third, to collect information relevant to democracy at a highly ''disaggregated'' level. Fourth, ''transparent'', a strategy for data collection and presentation that should enhance the precision, validity, transparency, and legitimacy of the resulting indicators. They also sum up the conceptions, and/or aspects, of democracy into six – ''electoral'', ''liberal'', ''majoritarian'', ''participatory'', ''deliberative'', and ''egalitarian'', which taken together offer a fairly comprehensive accounting of the concept of democracy as it is employed today (see overview in the table below).
{| class=&quot;wikitable&quot;
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |Conceptions of democracy by Michael Coppedge, John Gerring et al., 2011
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
| 
| 
|Principles
|Question
|Institutions
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|I.
|'''Electoral'''
|Contestation, competition
|Are government offices filled by free and fair multiparty elections?
|Elections, political parties, competitiveness and turnover
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|II.
|'''Liberal'''
|Limited government, multiple veto points, horizontal accountability, individual rights, civil liberties, transparency
|Is political power decentralized &amp; constrained?
|Multiple, independent, and decentralized, with special focus on the role of the media, interest groups, the judiciary, and a written constitution with explicit guarantees
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|III.
|'''Majoritarian'''
|Majority rule, centralization, vertical accountability
|Does the majority (or plurality) rule?
|Consolidated and centralized, with special focus on the role of political parties
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|IV.
|'''Participatory'''
|Government by the people
|Do ordinary citizens participate in politics?
|Election law, civil society, local government, direct democracy
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|V.
|'''Deliberative'''
|Government by reason
|Are political decisions the product of public deliberation?
|Media, hearings, panels, other deliberative bodies
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|VI.
|'''Egalitarian'''
|Political equality
|Are all citizens equally empowered?
|Designed to ensure equal participation, representation, protection, and politically relevant resources
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|}

=== Measurement of democracy ===
Main article: Measurement of democracy

Measurement of democracy varies according to the different fundamental conceptions of democracy. Minimalist democracy evaluations focus on free and fair elections, while maximalist democracy evaluates additional values, such as human rights, deliberation, economic outcomes or state capacity.

== Demokrazija mhux governattiva ==
Aside from the public sphere, similar democratic principles and mechanisms of voting and representation have been used to govern other kinds of groups. Many non-governmental organisations decide policy and leadership by voting. Most trade unions and cooperatives are governed by democratic elections. Corporations are ultimately governed by their shareholders through shareholder democracy. Corporations may also employ systems such as workplace democracy to handle internal governance. Amitai Etzioni has postulated a system that fuses elements of democracy with sharia law, termed Islamic democracy or ''Islamocracy''. There is also a growing number of Democratic educational institutions such as Sudbury schools that are co-governed by students and staff.

=== Demokrazija tal-azzjonisti ===
Shareholder democracy is a concept relating to the governance of corporations by their shareholders. In the United States, shareholders are typically granted voting rights according to the one share, one vote principle. Shareholders may vote annually to elect the company's board of directors, who themselves may choose the company's executives. The shareholder democracy framework may be inaccurate for companies which have different classes of stock that further alter the distribution of voting rights.

== Ġustifikazzjoni ==
Ingħataw diversi ġustifikazzjonijiet għad-demokrazija.

=== Leġittimità ===
Social contract theory argues that the legitimacy of government is based on consent of the governed, i.e. an election, and that political decisions must reflect the general will. The public legitimacy of democracy varies by country, in some countries religious texts have more public support than the will of the people.

=== Teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet aħjar ===
Condorcet's jury theorem is logical proof that if each decision-maker has a better than chance probability of making the right decision, then having the largest number of decision-makers, i.e. a democracy, will result in the best decisions. This has also been argued by theories of the wisdom of the crowd. Democracy tends to improve conflict resolution.

=== Suċċess ekonomiku ===
In ''Why Nations Fail'', economists Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson argue that democracies are more economically successful because undemocratic political systems tend to limit markets and favor monopolies at the expense of the creative destruction which is necessary for sustained economic growth.

A 2019 study by Acemoglu and others estimated that countries switching to democratic from authoritarian rule had on average a 20% higher GDP after 25 years than if they had remained authoritarian. The study examined 122 transitions to democracy and 71 transitions to authoritarian rule, occurring from 1960 to 2010. Acemoglu said this was because democracies tended to invest more in health care and human capital, and reduce special treatment of regime allies.

A 2023 study analyzed the long-term effects of democracy on economic prosperity using new data on GDP per capita and democracy for a dataset between 1789 and 2019. The results indicate that democracy substantially increases economic development.

Unemployment is associated with anti-democratic beliefs.

== Kritika ==
Democracy as a concept and as a practical form of government has been the subject of critique throughout history. Some critics consider that democratic regimes often fail to be true to the highest principles expected of them, while others reject the values promoted by constitutional democracy in whole or part.

Opposition to democracy goes as far back as Plato, who argued for a 'government of the best qualified'. More recently, James Madison extensively studied historic attempts at and arguments on democracy in his preparation for the Constitutional Convention, and Winston Churchill remarked that &quot;no one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.&quot;

Critics argue that modern democracies may fail to be sufficiently democratic and instead function in practice as oligarchies, insofar as governments are more responsive to the preferences of economic elites than to those of ordinary citizens. Numerous empirical studies across various western democracies including the United States, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Canada, Norway and Germany have consistently found that elected representatives tend to respond more to the preferences of very affluent citizens for policy outcomes than those of the average voter.

Some critics of democracy have highlighted the concept's inconsistencies, paradoxes, and limits: drawing contrasts with other forms of government, such as epistocracy or lottocracy. Others have characterized most modern democracies as democratic polyarchies and democratic aristocracies. Yet others have identified fascist moments in modern democracies. They have termed the societies produced by modern democracies as neo-feudal and have contrasted democracy with fascism, anarcho-capitalism, theocracy, and absolute monarchy.

== Tranżizzjonijiet demokratiċi ==
A democratic transition describes a phase in a country's political system, often created as a result of an incomplete change from an authoritarian regime to a democratic one (or vice versa).

=== Demokratizzazzjoni ===
Democratization, or democratisation, is the structural government transition from an authoritarian government to a more democratic political regime, including substantive political changes moving in a democratic direction. The opposite process of democratic transition is known as democratic backsliding or autocratization. Whether and to what extent democratization occurs can be influenced by various factors, including economic development, historical legacies, civil society, and international processes. Some accounts of democratization emphasize how elites drove democratization, whereas other accounts emphasize grassroots bottom-up processes. How democratization occurs has also been used to explain other political phenomena, such as whether a country goes to a war or whether its economy grows.

Several philosophers and researchers have outlined historical and social factors seen as supporting the evolution of democracy. Other commentators have mentioned the influence of economic development. In a related theory, Ronald Inglehart suggests that improved living-standards in modern developed countries can convince people that they can take their basic survival for granted, leading to increased emphasis on self-expression values, which correlates closely with democracy.

Douglas M. Gibler and Andrew Owsiak in their study argued about the importance of peace and stable borders for the development of democracy. It has often been assumed that democracy causes peace, but this study shows that, historically, peace has almost always predated the establishment of democracy.

Carroll Quigley concludes that the characteristics of weapons are the main predictor of democracy: Democracy—this scenario—tends to emerge only when the best weapons available are easy for individuals to obtain and use. By the 1800s, guns were the best personal weapons available, and in the United States of America (already nominally democratic), almost everyone could afford to buy a gun, and could learn how to use it fairly easily. Governments could not do any better: it became the age of mass armies of citizen soldiers with guns. Similarly, Periclean Greece was an age of the citizen soldier and democracy.

Other theories stressed the relevance of education and of human capital—and within them of cognitive ability to increasing tolerance, rationality, political literacy and participation. Two effects of education and cognitive ability are distinguished:&lt;sup&gt;[''need quotation to verify'']&lt;/sup&gt;

* a cognitive effect (competence to make rational choices, better information-processing)
* an ethical effect (support of democratic values, freedom, human rights etc.), which itself depends on intelligence.

Evidence consistent with conventional theories of why democracy emerges and is sustained has been hard to come by. Statistical analyses have challenged modernisation theory by demonstrating that there is no reliable evidence for the claim that democracy is more likely to emerge when countries become wealthier, more educated, or less unequal. In fact, empirical evidence shows that economic growth and education may not lead to increased demand for democratization as modernization theory suggests: historically, most countries attained high levels of access to primary education well before transitioning to democracy. Rather than acting as a catalyst for democratization, in some situations education provision may instead be used by non-democratic regimes to indoctrinate their subjects and strengthen their power.

The assumed link between education and economic growth is called into question when analyzing empirical evidence. Across different countries, the correlation between education attainment and math test scores is very weak (.07). A similarly weak relationship exists between per-pupil expenditures and math competency (.26). Additionally, historical evidence suggests that average human capital (measured using literacy rates) of the masses does not explain the onset of industrialization in France from 1750 to 1850 despite arguments to the contrary. Together, these findings show that education does not always promote human capital and economic growth as is generally argued to be the case. Instead, the evidence implies that education provision often falls short of its expressed goals, or, alternatively, that political actors use education to promote goals other than economic growth and development.

Some scholars have searched for the &quot;deep&quot; determinants of contemporary political institutions, be they geographical or demographic.

An example of this is the disease environment. Places with different mortality rates had different populations and productivity levels around the world. For example, in Africa, the tsetse fly—which afflicts humans and livestock—reduced the ability of Africans to plough the land. This made Africa less settled. As a consequence, political power was less concentrated. This also affected the colonial institutions European countries established in Africa. Whether colonial settlers could live or not in a place made them develop different institutions which led to different economic and social paths. This also affected the distribution of power and the collective actions people could take. As a result, some African countries ended up having democracies and others autocracies.

An example of geographical determinants for democracy is having access to coastal areas and rivers. This natural endowment has a positive relation with economic development thanks to the benefits of trade. Trade brought economic development, which in turn, broadened power. Rulers wanting to increase revenues had to protect property-rights to create incentives for people to invest. As more people had more power, more concessions had to be made by the ruler and in many places this process lead to democracy. These determinants defined the structure of the society moving the balance of political power.


Robert Michels asserts that although democracy can never be fully realised, democracy may be developed automatically in the act of striving for democracy:&lt;blockquote&gt;The peasant in the fable, when on his deathbed, tells his sons that a treasure is buried in the field. After the old man's death the sons dig everywhere in order to discover the treasure. They do not find it. But their indefatigable labor improves the soil and secures for them a comparative well-being. The treasure in the fable may well symbolise democracy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Democracy in modern times has almost always faced opposition from the previously existing government, and many times it has faced opposition from social elites. The implementation of a democratic government from a non-democratic state is typically brought by peaceful or violent democratic revolution.

The V-Dem Institute found 2026 ongoing democratization in 18 countries: Benin, Bolivia, Botswana, Bazil, Dominican Republic, Fiji, Guatemala, Lesotho, Mauritius, Montenegro, Poland, Seychelles, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Timor-Leste, Thailand, The Gambia, and Zambia.

===== Promozzjoni tad-demokrazija =====
Promotion of democracy can increase the quality of already existing democracies, reduce political apathy, and the chance of democratic backsliding. Democracy promotion measures include voting advice applications, participatory democracy, increasing electoral integrity, youth suffrage and civic education, reducing barriers to entry for new political parties, increasing proportionality, reducing presidentialism and aligning with median voter preferences.

=== Awtokratizzazzjoni ===
Democratic backsliding is a form of autocratization, a process of structural government transition toward authoritarianism in which the exercise of political power becomes less limited and more arbitrary and repressive. Democratic backsliding specifically assumes a starting point of a democratic system. The process typically restricts the space for public contest and political participation in the process of government selection. Democratic backsliding involves the weakening of democratic institutions, such as the peaceful transition of power or free and fair elections, or the violation of individual rights that underpin democracies, especially freedom of expression. Democratic backsliding is the opposite of democratization.&lt;sup&gt;[''citation needed'']&lt;/sup&gt;

Steven Levitsky says: &quot;It's not up to voters to defend a democracy. That's asking far, far too much of voters, to cast their ballot on the basis of some set of abstract principles or procedures. With the exception of a handful of cases, voters never, ever — in any society, in any culture — prioritize democracy over all else. Individual voters worry about much more mundane things, as is their right. It is up to élites and institutions to protect democracy — not voters.&quot;

The V-Dem Institute found 2026 ongoing democratic backsliding in 44 countries: Afghanistan, Argentina, Armenia, Belarus, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Central African Republic, Croatia, Georgia, Greece, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, El Salvador, Haiti, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Italy, Ivory Coast, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Mali, Madagascar, Mauretania, Mexico, Moldova, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Niger, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Slovakia, Slovenia, Senegal, Serbia, Romania, Togo, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and United States.

===== Tfixkil =====
Some democratic governments have experienced sudden state collapse and regime change to an undemocratic form of government. Domestic military coups or rebellions are the most common means by which democratic governments have been overthrown. (See List of coups and coup attempts by country and List of civil wars.) Examples include the Spanish Civil War, the Coup of 18 Brumaire that ended the French First Republic, and the 28 May 1926 coup d'état which ended the First Portuguese Republic. Some military coups are supported by foreign governments, such as the 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état and the 1953 Iranian coup d'état. Other types of a sudden end to democracy include:

* Invasion, for example the German occupation of Czechoslovakia, and the fall of South Vietnam.
* Self-coup, in which the leader of the government extra-legally seizes all power or unlawfully extends the term in office. This can be done through:
** Suspension of the constitution by decree, such as with the 1992 Peruvian coup d'état
** An &quot;electoral self-coup&quot; using election fraud to obtain re-election of a previously fairly elected official or political party. For example, in the 1999 Ukrainian presidential election, 2003 Russian legislative election, and 2004 Russian presidential election.
* Royal coup, in which a monarch not normally involved in government seizes all power. For example, the 6 January Dictatorship, begun in 1929 when King Alexander I of Yugoslavia dismissed parliament and started ruling by decree.

Democratic backsliding can end democracy in a gradual manner, by increasing emphasis on national security and eroding free and fair elections, freedom of expression, independence of the judiciary, rule of law. A famous example is the Enabling Act of 1933, which lawfully ended democracy in Weimar Germany and marked the transition to Nazi Germany.

Temporary or long-term political violence and government interference can prevent free and fair elections, which erode the democratic nature of governments. This has happened on a local level even in well-established democracies like the United States; for example, the Wilmington insurrection of 1898 and African-American disfranchisement after the Reconstruction era.

== Influwenza tal-midja ==
The theory of democracy relies on the implicit assumption that voters are well informed about social issues, policies, and candidates so that they can make a truly informed decision. Since the late 20th century there has been a growing concern that voters may be poorly informed due to the news media's focusing more on entertainment and gossip and less on serious journalistic research on political issues.

The media professors Michael Gurevitch and Jay Blumler have proposed a number of functions that the mass media are expected to fulfill in a democracy:

* Surveillance of the sociopolitical environment
* Meaningful agenda setting
* Platforms for an intelligible and illuminating advocacy
* Dialogue across a diverse range of views
* Mechanisms for holding officials to account for how they have exercised power
* Incentives for citizens to learn, choose, and become involved
* A principled resistance to the efforts of forces outside the media to subvert their independence, integrity, and ability to serve the audience
* A sense of respect for the audience member, as potentially concerned and able to make sense of his or her political environment

This proposal has inspired a lot of discussions over whether the news media are actually fulfilling the requirements that a well functioning democracy requires. Commercial mass media are generally not accountable to anybody but their owners, and they have no obligation to serve a democratic function. They are controlled mainly by economic market forces. Fierce economic competition may force the mass media to divert themselves from any democratic ideals and focus entirely on how to survive the competition.

The tabloidization and popularization of the news media is seen in an increasing focus on human examples rather than statistics and principles. There is more focus on politicians as personalities and less focus on political issues in the popular media. Election campaigns are covered more as horse races and less as debates about ideologies and issues. The dominating media focus on spin, conflict, and competitive strategies has made voters perceive the politicians as egoists rather than idealists. This fosters mistrust and a cynical attitude to politics, less civic engagement, and less interest in voting. The ability to find effective political solutions to social problems is hampered when problems tend to be blamed on individuals rather than on structural causes. This person-centered focus may have far-reaching consequences not only for domestic problems but also for foreign policy when international conflicts are blamed on foreign heads of state rather than on political and economic structures. A strong media focus on fear and terrorism has allowed military logic to penetrate public institutions, leading to increased surveillance and the erosion of civil rights.

The responsiveness and accountability of the democratic system is compromised when lack of access to substantive, diverse, and undistorted information is handicapping the citizens' capability of evaluating the political process. The fast pace and trivialization in the competitive news media is dumbing down the political debate. Thorough and balanced investigation of complex political issues does not fit into this format. The political communication is characterized by short time horizons, short slogans, simple explanations, and simple solutions. This is conducive to political populism rather than serious deliberation.

Commercial mass media are often differentiated along the political spectrum so that people can hear mainly opinions that they already agree with. Too much controversy and diverse opinions are not always profitable for the commercial news media. Political polarization is emerging when different people read different news and watch different TV channels. This polarization has been worsened by the emergence of the social media that allow people to communicate mainly with groups of like-minded people, the so-called echo chambers. Extreme political polarization may undermine the trust in democratic institutions, leading to erosion of civil rights and free speech and in some cases even reversion to autocracy.

