Disputatio:Lotus

E Vicipaedia

I did rely extensively on Dalby's A to Z for this page, but I'm not certain that it makes sense to give bibliography on a disambiguation page. --Iustinus 09:40, 22 Augusti 2006 (UTC)

I think sources should - on the long run - be given just on the page which explains the term and not whenever a term is used. So we have the information only in one place, which has advantages for maintaining and discussing the content. However, when the referenced page does not exist yet (red links), I sometimes whished I had the information, if that term was chosen intentionally ... in case someone edits the red link. --Roland (disp.) 20:44, 22 Augusti 2006 (UTC)
My thoughts exactly. Perhaps the solution is to create a template with words to the effect of "this footnote gives sources on a subject for whcih we do not yet have an article. Once that article is written, please move this note" vel sim. --Iustinus 00:26, 23 Augusti 2006 (UTC)