Disputatio Formulae:DalbyAZ

E Vicipaedia

[recensere] Image

Roland has added Imago:Open_bible_01_01.png to this template, which he has been adding to all source templates. I'm not certain it should be in this one though. The reason is that it's not a public domain resource, and so I credit it in the bibliography section instead of in a note at the bottom of the page. the only reason I made the template is that I use this souce so often. for a good example of why I think we shouldn't use the image here, see Lucunculus#Bibliographia.

I assumed that all images on Commons are licenced under the GPL. My mistake. I did not spend much effort in choosing that image, I just took any image in order to visually signal the reader that this is not a simple text but a formuala. I'll look for a "legal" image on Commons.
BTW, I've startet an overview about the used images on the Latin WP. Maybe then we can develop something like a "corporate identity" and substitute the actually used images with images which follow this CI style.
--Roland2 18:04, 31 Ianuarii 2006 (UTC)
You have misunderstood me! The image itself is PD. I mean the book Food in the Ancient World: A to Z is not. It seems to me that a template saying "This page incorporates text from such-and-such a PD source" is different from one saying "This page uses information and/or ideas from the following copyrighted source." --Iustinus 18:13, 31 Ianuarii 2006 (UTC)
Oops. Since you changed the image on the basis of a misunderstanding I reverted it, but I didn't realize that that would automatically revert ALL your changes. Now there's no image there at all. I don't think there should be an image there, but I don't want to remove it unilaterally. Sorry! --Iustinus 18:18, 31 Ianuarii 2006 (UTC)

[recensere] Maxcorrigenda

Roland, what's with the maxcorrigenda template? Did you just add that because you wrote the instruction text in English, or do you think there's a deeper problem with this template? --Iustinus 21:00, 12 Novembris 2006 (UTC)

I added it, because I wrote the comment/explanations in English. However, maybe we could translate Andrew. ;-) --Rolandus 22:05, 12 Novembris 2006 (UTC)
Well, should we ever write an article about him (hey, I think then he would be the first person to have an account and an article on la:—I know David Morgan has made contributions, but anonymously), it shoudl be under Andreas Dalby. But I left his name in English for this template so as not to hinder people who are looking for the book: his name will be listed in any bibliographic source as Andrew, afterall. --Iustinus 01:40, 13 Novembris 2006 (UTC)