Many media scholars have discussed non-commercial news media with public service obligations as a means to improve the democratic process by providing the kind of political contents that a free market does not provide. The World Bank has recommended public service broadcasting in order to strengthen democracy in developing countries. These broadcasting services should be accountable to an independent regulatory body that is adequately protected from interference from political and economic interests. Public service media have an obligation to provide reliable information to voters. Many countries have publicly funded radio and television stations with public service obligations, especially in Europe and Japan, while such media are weak or non-existent in other countries including the US. Several studies have shown that the stronger the dominance of commercial broadcast media over public service media, the less the amount of policy-relevant information in the media and the more focus on horse race journalism, personalities, and the pecadillos of politicians. Public service broadcasters are characterized by more policy-relevant information and more respect for journalistic norms and impartiality than the commercial media. However, the trend of deregulation has put the public service model under increased pressure from competition with commercial media.

The emergence of the internet and the social media has profoundly altered the conditions for political communication. The social media have given ordinary citizens easy access to voice their opinion and share information while bypassing the filters of the large news media. This is often seen as an advantage for democracy. The new possibilities for communication have fundamentally changed the way social movements and protest movements operate and organize. The internet and social media have provided powerful new tools for democracy movements in developing countries and emerging democracies, enabling them to bypass censorship, voice their opinions, and organize protests.

A serious problem with the social media is that they have no truth filters. The established news media have to guard their reputation as trustworthy, while ordinary citizens may post unreliable information. In fact, studies show that false stories are going more viral than true stories. The proliferation of false stories and conspiracy theories may undermine public trust in the political system and public officials.

Reliable information sources are essential for the democratic process. Less democratic governments rely heavily on censorship, propaganda, and misinformation in order to stay in power, while independent sources of information are able to undermine their legitimacy.

== Referenzi ==

[[Kategorija:Greċja antika]]</text>
      <sha1>5bkko8sw30sktn6w05b9h5v40a6lans</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330260</id>
      <parentid>330259</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T10:30:12Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Trigcly</username>
        <id>17859</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>/* Teorija kontemporanja */</comment>
      <origin>330260</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="92530" sha1="enoi6h7aldaw3em8ws5iwi5ip6crmyz" xml:space="preserve">Id-'''demokrazija''' hija forma ta' governanza li permezz tagħha l-poter [[Politika|politiku]] jinkiseb min-nies jew mill-popolazzjoni ta' stat. Skont definizzjoni minimalista tad-demokrazija, il-mexxejja jiġu eletti permezz ta' elezzjonijiet kompetittivi filwaqt li d-definizzjonijiet iktar wesgħin jew massimalisti jorbtu d-demokrazija mal-garanziji tal-libertajiet ċivili u d-drittijiet tal-[[bniedem]] apparti l-elezzjonijiet kompetittivi.

F'demokrazija diretta, il-poplu jkollu l-awtorità diretta li jagħmel deliberazzjonijiet u li jiddeċiedi dwar il-leġiżlazzjoni. F'demokrazija rappreżentattiva, il-poplu jagħżel l-uffiċjali tal-governanza permezz ta' elezzjonijiet. Id-definizzjoni ta' &quot;poplu&quot; u l-modi kif l-awtorità tiġi kondiviża fi ħdan il-poplu jew iddelegata minnu nbidlu mal-milja taż-żminijiet u b'rati li jvarjaw minn pajjiż għal ieħor. Il-karatteristiċi tad-demokrazija spiss jinkludu l-libertà tal-ġemgħa, il-libertà tal-assoċjazzjoni, il-proprjetà personali, il-libertà tar-[[reliġjon]] u tal-[[kelma]], iċ-ċittadinanza, il-kunsens ta' dawk li jiġu ggvernati, id-drittijiet tal-votazzjoni, il-libertà miċ-ċaħda governattiva mhux ġustifikata tad-dritt tal-ħajja u tal-libertà, u d-drittijiet tal-minoranzi.

In-nozzjoni tad-demokrazija evolviet b'mod konsiderevoli maż-żmien. Matul l-[[Storja|istorja]], wieħed jista' jsib evidenza ta' demokrazija diretta, fejn il-komunitajiet kienu jieħdu deċiżjonijiet permezz ta' ġemgħat popolari. Illum il-ġurnata, il-forma dominanti tad-demokrazija hija d-demokrazija rappreżentattiva, fejn iċ-ċittadini jeleġġu lill-uffiċjali tal-gvern biex jiggvernaw f'isimhom, pereżempju f'demokrazija parlamentari jew presidenzjali. Fil-varjant komuni tad-demokrazija liberali, is-setgħat tal-maġġoranza jiġu eżerċitati fi ħdan il-qafas ta' demokrazija rappreżentattiva, iżda l-kostituzzjoni u l-qorti suprema jillimitaw lill-maġġoranza u jipproteġu lill-minoranzi — normalment billi jiġi żgurat li kulħadd igawdi minn ċerti drittijiet individwali, bħal-libertà tal-kelma jew il-libertà tal-assoċjazzjoni.

It-terminu tfaċċa fis-seklu 5 [[Ante Christum natum|Q.K]]. fil-bliet-stati [[Greċja antika|Griegi]], b'mod partikolari f'[[Ateni]] Klassika, u kien ifisser &quot;it-tmexxija tal-poplu&quot;, b'kuntrast mal-aristokrazija (bil-[[Lingwa Griega|Grieg]]: ἀριστοκρατία, ''aristokratía''), li tfisser &quot;it-tmexxija tal-elit&quot;. Prattikament fil-gvernijiet demokratiċi kollha tul l-istorja tal-qedem u moderna, iċ-ċittadinanza demokratika inizjalment kienet ristretta għal klassi tal-elit, li iktar 'il quddiem ġiet estiża għaċ-ċittadini adulti kollha. Fil-biċċa l-kbira tad-demokraziji moderni, dan inkiseb permezz tal-movimenti tas-suffraġju tas-sekli 19 u 20.

Id-demokrazija tikkuntrasta mal-forom ta' governanza fejn il-poter ma jinbitx mill-popolazzjoni ġenerali ta' stat, pereżempju s-sistemi awtoritarji. Storikament is-sistemi demokratiċi kienu forma rari u vulnerabbli ta' governanza, iżda dawn saru iktar prevalenti mis-seklu 19 'l hawn, b'mod partikolari permezz ta' diversi mewġiet ta' demokratizzazzjoni. Id-demokrazija għandha leġittimità konsiderevoli fid-dinja moderna, peress li l-opinjoni pubblika fir-reġjuni dinjin normalment huma favur is-sistemi demokratiċi ta' governanza meta mqabbla mal-alternattivi, u peress li saħansitra l-istati awtoritarji jippruvaw ipinġu lilhom infushom bħala demokratiċi. Id-demokrazija b'mod iktar konsistenti tirriżulta f'saħħa, f'[[edukazzjoni]] u f'eżiti ekonomiċi mtejba. Skont l-indiċijiet ta' ''V-Dem Democracy'' u l-Indiċi tad-Demokrazija ta' ''The Economist'', inqas minn nofs il-popolazzjoni tad-dinja tgħix f'demokrazija mill-2022. Fl-istess ħin, filwaqt li d-demokrazija rappreżentattivi tingħata valur siewi b'mod mifrux, iċ-Ċentru tar-Riċerka ta' Pew sab li l-garr rigward il-prestazzjoni demokratika huwa komuni saħansitra f'bosta demokraziji stabbiliti.

== Karatteristiċi ==
Għalkemm id-demokrazija fid-demokraziji purament rappreżentattivi hija mifhuma b'rabta mal-votazzjoni, ma jeżisti l-ebda konsensus dwar definizzjoni preċiża tad-demokrazija. Jeżistu wisq approċċi. Kien hemm studju li identifika 2,234 aġġettiv li jintuża għad-deskrizzjoni tad-demokrazija bil-[[lingwa Ingliża]].

Minkejja dan, hemm fehim iktar profond – bħal dak ta' [[Abraham Lincoln]]:

: ''&quot;Governanza tan-nies, min-nies, għan-nies&quot;''

jew dik ta' [[Karl Popper]] li ssostni li l-ħarsa &quot;klassika&quot; lejn id-demokrazija hi, &quot;fil-qosor, it-teorija li d-demokrazija hija t-tmexxija tal-poplu u li l-poplu għandu d-dritt li jiggverna hu.

Il-prinċipji demokratiċi huma riflessi fiċ-ċittadini eliġibbli kollha, ilkoll indaqs quddiem il-[[Dritt|liġi]] u lkoll b'aċċess ugwali għall-proċessi leġiżlattivi.

Pereżempju, f'demokrazija rappreżentattiva, kull vot (fit-teorija) għandu l-istess piż, u l-libertà taċ-ċittadini eliġibbli hija żgurata permezz ta' drittijiet u libertajiet leġittimizzati li tipikament ikunu mnaqqxa f'kostituzzjoni, filwaqt li użi oħra tad-&quot;demokrazija&quot; jaf jħaddnu d-demokrazija diretta, fejn iċ-ċittadini jivvutaw direttament fuq id-diversi kwistjonijiet li jinqalgħu. Skont in-[[Ġnus Magħquda|Nazzjonijiet Uniti]], id-demokrazija &quot;tipprovdi ambjent li jirrispetta d-drittijiet tal-bniedem u l-libertajiet fundamentali, u fejn ir-rieda espressa liberament tal-poplu tiġi eżerċitata&quot;.

Skont teorija partikolari d-demokrazija tirrikjedi tliet prinċipji fundamentali: il-kontroll 'il fuq (sovranità fl-iżjed livelli baxxi tal-awtorità), l-ugwaljanza politika, u n-normi soċjali li permezz tagħhom l-individwi u l-istituzzjonijiet iqisu biss atti aċċettabbli li jirriflettu l-ewwel żewġ prinċipji tal-kontroll 'il fuq u l-ugwaljanza politika. L-ugwaljanza legali, il-libertà politika u l-istat ta' dritt sikwit jiġu identifikati bħala l-karatteristiċi ewlenin ta' demokrazija li tiffunzjona sew.

F'xi pajjiżi, b'mod partikolari fir-[[Renju Unit]] (minn fejn oriġinat is-sistema ta' Westminster), il-prinċipju dominanti hu dak tas-sovranità Parlamentari, filwaqt li tinżamm l-indipendenza ġudizzjarja. Fl-[[Indja]], is-sovranità Parlamentari hija soġġetta għall-Kostituzzjoni tal-Indja li tinkludi rieżami ġudizzjarju. Għalkemm it-terminu &quot;demokrazija&quot; tipikament jintuża fil-kuntest ta' stat politiku, il-prinċipji wkoll huma applikabbli potenzjalment għall-organizzazzjonijiet privati, bħal klabbs, għaqdiet u ditti.

Id-demokraziji jistgħu jużaw bosta metodi differenti ta' teħid tad-deċiżjonijiet, iżda t-tmexxija tal-maġġoranza hija l-forma dominanti. Mingħajr kumpens, bħal protezzjonijiet legali tad-drittijiet individwali jew kollettivi, il-minoranzi politiċi jistgħu jiġu mgħakksa mit-&quot;tirannija tal-maġġoranza&quot;. It-tmexxija tal-maġġoranza tinvolvi approċċ kompetittiv, għad-differenza tad-demokrazija tal-konsensus, u b'hekk tinħoloq il-ħtieġa li l-elezzjonijiet, u ġeneralment id-deliberazzjoni, ikunu sostantivament u proċeduralment &quot;ġusti&quot; u ekwi. Fżxi pajjiżi, il-libertà tal-espressjoni politika, il-libertà tal-kelma u l-libertà tal-istampa jitqiesu bħala importanti biex jiġi żgurat li l-votanti jkunu infurmati sew, u b'hekk ikunu jistgħu jivvutaw skont l-interessi u t-twemmin tagħhom stess.

Ġie ssuġġerit ukoll li karatteristika bażika tad-demokrazija hija l-kapaċità li l-votanti kollha jipparteċipaw b'mod ħieles u sħiħ fil-[[ħajja]] tas-soċjetà tagħhom. Bl-enfasi fuq in-nozzjonijiet tal-kuntratt soċjali u r-rieda kollettiva tal-votanti kollha, id-demokrazija tista' tkun ikkaratterizzata wkoll bħala forma ta' kollettiviżmu politiku peress li tiġi definita bħala forma ta' governanza fejn iċ-ċittadini eliġibbli kollha jkollhom vuċi ugwali fit-tfassil tal-liġijiet.

Ir-repubbliki, għalkemm spiss ikunu assoċjati popolarment mad-demokrazija minħabba l-prinċipju kondiviż tal-kunsens mogħti minn dawk li jiġu ggvernati għat-tmexxija, mhux neċessarjament ikunu demokraziji, għax ir-repubblikaniżmu ma jispeċifikax ''kif'' in-nies għandhom imexxu. Tradizzjonalment it-terminu &quot;repubblika&quot; kien iħaddan kemm id-demokraziji kif ukoll l-aristokraziji u l-varjanti tagħhom. F'sens modern, il-forma ta' governanza repubblikana hija forma ta' governanza mingħajr monarka. Minħabba f'hekk, id-demokraziji jistgħu jkunu repubbliki jew monarkiji kostituzzjonali, bħar-Renju Unit, fejn il-monarka ma jkunx il-mexxej.

== Storja ==
Il-ġemgħat demokratiċi għandhom żmien daqs kemm għandha żmien l-ispeċi umana u ilhom jeżistu tul l-istorja umana, iżda sas-seklu 19, il-figuri [[Politiku|politiċi]] ewlenin fil-biċċa l-kbira opponew id-demokrazija. It-teoriċi repubblikani rabtu d-demokrazija ma' daqs ċkejken: iktar ma kienu jikbru fid-daqs l-unitajiet politiċi, iktar kienet tiżdied il-probabbiltà li l-gvern isir tiranniku. Fl-istess waqt, l-unitajiet politiċi żgħar kienu vulnerabbli għall-ħakma. Montesquieu kiteb, &quot;Jekk repubblika tkun żgħira, tinqered minn qawwa barranija; jekk tkun kbira, tinqered mill-imperfezzjoni interna&quot;. Skont ix-xjenzat politiku tal-Università ta' Johns Hopkins [[Daniel Deudney]], il-ħolqien tal-[[Stati Uniti|Istati Uniti]], bid-daqs kbir u s-sistema ta' kontrolli u bilanċi tagħha, kienet soluzzjoni għall-problemi doppji tad-daqs. Fis-soċjetajiet ta' madwar id-dinja seħħew forom ta' demokrazija b'mod organiku li ma kellhom l-ebda kuntatt ma' xulxin.

=== Oriġini ===

==== [[Greċja]] u [[Ruma]] ====
It-terminu ''demokrazija'' tfaċċa għall-ewwel darba fil-ħsieb politiku u [[Filosofija|filosofiku]] tal-Greċja Antika fil-belt-stat ta' Ateni fl-antikità klassika. Il-kelma ġejja minn ''dêmos'' li tfisser &quot;nies (komuni)&quot; u minn ''krátos'' li tfisser &quot;qawwa/setgħa&quot;. Taħt Cleisthenes, f'Ateni ġie stabbilit dak li huwa maħsub bħala l-ewwel eżempju ta' tip ta' demokrazija fis-seklu 6 Q.K. (508–507 Q.K.). Cleisthenes huwa meqjus bħala &quot;l-missier tad-demokrazija ta' Ateni&quot;. L-ewwel użu attestat tal-kelma demokrazija jinsab fix-xogħlijiet ta' proża tal-ħabta tal-430 Q.K., bħall-''Istorji'' ta' Erodotu, iżda l-użu tagħha kien eqdem b'diversi deċennji, peress li żewġ persuni minn Ateni li twieldu għall-ħabta tal-470 Q.K. kien jisimhom Democrates, isem politiku ġdid — x'aktarx b'appoġġ għad-demokrazija — li ngħata fi żmien ta' dibattiti dwar kwistjonijiet kostituzzjonali f'Ateni. Aeschylus jalludi bis-saħħa wkoll għall-kelma fid-dramm tiegħu ''Is-Supplikanti'', li ttella' għall-ħabta tal-463 Q.K., fejn isemmi &quot;l-id tat-tmexxija tal-kotra&quot; [''demou kratousa cheir'']. Qabel dak iż-żmien, il-kelma li kienet tiddefinixxi s-sistema politika ġdida ta' Cleisthenes x'aktarx li kienet ''isonomija'', li tfisser ugwaljanza politika.

