Wikipedia:Anmodning om botstatus/arkiv
Fra Wikipedia, den frie encyklopædi
Dette er et arkiv af tidligere anmodninger om botstatus! Få at se nuværende anmodninger, se Wikipedia:Anmodning om botstatus.
English/Engelsk: This is an archive, please use Wikipedia:Anmodning om botstatus for new requests.
Indholdsfortegnelse |
[redigér] WeggeBot
Jeg kunne godt tænke mig at få sat et botflag på Bruger:WeggeBot -- ikke fordi jeg har et akut behov for det her og nu, men jeg pusler lidt meds pywikipediabot, så jeg vil gerne være på forkant med bureaukratiet. Og da der nok ikke er en steward der forstår dansk, kommer den lige på engelsk også:
I request bot status on dawiki for Bruger:WeggeBot. There are no formal plan for deployment of the bot of present, but the future will definitely bring some tedious work that can easily be fixed with a bot. -- Anders Wegge Jakobsen (diskussion) 22. jul 2005 kl. 20:12 (CEST)
- Jeg udtrykker hermed min støtte for dette - Wegge lyder altid til at han ved hvad han gør, og har en meget velfungerende bot kørende på irc-kanalen #da.wikipedia allerede. -- Brother Dysk 22. jul 2005 kl. 20:20 (CEST)
- I hereby express my support for this request - Wegge always sounds like he knows what he's doing, and already has a brilliant little bot running on #da.wikipedia on freenode. -- Brother Dysk 22. jul 2005 kl. 20:20 (CEST)
- Support the request by Wegge. --Sir48 (Thyge) 23. jul 2005 kl. 11:26 (CEST)
[redigér] Flabot
My name is Flacus i am a german bot-operatur. For my Interwiki-Link-Checker i need abotflag in da. I run the bot in da. No Problem but without bot-flag i mess up the recent-change-list. Is there any other Problem with my Bot ? --FlaBot 13. nov 2005 kl. 14:08 (CET)
- I support this request. --Maitch 13. nov 2005 kl. 14:16 (CET)
- Fine with me. -- Anders Wegge Jakobsen (diskussion) 13. nov 2005 kl. 14:46 (CET)
- Has been activated. - 62.221.197.31 23. nov 2005 kl. 12:53 (CET)
[redigér] User:Thijs!bot
Hello, after working a few days without a bot flag with the Interwiki-bot, I'd like to get a bot flag. I use a manually controlled Interwiki-bot, based on Dutch pages (nl:). I mainly focus on pages that are not widely interwikied. I can read some Swedish, which allows me to understand a fair bit of Danish, enough to use the bot on da: responsibly. Thijs! 10. maj 2006 kl. 23:39 (CEST)
- I have no problem with this request. --Peter Andersen 16. maj 2006 kl. 23:52 (CEST)
-
- I've given it bot status.
- Jeg har givet den bot-status.
- - Kåre Thor Olsen (Kaare) 25. maj 2006 kl. 14:06 (CEST)
[redigér] User:Escarbot
Hello,
I am a French Wikpedian fr:User:Vargenau (where I am sysop), here User:Vargenau, and I ask for permission to use robot User:Escarbot.
This robot will only be used to made interwikis (using pywikipedia interwiki.py).
You can see the interwikis I made by hand on Special:Contributions/Vargenau.
I have robot status on nl: and sr:, demand has been done on fr:, pt: sv:, it:. Other languages will follow.
Thank you in advance.
