Disputatio Vicipaediae:Acta Vicimediorum Communium
E Vicipaedia
Liber esto quaestiones ibi proferre aut in paginam disputationis UV vel Roland2.
Vide etiam m:User:Duesentrieb/CommonsTicker et m:User talk:Duesentrieb/CommonsTicker.
[recensere] Suggestions for improving the translation
If you have suggestions on how to improve the translation of the interface messages, please discuss them here! --UV 00:07, 12 Iunii 2006 (UTC)
[recensere] CommonsTicker: new version to fix some problems
Hi - you may have noticed some problems with CommonsTicker lately - namely, some entries about deletions went missing, and some entries arrived several days late (messing up the date headings for ticker pages using append mode). This is caused by the massive replication lag we currently see on the toolserver (it's more than a day behind). While I hope this will not happen again in the future, I have been working on improving CommonsTicker so it handles out-of-sync entries gracefully.
I plan to activate a new version of CommonsTicker tonight or tomorrow - so look out for any new problems. Here are the most relevant changes:
- fix handling of out-of-sync records (see above); added "latecomer" parameter to TickerEntry template (may be ignored)
- deleted images can be restored now. To reflect this, I have added a "restored" action to CommonsTicker. To use it, you need to change your templates and/or CSS like this.
- for pages in append-mode, there an empty "status" parameter is now handed to the TickerEntry template - this parameter can be set manually to trigger some type of marking or highliting, depending on how you set up your template and CSS. See here for an example that strikes out the entry if status is set to "done".
For the future, I'm planning to let CommonsTicker post warnings to the talk page of articles that use an image das is (about to be) deleted. I'll post another announcement when that feature is ready.
This message was posted automatically by the CommonsTicker bot. For feedback and discussion, please go to meta:User talk:Duesentrieb/CommonsTicker -- CommonsTicker 14:49, 20 Iunii 2006 (UTC)
[recensere] CommonsTicker: new version, new features
Hello. A new version of CommonsTicker will be rolled out soon (probably tomorrow). Please have an eye on what the bot is doing, and report any problems to m:User_talk:Duesentrieb/CommonsTicker. Some of the changes are:
- the ticker can now post warnings to the talk page of articles that are using "endangered" images. This is not enabled per default, and you can select for which namespaces it is done. If you want this feature, please request it at m:User:Duesentrieb/CommonsTicker#Change_Requests.
- in append mode, there are now three empty template parameters: status, editor, and notic. The ticker does not use them itself, but you can use them in the TickerEntry template, for example to strike through entries that have been fixed. en:wikinews has already been using this for a while now.
- if the ticker fails to post an update, a warning is posted to your and the ticker's talk page. In append mode, the ticker will also re-try to post the update on the next pass. Until now, failed updates where simply ignored.
- edit summaries become a bit more informative.
I hope these changes will help to make CommonsTicker more used and more useful.
On a related note: you may have noticed that on long pages, entries near the bottom of the page are sometimes not expanded but rendered just as {{TickerEntry}} or similar. This is due to a new limit to template expansion - see bugzilla:7005. To avoid it, try to keep the page short and/or try to simplify the TickerEntry template.
This message was posted automatically by the CommonsTicker bot. For feedback and discussion, please go to meta:User talk:Duesentrieb/CommonsTicker -- CommonsTicker 23:18, 20 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
- Personally, I would advocate against enabling the option described above (automatic posting of warnings to the talk page of articles that are using "endangered" images) on this wikipedia. In my view, this would unnecessarily cause the creation of many discussion pages. The CommonsTicker recentchanges list is fairly short on the Latin wikipedia so it is very easy to keep an eye on all the events (most of them requiring no action at all) without the need to create a mass of discussion pages. Any objections? --UV 23:38, 20 Augusti 2006 (UTC)