Id-demokrazija ta' Ateni ħadet is-sura ta' demokrazija diretta, u kellha żewġ karatteristiċi li jiddistingwuha: l-għażla aleatorja ta' ċittadini ordinarji biex jimlew il-ftit karigi amministrattivi u ġudizzjarji eżistenti tal-gvern, u ġemgħa leġiżlattiva li kienet tikkonsisti mill-maġġoranza taċ-ċittadini ta' Ateni. Iċ-ċittadini eliġibbli kollha kienu jitħallew jitkellmu u jivvutaw fil-ġemgħa jew fl-assemblea, fejn kienu jiġu stabbiliti l-liġijiet tal-belt-stat. Madankollu, iċ-ċittadinanza ta' Ateni ma kinitx tingħata lin-[[Mara|nisa]], lill-[[Skjavitù|ilsiera]], lill-barranin (μέτοικοι / ''métoikoi''), u liż-żgħażagħ taħt l-età tas-servizz militari. Effettivament, resident wieħed minn kull erba' f'Ateni kienu jikkwalifikaw bħala ċittadini. Is-sjieda tal-art ma kinitx rekwiżit għaċ-ċittadinanza. L-esklużjoni ta' partijiet kbar tal-popolazzjoni mill-korp taċ-ċittadini hija marbuta mill-qrib mal-fehim tal-qedem taċ-ċittadinanza. Fil-biċċa l-kbira ta' żmien il-qedem, il-benefiċċju taċ-ċittadinanza kien marbut mal-obbligu tal-ġlied fil-kampanji militari.

Id-demokrazija ta' Aterni mhux biss kienet ''diretta'' fis-sens li d-deċiżjonijiet kienu jittieħdu mill-ġemgħa, iżda anke l-''iżjed diretta'' fis-sens li l-ġemgħa permezz tal-istrutturi bħall-assemblea, is-senat u l-qrati legali kienet tikkontrolla l-proċess politiku kollu u proporzjon kbir taċ-ċittadini kienu jkunu involuti b'mod kostanti fl-affarijiet pubbliċi. Minkejja li d-drittijiet tal-individwu ma kinux żgurati mill-kostituzzjoni ta' Ateni fis-sens modern (il-Griegi tal-qedem ma kellhomx kelma għal &quot;drittijiet&quot;), dawk li kienu ċittadini ta' Ateni kienu jgawdu l-libertajiet tagħhom mhux f'oppożizzjoni għall-gvern iżda billi jgħixu f'belt li ma kinitx soġġetta għal xi setgħa oħra u billi huma stess ma kinux soġġetti għat-tmexxija ta' ħaddieħor.

Il-votazzjoni tfaċċat fi [[Sparta]] saħansitra fis-700 Q.K. L-ekkleżjastiċi ta' Sparta kienu ġemgħa tal-poplu, li kienet tiltaqa' darba fix-xahar, fejn kull ċittadini maskili ta' mill-inqas 20 sena seta' jipparteċipa. Fl-assemblea, l-Ispartani kienu jeleġġu l-mexxejja u jixħtu l-voti tagħhom bl-għajjat (il-votazzjoni kienet tiġi deċiża skont l-ikbar għajta tal-folla). [[Aristotli]] ddeskriva dan il-metodu bħala &quot;tat-tfal&quot;, meta mqabbel mas-sistema tal-votazzjoni fuq poloz tal-ġebel użata miċ-ċittadini ta' Ateni. Sparta adottat din is-sistema minħabba s-sempliċità tagħha, u biex jiġi evitat kull tip ta' preġudizzju, xiri jew qerq fil-votazzjoni, li kienu predominanti fl-elezzjonijiet demokratiċi bikrin.

Barra minn hekk, id-depożizzjoni tar-Renju Ruman ħolqot sistema b'element demokratiku fil-forma ta' bosta ġemgħat popolari differenti.

Minkejja li r-Repubblika Rumana tat kontribut sinifikanti għal bosta aspetti tad-demokrazija, frazzjon biss mir-Rumani kienu ċittadini li kellhom il-vot fl-elezzjonijiet għall-maġistrati. Il-voti tas-setgħana kienu jingħataw iktar piż permezz ta' sistema ta' votazzjoni ponderata, għaldaqstant il-biċċa l-kbira tal-uffiċjali għoljin, inkluż il-membri tas-Senat, kienu jiġu minn ftit familji għonja u nobbli. Il-mudell Ruman ta' governanza ispira bosta ħassieba politiċi tul is-sekli.

==== Indja tal-qedem ====
Vaishali, il-[[belt kapitali]] tal-Lega ta' Vajjika (Vrijji mahajanapada) tal-Indja, titqies bħala wieħed mill-ewwel eżempji ta' repubblika għall-ħabta tas-seklu 6 Q.K.

==== Amerki ====
[[Kultura|Kulturi]] oħra, bħall-Iroquois fl-Amerki, żviluppaw ukoll forma ta' soċjetà demokratika bejn l-1450 u l-1660 (u possibbilment fl-1142), ferm qabel ma kellhom kuntatt mal-[[Ewropa|Ewropej]]. Din id-demokrazija għadha preżenti sal-lum u hija l-iżjed demokrazija rappreżentattiva antika eżistenti fid-dinja.

=== [[Medjuevu|Medju Evu]] ===
Filwaqt li l-biċċa l-kbira tar-reġjuni fl-Ewropa matul il-Medju Evu kienu mmexxijin mill-kleru jew minn sinjuri fewdali, kienu jeżistu diversi sistemi li kienu jinvolvu l-elezzjonijiet jew il-ġemgħat, għalkemm spiss kienu jinvolvu parti żgħira mill-popolazzjoni. Fl-Iskandinavja, kien hemm korpi magħrufa ta' nies ħielsa ppreseduti minn kelliem tal-liġi. Dawn il-korpi ta' deliberazzjoni kienu responsabbli għas-soluzzjoni ta' kwistjonijiet politiċi, u xi varjanti kienu jinkludu l-Althing fl-[[Iżlanda]] u l-Løgting fil-[[Gżejjer Faroe|Gżejjer Faeroe]]. Il-''veche'', fil-[[Ewropa tal-Lvant|Lvant tal-Ewropa]], kien korp simili għal dawk tal-Iskandinavja. Fil-[[Knisja Kattolika]] Rumana, il-[[Papa]] ilu jiġi elett minn [[konklav]] Papali magħmul mill-kardinali mill-1059. L-ewwel korp Parlamentari ddokumentat fl-Ewropa kien il-Cortes ta' [[León]]. Stabbilit minn [[Alfonsu IX|Alfonso IX]] fl-1188, il-Cortes kellu l-awtorità għall-iffissar tat-tassazzjoni, għall-affarijiet barranin u għal-leġiżlazzjoni, għalkemm in-natura eżatta tar-rwol tiegħu għadha kkontestata. Ir-Repubblika ta' [[Ragusa]], stabbilita fl-1358 u ċċentrata madwar il-belt ta' [[Dubrovnik]], ipprovdiet drittijiet ta' rappreżentanza u ta' votazzjoni lill-aristokrazija maskili tagħha biss. Diversi bliet-stati u sistemi ta' governanza Taljani kellhom forom ta' governanza repubblikani. Pereżempju, ir-Repubblika ta' [[Firenze]], stabbilita fl-1115, kienet immexxija mis-Signoria u l-membri tagħha kienu jintgħażlu bix-xorti. Fil-Frisja tas-sekli 10–15, soċjetà mhux fewdali distinta, id-dritt tal-votazzjoni dwar kwistjonijiet lokali u dwar l-uffiċjali tal-kontea kien ibbażat fuq id-daqs tal-art. Il-''Kouroukan Fouga'' qasam l-Imperu tal-[[Mali]] fi klans tat-tmexxija li kienu rrappreżentati f'ġemgħa kbira msejħa l-''Gbara''. Madankollu, id-dokument wassal biex il-Mali jkun iktar simili għal monarkija kostituzzjonali milli repubblika demokratika.

Il-Parlament tal-[[Renju Unit|Ingilterra]] kellu l-għeruq tiegħu fir-restrizzjonijiet tal-poter tar-rejiet miktubin fil-''Magna Carta'' (1215), li b'mod espliċitu ħarset ċerti drittijiet tas-sudditi tar-Re u b'mod impliċitu appoġġat dak li mbagħad sar id-digriet Ingliż tal-''habeas corpus'', li jissalvagwardja l-libertà individwali mill-ħabs illegali u li jagħti d-dritt tal-appell. L-ewwel assemblea nazzjonali rappreżentattiva fl-Ingilterra kienet il-Parlament ta' [[Simon de Montfort]] fl-1265. Il-preżenza tat-tressiq tal-petizzjonijiet hija fost l-iżjed evidenza bikrija tal-użu tal-Parlament bħala forum biex jiġi indirizzat it-tħassib ġenerali tan-nies ordinarji. Madankollu, is-setgħa tas-sejħa tal-Parlament baqgħet f'idejn il-monarka.

Xi studji kkollegaw l-istabbiliment tal-istituzzjonijiet Parlamentari fl-Ewropa matul il-Medju Evu mal-agglomerazzjonijiet urbani u mal-ħolqien ta' klassijiet ġodda, bħall-[[Artiġjan|artiġjani]], kif ukoll mal-preżenza tan-nobbli u tal-eliti reliġjużi. L-istudjużi kkollegaw ukoll l-istabbiliment tal-governanza rappreżentattiva mal-frammentazzjoni politika relattiva tal-Ewropa. Ix-xjenzat politiku [[David Stasavage]] jikkollega l-frammentazzjoni tal-Ewropa, u d-demokratizzazzjoni sussegwenti tagħha, mal-mod kif sfaxxa l-[[Imperu Ruman]]: it-territorju Ruman inħakem minn gruppi frammentati żgħar ta' tribujiet Ġermaniċi, u dan wassal għall-ħolqien ta' unitajiet politiċi żgħar fejn il-mexxejja kienu relattivament dgħajfin u kienu jeħtieġu l-kunsens taċ-ċittadini tagħhom biex jifilħu għat-theddidiet barranin.

Fil-[[Polonja]], id-demokrazija nobbli kienet ikkaratterizzata minn żieda fl-attività tan-nobbiltà nofsanija, li riedet iżżid is-sehem tagħha fl-eżerċitar tal-poter għas-spejjeż tal-manjati. Il-manjati ddominaw l-iżjed karigi importanti fl-istat (lajċi u ekkleżjastiċi) u kienu jinġabru fil-kunsill irjali, li iktar 'il quddiem sar is-senat. L-importanza dejjem tikber tan-nobbiltà nofsanija kellha impatt fuq l-istabbiliment tal-istituzzjoni tal-art magħrufa bħala s-''sejmik'' (assemblea lokali), li sussegwentement kisbet iktar drittijiet. Matul is-seklu 15 u l-ewwel nofs tas-seklu 16, is-sejmiks ingħataw iktar u iktar poter u saru l-iżjed istituzzjonijiet importanti tal-poter lokali. Fl-1454, [[Casimir IV Jagiellon]] ta lis-sejmiks id-dritt li jiddeċiedu dwar it-taxxi u li jorganizzaw mobilizzazzjoni tal-massa fl-Istatuti ta' Nieszawa. Huwa wiegħed ukoll li ma kienx se joħloq liġijiet ġodda mingħajr il-kunsens tagħhom.

=== Era moderna ===

==== Perjodu modern bikri ====
Fl-Ingilterra tas-[[seklu 17]], kien hemm interess imġedded fil-Manja Karta. Il-Parlament tal-Ingilterra għadda l-Petizzjoni tad-Drittijiet fl-1628 li stabbiliet ċerti libertajiet għas-sudditi. Il-Gwerra Ċivili Ingliża (1642–1651) ġiet miġġielda bejn ir-Re u Parlament oligarkiku iżda elett, u matul dan iż-żmien iffurmat l-idea ta' partit politiku, bi gruppi jiddibattu d-drittijiet għar-rappreżentanza politika matul id-Dibattiti ta' Putney tal-1647. Sussegwentement, il-Protettorat (1653–59) u l-Integrazzjoni mill-Ġdid Ingliża (1660) integraw iktar tmexxija awtokratika, għalkemm il-Parlament għadda l-Att dwar il-''Habeas Corpus'' fl-1679 li saħħaħ il-konvenzjoni li pprojbixxiet id-detenzjoni mingħajr biżżejjed raġunijiet jew evidenza. Wara r-Rivoluzzjoni Glorjuża tal-1688, il-Liġi tad-Drittijiet ġiet ippromulgata fl-1689 u din ikkodifikat ċerti drittijiet u libertajiet u għadha fis-seħħ. Il-liġi stabbiliet ir-rekwiżiti li jsiru elezzjonijiet regolari, ir-regoli għal-libertà tal-kelma fil-Parlament u limitat il-poter tal-monarka, u b'hekk żgurat, għad-differenza tal-biċċa l-kbira tal-Ewropa ta' dak iż-żmien, li l-assolutiżmu rjali ma jipprevalix. L-istoriċi ekonomiċi [[Douglass North]] u [[Barry Weingast]] ikkaratterizzaw l-istituzzjonijiet implimentati fir-Rivoluzzjoni Glorjuża bħala suċċess kbir f'termini tar-restrizzjonijiet tal-governanza u l-iżgurar tal-protezzjoni tad-drittijiet tal-proprjetà.

L-interess imġedded fil-Manja Karta, il-Gwerra Ċivili Ingliża, u r-Rivoluzzjoni Glorjuża fis-seklu 17 xprunaw it-tkabbir ta' filosofija politika fil-Gżejjer Brittaniċi. [[Thomas Hobbes]] kien l-ewwel filosfu li fassal teorija dettaljata dwar il-kuntratt soċjali. Fil-''Leviathan'' (1651), Hobbes ħareġ bit-teorija li l-individwi li jgħixu fin-natura kienu jgħixu ħajja &quot;solitarja, fqira, kerha, iebsa u qasira&quot; u kienu jagħmlu gwerer kontinwi kontra kulħadd. Sabiex tiġi evitata l-okkorrenza tal-istat anarkiku tan-natura, Hobbes irraġuna li l-individwi kienu jċedu d-drittijiet tagħhom lil qawwa awtoritarja setgħana. Fi kliem ieħor, Hobbes tkellem favur monarkija assoluta, li fl-opinjoni tiegħu kienet l-aqwa forma ta' governanza. Iktar 'il quddiem, il-filosfu u t-[[tabib]] [[John Locke]] ħareġ b'interpretazzjoni differenti dwar it-teorija tal-kuntratt soċjali. Fiż-''Żewġ Trattati tal-Governanza'' (1689) tiegħu, Locke sostna li l-individwi kollha kellhom id-drittijiet inaljenabbli għall-ħajja, għal-libertà u għall-proprjetà. Skont Locke, l-individwi kienu jinġabru volontarjament flimkien biex jiffurmaw stat bl-għan li jiddefendu drittijiethom. Għal Locke kienu partikolarment importanti d-drittijiet tal-proprjetà, li skont Locke kienu jirrikjedu l-ħarsien, li kien l-iskop primarju tal-gvern. Barra minn hekk, Locke sostna li l-gvernijiet kienu leġittimi biss jekk kellhom il-kunsens ta' dawk li kienu ggvernati. Skont Locke, iċ-ċittadini kellhom id-dritt jirribellaw kontra l-gvern jekk dan kien jaġixxi kontra l-interessi tagħhom jew isir tiranniku. Għalkemm ma tantx kienu moqrija matul ħajtu, ix-xogħlijiet ta' Locke jitqiesu bħala d-dokumenti li jsejsu l-ħsieb liberali u influwenzaw ferm il-mexxejja tar-Rivoluzzjoni Amerikana u iktar 'il quddiem ir-[[Rivoluzzjoni Franċiża]]. Il-qafas demokratiku liberali tiegħu tal-governanza għadu l-forma ewlenija tad-demokrazija fid-dinja.

Fir-repubbliki tal-Cossack tal-[[Ukrajna]] fis-sekli 16 u 17, l-Etmanat tal-Cossack u s-Sich ta' Zaporizhia, id-detentur tal-ogħla kariga ta' Hetman kien jiġi elett mir-rappreżentanti tad-distretti tal-pajjiż.

Fl-[[L-Amerika ta' Fuq|Amerka ta' Fuq]], il-governanza rappreżentattiva bdiet f'Jamestown, Virginia, bl-elezzjoni tal-Kamra tal-Burgesses (il-prekursur tal-Assemblea Ġenerali ta' Virginia) fl-1619. Il-Puritani Ingliżi li għamlu migrazzjoni mill-1620 stabbilew kolonji f'New England, fejn kien hemm governanza lokali demokratika; il-poter ta' dawn l-assemblej lokali kien ivarja ferm tul il-perjodu kolonjali. Madankollu, uffiċjalment kellhom ammonti żgħar ta' poter devolut, peress li l-awtorità aħħarija kienet f'idejn il-monarkija u l-Parlament. Il-Puritani, il-Battisti u l-Quakers li stabbilew dawn il-kolonji applikaw l-organizzazzjoni demokratika tal-kongregazzjonijiet tagħhom anke għall-amministrazzjoni tal-komunitajiet tagħhom fil-ħajja ta' kuljum.