Vargenau 9. jun 2006 kl. 09:49 (CEST)
- Fine with me, but let's hear someone else's comment as well before your bot get the permission. - Kåre Thor Olsen (Kaare) 10. jun 2006 kl. 08:35 (CEST)
-
- I have no problems with this. --Peter Andersen 10. jun 2006 kl. 09:43 (CEST)
Escarbot now has bot privileges. - Kåre Thor Olsen (Kaare) 10. jun 2006 kl. 20:22 (CEST)
- Thank you very much. Vargenau 11. jun 2006 kl. 16:12 (CEST)
[redigér] JhsBot
JhsBot er på alle de skandinaviske wikipedier; det eneste den gjør er å legge inn interwikilenker, med mindre man vil at den skal gjøre noe annet (flytte en kategori e.l.). Jeg er ofte på irc, Jhs på #wikipedia-da, så om noe skulle gå galt med botten vil jeg være der så den kan stoppes. Botten kjører på pywikipedias interwiki.py. Jon Harald Søby 30. jun 2006 kl. 13:34 (CEST)
- Fint med mig. Jhs er god nok :) --Morten Barklund [ disk / bidrag ] 30. jun 2006 kl. 13:38 (CEST)
- Også fint med mig. --Christian List 2. jul 2006 kl. 03:04 (CEST)
-
- Den har nu fået botstatus. - Kåre Thor Olsen (Kaare) 3. jul 2006 kl. 15:21 (CEST)
[redigér] TuvicBot
Hi, I'm a user from the Dutch wiki, and I would like a bot flag to run my interwiki-bot TuvicBot (using Pywikipedia). This bot will run in manually assisted mode, adding and updating interwiki-links, using the Dutch wiki as a starting point. I'm mostly planning to solve interwikis that autonomous bot skip because they're ambigious. (And sorry for not speaking your language :-()--Tuvic 5. jul 2006 kl. 18:50 (CEST)
- Almost 2 weeks have passed now, without any reaction. If nobody objects, I'll start my bot on this wiki tomorrow. --Tuvic 18. jul 2006 kl. 16:23 (CEST)
- It seems a bad idea to me to run a bot manually against ambigious articles in a language that is not understood by the controlling user. --Sir48 (Thyge) 18. jul 2006 kl. 17:12 (CEST)
- PS!We already have the Thijsbot running with the same purpose, it seems. --Sir48 (Thyge) 18. jul 2006 kl. 17:14 (CEST)
- Ah, reaction :-) ! To reply: I'm running the bot on articles in the nl-wiki, and try to solve ambigious interwikis. I agree with you that the understanding of language is necessary to disambiguate interwikis about very similar subjects in a certain language, for example, 'da'. But, knowledge of the language is mostly not necessary: people make very stupid interwikis all the time (so I've learned, over the past time), like making a typo in the year of the Olympics or so. Easy to solve for a human, but gets skipped by a autonomous bot. So, for most interwikis, 'knowledge' of the language is not necessary. I can however partially understand the language here, but if I would come across an ambigious interwiki where the problem is this wiki, and it's not an obvious one, than I would give my bot the order to give up on the interwiki. I don't have to solve everything, you know.
- About Thijsbot: yes, maybe he's doing the same, but that's really not an objection, as I see it: people do the same on Wikipedia every day, and it can't hurt to have some more manpower. --Tuvic 18. jul 2006 kl. 17:31 (CEST)
-
-
-
- For my part I don't grant bot status until I see at least one positive response from someone and no serious negative ones. Besides, doesn't the Interwiki-Link-Checker serve the same purpose in a more controlled manner? - Kåre Thor Olsen (Kaare) 20. jul 2006 kl. 15:15 (CEST)
- Fine by me. Getting response after 2 weeks is the only thing I wanted for now.
- About the interwiki-link-checker: no, that does not the same thing. The interwiki-link-checker is for checking articles with the same name, if they handle about the same thing. What I do is the following: I choose a page to process, and order my bot to start: it then checks the page, finds any interwikis, and checks those, giving potentially new interwikis, checking those again, ... When there's nothing more to check, the bot makes up a result and then adds interwikis to all the languages, if the interwikis are niet ambigious, but ask what to do when they are ambigious.I then try to solve the the ambiguity, using the graph, and looking at the articles. For more information: at meta there are articles about the m:Interwiki bot and also about the m:Interwiki graphs. --Tuvic 20. jul 2006 kl. 15:52 (CEST)
- For my part I don't grant bot status until I see at least one positive response from someone and no serious negative ones. Besides, doesn't the Interwiki-Link-Checker serve the same purpose in a more controlled manner? - Kåre Thor Olsen (Kaare) 20. jul 2006 kl. 15:15 (CEST)
-
-
Støtter If you confident that you can solve some problems, while leaving those which you are not certain about then that sounds good to me. The important thing is (of course) that you don't solve the iw's in a wrong way. Better to leave them unsolved then. --Lhademmor 20. jul 2006 kl. 15:48 (CEST)
Maybe it would be a good idea to let the bot do a test run modifying, say 20 pages, after which we could evaluate the bot's performance --Morten LJ 20. jul 2006 kl. 22:10 (CEST)
- I'll do that. --Tuvic 21. jul 2006 kl. 14:58 (CEST)
- Test run done: see Speciel:Contributions/TuvicBot. --Tuvic 21. jul 2006 kl. 23:13 (CEST)
-
-
- Looks fine to me. If no one objects, I'll grant bot status tomorrow. - Kåre Thor Olsen (Kaare) 22. jul 2006 kl. 12:54 (CEST)
- Fine with me. --Christian List 22. jul 2006 kl. 13:08 (CEST)
- Looks fine to me. If no one objects, I'll grant bot status tomorrow. - Kåre Thor Olsen (Kaare) 22. jul 2006 kl. 12:54 (CEST)
-
- TuvicBot has now been given bot status. - Kåre Thor Olsen (Kaare) 23. jul 2006 kl. 11:07 (CEST)
- Thanks. My talk page is always open for remarks and suggestions, if needed. --Tuvic 24. jul 2006 kl. 14:15 (CEST)