==== Sekli 18 u 19 ====
L-ewwel Parlament tal-Gran Brittanja ġie stabbilit fl-1707, wara l-fużjoni tar-Renju tal-Ingilterra u r-Renju tal-[[Skozja|Iskozja]] skont l-Atti tal-Unjoni. Żewġ dokumenti ewlenin tal-kostituzzjoni mhux kodifikata tar-Renju Unit, id-Dikjarazzjoni Ingliża tad-Drittijiet tal-1689 (imsejħa mill-ġdid bħala l-Liġi dwar id-Drittijiet tal-1689) u d-Dikjarazzjoni Skoċċiża tad-Drittijiet tal-1689, it-tnejn li huma kienu kkonsolidaw il-pożizzjoni tal-Parlament bħala l-korp suprem tat-tfassil tal-liġijiet u kienu jgħidu li &quot;l-elezzjoni tal-membri tal-Parlament kellha tkun ħielsa&quot;. Madankollu, il-Parlament kien jiġi elett biss mis-sidien tal-art maskili, li kienu jammontaw għal 3 % tal-popolazzjoni fl-1780. L-ewwel persuna Brittanika magħrufa ta' nisel Afrikan li vvota f'elezzjoni ġenerali, [[Ignatius Sancho]], ivvota fl-1774 u fl-1780.

Matul l-Era tal-Libertà fl-[[Żvezja|Iżvezja]] (1718–1772), id-drittijiet ċivili twessgħu u l-poter għadda mingħand il-monarka għall-Parlament. Ir-raħħala intaxxati kienu rrappreżentati fil-Parlament, għalkemm ma tantx kellhom influwenza, iżda n-nies komuni mingħajr proprjetà intaxxata ma kellhomx suffraġju.

Il-ħolqien ta' Repubblika ta' [[Korsika]] ta' għomorha qasir fl-1755 kien tentattiv bikri li tiġi adottata kostituzzjoni demokratika (setgħu jivvutaw l-irġiel u n-nisa kollha li kellhom iktar minn 25 sena). Din il-Kostituzzjoni ta' Korsika kienet l-ewwel waħda bbażata fuq il-prinċipji tal-Illuminiżmu u kienet tinkludi s-suffraġju femminili, xi ħaġa li ma kinitx inkluża fil-biċċa l-kbira tad-demokraziji l-oħra sas-seklu 20.

L-Amerka kolonjali kellha kwalifikazzjonijiet simili dwar il-proprjetà bħall-Brittanja, u fil-perjodu qabel l-1776 l-abbundanza u d-disponibbiltà tal-art kienet tfisser li għadd kbir ta' kolonjalisti kienu jissodisfaw tali rekwiżiti b'mill-inqas 60 fil-mija tal-irġiel adulti ta' karnaġjon bajda li setgħu jivvutaw. Il-maġġoranza l-kbira tal-irġiel ta' karnaġjon bajda kienu [[Bidwi|bdiewa]] li kienu jissodisfaw ir-rekwiżiti tas-sjieda tal-proprjetà jew tal-ħlas tat-taxxa. Bi ftit eċċezzjonijiet, l-ebda mara jew persuna b'karnaġjon sewda ma setgħu jivvutaw. Vermont, li malli ddikjarat l-indipendenza mill-Gran Brittanja fl-1777, adottat kostituzzjoni mmudellata fuq iċ-ċittadinanza u s-suffraġju demokratiku ta' Pennsylvania għall-irġiel bi proprjetà jew mingħajr proprjetà. Il-Kostituzzjoni tal-Istati Uniti tal-1787 hija l-eqdem kostituzzjoni governattiva kkodifikata li għadha teżisti u li għadha attiva. Il-Kostituzzjoni kienet tipprevedi gvern elett u protezzjoni tad-drittijiet u tal-libertajiet ċivili, iżda ma temmitx il-jasar u lanqas ma estendiet id-drittijiet tal-votazzjoni fl-Istati Uniti, u minflok ħalliet il-kwistjoni tas-suffraġju f'idejn l-istati individwali. Ġeneralment, l-istati llimitaw is-suffraġju għas-sidien tal-proprjetà maskili u għal dawk li jħallsu t-taxxi ta' karnaġjon bajda. Meta kien hemm l-ewwel elezzjoni Presidenzjali fl-1789, madwar 6 % tal-popolazzjoni kienet eliġibbli biex tivvota. L-Att dwar in-Naturalizzazzjoni tal-1790 illimita ċ-ċittadinanza Amerikana lill-persuni ta' karnaġjon bajda biss. Il-Liġi tad-Drittijiet fl-1791 stabbiliet limiti fuq il-poter tal-gvern sabiex tħares il-libertajiet personali iżda kellha ftit impatt fuq is-sentenzi tal-qrati għall-ewwel 130 sena wara r-ratifika.

Fl-1789, [[Franza]] Rivoluzzjonarja adottat id-Dikjarazzjoni tad-Drittijiet tal-Bniedem u taċ-Ċittadini, u għalkemm għomorha kien qasir, il-Konvenzjoni Nazzjonali kienet eletta mill-irġiel kollha biss fl-1792. Il-Kostituzzjoni Pollakka-[[Litwanja|Litwana]] tat-3 ta' Mejju 1791 ippruvat timplimenta monarkija kostituzzjonali iktar effettiva, introduċiet l-ugwaljanza politika bejn iċ-ċittadini u n-nobbli, u poġġiet ir-raħħala taħt il-protezzjoni tal-gvern, u b'hekk taffiet l-agħar abbużi kontra r-raħħala. Din damet fis-seħħ għal inqas minn 19-il xahar, u ġiet iddikjarata nulla mis-Sejm ta' Grodno li ltaqa' fl-1793. Minkejja dan, il-Kostituzzjoni tal-1791 għenet biex l-aspirazzjonijiet tal-Pollakki jibqgħu ħajjin għar-restawr eventwali tas-sovranità tal-pajjiż iktar minn seklu wara.

In the United States, the 1828 presidential election was the first in which non-property-holding white males could vote in the vast majority of states. Voter turnout soared during the 1830s, reaching about 80% of the adult white male population in the 1840 presidential election. North Carolina was the last state to abolish property qualification in 1856 resulting in a close approximation to universal white male suffrage (however tax-paying requirements remained in five states in 1860 and survived in two states until the 20th century). In the 1860 United States census, the slave population had grown to four million, and in Reconstruction after the Civil War, three constitutional amendments were passed: the 13th Amendment (1865) that ended slavery; the 14th Amendment (1869) that gave black people citizenship, and the 15th Amendment (1870) that gave black males a nominal right to vote. Full enfranchisement of citizens was not secured until after the civil rights movement gained passage by the US Congress of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The voting franchise in the United Kingdom was expanded and made more uniform in a series of reforms that began with the Reform Act 1832 and continued into the 20th century, notably with the Representation of the People Act 1918 and the Equal Franchise Act 1928. Universal male suffrage was established in France in March 1848 in the wake of the French Revolution of 1848. During that year, several revolutions broke out in Europe as rulers were confronted with popular demands for liberal constitutions and more democratic government.

In 1876, the Ottoman Empire transitioned from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional one, and held two elections the next year to elect members to her newly formed parliament. Provisional Electoral Regulations were issued, stating that the elected members of the Provincial Administrative Councils would elect members to the first Parliament. Later that year, a new constitution was promulgated, which provided for a bicameral Parliament with a Senate appointed by the Sultan and a popularly elected Chamber of Deputies. Only men above the age of 30 who were competent in Turkish and had full civil rights were allowed to stand for election. Reasons for disqualification included holding dual citizenship, being employed by a foreign government, being bankrupt, employed as a servant, or having &quot;notoriety for ill deeds&quot;. Full universal suffrage was achieved in 1934.

In 1893, the self-governing colony New Zealand became the first country in the world (except for the short-lived 18th-century Corsican Republic) to establish active universal suffrage by recognizing women as having the right to vote.

==== Sekli 20 u 21 ====
20th-century transitions to liberal democracy have come in successive &quot;waves of democracy&quot;, variously resulting from wars, revolutions, decolonisation, and religious and economic circumstances. Global waves of &quot;democratic regression&quot; reversing democratization, have also occurred in the 1920s and 30s, in the 1960s and 1970s, and in the 2010s.

World War I and the dissolution of the autocratic Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian empires resulted in the creation of new nation-states in Europe, most of them at least nominally democratic. In the 1920s democratic movements flourished and women's suffrage advanced, but the Great Depression brought disenchantment and most of the countries of Europe, Latin America, and Asia turned to strong-man rule or dictatorships. Fascism and dictatorships flourished in Nazi Germany, Italy, Spain and Portugal, as well as non-democratic governments in the Baltics, the Balkans, Brazil, Cuba, China, and Japan, among others.

World War II brought a definitive reversal of this trend in Western Europe. The democratisation of the American, British, and French sectors of occupied Germany (disputed), Austria, Italy, and the occupied Japan served as a model for the later theory of government change. However, most of Eastern Europe, including the Soviet sector of Germany fell into the non-democratic Soviet-dominated bloc.

The war was followed by decolonisation, and again most of the new independent states had nominally democratic constitutions. India emerged as the world's largest democracy and continues to be so. Countries that were once part of the British Empire often adopted the British Westminster system.

In 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights mandated democracy:&lt;blockquote&gt;3. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.&lt;/blockquote&gt;— Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 21, United Nations, 1948

By 1960, the vast majority of country-states were nominally democracies, although most of the world's populations lived in nominal democracies that experienced sham elections, and other forms of subterfuge (particularly in &quot;Communist&quot; states and the former colonies). A subsequent wave of democratisation brought substantial gains toward true liberal democracy for many states, dubbed &quot;third wave of democracy&quot;. Portugal, Spain, and several of the military dictatorships in South America returned to civilian rule in the 1970s and 1980s. This was followed by countries in East and South Asia by the mid-to-late 1980s. Economic malaise in the 1980s, along with resentment of Soviet oppression, contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union, the associated end of the Cold War, and the democratisation and liberalisation of the former Eastern bloc countries. The most successful of the new democracies were those geographically and culturally closest to western Europe, and they are now either part of the European Union or candidate states. In 1986, after the toppling of the most prominent Asian dictatorship, the only democratic state of its kind at the time emerged in the Philippines with the rise of Corazon Aquino, who would later be known as the mother of Asian democracy.

The liberal trend spread to some states in Africa in the 1990s, most prominently in South Africa. Some recent examples of attempts of liberalisation include the Indonesian Revolution of 1998, the Bulldozer Revolution in Yugoslavia, the Rose Revolution in Georgia, the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, the Cedar Revolution in Lebanon, the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan, and the Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia.

According to Freedom House, in 2007 there were 123 electoral democracies (up from 40 in 1972). According to ''World Forum on Democracy'', electoral democracies now represent 120 of the 192 existing countries and constitute 58.2 per cent of the world's population. At the same time liberal democracies i.e. countries Freedom House regards as free and respectful of basic human rights and the rule of law are 85 in number and represent 38 per cent of the global population. Also in 2007 the United Nations declared 15 September the International Day of Democracy.

Many countries reduced their voting age to 18 years; the major democracies began to do so in the 1970s starting in Western Europe and North America.&lt;sup&gt;[''failed verification'']&lt;/sup&gt; Most electoral democracies continue to exclude those younger than 18 from voting. The voting age has been lowered to 16 for national elections in a number of countries, including Brazil, Austria, Cuba, and Nicaragua. In California, a 2004 proposal to permit a quarter vote at 14 and a half vote at 16 was ultimately defeated. In 2008, the German parliament proposed but shelved a bill that would grant the vote to each citizen at birth, to be used by a parent until the child claims it for themselves.

According to Freedom House, starting in 2005, there have been 17 consecutive years in which declines in political rights and civil liberties throughout the world have outnumbered improvements, as populist and nationalist political forces have gained ground everywhere from Poland (under the Law and Justice party) to the Philippines (under Rodrigo Duterte). In a Freedom House report released in 2018, Democracy Scores for most countries declined for the 12th consecutive year. ''The Christian Science Monitor'' reported that nationalist and populist political ideologies were gaining ground, at the expense of rule of law, in countries like Poland, Turkey and Hungary. For example, in Poland, the President appointed 27 new Supreme Court judges over legal objections from the European Commission. In Turkey, thousands of judges were removed from their positions following a failed coup attempt during a government crackdown .

&quot;Democratic backsliding&quot; in the 2010s were attributed to economic inequality and social discontent, personalism, poor government's management of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as other factors such as manipulation of civil society, &quot;toxic polarization&quot;, foreign disinformation campaigns, racism and nativism, excessive executive power, and decreased power of the opposition. Within English-speaking Western democracies, &quot;protection-based&quot; attitudes combining cultural conservatism and leftist economic attitudes were the strongest predictor of support for authoritarian modes of governance.

== Teorija ==
=== Teorija bikrija ===
Aristotle's '''democratic theory''' contrasted rule by the many (democracy/timocracy), with rule by the few (oligarchy/aristocracy/elitism), and with rule by a single person (tyranny/autocracy/absolute monarchy). He also thought that there was a good and a bad variant of each system (he considered democracy to be the degenerate counterpart to timocracy).

A common view among early and renaissance Republican theorists was that democracy could only survive in small political communities. Heeding the lessons of the Roman Republic's shift to monarchism as it grew larger or smaller, these Republican theorists held that the expansion of territory and population inevitably led to tyranny. Democracy was therefore highly fragile and rare historically, as it could only survive in small political units, which due to their size were vulnerable to conquest by larger political units. Montesquieu famously said, &quot;if a republic is small, it is destroyed by an outside force; if it is large, it is destroyed by an internal vice.&quot; Jean-Jacques Rousseau asserted, &quot;It is, therefore the natural property of small states to be governed as a republic, of middling ones to be subject to a monarch, and of large empires to be swayed by a despotic prince.&quot;

=== Teorija kontemporanja ===
Fost it-teoriji politiċi moderni, jeżistu kunċetti fundamentali differenti tad-demokrazija.

==== Aggregazzjoni ====
The theory of aggregative democracy claims that the aim of the democratic processes is to solicit citizens' preferences and aggregate them together to determine what social policies society should adopt. Therefore, proponents of this view hold that democratic participation should primarily focus on voting, where the policy with the most votes gets implemented. Different variants of aggregative democracy exist.

According to the minimalist democracy conception, elections are a mechanism for competition between politicians. Joseph Schumpeter articulated this view famously in his book ''Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy''.

Anthony Downs argues that ideological political parties are necessary to act as a mediating broker between individuals and governments. On the other hand, direct democracy, where citizens vote directly on legislative proposals, can show better aggregation in cases of differences in preferences between elites and voters.

===== Mandat medjan =====
According to the median voter theorem the political representativeness can be evaluated by comparing how close laws and policies are to the views of the median voter along the political spectrum. The ''median mandate'' views the preferences of the median voter as granting political legitimacy.

==== Poliarkija ====
Robert A. Dahl argues that the fundamental democratic principle is that, when it comes to binding collective decisions, each person in a political community is entitled to have his/her interests be given equal consideration. He uses the term polyarchy (&quot;rule by many&quot;) to refer to societies in which there exists a certain set of institutions and procedures which are perceived as leading to such democracy. First and foremost among these institutions is the regular occurrence of free and open elections which are used to select representatives who then manage all or most of the public policy of the society. However, these polyarchic procedures may not create a full democracy if, for example, poverty prevents political participation. Similarly, Ronald Dworkin argues that &quot;democracy is a substantive, not a merely procedural, ideal.&quot;

==== Deliberazzjoni ====
Deliberative democracy is based on the notion that democracy is government by deliberation. Unlike aggregative democracy, deliberative democracy holds that, for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by authentic deliberation, not merely the aggregation of preferences that occurs in voting. Authentic deliberation is deliberation among decision-makers that is free from distortions of unequal political power, such as power a decision-maker obtained through economic wealth or the support of interest groups. If the decision-makers cannot reach consensus after authentically deliberating on a proposal, then they vote on the proposal using a form of majority rule. Citizens assemblies are considered by many scholars as practical examples of deliberative democracy, with a recent OECD report identifying citizens assemblies as an increasingly popular mechanism to involve citizens in governmental decision-making. Proponents of direct democracy view citizens do not rule themselves unless they directly decide laws and policies. Political activity can be valuable in itself, it socialises and educates citizens, and popular participation can check powerful elites.

==== Tipi ta' demokraziji governattivi ====
Democracy has taken a number of forms, both in theory and practice. Some varieties of democracy provide better representation and more freedom for their citizens than others. However, if any democracy is not structured to prohibit the government from excluding the people from the legislative process, or any branch of government from altering the separation of powers in its favour, then a branch of the system can accumulate too much power and destroy the democracy.

The following kinds of democracy are not exclusive of one another: many specify details of aspects that are independent of one another and can co-exist in a single system.

===== Forom bażiċi =====
Several variants of democracy exist, but there are two basic forms, both of which concern how the whole body of all eligible citizens executes its will. One form of democracy is direct democracy, in which all eligible citizens have active participation in the political decision making, for example voting on policy initiatives directly. In most modern democracies, the whole body of eligible citizens remain the sovereign power but political power is exercised indirectly through elected representatives; this is called a representative democracy.

If the head of state is democratically elected then the polity is called a democratic republic

====== Demokrazija diretta ======
Direct democracy is a political system where the citizens participate in the decision-making personally, contrary to relying on intermediaries or representatives. Proponents like Jean-Jacques Rousseau argue the direct approach increases legitimacy. A direct democracy gives the voting population the power to:

* Change constitutional laws,
* Put forth initiatives, referendums and suggestions for laws

Within modern-day representative governments, certain electoral tools like referendums, citizens' initiatives and recall elections are referred to as forms of direct democracy. However, some advocates of direct democracy argue for local assemblies of face-to-face discussion. Direct democracy as a government system currently exists in the Swiss cantons of Appenzell Innerrhoden and Glarus, the Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipalities, communities affiliated with the CIPO-RFM, the Bolivian city councils of FEJUVE, and Kurdish cantons of Rojava.

====== Demokrazija semidiretta ======
Some modern democracies that are predominantly representative in nature also heavily rely upon forms of political action that are directly democratic. These democracies, which combine elements of representative democracy and direct democracy, are termed ''semi-direct democracies'' or ''participatory democracies''. Examples include Switzerland and some U.S. states, where frequent use is made of referendums and initiatives.

The Swiss confederation is a semi-direct democracy. At the federal level, citizens can propose changes to the constitution (federal popular initiative) or ask for a referendum to be held on any law voted by the parliament. Between January 1995 and June 2005, Swiss citizens voted 31 times, to answer 103 questions (during the same period, French citizens participated in only two referendums). Although in the past 120 years less than 250 initiatives have been put to referendum.

Examples include the extensive use of referendums in the US state of California, which is a state that has more than 20 million voters.

In New England, town meetings are often used, especially in rural areas, to manage local government. This creates a hybrid form of government, with a local direct democracy and a representative state government. For example, most Vermont towns hold annual town meetings in March in which town officers are elected, budgets for the town and schools are voted on, and citizens have the opportunity to speak and be heard on political matters.

====== Sistema tax-xorti ======
The use of a lot system, a characteristic of Athenian democracy, is a feature of some versions of direct democracies. In this system, important governmental and administrative tasks are performed by citizens picked from a lottery.

====== Demokrazija rappreżentattiva ======
Representative democracy involves the election of government officials by the people being represented. The most common mechanisms involve election of the candidate with a majority or a plurality of the votes. Most western countries have representative systems.

Representatives may be elected or become diplomatic representatives by a particular district (or constituency), or represent the entire electorate through proportional systems, with some using a combination of the two. Some representative democracies also incorporate elements of direct democracy, such as referendums. A characteristic of representative democracy is that while the representatives are elected by the people to act in the people's interest, they retain the freedom to exercise their own judgement as how best to do so. Such reasons have driven criticism upon representative democracy, pointing out the contradictions of representation mechanisms with democracy.

====== Demokrazija Parlamentari ======
Parliamentary democracy is a representative democracy where government is appointed by or can be dismissed by, representatives as opposed to a &quot;presidential rule&quot; wherein the president is both head of state and the head of government and is elected by the voters. Under a parliamentary democracy, government is exercised by delegation to an executive ministry and subject to ongoing review, checks and balances by the legislative parliament elected by the people.

In a parliamentary system, the prime minister may be dismissed by the legislature at any point in time for not meeting the expectations of the legislature. This is done through a vote of no confidence where the legislature decides whether or not to remove the prime minister from office with majority support for dismissal. In some countries, the prime minister can also call an election at any point in time, typically when the prime minister believes that they are in good favour with the public as to get re-elected. In other parliamentary democracies, extra elections are virtually never held, a minority government being preferred until the next ordinary elections. An important feature of the parliamentary democracy is the concept of the &quot;loyal opposition&quot;. The essence of the concept is that the second largest political party (or opposition) opposes the governing party (or coalition), while still remaining loyal to the state and its democratic principles.

====== Demokrazija Presidenzjali ======
Presidential democracy is a system where the public elects the president through an election. The president serves as both the head of state and head of government controlling most of the executive powers. The president serves for a specific term and cannot exceed that amount of time. The legislature often has limited ability to remove a president from office. Elections typically have a fixed date and are not easily changed. The president has direct control over the cabinet, specifically appointing the cabinet members.

The executive usually has the responsibility to execute or implement legislation and may have the limited legislative powers, such as a veto. However, a legislative branch passes legislation and budgets. This provides some measure of separation of powers. In consequence, however, the president and the legislature may end up in the control of separate parties, allowing one to block the other and thereby interfere with the orderly operation of the state. This may be the reason why presidential democracy is not very common outside the Americas, Africa, and Central and Southeast Asia.

A semi-presidential system is a system of democracy in which the government includes both a prime minister and a president. The particular powers held by the prime minister and president vary by country.

==== Tipoloġija ====

===== Monarkija kostituzzjonali =====
Many countries such as the United Kingdom, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Scandinavian countries, Thailand, Japan and Bhutan turned powerful monarchs into constitutional monarchs (often gradually) with limited or symbolic roles. For example, in the predecessor states to the United Kingdom, constitutional monarchy began to emerge and has continued uninterrupted since the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and passage of the Bill of Rights 1689. Strongly limited constitutional monarchies, such as the United Kingdom, have been referred to as crowned republics by writers such as H. G. Wells.

In other countries, the monarchy was abolished along with the aristocratic system (as in France, China, Russia, Germany, Austria, Hungary, Italy, Greece, and Egypt). An elected person, with or without significant powers, became the head of state in these countries.

Elite upper houses of legislatures, which often had lifetime or hereditary tenure, were common in many states. Over time, these either had their powers limited (as with the British House of Lords) or else became elective and remained powerful (as with the Australian Senate).

===== Demokrazija repubblika =====
The term ''republic'' has many different meanings, but today often refers to a representative democracy with an elected head of state, such as a president, serving for a limited term, in contrast to states with a hereditary monarch as a head of state, even if these states also are representative democracies with an elected or appointed head of government such as a prime minister.

The Founding Fathers of the United States often criticised direct democracy; James Madison argued, especially in ''The Federalist'' No. 10, that what distinguished a direct ''democracy'' from a ''republic'' was that the former depended on small size and suffered more violently from the effects of faction, whereas a republic could get stronger as it got larger and combats faction by its very structure. Accordingly, during Philadelphia convention Madison called election of representatives by large territories &quot;the only defence against the inconveniencies of democracy consistent with the democratic form of Govt.&quot;

Professors Richard Ellis of Willamette University and Michael Nelson of Rhodes College argue that much constitutional thought, from Madison to Lincoln and beyond, has focused on &quot;the problem of majority tyranny&quot;. They conclude, &quot;The principles of republican government embedded in the Constitution represent an effort by the framers to ensure that the inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness would not be trampled by majorities.&quot; What was critical to American values, John Adams insisted, was that the government be &quot;bound by fixed laws, which the people have a voice in making, and a right to defend.&quot; As Benjamin Franklin was exiting after writing the US Constitution, Elizabeth Willing Powel asked him &quot;Well, Doctor, what have we got—a republic or a monarchy?&quot;. He replied &quot;A republic—if you can keep it.&quot;

===== Demokrazija liberali =====
A liberal democracy is a representative democracy which enshrines a liberal political philosophy, where the ability of the elected representatives to exercise decision-making power is subject to the rule of law, moderated by a constitution or laws such as the protection of the rights and freedoms of individuals, and constrained on the extent to which the will of the majority can be exercised against the rights of minorities.

===== Demokrazija Soċjalista =====
Socialist thought has several different views on democracy, for example social democracy or democratic socialism. Many democratic socialists and social democrats believe in a form of participatory, industrial, economic and/or workplace democracy combined with a representative democracy.

===== Demokrazija Marxista =====
Marxist theory supports a democratic society centering the working class. Some Marxists and Trotskyists believe in direct democracy or workers' councils (which are sometimes called soviets). This system can begin with workplace democracy and can manifest itself as soviet democracy or dictatorship of the proletariat. Trotskyist groups have interpreted socialist democracy to be synonymous with multi-party far-left representation, autonomous union organizations, worker's control of production, internal party democracy and the mass participation of the working masses. Some communist parties support a soviet republic with democratic centralism. Within democracy in Marxism there can be hostility to what is commonly called &quot;liberal democracy&quot;.

===== Demokrazija Anarkista =====
Anarchists are split in this domain, depending on whether they believe that a majority-rule is tyrannic or not. To many anarchists, the only form of democracy considered acceptable is direct democracy. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon argued that the only acceptable form of direct democracy is one in which it is recognised that majority decisions are not binding on the minority, even when unanimous. However, anarcho-communist Murray Bookchin criticised individualist anarchists for opposing democracy, and says &quot;majority rule&quot; is consistent with anarchism.

Some anarcho-communists oppose the majoritarian nature of direct democracy, feeling that it can impede individual liberty and opt-in favour of a non-majoritarian form of consensus democracy, similar to Proudhon's position on direct democracy.

===== Demokrazija każwali =====
Sortition is the process of choosing decision-making bodies via a random selection. These bodies can be more representative of the opinions and interests of the people at large than an elected legislature or other decision-maker. The technique was in widespread use in Athenian Democracy and Renaissance Florence and is still used in modern jury selection and citizens' assemblies.

===== Demokrazija Kostituzzjonali =====
Consociational democracy, also called consociationalism, is a form of democracy based on power-sharing formula between elites representing the social groups within the society. In 1969, Arendt Lijphart argued this would stabilize democracies with factions. A consociational democracy allows for simultaneous majority votes in two or more ethno-religious constituencies, and policies are enacted only if they gain majority support from both or all of them. The Qualified majority voting rule in European Council of Ministers is a consociational democracy approach for supranational democracies. This system in Treaty of Rome allocates votes to member states in part according to their population, but heavily weighted in favour of the smaller states. A consociational democracy requires consensus of representatives, while consensus democracy requires consensus of electorate.

===== Demokrazija maġġoritarja =====
Majoritarian democracy is a form of democracy based upon a principle of majority rule. Majoritarian democracy contrasts with consensus democracy, rule by as many people as possible.

===== Konsensus =====
Consensus democracy requires consensus decision-making and supermajority to obtain a larger support than majority. In contrast, in majoritarian democracy minority opinions can potentially be ignored by vote-winning majorities. Constitutions typically require consensus or supermajorities.

===== Demokrazija etnika =====
The term ethnic democracy, as used by some political scientists, purports to describe a governance system that combines a structured ethnic dominance with democratic, political and civil rights for all. Both the dominant ethnic group—typically an ethnic majority—and the minority ethnic groups have citizenship and are able to fully participate in the political process. However, critics of the &quot;ethnic democracy&quot; model argue it is a contradiction in terms, and thus conceptually inadequate or confusing; these critics allege that purported ethnic democracies, most notably Israel, are not democratic at all, or are at best a sort of semi-democracy.

===== Demokrazija inklużiva =====
Inclusive democracy is a political theory and political project that aims for direct democracy in all fields of social life: political democracy in the form of face-to-face assemblies which are confederated, economic democracy in a stateless, moneyless and marketless economy, democracy in the social realm, i.e. self-management in places of work and education, and ecological democracy which aims to reintegrate society and nature. The theoretical project of inclusive democracy emerged from the work of political philosopher Takis Fotopoulos in &quot;Towards An Inclusive Democracy&quot; and was further developed in the journal ''Democracy &amp; Nature'' and its successor ''The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy''.

===== Politika parteċipattiva =====
A parpolity or participatory polity is a theoretical form of democracy that is ruled by a nested council structure. The guiding philosophy is that people should have decision-making power in proportion to how much they are affected by the decision. Local councils of 25–50 people are completely autonomous on issues that affect only them, and these councils send delegates to higher level councils who are again autonomous regarding issues that affect only the population affected by that council.

A council court of randomly chosen citizens serves as a check on the tyranny of the majority, and rules on which body gets to vote on which issue. Delegates may vote differently from how their sending council might wish but are mandated to communicate the wishes of their sending council. Delegates are recallable at any time. Referendums are possible at any time via votes of lower-level councils, however, not everything is a referendum as this is most likely a waste of time. A parpolity is meant to work in tandem with a participatory economy.

===== Demokrazija proċedurali =====
Procedural democracy or proceduralist democracy, proceduralism or hollow democracy is a term used to denote the particular procedures, such as regular elections based on universal suffrage, that produce an electorally-legitimated government. Procedural democracy, with its centering of electoral processes as the basis of democratic legitimacy, is often contrasted with substantive or participatory democracy, which centers the equal participation of all groups in society in the political process as the basis of legitimacy.

===== Demokrazija radikali =====
Radical democracy is based on the idea that there are hierarchical and oppressive power relations that exist in society. Radical democracy's role is to make visible and challenge those relations by allowing for difference, dissent and antagonisms in decision-making processes.

===== Demokrazija reliġjuża =====
Religious democracy is a form of democracy where the values of a particular religion or state religion are preferred. The term applies to all democratic countries in which religion is incorporated into the form of government.

===== Demokrazija kożmopolitana =====
Cosmopolitan democracy, also known as ''global democracy'' or ''world federalism'', is a political system in which democracy is implemented on a global scale, either directly or through representatives. An important justification for this kind of system is that the decisions made in national or regional democracies often affect people outside the constituency who, by definition, cannot vote. By contrast, in a cosmopolitan democracy, the people who are affected by decisions also have a say in them.

According to its supporters, any attempt to solve global problems is undemocratic without some form of cosmopolitan democracy. The general principle of cosmopolitan democracy is to expand some or all of the values and norms of democracy, including the rule of law; the non-violent resolution of conflicts; and equality among citizens, beyond the limits of the state. To be fully implemented, this would require reforming existing international organisations, e.g., the United Nations, as well as the creation of new institutions such as a World Parliament, which ideally would enhance public control over, and accountability in, international politics.

Cosmopolitan democracy has been promoted, among others, by physicist Albert Einstein, writer Kurt Vonnegut, columnist George Monbiot, and professors David Held and Daniele Archibugi. The creation of the International Criminal Court in 2003 was seen as a major step forward by many supporters of this type of cosmopolitan democracy.

===== Demokrazija kreattiva =====
Creative democracy is advocated by American philosopher John Dewey. The main idea about creative democracy is that democracy encourages individual capacity building and the interaction among the society. Dewey argues that democracy is a way of life in his work of &quot;Creative Democracy: The Task Before Us&quot; and an experience built on faith in human nature, faith in human beings, and faith in working with others. Democracy, in Dewey's view, is a moral ideal requiring actual effort and work by people; it is not an institutional concept that exists outside of ourselves. &quot;The task of democracy&quot;, Dewey concludes, &quot;is forever that of creation of a freer and more humane experience in which all share and to which all contribute&quot;.

===== Demokrazija ggwidata =====
Guided democracy is a form of democracy that incorporates regular popular elections, but which often carefully &quot;guides&quot; the choices offered to the electorate in a manner that may reduce the ability of the electorate to truly determine the type of government exercised over them. Such democracies typically have only one central authority which is often not subject to meaningful public review by any other governmental authority. Russian-style democracy has often been referred to as a &quot;guided democracy&quot;. Russian politicians have referred to their government as having only one center of power/ authority, as opposed to most other forms of democracy which usually attempt to incorporate two or more naturally competing sources of authority within the same government.

=== Tfittxija ta' fehim komuni ===
The search for a common approach to conceptualize, measure and compare democracy remains a challenge in modern political science. This challenge strikes through to measuring, assessing and comparing the quality of democracy, as Seva Gunitsky pointed in 2015 in the Washington Post, based upon his research for ''Ranking the World – Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance'', that measuring democracy can mislead as much as clarify – a problem for academics, policy-makers and anyone who cares about democracy.

In his contribution ''Lost in the Gray Zone: Competing Measures of Democracy in the Former Soviet Republics'' to ''Ranking the World'', he, on the example of former Soviet republics, examines fundamental problems with measures of democracy, observing that indices often disagree and occasionally draw contradictory conclusions from observing the same event. He argues, that this reflects inherent tradeoffs in conceptualizing democratic governance, which arise from fundamental normative disagreements about a highly contested concept.

In 2011, Michael Coppedge, John Gerring et al. proposed an approach to such conceptualization and measurement. In their paper ''Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach'' they review some of the weaknesses among contemporary and older approaches, then lay out their approach, characterizing it as ''historical'', ''multidimensional'', ''disaggregated'', and ''transparent''. The authors propose to create a new set of four features to conceptualize and measure democracy. First, ''historical'', extending indicators of democracy back through modern history, wherever possible. Second, a ''multidimensional'' approach to the problem of conceptualizing democracy. Third, to collect information relevant to democracy at a highly ''disaggregated'' level. Fourth, ''transparent'', a strategy for data collection and presentation that should enhance the precision, validity, transparency, and legitimacy of the resulting indicators. They also sum up the conceptions, and/or aspects, of democracy into six – ''electoral'', ''liberal'', ''majoritarian'', ''participatory'', ''deliberative'', and ''egalitarian'', which taken together offer a fairly comprehensive accounting of the concept of democracy as it is employed today (see overview in the table below).
{| class=&quot;wikitable&quot;
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |Conceptions of democracy by Michael Coppedge, John Gerring et al., 2011
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
| 
| 
|Principles
|Question
|Institutions
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|I.
|'''Electoral'''
|Contestation, competition
|Are government offices filled by free and fair multiparty elections?
|Elections, political parties, competitiveness and turnover
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|II.
|'''Liberal'''
|Limited government, multiple veto points, horizontal accountability, individual rights, civil liberties, transparency
|Is political power decentralized &amp; constrained?
|Multiple, independent, and decentralized, with special focus on the role of the media, interest groups, the judiciary, and a written constitution with explicit guarantees
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|III.
|'''Majoritarian'''
|Majority rule, centralization, vertical accountability
|Does the majority (or plurality) rule?
|Consolidated and centralized, with special focus on the role of political parties
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|IV.
|'''Participatory'''
|Government by the people
|Do ordinary citizens participate in politics?
|Election law, civil society, local government, direct democracy
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|V.
|'''Deliberative'''
|Government by reason
|Are political decisions the product of public deliberation?
|Media, hearings, panels, other deliberative bodies
|- valign=&quot;top&quot;
|VI.
|'''Egalitarian'''
|Political equality
|Are all citizens equally empowered?
|Designed to ensure equal participation, representation, protection, and politically relevant resources
|-
| colspan=&quot;5&quot; |
----
|}

=== Measurement of democracy ===
Main article: Measurement of democracy

Measurement of democracy varies according to the different fundamental conceptions of democracy. Minimalist democracy evaluations focus on free and fair elections, while maximalist democracy evaluates additional values, such as human rights, deliberation, economic outcomes or state capacity.

== Demokrazija mhux governattiva ==
Aside from the public sphere, similar democratic principles and mechanisms of voting and representation have been used to govern other kinds of groups. Many non-governmental organisations decide policy and leadership by voting. Most trade unions and cooperatives are governed by democratic elections. Corporations are ultimately governed by their shareholders through shareholder democracy. Corporations may also employ systems such as workplace democracy to handle internal governance. Amitai Etzioni has postulated a system that fuses elements of democracy with sharia law, termed Islamic democracy or ''Islamocracy''. There is also a growing number of Democratic educational institutions such as Sudbury schools that are co-governed by students and staff.

=== Demokrazija tal-azzjonisti ===
Shareholder democracy is a concept relating to the governance of corporations by their shareholders. In the United States, shareholders are typically granted voting rights according to the one share, one vote principle. Shareholders may vote annually to elect the company's board of directors, who themselves may choose the company's executives. The shareholder democracy framework may be inaccurate for companies which have different classes of stock that further alter the distribution of voting rights.

== Ġustifikazzjoni ==
Ingħataw diversi ġustifikazzjonijiet għad-demokrazija.

=== Leġittimità ===
Social contract theory argues that the legitimacy of government is based on consent of the governed, i.e. an election, and that political decisions must reflect the general will. The public legitimacy of democracy varies by country, in some countries religious texts have more public support than the will of the people.

=== Teħid ta' deċiżjonijiet aħjar ===
Condorcet's jury theorem is logical proof that if each decision-maker has a better than chance probability of making the right decision, then having the largest number of decision-makers, i.e. a democracy, will result in the best decisions. This has also been argued by theories of the wisdom of the crowd. Democracy tends to improve conflict resolution.

=== Suċċess ekonomiku ===
In ''Why Nations Fail'', economists Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson argue that democracies are more economically successful because undemocratic political systems tend to limit markets and favor monopolies at the expense of the creative destruction which is necessary for sustained economic growth.

A 2019 study by Acemoglu and others estimated that countries switching to democratic from authoritarian rule had on average a 20% higher GDP after 25 years than if they had remained authoritarian. The study examined 122 transitions to democracy and 71 transitions to authoritarian rule, occurring from 1960 to 2010. Acemoglu said this was because democracies tended to invest more in health care and human capital, and reduce special treatment of regime allies.

A 2023 study analyzed the long-term effects of democracy on economic prosperity using new data on GDP per capita and democracy for a dataset between 1789 and 2019. The results indicate that democracy substantially increases economic development.

Unemployment is associated with anti-democratic beliefs.

== Kritika ==
Democracy as a concept and as a practical form of government has been the subject of critique throughout history. Some critics consider that democratic regimes often fail to be true to the highest principles expected of them, while others reject the values promoted by constitutional democracy in whole or part.

Opposition to democracy goes as far back as Plato, who argued for a 'government of the best qualified'. More recently, James Madison extensively studied historic attempts at and arguments on democracy in his preparation for the Constitutional Convention, and Winston Churchill remarked that &quot;no one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.&quot;

Critics argue that modern democracies may fail to be sufficiently democratic and instead function in practice as oligarchies, insofar as governments are more responsive to the preferences of economic elites than to those of ordinary citizens. Numerous empirical studies across various western democracies including the United States, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Canada, Norway and Germany have consistently found that elected representatives tend to respond more to the preferences of very affluent citizens for policy outcomes than those of the average voter.

Some critics of democracy have highlighted the concept's inconsistencies, paradoxes, and limits: drawing contrasts with other forms of government, such as epistocracy or lottocracy. Others have characterized most modern democracies as democratic polyarchies and democratic aristocracies. Yet others have identified fascist moments in modern democracies. They have termed the societies produced by modern democracies as neo-feudal and have contrasted democracy with fascism, anarcho-capitalism, theocracy, and absolute monarchy.

== Tranżizzjonijiet demokratiċi ==
A democratic transition describes a phase in a country's political system, often created as a result of an incomplete change from an authoritarian regime to a democratic one (or vice versa).

=== Demokratizzazzjoni ===
Democratization, or democratisation, is the structural government transition from an authoritarian government to a more democratic political regime, including substantive political changes moving in a democratic direction. The opposite process of democratic transition is known as democratic backsliding or autocratization. Whether and to what extent democratization occurs can be influenced by various factors, including economic development, historical legacies, civil society, and international processes. Some accounts of democratization emphasize how elites drove democratization, whereas other accounts emphasize grassroots bottom-up processes. How democratization occurs has also been used to explain other political phenomena, such as whether a country goes to a war or whether its economy grows.

Several philosophers and researchers have outlined historical and social factors seen as supporting the evolution of democracy. Other commentators have mentioned the influence of economic development. In a related theory, Ronald Inglehart suggests that improved living-standards in modern developed countries can convince people that they can take their basic survival for granted, leading to increased emphasis on self-expression values, which correlates closely with democracy.

Douglas M. Gibler and Andrew Owsiak in their study argued about the importance of peace and stable borders for the development of democracy. It has often been assumed that democracy causes peace, but this study shows that, historically, peace has almost always predated the establishment of democracy.

Carroll Quigley concludes that the characteristics of weapons are the main predictor of democracy: Democracy—this scenario—tends to emerge only when the best weapons available are easy for individuals to obtain and use. By the 1800s, guns were the best personal weapons available, and in the United States of America (already nominally democratic), almost everyone could afford to buy a gun, and could learn how to use it fairly easily. Governments could not do any better: it became the age of mass armies of citizen soldiers with guns. Similarly, Periclean Greece was an age of the citizen soldier and democracy.

Other theories stressed the relevance of education and of human capital—and within them of cognitive ability to increasing tolerance, rationality, political literacy and participation. Two effects of education and cognitive ability are distinguished:&lt;sup&gt;[''need quotation to verify'']&lt;/sup&gt;

* a cognitive effect (competence to make rational choices, better information-processing)
* an ethical effect (support of democratic values, freedom, human rights etc.), which itself depends on intelligence.

Evidence consistent with conventional theories of why democracy emerges and is sustained has been hard to come by. Statistical analyses have challenged modernisation theory by demonstrating that there is no reliable evidence for the claim that democracy is more likely to emerge when countries become wealthier, more educated, or less unequal. In fact, empirical evidence shows that economic growth and education may not lead to increased demand for democratization as modernization theory suggests: historically, most countries attained high levels of access to primary education well before transitioning to democracy. Rather than acting as a catalyst for democratization, in some situations education provision may instead be used by non-democratic regimes to indoctrinate their subjects and strengthen their power.

The assumed link between education and economic growth is called into question when analyzing empirical evidence. Across different countries, the correlation between education attainment and math test scores is very weak (.07). A similarly weak relationship exists between per-pupil expenditures and math competency (.26). Additionally, historical evidence suggests that average human capital (measured using literacy rates) of the masses does not explain the onset of industrialization in France from 1750 to 1850 despite arguments to the contrary. Together, these findings show that education does not always promote human capital and economic growth as is generally argued to be the case. Instead, the evidence implies that education provision often falls short of its expressed goals, or, alternatively, that political actors use education to promote goals other than economic growth and development.

Some scholars have searched for the &quot;deep&quot; determinants of contemporary political institutions, be they geographical or demographic.

An example of this is the disease environment. Places with different mortality rates had different populations and productivity levels around the world. For example, in Africa, the tsetse fly—which afflicts humans and livestock—reduced the ability of Africans to plough the land. This made Africa less settled. As a consequence, political power was less concentrated. This also affected the colonial institutions European countries established in Africa. Whether colonial settlers could live or not in a place made them develop different institutions which led to different economic and social paths. This also affected the distribution of power and the collective actions people could take. As a result, some African countries ended up having democracies and others autocracies.

An example of geographical determinants for democracy is having access to coastal areas and rivers. This natural endowment has a positive relation with economic development thanks to the benefits of trade. Trade brought economic development, which in turn, broadened power. Rulers wanting to increase revenues had to protect property-rights to create incentives for people to invest. As more people had more power, more concessions had to be made by the ruler and in many places this process lead to democracy. These determinants defined the structure of the society moving the balance of political power.


Robert Michels asserts that although democracy can never be fully realised, democracy may be developed automatically in the act of striving for democracy:&lt;blockquote&gt;The peasant in the fable, when on his deathbed, tells his sons that a treasure is buried in the field. After the old man's death the sons dig everywhere in order to discover the treasure. They do not find it. But their indefatigable labor improves the soil and secures for them a comparative well-being. The treasure in the fable may well symbolise democracy.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Democracy in modern times has almost always faced opposition from the previously existing government, and many times it has faced opposition from social elites. The implementation of a democratic government from a non-democratic state is typically brought by peaceful or violent democratic revolution.

The V-Dem Institute found 2026 ongoing democratization in 18 countries: Benin, Bolivia, Botswana, Bazil, Dominican Republic, Fiji, Guatemala, Lesotho, Mauritius, Montenegro, Poland, Seychelles, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Timor-Leste, Thailand, The Gambia, and Zambia.

===== Promozzjoni tad-demokrazija =====
Promotion of democracy can increase the quality of already existing democracies, reduce political apathy, and the chance of democratic backsliding. Democracy promotion measures include voting advice applications, participatory democracy, increasing electoral integrity, youth suffrage and civic education, reducing barriers to entry for new political parties, increasing proportionality, reducing presidentialism and aligning with median voter preferences.

=== Awtokratizzazzjoni ===
Democratic backsliding is a form of autocratization, a process of structural government transition toward authoritarianism in which the exercise of political power becomes less limited and more arbitrary and repressive. Democratic backsliding specifically assumes a starting point of a democratic system. The process typically restricts the space for public contest and political participation in the process of government selection. Democratic backsliding involves the weakening of democratic institutions, such as the peaceful transition of power or free and fair elections, or the violation of individual rights that underpin democracies, especially freedom of expression. Democratic backsliding is the opposite of democratization.&lt;sup&gt;[''citation needed'']&lt;/sup&gt;

Steven Levitsky says: &quot;It's not up to voters to defend a democracy. That's asking far, far too much of voters, to cast their ballot on the basis of some set of abstract principles or procedures. With the exception of a handful of cases, voters never, ever — in any society, in any culture — prioritize democracy over all else. Individual voters worry about much more mundane things, as is their right. It is up to élites and institutions to protect democracy — not voters.&quot;

The V-Dem Institute found 2026 ongoing democratic backsliding in 44 countries: Afghanistan, Argentina, Armenia, Belarus, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Central African Republic, Croatia, Georgia, Greece, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, El Salvador, Haiti, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Italy, Ivory Coast, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, Mali, Madagascar, Mauretania, Mexico, Moldova, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Niger, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Slovakia, Slovenia, Senegal, Serbia, Romania, Togo, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and United States.

===== Tfixkil =====
Some democratic governments have experienced sudden state collapse and regime change to an undemocratic form of government. Domestic military coups or rebellions are the most common means by which democratic governments have been overthrown. (See List of coups and coup attempts by country and List of civil wars.) Examples include the Spanish Civil War, the Coup of 18 Brumaire that ended the French First Republic, and the 28 May 1926 coup d'état which ended the First Portuguese Republic. Some military coups are supported by foreign governments, such as the 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état and the 1953 Iranian coup d'état. Other types of a sudden end to democracy include:

* Invasion, for example the German occupation of Czechoslovakia, and the fall of South Vietnam.
* Self-coup, in which the leader of the government extra-legally seizes all power or unlawfully extends the term in office. This can be done through:
** Suspension of the constitution by decree, such as with the 1992 Peruvian coup d'état
** An &quot;electoral self-coup&quot; using election fraud to obtain re-election of a previously fairly elected official or political party. For example, in the 1999 Ukrainian presidential election, 2003 Russian legislative election, and 2004 Russian presidential election.
* Royal coup, in which a monarch not normally involved in government seizes all power. For example, the 6 January Dictatorship, begun in 1929 when King Alexander I of Yugoslavia dismissed parliament and started ruling by decree.

Democratic backsliding can end democracy in a gradual manner, by increasing emphasis on national security and eroding free and fair elections, freedom of expression, independence of the judiciary, rule of law. A famous example is the Enabling Act of 1933, which lawfully ended democracy in Weimar Germany and marked the transition to Nazi Germany.

Temporary or long-term political violence and government interference can prevent free and fair elections, which erode the democratic nature of governments. This has happened on a local level even in well-established democracies like the United States; for example, the Wilmington insurrection of 1898 and African-American disfranchisement after the Reconstruction era.

== Influwenza tal-midja ==
The theory of democracy relies on the implicit assumption that voters are well informed about social issues, policies, and candidates so that they can make a truly informed decision. Since the late 20th century there has been a growing concern that voters may be poorly informed due to the news media's focusing more on entertainment and gossip and less on serious journalistic research on political issues.

The media professors Michael Gurevitch and Jay Blumler have proposed a number of functions that the mass media are expected to fulfill in a democracy:

* Surveillance of the sociopolitical environment
* Meaningful agenda setting
* Platforms for an intelligible and illuminating advocacy
* Dialogue across a diverse range of views
* Mechanisms for holding officials to account for how they have exercised power
* Incentives for citizens to learn, choose, and become involved
* A principled resistance to the efforts of forces outside the media to subvert their independence, integrity, and ability to serve the audience
* A sense of respect for the audience member, as potentially concerned and able to make sense of his or her political environment

This proposal has inspired a lot of discussions over whether the news media are actually fulfilling the requirements that a well functioning democracy requires. Commercial mass media are generally not accountable to anybody but their owners, and they have no obligation to serve a democratic function. They are controlled mainly by economic market forces. Fierce economic competition may force the mass media to divert themselves from any democratic ideals and focus entirely on how to survive the competition.

The tabloidization and popularization of the news media is seen in an increasing focus on human examples rather than statistics and principles. There is more focus on politicians as personalities and less focus on political issues in the popular media. Election campaigns are covered more as horse races and less as debates about ideologies and issues. The dominating media focus on spin, conflict, and competitive strategies has made voters perceive the politicians as egoists rather than idealists. This fosters mistrust and a cynical attitude to politics, less civic engagement, and less interest in voting. The ability to find effective political solutions to social problems is hampered when problems tend to be blamed on individuals rather than on structural causes. This person-centered focus may have far-reaching consequences not only for domestic problems but also for foreign policy when international conflicts are blamed on foreign heads of state rather than on political and economic structures. A strong media focus on fear and terrorism has allowed military logic to penetrate public institutions, leading to increased surveillance and the erosion of civil rights.

The responsiveness and accountability of the democratic system is compromised when lack of access to substantive, diverse, and undistorted information is handicapping the citizens' capability of evaluating the political process. The fast pace and trivialization in the competitive news media is dumbing down the political debate. Thorough and balanced investigation of complex political issues does not fit into this format. The political communication is characterized by short time horizons, short slogans, simple explanations, and simple solutions. This is conducive to political populism rather than serious deliberation.

Commercial mass media are often differentiated along the political spectrum so that people can hear mainly opinions that they already agree with. Too much controversy and diverse opinions are not always profitable for the commercial news media. Political polarization is emerging when different people read different news and watch different TV channels. This polarization has been worsened by the emergence of the social media that allow people to communicate mainly with groups of like-minded people, the so-called echo chambers. Extreme political polarization may undermine the trust in democratic institutions, leading to erosion of civil rights and free speech and in some cases even reversion to autocracy.

Many media scholars have discussed non-commercial news media with public service obligations as a means to improve the democratic process by providing the kind of political contents that a free market does not provide. The World Bank has recommended public service broadcasting in order to strengthen democracy in developing countries. These broadcasting services should be accountable to an independent regulatory body that is adequately protected from interference from political and economic interests. Public service media have an obligation to provide reliable information to voters. Many countries have publicly funded radio and television stations with public service obligations, especially in Europe and Japan, while such media are weak or non-existent in other countries including the US. Several studies have shown that the stronger the dominance of commercial broadcast media over public service media, the less the amount of policy-relevant information in the media and the more focus on horse race journalism, personalities, and the pecadillos of politicians. Public service broadcasters are characterized by more policy-relevant information and more respect for journalistic norms and impartiality than the commercial media. However, the trend of deregulation has put the public service model under increased pressure from competition with commercial media.

The emergence of the internet and the social media has profoundly altered the conditions for political communication. The social media have given ordinary citizens easy access to voice their opinion and share information while bypassing the filters of the large news media. This is often seen as an advantage for democracy. The new possibilities for communication have fundamentally changed the way social movements and protest movements operate and organize. The internet and social media have provided powerful new tools for democracy movements in developing countries and emerging democracies, enabling them to bypass censorship, voice their opinions, and organize protests.

A serious problem with the social media is that they have no truth filters. The established news media have to guard their reputation as trustworthy, while ordinary citizens may post unreliable information. In fact, studies show that false stories are going more viral than true stories. The proliferation of false stories and conspiracy theories may undermine public trust in the political system and public officials.

Reliable information sources are essential for the democratic process. Less democratic governments rely heavily on censorship, propaganda, and misinformation in order to stay in power, while independent sources of information are able to undermine their legitimacy.

== Referenzi ==

[[Kategorija:Greċja antika]]</text>
      <sha1>enoi6h7aldaw3em8ws5iwi5ip6crmyz</sha1>
    </revision>
  </page>
  <page>
    <title>Diskussjoni:Demokrazija</title>
    <ns>1</ns>
    <id>34461</id>
    <revision>
      <id>330229</id>
      <timestamp>2026-05-26T13:05:59Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Trigcly</username>
        <id>17859</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>mudellCEE</comment>
      <origin>330229</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="57" sha1="8iax7w8tiic6wistqxfpeit6frdwmxs" xml:space="preserve">{{CEE Spring 2026 | utent = Trigcly | pajjiż = Greċja}}</text>
      <sha1>8iax7w8tiic6wistqxfpeit6frdwmxs</sha1>
    </revision>
  </page>
  <page>
    <title>JD Vance</title>
    <ns>0</ns>
    <id>34462</id>
    <revision>
      <id>330245</id>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:26:32Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>Maħluqa bit-traduzzjoni tal-paġna &quot;[[:en:Special:Redirect/revision/1356061465|JD Vance]]&quot;</comment>
      <origin>330245</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="1846" sha1="3uglaa1yh6rv5yswjz74c0x40g9td3f" xml:space="preserve">
 

'''James David Vance''' (imwieled '''James Donald Bowman''';{{Nota|Vance was named James Donald Bowman at birth. Afterward, he was adopted by his mother's third husband and had his name changed to '''James David Hamel'''. In April 2013, he adopted his maternal grandparents' surname of Vance.&lt;ref name=smyth /&gt;|name=name change}} Awissu{{Spazji}}2 ta' Frar, 1984) huwa politiku u awtur Amerikan li qed iservi bħala l-50 viċi president tal-Istati Uniti. Membru tal-Partit Repubblikan, huwa rrappreżenta lil Ohio fis-Senat tal-Istati Uniti mill-2023 sal-2025.

Imwieled u trabba f'Middletown, Ohio, Vance ingħaqad mal- Korp tal-Marini tal-Istati Uniti fl-2003, fejn serva bħala ġurnalist militari fl- affarijiet pubbliċi matul il-mandat tiegħu ta' erba' snin sal-2007. Huwa kiseb baċellerat mill-Università Statali ta' Ohio u Juris Doctor mil-lIskola tal-Liġi ta' Yale. Wara karriera qasira fil-liġi korporattiva, Vance ħadem għall-kumpanija tal-kapital ta' riskju ta' Peter Thiel, Mithril Capital.

Vance intgħażel bħala l-kandidat kandidat ta' Trump fl- elezzjoni presidenzjali tal-2024 u rriżenja mis-Senat qabel l-inawgurazzjoni tiegħu bħala viċi president. Matul il-mandat tiegħu bħala viċi president. Vance semma t-teoloġija Kattolika bħala influwenza fuq il-fehmiet tiegħu, iżda kemm [[Papa Franġisku|il-Papa Franġisku]] kif ukoll [[Papa Ljun XIV|il-Papa Ljun XIV]] ikkritikawh talli rrappreżenta ħażin it-tagħlim tal-Knisja. Il-pjattaforma politika tiegħu hija kkaratterizzata minn oppożizzjoni għall-immigrazzjoni, l-abort, iż-żwieġ bejn persuni tal-istess sess, il-kontroll tal-armi, u l-appoġġ tal-Istati Uniti għall-Ukrajna, u huwa kritiku miftuħ tan-nuqqas ta'tfal .
[[Kategorija:Viċi-Presidenti tal-Istati Uniti tal-Amerika]]
[[Kategorija:Nies ħajjin]]
[[Kategorija:Twieldu fl-1984]]</text>
      <sha1>3uglaa1yh6rv5yswjz74c0x40g9td3f</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330246</id>
      <parentid>330245</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:28:22Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330246</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="1845" sha1="jlnot42mv8l1wlngti84bhlfjaohr8l" xml:space="preserve">
 

'''James David Vance''' (imwieled '''James Donald Bowman''';{{Nota|Vance was named James Donald Bowman at birth. Afterward, he was adopted by his mother's third husband and had his name changed to '''James David Hamel'''. In April 2013, he adopted his maternal grandparents' surname of Vance.&lt;ref name=smyth /&gt;|name=name change}} Awissu{{Spazji}}2 ta' Frar, 1984) huwa politiku u awtur Amerikan li qed iservi bħala l-50 viċi president tal-Istati Uniti. Membru tal-Partit Repubblikan, huwa rrappreżenta lil Ohio fis-Senat tal-Istati Uniti mill-2023 sal-2025.

Imwieled u trabba f'Middletown, Ohio, Vance ingħaqad mal- Korp tal-Marini tal-Istati Uniti fl-2003, fejn serva bħala ġurnalist militari fl- affarijiet pubbliċi matul il-mandat tiegħu ta' erba' snin sal-2007. Huwa kiseb baċellerat mill-Università Statali ta' Ohio u Juris Doctor mil-lIskola tal-Liġi ta' Yale. Wara karriera qasira fil-liġi korporattiva, Vance ħadem għall-kumpanija tal-kapital ta' riskju ta' Peter Thiel, Mithril Capital.

Vance intgħażel bħala l-kandidat kandidat ta' Trump fl- elezzjoni presidenzjali tal-2024 u rriżenja mis-Senat qabel l-inawgurazzjoni tiegħu bħala viċi president. Matul il-mandat tiegħu bħala viċi president. Vance semma t-teoloġija Kattolika bħala influwenza fuq il-fehmiet tiegħu, iżda kemm [[Papa Franġisku|il-Papa Franġisku]] kif ukoll [[Papa Ljun XIV|il-Papa Ljun XIV]] ikkritikawh talli rrappreżenta ħażin it-tagħlim tal-Knisja. Il-pjattaforma politika tiegħu hija kkaratterizzata minn oppożizzjoni għall-immigrazzjoni, l-abort, iż-żwieġ bejn persuni tal-istess sess, il-kontroll tal-armi, u l-appoġġ tal-Istati Uniti għall-Ukrajna, u huwa kritiku miftuħ tan-nuqqas ta'tfal 
[[Kategorija:Viċi-Presidenti tal-Istati Uniti tal-Amerika]]
[[Kategorija:Nies ħajjin]]
[[Kategorija:Twieldu fl-1984]]</text>
      <sha1>jlnot42mv8l1wlngti84bhlfjaohr8l</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330247</id>
      <parentid>330246</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:29:24Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330247</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="1940" sha1="0vkhn9x03u6tupf8d9793kfxye2j12t" xml:space="preserve">
 
[[Stampa:January 2025 Official Vice Presidential Portrait of JD Vance.jpg|daqsminuri|JD Vance]]
'''James David Vance''' (imwieled '''James Donald Bowman''';{{Nota|Vance was named James Donald Bowman at birth. Afterward, he was adopted by his mother's third husband and had his name changed to '''James David Hamel'''. In April 2013, he adopted his maternal grandparents' surname of Vance.&lt;ref name=smyth /&gt;|name=name change}} Awissu{{Spazji}}2 ta' Frar, 1984) huwa politiku u awtur Amerikan li qed iservi bħala l-50 viċi president tal-Istati Uniti. Membru tal-Partit Repubblikan, huwa rrappreżenta lil Ohio fis-Senat tal-Istati Uniti mill-2023 sal-2025.

Imwieled u trabba f'Middletown, Ohio, Vance ingħaqad mal- Korp tal-Marini tal-Istati Uniti fl-2003, fejn serva bħala ġurnalist militari fl- affarijiet pubbliċi matul il-mandat tiegħu ta' erba' snin sal-2007. Huwa kiseb baċellerat mill-Università Statali ta' Ohio u Juris Doctor mil-lIskola tal-Liġi ta' Yale. Wara karriera qasira fil-liġi korporattiva, Vance ħadem għall-kumpanija tal-kapital ta' riskju ta' Peter Thiel, Mithril Capital.

Vance intgħażel bħala l-kandidat kandidat ta' Trump fl- elezzjoni presidenzjali tal-2024 u rriżenja mis-Senat qabel l-inawgurazzjoni tiegħu bħala viċi president. Matul il-mandat tiegħu bħala viċi president. Vance semma t-teoloġija Kattolika bħala influwenza fuq il-fehmiet tiegħu, iżda kemm [[Papa Franġisku|il-Papa Franġisku]] kif ukoll [[Papa Ljun XIV|il-Papa Ljun XIV]] ikkritikawh talli rrappreżenta ħażin it-tagħlim tal-Knisja. Il-pjattaforma politika tiegħu hija kkaratterizzata minn oppożizzjoni għall-immigrazzjoni, l-abort, iż-żwieġ bejn persuni tal-istess sess, il-kontroll tal-armi, u l-appoġġ tal-Istati Uniti għall-Ukrajna, u huwa kritiku miftuħ tan-nuqqas ta'tfal 
[[Kategorija:Viċi-Presidenti tal-Istati Uniti tal-Amerika]]
[[Kategorija:Nies ħajjin]]
[[Kategorija:Twieldu fl-1984]]</text>
      <sha1>0vkhn9x03u6tupf8d9793kfxye2j12t</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330248</id>
      <parentid>330247</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:30:15Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330248</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="2166" sha1="tk9j6d8l6hq0xifrvtr8hox1arzwv26" xml:space="preserve">
 
[[Stampa:January 2025 Official Vice Presidential Portrait of JD Vance.jpg|daqsminuri|JD Vance]]
'''James David Vance''' (imwieled '''James Donald Bowman''';{{Nota|Vance was named James Donald Bowman at birth. Afterward, he was adopted by his mother's third husband and had his name changed to '''James David Hamel'''. In April 2013, he adopted his maternal grandparents' surname of Vance.&lt;ref name=smyth /&gt;|name=name change}} Awissu{{Spazji}}2 ta' Frar, 1984) huwa politiku u awtur Amerikan li qed iservi bħala l-50 viċi president tal-Istati Uniti. Membru tal-Partit Repubblikan, huwa rrappreżenta lil Ohio fis-Senat tal-Istati Uniti mill-2023 sal-2025.&lt;ref&gt;O'Brien, Rebecca Davis (July 15, 2024). &quot;J.D. Vance Was Not Always His Name. But It's the One That Felt Closest to Home&quot;. ''The New York Times''. Archived from the original on July 19, 2024. Retrieved July 25, 2024.&lt;/ref&gt;

Imwieled u trabba f'Middletown, Ohio, Vance ingħaqad mal- Korp tal-Marini tal-Istati Uniti fl-2003, fejn serva bħala ġurnalist militari fl- affarijiet pubbliċi matul il-mandat tiegħu ta' erba' snin sal-2007. Huwa kiseb baċellerat mill-Università Statali ta' Ohio u Juris Doctor mil-lIskola tal-Liġi ta' Yale. Wara karriera qasira fil-liġi korporattiva, Vance ħadem għall-kumpanija tal-kapital ta' riskju ta' Peter Thiel, Mithril Capital.

Vance intgħażel bħala l-kandidat kandidat ta' Trump fl- elezzjoni presidenzjali tal-2024 u rriżenja mis-Senat qabel l-inawgurazzjoni tiegħu bħala viċi president. Matul il-mandat tiegħu bħala viċi president. Vance semma t-teoloġija Kattolika bħala influwenza fuq il-fehmiet tiegħu, iżda kemm [[Papa Franġisku|il-Papa Franġisku]] kif ukoll [[Papa Ljun XIV|il-Papa Ljun XIV]] ikkritikawh talli rrappreżenta ħażin it-tagħlim tal-Knisja. Il-pjattaforma politika tiegħu hija kkaratterizzata minn oppożizzjoni għall-immigrazzjoni, l-abort, iż-żwieġ bejn persuni tal-istess sess, il-kontroll tal-armi, u l-appoġġ tal-Istati Uniti għall-Ukrajna, u huwa kritiku miftuħ tan-nuqqas ta'tfal 
[[Kategorija:Viċi-Presidenti tal-Istati Uniti tal-Amerika]]
[[Kategorija:Nies ħajjin]]
[[Kategorija:Twieldu fl-1984]]</text>
      <sha1>tk9j6d8l6hq0xifrvtr8hox1arzwv26</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330249</id>
      <parentid>330248</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:31:35Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330249</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="2129" sha1="dm0e7zcrtyklnjfgf8pix798ho03bh8" xml:space="preserve">
 
[[Stampa:January 2025 Official Vice Presidential Portrait of JD Vance.jpg|daqsminuri|JD Vance]]
'''James David Vance''' (imwieled '''James Donald Bowman''';{{Nota|Vance was named James Donald Bowman at birth. Afterward, he was adopted by his mother's third husband and had his name changed to '''James David Hamel'''. In April 2013, he adopted his maternal grandparents' surname of Vance. Awissu{{Spazji}}2 ta' Frar, 1984) huwa politiku u awtur Amerikan li qed iservi bħala l-50 viċi president tal-Istati Uniti. Membru tal-Partit Repubblikan, huwa rrappreżenta lil Ohio fis-Senat tal-Istati Uniti mill-2023 sal-2025.&lt;ref&gt;O'Brien, Rebecca Davis (July 15, 2024). &quot;J.D. Vance Was Not Always His Name. But It's the One That Felt Closest to Home&quot;. ''The New York Times''. Archived from the original on July 19, 2024. Retrieved July 25, 2024.&lt;/ref&gt;

Imwieled u trabba f'Middletown, Ohio, Vance ingħaqad mal- Korp tal-Marini tal-Istati Uniti fl-2003, fejn serva bħala ġurnalist militari fl- affarijiet pubbliċi matul il-mandat tiegħu ta' erba' snin sal-2007. Huwa kiseb baċellerat mill-Università Statali ta' Ohio u Juris Doctor mil-lIskola tal-Liġi ta' Yale. Wara karriera qasira fil-liġi korporattiva, Vance ħadem għall-kumpanija tal-kapital ta' riskju ta' Peter Thiel, Mithril Capital.

Vance intgħażel bħala l-kandidat kandidat ta' Trump fl- elezzjoni presidenzjali tal-2024 u rriżenja mis-Senat qabel l-inawgurazzjoni tiegħu bħala viċi president. Matul il-mandat tiegħu bħala viċi president. Vance semma t-teoloġija Kattolika bħala influwenza fuq il-fehmiet tiegħu, iżda kemm [[Papa Franġisku|il-Papa Franġisku]] kif ukoll [[Papa Ljun XIV|il-Papa Ljun XIV]] ikkritikawh talli rrappreżenta ħażin it-tagħlim tal-Knisja. Il-pjattaforma politika tiegħu hija kkaratterizzata minn oppożizzjoni għall-immigrazzjoni, l-abort, iż-żwieġ bejn persuni tal-istess sess, il-kontroll tal-armi, u l-appoġġ tal-Istati Uniti għall-Ukrajna, u huwa kritiku miftuħ tan-nuqqas ta'tfal 
[[Kategorija:Viċi-Presidenti tal-Istati Uniti tal-Amerika]]
[[Kategorija:Nies ħajjin]]
[[Kategorija:Twieldu fl-1984]]</text>
      <sha1>dm0e7zcrtyklnjfgf8pix798ho03bh8</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330250</id>
      <parentid>330249</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:32:19Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330250</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="1863" sha1="7tfwk4pryg4mew83lh9kd81f7pm1h9u" xml:space="preserve">
 
[[Stampa:January 2025 Official Vice Presidential Portrait of JD Vance.jpg|daqsminuri|JD Vance]]
'''James David Vance''' (imwieled '''James Donald Bowman'''; huwa politiku u awtur Amerikan li qed iservi bħala l-50 viċi president tal-Istati Uniti. Membru tal-Partit Repubblikan, huwa rrappreżenta lil Ohio fis-Senat tal-Istati Uniti mill-2023 sal-2025.&lt;ref&gt;O'Brien, Rebecca Davis (July 15, 2024). &quot;J.D. Vance Was Not Always His Name. But It's the One That Felt Closest to Home&quot;. ''The New York Times''. Archived from the original on July 19, 2024. Retrieved July 25, 2024.&lt;/ref&gt;

Imwieled u trabba f'Middletown, Ohio, Vance ingħaqad mal- Korp tal-Marini tal-Istati Uniti fl-2003, fejn serva bħala ġurnalist militari fl- affarijiet pubbliċi matul il-mandat tiegħu ta' erba' snin sal-2007. Huwa kiseb baċellerat mill-Università Statali ta' Ohio u Juris Doctor mil-lIskola tal-Liġi ta' Yale. Wara karriera qasira fil-liġi korporattiva, Vance ħadem għall-kumpanija tal-kapital ta' riskju ta' Peter Thiel, Mithril Capital.

Vance intgħażel bħala l-kandidat kandidat ta' Trump fl- elezzjoni presidenzjali tal-2024 u rriżenja mis-Senat qabel l-inawgurazzjoni tiegħu bħala viċi president. Matul il-mandat tiegħu bħala viċi president. Vance semma t-teoloġija Kattolika bħala influwenza fuq il-fehmiet tiegħu, iżda kemm [[Papa Franġisku|il-Papa Franġisku]] kif ukoll [[Papa Ljun XIV|il-Papa Ljun XIV]] ikkritikawh talli rrappreżenta ħażin it-tagħlim tal-Knisja. Il-pjattaforma politika tiegħu hija kkaratterizzata minn oppożizzjoni għall-immigrazzjoni, l-abort, iż-żwieġ bejn persuni tal-istess sess, il-kontroll tal-armi, u l-appoġġ tal-Istati Uniti għall-Ukrajna, u huwa kritiku miftuħ tan-nuqqas ta'tfal 
[[Kategorija:Viċi-Presidenti tal-Istati Uniti tal-Amerika]]
[[Kategorija:Nies ħajjin]]
[[Kategorija:Twieldu fl-1984]]</text>
      <sha1>7tfwk4pryg4mew83lh9kd81f7pm1h9u</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330251</id>
      <parentid>330250</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:33:48Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330251</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="1936" sha1="ogk879fjra31018bncrjkkjfh1yt9nb" xml:space="preserve">
 
[[Stampa:January 2025 Official Vice Presidential Portrait of JD Vance.jpg|daqsminuri|JD Vance]]
'''James David Vance''' (imwieled '''James Donald Bowman'''; huwa politiku u awtur [[Stati Uniti|Amerikan]] li qed iservi bħala l-50 [[viċi president]] tal-Istati Uniti. Membru tal-Partit [[Repubblikan]], huwa rrappreżenta lil [[Ohio]] fis-Senat tal-Istati Uniti mill-2023 sal-2025.&lt;ref&gt;O'Brien, Rebecca Davis (July 15, 2024). &quot;J.D. Vance Was Not Always His Name. But It's the One That Felt Closest to Home&quot;. ''The New York Times''. Archived from the original on July 19, 2024. Retrieved July 25, 2024.&lt;/ref&gt;

Imwieled u trabba f'Middletown, Ohio, Vance ingħaqad mal- [[Korp tal-Marini]] tal-Istati Uniti fl-2003, fejn serva bħala ġurnalist militari fl- affarijiet pubbliċi matul il-mandat tiegħu ta' erba' snin sal-2007. Huwa kiseb baċellerat mill-[[Università Statali ta' Ohio]] u [[Juris Doctor]] mil-lIskola tal-Liġi ta' [[Yale]]. Wara karriera qasira fil-liġi korporattiva, Vance ħadem għall-kumpanija tal-kapital ta' riskju ta' [[Peter Thiel]], [[Mithril Capital]].

Vance intgħażel bħala l-kandidat kandidat ta' [[Donald Trump|Trump]] fl- elezzjoni [[presidenzjali]] tal-2024 u rriżenja mis-Senat qabel l-inawgurazzjoni tiegħu bħala viċi president. Matul il-mandat tiegħu bħala viċi president. Vance semma t-teoloġija Kattolika bħala influwenza fuq il-fehmiet tiegħu, iżda kemm [[Papa Franġisku|il-Papa Franġisku]] kif ukoll [[Papa Ljun XIV|il-Papa Ljun XIV]] ikkritikawh talli rrappreżenta ħażin it-tagħlim tal-Knisja. Il-pjattaforma politika tiegħu hija kkaratterizzata minn oppożizzjoni għall-immigrazzjoni, l-abort, iż-żwieġ bejn persuni tal-istess sess, il-kontroll tal-armi, u l-appoġġ tal-Istati Uniti għall-Ukrajna, u huwa kritiku miftuħ tan-nuqqas ta'tfal 
[[Kategorija:Viċi-Presidenti tal-Istati Uniti tal-Amerika]]
[[Kategorija:Nies ħajjin]]
[[Kategorija:Twieldu fl-1984]]</text>
      <sha1>ogk879fjra31018bncrjkkjfh1yt9nb</sha1>
    </revision>
  </page>
  <page>
    <title>Mikelina Camilleri</title>
    <ns>0</ns>
    <id>34463</id>
    <revision>
      <id>330252</id>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:51:27Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Dwardu</username>
        <id>405</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>Paġna ġdida: {{Stub|bijografija}}{{Infobox bijografija}}  '''Mikelina Camilleri''' hija [[Għana|għannejja Maltija]].  [[Kategorija:Nies ħajjin]] [[Kategorija:Kantanti Maltin]] [[Kategorija:Atturi Maltin]]</comment>
      <origin>330252</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="194" sha1="eui999079ajcg6gvuc8i648vz5hyrdm" xml:space="preserve">{{Stub|bijografija}}{{Infobox bijografija}}

'''Mikelina Camilleri''' hija [[Għana|għannejja Maltija]].

[[Kategorija:Nies ħajjin]]
[[Kategorija:Kantanti Maltin]]
[[Kategorija:Atturi Maltin]]</text>
      <sha1>eui999079ajcg6gvuc8i648vz5hyrdm</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330253</id>
      <parentid>330252</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T01:52:52Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Dwardu</username>
        <id>405</id>
      </contributor>
      <minor />
      <comment>removed [[Category:Atturi Maltin]] using [[Help:Gadget-HotCat|HotCat]]</comment>
      <origin>330253</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="165" sha1="8ecwyb0e0x26loy3ktvxz2v1309uojp" xml:space="preserve">{{Stub|bijografija}}{{Infobox bijografija}}

'''Mikelina Camilleri''' hija [[Għana|għannejja Maltija]].

[[Kategorija:Nies ħajjin]]
[[Kategorija:Kantanti Maltin]]</text>
      <sha1>8ecwyb0e0x26loy3ktvxz2v1309uojp</sha1>
    </revision>
  </page>
  <page>
    <title>N. Robert Branch</title>
    <ns>0</ns>
    <id>34464</id>
    <revision>
      <id>330254</id>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T02:08:59Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>Maħluqa bit-traduzzjoni tal-paġna &quot;[[:en:Special:Redirect/revision/1353085197|N. Robert Branch]]&quot;</comment>
      <origin>330254</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="3772" sha1="iia9gf6f97g9q4re1i9ux00k2kzgrus" xml:space="preserve">
{{Infobox Ċelebrità|name=N. Robert Branch|occupation=Economist}}'''N. Robert Branch''' huwa ekonomista u riċerkatur Amerikan fil-''British Journal of Economics''.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://faculty.britishecon.co.uk/n-robert-branch|titlu=N. Robert Branch · Journal of British Economics Faculty|sit=faculty.britishecon.co.uk|data-aċċess=2026-04-12}}&lt;/ref&gt; Preċedentement disinjatur tal-moda, huwa ppresieda l-marka tal-kożmetiċi Astoria bbażata f'Austin qabel ma telaq fl-2025.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=http://wdstudios.org/article/aHR0cHM6Ly9uYXRpb25hbHRpbWVzLmludGVybmFsL2N1c3RvbS9iRUJSQ0VwN1JVby1icmFuY2gtZXhpdHMtYXN0b3JpYQ|titlu=Branch Exits Astoria in Undisclosed Deal, Sets Sights on Los Angeles Expansion|isem=Meredith|awtur=Collier|data=2025-12-12|sit=Writers' Desk Studios|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2026-04-17}}&lt;/ref&gt; Huwa rikonoxxut għar-rwol influwenti tiegħu fl-iżvilupp tal- liberaliżmu ekonomiku fl-Istati Uniti.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://astoriaandco.com/article/S2a9RqJPLFEDT9ywEBEN5o|titlu=Homecoming: Branch Returns from Lecture Tour with a New Playbook for Beverly Hills|isem=Emzy|awtur=Veazy|data=2026-03-14|sit=Astoria &amp; Co.|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2026-04-10}}&lt;/ref&gt; Huwa kiseb attenzjoni mill-istampa nazzjonali wara serje ta' lekċers ta' profil għoli fil-[[Kolumbja Brittanika|British Columbia]] u [[Chicago]]; tal-aħħar ġiet ipprofilata fin-''New York Times'', li enfasizzat il-kontribut tiegħu għar-riforma regolatorja.

== Ħajja bikrija u karriera ==
Branch għandu kwalifiki mill-Università ta' Yale u żewġ lawrji tal-baċellerat mill-Università ta' Texas f'Austin.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://faculty.britishecon.co.uk/n-robert-branch|titlu=N. Robert Branch · Journal of British Economics|sit=faculty.britishecon.co.uk|data-aċċess=2026-04-10}}&lt;/ref&gt; Huwa ġie elett fil-kumitat tar-riċerka tas-Senat tal-UT fid-dipartiment tal-Ekonomija tal-UT, u kkopresieda,&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/88R/billtext/html/SR00263F.htm|titlu=88(R) SR 263 - Enrolled version - Bill Text|sit=capitol.texas.gov|data-aċċess=2026-04-10}}&lt;/ref&gt; fejn ikkontesta mingħajr suċċess għall-kariga ta' president tal-assemblea at-large.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://deanofstudents.utexas.edu/studentelections/firstyearelection/candidatestatements2023.html|titlu=2023 First-Year Election Candidate Statements|sit=deanofstudents.utexas.edu|data-aċċess=2026-04-10}}&lt;/ref&gt; Matul il-mandat tiegħu fil- Fondazzjoni tal-Ġappun, organizzazzjoni mingħajr skop ta' qligħ, Branch ikkontribwixxa għall-iżvilupp ta' MatrixEngine, proġett ta' umanistika diġitali ffukat fuq il-preservazzjoni tal-logħob Ġappuniż Sugoroku.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.utjapanlab.com/all-projects|titlu=Projects|sit=JapanLab|lingwa=en-US|data-aċċess=2026-04-10}}&lt;/ref&gt; Branch jikkwota t-tfulija tiegħu f'Hyde Park ta' Austin u l-esperjenza tiegħu fil-Parkway Village ta' Memphis bħala l-ispinta għax-xogħol tiegħu fuq ir-Riforma tal-Benesseri.

F'Awwissu 2024, Branch beda jidderieġi fond privat ta' opzjonijiet tal-IWM ibbażat f'Austin, fejn ikkontrolla bażi sostanzjali ta' AUM u volum ta' seba' ċifri fix-xahar, mill-perjodu bejn Awwissu 2024 u April 2025 li ntemm fil-bidu tal-gwerra kummerċjali [[Donald Trump|ta' Trump]].&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=http://wdstudios.org/article/aHR0cHM6Ly9uYXRpb25hbHRpbWVzLmludGVybmFsL2N1c3RvbS94bTRxOHcybjd2a3I5cGozLXJhbmRvbS11cmwtZGVtbw|titlu=Branch Exits Austin Boutique Fund as &quot;Liberation Day&quot; Tariffs Roil Small Caps|isem=Elena|awtur=Vance|data=2025-05-01|sit=Writers' Desk Studios|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2026-04-14}}&lt;/ref&gt; Huwa serva fil-bord tal-marka tal-kożmetiċi Astoria qabel ma telaq għal somma mhux żvelata fl-aħħar tal-2025.{{Referenzi}}
[[Kategorija:Nies ħajjin]]</text>
      <sha1>iia9gf6f97g9q4re1i9ux00k2kzgrus</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>330255</id>
      <parentid>330254</parentid>
      <timestamp>2026-05-27T02:11:24Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Stevejobessy</username>
        <id>28120</id>
      </contributor>
      <origin>330255</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="3803" sha1="fo4b3dke8c611cyncrm9wkghqsyzcal" xml:space="preserve">
{{Infobox Ċelebrità|name=N. Robert Branch|occupation=Economist}}'''N. Robert Branch''' huwa ekonomista u riċerkatur Amerikan fil-''British Journal of Economics'', fejn jikteb kolonna bil-Malti.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://faculty.britishecon.co.uk/n-robert-branch|titlu=N. Robert Branch · Journal of British Economics Faculty|sit=faculty.britishecon.co.uk|data-aċċess=2026-04-12}}&lt;/ref&gt; Preċedentement disinjatur tal-moda, huwa ppresieda l-marka tal-kożmetiċi Astoria bbażata f'Austin qabel ma telaq fl-2025.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=http://wdstudios.org/article/aHR0cHM6Ly9uYXRpb25hbHRpbWVzLmludGVybmFsL2N1c3RvbS9iRUJSQ0VwN1JVby1icmFuY2gtZXhpdHMtYXN0b3JpYQ|titlu=Branch Exits Astoria in Undisclosed Deal, Sets Sights on Los Angeles Expansion|isem=Meredith|awtur=Collier|data=2025-12-12|sit=Writers' Desk Studios|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2026-04-17}}&lt;/ref&gt; Huwa rikonoxxut għar-rwol influwenti tiegħu fl-iżvilupp tal- liberaliżmu ekonomiku fl-Istati Uniti.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://astoriaandco.com/article/S2a9RqJPLFEDT9ywEBEN5o|titlu=Homecoming: Branch Returns from Lecture Tour with a New Playbook for Beverly Hills|isem=Emzy|awtur=Veazy|data=2026-03-14|sit=Astoria &amp; Co.|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2026-04-10}}&lt;/ref&gt; Huwa kiseb attenzjoni mill-istampa nazzjonali wara serje ta' lekċers ta' profil għoli fil-[[Kolumbja Brittanika|British Columbia]] u [[Chicago]]; tal-aħħar ġiet ipprofilata fin-''New York Times'', li enfasizzat il-kontribut tiegħu għar-riforma regolatorja.

== Ħajja bikrija u karriera ==
Branch għandu kwalifiki mill-Università ta' Yale u żewġ lawrji tal-baċellerat mill-Università ta' Texas f'Austin.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://faculty.britishecon.co.uk/n-robert-branch|titlu=N. Robert Branch · Journal of British Economics|sit=faculty.britishecon.co.uk|data-aċċess=2026-04-10}}&lt;/ref&gt; Huwa ġie elett fil-kumitat tar-riċerka tas-Senat tal-UT fid-dipartiment tal-Ekonomija tal-UT, u kkopresieda,&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/88R/billtext/html/SR00263F.htm|titlu=88(R) SR 263 - Enrolled version - Bill Text|sit=capitol.texas.gov|data-aċċess=2026-04-10}}&lt;/ref&gt; fejn ikkontesta mingħajr suċċess għall-kariga ta' president tal-assemblea at-large.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://deanofstudents.utexas.edu/studentelections/firstyearelection/candidatestatements2023.html|titlu=2023 First-Year Election Candidate Statements|sit=deanofstudents.utexas.edu|data-aċċess=2026-04-10}}&lt;/ref&gt; Matul il-mandat tiegħu fil- Fondazzjoni tal-Ġappun, organizzazzjoni mingħajr skop ta' qligħ, Branch ikkontribwixxa għall-iżvilupp ta' MatrixEngine, proġett ta' umanistika diġitali ffukat fuq il-preservazzjoni tal-logħob Ġappuniż Sugoroku.&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=https://www.utjapanlab.com/all-projects|titlu=Projects|sit=JapanLab|lingwa=en-US|data-aċċess=2026-04-10}}&lt;/ref&gt; Branch jikkwota t-tfulija tiegħu f'Hyde Park ta' Austin u l-esperjenza tiegħu fil-Parkway Village ta' Memphis bħala l-ispinta għax-xogħol tiegħu fuq ir-Riforma tal-Benesseri.

F'Awwissu 2024, Branch beda jidderieġi fond privat ta' opzjonijiet tal-IWM ibbażat f'Austin, fejn ikkontrolla bażi sostanzjali ta' AUM u volum ta' seba' ċifri fix-xahar, mill-perjodu bejn Awwissu 2024 u April 2025 li ntemm fil-bidu tal-gwerra kummerċjali [[Donald Trump|ta' Trump]].&lt;ref&gt;{{Ċita web|url=http://wdstudios.org/article/aHR0cHM6Ly9uYXRpb25hbHRpbWVzLmludGVybmFsL2N1c3RvbS94bTRxOHcybjd2a3I5cGozLXJhbmRvbS11cmwtZGVtbw|titlu=Branch Exits Austin Boutique Fund as &quot;Liberation Day&quot; Tariffs Roil Small Caps|isem=Elena|awtur=Vance|data=2025-05-01|sit=Writers' Desk Studios|lingwa=en|data-aċċess=2026-04-14}}&lt;/ref&gt; Huwa serva fil-bord tal-marka tal-kożmetiċi Astoria qabel ma telaq għal somma mhux żvelata fl-aħħar tal-2025.{{Referenzi}}
[[Kategorija:Nies ħajjin]]</text>
      <sha1>fo4b3dke8c611cyncrm9wkghqsyzcal</sha1>
    </revision>
  </page>
</mediawiki>